Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Corbynus interruptus would destroy Tory hubris about 2020 i

SystemSystem Posts: 12,267
edited March 2016 in General

imagepoliticalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Corbynus interruptus would destroy Tory hubris about 2020 immediately

Just look at the above tweets, coupled with various ministers at the DWP arguing publicly over how good/bad IDS was,  In normal circumstances the way the Tory party is acting over the  EU and IDS’s attack on the government not helping the poor, and the cherry on the parfait, allies of Cameron welcoming a leadership challenge, you wouldn’t want to put a single penny on them winning the 20…

Read the full story here


«134

Comments

  • MikeKMikeK Posts: 9,053
    First and frisky. :D
  • MortimerMortimer Posts: 14,158
    FPT:

    Those whom the gods wish to destroy they first make mad.
    I wonder, in a year's time will Labour or the Conservatives seem madder?
    The blues need either a post-referendum reconciliation or a crushing victory for one side (in the party, not necessarily the referendum).

    To my eyes the only person at the top of the Conservatives who has spoken with sense and presence this weekend is Graham Brady, Chairman of the 1922. He has the respect and votes of most of the backbenchers in his pocket. Sadly he probably lacks the ambition to leave the 1922 and go into cabinet now. But if that changed then his odds (circa 100/1) will drop dramatically.
    1. Grammar school
    2. LEAVER
    3. Back bench support
    4. Top media performer.

    Looks like a good combo. I'm on (but then I'm on about 20 contenders, so I shouldn't be taken as a tipster for this).

    DYOR.
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 62,080
    Cameron and Osborne have been complacent and arrogant. But the risk the Conservatives take is ditching mass appeal and lurching to the right, assuming they'll sweep to victory.

    Gove's role influencing the choice of leader, and whoever that leader is, could be critical.
  • MikeKMikeK Posts: 9,053
    When I saw David Laws on Marr this morning, it took me more than a few seconds realise who I was seeing on the screen; he has aged noticeably.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 72,178
    Can't get the thread header up. Keeps saying 'error 404 not found'
  • anothernickanothernick Posts: 3,591
    Spot on TSE.

    With every day that passes it seems to become less and less likely that the Tories will be able to pull themselves together after the referendum. whatever the result. How Cameron must regret not following through when he told his party to stop banging on about Europe!

    FWIW as a Labour activist and opponent of Corbyn my view is that it is as certain as these things can be that the PLP will move against him at some point. The prospect of a Labour win in 2020 will make a coup more likely. The widespread assumption that the membership consists entirely of committed corbynites is fallacious - most of the new members have done nothing except vote in the leadership contest, very few CLP posts have been won by Momentum supporters and the vast majority of activists and Councillors that I know are opposed to the leadership. At my own CLP Momentum candidates were crushed by 4-1 by moderates at the AGM.

    Corbyn is not as strong as Momentum, and the tory press, would like you to believe - they both have their own reasons for creating an aura of invincibility around him which is not borne out by events at the grassroots. The anti-Corbyn forces are now much more organised amongst the membership, and they have most MPs, Councillors and the party organisation on their side. A new leadership contest would not be a shoo-in for McDonnell or another Corbynite candidate.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,663
    @Thescreamingeagles Can you stop posting suggestions to both parties that tries to ruin my betting position ?!
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 120,433
    edited March 2016
    Pulpstar said:

    @Thescreamingeagles Can you stop posting suggestions to both parties that tries to ruin my betting position ?!

    I suspect your betting positions are similar to mine.

    I'm just trying to be honest on how I see politics.
  • FrankBoothFrankBooth Posts: 10,001
    Apparently Boris is skiing.
  • SimonStClareSimonStClare Posts: 7,976
    Adj, Corbynus interruptus: Never interrupt you opponent when he’s dipping his wick…?
  • WandererWanderer Posts: 3,838
    Anyone know why Jeb has been backed in for the nomination?
  • Adj, Corbynus interruptus: Never interrupt you opponent when he’s dipping his wick…?

    More Labour should consider withdrawing Corbyn from the leadership, or Corbyn should pull out himself, to give Labour a fighting chance.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,663
    edited March 2016

    Pulpstar said:

    @Thescreamingeagles Can you stop posting suggestions to both parties that tries to ruin my betting position ?!

    I suspect your betting positions are similar to mine.

    I'm just trying to be honest on how I see politics.
    :D

    Jeremy needs to stay for a while :)
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 120,433
    edited March 2016
    Pulpstar said:

    Pulpstar said:

    @Thescreamingeagles Can you stop posting suggestions to both parties that tries to ruin my betting position ?!

    I suspect your betting positions are similar to mine.

    I'm just trying to be honest on how I see politics.
    :D

    Jeremy needs to stay for a while :)
    Obviously we disagree on backing Matt Hancock as the next Tory leader :lol:
  • A fascinating idea. Except that (a) Corbyn stood up and said the budget was morally wrong in response to Osborne on Wednesday and (b) the continuity New Labour faction decided to abstain in response to the post-election budget (an action which sunk Burnham's chances of the leadeship).

    Labour ARE leading the attack on this. The "Labour aren't attacking" attack has about as much credibility as an Osborne budget forecast
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 62,080
    Mr. Wanderer, either someone's balancing a book (or seeking to), or there's a rumour he'll be the Establishment's stitch-up candidate. Or someone's making a silly bet.
  • RoyalBlueRoyalBlue Posts: 3,223
    FPT:

    Just got back from Vote Leave leafleting on a newish estate. Lots of families with young children plus pensioners. Now I feel like I've accomplished something this weekend!
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,663

    Pulpstar said:

    Pulpstar said:

    @Thescreamingeagles Can you stop posting suggestions to both parties that tries to ruin my betting position ?!

    I suspect your betting positions are similar to mine.

    I'm just trying to be honest on how I see politics.
    :D

    Jeremy needs to stay for a while :)
    Obviously we disagree on backing Matt Hancock as the next Tory leader :lol:
    Hapless Hancock :p
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,663
    edited March 2016
    http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/oct/30/kids-company-funded-relatives-of-its-staff-said-report-sent-to-ministers

    It was handed to the Cabinet Office just days before two ministers, Oliver Letwin and Matthew Hancock, approved the handing over of a final rescue grant to the charity a week before its collapse.
  • A fascinating idea. Except that (a) Corbyn stood up and said the budget was morally wrong in response to Osborne on Wednesday and (b) the continuity New Labour faction decided to abstain in response to the post-election budget (an action which sunk Burnham's chances of the leadeship).

    Labour ARE leading the attack on this. The "Labour aren't attacking" attack has about as much credibility as an Osborne budget forecast

    Ed Miliband led similar attacks on say the bedroom tax and other welfare cuts.

    He wasn't seen as a credible PM, the same will apply to Corbyn.
  • MortimerMortimer Posts: 14,158

    A fascinating idea. Except that (a) Corbyn stood up and said the budget was morally wrong in response to Osborne on Wednesday and (b) the continuity New Labour faction decided to abstain in response to the post-election budget (an action which sunk Burnham's chances of the leadeship).

    Labour ARE leading the attack on this. The "Labour aren't attacking" attack has about as much credibility as an Osborne budget forecast

    Urm, I think you'll find IDS is leading the attack presently.

    Corbyn's Labour have been drowned out of the media since it was dominated by stories of their 80s and 90s friends and acquaintances.....
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 22,387
    Let me get this right. If Labour are well behind in the polls with no chance of winning the 2020 GE then Corbyn is safe. If Labour is ahead and could win the GE then he is under threat.

    OK.
  • HurstLlamaHurstLlama Posts: 9,098

    Spot on TSE.

    With every day that passes it seems to become less and less likely that the Tories will be able to pull themselves together after the referendum. whatever the result. How Cameron must regret not following through when he told his party to stop banging on about Europe!

    FWIW as a Labour activist and opponent of Corbyn my view is that it is as certain as these things can be that the PLP will move against him at some point. The prospect of a Labour win in 2020 will make a coup more likely. The widespread assumption that the membership consists entirely of committed corbynites is fallacious - most of the new members have done nothing except vote in the leadership contest, very few CLP posts have been won by Momentum supporters and the vast majority of activists and Councillors that I know are opposed to the leadership. At my own CLP Momentum candidates were crushed by 4-1 by moderates at the AGM.

    Corbyn is not as strong as Momentum, and the tory press, would like you to believe - they both have their own reasons for creating an aura of invincibility around him which is not borne out by events at the grassroots. The anti-Corbyn forces are now much more organised amongst the membership, and they have most MPs, Councillors and the party organisation on their side. A new leadership contest would not be a shoo-in for McDonnell or another Corbynite candidate.

    Interesting stuff, Mr. Nick. So when the coup d'etat comes who do you think will be the new leader? Who, when it comes to it, is actually capable and willing to organise the coup?
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,663

    A fascinating idea. Except that (a) Corbyn stood up and said the budget was morally wrong in response to Osborne on Wednesday and (b) the continuity New Labour faction decided to abstain in response to the post-election budget (an action which sunk Burnham's chances of the leadeship).

    Labour ARE leading the attack on this. The "Labour aren't attacking" attack has about as much credibility as an Osborne budget forecast

    Ed Miliband led similar attacks on say the bedroom tax and other welfare cuts.

    He wasn't seen as a credible PM, the same will apply to Corbyn.
    Ed Miliband is alot more credible PM than Matt Hancock !
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 62,080
    Mr. Eagles, those attacks will have a far sharper edge after IDS' ill-considered remarks. He's not just cut Osborne and Cameron, he's damaged the blues as a whole.
  • WandererWanderer Posts: 3,838
    And on topic, yes, the Tories seem to be longing for the opposition benches. Their strategy for winning in 2020 is now entirely in Labour's hands to deliver.
  • Let me get this right. If Labour are well behind in the polls with no chance of winning the 2020 GE then Corbyn is safe. If Labour is ahead and could win the GE then he is under threat.

    OK.

    Yup, the polling paradox.

    Remember when Labour under Ed led in the polls, but we all saw in the supplementaries the voters preferred the Dave over Ed. Dave and George over the two Eds on the economy.

    Deep down, we know all know Corbyn's dire personal ratings mean, coupled with the perceptions that he is a terrorist sympathiser/risk to national security.
  • Honestly, I've spent most of today considering laying the Tories for most seats/backing Labour for most seats in 2020.
  • WandererWanderer Posts: 3,838

    Mr. Wanderer, either someone's balancing a book (or seeking to), or there's a rumour he'll be the Establishment's stitch-up candidate. Or someone's making a silly bet.

    It's information on option 2 I was hoping to flush out ;)
  • TudorRoseTudorRose Posts: 1,683

    Spot on TSE.

    With every day that passes it seems to become less and less likely that the Tories will be able to pull themselves together after the referendum. whatever the result. How Cameron must regret not following through when he told his party to stop banging on about Europe!

    FWIW as a Labour activist and opponent of Corbyn my view is that it is as certain as these things can be that the PLP will move against him at some point. The prospect of a Labour win in 2020 will make a coup more likely. The widespread assumption that the membership consists entirely of committed corbynites is fallacious - most of the new members have done nothing except vote in the leadership contest, very few CLP posts have been won by Momentum supporters and the vast majority of activists and Councillors that I know are opposed to the leadership. At my own CLP Momentum candidates were crushed by 4-1 by moderates at the AGM.

    Corbyn is not as strong as Momentum, and the tory press, would like you to believe - they both have their own reasons for creating an aura of invincibility around him which is not borne out by events at the grassroots. The anti-Corbyn forces are now much more organised amongst the membership, and they have most MPs, Councillors and the party organisation on their side. A new leadership contest would not be a shoo-in for McDonnell or another Corbynite candidate.

    But won't that just create a divided Labour party fighting a divided Tory party, which won't help their chances much?

    Perhaps the result will be a Lib-Dem resurgence (stop laughing at the back there!)
  • WandererWanderer Posts: 3,838

    Mr. Eagles, those attacks will have a far sharper edge after IDS' ill-considered remarks. He's not just cut Osborne and Cameron, he's damaged the blues as a whole.

    That is true. Conservatives who are impressed with IDS today may change their minds when, in 20 years' time, his words are still being flung in their face.
  • perdixperdix Posts: 1,806

    Pulpstar said:

    Pulpstar said:

    @Thescreamingeagles Can you stop posting suggestions to both parties that tries to ruin my betting position ?!

    I suspect your betting positions are similar to mine.

    I'm just trying to be honest on how I see politics.
    :D

    Jeremy needs to stay for a while :)
    Obviously we disagree on backing Matt Hancock as the next Tory leader :lol:
    Hancock has been described by a Tory MP as having the characteristics of a hermaphrodite.

  • JackWJackW Posts: 14,787

    Let me get this right. If Labour are well behind in the polls with no chance of winning the 2020 GE then Corbyn is safe. If Labour is ahead and could win the GE then he is under threat.

    OK.

    Precisely.

    Corbyn is the gift that keeps on giving and in such abundance and sustained beneficence that he should be declared a national treasure and shrines be erected for all to worship for his sustained health and continuance as Labour leader.
  • WandererWanderer Posts: 3,838

    Honestly, I've spent most of today considering laying the Tories for most seats/backing Labour for most seats in 2020.

    I laid Con Maj for a small amount a couple of days ago. Long time to wait for one's money when there's so much else afoot though.
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 62,080
    Mr. Wanderer, on the other thread, I highlighted that as comparable to the Battle of Gaza (the one in the 4th century BC) which appeared to have minimal long-term impact for Antigonus or Demetrius (his son, in command that day).

    However, it briefly gave Ptolemy control of Coele-Syria and the confidence to let Seleucus go try and reclaim his old satrapy of Babylonia. Despite being hugely outnumbered, Seleucus was a clever chap and through military and diplomatic means took not only Babylonia but, in time, all the eastern portion of Antigonus' empire. A couple of decades later, it was Seleucus' elephants that prevented Demetrius rescuing his father at Ipsus, ending the Antigonid Empire [although the dynasty did go on to become the royal line of Macedon].

    Or, to quote myself when previously referring to the Lib Dem electoral campaign: being a flasher today and castrated tomorrow is not a winning strategy.
  • WandererWanderer Posts: 3,838

    Let me get this right. If Labour are well behind in the polls with no chance of winning the 2020 GE then Corbyn is safe. If Labour is ahead and could win the GE then he is under threat.

    OK.

    Yes.

    Corbyn is safer if:

    Labour are so far behind that there seems no prospect of a win even with a new leader; or
    Labour are so far in front that it looks like they can win with Corbyn

    Corbyn is less safe if:

    Labour are doing just well enough to suggest they could win with a new leader but not well enough to suggest they could win with Corbyn
  • The problem with Continuity New Labour is that they had planned on Osborne delivering a good budget, Labour's response being awful and their "moderate" nodding at most of Osborne's doing for "fiscal credibility" would set them up for a post-locals coup.

    Except that Osborne's budget was crap, Corbyn's response set the tone for the last few days and Osborne's credibility is dust. The debate has become one of basic morality - thats the message the leadership have been laying out out for a while and has now been joined by IDS and other Tories.

    Ignore talk of a coup - if there is an attempt it will be about effective as Purnell going in 2009. The bitterati/First 11/G10/whatever they want to call themselves might be mainstream PLP but they're not mainstream Labour membership. Saying "Corbyn is crap" over and over doesn't make him crap. The government are tearing themselves apart over the immorality of taking from the poor to give to the well off. That helps Corbyn not hinders him.
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 63,567

    Spot on TSE.

    With every day that passes it seems to become less and less likely that the Tories will be able to pull themselves together after the referendum. whatever the result. How Cameron must regret not following through when he told his party to stop banging on about Europe!

    FWIW as a Labour activist and opponent of Corbyn my view is that it is as certain as these things can be that the PLP will move against him at some point. The prospect of a Labour win in 2020 will make a coup more likely. The widespread assumption that the membership consists entirely of committed corbynites is fallacious - most of the new members have done nothing except vote in the leadership contest, very few CLP posts have been won by Momentum supporters and the vast majority of activists and Councillors that I know are opposed to the leadership. At my own CLP Momentum candidates were crushed by 4-1 by moderates at the AGM.

    Corbyn is not as strong as Momentum, and the tory press, would like you to believe - they both have their own reasons for creating an aura of invincibility around him which is not borne out by events at the grassroots. The anti-Corbyn forces are now much more organised amongst the membership, and they have most MPs, Councillors and the party organisation on their side. A new leadership contest would not be a shoo-in for McDonnell or another Corbynite candidate.

    Bravo. Moderate Labour MPs need to move this summer. I'm not convinced that this idea that there's no point as Corbyn would simply win again easily is based on any reality about these new members and £3ers. Most of them won't be that motivated to back him a second time, or indeed, may already have dropped off the membership lists. IMHO it was all a moment of summer madness and will not be repeated.
  • NorfolkTilIDieNorfolkTilIDie Posts: 1,268
    MikeK said:

    http://nypost.com/2016/03/19/why-its-time-for-a-trump-revolution/

    A good article from a democrat now supporting The Donald.

    That article worries me. If Clinton loses all those Democrats who hate Obama, admire Ted Cruz and wants more Scalias on the Supreme Court, who will she have left??
  • LadyBucketLadyBucket Posts: 590
    I'm having trouble with this thread.

    MikeK (David Laws seemed to have aged noticeably).

    I agree but he's still just as arrogant. This man should never have been allowed back in government after his 'expenses' debacle. He's got a bloody cheek writing a book, when he was only an MP for five minutes.

    I take it he and Clegg were behind the stitching up Michael Gove and the Queen?

    I really don't like politics at the moment. MPs' from all sides need to have a bit more self-awareness about how things look to the public.



  • MikeKMikeK Posts: 9,053
    http://nypost.com/2016/03/19/why-its-time-for-a-trump-revolution/

    A good article from a democrat now supporting The Donald.
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 63,567
    Pulpstar said:

    Pulpstar said:

    Pulpstar said:

    @Thescreamingeagles Can you stop posting suggestions to both parties that tries to ruin my betting position ?!

    I suspect your betting positions are similar to mine.

    I'm just trying to be honest on how I see politics.
    :D

    Jeremy needs to stay for a while :)
    Obviously we disagree on backing Matt Hancock as the next Tory leader :lol:
    Hapless Hancock :p
    Hancock as leader is one of the funnier things I've heard recently.
  • stodgestodge Posts: 14,070
    Afternoon all :)

    Not sure I agree with TSE on this - I don't usually to be honest.

    2020 is a lifetime away - this will probably all be long forgotten. Has it damaged Cameron and especially Osborne ? Yes. for the moment but if REMAIN win well on June 23rd, none of it will matter.

    As for hubris, well, the Conservatives carried on with their self-immolation even after Kinnock. I suspect they thought any Labour leader was beatable, even Tony Blair. The disconnect was so strong they carried on even after losing 2,000 Councillors in a single night in 1995.

    Does the current crop think they would still win if they were facing Jarvis or someone else ? I don't know but they seem supremely confident of beating Corbyn (and with good reason). However, the public dislikes dysfunctional parties as we know so this round of Conservative in-fighting doesn't augur well for the party's candidates in six weeks or so.
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 63,567

    The problem with Continuity New Labour is that they had planned on Osborne delivering a good budget, Labour's response being awful and their "moderate" nodding at most of Osborne's doing for "fiscal credibility" would set them up for a post-locals coup.

    Except that Osborne's budget was crap, Corbyn's response set the tone for the last few days and Osborne's credibility is dust. The debate has become one of basic morality - thats the message the leadership have been laying out out for a while and has now been joined by IDS and other Tories.

    Ignore talk of a coup - if there is an attempt it will be about effective as Purnell going in 2009. The bitterati/First 11/G10/whatever they want to call themselves might be mainstream PLP but they're not mainstream Labour membership. Saying "Corbyn is crap" over and over doesn't make him crap. The government are tearing themselves apart over the immorality of taking from the poor to give to the well off. That helps Corbyn not hinders him.

    Can't agree. Labour needs a leadership election this summer.
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 54,249
    Yeah, Man U improve a pretty ordinary sporting weekend.
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 63,567
    Wanderer said:

    Let me get this right. If Labour are well behind in the polls with no chance of winning the 2020 GE then Corbyn is safe. If Labour is ahead and could win the GE then he is under threat.

    OK.

    Yes.

    Corbyn is safer if:

    Labour are so far behind that there seems no prospect of a win even with a new leader; or
    Labour are so far in front that it looks like they can win with Corbyn

    Corbyn is less safe if:

    Labour are doing just well enough to suggest they could win with a new leader but not well enough to suggest they could win with Corbyn
    Labour need to beware mid-term blues giving polls that seem to indicate that Corbyn will be PM. They will not be an accurate reflection of how people will vote in the actual GE.
  • foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548
    Pulpstar said:

    Pulpstar said:

    @Thescreamingeagles Can you stop posting suggestions to both parties that tries to ruin my betting position ?!

    I suspect your betting positions are similar to mine.

    I'm just trying to be honest on how I see politics.
    :D

    Jeremy needs to stay for a while :)
    Interestingly, when Jezza won the leadership he said that he would serve the full five years. This would imply that he plans to step down in 2020, either before or after the GE.

    Probably best time to move against him would be a post Brexit referendum contest.
  • foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548
    DavidL said:

    Yeah, Man U improve a pretty ordinary sporting weekend.

    The fight for 4th place is getting interesting. LVG should be safe for a little longer. Title race now down to 3. Arsenal have the easiest run in, Spurs the toughest, but still advantage Leicester.
  • perdix said:

    Pulpstar said:

    Pulpstar said:

    @Thescreamingeagles Can you stop posting suggestions to both parties that tries to ruin my betting position ?!

    I suspect your betting positions are similar to mine.

    I'm just trying to be honest on how I see politics.
    :D

    Jeremy needs to stay for a while :)
    Obviously we disagree on backing Matt Hancock as the next Tory leader :lol:
    Hancock has been described by a Tory MP as having the characteristics of a hermaphrodite.

    Whatever turns TSE on , I guess.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 124,735
    Labour could have picked a moderate leader last September it chose a leftwinger and the party will only accept a leftwinger replacing him before the next election as only a rightwinger like Michael Howard would be acceptable enough to the Tory Party to replace IDS. Once a right-wing platform was defeated in 2005 the Tories were ready to accept a charismatic moderate like Cameron just as Labour will only be ready to accept a charismatic moderate like Chuka Umunna or Dan Jarvis following a 2020 defeat.

    The Tories are at greater risk of leaking voters to UKIP than Labour at the moment as Labour was more at risk of leaking voters to the LDs than the Tories in 2005
  • IndigoIndigo Posts: 9,966
    Wanderer said:

    Mr. Eagles, those attacks will have a far sharper edge after IDS' ill-considered remarks. He's not just cut Osborne and Cameron, he's damaged the blues as a whole.

    That is true. Conservatives who are impressed with IDS today may change their minds when, in 20 years' time, his words are still being flung in their face.
    They said that about Mrs May and the Nasty Party, we still keep hearing about the Nasty Party, and yet she is supposedly a front runner for next leader.
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 22,387
    Watching Question Time on the Parliament channel.

    Nicky Morgan, leadership contender? LOL.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 124,735
    edited March 2016

    Wanderer said:

    Let me get this right. If Labour are well behind in the polls with no chance of winning the 2020 GE then Corbyn is safe. If Labour is ahead and could win the GE then he is under threat.

    OK.

    Yes.

    Corbyn is safer if:

    Labour are so far behind that there seems no prospect of a win even with a new leader; or
    Labour are so far in front that it looks like they can win with Corbyn

    Corbyn is less safe if:

    Labour are doing just well enough to suggest they could win with a new leader but not well enough to suggest they could win with Corbyn
    Labour need to beware mid-term blues giving polls that seem to indicate that Corbyn will be PM. They will not be an accurate reflection of how people will vote in the actual GE.
    Cameron trounces Corbyn on preferred PM as he trounced Ed Miliband
  • JackWJackW Posts: 14,787

    Saying "Corbyn is crap" over and over doesn't make him crap.....

    It does if he is, and Corbyn is as crap as the founder of the flushing lavatory - Thomas Crapper Esq might possibly have envisaged for his sanitary ware being a superbly efficient method of evacuating the khazi of political effluent.

  • Anyone got any idea about the odds against the SNP being the official Opposition in the next Parliament?
  • TCPoliticalBettingTCPoliticalBetting Posts: 10,819
    edited March 2016


    Or, to quote myself when previously referring to the Lib Dem electoral campaign: being a flasher today and castrated tomorrow is not a winning strategy.

    The REMAIN camp's head of strategy is the former head of the LD GE2015 campaign. Anyone spot the reason why REMAIN are not 20 points ahead when against 3 or 4 separate LEAVE campaigns?
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 22,387
    HYUFD said:

    Wanderer said:

    Let me get this right. If Labour are well behind in the polls with no chance of winning the 2020 GE then Corbyn is safe. If Labour is ahead and could win the GE then he is under threat.

    OK.

    Yes.

    Corbyn is safer if:

    Labour are so far behind that there seems no prospect of a win even with a new leader; or
    Labour are so far in front that it looks like they can win with Corbyn

    Corbyn is less safe if:

    Labour are doing just well enough to suggest they could win with a new leader but not well enough to suggest they could win with Corbyn
    Labour need to beware mid-term blues giving polls that seem to indicate that Corbyn will be PM. They will not be an accurate reflection of how people will vote in the actual GE.
    Cameron trounces Corbyn on preferred PM as he trounced Ed Miliband
    Cameron won't be a candidate in 2020.
  • JackW said:

    Saying "Corbyn is crap" over and over doesn't make him crap.....

    It does if he is, and Corbyn is as crap as the founder of the flushing lavatory - Thomas Crapper Esq might possibly have envisaged for his sanitary ware being a superbly efficient method of evacuating the khazi of political effluent.

    Except that the water closet had been around for well over two centuries before Mr Crapper was born.

  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 124,735

    HYUFD said:

    Wanderer said:

    Let me get this right. If Labour are well behind in the polls with no chance of winning the 2020 GE then Corbyn is safe. If Labour is ahead and could win the GE then he is under threat.

    OK.

    Yes.

    Corbyn is safer if:

    Labour are so far behind that there seems no prospect of a win even with a new leader; or
    Labour are so far in front that it looks like they can win with Corbyn

    Corbyn is less safe if:

    Labour are doing just well enough to suggest they could win with a new leader but not well enough to suggest they could win with Corbyn
    Labour need to beware mid-term blues giving polls that seem to indicate that Corbyn will be PM. They will not be an accurate reflection of how people will vote in the actual GE.
    Cameron trounces Corbyn on preferred PM as he trounced Ed Miliband
    Cameron won't be a candidate in 2020.
    He will stay long enough to see off Corbyn
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 82,554
    edited March 2016
    Pulpstar said:

    http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/oct/30/kids-company-funded-relatives-of-its-staff-said-report-sent-to-ministers

    It was handed to the Cabinet Office just days before two ministers, Oliver Letwin and Matthew Hancock, approved the handing over of a final rescue grant to the charity a week before its collapse.

    Anybody who saw the BBC documentary that was on last month (and made by a personal friend of Batwoman) would see that giving that women control of any significant amount of money was bonkers. And she openly admits things on camera that should be taken further, including this final rescue grant.

    Batwoman was using Kid Company money to fund a particular adult, flat, living costs, etc and even the personal friend of her's making the film basically said this seems very very wrong.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b06zw47r

    Wonder why it isn't available on iPlayer?
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 124,735
    Utah Y2 Analytics
    Cruz 53
    Kasich 29
    Trump 11
  • "Ros Altmann should be sacked
    Numbers 10 and 11 say that she attacked Duncan Smith without their approval. They could prove it by removing her as Pensions Minister."
    ToryDiary | By Mark Wallace
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 124,735


    Or, to quote myself when previously referring to the Lib Dem electoral campaign: being a flasher today and castrated tomorrow is not a winning strategy.

    The REMAIN camp's head of strategy is the former head of the LD GE2015 campaign. Anyone spot the reason why REMAIN are not 20 points ahead when against 3 or 4 separate LEAVE campaigns?
    Half the Remain team worked at CCHQ when the Tories won a majority
  • Mike Smithson ‎@MSmithsonPB
    Osbo now down to 13% chance as next CON leader on Betfair exchange.
  • JohnLilburneJohnLilburne Posts: 6,360

    Pulpstar said:

    http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/oct/30/kids-company-funded-relatives-of-its-staff-said-report-sent-to-ministers

    It was handed to the Cabinet Office just days before two ministers, Oliver Letwin and Matthew Hancock, approved the handing over of a final rescue grant to the charity a week before its collapse.

    Anybody who saw the BBC documentary that was on last month (and made by a personal friend of Batwoman) would see that giving that women control of any significant amount of money was bonkers. And she openly admits things on camera that should be taken further, including this final rescue grant.

    Batwoman was using Kid Company money to fund a particular adult, flat, living costs, etc and even the personal friend of her's making the film basically said this seems very very wrong.
    As a taxpayer, I certainly hope to see prosecutions
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 82,554

    Mike Smithson ‎@MSmithsonPB
    Osbo now down to 13% chance as next CON leader on Betfair exchange.

    That still 10 times too high...1.3% more like.
  • runnymederunnymede Posts: 2,536
    Frankly, what has happened Kid's Company is criminal - and it's a dreadful example of the superficial idiocy of today's political culture.
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 82,554

    Pulpstar said:

    http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/oct/30/kids-company-funded-relatives-of-its-staff-said-report-sent-to-ministers

    It was handed to the Cabinet Office just days before two ministers, Oliver Letwin and Matthew Hancock, approved the handing over of a final rescue grant to the charity a week before its collapse.

    Anybody who saw the BBC documentary that was on last month (and made by a personal friend of Batwoman) would see that giving that women control of any significant amount of money was bonkers. And she openly admits things on camera that should be taken further, including this final rescue grant.

    Batwoman was using Kid Company money to fund a particular adult, flat, living costs, etc and even the personal friend of her's making the film basically said this seems very very wrong.
    As a taxpayer, I certainly hope to see prosecutions
    There is definitely enough suspicious activity that a full criminal investigation should be undertaken without fear or favour.
  • WandererWanderer Posts: 3,838
    Indigo said:

    Wanderer said:

    Mr. Eagles, those attacks will have a far sharper edge after IDS' ill-considered remarks. He's not just cut Osborne and Cameron, he's damaged the blues as a whole.

    That is true. Conservatives who are impressed with IDS today may change their minds when, in 20 years' time, his words are still being flung in their face.
    They said that about Mrs May and the Nasty Party, we still keep hearing about the Nasty Party, and yet she is supposedly a front runner for next leader.
    That damaged May within the Conservative Party. This will damage the Conservative Party within the country.

    As you know, there's a widespread belief that Conservatives are wankers who take money from defenceless poor people to give it to pampered rich arseholes. IDS has just said that it's true.
  • Watching Question Time on the Parliament channel.

    Nicky Morgan, leadership contender? LOL.

    Agreed. Over promoted. Way out of her depth. Contrast with Andrea Leadsom.
  • anothernickanothernick Posts: 3,591

    Spot on TSE.

    With every day that passes it seems to become less and less likely that the Tories will be able to pull themselves together after the referendum. whatever the result. How Cameron must regret not following through when he told his party to stop banging on about Europe!

    FWIW as a Labour activist and opponent of Corbyn my view is that it is as certain as these things can be that the PLP will move against him at some point. The prospect of a Labour win in 2020 will make a coup more likely. The widespread assumption that the membership consists entirely of committed corbynites is fallacious - most of the new members have done nothing except vote in the leadership contest, very few CLP posts have been won by Momentum supporters and the vast majority of activists and Councillors that I know are opposed to the leadership. At my own CLP Momentum candidates were crushed by 4-1 by moderates at the AGM.

    Corbyn is not as strong as Momentum, and the tory press, would like you to believe - they both have their own reasons for creating an aura of invincibility around him which is not borne out by events at the grassroots. The anti-Corbyn forces are now much more organised amongst the membership, and they have most MPs, Councillors and the party organisation on their side. A new leadership contest would not be a shoo-in for McDonnell or another Corbynite candidate.

    Bravo. Moderate Labour MPs need to move this summer. I'm not convinced that this idea that there's no point as Corbyn would simply win again easily is based on any reality about these new members and £3ers. Most of them won't be that motivated to back him a second time, or indeed, may already have dropped off the membership lists. IMHO it was all a moment of summer madness and will not be repeated.
    Yes I think there is a good chance you are right. The £3 members are a political flashmob who could easily melt away as suddenly as they appeared.

    My current view is that the coup will be later rather than sooner - 2018 maybe - but events are moving so quickly at the moment that it is hard to be sure.
  • Richard_TyndallRichard_Tyndall Posts: 32,728
    Re TSE's very stupid tweet. I am afraid the twats are the ones who are still trying to support Osborne in spite of the fact he is the man most likely to lose the election for the Blues in 2020.

    Since he is such a Cameron fanatic perhaps TSE should also remember his idol's remarks regarding tweets before he posts anymore.
  • JackWJackW Posts: 14,787

    JackW said:

    Saying "Corbyn is crap" over and over doesn't make him crap.....

    It does if he is, and Corbyn is as crap as the founder of the flushing lavatory - Thomas Crapper Esq might possibly have envisaged for his sanitary ware being a superbly efficient method of evacuating the khazi of political effluent.

    Except that the water closet had been around for well over two centuries before Mr Crapper was born.

    How very dare you madam spoil my crap analogy with the bare faced intrusion of facts !! .... :smile:
  • WandererWanderer Posts: 3,838
    edited March 2016

    HYUFD said:

    Wanderer said:

    Let me get this right. If Labour are well behind in the polls with no chance of winning the 2020 GE then Corbyn is safe. If Labour is ahead and could win the GE then he is under threat.

    OK.

    Yes.

    Corbyn is safer if:

    Labour are so far behind that there seems no prospect of a win even with a new leader; or
    Labour are so far in front that it looks like they can win with Corbyn

    Corbyn is less safe if:

    Labour are doing just well enough to suggest they could win with a new leader but not well enough to suggest they could win with Corbyn
    Labour need to beware mid-term blues giving polls that seem to indicate that Corbyn will be PM. They will not be an accurate reflection of how people will vote in the actual GE.
    Cameron trounces Corbyn on preferred PM as he trounced Ed Miliband
    Cameron won't be a candidate in 2020.
    Though I am pouring cold water on the Conservatives' prospects I think there are very few circumstances in which they wouldn't beat a Corbyn-led Labour. But, increasingly, they are relying on Labour not rectifying that mistake.
  • anothernickanothernick Posts: 3,591

    Spot on TSE.

    With every day that passes it seems to become less and less likely that the Tories will be able to pull themselves together after the referendum. whatever the result. How Cameron must regret not following through when he told his party to stop banging on about Europe!

    FWIW as a Labour activist and opponent of Corbyn my view is that it is as certain as these things can be that the PLP will move against him at some point. The prospect of a Labour win in 2020 will make a coup more likely. The widespread assumption that the membership consists entirely of committed corbynites is fallacious - most of the new members have done nothing except vote in the leadership contest, very few CLP posts have been won by Momentum supporters and the vast majority of activists and Councillors that I know are opposed to the leadership. At my own CLP Momentum candidates were crushed by 4-1 by moderates at the AGM.

    Corbyn is not as strong as Momentum, and the tory press, would like you to believe - they both have their own reasons for creating an aura of invincibility around him which is not borne out by events at the grassroots. The anti-Corbyn forces are now much more organised amongst the membership, and they have most MPs, Councillors and the party organisation on their side. A new leadership contest would not be a shoo-in for McDonnell or another Corbynite candidate.

    Interesting stuff, Mr. Nick. So when the coup d'etat comes who do you think will be the new leader? Who, when it comes to it, is actually capable and willing to organise the coup?
    I have no idea who the new leader would be but I do think there will be an attempt to get the PLP to agree on someone - rather like the Tories agreed on Howard in 2003. I have been told that there is widespread agreement in the PLP that something has to be done.
  • JackWJackW Posts: 14,787

    Re TSE's very stupid tweet. I am afraid the twats are the ones who are still trying to support Osborne in spite of the fact he is the man most likely to lose the election for the Blues in 2020.

    Since he is such a Cameron fanatic perhaps TSE should also remember his idol's remarks regarding tweets before he posts anymore.

    Who are the Conservatives going to lose the election to?

  • WandererWanderer Posts: 3,838

    Spot on TSE.

    With every day that passes it seems to become less and less likely that the Tories will be able to pull themselves together after the referendum. whatever the result. How Cameron must regret not following through when he told his party to stop banging on about Europe!

    FWIW as a Labour activist and opponent of Corbyn my view is that it is as certain as these things can be that the PLP will move against him at some point. The prospect of a Labour win in 2020 will make a coup more likely. The widespread assumption that the membership consists entirely of committed corbynites is fallacious - most of the new members have done nothing except vote in the leadership contest, very few CLP posts have been won by Momentum supporters and the vast majority of activists and Councillors that I know are opposed to the leadership. At my own CLP Momentum candidates were crushed by 4-1 by moderates at the AGM.

    Corbyn is not as strong as Momentum, and the tory press, would like you to believe - they both have their own reasons for creating an aura of invincibility around him which is not borne out by events at the grassroots. The anti-Corbyn forces are now much more organised amongst the membership, and they have most MPs, Councillors and the party organisation on their side. A new leadership contest would not be a shoo-in for McDonnell or another Corbynite candidate.

    Interesting stuff, Mr. Nick. So when the coup d'etat comes who do you think will be the new leader? Who, when it comes to it, is actually capable and willing to organise the coup?
    I have no idea who the new leader would be but I do think there will be an attempt to get the PLP to agree on someone - rather like the Tories agreed on Howard in 2003. I have been told that there is widespread agreement in the PLP that something has to be done.
    I read that there are rule changes afoot which would lower the number of MPs required to nominate and clarify that the sitting leader doesn't need to be nominated to stand? Don't know what the prospect of those going through is.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 124,735
    Desert News KSL Utah

    Clinton 38
    Trump 36

    Sanders 48
    Trump 37

    Both Cruz and Kasich beat both Democrats comfortably. If Trump lost Utah he would be the first Republican to do since 1964 when Barry Goldwater lost the state to LBJ
  • HYUFD said:

    Once a right-wing platform was defeated in 2005 the Tories were ready to accept a charismatic moderate like Cameron just as Labour will only be ready to accept a charismatic moderate like Chuka Umunna or Dan Jarvis following a 2020 defeat.

    I do not agree. Cameron secured the largest backing of MPs partly by promising to take the Conservative MEPs out of the europhile EPP and other indications. He then turned out to be another John Major.
  • anothernickanothernick Posts: 3,591

    Let me get this right. If Labour are well behind in the polls with no chance of winning the 2020 GE then Corbyn is safe. If Labour is ahead and could win the GE then he is under threat.

    OK.

    Yes. If defeat looks certain Corbyn will be left to take the blame. If victory looks possible under a new leader the incentive to get rid of Corbyn is greater.
  • JackW said:

    Re TSE's very stupid tweet. I am afraid the twats are the ones who are still trying to support Osborne in spite of the fact he is the man most likely to lose the election for the Blues in 2020.

    Since he is such a Cameron fanatic perhaps TSE should also remember his idol's remarks regarding tweets before he posts anymore.

    Who are the Conservatives going to lose the election to?

    McDonnel at the present rate.
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 82,554
    edited March 2016
    Western governments KNEW where 80 Nigerian girls kidnapped by Boko Haram were - but no-one tried to rescue them

    Dr Andrew Pocock, the former British high commissioner to Nigeria, has now revealed that a large group of the missing girls were spotted by British and American surveillance officials shortly after their disappearance, but experts felt nothing could be done.

    He told The Sunday Times that Western governments felt 'powerless' to help as any rescue attempt would have been too high risk - with Boko Haram terrorists using the girls as human shields.

    ----

    Barack - So darling what have you done today

    Michelle - I made a tweet for that "Bring our girls back hashtag"

    Barack - Errhhh right..
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 124,735
    edited March 2016

    HYUFD said:

    Once a right-wing platform was defeated in 2005 the Tories were ready to accept a charismatic moderate like Cameron just as Labour will only be ready to accept a charismatic moderate like Chuka Umunna or Dan Jarvis following a 2020 defeat.

    I do not agree. Cameron secured the largest backing of MPs partly by promising to take the Conservative MEPs out of the europhile EPP and other indications. He then turned out to be another John Major.
    Rubbish. Cameron fought the election as a moderate promising to reach out and change the party, the right-wing candidates were Liam Fox and David Davis and it is rewrioting history to suggest otherwise

    He then turned out to be another Major? You mean he was the first Tory leader since Major to win an election?
  • runnymederunnymede Posts: 2,536
    a full criminal investigation should be undertaken without fear or favour.

    Another test of the increasingly discredited British plod
  • HYUFD said:


    Or, to quote myself when previously referring to the Lib Dem electoral campaign: being a flasher today and castrated tomorrow is not a winning strategy.

    The REMAIN camp's head of strategy is the former head of the LD GE2015 campaign. Anyone spot the reason why REMAIN are not 20 points ahead when against 3 or 4 separate LEAVE campaigns?
    Half the Remain team worked at CCHQ when the Tories won a majority
    Were they the ones that were right? They also have Labour's Will Straw and the chairman with BSE or is that the chairman of BSE (ex Marks & Sparks).
  • SimonStClareSimonStClare Posts: 7,976
    edited March 2016

    Let me get this right. If Labour are well behind in the polls with no chance of winning the 2020 GE then Corbyn is safe. If Labour is ahead and could win the GE then he is under threat.

    OK.

    Yes. If defeat looks certain Corbyn will be left to take the blame. If victory looks possible under a new leader the incentive to get rid of Corbyn is greater.
    Ah, when you put it like that, makes sense. Was scratching my head over that too, cheers.
  • JackWJackW Posts: 14,787

    JackW said:

    Re TSE's very stupid tweet. I am afraid the twats are the ones who are still trying to support Osborne in spite of the fact he is the man most likely to lose the election for the Blues in 2020.

    Since he is such a Cameron fanatic perhaps TSE should also remember his idol's remarks regarding tweets before he posts anymore.

    Who are the Conservatives going to lose the election to?

    McDonnel at the present rate.
    Funniest post today. Well done .. :smiley:
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 124,735

    HYUFD said:


    Or, to quote myself when previously referring to the Lib Dem electoral campaign: being a flasher today and castrated tomorrow is not a winning strategy.

    The REMAIN camp's head of strategy is the former head of the LD GE2015 campaign. Anyone spot the reason why REMAIN are not 20 points ahead when against 3 or 4 separate LEAVE campaigns?
    Half the Remain team worked at CCHQ when the Tories won a majority
    Were they the ones that were right? They also have Labour's Will Straw and the chairman with BSE or is that the chairman of BSE (ex Marks & Sparks).
    Leave of course have Farage, Galloway and Dominic Cummings
  • Stark_DawningStark_Dawning Posts: 9,765
    Interesting header. But IDS has exposed himself as a social Heathite, a One-Nation Tory and a Wet. Already he's being lauded by Corbyn and the Guardian. He's Cameron's Ian Gilmour. Best rid.
  • AlistairAlistair Posts: 23,670
    Wanderer said:

    Anyone know why Jeb has been backed in for the nomination?

    Because it is the Republican primary betting market. Anything can, and will, happen.

    Why did Rubio go odds on after finishing third in Iowa? We'll never know.
  • WandererWanderer Posts: 3,838
    Alistair said:

    Wanderer said:

    Anyone know why Jeb has been backed in for the nomination?

    Because it is the Republican primary betting market. Anything can, and will, happen.

    Why did Rubio go odds on after finishing third in Iowa? We'll never know.
    Hehe. Fair enough.
  • SandpitSandpit Posts: 55,628

    HYUFD said:


    Or, to quote myself when previously referring to the Lib Dem electoral campaign: being a flasher today and castrated tomorrow is not a winning strategy.

    The REMAIN camp's head of strategy is the former head of the LD GE2015 campaign. Anyone spot the reason why REMAIN are not 20 points ahead when against 3 or 4 separate LEAVE campaigns?
    Half the Remain team worked at CCHQ when the Tories won a majority
    Were they the ones that were right? They also have Labour's Will Straw and the chairman with BSE or is that the chairman of BSE (ex Marks & Sparks).
    Ah yes, Stuart Rose, the S&M guy who said we should remain becuase wages will go up if we leave.
  • JohnLilburneJohnLilburne Posts: 6,360
    Two comments on the IDS affair. One is that Government doesn't do detail. I know Cammo doesn't, but in general the Civil Service doesn't either. There is no sense that you look into individual hard cases to see why they have happened, and whether policy needs to change. I can see why the change to PIP has been mooted (people actually get things free that the Daily Living component is supposed to pay for) and why the WRAG premium is going (it makes those minded to spend their lives on benefits too well off, to be honest) but it will also hit a lot of people who are genuinely too ill to work over a long period. In a lot of cases the failure of the NHS to provide services in a timely manner leaving people claiming benefits for months or years. So after years of carefully crafting UC so it delivers help to the needy and makes work sustainable, IDS sees it all buggered up by idiots in the Treasury with no attention to detail and no idea how it will impact on individuals.

    The second point is we will probably never know why IDS apparently agreed to the changes on Wednesday morning and then resigned on Friday. The likelihood is that he felt he was pushed into a corner and couldn't practicably oppose the changes. If he had wanted to damage the Government he would have resigned Wednesday morning. He didn't, and instead resigned at what was probably the least inauspicious time. I think this is a pre-emptive strike against Osborne, aimed at keeping him out of the leadership, at a time when a Leave vote could lead to Cameron standing down earlier rather than later.
  • SandpitSandpit Posts: 55,628

    Spot on TSE.

    With every day that passes it seems to become less and less likely that the Tories will be able to pull themselves together after the referendum. whatever the result. How Cameron must regret not following through when he told his party to stop banging on about Europe!

    Quite. What a mess, and entirely of their own making.

    This relatively new Tory member certainly didn't expect Cameron and Osborne's behaviour of the past few weeks, having supported the pair of them for ten years.
  • HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:


    Or, to quote myself when previously referring to the Lib Dem electoral campaign: being a flasher today and castrated tomorrow is not a winning strategy.

    The REMAIN camp's head of strategy is the former head of the LD GE2015 campaign. Anyone spot the reason why REMAIN are not 20 points ahead when against 3 or 4 separate LEAVE campaigns?
    Half the Remain team worked at CCHQ when the Tories won a majority
    Were they the ones that were right? They also have Labour's Will Straw and the chairman with BSE or is that the chairman of BSE (ex Marks & Sparks).
    Leave of course have Farage, Galloway and Dominic Cummings
    and REMAIN still cannot pull 20 points ahead......
  • JackW said:

    JackW said:

    Re TSE's very stupid tweet. I am afraid the twats are the ones who are still trying to support Osborne in spite of the fact he is the man most likely to lose the election for the Blues in 2020.

    Since he is such a Cameron fanatic perhaps TSE should also remember his idol's remarks regarding tweets before he posts anymore.

    Who are the Conservatives going to lose the election to?

    McDonnel at the present rate.
    Funniest post today. Well done .. :smiley:
    JackW - looking at the direction of the polls it is no joke. The Conservative party's chances are being sacrificed on the ambition of Osborne.
  • PeterCPeterC Posts: 1,275

    HYUFD said:


    Or, to quote myself when previously referring to the Lib Dem electoral campaign: being a flasher today and castrated tomorrow is not a winning strategy.

    The REMAIN camp's head of strategy is the former head of the LD GE2015 campaign. Anyone spot the reason why REMAIN are not 20 points ahead when against 3 or 4 separate LEAVE campaigns?
    Half the Remain team worked at CCHQ when the Tories won a majority
    Were they the ones that were right? They also have Labour's Will Straw and the chairman with BSE or is that the chairman of BSE (ex Marks & Sparks).
    The point is that the public face of REMAIN is Cameron & Osborne. They have just been made to look like a pair of prats.
  • HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    Once a right-wing platform was defeated in 2005 the Tories were ready to accept a charismatic moderate like Cameron just as Labour will only be ready to accept a charismatic moderate like Chuka Umunna or Dan Jarvis following a 2020 defeat.

    I do not agree. Cameron secured the largest backing of MPs partly by promising to take the Conservative MEPs out of the europhile EPP and other indications. He then turned out to be another John Major.
    Rubbish. Cameron fought the election as a moderate promising to reach out and change the party, the right-wing candidates were Liam Fox and David Davis and it is rewrioting history to suggest otherwise

    He then turned out to be another Major? You mean he was the first Tory leader since Major to win an election?
    No, he turned more centrist and europhile with each day in office.
  • EPGEPG Posts: 6,674
    My working hypothesis is that Conservatives think Dan Jarvis is the right choice, the same way Labour thought Ken Clarke was the right choice
  • FregglesFreggles Posts: 3,486
    PB Knowledge Request.

    Can anyone recommend a book on American politics that is entertaining and informative, like a Bill Bryson style, accessible to someone whose only knowledge of the topic is having watched The West Wing? For my sister. Thanks
This discussion has been closed.