politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Huge YouGov boost for Theresa May on the night before nominations close
Let us lust remind ourselves how the CON leadership election works. There will be a series of secret ballot of MPs until they get down to a final two – then the choice will be made by party members in a postal ballot.
If I'd heard May's speech before the referendum, I might very well have changed my mind. It was extremely cogent and well argued. Even better, it had actual crunchy numbers. I guess Remain thought it was more effective to keep calling me a racist Little Englander.
She made a very interesting point that I've not seen made elsewhere. With Brexit, the free trade faction of the EU won't have the 35% blocking threshold that it has with us as a member.
Corbyn a broken man. Would quit were it not for the far-left telling him that if he leaves then Momentum loses control of the party.
The PLP should hold off, and don't challenge, but keep up the pressure. More NCV in CLPs, more council leader resignations, appoint a leader in the Commons. Keep turning the screw. Horrible, but necessary.
If May becomes PM she will be a lazy authoritarian beholden to Dacre and that is a dreadful thought. Also her or crabb seem to be back to basics style tories and if they are, however rosy (comparatively) it looks for the conservative party right now that is certainly not what the country wants.
On the labour side, interesting times, if corbyn survives and purges the labour party (Creepy Tom watson was looking decidely sheepish now the plot has failed-ish) then no one can accuse him of lacking leadership or guts. All he needs is a young protege in the wings and slightly moderated policies (bear in mind that the world is becoming more and more unequal and therefore heading to the left) and i would not right off his chances in 2020 (and i think it will be then as any earlier will look like cynical opportunism and be punished)
Even he cannot keep this up. Even if his enemies are right that Labour is more a vehicle for him than a true cause, it's a vehicle he would need, and his staying blows its tires off. He'll switch to a new driver he trusts.
Corbyn a broken man. Would quit were it not for the far-left telling him that if he leaves then Momentum loses control of the party.
The PLP should hold off, and don't challenge, but keep up the pressure. More NCV in CLPs, more council leader resignations, appoint a leader in the Commons. Keep turning the screw. Horrible, but necessary.
I am a Tory member and was going to vote for Boris but now feel that I have to vote for May as Boris will be too divisive in what has become a very fractured nation.
If May becomes PM she will be a lazy authoritarian beholden to Dacre and that is a dreadful thought. Also her or crabb seem to be back to basics style tories and if they are, however rosy (comparatively) it looks for the conservative party right now that is certainly not what the country wants.
On the labour side, interesting times, if corbyn survives and purges the labour party (Creepy Tom watson was looking decidely sheepish now the plot has failed-ish) then no one can accuse him of lacking leadership or guts. All he needs is a young protege in the wings and slightly moderated policies (bear in mind that the world is becoming more and more unequal and therefore heading to the left) and i would not right off his chances in 2020 (and i think it will be then as any earlier will look like cynical opportunism and be punished)
The £350m may well turn out to be Boris' albatross. A Pyrrhic victory for him: won the referendum and lost the leadership.
We need to start seeing more MP declarations though. I think the last I heard was May could count on around 70-80 and Boris 100. May needs a few more converts to be guaranteed a spot in the final ballot. Polls like this will help though.
I am a Tory member and was going to vote for Boris but now feel that I have to vote for May as Boris will be too divisive in what has become a very fractured nation.
We need May for the 48%, I feel. We mustn't forget them (not that it's likely given all the squawking ).
It is interesting that PBers who have a vote in this election are overwhelmingly breaking for Mrs May
I'd trust her more.
I've said this a lot, and my fellow leavers don't like it, but in a scenario where the PM had backed leave, there is absolutely no chance that Boris would be on any side other than remain.
I am a Tory member and was going to vote for Boris but now feel that I have to vote for May as Boris will be too divisive in what has become a very fractured nation.
Also remember that PM Boris would have to deliver the bullshit leave manifesto, PM Theresa could appoint Boris to fail at it.
@DavidPBMaddox: Have heard a dark horse for Labour leadership is @IanMurrayMP. Popular in PLP and passionate about leftwing politics including antiTrident
I am a Tory member and was going to vote for Boris but now feel that I have to vote for May as Boris will be too divisive in what has become a very fractured nation.
We need May for the 48%, I feel. We mustn't forget them (not that it's likely given all the squawking ).
I'm a Leaver but always wanted an EFTA/EEA membership for the UK. So things are working out pretty well.
Has Andrea Leadsom announced yet? She's a far better choice than May IMO.
That's not clear. She had an article in the Times the other day. Guido says she has 60 MPs (she headed up the Fresh Start Group in the HoC), and is angling on trading her support for the Chancellor gig.
It is interesting that PBers who have a vote in this election are overwhelmingly breaking for Mrs May
I'd trust her more.
I've said this a lot, and my fellow leavers don't like it, but in a scenario where the PM had backed leave, there is absolutely no chance that Boris would be on any side other than remain.
I am a Tory member and was going to vote for Boris but now feel that I have to vote for May as Boris will be too divisive in what has become a very fractured nation.
Also remember that PM Boris would have to deliver the bullshit leave manifesto, PM Theresa could appoint Boris to fail at it.
Much as some people would love to see him come a cropper, I think it'd be better for the country to appoint someone who's not a flibbertigibbet.
Has Andrea Leadsom announced yet? She's a far better choice than Theresa May IMO.
I don't think now is time for a novice, to borrow a line from Brown. We need a ready made PM, it has to be one of Boris or Theresa. This leadership election has come two years too early for Leadsom. Also, I wouldn't trust her to keep us in the single market, similar Gove I think she really does want to remove us from the single market to gain immigration control.
Like I said in the last thread, I asked 89 of "The Great and the Good" today at the Royal Norfolk Show, highlight of the social calendar here in Norfolk, how they would vote in a forced choice between May and Johnson. This included an even mix of remainers and leavers.
Remarkably, 87 broke for Theresa May. Of the two that chose Johnson, the second said they'd change their mind when I told them who the other person backing Boris was. Has he become that toxic already to those in the sticks?
So the poll of party members is no surprise based on my straw poll.... except to say that I wonder whether it's actually OVERstating Boris's support.
I was also told by a Parliamentarian that a bombshell revelation with 'news from Scotland' is due, which might explain the change in tone amongst some of the broadsheets, who now seem much more open minded to the TM4PM message. :Cryptic:
Has anybody senior in the Conservative party considered changing the leadership contest rules, so that the membership only get a vote in certain circumstances, and otherwise MPs just have a ballot on the final two?
It can be a real downer for the country, as we are seeing now, when there is a leadership vacuum while the Tories are governing the country, so a simple "membership vote in opposition, MP vote in power" would make sense. It was eminently foreseeable that sitting PMs are quite likely to be toppled during some sort of crisis, and a lame duck or temporary PM can then be very damaging. (Since such crises might involve lack of confidence in the PM from backbenchers, it would make particular sense in this scenario to ensure that the new leader has majority support from MPs, not just "scraped into the final two" levels of support.)
I appreciate that there are some other scenarios e.g. "orderly handing over of the reins of power" where a membership vote might make sense even while in government, so perhaps a more sophisticated rule change might be in order, but I am surprised I haven't seen serious discontent at the current rules. (Must be some furious Tories watching Sturgeon strutting about and thinking "she owns the stage until September - can't my party get a move on?")
Corbyn a broken man. Would quit were it not for the far-left telling him that if he leaves then Momentum loses control of the party.
The PLP should hold off, and don't challenge, but keep up the pressure. More NCV in CLPs, more council leader resignations, appoint a leader in the Commons. Keep turning the screw. Horrible, but necessary.
Sounds like his family might step in and call this off.
I am a Tory member and was going to vote for Boris but now feel that I have to vote for May as Boris will be too divisive in what has become a very fractured nation.
That's my thinking. Boris is too divisive: we need a more neutral - yet hardened - figure.
slightly off topic. - I was thinking about the pre referendum predictions on turnout - the consensus seemed to be sub-60% meant leave, 60-75% meant remain, and above 75% meant leave. I don't think anyone was saying leave on 72% turnout - any theories on why we saw decently but not massively elevated turnout from GE yet a leave vote?
The highest increases came from council estates, in Scotland where the debate was one sided turnout was similar to GE, I.e. middle class more likely to turnout.
The turnout of pensioners was at a record high, the turnout of working class voters in safe seats rose more than was expected, the turnout of younger voters esp 18-24 appears to have been below 50%. Turnout in Scotland and London was good, but not as good as most of the English provinces. Thus turnout rose, but not evenly.
We wanted to be involved but obviously had no data so hard to target our voters.
We got some addresses to target in the last week. These looked more like market research targeting than registered/canvassed supporters.
If we had ukip data we might have had an even better vote share, but then again Nigel Garage is toxic for most voters so swings and roundabouts really Also its questionable how good ukips data is as they always fail on the ground game anyway.
I don't know if its significant, but I noticed Vote Leave were using the same platform as UKIP (Nation Builder)
Has anybody senior in the Conservative party considered changing the leadership contest rules, so that the membership only get a vote in certain circumstances, and otherwise MPs just have a ballot on the final two?
It can be a real downer for the country, as we are seeing now, when there is a leadership vacuum while the Tories are governing the country, so a simple "membership vote in opposition, MP vote in power" would make sense. It was eminently foreseeable that sitting PMs are quite likely to be toppled during some sort of crisis, and a lame duck or temporary PM can then be very damaging. (Since such crises might involve lack of confidence in the PM from backbenchers, it would make particular sense in this scenario to ensure that the new leader has majority support from MPs, not just "scraped into the final two" levels of support.)
I appreciate that there are some other scenarios e.g. "orderly handing over of the reins of power" where a membership vote might make sense even while in government, so perhaps a more sophisticated rule change might be in order, but I am surprised I haven't seen serious discontent at the current rules. (Must be some furious Tories watching Sturgeon strutting about and thinking "she owns the stage until September - can't my party get a move on?")
It has been considered, never implemented.
There's talk of weighting the votes into an electoral college of both MPs and members.
They want to avoid the IDS situation where he was elected with only the support of 1/3 of Tory MPs and 2/3 thinking he was useful as a chocolate fireguard
@BBCNewsnight: "Theresa looks like a responsible adult instead of winging it & ad-libbing it like Boris" Guardian's Jonathan Freedland tells #newsnight
Like I said in the last thread, I asked 89 of "The Great and the Good" today at the Royal Norfolk Show, highlight of the social calendar here in Norfolk, how they would vote in a forced choice between May and Johnson. This included an even mix of remainers and leavers.
Remarkably, 87 broke for Theresa May. Of the two that chose Johnson, the second said they'd change their mind when I told them who the other person backing Boris was. Has he become that toxic already to those in the sticks?
So the poll of party members is no surprise based on my straw poll.... except to say that I wonder whether it's actually OVERstating Boris's support.
I was also told by a Parliamentarian that a bombshell revelation with 'news from Scotland' is due, which might explain the change in tone amongst some of the broadsheets, who now seem much more open minded to the TM4PM message. :Cryptic:
Bunnco - Your Man on the Spot
The carefully scripted line from Amber Rudd to Boris in the first debate was a clue.
Incidentally, watching Newsnight, it's interesting how the implicit consensus is that we are definitely OUT, in some form, despite the hopes of some (including me at about 3pm every day, for the last week)
And they are right. We are OUT. We can't just ignore 17m votes. BREXIT is here.
Article 50 will be triggered, probably before the end of the year. We need to roll up our sleeves and get on with it.
Even he cannot keep this up. Even if his enemies are right that Labour is more a vehicle for him than a true cause, it's a vehicle he would need, and his staying blows its tires off. He'll switch to a new driver he trusts.
Very hard for him to do so. Unlikely a Corbynite would make the ballot.
Has anybody senior in the Conservative party considered changing the leadership contest rules, so that the membership only get a vote in certain circumstances, and otherwise MPs just have a ballot on the final two?
It can be a real downer for the country, as we are seeing now, when there is a leadership vacuum while the Tories are governing the country, so a simple "membership vote in opposition, MP vote in power" would make sense. It was eminently foreseeable that sitting PMs are quite likely to be toppled during some sort of crisis, and a lame duck or temporary PM can then be very damaging. (Since such crises might involve lack of confidence in the PM from backbenchers, it would make particular sense in this scenario to ensure that the new leader has majority support from MPs, not just "scraped into the final two" levels of support.)
I appreciate that there are some other scenarios e.g. "orderly handing over of the reins of power" where a membership vote might make sense even while in government, so perhaps a more sophisticated rule change might be in order, but I am surprised I haven't seen serious discontent at the current rules. (Must be some furious Tories watching Sturgeon strutting about and thinking "she owns the stage until September - can't my party get a move on?")
It has been considered, never implemented.
There's talk of weighting the votes into an electoral college of both MPs and members.
They want to avoid the IDS situation where he was elected with only the support of 1/3 of Tory MPs and 2/3 thinking he was useful as a chocolate fireguard
Since it's the membership aspect of the vote that eats so much of the contest time, I wondered if a "fast-track leadership selection process" might work for e.g. national emergencies. I guess the hope is that if the situation were really bad, MPs would knock their heads together to ensure that only one candidate stood, but if the current situation doesn't qualify I don't know how bad it would have to be. I do think a lot of the British public - especially those who are not involved in Tory politics, and are unsettled by the current chaos - would welcome a speedier transition than is currently on offer.
Incidentally, watching Newsnight, it's interesting how the implicit consensus is that we are definitely OUT, in some form, despite the hopes of some (including me at about 3pm every day, for the last week)
And they are right. We are OUT. We can't just ignore 17m votes. BREXIT is here.
Article 50 will be triggered, probably before the end of the year. We need to roll up our sleeves and get on with it.
I think we are out, but I think there is a possibility, albeit very slim, we won't be - but that no one credible could say that as the plan now. Even the LDs are not pretending they can stop it. The slim change would be some incredible change in circumstances and fortune which unequivocally changed opinion in parliament and the public, within the next 3-4 months, if we can hold off declaring article 50 before then.
Not probable at all, but I think public pronouncements or acceptance that out is out mean little right now - so soon after only fools could declare that their approach, but there are people who would revive it as a possibility if things unravel much more significantly prior to article 50.
All this Tory poll means is LEAVERS will look for a stronger candidate than Johnson...
He knew this day would come. It is his destiny.
Step forward, IDS...
Nah. The one man we really want to lead this great nation of ours is... Rees-Mogg!
(Seriously - the more I see of him, the higher my regard... though he's not PM material in the current age, he should have a more prominent role somehow..)
So May becomes PM, makes Boris Minister for Brexit (he can't turn it down), but she needs a chancellor.
Someone who can calm the markets. Someone with experience. Someone who knows where the bodies are buried.
Yes, step forward, George Osborne...
I can see Osborne as Chancellor... it's his punishment - he can't leave the Treasury until that surplus comes about... hahahaha
Groan.
I'd like to see Osborne out pronto. That last budget was a political disaster. He is meant to be a political chancellor.
Leadsom may be the anti-Osborne choice.
"Andrea Leadsom, billed by anyone who’d met her as a rising star in the party, was repeatedly left out of reshuffles because she had the temerity to question Osborne’s handling of the Libor scandal in 2012. She was eventually made economic secretary to the Treasury — Tories suggested this was a case of Osborne keeping his enemies closer — and is now minister of state for the rather lesser Department of Energy and Climate Change."
Has anybody senior in the Conservative party considered changing the leadership contest rules, so that the membership only get a vote in certain circumstances, and otherwise MPs just have a ballot on the final two?
It can be a real downer for the country, as we are seeing now, when there is a leadership vacuum while the Tories are governing the country, so a simple "membership vote in opposition, MP vote in power" would make sense. It was eminently foreseeable that sitting PMs are quite likely to be toppled during some sort of crisis, and a lame duck or temporary PM can then be very damaging. (Since such crises might involve lack of confidence in the PM from backbenchers, it would make particular sense in this scenario to ensure that the new leader has majority support from MPs, not just "scraped into the final two" levels of support.)
I appreciate that there are some other scenarios e.g. "orderly handing over of the reins of power" where a membership vote might make sense even while in government, so perhaps a more sophisticated rule change might be in order, but I am surprised I haven't seen serious discontent at the current rules. (Must be some furious Tories watching Sturgeon strutting about and thinking "she owns the stage until September - can't my party get a move on?")
It has been considered, never implemented.
There's talk of weighting the votes into an electoral college of both MPs and members.
They want to avoid the IDS situation where he was elected with only the support of 1/3 of Tory MPs and 2/3 thinking he was useful as a chocolate fireguard
Since it's the membership aspect of the vote that eats so much of the contest time, I wondered if a "fast-track leadership selection process" might work for e.g. national emergencies. I guess the hope is that if the situation were really bad, MPs would knock their heads together to ensure that only one candidate stood, but if the current situation doesn't qualify I don't know how bad it would have to be. I do think a lot of the British public - especially those who are not involved in Tory politics, and are unsettled by the current chaos - would welcome a speedier transition than is currently on offer.
All this Tory poll means is LEAVERS will look for a stronger candidate than Johnson...
He knew this day would come. It is his destiny.
Step forward, IDS...
Nah. The one man we really want to lead this great nation of ours is... Rees-Mogg!
(Seriously - the more I see of him, the higher my regard... though he's not PM material in the current age, he should have a more prominent role somehow..)
All this Tory poll means is LEAVERS will look for a stronger candidate than Johnson...
He knew this day would come. It is his destiny.
Step forward, IDS...
Nah. The one man we really want to lead this great nation of ours is... Rees-Mogg!
(Seriously - the more I see of him, the higher my regard... though he's not PM material in the current age, he should have a more prominent role somehow..)
Agreed.
JRM would make an excellent Brexit negotiator. EXCELLENT.
Like I said in the last thread, I asked 89 of "The Great and the Good" today at the Royal Norfolk Show, highlight of the social calendar here in Norfolk, how they would vote in a forced choice between May and Johnson. This included an even mix of remainers and leavers.
Remarkably, 87 broke for Theresa May. Of the two that chose Johnson, the second said they'd change their mind when I told them who the other person backing Boris was. Has he become that toxic already to those in the sticks?
So the poll of party members is no surprise based on my straw poll.... except to say that I wonder whether it's actually OVERstating Boris's support.
I was also told by a Parliamentarian that a bombshell revelation with 'news from Scotland' is due, which might explain the change in tone amongst some of the broadsheets, who now seem much more open minded to the TM4PM message. :Cryptic:
Bunnco - Your Man on the Spot
The carefully scripted line from Amber Rudd to Boris in the first debate was a clue.
Yep - a real jaw-dropping game changer, which you may only be able to read about on Guido or over the pond in TTIP-land
Even he cannot keep this up. Even if his enemies are right that Labour is more a vehicle for him than a true cause, it's a vehicle he would need, and his staying blows its tires off. He'll switch to a new driver he trusts.
Very hard for him to do so. Unlikely a Corbynite would make the ballot.
How many nominations would be needed this time? 35 again?
Are there 35 or more MPs with sympathy to Corbyn style policies??
Like I said in the last thread, I asked 89 of "The Great and the Good" today at the Royal Norfolk Show, highlight of the social calendar here in Norfolk, how they would vote in a forced choice between May and Johnson. This included an even mix of remainers and leavers.
Remarkably, 87 broke for Theresa May. Of the two that chose Johnson, the second said they'd change their mind when I told them who the other person backing Boris was. Has he become that toxic already to those in the sticks?
So the poll of party members is no surprise based on my straw poll.... except to say that I wonder whether it's actually OVERstating Boris's support.
I was also told by a Parliamentarian that a bombshell revelation with 'news from Scotland' is due, which might explain the change in tone amongst some of the broadsheets, who now seem much more open minded to the TM4PM message. :Cryptic:
Bunnco - Your Man on the Spot
The carefully scripted line from Amber Rudd to Boris in the first debate was a clue.
Do you mean the one about immigration? Being “a complex problem... you need to look at the numbers. But the only number Boris is interested in is Number 10!”
Yes, I think she nailed what many Conservative members and the general public think about Boris and why he backed Leave...
Or did you mean "not the man you want to drive you home at the end of the evening", which has touches of "something of the night about him" but rather more ominous for a man with a complex history of relationships.
Corbyn a broken man. Would quit were it not for the far-left telling him that if he leaves then Momentum loses control of the party.
The PLP should hold off, and don't challenge, but keep up the pressure. More NCV in CLPs, more council leader resignations, appoint a leader in the Commons. Keep turning the screw. Horrible, but necessary.
Sounds like his family might step in and call this off.
They would be right to. He is essentially a placeholder for the far left now. Clearly they have run the numbers and know they won't get anyone on the ballot if Corbyn concedes.
Like I said in the last thread, I asked 89 of "The Great and the Good" today at the Royal Norfolk Show, highlight of the social calendar here in Norfolk, how they would vote in a forced choice between May and Johnson. This included an even mix of remainers and leavers.
Remarkably, 87 broke for Theresa May. Of the two that chose Johnson, the second said they'd change their mind when I told them who the other person backing Boris was. Has he become that toxic already to those in the sticks?
So the poll of party members is no surprise based on my straw poll.... except to say that I wonder whether it's actually OVERstating Boris's support.
I was also told by a Parliamentarian that a bombshell revelation with 'news from Scotland' is due, which might explain the change in tone amongst some of the broadsheets, who now seem much more open minded to the TM4PM message. :Cryptic:
Bunnco - Your Man on the Spot
The carefully scripted line from Amber Rudd to Boris in the first debate was a clue.
If Boris Johnson and Eddie Izzard are revealed to be the same person, I'm going to be very disappointed.
I am a Tory member and was going to vote for Boris but now feel that I have to vote for May as Boris will be too divisive in what has become a very fractured nation.
That's my thinking. Boris is too divisive: we need a more neutral - yet hardened - figure.
Yep - not necessarily May, but if it's Boris v May then May it is.
All this Tory poll means is LEAVERS will look for a stronger candidate than Johnson...
He knew this day would come. It is his destiny.
Step forward, IDS...
Nah. The one man we really want to lead this great nation of ours is... Rees-Mogg!
(Seriously - the more I see of him, the higher my regard... though he's not PM material in the current age, he should have a more prominent role somehow..)
Agreed.
JRM would make an excellent Brexit negotiator. EXCELLENT.
The Euros wouldn't know what to think, say or do faced with the Moggster.
Even he cannot keep this up. Even if his enemies are right that Labour is more a vehicle for him than a true cause, it's a vehicle he would need, and his staying blows its tires off. He'll switch to a new driver he trusts.
Very hard for him to do so. Unlikely a Corbynite would make the ballot.
How many nominations would be needed this time? 35 again?
Are there 35 or more MPs with sympathy to Corbyn style policies??
He would have to attract a score of nominations from the soft left to get over the line I should think. Unlikely, possibly very unlikely – the likes of Eagle and Nandy are part of the rebellion. The rebellion covers every MP from soft left, centre-left, centre, right and union right.
Comments
She made a very interesting point that I've not seen made elsewhere. With Brexit, the free trade faction of the EU won't have the 35% blocking threshold that it has with us as a member.
Corbyn a broken man. Would quit were it not for the far-left telling him that if he leaves then Momentum loses control of the party.
The PLP should hold off, and don't challenge, but keep up the pressure. More NCV in CLPs, more council leader resignations, appoint a leader in the Commons. Keep turning the screw. Horrible, but necessary.
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/jun/29/working-eu-uk-free-movement-permit-easy-entry-migrants-jobs-automatic-rights-?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Copy_to_clipboard
And PBers generally (less a betting tip, but perhaps an indicator of mood)
On the labour side, interesting times, if corbyn survives and purges the labour party (Creepy Tom watson was looking decidely sheepish now the plot has failed-ish) then no one can accuse him of lacking leadership or guts. All he needs is a young protege in the wings and slightly moderated policies (bear in mind that the world is becoming more and more unequal and therefore heading to the left) and i would not right off his chances in 2020 (and i think it will be then as any earlier will look like cynical opportunism and be punished)
http://www.conservativehome.com/thetorydiary/2016/06/our-next-tory-leader-survey-finds-may-leading-johnson-by-just-ten-votes-in-well-over-a-thousand.html
His career might be over if he doesn't win it, do you think? Or hyperbole?
We need to start seeing more MP declarations though. I think the last I heard was May could count on around 70-80 and Boris 100. May needs a few more converts to be guaranteed a spot in the final ballot. Polls like this will help though.
I've said this a lot, and my fellow leavers don't like it, but in a scenario where the PM had backed leave, there is absolutely no chance that Boris would be on any side other than remain.
https://twitter.com/andrealeadsom
http://order-order.com/2016/06/29/gove-chief-negotiator-boris-leadsom-summit-priti-rumours/
Someone who can calm the markets. Someone with experience. Someone who knows where the bodies are buried.
Yes, step forward, George Osborne...
McDonnell compares the Parliamentary Labour Party to “a lynch mob without a rope”
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/jeremy-corbyn-resignation-news-latest-john-mcdonnell-compares-parliamentary-labour-party-to-lynch-a7110076.html
Remarkably, 87 broke for Theresa May. Of the two that chose Johnson, the second said they'd change their mind when I told them who the other person backing Boris was.
Has he become that toxic already to those in the sticks?
So the poll of party members is no surprise based on my straw poll.... except to say that I wonder whether it's actually OVERstating Boris's support.
I was also told by a Parliamentarian that a bombshell revelation with 'news from Scotland' is due, which might explain the change in tone amongst some of the broadsheets, who now seem much more open minded to the TM4PM message. :Cryptic:
Bunnco - Your Man on the Spot
It can be a real downer for the country, as we are seeing now, when there is a leadership vacuum while the Tories are governing the country, so a simple "membership vote in opposition, MP vote in power" would make sense. It was eminently foreseeable that sitting PMs are quite likely to be toppled during some sort of crisis, and a lame duck or temporary PM can then be very damaging. (Since such crises might involve lack of confidence in the PM from backbenchers, it would make particular sense in this scenario to ensure that the new leader has majority support from MPs, not just "scraped into the final two" levels of support.)
I appreciate that there are some other scenarios e.g. "orderly handing over of the reins of power" where a membership vote might make sense even while in government, so perhaps a more sophisticated rule change might be in order, but I am surprised I haven't seen serious discontent at the current rules. (Must be some furious Tories watching Sturgeon strutting about and thinking "she owns the stage until September - can't my party get a move on?")
Ken Clarke MP
Jim Dowd MP
Anna Soubry MP
David Lammy MP
Tam Dalyell
Richard Dawkins
Michael Heseltine
David Aaronovitch
'but it is hard to look beyond May at the still generous 8/1 in the same market.'
http://nationbuilder.com
There's talk of weighting the votes into an electoral college of both MPs and members.
They want to avoid the IDS situation where he was elected with only the support of 1/3 of Tory MPs and 2/3 thinking he was useful as a chocolate fireguard
I'd like to see Osborne out pronto. That last budget was a political disaster. He is meant to be a political chancellor.
Step forward, IDS...
twitter.com/lewisiwu/status/746076633644281856
£350 quid a week for the NHS, job done...
"Boris is too divisive"
"We need a serious political to deal with the EU talks"
Were the reasons given.
Labour WPM (until extinction) = 0
PS Was only joking with the 'heartless swine' remark. I hope I haven't offended you!
Not probable at all, but I think public pronouncements or acceptance that out is out mean little right now - so soon after only fools could declare that their approach, but there are people who would revive it as a possibility if things unravel much more significantly prior to article 50.
(Seriously - the more I see of him, the higher my regard... though he's not PM material in the current age, he should have a more prominent role somehow..)
"Andrea Leadsom, billed by anyone who’d met her as a rising star in the party, was repeatedly left out of reshuffles because she had the temerity to question Osborne’s handling of the Libor scandal in 2012. She was eventually made economic secretary to the Treasury — Tories suggested this was a case of Osborne keeping his enemies closer — and is now minister of state for the rather lesser Department of Energy and Climate Change."
http://www.spectator.co.uk/2015/08/inside-george-osbornes-empire-how-the-chancellor-rules-westminster/
JRM would make an excellent Brexit negotiator. EXCELLENT.
Are there 35 or more MPs with sympathy to Corbyn style policies??
Brexit (thanks to Corbers) is their meteorite.
Yes, I think she nailed what many Conservative members and the general public think about Boris and why he backed Leave...
Or did you mean "not the man you want to drive you home at the end of the evening", which has touches of "something of the night about him" but rather more ominous for a man with a complex history of relationships.
What a sad man hanging around in parliament.
...or will be asking the Electoral Commission to re-register itself as The Silly Party...