Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Options

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Might Balls be Labour’s answer at 100/1?

1678911

Comments

  • Scrapheap_as_wasScrapheap_as_was Posts: 10,069
    Thrak said:

    Jobabob said:

    Chuck Falconer has flown the nest

    Have the Eagles landed yet?
    The Eagles are (n't) coming! The Eagles are (n't) coming..... better later than never???
  • AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 25,921
    rcs1000 said:

    SeanT said:

    Yes, to be fair I probably overseasoned that haggis (I have been on this site for five hours now, I am getting tired). SOME Irish pundits have discussed IREXIT, but only to dismiss it.

    What is certainly true is that the Irish are freaked by the economic implications of Brexit. This fear and doubt would be quintuple for Scexit.

    Yesterday, I (in my capacity as a fund manager) recieved stuff from Ireland about how Dublin is a fantastic place to relocate my business to. Low taxes, low rent, in the single market for financial services.

    I think they're going to take a swing at London, so I can't see them leaving.
    Its part of the Brexit plan since they're worried about a recession.

    It's also a nail in Edinburghs coffin as by the time the iScots have sorted themselves out there'll be no business for the Scottish finance sector to chase.
  • SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 40,054
    SeanT said:

    TOPPING said:

    kle4 said:

    TOPPING said:

    SeanT said:

    kle4 said:

    MikeL said:

    How are we actually going to leave the EU?

    If the new Con PM calls a GE and gets a majority then yes, we will leave.

    But what if it's a Hung Parliament? Then how on earth is it actually going to happen? Coalition with LDs will halt it immediately - as LDs will vote against.

    So it would need some kind of grand Con + Lab coalition. That doesn't seem very likely to me.

    Should Betfair set up a market on whether we will be in the EU on, say, 1 July 2019 (ie giving 2 years plus a bit of extra time for leeway)?

    I reckon it's 50:50 at most that we actually leave.

    Seems increasingly to be that the UK will not leave the EU, but we will have two years of chaos, followed by another referendum.
    Once we activate Article 50 we are leaving. That will happen once Cameron is gone at the latest.
    hmmm

    I still dont think this is over. The establishment have had a good kicking but they will come back and Boris is anything but consistent.

    My guess is all sides will want a fudge. Not what you want to hear I know.
    A fudge mndorsement of the referendum.
    I jus
    She voted because she wanted to register a protest but actually, now that she thinks about it, regrets it because she hadn't realised that Leave would actually win.
    That's unfortunate for her, but if people learn not to treat their votes as mere protests that will be a good thing. Besides, plenty of people who don't usually vote turned out, one theory being for once they knew their votes would make a difference, so not much excuse if others did not realise it could. And of course it won't be hundreds of thousands (though if in 12 months everything has gone to hell, it will become millions who claim that).
    I was just interested to see that she was chanelling @SeanT. or vice versa.

    Sean uses more words, of course, but I agree with you. Teaches them both a lesson to think before they vote.
    I do not regret my vote. Not yet. NOT YET. But only a fool would be totally happy with the way things are panning out. This is just incredible:

    http://news.sky.com/video/1717859/islam-there-is-no-brexit-plan

    They were too busy lying to formulate a coherent post-vote strategy.

  • EPGEPG Posts: 6,737
    SeanT said:

    There's actually an extraordinary route back to power for Labour here.

    Let's say the economy tanks over the summer, and the direst predix come true. The Tories will have elected a Brexiteer (or May) so they won't be able to row back from LEAVE

    If Labour were led by, say, Tom Watson, a man saying we should be in the EU, and not trigger A50, but we must do something on Free Movement; then Labour could win a majority, or a plurality, supported by the SNP then "renegotiate".

    That is entirely possible. But first Labour need to get rid of Le Corb.

    This is entirely possible. But it would effectively render the referendum moot. God help the UK.
  • weejonnieweejonnie Posts: 3,820

    Isn't it lovely to think that in a few month's time we can abandon euroscepticism. It can become a thing of the past. People who love Europe can just love it, people who prefer Bognor can just do that, and whether someone is a chauvanist bigot can be judged on whether they're a chauvanist bigot. Europe will be Europe, and it will still be there with all its beauty to be enjoyed and appreciated, and Britain will be Britain. Truly a wonderful prospect.

    Euroscepticism is probably misnamed it should have been euscepticism. Most leavers probably like Europe - it's people, culture and climate. They just didn't like the brown paper and string tying it all together.
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,579
    SeanT said:

    TOPPING said:

    kle4 said:

    TOPPING said:

    SeanT said:

    kle4 said:

    MikeL said:

    How are we actually going to leave the EU?

    If the new Con PM calls a GE and gets a majority then yes, we will leave.

    But what if it's a Hung Parliament? Then how on earth is it actually going to happen? Coalition with LDs will halt it immediately - as LDs will vote against.

    So it would need some kind of grand Con + Lab coalition. That doesn't seem very likely to me.

    Should Betfair set up a market on whether we will be in the EU on, say, 1 July 2019 (ie giving 2 years plus a bit of extra time for leeway)?

    I reckon it's 50:50 at most that we actually leave.

    Seems increasingly to be that the UK will not leave the EU, but we will have two years of chaos, followed by another referendum.
    Once we activate Article 50 we are leaving. That will happen once Cameron is gone at the latest.
    hmmm

    I still dont think this is over. The establishment have had a good kicking but they will come back and Boris is anything but consistent.

    My guess is all sides will want a fudge. Not what you want to hear I know.
    A fudge mndorsement of the referendum.
    I jus
    She voted because she wanted to register a protest but actually, now that she thinks about it, regrets it because she hadn't realised that Leave would actually win.
    That's unfortunate for her, but if people learn not to treat their votes as mere protests that will be a good thing. Besides, plenty of people who don't usually vote turned out, one theory being for once they knew their votes would make a difference, so not much excuse if others did not realise it could. And of course it won't be hundreds of thousands (though if in 12 months everything has gone to hell, it will become millions who claim that).
    I was just interested to see that she was chanelling @SeanT. or vice versa.

    Sean uses more words, of course, but I agree with you. Teaches them both a lesson to think before they vote.
    I do not regret my vote. Not yet. NOT YET. But only a fool would be totally happy with the way things are panning out. This is just incredible:

    http://news.sky.com/video/1717859/islam-there-is-no-brexit-plan

    Hope Cameron gets asked in Pariament why the Civil Service didn't plan for this eventuality.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 99,006

    Bill Cash disowning migration numbers coming down dramatically and £350m claim.. nothing to do with him (on R5L) he was campaigning about other more important issues for leaving

    Hah. Come off it Bill. Look. someone at some point has to accept that it was heavily implied at the very least immigration would come down. No skin of my nose if they decide not to, but even if individuals chose not to push that line, that was one of the less open to interpretation claims, at least in terms of the general point.
  • OmniumOmnium Posts: 11,732
    SeanT said:

    TOPPING said:

    kle4 said:

    TOPPING said:

    SeanT said:

    kle4 said:

    MikeL said:

    How are we actually going to leave the EU?

    If the new Con PM calls a GE and gets a majority then yes, we will leave.

    But what if it's a Hung Parliament? Then how on earth is it actually going to happen? Coalition with LDs will halt it immediately - as LDs will vote against.

    So it would need some kind of grand Con + Lab coalition. That doesn't seem very likely to me.

    Should Betfair set up a market on whether we will be in the EU on, say, 1 July 2019 (ie giving 2 years plus a bit of extra time for leeway)?

    I reckon it's 50:50 at most that we actually leave.

    Seems increasingly to be that the UK will not leave the EU, but we will have two years of chaos, followed by another referendum.
    Once we activate Article 50 we are leaving. That will happen once Cameron is gone at the latest.
    hmmm

    I still dont think this is over. The establishment have had a good kicking but they will come back and Boris is anything but consistent.

    My guess is all sides will want a fudge. Not what you want to hear I know.
    A fudge mndorsement of the referendum.
    I jus
    She voted because she wanted to register a protest but actually, now that she thinks about it, regrets it because she hadn't realised that Leave would actually win.
    That's unfortunate for her, but if people learn not to treat their votes as mere protests that will be a good thing. Besides, plenty of people who don't usually vote turned out, one theory being for once they knew their votes would make a difference, so not much excuse if others did not realise it could. And of course it won't be hundreds of thousands (though if in 12 months everything has gone to hell, it will become millions who claim that).
    I was just interested to see that she was chanelling @SeanT. or vice versa.

    Sean uses more words, of course, but I agree with you. Teaches them both a lesson to think before they vote.
    I do not regret my vote. Not yet. NOT YET. But only a fool would be totally happy with the way things are panning out. This is just incredible:

    http://news.sky.com/video/1717859/islam-there-is-no-brexit-plan

    "I do not regret my vote"

    I'm baffled that you could post such a phrase.
  • Richard_TyndallRichard_Tyndall Posts: 33,409
    edited June 2016
    TOPPING said:

    What we need is for Osborne to stride out tomorrow, holding aloft his fully-worked-out early-stage Brexit plan. Yes, many Leavers will cry that it's no longer his business and he should butt out, but it's clear everyone else is terrified of making the first move. Come on, George, your day of destiny awaits...

    If he is as canny as I think he is, he will have been up all weekend and he and his team will have a fully-worked out such plan and will present it (will ofc have the backing of the, ahem, PM).

    Cut off at the knees those who throw their hands up and say "the govt didn't do any planning", cuts off at the knees those who say "it's up to the govt.", cuts off at the knees those who say "we need a Brexiteer in charge".
    In all honesty if he did that I could see him winning back a huge amount of good will.

    All the more do if he did it with Gove and Boris stood beside him .

    Edit. Fantasy land I know but sometimes it us nice to indulge oneself.
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 44,033
    edited June 2016
    @SeanT

    Yes but it's a big if. Farron is doing the right thing but his is such a tiny party and their credibility is shot.

    But yes of course - put a sensible leader in charge of Lab (I have Stephen Kinnock at something nice-to-one), be pro-EU, force a GE (no idea how, refuse to ratify anything, perhaps), and voila. To use an enemy phrase.
  • tlg86tlg86 Posts: 26,865
    SeanT said:

    TOPPING said:

    kle4 said:

    TOPPING said:

    SeanT said:

    kle4 said:

    MikeL said:

    How are we actually going to leave the EU?

    If the new Con PM calls a GE and gets a majority then yes, we will leave.

    But what if it's a Hung Parliament? Then how on earth is it actually going to happen? Coalition with LDs will halt it immediately - as LDs will vote against.

    So it would need some kind of grand Con + Lab coalition. That doesn't seem very likely to me.

    Should Betfair set up a market on whether we will be in the EU on, say, 1 July 2019 (ie giving 2 years plus a bit of extra time for leeway)?

    I reckon it's 50:50 at most that we actually leave.

    Seems increasingly to be that the UK will not leave the EU, but we will have two years of chaos, followed by another referendum.
    Once we activate Article 50 we are leaving. That will happen once Cameron is gone at the latest.
    hmmm

    I still dont think this is over. The establishment have had a good kicking but they will come back and Boris is anything but consistent.

    My guess is all sides will want a fudge. Not what you want to hear I know.
    A fudge mndorsement of the referendum.
    I jus
    She voted because she wanted to register a protest but actually, now that she thinks about it, regrets it because she hadn't realised that Leave would actually win.
    That's unfortunate for her, but if people learn not to treat their votes as mere protests that will be a good thing. Besides, plenty of people who don't usually vote turned out, one theory being for once they knew their votes would make a difference, so not much excuse if others did not realise it could. And of course it won't be hundreds of thousands (though if in 12 months everything has gone to hell, it will become millions who claim that).
    I was just interested to see that she was chanelling @SeanT. or vice versa.

    Sean uses more words, of course, but I agree with you. Teaches them both a lesson to think before they vote.
    I do not regret my vote. Not yet. NOT YET. But only a fool would be totally happy with the way things are panning out. This is just incredible:

    http://news.sky.com/video/1717859/islam-there-is-no-brexit-plan

    It actually makes me even happier that Leave won. It shows the contempt that our politicians have for us. They are so arrogant they didn't think that this could happen. They thought they could use this referendum to stamp their authority on us. Well, it failed.
  • John_MJohn_M Posts: 7,503
    SeanT said:

    TOPPING said:

    kle4 said:

    TOPPING said:

    SeanT said:

    kle4 said:

    MikeL said:

    How are we actually going to leave the EU?

    If the new Con PM calls a GE and gets a majority then yes, we will leave.

    But what if it's a Hung Parliament? Then how on earth is it actually going to happen? Coalition with LDs will halt it immediately - as LDs will vote against.

    So it would need some kind of grand Con + Lab coalition. That doesn't seem very likely to me.

    Should Betfair set up a market on whether we will be in the EU on, say, 1 July 2019 (ie giving 2 years plus a bit of extra time for leeway)?

    I reckon it's 50:50 at most that we actually leave.

    Seems increasingly to be that the UK will not leave the EU, but we will have two years of chaos, followed by another referendum.
    Once we activate Article 50 we are leaving. That will happen once Cameron is gone at the latest.
    hmmm

    I still dont think this is over. The establishment have had a good kicking but they will come back and Boris is anything but consistent.

    My guess is all sides will want a fudge. Not what you want to hear I know.
    A fudge mndorsement of the referendum.
    I jus
    She voted because she wanted to register a protest but actually, now that she thinks about it, regrets it because she hadn't realised that Leave would actually win.
    That's unfortunate for her, but if people learn not to treat their votes as mere protests that will be a good thing. Besides, plenty of people who don't usually vote turned out, one theory being for once they knew their votes would make a difference, so not much excuse if others did not realise it could. And of course it won't be hundreds of thousands (though if in 12 months everything has gone to hell, it will become millions who claim that).
    I was just interested to see that she was chanelling @SeanT. or vice versa.

    Sean uses more words, of course, but I agree with you. Teaches them both a lesson to think before they vote.
    I do not regret my vote. Not yet. NOT YET. But only a fool would be totally happy with the way things are panning out. This is just incredible:

    http://news.sky.com/video/1717859/islam-there-is-no-brexit-plan

    We would have to be automata not to have regrets, concerns, worries.

    Who are these Ubermensch that can make epoch-making decisions and then skip along completely unbothered?

    Certainty is for fanatics, idiots and the young.
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 23,111
    Paul Nuttall just specifically stated that UKIP's future lies in northern working class constituencies.

    That's what he wants but is it what Farage wants? I see a UKIP showdown in the next 12 months - we'll be due a leadership election by then anyway.
  • DecrepitJohnLDecrepitJohnL Posts: 13,300

    GIN1138 said:

    RodCrosby said:

    Karl Turner goes...

    Who?

    So many names have been cropping up today and I've no idea who most of them are...
    Well, quite. But that reminds me of the fact that Corbyn was scrabbling around to find shadow cabinet members last time.

    How is he going to fill 11+ vacancies? Who is going to serve?
    Which will be more entertaining -- the next Cabinet or Shadow Cabinet meeting?
  • surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549
    What will the markets be up to tomorrow ?
  • Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 31,938
    weejonnie said:

    Isn't it lovely to think that in a few month's time we can abandon euroscepticism. It can become a thing of the past. People who love Europe can just love it, people who prefer Bognor can just do that, and whether someone is a chauvanist bigot can be judged on whether they're a chauvanist bigot. Europe will be Europe, and it will still be there with all its beauty to be enjoyed and appreciated, and Britain will be Britain. Truly a wonderful prospect.

    Euroscepticism is probably misnamed it should have been euscepticism. Most leavers probably like Europe - it's people, culture and climate. They just didn't like the brown paper and string tying it all together.
    I love Europe. Lived in France for a few months, many of my friends are from the continent. Not wanting it to have political control over my country (or my country over it) currently makes me a racist bigot. I look forward not to being one.

    RIP Euroscepticism. Surely something all PBers can raise a dram to.
  • AramintaMoonbeamQCAramintaMoonbeamQC Posts: 3,901
    edited June 2016


    I pray that they can get rid of Corbyn asap, for England's sake. Scotland have a credible political party but someone needs to step in to that role in England, the Corbyn opposition is a joke and the time for laughing is long gone.
  • ThrakThrak Posts: 494

    Thrak said:

    Jobabob said:

    Chuck Falconer has flown the nest

    Have the Eagles landed yet?
    The Eagles are (n't) coming! The Eagles are (n't) coming..... better later than never???
    Do the Eagles dare?
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 60,558

    rcs1000 said:

    SeanT said:

    Yes, to be fair I probably overseasoned that haggis (I have been on this site for five hours now, I am getting tired). SOME Irish pundits have discussed IREXIT, but only to dismiss it.

    What is certainly true is that the Irish are freaked by the economic implications of Brexit. This fear and doubt would be quintuple for Scexit.

    Yesterday, I (in my capacity as a fund manager) recieved stuff from Ireland about how Dublin is a fantastic place to relocate my business to. Low taxes, low rent, in the single market for financial services.

    I think they're going to take a swing at London, so I can't see them leaving.
    Its part of the Brexit plan since they're worried about a recession.

    It's also a nail in Edinburghs coffin as by the time the iScots have sorted themselves out there'll be no business for the Scottish finance sector to chase.
    That's true: there are probably a number of Edinburgh based fund managers who could be enticed across the Irish Sea.
  • mattmatt Posts: 3,789
    TOPPING said:

    rcs1000 said:

    alex. said:

    The smart money in on a rapid negotiation pre Article 50 - one of the interesting things in international politics is how, once they *have* to get something done, how quickly it will happen.

    My guess is that we are looking at a second referendum within 2 months to sign off on such a deal. If Remain are smart, they should start pushing for it - and use that support to get NoBrexit as the alternative on the ballot paper to The Deal.

    I'd be very surprised if the UK-EU negotiate an agreement 'within 2 months'.
    Lol, why 2 months. Hell let's get it done in a couple of weeks! Any advance on that?
    One could reach "Heads of Terms" in a couple of weeks, with a full (treaty) agreement taking several years to be finalised.
    That's exactly what I mean - a couple of pages. But a couple of pages that actually deal with the issues.

    The 6,000 page version come later.
    For some time mooted as the "sticking plaster" approach.

    Please be aware that all EU laws, treaties and directives will remain in force until such time that the United Kingdom chooses to abrogate...etc...

    And then take as long as they want.

    Question is, as has been asked all day (and Pienaar was fantastic this morning), what will the people want, and when? If that is at all a consideration these days for politicians.
    With my lawyer hat on, I'm genuinely interested to see which EU originated laws are so offensive that they'll be swiftly washed away. I've struggled to find specifics but I guess that they'll substantially relate to the environment. Capital punishment could return, I suppose.

    Within my area of interest, most debt and equity capital markets stuff will have to remain, even if rebranded. We can ignore Brussels and Rome regs on reciprocal enforcement I suppose but we'll be hurting ourselves. Interested to see what happens on open skies. From memory, country to country open skies were limited (Netherlands, other maybe). A return to bilateral would be unfortunate but would benefit the old and tired legacy European airlines (AF-KLM, Alitalia I'm looking at you). I suspect that we'll see less Ryanair and WizzAir flights. EZY, unclear. It will probably work out but vested interests could easily come out to play. Still, restructuring a tend to be well compensated. Airlines dont collapse enough in Europe (cf c.11 in the US).

    Perhaps employment will change. I don't know enough about the interaction between national and supranational law there.


    Lots to consider.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 99,006
    edited June 2016
    John_M said:

    kle4 said:

    Not to go all 'everyone's the same' but there's a lot of self delusion going on in the commentariat, even more than usual. Commentators criticising the lack of respect for democracy of Remainers, even though we know some Leavers stated before the vote if it was close it should be rerun. Remainers faint with anger some Leavers are giving Remainers short shrift, telling them bluntly it's over and its time to move on, though we know Remainers would have been similarly insistent that it was over, should they have one.

    In summary, the human condition writ large. Some people on both sides being giant arseholes, amplified by social media.
    Yes. And while emotions are running high, no one can pretend people on their side have not been or would have been just as guilty - it's human, political behaviour, not partisan behaviour.
    SeanT said:



    I do not regret my vote. Not yet. NOT YET. But only a fool would be totally happy with the way things are panning out. This is just incredible:

    It's too early to say things will not work out - it's been a chaotic start, worse than some predicted, but it could also have been worse. I don't think we can say for sure whether it's time to regret votes until it's been a few years and our position and the EUs is clearer.

  • Richard_TyndallRichard_Tyndall Posts: 33,409

    weejonnie said:

    Isn't it lovely to think that in a few month's time we can abandon euroscepticism. It can become a thing of the past. People who love Europe can just love it, people who prefer Bognor can just do that, and whether someone is a chauvanist bigot can be judged on whether they're a chauvanist bigot. Europe will be Europe, and it will still be there with all its beauty to be enjoyed and appreciated, and Britain will be Britain. Truly a wonderful prospect.

    Euroscepticism is probably misnamed it should have been euscepticism. Most leavers probably like Europe - it's people, culture and climate. They just didn't like the brown paper and string tying it all together.
    I love Europe. Lived in France for a few months, many of my friends are from the continent. Not wanting it to have political control over my country (or my country over it) currently makes me a racist bigot. I look forward not to being one.

    RIP Euroscepticism. Surely something all PBers can raise a dram to.
    Oh yes.
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,579
    surbiton said:

    What will the markets be up to tomorrow ?

    Suspect it depends what noises the government are making.
  • Scrapheap_as_wasScrapheap_as_was Posts: 10,069
    edited June 2016


    bollocks - it was remains' job to implement leaves promises....



    I'm looking forward to proposing abolishing bad weather, the common cold, 10 more bank holidays a month and Piers Morgan in a future referendum despite what the establishment and their experts may say!! They can then sort it out for me when I righteously win as surely I will.
  • NickPalmerNickPalmer Posts: 21,708
    Scott_P said:

    Does Stewart still post here I wonder...

    https://twitter.com/euanmccolm/status/747125967534067712

    I used to like it when Stewart posted here - the only time we've had two named MPs on the site, and he was so obnoxious that even conservative PBers thought I was the lesser evil. :)

    kle4 makes a good point on people remembering how they voted - it's worth keeping in mind in future polls. People tend to think they voted in accordance with what they think now, covering up embarrassing past votes.
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 60,558
    That's a big difference. One has PP up quite a bit, and the other has them down.
  • SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 40,054
    SeanT said:

    TOPPING said:

    SeanT said:

    kle4 said:

    MikeL said:

    How are we actually going to leave the EU?

    If the new Con PM calls a GE and gets a majority then yes, we will leave.

    But what if it's a Hung Parliament? Then how on earth is it actually going to happen? Coalition with LDs will halt it immediately - as LDs will vote against.

    So it would need some kind of grand Con + Lab coalition. That doesn't seem very likely to me.

    Should Betfair set up a market on whether we will be in the EU on, say, 1 July 2019 (ie giving 2 years plus a bit of extra time for leeway)?

    I reckon it's 50:50 at most that we actually leave.

    Seems increasingly to be that the UK will not leave the EU, but we will have two years of chaos, followed by another referendum.
    Once we activate Article 50 we are leaving. That will happen once Cameron is gone at the latest.
    hmmm

    I still dont think this is over. The establishment have had a good kicking but they will come back and Boris is anything but consistent.

    My guess is all sides will want a fudge. Not what you want to hear I know.
    A fudge ment here could accept it without some sort of democratic endorsement to counter the democratic endorsement of the referendum.
    I just don't know any more. If the worst quo ante)

    It all depends on the markets, starting tomorrow. It only takes two or three banks to say We're moving for the whole edifice to start collapsing.

    Bloody hell.

    I DON'T WANT THIS TO HAPPEN. Just to be clear.
    That's super-spooky. There was some old bird from Cleethorpes saying exactly the same thing ('cept for the bit about the market, and the banks) on the radio just now.

    She voted because she wanted to register a protest but actually, now that she thinks about it, regrets it because she hadn't realised that Leave would actually win.
    There's actually an extraordinary route back to power for Labour here.

    Let's say the economy tanks over the summer, and the direst predix come true. The Tories will have elected a Brexiteer (or May) so they won't be able to row back from LEAVE

    If Labour were led by, say, Tom Watson, a man saying we should be in the EU, and not trigger A50, but we must do something on Free Movement; then Labour could win a majority, or a plurality, supported by the SNP then "renegotiate".

    That is entirely possible. But first Labour need to get rid of Le Corb.

    You know what? Corbyn may not make it. Zoe Williams saying it's time for him to go is highly significant IMO.

  • SpeedySpeedy Posts: 12,100

    TOPPING said:

    SeanT said:

    kle4 said:

    MikeL said:

    How are we actually going to leave the EU?

    If the new Con PM calls a GE and gets a majority then yes, we will leave.

    But what if it's a Hung Parliament? Then how on earth is it actually going to happen? Coalition with LDs will halt it immediately - as LDs will vote against.

    So it would need some kind of grand Con + Lab coalition. That doesn't seem very likely to me.

    Should Betfair set up a market on whether we will be in the EU on, say, 1 July 2019 (ie giving 2 years plus a bit of extra time for leeway)?

    I reckon it's 50:50 at most that we actually leave.

    Seems increasingly to be that the UK will not leave the EU, but we will have two years of chaos, followed by another referendum.
    Once we activate Article 50 we are leaving. That will happen once Cameron is gone at the latest.
    hmmm

    I still dont think this is over. The establishment have had a good kicking but they will come back and Boris is anything but consistent.

    My guess is all sides will want a fudge. Not what you want to hear I know.
    I just don't know any more. If the worst economic predictions look like coming true, then a party which repudiated the referendum might actually benefit (especially if they fudged a renegotiation: giving a relieved people a new excuse to vote for status quo ante)

    It all depends on the markets, starting tomorrow. It only takes two or three banks to say We're moving for the whole edifice to start collapsing.

    Bloody hell.

    I DON'T WANT THIS TO HAPPEN. Just to be clear.
    That's super-spooky. There was some old bird from Cleethorpes saying exactly the same thing ('cept for the bit about the market, and the banks) on the radio just now.

    She voted because she wanted to register a protest but actually, now that she thinks about it, regrets it because she hadn't realised that Leave would actually win.

    What shocks me is that the stuff experts said might happen really might happen. How does that work?

    And have already been proved that they have not.
    Experts were wrong once again.
    Which begs the question, when were the experts ever right?
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 44,033
    matt said:

    TOPPING said:

    rcs1000 said:

    alex. said:

    The smart money in on a rapid negotiation pre Article 50 - one of the interesting things in international politics is how, once they *have* to get something done, how quickly it will happen.

    My guess is that we are looking at a second referendum within 2 months to sign off on such a deal. If Remain are smart, they should start pushing for it - and use that support to get NoBrexit as the alternative on the ballot paper to The Deal.

    I'd be very surprised if the UK-EU negotiate an agreement 'within 2 months'.
    Lol, why 2 months. Hell let's get it done in a couple of weeks! Any advance on that?
    One could reach "Heads of Terms" in a couple of weeks, with a full (treaty) agreement taking several years to be finalised.
    That's exactly what I mean - a couple of pages. But a couple of pages that actually deal with the issues.

    The 6,000 page version come later.
    For some time mooted as the "sticking plaster" approach.

    Please be aware that all EU laws, treaties and directives will remain in force until such time that the United Kingdom chooses to abrogate...etc...

    And then take as long as they want.

    Question is, as has been asked all day (and Pienaar was fantastic this morning), what will the people want, and when? If that is at all a consideration these days for politicians.
    With my lawyer hat on, I'm genuinely interested to see which EU originated laws are so offensive that they'll be swiftly washed away. I've struggled to find specifics but I guess that they'll substantially relate to the environment. Capital punishment could return, I suppose.

    Within my area of interest, most debt and equity capital markets stuff will have to remain, even if rebranded. We can ignore Brussels and Rome regs on reciprocal enforcement I suppose but we'll be hurting ourselves. Interested to see what happens on open skies. From memory, country to country open skies were limited (Netherlands, other maybe). A return to bilateral would be unfortunate but would benefit the old and tired legacy European airlines (AF-KLM, Alitalia I'm looking at you). I suspect that we'll see less Ryanair and WizzAir flights. EZY, unclear. It will probably work out but vested interests could easily come out to play. Still, restructuring a tend to be well compensated. Airlines dont collapse enough in Europe (cf c.11 in the US).

    Perhaps employment will change. I don't know enough about the interaction between national and supranational law there.


    Lots to consider.
    For god's sake, now is not the time for logic.
  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 55,435
    alex. said:

    alex. said:

    rcs1000 said:

    alex. said:

    The smart money in on a rapid negotiation pre Article 50 - one of the interesting things in international politics is how, once they *have* to get something done, how quickly it will happen.

    My guess is that we are looking at a second referendum within 2 months to sign off on such a deal. If Remain are smart, they should start pushing for it - and use that support to get NoBrexit as the alternative on the ballot paper to The Deal.

    I'd be very surprised if the UK-EU negotiate an agreement 'within 2 months'.
    Lol, why 2 months. Hell let's get it done in a couple of weeks! Any advance on that?
    One could reach "Heads of Terms" in a couple of weeks, with a full (treaty) agreement taking several years to be finalised.
    That's exactly what I mean - a couple of pages. But a couple of pages that actually deal with the issues.

    The 6,000 page version come later.
    I'm struggling a bit to understand how the rules, rights and obligations of companies trading between the EU and the UK could seriously continue for several years on the basis of a document encompassing a couple of pages.
    The point is to create the process for the transition from UK (in EU) to UK (something else). Once that roadmap has been published, most of the uncertainty goes away.
    Really? So does everyone have to educatedly guess exactly what the 6,000 page document is going to say on the basis that it might be applied retrospectively? Or do you mean that all EU rules remain in place until such time as they don't?
    It would have to be a phased process in any event - unless you went Mad Max and tried to repeal all EU legislation in one bill or something.

    What can be negotiated more quickly is the end state for the various big ticket items - borders, immigration, free market access etc.

    Yes, EU rules would remain in place until they were removed, using legislation, as part of the deal.

    The alternative - sit there while a sub-commitee of a sub-committe on the coordination of Avian Pet Sales within the EU comes out with the 33rd draft of the trade rules for EU-UK sales of parakeets - is not going to be a big seller to many people....
  • Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    Project fear...

    @SamCoatesTimes: Half a dozen companies planning to float or issue debt have abandoned their plans because of Brexit https://t.co/Tt86oekF0j
  • LowlanderLowlander Posts: 941
    Dan Hannan has deleted his twitter account.
  • Scrapheap_as_wasScrapheap_as_was Posts: 10,069
    edited June 2016
    Lowlander said:

    Dan Hannan has deleted his twitter account.

    You are shitting me. Yes you are he hasn't - he is however taking a month off as clearly there's nothing he needs to do...

    https://twitter.com/DanielJHannan/status/746742188374134784
  • NickPalmerNickPalmer Posts: 21,708
    Unexpected side-effect of Brexit: Pokerstars is warning that due to unprecedented curerency turmoil, they will temporarily charge 4% on all currency conversions - presumably to stop people using them as a cheap speculative bank.
  • LowlanderLowlander Posts: 941

    Lowlander said:

    Dan Hannan has deleted his twitter account.

    You are shitting me.
    See for yourself

    https://twitter.com/DanHannanMEP?ref_src=twsrc^google|twcamp^serp|twgr^author

    Hannan has basically run away from every single thing he's said for the last 2 years.
  • LucyJonesLucyJones Posts: 651
    edited June 2016
    SeanT said:

    TOPPING said:

    kle4 said:

    TOPPING said:

    SeanT said:

    kle4 said:

    MikeL said:

    How are we actually going to leave the EU?

    If the new Con PM calls a GE and gets a majority then yes, we will leave.

    So it would need some kind of grand Con + Lab coalition. That doesn't seem very likely to me.

    Should Betfair set up a market on whether we will be in the EU on, say, 1 July 2019 (ie giving 2 years plus a bit of extra time for leeway)?

    I reckon it's 50:50 at most that we actually leave.

    Seems increasingly to be that the UK will not leave the EU, but we will have two years of chaos, followed by another referendum.
    Once we activate Article 50 we are leaving. That will happen once Cameron is gone at the latest.
    hmmm

    I still dont think this is over. The establishment have had a good kicking but they will come back and Boris is anything but consistent.

    My guess is all sides will want a fudge. Not what you want to hear I know.
    A fudge mndorsement of the referendum.
    I jus
    She voted because she wanted to register a protest but actually, now that she thinks about it, regrets it because she hadn't realised that Leave would actually win.
    That's unfortunate for her, but if people learn not to treat their votes as mere protests that will be a good thing. Besides, plenty of people who don't usually vote turned out, one theory being for once they knew their votes would make a difference, so not much excuse if others did not realise it could. And of course it won't be hundreds of thousands (though if in 12 months everything has gone to hell, it will become millions who claim that).
    I was just interested to see that she was chanelling @SeanT. or vice versa.

    Sean uses more words, of course, but I agree with you. Teaches them both a lesson to think before they vote.
    I do not regret my vote. Not yet. NOT YET. But only a fool would be totally happy with the way things are panning out. This is just incredible:

    http://news.sky.com/video/1717859/islam-there-is-no-brexit-plan

    From the government's £9million information pamphlet: "This is your decision. The Government will implement what you decide."
    So have the government got a plan for Brexit, or were they making that bit up?
    https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/515068/why-the-government-believes-that-voting-to-remain-in-the-european-union-is-the-best-decision-for-the-uk.pdf

    Edited to add link.
  • Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 54,830
    Lowlander said:

    Dan Hannan has deleted his twitter account.

    Wow! He's being trolled by SJWs?
  • FregglesFreggles Posts: 3,487
    SeanT said:


    There's actually an extraordinary route back to power for Labour here.

    Let's say the economy tanks over the summer, and the direst predix come true. The Tories will have elected a Brexiteer (or May) so they won't be able to row back from LEAVE

    If Labour were led by, say, Tom Watson, a man saying we should be in the EU, and not trigger A50, but we must do something on Free Movement; then Labour could win a majority, or a plurality, supported by the SNP then "renegotiate".

    That is entirely possible. But first Labour need to get rid of Le Corb.

    The phrase "Tory Recession" could soon be back in vogue.
    Lowlander said:

    Dan Hannan has deleted his twitter account.

    On the advice of Clinton was it? :lol:
  • alex.alex. Posts: 4,658

    Lowlander said:

    Dan Hannan has deleted his twitter account.

    You are shitting me.
    Does that wipe the history?
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,579
    Lowlander said:

    Lowlander said:

    Dan Hannan has deleted his twitter account.

    You are shitting me.
    See for yourself

    https://twitter.com/DanHannanMEP?ref_src=twsrc^google|twcamp^serp|twgr^author

    Hannan has basically run away from every single thing he's said for the last 2 years.
    :open_mouth:
  • SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 40,054
    Scott_P said:

    Project fear...

    @SamCoatesTimes: Half a dozen companies planning to float or issue debt have abandoned their plans because of Brexit https://t.co/Tt86oekF0j

    Impossible.

  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,579
    alex. said:

    Lowlander said:

    Dan Hannan has deleted his twitter account.

    You are shitting me.
    Does that wipe the history?
    It'll be saved.
  • Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    Angela Eagle has released a statement, but not resigned

    @bbclaurak: Source close to Angela Eagle says she is 'desperately worried Labour is failing to connect with communities across the country'

    @rowenamason: Is Angela Eagle staying because she needs to keep her NEC seat for any impending rule change battle?
  • mattmatt Posts: 3,789
    rcs1000 said:

    rcs1000 said:

    SeanT said:

    Yes, to be fair I probably overseasoned that haggis (I have been on this site for five hours now, I am getting tired). SOME Irish pundits have discussed IREXIT, but only to dismiss it.

    What is certainly true is that the Irish are freaked by the economic implications of Brexit. This fear and doubt would be quintuple for Scexit.

    Yesterday, I (in my capacity as a fund manager) recieved stuff from Ireland about how Dublin is a fantastic place to relocate my business to. Low taxes, low rent, in the single market for financial services.

    I think they're going to take a swing at London, so I can't see them leaving.
    Its part of the Brexit plan since they're worried about a recession.

    It's also a nail in Edinburghs coffin as by the time the iScots have sorted themselves out there'll be no business for the Scottish finance sector to chase.
    That's true: there are probably a number of Edinburgh based fund managers who could be enticed across the Irish Sea.
    Superficially, Dublin is understandably attractive. Helpful range of DTTs, low corporate tax, English and US flights (plus clear US immigration before departure!) but there are real problems, both legal and practical. The legal one is that Irish companies cut be shams any more. Staff have yo live in Ireland and real decision making has to happen in Ireland. The practical ones are Dublin has a real shortage of office and residential space and it is, without doubt, a high tax economy. Yes I know that Ireland isn't just Dublin but Good luck having people move to Shannon and Limerick.....

    I like Dublin and Ireland a lot and have spent a lot of time working there but it's not a easy slam dunk. FFM on the other hand....
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 99,006
    edited June 2016
    LucyJones said:


    From the government's £9million information pamphlet: "This is your decision. The Government will implement what you decide."
    So have the government got a plan for Brexit, or were they making that bit up?

    The bit you quote doesn't say they have a plan, it says they will implement the decision, which is not the same thing.
  • SimonStClareSimonStClare Posts: 7,976
    1060+ comments – any chance of a continuation thread pls – tis a bit clunky when refreshing.
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 60,558

    alex. said:

    alex. said:

    rcs1000 said:

    alex. said:

    The smart money in on a rapid negotiation pre Article 50 - one of the interesting things in international politics is how, once they *have* to get something done, how quickly it will happen.

    My guess is that we are looking at a second referendum within 2 months to sign off on such a deal. If Remain are smart, they should start pushing for it - and use that support to get NoBrexit as the alternative on the ballot paper to The Deal.

    I'd be very surprised if the UK-EU negotiate an agreement 'within 2 months'.
    Lol, why 2 months. Hell let's get it done in a couple of weeks! Any advance on that?
    One could reach "Heads of Terms" in a couple of weeks, with a full (treaty) agreement taking several years to be finalised.
    That's exactly what I mean - a couple of pages. But a couple of pages that actually deal with the issues.

    The 6,000 page version come later.
    I'm struggling a bit to understand how the rules, rights and obligations of companies trading between the EU and the UK could seriously continue for several years on the basis of a document encompassing a couple of pages.
    The point is to create the process for the transition from UK (in EU) to UK (something else). Once that roadmap has been published, most of the uncertainty goes away.
    Really? So does everyone have to educatedly guess exactly what the 6,000 page document is going to say on the basis that it might be applied retrospectively? Or do you mean that all EU rules remain in place until such time as they don't?
    It would have to be a phased process in any event - unless you went Mad Max and tried to repeal all EU legislation in one bill or something.

    What can be negotiated more quickly is the end state for the various big ticket items - borders, immigration, free market access etc.

    Yes, EU rules would remain in place until they were removed, using legislation, as part of the deal.

    The alternative - sit there while a sub-commitee of a sub-committe on the coordination of Avian Pet Sales within the EU comes out with the 33rd draft of the trade rules for EU-UK sales of parakeets - is not going to be a big seller to many people....
    Our border controls are set by the Treaties of the Common Travel Area, not the EU.
  • SpeedySpeedy Posts: 12,100
    surbiton said:

    What will the markets be up to tomorrow ?

    Well spanish markets maybe down, affected by the negative for them result of the spanish election.
    Could affect other eurozone markets too.
  • John_MJohn_M Posts: 7,503
    People still confusing Twitter with real life I see.
  • AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    Freggles said:

    SeanT said:


    There's actually an extraordinary route back to power for Labour here.

    Let's say the economy tanks over the summer, and the direst predix come true. The Tories will have elected a Brexiteer (or May) so they won't be able to row back from LEAVE

    If Labour were led by, say, Tom Watson, a man saying we should be in the EU, and not trigger A50, but we must do something on Free Movement; then Labour could win a majority, or a plurality, supported by the SNP then "renegotiate".

    That is entirely possible. But first Labour need to get rid of Le Corb.

    The phrase "Tory Recession" could soon be back in vogue.
    Lowlander said:

    Dan Hannan has deleted his twitter account.

    On the advice of Clinton was it? :lol:
    *cough*

    http://www2.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2016/06/07/alastair-meeks-on-how-conservative-leavers-could-gift-labour-the-next-election/
  • DecrepitJohnLDecrepitJohnL Posts: 13,300
    edited June 2016



    What shocks me is that the stuff experts said might happen really might happen. How does that work?

    Perhaps if the Prime Minister had not forecast World War 3, voters might have taken the more sober warnings seriously.
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,579
    SeanT said:



    I pray that they can get rid of Corbyn asap, for England's sake. Scotland have a credible political party but someone needs to step in to that role in England, the Corbyn opposition is a joke and the time for laughing is long gone.

    Look at this. I am getting actively depressed. Other countries had prepared for Brexit. We hadn't. WE HADN'T.

    https://twitter.com/AlbertoNardelli/status/747137245476425732

    Whether you are left, right, in out, LEAVE REMAIN or a transvestite Scotsman with a beach donkey fetish, that is just astonishing, an utter failure by the government. We are ill served.
    Made no plans according to the speculation of one Tory MP. Any official word for HMG? Carney said the BoE and HM Treasury had planned.
  • Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    @JakubKrupa: Polish Ambassador to the UK calls on British politicians to condemn post-ref hate-motivated attacks on migrants https://t.co/lGnGcUMZa5
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 99,006

    Freggles said:

    SeanT said:


    There's actually an extraordinary route back to power for Labour here.

    Let's say the economy tanks over the summer, and the direst predix come true. The Tories will have elected a Brexiteer (or May) so they won't be able to row back from LEAVE

    If Labour were led by, say, Tom Watson, a man saying we should be in the EU, and not trigger A50, but we must do something on Free Movement; then Labour could win a majority, or a plurality, supported by the SNP then "renegotiate".

    That is entirely possible. But first Labour need to get rid of Le Corb.

    The phrase "Tory Recession" could soon be back in vogue.
    Lowlander said:

    Dan Hannan has deleted his twitter account.

    On the advice of Clinton was it? :lol:
    *cough*

    http://www2.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2016/06/07/alastair-meeks-on-how-conservative-leavers-could-gift-labour-the-next-election/
    It was also a possibility, as you raised. If there were Tories out there who were happy to Leave only because they thought they would definitely be in power, well, that was very short sighted of them.
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 122,593
    SeanT said:

    TOPPING said:

    SeanT said:

    kle4 said:

    MikeL said:

    How are we actually going to leave the EU?

    If the new Con PM calls a GE and gets a majority then yes, we will leave.

    But what if it's a Hung Parliament? Then how on earth is it actually going to happen? Coalition with LDs will halt it immediately - as LDs will vote against.

    So it would need some kind of grand Con + Lab coalition. That doesn't seem very likely to me.

    Should Betfair set up a market on whether we will be in the EU on, say, 1 July 2019 (ie giving 2 years plus a bit of extra time for leeway)?

    I reckon it's 50:50 at most that we actually leave.

    Seems increasingly to be that the UK will not leave the EU, but we will have two years of chaos, followed by another referendum.
    Once we activate Article 50 we are leaving. That will happen once Cameron is gone at the latest.
    hmmm

    I still dont think this is over. The establishment have had a good kicking but they will come back and Boris is anything but consistent.

    My guess is all sides will want a fudge. Not what you want to hear I know.
    A fudge ment here could accept it without some sort of democratic endorsement to counter the democratic endorsement of the referendum.
    I just don't know any more. If the worst economic predictions look like coming true, then a party which repudiated

    I DON'T WANT THIS TO HAPPEN. Just to be clear.
    That's super-spooky. There was some old bird from Cleethorpes saying exactly the same thing ('cept for the bit about the market, and the banks) on the radio just now.

    She voted because she wanted to register a protest but actually, now that she thinks about it, regrets it because she hadn't realised that Leave would actually win.
    There's actually an extraordinary route back to power for Labour here.

    Let's say the economy tanks over the summer, and the direst predix come true. The Tories will have elected a Brexiteer (or May) so they won't be able to row back from LEAVE

    If Labour were led by, say, Tom Watson, a man saying we should be in the EU, and not trigger A50, but we must do something on Free Movement; then Labour could win a majority, or a plurality, supported by the SNP then "renegotiate".

    That is entirely possible. But first Labour need to get rid of Le Corb.
    Alastair and myself wrote threads on this kind of scenario but we got nothing but abuse from PB Leavers for it.
  • AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 25,921
    Scott_P said:

    @JakubKrupa: Polish Ambassador to the UK calls on British politicians to condemn post-ref hate-motivated attacks on migrants https://t.co/lGnGcUMZa5

    were you expecting him to say he supports them ?
  • malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 44,455
    tlg86 said:

    Alex Salmond is a CNUT.

    I am sure he rates you highly
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 99,006
    John_M said:

    People still confusing Twitter with real life I see.

    Well, David Cameron told me Britain and twitter are not the same thing, but we're not supposed to believe anything he says or said anymore.
  • Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453

    Perhaps if the Prime Minister had not forecast World War 3

    He didn't.

    NEXT!
  • alex. said:

    Lowlander said:

    Dan Hannan has deleted his twitter account.

    You are shitting me.
    Does that wipe the history?
    It's still on there
    https://twitter.com/DanielJHannan
  • malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 44,455
    DanSmith said:

    EPG said:

    Even the mere name of Nicola Sturgeon gets Alex Salmond loud boos on Question Time.

    The SNP are as unpopular in England, as the Tories are in Scotland.
    Impossible
  • felixfelix Posts: 15,180
    Speedy said:

    Yet another result which proves the future (and the present) doesn't lie with liberal centrism.
    It's not a result and very uncertain that Podemos/PSOE coalition is on.
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,579

    alex. said:

    Lowlander said:

    Dan Hannan has deleted his twitter account.

    You are shitting me.
    Does that wipe the history?
    It's still on there
    https://twitter.com/DanielJHannan
    He has two accounts? The deleted one had the blue tick.
  • FregglesFreggles Posts: 3,487

    Freggles said:

    SeanT said:


    There's actually an extraordinary route back to power for Labour here.

    Let's say the economy tanks over the summer, and the direst predix come true. The Tories will have elected a Brexiteer (or May) so they won't be able to row back from LEAVE

    If Labour were led by, say, Tom Watson, a man saying we should be in the EU, and not trigger A50, but we must do something on Free Movement; then Labour could win a majority, or a plurality, supported by the SNP then "renegotiate".

    That is entirely possible. But first Labour need to get rid of Le Corb.

    The phrase "Tory Recession" could soon be back in vogue.
    Lowlander said:

    Dan Hannan has deleted his twitter account.

    On the advice of Clinton was it? :lol:
    *cough*

    http://www2.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2016/06/07/alastair-meeks-on-how-conservative-leavers-could-gift-labour-the-next-election/
    Valuable Brain-wave there from the Meeksmeister.

    The question is will there be a Labour party left after Jeremy's scorched earth strategy.
  • CopperSulphateCopperSulphate Posts: 1,119
    What a surprise, the politicians are pretending they didn't plan anything in case the referendum was lost in a pathetic attempt to reverse the decision from the voters.

    Stop messing about and get on with it you twats.
  • geoffwgeoffw Posts: 9,130
    Has anyone commented on Lord Hill's resignation as Britain's rep on the EU commission?
    Seems rather precipitate to me.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 99,006

    SeanT said:

    TOPPING said:

    SeanT said:

    kle4 said:

    MikeL said:

    How are we actually going to leave the EU?

    If the new Con PM calls a GE and gets a majority then yes, we will leave.

    But what if it's a Hung Parliament? Then how on earth is it actually going to happen? Coalition with LDs will halt it immediately - as LDs will vote against.

    So it would need some kind of grand Con + Lab coalition. That doesn't seem very likely to me.

    Should Betfair set up a market on whether we will be in the EU on, say, 1 July 2019 (ie giving 2 years plus a bit of extra time for leeway)?

    I reckon it's 50:50 at most that we actually leave.

    Seems increasingly to be that the UK will not leave the EU, but we will have two years of chaos, followed by another referendum.
    Once we activate Article 50 we are leaving. That will happen once Cameron is gone at the latest.
    hmmm

    I still dont think this is over. The establishment have had a good kicking but they will come back and Boris is anything but consistent.

    My guess is all sides will want a fudge. Not what you want to hear I know.
    A fudge ment here could accept it without some sort of democratic endorsement to counter the democratic endorsement of the referendum.
    I just don't know any more. If the worst economic predictions look like coming true, then a party which repudiated

    I DON'T WANT THIS TO HAPPEN. Just to be clear.
    That's super-spooky. There was some old bird from Cleethorpes saying exactly the same thing ('cept for the bit about the market, and the banks) on the radio just now.

    She voted because she wanted to register a protest but actually, now that she thinks about it, regrets it because she hadn't realised that Leave would actually win.
    There's actually an extraordinary route back to power for Labour here.

    Let's say the economy tanks over the summer, and the direst predix come true. The Tories will have elected a Brexiteer (or May) so they won't be able to row back from LEAVE

    If Labour were led by, say, Tom Watson, a man saying we should be in the EU, and not trigger A50, but we must do something on Free Movement; then Labour could win a majority, or a plurality, supported by the SNP then "renegotiate".

    That is entirely possible. But first Labour need to get rid of Le Corb.
    Alastair and myself wrote threads on this kind of scenario but we got nothing but abuse from PB Leavers for it.
    #NotallLeavers
  • MikeKMikeK Posts: 9,053
    RobD said:

    SeanT said:



    I pray that they can get rid of Corbyn asap, for England's sake. Scotland have a credible political party but someone needs to step in to that role in England, the Corbyn opposition is a joke and the time for laughing is long gone.

    Look at this. I am getting actively depressed. Other countries had prepared for Brexit. We hadn't. WE HADN'T.

    https://twitter.com/AlbertoNardelli/status/747137245476425732

    Whether you are left, right, in out, LEAVE REMAIN or a transvestite Scotsman with a beach donkey fetish, that is just astonishing, an utter failure by the government. We are ill served.
    Made no plans according to the speculation of one Tory MP. Any official word for HMG? Carney said the BoE and HM Treasury had planned.
    Cameron has betrayed the nation he supposedly loves. He had no fallback plan should Brexit succeed. He gambled all his chips on IN winning and so lost everything. Never has hubris been so nakedly exposed.
  • malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 44,455
    EPG said:

    Even the mere name of Nicola Sturgeon gets Alex Salmond loud boos on Question Time.

    Little Englanders are getting braver, good time to be producing bed linen , they will be in big demand soon
  • LowlanderLowlander Posts: 941

    alex. said:

    Lowlander said:

    Dan Hannan has deleted his twitter account.

    You are shitting me.
    Does that wipe the history?
    It's still on there
    https://twitter.com/DanielJHannan
    I thought that was a parody account from a couple of the posts. It isn't verified. The officially verified one is definitely gone.
  • alex.alex. Posts: 4,658
    SeanT said:



    I pray that they can get rid of Corbyn asap, for England's sake. Scotland have a credible political party but someone needs to step in to that role in England, the Corbyn opposition is a joke and the time for laughing is long gone.

    Look at this. I am getting actively depressed. Other countries had prepared for Brexit. We hadn't. WE HADN'T.

    https://twitter.com/AlbertoNardelli/status/747137245476425732

    Whether you are left, right, in out, LEAVE REMAIN or a transvestite Scotsman with a beach donkey fetish, that is just astonishing, an utter failure by the government. We are ill served.
    Public Administration at every level of the UK is an absolute shambles. We've been living on the past glories of efficient British bureaucracy dating back to the Empire for far too long and the chickens are all coming back to roost. Anyone who works in the public sector knows this, and the problems have been exacerbated 10 fold since the cuts really started to kick in post 2008. Organisations have been reorganised, cut, split, reorganised, hugely experienced staff who traditionally would have had careers spanning 30-40 years have gone, replaced by people who's experience is a few years in many cases not having been properly trained for the tasks they need to do.

  • Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    @Jake_Wilde: Prominent Corbynistas are currently being asked to start thinking about what they'd like their life peerage name to be
  • Stark_DawningStark_Dawning Posts: 10,176

    Scott_P said:

    @JakubKrupa: Polish Ambassador to the UK calls on British politicians to condemn post-ref hate-motivated attacks on migrants https://t.co/lGnGcUMZa5

    were you expecting him to say he supports them ?
    He shouldn't have to be saying anything.
  • bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 22,946
    SeanT said:

    TOPPING said:

    SeanT said:

    kle4 said:

    MikeL said:

    How are we actually going to leave the EU?

    If the new Con PM calls a GE and gets a majority then yes, we will leave.

    But what if it's a Hung Parliament? Then how on earth is it actually going to happen? Coalition with LDs will halt it immediately - as LDs will vote against.

    So it would need some kind of grand Con + Lab coalition. That doesn't seem very likely to me.

    Should Betfair set up a market on whether we will be in the EU on, say, 1 July 2019 (ie giving 2 years plus a bit of extra time for leeway)?

    I reckon it's 50:50 at most that we actually leave.

    Seems increasingly to be that the UK will not leave the EU, but we will have two years of chaos, followed by another referendum.
    Once we activate Article 50 we are leaving. That will happen once Cameron is gone at the latest.
    hmmm

    I still dont think this is over. The establishment have had a good kicking but they will come back and Boris is anything but consistent.

    My guess is all sides will want a fudge. Not what you want to hear I know.
    A fudge ment here could accept it without some sort of democratic endorsement to counter the democratic endorsement of the referendum.
    I just don't know any more. If the worst economic predictions look like coming true, then a party which repudiated the referendum might actually benefit (especially if they fudged a renegotiation: giving a relieved people a new excuse to vote for status quo ante)

    It all depends on the markets, starting tomorrow. It only takes two or three banks to say We're moving for the whole edifice to start collapsing.

    Bloody hell.

    I DON'T WANT THIS TO HAPPEN. Just to be clear.
    There's actually an extraordinary route back to power for Labour here.

    Let's say the economy tanks over the summer, and the direst predix come true. The Tories will have elected a Brexiteer (or May) so they won't be able to row back from LEAVE

    If Labour were led by, say, Tom Watson, a man saying we should be in the EU, and not trigger A50, but we must do something on Free Movement; then Labour could win a majority, or a plurality, supported by the SNP then "renegotiate".

    That is entirely possible. But first Labour need to get rid of Le Corb.
    If LAB wants the 40% of voters who voted for BREXIT back saying we should be in the EU is a good way of ensuring they will never return.
  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 55,435
    rcs1000 said:

    alex. said:

    alex. said:

    rcs1000 said:

    alex. said:

    The smart money in on a rapid negotiation pre Article 50 - one of the interesting things in international politics is how, once they *have* to get something done, how quickly it will happen.

    My guess is that we are looking at a second referendum within 2 months to sign off on such a deal. If Remain are smart, they should start pushing for it - and use that support to get NoBrexit as the alternative on the ballot paper to The Deal.

    I'd be very surprised if the UK-EU negotiate an agreement 'within 2 months'.
    Lol, why 2 months. Hell let's get it done in a couple of weeks! Any advance on that?
    One could reach "Heads of Terms" in a couple of weeks, with a full (treaty) agreement taking several years to be finalised.
    That's exactly what I mean - a couple of pages. But a couple of pages that actually deal with the issues.

    The 6,000 page version come later.
    I'm struggling a bit to understand how the rules, rights and obligations of companies trading between the EU and the UK could seriously continue for several years on the basis of a document encompassing a couple of pages.
    The point is to create the process for the transition from UK (in EU) to UK (something else). Once that roadmap has been published, most of the uncertainty goes away.
    Really? So does everyone have to educatedly guess exactly what the 6,000 page document is going to say on the basis that it might be applied retrospectively? Or do you mean that all EU rules remain in place until such time as they don't?
    It would have to be a phased process in any event - unless you went Mad Max and tried to repeal all EU legislation in one bill or something.

    What can be negotiated more quickly is the end state for the various big ticket items - borders, immigration, free market access etc.

    Yes, EU rules would remain in place until they were removed, using legislation, as part of the deal.

    The alternative - sit there while a sub-commitee of a sub-committe on the coordination of Avian Pet Sales within the EU comes out with the 33rd draft of the trade rules for EU-UK sales of parakeets - is not going to be a big seller to many people....
    Our border controls are set by the Treaties of the Common Travel Area, not the EU.
    True - but in this kind of negotiation they will be looking at the big picture level, where borders interact with immigration and trade.
  • AlistairAlistair Posts: 23,670
    Lowlander said:

    Lowlander said:

    Dan Hannan has deleted his twitter account.

    You are shitting me.
    See for yourself

    https://twitter.com/DanHannanMEP?ref_src=twsrc^google|twcamp^serp|twgr^author

    Hannan has basically run away from every single thing he's said for the last 2 years.
    https://twitter.com/DanielJHannan
  • CD13CD13 Posts: 6,386
    Come on Remainers, man up, your whingeing is unbecoming. You lost, we are committed to leaving. It will take a big offer from the EU to make it worth while having another referendum.

    They are quivering in fright at the prospect of their project unravelling before them.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WOeYPpOblAw

    Something to stiffen your upper lips

  • AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 25,921
    rcs1000 said:

    alex. said:

    alex. said:

    rcs1000 said:

    alex. said:

    The smart money in on a rapid negotiation pre Article 50 - one of the interesting things in international politics is how, once they *have* to get something done, how quickly it will happen.

    My guess is that we are looking at a second referendum within 2 months to sign off on such a deal. If Remain are smart, they should start pushing for it - and use that support to get NoBrexit as the alternative on the ballot paper to The Deal.

    I'd be very surprised if the UK-EU negotiate an agreement 'within 2 months'.
    Lol, why 2 months. Hell let's get it done in a couple of weeks! Any advance on that?
    One could reach "Heads of Terms" in a couple of weeks, with a full (treaty) agreement taking several years to be finalised.
    That's exactly what I mean - a couple of pages. But a couple of pages that actually deal with the issues.

    The 6,000 page version come later.
    I'm struggling a bit to understand how the rules, rights and obligations of companies trading between the EU and the UK could seriously continue for several years on the basis of a document encompassing a couple of pages.
    The point is to create the process for the transition from UK (in EU) to UK (something else). Once that roadmap has been pub they don't?
    It would have to be a phased process in anpeople....
    Our border controls are set by the Treaties of the Common Travel Area, not the EU.
    PBs off on one today, really the only facts are turmoil in Labour and the Spanish election the rest is just froth

    Tomorrow the real picture starts to unfolds. Since neither side is particularly looking a fight I could see a compromise cobbled together quite quickly. Whether that is in or EFTA remains to be seen, but as so often the odds are common sense will prevail both the EU and UK have too many problems ongoing to want to drag this out.
  • Scrapheap_as_wasScrapheap_as_was Posts: 10,069
    RobD said:

    Bill Cash disowning migration numbers coming down dramatically and £350m claim.. nothing to do with him (on R5L) he was campaigning about other more important issues for leaving

    Nice avatar :D
    Thank you - seems apt...

    I also agree it would be astonishing if the civil service hadn't done prep work for Brexit...
  • malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 44,455
    RobD said:

    HYUFD said:

    Spanish result also good for Gibraltar, Spain will be far too busy with yet another split Parliament to focus too much on the Rock!

    OK Gibraltar also voted REMAIN and WAY more emphatically than Scotland or NI. Yet there isn't a movement for secession or union with Spain?
    Union with Spain? lol
    It gets nuttier om here as the day progresses, the money wasted giving degrees to halfwits is unbelievable
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 122,593

    NEW THREAD NEW THREAD

  • EPGEPG Posts: 6,737
    matt said:

    rcs1000 said:

    rcs1000 said:

    SeanT said:

    Yes, to be fair I probably overseasoned that haggis (I have been on this site for five hours now, I am getting tired). SOME Irish pundits have discussed IREXIT, but only to dismiss it.

    What is certainly true is that the Irish are freaked by the economic implications of Brexit. This fear and doubt would be quintuple for Scexit.

    Yesterday, I (in my capacity as a fund manager) recieved stuff from Ireland about how Dublin is a fantastic place to relocate my business to. Low taxes, low rent, in the single market for financial services.

    I think they're going to take a swing at London, so I can't see them leaving.
    Its part of the Brexit plan since they're worried about a recession.

    It's also a nail in Edinburghs coffin as by the time the iScots have sorted themselves out there'll be no business for the Scottish finance sector to chase.
    That's true: there are probably a number of Edinburgh based fund managers who could be enticed across the Irish Sea.
    Superficially, Dublin is understandably attractive. Helpful range of DTTs, low corporate tax, English and US flights (plus clear US immigration before departure!) but there are real problems, both legal and practical. The legal one is that Irish companies cut be shams any more. Staff have yo live in Ireland and real decision making has to happen in Ireland. The practical ones are Dublin has a real shortage of office and residential space and it is, without doubt, a high tax economy. Yes I know that Ireland isn't just Dublin but Good luck having people move to Shannon and Limerick.....

    I like Dublin and Ireland a lot and have spent a lot of time working there but it's not a easy slam dunk. FFM on the other hand....
    God help me, Dublin is more a world city than FFM.
  • RobD said:

    alex. said:

    Lowlander said:

    Dan Hannan has deleted his twitter account.

    You are shitting me.
    Does that wipe the history?
    It's still on there
    https://twitter.com/DanielJHannan
    He has two accounts? The deleted one had the blue tick.
    No idea if he has multiple accounts.
    The one I linked to is the one I've been following for ages.
  • MikeKMikeK Posts: 9,053
    Scott_P said:

    Angela Eagle has released a statement, but not resigned

    @bbclaurak: Source close to Angela Eagle says she is 'desperately worried Labour is failing to connect with communities across the country'

    @rowenamason: Is Angela Eagle staying because she needs to keep her NEC seat for any impending rule change battle?

    No she's staying because her bum feels comfy in her Seat and bugger the working class.
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 60,558
    Holy Cr&p - PP has ZERO votes.
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 55,314
    John_M said:

    Omnium said:

    John_M said:

    Omnium said:

    Why do people assume that a referendum means everyone is entirely polarised? I voted Leave, but it was a very close call. I find myself in very close agreement with almost all my friends about the issues, and around 50% of those friends voted Remain.

    Anyone that finds themselves thinking that this was 100% right or 100% wrong probably needs to have a bit of a quiet period of thought.

    We're often better than our politicians - sometimes much, much better.

    Yes, very much agree with you. I don't think that all Remainers are quisling traitorous pig dogs, nor are all Leavers noble democrats. This is real life, not fucking Star Wars.

    We'll all have our red lines that made us choose one side over another; immigration, sovereignty, the economy or whatever.

    I'm a lukewarm Leaver. While I've felt for a long time that the EU has lost its way, it wouldn't have taken much to make me a lukewarm Remainer. It's a pity that it's all become so partisan and vitriolic.
    Decent club of two then :)

    I sort of want the badge saying 'quisling traitorous pig-dog' mind you.

    In our club of two, supposing we wanted to march on Westminster, what should our slogan be? I quite like your 'lukewarm'.
    "What do we want?" "Not much" "When do we want it?" "Any time it's convenient actually".

    I feel we have a movement here ;).
    Can I carry the placard that says "Down with this kind of thing!"...?
  • TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 44,196
    DanSmith said:

    EPG said:

    Even the mere name of Nicola Sturgeon gets Alex Salmond loud boos on Question Time.

    The SNP are as unpopular in England, as the Tories are in Scotland.
    Thank goodness the SNP stands for seats only in Scotland, and the Tories only in England.
  • SeanT said:



    I pray that they can get rid of Corbyn asap, for England's sake. Scotland have a credible political party but someone needs to step in to that role in England, the Corbyn opposition is a joke and the time for laughing is long gone.

    Look at this. I am getting actively depressed. Other countries had prepared for Brexit. We hadn't. WE HADN'T.

    https://twitter.com/AlbertoNardelli/status/747137245476425732

    Whether you are left, right, in out, LEAVE REMAIN or a transvestite Scotsman with a beach donkey fetish, that is just astonishing, an utter failure by the government. We are ill served.
    Agree completely. Transpires that everyone thought Remain would win, so why bother planning? Serious plans were in place, in case we voted Yes in 2014, and that was a much longer shot. But no one bothered? And now no one appears to be in charge. Shambolic. No wonder people want rid of the 'political class'.
  • TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 44,196
    EPG said:

    Even the mere name of Nicola Sturgeon gets Alex Salmond loud boos on Question Time.

    Cybernat False Flag operation obviously.
  • malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 44,455
    just watched evacuation of Saigon after Vietnam War, excellent programme.
  • AlistairAlistair Posts: 23,670
    RobD said:

    alex. said:

    Lowlander said:

    Dan Hannan has deleted his twitter account.

    You are shitting me.
    Does that wipe the history?
    It's still on there
    https://twitter.com/DanielJHannan
    He has two accounts? The deleted one had the blue tick.
    He's deleted his MEP one I presume as some kind of statement
  • SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 40,054
    edited June 2016
  • Stark_DawningStark_Dawning Posts: 10,176
    Look on the bright side - the reputation of the good old British sense of humour remains intact.
    SeanT said:



    I pray that they can get rid of Corbyn asap, for England's sake. Scotland have a credible political party but someone needs to step in to that role in England, the Corbyn opposition is a joke and the time for laughing is long gone.

    Look at this. I am getting actively depressed. Other countries had prepared for Brexit. We hadn't. WE HADN'T.

    https://twitter.com/AlbertoNardelli/status/747137245476425732

    Whether you are left, right, in out, LEAVE REMAIN or a transvestite Scotsman with a beach donkey fetish, that is just astonishing, an utter failure by the government. We are ill served.
  • AlistairAlistair Posts: 23,670
    edited June 2016

    Polish immigrants ...

    twitter.com/b0redinbucks/status/746847561504391168

    EDIT: Didn't see your lead in
  • alex.alex. Posts: 4,658
    New thread
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 99,006

    DanSmith said:

    EPG said:

    Even the mere name of Nicola Sturgeon gets Alex Salmond loud boos on Question Time.

    The SNP are as unpopular in England, as the Tories are in Scotland.
    Thank goodness the SNP stands for seats only in Scotland, and the Tories only in England.
    Hey now, the Tories are now a (distant) second in Scotland. For now.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 99,006

    John_M said:

    Omnium said:

    John_M said:

    Omnium said:

    Why do people assume that a referendum means everyone is entirely polarised? I voted Leave, but it was a very close call. I find myself in very close agreement with almost all my friends about the issues, and around 50% of those friends voted Remain.

    Anyone that finds themselves thinking that this was 100% right or 100% wrong probably needs to have a bit of a quiet period of thought.

    We're often better than our politicians - sometimes much, much better.

    Yes, very much agree with you. I don't think that all Remainers are quisling traitorous pig dogs, nor are all Leavers noble democrats. This is real life, not fucking Star Wars.

    We'll all have our red lines that made us choose one side over another; immigration, sovereignty, the economy or whatever.

    I'm a lukewarm Leaver. While I've felt for a long time that the EU has lost its way, it wouldn't have taken much to make me a lukewarm Remainer. It's a pity that it's all become so partisan and vitriolic.
    Decent club of two then :)

    I sort of want the badge saying 'quisling traitorous pig-dog' mind you.

    In our club of two, supposing we wanted to march on Westminster, what should our slogan be? I quite like your 'lukewarm'.
    "What do we want?" "Not much" "When do we want it?" "Any time it's convenient actually".

    I feel we have a movement here ;).
    Can I carry the placard that says "Down with this kind of thing!"...?
    I'm sure there's one online of people holding signs like 'People who protest are dumb' 'People against people who protest'
This discussion has been closed.