Mass fracking licenses, sweeping cuts to renewables, and fixing the upper house to ensure that it is rendered useless. Another day of Tory rule. Further, they have cleverly put a noose around the neck of the BBC and perched it precariously on a rickety stool to ensure that it remains quiet for the foreseeable.
The Tories and their cheerleaders are lowlife scum- people impressed by money, making money, and protecting people with money.
Somebody got out of the bed the wrong side today...
Mass fracking licenses, sweeping cuts to renewables, and fixing the upper house to ensure that it is rendered useless. Another day of Tory rule. Further, they have cleverly put a noose around the neck of the BBC and perched it precariously on a rickety stool to ensure that it remains quiet for the foreseeable.
The Tories and their cheerleaders are lowlife scum- people impressed by money, making money, and protecting people with money.
Somebody got out of the bed the wrong side today...
Tyson's probably still hacked off with Osborne for putting the boot into his Buy to Let empire.
Mass fracking licenses, sweeping cuts to renewables, and fixing the upper house to ensure that it is rendered useless. Another day of Tory rule. Further, they have cleverly put a noose around the neck of the BBC and perched it precariously on a rickety stool to ensure that it remains quiet for the foreseeable.
Fantastic news, a good day all round for the government I'm sure you'll agree
Mass fracking licenses, sweeping cuts to renewables, and fixing the upper house to ensure that it is rendered useless. Another day of Tory rule. Further, they have cleverly put a noose around the neck of the BBC and perched it precariously on a rickety stool to ensure that it remains quiet for the foreseeable.
The Tories and their cheerleaders are lowlife scum- people impressed by money, making money, and protecting people with money.
Your contempt for money doesn't extend to your own sybaritic rentier life-style, naturally.
Mass fracking licenses, sweeping cuts to renewables, and fixing the upper house to ensure that it is rendered useless. Another day of Tory rule. Further, they have cleverly put a noose around the neck of the BBC and perched it precariously on a rickety stool to ensure that it remains quiet for the foreseeable.
The Tories and their cheerleaders are lowlife scum- people impressed by money, making money, and protecting people with money.
Your contempt for money doesn't extend to your own sybaritic rentier life-style, naturally.
Indeed. Tyson whining as he wafts around Florence and other delightful perches for his expensively shod Lefty feet.
In unrelated news, the Banner Saga will come to consoles on 12 January next year. Rather delayed (was meant to be early 2015), but looking forward to it (it's a Viking-y RPG). Only digital, so it may well be my first digital purchase [I've had free DLC before, but never paid for it].
Hope we get XCOM 2 as well. Be both surprised and disappointed if not.
Actually I woke up quite chipper, but was brought down with a bump by the Today show which reported matter of factly the Tory misdeeds without any kind of critique.
The drive for fracking, including the green belt and the cuts to subsidies for renewables are just astonishing, brutal and without any kind of regard for the environment or for future generations. It just represents cynical, lobby influenced politics worthy only of the tea party.
Once again, I say unto you that our Tory Rulers are my kind of skum - fearless and inventive.
Mass fracking licenses, sweeping cuts to renewables, and fixing the upper house to ensure that it is rendered useless. Another day of Tory rule. Further, they have cleverly put a noose around the neck of the BBC and perched it precariously on a rickety stool to ensure that it remains quiet for the foreseeable.
The Tories and their cheerleaders are lowlife scum- people impressed by money, making money, and protecting people with money.
Somebody got out of the bed the wrong side today...
Mass fracking licenses, sweeping cuts to renewables, and fixing the upper house to ensure that it is rendered useless. Another day of Tory rule. Further, they have cleverly put a noose around the neck of the BBC and perched it precariously on a rickety stool to ensure that it remains quiet for the foreseeable.
The Tories and their cheerleaders are lowlife scum- people impressed by money, making money, and protecting people with money.
Fracking is great news, well done the govt as is cuts to renewables. The sooner the tv licence fee is abolished the better.
Mass fracking licenses, sweeping cuts to renewables, and fixing the upper house to ensure that it is rendered useless. Another day of Tory rule. Further, they have cleverly put a noose around the neck of the BBC and perched it precariously on a rickety stool to ensure that it remains quiet for the foreseeable.
The Tories and their cheerleaders are lowlife scum- people impressed by money, making money, and protecting people with money.
Actually I woke up quite chipper, but was brought down with a bump by the Today show which reported matter of factly the Tory misdeeds without any kind of critique.
The drive for fracking, including the green belt and the cuts to subsidies for renewables are just astonishing, brutal and without any kind of regard for the environment or for future generations. It just represents cynical, lobby influenced politics worthy only of the tea party.
Scum- that's the kindest word I can think of for our Tory rulers.
Mass fracking licenses, sweeping cuts to renewables, and fixing the upper house to ensure that it is rendered useless. Another day of Tory rule. Further, they have cleverly put a noose around the neck of the BBC and perched it precariously on a rickety stool to ensure that it remains quiet for the foreseeable.
The Tories and their cheerleaders are lowlife scum- people impressed by money, making money, and protecting people with money.
Somebody got out of the bed the wrong side today...
Scum - not in your eyes people who spit on those they disagree with, but people who want to permit a perfectly safe, perfectly legitimate, cost-effective, environmentally-friendly, lower-carbon method of energy generation that has led to affordable energy worldwide thanks to the boom in its generation in America.
Mass fracking licenses, sweeping cuts to renewables, and fixing the upper house to ensure that it is rendered useless. Another day of Tory rule. Further, they have cleverly put a noose around the neck of the BBC and perched it precariously on a rickety stool to ensure that it remains quiet for the foreseeable.
This feels like a 'Dear Marge" letter, but I have solar panels (at the full rate) thanks to that nice Mr Milliband. A ludicrously good deal pursued by a feeble minded ideologue. But fair play to him, he's extraordinarily generous with other people's money.
I'm not a greeny (more a greedy) but I can be bribed. Yet, I feel unclean somehow. Should I paint them over?
Actually I woke up quite chipper, but was brought down with a bump by the Today show which reported matter of factly the Tory misdeeds without any kind of critique.
The drive for fracking, including the green belt and the cuts to subsidies for renewables are just astonishing, brutal and without any kind of regard for the environment or for future generations. It just represents cynical, lobby influenced politics worthy only of the tea party.
Scum- that's the kindest word I can think of for our Tory rulers.
Mass fracking licenses, sweeping cuts to renewables, and fixing the upper house to ensure that it is rendered useless. Another day of Tory rule. Further, they have cleverly put a noose around the neck of the BBC and perched it precariously on a rickety stool to ensure that it remains quiet for the foreseeable.
The Tories and their cheerleaders are lowlife scum- people impressed by money, making money, and protecting people with money.
Somebody got out of the bed the wrong side today...
Scum - not in your eyes people who spit on those they disagree with, but people who want to permit a perfectly safe, perfectly legitimate, cost-effective, environmentally-friendly, lower-carbon method of energy generation that has led to affordable energy worldwide thanks to the boom in its generation in America.
Nice to see your priorities.
The US shale gas industry resulted in increased use of coal in UK power stations as a result of a slump in US coal demand reducing the price of coal. A short term effect of course, as the coal plants are all on their way out (Longannet, Eggborough and Ferrybridge next spring).
UK shale gas development is not anticipated to result in a fall in UK gas prices, just result in a switch from imported to domestic supply. If the UK was so fussed about domestic energy supply, we would still have coal mines.
I have heard it said that the cheapest source of shale gas in the UK will be LNG imported from the US.
'Mass fracking licenses, sweeping cuts to renewables, and fixing the upper house to ensure that it is rendered useless. Another day of Tory rule. Further, they have cleverly put a noose around the neck of the BBC and perched it precariously on a rickety stool to ensure that it remains quiet for the foreseeable.
The Tories and their cheerleaders are lowlife scum- people impressed by money, making money, and protecting people with money.'
Oh dear, an end to the never ending subsidy for renewables,fixing the upper house so an un-elected,unaccountable bunch of reject politicians can't decide on major constitutional reforms,a possible revision to the BBC poll tax & allowing fracking to reduce the plebs energy bills.
And our Champagne buy-to-let socialist is unhappy, who is the real scum ?
This feels like a 'Dear Marge" letter, but I have solar panels (at the full rate) thanks to that nice Mr Milliband. A ludicrously good deal pursued by a feeble minded ideologue. But fair play to him, he's extraordinarily generous with other people's money.
I'm not a greeny (more a greedy) but I can be bribed. Yet, I feel unclean somehow. Should I paint them over?
If you don't mind me asking, what is the payback period on the investment?
Just look at the images of what fracking does to the landscape. Clean- really? Sounds like you are a lobbyist.
The Tory party used to take it's role in protecting the environment seriously. The protection of the green belt, outlawing badger cruelty and so forth.
Now it largely comprises of squalid, sordid, unpleasant, money obsessed, scumbags really.
Actually I woke up quite chipper, but was brought down with a bump by the Today show which reported matter of factly the Tory misdeeds without any kind of critique.
The drive for fracking, including the green belt and the cuts to subsidies for renewables are just astonishing, brutal and without any kind of regard for the environment or for future generations. It just represents cynical, lobby influenced politics worthy only of the tea party.
Scum- that's the kindest word I can think of for our Tory rulers.
Mass fracking licenses, sweeping cuts to renewables, and fixing the upper house to ensure that it is rendered useless. Another day of Tory rule. Further, they have cleverly put a noose around the neck of the BBC and perched it precariously on a rickety stool to ensure that it remains quiet for the foreseeable.
The Tories and their cheerleaders are lowlife scum- people impressed by money, making money, and protecting people with money.
Somebody got out of the bed the wrong side today...
Scum - not in your eyes people who spit on those they disagree with, but people who want to permit a perfectly safe, perfectly legitimate, cost-effective, environmentally-friendly, lower-carbon method of energy generation that has led to affordable energy worldwide thanks to the boom in its generation in America.
Actually I woke up quite chipper, but was brought down with a bump by the Today show which reported matter of factly the Tory misdeeds without any kind of critique.
The drive for fracking, including the green belt and the cuts to subsidies for renewables are just astonishing, brutal and without any kind of regard for the environment or for future generations. It just represents cynical, lobby influenced politics worthy only of the tea party.
Scum- that's the kindest word I can think of for our Tory rulers.
Mass fracking licenses, sweeping cuts to renewables, and fixing the upper house to ensure that it is rendered useless. Another day of Tory rule. Further, they have cleverly put a noose around the neck of the BBC and perched it precariously on a rickety stool to ensure that it remains quiet for the foreseeable.
The Tories and their cheerleaders are lowlife scum- people impressed by money, making money, and protecting people with money.
Somebody got out of the bed the wrong side today...
Scum - not in your eyes people who spit on those they disagree with, but people who want to permit a perfectly safe, perfectly legitimate, cost-effective, environmentally-friendly, lower-carbon method of energy generation that has led to affordable energy worldwide thanks to the boom in its generation in America.
Nice to see your priorities.
The US shale gas industry resulted in increased use of coal in UK power stations as a result of a slump in US coal demand reducing the price of coal. A short term effect of course, as the coal plants are all on their way out (Longannet, Eggborough and Ferrybridge next spring).
UK shale gas development is not anticipated to result in a fall in UK gas prices, just result in a switch from imported to domestic supply. If the UK was so fussed about domestic energy supply, we would still have coal mines.
I have heard it said that the cheapest source of shale gas in the UK will be LNG imported from the US.
Thanks for the facts and reasoned argument. Interesting to see the arguments put forward previously viewing the same decisions from diametrically opposed directions, shame about the name calling though.
Just look at the images of what fracking does to the landscape. Clean- really? Sounds like you are a lobbyist.
The Tory party used to take it's role in protecting the environment seriously. The protection of the green belt, outlawing badger cruelty and so forth.
Now it largely comprises of squalid, sordid, unpleasant, money obsessed, scumbags really.
Actually I woke up quite chipper, but was brought down with a bump by the Today show which reported matter of factly the Tory misdeeds without any kind of critique.
The drive for fracking, including the green belt and the cuts to subsidies for renewables are just astonishing, brutal and without any kind of regard for the environment or for future generations. It just represents cynical, lobby influenced politics worthy only of the tea party.
Scum- that's the kindest word I can think of for our Tory rulers.
Mass fracking licenses, sweeping cuts to renewables, and fixing the upper house to ensure that it is rendered useless. Another day of Tory rule. Further, they have cleverly put a noose around the neck of the BBC and perched it precariously on a rickety stool to ensure that it remains quiet for the foreseeable.
The Tories and their cheerleaders are lowlife scum- people impressed by money, making money, and protecting people with money.
Somebody got out of the bed the wrong side today...
Scum - not in your eyes people who spit on those they disagree with, but people who want to permit a perfectly safe, perfectly legitimate, cost-effective, environmentally-friendly, lower-carbon method of energy generation that has led to affordable energy worldwide thanks to the boom in its generation in America.
Nice to see your priorities.
Have you thought about buying your own drilling rig? It would be the perfect investment for a parasitical rentier, now that Osborne's put the brakes on any future expansion of your Buy to Let empire.
Just look at the images of what fracking does to the landscape. Clean- really? Sounds like you are a lobbyist.
The Tory party used to take it's role in protecting the environment seriously. The protection of the green belt, outlawing badger cruelty and so forth.
Now it largely comprises of squalid, sordid, unpleasant, money obsessed, scumbags really.
Just look at the images of what fracking does to the landscape. Clean- really? Sounds like you are a lobbyist.
The Tory party used to take it's role in protecting the environment seriously. The protection of the green belt, outlawing badger cruelty and so forth.
Now it largely comprises of squalid, sordid, unpleasant, money obsessed, scumbags really.
Actually I woke up quite chipper, but was brought down with a bump by the Today show which reported matter of factly the Tory misdeeds without any kind of critique.
The drive for fracking, including the green belt and the cuts to subsidies for renewables are just astonishing, brutal and without any kind of regard for the environment or for future generations. It just represents cynical, lobby influenced politics worthy only of the tea party.
Scum- that's the kindest word I can think of for our Tory rulers.
Mass fracking licenses, sweeping cuts to renewables, and fixing the upper house to ensure that it is rendered useless. Another day of Tory rule. Further, they have cleverly put a noose around the neck of the BBC and perched it precariously on a rickety stool to ensure that it remains quiet for the foreseeable.
The Tories and their cheerleaders are lowlife scum- people impressed by money, making money, and protecting people with money.
Somebody got out of the bed the wrong side today...
Scum - not in your eyes people who spit on those they disagree with, but people who want to permit a perfectly safe, perfectly legitimate, cost-effective, environmentally-friendly, lower-carbon method of energy generation that has led to affordable energy worldwide thanks to the boom in its generation in America.
Nice to see your priorities.
Have you thought about buying your own drilling rig? It would be the perfect investment for a parasitical rentier, now that Osborne's put the brakes on any future expansion of your Buy to Let empire.
Just look at the images of what fracking does to the landscape. Clean- really? Sounds like you are a lobbyist.
The Tory party used to take it's role in protecting the environment seriously. The protection of the green belt, outlawing badger cruelty and so forth.
Now it largely comprises of squalid, sordid, unpleasant, money obsessed, scumbags really.
Actually I woke up quite chipper, but was brought down with a bump by the Today show which reported matter of factly the Tory misdeeds without any kind of critique.
The drive for fracking, including the green belt and the cuts to subsidies for renewables are just astonishing, brutal and without any kind of regard for the environment or for future generations. It just represents cynical, lobby influenced politics worthy only of the tea party.
Scum- that's the kindest word I can think of for our Tory rulers.
Mass fracking licenses, sweeping cuts to renewables, and fixing the upper house to ensure that it is rendered useless. Another day of Tory rule. Further, they have cleverly put a noose around the neck of the BBC and perched it precariously on a rickety stool to ensure that it remains quiet for the foreseeable.
The Tories and their cheerleaders are lowlife scum- people impressed by money, making money, and protecting people with money.
Somebody got out of the bed the wrong side today...
Scum - not in your eyes people who spit on those they disagree with, but people who want to permit a perfectly safe, perfectly legitimate, cost-effective, environmentally-friendly, lower-carbon method of energy generation that has led to affordable energy worldwide thanks to the boom in its generation in America.
Nice to see your priorities.
You should agitate to get those Tuscan marble quarries shut down. You're our man on the spot.
Just look at the images of what fracking does to the landscape. Clean- really? Sounds like you are a lobbyist.
The Tory party used to take it's role in protecting the environment seriously. The protection of the green belt, outlawing badger cruelty and so forth.
Now it largely comprises of squalid, sordid, unpleasant, money obsessed, scumbags really.
Scum - not in your eyes people who spit on those they disagree with, but people who want to permit a perfectly safe, perfectly legitimate, cost-effective, environmentally-friendly, lower-carbon method of energy generation that has led to affordable energy worldwide thanks to the boom in its generation in America.
Nice to see your priorities.
Compared to other used, cost-effective alternatives to it like coal then yes it is very clean and very environmentally friendly.
But keep on with your crocodile tears if you want.
Actually I woke up quite chipper, but was brought down with a bump by the Today show which reported matter of factly the Tory misdeeds without any kind of critique.
The drive for fracking, including the green belt and the cuts to subsidies for renewables are just astonishing, brutal and without any kind of regard for the environment or for future generations. It just represents cynical, lobby influenced politics worthy only of the tea party.
Scum- that's the kindest word I can think of for our Tory rulers.
Mass fracking licenses, sweeping cuts to renewables, and fixing the upper house to ensure that it is rendered useless. Another day of Tory rule. Further, they have cleverly put a noose around the neck of the BBC and perched it precariously on a rickety stool to ensure that it remains quiet for the foreseeable.
The Tories and their cheerleaders are lowlife scum- people impressed by money, making money, and protecting people with money.
Somebody got out of the bed the wrong side today...
Scum - not in your eyes people who spit on those they disagree with, but people who want to permit a perfectly safe, perfectly legitimate, cost-effective, environmentally-friendly, lower-carbon method of energy generation that has led to affordable energy worldwide thanks to the boom in its generation in America.
Nice to see your priorities.
The US shale gas industry resulted in increased use of coal in UK power stations as a result of a slump in US coal demand reducing the price of coal. A short term effect of course, as the coal plants are all on their way out (Longannet, Eggborough and Ferrybridge next spring).
UK shale gas development is not anticipated to result in a fall in UK gas prices, just result in a switch from imported to domestic supply. If the UK was so fussed about domestic energy supply, we would still have coal mines.
I have heard it said that the cheapest source of shale gas in the UK will be LNG imported from the US.
Not sure about the value of your last statement/argument. Are you suggesting that, as the cheapest sources of petrol are in KSA, Kuwait and Iraq, that the UK should never have developed the North Sea fields?
Surely, the question is whether the field (or coal mines) are economic to exploit, rather than energy security. I thought the coal mines closed because of economics.
Just look at the images of what fracking does to the landscape. Clean- really? Sounds like you are a lobbyist.
The Tory party used to take it's role in protecting the environment seriously. The protection of the green belt, outlawing badger cruelty and so forth.
Now it largely comprises of squalid, sordid, unpleasant, money obsessed, scumbags really.
Just look at the images of what fracking does to the landscape. Clean- really? Sounds like you are a lobbyist.
The Tory party used to take it's role in protecting the environment seriously. The protection of the green belt, outlawing badger cruelty and so forth.
Now it largely comprises of squalid, sordid, unpleasant, money obsessed, scumbags really.
It amuses me greatly how much it irritates right wingers that a lefty could be self made and still be a lefty. As said, Tories seem to be impressed by money. Makes them petty, jealous, selfish, vindictive and unpleasant.
I made my money on developing property- but by my early 40's I had lost interest in accumulating wealth. I could have made more simply by leveraging. I rent a couple out now, but largely to keep my options open for the future about where to live.
Mass fracking licenses, sweeping cuts to renewables, and fixing the upper house to ensure that it is rendered useless. Another day of Tory rule. Further, they have cleverly put a noose around the neck of the BBC and perched it precariously on a rickety stool to ensure that it remains quiet for the foreseeable.
The Tories and their cheerleaders are lowlife scum- people impressed by money, making money, and protecting people with money.
Your contempt for money doesn't extend to your own sybaritic rentier life-style, naturally.
Indeed. Tyson whining as he wafts around Florence and other delightful perches for his expensively shod Lefty feet.
(wrt fracking plenty of Cons MPs are instinctively against for NIMBY reasons but realise there is no substantial reason to oppose a cleaner source of energy with a reasonable footprint)
Frankly anyone who can't see that there is a perfectly respectable environmental argument in favour of fracking is out with the fairies. As the Shadow Energy Minister puts it:
"We have to be realistic," she told BBC News. "We are going to be using gas for a long time because of the huge role it plays for heating homes and for industry.
"The important thing is to minimize the carbon emissions from gas. That means if we can get our own fracked gas, it's better to use that than importing gas that's been compressed at great energy cost somewhere else."
Of course there are legitimate concerns as well, but it takes a special kind of lefty vileness to personalise this.
Not sure what's happened to Wiki - someone seems to have deliberately changed a whole mass of polling numbers so they are now all wrong and much better for Lab than the true numbers:
No, it's your overweening hypocrisy and self righteous unprovoked nastiness. Your last revolting comment about me was a game changer. No more overlooking your bigoted views or indulging you as quaintly odd.
It amuses me greatly how much it irritates right wingers that a lefty could be self made and still be a lefty. As said, Tories seem to be impressed by money. Makes them petty, jealous, selfish, vindictive and unpleasant.
I made my money on developing property- but by my early 40's I had lost interest in accumulating wealth. I could have made more simply by leveraging. I rent a couple out now, but largely to keep my options open for the future about where to live.
Mass fracking licenses, sweeping cuts to renewables, and fixing the upper house to ensure that it is rendered useless. Another day of Tory rule. Further, they have cleverly put a noose around the neck of the BBC and perched it precariously on a rickety stool to ensure that it remains quiet for the foreseeable.
The Tories and their cheerleaders are lowlife scum- people impressed by money, making money, and protecting people with money.
Your contempt for money doesn't extend to your own sybaritic rentier life-style, naturally.
Indeed. Tyson whining as he wafts around Florence and other delightful perches for his expensively shod Lefty feet.
Not sure what's happened to Wiki - someone seems to have deliberately changed a whole mass of polling numbers so they are now all wrong and much better for Lab than the true numbers:
What I would say...The Labour brand, despite Blair, despite Brown, despite Miliband, despite Corbyn, somehow manages to stagger on. Clegg killed the Lib Dem brand, the Tories brand was (and still is to some extent hence all the "silent" Tory votes) toxic, but Labour brand seems to be able to stagger on despite the terrible leaders.
When did the 'Labour brand' last win? 1974? New Labour was effectively an admission that Labour (without the new) was toxic.
The Labour brand is a byword for fiscal incontinence and all-round buffoonery. Comrade Corbyn is the embodiment of this.
For what it's worth - the Tories were polling 28-30 this time last year with Comres, ICM, Survation etc.
Frankly anyone who can't see that there is a perfectly respectable environmental argument in favour of fracking is out with the fairies. As the Shadow Energy Minister puts it:
"We have to be realistic," she told BBC News. "We are going to be using gas for a long time because of the huge role it plays for heating homes and for industry.
"The important thing is to minimize the carbon emissions from gas. That means if we can get our own fracked gas, it's better to use that than importing gas that's been compressed at great energy cost somewhere else."
Of course there are legitimate concerns as well, but it takes a special kind of lefty vileness to personalise this.
Hmm I'm backing her presently for next Labour leader.
Such common sense surely can't help her chances in Corbyn's Labour party though ?
Frankly anyone who can't see that there is a perfectly respectable environmental argument in favour of fracking is out with the fairies. As the Shadow Energy Minister puts it:
"We have to be realistic," she told BBC News. "We are going to be using gas for a long time because of the huge role it plays for heating homes and for industry.
"The important thing is to minimize the carbon emissions from gas. That means if we can get our own fracked gas, it's better to use that than importing gas that's been compressed at great energy cost somewhere else."
Of course there are legitimate concerns as well, but it takes a special kind of lefty vileness to personalise this.
I'm genuinely interested, Richard - What are the legitimate concerns in your eyes?
He's been arrested on securities fraud charges - shame, as he's such a nice guy...
Where he's going, he might need those HIV drugs
The USA doesn't care how much money you have or make - or even how you make it (See Trump chapter bankruptcies), but you do NOT cheat the rules - or you're looking at a long time in prison. They take that stuff very, very seriously.
Can I just remind PBers that 'three-quidders' are NOT members of the Labour Party and have no voting rights in branch or CLP officer elections, council election candidates, etc. Only full-on entryists can have any direct influence over who leads or represents the party at local level. In some places, they are having such an effect.
So how come they keep sending me emails then?!
Just had one purporting to be from Jeremy (actually from theteam@labour.org.uk).
I'm genuinely interested, Richard - What are the legitimate concerns, in your eyes?
Mainly the lorry movements and the fact that you need lots of ugly drill sites - that might be OK in North Dakota, but not in heavily-populated Britain or in good-quality countryside.
There's also the concern about water contamination, but I think that has been exaggerated and can be managed with good geological data.
What I would say...The Labour brand, despite Blair, despite Brown, despite Miliband, despite Corbyn, somehow manages to stagger on. Clegg killed the Lib Dem brand, the Tories brand was (and still is to some extent hence all the "silent" Tory votes) toxic, but Labour brand seems to be able to stagger on despite the terrible leaders.
When did the 'Labour brand' last win? 1974? New Labour was effectively an admission that Labour (without the new) was toxic.
The Labour brand is a byword for fiscal incontinence and all-round buffoonery. Comrade Corbyn is the embodiment of this.
For what it's worth - the Tories were polling 28-30 this time last year with Comres, ICM, Survation etc.
What I would say...The Labour brand, despite Blair, despite Brown, despite Miliband, despite Corbyn, somehow manages to stagger on. Clegg killed the Lib Dem brand, the Tories brand was (and still is to some extent hence all the "silent" Tory votes) toxic, but Labour brand seems to be able to stagger on despite the terrible leaders.
When did the 'Labour brand' last win? 1974? New Labour was effectively an admission that Labour (without the new) was toxic.
The Labour brand is a byword for fiscal incontinence and all-round buffoonery. Comrade Corbyn is the embodiment of this.
For what it's worth - the Tories were polling 28-30 this time last year with Comres, ICM, Survation etc.
I don't leverage anymore actually so Osborne's reforms don't touch me. And, the couple of properties I do let- I could charge a hell of a lot more rent if wanted more cash. I live more off my investments actually which granted is not particularly noble- making money out of money. How capitalism stacks up for people with cash. You have to be really stupid to lose it.
But, any of you want to make any money, go buy some houses in some prime estate areas, leverage on your salary, do them up and sell them, meanwhile spread your assets in a few investment trusts, ISA's, properties and whatnot - and after doing this repeatedly for 20 years or so bingo, you don't have to work anymore. And the good thing is, you can just stop, and just carry on getting wealthier without doing anything because everything is stacked up in your favour.
You don't have to be intelligent either. My IQ isn't great.
Just look at the images of what fracking does to the landscape. Clean- really? Sounds like you are a lobbyist.
The Tory party used to take it's role in protecting the environment seriously. The protection of the green belt, outlawing badger cruelty and so forth.
Now it largely comprises of squalid, sordid, unpleasant, money obsessed, scumbags really.
Actually I woke up quite chipper, but was brought down with a bump by the Today show which reported matter of factly the Tory misdeeds without any kind of critique.
The drive for fracking, including the green belt and the cuts to subsidies for renewables are just astonishing, brutal and without any kind of regard for the environment or for future generations. It just represents cynical, lobby influenced politics worthy only of the tea party.
Scum- that's the kindest word I can think of for our Tory rulers.
Nice to see your priorities.
Have you thought about buying your own drilling rig? It would be the perfect investment for a parasitical rentier, now that Osborne's put the brakes on any future expansion of your Buy to Let empire.
As you may be aware, I’ve recently become quite an expert at this whole “leaving the Labour party” thing. And there’s a template you normally have to follow.
You leave. You write about why you left. Then – and this is where I started to go wrong – you make sure the next thing you write is a stout defence of the underlying principles of your former party, and a full throated attack on their opponents. “Whatever differences I may have with Jeremy Corbyn’s Labour party, they’re nothing compared to the differences I have with those evil, child-eating, Tory party white slavers”. The idea is, it helps you recoup a little bit of lost credibility.
TSE re WIKI..The original info would still be there alongside the new edited material, they could also supply the date of the edit...not too difficult ..and would show what had been changed or tampered with
He's been arrested on securities fraud charges - shame, as he's such a nice guy...
Where he's going, he might need those HIV drugs
You reckon he might be sharing a cell with the leader of the Aryan Brotherhood, who's looking for a new "girlfriend?"
They take securities fraud very seriously over there.
I read a publication a few years ago, about the rights of Prison guards in the US because of the high levels of HIV in the prison population, and the safe guards they have to take.
IIRC the US Prison population is six or seven times more likely to have HIV/AIDS than the average US population.
TSE re WIKI..The original info would still be there alongside the new edited material, they could also supply the date of the edit...not too difficult ..and would show what had been changed or tampered with
It's all logged and timestamped. There is no such thing as "original" info on Wiki in the way you make it out too, it is the nature of the beast.
Tens of thousands of couples who have settled their divorces in the last 20 months may have to re-open negotiations because a critical fault has been found in software used to calculate financial terms.
The Ministry of Justice was urgently investigating the extent of the errors of “Form E” on its website which have the potential to inflate the financial worth of a wife or husband. It has published an email address – formE@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk – asking anyone who believes they have been affected to contact the department.
The fact the software had been miscalculating assets since April 2014 was only spotted earlier this month by a family law specialist, Nicola Matheson-Durrant of the Family Law Clinic in Ascot, Berkshire. The MoJ only publicly admitted the problem on Thursday.
Matheson-Durrant told the Guardian: “Having discovered the fault and advised the MoJ, it became apparent that not a single solicitor, barrister or judge in the whole of the UK had noticed this error. It is such a critical fault. This form has been used in training so it will also have been seen by paralegals, university law departments and the Law Society.”
TSE re WIKI..The original info would still be there alongside the new edited material, they could also supply the date of the edit...not too difficult ..and would show what had been changed or tampered with
That's 3 IMF chiefs out of 3. The governance of the IMF is as bad as N.Jersey and Detroit, where having someone who runs the place not arrested is very rare.
As you may be aware, I’ve recently become quite an expert at this whole “leaving the Labour party” thing. And there’s a template you normally have to follow.
You leave. You write about why you left. Then – and this is where I started to go wrong – you make sure the next thing you write is a stout defence of the underlying principles of your former party, and a full throated attack on their opponents. “Whatever differences I may have with Jeremy Corbyn’s Labour party, they’re nothing compared to the differences I have with those evil, child-eating, Tory party white slavers”. The idea is, it helps you recoup a little bit of lost credibility.
It's amazing that Hodges is paid money for his gibberish. It can last.
I'm genuinely interested, Richard - What are the legitimate concerns, in your eyes?
Mainly the lorry movements and the fact that you need lots of ugly drill sites - that might be OK in North Dakota, but not in heavily-populated Britain or in good-quality countryside.
There's also the concern about water contamination, but I think that has been exaggerated and can be managed with good geological data.
Since when was extracting any energy 'pretty'. The drill sites are not 'ugly', they are small. There are oil extraction wells on Green Island not far for the most expensive real estate in the country. You cannot see it.
Tens of thousands of couples who have settled their divorces in the last 20 months may have to re-open negotiations because a critical fault has been found in software used to calculate financial terms.
The Ministry of Justice was urgently investigating the extent of the errors of “Form E” on its website which have the potential to inflate the financial worth of a wife or husband. It has published an email address – formE@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk – asking anyone who believes they have been affected to contact the department.
The fact the software had been miscalculating assets since April 2014 was only spotted earlier this month by a family law specialist, Nicola Matheson-Durrant of the Family Law Clinic in Ascot, Berkshire. The MoJ only publicly admitted the problem on Thursday.
Matheson-Durrant told the Guardian: “Having discovered the fault and advised the MoJ, it became apparent that not a single solicitor, barrister or judge in the whole of the UK had noticed this error. It is such a critical fault. This form has been used in training so it will also have been seen by paralegals, university law departments and the Law Society.”
Tens of thousands of couples who have settled their divorces in the last 20 months may have to re-open negotiations because a critical fault has been found in software used to calculate financial terms.
The Ministry of Justice was urgently investigating the extent of the errors of “Form E” on its website which have the potential to inflate the financial worth of a wife or husband. It has published an email address – formE@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk – asking anyone who believes they have been affected to contact the department.
The fact the software had been miscalculating assets since April 2014 was only spotted earlier this month by a family law specialist, Nicola Matheson-Durrant of the Family Law Clinic in Ascot, Berkshire. The MoJ only publicly admitted the problem on Thursday.
Matheson-Durrant told the Guardian: “Having discovered the fault and advised the MoJ, it became apparent that not a single solicitor, barrister or judge in the whole of the UK had noticed this error. It is such a critical fault. This form has been used in training so it will also have been seen by paralegals, university law departments and the Law Society.”
Tens of thousands of couples who have settled their divorces in the last 20 months may have to re-open negotiations because a critical fault has been found in software used to calculate financial terms.
The Ministry of Justice was urgently investigating the extent of the errors of “Form E” on its website which have the potential to inflate the financial worth of a wife or husband. It has published an email address – formE@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk – asking anyone who believes they have been affected to contact the department.
The fact the software had been miscalculating assets since April 2014 was only spotted earlier this month by a family law specialist, Nicola Matheson-Durrant of the Family Law Clinic in Ascot, Berkshire. The MoJ only publicly admitted the problem on Thursday.
Matheson-Durrant told the Guardian: “Having discovered the fault and advised the MoJ, it became apparent that not a single solicitor, barrister or judge in the whole of the UK had noticed this error. It is such a critical fault. This form has been used in training so it will also have been seen by paralegals, university law departments and the Law Society.”
Tens of thousands of couples who have settled their divorces in the last 20 months may have to re-open negotiations because a critical fault has been found in software used to calculate financial terms.
The Ministry of Justice was urgently investigating the extent of the errors of “Form E” on its website which have the potential to inflate the financial worth of a wife or husband. It has published an email address – formE@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk – asking anyone who believes they have been affected to contact the department.
The fact the software had been miscalculating assets since April 2014 was only spotted earlier this month by a family law specialist, Nicola Matheson-Durrant of the Family Law Clinic in Ascot, Berkshire. The MoJ only publicly admitted the problem on Thursday.
Matheson-Durrant told the Guardian: “Having discovered the fault and advised the MoJ, it became apparent that not a single solicitor, barrister or judge in the whole of the UK had noticed this error. It is such a critical fault. This form has been used in training so it will also have been seen by paralegals, university law departments and the Law Society.”
Tens of thousands of couples who have settled their divorces in the last 20 months may have to re-open negotiations because a critical fault has been found in software used to calculate financial terms.
The Ministry of Justice was urgently investigating the extent of the errors of “Form E” on its website which have the potential to inflate the financial worth of a wife or husband. It has published an email address – formE@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk – asking anyone who believes they have been affected to contact the department.
The fact the software had been miscalculating assets since April 2014 was only spotted earlier this month by a family law specialist, Nicola Matheson-Durrant of the Family Law Clinic in Ascot, Berkshire. The MoJ only publicly admitted the problem on Thursday.
Matheson-Durrant told the Guardian: “Having discovered the fault and advised the MoJ, it became apparent that not a single solicitor, barrister or judge in the whole of the UK had noticed this error. It is such a critical fault. This form has been used in training so it will also have been seen by paralegals, university law departments and the Law Society.”
He's been arrested on securities fraud charges - shame, as he's such a nice guy...
He is only 32 and been dealing in his own inimitable way since he was about 19. It shows you do not need to have a classical education to be a barrow boy.
He's been arrested on securities fraud charges - shame, as he's such a nice guy...
Where he's going, he might need those HIV drugs
You reckon he might be sharing a cell with the leader of the Aryan Brotherhood, who's looking for a new "girlfriend?"
They take securities fraud very seriously over there.
I read a publication a few years ago, about the rights of Prison guards in the US because of the high levels of HIV in the prison population, and the safe guards they have to take.
IIRC the US Prison population is six or seven times more likely to have HIV/AIDS than the average US population.
Tens of thousands of couples who have settled their divorces in the last 20 months may have to re-open negotiations because a critical fault has been found in software used to calculate financial terms.
The Ministry of Justice was urgently investigating the extent of the errors of “Form E” on its website which have the potential to inflate the financial worth of a wife or husband. It has published an email address – formE@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk – asking anyone who believes they have been affected to contact the department.
The fact the software had been miscalculating assets since April 2014 was only spotted earlier this month by a family law specialist, Nicola Matheson-Durrant of the Family Law Clinic in Ascot, Berkshire. The MoJ only publicly admitted the problem on Thursday.
Matheson-Durrant told the Guardian: “Having discovered the fault and advised the MoJ, it became apparent that not a single solicitor, barrister or judge in the whole of the UK had noticed this error. It is such a critical fault. This form has been used in training so it will also have been seen by paralegals, university law departments and the Law Society.”
He's been arrested on securities fraud charges - shame, as he's such a nice guy...
Where he's going, he might need those HIV drugs
You reckon he might be sharing a cell with the leader of the Aryan Brotherhood, who's looking for a new "girlfriend?"
They take securities fraud very seriously over there.
I read a publication a few years ago, about the rights of Prison guards in the US because of the high levels of HIV in the prison population, and the safe guards they have to take.
IIRC the US Prison population is six or seven times more likely to have HIV/AIDS than the average US population.
Mr. JS, apparently, some Quaker firms still do without technology, using pen, paper, and just a telephone. From what I've heard, they're perfectly efficient, despite it sounding quaint.
He's been arrested on securities fraud charges - shame, as he's such a nice guy...
Where he's going, he might need those HIV drugs
You reckon he might be sharing a cell with the leader of the Aryan Brotherhood, who's looking for a new "girlfriend?"
They take securities fraud very seriously over there.
I read a publication a few years ago, about the rights of Prison guards in the US because of the high levels of HIV in the prison population, and the safe guards they have to take.
IIRC the US Prison population is six or seven times more likely to have HIV/AIDS than the average US population.
Mr. T, isn't the overwhelming majority of people in jail (here or the US) male?
If the gender disparity were reversed one can't help but feel some people would be going crazy about it.
Of course, that's largely because men are likelier to commit crimes. However, they're also likelier to receive harsher sentences and not have psychological mitigating factors play a role in sentencing.
[Both attractive men and good-looking women get lighter sentences as well].
Mr. JS, apparently, some Quaker firms still do without technology, using pen, paper, and just a telephone. From what I've heard, they're perfectly efficient, despite it sounding quaint.
The Mafia has ignored the IT revolution. They communicate verbally or on bits of paper that they then swallow.
Mass fracking licenses, sweeping cuts to renewables, and fixing the upper house to ensure that it is rendered useless. Another day of Tory rule. Further, they have cleverly put a noose around the neck of the BBC and perched it precariously on a rickety stool to ensure that it remains quiet for the foreseeable.
The Tories and their cheerleaders are my kind of skum - fearless and inventive.
You are really struggling to find anything wrong with the present government. '93 licences to explore 159 blocks of land' - this is a definition of 'mass' that is new to me. I do see your post as a good example of hysteria.
He's been arrested on securities fraud charges - shame, as he's such a nice guy...
Where he's going, he might need those HIV drugs
You reckon he might be sharing a cell with the leader of the Aryan Brotherhood, who's looking for a new "girlfriend?"
They take securities fraud very seriously over there.
I read a publication a few years ago, about the rights of Prison guards in the US because of the high levels of HIV in the prison population, and the safe guards they have to take.
IIRC the US Prison population is six or seven times more likely to have HIV/AIDS than the average US population.
Tens of thousands of couples who have settled their divorces in the last 20 months may have to re-open negotiations because a critical fault has been found in software used to calculate financial terms.
The Ministry of Justice was urgently investigating the extent of the errors of “Form E” on its website which have the potential to inflate the financial worth of a wife or husband. It has published an email address – formE@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk – asking anyone who believes they have been affected to contact the department.
The fact the software had been miscalculating assets since April 2014 was only spotted earlier this month by a family law specialist, Nicola Matheson-Durrant of the Family Law Clinic in Ascot, Berkshire. The MoJ only publicly admitted the problem on Thursday.
Matheson-Durrant told the Guardian: “Having discovered the fault and advised the MoJ, it became apparent that not a single solicitor, barrister or judge in the whole of the UK had noticed this error. It is such a critical fault. This form has been used in training so it will also have been seen by paralegals, university law departments and the Law Society.”
Tens of thousands of couples who have settled their divorces in the last 20 months may have to re-open negotiations because a critical fault has been found in software used to calculate financial terms.
The Ministry of Justice was urgently investigating the extent of the errors of “Form E” on its website which have the potential to inflate the financial worth of a wife or husband. It has published an email address – formE@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk – asking anyone who believes they have been affected to contact the department.
The fact the software had been miscalculating assets since April 2014 was only spotted earlier this month by a family law specialist, Nicola Matheson-Durrant of the Family Law Clinic in Ascot, Berkshire. The MoJ only publicly admitted the problem on Thursday.
Matheson-Durrant told the Guardian: “Having discovered the fault and advised the MoJ, it became apparent that not a single solicitor, barrister or judge in the whole of the UK had noticed this error. It is such a critical fault. This form has been used in training so it will also have been seen by paralegals, university law departments and the Law Society.”
He's been arrested on securities fraud charges - shame, as he's such a nice guy...
Where he's going, he might need those HIV drugs
You reckon he might be sharing a cell with the leader of the Aryan Brotherhood, who's looking for a new "girlfriend?"
They take securities fraud very seriously over there.
I read a publication a few years ago, about the rights of Prison guards in the US because of the high levels of HIV in the prison population, and the safe guards they have to take.
IIRC the US Prison population is six or seven times more likely to have HIV/AIDS than the average US population.
Comments
Oh...
Oh and he's written previously of his weird desire to see me in a lesbian threesome with Anne Coulter and Katie Hopkins - or was it Melanie Phillips?
I used to ignore his warped nastiness. I can't see a reason to restrain myself.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-35121022
Hope we get XCOM 2 as well. Be both surprised and disappointed if not.
The drive for fracking, including the green belt and the cuts to subsidies for renewables are just astonishing, brutal and without any kind of regard for the environment or for future generations. It just represents cynical, lobby influenced politics worthy only of the tea party.
Once again, I say unto you that our Tory Rulers are my kind of skum - fearless and inventive.
I'm by no means pro tory but credit where its due
Nice to see your priorities.
This feels like a 'Dear Marge" letter, but I have solar panels (at the full rate) thanks to that nice Mr Milliband. A ludicrously good deal pursued by a feeble minded ideologue. But fair play to him, he's extraordinarily generous with other people's money.
I'm not a greeny (more a greedy) but I can be bribed. Yet, I feel unclean somehow. Should I paint them over?
UK shale gas development is not anticipated to result in a fall in UK gas prices, just result in a switch from imported to domestic supply. If the UK was so fussed about domestic energy supply, we would still have coal mines.
I have heard it said that the cheapest source of shale gas in the UK will be LNG imported from the US.
'Mass fracking licenses, sweeping cuts to renewables, and fixing the upper house to ensure that it is rendered useless. Another day of Tory rule. Further, they have cleverly put a noose around the neck of the BBC and perched it precariously on a rickety stool to ensure that it remains quiet for the foreseeable.
The Tories and their cheerleaders are lowlife scum- people impressed by money, making money, and protecting people with money.'
Oh dear, an end to the never ending subsidy for renewables,fixing the upper house so an un-elected,unaccountable bunch of reject politicians can't decide on major constitutional reforms,a possible revision to the BBC poll tax & allowing fracking to reduce the plebs energy bills.
And our Champagne buy-to-let socialist is unhappy, who is the real scum ?
Been on the sauce again?
The Tory party used to take it's role in protecting the environment seriously. The protection of the green belt, outlawing badger cruelty and so forth.
Now it largely comprises of squalid, sordid, unpleasant, money obsessed, scumbags really.
Interesting to see the arguments put forward previously viewing the same decisions from diametrically opposed directions, shame about the name calling though.
http://www.gmb.org.uk/newsroom/baroness-worthing-on-fracking
Oh.
But keep on with your crocodile tears if you want.
Surely, the question is whether the field (or coal mines) are economic to exploit, rather than energy security. I thought the coal mines closed because of economics.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bryony_Worthington,_Baroness_Worthington
"If you don't mind me asking, what is the payback period on the investment?"
I've had them four and a half years and I anticipate another eighteen months will see the purchase price repaid.
No maintenance costs so far.
Pity about the last few weeks - hardly a sight of the sun in the NW of England.
A very good Scouser company installed them so I'm expecting a knock on the door from the original owners soon, asking for them back.
PS That was a joke.
I made my money on developing property- but by my early 40's I had lost interest in accumulating wealth. I could have made more simply by leveraging. I rent a couple out now, but largely to keep my options open for the future about where to live.
What have Tuscan quarries, Buy to Let and Syrian refugees have to do with fracking?
We have been lamenting the lack of lefties on here and now that we have a bona fide one we are all giving him/her a hard time.
@tyson - go for it.
(wrt fracking plenty of Cons MPs are instinctively against for NIMBY reasons but realise there is no substantial reason to oppose a cleaner source of energy with a reasonable footprint)
"We have to be realistic," she told BBC News. "We are going to be using gas for a long time because of the huge role it plays for heating homes and for industry.
"The important thing is to minimize the carbon emissions from gas. That means if we can get our own fracked gas, it's better to use that than importing gas that's been compressed at great energy cost somewhere else."
Of course there are legitimate concerns as well, but it takes a special kind of lefty vileness to personalise this.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_polling_for_the_next_United_Kingdom_general_election
https://twitter.com/sunny_hundal/status/677528412127408131
That table says Labour lead of 2.
The IPSOS-MORI website (https://www.ipsos-mori.com/researchpublications/researcharchive/3672/Few-believe-air-strikes-in-Syria-will-make-Britain-safer.aspx)
says Con lead of 7.
Either someone is confuzzled or someone is being naughty.
The Labour brand is a byword for fiscal incontinence and all-round buffoonery. Comrade Corbyn is the embodiment of this.
For what it's worth - the Tories were polling 28-30 this time last year with Comres, ICM, Survation etc.
The Tories are miles ahead now.
Such common sense surely can't help her chances in Corbyn's Labour party though
Just had one purporting to be from Jeremy (actually from theteam@labour.org.uk).
There's also the concern about water contamination, but I think that has been exaggerated and can be managed with good geological data.
https://twitter.com/Sunil_P2/status/544101205103116288
2) Exactly how would people be able to edit wiki then?
Those were the days.
But, any of you want to make any money, go buy some houses in some prime estate areas, leverage on your salary, do them up and sell them, meanwhile spread your assets in a few investment trusts, ISA's, properties and whatnot - and after doing this repeatedly for 20 years or so bingo, you don't have to work anymore. And the good thing is, you can just stop, and just carry on getting wealthier without doing anything because everything is stacked up in your favour.
You don't have to be intelligent either. My IQ isn't great.
I read a publication a few years ago, about the rights of Prison guards in the US because of the high levels of HIV in the prison population, and the safe guards they have to take.
IIRC the US Prison population is six or seven times more likely to have HIV/AIDS than the average US population.
Was a real eye opener
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_polling_for_the_next_United_Kingdom_general_election
I don't know who that is, but it's wrong.
Corbyn never had a lead after he was elected, and if he does I would prefer it be legitimate not fake.
Tens of thousands of couples who have settled their divorces in the last 20 months may have to re-open negotiations because a critical fault has been found in software used to calculate financial terms.
The Ministry of Justice was urgently investigating the extent of the errors of “Form E” on its website which have the potential to inflate the financial worth of a wife or husband. It has published an email address – formE@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk – asking anyone who believes they have been affected to contact the department.
The fact the software had been miscalculating assets since April 2014 was only spotted earlier this month by a family law specialist, Nicola Matheson-Durrant of the Family Law Clinic in Ascot, Berkshire. The MoJ only publicly admitted the problem on Thursday.
Matheson-Durrant told the Guardian: “Having discovered the fault and advised the MoJ, it became apparent that not a single solicitor, barrister or judge in the whole of the UK had noticed this error. It is such a critical fault. This form has been used in training so it will also have been seen by paralegals, university law departments and the Law Society.”
http://bit.ly/1JexLSy
The governance of the IMF is as bad as N.Jersey and Detroit, where having someone who runs the place not arrested is very rare.
Would we sanction coal mines now?
I'll give you a clue, he messed up in his previous department and got demoted.
I have two words for the MoJ: Unit Testing
Just now needs today's and November's ComRes/Mail to be added.
http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/group/correctional.html
PS Read further, and it's really not good to be black and male in the US prison system
I think the figure I quoted was to do with other blood diseases like the Heps
If the gender disparity were reversed one can't help but feel some people would be going crazy about it.
Of course, that's largely because men are likelier to commit crimes. However, they're also likelier to receive harsher sentences and not have psychological mitigating factors play a role in sentencing.
[Both attractive men and good-looking women get lighter sentences as well].
Next time an atheist comes to me I can point to this.