politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » The big BREXIT news – the resignation of Britain’s Ambassador to the EU only weeks before Article 50 due to be invoked
politicalbetting.com is proudly powered by WordPress with "Neat!" theme. Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).
Read the full story here
Comments
Let the ideological purges commence. Only pure supporters of the party are able to fully understand the plan.
Brexit is pure newspeak.
After years of EU intergration, cooperation and searching for harmony a 180 degree turn to dismantle years of work seemed incoherent and unattainable to him.
Not really a shock in any way. Should allow for a more integrated and cohesive negotiation.
I suspect Sir Ivan's mum has to go on Wikipedia to find out who he is.
EU ?
Not sure the govt has 12-14HCP
https://www.ipsos-mori.com/Assets/Docs/Polls/pm-november-2016-charts.pdf
Oh well, I suppose the i, Guardian et al could have led on yesterday's Manufacturing PMI......or not.....
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/816452807024840704
Sir Ivan Rogers was principal private secretary to Eurosceptic Ken Clarke
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4085982/Arrogant-merchant-gloom-Mrs-glad-ANDREW-PIERCE-writing-wall-Sir-Ivan-Rogers-months.html
If we were 12 months in and the lead guy quit, then yes, otherwise headline should be Pro-EU ambassador quits early before Brexit talks commence.
BREAKING NEWS: Serial killer Charles Manson is 'seriously ill' in hospital after being escorted from California prison
2015 regional election turnout: 50%
Presidential election turnouts:
2012: 80% (each round);
2007: 84% (each round)
2002: 72% R1, 80% R2
Redwoods reaction was interesting
"We need to appoint someone who thinks leaving the eu will be easy".
Many leavers are still completely deluded about the scale of the task we are embarking on. Only david davis seems to be living in the real world. (Of the front bench leavers)
So emotionally invested in the EU that he is unable to accept and adhere to the thought process and implement the arguments required for Brexit during negotiations.
His view of muddled thinking could be no more than thinking that disagrees with his more pro EU view. You come away with the impression that he knows he is right therefore contrary views are wrong, muddled and unacceptable to his core beliefs.
Obviously he was never going to be a successful Brexit negotiator, assuming there is a scintilla of truth in the Mail article.
But it's a helluva job for his replacement.
Concerning that he suggests ministers don't want to hear what other EU countries are telling him.
The talks are yet to begin, Sir Ivan Rogers was not an Ambassador, tis better for him to go now than mid negotiations as planned and activating A50 is at least two months away.
Apart from that…
If Theresa May never wanted him in the first place, if he was such a nightmare to work with, if she expected him to go with Cameron...
Why on earth didn't she fire or move him and get a replacement? Why end up in a situation where he resigns so soon to talks starting?
A stellar entrance?
the i: Brexit talks in chaos There are no Brexit talks
the Guardian: Brexit Row as top EU Envoy stands down When 'isn't' there a 'Brexit row'? - otherwise accurate
The Times: Envoy quits over Brexit 'muddle' Not what his email says - in fact he says he's quitting to let his successor see through the whole process
The Telegraph: May to Pick Brexiteer as our Man in Brussels How quickly the ripples have closed over Sir Ivan's head.....
The Express: New Hope For Faster EU Exit Hope Springs Eternal....either that or Star Wars geek, which seems unlikely...
The Independent: 'Hounded out by Hostile Brexiteers' In quotes as I suppose as it doesn't remotely reflect what Sir Ivan writes....
The FT: London's 'frustrated' EU envoy resigns weeks before deadline on Brexit clause Note use of quotation marks over statement Sir Ivan didn't make himself
I'd say the Guardian easily wins for 'Just the facts, Ma'am'......with a little bit of spin on top...
Our government is shambolically trying to determine what it wants as an outcome, while the EU27 is planning talks on mechanisms of exit.
It would be popcorn time were we not passengers in the slowmotion car crash.
Really why do we employ these people - remove his knighthood and make him work for his pension. He has failed, he didnt prepare for a possible leave vote and he made no impact on the EU in telling them the danger of a leave vote was real and they should accommodate UK concerns.
Now he's legged it and wants to cover his arse by blaming everyone else. Useless.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-38502339
We need to make sure no suspicious Chinese people are hanging around the dinosaur during its tour, just in case they're trying to retrieve the microfilm forty years later. The recipe for Wonton Soup must be retrieved ...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One_of_Our_Dinosaurs_Is_Missing
In business when we got into trouble you kept the team involved (unless they'd caused the mess in the first place - which arguably Rogers contributed to) in place until they'd fixed it, none of this 'looks like a bit hard, can I have a cushier number please, I'm a Knight you know....?'
The EU chose not to accommodate leave concerns... Now that we have voted to leave they are still not accommodating those concerns.
So if Rogers had been clearer that we will leave unless you do xyz... i don't see that it would have made any difference.
At least Oxford wouldn't let MarqueeMark or Alanbrooke in...
The whinging pub bore has announced that he is leaving the pub. Why listen any more?
the man who tells the CS to speak truth to power singularly failed to do so himself.
his boss that other spineless Oxford flunker noticeably didnt receive any advice from Ivan of the " youre off your head if you dont have a plan B" variety. Ivy's silence on the matter juxtaposes with his sudden discovery of principles.
so now theyve both charged off to benefit from highly paid consultancies and and can lecture us all on commitment to the Big Society and making the UK a better place,
my arse,
That's why Tim's barbs were better: he lacked Sean's literary verve, but he was at least internally consistent. He believed what he was writing.
Then again, what else can be expected from a Devonian cream-tea boy?
Newsnight was quite good last night, except that it would have saved time had Evan Davis just tattooed "I hate Donald Trump on the back of his head" to avoid putting his own views across.
Also the "Will the euro survive the year, or next few?" question would've been better phrased as a decade or two.
Kudos to the BBC for managing to find a Corbyn supporter.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/12/15/post-brexit-trade-deal-could-take-10-years-still-fail-warns/
It sounds like the Brown/May forces of hell were unleashed on him at that point, making his position untenable. I don't think May is very forgiving for being left looking like Theresa No-mates at the Dec EU leaders meeting.
I would be curious to know what sort of severance package Sir Ivan negotiated before making such a claim. But it is Redwood...
Having that all pervading depressive fear of Brexit must make life miserable. Far better to accept where we are and work to make it acceptable.
Maybe one reason a plan wasn't forming could have been an unreconcilable difference between our ex EU negotiator and the political masters. Maybe both were intransigent so one had to go. It may allow for a more detailed and cohesive plan. It may not be bad news, certainly no need for despair or angst.
Instead of wasting time sniffing out and then flaying Remainers for lacking conviction in Brexit, their priority should be a Brexit plan. But not only is there no plan, the government gives no indication of having any ability to draw up and implement a workable plan.
Now, not so much...
' Today, we are setting out our assessment of what would happen in the weeks and months after a vote to Leave on June 23.
It is clear that there would be an immediate and profound shock to our economy.
The analysis produced by the Treasury today shows that a vote to leave will push our economy into a recession that would knock 3.6 per cent off GDP and, over two years, put hundreds of thousands of people out of work right across the country, compared to the forecast for continued growth if we vote to remain in the EU.
In a more severe shock scenario, Treasury economists estimate that our economy could be hit by 6 per cent, there would be a deeper recession and unemployment would rise by even more. '
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/05/22/david-cameron-and-george-osborne-brexit-would-put-our-economy-in/
It might also be remembered that whoever May has in her government she at least got shot of Olly Letwin and Nicky Morgan.
How very fortuitous for them.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9cQgQIMlwWw