So there has to be a period after 2019 which yields enough time to negotiate a final settlement. This is where it gets interesting.
Headbanger Brexiteers will cry foul but so will the EU – unless the transition deal changes absolutely nothing. Freedom of movement, the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice and all the rest must be preserved or the EU will not agree to an open-ended transition.
That’s a clearly established red line. In this scenario, the UK leaves the EU and then absolutely nothing happens. Nothing changes at all except for the absence of the UK during any EU decision making process. The scriptwriters of Father Ted, or any other comedy show, couldn’t make it up.
Wonder what's driving the very different reactions within the EU - from Italy 62% positive to Spain 29%? Its always tempting to read politics/Brexit into everything, but could it be something else like local coverage of drunk Brits on the Costas in Spain that's dragging us down?
Its also interesting that while Canada/Australia clearly lead in global perceptions, (net +62, +58) there's a step change to Europe, with Germany leading (+34), then another step down to France (+18), UK (+14), EU (+14).
I can understand UK 'US poodle' getting a bad rap, but France? Also in what way has Germany been (in recent history) materially different to Canada/Australia?
Any road up....so much for 'global laughing stock'......
So there has to be a period after 2019 which yields enough time to negotiate a final settlement. This is where it gets interesting.
Headbanger Brexiteers will cry foul but so will the EU – unless the transition deal changes absolutely nothing. Freedom of movement, the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice and all the rest must be preserved or the EU will not agree to an open-ended transition.
That’s a clearly established red line. In this scenario, the UK leaves the EU and then absolutely nothing happens. Nothing changes at all except for the absence of the UK during any EU decision making process. The scriptwriters of Father Ted, or any other comedy show, couldn’t make it up.
Shoppers would be forced to pay £3 more for a traditional British fry-up if the government fails to secure a trade deal with the EU, piling more pressure on already cash-strapped consumers.
A typical basket of ingredients for a family breakfast could rise by almost 13% from £23.59 to £26.61 according to a report by KPMG.
The accountancy firm warned households would face above-inflation price rises for imported breakfast classics such as olive oil, bacon and orange juice if Britain left the EU without a deal and defaulted to the World Trade Organisation’s (WTO) customs rules.
I expect Gibraltar is part of the reason for the low rating for Spain. Perhaps not surprisingly the UK gets its highest ratings from the Anglosphrre, India, the US, Australia, New Zealand and Canada
Shoppers would be forced to pay £3 more for a traditional British fry-up if the government fails to secure a trade deal with the EU, piling more pressure on already cash-strapped consumers.
A typical basket of ingredients for a family breakfast could rise by almost 13% from £23.59 to £26.61 according to a report by KPMG.
The accountancy firm warned households would face above-inflation price rises for imported breakfast classics such as olive oil, bacon and orange juice if Britain left the EU without a deal and defaulted to the World Trade Organisation’s (WTO) customs rules.
Shoppers would be forced to pay £3 more for a traditional British fry-up if the government fails to secure a trade deal with the EU, piling more pressure on already cash-strapped consumers.
A typical basket of ingredients for a family breakfast could rise by almost 13% from £23.59 to £26.61 according to a report by KPMG.
The accountancy firm warned households would face above-inflation price rises for imported breakfast classics such as olive oil, bacon and orange juice if Britain left the EU without a deal and defaulted to the World Trade Organisation’s (WTO) customs rules.
Methinks the authors have a tenuous grasp on the cooking of most fry up breakfasts.....
Olive oil smokes and goes acrid when shallow frying, better to use a lighter oil. As for Danish bacon...
Though under PM JRM the choice would be porridge, kippers or grouse, served by nanny in the nursery.
You are too posh. Extra virgin olive oil has a notoriously low smoke point (as low as 160 degrees C, according to wikipedia). Plebs' olive oil is better in this regard. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smoke_point
You are too posh. Extra virgin olive oil has a notoriously low smoke point (as low as 160 degrees C, according to wikipedia). Plebs' olive oil is better in this regard. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smoke_point
None of this EU olive oil muck .... stand up for British dripping !! ....
Shoppers would be forced to pay £3 more for a traditional British fry-up if the government fails to secure a trade deal with the EU, piling more pressure on already cash-strapped consumers.
A typical basket of ingredients for a family breakfast could rise by almost 13% from £23.59 to £26.61 according to a report by KPMG.
The accountancy firm warned households would face above-inflation price rises for imported breakfast classics such as olive oil, bacon and orange juice if Britain left the EU without a deal and defaulted to the World Trade Organisation’s (WTO) customs rules.
Shoppers would be forced to pay £3 more for a traditional British fry-up if the government fails to secure a trade deal with the EU, piling more pressure on already cash-strapped consumers.
A typical basket of ingredients for a family breakfast could rise by almost 13% from £23.59 to £26.61 according to a report by KPMG.
The accountancy firm warned households would face above-inflation price rises for imported breakfast classics such as olive oil, bacon and orange juice if Britain left the EU without a deal and defaulted to the World Trade Organisation’s (WTO) customs rules.
You are too posh. Extra virgin olive oil has a notoriously low smoke point (as low as 160 degrees C, according to wikipedia). Plebs' olive oil is better in this regard. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smoke_point
None of this EU olive oil muck .... stand up for British dripping !! ....
Beef Dripping is best for roast potatoes, but no longer for me.
Neither feature in my rabbit food diet. I have lost 10 kilos in 2 months though. BMI now down to 25. Another 10 to go...
You are too posh. Extra virgin olive oil has a notoriously low smoke point (as low as 160 degrees C, according to wikipedia). Plebs' olive oil is better in this regard. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smoke_point
None of this EU olive oil muck .... stand up for British dripping !! ....
Beef Dripping is best for roast potatoes, but no longer for me.
Neither feature in my rabbit food diet. I have lost 10 kilos in 2 months though. BMI now down to 25. Another 10 to go...
You are too posh. Extra virgin olive oil has a notoriously low smoke point (as low as 160 degrees C, according to wikipedia). Plebs' olive oil is better in this regard. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smoke_point
None of this EU olive oil muck .... stand up for British dripping !! ....
Beef Dripping is best for roast potatoes, but no longer for me.
Neither feature in my rabbit food diet. I have lost 10 kilos in 2 months though. BMI now down to 25. Another 10 to go...
10 kg or 10 BMI points???
Kilo's. I am not planning anorexia!
I was inspired by my blood pressure getting a bit borderline, wanted to try lifestyle before pills.
Shoppers would be forced to pay £3 more for a traditional British fry-up if the government fails to secure a trade deal with the EU, piling more pressure on already cash-strapped consumers.
A typical basket of ingredients for a family breakfast could rise by almost 13% from £23.59 to £26.61 according to a report by KPMG.
The accountancy firm warned households would face above-inflation price rises for imported breakfast classics such as olive oil, bacon and orange juice if Britain left the EU without a deal and defaulted to the World Trade Organisation’s (WTO) customs rules.
Shoppers would be forced to pay £3 more for a traditional British fry-up if the government fails to secure a trade deal with the EU, piling more pressure on already cash-strapped consumers.
A typical basket of ingredients for a family breakfast could rise by almost 13% from £23.59 to £26.61 according to a report by KPMG.
The accountancy firm warned households would face above-inflation price rises for imported breakfast classics such as olive oil, bacon and orange juice if Britain left the EU without a deal and defaulted to the World Trade Organisation’s (WTO) customs rules.
My fairly mainstream Conservative uncle on the Isle of Wight has posted this on FB.
Signs of a real move to make JRM the PM?
Rees-Mogg versus Corbyn? I would have laughed at both a year ago. Actually they are quite similar - personable, issues driven, no policy, unsuitable to be leaders.
My fairly mainstream Conservative uncle on the Isle of Wight has posted this on FB.
Signs of a real move to make JRM the PM?
Rees-Mogg versus Corbyn? I would have laughed at both a year ago. Actually they are quite similar - personable, issues driven, no policy, unsuitable to be leaders.
RM is for light entertainment only; a fairground amusement who would grate with repeated exposure. How can anyone take him seriously as a potential leader?
My fairly mainstream Conservative uncle on the Isle of Wight has posted this on FB.
Signs of a real move to make JRM the PM?
Rees-Mogg versus Corbyn? I would have laughed at both a year ago. Actually they are quite similar - personable, issues driven, no policy, unsuitable to be leaders.
RM is for light entertainment only; a fairground amusement who would grate with repeated exposure. How can anyone take him seriously as a potential leader?
He might win and do well for precisely the same reasons Corbyn did.
Those are the times we live in.
Also, to be fair, he's one of the few Tory MPs who give an intellectually confident defence of Conservativism.
To expand on the Bottas thinking, I do believe the 17 on him for the title is simply too long. It's a three horse race, and, whilst he's third, he's in the running.
You are too posh. Extra virgin olive oil has a notoriously low smoke point (as low as 160 degrees C, according to wikipedia). Plebs' olive oil is better in this regard. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smoke_point
None of this EU olive oil muck .... stand up for British dripping !! ....
Surely you drizzle it on your wholemeal toast before slicing the avocado on it, Jack ?
My fairly mainstream Conservative uncle on the Isle of Wight has posted this on FB.
Signs of a real move to make JRM the PM?
Rees-Mogg versus Corbyn? I would have laughed at both a year ago. Actually they are quite similar - personable, issues driven, no policy, unsuitable to be leaders.
And the gap in the centre of British politics yawns wider...
My fairly mainstream Conservative uncle on the Isle of Wight has posted this on FB.
Signs of a real move to make JRM the PM?
Rees-Mogg versus Corbyn? I would have laughed at both a year ago. Actually they are quite similar - personable, issues driven, no policy, unsuitable to be leaders.
RM is for light entertainment only; a fairground amusement who would grate with repeated exposure. How can anyone take him seriously as a potential leader?
He might win and do well for precisely the same reasons Corbyn did.
Those are the times we live in.
Also, to be fair, he's one of the few Tory MPs who give an intellectually confident defence of Conservativism.
He's playing a longer game - in 40 years' time half the cabinet will be mini-Moggsters.
My fairly mainstream Conservative uncle on the Isle of Wight has posted this on FB.
Signs of a real move to make JRM the PM?
Rees-Mogg versus Corbyn? I would have laughed at both a year ago. Actually they are quite similar - personable, issues driven, no policy, unsuitable to be leaders.
We are in those days.
Like everyone in the UK I haven't spent much time considering JRM for PM, or anything else for that matter. But he is a very bright guy, a constitutionalist, unencumbered by a need for self-enrichment, is probably more "down with the kids" (I know, I know, nanny canvassing) than many Cons MPs, and who knows.
Negatives? Obduracy (can be good/bad we're seeing how it can backfire with Tezza, obvs). One particular faith-driven might cause problems.
I mean that we're having this discussion in itself is the most telling element.
I'm surprised Paris and Rome are so high, and Madrid and Berlin so low. We're looking to open a European development centre with a UX focus, and Berlin looks to be by far the best choice.
You are too posh. Extra virgin olive oil has a notoriously low smoke point (as low as 160 degrees C, according to wikipedia). Plebs' olive oil is better in this regard. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smoke_point
None of this EU olive oil muck .... stand up for British dripping !! ....
Beef Dripping is best for roast potatoes, but no longer for me.
Neither feature in my rabbit food diet. I have lost 10 kilos in 2 months though. BMI now down to 25. Another 10 to go...
I'm surprised Paris and Rome are so high, and Madrid and Berlin so low. We're looking to open a European development centre with a UX focus, and Berlin looks to be by far the best choice.
Recruitment in Berlin quite hard. Big gaps in some disciplines.
My fairly mainstream Conservative uncle on the Isle of Wight has posted this on FB.
Signs of a real move to make JRM the PM?
Rees-Mogg versus Corbyn? I would have laughed at both a year ago. Actually they are quite similar - personable, issues driven, no policy, unsuitable to be leaders.
You are too posh. Extra virgin olive oil has a notoriously low smoke point (as low as 160 degrees C, according to wikipedia). Plebs' olive oil is better in this regard. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smoke_point
None of this EU olive oil muck .... stand up for British dripping !! ....
Surely you drizzle it on your wholemeal toast before slicing the avocado on it, Jack ?
My fairly mainstream Conservative uncle on the Isle of Wight has posted this on FB.
Signs of a real move to make JRM the PM?
Rees-Mogg versus Corbyn? I would have laughed at both a year ago. Actually they are quite similar - personable, issues driven, no policy, unsuitable to be leaders.
My fairly mainstream Conservative uncle on the Isle of Wight has posted this on FB.
Signs of a real move to make JRM the PM?
Rees-Mogg versus Corbyn? I would have laughed at both a year ago. Actually they are quite similar - personable, issues driven, no policy, unsuitable to be leaders.
Why is Jacob Rees Mogg being discussed as a serious contender? He is one of the last people the tories should be looking at. Don't learn the wrong lesson from Cameron - he was able to connect with the public at large because while he didn't try and hide being posh, he focused on being seen as 'down to earth' and 'one of us' - hence all the fruit ninja and chillaxing with boxsets. JRM, and respect to him for embracing it, is a very different type of posh tory - he will not connect with the public at large. Comparisons with Corbyn are misplaced - JRM is on the toff wing of the party, and is the mirror image of the 'champagne socialist / luvvie' wing in Labour. Corbyn is more of an insurgent - Farage is a better mirror for Corbyn on the right.
My fairly mainstream Conservative uncle on the Isle of Wight has posted this on FB.
Signs of a real move to make JRM the PM?
Rees-Mogg versus Corbyn? I would have laughed at both a year ago. Actually they are quite similar - personable, issues driven, no policy, unsuitable to be leaders.
One looks acts and sounds like a clown.
The other's the real thing
Which is worse?
Either Rees-Mogg is very cynical or he is a fool because you can be clever but not smart. I suspect the second. Corbyn is genuinely dim.
From yesterday's discussion on university funding, a strong reason not to trash the sector is that it's a very big positive contributor to our balance of payments: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-40447950
There are good reasons for funding reform, but whatever we do should be carefully considered, rather than brought in by May in a desperate attempt to salvage her popularity... or Corbyn in a ferment of social justice enthusiasm.
Caught some of Rayner on Marr from yesterday. The Labour party are seriously presenting this woman as a potential SOS for Education? My word, this country is doomed. It would be akin to placing Baldrick in charge of the army.
From yesterday's discussion on university funding, a strong reason not to trash the sector is that it's a very big positive contributor to our balance of payments: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-40447950
There are good reasons for funding reform, but whatever we do should be carefully considered, rather than brought in by May in a desperate attempt to salvage her popularity... or Corbyn in a ferment of social justice enthusiasm.
Is that the right link? It seems to be about getting children into Eton and other top public schools.
From yesterday's discussion on university funding, a strong reason not to trash the sector is that it's a very big positive contributor to our balance of payments: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-40447950
There are good reasons for funding reform, but whatever we do should be carefully considered, rather than brought in by May in a desperate attempt to salvage her popularity... or Corbyn in a ferment of social justice enthusiasm.
I was just wondering why someone like Gina Millar doesn't sue the Labour Party for false representation. They pledged to abolish tuition fees which undoubtedly caused many youngsters to vote for them. Now that pledge is an aim, or ambition.
So their lying very probably cost the Cons their OM and that surely is actionable.
My fairly mainstream Conservative uncle on the Isle of Wight has posted this on FB.
Signs of a real move to make JRM the PM?
Rees-Mogg versus Corbyn? I would have laughed at both a year ago. Actually they are quite similar - personable, issues driven, no policy, unsuitable to be leaders.
One looks acts and sounds like a clown.
The other's the real thing
Which is worse?
It's hard to say but if that's the choice I'm not too unhappy about May staying on until alternatives for both of them are found
From yesterday's discussion on university funding, a strong reason not to trash the sector is that it's a very big positive contributor to our balance of payments: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-40447950
There are good reasons for funding reform, but whatever we do should be carefully considered, rather than brought in by May in a desperate attempt to salvage her popularity... or Corbyn in a ferment of social justice enthusiasm.
I was just wondering why someone like Gina Millar doesn't sue the Labour Party for false representation. They pledged to abolish tuition fees which undoubtedly caused many youngsters to vote for them. Now that pledge is an aim, or ambition.
So their lying very probably cost the Cons their OM and that surely is actionable.
(IANAL, obvs)
Writing off existing student debt is an ambition. Abolishing fees is a policy.
Shoppers would be forced to pay £3 more for a traditional British fry-up if the government fails to secure a trade deal with the EU, piling more pressure on already cash-strapped consumers.
A typical basket of ingredients for a family breakfast could rise by almost 13% from £23.59 to £26.61 according to a report by KPMG.
The accountancy firm warned households would face above-inflation price rises for imported breakfast classics such as olive oil, bacon and orange juice if Britain left the EU without a deal and defaulted to the World Trade Organisation’s (WTO) customs rules.
My fairly mainstream Conservative uncle on the Isle of Wight has posted this on FB.
Signs of a real move to make JRM the PM?
Rees-Mogg versus Corbyn? I would have laughed at both a year ago. Actually they are quite similar - personable, issues driven, no policy, unsuitable to be leaders.
One looks acts and sounds like a clown.
The other's the real thing
Which is worse?
It's hard to say but if that's the choice I'm not too unhappy about May staying on until alternatives for both of them are found
From yesterday's discussion on university funding, a strong reason not to trash the sector is that it's a very big positive contributor to our balance of payments: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-40447950
There are good reasons for funding reform, but whatever we do should be carefully considered, rather than brought in by May in a desperate attempt to salvage her popularity... or Corbyn in a ferment of social justice enthusiasm.
I agree with this.
One of the most dishonest contributions to the whole debate was from Lord Adonis yesterday. The Great Architect of Tuition Fees now thinks they should be dismantled because:
"They were a sensible idea wrecked by David Cameron and Nick Clegg’s decision to treble them overnight, and by the greed and complacency of vice-chancellors who thought they were a licence to print money"
Nick Clegg and David Cameron followed the recommendation of the Browne Review (set up by New Labour).
There is no greed behind this. The money universities receive per student has not increased dramatically. What has happened is that the source of the money has changed from the State to the student.
Whilst Vice Chancellors' pay has increased to ridiculous levels, the same phenomenon exists at the top of the BBC or trade unions or local government. I am not defending it, but to suggest, as Adonis does, that this is behind the tripling of fees is wicked nonsense.
Lord Adonis -- a walking embodiment of all that was wrong with New Labour. Dishonest then, and dishonest now.
From yesterday's discussion on university funding, a strong reason not to trash the sector is that it's a very big positive contributor to our balance of payments: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-40447950
There are good reasons for funding reform, but whatever we do should be carefully considered, rather than brought in by May in a desperate attempt to salvage her popularity... or Corbyn in a ferment of social justice enthusiasm.
Is that the right link? It seems to be about getting children into Eton and other top public schools.
Read the whole thing, and consider who is paying whom.
From yesterday's discussion on university funding, a strong reason not to trash the sector is that it's a very big positive contributor to our balance of payments: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-40447950
There are good reasons for funding reform, but whatever we do should be carefully considered, rather than brought in by May in a desperate attempt to salvage her popularity... or Corbyn in a ferment of social justice enthusiasm.
I was just wondering why someone like Gina Millar doesn't sue the Labour Party for false representation. They pledged to abolish tuition fees which undoubtedly caused many youngsters to vote for them. Now that pledge is an aim, or ambition.
So their lying very probably cost the Cons their OM and that surely is actionable.
(IANAL, obvs)
The GE2017 is the greatest work of fiction since Charlie and the Chocolate factory. The disappointments will be vast and legion.
Since Corbyn and McDonnell don't particularly care for representative democracy, they don't view what goes into it as particularly relevant, so long as it gains them Office.
From yesterday's discussion on university funding, a strong reason not to trash the sector is that it's a very big positive contributor to our balance of payments: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-40447950
There are good reasons for funding reform, but whatever we do should be carefully considered, rather than brought in by May in a desperate attempt to salvage her popularity... or Corbyn in a ferment of social justice enthusiasm.
I agree with this.
One of the most dishonest contributions to the whole debate was from Lord Adonis yesterday. The Great Architect of Tuition Fees now thinks they should be dismantled because:
"They were a sensible idea wrecked by David Cameron and Nick Clegg’s decision to treble them overnight, and by the greed and complacency of vice-chancellors who thought they were a licence to print money"
Nick Clegg and David Cameron followed the recommendation of the Browne Review (set up by New Labour).
There is no greed behind this. The money universities receive per student has not increased dramatically. What has happened is that the source of the money has changed from the State to the student.
Whilst Vice Chancellors pay has increased to ridiculous levels, the same phenomenon exists at the top of the BBC or trade unions or local government I am not defending it, but to suggest, as Adonis does, that this is behind the tripling of fees is wicked nonsense.
Lord Adonis -- a walking embodiment of all that was wrong with New Labour. Dishonest then, and dishonest now.
Or perhaps one of those dangerous men who know enough to consider themselves experts, and not enough to realise that they aren't ?
From yesterday's discussion on university funding, a strong reason not to trash the sector is that it's a very big positive contributor to our balance of payments: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-40447950
There are good reasons for funding reform, but whatever we do should be carefully considered, rather than brought in by May in a desperate attempt to salvage her popularity... or Corbyn in a ferment of social justice enthusiasm.
I was just wondering why someone like Gina Millar doesn't sue the Labour Party for false representation. They pledged to abolish tuition fees which undoubtedly caused many youngsters to vote for them. Now that pledge is an aim, or ambition.
So their lying very probably cost the Cons their OM and that surely is actionable.
(IANAL, obvs)
Writing off existing student debt is an ambition. Abolishing fees is a policy.
I just don't think you will be able to get away with this.
You won't be able to leave one cohort treated blatantly unfairly.
Just as -- when you establish the National Care Service -- and dementia treatment is free, families like mine will demand the return of the money we spent looking after our sick parents.
Comments
R.I.P. the 8 British servicemen who died in Afghanistan, 10th July 2009
DiqawtaH
Just kidding, TSE.
That's strange, we're forever being told how deluded we are.......
via The Irish Times
http://www.irishtimes.com/business/economy/brexit-now-resembles-a-mash-up-of-father-ted-1.3146815
So there has to be a period after 2019 which yields enough time to negotiate a final settlement. This is where it gets interesting.
Headbanger Brexiteers will cry foul but so will the EU – unless the transition deal changes absolutely nothing. Freedom of movement, the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice and all the rest must be preserved or the EU will not agree to an open-ended transition.
That’s a clearly established red line. In this scenario, the UK leaves the EU and then absolutely nothing happens. Nothing changes at all except for the absence of the UK during any EU decision making process. The scriptwriters of Father Ted, or any other comedy show, couldn’t make it up.
Its also interesting that while Canada/Australia clearly lead in global perceptions, (net +62, +58) there's a step change to Europe, with Germany leading (+34), then another step down to France (+18), UK (+14), EU (+14).
I can understand UK 'US poodle' getting a bad rap, but France? Also in what way has Germany been (in recent history) materially different to Canada/Australia?
Any road up....so much for 'global laughing stock'......
My fairly mainstream Conservative uncle on the Isle of Wight has posted this on FB.
Signs of a real move to make JRM the PM?
Feck! Drink!
Though it would add to the gaiety of the nation.
A typical basket of ingredients for a family breakfast could rise by almost 13% from £23.59 to £26.61 according to a report by KPMG.
The accountancy firm warned households would face above-inflation price rises for imported breakfast classics such as olive oil, bacon and orange juice if Britain left the EU without a deal and defaulted to the World Trade Organisation’s (WTO) customs rules.
https://www.theguardian.com/business/2017/jul/10/hard-brexit-english-breakfast-hard-luck-fry-up-fans?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter
Methinks the authors have a tenuous grasp on the cooking of most fry up breakfasts.....
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/3982901/seamus-milne-mystery-blonde-east-london-hotel/
I have to say, I don't have a high opinion of Canada. They gave us Mark Carney.
Though under PM JRM the choice would be porridge, kippers or grouse, served by nanny in the nursery.
https://www.ipsos.com/sites/default/files/2017-06/global-advisor-global-influence-2017.pdf
Is it because he was a 'Remainer'?
So the concept of freedom of choice is alien to KPMG wonks.
Germany has certainly turned its scores around in the last 70 years.
"Samantha, what do you think the oiks use for their fry up breakfast?"
"EVO obs...."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smoke_point
I'll be glad if Danish (And Dutch) bacon heads north in price, and virgin olive oil on a fry up ???
It really is hilarious that KPMG in seeking to condescend to the 'average voter' thinks they use olive oil in their fry-ups.....
Rape seed oil is used in the Rentool kitchen. Or butter.
Oh, and what does Father Jack think of Brexit? That would be an Ecumenical Matter.
British butter £1.18 for 250 g vs KPMG's 500g for £4.36....
Where on earth is KPMG buying this crap from ?
brexitbreakfast!Neither feature in my rabbit food diet. I have lost 10 kilos in 2 months though. BMI now down to 25. Another 10 to go...
I was inspired by my blood pressure getting a bit borderline, wanted to try lifestyle before pills.
Can I refer her to the Labour manifesto, and suggest she gets on with it.
Or better still, asks us to get on with it.
https://mobile.twitter.com/IpsosMORI/status/884291094845861888
spot the budget saving
we might even try training some doctors for a change
EU ranking of European cities:
London: 49
Zurich: 43
Paris: 40
Rome: 37
Berin: 31
Madrid: 23
Brussels: 14
https://www.ipsos.com/ipsos-mori/en-uk/ipsos-top-cities-2017
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/corbyn-ally-angela-rayner-passionately-10763442
So New York and Abu Dhabi are the top two, except nobody would want to live there or visit there. Great survey!
Those are the times we live in.
Also, to be fair, he's one of the few Tory MPs who give an intellectually confident defence of Conservativism.
F1: post-race analysis is up here:
http://enormo-haddock.blogspot.co.uk/2017/07/austria-post-race-analysis-2017.html
To expand on the Bottas thinking, I do believe the 17 on him for the title is simply too long. It's a three horse race, and, whilst he's third, he's in the running.
Corbyn as PM would be an even bigger disaster.
Still can't fathom why the Tories are going for this drawn out, painful leadership contest.
Like everyone in the UK I haven't spent much time considering JRM for PM, or anything else for that matter. But he is a very bright guy, a constitutionalist, unencumbered by a need for self-enrichment, is probably more "down with the kids" (I know, I know, nanny canvassing) than many Cons MPs, and who knows.
Negatives? Obduracy (can be good/bad we're seeing how it can backfire with Tezza, obvs). One particular faith-driven might cause problems.
I mean that we're having this discussion in itself is the most telling element.
What do you suggest?
Final nail in the coffin of BAU centrist politics.
An unappetising choice.
Hanging on never works. You may fear Corbyn, but you will only gain a few months at the cost of your party by dragging this out.
The other's the real thing
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-40447950
There are good reasons for funding reform, but whatever we do should be carefully considered, rather than brought in by May in a desperate attempt to salvage her popularity... or Corbyn in a ferment of social justice enthusiasm.
So their lying very probably cost the Cons their OM and that surely is actionable.
(IANAL, obvs)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DohRa9lsx0Q
One of the most dishonest contributions to the whole debate was from Lord Adonis yesterday. The Great Architect of Tuition Fees now thinks they should be dismantled because:
"They were a sensible idea wrecked by David Cameron and Nick Clegg’s decision to treble them overnight, and by the greed and complacency of vice-chancellors who thought they were a licence to print money"
Nick Clegg and David Cameron followed the recommendation of the Browne Review (set up by New Labour).
There is no greed behind this. The money universities receive per student has not increased dramatically. What has happened is that the source of the money has changed from the State to the student.
Whilst Vice Chancellors' pay has increased to ridiculous levels, the same phenomenon exists at the top of the BBC or trade unions or local government. I am not defending it, but to suggest, as Adonis does, that this is behind the tripling of fees is wicked nonsense.
Lord Adonis -- a walking embodiment of all that was wrong with New Labour. Dishonest then, and dishonest now.
Bloody Tory party. Never ever bloody learn.
Since Corbyn and McDonnell don't particularly care for representative democracy, they don't view what goes into it as particularly relevant, so long as it gains them Office.
You won't be able to leave one cohort treated blatantly unfairly.
Just as -- when you establish the National Care Service -- and dementia treatment is free, families like mine will demand the return of the money we spent looking after our sick parents.