Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » This just possibly could be the moment for Yvette: A Labour

SystemSystem Posts: 12,250
edited August 2013 in General

imagepoliticalbetting.com » Blog Archive » This just possibly could be the moment for Yvette: A Labour insider gives his view of EdM’s prospects and what might happen

If (and it’s still a big if) Ed M leaves before election then Yvette will almost certainly take over. She’s been conspicuous by her silence this summer. Shocking really. If however Ed M disappoints at general election then Andy Burnham will also go for it and have a pretty decent chance as will Chuka Umunna.

Read the full story here


«134

Comments

  • AveryLPAveryLP Posts: 7,815
    FPT
    tim said:

    Guess who.

    "Most women can find the mustard in the pantry quicker than a man and most men can reverse a car better than a woman - although my wife can reverse a horsebox through a narrow passageway better than most men.

    "My female French colleague is a phenomenal car parker in tiny spaces in French cities. But it is not the norm."

    ********* went on to describe himself as an alpha male who "would not be caught dead at a birth of a baby" and would be "happy to punch the first man who tries to steal my beer".

    He argued that women are more interested in making beds and keeping bathrooms tidy than getting on in business.

    He also suggested that feminism is a passing fashion created by "shrill, bored, middle class women of a certain physical genre"

    Blooming 'ell. Catch me a kipper.
  • AveryLPAveryLP Posts: 7,815
    Balls Up or Balls Out.

    The silence is deafening.
  • Is Labour Insider a Drenge fan ?
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 54,191
    A net 60% of Labour supporters did not know who the shadow home secretary was this week. She has no profile at all in the country and very little in the party. Where is the Gordon Brown lurking in the wings? Who would the opposition coalesce around? I simply do not see this at all.

    He is undoubtedly isolated to the extent that he does not seem to have many (any) natural supporters. But this party couldn't revolt against Gordon Brown. Ed is better than that.
  • Tissue_PriceTissue_Price Posts: 9,039
    Well then, is the bet Ladbrokes 14/1 that Ed goes this year, backed up by Coral's 1/5 he makes it to the election?

    As for "they won’t do it any closer to the election", the Aussies would surely deem next autumn to be a bit early, let alone this one?
  • carlcarl Posts: 750
    "Labour insider", eh?

    How "inside"?

    Voter? Supporter? Member? Researcher? Journalist? MP? Union bigwig?

    Seems to like David Miliband whoever it is...
  • If Redward gets it in the neck and if Labour is polling worse than Dave (both big 'ifs' right now) - would putting Yvette behind the lefty steering wheel recover the situation for Labour? Hmm.....
  • AveryLPAveryLP Posts: 7,815
    To cut tim a little slack, he is not the only commentator to misapply the term "soaring" to rises in the housing and mortgage lending markets.

    Even professional journalists and estate agents are playing the game:

    House prices continued to soar during August, despite asking prices actually dropping lower, property website Rightmove has revealed.

    Although the average asking price dropped 1.8% month-on-month in August to £249,199, increases since the start of the year have meant that houses are actually still worth on average £20,000 more than they were seven months ago.


    So even a 1.8% month on month price fall is being announced as a "soaring rise".

    If the cows catch foot and mouth and the bottles get corked, tim still has potential as an estate agent.
  • RichardNabaviRichardNabavi Posts: 3,413
    Is this the same insider who posted about Alan Johnson?

    If so, Ed needs to be afraid, very afraid.
  • SlackbladderSlackbladder Posts: 9,786
    I would have thought it would be actually in those 'younger' labour bright lights to keep Ed in place at the moment. He'll either get them into government and give them gravitas as ministers, or he'll be the fall guy.

    Its too soon for the Chuka's and the Stellas to make their play, their time is after the next election.

    The problem for Cooper is always going to be the same 'what do I do with the husband?'....
  • JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 43,845
    FPT:
    How we define terrorism:
    http://www.cps.gov.uk/publications/prosecution/ctd.html

    Terrorism is defined in the Terrorism Act 2000 (TACT 2000) and means the use or threat of action where –

    1) The action –
    a) involves serious violence against a person,
    b) involves serious damage to property,
    c) endangers a person's life, other than that of the person committing the action,
    d) creates a serious risk to the health or safety of the public or a section of the public, or
    e) is designed seriously to interfere with or seriously to disrupt an electronic system AND
    2) The use or threat is designed to influence the government or to intimidate the public or a section of the public, AND
    3) The use or threat is made for the purpose of advancing a political, religious or ideological cause
    4) Where the use or threat of action as defined above involves the use of firearms or explosives it is always terrorism, whether or not the condition in (2) above is satisfied.
    Quite a bit wider than I expected, and I can see why many offences or activities can be caught up in it. It would be interesting to see definitions before TACT 2000.
  • AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 25,658
    Cooper just doesn't have the personality to front a major party, she lacks personal warmth and empathy.
  • SlackbladderSlackbladder Posts: 9,786
    Ironic that the Guardian is suing the home office to stop them looking at Miranda's data.

    So they want to keep their secrets safe??
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,573
    Nice of Ed Balls to post his first piece on pb.com !
  • RichardNabaviRichardNabavi Posts: 3,413
    edited August 2013
    OK, let's take the premise, and look at the mechanics. Suppose the unions and key MPs have given up on Ed M, and have decided Something Must Be Done. Presumably the initial bit of the mechanism would be to hold coordinated chats in confidence with Ed M. In the best scenario for the plotters, he'd take the hint, and resign. If not, it gets messy, but, even if he does agree to go quietly, then what? The only way the transition can be smooth and quick is the Michael Howard scenario - making sure there's only one candidate, so you don't get the pesky inconvenience of the party members having a say in a long-drawn out contest. And that in turn means the plotters have to have squared off all the potential alternatives in advance, and got them to agree to defer in advance to one candidate - Yvette, it is suggested here - and also for that agreement to be watertight. It only takes one to break ranks for the whole plot to descend into a nightmare of in-fighting. Oh, and all this has to be done without leaks.

    Still, it would be fun, wouldn't it?
  • SlackbladderSlackbladder Posts: 9,786
    tim said:

    Ironic that the Guardian is suing the home office to stop them looking at Miranda's data.


    Yet another Slackbladder "I don't understand but that won't stop me posting" special
    Take it up with your blessed BBC:


    BBC Breaking News ‏@BBCBreaking 1m
    Correction: David #Miranda is taking legal action to stop police examining material seized from him. Guardian "supportive" - @DannyShawBBC

  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 53,230
    edited August 2013
    Homer Simpson goes on the record about the Labour leader's polling:

    Doh! (link didn't work!)
  • david_herdsondavid_herdson Posts: 17,953
    "There’s a few folk who have cast their eye to Australia and ... have seen the difference Rudd has made to his party’s standing and drawing some conclusions"

    Weren't the same Aussie MPs who ditched Gillard were the same ones who dumped Rudd in her favour earlier. Whatever else may be said of Labour MPs, they're neither as ruthless or panicky as their Australian counterparts. Jittery perhaps but that's not the same thing.
  • SlackbladderSlackbladder Posts: 9,786
    I do have to say this post from OGH (via whoever 'labour insider') is, is rather interesting.

    Means that there's more to the labour discontent than just froth.
  • SlackbladderSlackbladder Posts: 9,786
    tim said:

    tim said:

    Ironic that the Guardian is suing the home office to stop them looking at Miranda's data.


    Yet another Slackbladder "I don't understand but that won't stop me posting" special
    Take it up with your blessed BBC:


    BBC Breaking News ‏@BBCBreaking 1m
    Correction: David #Miranda is taking legal action to stop police examining material seized from him. Guardian "supportive" - @DannyShawBBC

    So the Guardian isn't suing then?


    Katharine Viner ‏@KathViner 8m
    Guardian suing the UK Home Office over David Miranda detention http://www.theguardian.com/politics/blog/2013/aug/20/david-miranda-detention-latest-developments#block-52134ffde4b04c508c46390b

    It would appear the guardian isn't even sure themselves... unsurprisingly.
  • NeilNeil Posts: 7,983
    The reason Labour shouldnt get rid of Ed Miliband is because they dont have anyone in the wings who's sufficiently better to justify the bother. Yvette Cooper? Really? I cant see her setting the world on fire.

    If Labour MPs are unhappy with Ed's team then maybe they should try helping by doing something useful themselves.
  • Rexel56Rexel56 Posts: 807
    She wouldn't stand... last time she didn't because her youngest child was five; three years later and the child being eight wouldn't be materially different...
  • richardDoddrichardDodd Posts: 5,472
    Yvette..yes yes yes..even better than Ed..such a rich crop from which to choose..7% and soaring..bring on the debates
  • NeilNeil Posts: 7,983
    @tim

    If we were feeling nostalgic we could repost Labour's arguments that low bond yields were a sign of economic weakness. Now it's the other way around apparently! Even when a major driver of the higher yields is the market being far more optimistic about unemployment prospects than the Bank of England.
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 62,061
    Interesting piece, Mr. Insider, thanks for writing it.

    Personally, I think Miliband will be safe (given how rubbish Labour was when it tried to axe Brown and who the potential alternatives are, though Cooper would be better than Balls).

    FPT: Interesting piece by Gary Anderson on Spa: http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/formula1/23754151

    Spa and Suzuka will be the toughest on the tyres, he says, so there may be the possibility of delamination during the race. Perhaps something to consider when betting.
  • SlackbladderSlackbladder Posts: 9,786
    Neil said:

    The reason Labour shouldnt get rid of Ed Miliband is because they dont have anyone in the wings who's sufficiently better to justify the bother. Yvette Cooper? Really? I cant see her setting the world on fire.

    If Labour MPs are unhappy with Ed's team then maybe they should try helping by doing something useful themselves.

    There's not much they can do until Ed works out what labour is actually standing for...
  • david_herdsondavid_herdson Posts: 17,953
    On topic, there might be muttering about Ed but he won't go anywhere for the same reason that Brown didn't: it's extremely hard replacing a Labour leader unless a large part of the cabinet, the PLP or both are prepared to risk a great deal of damage in the process. Ed just has to sit firm and he'll be fine. I'm sure he knows this having watched the master operator Brown at first hand.

    Besides, with Labour 6-10% ahead in the polls, things aren't desperate. True, Iain Gray's Scotish Labour was ahead in the polls too before it all fell apart during the campaign but lightning doesn't strike twice and in any case, there wasn't a factor like UKIP to damage the SNP in Scotland as there is for the Tories across England and Wales. Best leave things as they are and see what develops.

    In any case, would any alternative leader *want* to take over from Miliband? It's not like when IDS was dumped by the Tories. Could Balls, Cooper or whoever reasonably expect to increase Labour's lead? They might be prepared to knock the party into shape (as Howard did for the Conservatives) but would that really make much difference. Any Labour politician of Miliband's generation knows that they'd be putting their entire career on the line to go up against him now, with the bet being a double as they'd have to deliver at the election too. That's a mighty big risk.

    If, on the other hand, we are looking at a IDS scenario, the Howard figure is Harriet Harman. Those thinking that EdM won't see out the parliament could do worse than back her.
  • CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758
    edited August 2013
    tim said:

    Joe Lynam BBC Biz ‏@BBC_Joe_Lynam 4m
    at 2.7% UK govt borrowing costs (10y Gilts) are as high as Belgium (2 years without a govt) and notably higher than Fra, Ger + Austria

    This bubble policy is going well then.

    Several people explained to you, at length, that there are many different reasons why interest rates could go up. Some good, some bad. And the implications are either good, or bad, depending on the cause.

    But you've chosen to ignore all that to obssessively pursue your latest meme.

    PB is a wonderful resource of people who know lots about many things. It's worth taking advantage of that sometimes.
  • NeilNeil Posts: 7,983
    Rexel56 said:

    She wouldn't stand... last time she didn't because her youngest child was five; three years later and the child being eight wouldn't be materially different...

    I think you might be making the mistake of taking a politician at their word.

  • richardDoddrichardDodd Posts: 5,472
    FPT..The ones who flew the aircraft into the Twin Towers were not considered terrorists untiil the nose cones went into the thirty fourth floor office windows...You can never tell ,and they just have to get lucky once..
  • Sounds like I may have to revive my Ed out by end of 2013 bet with IOS.

    I'd shed no tears if Ed were to go. He has never looked like a leader.
  • SlackbladderSlackbladder Posts: 9,786

    On topic, there might be muttering about Ed but he won't go anywhere for the same reason that Brown didn't: it's extremely hard replacing a Labour leader unless a large part of the cabinet, the PLP or both are prepared to risk a great deal of damage in the process. Ed just has to sit firm and he'll be fine. I'm sure he knows this having watched the master operator Brown at first hand.

    Besides, with Labour 6-10% ahead in the polls, things aren't desperate. True, Iain Gray's Scotish Labour was ahead in the polls too before it all fell apart during the campaign but lightning doesn't strike twice and in any case, there wasn't a factor like UKIP to damage the SNP in Scotland as there is for the Tories across England and Wales. Best leave things as they are and see what develops.

    In any case, would any alternative leader *want* to take over from Miliband? It's not like when IDS was dumped by the Tories. Could Balls, Cooper or whoever reasonably expect to increase Labour's lead? They might be prepared to knock the party into shape (as Howard did for the Conservatives) but would that really make much difference. Any Labour politician of Miliband's generation knows that they'd be putting their entire career on the line to go up against him now, with the bet being a double as they'd have to deliver at the election too. That's a mighty big risk.

    If, on the other hand, we are looking at a IDS scenario, the Howard figure is Harriet Harman. Those thinking that EdM won't see out the parliament could do worse than back her.

    I agree, labour is doing enough polling wise at the moment that they should win the next election, and comfortably (currently).

    However the size of the lead has shrunk, and Ed's dire ratings mean they run the risk of that lead slipping away once people really start focusing on the next election and the idea of labour in government, and are really faced with the possibility of Ed as PM.
  • felixfelix Posts: 15,180

    tim said:

    Ironic that the Guardian is suing the home office to stop them looking at Miranda's data.


    Yet another Slackbladder "I don't understand but that won't stop me posting" special
    Take it up with your blessed BBC:


    BBC Breaking News ‏@BBCBreaking 1m
    Correction: David #Miranda is taking legal action to stop police examining material seized from him. Guardian "supportive" - @DannyShawBBC


    He probably doesen't want them ogling his porn:)
  • AveryLPAveryLP Posts: 7,815
    edited August 2013
    tim said:

    @Avery

    Households are increasing their borrowing in order to maintain their standard of living

    http://www.pieria.co.uk/articles/households_are_increasing_their_borrowing_in_order_to_maintain_their_standard_of_living

    Which is of course one of the reasons why Osborne is extending taxpayer subsidised mortgages to remortgaging.


    Oh my god, tim, it's Jonathan Portes in harmony with the singing 'economist'.

    A lot of hedging going on in the Simon Kirkby article (any relation to the Soprano Emma Kirkby?).

    The conclusion:

    The question is can [GDP growth] continue through this year and next? As long as wage growth continues to lag behind inflation, as long as there’s very weak export demand from the Euro Area and as long as businesses are too uncertain about the future to invest it’s going to remain quite challenging.

    Valid questions for sure, but the early indications are that all will be satisfied on the upside.

    Business Investment increased for the first time in months in the last BoE figures, with the main UK banks predicting strong growth in the second half of the year.

    The EU and Eurozone tentatively emerged out of recession for the first time since 2011 in Q2 2013, even if second half forecasts remain flat. Trade activity is however growing faster than their economies. So the UK can expect an end to falling EU exports and, at best, a small recovery.

    Real incomes growth has also stated to turn up, maybe overstated by the bonus/45% tax effect, but likely to continue at a reduced rate due to both falling inflation and output growth feeding through to increased hours worked.

    No miracles predicted but just incremental improvement in all key drivers will be enough.
  • AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    It's not effectively the last chance to strike. If lessons are being drawn from Kevin Rudd, it's that the fatal blow can be struck very close to the election date.

    Even if that isn't true, enough Labour doubters will believe it to make a coup this year unlikely.
  • SlackbladderSlackbladder Posts: 9,786

    Sounds like I may have to revive my Ed out by end of 2013 bet with IOS.

    I'd shed no tears if Ed were to go. He has never looked like a leader.

    Neither does anyone else out of the current runners... the next generation might be different, but their time has not yet come.
  • david_herdsondavid_herdson Posts: 17,953
    Pulpstar said:

    Nice of Ed Balls to post his first piece on pb.com !

    'Labour Insider' wouldn't be Snowflake5 would it?
  • carlcarl Posts: 750
    Cooper next PM 20/1

    If I was convinced by "Labour insider" I'd put some pocket money on that.

    But frankly, the evident David Miliband fandom in this piece makes me suspicious...
  • Rexel56Rexel56 Posts: 807
    tim said:

    Rexel56 said:

    She wouldn't stand... last time she didn't because her youngest child was five; three years later and the child being eight wouldn't be materially different...

    You don't think there's a material difference between an eight year old and a five year old?



    One is a child at primary school, the other is, er, a child at primary school... one can probably read more, write a bit and play the recorder badly... so no, not materially different... now google away as usual and come back and prove me wrong with some obscure paediatric data...
  • Tissue_PriceTissue_Price Posts: 9,039
    antifrank said:

    It's not effectively the last chance to strike. If lessons are being drawn from Kevin Rudd, it's that the fatal blow can be struck very close to the election date.

    True, but Kevin Rudd was a known quantity. I don't think Labour could realistically impose an "unknown" - and all of the names mentioned above are effectively "unknowns" to the public at large - in early 2015.
  • felixfelix Posts: 15,180
    ot - Yvette has generally been bested by May in the HO - she can come across as humourless and whiny - rather like the Eagle sisters - or, to avoid the charge of stereotyping - Gerald Kaufmann
  • RichardNabaviRichardNabavi Posts: 3,413
    edited August 2013
    antifrank said:

    It's not effectively the last chance to strike. If lessons are being drawn from Kevin Rudd, it's that the fatal blow can be struck very close to the election date.

    Even if that isn't true, enough Labour doubters will believe it to make a coup this year unlikely.

    In Australia Labor had nothing whatsoever to lose, whereas here Labour have what looks like at worst a reasonable chance, and arguably a very good chance, of winning the next election under Ed M. OK, they might fret that the polling lead is a bit flakey, but it is still a lead.
  • SlackbladderSlackbladder Posts: 9,786

    antifrank said:

    It's not effectively the last chance to strike. If lessons are being drawn from Kevin Rudd, it's that the fatal blow can be struck very close to the election date.

    True, but Kevin Rudd was a known quantity. I don't think Labour could realistically impose an "unknown" - and all of the names mentioned above are effectively "unknowns" to the public at large - in early 2015.
    Still time for the King over the Water in NY to make a return then!!
  • AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340

    antifrank said:

    It's not effectively the last chance to strike. If lessons are being drawn from Kevin Rudd, it's that the fatal blow can be struck very close to the election date.

    True, but Kevin Rudd was a known quantity. I don't think Labour could realistically impose an "unknown" - and all of the names mentioned above are effectively "unknowns" to the public at large - in early 2015.
    I actually agree with you, but the second half of my post is why Ed Miliband is probably safe. As well as a left wing and a right wing, Labour has a Micawber wing.
  • felixfelix Posts: 15,180
    tim said:

    Sounds like I may have to revive my Ed out by end of 2013 bet with IOS.

    I'd shed no tears if Ed were to go. He has never looked like a leader.

    Neither does anyone else out of the current runners... the next generation might be different, but their time has not yet come.
    Milband has led Cameron on leader ratings for 15 out of the last 18 months.
    He hasn't got to beat Thatcher or Blair he's got to beat a second rater who couldn't get a majority against Brown after 13 years of Labour Govt.

    PB Tory Golden Rule.

    On PB David Cameron is always overestimated.


    If you're so confident in Ed it's odd that you're bothering to post the nonsense about leader ratings for the umpteenth time. Believe in yourself.
  • It's enjoyable to see the leadership of the Workers Party reduced to an upper-middle class soap-opera.
    Yvette in No.10 and EdBalls in No.11.
    I'd laugh.
  • As per the previous thread - look at the photo and ask yourselves:

    A. PM material? or
    B. A pixie / not been punched enough?

    QED.
  • A five year old has just started primary school - a huge change in a child's life - an 8 year old hasn't. I doubt Cooper would stand though. If she did and won, however, it would be a treat to read the comments about her from some on here.
  • NeilNeil Posts: 7,983
    Patrick said:

    As per the previous thread - look at the photo and ask yourselves:

    A. PM material? or
    B. A pixie / not been punched enough?

    QED.

    "not been punched enough"?

    Rather disturbing.
  • SchardsSchards Posts: 210
    tim said:

    @Avery

    Households are increasing their borrowing in order to maintain their standard of living

    http://www.pieria.co.uk/articles/households_are_increasing_their_borrowing_in_order_to_maintain_their_standard_of_living

    Which is of course one of the reasons why Osborne is extending taxpayer subsidised mortgages to remortgaging.



    Am I right in thinking you can only do a debt for debt swap remortgage under Osborne's scheme so anyone "increasing their borrowing" can't use it? So it therefore, follows that Tim's post is nonsense.
  • Wulfrun_PhilWulfrun_Phil Posts: 4,780
    "She’s been conspicuous by her silence this summer. Shocking really."

    Nothing new there. She's been conspicuous by her silence ever since joining the Shadow Cabinet as one of its least effective members. Her star (such as it ever was) is on the wane.
  • JonathanJonathan Posts: 21,758
    The Rudd point is interesting. One of the puzzle pieces you simply cannot control that has helped bring EdM's leadership under greater focus.

    Politics can be quite subtle.

    Clearly the underlying problem is disappointing electoral/polling performance and, unlike 2012, weak media presence this year.



  • UPDATE ON OZ ELECTION

    For those that think Rudd and Beattie in Oz are making a difference in queensland where they come from let alone Oz wide, take a look at the latest polling.

    Bringing Beattie in was supposed to be a gamechanger. The opposition is now 1.20 to win the seat of Forde where he is standing. First week after Rudd got back in he was an odds on favourite but novelty wears off and memories return.

    People vote on trust, and people simply do not trust Rudd or Beattie. They may not like Abbott much but they trust him, albeit he is old fashioned and boring.
    Many people vote for a candidate, many also vote against a party.
    Miliband is beige and boring, therefore has some Abbott tendencies but is not as clever and does not care about people the same way* but that gives him 35% plus of the vote, which is what he needs. Posh boy tag for Miliband whereas Abbott as an ex boxing blue and Rhodes scholar.

    * 15 years of spending his holidays helping aboriginals, firefighting bushfires and surf life saving on the beaches locally makes Abbott grudgingly "not bad", and not bad is good enough.

    Conclusion. labour in UK need someone who is not bad, and Miliband not quite fits the tag.
  • RogerRoger Posts: 20,047
    "If anything happens to Ed M it'll happen at party conference this year"

    Sounds like the famous scene in the Godfather when Don Corleone warns Michael where the traitor Tessio will strike.iI'm in two minds. Ed should never have been chosen but now he's there I think he could succeed. He needs to work very hard with his advertisers on his message and then with a lot of imput come up with an unassailable USP which goes further than just not being a Tory. It's definitely doable
  • It's hard to believe the loss of Tom Watson would be a "truly massive blow" to anyone on earth.
  • Tissue_PriceTissue_Price Posts: 9,039

    "Her star (such as it ever was) is on the wane.

    So surely best to strike now, before it gets eclipsed?
  • taffystaffys Posts: 9,753
    Fascinating article, absolutely fascinating thanks for this.

    I'm a bit puzzled as to why there's so much discontent with a leader of a party that's consistently leading in the polls, but there it is....
  • SlackbladderSlackbladder Posts: 9,786

    It's hard to believe the loss of Tom Watson would be a "truly massive blow" to anyone on earth.

    It would be to Watson's local curry house when he's in Oz...
  • JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 43,845
    Roger said:

    "If anything happens to Ed M it'll happen at party conference this year"

    Sounds like the famous scene in the Godfather when Don Corleone warns Michael where the traitor Tessio will strike.iI'm in two minds. Ed should never have been chosen but now he's there I think he could succeed. He needs to work very hard with his advertisers on his message and then with a lot of imput come up with an unassailable USP which goes further than just not being a Tory. It's definitely doable

    It depends how you define 'succeed'. He may well succeed in getting Labour into government. Fair enough.

    I'm far from convinced he'd succeed at leading the country. His track record (for instance at DECC and as leader of the party) does not bode well.
  • SimonStClareSimonStClare Posts: 7,976
    “If Ed survives till the end of October he should be okay”

    I doubt very much Ed is going anywhere, before or after conference this year. – However, the way Labour has been leaking like a sieve over the summer, I’m sure we’ll get to hear about of any future manoeuvrings soon enough.
  • Tissue_PriceTissue_Price Posts: 9,039
    edited August 2013
    taffys said:

    I'm a bit puzzled as to why there's so much discontent with a leader of a party that's consistently leading in the polls, but there it is....

    Well, some people think the lead isn't big enough. But I suspect a major reason is:

    MILIBAND, David 140
    MILIBAND, Ed 122

    And the fact that politics is personal, and some people see a better future for themselves if Ed were to be replaced.
  • PlatoPlato Posts: 15,724
    Sunny Hundal @sunny_hundal
    Alan Rusbridger just said on BBC #wato that Guardian people destroyed the computers, not GCHQ. Huh?
  • AveryLPAveryLP Posts: 7,815
    felix said:

    ot - Yvette has generally been bested by May in the HO - she can come across as humourless and whiny - rather like the Eagle sisters - or, to avoid the charge of stereotyping - Gerald Kaufmann

    To avoid the accusation of sexism, I find it useful to use the qualifying phrase: "by women, I mean women of both sexes".

    This always gets me out of trouble when needed.

  • taffystaffys Posts: 9,753
    Today's Mirror poll can't be good news for ed.

    You can't run on a 35% wins strategy if almost half of your bedrock vote is dissatisfied with you.
  • tim said:

    Patrick said:

    As per the previous thread - look at the photo and ask yourselves:

    A. PM material? or
    B. A pixie / not been punched enough?

    QED.

    Trying to top your performance on the last thread was going to be difficult but I think you managed it<

    Note the howls of outrage from certain quarters.

    It's when we get posts like Patrick's that I wish the Like button was still with us.

  • NeilNeil Posts: 7,983

    some people see a better future for themselves if Ed were to be replaced.

    Can you imagine it - Dan Hodges in charge of Labour's PR!
  • NextNext Posts: 826
    edited August 2013

    tim said:

    Patrick said:

    As per the previous thread - look at the photo and ask yourselves:

    A. PM material? or
    B. A pixie / not been punched enough?

    QED.

    Trying to top your performance on the last thread was going to be difficult but I think you managed it<

    Note the howls of outrage from certain quarters.

    It's when we get posts like Patrick's that I wish the Like button was still with us.

    Not Been Punched Enough. Describes a medical condition where the sufferer believes themselves to be somehow better than the rest of the population of the planet simply because they have Not Been Punched Enough. The puncher of said sufferer will have been driven mad by the NBPE person's actions and will deliver the only cure available: A damn good punching.

    Not a phrase that I would use, but I doubt it was meant literally.

  • AndreaParma_82AndreaParma_82 Posts: 4,714
    edited August 2013
    I'm bringing disappointing news: no Euan Blair in Coventry. At least, for the moment.

    Apparently, Coventry North Eeast got an AWS to replace Bob Ainsworth
  • FensterFenster Posts: 2,115
    edited August 2013
    I like Yvette Cooper. I think she would've done a better job of being an opposition leader than Ed Miliband. But that's by the by.

    The two big questions for me are:

    1. What difference would Yvette Cooper make to labour's economic policy? With Ed Balls at No 11, and with Labour pursuing a sensible course of continuing to reduce the deficit, I can't see why changing leaders to another sensible middle-ground type (Cooper) would make the unions-relationship any more comfy.

    2. The question Labour should be asking itself, do the Tories want Ed Miliband to stay? I'd say the answer to that is an emphatic yes. The Tories think Cameron can destroy Miliband in a GE campaign, they are not scared or fussed by him, and would quite like him to lead Labour into a GE. I guess this is a problem which is greatly exercising Labour.

    But as I said yesterday, the fact there is now media talk of Ed Miliband being weak/poor/possibly replaced seems a bit unfair. But then politics is a ruthless bloodsport.
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 43,098
    Plato said:

    Sunny Hundal @sunny_hundal
    Alan Rusbridger just said on BBC #wato that Guardian people destroyed the computers, not GCHQ. Huh?

    "Rusbridger says he had to consider the time it would take to fight a legal case. During that time the material would have to be surrendered to the courts anyway. It could have taken a year. During that time the Guardian would not have been able to write about the material. It was better to transfer the reporting to the US, he says."

    theguardian.com/politics/blog/2013/aug/20/david-miranda-detention-latest-developments

    ie there would have been a commercial impact on The Guardian.
  • Tissue_PriceTissue_Price Posts: 9,039
    Neil said:


    Can you imagine it - Dan Hodges in charge of Labour's PR!

    I meant some Shadow Cabinet members! But if Ed were to be replaced, you'd hope whoever benefits would remember the heroic efforts of Comrade Hodges in an appropriately Lordly way.
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 43,098
    Next said:

    tim said:

    Patrick said:

    As per the previous thread - look at the photo and ask yourselves:

    A. PM material? or
    B. A pixie / not been punched enough?

    QED.

    Trying to top your performance on the last thread was going to be difficult but I think you managed it<

    Note the howls of outrage from certain quarters.

    It's when we get posts like Patrick's that I wish the Like button was still with us.

    Not Been Punched Enough. Describes a medical condition where the sufferer believes themselves to be somehow better than the rest of the population of the planet simply because they have Not Been Punched Enough. The puncher of said sufferer will have been driven mad by the NBPE person's actions and will deliver the only cure available: A damn good punching.

    Not a phrase that I would use, but I doubt it was meant literally.

    Inadequate political operator aside, I do feel for EdM. Trying to sort his voice/nose out seems to have gone very badly. I'm not sure what the doctors told him would be the post-op outcome but I can't believe he would have gone through it all if he had known.
  • NeilNeil Posts: 7,983
    @Andrea

    That will disappoint those fans of instances of nepotism in the Labour party (even if they are a poor second in that to the Tories - the same people tend to ignore that fact). Still we have Will Straw! I mean he would *never* have had a chance if it wasnt for his dad ;)
  • NeilNeil Posts: 7,983

    But if Ed were to be replaced, you'd hope whoever benefits would remember the heroic efforts of Comrade Hodges in an appropriately Lordly way.

    In time the Telegraph will have compensated Dan enough for him to buy his own seat in the Lords!

  • @Neil

    The local paper mentions as potential riders 3 local Cllrs, a lady working at Coventry University, a woman who stood in Burton in 2010 and a former SpAd of Harriet. I am now checking if Ainsworth has a daughter.
  • GrandioseGrandiose Posts: 2,323
    EdM's not going anywhere, nor is NC or DC.
  • AveryLPAveryLP Posts: 7,815
    edited August 2013
    Schards said:

    tim said:

    @Avery

    Households are increasing their borrowing in order to maintain their standard of living

    http://www.pieria.co.uk/articles/households_are_increasing_their_borrowing_in_order_to_maintain_their_standard_of_living

    Which is of course one of the reasons why Osborne is extending taxpayer subsidised mortgages to remortgaging.


    Am I right in thinking you can only do a debt for debt swap remortgage under Osborne's scheme so anyone "increasing their borrowing" can't use it? So it therefore, follows that Tim's post is nonsense.
    Schards

    The full terms and conditions being applied to Banks participating in the 2014 Help of Buy guarantee scheme have not been released by the government.

    My guess, and it is only a guess, is that the undisclosed guidelines constrain rather than prohibit an equity release element of a remortgage product. In other words, the Banks will have agreed in aggregrate to keep new equity release lending within prudential limits. This gives them the flexibility to allow it in for individual loans where circumstances justify.

    Funding for Lending, together with the various mortgage stimulus schemes and the restructuring of bank balance sheets, have reduced the average mortgage lending rate being offered to new customers. Many current mortgage holders will benefit by remortgaging at the new lower rates.They may even be able to reduce repayments and repayment risk further, and make their mortgages more resilient to future interest rate rises, by extending the terms of their existing loans. Small amounts of equity release may also be justifiable based on individual circumstances.

    In almost all cases of remortaging the economy benefits as money saved on paying interest rates becomes available for investment or consumption, thereby increasing demand and growth. For this reason there is nothing intrinsically 'wrong' with equity release loans provided its share of total lending doesn't lead it to having an inflationary effect on the economy.

  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,573

    Neil said:


    Can you imagine it - Dan Hodges in charge of Labour's PR!

    I meant some Shadow Cabinet members! But if Ed were to be replaced, you'd hope whoever benefits would remember the heroic efforts of Comrade Hodges in an appropriately Lordly way.
    He was introduced as an advisor to Ed Miliband on the radio the other day. Almost crashed the car with laughter.
  • fitalassfitalass Posts: 4,320
    edited August 2013
    When Mudie launched his attack, it was always going to be interesting to see if it was the first salvo in an organised campaign to undermine and weaken Ed Miliband yet further in the run up to the Labour party Conference. Both Burnham and Watson's later interventions left us in no doubt that it was, as did the silence from Ed Balls and Yvette Cooper. And now this helpful article on PB from a Labour insider who backs Yvette Cooper if Ed Miliband is ousted, and finishes off heaping praise on Tom Watson. Oddly enough, Tom Watson singled out and heaped praise on Andy Burnham as one of the Shadow Cabinet working hard in his brief. Well, we know who is on manoeuvres within the Labour party, and we now know just how weak Ed Miliband has become, and just what a mess the Labour organisation is in currently thanks to this article.

    The Labour party Conference is now going to be about the Labour party factions slugging it out as Ed Miliband tries to hang onto his Leadership, Ed was never in control of the party, so he always going to be pretty powerless to control events now. And Dan Hodges, take a bow. So the two clear stalking horses are Cooper and Burnham, Chukka, give me a break! Now lets see what Jim Murphy and Douglas Alexander think of it all.
  • SimonStClareSimonStClare Posts: 7,976
    Pulpstar said:

    Neil said:


    Can you imagine it - Dan Hodges in charge of Labour's PR!

    I meant some Shadow Cabinet members! But if Ed were to be replaced, you'd hope whoever benefits would remember the heroic efforts of Comrade Hodges in an appropriately Lordly way.
    He was introduced as an advisor to Ed Miliband on the radio the other day. Almost crashed the car with laughter.
    In a way he is, just not a very helpful one.
  • JohnLilburneJohnLilburne Posts: 6,343
    Rexel56 said:

    She wouldn't stand... last time she didn't because her youngest child was five; three years later and the child being eight wouldn't be materially different...

    This time, Balls might be available to do the childcare ;-)

  • AveryLPAveryLP Posts: 7,815
    Neil said:

    But if Ed were to be replaced, you'd hope whoever benefits would remember the heroic efforts of Comrade Hodges in an appropriately Lordly way.

    In time the Telegraph will have compensated Dan enough for him to buy his own seat in the Lords!

    For goodness sake, Neil, stop putting these ideas into currency.

    Lord Hodges of Highgate would be difficult enough to bear.

    Now imagine the burden on PBers of having to show due respect to Lord Thomas of Truro.

  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 33,090
    edited August 2013
    Yvette Cooper will become Labour leader IMO. It's just a question of when.
  • PlatoPlato Posts: 15,724
    "...Meanwhile, over on BBC Breakfast, Chuka Umunna – Shadow Business Secretary and human manbag – was publicising his leader’s opposition to zero-hour contracts.

    But, pointed out the presenter, some Labour councils employed workers on zero-hour contracts. The Labour council in Doncaster – part of which town is Mr Miliband’s constituency – employed about 300 of them.

    Ah, replied Mr Umunna with his familiar serpentine smoothness. He hadn’t said he was opposed to all zero-hour contracts. He’d said he was opposed to their “ubiquity”. Some organisations who used zero-hour contracts were “responsible employers”.

    Perhaps that could be another Labour slogan: “All Right When We Do It.” http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/10254624/Sketch-Covering-up-for-the-invisible-man.html
  • AveryLPAveryLP Posts: 7,815
    Plato said:

    "...Meanwhile, over on BBC Breakfast, Chuka Umunna – Shadow Business Secretary and human manbag – was publicising his leader’s opposition to zero-hour contracts.

    But, pointed out the presenter, some Labour councils employed workers on zero-hour contracts. The Labour council in Doncaster – part of which town is Mr Miliband’s constituency – employed about 300 of them.

    Ah, replied Mr Umunna with his familiar serpentine smoothness. He hadn’t said he was opposed to all zero-hour contracts. He’d said he was opposed to their “ubiquity”. Some organisations who used zero-hour contracts were “responsible employers”.

    Perhaps that could be another Labour slogan: “All Right When We Do It.” http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/10254624/Sketch-Covering-up-for-the-invisible-man.html

    Chuka Umunna would be wise to register "Ubiquity" as a trademark for an upcoming release of aftershave.

    He certainly doesn't lack the bottle.
  • OblitusSumMeOblitusSumMe Posts: 9,143
    edited August 2013

    OK, let's take the premise, and look at the mechanics. Suppose the unions and key MPs have given up on Ed M, and have decided Something Must Be Done. Presumably the initial bit of the mechanism would be to hold coordinated chats in confidence with Ed M. In the best scenario for the plotters, he'd take the hint, and resign. If not, it gets messy, but, even if he does agree to go quietly, then what? The only way the transition can be smooth and quick is the Michael Howard scenario - making sure there's only one candidate, so you don't get the pesky inconvenience of the party members having a say in a long-drawn out contest. And that in turn means the plotters have to have squared off all the potential alternatives in advance, and got them to agree to defer in advance to one candidate - Yvette, it is suggested here - and also for that agreement to be watertight. It only takes one to break ranks for the whole plot to descend into a nightmare of in-fighting. Oh, and all this has to be done without leaks.

    Still, it would be fun, wouldn't it?

    I don't know what the mechanism is in the Labour party for triggering a leadership election. When IDS was defenestrated the trigger was letters to the chair of the 1922 committee.

    I think it is likely that the left would object to an internal coup. Though they would struggle to muster the requisite nominations for a contest, even that process would extend the agony.
  • taffystaffys Posts: 9,753
    ''Chuka Umunna would be wise to register "Ubiquity" as a trademark for an upcoming release of aftershave.''

    LOL.....Shame Ralph Lauren got there before him in this market.

    Otherwise he could have had:-

    'Polo, by Chuka'

    I'll get me coat.
  • felixfelix Posts: 15,180
    edited August 2013
    Julian Huppert making a muppe(r)t of himself on the news re mirandagate.
  • richardDoddrichardDodd Posts: 5,472
    edited August 2013
    Yvette and Ed on holiday together .. sweet, i wonder if they pointed at antthing in a shop window..maybe some shoes in a ermm .. shoe shop, perhaps.
  • david_herdsondavid_herdson Posts: 17,953
    Fenster said:

    I like Yvette Cooper. I think she would've done a better job of being an opposition leader than Ed Miliband. But that's by the by.

    The two big questions for me are:

    1. What difference would Yvette Cooper make to labour's economic policy? With Ed Balls at No 11, and with Labour pursuing a sensible course of continuing to reduce the deficit, I can't see why changing leaders to another sensible middle-ground type (Cooper) would make the unions-relationship any more comfy.

    2. The question Labour should be asking itself, do the Tories want Ed Miliband to stay? I'd say the answer to that is an emphatic yes. The Tories think Cameron can destroy Miliband in a GE campaign, they are not scared or fussed by him, and would quite like him to lead Labour into a GE. I guess this is a problem which is greatly exercising Labour.

    But as I said yesterday, the fact there is now media talk of Ed Miliband being weak/poor/possibly replaced seems a bit unfair. But then politics is a ruthless bloodsport.

    The media need at least one leader to be under pressure at any one time (which generally, one or more will be given that it's a relative rather than absolute game). Clegg's been on the back foot so long that the story's no longer interesting as it's clear that nothing's happening soon. So it's Ed. At some point it will be Dave or Nick again. Sections of the political media are nothing if not lazy, predictable and repetitive.
  • OblitusSumMeOblitusSumMe Posts: 9,143

    If, on the other hand, we are looking at a IDS scenario, the Howard figure is Harriet Harman. Those thinking that EdM won't see out the parliament could do worse than back her.

    "To date, the only Deputy Leaders who have gone on to become the Leader of the Labour Party are Clement Attlee and Michael Foot."

    Which would Harman be?
  • david_herdsondavid_herdson Posts: 17,953
    AveryLP said:

    Neil said:

    But if Ed were to be replaced, you'd hope whoever benefits would remember the heroic efforts of Comrade Hodges in an appropriately Lordly way.

    In time the Telegraph will have compensated Dan enough for him to buy his own seat in the Lords!

    For goodness sake, Neil, stop putting these ideas into currency.

    Lord Hodges of Highgate would be difficult enough to bear.

    Now imagine the burden on PBers of having to show due respect to Lord Thomas of Truro.

    Baron Thomas of Bangkok, surely?
  • AveryLPAveryLP Posts: 7,815

    Yvette and Ed on holiday together .. sweet, i wonder if they pointed at antthing in a shop window..maybe some shoes in a ermm .. shoe shop, perhaps.

    How much is that doggie in the window?
    The one with the waggly tail
    How much is that doggie in the window?
    I do hope that doggie is for sale

    I read in the papers, there are Chukas
    With flash smiles that shine in the dark
    My love needs a doggie to protect her
    And scare them away with one bark

  • AveryLP said:

    Neil said:

    But if Ed were to be replaced, you'd hope whoever benefits would remember the heroic efforts of Comrade Hodges in an appropriately Lordly way.

    In time the Telegraph will have compensated Dan enough for him to buy his own seat in the Lords!

    For goodness sake, Neil, stop putting these ideas into currency.

    Lord Hodges of Highgate would be difficult enough to bear.

    Now imagine the burden on PBers of having to show due respect to Lord Thomas of Truro.

    Baron Thomas of Bangkok, surely?
    Primrose Hill, surely!
  • Fenster said:

    I like Yvette Cooper.

    I'm more of a Rachel Reeves man, myself. And Stella Creasey :)

  • It's not like when IDS was dumped by the Tories.

    Remember, IDS never lost a GE as Tory leader! Fact!

  • david_herdsondavid_herdson Posts: 17,953

    OK, let's take the premise, and look at the mechanics. Suppose the unions and key MPs have given up on Ed M, and have decided Something Must Be Done. Presumably the initial bit of the mechanism would be to hold coordinated chats in confidence with Ed M. In the best scenario for the plotters, he'd take the hint, and resign. If not, it gets messy, but, even if he does agree to go quietly, then what? The only way the transition can be smooth and quick is the Michael Howard scenario - making sure there's only one candidate, so you don't get the pesky inconvenience of the party members having a say in a long-drawn out contest. And that in turn means the plotters have to have squared off all the potential alternatives in advance, and got them to agree to defer in advance to one candidate - Yvette, it is suggested here - and also for that agreement to be watertight. It only takes one to break ranks for the whole plot to descend into a nightmare of in-fighting. Oh, and all this has to be done without leaks.

    Still, it would be fun, wouldn't it?

    I don't know what the mechanism is in the Labour party for triggering a leadership election. When IDS was defenestrated the trigger was letters to the chair of the 1922 committee.

    I think it is likely that the left would object to an internal coup. Though they would struggle to muster the requisite nominations for a contest, even that process would extend the agony.
    Labour's formal process is cumbersome and almost designed to prevent a challenge. From memory, I think an openly-declared candidate needs the backing of a third of the PLP, after which a vote is taken at conference. Alternatively, the matter can go through the NEC for a special conference. Either way, it needs a challenger to stand up in public demanding Miliband go, and for 80+ MPs to line up behind him or her. Won't happen.

    The only realistic route is to try to create enough pressure on the leader that he'll feel obliged to stand down. Experience suggests that this ain't easy and can't be managed behind closed doors.
  • NextNext Posts: 826
    "The only realistic route is to try to create enough pressure on the leader that he'll feel obliged to stand down. Experience suggests that this ain't easy and can't be managed behind closed doors. "

    Perhaps they could post anonymous articles on political blogs?
  • AveryLPAveryLP Posts: 7,815
    tim said:

    And the good news is that after successfully locating his spine surgeons have released the PM to continue his summer tour.

    https://twitter.com/TelePolitics/status/369808103664926721/photo/1

    Ahhh...
    Now thats romantic.

    Bet they didn't buy that bottle from the cafe though.

    Available on prescription from all NHS osteopaths.

    In Polzeath, it comes free courtesy of the Duchy of Cornwall Homeopathy Fund.

    Dave looks good on it.

  • CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 60,216
    CNN tweet:

    "Deadline! Miranda lawyer says they'll file High Court claim Wednesday morning if Home Office/Met don't concede detention was illegal"

    I trust the Home Office refer Mr Miranda to the reply given in Arkel vs Pressdram.....
This discussion has been closed.