Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Antifrank looks at where the EU referendum will be won and

SystemSystem Posts: 12,292
edited 2015 15 in General

imagepoliticalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Antifrank looks at where the EU referendum will be won and lost

Referenda are odd affairs.  Two sides, both of which are passionately invested in the success or failure of the proposition, seek to woo disproportionate numbers of far less interested voters to their respective causes.  Votes are counted, not marked out of ten for enthusiasm.  Each side must resist the temptation to make arguments that fascinate those who are already-engaged but which make the ba…

Read the full story here


«134

Comments

  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,233
    First!
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 61,451
    FPT - Yokel: "There appears to be some indications that the attacks in Paris may have a mix of general instruction of IS big chief Baghdadi and a relatively devolved execution. If they go for the full deck, they've done the following enemies so far: France, Russia, Hizbollah. Iran, the USA and I suppose ourselves are missing.

    Certainly multiple sources in the Middle East seemed to know something was coming. The Saudis and Iraqis have now both claimed they warned a number of countries including the French."

    That's interesting. If that is the case, and this can be traced to ISIS central command, then any public appetite for a full-out international coalition to crush them might rapidly increase.

    Could it even lead to boots on the ground?
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 97,047
    I almost wish you'd not put a caption on the picture and only referred to lemmings, the noun, without reference to the game, and seen how many people were confused by the image.
  • Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 52,640
    I used to like playing Lemmings - we were allowed to play it at school during lunch break :)
  • surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549
    This is my equation based on the GE2015 election numbers for the Referendum:

    Party - GE15 - % IN - Net

    Tory - 37% - 50% - 18.5% * If Cameron backs IN
    Lab - 31% - 70% - 21.7%
    LD - 8% - 75% - 6%
    UKIP - 13% - 10% - 1.3%
    Others-11% - 70% - 7.7%

    Total - 100% - - 55.2%
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 43,238
    Have we already discussed the big news here today?

    Rousey vs Holm?
  • FloaterFloater Posts: 14,207

    FPT - Yokel: "There appears to be some indications that the attacks in Paris may have a mix of general instruction of IS big chief Baghdadi and a relatively devolved execution. If they go for the full deck, they've done the following enemies so far: France, Russia, Hizbollah. Iran, the USA and I suppose ourselves are missing.

    Certainly multiple sources in the Middle East seemed to know something was coming. The Saudis and Iraqis have now both claimed they warned a number of countries including the French."

    That's interesting. If that is the case, and this can be traced to ISIS central command, then any public appetite for a full-out international coalition to crush them might rapidly increase.

    Could it even lead to boots on the ground?

    I think I recall hearing / reading earlier today that it is expected that France will invoke article 5 and there will be 15K troops put on the ground.

  • runnymederunnymede Posts: 2,536
    5/10 for trying to prevent the author's own prejudices seeping into this thread article.
  • MP_SEMP_SE Posts: 3,642
    Lemmings. I really hated that game and found it incredibly difficult. If I remember correctly, the image above is the first level.

    I know I posted the heat map for the petition to end all immigration to the UK yesterday. The petition itself is not interesting, however, the number of people signing it in Labour seats is interesting. UKIP need to tap into voters in these constituencies.

    http://petitionmap.unboxedconsulting.com/?petition=107516
  • Sean_FSean_F Posts: 37,876
    IMHO, 1 favours Remain and 3 favours Leave.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 72,365
    I don't think Theresa May's reputation for competence will survive much longer the way she is going, for all she is now the longest-serving Home Secretary since 1880.

    Out of curiosity, where does David Davis stand on this issue? He's a bit of a maverick, admittedly, but he's also an intelligent and forceful maverick who is certainly boring in political terms.
  • FloaterFloater Posts: 14,207
    2 suicide bombers now identified, one was 31 and the other 20.
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,233
    @surbiton do you have a similar prediction if Cameron backs out? Unlikely, i know!
  • chestnutchestnut Posts: 7,341
    Andrew Neil ‏@afneil 2 hrs2 hours ago
    Iraqi intelligence warned US-led coalition countries of an imminent assault the day before the Paris attacks, it has emerged.

    Andrew Neil ‏@afneil 1 hr1 hour ago
    Those who think Islamic State barbarity is a response to Western foreign policy might like to speak to the Yazidi women who are still alive
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 61,451
    Good thread antifrank. Smart observation on how the political Left should be appealed to in this debate too.

    Most of Leave's focus seems to be on wavering Conservatives - and how to stop Cameron's inevitable endorsement bringing them into the Remain camp.

    I'm hearing far less of how they plan to target Labour voters. There may be a rich seam to mine there.

    But Theresa May won't be Leave leader whilst she's still in the cabinet. She'll make some sympathetic noises but otherwise keep her powder dry for the eventual leadership contest.
  • TCPoliticalBettingTCPoliticalBetting Posts: 10,819
    There is an assumption that Labour voters are going to break more than 2:1 in favour of Remain. It overlooks the massive concerns about immigration and the patriotic element in the Labour vote.
  • Richard_TyndallRichard_Tyndall Posts: 32,739
    Interesting thread header Antifrank.

    It is interesting how your own left leaning bias leads you to a view which I don't think is shared by a single person in the Leave camp - that leaving would result in a more isolationist position for the UK.

    In fact the Leave view is the exact opposite. We regard leaving the EU as a move away from isolationism and protectionism and towards a more forward looking internationalist position which maintains our positions on the UN and WTO amongst many other bodies and which has Britain pursuing her own foreign policy in collaboration with our neighbours but not dominated by them.

    The Leave position is entirely positive and forward looking as opposed to the clinging to Nanny's skirts attitude being portrayed by Remain.
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 61,451
    ydoethur said:

    I don't think Theresa May's reputation for competence will survive much longer the way she is going, for all she is now the longest-serving Home Secretary since 1880.

    Out of curiosity, where does David Davis stand on this issue? He's a bit of a maverick, admittedly, but he's also an intelligent and forceful maverick who is certainly boring in political terms.

    Her problem is that she's quite dull and struggles to answer questions straight: it makes her sound evasive.

    However, that's not necessarily fatal. She has balls of steel and is a survivor. Of all the Tory frontrunners for the leadership atm she's probably the best of the bunch.
  • notmenotme Posts: 3,293

    I used to like playing Lemmings - we were allowed to play it at school during lunch break :)

    Strangely good on the BBC Archimedes. A computer with a highly functional OS, miles ahead of windows at the time, and essentially at its core, the foundation of all mobile computing as we know it...
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 43,238

    ydoethur said:

    I don't think Theresa May's reputation for competence will survive much longer the way she is going, for all she is now the longest-serving Home Secretary since 1880.

    Out of curiosity, where does David Davis stand on this issue? He's a bit of a maverick, admittedly, but he's also an intelligent and forceful maverick who is certainly boring in political terms.

    Her problem is that she's quite dull and struggles to answer questions straight: it makes her sound evasive.

    However, that's not necessarily fatal. She has balls of steel and is a survivor. Of all the Tory frontrunners for the leadership atm she's probably the best of the bunch.
    dull is the right word.

    Will be interesting to see if the Cons believe their position is so secure in 2020 and beyond that they can elect a dull, typical, boring, plodding Conservative as leader.

    Perhaps they can.
  • surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549
    RobD said:

    @surbiton do you have a similar prediction if Cameron backs out? Unlikely, i know!

    I would say 40%. Then that will make it close. Note there will be an avalanche of scare stories from big business just before R-day.
  • chestnutchestnut Posts: 7,341

    There is an assumption that Labour voters are going to break more than 2:1 in favour of Remain. It overlooks the massive concerns about immigration and the patriotic element in the Labour vote.

    Is this 2:1 of what's left of their 2015 vote?

  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 61,451
    Floater said:

    FPT - Yokel: "There appears to be some indications that the attacks in Paris may have a mix of general instruction of IS big chief Baghdadi and a relatively devolved execution. If they go for the full deck, they've done the following enemies so far: France, Russia, Hizbollah. Iran, the USA and I suppose ourselves are missing.

    Certainly multiple sources in the Middle East seemed to know something was coming. The Saudis and Iraqis have now both claimed they warned a number of countries including the French."

    That's interesting. If that is the case, and this can be traced to ISIS central command, then any public appetite for a full-out international coalition to crush them might rapidly increase.

    Could it even lead to boots on the ground?

    I think I recall hearing / reading earlier today that it is expected that France will invoke article 5 and there will be 15K troops put on the ground.

    But this all hinges on Obama, and needs Putin's sanction too tbh.

    No ground intervention in Syria/Iraq would be a serious proposition without US logistical support. And I just can't see that whilst Obama is still in office. But, if (he) found a backbone, and the US infrastructure was there to facilitate an intervention, I think a fair few countries would supply troops. Including possibly some of the Arab states.

    Given the decimated state of our forces, I imagine we'd only be able to cobble together 3-5K of troops at best.
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 61,451

    There is an assumption that Labour voters are going to break more than 2:1 in favour of Remain. It overlooks the massive concerns about immigration and the patriotic element in the Labour vote.

    Cummings (and the other erstwhile Tories at the top of Vote Leave) need to stop obsessing about Cameron and work on these voters hard IMHO.
  • tlg86tlg86 Posts: 26,346
    Question. If a terrorist attack such as the one in Paris was to occur a week before the referendum, would the vote still go ahead?
  • FloaterFloater Posts: 14,207
    edited 2015 15
    This article made me think again about the cartoon re France and political correctness posted on last thread

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/france/11997410/Paris-attackers-linked-to-Belgian-suburb-where-the-authorities-have-lost-control.html

    "Two of the Paris attackers – and at least three other people involved – are linked to a heavily-Muslim suburb of Brussels where the authorities admit they have “lost control.”"

    That total arsewipe Choudery gets a mention too.
  • Moses_Moses_ Posts: 4,865
    chestnut said:

    Andrew Neil ‏@afneil 2 hrs2 hours ago
    Iraqi intelligence warned US-led coalition countries of an imminent assault the day before the Paris attacks, it has emerged.

    Andrew Neil ‏@afneil 1 hr1 hour ago
    Those who think Islamic State barbarity is a response to Western foreign policy might like to speak to the Yazidi women who are still alive

    Or even the Kenyans when this happened recently in April 2015. I seems violence is not restricted to us neither is the targeting of the young..........

    147 dead, Islamist gunmen killed after attack at Kenya college

    http://edition.cnn.com/2015/04/02/africa/kenya-university-attack/
  • SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 39,842
    It's all about turnout: 60%-70% is the sweet spot for Remain. Above or below that and it will look good for Leave.
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 61,451
    TOPPING said:

    ydoethur said:

    I don't think Theresa May's reputation for competence will survive much longer the way she is going, for all she is now the longest-serving Home Secretary since 1880.

    Out of curiosity, where does David Davis stand on this issue? He's a bit of a maverick, admittedly, but he's also an intelligent and forceful maverick who is certainly boring in political terms.

    Her problem is that she's quite dull and struggles to answer questions straight: it makes her sound evasive.

    However, that's not necessarily fatal. She has balls of steel and is a survivor. Of all the Tory frontrunners for the leadership atm she's probably the best of the bunch.
    dull is the right word.

    Will be interesting to see if the Cons believe their position is so secure in 2020 and beyond that they can elect a dull, typical, boring, plodding Conservative as leader.

    Perhaps they can.
    It worked in 1990.

    What May has in her favour is that she's the only candidate who can realistically become next PM who talks-the-talk on immigration, security and the EU, and has walked a little bit of the walk too.

    If the situation deteriorates further over the next 4 years, I can only see her relative position improve.

    Boris wants to play this card too - and with more rhetorical panache - but his trouble is that no-one believes him, or trusts him.
  • surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549

    Floater said:

    FPT - Yokel: "There appears to be some indications that the attacks in Paris may have a mix of general instruction of IS big chief Baghdadi and a relatively devolved execution. If they go for the full deck, they've done the following enemies so far: France, Russia, Hizbollah. Iran, the USA and I suppose ourselves are missing.

    Certainly multiple sources in the Middle East seemed to know something was coming. The Saudis and Iraqis have now both claimed they warned a number of countries including the French."

    That's interesting. If that is the case, and this can be traced to ISIS central command, then any public appetite for a full-out international coalition to crush them might rapidly increase.

    Could it even lead to boots on the ground?

    I think I recall hearing / reading earlier today that it is expected that France will invoke article 5 and there will be 15K troops put on the ground.

    But this all hinges on Obama, and needs Putin's sanction too tbh.

    No ground intervention in Syria/Iraq would be a serious proposition without US logistical support. And I just can't see that whilst Obama is still in office. But, if (he) found a backbone, and the US infrastructure was there to facilitate an intervention, I think a fair few countries would supply troops. Including possibly some of the Arab states.

    Given the decimated state of our forces, I imagine we'd only be able to cobble together 3-5K of troops at best.
    I cannot imagine any Arab state will provide troops since they don't have any. The UAE , Saudi and Kuwaiti army are full of Pakistani and Bangladeshi conscripts. Pakistan point blank refused to place its troops in Yemen - far less tricky than this hot bed since ISIL can cause trouble in their own country.

    Jordan is the only one. Would you really want Iraqi troops ? Their tanks have only one gear !
    http://www.dawn.com/news/1175284
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 72,365


    Her problem is that she's quite dull and struggles to answer questions straight: it makes her sound evasive.

    However, that's not necessarily fatal. She has balls of steel and is a survivor. Of all the Tory frontrunners for the leadership atm she's probably the best of the bunch.

    There are so many jokes could be made about that!

    However, on the substantive point it would be very surprising if she were the next Tory leader. She's Home Secretary - the last Home Secretary to become PM directly was Palmerston in 1855, under very unusual circumstances. Asquith and then of all people William Joynson-Hicks are the two who come nearest after that (Asquith would have been LOTO and then PM with no Campbell-Bannerman could he have afforded to give up his practice as a barrister). But more than that, she is too divisive. She tends to repel as many people as she attracts - what some see as good old-fashioned straight-talking, others see as straight bigotry. In office, the Conservatives are more likely to look for a conciliator. The same problem tells against George Osborne and to a lesser extent Boris Johnson.

    Hammond should probably be betting favourite at the moment, especially if he is in the Cabinet and Britain votes Leave. However, my instinct is that the next Tory leader will be somebody totally unexpected and possibly currently quite junior (as in Minister of State). An awful lot will depend on when the good Mr Cameron jacks it in and whether Jeremy Corbyn is still clinging on to the Labour leadership. The referendum's result will matter, as will the state of the economy (make a hole in each end...) We don't know the answer to either of those yet, so I would say there isn't much actual value in any contender right now.
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 61,451
    Iain Dale has gone a bit hard line - I agree with most of what he says:

    http://www.conservativehome.com/platform/2015/11/iain-dale-sixteen-things-britain-should-do-to-beat-isis.html
  • Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 52,640
    notme said:

    I used to like playing Lemmings - we were allowed to play it at school during lunch break :)

    Strangely good on the BBC Archimedes. A computer with a highly functional OS, miles ahead of windows at the time, and essentially at its core, the foundation of all mobile computing as we know it...
    Arkanoid
    Mr Eee


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MfwqXga1ul4
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,233
    tlg86 said:

    Question. If a terrorist attack such as the one in Paris was to occur a week before the referendum, would the vote still go ahead?

    I think there are conditions in which general elections can be delayed, notably the demise of the crown. Not sure if these apply to referenda.
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 43,238

    TOPPING said:

    ydoethur said:

    I don't think Theresa May's reputation for competence will survive much longer the way she is going, for all she is now the longest-serving Home Secretary since 1880.

    Out of curiosity, where does David Davis stand on this issue? He's a bit of a maverick, admittedly, but he's also an intelligent and forceful maverick who is certainly boring in political terms.

    Her problem is that she's quite dull and struggles to answer questions straight: it makes her sound evasive.

    However, that's not necessarily fatal. She has balls of steel and is a survivor. Of all the Tory frontrunners for the leadership atm she's probably the best of the bunch.
    dull is the right word.

    Will be interesting to see if the Cons believe their position is so secure in 2020 and beyond that they can elect a dull, typical, boring, plodding Conservative as leader.

    Perhaps they can.
    It worked in 1990.

    What May has in her favour is that she's the only candidate who can realistically become next PM who talks-the-talk on immigration, security and the EU, and has walked a little bit of the walk too.

    If the situation deteriorates further over the next 4 years, I can only see her relative position improve.

    Boris wants to play this card too - and with more rhetorical panache - but his trouble is that no-one believes him, or trusts him.
    Yes it's true - like death and taxes, a new Cons leader is inevitable I just have a hard time getting my head around who it will be (it won't be clown Boris. Or Voldemort George).

    I just can't see a sensible or likely candidate.

    I would have said Jeremy and it might still be the case if the public take against the strike.

    But I'm stumped (not for the first time..)
  • Richard_TyndallRichard_Tyndall Posts: 32,739
    surbiton said:

    Floater said:

    FPT - Yokel: "There appears to be some indications that the attacks in Paris may have a mix of general instruction of IS big chief Baghdadi and a relatively devolved execution. If they go for the full deck, they've done the following enemies so far: France, Russia, Hizbollah. Iran, the USA and I suppose ourselves are missing.

    Certainly multiple sources in the Middle East seemed to know something was coming. The Saudis and Iraqis have now both claimed they warned a number of countries including the French."

    That's interesting. If that is the case, and this can be traced to ISIS central command, then any public appetite for a full-out international coalition to crush them might rapidly increase.

    Could it even lead to boots on the ground?

    I think I recall hearing / reading earlier today that it is expected that France will invoke article 5 and there will be 15K troops put on the ground.

    But this all hinges on Obama, and needs Putin's sanction too tbh.

    No ground intervention in Syria/Iraq would be a serious proposition without US logistical support. And I just can't see that whilst Obama is still in office. But, if (he) found a backbone, and the US infrastructure was there to facilitate an intervention, I think a fair few countries would supply troops. Including possibly some of the Arab states.

    Given the decimated state of our forces, I imagine we'd only be able to cobble together 3-5K of troops at best.
    I cannot imagine any Arab state will provide troops since they don't have any. The UAE , Saudi and Kuwaiti army are full of Pakistani and Bangladeshi conscripts. Pakistan point blank refused to place its troops in Yemen - far less tricky than this hot bed since ISIL can cause trouble in their own country.

    Jordan is the only one. Would you really want Iraqi troops ? Their tanks have only one gear !
    http://www.dawn.com/news/1175284
    I know they are not Arabs but to my mind - as I have said repeatedly - the best choice would be Iran. But it needs a leap of faith that I am not sure the US are willing to take.
  • CyclefreeCyclefree Posts: 25,548
    ydoethur said:


    Her problem is that she's quite dull and struggles to answer questions straight: it makes her sound evasive.

    However, that's not necessarily fatal. She has balls of steel and is a survivor. Of all the Tory frontrunners for the leadership atm she's probably the best of the bunch.

    There are so many jokes could be made about that!

    However, on the substantive point it would be very surprising if she were the next Tory leader. She's Home Secretary - the last Home Secretary to become PM directly was Palmerston in 1855, under very unusual circumstances. Asquith and then of all people William Joynson-Hicks are the two who come nearest after that (Asquith would have been LOTO and then PM with no Campbell-Bannerman could he have afforded to give up his practice as a barrister). But more than that, she is too divisive. She tends to repel as many people as she attracts - what some see as good old-fashioned straight-talking, others see as straight bigotry. In office, the Conservatives are more likely to look for a conciliator. The same problem tells against George Osborne and to a lesser extent Boris Johnson.

    Hammond should probably be betting favourite at the moment, especially if he is in the Cabinet and Britain votes Leave. However, my instinct is that the next Tory leader will be somebody totally unexpected and possibly currently quite junior (as in Minister of State). An awful lot will depend on when the good Mr Cameron jacks it in and whether Jeremy Corbyn is still clinging on to the Labour leadership. The referendum's result will matter, as will the state of the economy (make a hole in each end...) We don't know the answer to either of those yet, so I would say there isn't much actual value in any contender right now.
    I have a really filthy "balls of steel" joke. Far too filthy for PB. Only to be shared with women.
  • foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548

    @ydeoether

    Very interesting comments on past thread and not far from my own experience. It is one reason why (though I hate the thing) I would not support a burkha ban. We should not punish the victims of a misogynist medival mindset. The Burkha is a barrier as is the compulsory chaperoning. This is bypassed by modern technology and is obselete. These women can and do explore the web, and not just here in Leicester but in most parts of the world. They can read Cyclefrees comments as easily as the next person.

    Muslim women do tend to academically do better than the men. I think partly is because of fewer distractions, but also because of the greater self discipline they need to survive in such a controlling culture. Those that can work outside the home are in contact with a much more liberal worldview. Those that cannot get frustrated. Either way there is tremendous cognitive dissonance. Some react by going deeper in, perhaps even fantasising about being jihadi brides. Others just gradually evolve more western values. The steps are small and gingerly but need to be encouraged.

    The threat to the fundamentalists is not military or police (though this may nessecary for containment) it is the ubiquity and appeal of pop music, fashion, celebrity gossip, sport, chinese tat and Bollywood movies. IS know this, which is why they hate our culture, and perpetrate acts like Friday 13th. We are eroding the sand that the fanatics have built their house on.



  • Moses_Moses_ Posts: 4,865
    TOPPING said:

    ydoethur said:

    I don't think Theresa May's reputation for competence will survive much longer the way she is going, for all she is now the longest-serving Home Secretary since 1880.

    Out of curiosity, where does David Davis stand on this issue? He's a bit of a maverick, admittedly, but he's also an intelligent and forceful maverick who is certainly boring in political terms.

    Her problem is that she's quite dull and struggles to answer questions straight: it makes her sound evasive.

    However, that's not necessarily fatal. She has balls of steel and is a survivor. Of all the Tory frontrunners for the leadership atm she's probably the best of the bunch.
    dull is the right word.

    Will be interesting to see if the Cons believe their position is so secure in 2020 and beyond that they can elect a dull, typical, boring, plodding Conservative as leader.

    Perhaps they can.
    Yeah for excitement bring back Jackie Spliff and porn- gate and Err another set of gates and who could forget spare room gate etc etc etc....
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 61,451
    ydoethur said:


    Her problem is that she's quite dull and struggles to answer questions straight: it makes her sound evasive.

    However, that's not necessarily fatal. She has balls of steel and is a survivor. Of all the Tory frontrunners for the leadership atm she's probably the best of the bunch.

    There are so many jokes could be made about that!

    However, on the substantive point it would be very surprising if she were the next Tory leader. She's Home Secretary - the last Home Secretary to become PM directly was Palmerston in 1855, under very unusual circumstances. Asquith and then of all people William Joynson-Hicks are the two who come nearest after that (Asquith would have been LOTO and then PM with no Campbell-Bannerman could he have afforded to give up his practice as a barrister). But more than that, she is too divisive. She tends to repel as many people as she attracts - what some see as good old-fashioned straight-talking, others see as straight bigotry. In office, the Conservatives are more likely to look for a conciliator. The same problem tells against George Osborne and to a lesser extent Boris Johnson.

    Hammond should probably be betting favourite at the moment, especially if he is in the Cabinet and Britain votes Leave. However, my instinct is that the next Tory leader will be somebody totally unexpected and possibly currently quite junior (as in Minister of State). An awful lot will depend on when the good Mr Cameron jacks it in and whether Jeremy Corbyn is still clinging on to the Labour leadership. The referendum's result will matter, as will the state of the economy (make a hole in each end...) We don't know the answer to either of those yet, so I would say there isn't much actual value in any contender right now.
    I don't think labelling Theresa May bigoted is a credible attack line. She was one of the earliest modernisers.

    I think the point about Home Secretary is a classic correlation does not equal causation canard.

    I think there are some interesting longshots (beneath the radar at the moment) but I disagree that she isn't value.
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 82,624
    edited 2015 15
    Turkish authorities foiled a plot to stage a "major" attack in Istanbul on the same day as the deadly gun and suicide attacks in Paris, a senior official has told AFP news agency.

    Police on Friday detained five people in Istanbul, the source said.

    ----

    Maybe they will stop bombing the Kurds and focused their bombs on ISIS instead..

    I read something interest yesterday which stated that getting people into ISIS territory from Turkey has become a lot harder. Not because the Turkish have suddenly grown a backbone, but because the Kurds now control a lot of the land along the border.
  • surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549

    ydoethur said:


    Her problem is that she's quite dull and struggles to answer questions straight: it makes her sound evasive.

    However, that's not necessarily fatal. She has balls of steel and is a survivor. Of all the Tory frontrunners for the leadership atm she's probably the best of the bunch.

    There are so many jokes could be made about that!

    However, on the substantive point it would be very surprising if she were the next Tory leader. She's Home Secretary - the last Home Secretary to become PM directly was Palmerston in 1855, under very unusual circumstances. Asquith and then of all people William Joynson-Hicks are the two who come nearest after that (Asquith would have been LOTO and then PM with no Campbell-Bannerman could he have afforded to give up his practice as a barrister). But more than that, she is too divisive. She tends to repel as many people as she attracts - what some see as good old-fashioned straight-talking, others see as straight bigotry. In office, the Conservatives are more likely to look for a conciliator. The same problem tells against George Osborne and to a lesser extent Boris Johnson.

    Hammond should probably be betting favourite at the moment, especially if he is in the Cabinet and Britain votes Leave. However, my instinct is that the next Tory leader will be somebody totally unexpected and possibly currently quite junior (as in Minister of State). An awful lot will depend on when the good Mr Cameron jacks it in and whether Jeremy Corbyn is still clinging on to the Labour leadership. The referendum's result will matter, as will the state of the economy (make a hole in each end...) We don't know the answer to either of those yet, so I would say there isn't much actual value in any contender right now.
    I don't think labelling Theresa May bigoted is a credible attack line. She was one of the earliest modernisers.

    I think the point about Home Secretary is a classic correlation does not equal causation canard.

    I think there are some interesting longshots (beneath the radar at the moment) but I disagree that she isn't value.
    "We are the NASTY PARTY" - Theresa May
  • RogerRoger Posts: 20,062
    FPT. Surbiton

    "It's worth reading Fawwaz Traboulsi [ from Tripoli ] 's book: A History of Modern Lebanon recommended to me by a Maronite."

    Thanks. I'll take a look. The Lebanese are very aware of their heritage. They got me to do this for their COI. (A bit portentous but it was for the whole Arab world which likes OTT)


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cL6AVWLPJD0&feature=youtu.be
  • surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549

    Turkish authorities foiled a plot to stage a "major" attack in Istanbul on the same day as the deadly gun and suicide attacks in Paris, a senior official has told AFP news agency.

    Police on Friday detained five people in Istanbul, the source said.

    ----

    Maybe they will stop bombing the Kurds and focused their bombs on ISIS instead..

    Why ? The PKK are terrorists.
  • JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 44,238

    I used to like playing Lemmings - we were allowed to play it at school during lunch break :)

    Just that picture has sent me onto YouTube to watch some videos of the game. It was a classic.

    Going way off-topic, here's a nice little site detailing the creation of the game nearly 25 years ago. That was back in the days when a couple of people in a small office could create a hit computer game. Nowadays they can cost over $100 million to make and market ...

    http://www.javalemmings.com/DMA/Lem_1.htm
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 72,365
    RobD said:

    tlg86 said:

    Question. If a terrorist attack such as the one in Paris was to occur a week before the referendum, would the vote still go ahead?

    I think there are conditions in which general elections can be delayed, notably the demise of the crown. Not sure if these apply to referenda.
    I think the only reason that an election would be delayed due of the death of the sovereign is if the new sovereign would not be able to return to Britain in time to kiss hands. That wouldn't apply to a referendum.

    I would have thought it would still go ahead unless the security services and police thought that it would not be possible to assure public safety and the integrity of the ballot.
  • CyclefreeCyclefree Posts: 25,548
    Floater said:

    This article made me think again about the cartoon re France and political correctness posted on last thread

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/france/11997410/Paris-attackers-linked-to-Belgian-suburb-where-the-authorities-have-lost-control.html

    "Two of the Paris attackers – and at least three other people involved – are linked to a heavily-Muslim suburb of Brussels where the authorities admit they have “lost control.”"

    That total arsewipe Choudery gets a mention too.

    Andrew Hussey's book: The French Intifada is very good on life within the banlieues. There was also File on 4 at 5 pm today on people smuggling and the migrant camps around Calais and Dunkirk. Most of the people smugglers are based in Britain and one local Mayor was effectively saying that he had no control over the camp even though it was in his territory. When the authorities lose control of even small parts of their country like that there are the seeds of a big problem.

    What I would like to understand is why there appears to be so much radicalisation within the Belgian Muslim community. What are the factors operating there?
  • FloaterFloater Posts: 14,207
    Hope you found number 5 a bit far fetched.
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 82,624
    edited 2015 15
    surbiton said:

    Turkish authorities foiled a plot to stage a "major" attack in Istanbul on the same day as the deadly gun and suicide attacks in Paris, a senior official has told AFP news agency.

    Police on Friday detained five people in Istanbul, the source said.

    ----

    Maybe they will stop bombing the Kurds and focused their bombs on ISIS instead..

    Why ? The PKK are terrorists.
    That would be the same PKK whose political wing used to be affiliated to the same group as the Labour Party in a European group? They are certainly no angels. but I think damaging ISIS is a much higher priority at the moment.
  • Scrapheap_as_wasScrapheap_as_was Posts: 10,069

    notme said:

    I used to like playing Lemmings - we were allowed to play it at school during lunch break :)

    Strangely good on the BBC Archimedes. A computer with a highly functional OS, miles ahead of windows at the time, and essentially at its core, the foundation of all mobile computing as we know it...
    Arkanoid
    Mr Eee


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MfwqXga1ul4
    Gb ltd

    Elite

    2 best games pre uni on BBC acorn

    Football manager on spectrum at uni, football the size of the goal.

    Top times
  • foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548
    SeanT said:

    I confess I am tempted to vote Leave JUST to annoy Cameron, Osborne, the Guardian, the BBC, everyone in the media bubble, just about everyone on Facebook. Etc.

    Fuck them. Scare them. Smug bastards.

    If I feel this, how many others feel the same? This referendum could easily be *lost*

    Probably as many again would want to stick up two fingers to Farage.
  • saddenedsaddened Posts: 2,245
    surbiton said:

    ydoethur said:


    Her problem is that she's quite dull and struggles to answer questions straight: it makes her sound evasive.

    However, that's not necessarily fatal. She has balls of steel and is a survivor. Of all the Tory frontrunners for the leadership atm she's probably the best of the bunch.

    There are so many jokes could be made about that!

    However, on the substantive point it would be very surprising if she were the next Tory leader. She's Home Secretary - the last Home Secretary to become PM directly was Palmerston in 1855, under very unusual circumstances. Asquith and then of all people William Joynson-Hicks are the two who come nearest after that (Asquith would have been LOTO and then PM with no Campbell-Bannerman could he have afforded to give up his practice as a barrister). But more than that, she is too divisive. She tends to repel as many people as she attracts - what some see as good old-fashioned straight-talking, others see as straight bigotry. In office, the Conservatives are more likely to look for a conciliator. The same problem tells against George Osborne and to a lesser extent Boris Johnson.

    Hammond should probably be betting favourite at the moment, especially if he is in the Cabinet and Britain votes Leave. However, my instinct is that the next Tory leader will be somebody totally unexpected and possibly currently quite junior (as in Minister of State). An awful lot will depend on when the good Mr Cameron jacks it in and whether Jeremy Corbyn is still clinging on to the Labour leadership. The referendum's result will matter, as will the state of the economy (make a hole in each end...) We don't know the answer to either of those yet, so I would say there isn't much actual value in any contender right now.
    I don't think labelling Theresa May bigoted is a credible attack line. She was one of the earliest modernisers.

    I think the point about Home Secretary is a classic correlation does not equal causation canard.

    I think there are some interesting longshots (beneath the radar at the moment) but I disagree that she isn't value.
    "We are the NASTY PARTY" - Theresa May
    Nope, as I would hope you well know.
  • Richard_TyndallRichard_Tyndall Posts: 32,739
    Roger said:

    FPT. Surbiton

    "It's worth reading Fawwaz Traboulsi [ from Tripoli ] 's book: A History of Modern Lebanon recommended to me by a Maronite."

    Thanks. I'll take a look. The Lebanese are very aware of their heritage. They got me to do this for their COI. (A bit portentous but it was for the whole Arab world which likes OTT)


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cL6AVWLPJD0&feature=youtu.be

    The Lebanese music scene is currently one of the best in the world. My personal favourite is the Wanton Bishops. Great heavy blues rock.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KwV5LfxFMxU
  • JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 44,238
    edited 2015 15
    surbiton said:

    ydoethur said:


    Her problem is that she's quite dull and struggles to answer questions straight: it makes her sound evasive.

    However, that's not necessarily fatal. She has balls of steel and is a survivor. Of all the Tory frontrunners for the leadership atm she's probably the best of the bunch.

    There are so many jokes could be made about that!

    However, on the substantive point it would be very surprising if she were the next Tory leader. She's Home Secretary - the last Home Secretary to become PM directly was Palmerston in 1855, under very unusual circumstances. Asquith and then of all people William Joynson-Hicks are the two who come nearest after that (Asquith would have been LOTO and then PM with no Campbell-Bannerman could he have afforded to give up his practice as a barrister). But more than that, she is too divisive. She tends to repel as many people as she attracts - what some see as good old-fashioned straight-talking, others see as straight bigotry. In office, the Conservatives are more likely to look for a conciliator. The same problem tells against George Osborne and to a lesser extent Boris Johnson.

    Hammond should probably be betting favourite at the moment, especially if he is in the Cabinet and Britain votes Leave. However, my instinct is that the next Tory leader will be somebody totally unexpected and possibly currently quite junior (as in Minister of State). An awful lot will depend on when the good Mr Cameron jacks it in and whether Jeremy Corbyn is still clinging on to the Labour leadership. The referendum's result will matter, as will the state of the economy (make a hole in each end...) We don't know the answer to either of those yet, so I would say there isn't much actual value in any contender right now.
    I don't think labelling Theresa May bigoted is a credible attack line. She was one of the earliest modernisers.

    I think the point about Home Secretary is a classic correlation does not equal causation canard.

    I think there are some interesting longshots (beneath the radar at the moment) but I disagree that she isn't value.
    "We are the NASTY PARTY" - Theresa May
    But that's not what she said, especially as a quote.
  • felixfelix Posts: 15,180
    SeanT said:

    20 paragraphs. Written by a corporate lawyer? Life is too short. Sorry.

    For future reference, antifrank, please see Pascal. "I'm sorry this letter is so long, I didn't have the time to make it shorter".

    When I was a manager we had a rule of no more than 1 side of A4 - I think the header gets close but no cigar.
  • CyclefreeCyclefree Posts: 25,548
    ydoethur said:

    RobD said:

    tlg86 said:

    Question. If a terrorist attack such as the one in Paris was to occur a week before the referendum, would the vote still go ahead?

    I think there are conditions in which general elections can be delayed, notably the demise of the crown. Not sure if these apply to referenda.
    I think the only reason that an election would be delayed due of the death of the sovereign is if the new sovereign would not be able to return to Britain in time to kiss hands. That wouldn't apply to a referendum.

    I would have thought it would still go ahead unless the security services and police thought that it would not be possible to assure public safety and the integrity of the ballot.
    If something like that happened I'd do my damndest to get to the ballot, just to put two giant fingers up to the terrorists.

    NFW should terrorists be allowed to stop elections, referenda and the rest of it.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 125,135

    There is an assumption that Labour voters are going to break more than 2:1 in favour of Remain. It overlooks the massive concerns about immigration and the patriotic element in the Labour vote.

    The polling evidence supports that, most of the 'patriotic', anti immigration working class are now backing UKIP, the Labour vote now is made up of the public sector, the poor and those on welfare and non-Indian ethnic minorities
  • CyclefreeCyclefree Posts: 25,548

    surbiton said:

    ydoethur said:


    Her problem is that she's quite dull and struggles to answer questions straight: it makes her sound evasive.

    However, that's not necessarily fatal. She has balls of steel and is a survivor. Of all the Tory frontrunners for the leadership atm she's probably the best of the bunch.

    There are so many jokes could be made about that!

    However, on the substantive point it would be very surprising if she were the next Tory leader. She's Home Secretary - the last Home Secretary to become PM directly was Palmerston in 1855, under very unusual circumstances. Asquith and then of all people William Joynson-Hicks are the two who come nearest after that (Asquith would have been LOTO and then PM with no Campbell-Bannerman could he have afforded to give up his practice as a barrister). But more than that, she is too divisive. She tends to repel as many people as she attracts - what some see as good old-fashioned straight-talking, others see as straight bigotry. In office, the Conservatives are more likely to look for a conciliator. The same problem tells against George Osborne and to a lesser extent Boris Johnson.

    Hammond should probably be betting favourite at the moment, especially if he is in the Cabinet and Britain votes Leave. However, my instinct is that the next Tory leader will be somebody totally unexpected and possibly currently quite junior (as in Minister of State). An awful lot will depend on when the good Mr Cameron jacks it in and whether Jeremy Corbyn is still clinging on to the Labour leadership. The referendum's result will matter, as will the state of the economy (make a hole in each end...) We don't know the answer to either of those yet, so I would say there isn't much actual value in any contender right now.
    I don't think labelling Theresa May bigoted is a credible attack line. She was one of the earliest modernisers.

    I think the point about Home Secretary is a classic correlation does not equal causation canard.

    I think there are some interesting longshots (beneath the radar at the moment) but I disagree that she isn't value.
    "We are the NASTY PARTY" - Theresa May
    But that's not what she said, especially as a quote.
    True - but like the "There's no such thing as society" quote which is always left incomplete, it will still be hung round her neck.
  • JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 44,238
    notme said:

    I used to like playing Lemmings - we were allowed to play it at school during lunch break :)

    Strangely good on the BBC Archimedes. A computer with a highly functional OS, miles ahead of windows at the time, and essentially at its core, the foundation of all mobile computing as we know it...
    Thanks. ;)

    (At least for later versions, before the lights went out)
  • Moses_Moses_ Posts: 4,865
    surbiton said:

    ydoethur said:


    Her problem is that she's quite dull and struggles to answer questions straight: it makes her sound evasive.

    However, that's not necessarily fatal. She has balls of steel and is a survivor. Of all the Tory frontrunners for the leadership atm she's probably the best of the bunch.

    There are so many jokes could be made about that!

    However, on the substantive point it would be very surprising if she were the next Tory leader. She's Home Secretary - the last Home Secretary to become PM directly was Palmerston in 1855, under very unusual circumstances. Asquith and then of all people William Joynson-Hicks are the two who come nearest after that (Asquith would have been LOTO and then PM with no Campbell-Bannerman could he have afforded to give up his practice as a barrister). But more than that, she is too divisive. She tends to repel as many people as she attracts - what some see as good old-fashioned straight-talking, others see as straight bigotry. In office, the Conservatives are more likely to look for a conciliator. The same problem tells against George Osborne and to a lesser extent Boris Johnson.

    Hammond should probably be betting favourite at the moment, especially if he is in the Cabinet and Britain votes Leave. However, my instinct is that the next Tory leader will be somebody totally unexpected and possibly currently quite junior (as in Minister of State). An awful lot will depend on when the good Mr Cameron jacks it in and whether Jeremy Corbyn is still clinging on to the Labour leadership. The referendum's result will matter, as will the state of the economy (make a hole in each end...) We don't know the answer to either of those yet, so I would say there isn't much actual value in any contender right now.
    I don't think labelling Theresa May bigoted is a credible attack line. She was one of the earliest modernisers.

    I think the point about Home Secretary is a classic correlation does not equal causation canard.

    I think there are some interesting longshots (beneath the radar at the moment) but I disagree that she isn't value.
    "We are the NASTY PARTY" - Theresa May
    She didn't actually say that .......but you already knew that.
  • Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 29,482
    'It doesn’t want to be ganged up on by all the other EU countries and see Britain forced to do things it doesn’t want to do. But it doesn’t want to be shut out from decision-making. It likes the idea of international co-operation in the abstract. And it likes Britain doing lots of things and having lots of influence around the world.'

    Polling evidence for this? Particularly the last part? What does 'doing lots of things' even mean?

    I strongly disagree that people want this - it's one of the weakest of the pro-eu arguments that we need to be part of some powerful bloc so we can continue to tell people what to do. The idea is profoundly illiberal (which is perhaps why it's so often espoused by the Lib Dems).

    I think what people want is a Britain that is capable of defending its citizens and its laws, and is prosperous, free, stable, democratic, and peaceful. It's politicians who want the biggest motorcade and a seat at the front at international junkets.
  • chestnutchestnut Posts: 7,341
    17% of Tories 'undecided' according to ICM.

    Friday Night in Paris: the sequel = leave, if it falls at an inconvenient moment.

  • foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548
    An interesting analysis antifrank.

    I think economy wil break for Leave/Remain depending on industry. Fishing for Leave, Farming probably for remain, NHS for Remain etc.

    When judging these things those losing out are always more vocal. A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.

    Jack W thinks that Remain will win. No further analysis needed!
  • Sean_FSean_F Posts: 37,876
    Cyclefree said:

    Floater said:

    This article made me think again about the cartoon re France and political correctness posted on last thread

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/france/11997410/Paris-attackers-linked-to-Belgian-suburb-where-the-authorities-have-lost-control.html

    "Two of the Paris attackers – and at least three other people involved – are linked to a heavily-Muslim suburb of Brussels where the authorities admit they have “lost control.”"

    That total arsewipe Choudery gets a mention too.

    Andrew Hussey's book: The French Intifada is very good on life within the banlieues. There was also File on 4 at 5 pm today on people smuggling and the migrant camps around Calais and Dunkirk. Most of the people smugglers are based in Britain and one local Mayor was effectively saying that he had no control over the camp even though it was in his territory. When the authorities lose control of even small parts of their country like that there are the seeds of a big problem.

    What I would like to understand is why there appears to be so much radicalisation within the Belgian Muslim community. What are the factors operating there?
    Yvette Cooper wants the inhabitants of the camps to settle in the UK. We dodged a bullet in May.
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,233
    ydoethur said:

    RobD said:

    tlg86 said:

    Question. If a terrorist attack such as the one in Paris was to occur a week before the referendum, would the vote still go ahead?

    I think there are conditions in which general elections can be delayed, notably the demise of the crown. Not sure if these apply to referenda.
    I think the only reason that an election would be delayed due of the death of the sovereign is if the new sovereign would not be able to return to Britain in time to kiss hands. That wouldn't apply to a referendum.

    I would have thought it would still go ahead unless the security services and police thought that it would not be possible to assure public safety and the integrity of the ballot.
    The Representation of the People Act 1985 disagrees with you. It delays the vote by 14 days.
  • TheWhiteRabbitTheWhiteRabbit Posts: 12,454
    Floater said:

    Hope you found number 5 a bit far fetched.
    Not impossible to take, difficult to hold. ISIS's main forces never number that many men.
  • Sean_FSean_F Posts: 37,876
    Moses_ said:

    surbiton said:

    ydoethur said:


    Her problem is that she's quite dull and struggles to answer questions straight: it makes her sound evasive.

    However, that's not necessarily fatal. She has balls of steel and is a survivor. Of all the Tory frontrunners for the leadership atm she's probably the best of the bunch.

    There are so many jokes could be made about that!

    However, on the substantive point it would be very surprising if she were the next Tory leader. She's Home Secretary - the last Home Secretary to become PM directly was Palmerston in 1855, under very unusual circumstances. Asquith and then of all people William Joynson-Hicks are the two who come nearest after that (Asquith would have been LOTO and then PM with no Campbell-Bannerman could he have afforded to give up his practice as a barrister). But more than that, she is too divisive. She tends to repel as many people as she attracts - what some see as good old-fashioned straight-talking, others see as straight bigotry. In office, the Conservatives are more likely to look for a conciliator. The same problem tells against George Osborne and to a lesser extent Boris Johnson.

    Hammond should probably be betting favourite at the moment, especially if he is in the Cabinet and Britain votes Leave. However, my instinct is that the next Tory leader will be somebody totally unexpected and possibly currently quite junior (as in Minister of State). An awful lot will depend on when the good Mr Cameron jacks it in and whether Jeremy Corbyn is still clinging on to the Labour leadership. The referendum's result will matter, as will the state of the economy (make a hole in each end...) We don't know the answer to either of those yet, so I would say there isn't much actual value in any contender right now.
    I don't think labelling Theresa May bigoted is a credible attack line. She was one of the earliest modernisers.

    I think the point about Home Secretary is a classic correlation does not equal causation canard.

    I think there are some interesting longshots (beneath the radar at the moment) but I disagree that she isn't value.
    "We are the NASTY PARTY" - Theresa May
    She didn't actually say that .......but you already knew that.
    What she meant to say was We Are the Nazi Party.
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,233
    Sean_F said:

    Moses_ said:

    surbiton said:

    ydoethur said:


    Her problem is that she's quite dull and struggles to answer questions straight: it makes her sound evasive.

    However, that's not necessarily fatal. She has balls of steel and is a survivor. Of all the Tory frontrunners for the leadership atm she's probably the best of the bunch.

    There are so many jokes could be made about that!

    However, on the substantive point it would be very surprising if she were the next Tory leader. She's Home Secretary - the last Home Secretary to become PM directly was Palmerston in 1855, under very unusual circumstances. Asquith and then of all people William Joynson-Hicks are the two who come nearest after that (Asquith would have been LOTO and then PM with no Campbell-Bannerman could he have afforded to give up his practice as a barrister). But more than that, she is too divisive. She tends to repel as many people as she attracts - what some see as good old-fashioned straight-talking, others see as straight bigotry. In office, the Conservatives are more likely to look for a conciliator. The same problem tells against George Osborne and to a lesser extent Boris Johnson.

    Hammond should probably be betting favourite at the moment, especially if he is in the Cabinet and Britain votes Leave. However, my instinct is that the next Tory leader will be somebody totally unexpected and possibly currently quite junior (as in Minister of State). An awful lot will depend on when the good Mr Cameron jacks it in and whether Jeremy Corbyn is still clinging on to the Labour leadership. The referendum's result will matter, as will the state of the economy (make a hole in each end...) We don't know the answer to either of those yet, so I would say there isn't much actual value in any contender right now.
    I don't think labelling Theresa May bigoted is a credible attack line. She was one of the earliest modernisers.

    I think the point about Home Secretary is a classic correlation does not equal causation canard.

    I think there are some interesting longshots (beneath the radar at the moment) but I disagree that she isn't value.
    "We are the NASTY PARTY" - Theresa May
    She didn't actually say that .......but you already knew that.
    What she meant to say was We Are the Nazi Party.
    Sure as hell beats "Evil Tory Scum" :p
  • CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758
    @Cyclefree

    Thanks for the promise of a future invitation FPT... I should be fascinated and happy to give a personal view... Should you need space I'm sure we can russle up something - my brother has a better set up for that kind of event (mine is a little old school) but it may be too controversial for his taste.
  • foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548

    Floater said:

    Hope you found number 5 a bit far fetched.
    Not impossible to take, difficult to hold. ISIS's main forces never number that many men.
    I am a bit surprised that critical buildings in Raqqa still stand. Bridges, powerstations, water supply, warehouses must surely be very tempting targets. IS is troop light and needs to be able to move things about. They also need at least a semblence of normal life. Troops that get no respite get battle fatigue very quickly.
  • PongPong Posts: 4,693
    edited 2015 15

    Floater said:

    Hope you found number 5 a bit far fetched.
    Not impossible to take, difficult to hold. ISIS's main forces never number that many men.
    Don't isis believe the endtimes will happen in some battle in some Syrian town?

    Can we not just set a date, set the rules (no children, no civilians, no knuckledusters) and fighty fighty to the death?
  • surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549
    Moses_ said:

    surbiton said:

    ydoethur said:


    Her problem is that she's quite dull and struggles to answer questions straight: it makes her sound evasive.

    However, that's not necessarily fatal. She has balls of steel and is a survivor. Of all the Tory frontrunners for the leadership atm she's probably the best of the bunch.

    There are so many jokes could be made about that!

    However, on the substantive point it would be very surprising if she were the next Tory leader. She's Home Secretary - the last Home Secretary to become PM directly was Palmerston in 1855, under very unusual circumstances. Asquith and then of all people William Joynson-Hicks are the two who come nearest after that (Asquith would have been LOTO and then PM with no Campbell-Bannerman could he have afforded to give up his practice as a barrister). But more than that, she is too divisive. She tends to repel as many people as she attracts - what some see as good old-fashioned straight-talking, others see as straight bigotry. In office, the Conservatives are more likely to look for a conciliator. The same problem tells against George Osborne and to a lesser extent Boris Johnson.

    Hammond should probably be betting favourite at the moment, especially if he is in the Cabinet and Britain votes Leave. However, my instinct is that the next Tory leader will be somebody totally unexpected and possibly currently quite junior (as in Minister of State). An awful lot will depend on when the good Mr Cameron jacks it in and whether Jeremy Corbyn is still clinging on to the Labour leadership. The referendum's result will matter, as will the state of the economy (make a hole in each end...) We don't know the answer to either of those yet, so I would say there isn't much actual value in any contender right now.
    I don't think labelling Theresa May bigoted is a credible attack line. She was one of the earliest modernisers.

    I think the point about Home Secretary is a classic correlation does not equal causation canard.

    I think there are some interesting longshots (beneath the radar at the moment) but I disagree that she isn't value.
    "We are the NASTY PARTY" - Theresa May
    She didn't actually say that .......but you already knew that.
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/2306621.stm

    That will do me.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 72,365
    RobD said:


    The Representation of the People Act 1985 disagrees with you. It delays the vote by 14 days.

    20 Summoning new Parliament: effect of demise of the Crown.

    (1)Where a proclamation summoning a new Parliament has been given, the demise of the Crown shall not, except as provided by this section, affect the summoning of the new Parliament in pursuance of the proclamation or its duration; and accordingly sections 3 and 4 of the M5Meeting of Parliament Act 1797 (which, if the demise occurs before the day appointed for the meeting of the new Parliament, require the dissolved Parliament to meet and sit for six months and make similar provision in the event of the death of the heir within that period) and section 5 of that Act (which, if the demise occurs on or after that day but before the new Parliament meets and sits, requires the new Parliament to be dissolved within six months) shall cease to have effect.

    (2)Where the demise occurs at any time after the proclamation is given and before the date of the poll—

    (a)the meeting of Parliament shall (subject to any prorogation subsequent to the demise) take place on the day following the end of the period of fourteen days beginning with the day appointed in the proclamation for the meeting or, if the first-mentioned day is a day to be disregarded in computing any period of time for the purposes of the timetable in the rules in Schedule 1 to the principal Act, on the next day which is not such a day, and

    (b)that timetable shall have effect for the purposes of the Representation of the People Acts, in relation to anything which at the time of the demise has not been done and was not required to be done before that time, as if the proclamation given, and any proceeding referred to in that timetable (including the receipt of the writ) which has taken place, had been given or taken place on the day following the end of the period of fourteen days beginning with the day on which it was given or took place.

    (3)Where the meeting of Parliament is postponed under subsection (2) above, any writ issued or to be issued in pursuance of the proclamation (whether a writ of election, writ of summons or writ of attendance) shall have effect as if, instead of the date appointed in the proclamation for the meeting, it specified the date to which the meeting is postponed (but any writ still to be issued may specify the latter date).
    (continued)
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 72,365
    edited 2015 15
    (continued)
    (4)Where the day on or before which or before a certain time in which or between certain times in which anything is required to be done under the Representation of the People Acts is postponed under subsection (2) above, any notice or other document under any provision of those Acts, being a document referring to the original day, shall have effect as if it referred instead to the day determined by virtue of that subsection (but a document under any such provision may specify the latter day).

    (5)Where the date of the poll at an election is postponed under subsection (2) above, section 76 of the principal Act (limitation on election expenses) shall have effect in relation to any candidate at the election as if the maximum amount specified in subsection (2)(a) of that section were increased by one half.
    I can't see anything in there that applies to referenda. Only to the summoning of the new parliament, which would surely be to allow more time for the transition to a new government if needed.
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 82,624

    Floater said:

    Hope you found number 5 a bit far fetched.
    Not impossible to take, difficult to hold. ISIS's main forces never number that many men.
    I am a bit surprised that critical buildings in Raqqa still stand. Bridges, powerstations, water supply, warehouses must surely be very tempting targets. IS is troop light and needs to be able to move things about. They also need at least a semblence of normal life. Troops that get no respite get battle fatigue very quickly.
    Isn't the problem that there are lots of people living there under duress, and their lives are pretty screwed as it is.
  • surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549
    HYUFD said:

    There is an assumption that Labour voters are going to break more than 2:1 in favour of Remain. It overlooks the massive concerns about immigration and the patriotic element in the Labour vote.

    The polling evidence supports that, most of the 'patriotic', anti immigration working class are now backing UKIP, the Labour vote now is made up of the public sector, the poor and those on welfare and non-Indian ethnic minorities
    and 40% of Indian ethnic minorities. Brent and Ealing Southall voted Labour heavily.
  • RogerRoger Posts: 20,062
    Richard T

    A great track! It's a really lively place full of clubs cafes restaurants and one of the most attractive populations anywhere (thanks in part to extensive plastic surgery). If only the Israelis would stop using it for target practice
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,233
    edited 2015 15
    ydoethur said:

    RobD said:


    The Representation of the People Act 1985 disagrees with you. It delays the vote by 14 days.

    20 Summoning new Parliament: effect of demise of the Crown.

    SNIP
    Yes:

    that timetable shall have effect for the purposes of the Representation of the People Acts, in relation to anything which at the time of the demise has not been done and was not required to be done before that time, as if the proclamation given, and any proceeding referred to in that timetable (including the receipt of the writ) which has taken place, had been given or taken place on the day following the end of the period of fourteen days beginning with the day on which it was given or took place.

    i.e. delayed by fourteen days.

    EDIT - I was talking about general elections. Not about referenda. Sorry!
  • foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548

    Floater said:

    Hope you found number 5 a bit far fetched.
    Not impossible to take, difficult to hold. ISIS's main forces never number that many men.
    No need to hold. A punitive visit in the grand old style, with plenty of demolition charges to leave it as rubble. There's gonna be a lot of IEDs though.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 125,135
    SeanT said:

    SeanT said:

    I confess I am tempted to vote Leave JUST to annoy Cameron, Osborne, the Guardian, the BBC, everyone in the media bubble, just about everyone on Facebook. Etc.

    Fuck them. Scare them. Smug bastards.

    If I feel this, how many others feel the same? This referendum could easily be *lost*

    Probably as many again would want to stick up two fingers to Farage.
    No. Those who hate Farage so much they'll vote agin him are priced into the polling. Point about euro ref is that it might lure out non-voters, who see a unique chance of upending things, in their favour.

    It's the same dynamic we saw in indyref. But there the unionists got lucky. The ultra high turnout favoured the Nos in the end, as unprecedented Yes votes met even more unprecedented No votes.

    The EU ref might see this scenario reversed.

    And with that, goodnight from Delhi.
    I think it will be tight but In will still win, the middle class and graduates in particular are most likely to vote and will back In
  • notmenotme Posts: 3,293

    notme said:

    I used to like playing Lemmings - we were allowed to play it at school during lunch break :)

    Strangely good on the BBC Archimedes. A computer with a highly functional OS, miles ahead of windows at the time, and essentially at its core, the foundation of all mobile computing as we know it...
    Thanks. ;)

    (At least for later versions, before the lights went out)
    Did you play a part in its development?
  • notmenotme Posts: 3,293

    notme said:

    I used to like playing Lemmings - we were allowed to play it at school during lunch break :)

    Strangely good on the BBC Archimedes. A computer with a highly functional OS, miles ahead of windows at the time, and essentially at its core, the foundation of all mobile computing as we know it...
    Arkanoid
    Mr Eee


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MfwqXga1ul4
    Gb ltd

    Elite

    2 best games pre uni on BBC acorn

    Football manager on spectrum at uni, football the size of the goal.

    Top times
    GB ltd..... Ha I remember playing that.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 125,135
    surbiton said:

    HYUFD said:

    There is an assumption that Labour voters are going to break more than 2:1 in favour of Remain. It overlooks the massive concerns about immigration and the patriotic element in the Labour vote.

    The polling evidence supports that, most of the 'patriotic', anti immigration working class are now backing UKIP, the Labour vote now is made up of the public sector, the poor and those on welfare and non-Indian ethnic minorities
    and 40% of Indian ethnic minorities. Brent and Ealing Southall voted Labour heavily.
    Yet 49% of Hindus and Sikhs voted Tory
    http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/may/24/one-million-minority-ethnic-votes-helped-tories-no-10
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 72,365
    RobD said:


    EDIT - I was talking about general elections. Not about referenda. Sorry!

    Ah - no worries. I was talking about referenda, not general elections and of course the date will be fixed in the bill, so it would be covered by that 'required to be done' clause.

    Glad we've cleared that up.
  • foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548

    Floater said:

    Hope you found number 5 a bit far fetched.
    Not impossible to take, difficult to hold. ISIS's main forces never number that many men.
    I am a bit surprised that critical buildings in Raqqa still stand. Bridges, powerstations, water supply, warehouses must surely be very tempting targets. IS is troop light and needs to be able to move things about. They also need at least a semblence of normal life. Troops that get no respite get battle fatigue very quickly.
    Isn't the problem that there are lots of people living there under duress, and their lives are pretty screwed as it is.
    I think that is what Hollande meant by pitiless.
  • Moses_Moses_ Posts: 4,865
    edited 2015 15

    What she meant to say was We Are the Nazi Party.

    Perhaps so..... Easy mistake to make

    However Surbiton placed the quote firmly in inverted commas and also capitals. At the very least having done that on this website a full link to those precise words as quoted including the shouting of 'nasty party' , is the very least required. Maybe she said it? I don't know but I hear it quoted here so where is the link to theses precise words. I don't want a link to an hour long speech either. If she said this it should be easily available
  • notmenotme Posts: 3,293

    I used to like playing Lemmings - we were allowed to play it at school during lunch break :)

    Just that picture has sent me onto YouTube to watch some videos of the game. It was a classic.

    Going way off-topic, here's a nice little site detailing the creation of the game nearly 25 years ago. That was back in the days when a couple of people in a small office could create a hit computer game. Nowadays they can cost over $100 million to make and market ...

    http://www.javalemmings.com/DMA/Lem_1.htm

    What was incredibly engaging, the two player version... If you think MarioKart battlemode on the SNES (something they have failed to recreate successfully on any of the sequels).
  • foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548
    HYUFD said:

    surbiton said:

    HYUFD said:

    There is an assumption that Labour voters are going to break more than 2:1 in favour of Remain. It overlooks the massive concerns about immigration and the patriotic element in the Labour vote.

    The polling evidence supports that, most of the 'patriotic', anti immigration working class are now backing UKIP, the Labour vote now is made up of the public sector, the poor and those on welfare and non-Indian ethnic minorities
    and 40% of Indian ethnic minorities. Brent and Ealing Southall voted Labour heavily.
    Yet 49% of Hindus and Sikhs voted Tory
    http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/may/24/one-million-minority-ethnic-votes-helped-tories-no-10
    Doesn't mean that they will vote Leave though!
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 82,624
    Former French President Nicola Sarkozy has told French TV that all those on an official watchlist of suspected radicals should be forced to wear "an electronic tag". He is widely expected to run for the presidency again in 2017.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 72,365
    edited 2015 15
    Last post before I go - thank you for your reply Dr @foxinsoxuk. The stuff on exposure to Western culture is a good extension to my point and I agree with it. My argument would be - and will continue to be - that in isolating Muslims who are interested in such cultural things from our society we are making that more difficult and therefore making the fight longer and more arduous, notwithstanding the internet and the impact it can have (and possibly, is having).

    Of course, even allowing for the horror of Paris, the people who also suffer most from Islamism are other Muslims. They have to live with them.

    Good night all and have a good week.
  • chestnutchestnut Posts: 7,341

    HYUFD said:

    surbiton said:

    HYUFD said:

    There is an assumption that Labour voters are going to break more than 2:1 in favour of Remain. It overlooks the massive concerns about immigration and the patriotic element in the Labour vote.

    The polling evidence supports that, most of the 'patriotic', anti immigration working class are now backing UKIP, the Labour vote now is made up of the public sector, the poor and those on welfare and non-Indian ethnic minorities
    and 40% of Indian ethnic minorities. Brent and Ealing Southall voted Labour heavily.
    Yet 49% of Hindus and Sikhs voted Tory
    http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/may/24/one-million-minority-ethnic-votes-helped-tories-no-10
    Doesn't mean that they will vote Leave though!
    Very little difference in their opinions on the EU and current immigration to those of the WWC in my experience.
  • Sean_FSean_F Posts: 37,876
    HYUFD said:

    surbiton said:

    HYUFD said:

    There is an assumption that Labour voters are going to break more than 2:1 in favour of Remain. It overlooks the massive concerns about immigration and the patriotic element in the Labour vote.

    The polling evidence supports that, most of the 'patriotic', anti immigration working class are now backing UKIP, the Labour vote now is made up of the public sector, the poor and those on welfare and non-Indian ethnic minorities
    and 40% of Indian ethnic minorities. Brent and Ealing Southall voted Labour heavily.
    Yet 49% of Hindus and Sikhs voted Tory
    http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/may/24/one-million-minority-ethnic-votes-helped-tories-no-10
    I think that may overestimate. My guess is 35-40% Sikhs and Hindus voted Conservative, compared to 45-50% Labour. Still good compared to previously.
  • TomsToms Posts: 2,478
    edited 2015 15
    @Roger
    "Thanks. I'll take a look. The Lebanese are very aware of their heritage."

    I understand that Lebanese dna threads back to the Phoenicians, who invented and propagated the alphabet. Heritage writ large.
    Speaking of writing, I must get around to reading The Ice Twins, currently gathering dust on a shelf, that is if it's not too long.
  • AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    Sean_F said:

    HYUFD said:

    surbiton said:

    HYUFD said:

    There is an assumption that Labour voters are going to break more than 2:1 in favour of Remain. It overlooks the massive concerns about immigration and the patriotic element in the Labour vote.

    The polling evidence supports that, most of the 'patriotic', anti immigration working class are now backing UKIP, the Labour vote now is made up of the public sector, the poor and those on welfare and non-Indian ethnic minorities
    and 40% of Indian ethnic minorities. Brent and Ealing Southall voted Labour heavily.
    Yet 49% of Hindus and Sikhs voted Tory
    http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/may/24/one-million-minority-ethnic-votes-helped-tories-no-10
    I think that may overestimate. My guess is 35-40% Sikhs and Hindus voted Conservative, compared to 45-50% Labour. Still good compared to previously.
    I expect the Tories to do even better with Hindus and Sikhs at the next election, possibly reaching 50%.
  • foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548
    edited 2015 15
    ydoethur said:

    Last post before I go - thank you for your reply Dr @foxinsoxuk. The stuff on exposure to Western culture is a good extension to my point and I agree with it. My argument would be - and will continue to be - that in isolating Muslims who are interested in such cultural things from our society we are making that more difficult and therefore making the fight longer and more arduous, notwithstanding the internet and the impact it can have (and possibly, is having).

    Of course, even allowing for the horror of Paris, the people who also suffer most from Islamism are other Muslims. They have to live with them.

    Good night all and have a good week.

    I think such steps will be slow and often timid, but should always be welcomed. Compliments work wonders and everyone is open to flattery.

    Nadya winning bakeoff was a positive start. Engaged in the contest but not threatened or forced to do anything she was not comfortable with. An excellent role model.
  • AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395

    Former French President Nicola Sarkozy has told French TV that all those on an official watchlist of suspected radicals should be forced to wear "an electronic tag". He is widely expected to run for the presidency again in 2017.

    You can't imagine British politicians saying something like that, even those on the fringes. Yet Sarkozy is mainstream in France.
  • JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 44,238
    notme said:

    notme said:

    I used to like playing Lemmings - we were allowed to play it at school during lunch break :)

    Strangely good on the BBC Archimedes. A computer with a highly functional OS, miles ahead of windows at the time, and essentially at its core, the foundation of all mobile computing as we know it...
    Thanks. ;)

    (At least for later versions, before the lights went out)
    Did you play a part in its development?
    The hardware, no. The OS and software, yes. Although I was there near the end, so only a few things that appeared in 'official' ROM images in shipped 'puters. Much of my later work went into the OS on other platforms.

    Acorn probably had the best team of hw and sw engineers I've worked with, killed off (ironically enough) by their child ARM. Not that it was ARM's fault ...
  • CyclefreeCyclefree Posts: 25,548

    Floater said:

    Hope you found number 5 a bit far fetched.
    Not impossible to take, difficult to hold. ISIS's main forces never number that many men.
    I am a bit surprised that critical buildings in Raqqa still stand. Bridges, powerstations, water supply, warehouses must surely be very tempting targets. IS is troop light and needs to be able to move things about. They also need at least a semblence of normal life. Troops that get no respite get battle fatigue very quickly.
    Isn't the problem that there are lots of people living there under duress, and their lives are pretty screwed as it is.
    I think that is what Hollande meant by pitiless.
    On Channel 4 news earlier Bernard Kouchner was sounding very pitiless.
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 61,451

    Former French President Nicola Sarkozy has told French TV that all those on an official watchlist of suspected radicals should be forced to wear "an electronic tag". He is widely expected to run for the presidency again in 2017.

    And he will win.

    Sarkozy will swing as Right as he needs to do to beat Le Pen.
  • Moses_Moses_ Posts: 4,865


    "We are the NASTY PARTY" - Theresa May

    She didn't actually say that .......but you already knew that.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/2306621.stm

    That will do me.</blockquote


    That will do you? Well it doesn't do me. You placed a quote in inverted commas with the nasty party in capitals ( shouted) . That's not what happened as you knew when you posted.

    So it was a huge porkie then. That will do me.

    You got called out just stop digging.
This discussion has been closed.