politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » The 2016 London Mayoral race: Tories open their anti-Sadiq negative campaign
Like many PBers I’m on Sadiq Khan for London Mayor at longish odds following the excellent HenryG tip here two and a half years ago. My best price is 50/1 with PaddyPower so I’ve got a reasonably sized financial interest in the outcome.
If Labour are within 10% or less of the Tories in national polls in May, then I think Khan should be safe.
Since neither of these are very big personalities (in the way Johnson and Livingstone were), one would expect the result this time will largely reflect however strong/weak the Labour/Tory brands are at the time.
There is other stuff, though, isn't there? Ethnic quotas, for one thing. The fact that he nominated Corbyn, for another.
Khan himself is aware of his own negatives - as can be seen by the recent speech he gave about Islamist extremism, post-Paris.
I received through the letter box this weekend a two page spread from Zac. All about him and his policies. On the back, it listed 4 negatives about Khan. Chicken outlets was not one of them.
I loathe the Top Trumps Identity Competition approach adopted by Labour, the view that people should be seen and approached only as part of groups (based on one shared usually involuntary characteristic). It was an approach which Livingstone perfected and which is poisonous to harmonious social cohesion. My biggest concern with Khan is whether he is in that Livingstonian tradition - which now seems uppermost within Labour - or not. If he is, he's not getting my vote.
Incidentally, kudos to Messrs Llama and John_M for their posts on the previous thread on this topic.
If Labour are within 10% or less of the Tories in national polls in May, then I think Khan should be safe.
Since neither of these are very big personalities (in the way Johnson and Livingstone were), one would expect the result this time will largely reflect however strong/weak the Labour/Tory brands are at the time.
Those masses of votes for Labour in East Ham and so forth actually count this election !
The 2015 election was decided off the back of a relatively benign economic background. You know how a recession can change political views.
Don't go laying Corbyn next PM at ~ 9-1 just yet...
If we have a recession, 2020 will be like 1992 with knobs on.
As a pointed out a day or so ago - quoting Davis Smith Economics Editor of the Sunday Times - there is no long term prospect of interest rates rising much above 2% for at least 5 years. The long term downward pressure on interest rates (according to analysis by BoE and OBR) began before the bank crisis and recession. This analysis may be wrong, who knows, but it is by people who know better than anyone on here. I do not see interest rates hovering around 2% as indicative of a crisis or recession. The normal course is for the economy to overheat - interest rates rise to slow it down so spending falls, unemployment rises and the economy slows down. A slow down is not necessarily a contraction. Its called the economic cycle. If interest rates are going top stay at 2% max then policy leading to a contraction does not look likely. The closing comment was - Not so long ago 2% would have been a mere staging post for interest rates. Now it starts to look like the final destination.
For those of use who subscribe to the Austrian Economics and the 'Austrian Business Cycle' Interest rates may already be to low, its impossible to say for certain. What can be sead will a high degree of confidence is that they will not rise as fast or as far as they should, which will lay the foundation of the next reception.
Central planning and setting prices of good didn't work for goods in the USSR or Venezuela and has never really worked successfully when it is tried, leading to too much of some things and shortages of others. Interest rates are a 'price' the price of money like all other goods should also be set at the interaction of supply of and demand (savers and borrowers) and not set by a committee, however talented we think the Monetary Policy Committee are, they fundamentally have the same problems that the central planers in the USSR.
If I have whetted anybody's appetite then see a simple explanation here:
The other problem is that this is a fairly pleasant-looking picture of Khan. The only reaction it triggers in me is that he's a nice man who likes chicken. Or doesn't.
It must be a contender for the weakest attack ad ever?
There is other stuff, though, isn't there? Ethnic quotas, for one thing. The fact that he nominated Corbyn, for another.
I'm still not for the life of me understanding what the objection is to Khan saying the police force should recruit more Muslims.
That really depends. More Muslims, yes. To say no more would mean a Trump-esque ban. But does more actually mean a higher proportion of? In which case why should non-Muslims be discriminated against?
There is other stuff, though, isn't there? Ethnic quotas, for one thing. The fact that he nominated Corbyn, for another.
I'm still not for the life of me understanding what the objection is to Khan saying the police force should recruit more Muslims.
There is nothing wrong with recruiting more people to the police. What is wrong is imposing quotas for people from particular groups rather than choosing the best person for the job, regardless of whether you are Muslim, black, white, Jewish or whatever.
A Muslim who joins the police force is a police officer and should deal with all people without fear or favour in accordance with the law. His religion is - or should be - irrelevant to his role as an officer. He or she is not there to represent anyone or any one group because the role of the police is not to represent people but to keep the peace and enforce the law, treating all equally under the law and in accordance with the law.
At the end of the clip she hints that she would quit the party if he became leader.
Nadine Dorries is someone who I've nearly always disagreed with. That's the first time I've agreed with everything she said.
Time to make George PM in waiting, then Nadine will quit.
Osborne being PM is a far worse thought than anything Dorries as done, tbh.
I actually find Osborne the most likeable of the senior Tory front-bench. I don't think he'd be their best choice as leader but I don't really get the dislike some people have for him. Then again I don't really get what people have against Mandelson, Balls and Bercow.
I can think of far better attack ads on Khan, ones about the sort of friends you keep, or don't, or perhaps do, but don't, but who are just constituents, but were one of your best buddies growing up, but perhaps weren't....
Wasn't the chicken shop one done by Tooting Tories as a local in joke? It wasn't on the sadiqwatch website. It struck me that they had brought this forward a bit after last week's bad poll, and it seems fairly insubstantial.
What they don't have this time is Ken's unrepentant abrasiveness and the Evening Standard running effectively a two year campaign against the Labour candidate which made it much easier for Lynton to do the negative stuff without its being associated with Boris. Much harder this time and i don't think Zak is a particularly strong candidate. Sadiq is also fairly ruthless and rarely for a politician aware of his weaknesses and is trying to deal with them.
I have a little bit of money on Zak but i reckon Khan is 60/40 to win at present.
Saying more people of xyz doesn't have to involve quotas, nor does it have to mean that the best person does not get the job. It can be attempt to broaden the appeal of joining the police to wider demographic than those who usually a part of the force.
Individuals don't just say more Muslims/Blacks/women etc should join the Police force no reason. I know in regard to encouraging more Black people to join the Police Force it was related to the historically strained relationships between Black people in London and the Police Force.
I'd have thought the ad in Mikes header was comparable to the opening, seemingly irrelevant, questions you see on courtroom dramas, ie to establish that he is demonstrably capable of hypocrisy.
I'd expect it's the build up to a more serious sounding double standard like knocking about w islamic extremists then making a speech warning against islamic extremism
When a person puts on the uniform their personal views, their personal characteristics should be put to one side, in the same way that I have no interest whatever in the personal views, background, religion or sex life of a doctor treating me, merely his or her ability as a doctor.
At the end of the clip she hints that she would quit the party if he became leader.
Seems extreme, but as many friends as he does have in the party, a bit worrying for him if the prospect of him winning has even a serial troublemaker hinting at such a thing.
On Khan, I'm sure they'll have better attack ads to come, but he seems reasonable on the face of it, though if I recall my reaction to his victory speech he seemed lacking in charisma. But if Corbyn is putting off droves of Labour voters, he should be doing ok unless the Tories can damage him significantly, and being a flip flopper probably won't do that.
At the end of the clip she hints that she would quit the party if he became leader.
Nadine Dorries is someone who I've nearly always disagreed with. That's the first time I've agreed with everything she said.
Time to make George PM in waiting, then Nadine will quit.
Osborne being PM is a far worse thought than anything Dorries as done, tbh.
Why? What is your actual objection to Osborne?
I don't believe he'd make a good PM.
Because?
He tends to make decisions based on politics, as opposed to the good of the country, in my view. I don't like the idea of a PM, who is supposed to be a statesmen making all decisions based on what is good for the political fortunes of their party, first and foremost.
@Wanderer I personally do find Osborne (along with IDS) to be the most unlikable Conservative on the front bench.
@AlistairMeeks I'm sorry to hear that. Not surprised at the behaviour of Corbynites though.
Although I wouldn't support "ethnic quotas" for most professions, I would make an exception for the police, because they have a particular duty to totally represent their community. Fairly or unfairly, a lot of blacks and Muslims are not going to have much faith in the police if they don't look "like them", and it's not in any of our interests for huge sections of the population not to trust the police.
However, I can totally understand that people wouldn't think quotas were a good idea - but, even if you think it's not a good idea, calling Khan a "threat to London" or comparing him to Islamic extremists, like some PBTories have done, seems like a huge overreaction to me.
At the end of the clip she hints that she would quit the party if he became leader.
Nadine Dorries is someone who I've nearly always disagreed with. That's the first time I've agreed with everything she said.
Time to make George PM in waiting, then Nadine will quit.
Osborne being PM is a far worse thought than anything Dorries as done, tbh.
I actually find Osborne the most likeable of the senior Tory front-bench. I don't think he'd be their best choice as leader but I don't really get the dislike some people have for him. Then again I don't really get what people have against Mandelson, Balls and Bercow.
I quite like Osborne. I know people who have worked with him who say that he is a much nicer person, more rounded,funnier than he appears. That may not be enough to make him a good PM but I too don't get why people dislike him.
Mind you, I have met Bercow and he was much nicer than his public image. In some roles, politics often forces people to hide their full selves, which can be a pity.
I can think of far better attack ads on Khan, ones about the sort of friends you keep, or don't, or perhaps do, but don't, but who are just constituents, but were one of your best buddies growing up, but perhaps weren't....
There is other stuff, though, isn't there? Ethnic quotas, for one thing. The fact that he nominated Corbyn, for another.
I'm still not for the life of me understanding what the objection is to Khan saying the police force should recruit more Muslims.
Because there is nothing special about Muslims. If we're going to be infantile and insist that the ethnic, sexual and gender makeup of the police service is identical to society at large, then we are on the road to Planet Stupid. Should we recruit a Somali Muslim (say) over a Lebanese gay candidate? What about a Polish transgender candidate?
What organizations need to do is examine their recruitment process (including outreach programs and advertising) to ensure that there is no systemic bias against people who differ from the existing workforce norms. That's particularly important during the paper sift and interview process.
At the end of the clip she hints that she would quit the party if he became leader.
Nadine Dorries is someone who I've nearly always disagreed with. That's the first time I've agreed with everything she said.
Time to make George PM in waiting, then Nadine will quit.
Osborne being PM is a far worse thought than anything Dorries as done, tbh.
Why? What is your actual objection to Osborne?
I don't believe he'd make a good PM.
Because?
@Wanderer I personally do find Osborne (along with IDS) to be the most unlikable Conservative on the front bench.
Who's the most likable?
For Tories, not including Benn (who saw his stock with Tories rise this past week), who's the most likable Shadow Cabinet figure? I don't know many of them so am finding it hard to say. Maybe Chris Bryant?
I can think of far better attack ads on Khan, ones about the sort of friends you keep, or don't, or perhaps do, but don't, but who are just constituents, but were one of your best buddies growing up, but perhaps weren't....
And on Mandelson/Balls/Bercow I actually like Mandelson. He knew his place in the Labour party. Had he tried to become PM with his Machiavellian style, I probably would have disliked him. I also like Balls more after losing his seat, then when he was an MP. I'm neutral on Bercow, although I can see why Tories don't like him.
At the end of the clip she hints that she would quit the party if he became leader.
Nadine Dorries is someone who I've nearly always disagreed with. That's the first time I've agreed with everything she said.
Time to make George PM in waiting, then Nadine will quit.
Osborne being PM is a far worse thought than anything Dorries as done, tbh.
Why? What is your actual objection to Osborne?
I don't believe he'd make a good PM.
Because?
@Wanderer I personally do find Osborne (along with IDS) to be the most unlikable Conservative on the front bench.
Who's the most likable?
For Tories, not including Benn (who saw his stock with Tories rise this past week), who's the most likable Shadow Cabinet figure? I don't know many of them so am finding it hard to say. Maybe Chris Bryant?
For the Tories, I think it's Thersea May. I've always found Hammond to be dull as dishwater, and have never liked Jeremy Hunt. For Labour, hmmm that's hard. Lisa Nandy comes across okay, I guess.
Thanks for that, very interesting. I'm not an economist but something feels very wrong about our economy. The irony is that house prices are so high that I'm saving as much as I can irrespective of the low interest rates. House prices should very much be part of the inflation assessment, but our politicians - of all colours - seem to think that inflation is bad...unless it is house price inflation.
Saying more people of xyz doesn't have to involve quotas, nor does it have to mean that the best person does not get the job. It can be attempt to broaden the appeal of joining the police to wider demographic than those who usually a part of the force.
Individuals don't just say more Muslims/Blacks/women etc should join the Police force no reason. I know in regard to encouraging more Black people to join the Police Force it was related to the historically strained relationships between Black people in London and the Police Force.
Broadening the appeal is fine i.e. getting those who may not have considered it as a career to consider it. But saying that being Muslim, say, or Jewish (are there many Jewish police officers? Are they unrepresented? Is Khan speaking up for them or for other unrepresented communities?) are key attributes of being a police officer is a nonsense. We really need to get away from this idea that an area with, say, a significant Sikh community or an Irish community or a Polish community or a Muslim community should only have public officials from that community. It is utterly divisive and wrong in principle. It's the Lutfur Rahman approach to governance - despite Bengalis being a minority within Tower Hamlets they got the lion's share of the monies he controlled.
Or to be European about it, its the English version of Italian clientilismo.
Mass immigration means newcomers cant immigrate into a cohesive society. Never has the point been more deftly illustrated than the demand for different coloured policeman for different parts of the capital, by affirmative action if required
And lefties are bemused as to what the problem is... god help us
Although I wouldn't support "ethnic quotas" for most professions, I would make an exception for the police, because they have a particular duty to totally represent their community. Fairly or unfairly, a lot of blacks and Muslims are not going to have much faith in the police if they don't look "like them", and it's not in any of our interests for huge sections of the population not to trust the police.
However, I can totally understand that people wouldn't think quotas were a good idea - but, even if you think it's not a good idea, calling Khan a "threat to London" or comparing him to Islamic extremists, like some PBTories have done, seems like a huge overreaction to me.
The police do not have a representative function. That is for politicians. The question of trust in the police is one which is addressed by making policemen and policewomen trustworthy in their behaviour and by showing this in their words and deeds, day in, day out. It is not done by changing the packaging they come in.
Plenty of reports of small groups of Syrian men travelling to South America, making their way north, and crossing into the USA from Mexico. Trump's opponents will have nothing to say if there are more attacks, and I think there will be.
At the end of the clip she hints that she would quit the party if he became leader.
Nadine Dorries is someone who I've nearly always disagreed with. That's the first time I've agreed with everything she said.
Time to make George PM in waiting, then Nadine will quit.
Osborne being PM is a far worse thought than anything Dorries as done, tbh.
I actually find Osborne the most likeable of the senior Tory front-bench. I don't think he'd be their best choice as leader but I don't really get the dislike some people have for him. Then again I don't really get what people have against Mandelson, Balls and Bercow.
I quite like Osborne. I know people who have worked with him who say that he is a much nicer person, more rounded,funnier than he appears. That may not be enough to make him a good PM but I too don't get why people dislike him.
Mind you, I have met Bercow and he was much nicer than his public image. In some roles, politics often forces people to hide their full selves, which can be a pity.
I'm sure that is true. Honestly, I understand the dislike of Osborne from a point of view he always puts politics over other considerations, but I don't think a lot of the general dislike is that deep, though I take people at their word here that is the case. As DavidHerdson put it in a piece, he has a grating voice* and punchable face. Add to that he's the guy in charge of the money, is posh and has a reputation for political sneakiness, and he's easy to instinctively dislike. Balls I instinctively disliked in much the same way, but I've heard he's a nice guy, and I used to like Livingstone and I'm now certain he's a worse person than Balls or Osborne. Life's unfair.
*It's amazing how much this can help matters - Corbyn and McDonnell I find to both have pretty trustworthy sounding voices, they have some authority to them.
Glad to see Manchester Police are doing the important stuff - no, not counter-terrorism work and keeping the streets safe, but investigating Tyson Fury for a potential "hate crime" regarding his views on women and gays. Someone asked for his opinion and he gave it. Is there any point in pretending this is a free country anymore?
Saying more people of xyz doesn't have to involve quotas, nor does it have to mean that the best person does not get the job. It can be attempt to broaden the appeal of joining the police to wider demographic than those who usually a part of the force.
Individuals don't just say more Muslims/Blacks/women etc should join the Police force no reason. I know in regard to encouraging more Black people to join the Police Force it was related to the historically strained relationships between Black people in London and the Police Force.
Broadening the appeal is fine i.e. getting those who may not have considered it as a career to consider it. But saying that being Muslim, say, or Jewish (are there many Jewish police officers? Are they unrepresented? Is Khan speaking up for them or for other unrepresented communities?) are key attributes of being a police officer is a nonsense. We really need to get away from this idea that an area with, say, a significant Sikh community or an Irish community or a Polish community or a Muslim community should only have public officials from that community. It is utterly divisive and wrong in principle. It's the Lutfur Rahman approach to governance - despite Bengalis being a minority within Tower Hamlets they got the lion's share of the monies he controlled.
Or to be European about it, its the English version of Italian clientilismo.
I think Khan should speak up for other unrepresented communities. I also don't think being a Muslim, or anything else along those lines is a 'key' attribute. Nor do I think that these communities should only have public officials from that community - but that it can help relations between the police and these communities, by having a officers from a similar background in the Police Force.
At the end of the clip she hints that she would quit the party if he became leader.
Nadine Dorries is someone who I've nearly always disagreed with. That's the first time I've agreed with everything she said.
Time to make George PM in waiting, then Nadine will quit.
Osborne being PM is a far worse thought than anything Dorries as done, tbh.
Why? What is your actual objection to Osborne?
I don't believe he'd make a good PM.
Because?
He tends to make decisions based on politics, as opposed to the good of the country, in my view. I don't like the idea of a PM, who is supposed to be a statesmen making all decisions based on what is good for the political fortunes of their party, first and foremost.
Osborne makes decisions based on what is good for him, not politics.
You wonder whether they now feel any more sympathetic towards her given the treatment of some Labour MPs?
That interpretation of Nadine Dorries and her 'stalker' is a very considerable stretch indeed, and In my opinion Dorries is largely responsible for undermining her own reputation. I'll restrain myself out of respect for Mike, but ND only won the last round because her opponent got a legal technicality wrong and is financially weaker.
I think likeability in politics is sort of irrelevant. What does like even mean?
I am a huge fan of Margaret Thatcher, but I think even I might have struggled to spend a relaxed fun evening with her. Because she didn't do that. I liked her politics but perhaps wouldn't have liked her personality.
Conversely, John Major was a great guy to have a beer with and good fun - as is Farage, actually - the former is obviously likeable, and I although I also liked socialising with the latter he has some dislikeable political features too.
Cameron is rated as likeable. But he can be aloof and distant unless he's known you for a very long time, and doesn't trust those not a longstanding member of his inner circle.
Although I wouldn't support "ethnic quotas" for most professions, I would make an exception for the police, because they have a particular duty to totally represent their community. Fairly or unfairly, a lot of blacks and Muslims are not going to have much faith in the police if they don't look "like them", and it's not in any of our interests for huge sections of the population not to trust the police.
However, I can totally understand that people wouldn't think quotas were a good idea - but, even if you think it's not a good idea, calling Khan a "threat to London" or comparing him to Islamic extremists, like some PBTories have done, seems like a huge overreaction to me.
I'm not aware of anyone calling him like an Islamic extremist. Some have pointed out his long-standing friendship with an actual convicted Islamic extremist, Babar Ahmed. That does not, of course, make him one himself. His recent speech was, I think, an attempt to deal with this concern.
Given the sort of friends Corbyn has, it is understandable that people are focusing on the friends of other senior Labour politicians, particularly one vying to be Mayor of a city which has faced terrorist attacks and is highly likely to face more.
Khan recognises this issue and recognised, at least post-Paris, that it has the potential to harm him.
Off topic, it wouldn't surprise me if heathrowcrashriskgate politically kills off a 3rd runaway now.
As with many similar scandals before, it won't be the substance but the cover up that will do for it. On what was already a very controversial project.
think Khan should speak up for other unrepresented communities.
What on earth is an 'unrepresented' community?? We have universal franchise in this country, and government by democracy.
Everybody is as 'represented' as any human being in any society that has ever existed.
Unrepresented in terms of the Police Force. There are many out there who do not feel the Police represents them, and has their best interests at heart. And that's a big issue.
I think likeability in politics is sort of irrelevant. What does like even mean?
I am a huge fan of Margaret Thatcher, but I think even I might have struggled to spend a relaxed fun evening with her. Because she didn't do that. I liked her politics but perhaps wouldn't have liked her personality.
Conversely, John Major was a great guy to have a beer with and good fun - as is Farage, actually - the former is obviously likeable, and I although I also liked socialising with the latter he has some dislikeable political features too.
Cameron is rated as likeable. But he can be aloof and distant unless he's known you for a very long time, and doesn't trust those not a longstanding member of his inner circle.
Does that make him likeable, or not?
Like is as meaningful as 'nice'. Not very.
I don't think it's irrelevant. I take your point about difficult to pin down a definition of what it means, but I would suggest it boils down to how much they can get away with saying or doing things another politician could not, while retaining electability, and how much they could say something someone would otherwise support but be suspicious of because of who said it.
That will partly be down to political persuasion, we know Tories will dismiss something Corbyn says more instinctively than considering it fully, and Labour would do the same with Cameron. But if we like someone (even if the general sense, not in the like to have a beer with sense), we'll give even someone from the 'wrong' party more of the time of day. Past views and actions will contribute to that likability, but a certain instinctual level is there I think.
You can manage without it if able enough, authoritative enough, but it can be very useful, and lacking it can be fatal to some leadership ambitions. Osborne may be a natural number 2.
At the end of the clip she hints that she would quit the party if he became leader.
Nadine Dorries is someone who I've nearly always disagreed with. That's the first time I've agreed with everything she said.
Time to make George PM in waiting, then Nadine will quit.
Osborne being PM is a far worse thought than anything Dorries as done, tbh.
Why? What is your actual objection to Osborne?
I don't believe he'd make a good PM.
Because?
He tends to make decisions based on politics, as opposed to the good of the country, in my view. I don't like the idea of a PM, who is supposed to be a statesmen making all decisions based on what is good for the political fortunes of their party, first and foremost.
Osborne makes decisions based on what is good for him, not politics.
I see.. so the original Tax credits decision that was eventually reversed was good For George.. Interesting thinking if you think he thought far enough ahread that he would have to reverse it and then be treated as Santa Claus..
as for KLE 4 thinking Chris Bryant is likeable, now Ive heard it all.
''Unrepresented in terms of the Police Force. There are many out there who do not feel the Police represents them, and has their best interests at heart. And that's a big issue.''
They police are not there to represent people, they are there to enforce the law of the land.
Saying more people of xyz doesn't have to involve quotas, nor does it have to mean that the best person does not get the job.
Individuals don't just say more Muslims/Blacks/women etc should join the Police force no reason. I know in regard to encouraging more Black people to join the Police Force it was related to the historically strained relationships between Black people in London and the Police Force.
Broadening the appeal is fine i.e. getting those who may not have considered it as a career to consider it. But saying that being Muslim, say, or Jewish (are there many Jewish police officers? Are they unrepresented? Is Khan speaking up for them or for other unrepresented communities?) are key attributes of being a police officer is a nonsense. We really need to get away from this idea that an area with, say, a significant Sikh community or an Irish community or a Polish community or a Muslim community should only have public officials from that community. It is utterly divisive and wrong in principle. It's the Lutfur Rahman approach to governance - despite Bengalis being a minority within Tower Hamlets they got the lion's share of the monies he controlled.
Or to be European about it, its the English version of Italian clientilismo.
I think Khan should speak up for other unrepresented communities. I also don't think being a Muslim, or anything else along those lines is a 'key' attribute. Nor do I think that these communities should only have public officials from that community - but that it can help relations between the police and these communities, by having a officers from a similar background in the Police Force.
How does one know whether someone is a Muslim? It's not something you see after all in a person's face. White people can be Muslims. And people who are Asian-looking are not necessarily Muslims. So when you see a police officer, how can their Muslim faith be identified? Or is it that when they intervene or speak to someone they are supposed to say "Well, I'm a Muslim so you should listen to what I have to say". As opposed to "I'm a police officer so you should listen to what I have to say."
And of course the officer speaking to the person in the street has to make the same assessment about whether or not that person is Muslim and would welcome ("why?") knowing that the officer is also a Muslim. Of course if he isn't he might be a tad surprised to find that the police officer is willing to share such information with him, much as I might be if the bus driver or police officer or my local traffic warden or doctor suddenly announced to me that they were gay or had a disabled child or were a born-again Christian.
Thanks for that, very interesting. I'm not an economist but something feels very wrong about our economy. The irony is that house prices are so high that I'm saving as much as I can irrespective of the low interest rates. House prices should very much be part of the inflation assessment, but our politicians - of all colours - seem to think that inflation is bad...unless it is house price inflation.
Glad you found it interesting. House prises are undoubtedly higher that they would be in a Free Market, and as a result of government actions getting worse, the new 'Help to Buy ISA' being a yet another distortion.
Who Suffers, everybody in as much as we are lining are selves up for a painful correction. and the pore, or at least those that don't currently own at least one house, who are paying bigger rents, and will need to spend more if they chose to buy.
Who benefits, well in the long run nobody, but in the shout run the people who already own houses, see there equity increase, even if this is balanced out by the extra pain of the next reception and house price falls when they come. O and the politicians that do this because it makes things seem better in the shout run than they would otherwise be, so get credit and votes.
Don't misunderstand me I think Osborn and Co are better than any other lot, especially the Corbynes, but I do want to point out where and when I disagree, perhaps only in the vague hope that people will start to take not, and next time there may be a better option.
At the end of the clip she hints that she would quit the party if he became leader.
Nadine Dorries is someone who I've nearly always disagreed with. That's the first time I've agreed with everything she said.
Time to make George PM in waiting, then Nadine will quit.
Osborne being PM is a far worse thought than anything Dorries as done, tbh.
Why? What is your actual objection to Osborne?
I don't believe he'd make a good PM.
Because?
He tends to make decisions based on politics, as opposed to the good of the country, in my view. I don't like the idea of a PM, who is supposed to be a statesmen making all decisions based on what is good for the political fortunes of their party, first and foremost.
Osborne makes decisions based on what is good for him, not politics.
I see.. so the original Tax credits decision that was eventually reversed was good For George.. Interesting thinking if you think he thought far enough ahread that he would have to reverse it and then be treated as Santa Claus..
as for KLE 4 thinking Chris Bryant is likeable, now Ive heard it all.
I was bereft of options, to be honest, and did include a question mark. I know so little about most of them, and he was one of the few I recognised and have never personally reacted against. I did used to like Burnham, but he now seems a joke.
Bryant takes the friendliest picture of the shadow cabinet on the labour website
''Unrepresented in terms of the Police Force. There are many out there who do not feel the Police represents them, and has their best interests at heart. And that's a big issue.''
They police are not there to represent people, they are there to enforce the law of the land.
Yes, but in practical terms communities feeling that the Police has their best interests at heart helps to achieve that.
@Cyclefree There are exceptions, but most of the time you can tell when someone is a Muslim - a lot of the White Muslim women I've encountered tend to wear headscarf, for instance. It's not that an officer would say literally 'I'm a Muslim so trust me'. From what I've seen (in relation to Black people in London) it's a more far instinct thing, it is subtle and unsaid. I also don't think that the officer would have to make any kind of 'assessment'. They would most probably instinctively know whether someone is a Muslim like them or not.
I think likeability in politics is sort of irrelevant. What does like even mean?
I am a huge fan of Margaret Thatcher, but I think even I might have struggled to spend a relaxed fun evening with her. Because she didn't do that. I liked her politics but perhaps wouldn't have liked her personality.
Conversely, John Major was a great guy to have a beer with and good fun - as is Farage, actually - the former is obviously likeable, and I although I also liked socialising with the latter he has some dislikeable political features too.
Cameron is rated as likeable. But he can be aloof and distant unless he's known you for a very long time, and doesn't trust those not a longstanding member of his inner circle.
Does that make him likeable, or not?
Like is as meaningful as 'nice'. Not very.
I don't think it's irrelevant. I take your point about difficult to pin down a definition of what it means, but I would suggest it boils down to how much they can get away with saying or doing things another politician could not, while retaining electability, and how much they could say something someone would otherwise support but be suspicious of because of who said it.
That will partly be down to political persuasion, we know Tories will dismiss something Corbyn says more instinctively than considering it fully, and Labour would do the same with Cameron. But if we like someone (even if the general sense, not in the like to have a beer with sense), we'll give even someone from the 'wrong' party more of the time of day. Past views and actions will contribute to that likability, but a certain instinctual level is there I think.
You can manage without it if able enough, authoritative enough, but it can be very useful, and lacking it can be fatal to some leadership ambitions. Osborne may be a natural number 2.
That's fair enough. It certainly has an impact at the electoral level.
I thought we were talking about which politicians we personally liked, or not. And to me that is a complex question that can mean a variety of things so not that relevant or meaningful for me.
At the end of the clip she hints that she would quit the party if he became leader.
Nadine Dorries is someone who I've nearly always disagreed with. That's the first time I've agreed with everything she said.
Time to make George PM in waiting, then Nadine will quit.
Osborne being PM is a far worse thought than anything Dorries as done, tbh.
Why? What is your actual objection to Osborne?
I don't believe he'd make a good PM.
Because?
He tends to make decisions based on politics, as opposed to the good of the country, in my view. I don't like the idea of a PM, who is supposed to be a statesmen making all decisions based on what is good for the political fortunes of their party, first and foremost.
Osborne makes decisions based on what is good for him, not politics.
I see.. so the original Tax credits decision that was eventually reversed was good For George.. Interesting thinking if you think he thought far enough ahread that he would have to reverse it and then be treated as Santa Claus..
as for KLE 4 thinking Chris Bryant is likeable, now Ive heard it all.
I was bereft of options, to be honest, and did include a question mark. I know so little about most of them, and he was one of the few I recognised and have never personally reacted against. I did used to like Burnham, but he now seems a joke.
Bryant takes the friendliest picture of the shadow cabinet on the labour website
YOU may not be aware but this MP put up a picture of himself in his underpants on a gay website detailing exactly what he "enjoyed" for those who might be interested.
Anyone who can have that lack of judgement is lacking in decision making skills.
At the end of the clip she hints that she would quit the party if he became leader.
Nadine Dorries is someone who I've nearly always disagreed with. That's the first time I've agreed with everything she said.
Time to make George PM in waiting, then Nadine will quit.
Osborne being PM is a far worse thought than anything Dorries as done, tbh.
Why? What is your actual objection to Osborne?
I don't believe he'd make a good PM.
Because?
He tends to make decisions based on politics, as opposed to the good of the country, in my view. I don't like the idea of a PM, who is supposed to be a statesmen making all decisions based on what is good for the political fortunes of their party, first and foremost.
Osborne makes decisions based on what is good for him, not politics.
I see.. so the original Tax credits decision that was eventually reversed was good For George.. Interesting thinking if you think he thought far enough ahread that he would have to reverse it and then be treated as Santa Claus..
as for KLE 4 thinking Chris Bryant is likeable, now Ive heard it all.
I was bereft of options, to be honest, and did include a question mark. I know so little about most of them, and he was one of the few I recognised and have never personally reacted against. I did used to like Burnham, but he now seems a joke.
Bryant takes the friendliest picture of the shadow cabinet on the labour website
YOU may not be aware but this MP put up a picture of himself in his underpants on a gay website detailing exactly what he "enjoyed" for those who might be interested.
Anyone who can have that lack of judgement is lacking in decision making skills.
I was aware actually, but it didn't factor into whether I considered him likable.
think Khan should speak up for other unrepresented communities.
What on earth is an 'unrepresented' community?? We have universal franchise in this country, and government by democracy.
Everybody is as 'represented' as any human being in any society that has ever existed.
Unrepresented in terms of the Police Force. There are many out there who do not feel the Police represents them, and has their best interests at heart. And that's a big issue.
The purpose of the police is to uphold the law and maintain order not engage in identity politics.
''Yes, but in practical terms communities feeling that the Police has their best interests at heart helps to achieve that''.
If I lived in, say Nigeria, I would expect to be policed by black christian or possibly muslim police personnel. I wouldn't expect white police, even if I lived in a white enclave.
Minorities should expect to be policed by white police, given that Britain is 90% white.
I think likeability in politics is sort of irrelevant. What does like even mean?
I am a huge fan of Margaret Thatcher, but I think even I might have struggled to spend a relaxed fun evening with her. Because she didn't do that. I liked her politics but perhaps wouldn't have liked her personality.
Conversely, John Major was a great guy to have a beer with and good fun - as is Farage, actually - the former is obviously likeable, and I although I also liked socialising with the latter he has some dislikeable political features too.
Cameron is rated as likeable. But he can be aloof and distant unless he's known you for a very long time, and doesn't trust those not a longstanding member of his inner circle.
Does that make him likeable, or not?
Like is as meaningful as 'nice'. Not very.
I don't think it's irrelevant. I take your point about difficult to pin down a definition of what it means, but I would suggest it boils down to how much they can get away with saying or doing things another politician could not, while retaining electability, and how much they could say something someone would otherwise support but be suspicious of because of who said it.
That will partly be down to political persuasion, we know Tories will dismiss something Corbyn says more instinctively than considering it fully, and Labour would do the same with Cameron. But if we like someone (even if the general sense, not in the like to have a beer with sense), we'll give even someone from the 'wrong' party more of the time of day. Past views and actions will contribute to that likability, but a certain instinctual level is there I think.
You can manage without it if able enough, authoritative enough, but it can be very useful, and lacking it can be fatal to some leadership ambitions. Osborne may be a natural number 2.
That's fair enough. It certainly has an impact at the electoral level.
I thought we were talking about which politicians we personally liked, or not. And to me that is a complex question that can mean a variety of things so not that relevant or meaningful for me.
Ah, I see. That's true enough. I like the personality of some, the politics of others, and a mixture in between.
If Geert Wilders' Party for Freedom win the most seats would he become the President of the Netherlands?
Prime Minister.
And that depends on his ability to build a coalition. The Netherlands is a completely proportional system with 150 seats. If he's got 40, he needs to persuade parties with 35 MP's to back him.
At the end of the clip she hints that she would quit the party if he became leader.
Nadine Dorries is someone who I've nearly always disagreed with. That's the first time I've agreed with everything she said.
Time to make George PM in waiting, then Nadine will quit.
Osborne being PM is a far worse thought than anything Dorries as done, tbh.
Why? What is your actual objection to Osborne?
I don't believe he'd make a good PM.
Because?
He tends to make decisions based on politics, as opposed to the good of the country, in my view. I don't like the idea of a PM, who is supposed to be a statesmen making all decisions based on what is good for the political fortunes of their party, first and foremost.
Osborne makes decisions based on what is good for him, not politics.
I see.. so the original Tax credits decision that was eventually reversed was good For George.. Interesting thinking if you think he thought far enough ahread that he would have to reverse it and then be treated as Santa Claus..
as for KLE 4 thinking Chris Bryant is likeable, now Ive heard it all.
I was bereft of options, to be honest, and did include a question mark. I know so little about most of them, and he was one of the few I recognised and have never personally reacted against. I did used to like Burnham, but he now seems a joke.
Bryant takes the friendliest picture of the shadow cabinet on the labour website
YOU may not be aware but this MP put up a picture of himself in his underpants on a gay website detailing exactly what he "enjoyed" for those who might be interested.
Anyone who can have that lack of judgement is lacking in decision making skills.
So ducking what? What on Earth does his sex life have to do with judgement?
think Khan should speak up for other unrepresented communities.
What on earth is an 'unrepresented' community?? We have universal franchise in this country, and government by democracy.
Everybody is as 'represented' as any human being in any society that has ever existed.
Unrepresented in terms of the Police Force. There are many out there who do not feel the Police represents them, and has their best interests at heart. And that's a big issue.
The purpose of the police is to uphold the law and maintain order not engage in identity politics.
Again see my reply to @taffys @taffys And if the police hadn't had an extensive history of racism in recent decades towards minorities in this country, that'd be a fine expectation. But the police have, in that history of racism - epitomised by the Stephen Lawrence case - damaged that relationship. And while most of the country is white, London especially is far more diverse.
If you lived in Nigeria and there was a white community, and people began discriminating against you, I'd expect that the Police would have to do something to restore that trust back, and re-build relationships.
I think likeability in politics is sort of irrelevant. What does like even mean?
I am a huge fan of Margaret Thatcher, but I think even I might have struggled to spend a relaxed fun evening with her. Because she didn't do that. I liked her politics but perhaps wouldn't have liked her personality.
Conversely, John Major was a great guy to have a beer with and good fun - as is Farage, actually - the former is obviously likeable, and I although I also liked socialising with the latter he has some dislikeable political features too.
Cameron is rated as likeable. But he can be aloof and distant unless he's known you for a very long time, and doesn't trust those not a longstanding member of his inner circle.
Does that make him likeable, or not?
Like is as meaningful as 'nice'. Not very.
I think there's been a big shift since Thatcher, though - both here and in the US. During the Cold War, people put more emphasis on how "tough" the leader was, but now people do tend to go much more on whether they "like" the leader. 3 of the last 4 failed US presidential candidates, a lack of likeability was one of the big factors in their defeat (Gore, Kerry, Romney).
I used to think/hope likeability didn't matter much, but I've heard FAR too many people say over the last few years that they wouldn't be voting Labour because "I couldn't have a drink with that Brown/Miliband" - and Osborne will IMO have the same problem.
At the end of the clip she hints that she would quit the party if he became leader.
Nadine Dorries is someone who I've nearly always disagreed with. That's the first time I've agreed with everything she said.
Time to make George PM in waiting, then Nadine will quit.
Osborne being PM is a far worse thought than anything Dorries as done, tbh.
Why? What is your actual objection to Osborne?
I don't believe he'd make a good PM.
Because?
He tends to make decisions based on politics, as opposed to the good of the country, in my view. I don't like the idea of a PM, who is supposed to be a statesmen making all decisions based on what is good for the political fortunes of their party, first and foremost.
Osborne makes decisions based on what is good for him, not politics.
I see.. so the original Tax credits decision that was eventually reversed was good For George.. Interesting thinking if you think he thought far enough ahread that he would have to reverse it and then be treated as Santa Claus..
as for KLE 4 thinking Chris Bryant is likeable, now Ive heard it all.
I was bereft of options, to be honest, and did include a question mark. I know so little about most of them, and he was one of the few I recognised and have never personally reacted against. I did used to like Burnham, but he now seems a joke.
Bryant takes the friendliest picture of the shadow cabinet on the labour website
YOU may not be aware but this MP put up a picture of himself in his underpants on a gay website detailing exactly what he "enjoyed" for those who might be interested.
Anyone who can have that lack of judgement is lacking in decision making skills.
George Osborne has the air of a child who likes pulling wings off flies. He'll never shake it off and the public won't want to spend much of their time thinking about him. That may not stop him becoming Prime Minister but it will be a major impediment to him winning a general election.
think Khan should speak up for other unrepresented communities.
What on earth is an 'unrepresented' community?? We have universal franchise in this country, and government by democracy.
Everybody is as 'represented' as any human being in any society that has ever existed.
Unrepresented in terms of the Police Force. There are many out there who do not feel the Police represents them, and has their best interests at heart. And that's a big issue.
The police do not need to represent anyone - they just need to do their job. The idea that every profession must be a mirror image of society is the worst kind of identity politics.
Jim Waterson @jimwaterson 4h4 hours ago Conservative opposition research fail shocker as it's revealed that Chicken Shop sells "free range rotisserie chicken", not fried chicken.
think Khan should speak up for other unrepresented communities.
What on earth is an 'unrepresented' community?? We have universal franchise in this country, and government by democracy.
Everybody is as 'represented' as any human being in any society that has ever existed.
Unrepresented in terms of the Police Force. There are many out there who do not feel the Police represents them, and has their best interests at heart. And that's a big issue.
The purpose of the police is to uphold the law and maintain order not engage in identity politics.
I don't think they can effectively uphold the law and maintain order if vast swathes of the population have no confidence in them.
Incidentally, that well-known bleeding-heart liberal Theresa May also shares that view.
think Khan should speak up for other unrepresented communities.
What on earth is an 'unrepresented' community?? We have universal franchise in this country, and government by democracy.
Everybody is as 'represented' as any human being in any society that has ever existed.
Unrepresented in terms of the Police Force. There are many out there who do not feel the Police represents them, and has their best interests at heart. And that's a big issue.
The purpose of the police is to uphold the law and maintain order not engage in identity politics.
I don't think they can effectively uphold the law and maintain order if vast swathes of the population have no confidence in them.
Incidentally, that well-known bleeding-heart liberal Theresa May also shares that view.
Confidence is often down to the individual.
I have no confidence in several layers of government; but it doesn't make me disobey them...
At the end of the clip she hints that she would quit the party if he became leader.
Nadine Dorries is someone who I've nearly always disagreed with. That's the first time I've agreed with everything she said.
Time to make George PM in waiting, then Nadine will quit.
Osborne being PM is a far worse thought than anything Dorries as done, tbh.
Why? What is your actual objection to Osborne?
I don't believe he'd make a good PM.
Because?
He tends to make decisions based on politics, as opposed to the good of the country, in my view. I don't like the idea of a PM, who is supposed to be a statesmen making all decisions based on what is good for the political fortunes of their party, first and foremost.
Osborne makes decisions based on what is good for him, not politics.
I see.. so the original Tax credits decision that was eventually reversed was good For George.. Interesting thinking if you think he thought far enough ahread that he would have to reverse it and then be treated as Santa Claus..
as for KLE 4 thinking Chris Bryant is likeable, now Ive heard it all.
I was bereft of options, to be honest, and did include a question mark. I know so little about most of them, and he was one of the few I recognised and have never personally reacted against. I did used to like Burnham, but he now seems a joke.
Bryant takes the friendliest picture of the shadow cabinet on the labour website
YOU may not be aware but this MP put up a picture of himself in his underpants on a gay website detailing exactly what he "enjoyed" for those who might be interested.
Anyone who can have that lack of judgement is lacking in decision making skills.
So ducking what? What on Earth does his sex life have to do with judgement?
Comments
"Vote Zac Goldsmith, he likes his chicken Kentucky fried"
Heathrow makes Zac a complete lock for the Tory mayoralty candidacy methinks (99 -> 99.9% probability of him being the candidate on the day)
Still on Zac overall.
Since neither of these are very big personalities (in the way Johnson and Livingstone were), one would expect the result this time will largely reflect however strong/weak the Labour/Tory brands are at the time.
Khan himself is aware of his own negatives - as can be seen by the recent speech he gave about Islamist extremism, post-Paris.
I received through the letter box this weekend a two page spread from Zac. All about him and his policies. On the back, it listed 4 negatives about Khan. Chicken outlets was not one of them.
I loathe the Top Trumps Identity Competition approach adopted by Labour, the view that people should be seen and approached only as part of groups (based on one shared usually involuntary characteristic). It was an approach which Livingstone perfected and which is poisonous to harmonious social cohesion. My biggest concern with Khan is whether he is in that Livingstonian tradition - which now seems uppermost within Labour - or not. If he is, he's not getting my vote.
Incidentally, kudos to Messrs Llama and John_M for their posts on the previous thread on this topic.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=078Ehi1F7kY
At the end of the clip she hints that she would quit the party if he became leader.
It is about issues, and principles:
- Apparently changing mind about Heathrow
- Nominating Corbo but then attacking him
- Night tube: pro despite connections with fervent antis.
Lynton is doing a STUNNING job already.
Central planning and setting prices of good didn't work for goods in the USSR or Venezuela and has never really worked successfully when it is tried, leading to too much of some things and shortages of others. Interest rates are a 'price' the price of money like all other goods should also be set at the interaction of supply of and demand (savers and borrowers) and not set by a committee, however talented we think the Monetary Policy Committee are, they fundamentally have the same problems that the central planers in the USSR.
If I have whetted anybody's appetite then see a simple explanation here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jrCMUBppDd4
Or if you what a more amusing video of Austrian economics V Keynes .
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d0nERTFo-Sk
It must be a contender for the weakest attack ad ever?
A Muslim who joins the police force is a police officer and should deal with all people without fear or favour in accordance with the law. His religion is - or should be - irrelevant to his role as an officer. He or she is not there to represent anyone or any one group because the role of the police is not to represent people but to keep the peace and enforce the law, treating all equally under the law and in accordance with the law.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2755035/This-man-s-stalked-seven-years-t-police-stop-A-horrifying-account-life-lived-fear-savage-indictment-UK-justice-NADINE-DORRIES-MP.html
but didn't get much sympathy from leftwing journalists at the time:
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/andy-mcsmiths-diary-when-stalking-isn-t-really-what-you-would-call-stalking-9736760.html
You wonder whether they now feel any more sympathetic towards her given the treatment of some Labour MPs?
What they don't have this time is Ken's unrepentant abrasiveness and the Evening Standard running effectively a two year campaign against the Labour candidate which made it much easier for Lynton to do the negative stuff without its being associated with Boris. Much harder this time and i don't think Zak is a particularly strong candidate. Sadiq is also fairly ruthless and rarely for a politician aware of his weaknesses and is trying to deal with them.
I have a little bit of money on Zak but i reckon Khan is 60/40 to win at present.
Individuals don't just say more Muslims/Blacks/women etc should join the Police force no reason. I know in regard to encouraging more Black people to join the Police Force it was related to the historically strained relationships between Black people in London and the Police Force.
I'd expect it's the build up to a more serious sounding double standard like knocking about w islamic extremists then making a speech warning against islamic extremism
http://www.politico.com/story/2015/12/hillary-clinton-trump-rubio-cruz-216516
When a person puts on the uniform their personal views, their personal characteristics should be put to one side, in the same way that I have no interest whatever in the personal views, background, religion or sex life of a doctor treating me, merely his or her ability as a doctor.
On Khan, I'm sure they'll have better attack ads to come, but he seems reasonable on the face of it, though if I recall my reaction to his victory speech he seemed lacking in charisma. But if Corbyn is putting off droves of Labour voters, he should be doing ok unless the Tories can damage him significantly, and being a flip flopper probably won't do that.
@Wanderer I personally do find Osborne (along with IDS) to be the most unlikable Conservative on the front bench.
@AlistairMeeks I'm sorry to hear that. Not surprised at the behaviour of Corbynites though.
However, I can totally understand that people wouldn't think quotas were a good idea - but, even if you think it's not a good idea, calling Khan a "threat to London" or comparing him to Islamic extremists, like some PBTories have done, seems like a huge overreaction to me.
I quite like Osborne. I know people who have worked with him who say that he is a much nicer person, more rounded,funnier than he appears. That may not be enough to make him a good PM but I too don't get why people dislike him.
Mind you, I have met Bercow and he was much nicer than his public image. In some roles, politics often forces people to hide their full selves, which can be a pity.
What organizations need to do is examine their recruitment process (including outreach programs and advertising) to ensure that there is no systemic bias against people who differ from the existing workforce norms. That's particularly important during the paper sift and interview process.
For Tories, not including Benn (who saw his stock with Tories rise this past week), who's the most likable Shadow Cabinet figure? I don't know many of them so am finding it hard to say. Maybe Chris Bryant?
Thanks for that, very interesting. I'm not an economist but something feels very wrong about our economy. The irony is that house prices are so high that I'm saving as much as I can irrespective of the low interest rates. House prices should very much be part of the inflation assessment, but our politicians - of all colours - seem to think that inflation is bad...unless it is house price inflation.
Or to be European about it, its the English version of Italian clientilismo.
And lefties are bemused as to what the problem is... god help us
*It's amazing how much this can help matters - Corbyn and McDonnell I find to both have pretty trustworthy sounding voices, they have some authority to them.
Interesting makeover.
I am a huge fan of Margaret Thatcher, but I think even I might have struggled to spend a relaxed fun evening with her. Because she didn't do that. I liked her politics but perhaps wouldn't have liked her personality.
Conversely, John Major was a great guy to have a beer with and good fun - as is Farage, actually - the former is obviously likeable, and I although I also liked socialising with the latter he has some dislikeable political features too.
Cameron is rated as likeable. But he can be aloof and distant unless he's known you for a very long time, and doesn't trust those not a longstanding member of his inner circle.
Does that make him likeable, or not?
Like is as meaningful as 'nice'. Not very.
Given the sort of friends Corbyn has, it is understandable that people are focusing on the friends of other senior Labour politicians, particularly one vying to be Mayor of a city which has faced terrorist attacks and is highly likely to face more.
Khan recognises this issue and recognised, at least post-Paris, that it has the potential to harm him.
What on earth is an 'unrepresented' community?? We have universal franchise in this country, and government by democracy.
Everybody is as 'represented' as any human being in any society that has ever existed.
As with many similar scandals before, it won't be the substance but the cover up that will do for it. On what was already a very controversial project.
If you're going to go all red and black and scary and dangerous, why have the tagline that he's not going to deliver on his (presumably) scary agenda?
Fried chicken restaurants? Does anyone care about fried chicken restaurants?
Really?
D-
That will partly be down to political persuasion, we know Tories will dismiss something Corbyn says more instinctively than considering it fully, and Labour would do the same with Cameron. But if we like someone (even if the general sense, not in the like to have a beer with sense), we'll give even someone from the 'wrong' party more of the time of day. Past views and actions will contribute to that likability, but a certain instinctual level is there I think.
You can manage without it if able enough, authoritative enough, but it can be very useful, and lacking it can be fatal to some leadership ambitions. Osborne may be a natural number 2.
as for KLE 4 thinking Chris Bryant is likeable, now Ive heard it all.
They police are not there to represent people, they are there to enforce the law of the land.
And of course the officer speaking to the person in the street has to make the same assessment about whether or not that person is Muslim and would welcome ("why?") knowing that the officer is also a Muslim. Of course if he isn't he might be a tad surprised to find that the police officer is willing to share such information with him, much as I might be if the bus driver or police officer or my local traffic warden or doctor suddenly announced to me that they were gay or had a disabled child or were a born-again Christian.
Who Suffers, everybody in as much as we are lining are selves up for a painful correction. and the pore, or at least those that don't currently own at least one house, who are paying bigger rents, and will need to spend more if they chose to buy.
Who benefits, well in the long run nobody, but in the shout run the people who already own houses, see there equity increase, even if this is balanced out by the extra pain of the next reception and house price falls when they come. O and the politicians that do this because it makes things seem better in the shout run than they would otherwise be, so get credit and votes.
Don't misunderstand me I think Osborn and Co are better than any other lot, especially the Corbynes, but I do want to point out where and when I disagree, perhaps only in the vague hope that people will start to take not, and next time there may be a better option.
Bryant takes the friendliest picture of the shadow cabinet on the labour website
http://www.labour.org.uk/people/filter/c/shadow-cabinet
@Cyclefree There are exceptions, but most of the time you can tell when someone is a Muslim - a lot of the White Muslim women I've encountered tend to wear headscarf, for instance. It's not that an officer would say literally 'I'm a Muslim so trust me'. From what I've seen (in relation to Black people in London) it's a more far instinct thing, it is subtle and unsaid. I also don't think that the officer would have to make any kind of 'assessment'. They would most probably instinctively know whether someone is a Muslim like them or not.
I thought we were talking about which politicians we personally liked, or not. And to me that is a complex question that can mean a variety of things so not that relevant or meaningful for me.
Anyone who can have that lack of judgement is lacking in decision making skills.
If I lived in, say Nigeria, I would expect to be policed by black christian or possibly muslim police personnel. I wouldn't expect white police, even if I lived in a white enclave.
Minorities should expect to be policed by white police, given that Britain is 90% white.
It's called 'integrating'.
And that depends on his ability to build a coalition. The Netherlands is a completely proportional system with 150 seats. If he's got 40, he needs to persuade parties with 35 MP's to back him.
If he's on 30, it will be very tough
Terrible, woeful and shite.
He could post on a BSDM website I wouldn't care.
@taffys And if the police hadn't had an extensive history of racism in recent decades towards minorities in this country, that'd be a fine expectation. But the police have, in that history of racism - epitomised by the Stephen Lawrence case - damaged that relationship. And while most of the country is white, London especially is far more diverse.
If you lived in Nigeria and there was a white community, and people began discriminating against you, I'd expect that the Police would have to do something to restore that trust back, and re-build relationships.
I used to think/hope likeability didn't matter much, but I've heard FAR too many people say over the last few years that they wouldn't be voting Labour because "I couldn't have a drink with that Brown/Miliband" - and Osborne will IMO have the same problem.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chris_Bryant
Heathrow, can we build it, no we cant.
Conservative opposition research fail shocker as it's revealed that Chicken Shop sells "free range rotisserie chicken", not fried chicken.
Incidentally, that well-known bleeding-heart liberal Theresa May also shares that view.
Yes and many of those people are white British
I have no confidence in several layers of government; but it doesn't make me disobey them...