What about EASA? Planes can't fly if they aren't certified by that body. Nor can ATC control movements.
This is getting worse than the Millennium bug!
Nope. Triggering article 50 makes no difference at all. We do not leave anything until we leave the EU
This is just more scaremongering bollocks.
There will undoubtedly be a huge amount of negotiation to arrive back (for certain areas and sectors) at the position we currently already occupy.
Of course there will. But the idea we will be locked out of anything we are currently members of and which does not require EU membership is garbage.
Right now I'm more concerned that Mrs May decides that we don't want to be members of any EU-administered bodies. It seems bizarre that we'd want to leave EASA or the EMA, for example.
Who knows? A third of the French want Le Pen. And 50% abhor her.
A quarter of French want a Thatcherite, and about two thirds think that isn't what France needs.
And a about one in five think that Macon has what it takes.
That being said, I've met Emmanuel Macron and he's a very sharp cookie. Will he win? Probably not. But is it possible that those on the Left lend him their votes to avoid a Fillon - Le Pen run-off? Yes, it's possible.
I think there are some domain resolution issues across the Internet. I can't get to Register.com, for example. (And pb is registered with Register.com)
What a nightmare to box against. All those wasted punches. Totally knackering.
It irritates me when people say he is boring to watch.
He reminds me a bit of Sampras on the grass, so clearly superior to all other contempories that he never seriously was challenged. His legacy can't match that of say Sugar Ray Leonard as he simply didn't have the same quality and calibre of opponents as Haggler, Hearns, Duran.
The tennis equivalent would be Fed (To Leonard) - Djokovic, Nadal and to some degree Murray all provided the competition needed for his legacy.
I used to get quite nauseous before giving a big speech. I'm now getting the same feeling on PM May's behalf, and it's not 17:30 yet. Please God, let it be OK and not a cringefest.
Just seen video showing Theresa May in front of the Churchill bust with Donald Trump in the oval office
Who knows? A third of the French want Le Pen. And 50% abhor her.
A quarter of French want a Thatcherite, and about two thirds think that isn't what France needs.
And a about one in five think that Macon has what it takes.
That being said, I've met Emmanuel Macron and he's a very sharp cookie. Will he win? Probably not. But is it possible that those on the Left lend him their votes to avoid a Fillon - Le Pen run-off? Yes, it's possible.
Darn. I shorted at 3.6
I bought loads between 19 and 23, and sold almost all between 8 and 11. I think he's too short here too. But I don't share HYUFD's utter certainty that he cannot be President. He's a lot more likely to make it than Marine Le Pen, in my view.
I used to get quite nauseous before giving a big speech. I'm now getting the same feeling on PM May's behalf, and it's not 17:30 yet. Please God, let it be OK and not a cringefest.
Just seen video showing Theresa May in front of the Churchill bust with Donald Trump in the oval office
Just seen picture showing Theresa May bust with Donald Trump in the Oval Office.
Who knows? A third of the French want Le Pen. And 50% abhor her.
A quarter of French want a Thatcherite, and about two thirds think that isn't what France needs.
And a about one in five think that Macon has what it takes.
That being said, I've met Emmanuel Macron and he's a very sharp cookie. Will he win? Probably not. But is it possible that those on the Left lend him their votes to avoid a Fillon - Le Pen run-off? Yes, it's possible.
Darn. I shorted at 3.6
I bought loads between 19 and 23, and sold almost all between 8 and 11. I think he's too short here too. But I don't share HYUFD's utter certainty that he cannot be President. He's a lot more likely to make it than Marine Le Pen, in my view.
I'm scared he will go shorter. And not come up again.
Do I reback at 3.2 for a small loss?
Or am I just being all gaylord ponceyboots and should just hold fire.
What about EASA? Planes can't fly if they aren't certified by that body. Nor can ATC control movements.
This is getting worse than the Millennium bug!
Nope. Triggering article 50 makes no difference at all. We do not leave anything until we leave the EU
This is just more scaremongering bollocks.
There will undoubtedly be a huge amount of negotiation to arrive back (for certain areas and sectors) at the position we currently already occupy.
Of course there will. But the idea we will be locked out of anything we are currently members of and which does not require EU membership is garbage.
Right now I'm more concerned that Mrs May decides that we don't want to be members of any EU-administered bodies. It seems bizarre that we'd want to leave EASA or the EMA, for example.
I don't think it's up to us - a la the Single Market.
I used to get quite nauseous before giving a big speech. I'm now getting the same feeling on PM May's behalf, and it's not 17:30 yet. Please God, let it be OK and not a cringefest.
Just seen video showing Theresa May in front of the Churchill bust with Donald Trump in the oval office
Just seen picture showing Theresa May bust with Donald Trump in the Oval Office.
What about EASA? Planes can't fly if they aren't certified by that body. Nor can ATC control movements.
This is getting worse than the Millennium bug!
Nope. Triggering article 50 makes no difference at all. We do not leave anything until we leave the EU
This is just more scaremongering bollocks.
There will undoubtedly be a huge amount of negotiation to arrive back (for certain areas and sectors) at the position we currently already occupy.
Of course there will. But the idea we will be locked out of anything we are currently members of and which does not require EU membership is garbage.
Right now I'm more concerned that Mrs May decides that we don't want to be members of any EU-administered bodies. It seems bizarre that we'd want to leave EASA or the EMA, for example.
We can't legally be in the EMA without being in the EEA.
Watching that Cameron video, I'm coming close to thinking Remoaners should go to fucking jail.
Enough now.
You jelly-spined, weak, naive, childlike TOSSER.
We are leaving. Geddit? Leaving the EU.
But as every fuckwit is quick to point out, there was no manifesto for leave. No, you're right, amazingly the OFFICIALLY-DESIGNATED LEAVE CAMPAIGN was, apparently, not empowered to dictate what flavour of leave we would get.
So we are in limbo with all sides fighting for what they believe best for the UK. Apart, perhaps, from you, who seems so divorced from the realities of life in the UK that you only comment after your first sundowner in a country 5,000 miles away.
We are working out what is best for us as a non-EU member. As plenty of people who know what they are talking about will point out, non-EU members including Norway, Liechtenstein and home of equally virulent Leaver Max, Switzerland, are all members of the single market. So plenty of options for us.
Get with the programme.
And you accused me of being the bargain bin SeanT. Brexit really has destroyed some posters' dignity.
Which bit did I get wrong?
The forced expletives and CAPS. I'll admit I glazed over soon after that.
I used to get quite nauseous before giving a big speech. I'm now getting the same feeling on PM May's behalf, and it's not 17:30 yet. Please God, let it be OK and not a cringefest.
Just seen video showing Theresa May in front of the Churchill bust with Donald Trump in the oval office
Just seen picture showing Theresa May bust with Donald Trump in the Oval Office.
Is her tangerine suit meant as an homage?
song lyrics -
Tangerine, she is all they claim With her eyes of night and lips as bright as flame Tangerine, when she dances by, senoritas stare and caballeros sigh And I've seen toasts to Tangerine Raised in every bar across the Argentine Yes, she has them all on the run, but her heart belongs to just one Her heart belongs to Tangerine
I used to get quite nauseous before giving a big speech. I'm now getting the same feeling on PM May's behalf, and it's not 17:30 yet. Please God, let it be OK and not a cringefest.
Just seen video showing Theresa May in front of the Churchill bust with Donald Trump in the oval office
Just seen picture showing Theresa May bust with Donald Trump in the Oval Office.
What about EASA? Planes can't fly if they aren't certified by that body. Nor can ATC control movements.
This is getting worse than the Millennium bug!
Nope. Triggering article 50 makes no difference at all. We do not leave anything until we leave the EU
This is just more scaremongering bollocks.
There will undoubtedly be a huge amount of negotiation to arrive back (for certain areas and sectors) at the position we currently already occupy.
Of course there will. But the idea we will be locked out of anything we are currently members of and which does not require EU membership is garbage.
Right now I'm more concerned that Mrs May decides that we don't want to be members of any EU-administered bodies. It seems bizarre that we'd want to leave EASA or the EMA, for example.
I don't think it's up to us - a la the Single Market.
Yeah, but the EU wants our money, and it'd be cheaper for both of us to cut a deal.
I used to get quite nauseous before giving a big speech. I'm now getting the same feeling on PM May's behalf, and it's not 17:30 yet. Please God, let it be OK and not a cringefest.
Just seen video showing Theresa May in front of the Churchill bust with Donald Trump in the oval office
Just seen picture showing Theresa May bust with Donald Trump in the Oval Office.
I used to get quite nauseous before giving a big speech. I'm now getting the same feeling on PM May's behalf, and it's not 17:30 yet. Please God, let it be OK and not a cringefest.
Just seen video showing Theresa May in front of the Churchill bust with Donald Trump in the oval office
Just seen picture showing Theresa May bust with Donald Trump in the Oval Office.
I used to get quite nauseous before giving a big speech. I'm now getting the same feeling on PM May's behalf, and it's not 17:30 yet. Please God, let it be OK and not a cringefest.
Just seen video showing Theresa May in front of the Churchill bust with Donald Trump in the oval office
Just seen picture showing Theresa May bust with Donald Trump in the Oval Office.
I used to get quite nauseous before giving a big speech. I'm now getting the same feeling on PM May's behalf, and it's not 17:30 yet. Please God, let it be OK and not a cringefest.
Just seen video showing Theresa May in front of the Churchill bust with Donald Trump in the oval office
Just seen picture showing Theresa May bust with Donald Trump in the Oval Office.
Is her tangerine suit meant as an homage?
Isn't it red?
I saw another photo where it looked orange but it looks red below.
I used to get quite nauseous before giving a big speech. I'm now getting the same feeling on PM May's behalf, and it's not 17:30 yet. Please God, let it be OK and not a cringefest.
Just seen video showing Theresa May in front of the Churchill bust with Donald Trump in the oval office
Just seen picture showing Theresa May bust with Donald Trump in the Oval Office.
What about EASA? Planes can't fly if they aren't certified by that body. Nor can ATC control movements.
This is getting worse than the Millennium bug!
Nope. Triggering article 50 makes no difference at all. We do not leave anything until we leave the EU
This is just more scaremongering bollocks.
There will undoubtedly be a huge amount of negotiation to arrive back (for certain areas and sectors) at the position we currently already occupy.
Of course there will. But the idea we will be locked out of anything we are currently members of and which does not require EU membership is garbage.
Right now I'm more concerned that Mrs May decides that we don't want to be members of any EU-administered bodies. It seems bizarre that we'd want to leave EASA or the EMA, for example.
We can't legally be in the EMA without being in the EEA.
What about EASA? Planes can't fly if they aren't certified by that body. Nor can ATC control movements.
This is getting worse than the Millennium bug!
Nope. Triggering article 50 makes no difference at all. We do not leave anything until we leave the EU
This is just more scaremongering bollocks.
There will undoubtedly be a huge amount of negotiation to arrive back (for certain areas and sectors) at the position we currently already occupy.
Of course there will. But the idea we will be locked out of anything we are currently members of and which does not require EU membership is garbage.
Right now I'm more concerned that Mrs May decides that we don't want to be members of any EU-administered bodies. It seems bizarre that we'd want to leave EASA or the EMA, for example.
I don't think it's up to us - a la the Single Market.
Yeah, but the EU wants our money, and it'd be cheaper for both of us to cut a deal.
I'm feeling very sensitive . The reporting of our withdrawal from EUratom is being so blatantly misreported, it's wound me up a bit. There's no reason why we can't have bilateral arrangements across a range of areas where we have mutual interests, as you say. It depends how fractious the negotiations become, I would imagine.
www2.politicalbetting.com 's DNS entry has gone away, at least for me on Verizon in downstate New York. politicalbetting.com (with no subdomain) is working still.
In north Georgia (on AT&T) I get the 'resolving host' message sometimes when on the www2 site but it works mostly.
When I lived in New York state there was no internet...
What about EASA? Planes can't fly if they aren't certified by that body. Nor can ATC control movements.
This is getting worse than the Millennium bug!
Nope. Triggering article 50 makes no difference at all. We do not leave anything until we leave the EU
This is just more scaremongering bollocks.
There will undoubtedly be a huge amount of negotiation to arrive back (for certain areas and sectors) at the position we currently already occupy.
Of course there will. But the idea we will be locked out of anything we are currently members of and which does not require EU membership is garbage.
Right now I'm more concerned that Mrs May decides that we don't want to be members of any EU-administered bodies. It seems bizarre that we'd want to leave EASA or the EMA, for example.
We can't legally be in the EMA without being in the EEA.
EFTA also covered by EMA.
Only countries in the EEA. Switzerland is excluded.
www2.politicalbetting.com 's DNS entry has gone away, at least for me on Verizon in downstate New York. politicalbetting.com (with no subdomain) is working still.
In north Georgia (on AT&T) I get the 'resolving host' message sometimes when on the www2 site but it works mostly.
When I lived in New York state there was no internet...
I used to get quite nauseous before giving a big speech. I'm now getting the same feeling on PM May's behalf, and it's not 17:30 yet. Please God, let it be OK and not a cringefest.
Just seen video showing Theresa May in front of the Churchill bust with Donald Trump in the oval office
Just seen picture showing Theresa May bust with Donald Trump in the Oval Office.
Is her tangerine suit meant as an homage?
Homage to the Republical party.
Good psychology. May has read The Donald's book about doing deals.
The EMA in London employs 59 British, several thousand EU. Not sure it is a big loss of jobs.
Why do you think so many countries are already bidding to become the new host?
And most of the QPPVs employed by drug companies are resident in Britain. They will not be able to do so after Brexit. The MHRA has played a very influential part in the running of the EMA and it will lose a very respected and influential chair of the Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee too.
What about EASA? Planes can't fly if they aren't certified by that body. Nor can ATC control movements.
This is getting worse than the Millennium bug!
Nope. Triggering article 50 makes no difference at all. We do not leave anything until we leave the EU
This is just more scaremongering bollocks.
There will undoubtedly be a huge amount of negotiation to arrive back (for certain areas and sectors) at the position we currently already occupy.
Of course there will. But the idea we will be locked out of anything we are currently members of and which does not require EU membership is garbage.
Right now I'm more concerned that Mrs May decides that we don't want to be members of any EU-administered bodies. It seems bizarre that we'd want to leave EASA or the EMA, for example.
We can't legally be in the EMA without being in the EEA.
EFTA also covered by EMA.
But many aspects of British law concerning the licensing of medicines is now contingent on us being members of the EU.
Yeah, but the EU wants our money, and it'd be cheaper for both of us to cut a deal.
Yes, but membership of, and the physical location of, those types of institution are exactly the kinds of issue over which minor EU27 players will see that they have veto power which can be put to good pork-barrelling use. We, and the EU as a whole, could easily suffer considerable collateral damage.
Yeah, but the EU wants our money, and it'd be cheaper for both of us to cut a deal.
Yes, but membership of, and the physical location of, those types of institution are exactly the kinds of issue over which minor EU27 players will see that they have veto power which can be put to good pork-barrelling use. We, and the EU as a whole, could easily suffer considerable collateral damage.
Minor EU 27 players (a la Wallonia) will be holding other EU 27 players to ransom not the UK.
When considering today's events at the White House, Conservatives are probably glad they got May not Leadsom in the end.
The moment I realised that we could end up with PM Leadsom via the most freakish of circumstances was the closest I've come to thinking..."omg, what have we done!"
Yeah, but the EU wants our money, and it'd be cheaper for both of us to cut a deal.
Yes, but membership of, and the physical location of, those types of institution are exactly the kinds of issue over which minor EU27 players will see that they have veto power which can be put to good pork-barrelling use. We, and the EU as a whole, could easily suffer considerable collateral damage.
Minor EU 27 players (a la Wallonia) will be holding other EU 27 players to ransom not the UK.
Sure, that's why I said collateral damage.
Edit: But it's direct damage as well. There's not a snowflake's chance in hell of the European Medicines Agency remaining in the UK, even though it would make sense.
What a nightmare to box against. All those wasted punches. Totally knackering.
It irritates me when people say he is boring to watch.
He reminds me a bit of Sampras on the grass, so clearly superior to all other contempories that he never seriously was challenged. His legacy can't match that of say Sugar Ray Leonard as he simply didn't have the same quality and calibre of opponents as Haggler, Hearns, Duran.
The tennis equivalent would be Fed (To Leonard) - Djokovic, Nadal and to some degree Murray all provided the competition needed for his legacy.
Yes but Canelo is his "control" opponent. Now one of the most feared at 147-160 (officially) and Floyd fought him in his prime.
What about EASA? Planes can't fly if they aren't certified by that body. Nor can ATC control movements.
This is getting worse than the Millennium bug!
Nope. Triggering article 50 makes no difference at all. We do not leave anything until we leave the EU
This is just more scaremongering bollocks.
There will undoubtedly be a huge amount of negotiation to arrive back (for certain areas and sectors) at the position we currently already occupy.
Of course there will. But the idea we will be locked out of anything we are currently members of and which does not require EU membership is garbage.
Right now I'm more concerned that Mrs May decides that we don't want to be members of any EU-administered bodies. It seems bizarre that we'd want to leave EASA or the EMA, for example.
We can't legally be in the EMA without being in the EEA.
EFTA also covered by EMA.
That's not quite true. Switzerland is not a member of the EMA, but it does have bilateral treaties with it.
What about EASA? Planes can't fly if they aren't certified by that body. Nor can ATC control movements.
This is getting worse than the Millennium bug!
Nope. Triggering article 50 makes no difference at all. We do not leave anything until we leave the EU
This is just more scaremongering bollocks.
There will undoubtedly be a huge amount of negotiation to arrive back (for certain areas and sectors) at the position we currently already occupy.
Of course there will. But the idea we will be locked out of anything we are currently members of and which does not require EU membership is garbage.
Right now I'm more concerned that Mrs May decides that we don't want to be members of any EU-administered bodies. It seems bizarre that we'd want to leave EASA or the EMA, for example.
We can't legally be in the EMA without being in the EEA.
EFTA also covered by EMA.
That's not quite true. Switzerland is not a member of the EMA, but it does have bilateral treaties with it.
As it does with the USA, Canada, Japan, Australia, New Zealand and Israel. Looser arrangements with China, India and Russia.
www2.politicalbetting.com 's DNS entry has gone away, at least for me on Verizon in downstate New York. politicalbetting.com (with no subdomain) is working still.
Ditto
Yes it disappeared from my screen too until fairly recently and other websites loaded OK.
Hard for Trump/May to talk about and agree much in a one hour meeting. Apart from vague aspirations agreed by officials in advance, it is just symbolic. But symbols can be important and it will help the atmosphere for future negotiations.
In the previous thread some PBers are referring to Trump's approval ratings going up. They've improved relative from from campaign, but since he became President Elect, they have not improved. Indeed a new Quinnipiac poll released after his first week in office, shows him having an approval rating of 36%. That's even lower than several other polls prior to his inauguration which show him on a 40% approval rating on average.
Yeah, but the EU wants our money, and it'd be cheaper for both of us to cut a deal.
Yes, but membership of, and the physical location of, those types of institution are exactly the kinds of issue over which minor EU27 players will see that they have veto power which can be put to good pork-barrelling use. We, and the EU as a whole, could easily suffer considerable collateral damage.
There will be damage. Again, consider it akin to childbirth. Anticipate drooping, stretchmarks, piles, pain and enervating tedium. But, a child.
Yeah, but the EU wants our money, and it'd be cheaper for both of us to cut a deal.
Yes, but membership of, and the physical location of, those types of institution are exactly the kinds of issue over which minor EU27 players will see that they have veto power which can be put to good pork-barrelling use. We, and the EU as a whole, could easily suffer considerable collateral damage.
There will be damage. Again, consider it akin to childbirth. Anticipate drooping, stretchmarks, piles, pain and enervating tedium. But, a child.
More akin to chopping a leg off.
That's the spirit Jonathan! I feel we're making progress .
What a nightmare to box against. All those wasted punches. Totally knackering.
It irritates me when people say he is boring to watch.
He reminds me a bit of Sampras on the grass, so clearly superior to all other contempories that he never seriously was challenged. His legacy can't match that of say Sugar Ray Leonard as he simply didn't have the same quality and calibre of opponents as Haggler, Hearns, Duran.
The tennis equivalent would be Fed (To Leonard) - Djokovic, Nadal and to some degree Murray all provided the competition needed for his legacy.
I used to have to argue Federer's superiority over Nadal et al, and one thing I used point out was that Federer defeated Sampras at Wimbledon in 2001. This was before Sampras won his final grand slam and before they messed about with the balls and grass at Wimbledon. I don't think any of Nadal, Djokovic or Murray could have done that to Sampras at Wimbledon.
Yeah, but the EU wants our money, and it'd be cheaper for both of us to cut a deal.
Yes, but membership of, and the physical location of, those types of institution are exactly the kinds of issue over which minor EU27 players will see that they have veto power which can be put to good pork-barrelling use. We, and the EU as a whole, could easily suffer considerable collateral damage.
There will be damage. Again, consider it akin to childbirth. Anticipate drooping, stretchmarks, piles, pain and enervating tedium. But, a child.
More akin to chopping a leg off.
No, if you chop a leg off, you get nothing back. You've lost a leg. is all.
Do you seriously believe there are NO upsides to taking back all our laws, government, rules, and democracy? To making our MPs responsible for EVERYTHING they do to us?
It's ridic to say this is all negative - "an amputation".
But many aspects of British law concerning the licensing of medicines is now contingent on us being members of the EU.
That's not a problem. The oddly-named Great Repeal Bill will ensure those aspects of British law don't get repealed on Brexit.
It is a problem as it will require further primary legislation to put it right.
Of all the Brexit problems to worry about, ones which are entirely in the control of the UK government really aren't significant. It's the issues which are not in our control which matter.
Do you seriously believe there are NO upsides to taking back all our laws, government, rules, and democracy? To making our MPs responsible for EVERYTHING they do to us? .
We already had democracy, have gained nothing and lost things of significant benefit.
Yeah, but the EU wants our money, and it'd be cheaper for both of us to cut a deal.
Yes, but membership of, and the physical location of, those types of institution are exactly the kinds of issue over which minor EU27 players will see that they have veto power which can be put to good pork-barrelling use. We, and the EU as a whole, could easily suffer considerable collateral damage.
There will be damage. Again, consider it akin to childbirth. Anticipate drooping, stretchmarks, piles, pain and enervating tedium. But, a child.
More akin to chopping a leg off.
No, if you chop a leg off, you get nothing back. You've lost a leg. is all.
Do you seriously believe there are NO upsides to taking back all our laws, government, rules, and democracy? To making our MPs responsible for EVERYTHING they do to us?
It's ridic to say this is all negative - "an amputation".
No, but on balance it seems profoundly negative. Over 40 years, a lot of good legislation was imposed on us by the EU, e.g. the drinking water directive, the data protection directive. Meanwhile, Whitehall (i.e., the executive, overseen very badly by a parliament elected by FPTP) variously sought to abolish jury trial (Blair), created a regressive local government taxation system out of the wreckage of the poll tax (Thatcher), etc.
We don't yet know the cost of setting up UK government offices to do the work done for us by the EU for the net payment of £8 bn per year or so. It includes, e.g. writing and policing anti-trust legislation against companies like Google, Amazon, etc. Not cheap. Lots more to do besides.
Plus my European Health Insurance Card will no longer work and I'll need to take out medical insurance when I travel on the continent. As I did 20-40 years ago befpore the EHIC.
Watching that Cameron video, I'm coming close to thinking Remoaners should go to fucking jail.
Enough now.
You jelly-spined, weak, naive, childlike TOSSER.
We are leaving. Geddit? Leaving the EU.
But as every fuckwit is quick to point out, there was no manifesto for leave. No, you're right, amazingly the OFFICIALLY-DESIGNATED LEAVE CAMPAIGN was, apparently, not empowered to dictate what flavour of leave we would get.
So we are in limbo with all sides fighting for what they believe best for the UK. Apart, perhaps, from you, who seems so divorced from the realities of life in the UK that you only comment after your first sundowner in a country 5,000 miles away.
We are working out what is best for us as a non-EU member. As plenty of people who know what they are talking about will point out, non-EU members including Norway, Liechtenstein and home of equally virulent Leaver Max, Switzerland, are all members of the single market. So plenty of options for us.
Get with the programme.
And you accused me of being the bargain bin SeanT. Brexit really has destroyed some posters' dignity.
Which bit did I get wrong?
The forced expletives and CAPS. I'll admit I glazed over soon after that.
Right, thanks. So just out of interest, what point did you think you were making when you used CAPS?
Yeah, but the EU wants our money, and it'd be cheaper for both of us to cut a deal.
Yes, but membership of, and the physical location of, those types of institution are exactly the kinds of issue over which minor EU27 players will see that they have veto power which can be put to good pork-barrelling use. We, and the EU as a whole, could easily suffer considerable collateral damage.
There will be damage. Again, consider it akin to childbirth. Anticipate drooping, stretchmarks, piles, pain and enervating tedium. But, a child.
More akin to chopping a leg off.
No, if you chop a leg off, you get nothing back. You've lost a leg. is all.
Do you seriously believe there are NO upsides to taking back all our laws, government, rules, and democracy? To making our MPs responsible for EVERYTHING they do to us?
It's ridic to say this is all negative - "an amputation".
No, but on balance it seems profoundly negative. Over 40 years, a lot of good legislation was imposed on us by the EU, e.g. the drinking water directive, the data protection directive. Meanwhile, Whitehall (i.e., the executive, overseen very badly by a parliament elected by FPTP) variously sought to abolish jury trial (Blair), created a regressive local government taxation system out of the wreckage of the poll tax (Thatcher), etc.
We don't yet know the cost of setting up UK government offices to do the work done for us by the EU for the net payment of £8 bn per year or so. It includes, e.g. writing and policing anti-trust legislation against companies like Google, Amazon, etc. Not cheap. Lots more to do besides.
Plus my European Health Insurance Card will no longer work and I'll need to take out medical insurance when I travel on the continent. As I did 20-40 years ago befpore the EHIC.
It's a little late to be worrying about all this stuff.
Mr. Voter, you should have such insurance when travelling in the EU anyway.
The health card only means you're not meant to be discriminated against, but if a member state only has minimal or no free healthcare, that's what you get.
Those who want to remain on this forum seem to be getting more desperate and extreme in their comments and doom and gloom
I think there may be a place for a remain grief counsellor to help their peace of mind
No just pointing out the entirely foreseeable consequence to the idiots.
If the consequences of brexit were so foreseeable to you and so disastrous, then either you spent every spare hour you had in the weeks before the vote knocking on doors and manning phone lines to get the In vote out, or you are a complacent blowhard. Which?
Comments
His legacy can't match that of say Sugar Ray Leonard as he simply didn't have the same quality and calibre of opponents as Haggler, Hearns, Duran.
The tennis equivalent would be Fed (To Leonard) - Djokovic, Nadal and to some degree Murray all provided the competition needed for his legacy.
The "www." version disappeared for me too.
Do I reback at 3.2 for a small loss?
Or am I just being all gaylord ponceyboots and should just hold fire.
You mean it's NOT because of Brexit?
Tangerine, she is all they claim
With her eyes of night and lips as bright as flame
Tangerine, when she dances by, senoritas stare and caballeros sigh
And I've seen toasts to Tangerine
Raised in every bar across the Argentine
Yes, she has them all on the run, but her heart belongs to just one
Her heart belongs to Tangerine
Also, Mr. Royale, I'd hold on, if I were you.
She is growing into being the PM.
Useful to have had six months as PM already.
(All back to normal for me now)
Good psychology. May has read The Donald's book about doing deals.
1996 perhaps?
Edit: But it's direct damage as well. There's not a snowflake's chance in hell of the European Medicines Agency remaining in the UK, even though it would make sense.
That stands for something.
I think there may be a place for a remain grief counsellor to help their peace of mind
http://www.mccain.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/press-releases?ID=C9F10A81-5E01-4937-9395-64533976169F
The things Her Majesty has to do for her country...
But, as we are only up to 1954, it will be in series 12.
Will Alec Baldwin still be available?
We don't yet know the cost of setting up UK government offices to do the work done for us by the EU for the net payment of £8 bn per year or so. It includes, e.g. writing and policing anti-trust legislation against companies like Google, Amazon, etc. Not cheap. Lots more to do besides.
Plus my European Health Insurance Card will no longer work and I'll need to take out medical insurance when I travel on the continent. As I did 20-40 years ago befpore the EHIC.
The health card only means you're not meant to be discriminated against, but if a member state only has minimal or no free healthcare, that's what you get.
More
Theresa May sets out in detail nature of special relationship. Trump says "my mum's from Scotland.".
F**** immigrants, flooding into the US.