Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Options

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Game over. What should the Labour right do now that it has

SystemSystem Posts: 11,723
edited May 2016 in General

imagepoliticalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Game over. What should the Labour right do now that it has lost?

As Leonard Cohen once crooned, everybody knows the war is over, everybody knows the good guys lost.  With Labour’s surprisingly good performance in the recent election round, even the faint hope of a challenge to Jeremy Corbyn’s leadership this year has evaporated.  This will give him the time and space to effect the necessary reforms of the party to ensure that he cannot be ousted by a…

Read the full story here


«13456

Comments

  • Options
    CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 59,855
    First!
  • Options
    felixfelix Posts: 15,125
    I'd expect a bit of everything and a lot of nothing. Despite the current froth on here the Conservatives are in a better place. Anyway one hopes, I suspect in vain, for a decent break from the loons after another nutjob night ends after two bad polls. This site used to be full of sensible and thoughtful comments. Let's hope it returns soon.
  • Options
    Innocent_AbroadInnocent_Abroad Posts: 3,294
    felix said:

    I'd expect a bit of everything and a lot of nothing. Despite the current froth on here the Conservatives are in a better place. Anyway one hopes, I suspect in vain, for a decent break from the loons after another nutjob night ends after two bad polls. This site used to be full of sensible and thoughtful comments. Let's hope it returns soon.

    Not before the Referendum, Felix - I do agree with you about the site. I fear we shall hope in vain, much like Labour's Right Wing.

  • Options
    CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 59,855
    Interesting analysis Mr Meeks - and while I agree that it would be foolish to rely on the Mr Micawber option:

    Labour rightwingers can also present this to themselves as the Mr Micawber option. In practice, however, there is no particular reason why anything should turn up.

    I suspect quite a few things will turn up.

    None of us know the state of the Conservative Party, or the government not much over a month from now. 'Weakened' and 'Divided' are both dead certs, but 'badly' or 'disastrously'?

    Who will be the PM three months from now?

    What will be the state of the economy six months from now?

    So, lots of 'events, dear boy, events'.......
  • Options
    JackWJackW Posts: 14,787
    Latest ARSE4EU Referendum Projection Countdown

    3 hours 3 minutes 3 seconds
  • Options
    shiney2shiney2 Posts: 672
    Yippee, its a new day! Hello Britain..

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j0pwXLtvt2w&feature=youtu.be

  • Options
    CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 59,855
    edited May 2016
    shiney2 said:

    Yippee, its a new day! Hello Britain..
    www.youtube.com/watch?v=j0pwXLtvt2w&feature=youtu.be

    Its PIFFLE! again!

    PIFFLE piffle PIFFLE piffle PIFFLE PIFFLE

    Seriously, you want yesterday's embarrassment repeated today?
  • Options
    shiney2shiney2 Posts: 672

    shiney2 said:

    Yippee, its a new day! Hello Britain..
    www.youtube.com/watch?v=j0pwXLtvt2w&feature=youtu.be

    Its PIFFLE! again!

    PIFFLE piffle PIFFLE piffle PIFFLE PIFFLE

    Seriously, you want yesterday's embarrassment repeated today?
    You were so sure your little quote proved what you thought. It seemed a shame to disturb your entire day..
  • Options
    CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 59,855
    edited May 2016
    shiney2 said:

    shiney2 said:

    Yippee, its a new day! Hello Britain..
    www.youtube.com/watch?v=j0pwXLtvt2w&feature=youtu.be

    Its PIFFLE! again!

    PIFFLE piffle PIFFLE piffle PIFFLE PIFFLE

    Seriously, you want yesterday's embarrassment repeated today?
    You were so sure your little quote proved what you thought. It seemed a shame to disturb your entire day..
    Joking apart - posting videos costs OGH money - so I would submit, out of politeness, once is enough (and this one you posted more than once yesterday, let alone in previous days.)

    Oh, and piffle
  • Options
    CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 59,855

    felix said:

    I'd expect a bit of everything and a lot of nothing. Despite the current froth on here the Conservatives are in a better place. Anyway one hopes, I suspect in vain, for a decent break from the loons after another nutjob night ends after two bad polls. This site used to be full of sensible and thoughtful comments. Let's hope it returns soon.

    Not before the Referendum, Felix - I do agree with you about the site. I fear we shall hope in vain, much like Labour's Right Wing.


    No, but as we saw in SINDYRef, those possessed of the most adamantine certainty in the run up to the vote disappeared in puffs of embarrassment after it.....
  • Options
    shiney2shiney2 Posts: 672

    shiney2 said:

    shiney2 said:

    Yippee, its a new day! Hello Britain..
    www.youtube.com/watch?v=j0pwXLtvt2w&feature=youtu.be

    Its PIFFLE! again!

    PIFFLE piffle PIFFLE piffle PIFFLE PIFFLE

    Seriously, you want yesterday's embarrassment repeated today?
    You were so sure your little quote proved what you thought. It seemed a shame to disturb your entire day..
    Joking apart - posting video's costs OGH money - so I would submit, out of politeness, once is enough (and this one you posted more than once yesterday, let alone in previous days.)

    Oh, and piffle
    So, no argument left. Not even yesterdays comprehension failure?
  • Options
    Paul_BedfordshirePaul_Bedfordshire Posts: 3,632
    edited May 2016
    "EXCLUSIVE: David Cameron's EU sham exposed: Leaked letter reveals PM hatched anti-Brexit plot ... while still telling voters he could campaign to leave

    A leaked letter suggests the Prime Minister was plotting with a multinational firm on how to hammer home the Remain case while still claiming he was prepared to campaign to leave.

    He had been telling the Commons that he ‘ruled nothing out’ unless he won concessions from the EU.

    The secret ‘mobilisation’ plan involved asking FTSE 500 companies to put in their annual reports warnings about the dangers of Brexit.




    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3593784/David-Cameron-s-EU-sham-exposed-Leaked-letter-reveals-PM-hatched-anti-Brexit-plot-telling-voters-campaign-leave.html
  • Options
    Plato_SaysPlato_Says Posts: 11,822
    shiney2 said:

    shiney2 said:

    Yippee, its a new day! Hello Britain..
    www.youtube.com/watch?v=j0pwXLtvt2w&feature=youtu.be

    Its PIFFLE! again!

    PIFFLE piffle PIFFLE piffle PIFFLE PIFFLE

    Seriously, you want yesterday's embarrassment repeated today?
    You were so sure your little quote proved what you thought. It seemed a shame to disturb your entire day..
    :smiley:

    I really must watch this - and the longer one. I'm voting Leave, and ought to catch up with the campaigning.
  • Options
    JackWJackW Posts: 14,787
    GIN1138 said:

    SeanT said:

    GIN1138 said:

    SeanT said:

    MP_SE said:

    Dave won't have to worry anymore about 50 letters. I imagine it will be far closer to 100.
    There are no words to describe my loathing for Cameron. He's worse than Heath.
    Far, far worse than Heath. At least Heath was honest about his position and it was a view (however misguided) born out of WWII.

    Cameron is just a liar and a fake.
    Yes. I first said on here months ago that Cameron would become the Tory Blair, loathed with a passion by his own party. I see my thesis has been taken up.

    He will become the lightning conductor for all the Tory shame and self hatred that will bubble over - once we have voted IN. He will be the symbol of the GREAT LIE that was told to the British people, etc etc. And as the EU comes after more of our sovereignty, which it will (because it always does) the anger at Cameron will only grow.

    He'll win his vote. But then he can look forward to a lifetime of contumely, poured over his silly pink head.
    It depends how comprehensive the defeat is.

    I see a direct line between the Conservatives who cheered when Chris Patten lost his seat, the gang of Redwood, Gorman, Cash, IDS et al who rendered the party incapable of opposing the rise of Blair and Brown, and the present lynch mob out for Cameron's blood today.

    If Cameron goes down, the long project to rescue the natural party of government from the grip of an ideological virus will go down too. With Labour led by Corbyn and the Lib Dems in disarray the country can ill afford such a train of events.
    Sorry, the Tories will be out of power for a generation (maybe longer) very shortly. Its no more than they deserve.
    Chortle ....

    Who exactly are the Tories about to lose power to

    The Jezzbollah .... Firing blanks with gun and ballot box
    The Kippers .... Sounds fishy to me
    Yellow Peril .... Not Winning Here any time soon
    Finchley Road Lizards .... (Y)Icke(s)
  • Options
    Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    edited May 2016

    A leaked letter suggests the Prime Minister was plotting with a multinational firm on how to hammer home the Remain case while still claiming he was prepared to campaign to leave.

    The interesting point about this story is that Brexiteers are prepared to leak this

    Bringing down Cameron is much more important to them than whether we are in the EU or not.
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,543

    Interesting analysis Mr Meeks - and while I agree that it would be foolish to rely on the Mr Micawber option:

    Labour rightwingers can also present this to themselves as the Mr Micawber option. In practice, however, there is no particular reason why anything should turn up.

    I suspect quite a few things will turn up.

    None of us know the state of the Conservative Party, or the government not much over a month from now. 'Weakened' and 'Divided' are both dead certs, but 'badly' or 'disastrously'?

    Who will be the PM three months from now?

    What will be the state of the economy six months from now?

    So, lots of 'events, dear boy, events'.......

    The point is that whatever turns up, it is most unlikely to benefit a Labour Party led by Corbyn. The national vote share they received last week was, if not risible, certainly underwhelming, and with a divided and incompetent government in the throes of a major policy disagreement, any halfway competent opposition would be streaking ahead in the polls. Even Michael Foot did better than Corbyn is doing on these counts, and he went on to lose the small matter of one in four of Labour's voters and all but three of their seats in the south of England.

    What still puzzles me about Labour is how they cannot see that this makes achieving any goals they may have impossible. Worse, if Corbyn does succeed in forcing through constitutional reform they will stand a very real risk of losing all their support and becoming as relevant as the Liberal Democrats. I know some people talk about a crisis of capitalism, or the threat from the Greens, that make Corbyn a potential winner, but even if that were true neither could be exploited by the current Labour Party. Socialism is failing far more disastrously than capitalism at the moment (cf. Venezuela, Greece) and Labour are in any case blamed for the extent of our problems (rightly, in fact, and their state of denial about this was their major stumbling-block to being credible last year).

    If I were a member of the Labour right, I would take the Charge of the Light Brigade option to at least show willing. I agree with Alastair though that Labour's right has neither the courage nor the integrity to do the 'right' thing.

    PS - it's faintly amusing that Corbyn, who has sucked up to numerous fascist (Galtieri, Saddam, Gaddafi, Eisen) and paramilitary (IRA) organisations, is described as being on the left. Self awareness isn't his long suit, is it? But then Chavez had the same problem.
  • Options
    shiney2shiney2 Posts: 672

    shiney2 said:

    shiney2 said:

    Yippee, its a new day! Hello Britain..
    www.youtube.com/watch?v=j0pwXLtvt2w&feature=youtu.be

    Its PIFFLE! again!

    PIFFLE piffle PIFFLE piffle PIFFLE PIFFLE

    Seriously, you want yesterday's embarrassment repeated today?
    You were so sure your little quote proved what you thought. It seemed a shame to disturb your entire day..
    :smiley:

    I really must watch this - and the longer one. I'm voting Leave, and ought to catch up with the campaigning.
    Its getting a good airing in our canvassing. Its points, and Immigration, Immigration, Immigration are top sellers!

  • Options
    Plato_SaysPlato_Says Posts: 11,822
    JackW said:

    GIN1138 said:

    SeanT said:

    GIN1138 said:

    SeanT said:

    MP_SE said:

    Dave won't have to worry anymore about 50 letters. I imagine it will be far closer to 100.
    There are no words to describe my loathing for Cameron. He's worse than Heath.
    Far, far worse than Heath. At least Heath was honest about his position and it was a view (however misguided) born out of WWII.

    Cameron is just a liar and a fake.
    Yes. I first said on here months ago that Cameron would become the Tory Blair, loathed with a passion by his own party. I see my thesis has been taken up.

    He will become the lightning conductor for all the Tory shame and self hatred that will bubble over - once we have voted IN. He will be the symbol of the GREAT LIE that was told to the British people, etc etc. And as the EU comes after more of our sovereignty, which it will (because it always does) the anger at Cameron will only grow.

    He'll win his vote. But then he can look forward to a lifetime of contumely, poured over his silly pink head.
    It depends how comprehensive the defeat is.

    I see a direct line between the Conservatives who cheered when Chris Patten lost his seat, the gang of Redwood, Gorman, Cash, IDS et al who rendered the party incapable of opposing the rise of Blair and Brown, and the present lynch mob out for Cameron's blood today.

    If Cameron goes down, the long project to rescue the natural party of government from the grip of an ideological virus will go down too. With Labour led by Corbyn and the Lib Dems in disarray the country can ill afford such a train of events.
    Sorry, the Tories will be out of power for a generation (maybe longer) very shortly. Its no more than they deserve.
    Chortle ....

    Who exactly are the Tories about to lose power to

    The Jezzbollah .... Firing blanks with gun and ballot box
    The Kippers .... Sounds fishy to me
    Yellow Peril .... Not Winning Here any time soon
    Finchley Road Lizards .... (Y)Icke(s)
    Mossad agents
  • Options
    JackW said:

    Latest ARSE4EU Referendum Projection Countdown

    3 hours 3 minutes 3 seconds

    Go on Jack ..... surprise us.
  • Options
    Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    @euanmccolm: there are exactly as many snp mps having affairs with that journalist as there are pandas in Scotland.
  • Options
    OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 32,128

    Interesting analysis Mr Meeks - and while I agree that it would be foolish to rely on the Mr Micawber option:

    Labour rightwingers can also present this to themselves as the Mr Micawber option. In practice, however, there is no particular reason why anything should turn up.

    I suspect quite a few things will turn up.

    None of us know the state of the Conservative Party, or the government not much over a month from now. 'Weakened' and 'Divided' are both dead certs, but 'badly' or 'disastrously'?

    Who will be the PM three months from now?

    What will be the state of the economy six months from now?

    So, lots of 'events, dear boy, events'.......

    20 or so Conservative MP’s defenestrated, resulting in by-elections, most of which will won by LD’s?

    I wouldn’t think that, if that happens, Farron will be likely to give much support to a Cameron (or any other Tory) Government.
  • Options
    CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 59,855
    shiney2 said:

    shiney2 said:

    shiney2 said:

    Yippee, its a new day! Hello Britain..
    www.youtube.com/watch?v=j0pwXLtvt2w&feature=youtu.be

    Its PIFFLE! again!

    PIFFLE piffle PIFFLE piffle PIFFLE PIFFLE

    Seriously, you want yesterday's embarrassment repeated today?
    You were so sure your little quote proved what you thought. It seemed a shame to disturb your entire day..
    Joking apart - posting video's costs OGH money - so I would submit, out of politeness, once is enough (and this one you posted more than once yesterday, let alone in previous days.)

    Oh, and piffle
    So, no argument left. Not even yesterdays comprehension failure?
    Out of kindness I'm not going to repost the articles from the Lisbon Treaty which you claimed supported your little video, but in fact directly contradicted it

    Now run along, Piffle......
  • Options
    Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453

    20 or so Conservative MP’s defenestrated

    Labour have the same problem. The Lib Dems probably do too, but nobody cares enough to check
  • Options
    MortimerMortimer Posts: 13,960
    Point of order Mr Meeks.

    It might not be popular, but conservative economics has done more to combat world poverty than socialism ever will. It is not out of community interest that the baker rises at 5am each morning....
  • Options
    I suspect little will happen over the next 6 months - Dave will win his referendum, just, and shortly thereafter Parliament will break up for its three and a half month summer jolly hols.
    Dave should be implementing a reshuffle of his Cabinet, moving on the likes of Osborne, etc, but he won't ...... Dave doesn't do re-shuffles.
  • Options
    shiney2shiney2 Posts: 672

    shiney2 said:

    shiney2 said:

    shiney2 said:

    Yippee, its a new day! Hello Britain..
    www.youtube.com/watch?v=j0pwXLtvt2w&feature=youtu.be

    Its PIFFLE! again!

    PIFFLE piffle PIFFLE piffle PIFFLE PIFFLE

    Seriously, you want yesterday's embarrassment repeated today?
    You were so sure your little quote proved what you thought. It seemed a shame to disturb your entire day..
    Joking apart - posting video's costs OGH money - so I would submit, out of politeness, once is enough (and this one you posted more than once yesterday, let alone in previous days.)

    Oh, and piffle
    So, no argument left. Not even yesterdays comprehension failure?
    Out of kindness I'm not going to repost the articles from the Lisbon Treaty which you claimed supported your little video, but in fact directly contradicted it

    Now run along, Piffle......
    You wrongly said I quoted from the Lisbon Treaty.

    1) I didn't quote from anything.
    2) that link isnt 'the Lisbon Treaty'.

    That apart, good post!
  • Options
    philiphphiliph Posts: 4,704
    JackW said:

    GIN1138 said:

    SeanT said:

    GIN1138 said:

    SeanT said:

    MP_SE said:

    Dave won't have to worry anymore about 50 letters. I imagine it will be far closer to 100.
    There are no words to describe my loathing for Cameron. He's worse than Heath.
    Far, far worse than Heath. At least Heath was honest about his position and it was a view (however misguided) born out of WWII.

    Cameron is just a liar and a fake.
    Yes. I first said on here months ago that Cameron would become the Tory Blair, loathed with a passion by his own party. I see my thesis has been taken up.

    He will become the lightning conductor for all the Tory shame and self hatred that will bubble over - once we have voted IN. He will be the symbol of the GREAT LIE that was told to the British people, etc etc. And as the EU comes after more of our sovereignty, which it will (because it always does) the anger at Cameron will only grow.

    He'll win his vote. But then he can look forward to a lifetime of contumely, poured over his silly pink head.
    It depends how comprehensive the defeat is.

    I see a direct line between the Conservatives who cheered when Chris Patten lost his seat, the gang of Redwood, Gorman, Cash, IDS et al who rendered the party incapable of opposing the rise of Blair and Brown, and the present lynch mob out for Cameron's blood today.

    If Cameron goes down, the long project to rescue the natural party of government from the grip of an ideological virus will go down too. With Labour led by Corbyn and the Lib Dems in disarray the country can ill afford such a train of events.
    Sorry, the Tories will be out of power for a generation (maybe longer) very shortly. Its no more than they deserve.
    Chortle ....

    Who exactly are the Tories about to lose power to

    The Jezzbollah .... Firing blanks with gun and ballot box
    The Kippers .... Sounds fishy to me
    Yellow Peril .... Not Winning Here any time soon
    Finchley Road Lizards .... (Y)Icke(s)
    You miss out one option, the most dangerous to the Tories.

    Other Tories.

    The thread header has considered Labour in too much isolation. What they do is in part dictated by what the Tories do.

    Post referendum the right of Labour and left of the Tories could have a very happy union. I still think there is a likleyhood of both parties splitting after the referendum.
  • Options
    CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 59,855
    shiney2 said:

    shiney2 said:

    shiney2 said:

    shiney2 said:

    Yippee, its a new day! Hello Britain..
    www.youtube.com/watch?v=j0pwXLtvt2w&feature=youtu.be

    Its PIFFLE! again!

    PIFFLE piffle PIFFLE piffle PIFFLE PIFFLE

    Seriously, you want yesterday's embarrassment repeated today?
    You were so sure your little quote proved what you thought. It seemed a shame to disturb your entire day..
    Joking apart - posting video's costs OGH money - so I would submit, out of politeness, once is enough (and this one you posted more than once yesterday, let alone in previous days.)

    Oh, and piffle
    So, no argument left. Not even yesterdays comprehension failure?
    Out of kindness I'm not going to repost the articles from the Lisbon Treaty which you claimed supported your little video, but in fact directly contradicted it

    Now run along, Piffle......
    You wrongly said I quoted from the Lisbon Treaty.

    1) I didn't quote from anything.
    2) that link isnt 'the Lisbon Treaty'.

    So what's today's defence?

    Same video, new defence?

    It was piffle yesterday, it's piffle today.....
  • Options
    shiney2shiney2 Posts: 672

    shiney2 said:

    shiney2 said:

    shiney2 said:

    shiney2 said:

    Yippee, its a new day! Hello Britain..
    www.youtube.com/watch?v=j0pwXLtvt2w&feature=youtu.be

    Its PIFFLE! again!

    PIFFLE piffle PIFFLE piffle PIFFLE PIFFLE

    Seriously, you want yesterday's embarrassment repeated today?
    You were so sure your little quote proved what you thought. It seemed a shame to disturb your entire day..
    Joking apart - posting video's costs OGH money - so I would submit, out of politeness, once is enough (and this one you posted more than once yesterday, let alone in previous days.)

    Oh, and piffle
    So, no argument left. Not even yesterdays comprehension failure?
    Out of kindness I'm not going to repost the articles from the Lisbon Treaty which you claimed supported your little video, but in fact directly contradicted it

    Now run along, Piffle......
    You wrongly said I quoted from the Lisbon Treaty.

    1) I didn't quote from anything.
    2) that link isnt 'the Lisbon Treaty'.

    So what's today's defence?

    Same video, new defence?

    It was piffle yesterday, it's piffle today.....
    No defence is required against a false statement. Read the link..
  • Options
    JackWJackW Posts: 14,787
    philiph said:

    JackW said:

    GIN1138 said:

    SeanT said:

    GIN1138 said:

    SeanT said:

    MP_SE said:

    Dave won't have to worry anymore about 50 letters. I imagine it will be far closer to 100.
    There are no words to describe my loathing for Cameron. He's worse than Heath.
    Far, far worse than Heath. At least Heath was honest about his position and it was a view (however misguided) born out of WWII.

    Cameron is just a liar and a fake.
    Yes. I first said on here months ago that Cameron would become the Tory Blair, loathed with a passion by his own party. I see my thesis has been taken up.

    He will become the lightning conductor for all the Tory shame and self hatred that will bubble over - once we have voted IN. He will be the symbol of the GREAT LIE that was told to the British people, etc etc. And as the EU comes after more of our sovereignty, which it will (because it always does) the anger at Cameron will only grow.

    He'll win his vote. But then he can look forward to a lifetime of contumely, poured over his silly pink head.
    It depends how comprehensive the defeat is.

    I see a direct line between the Conservatives who cheered when Chris Patten lost his seat, the gang of Redwood, Gorman, Cash, IDS et al who rendered the party incapable of opposing the rise of Blair and Brown, and the present lynch mob out for Cameron's blood today.

    If Cameron goes down, the long project to rescue the natural party of government from the grip of an ideological virus will go down too. With Labour led by Corbyn and the Lib Dems in disarray the country can ill afford such a train of events.
    Sorry, the Tories will be out of power for a generation (maybe longer) very shortly. Its no more than they deserve.
    Chortle ....

    Who exactly are the Tories about to lose power to

    The Jezzbollah .... Firing blanks with gun and ballot box
    The Kippers .... Sounds fishy to me
    Yellow Peril .... Not Winning Here any time soon
    Finchley Road Lizards .... (Y)Icke(s)
    You miss out one option, the most dangerous to the Tories.

    Other Tories.

    The thread header has considered Labour in too much isolation. What they do is in part dictated by what the Tories do.

    Post referendum the right of Labour and left of the Tories could have a very happy union. I still think there is a likleyhood of both parties splitting after the referendum.
    Other Tories elect new leader (factored in) and join the ..... er .... er .... Tory Party.

    Sounds about right to me.
  • Options
    ThreeQuidderThreeQuidder Posts: 6,133
    JackW said:

    Finchley Road Lizards .... (Y)Icke(s)

    :lol:
  • Options
    CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 59,855
    shiney2 said:

    shiney2 said:

    shiney2 said:

    shiney2 said:

    shiney2 said:

    Yippee, its a new day! Hello Britain..
    www.youtube.com/watch?v=j0pwXLtvt2w&feature=youtu.be

    Its PIFFLE! again!

    PIFFLE piffle PIFFLE piffle PIFFLE PIFFLE

    Seriously, you want yesterday's embarrassment repeated today?
    You were so sure your little quote proved what you thought. It seemed a shame to disturb your entire day..
    Joking apart - posting video's costs OGH money - so I would submit, out of politeness, once is enough (and this one you posted more than once yesterday, let alone in previous days.)

    Oh, and piffle
    So, no argument left. Not even yesterdays comprehension failure?
    Out of kindness I'm not going to repost the articles from the Lisbon Treaty which you claimed supported your little video, but in fact directly contradicted it

    Now run along, Piffle......
    You wrongly said I quoted from the Lisbon Treaty.

    1) I didn't quote from anything.
    2) that link isnt 'the Lisbon Treaty'.

    So what's today's defence?

    Same video, new defence?

    It was piffle yesterday, it's piffle today.....
    No defence is required against a false statement. Read the link..
    I did - and I quoted details back to you which directly contradict the claims in the video

    But for our entertainment, can you provide links that support we will have to:

    - replace the pound with the Euro
    - replace common law & jury trial with bench trials
    - join Schengen.

    In your own time.
  • Options
    CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 59,855
    edited May 2016
    Since piffle2 may be a while in supporting his video's claims - here's one for starters:

    The claim: We will not join the euro

    Reality Check verdict:
    This is true - the UK secured an opt-out, which is written into EU law. The UK cannot be forced to adopt the single currency.


    http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-eu-referendum-35990076
  • Options
    shiney2shiney2 Posts: 672

    shiney2 said:

    shiney2 said:

    shiney2 said:

    shiney2 said:

    shiney2 said:

    Yippee, its a new day! Hello Britain..
    www.youtube.com/watch?v=j0pwXLtvt2w&feature=youtu.be

    Its PIFFLE! again!

    PIFFLE piffle PIFFLE piffle PIFFLE PIFFLE

    Seriously, you want yesterday's embarrassment repeated today?
    You were so sure your little quote proved what you thought. It seemed a shame to disturb your entire day..
    Joking apart - posting video's costs OGH money - so I would submit, out of politeness, once is enough (and this one you posted more than once yesterday, let alone in previous days.)

    Oh, and piffle
    So, no argument left. Not even yesterdays comprehension failure?
    Out of kindness I'm not going to repost the articles from the Lisbon Treaty which you claimed supported your little video, but in fact directly contradicted it

    Now run along, Piffle......
    You wrongly said I quoted from the Lisbon Treaty.

    1) I didn't quote from anything.
    2) that link isnt 'the Lisbon Treaty'.

    So what's today's defence?

    Same video, new defence?

    It was piffle yesterday, it's piffle today.....
    No defence is required against a false statement. Read the link..
    I did - and I quoted details back to you which directly contradict the claims in the video

    But for our entertainment, can you provide links that support we will have to:

    - replace the pound with the Euro
    - replace common law & jury trial with bench trials
    - join Schengen.

    In your own time.
    Still trying to muddy the waters..

    If it directly contradicts, you'll have no difficulty quoting it again, will you?
  • Options
    tlg86tlg86 Posts: 25,221
    Scott_P said:

    A leaked letter suggests the Prime Minister was plotting with a multinational firm on how to hammer home the Remain case while still claiming he was prepared to campaign to leave.

    The interesting point about this story is that Brexiteers are prepared to leak this

    Bringing down Cameron is much more important to them than whether we are in the EU or not.
    Wow. You're not arguing that it looks bad for Cameron.
  • Options
    CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 59,855
    shiney2 said:

    shiney2 said:

    shiney2 said:

    shiney2 said:

    shiney2 said:

    shiney2 said:

    Yippee, its a new day! Hello Britain..
    www.youtube.com/watch?v=j0pwXLtvt2w&feature=youtu.be

    Its PIFFLE! again!

    PIFFLE piffle PIFFLE piffle PIFFLE PIFFLE

    Seriously, you want yesterday's embarrassment repeated today?
    You were so sure your little quote proved what you thought. It seemed a shame to disturb your entire day..
    Joking apart - posting video's costs OGH money - so I would submit, out of politeness, once is enough (and this one you posted more than once yesterday, let alone in previous days.)

    Oh, and piffle
    So, no argument left. Not even yesterdays comprehension failure?
    Out of kindness I'm not going to repost the articles from the Lisbon Treaty which you claimed supported your little video, but in fact directly contradicted it

    Now run along, Piffle......
    You wrongly said I quoted from the Lisbon Treaty.

    1) I didn't quote from anything.
    2) that link isnt 'the Lisbon Treaty'.

    So what's today's defence?

    Same video, new defence?

    It was piffle yesterday, it's piffle today.....
    No defence is required against a false statement. Read the link..
    I did - and I quoted details back to you which directly contradict the claims in the video

    But for our entertainment, can you provide links that support we will have to:

    - replace the pound with the Euro
    - replace common law & jury trial with bench trials
    - join Schengen.

    In your own time.
    Still trying to muddy the waters..

    If it directly contradicts, you'll have no difficulty quoting it again, will you?
    You're the one (re) posting the video - if you can't support the claims in it, we may draw our own conclusions about the veracity of the rest of it....
  • Options
    SquareRootSquareRoot Posts: 7,095
    edited May 2016
    At 5.30 every evening on PM there is a regular roundup of the days EU referendum's major moments.. I cannot bring myself to listen as its just lies from both sides.. the result will be based on who are the better liars..
  • Options
    Plato_SaysPlato_Says Posts: 11,822

    Since piffle2 may be a while in supporting his video's claims - here's one for starters:

    The claim: We will not join the euro

    Reality Check verdict:
    This is true - the UK secured an opt-out, which is written into EU law. The UK cannot be forced to adopt the single currency.


    http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-eu-referendum-35990076

    Get a room.
  • Options
    philiphphiliph Posts: 4,704
    edited May 2016

    Since piffle2 may be a while in supporting his video's claims - here's one for starters:

    The claim: We will not join the euro

    Reality Check verdict:
    This is true - the UK secured an opt-out, which is written into EU law. The UK cannot be forced to adopt the single currency.


    http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-eu-referendum-35990076

    Which is one of the best reasons for voting out. With a growing number of nations joining the euro policy of the EU will rightly be orientated round the interests of euro members. That leaves us isolated and irrelevant on the sideline.

  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,812
    Scott_P said:

    A leaked letter suggests the Prime Minister was plotting with a multinational firm on how to hammer home the Remain case while still claiming he was prepared to campaign to leave.

    The interesting point about this story is that Brexiteers are prepared to leak this

    Bringing down Cameron is much more important to them than whether we are in the EU or not.
    It really isn't. I'd far rather have Brexit than remove Cameron as PM.

    I haven't decided what I think about Cameron's continuance in office yet. I certainly want Osborne to go.

    No matter what the result.
  • Options
    shiney2shiney2 Posts: 672

    shiney2 said:

    shiney2 said:

    shiney2 said:

    shiney2 said:

    shiney2 said:

    shiney2 said:

    Yippee, its a new day! Hello Britain..
    www.youtube.com/watch?v=j0pwXLtvt2w&feature=youtu.be

    Its PIFFLE! again!

    PIFFLE piffle PIFFLE piffle PIFFLE PIFFLE

    Seriously, you want yesterday's embarrassment repeated today?
    You were so sure your little quote proved what you thought. It seemed a shame to disturb your entire day..
    Joking apart - posting video's costs OGH money - so I would submit, out of politeness, once is enough (and this one you posted more than once yesterday, let alone in previous days.)

    Oh, and piffle
    So, no argument left. Not even yesterdays comprehension failure?
    Out of kindness I'm not going to repost the articles from the Lisbon Treaty which you claimed supported your little video, but in fact directly contradicted it

    Now run along, Piffle......
    You wrongly said I quoted from the Lisbon Treaty.

    1) I didn't quote from anything.
    2) that link isnt 'the Lisbon Treaty'.

    So what's today's defence?

    Same video, new defence?

    It was piffle yesterday, it's piffle today.....
    No defence is required against a false statement. Read the link..
    I did - and I quoted details back to you which directly contradict the claims in the video

    But for our entertainment, can you provide links that support we will have to:

    - replace the pound with the Euro
    - replace common law & jury trial with bench trials
    - join Schengen.

    In your own time.
    Still trying to muddy the waters..

    If it directly contradicts, you'll have no difficulty quoting it again, will you?
    You're the one (re) posting the video - if you can't support the claims in it, we may draw our own conclusions about the veracity of the rest of it....
    Ah, so you can't even reproduce something from yesterday that you claim 'directly contradicts' one small part of the vid.

    Its not going well for you is it?
  • Options
    shiney2shiney2 Posts: 672

    Since piffle2 may be a while in supporting his video's claims - here's one for starters:

    The claim: We will not join the euro

    Reality Check verdict:
    This is true - the UK secured an opt-out, which is written into EU law. The UK cannot be forced to adopt the single currency.


    http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-eu-referendum-35990076

    Get a room.
    Have a heart. She/it/he is a REMAINer
  • Options
    RogerRoger Posts: 18,939
    Good article Alastaire. Life's a bitch. The only precedent I can remember and it was a pretty close parallel was the early 80's though I agree it won't happen this time.

    It's possible that after the Referendum the Tories split and unpredictable opportunities open up. Vacuums usually get filled and there's a large one on the centre left but what fills it is beyond my imagination.

    I keep hearing David Miliband and wishing Ralph and Marion had stopped at one.....
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,543

    Scott_P said:

    A leaked letter suggests the Prime Minister was plotting with a multinational firm on how to hammer home the Remain case while still claiming he was prepared to campaign to leave.

    The interesting point about this story is that Brexiteers are prepared to leak this

    Bringing down Cameron is much more important to them than whether we are in the EU or not.
    It really isn't. I'd far rather have Brexit than remove Cameron as PM.

    I haven't decided what I think about Cameron's continuance in office yet. I certainly want Osborne to go.

    No matter what the result.
    Speaking for myself, I never wanted him as Chancellor in the first place!
  • Options
    DavidLDavidL Posts: 51,520
    What do the Labour right believe? What are they fighting for?

    If you take someone like Yvette Cooper what does she want that is different from current government policy? Recently, she has wanted us to be more compassionate and more open to refugees in Europe. I think she has been quite effective in this and the fact that Government policy changed quite significantly in her direction shows a lot of Tories think the same. Would she go further than current government policy? I am not sure, it may be that she would simply want to get on with it faster.

    There is still a somewhat banal mantra right across the Labour party that Tory cuts must be opposed. The critique of IDS, of all people, is probably shared across the Labour right. How can it be right to be cutting the welfare bill and CGT at the same time? I think that Corbyn would agree but the difference is that he seems minded to reinstate these cuts regardless of the state of public finances. Would the Labour right go that far? I think they are more pragmatic and know full well the electoral consequences of "unfunded" spending commitments but is pragmatism something to die in a ditch for?

    For me the break point for the Labour right is likely to be defence. The Labour right has always wanted an independent nuclear deterrent. Corbyn does not. With Ken currently in the dog house he may have to move a little more slowly but he still has overwhelming advantages and is likely to prevail. At that stage they have to take one of Alastair's options. I suspect option 5 will look the most attractive. Or becoming Mayor of Manchester or something.
  • Options
    CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 59,855
    shiney2 said:

    shiney2 said:

    shiney2 said:

    shiney2 said:

    shiney2 said:

    shiney2 said:

    shiney2 said:

    Yippee, its a new day! Hello Britain..
    www.youtube.com/watch?v=j0pwXLtvt2w&feature=youtu.be

    Its PIFFLE! again!

    PIFFLE piffle PIFFLE piffle PIFFLE PIFFLE

    Seriously, you want yesterday's embarrassment repeated today?
    You were so sure your little quote proved what you thought. It seemed a shame to disturb your entire day..
    Joking apart - posting video's costs OGH money - so I would submit, out of politeness, once is enough (and this one you posted more than once yesterday, let alone in previous days.)

    Oh, and piffle
    So, no argument left. Not even yesterdays comprehension failure?
    Out of kindness I'm not going to repost the articles from the Lisbon Treaty which you claimed supported your little video, but in fact directly contradicted it

    Now run along, Piffle......
    You wrongly said I quoted from the Lisbon Treaty.

    1) I didn't quote from anything.
    2) that link isnt 'the Lisbon Treaty'.

    So what's today's defence?

    Same video, new defence?

    It was piffle yesterday, it's piffle today.....
    No defence is required against a false statement. Read the link..
    I did - and I quoted details back to you which directly contradict the claims in the video

    But for our entertainment, can you provide links that support we will have to:

    - replace the pound with the Euro
    - replace common law & jury trial with bench trials
    - join Schengen.

    In your own time.
    Still trying to muddy the waters..

    If it directly contradicts, you'll have no difficulty quoting it again, will you?
    You're the one (re) posting the video - if you can't support the claims in it, we may draw our own conclusions about the veracity of the rest of it....
    Ah, so you can't even reproduce something from yesterday that you claim 'directly contradicts' one small part of the vid.

    Its not going well for you is it?
    I'm not the one whose piffle video has been exposed as well, piffle......And since you can't support the claims in it, I think we may all draw our own conclusions......
  • Options
    philiphphiliph Posts: 4,704
    JackW said:

    philiph said:

    JackW said:

    GIN1138 said:

    SeanT said:

    GIN1138 said:

    SeanT said:

    MP_SE said:

    Dave won't have to worry anymore about 50 letters. I imagine it will be far closer to 100.
    There are no words to describe my loathing for Cameron. He's worse th.
    Yes. I first said on here months ago that Cameron would become the Tory Blair, loathed with a passion by his own party. I see my thesis has been taken up.

    He will become the lightning conductor for all the Tory shame and self hatred that will bubble over - once we have voted IN. He will be the symbol of the GREAT LIE that was told to the British people, etc etc. And as the EU comes after more of our sovereignty, which it will (because it always does) the anger at Cameron will only grow.

    He'll win his vote. But then he can look forward to a lifetime of contumely, poured over his silly pink head.
    It depends how comprehensive the defeat is.

    I see a direct line between the Conservatives who cheered when Chris Patten lost his seat, the gang of Redwood, Gorman, Cash, IDS et al who rendered the party incapable of opposing the rise of Blair and Brown, and the present lynch mob out for Cameron's blood today.

    If Cameron goes down, the long project to rescue the natural party of government from the grip of an ideological virus will go down too. With Labour led by Corbyn and the Lib Dems in disarray the country can ill afford such a train of events.
    Sorry, the Tories will be out of power for a generation (maybe longer) very shortly. Its no more than they deserve.
    Chortle ....

    Who exactly are the Tories about to lose power to

    The Jezzbollah .... Firing blanks with gun and ballot box
    The Kippers .... Sounds fishy to me
    Yellow Peril .... Not Winning Here any time soon
    Finchley Road Lizards .... (Y)Icke(s)
    You miss out one option, the most dangerous to the Tories.

    Other Tories.

    The thread header has considered Labour in too much isolation. What they do is in part dictated by what the Tories do.

    Post referendum the right of Labour and left of the Tories could have a very happy union. I still think there is a likleyhood of both parties splitting after the referendum.
    Other Tories elect new leader (factored in) and join the ..... er .... er .... Tory Party.

    Sounds about right to me.
    The problem is that broad churches tend to split and fragment when they contain people with incompatible core beliefs.
  • Options
    shiney2shiney2 Posts: 672

    shiney2 said:

    shiney2 said:

    shiney2 said:

    shiney2 said:

    shiney2 said:

    shiney2 said:

    shiney2 said:

    Yippee, its a new day! Hello Britain..
    www.youtube.com/watch?v=j0pwXLtvt2w&feature=youtu.be

    Its PIFFLE! again!

    PIFFLE piffle PIFFLE piffle PIFFLE PIFFLE

    Seriously, you want yesterday's embarrassment repeated today?
    You were so sure your little quote proved what you thought. It seemed a shame to disturb your entire day..
    Joking apart - posting video's costs OGH money - so I would submit, out of politeness, once is enough (and this one you posted more than once yesterday, let alone in previous days.)

    Oh, and piffle
    So, no argument left. Not even yesterdays comprehension failure?
    Out of kindness I'm not going to repost the articles from the Lisbon Treaty which you claimed supported your little video, but in fact directly contradicted it

    Now run along, Piffle......
    You wrongly said I quoted from the Lisbon Treaty.

    1) I didn't quote from anything.
    2) that link isnt 'the Lisbon Treaty'.

    So what's today's defence?

    Same video, new defence?

    It was piffle yesterday, it's piffle today.....
    No defence is required against a false statement. Read the link..
    I did - and I quoted details back to you which directly contradict the claims in the video

    But for our entertainment, can you provide links that support we will have to:

    - replace the pound with the Euro
    - replace common law & jury trial with bench trials
    - join Schengen.

    In your own time.
    Still trying to muddy the waters..

    If it directly contradicts, you'll have no difficulty quoting it again, will you?
    You're the one (re) posting the video - if you can't support the claims in it, we may draw our own conclusions about the veracity of the rest of it....
    Ah, so you can't even reproduce something from yesterday that you claim 'directly contradicts' one small part of the vid.

    Its not going well for you is it?
    I'm not the one whose piffle video has been exposed as well, piffle......And since you can't support the claims in it, I think we may all draw our own conclusions......
    Still ducking and divin'..

    Let's see this 'exposure' then..



  • Options
    CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 59,855
    philiph said:

    Since piffle2 may be a while in supporting his video's claims - here's one for starters:

    The claim: We will not join the euro

    Reality Check verdict:
    This is true - the UK secured an opt-out, which is written into EU law. The UK cannot be forced to adopt the single currency.


    http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-eu-referendum-35990076

    Which is one of the best reasons for voting out. With a growing number of nations joining the euro policy of the EU will rightly be orientated round the interests of euro members. That leaves us isolated and irrelevant on the sideline.


    That's certainly an argument - but not one thats in the Piffle video which has the bare-faced lie that we'd have to replace the pound with the euro - among other lies.....which piffle2, curiously is too shy to support.....
  • Options
    ThreeQuidderThreeQuidder Posts: 6,133
    philiph said:

    Since piffle2 may be a while in supporting his video's claims - here's one for starters:

    The claim: We will not join the euro

    Reality Check verdict:
    This is true - the UK secured an opt-out, which is written into EU law. The UK cannot be forced to adopt the single currency.


    http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-eu-referendum-35990076

    Which is one of the best reasons for voting out. With a growing number of nations joining the euro policy of the EU will rightly be orientated round the interests of euro members. That leaves us isolated and irrelevant on the sideline.

    And the government disliked and distrusted by the rest of the EU governments for refusing to sign up to the full Project despite an instruction in the referendum to do so...
  • Options
    Plato_SaysPlato_Says Posts: 11,822
    Only 36 days to go...
  • Options
    RogerRoger Posts: 18,939

    shiney2 said:

    shiney2 said:

    Yippee, its a new day! Hello Britain..
    www.youtube.com/watch?v=j0pwXLtvt2w&feature=youtu.be

    Its PIFFLE! again!

    PIFFLE piffle PIFFLE piffle PIFFLE PIFFLE

    Seriously, you want yesterday's embarrassment repeated today?
    You were so sure your little quote proved what you thought. It seemed a shame to disturb your entire day..
    Joking apart - posting videos costs OGH money - so I would submit, out of politeness, once is enough (and this one you posted more than once yesterday, let alone in previous days.)

    Oh, and piffle
    I haven't seen it before. It's spoilt by being so childish. The graphics are OK but the dialogue sounds like it was written for twelve year olds
  • Options
    shiney2shiney2 Posts: 672

    Only 36 days to go...

    That's 36,000 leaflets and my next pair of trainers.

    Nevermind, if I flag, I shall think of 'Carlotta'.

    That'll see me through.

    Carthago delenda est.
  • Options
    DavidLDavidL Posts: 51,520

    Only 36 days to go...

    Quite.

    A friend of mine who was standing for the Scottish Parliament had the main objective of getting to the 6th of May so that the madness of being a candidate and dealing with hundreds of e-mails (mainly the same generated by websites), face book, twitter and other rubbish might end. There was one flaw in his plan. He is now an MSP.
  • Options
    CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 59,855
    shiney2 said:

    Only 36 days to go...

    That's 36,000 leaflets and my next pair of trainers.
    Do your leaflets repeat the claims in your piffle video?
  • Options
    Plato_SaysPlato_Says Posts: 11,822
    shiney2 said:

    Only 36 days to go...

    That's 36,000 leaflets and my next pair of trainers.

    Nevermind, if I flag, I shall think of 'Carlotta'.

    That'll see me through.

    Carthago delenda est.
    *impressed face*

    I'll be donating again too. Have to do all we can.
  • Options
    shiney2shiney2 Posts: 672

    shiney2 said:

    Only 36 days to go...

    That's 36,000 leaflets and my next pair of trainers.
    Do your leaflets repeat the claims in your piffle video?
    Give me your address and I'll drop one off.
  • Options
    blackburn63blackburn63 Posts: 4,492
    The labour right should unite with the conservative left and form one homogenous, London centric, public sector orientated Quango led by Nick Clegg. They can agree with everybody, achieve nothing, and sneer and pontificate in nice restaurants with senior BBC staff on taxpayer's expenses. Mandelson will be their spiritual leader, both Cameron and Blair can pop in to "the big tent" periodically, they will be inclusive.

  • Options
    JackWJackW Posts: 14,787

    Only 36 days to go...

    ONLY !! .... :cry:
  • Options
    david_herdsondavid_herdson Posts: 17,464
    I agree with Alastair's conclusion. The Labour right's best option now is to hope for the best and bring down as little criticism on themselves as possible. The odd article for The Guardian putting forward a different line but in a positive way won't harm but trying to take on the leadership directly will almost inevitably end in defeat on the specific - they won't get their policies, with rare exceptions - and blame for the ensuing defeat in the general election, when it comes.

    Put simply, they cannot take their party back until their party is ready for them to take it back - and it won't be ready until Corbyn and his kind are discredited. That might happen before 2020; chances are it will be afterwards. The Labour right also need a figure they can rally around. Blair had already proved himself under Kinnock and Smith. At present, there is no such figure. Unfortunately, the difficulty is that it'll be almost impossible for anyone on Labour's right to distinguish themselves at present: either they'll be tied to Corbyn or they'll be disloyal to him. How do you square that circle?

    What isn't an option is breaking away. There might be a large block in parliament who'd follow given the right conditions but those conditions won't be there. The unions won't defect, not all that many members would (going on both the experience of the SDP and the 2015 leadership vote). Would voters? There's no love for Corbyn, for the Lib Dems, for UKIP or the Tories among centrist floating voters, so there is a pool to fish in but again, we go back to the questions of what the positive vision of an SDP2 would be, and who would front its message.

    One point that Alastair doesn't address is whether the Labour left will give the right space to wait. New boundaries and reselections might force the right's hands if it looks like there's a purge by stealth. Then - but only then - might there be a case for starting again. But while there's hope, they simply have to hunker down and wait their chance.
  • Options
    CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 59,855
    shiney2 said:

    shiney2 said:

    Only 36 days to go...

    That's 36,000 leaflets and my next pair of trainers.
    Do your leaflets repeat the claims in your piffle video?
    Give me your address and I'll drop one off.
    That's a 'no' then......thought not......
  • Options
    RogerRoger Posts: 18,939
    Mortimer said:

    Point of order Mr Meeks.

    It might not be popular, but conservative economics has done more to combat world poverty than socialism ever will. It is not out of community interest that the baker rises at 5am each morning....

    I read 'Baker' as 'Banker' and was about to agree with you
  • Options
    DavidLDavidL Posts: 51,520
    Roger said:

    Mortimer said:

    Point of order Mr Meeks.

    It might not be popular, but conservative economics has done more to combat world poverty than socialism ever will. It is not out of community interest that the baker rises at 5am each morning....

    I read 'Baker' as 'Banker' and was about to agree with you
    LOL. Some welcome light relief. Thank you Roger.
  • Options
    philiphphiliph Posts: 4,704

    The labour right should unite with the conservative left and form one homogenous, London centric, public sector orientated Quango led by Nick Clegg. They can agree with everybody, achieve nothing, and sneer and pontificate in nice restaurants with senior BBC staff on taxpayer's expenses. Mandelson will be their spiritual leader, both Cameron and Blair can pop in to "the big tent" periodically, they will be inclusive.

    Rather alarmingly for me, as it is an unexpected conclusion that is at odds with my disdain for deals in smokey rooms, I have to point out that the best period of government in the last twenty years or so was the coalition. Far better than Blair, brown or Cameron administrating unfettered.
  • Options
    DavidLDavidL Posts: 51,520
    And in other shock news: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-scotland-politics-36300892

    BBC, fingers on the pulse.
  • Options
    RobDRobD Posts: 59,022
    Something about Corbynism sweeping the nation? :D
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,543
    edited May 2016


    Put simply, they cannot take their party back until their party is ready for them to take it back - and it won't be ready until Corbyn and his kind are discredited. That might happen before 2020; chances are it will be afterwards. The Labour right also need a figure they can rally around. Blair had already proved himself under Kinnock and Smith. At present, there is no such figure. Unfortunately, the difficulty is that it'll be almost impossible for anyone on Labour's right to distinguish themselves at present: either they'll be tied to Corbyn or they'll be disloyal to him. How do you square that circle?

    One point that Alastair doesn't address is whether the Labour left will give the right space to wait. New boundaries and reselections might force the right's hands if it looks like there's a purge by stealth. Then - but only then - might there be a case for starting again. But while there's hope, they simply have to hunker down and wait their chance.

    http://labour-uncut.co.uk/2016/05/13/the-results-are-in-on-corbyns-first-few-months-no-matter-how-you-spin-it-theyre-terrible/

    The last paragraph is the crucial one in this context.
  • Options
    david_herdsondavid_herdson Posts: 17,464
    Unsurprising, given, as you say, the number of Labour members who've joined from the left and left from the right.
  • Options
    CD13CD13 Posts: 6,352
    edited May 2016
    Mr Meeks,

    "Me, I expect a little of option 1 and a little of option 5"

    I can only agree. But I still think Jezza is for one more Christmas and not forever. Once he's wrought the party in his own image, he will stand down with his job done. The revamped Labour/SWP Conglomerate will fight 2020 and lose.

    Because they can.
  • Options
    rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 58,576

    I agree with Alastair's conclusion. The Labour right's best option now is to hope for the best and bring down as little criticism on themselves as possible. The odd article for The Guardian putting forward a different line but in a positive way won't harm but trying to take on the leadership directly will almost inevitably end in defeat on the specific - they won't get their policies, with rare exceptions - and blame for the ensuing defeat in the general election, when it comes.

    Put simply, they cannot take their party back until their party is ready for them to take it back - and it won't be ready until Corbyn and his kind are discredited. That might happen before 2020; chances are it will be afterwards. The Labour right also need a figure they can rally around. Blair had already proved himself under Kinnock and Smith. At present, there is no such figure. Unfortunately, the difficulty is that it'll be almost impossible for anyone on Labour's right to distinguish themselves at present: either they'll be tied to Corbyn or they'll be disloyal to him. How do you square that circle?

    What isn't an option is breaking away. There might be a large block in parliament who'd follow given the right conditions but those conditions won't be there. The unions won't defect, not all that many members would (going on both the experience of the SDP and the 2015 leadership vote). Would voters? There's no love for Corbyn, for the Lib Dems, for UKIP or the Tories among centrist floating voters, so there is a pool to fish in but again, we go back to the questions of what the positive vision of an SDP2 would be, and who would front its message.

    One point that Alastair doesn't address is whether the Labour left will give the right space to wait. New boundaries and reselections might force the right's hands if it looks like there's a purge by stealth. Then - but only then - might there be a case for starting again. But while there's hope, they simply have to hunker down and wait their chance.

    The other aspect is the unions. We may yet see the men in grey suits. I suspect that this will result in another hard left figure, probably McDonnell, but we'll see. I can't see some of the more pragmatic union bosses staring at electoral slaughter in 2020 (and therefore at least two further heaves to get back into contention) and not doing something. Union bosses rarely sit on their hands. Just possibly they would engineer their old mucker, Tom Watson, as caretaker for the GE with instructions to save as many seats as humanely possible.
  • Options
    SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 38,986
    The Labour membership has made clear it is happy to leave the Tories - hopelessly split, increasingly inept and highly likely to veer even further right - to govern the country. Mounting a challenge to Corbyn in such circumstances is entirely pointless. He'll win again and that will be that.

    The essential problem is that under FPTP we get broad coalitions. The Labour right is stuck in what they thought was the centre left one. There's no-one to defect to: whatever Corbynistas say, the Tories are anathema and, what's more, are at war with each other, the LDs are even less relevant than Labour. A new party would take years to build and would struggle to move beyond the seats held by a handful of well known MPs with large personal votes.

    Being Labour matters a lot to Labour people. It's a very hard party to walk away from. I hate the fact I have been forced into doing it and it has been far less a part of my life than it has been for long-time members and serving MPs. They feel it is part of what they are. For better or worse, they are going to stick with it because that's what Labour people do. I'd call it an exercise in futility rather than cowardice. And, pragmatically, there is always the chance something will turn up.

    For the country, all this is sub-optimal: the Tories are rudderless and at each others' throats, with a wafer thin majority given to them by 37% of the electorate; the Labour party is rudderless and at each others' throats with the support of around 30% of the electorate. Whichever way you look at it and whatever happens on 23rd June, it's no way to run a country.

  • Options
    CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 59,855
    philiph said:

    The labour right should unite with the conservative left and form one homogenous, London centric, public sector orientated Quango led by Nick Clegg. They can agree with everybody, achieve nothing, and sneer and pontificate in nice restaurants with senior BBC staff on taxpayer's expenses. Mandelson will be their spiritual leader, both Cameron and Blair can pop in to "the big tent" periodically, they will be inclusive.

    Rather alarmingly for me, as it is an unexpected conclusion that is at odds with my disdain for deals in smokey rooms, I have to point out that the best period of government in the last twenty years or so was the coalition. Far better than Blair, brown or Cameron administrating unfettered.
    Agree completely - much better to have Cameron held to account by LibDem Orange bookers than his right wing nutters
  • Options
    rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 58,576

    The labour right should unite with the conservative left and form one homogenous, London centric, public sector orientated Quango led by Nick Clegg. They can agree with everybody, achieve nothing, and sneer and pontificate in nice restaurants with senior BBC staff on taxpayer's expenses. Mandelson will be their spiritual leader, both Cameron and Blair can pop in to "the big tent" periodically, they will be inclusive.

    That's right. Blair and Mandelson achieved nothing.
  • Options
    CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 59,855
    DavidL said:

    And in other shock news: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-scotland-politics-36300892

    BBC, fingers on the pulse.


    And Irony meter bust:

    "And we will not assume a monopoly of wisdom. Good ideas exist across the parliamentary chamber and I promise that we will always seek to judge them on merit, rather than on their party of origin.
  • Options
    Plato_SaysPlato_Says Posts: 11,822

    Unsurprising, given, as you say, the number of Labour members who've joined from the left and left from the right.
    I can't recall the source, but it was suggested that c25% of Labour's new members voted Green at GE2015
  • Options
    JackWJackW Posts: 14,787
    edited May 2016

    philiph said:

    The labour right should unite with the conservative left and form one homogenous, London centric, public sector orientated Quango led by Nick Clegg. They can agree with everybody, achieve nothing, and sneer and pontificate in nice restaurants with senior BBC staff on taxpayer's expenses. Mandelson will be their spiritual leader, both Cameron and Blair can pop in to "the big tent" periodically, they will be inclusive.

    Rather alarmingly for me, as it is an unexpected conclusion that is at odds with my disdain for deals in smokey rooms, I have to point out that the best period of government in the last twenty years or so was the coalition. Far better than Blair, brown or Cameron administrating unfettered.
    Agree completely - much better to have Cameron held to account by LibDem Orange bookers than his right wing nutters
    One of the advantages of the Coalition was that most of the nuttier ideas of both parties were blocked by the sensible tendency of either, most usually this was thrashed out in the Quad and that meant for better government.

    To some degree a small majority also has the same effect but the restraining factor has tended to kick in after rather than before it leaves government departments.
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,543

    Unsurprising, given, as you say, the number of Labour members who've joined from the left and left from the right.
    I can't recall the source, but it was suggested that c25% of Labour's new members voted Green at GE2015
    Since they achieved less than 4% of the vote, that doesn't exactly suggest a massive influx of new members to Labour, contrary to the Jezziah's claims.
  • Options
    rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 58,576
    Levels of delusion appear to be growing then? Even if policy platform is right, how can people seriously believe he is a credible candidate for PM?
  • Options
    rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 58,576

    Unsurprising, given, as you say, the number of Labour members who've joined from the left and left from the right.
    I can't recall the source, but it was suggested that c25% of Labour's new members voted Green at GE2015
    And the debate about what to do about it within Greens has started:

    http://www.theecologist.org/News/news_analysis/2987663/in_the_corbyn_era_greens_must_move_from_socialism_to_ecologism.html

    I suspect the forthcoming leadership election will involve some debate about the way ahead for the party.
  • Options
    DavidLDavidL Posts: 51,520
    Tom Lehrer was a genius but it is incredible that nearly 50 years on the words of The Folk Song Army so brilliantly describe the current Labour party: http://www.metrolyrics.com/the-folk-song-army-lyrics-tom-lehrer.html

    We are the Folk Song Army.
    Everyone of us cares.
    We all hate poverty, war, and injustice,
    Unlike the rest of you squares

    Remember the war against Franco?
    That's the kind where each of us belongs.
    Though he may have won all the battles,
    We had all the good songs.

    So join in the Folk Song Army,
    Guitars are the weapons we bring
    To the fight against poverty, war, and injustice.
    Ready! Aim! Sing!
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,543
    edited May 2016

    Levels of delusion appear to be growing then? Even if policy platform is right, how can people seriously believe he is a credible candidate for PM?
    But that wasn't why they voted for him, was it? It was so they could feel that they were being decent people who cared about the poor and were proper socialists who didn't vote for machine politicians.

    The irony of electing Corbyn on that platform, who has never done anything in his life to improve the lot of the poor or vulnerable and owes his entire career to his father's connections and brown-nosing his way up the London Labour machine, was apparently lost on them.
  • Options
    Plato_SaysPlato_Says Posts: 11,822
    ydoethur said:

    Unsurprising, given, as you say, the number of Labour members who've joined from the left and left from the right.
    I can't recall the source, but it was suggested that c25% of Labour's new members voted Green at GE2015
    Since they achieved less than 4% of the vote, that doesn't exactly suggest a massive influx of new members to Labour, contrary to the Jezziah's claims.
    Guido had the Compliance Unit list of infiltrators - I glanced at Page 1, dozens and dozens of SWP/Green/TUSC et al former candidates
  • Options
    SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 20,787
    How about the Labour right put forward their arguments to the rest of us. If they are compelling then the mood in the party will change.

    No - they tried that last year and received 4.5% support.

    The political centre of Labour is essentially soft left. If the right want to be pragmatic they should get behind a soft left leadership challenge as the best chance to move the party slightly in their direction.
  • Options
    CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 59,855
    JackW said:

    philiph said:

    The labour right should unite with the conservative left and form one homogenous, London centric, public sector orientated Quango led by Nick Clegg. They can agree with everybody, achieve nothing, and sneer and pontificate in nice restaurants with senior BBC staff on taxpayer's expenses. Mandelson will be their spiritual leader, both Cameron and Blair can pop in to "the big tent" periodically, they will be inclusive.

    Rather alarmingly for me, as it is an unexpected conclusion that is at odds with my disdain for deals in smokey rooms, I have to point out that the best period of government in the last twenty years or so was the coalition. Far better than Blair, brown or Cameron administrating unfettered.
    Agree completely - much better to have Cameron held to account by LibDem Orange bookers than his right wing nutters
    To some degree a small majority also has the same effect but the restraining factor has tended to kick in after rather than before it leaves government departments.
    Yes, as we've seen in the compulsory freedom of choice forced academisation plan, it get out into the public domain, is defended with increasing bluster, before being taken out and shot 'modified'.......was Osborne behind that?
  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,812
    philiph said:

    The labour right should unite with the conservative left and form one homogenous, London centric, public sector orientated Quango led by Nick Clegg. They can agree with everybody, achieve nothing, and sneer and pontificate in nice restaurants with senior BBC staff on taxpayer's expenses. Mandelson will be their spiritual leader, both Cameron and Blair can pop in to "the big tent" periodically, they will be inclusive.

    Rather alarmingly for me, as it is an unexpected conclusion that is at odds with my disdain for deals in smokey rooms, I have to point out that the best period of government in the last twenty years or so was the coalition. Far better than Blair, brown or Cameron administrating unfettered.
    That's interesting.

    I struggle to think of anything of significance this purely Conservative Government has achieved over the last year.
  • Options
    WandererWanderer Posts: 3,838
    Mortimer said:

    Point of order Mr Meeks.

    It might not be popular, but conservative economics has done more to combat world poverty than socialism ever will. It is not out of community interest that the baker rises at 5am each morning....

    The Labour right isn't socialist. Actually, neither is a lot of the Labour soft left.
  • Options
    WandererWanderer Posts: 3,838
    Mortimer said:

    Point of order Mr Meeks.

    It might not be popular, but conservative economics has done more to combat world poverty than socialism ever will. It is not out of community interest that the baker rises at 5am each morning....

    The Labour right isn't socialist. Actually, neither is a lot of the Labour soft left.
  • Options
    JackWJackW Posts: 14,787

    JackW said:

    philiph said:

    The labour right should unite with the conservative left and form one homogenous, London centric, public sector orientated Quango led by Nick Clegg. They can agree with everybody, achieve nothing, and sneer and pontificate in nice restaurants with senior BBC staff on taxpayer's expenses. Mandelson will be their spiritual leader, both Cameron and Blair can pop in to "the big tent" periodically, they will be inclusive.

    Rather alarmingly for me, as it is an unexpected conclusion that is at odds with my disdain for deals in smokey rooms, I have to point out that the best period of government in the last twenty years or so was the coalition. Far better than Blair, brown or Cameron administrating unfettered.
    Agree completely - much better to have Cameron held to account by LibDem Orange bookers than his right wing nutters
    To some degree a small majority also has the same effect but the restraining factor has tended to kick in after rather than before it leaves government departments.
    Yes, as we've seen in the compulsory freedom of choice forced academisation plan, it get out into the public domain, is defended with increasing bluster, before being taken out and shot 'modified'.......was Osborne behind that?
    The Ozzie Monster .... He' Behind You !!!

    The Chancellor isn't the panto villain in all cases .... not quite .... :smile:
  • Options
    Plato_SaysPlato_Says Posts: 11,822

    Unsurprising, given, as you say, the number of Labour members who've joined from the left and left from the right.
    I can't recall the source, but it was suggested that c25% of Labour's new members voted Green at GE2015
    And the debate about what to do about it within Greens has started:

    http://www.theecologist.org/News/news_analysis/2987663/in_the_corbyn_era_greens_must_move_from_socialism_to_ecologism.html

    I suspect the forthcoming leadership election will involve some debate about the way ahead for the party.
    Indeed.
    And that compelling reason simply cannot possibly be: 'We're strong on equality and social justice and public services'. Because not only does that not distinguish us form Labour any more, worse still, it encourages the thought that there's no need to vote Green any more, now that Corbyn leads Labour. It fights worse than weakly, because it fights on, and reinforces, Labour's home ground.
  • Options
    ThreeQuidderThreeQuidder Posts: 6,133

    Levels of delusion appear to be growing then? Even if policy platform is right, how can people seriously believe he is a credible candidate for PM?
    Because they agree with him.
  • Options
    AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    Wanderer said:

    Mortimer said:

    Point of order Mr Meeks.

    It might not be popular, but conservative economics has done more to combat world poverty than socialism ever will. It is not out of community interest that the baker rises at 5am each morning....

    The Labour right isn't socialist. Actually, neither is a lot of the Labour soft left.
    The party's flag is deepest puce with fleurs de lys in pale chartreuse.
  • Options
    SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 20,787
    Worth also noting that those who joined Labour last year to vote in the leadership election will either have to renew over the summer or lapse. The makeup of the membership could be quite a bit different by the Autumn.
  • Options
    tlg86tlg86 Posts: 25,221

    philiph said:

    The labour right should unite with the conservative left and form one homogenous, London centric, public sector orientated Quango led by Nick Clegg. They can agree with everybody, achieve nothing, and sneer and pontificate in nice restaurants with senior BBC staff on taxpayer's expenses. Mandelson will be their spiritual leader, both Cameron and Blair can pop in to "the big tent" periodically, they will be inclusive.

    Rather alarmingly for me, as it is an unexpected conclusion that is at odds with my disdain for deals in smokey rooms, I have to point out that the best period of government in the last twenty years or so was the coalition. Far better than Blair, brown or Cameron administrating unfettered.
    That's interesting.

    I struggle to think of anything of significance this purely Conservative Government has achieved over the last year.
    Do you think it would have been any better had the Lib Dems held on to 25 seats and the coalition had continued, albeit in a different form? One thing that I didn't like about the coalition was that it was expensive. Both sides needed to win and that costs money. We still have a deficit of £75bn and there appears to be no appetite for tackling it, and I think that would have been as true with the Coalition.

    Of course, we probably wouldn't be having an In-Out referendum right now.
  • Options
    Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 25,671
    What I'd like is for them to break away and join a Cameronite rump, adopt an unashamedly 'party of in', statist, pc platform, and let people decide whether they want to vote for it.

    What they should do (from their pov) is wait and hope for Labour's disastrous defeat at the GE, and try to regain control of the party.

    Good thread.
  • Options
    SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 38,986

    Levels of delusion appear to be growing then? Even if policy platform is right, how can people seriously believe he is a credible candidate for PM?

    They are not interested in power. They are perfectly content for the Tories to govern; however disastrously they do it.

  • Options
    foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548
    philiph said:

    The labour right should unite with the conservative left and form one homogenous, London centric, public sector orientated Quango led by Nick Clegg. They can agree with everybody, achieve nothing, and sneer and pontificate in nice restaurants with senior BBC staff on taxpayer's expenses. Mandelson will be their spiritual leader, both Cameron and Blair can pop in to "the big tent" periodically, they will be inclusive.

    Rather alarmingly for me, as it is an unexpected conclusion that is at odds with my disdain for deals in smokey rooms, I have to point out that the best period of government in the last twenty years or so was the coalition. Far better than Blair, brown or Cameron administrating unfettered.
    I did point out a year ago that people would look back on the Coalition as a golden period of good government. It is one reason that the LDs will revive, opinions on that period will mellow with time.

    A second reason for an LD revival being that the extremists in both Labour and Tory will drive centrist voters elsewhere. Even if politicians remain in their current parties, the voters will not.

    I think that the differences between the Corbynistas and the Labour right are actually not that major or fatal. The principle dislike of the left is its perceived unelectability rather than its policies. Both wings oppose austerity, support the NHS and want it revived, are pro-Remain and want redistribution of wealth. Trident renewal and Mid-East wars are the major differences of substance, but neither are very popular with the public. They are not issues worth splitting over, but ones on which to agree to differ.

    If the Corbynistas were to become a little more professional at winning elections rather than internal contests then the Labour right would support them with gusto. Nothing appeals more to them than the prospect of forming a government. I see some signs of this happening already. If you can't beat them - join them. In practice the alternative in the short term is a Labour led coalition, so not the full juice of the grape.

    We hear a lot of guff about anti-establishment parties on the rise, but the real anti-establishment party is the Labour Left, and that may well yet come to power. Ironically that could be brought about by an early election following a Leave vote.
  • Options
    DavidLDavidL Posts: 51,520
    JackW said:

    philiph said:

    The labour right should unite with the conservative left and form one homogenous, London centric, public sector orientated Quango led by Nick Clegg. They can agree with everybody, achieve nothing, and sneer and pontificate in nice restaurants with senior BBC staff on taxpayer's expenses. Mandelson will be their spiritual leader, both Cameron and Blair can pop in to "the big tent" periodically, they will be inclusive.

    Rather alarmingly for me, as it is an unexpected conclusion that is at odds with my disdain for deals in smokey rooms, I have to point out that the best period of government in the last twenty years or so was the coalition. Far better than Blair, brown or Cameron administrating unfettered.
    Agree completely - much better to have Cameron held to account by LibDem Orange bookers than his right wing nutters
    One of the advantages of the Coalition was that most of the nuttier ideas of both parties were blocked by the sensible tendency of either, most usually this was thrashed out in the Quad and that meant for better government.

    To some degree a small majority also has the same effect but the restraining factor has tended to kick in after rather than before it leaves government departments.
    I agree with that Jack and it is a pity that Cameron and Osborne did not learn from the positive experience of the quad. An Inner Cabinet where ideas are thoroughly critiqued and the issue of what could go wrong is properly considered before publication would have saved the government a serious amount of heartache.
  • Options
    Scrapheap_as_wasScrapheap_as_was Posts: 10,060
    6) Sweep the nation's mayoral roles

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-36308593
This discussion has been closed.