politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » The Brexiteers, Juncker’s fifth columnists?
Despite all the hype and bluster, the court case, and Parliamentary scrutiny, the United Kingdom will be leaving the European Union within the next few few years, and both will rapidly change because of Brexit.
God bless case law. The Article 50 appeal is currently discussing lobster farming in the 19th century and OGH has just tweeted something about Henry VIII and the Privy Council.
Those tedious Eurocrats could never understand the wonderful tatterdemalion that is our constitution.
God bless case law. The Article 50 appeal is currently discussing lobster farming in the 19th century and OGH has just tweeted something about Henry VIII and the Privy Council.
Those tedious Eurocrats could never understand the wonderful tatterdemalion that is our constitution.
F##king hell, some of the second lots of children look even older than yesterdays intake....one has wrinkles and looks like is about to go grey....no sign of what most people would think as kids.
Apparently the Home Office says, may look older 'because war has toughened them up'.
F##king hell, some of the second lots of children look even older than yesterdays intake....one has wrinkles and looks like is about to go grey....no sign of what most people would think as kids.
Apparently the Home Office says, may look older 'because war has toughened them up'.
God bless case law. The Article 50 appeal is currently discussing lobster farming in the 19th century and OGH has just tweeted something about Henry VIII and the Privy Council.
Those tedious Eurocrats could never understand the wonderful tatterdemalion that is our constitution.
God bless case law. The Article 50 appeal is currently discussing lobster farming in the 19th century and OGH has just tweeted something about Henry VIII and the Privy Council.
Those tedious Eurocrats could never understand the wonderful tatterdemalion that is our constitution.
Theresa May = Henry VIII
Both broke with (the treaty of) Rome.....
so who's Thomas Cromwell?
The way things are going, Philip Hammond.
Ends up getting executed, ans the Henry/Theresa ends up regretting it and blaming their ministers for bringing false charges against Phil/Thomas
Excellent piece, and articulates a huge concern of mine. Most of the Leavers will have croaked in a decade. Who knows what the attitude of future generations will be - those whose judgements were never tainted by end-of-Empire hang-ups, 1970s sitcoms and so forth. It's perfectly possible that our descendants will want to revisit EU membership. Sadly, for them, it will never be on the beneficial terms we enjoyed but then squandered. The terrible consequence of a truculent whim.
God bless case law. The Article 50 appeal is currently discussing lobster farming in the 19th century and OGH has just tweeted something about Henry VIII and the Privy Council.
Those tedious Eurocrats could never understand the wonderful tatterdemalion that is our constitution.
Theresa May = Henry VIII
Both broke with (the treaty of) Rome.....
so who's Thomas Cromwell?
The way things are going, Philip Hammond.
Ends up getting executed, ans the Henry/Theresa ends up regretting it and blaming their ministers for bringing false charges against Phil/Thomas
Boris Johnson potentially fits the Henry VIII bill better. Breaks with Rome on a matter of personal convenience; goes through "companions" like toilet paper, but somehow represents "Merrie England".
On topic, an interesting piece but one which in listing the UK's achievements within the EU, doesn't mention 'trying to keep it in some kind of contact with reality'. The danger of the likes of Juncker pushing ahead with grand projects is that it encourages extremism across the board and could lead to the collapse of the whole thing.
The initial public reaction to Brexit from the rEU has been to increase support for it, that's true. Whether that will continue over coming years is a different matter.
''Sadly, for them, it will never be on the beneficial terms we enjoyed but then squandered. The terrible consequence of a truculent whim''
I see the remainer Mystic Meg syndrome has returned. Reassuringly for you, this prediction may be complete and utter horsesh8t, just like your predictions the UK would explode one day after we decided to leave.
Sure, demographic changes might make us a nation proEU again... in forty years. I don't see the consensus changing in less than that, once the status quo is out.
By the time this might happen we will all be living in the tropical Antarctic as slaves to robot overlords run by AmaGoogleFacebook.
Next.
The public are fickle, who knows what they will do next week let alone next year. 58% of Leave voters believe they are going to be better off after Brexit - does anyone seriously believe that that is going to be the case in the short or even medium term?. Even the optimists in the die-hard camp seem to think we are going to get 5 years economic grief
Excellent piece, and articulates a huge concern of mine. Most of the Leavers will have croaked in a decade. Who knows what the attitude of future generations will be - those whose judgements were never tainted by end-of-Empire hang-ups, 1970s sitcoms and so forth. It's perfectly possible that our descendants will want to revisit EU membership. Sadly, for them, it will never be on the beneficial terms we enjoyed but then squandered. The terrible consequence of a truculent whim.
People get wiser as they get older and acquire knowledge and experience.
Serious question. I can understand why and how you are disgruntled, but some day in the future, for your own benefit, and that of the country, you and your pals will need to reconcile yourself to the change and make the best of it.
Will that be before or after your conversion to the Bitterest Bremorse ever witnessed?
By the time this might happen we will all be living in the tropical Antarctic as slaves to robot overlords run by AmaGoogleFacebook.
Next.
The public are fickle, who knows what they will do next week let alone next year. 58% of Leave voters believe they are going to be better off after Brexit - does anyone seriously believe that that is going to be the case in the short or even medium term?. Even the optimists in the die-hard camp seem to think we are going to get 5 years economic grief
Nobody doubts that we are likely to better off. The question is whether we would have been better off still, had we remained within the EU.
Excellent piece, and articulates a huge concern of mine. Most of the Leavers will have croaked in a decade. Who knows what the attitude of future generations will be - those whose judgements were never tainted by end-of-Empire hang-ups, 1970s sitcoms and so forth. It's perfectly possible that our descendants will want to revisit EU membership. Sadly, for them, it will never be on the beneficial terms we enjoyed but then squandered. The terrible consequence of a truculent whim.
People get wiser as they get older and acquire knowledge and experience.
They also acquire a fear of change, with change being exemplified by foreigners.
Here's the thing. The people I work with think I didn;t vote for Brexit. I told them I didn;t vote at all.
And yet Brexit is far less contentious than supporting Donald Trump. Partly because people like 619 have made it so.
And so who knows what the size of the shy Trump vote is. Is it an ice cube. Or is it an ice berg? we won't know until November 09 and no amount of JackW poll posting is going to change that.
Here's the thing. The people I work with think I didn;t vote for Brexit. I told them I didn;t vote at all.
And yet Brexit is far less contentious than supporting Donald Trump. Partly because people like 619 have made it so.
And so who knows what the size of the shy Trump vote is. Is it an ice cube. Or is it an ice berg? we won't know until November 09 and no amount of JackW poll posting is going to change that.
God bless case law. The Article 50 appeal is currently discussing lobster farming in the 19th century and OGH has just tweeted something about Henry VIII and the Privy Council.
Those tedious Eurocrats could never understand the wonderful tatterdemalion that is our constitution.
Theresa May = Henry VIII
Both broke with (the treaty of) Rome.....
so who's Thomas Cromwell?
Cameron.
The analogy of TM as H8 doesn't really work all that well because TM wasn't PM pre the decision to seek divorce.
Here's the thing. The people I work with think I didn;t vote for Brexit. I told them I didn;t vote at all.
And yet Brexit is far less contentious than supporting Donald Trump. Partly because people like 619 have made it so.
And so who knows what the size of the shy Trump vote is. Is it an ice cube. Or is it an ice berg? we won't know until November 09 and no amount of JackW poll posting is going to change that.
Here's the thing. The people I work with think I didn;t vote for Brexit. I told them I didn;t vote at all.
And yet Brexit is far less contentious than supporting Donald Trump. Partly because people like 619 have made it so.
And so who knows what the size of the shy Trump vote is. Is it an ice cube. Or is it an ice berg? we won't know until November 09 and no amount of JackW poll posting is going to change that.
Wah wah, why are people calling me a racist for voting for a racist?
Re: bets. It's illegal to gamble in most states of the US.
It has lead to:
Huge overrounds at casinos on horse-racing (As they're a monopoly) "Prediction" websites where odds are expressed as %s and bets as 'contracts' Pay to play 'Fantasy football' leagues.
Excellent piece, and articulates a huge concern of mine. Most of the Leavers will have croaked in a decade. Who knows what the attitude of future generations will be - those whose judgements were never tainted by end-of-Empire hang-ups, 1970s sitcoms and so forth. It's perfectly possible that our descendants will want to revisit EU membership. Sadly, for them, it will never be on the beneficial terms we enjoyed but then squandered. The terrible consequence of a truculent whim.
I did write a piece along these lines before the vote:
Here's the thing. The people I work with think I didn;t vote for Brexit. I told them I didn;t vote at all.
And yet Brexit is far less contentious than supporting Donald Trump. Partly because people like 619 have made it so.
And so who knows what the size of the shy Trump vote is. Is it an ice cube. Or is it an ice berg? we won't know until November 09 and no amount of JackW poll posting is going to change that.
You assume a "shy Trump vote" just as in 08 we were told of the Bradley effect and in 12 that Obama couldn't repeat the turnout of 08.
Indeed we may see a shy Clinton effect - a differential turnout of women and Hispanic voters. Indeed the evidence of early voting and enthusiasm for Trump among GOP voters is that the Donald is holed below the waterline.
Here's the thing. The people I work with think I didn;t vote for Brexit. I told them I didn;t vote at all.
And yet Brexit is far less contentious than supporting Donald Trump. Partly because people like 619 have made it so.
And so who knows what the size of the shy Trump vote is. Is it an ice cube. Or is it an ice berg? we won't know until November 09 and no amount of JackW poll posting is going to change that.
Despite the enormous societal pressure against them enough people managed to tell Opinium they were going to vote Leave that they said leave would win.
Enough people managed to summon up the courage to tell TNS that they predicted a Leave win.
The most important thing when trying to work out the shy Trumpeter effect is Likely Voter screens in the US heavily squeeze the Democratic vote. Pollsters adjustments reduce Hilary's vote, not increase it. There was a poll last month where pre LV screen Hilary had a 15 point lead that got LV screened down to 6. Higher propensity to vote Republican is already factored in.
Ladbrokes report that betting on the Witney by-election is the highest ever for a by-election.
Something's going on there and we are too busy exchanging Brexit sniper fire and avoiding Plato's David Icke links.
I like that. Perhaps instead of platonic, we could use 'Platonicke' to describe obsessive behaviour which continues in the face of derision from all sides?
Excellent piece, and articulates a huge concern of mine. Most of the Leavers will have croaked in a decade. Who knows what the attitude of future generations will be - those whose judgements were never tainted by end-of-Empire hang-ups, 1970s sitcoms and so forth. It's perfectly possible that our descendants will want to revisit EU membership. Sadly, for them, it will never be on the beneficial terms we enjoyed but then squandered. The terrible consequence of a truculent whim.
How blindingly arrogant to think we should have beneficial terms. Why should we have benefits over Germany, France, Hungary or Portugal?
I'm happy to be in or out. Not the stupid and unworkable half way in and half way out always in a huff with the direction of the EU position of the last decade or two.
God bless case law. The Article 50 appeal is currently discussing lobster farming in the 19th century and OGH has just tweeted something about Henry VIII and the Privy Council.
Those tedious Eurocrats could never understand the wonderful tatterdemalion that is our constitution.
Theresa May = Henry VIII
Both broke with (the treaty of) Rome.....
The Treaty of Rome is a such a 1950s throwback.
Brexit will propel this nation into the 21st century.
You assume a "shy Trump vote" just as in 08 we were told of the Bradley effect and in 12 that Obama couldn't repeat the turnout of 08
You may well be right, but I would argue that this election is more contentious than any in many decades.
I'm just going by the logic that made me money in 2015 and 2016. But after 619's comment, that's the last I will post on this topic before the election.
Ladbrokes report that betting on the Witney by-election is the highest ever for a by-election.
Something's going on there and we are too busy exchanging Brexit sniper fire and avoiding Plato's David Icke links.
I like that. Perhaps instead of platonic, we could use 'Platonicke' to describe obsessive behaviour which continues in the face of derision from all sides?
Actually what did happen to @hunchman? Finally found what he was looking for, beyond the ol' Finchley Road?
Ladbrokes report that betting on the Witney by-election is the highest ever for a by-election.
I think the Tories will be all right. However, these are strange times. The voters of Witney have had the PM as their MP so perhaps they feel they're allowed a bit of naughtiness. Voters sometimes do unexpected things just for sh*ts and giggles.
God bless case law. The Article 50 appeal is currently discussing lobster farming in the 19th century and OGH has just tweeted something about Henry VIII and the Privy Council.
Those tedious Eurocrats could never understand the wonderful tatterdemalion that is our constitution.
Theresa May = Henry VIII
Both broke with (the treaty of) Rome.....
The Treaty of Rome is a such a 1950s throwback.
Brexit will propel this nation into the 21st century.
No it isn't. Federally it is legal, and possible to bet I believe in every state except Utah and Hawaii. However, in most it is restricted to small numbers of physical locations.
Online, it isn't illegal for individuals to place wagers, what is illegal is for providers to process payments. Even so, the amount of money bet by Americans each weekend on US sports is enormous.
God bless case law. The Article 50 appeal is currently discussing lobster farming in the 19th century and OGH has just tweeted something about Henry VIII and the Privy Council.
Those tedious Eurocrats could never understand the wonderful tatterdemalion that is our constitution.
Theresa May = Henry VIII
Both broke with (the treaty of) Rome.....
The Treaty of Rome is a such a 1950s throwback.
Brexit will propel this nation into the 21st century.
By the time this might happen we will all be living in the tropical Antarctic as slaves to robot overlords run by AmaGoogleFacebook.
Next.
The public are fickle, who knows what they will do next week let alone next year. 58% of Leave voters believe they are going to be better off after Brexit - does anyone seriously believe that that is going to be the case in the short or even medium term?. Even the optimists in the die-hard camp seem to think we are going to get 5 years economic grief
Total misunderstanding of human nature. If it's a Soft Brexit and the suffering is minimal then people will rejoice and Leave will become MORE popular.
If it's a Hard Brexit because the UK and EU fall out, then the natural reaction of most Brits will be to say Fuck Them, We Can Cope, the Blitz Spirit, etc etc, and euroscepticism will surge even more. Remainers really WILL be seen as traitors.
There is no immediate way back into the EU for a generation, or two. Looking at the polling on membership in places like Norway or Switzerland, I'd say we won't ever go back, in the far and foreseeable future.
Agree, but only after the next few months, before the options of Soft, semi-soft, withdrawal, etc are fully sorted. If *all* options look dicey, then pubic support for back into EU may get a surge.
Then again, if the EU is seen as being the barrier to a 'good' deal, then Euroscepticism and leave may increase.
Here's the thing. The people I work with think I didn;t vote for Brexit. I told them I didn;t vote at all.
And yet Brexit is far less contentious than supporting Donald Trump. Partly because people like 619 have made it so.
And so who knows what the size of the shy Trump vote is. Is it an ice cube. Or is it an ice berg? we won't know until November 09 and no amount of JackW poll posting is going to change that.
Wah wah, why are people calling me a racist for voting for a racist?
No it isn't. Federally it is legal, and possible to bet I believe in every state except Utah and Hawaii. However, in most it is restricted to small numbers of physical locations.
Online, it isn't illegal for individuals to place wagers, what is illegal is for providers to process payments. Even so, the amount of money bet by Americans each weekend on US sports is enormous.
Pay to play NFL in particular. It's a game that lends itself tremendously well to a fantasy structure tbh.
TSE has well and truly lost his marbles. How many people in the Republic of Ireland wish to rejoin the UK, or Mongolia China?
Was Mongolia ever part of China?
Newfoundland voluntarily opted back in to direct imperial control in the 1930s having previously had 'responsible government'.
Inner Mongolia is still part of China. Outer Mongolia, which was de facto independent although nominally still part of China, held a fake referendum in the 1940's as part of a deal between the Nationalist government and the Soviet Union. China would allow the Soviet Union to effectively annexe Mongolia in exchange for the Soviet Union covertly supporting the Nationlists in its civil war with the Communists.
The Scots chose to be taken over by the English (they didn't call it that, but that's what it was). The UK returning to the EU would only occur in substantially similar circumstances - ie we were completely broke.
Britain will not be accepted back by the EU unless it is clear that Britain's wayward spirit is broken. That will only happen in the case of overwhelming catastrophe.
The Scots chose to be taken over by the English (they didn't call it that, but that's what it was). The UK returning to the EU would only occur in substantially similar circumstances - ie we were completely broke.
Britain will not be accepted back by the EU unless it is clear that Britain's wayward spirit is broken. That will only happen in the case of overwhelming catastrophe.
Brexit means Brexit.
What id there is no UK?
Presumably an independent Scotland would be back in asap and Northern Ireland - once back with the Republic - would automatically join. In truth, the EU's UK problem is essentially an English one.
TSE has well and truly lost his marbles. How many people in the Republic of Ireland wish to rejoin the UK, or Mongolia China?
Was Mongolia ever part of China?
Newfoundland voluntarily opted back in to direct imperial control in the 1930s having previously had 'responsible government'.
Uhm, Mongolia TOOK OVER China for many centuries. They WERE China.
Yes, but in the context of RoyalBlue's original point, that would be "how many people in China would wish to rejoin Mongolia", not the other way round?
As an aside, I think to say that 'they were China' probably over-eggs it. They conquered China militarily and imposed a ruling caste but their lasting legacy was transient and ultimately, Chinese culture subsumed them.
Here's the thing. The people I work with think I didn;t vote for Brexit. I told them I didn;t vote at all.
And yet Brexit is far less contentious than supporting Donald Trump. Partly because people like 619 have made it so.
And so who knows what the size of the shy Trump vote is. Is it an ice cube. Or is it an ice berg? we won't know until November 09 and no amount of JackW poll posting is going to change that.
Wah wah, why are people calling me a racist for voting for a racist?
No it isn't. Federally it is legal, and possible to bet I believe in every state except Utah and Hawaii. However, in most it is restricted to small numbers of physical locations.
Online, it isn't illegal for individuals to place wagers, what is illegal is for providers to process payments. Even so, the amount of money bet by Americans each weekend on US sports is enormous.
Pay to play NFL in particular. It's a game that lends itself tremendously well to a fantasy structure tbh.
Yes, there are also massive carve outs, e.g. DFS (Daily Fantasy Sports), which nothing more than sports betting with specific criteria on how you have to play your wager i.e. you have to chose a team of players from those in action that day, rather than being able to bet on team vs team action.
The Scots chose to be taken over by the English (they didn't call it that, but that's what it was). The UK returning to the EU would only occur in substantially similar circumstances - ie we were completely broke.
Britain will not be accepted back by the EU unless it is clear that Britain's wayward spirit is broken. That will only happen in the case of overwhelming catastrophe.
Brexit means Brexit.
If we were completely broke, I doubt that the EU would want us back.
Comments
Clinton 51 .. Trump 40
http://view2.fdu.edu/publicmind/2016/161018/
God bless case law.
The Article 50 appeal is currently discussing lobster farming in the 19th century and OGH has just tweeted something about Henry VIII and the Privy Council.
Those tedious Eurocrats could never understand the wonderful tatterdemalion that is our constitution.
Clinton 39 (2 pt lead)
Trump 37
Johnson 8
Stein 3
HighGround Public Affairs poll of AZ voters Oct. 14.
https://t.co/bkUCaUed2S
UTAH
Trump 30 (1 pt lead)
McMullin 29
Clinton 28
Johnson 5
Stein 1
Rasmussen Reports, likely voters, Oct. 14-16.
https://t.co/HPrvkfsfp2
COLORADO
Trump there today:
Clinton 45 (7 pts up)
Trump 37
Johnson 10
Stein 3
Q poll of likely voters Oct 10-16
https://t.co/vaO45sbZmN
Both broke with (the treaty of) Rome.....
Apparently the Home Office says, may look older 'because war has toughened them up'.
What a total farce.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3847262/They-look-older-war-toughened-Home-Office-claims-Calais-child-migrants-aged-conflict-REFUSE-carry-intrusive-checks.html
I agree. IF we were to go back into the EU, then we should go in properly and not dick about on the edge.
But I don't see it happening.
The logical architecture for Europe is:
an outer ring focused on trade liberalisation, education and cultural ties, and human rights
A middle ring focused on defence cooperation, and maybe energy policy and climate change
And an inner ring with a single currency and fiscal union. This latter could be called the EU.
The UK should be trying to facilitate this architecture through Brexit, for ours and Europe's sustainable future.
Seen against this potential outcome, there would be no interest or compelling reasons to rejoin the EU.
Clinton 68 .. Trump 20
http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/301481-poll-clinton-leads-trump-by-48-points-among-millennials
http://www.tradingeconomics.com/euro-area/gdp-growth
Why will the Eurozone suddenly start performing well?
Ends up getting executed, ans the Henry/Theresa ends up regretting it and blaming their ministers for bringing false charges against Phil/Thomas
The ECJ would be inner ring.
FOM starts in the inner ring and weakens progressively, perhaps ad hoc. It does not need to follow symmetrically.
Time for one of those irregular verb lessons.
I have a feeling of De Ja Vu
The initial public reaction to Brexit from the rEU has been to increase support for it, that's true. Whether that will continue over coming years is a different matter.
I see the remainer Mystic Meg syndrome has returned. Reassuringly for you, this prediction may be complete and utter horsesh8t, just like your predictions the UK would explode one day after we decided to leave.
Clinton 42 .. Trump 41
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2016/white_house_watch_oct18
Here's the thing. The people I work with think I didn;t vote for Brexit. I told them I didn;t vote at all.
And yet Brexit is far less contentious than supporting Donald Trump. Partly because people like 619 have made it so.
And so who knows what the size of the shy Trump vote is. Is it an ice cube. Or is it an ice berg? we won't know until November 09 and no amount of JackW poll posting is going to change that.
https://twitter.com/EuropeElects/status/788365749429690368
This adds 18-34s to Latinos as Demographics with big differences from other polls for USC/LA Times.
The analogy of TM as H8 doesn't really work all that well because TM wasn't PM pre the decision to seek divorce.
I don't wish to be a part of a USE.
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-37689210
https://youtu.be/In4KVZ95jY0
You lot still Trump ramping?
wah wah wah
Huge overrounds at casinos on horse-racing (As they're a monopoly)
"Prediction" websites where odds are expressed as %s and bets as 'contracts'
Pay to play 'Fantasy football' leagues.
http://www2.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2016/06/19/britains-eu-hokey-cokey-what-would-in-again-look-like-and-why-isnt-remain-talking-about-it/
Indeed we may see a shy Clinton effect - a differential turnout of women and Hispanic voters. Indeed the evidence of early voting and enthusiasm for Trump among GOP voters is that the Donald is holed below the waterline.
Where is Trump's path to 270 ?
Once we are out, we are out; and that will be that. If it all goes wrong, it will be the Tories who pay the price.
Enough people managed to summon up the courage to tell TNS that they predicted a Leave win.
The most important thing when trying to work out the shy Trumpeter effect is Likely Voter screens in the US heavily squeeze the Democratic vote. Pollsters adjustments reduce Hilary's vote, not increase it. There was a poll last month where pre LV screen Hilary had a 15 point lead that got LV screened down to 6. Higher propensity to vote Republican is already factored in.
https://youtu.be/9uYSAeIbLlk
I'm happy to be in or out. Not the stupid and unworkable half way in and half way out always in a huff with the direction of the EU position of the last decade or two.
The Tory campaign has been interesting. At the weekend they wheeled out both David Cameron and Theresa May.
Sitting PMs seldom campaign in by elections.
Brexit will propel this nation into the 21st century.
I remember the days when you were talking about plumping for Leave....
Respec'!
You may well be right, but I would argue that this election is more contentious than any in many decades.
I'm just going by the logic that made me money in 2015 and 2016. But after 619's comment, that's the last I will post on this topic before the election.
Finally found what he was looking for, beyond the ol' Finchley Road?
Online, it isn't illegal for individuals to place wagers, what is illegal is for providers to process payments. Even so, the amount of money bet by Americans each weekend on US sports is enormous.
We were the future once?
Newfoundland voluntarily opted back in to direct imperial control in the 1930s having previously had 'responsible government'.
William Hill 12/1 LibDem, 1/50 Tories
Then again, if the EU is seen as being the barrier to a 'good' deal, then Euroscepticism and leave may increase.
#BREAKING Belgium detains four on terror charges after raids: statement
It's a game that lends itself tremendously well to a fantasy structure tbh.
Britain will not be accepted back by the EU unless it is clear that Britain's wayward spirit is broken. That will only happen in the case of overwhelming catastrophe.
Brexit means Brexit.
How can any true Englishman ever describe himself as close to the French?
Presumably an independent Scotland would be back in asap and Northern Ireland - once back with the Republic - would automatically join. In truth, the EU's UK problem is essentially an English one.
As an aside, I think to say that 'they were China' probably over-eggs it. They conquered China militarily and imposed a ruling caste but their lasting legacy was transient and ultimately, Chinese culture subsumed them.
No more credible evidence?