Assuming Hillary wins, do you reckon the Trumpers will accept the result or go down the road of the Bitter Remainers and try to stop her being appointed?
Fancy not accepting the result. So different, so very different, from our own dear voters.
It's not Trumpsters but House Republicans who will refuse to accept the result. Heck, half of them won't even work with their own side: ask John Boehner.
Ugh, just found myself agreeing with Michael O'Leary re airport expansion
I'm away but I presume it's a case of "its unnecessary". If so, he made that argument about the building of T2 in Dublin. If that hadn't been built then the airport would now be very capacity constrained (let's not mention the 2nd runway though).
No! He's suggested 3 new runways. Heathrow, Gatwick, and Stanstead
Yes, he is still making a play for some 'Berniebots'
Yes, the key to the election, and why the polls might be wrong, is the previously non-voting Bernie supporters. Will they stay at home, vote for Hillary as a Democrat, or vote for the Donald as NOTA?
Most will vote for Hillary but some will stay at home and some will vote for Stein, a small minority will even vote for Trump
I see the daily mail today moves onto publishing photos and details of the Supreme Court judges.
Naked intimidation.
They misread their targets (if they genuine hope to shift the vote). Judges are so allergic to being pressured that it risks overriding a neutral assessment of the case.
Interesting Ashcroft assessment of the Trump-Brexit analogy:
Ugh, just found myself agreeing with Michael O'Leary re airport expansion
I'm away but I presume it's a case of "its unnecessary". If so, he made that argument about the building of T2 in Dublin. If that hadn't been built then the airport would now be very capacity constrained (let's not mention the 2nd runway though).
No! He's suggested 3 new runways. Heathrow, Gatwick, and Stanstead
Problem with scheduling like 4 events in one day that HYUFD was so impressed by: Trump running several hours late, leaving mostly-elderly supporters standing around getting annoyed at him.
I see the daily mail today moves onto publishing photos and details of the Supreme Court judges.
Naked intimidation.
They misread their targets (if they genuine hope to shift the vote). Judges are so allergic to being pressured that it risks overriding a neutral assessment of the case.
Interesting Ashcroft assessment of the Trump-Brexit analogy:
Problem with scheduling like 4 events in one day that HYUFD was so impressed by: Trump running several hours late, leaving mostly-elderly supporters standing around getting annoyed at him.
Ugh, just found myself agreeing with Michael O'Leary re airport expansion
I'm away but I presume it's a case of "its unnecessary". If so, he made that argument about the building of T2 in Dublin. If that hadn't been built then the airport would now be very capacity constrained (let's not mention the 2nd runway though).
No! He's suggested 3 new runways. Heathrow, Gatwick, and Stanstead
On balance that's no reversal - runways good, terminals bad. Given Ryanair's 20 minute turn around that's no surprise though.
Assuming Hillary wins, do you reckon the Trumpers will accept the result or go down the road of the Bitter Remainers and try to stop her being appointed?
Fancy not accepting the result. So different, so very different, from our own dear voters.
It's not Trumpsters but House Republicans who will refuse to accept the result. Heck, half of them won't even work with their own side: ask John Boehner.
If it's anything bar a Clinton landslide, she's in danger of being able to pass precisely nothing through the House for at least the first two years.
Paul Ryan might be a good bet to run in 2020 - if he can ensure the Republicans make Hillary a completely lame duck for four years, he'll be monumentally popular with his own side.
I see the daily mail today moves onto publishing photos and details of the Supreme Court judges.
Naked intimidation.
They misread their targets (if they genuine hope to shift the vote). Judges are so allergic to being pressured that it risks overriding a neutral assessment of the case.
Interesting Ashcroft assessment of the Trump-Brexit analogy:
That's a good piece from Ashcroft about the similarities and differences between the Brexit vote and the Trump phenomenon.
The similarities are the white working and lower middle cllass for Trump/Leave, white college graduates for Hillary/Remain, minorities for Hillary/Remain, the old for Trump/Leave, the young for Hillary/Remain. The differences are the Hispanic vote in the US which is not present in the UK which will be an advantage for Hillary and the libertarian vote in the US will be voting for Johnson not Trump whereas in the UK it voted for Leave. The latter two factors are probably enough to give Hillary the edge and produce a Hillary victory but remember the final UK poll average had Remain ahead by 0. 5% and Leave won by 4%, Hillary's average poll lead is not so big a similar error could not produce a narrow Trump won, at least in the popular vote, if the white working class turnout in the US to the extent they did in the UK
Assuming Hillary wins, do you reckon the Trumpers will accept the result or go down the road of the Bitter Remainers and try to stop her being appointed?
Fancy not accepting the result. So different, so very different, from our own dear voters.
It's not Trumpsters but House Republicans who will refuse to accept the result. Heck, half of them won't even work with their own side: ask John Boehner.
If it's anything bar a Clinton landslide, she's in danger of being able to pass precisely nothing through the House for at least the first two years.
Paul Ryan might be a good bet to run in 2020 - if he can ensure the Republicans make Hillary a completely lame duck for four years, he'll be monumentally popular with his own side.
Ryan is now seen as a RINO by the base and losing VP nominees, as he was in 2012, almost never get the nomination. It will also be difficult for him to match the level of opposition to Hillary Cruz will show in the Senate, as Speaker he will have to make a few compromises
Problem with scheduling like 4 events in one day that HYUFD was so impressed by: Trump running several hours late, leaving mostly-elderly supporters standing around getting annoyed at him.
Assuming Hillary wins, do you reckon the Trumpers will accept the result or go down the road of the Bitter Remainers and try to stop her being appointed?
Fancy not accepting the result. So different, so very different, from our own dear voters.
It's not Trumpsters but House Republicans who will refuse to accept the result. Heck, half of them won't even work with their own side: ask John Boehner.
If it's anything bar a Clinton landslide, she's in danger of being able to pass precisely nothing through the House for at least the first two years.
Paul Ryan might be a good bet to run in 2020 - if he can ensure the Republicans make Hillary a completely lame duck for four years, he'll be monumentally popular with his own side.
Assuming Hillary wins, do you reckon the Trumpers will accept the result or go down the road of the Bitter Remainers and try to stop her being appointed?
Fancy not accepting the result. So different, so very different, from our own dear voters.
It's not Trumpsters but House Republicans who will refuse to accept the result. Heck, half of them won't even work with their own side: ask John Boehner.
If it's anything bar a Clinton landslide, she's in danger of being able to pass precisely nothing through the House for at least the first two years.
Paul Ryan might be a good bet to run in 2020 - if he can ensure the Republicans make Hillary a completely lame duck for four years, he'll be monumentally popular with his own side.
Agreed, I'm on Ryan for 2020: acceptable to the base, intelligent, clean cut.
Assuming Hillary wins, do you reckon the Trumpers will accept the result or go down the road of the Bitter Remainers and try to stop her being appointed?
Fancy not accepting the result. So different, so very different, from our own dear voters.
It's not Trumpsters but House Republicans who will refuse to accept the result. Heck, half of them won't even work with their own side: ask John Boehner.
If it's anything bar a Clinton landslide, she's in danger of being able to pass precisely nothing through the House for at least the first two years.
Paul Ryan might be a good bet to run in 2020 - if he can ensure the Republicans make Hillary a completely lame duck for four years, he'll be monumentally popular with his own side.
Agreed, I'm on Ryan for 2020: acceptable to the base, intelligent, clean cut.
I question whether he is now acceptable to the base in a way Cruz or Pence are. The latter two are more likely in my view and Cruz was runner-up this year and cleverly distanced himself from Trump at the beginning before now giving him a clearer endorsement than Ryan has thus ensuring he is better placed to pick up Trump voters in the 2012 primaries without being identified too closely with a losing Trump campaign which Pence would be
Morning all. So here we are, 24 hours to go and Betfair says it's a clear win for Hillary, back in to 1.21 this morning. Do we agree that Florida, Pennsylvania and Nevada are the key States to watch?
Put it like this - if the GOTV tomorrow isn't VERY heavily skewed towards the male,pale and stale then this will be a procession.
However there is a very large potential pool of MPS who didn't vote last time.
As has been mentioned two Republican states declare early.
Indiana - which would need a Trump +15 exit poll to make life interesting. Kentucky - which would need a Trump +25 exit poll to make life interesting.
Anything less than that and you can probably pour onto the swing states for HRC. If it is above that then I am sorry but you're going to have a late (but exciting) night.
(Fortunately most swing states are in the East so by 2.00am we will know the result (Unless Nevada is required))
Assuming Hillary wins, do you reckon the Trumpers will accept the result or go down the road of the Bitter Remainers and try to stop her being appointed?
Fancy not accepting the result. So different, so very different, from our own dear voters.
It's not Trumpsters but House Republicans who will refuse to accept the result. Heck, half of them won't even work with their own side: ask John Boehner.
If it's anything bar a Clinton landslide, she's in danger of being able to pass precisely nothing through the House for at least the first two years.
Paul Ryan might be a good bet to run in 2020 - if he can ensure the Republicans make Hillary a completely lame duck for four years, he'll be monumentally popular with his own side.
Agreed, I'm on Ryan for 2020: acceptable to the base, intelligent, clean cut.
Ryan is a dead end. He's more of a dead end than Scott Walker.
Assuming Hillary wins, do you reckon the Trumpers will accept the result or go down the road of the Bitter Remainers and try to stop her being appointed?
Fancy not accepting the result. So different, so very different, from our own dear voters.
It's not Trumpsters but House Republicans who will refuse to accept the result. Heck, half of them won't even work with their own side: ask John Boehner.
If it's anything bar a Clinton landslide, she's in danger of being able to pass precisely nothing through the House for at least the first two years.
Paul Ryan might be a good bet to run in 2020 - if he can ensure the Republicans make Hillary a completely lame duck for four years, he'll be monumentally popular with his own side.
Agreed, I'm on Ryan for 2020: acceptable to the base, intelligent, clean cut.
I question whether he is now acceptable to the base in a way Cruz or Pence are. The latter two are more likely in my view and Cruz was runner-up this year and cleverly distanced himself from Trump at the beginning before now giving him a clearer endorsement than Ryan has thus ensuring he is better placed to pick up Trump voters in the 2012 primaries without being identified too closely with a losing Trump campaign which Pence would be
Cruz has poisoned himself to the never Trump crowd.
Assuming Hillary wins, do you reckon the Trumpers will accept the result or go down the road of the Bitter Remainers and try to stop her being appointed?
Fancy not accepting the result. So different, so very different, from our own dear voters.
It's not Trumpsters but House Republicans who will refuse to accept the result. Heck, half of them won't even work with their own side: ask John Boehner.
If it's anything bar a Clinton landslide, she's in danger of being able to pass precisely nothing through the House for at least the first two years.
Paul Ryan might be a good bet to run in 2020 - if he can ensure the Republicans make Hillary a completely lame duck for four years, he'll be monumentally popular with his own side.
Agreed, I'm on Ryan for 2020: acceptable to the base, intelligent, clean cut.
Ryan is going to have a though time getting re elected as speaker. I wouldn't bet on him.
Assuming Hillary wins, do you reckon the Trumpers will accept the result or go down the road of the Bitter Remainers and try to stop her being appointed?
Fancy not accepting the result. So different, so very different, from our own dear voters.
It's not Trumpsters but House Republicans who will refuse to accept the result. Heck, half of them won't even work with their own side: ask John Boehner.
If it's anything bar a Clinton landslide, she's in danger of being able to pass precisely nothing through the House for at least the first two years.
Paul Ryan might be a good bet to run in 2020 - if he can ensure the Republicans make Hillary a completely lame duck for four years, he'll be monumentally popular with his own side.
Agreed, I'm on Ryan for 2020: acceptable to the base, intelligent, clean cut.
I question whether he is now acceptable to the base in a way Cruz or Pence are. The latter two are more likely in my view and Cruz was runner-up this year and cleverly distanced himself from Trump at the beginning before now giving him a clearer endorsement than Ryan has thus ensuring he is better placed tos in the 2012 primaries without being identified too closely with a losing Trump campaign which Pence would be
Cruz has poisoned himself to the never Trump crowd.
Never Trump voters are now just a tiny minority of GOP voters
Comments
"All four judges to rule on the Government's Brexit case have links to Europe"
All four ?
Um, how many judges will be sitting ?
We'll know the proportions of each in about 28 hours.
The Attack Of The Clintons
44 minutes 44 seconds
Paul Ryan might be a good bet to run in 2020 - if he can ensure the Republicans make Hillary a completely lame duck for four years, he'll be monumentally popular with his own side.
However there is a very large potential pool of MPS who didn't vote last time.
As has been mentioned two Republican states declare early.
Indiana - which would need a Trump +15 exit poll to make life interesting.
Kentucky - which would need a Trump +25 exit poll to make life interesting.
Anything less than that and you can probably pour onto the swing states for HRC. If it is above that then I am sorry but you're going to have a late (but exciting) night.
(Fortunately most swing states are in the East so by 2.00am we will know the result (Unless Nevada is required))