politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » If the phone polls have got this right Dave’s more in tune with CON voters than party members and many MPs
It is a fact that all but one of the telephone polls carried out on the referendum since the General Election has shown more Conservative voters wanting to remain than leave.
If the phone pollster view of the referendum is correct then those who vote for the party have a different position than not just the many CON MPs now declaring for REMAIN but the party membership. This is from the latest survey of Conservative members by CONHome.
As has been pointed out on numerous occasions before UKIPCONHome is a far from proven approximation to the views of Conservative members......
Meanwhile the SNP are trumpeting the salvaging of 2.5% of their income tax take - that '£3billion' figure is over ten years, so the annual £300 million is less than they underspent their much smaller budget by in 2014/15
Trump is still nearly at evens for the nomination. This is insane. He ought to be no longer than 1/4 and probably shorter still. He won big in Nevada, he won comfortably in S Carolina, he won big in New Hampshire and he has a 20 point lead over the field nationally. What is going to stop him? Even if Cruz were to drop out (and he won't), Trump would still lead Rubio even if the latter picked up all of Cruz's support(which he wouldn't).
Trump is still nearly at evens for the nomination. This is insane. He ought to be no longer than 1/4 and probably shorter still. He won big in Nevada, he won comfortably in S Carolina, he won big in New Hampshire and he has a 20 point lead over the field nationally. What is going to stop him? Even if Cruz were to drop out (and he won't), Trump would still lead Rubio even if the latter picked up all of Cruz's support(which he wouldn't).
Trump is still nearly at evens for the nomination. This is insane. He ought to be no longer than 1/4 and probably shorter still. He won big in Nevada, he won comfortably in S Carolina, he won big in New Hampshire and he has a 20 point lead over the field nationally. What is going to stop him? Even if Cruz were to drop out (and he won't), Trump would still lead Rubio even if the latter picked up all of Cruz's support(which he wouldn't).
Reminds me of Obama in 08.
Despite results and polling indicating that Obama would defeat Clinton many punters remained unconvinced that he would win and their poor judgement was laid bare by many not understanding how the primaries and caucuses worked.
Better off if UK left - Better if the UK stayed - no different - don’t know:
Levels of immigration into Britain 48% 13% 36% 4% The strength of British democracy 39% 21% 37% 3% Britain’s national security 28% 34% 34% 4% The British economy 24% 46% 25% 6%
Gove is a classy operator - much more persuasive than the spittle flecked "CAMERON LIED!!!!" from some of the other LEAVErs.....
He said Mr Cameron was "absolutely right that this is a deal between 28 nations all of whom believe it", adding: "But the whole point about the European Court of Justice is that it stands above the nation states."
Mr Cameron has "not been misleading anyone", Mr Gove went on, but he added: "I do think it's important that people also realise that the European Court of Justice stands above every nation state, and ultimately it will decide on the basis of the treaties and this deal is not yet in the treaties."
Around two thirds (68%) of Britons say they are passionate about the issue of Britain’s membership of the EU. However, those likely to vote for “Remain” are more likely to say they are passionate than those supporting “Leave” (76% and 66% respectively).
You can't really ask that question in isolation - it should be in a field of similar topics to try to tease out which issues people are genuinely passionate about.....
People will only vote for Brexit if they think it's good for the economy:
"This is because voters are only likely to back leaving if a concern about issues such as identity, sovereignty and immigration – that is, the concern on which above all scepticism feeds – is coupled with the much less popular belief that Britain’s economy would be better off if it left the EU."
Around two thirds (68%) of Britons say they are passionate about the issue of Britain’s membership of the EU. However, those likely to vote for “Remain” are more likely to say they are passionate than those supporting “Leave” (76% and 66% respectively).
You can't really ask that question in isolation - it should be in a field of similar topics to try to tease out which issues people are genuinely passionate about.....
It does seem to indicate that there may not be too much differential in the turnout.
Trump is still nearly at evens for the nomination. This is insane. He ought to be no longer than 1/4 and probably shorter still. He won big in Nevada, he won comfortably in S Carolina, he won big in New Hampshire and he has a 20 point lead over the field nationally. What is going to stop him? Even if Cruz were to drop out (and he won't), Trump would still lead Rubio even if the latter picked up all of Cruz's support(which he wouldn't).
Around two thirds (68%) of Britons say they are passionate about the issue of Britain’s membership of the EU. However, those likely to vote for “Remain” are more likely to say they are passionate than those supporting “Leave” (76% and 66% respectively).
You can't really ask that question in isolation - it should be in a field of similar topics to try to tease out which issues people are genuinely passionate about.....
It does seem to indicate that there may not be too much differential in the turnout.
Indeed - if anything the reverse of a view widely held here, that LEAVErs were more passionate than REMAINians......the polling (for what its worth, in my view, not very much) suggests its the other way round......
Vote REMAIN for the Economy - unless you want to LEAVE with Nigel & George......
I expected Remain to be dominant given the position adopted by Cameron but @Casino_Royale is right that this is getting ridiculous. At the moment members of the multifarious Leave campaigns (which is surely something that needs sorted out right now) must be looking back to the Lib Dem campaign for AV in awe at its clarity, vision, coherence and market penetration.
If this brings Gove and Boris to the fore somewhat that just might be a good thing but the hour is already getting late and views of a largely indifferent public are getting fixed. The EU is far too boring to think about more than once for most. Once those views are fixed it is game over.
I am on the other side of this argument but the old cliché of Cameron being at his best when his back is against the wall has never been truer than it has been this week. He came back with a deal that was not so much criticised as ridiculed and he has completely dominated ever since.
People will only vote for Brexit if they think it's good for the economy:
"This is because voters are only likely to back leaving if a concern about issues such as identity, sovereignty and immigration – that is, the concern on which above all scepticism feeds – is coupled with the much less popular belief that Britain’s economy would be better off if it left the EU."
We are witnessing what happens when the Establishment pulls rank. Remain has no official group, it has govt, the civil service and BBC instead.
It's why people like me stood at the general election, its little to do with immigration, GDP, NHS and other issues, its about a state of mind. Regardless of the outcome plenty of Conservatives are clearly viewing events through a different lens, that can only be positive.
But I suspect that may include people who spend part of their time abroad, part in the UK.....
I agree, most will probably be REMAINians - as LEAVE's glorious lack of clarity about what will happen to 'borders' may lead them (not unreasonably) to conclude the worst.....
Trump is still nearly at evens for the nomination. This is insane. He ought to be no longer than 1/4 and probably shorter still. He won big in Nevada, he won comfortably in S Carolina, he won big in New Hampshire and he has a 20 point lead over the field nationally. What is going to stop him? Even if Cruz were to drop out (and he won't), Trump would still lead Rubio even if the latter picked up all of Cruz's support(which he wouldn't).
Cruz has also won a state and will win Texas next week. Trump will now almost certainly win the nomination having won three of Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina and Nevada while McCain and Romney by contrast only won two of those states. If Trump is the nominee that is great news for Hillary as despite her email problems she still beats him in most general election polls helped by his abysmal ratings with Hispanics where he gets less than 20% in a general election and women. If Rubio were the nominee by contrast Hillary would likely be toast as he beats her in most general election polls with up to 30% of the Hispanic vote
Trump is still nearly at evens for the nomination. This is insane. He ought to be no longer than 1/4 and probably shorter still. He won big in Nevada, he won comfortably in S Carolina, he won big in New Hampshire and he has a 20 point lead over the field nationally. What is going to stop him? Even if Cruz were to drop out (and he won't), Trump would still lead Rubio even if the latter picked up all of Cruz's support(which he wouldn't).
Just seen a graphic showing that there are 1.7m Brits living in other EU countries. Presumably a high proportion of them are in favour of Remain.
As well as those 1.7 million, there are extended family members here and many more who aspire to live on the continent. Fox jr rather fancies Sweden for an MA for example. No uni fees there, and excellent teaching.
Just seen a graphic showing that there are 1.7m Brits living in other EU countries. Presumably a high proportion of them are in favour of Remain.
As well as those 1.7 million, there are extended family members here and many more who aspire to live on the continent. Fox jr rather fancies Sweden for an MA for example. No uni fees there, and excellent teaching.
If we leave the EU will your son be prevented from studying in Sweden?
Trump is still nearly at evens for the nomination. This is insane. He ought to be no longer than 1/4 and probably shorter still. He won big in Nevada, he won comfortably in S Carolina, he won big in New Hampshire and he has a 20 point lead over the field nationally. What is going to stop him? Even if Cruz were to drop out (and he won't), Trump would still lead Rubio even if the latter picked up all of Cruz's support(which he wouldn't).
Cruz has also won a state and will win Texas next week. Trump will now almost certainly win the nomination having won three of Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina and Nevada while McCain and Romney by contrast only won two of those states. If Trump is the nominee that is great news for Hillary as despite her email problems she still beats him in most general election polls helped by his abysmal ratings with Hispanics where he gets less than 20% in a general election and women. If Rubio were the nominee by contrast Hillary would likely be toast as he beats her in most general election polls with up to 30% of the Hispanic vote
If Hillary can't cope with an old never was like Sanders there is no way that she is going to cope with Trump. Her campaign to be the first female President of the United States should be as exciting and ground breaking as Obama's was. Instead it is drowning in baggage and ennui. I am seriously tempted to top up on Trump before the odds come into line with reality.
But I suspect that may include people who spend part of their time abroad, part in the UK.....
I agree, most will probably be REMAINians - as LEAVE's glorious lack of clarity about what will happen to 'borders' may lead them (not unreasonably) to conclude the worst.....
I take it that they can vote if they’ve not been away too long. Is it ten years?
But I suspect that may include people who spend part of their time abroad, part in the UK.....
I agree, most will probably be REMAINians - as LEAVE's glorious lack of clarity about what will happen to 'borders' may lead them (not unreasonably) to conclude the worst.....
Even if the status of existing Euro-brits is unchanged, it will affect aspirant ones and also the property values of those that are there.
Does anyone know when 'Remain' are going to appoint an ad agency? I had lunch yesterday with some agency friends and none had any idea who it would be though apparently it is a much coveted account. It seems such an obvious first step that none of them could understand why it hadn't happened. It's unlikely to be the sort of thing that's done on an ad hoc basis.
M&C Saatchis worked for the Tories so the betting must be on them
Just seen a graphic showing that there are 1.7m Brits living in other EU countries. Presumably a high proportion of them are in favour of Remain.
As well as those 1.7 million, there are extended family members here and many more who aspire to live on the continent. Fox jr rather fancies Sweden for an MA for example. No uni fees there, and excellent teaching.
My daughter is looking at spending a year of her degree in Amsterdam. She frankly struggles to understand how anyone could want to Leave, including me.
Just seen a graphic showing that there are 1.7m Brits living in other EU countries. Presumably a high proportion of them are in favour of Remain.
As well as those 1.7 million, there are extended family members here and many more who aspire to live on the continent. Fox jr rather fancies Sweden for an MA for example. No uni fees there, and excellent teaching.
I understand Dutch universities, especially, somewhat ironically, Maastricht are becoming popular, too.
I'm finding the exchanges on here this morning extraordinary, I'm supposed to be the xenophobe but its now being suggested that if we Leave the savages across the water will burn our Tuscan villas, close universities to our brightest students and restrict all travel.
Look, people are people, they are generally very nice. This referndum is about an unnecessary and unwanted layer of bureaucracy, nothing else.
Just seen a graphic showing that there are 1.7m Brits living in other EU countries. Presumably a high proportion of them are in favour of Remain.
Do we have to go over this every day ? I live outside the EU, my sole immigration hassle it to show my face once a year, pay the three quid fee and get my passport stamped for another year. I don't know how I have managed it to be honest. Chance of me being thrown out is basically zero. How is it going to be harder in an EU countries who had people living there permanently and uncontroversially well before 1972.
Trump is still nearly at evens for the nomination. This is insane. He ought to be no longer than 1/4 and probably shorter still. He won big in Nevada, he won comfortably in S Carolina, he won big in New Hampshire and he has a 20 point lead over the field nationally. What is going to stop him? Even if Cruz were to drop out (and he won't), Trump would still lead Rubio even if the latter picked up all of Cruz's support(which he wouldn't).
Cruz has also won a state unlike Rubio and [everyone else?]
Yes. I only picked Cruz to drop out because I think Rubio would gain a larger share of Cruz's vote than Cruz would of Rubio's.
Cruz is clearly making Texas his firewall state, and with good reason. But the fact for the rest of the field is that even if Cruz wins there, as he should, he and Trump will split virtually all the 152 delegates between them, so if Trump does win it and Cruz withdraws, everyone else will be so far back that Trump will be out of sight.
If Trump is the nominee that is great news for Hillary as despite her email problems she still beats him in most general election polls helped by his abysmal ratings with Hispanics where he gets less than 20% in a general election and women. If Rubio were the nominee by contrast Hillary would likely be toast as he beats her in most general election polls with up to 30% of the Hispanic vote
What about if Trump picks a black or hispanic (ideally female) running mate, that would surely set the cat amongst the pigeons.
As a dedicated LEAVEr, are you suggesting that any of the Four Freedoms will be affected by LEAVEing the EU?
So far, the LEAVE campaigns have been studiously ambiguous.....
So you decided to avoid my question, I'll ask again:
If we Leave will nation states repatriate UK citizens?
I would think No, any more than we will repatriate/deport current EU migrants. However, they may well not be as welcome as they may have been, life will be, at least marginally more difficult and services previously available will no longer be. Also, in future immigration may well not be as easy.
Just seen a graphic showing that there are 1.7m Brits living in other EU countries. Presumably a high proportion of them are in favour of Remain.
As well as those 1.7 million, there are extended family members here and many more who aspire to live on the continent. Fox jr rather fancies Sweden for an MA for example. No uni fees there, and excellent teaching.
I understand Dutch universities, especially, somewhat ironically, Maastricht are becoming popular, too.
This would be the same Dutch that want their own IN-OUT referendum ?
what are the best explanations for the discrepancy between the results of telephone and internet polling on the question of the EU vote?
Thanks
An occasional visitor
Its all about who they can contact and what the sample is that they then try to "tweak" to produce a result. Online survey takers tend to be self selecting and do not reflect the population as a whole, typically being far more engaged in politics for a start. But telephone polling in the age of caller ID is potentially not much better with an increasing percentage simply not answering unidentified numbers. Those that do are again not necessarily typical.
Which one is least untypical and capable of being relied on? Who knows? At the election the phones were marginally better but still poor.
Just seen a graphic showing that there are 1.7m Brits living in other EU countries. Presumably a high proportion of them are in favour of Remain.
As well as those 1.7 million, there are extended family members here and many more who aspire to live on the continent. Fox jr rather fancies Sweden for an MA for example. No uni fees there, and excellent teaching.
If we leave the EU will your son be prevented from studying in Sweden?
Whether he will or not, the perception that it will all get a lot more complicated, for Fox Jr and the 1.7m, is what is important; not the nitty gritty of whatever deal is worked out.
As a dedicated LEAVEr, are you suggesting that any of the Four Freedoms will be affected by LEAVEing the EU?
So far, the LEAVE campaigns have been studiously ambiguous.....
So you decided to avoid my question, I'll ask again:
If we Leave will nation states repatriate UK citizens?
I would think No, any more that we will repatriate/deport current EU migrants. However, they may well not be as welcome as they may have been, life will be, at least marginally more difficult and services previously available will no longerbe. Also, in future immigration may well not be as easy.
That is a possibility, and that does not sound terrible to me.
Trump is still nearly at evens for the nomination. This is insane. He ought to be no longer than 1/4 and probably shorter still. He won big in Nevada, he won comfortably in S Carolina, he won big in New Hampshire and he has a 20 point lead over the field nationally. What is going to stop him? Even if Cruz were to drop out (and he won't), Trump would still lead Rubio even if the latter picked up all of Cruz's support(which he wouldn't).
Cruz has also won a state and will win Texas next week. Trump will now almost certainly win the nomination having won three of Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina and Nevada while McCain and Romney by contrast only won two of those states. If Trump is the nominee that is great news for Hillary as despite her email problems she still beats him in most general election polls helped by his abysmal ratings with Hispanics where he gets less than 20% in a general election and women. If Rubio were the nominee by contrast Hillary would likely be toast as he beats her in most general election polls with up to 30% of the Hispanic vote
It's very early to take the GE polls as more tha a guide. Hillary does have better ratings but not by much and leads in head-to-heads againstTrump by only a few percent. With more than eight months to go, that's next to nothing. Trump has plenty of time to work on his women / Latino problem.
That said, I'd still make Hillary favourite in a Trump / Clinton contest but only about 60/40.
If Trump is the nominee that is great news for Hillary as despite her email problems she still beats him in most general election polls helped by his abysmal ratings with Hispanics where he gets less than 20% in a general election and women. If Rubio were the nominee by contrast Hillary would likely be toast as he beats her in most general election polls with up to 30% of the Hispanic vote
What about if Trump picks a black or hispanic (ideally female) running mate, that would surely set the cat amongst the pigeons.
I think - given the comments Trump made about Mexicans - he'll go for a Hispanic. My money would be on VP Rubio.
That is a possibility, and that does not sound terrible to me.
Christ the lack of ambition of so many Brits is depressing, reminds me of why I do business in Asia. No one is concerned about the future of their country, or the possibilities of a better and more prosperous life for their grandchildren, or reaching out across the world and becoming a truly global country, not stuck in a decaying backwater.
Oh no, everyone is concerned it might cost them £2.50 a month off their pension, or they might have a couple extra forms to fill in once a year. The poverty of ambition is breathtaking. The UK doesn't reach for the stars any more, it reaches for the six pack of lager and turns of Big Brother.
I've just checked and M&C Saatchi did 'Better together' so unlikely they'll do 'Remain'. I imagine they'll have to be approved by all interested paries and the Scottish Nationalists may well not be too happy with them.
As for the agencies themselves nearly all of whom are multi national they'll have their own interests so it's not beyond the bounds of possibility they might individually try to use it as a shop window in which case it'll be a lot of fun.
The argument about the 4 freedoms is emblematic of a bigger issue. What are Leave offering? What does Out look like and why would it be better? There is a case to be made and I think Gove is probably best placed to make it but it needs to be a vision that Leave as a whole signs up to.
Personally, I think Leave should commit to remaining in the EEA and single market. This means accepting that change will be modest and "control of our borders" won't be that different from the current situation.
But it also means that we can decide a lot more things for ourselves, that our economic access is still secure, that external investment in the UK still has that market access and, as Blackburn says, the layer of bureaucracy that is the European Parliament and the Commission is no longer our problem. I am clearly biased because this is what I want but I also believe that this is a sellable proposition that really should not frighten the horses too much.
If Trump is the nominee that is great news for Hillary as despite her email problems she still beats him in most general election polls helped by his abysmal ratings with Hispanics where he gets less than 20% in a general election and women. If Rubio were the nominee by contrast Hillary would likely be toast as he beats her in most general election polls with up to 30% of the Hispanic vote
What about if Trump picks a black or hispanic (ideally female) running mate, that would surely set the cat amongst the pigeons.
I think - given the comments Trump made about Mexicans - he'll go for a Hispanic. My money would be on VP Rubio.
That is a possibility, and that does not sound terrible to me.
Christ the lack of ambition of so many Brits is depressing, reminds me of why I do business in Asia. No one is concerned about the future of their country, or the possibilities of a better and more prosperous life for their grandchildren, or reaching out across the world and becoming a truly global country, not stuck in a decaying backwater.
Oh no, everyone is concerned it might cost them £2.50 a month off their pension, or they might have a couple extra forms to fill in once a year. The poverty of ambition is breathtaking. The UK doesn't reach for the stars any more, it reaches for the six pack of lager and turns of Big Brother.
what are the best explanations for the discrepancy between the results of telephone and internet polling on the question of the EU vote?
Thanks
An occasional visitor
Telephone polling vastly over-samples certain groups while internet polling is extremely vulnerable to self selection political activism. Witness the number on here who seem to be forever answering polls.
Telephone sampling will get easier to reach groups and will, for example, over-represent public sector workers whilst struggling to contact tradesmen. They also up-weight their under 35 samples significantly.
The great value in polls is the direction of travel plus you can adjust your projections according to their usual pattern of error.
In fairness to YG and ICM - they were both about right with the SIndy ref at the four month pre-referendum stage.
I believe that the Common Market - Economic Community - European Union is on a one-way track to a United Europe by way of a Political Union. I'm looking at past trends.
Because of those pesky voters, they have to take occasional diversions but there is only one final destination.
If you're happy, I fully respect your decision. If not, why would you vote Remain? Do you expect the other 27 countries to say ... "What fools we've been, if only we'd seen the light earlier. We must change our destination immediately."
Or is it "A touch on the brakes around this curve while we let the passengers see the scenery and then on we go."
Cameron is clearly doing better with Tory voters than members but online polls again tell a different story to phone polls. Yougov today has Leave leading 57 to 43 amongst Tory voters
Personally, I think Leave should commit to remaining in the EEA and single market. This means accepting that change will be modest and "control of our borders" won't be that different from the current situation.
That would make sense - are any of the LEAVE campaigns advocating that (in so far as one can tell)?
Can't get much sense out of their fanboys on here......
The argument about the 4 freedoms is emblematic of a bigger issue. What are Leave offering? What does Out look like and why would it be better? There is a case to be made and I think Gove is probably best placed to make it but it needs to be a vision that Leave as a whole signs up to.
Personally, I think Leave should commit to remaining in the EEA and single market. This means accepting that change will be modest and "control of our borders" won't be that different from the current situation.
But it also means that we can decide a lot more things for ourselves, that our economic access is still secure, that external investment in the UK still has that market access and, as Blackburn says, the layer of bureaucracy that is the European Parliament and the Commission is no longer our problem. I am clearly biased because this is what I want but I also believe that this is a sellable proposition that really should not frighten the horses too much.
Tory Leave is a lot less worrying than UKIP Leave because, on a day to day basis, it changes very little and means on-going access to the free market on pretty much the basis we have now. It will, though, leave many Leavers hugely disappointed as it is going to make almost no significant difference to levels of immigration.
Just seen a graphic showing that there are 1.7m Brits living in other EU countries. Presumably a high proportion of them are in favour of Remain.
As well as those 1.7 million, there are extended family members here and many more who aspire to live on the continent. Fox jr rather fancies Sweden for an MA for example. No uni fees there, and excellent teaching.
If we leave the EU will your son be prevented from studying in Sweden?
No, but he will no longer get free tuition, so would cost him £17 000. He would have to give up the idea.
'My daughter is looking at spending a year of her degree in Amsterdam. She frankly struggles to understand how anyone could want to Leave, including me.'
My niece is spending a year at a US university. So what?
The prospect of a President Trump may be quite a decent calling card for Remain. You wouldn't want to be relying on him for anything.
You want to be relying on Jean-Claude Junker for anything?
I suspect despite the dicking about with Scottish golf courses, Trump has a soft spot for the UK - and would be well disposed to help us out if push comes to shove.
That is a possibility, and that does not sound terrible to me.
Christ the lack of ambition of so many Brits is depressing, reminds me of why I do business in Asia. No one is concerned about the future of their country, or the possibilities of a better and more prosperous life for their grandchildren, or reaching out across the world and becoming a truly global country, not stuck in a decaying backwater.
Oh no, everyone is concerned it might cost them £2.50 a month off their pension, or they might have a couple extra forms to fill in once a year. The poverty of ambition is breathtaking. The UK doesn't reach for the stars any more, it reaches for the six pack of lager and turns of Big Brother.
You'd think that there weren't hundreds of thousands of British citizens already working, studying, and living in non-EU countries that have immigration controls. How do they cope?
The most likely outcome of Leave is that the UK joins EFTA/EEA, in which case there's reciprocal free movement. I'm certainly not expecting forcible transfers of population.
That is a possibility, and that does not sound terrible to me.
Christ the lack of ambition of so many Brits is depressing, reminds me of why I do business in Asia. No one is concerned about the future of their country, or the possibilities of a better and more prosperous life for their grandchildren, or reaching out across the world and becoming a truly global country, not stuck in a decaying backwater.
Oh no, everyone is concerned it might cost them £2.50 a month off their pension, or they might have a couple extra forms to fill in once a year. The poverty of ambition is breathtaking. The UK doesn't reach for the stars any more, it reaches for the six pack of lager and turns of Big Brother.
It's legalism. We have all been brought up to respect the law. None of the Elizabethan seadogs did. Robert Clive didn't, although in the end he wormed his way out of it. Al Capone didn't even manage to worm his way out of it in the end.
The idea that there is entrepreneurship over HERE and crime over THERE needs to be knocked on the head. The slide into each other. It is an extraordinary fact that merely by posting on pb.com it proves that all an individual's business dealings are pure as the driven slush.
There's no such thing as an honest penny - which is what led Lenin to lead a revolution and then find he couldn't make it work.
I've just checked and M&C Saatchi did 'Better together' so unlikely they'll do 'Remain'. I imagine they'll have to be approved by all interested paries and the Scottish Nationalists may well not be too happy with them.
As for the agencies themselves nearly all of whom are multi national they'll have their own interests so it's not beyond the bounds of possibility they might individually try to use it as a shop window in which case it'll be a lot of fun.
The argument about the 4 freedoms is emblematic of a bigger issue. What are Leave offering? What does Out look like and why would it be better? There is a case to be made and I think Gove is probably best placed to make it but it needs to be a vision that Leave as a whole signs up to.
Personally, I think Leave should commit to remaining in the EEA and single market. This means accepting that change will be modest and "control of our borders" won't be that different from the current situation.
But it also means that we can decide a lot more things for ourselves, that our economic access is still secure, that external investment in the UK still has that market access and, as Blackburn says, the layer of bureaucracy that is the European Parliament and the Commission is no longer our problem. I am clearly biased because this is what I want but I also believe that this is a sellable proposition that really should not frighten the horses too much.
Tory Leave is a lot less worrying than UKIP Leave because, on a day to day basis, it changes very little and means on-going access to the free market on pretty much the basis we have now. It will, though, leave many Leavers hugely disappointed as it is going to make almost no significant difference to levels of immigration.
I have been thinking about that and it may be possible to keep the frothers on board by pointing out that if EFTA doesn't work for us it may prove to be no more than an intermediate step and we would have the options of either revising our deal or cutting out altogether once things have settled down but the first step is to Leave.
@CarlottaVance I find studying what the various Leave factions are saying simply too depressing for words. A combination of fantasy and unreality swirling around concepts like sovereignty which mean far less to most people than last week's losing lottery ticket.
Trump is still nearly at evens for the nomination. This is insane. He ought to be no longer than 1/4 and probably shorter still. He won big in Nevada, he won comfortably in S Carolina, he won big in New Hampshire and he has a 20 point lead over the field nationally. What is going to stop him? Even if Cruz were to drop out (and he won't), Trump would still lead Rubio even if the latter picked up all of Cruz's support(which he wouldn't).
Cruz has also won a state and will win Texas next week. Trump will now almost certainly win the nomination having won three of Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina and Nevada while McCain and Romney by contrast only won two of those states. If Trump is the nominee that is great news for Hillary as despite her email problems she still beats him in most general election polls helped by his abysmal ratings with Hispanics where he gets less than 20% in a general election and women. If Rubio were the nominee by contrast Hillary would likely be toast as he beats her in most general election polls with up to 30% of the Hispanic vote
If Hillary can't cope with an old never was like Sanders there is no way that she is going to cope with Trump. Her campaign to be the first female President of the United States should be as exciting and ground breaking as Obama's was. Instead it is drowning in baggage and ennui. I am seriously tempted to top up on Trump before the odds come into line with reality.
No Hillary is Nixon in a pantsuit not Obama or JFK. She would never beat a moderate charismatic opponent but she can beat Trump. Just as Nixon would have lost to Bobby Kennedy but narrowly beat Humphrey in 1968 do Hillary would have lost to Rubio but will narriwly beat Trump
Tory Leave is a lot less worrying than UKIP Leave because, on a day to day basis, it changes very little and means on-going access to the free market on pretty much the basis we have now. It will, though, leave many Leavers hugely disappointed as it is going to make almost no significant difference to levels of immigration.
The danger is that one becomes the other.
If say a quarter of Tory voters are sufficiently pissed off about the Tory Leave result that they peel off to the Kippers, then the Kippers are in the low 20's at the next GE. What happens then the Tories, almost certainly with a more sceptical leader, need a coalition partner, and the kippers now have 30ish seats.
Personally, I think Leave should commit to remaining in the EEA and single market. This means accepting that change will be modest and "control of our borders" won't be that different from the current situation.
That would make sense - are any of the LEAVE campaigns advocating that (in so far as one can tell)?
Can't get much sense out of their fanboys on here......
I could promise you a Rose garden if we vote Leave, but I don't get to make the decisions.
If Trump is the nominee that is great news for Hillary as despite her email problems she still beats him in most general election polls helped by his abysmal ratings with Hispanics where he gets less than 20% in a general election and women. If Rubio were the nominee by contrast Hillary would likely be toast as he beats her in most general election polls with up to 30% of the Hispanic vote
What about if Trump picks a black or hispanic (ideally female) running mate, that would surely set the cat amongst the pigeons.
I think - given the comments Trump made about Mexicans - he'll go for a Hispanic. My money would be on VP Rubio.
Trump Rubio - so a moderate president and a neo-con VP !
That is a possibility, and that does not sound terrible to me.
Christ the lack of ambition of so many Brits is depressing, reminds me of why I do business in Asia. No one is concerned about the future of their country, or the possibilities of a better and more prosperous life for their grandchildren, or reaching out across the world and becoming a truly global country, not stuck in a decaying backwater.
Oh no, everyone is concerned it might cost them £2.50 a month off their pension, or they might have a couple extra forms to fill in once a year. The poverty of ambition is breathtaking. The UK doesn't reach for the stars any more, it reaches for the six pack of lager and turns of Big Brother.
British businesses are way behind many of their EU counterparts when it comes to operating in Asia and other parts of the developing world. That's not the EU's fault, it's the fault of the people who run the businesses (and those who invest in them). Our business culture is focused on short term return, trimming cost rather than investment. As you say, it leads to a tremendous lack of ambition - and making stuff not many people want to buy. There are exceptions - particularly on the services side - but it's been a problem of ours for decades.
That is a possibility, and that does not sound terrible to me.
Christ the lack of ambition of so many Brits is depressing, reminds me of why I do business in Asia. No one is concerned about the future of their country, or the possibilities of a better and more prosperous life for their grandchildren, or reaching out across the world and becoming a truly global country, not stuck in a decaying backwater.
Oh no, everyone is concerned it might cost them £2.50 a month off their pension, or they might have a couple extra forms to fill in once a year. The poverty of ambition is breathtaking. The UK doesn't reach for the stars any more, it reaches for the six pack of lager and turns of Big Brother.
The most likely outcome of Leave is that the UK joins EFTA/EEA, in which case there's reciprocal free movement. I'm certainly not expecting forcible transfers of population.
As with DavidL a perfectly sensible answer - have any of the LEAVE campaigns spelled it out?
Just seen a graphic showing that there are 1.7m Brits living in other EU countries. Presumably a high proportion of them are in favour of Remain.
As well as those 1.7 million, there are extended family members here and many more who aspire to live on the continent. Fox jr rather fancies Sweden for an MA for example. No uni fees there, and excellent teaching.
If we leave the EU will your son be prevented from studying in Sweden?
I took my car into the garage yesterday and when the mechanic was taking me home to make conversation I asked how he'd be voting in the referendum and he said "I'll be voting to stay in because my dad's got a place in Teneriffe"!
And you cant tell me whether the Four Freedoms will be affected if we do LEAVE, or whether that's a desire of any of the LEAVE campaigns.
WHAT HAPPENS AFTER THE REFERENDUM IS NOT UP TO THE CAMPAIGN, IT'S UP TO THE GOVERNMENT OF THE DAY.
What are the LEAVE Campaign's positions on the 'Four Freedoms'?
They are advocating 'taking control' - does that affect the Four Freedoms?
Surely if their campaign has won, the Government will want to be mindful of the prospectus upon which that victory was achieved.
So what is it?
Ugh, more pointless rhetorical crap, sorry I am bored, go and bother someone else.
trans 'I don't know, I haven't thought about it, I have no view....' But LEAVE anyway......
It's a little early in the morning to be quite so patronising....
When a simple question is described as "rhetorical crap' either the poster's English comprehension skills are lacking, or they are not fully woken up yet.
Cameron is clearly doing better with Tory voters than members but online polls again tell a different story to phone polls. Yougov today has Leave leading 57 to 43 amongst Tory voters
Non-Tory voters give similar answers, whether polled by phone or online. It's very hard to see why a lead of 14% for Leave online becomes a similar lead for Remain by phone.
Tory Leave is a lot less worrying than UKIP Leave because, on a day to day basis, it changes very little and means on-going access to the free market on pretty much the basis we have now. It will, though, leave many Leavers hugely disappointed as it is going to make almost no significant difference to levels of immigration.
The danger is that one becomes the other.
If say a quarter of Tory voters are sufficiently pissed off about the Tory Leave result that they peel off to the Kippers, then the Kippers are in the low 20's at the next GE. What happens then the Tories, almost certainly with a more sceptical leader, need a coalition partner, and the kippers now have 30ish seats.
If the thread header is correct, that would require 60% of Conservative Leaver voters to defect post-referendum to UKIP. That sounds wildly implausible.
That is a possibility, and that does not sound terrible to me.
Christ the lack of ambition of so many Brits is depressing, reminds me of why I do business in Asia. No one is concerned about the future of their country, or the possibilities of a better and more prosperous life for their grandchildren, or reaching out across the world and becoming a truly global country, not stuck in a decaying backwater.
Oh no, everyone is concerned it might cost them £2.50 a month off their pension, or they might have a couple extra forms to fill in once a year. The poverty of ambition is breathtaking. The UK doesn't reach for the stars any more, it reaches for the six pack of lager and turns of Big Brother.
British businesses are way behind many of their EU counterparts when it comes to operating in Asia and other parts of the developing world. That's not the EU's fault, it's the fault of the people who run the businesses (and those who invest in them). Our business culture is focused on short term return, trimming cost rather than investment. As you say, it leads to a tremendous lack of ambition - and making stuff not many people want to buy. There are exceptions - particularly on the services side - but it's been a problem of ours for decades.
We've never, despite Napoleon's gibe, been any good at making what people want and then marketing & selling it to them. We are brought up to find those processes demeaning. In the "good old days" we had an Empire who had to buy whatever we condescended to let them have. Then there was North Sea Oil. Now that's gone, too.
Tory Leave is a lot less worrying than UKIP Leave because, on a day to day basis, it changes very little and means on-going access to the free market on pretty much the basis we have now. It will, though, leave many Leavers hugely disappointed as it is going to make almost no significant difference to levels of immigration.
The danger is that one becomes the other.
If say a quarter of Tory voters are sufficiently pissed off about the Tory Leave result that they peel off to the Kippers, then the Kippers are in the low 20's at the next GE. What happens then the Tories, almost certainly with a more sceptical leader, need a coalition partner, and the kippers now have 30ish seats.
A new deal will be done way before the next GE. And it will be negotiated by people who believe in the free movement of goods, services, capital and people within an EU/EEA/UK single market. A few extra UKIP MPs in 2020 can't and won't change that.
In this campaign there are two Leaves - the Tory one and the UKIP one. Only the first matters and, when it comes down to it, on a practical basis it will change our day-to-day lives only slightly. That will, of course, lead to many Leavers feeling massively betrayed. But FPTP pretty much guarantees it will make no difference to anything - except, perhaps, turnouts.
concepts like sovereignty which mean far less to most people than last week's losing lottery ticket.
Which is too depressing for words. People are so obsessed by the minutiae of their lives, so fearful that something might change, that they never glance up to ask who is running the show and why. They just accept it as a fact.
As Stephen Hawking said : "Look up at the stars, not down at your feet"
Comments
As has been pointed out on numerous occasions before UKIPCONHome is a far from proven approximation to the views of Conservative members......
http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-scotland-politics-34426237
I wonder how well their income tax take will hold up in the face of the dire news from the North Sea?
Despite results and polling indicating that Obama would defeat Clinton many punters remained unconvinced that he would win and their poor judgement was laid bare by many not understanding how the primaries and caucuses worked.
We are seeing the same with Trump.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-eu-referendum-35646004
Better off if UK left - Better if the UK stayed - no different - don’t know:
Levels of immigration into Britain 48% 13% 36% 4%
The strength of British democracy 39% 21% 37% 3%
Britain’s national security 28% 34% 34% 4%
The British economy 24% 46% 25% 6%
http://www.comres.co.uk/polls/daily-mail-political-poll-february-2016/
People vote on the economy. Things like British democracy, sovereignty and immigration can take a walk.
Leave need to hammer home economic risk of staying.
He said Mr Cameron was "absolutely right that this is a deal between 28 nations all of whom believe it", adding: "But the whole point about the European Court of Justice is that it stands above the nation states."
Mr Cameron has "not been misleading anyone", Mr Gove went on, but he added: "I do think it's important that people also realise that the European Court of Justice stands above every nation state, and ultimately it will decide on the basis of the treaties and this deal is not yet in the treaties."
Around two thirds (68%) of Britons say they are passionate about the issue of Britain’s membership of the EU. However, those likely to vote for “Remain” are more likely to say they are passionate than those supporting “Leave” (76% and 66% respectively).
You can't really ask that question in isolation - it should be in a field of similar topics to try to tease out which issues people are genuinely passionate about.....
"This is because voters are only likely to back leaving if a concern about issues such as identity, sovereignty and immigration – that is, the concern on which above all scepticism feeds – is coupled with the much less popular belief that Britain’s economy would be better off if it left the EU."
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/eureferendum/12171049/Revealed-Two-thirds-of-British-voters-are-Eurosceptics-but-they-arent-convinced-we-should-leave.html
Vote Leave: WHERE are you? WHAT are you doing?
Pull your bloody finger out. Now.
Vote REMAIN for the Economy - unless you want to LEAVE with Nigel & George......
If this brings Gove and Boris to the fore somewhat that just might be a good thing but the hour is already getting late and views of a largely indifferent public are getting fixed. The EU is far too boring to think about more than once for most. Once those views are fixed it is game over.
I am on the other side of this argument but the old cliché of Cameron being at his best when his back is against the wall has never been truer than it has been this week. He came back with a deal that was not so much criticised as ridiculed and he has completely dominated ever since.
It's why people like me stood at the general election, its little to do with immigration, GDP, NHS and other issues, its about a state of mind. Regardless of the outcome plenty of Conservatives are clearly viewing events through a different lens, that can only be positive.
I've seen 2.2 Million:
http://aiec.hu/ckfinder/userfiles/images/British-in-the-EU-European-Union.jpg
But I suspect that may include people who spend part of their time abroad, part in the UK.....
I agree, most will probably be REMAINians - as LEAVE's glorious lack of clarity about what will happen to 'borders' may lead them (not unreasonably) to conclude the worst.....
M&C Saatchis worked for the Tories so the betting must be on them
I'd like you to be clear here please: are you suggesting, even remotely, that if we leave the EU nation states will repatriate UK citizens?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/eureferendum/12170831/Michael-Gove-brilliant-but-unloved-plays-the-game-of-thrones.html
http://www.europeanpolicy.org/en/european-policies/single-market.html
http://www.efta.int/eea/eu-programmes/application-finances/background
As a dedicated LEAVEr, are you suggesting that any of the Four Freedoms will be affected by LEAVEing the EU?
So far, the LEAVE campaigns have been studiously ambiguous.....
Look, people are people, they are generally very nice. This referndum is about an unnecessary and unwanted layer of bureaucracy, nothing else.
Cruz is clearly making Texas his firewall state, and with good reason. But the fact for the rest of the field is that even if Cruz wins there, as he should, he and Trump will split virtually all the 152 delegates between them, so if Trump does win it and Cruz withdraws, everyone else will be so far back that Trump will be out of sight.
If we Leave will nation states repatriate UK citizens?
what are the best explanations for the discrepancy between the results of telephone and internet polling on the question of the EU vote?
Thanks
An occasional visitor
You should get the LEAVE campaigns to clear that up.....
Note. Edited for spelling!
I'm not advocating LEAVE - you are.
And you cant tell me whether the Four Freedoms will be affected if we do LEAVE, or whether that's a desire of any of the LEAVE campaigns.
Which one is least untypical and capable of being relied on? Who knows? At the election the phones were marginally better but still poor.
It depends of what deal is negotiated after a LEAVE result, and now, know the next bit is tricky, so I will try and keep it simple for you.
WHAT HAPPENS AFTER THE REFERENDUM IS NOT UP TO THE CAMPAIGN, IT'S UP TO THE GOVERNMENT OF THE DAY.
Are we clear on this now, good, maybe we can stop the idiotic Nabavite question begging now and actually look at the issues ?
That said, I'd still make Hillary favourite in a Trump / Clinton contest but only about 60/40.
"Well you started it", simply doesn't wash.
Some people need to grow up.
blogs.lse.ac.uk/brexitvote/2016/02/22/polls-apart-why-we-need-to-treat-all-eu-referendum-polling-with-caution/
They are advocating 'taking control' - does that affect the Four Freedoms?
Surely if their campaign has won, the Government will want to be mindful of the prospectus upon which that victory was achieved.
So what is it?
Oh no, everyone is concerned it might cost them £2.50 a month off their pension, or they might have a couple extra forms to fill in once a year. The poverty of ambition is breathtaking. The UK doesn't reach for the stars any more, it reaches for the six pack of lager and turns of Big Brother.
As for the agencies themselves nearly all of whom are multi national they'll have their own interests so it's not beyond the bounds of possibility they might individually try to use it as a shop window in which case it'll be a lot of fun.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1vp6viBi5DA4avMgR2Y8lKrrAUqJp-0zL2LZB6iVD3uU/edit?pref=2&pli=1#gid=450656551
In: 151
Out: 139
ND: 40
Personally, I think Leave should commit to remaining in the EEA and single market. This means accepting that change will be modest and "control of our borders" won't be that different from the current situation.
But it also means that we can decide a lot more things for ourselves, that our economic access is still secure, that external investment in the UK still has that market access and, as Blackburn says, the layer of bureaucracy that is the European Parliament and the Commission is no longer our problem. I am clearly biased because this is what I want but I also believe that this is a sellable proposition that really should not frighten the horses too much.
Telephone sampling will get easier to reach groups and will, for example, over-represent public sector workers whilst struggling to contact tradesmen. They also up-weight their under 35 samples significantly.
The great value in polls is the direction of travel plus you can adjust your projections according to their usual pattern of error.
In fairness to YG and ICM - they were both about right with the SIndy ref at the four month pre-referendum stage.
I believe that the Common Market - Economic Community - European Union is on a one-way track to a United Europe by way of a Political Union. I'm looking at past trends.
Because of those pesky voters, they have to take occasional diversions but there is only one final destination.
If you're happy, I fully respect your decision. If not, why would you vote Remain? Do you expect the other 27 countries to say ... "What fools we've been, if only we'd seen the light earlier. We must change our destination immediately."
Or is it "A touch on the brakes around this curve while we let the passengers see the scenery and then on we go."
Can't get much sense out of their fanboys on here......
My niece is spending a year at a US university. So what?
I suspect despite the dicking about with Scottish golf courses, Trump has a soft spot for the UK - and would be well disposed to help us out if push comes to shove.
The most likely outcome of Leave is that the UK joins EFTA/EEA, in which case there's reciprocal free movement. I'm certainly not expecting forcible transfers of population.
The idea that there is entrepreneurship over HERE and crime over THERE needs to be knocked on the head. The slide into each other. It is an extraordinary fact that merely by posting on pb.com it proves that all an individual's business dealings are pure as the driven slush.
There's no such thing as an honest penny - which is what led Lenin to lead a revolution and then find he couldn't make it work.
Looks like REMAIN already have an agency:
http://www.campaignlive.co.uk/article/britain-stronger-europe-launch-adam-eve-ddb/1368428
@CarlottaVance I find studying what the various Leave factions are saying simply too depressing for words. A combination of fantasy and unreality swirling around concepts like sovereignty which mean far less to most people than last week's losing lottery ticket.
If say a quarter of Tory voters are sufficiently pissed off about the Tory Leave result that they peel off to the Kippers, then the Kippers are in the low 20's at the next GE. What happens then the Tories, almost certainly with a more sceptical leader, need a coalition partner, and the kippers now have 30ish seats.
He can't have convinced too many early deciders then !
Hopefully he can hold it, that will destroy Rubio's price a treat.
In this campaign there are two Leaves - the Tory one and the UKIP one. Only the first matters and, when it comes down to it, on a practical basis it will change our day-to-day lives only slightly. That will, of course, lead to many Leavers feeling massively betrayed. But FPTP pretty much guarantees it will make no difference to anything - except, perhaps, turnouts.
As Stephen Hawking said : "Look up at the stars, not down at your feet"