Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Undefined discussion subject.

SystemSystem Posts: 12,221
edited November 2015 in General
«134

Comments

  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 119,994
    edited November 2015
    I wrote a few months ago that it would be the Oldies that would win it for Leave
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,421
    Peak Lib Dem
  • chestnutchestnut Posts: 7,341
    FPT
    Pro_Rata said:

    On another note, the error ridden Oxfordshire letters must be the most jaw droppingly hopeless thing Cameron has done in a long, long time.

    The Labour move on parliamentary process is just an niggly opening shot for something they hope will get the kind of wider vague public awareness as, for example, the pasty tax stuck to Osborne. Must admit, playing this kind of Westminster awkward squad game is where Corbyn looks most at home, he seems to be having much more consistent success with it than Miliband ever did (the arithmetic of the houses, of course, favours him better).

    Are councils routinely subjected to external audit to check for waste and inefficiency?

  • I wrote a few months ago that it would be the Oldies that would win it for Leave

    I thought the Huff post poll that you liked to was also very interesting on this and would be worthy of a supplemental thread header.
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 119,994
    edited November 2015

    I wrote a few months ago that it would be the Oldies that would win it for Leave

    I thought the Huff post poll that you liked to was also very interesting on this and would be worthy of a supplemental thread header.
    I think Mike's waiting for the data tables to come out before he does a full thread on that poll.

    ICAMI

    New GQRR poll

    Cameron succeeds in negotiating a better deal from the EU, he adds 10 points to remain

    http://huff.to/1Qx3aGv
  • flightpath01flightpath01 Posts: 4,903
    edited November 2015
    The result of the referendum will be based on the results of the negotiations. Beyond that we have another thread brewing full of sound and fury and nothing else. The EU referendum is going to be one big massive turn off at this rate.
  • Plato_SaysPlato_Says Posts: 11,822
    Great soundbite
    ‘Careless skier’ Merkel has set off migrant avalanche, says German minister http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/news/world/europe/article4612197.ece
  • Whilst we know that voter turnout amongst oldies is high, is that so true of C2DE oldies?
  • CyclefreeCyclefree Posts: 25,346
    The curse of the new thread:-


    In response to NickPalmer who said (FPT)

    "I think it's largely FPTP that prevents very similar voting patterns in Britain (and would you feel that Farage is really worlds apart from Fini?). I'd put Britain somewhere in the upper middle of the European pack with respect to tolerance of races, creeds, etc. - behind Germany and Scandinavia, ahead of France and many Eastern European countries. There is more hostility to consistent tolerance (which critics call "political correctness") in Britain than on much of the Continent - in a funny sort of way, our relaxed culture makes us more tolerant of intolerance ("it was only a joke", "he's not altogether wrong", "it's understandable", etc.)."

    I'm not a Farage supporter but he is not a Fascist. Fini leads a party which is the explicit descendant of Mussolini's party. I think there is a significant difference - and I'm surprised (and a little disappointed, TBH) - that you should not.

    It's that kind of lazy thinking which infuriates me. Fascism is a specific political creed, a nasty one. Being against the EU or unlimited immigration does not make one a fascist.

    As ever Orwell had it right: "The word Fascism has now no meaning except in so far as it signifies "something not desirable"."

    FPTP may have something to do with it but is not the main reason. We are a largely pragmatic bottom up sort of a county where practicality matters more than theory. Partly as a result of that (and many other factors) we have not been prey to or have resisted the furiously murderous passions which have enveloped other European countries despite being, often, subject to the same political and economic whirlwinds. That is to Britain's credit and something to be proud of. It does sometimes feel that those who are in favour of the EU think that Britain's pride in itself is somehow a bad thing.
  • isamisam Posts: 41,118
    As people are so bored of the EU ref, how about Oldham bets?

    Come on,. the prices cant be that good (or do you only play when a poll comes out and you can pick a bookie off? You know who you are)


    Oldham by election

    Labour win by
    0-5 8/1
    5-10 11/2
    10-15 5/2
    15-20 5/2
    20-25 11/2
    25+ 8/1

    Labour lose 8/1

    Match bets

    Ukip 1/6 vs Con 7/2
    Con 1/6 vs Libs 7/2

    Labour winning margin uo 15.5 5/6
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 124,062

    I wrote a few months ago that it would be the Oldies that would win it for Leave

    Or the middle class that win it for Remain, male middle class oldies back In
  • watford30watford30 Posts: 3,474
    chestnut said:

    FPT

    Pro_Rata said:

    On another note, the error ridden Oxfordshire letters must be the most jaw droppingly hopeless thing Cameron has done in a long, long time.

    The Labour move on parliamentary process is just an niggly opening shot for something they hope will get the kind of wider vague public awareness as, for example, the pasty tax stuck to Osborne. Must admit, playing this kind of Westminster awkward squad game is where Corbyn looks most at home, he seems to be having much more consistent success with it than Miliband ever did (the arithmetic of the houses, of course, favours him better).

    Are councils routinely subjected to external audit to check for waste and inefficiency?

    It's a curious tale, since council leader Hudspeth seems 'pro cuts' in an article for the local paper last month.

    http://www.oxfordmail.co.uk/news/13847558.Leader_Ian_Hudspeth_on_the_latest_round_of_cuts_facing_the_county_council/?ref=mr&lp=3
  • Danny565Danny565 Posts: 8,091
    edited November 2015
    Prediction for Holyrood:

    SNP to win 68 out of 73 constituency seats.
    Labour to hold Edinburgh Northern and gain Edinburgh Southern
    Tories to hold Roxburgh & Berwickshire
    Lib Dems to hold both Orkney and Shetland.

    Constituency vote shares:
    SNP 52%
    Labour 27%
    Tories 13%
    Lib Dems 6%

    (This probably counts as an optimistic prediction from SLAB's point of view)
  • Danny565Danny565 Posts: 8,091
    Also, that's a surprisingly weak personal rating for Ruth Davidson given we're always told how great she is.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 124,062
    Danny565 said:

    Prediction for Holyrood:

    SNP to win 68 out of 73 constituency seats.
    Labour to hold Edinburgh Northern and gain Edinburgh Southern
    Tories to hold Roxburgh & Berwickshire
    Lib Dems to hold both Orkney and Shetland.

    Constituency vote shares:
    SNP 52%
    Labour 27%
    Tories 13%
    Lib Dems 6%

    (This probably counts as an optimistic prediction from SLAB's point of view)

    There is no way Edinburgh will vote for Corbyn, it is a Unionist City but prefers Sturgeon to him. Any gains Corbyn makes will it seems be on the list in the Central Belt on the constituency vote the SNP will increase their majority
  • DairDair Posts: 6,108
    Should be noted that Willie Rennie and Tim Farron don't even rate a question about their popularity. Suspect both would be over 80% No Idea Who They Are.
  • Danny565 said:

    Also, that's a surprisingly weak personal rating for Ruth Davidson given we're always told how great she is.

    Yeah, not for the first time the right wing, Unionist commentariat have got themselves a little over excited. Who could forget their fawning over Jim 'I’m Astonished By How Easy It’s Been To Outwit The SNP' Murphy.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,421
    Dair said:

    Should be noted that Willie Rennie and Tim Farron don't even rate a question about their popularity. Suspect both would be over 80% No Idea Who They Are.

    Who ?
  • DairDair Posts: 6,108
    Danny565 said:

    Also, that's a surprisingly weak personal rating for Ruth Davidson given we're always told how great she is.

    She's great in the eyes of the media bubbles in Holyrood and Westminster. Even if you do have a passing interest in Scottish politics, even if you're one of the 20,000 people who watch Scotland 2015, you could watch an entire month of the programme and the Sunday Politics Scotland and never see Ruth Davidson once.

    She is the leader of a minor party which gets coverage in newspapers no-one reads (the Scotsman sells about 15,000 copies a week) and gets very limited TV coverage. I think people outside Scotland don't really get it, To the public, Sturgeon *IS* Scottish politics right now, she's utterly dominant and dominating.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 124,062
    edited November 2015

    Danny565 said:

    Also, that's a surprisingly weak personal rating for Ruth Davidson given we're always told how great she is.

    Yeah, not for the first time the right wing, Unionist commentariat have got themselves a little over excited. Who could forget their fawning over Jim 'I’m Astonished By How Easy It’s Been To Outwit The SNP' Murphy.
    She is less disliked than Cameron or Corbyn and only 10% less disliked than Sturgeon and more liked than Dugdale. In Westminster polls the Tories have made gains in Scotland and are over 20% the SNP below 50% clearly some voters would vote SNP at Holyrood Tory at Westminster
  • Danny565Danny565 Posts: 8,091
    HYUFD said:

    Danny565 said:

    Prediction for Holyrood:

    SNP to win 68 out of 73 constituency seats.
    Labour to hold Edinburgh Northern and gain Edinburgh Southern
    Tories to hold Roxburgh & Berwickshire
    Lib Dems to hold both Orkney and Shetland.

    Constituency vote shares:
    SNP 52%
    Labour 27%
    Tories 13%
    Lib Dems 6%

    (This probably counts as an optimistic prediction from SLAB's point of view)

    There is no way Edinburgh will vote for Corbyn, it is a Unionist City but prefers Sturgeon to him. Any gains Corbyn makes will it seems be on the list in the Central Belt on the constituency vote the SNP will increase their majority
    In England atleast, Corbyn has gone down much better with the young than he has with the Old Labour white working-class vote. If there's a similar pattern in Scotland, that would make Edinburgh more fertile than the very WWC-dominated Central Belt.

    Also, it might seem strange to suggest SLAB could make a gain in a landslide defeat, but Edinburgh Southern still had a big LibDem vote to squeeze in 2011 (which will presumably be more unionist-leaning).
  • DairDair Posts: 6,108
    edited November 2015
    HYUFD said:

    Danny565 said:

    Also, that's a surprisingly weak personal rating for Ruth Davidson given we're always told how great she is.

    Yeah, not for the first time the right wing, Unionist commentariat have got themselves a little over excited. Who could forget their fawning over Jim 'I’m Astonished By How Easy It’s Been To Outwit The SNP' Murphy.
    She is less disliked than Cameron or Corbyn and only 10% less disliked than Sturgeon and more liked than Dugdale. In Westminster polls the Tories have made gains in Scotland and are over 20% the SNP below 50% clearly some voters would vote SNP at Holyrood Tory at Westminster
    You missed the most important part of the approval ratings in the TNS survey.

    Sturgeon is more popular with LABOUR supporters than Kezia Dugdale is.

    Good to see you're still clinging on to meaningless subsamples.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 124,062
    Dair said:

    HYUFD said:

    Danny565 said:

    Also, that's a surprisingly weak personal rating for Ruth Davidson given we're always told how great she is.

    Yeah, not for the first time the right wing, Unionist commentariat have got themselves a little over excited. Who could forget their fawning over Jim 'I’m Astonished By How Easy It’s Been To Outwit The SNP' Murphy.
    She is less disliked than Cameron or Corbyn and only 10% less disliked than Sturgeon and more liked than Dugdale. In Westminster polls the Tories have made gains in Scotland and are over 20% the SNP below 50% clearly some voters would vote SNP at Holyrood Tory at Westminster
    You missed the most important part of the approval ratings in the TNS survey.

    Sturgeon is more popular with LABOUR supporters than Kezia Dugdale is.
    So, that does not dispute my earlier comments on Davidson
  • isamisam Posts: 41,118
    If you're not a Europhile when you're a teenager you've no heart,
    If you're still one when you're 40 you've no brains
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 124,062
    edited November 2015
    Danny565 said:

    HYUFD said:

    Danny565 said:

    Prediction for Holyrood:

    SNP to win 68 out of 73 constituency seats.
    Labour to hold Edinburgh Northern and gain Edinburgh Southern
    Tories to hold Roxburgh & Berwickshire
    Lib Dems to hold both Orkney and Shetland.

    Constituency vote shares:
    SNP 52%
    Labour 27%
    Tories 13%
    Lib Dems 6%

    (This probably counts as an optimistic prediction from SLAB's point of view)

    There is no way Edinburgh will vote for Corbyn, it is a Unionist City but prefers Sturgeon to him. Any gains Corbyn makes will it seems be on the list in the Central Belt on the constituency vote the SNP will increase their majority
    In England atleast, Corbyn has gone down much better with the young than he has with the Old Labour white working-class vote. If there's a similar pattern in Scotland, that would make Edinburgh more fertile than the very WWC-dominated Central Belt.

    Also, it might seem strange to suggest SLAB could make a gain in a landslide defeat, but Edinburgh Southern still had a big LibDem vote to squeeze in 2011 (which will presumably be more unionist-leaning).
    No Labour has big leads in the North and Wales which are more wwc Edinburgh is middle-class and they probably preferred Ed Miliband to Corbyn which was why he held his one Scottish seat in the City. Edinburgh Tories also probably prefer even Sturgeon to Corbyn and will not tactically vote Labour. Scottish LDs are also more centrist than southern LDs
  • The result of the referendum will be based on the results of the negotiations. Beyond that we have another thread brewing full of sound and fury and nothing else. The EU referendum is going to be one big massive turn off at this rate.

    I really cringe at the idea of two years (potentially) reading posts by people on either side. They convince no-one and largely recycle the same ideas of language of their previous posts. As a matter of the preservation of my sanity (what is left of it before dementia strikes :-), I try very hard to ignore any and all such posts..
  • Plato_SaysPlato_Says Posts: 11,822
    :+1:

    The result of the referendum will be based on the results of the negotiations. Beyond that we have another thread brewing full of sound and fury and nothing else. The EU referendum is going to be one big massive turn off at this rate.

    I really cringe at the idea of two years (potentially) reading posts by people on either side. They convince no-one and largely recycle the same ideas of language of their previous posts. As a matter of the preservation of my sanity (what is left of it before dementia strikes :-), I try very hard to ignore any and all such posts..
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,421
    isam said:

    If you're not a Europhile when you're a teenager you've no heart,
    If you're still one when you're 40 you've no brains

    What happens if you're 28 :) ?
  • blackburn63blackburn63 Posts: 4,492

    The result of the referendum will be based on the results of the negotiations. Beyond that we have another thread brewing full of sound and fury and nothing else. The EU referendum is going to be one big massive turn off at this rate.

    That will suit LEAVE perfectly

  • isamisam Posts: 41,118
    Pulpstar said:

    isam said:

    If you're not a Europhile when you're a teenager you've no heart,
    If you're still one when you're 40 you've no brains

    What happens if you're 28 :) ?
    You are allowed to be undecided!

    Is your monicker because you like the group Pulp?
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,421

    The result of the referendum will be based on the results of the negotiations. Beyond that we have another thread brewing full of sound and fury and nothing else. The EU referendum is going to be one big massive turn off at this rate.

    That will suit LEAVE perfectly

    The result of the referendum will be based on the results of the negotiations.

    Not a chance I'm afraid, @Blackburn63. Most people will not care about the renegotiation or lack of it one bit. It will swing only the smallest number of votes (Mine perhaps if Dave gets alot more than he looks to be at the moment), but the general public won't know or care for the details !
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,421
    edited November 2015
    isam said:

    Pulpstar said:

    isam said:

    If you're not a Europhile when you're a teenager you've no heart,
    If you're still one when you're 40 you've no brains

    What happens if you're 28 :) ?
    You are allowed to be undecided!

    Is your monicker because you like the group Pulp?
    No, I needed a name for my character way back in Uni for my Quake 3 character during a LAN party :neutral:. The band "Pulp" may have been in there at a subconcsious level I guess !
  • isamisam Posts: 41,118
    edited November 2015
    Pulpstar said:

    isam said:

    Pulpstar said:

    isam said:

    If you're not a Europhile when you're a teenager you've no heart,
    If you're still one when you're 40 you've no brains

    What happens if you're 28 :) ?
    You are allowed to be undecided!

    Is your monicker because you like the group Pulp?
    No, I needed a name for my character way back in Uni for my Quake 3 character during a LAN party :neutral:. The band "Pulp" may have been in there at a subconcsious level I guess !
    Oh.. Im listening to Different Class as I type.. classic album

    BREXIT
    Lads tote and sky 1/2
    bwin 21/10

    Is that a free fiver for 305?
  • Plato_SaysPlato_Says Posts: 11,822
    When border controls aren't border controls http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/eu/11991098/Migrant-crisis-Donald-Tusk-warns-that-Schengen-is-on-brink-of-collapse-latest-news.html
    Sweden has reinstated border controls in a bid to gain control over the massive influx of migrants arriving in the country. Prime Minister Stefan Lofven insisted: "This is not a fence. We need to make sure that we have control ... We have to make sure we know who is coming to Sweden"...

    Police began carrying out identification checks on passengers travelling on trains crossing the bridge over the Oresund strait from Denmark, an AFP correspondent reported.
  • 1. How is that LD fightback doing in Scotland?
    Innocent face.
    2. When does the LD polling reach the peak of an asterix?
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,421
    edited November 2015
    isam said:

    Pulpstar said:

    isam said:

    If you're not a Europhile when you're a teenager you've no heart,
    If you're still one when you're 40 you've no brains

    What happens if you're 28 :) ?
    You are allowed to be undecided!

    Is your monicker because you like the group Pulp?
    The misses told me she wasn't happy that I was veering towards 'leave'. I asked her why, she replied that the EU protects workers rights. I said that we could protect those outside the EU anyway. "What under the Tories ?!" was her comeback ! I then replied that Gov'ts would come and go of all colours for the ~ 40 years the vote will/should be valid for - the current Gov't shouldn't be the basis of the decision tbh ^_~
  • Anyone know what has happened to JEO? Casino Royale mentioned something about a possible banning yesterday. Has he actually been banned for some reason? A shame, if so.

  • Pulpstar said:

    isam said:

    Pulpstar said:

    isam said:

    If you're not a Europhile when you're a teenager you've no heart,
    If you're still one when you're 40 you've no brains

    What happens if you're 28 :) ?
    You are allowed to be undecided!

    Is your monicker because you like the group Pulp?
    The misses told me she wasn't happy that I was veering towards 'leave'. I asked her why, she replied that the EU protects workers rights. I said that we could protect those outside the EU anyway. "What under the Tories ?!" was her comeback ! I then replied that Gov'ts would come and go of all colours for the ~ 40 years the vote will/should be valid for - the current Gov't shouldn't be the basis of the decision tbh ^_~
    Pretty undemocratic to support the EU on the basis that it imposes legislation that the electorate wouldn't actually choose via the ballot box.

  • isamisam Posts: 41,118
    LucyJones said:

    Pulpstar said:

    isam said:

    Pulpstar said:

    isam said:

    If you're not a Europhile when you're a teenager you've no heart,
    If you're still one when you're 40 you've no brains

    What happens if you're 28 :) ?
    You are allowed to be undecided!

    Is your monicker because you like the group Pulp?
    The misses told me she wasn't happy that I was veering towards 'leave'. I asked her why, she replied that the EU protects workers rights. I said that we could protect those outside the EU anyway. "What under the Tories ?!" was her comeback ! I then replied that Gov'ts would come and go of all colours for the ~ 40 years the vote will/should be valid for - the current Gov't shouldn't be the basis of the decision tbh ^_~
    Pretty undemocratic to support the EU on the basis that it imposes legislation that the electorate wouldn't actually choose via the ballot box.

    That's the entire reason that Labour started to support them if Peter Hitchens documentary "This Sceptic Isle" is to be believed

    Worth a look
  • AnorakAnorak Posts: 6,621
    Pulpstar said:

    The result of the referendum will be based on the results of the negotiations. Beyond that we have another thread brewing full of sound and fury and nothing else. The EU referendum is going to be one big massive turn off at this rate.

    That will suit LEAVE perfectly

    The result of the referendum will be based on the results of the negotiations.

    Not a chance I'm afraid, @Blackburn63. Most people will not care about the renegotiation or lack of it one bit. It will swing only the smallest number of votes (Mine perhaps if Dave gets alot more than he looks to be at the moment), but the general public won't know or care for the details !
    Given how tight the polls are, it wouldn't take much, though, would it.
  • FrankBoothFrankBooth Posts: 9,929
    Danny565 said:

    Also, that's a surprisingly weak personal rating for Ruth Davidson given we're always told how great she is.

    I think it sums up the hopelessness of the Tory situation in Scotland. They've had one good female leader after another and it's done them no good whatsoever.

    'One nation' Dave's approval ratings north of the border look truly abysmal.
  • KenKen Posts: 24
    To the fellow who thinks that Labour will hold Edinburgh Northern & Leith, which happens to be my constituency:

    Malcolm Chisholm will retire at the election and the Labour candidate is Lesley Hinds... Yeah, that woman who messed up the trams. Back in August I was having a pint on the Royal Mile and I fell to talking to a bloke from East Kilbride who must be the last remaining Lib-Dem member in that part of the country. As soon as I told him where I lived her started chortling and said that EN&L was the constituency where they hoped to save their deposit, all thanks to Lesley Hinds.

    Needless to say, I will be voting SNP in the seat. Probably Labour for the Lothian list.
  • tlg86tlg86 Posts: 26,223
    Ken said:

    To the fellow who thinks that Labour will hold Edinburgh Northern & Leith, which happens to be my constituency:

    Malcolm Chisholm will retire at the election and the Labour candidate is Lesley Hinds... Yeah, that woman who messed up the trams. Back in August I was having a pint on the Royal Mile and I fell to talking to a bloke from East Kilbride who must be the last remaining Lib-Dem member in that part of the country. As soon as I told him where I lived her started chortling and said that EN&L was the constituency where they hoped to save their deposit, all thanks to Lesley Hinds.

    Needless to say, I will be voting SNP in the seat. Probably Labour for the Lothian list.

    Ha! So there is a logical reason for voting SNP constituency and Labour list!
  • blackburn63blackburn63 Posts: 4,492
    Pulpstar said:

    The result of the referendum will be based on the results of the negotiations. Beyond that we have another thread brewing full of sound and fury and nothing else. The EU referendum is going to be one big massive turn off at this rate.

    That will suit LEAVE perfectly

    The result of the referendum will be based on the results of the negotiations.

    Not a chance I'm afraid, @Blackburn63. Most people will not care about the renegotiation or lack of it one bit. It will swing only the smallest number of votes (Mine perhaps if Dave gets alot more than he looks to be at the moment), but the general public won't know or care for the details !
    Exactly my point, the OUTERs are far more determined than the INNERs, ambivalence is great news for us.

    The minor details of negotiation and outcome are lost on the majority of the electorate, they will follow their instincts, and those most likely to vote are those who want to change things in this instance.

    IN is still favourite but the gap is closing. Remember when Brown delayed the election and was called frit? That's what will happen with Dave.

  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,421
    isam said:

    LucyJones said:

    Pulpstar said:

    isam said:

    Pulpstar said:

    isam said:

    If you're not a Europhile when you're a teenager you've no heart,
    If you're still one when you're 40 you've no brains

    What happens if you're 28 :) ?
    You are allowed to be undecided!

    Is your monicker because you like the group Pulp?
    The misses told me she wasn't happy that I was veering towards 'leave'. I asked her why, she replied that the EU protects workers rights. I said that we could protect those outside the EU anyway. "What under the Tories ?!" was her comeback ! I then replied that Gov'ts would come and go of all colours for the ~ 40 years the vote will/should be valid for - the current Gov't shouldn't be the basis of the decision tbh ^_~
    Pretty undemocratic to support the EU on the basis that it imposes legislation that the electorate wouldn't actually choose via the ballot box.

    That's the entire reason that Labour started to support them if Peter Hitchens documentary "This Sceptic Isle" is to be believed

    Worth a look
    She couldn't believe it when she was agreeing with him on the last QT !
  • JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 43,536
    LucyJones said:

    Anyone know what has happened to JEO? Casino Royale mentioned something about a possible banning yesterday. Has he actually been banned for some reason? A shame, if so.

    We're not supposed to discuss banning, but his account suddenly appeared as banned, and I've no idea why: his posts that morning seemed innocuous enough, unless one was deleted. He then came back as JEO2, and I haven't seen anything from him since.

    Either he or CR asked if it was a geographic issue due to where he was posting from.

    If he has been banned, then it's a shame. Let's hope it's not a long one.

    (And on that basis, have totally broken the rule not discuss bans ... )
  • Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 28,917

    Danny565 said:

    Also, that's a surprisingly weak personal rating for Ruth Davidson given we're always told how great she is.

    I think it sums up the hopelessness of the Tory situation in Scotland. They've had one good female leader after another and it's done them no good whatsoever.

    'One nation' Dave's approval ratings north of the border look truly abysmal.
    They need to break away North of the border.
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 54,040
    This was the TNS poll on 3rd May 2011 : http://www.tns-bmrb.co.uk/uploads/files/may-2011-voting-intentions-poll_1304440562.pdf

    This was the result 2 days later: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scottish_Parliament_election,_2011

    Not even close.

    Why do people still bother to waste their money this way?

    (Yes, this does mean I do not like what they have found. But still.)
  • AnorakAnorak Posts: 6,621
    Is it just me, or are posts discussing other posters being 'disappeared'? No names mentioned as the ban hammer seems to be hovering over our collective heads at the mo.
  • Richard_NabaviRichard_Nabavi Posts: 30,822
    edited November 2015
    I'm impressed that 21% of Scots, according to this poll, don't know who Jeremy Corbyn is.

    Edit: For that matter, 5% don't know who Nicola Sturgeon is!
  • AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    It's border control but not as we know it.

    When border controls aren't border controls http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/eu/11991098/Migrant-crisis-Donald-Tusk-warns-that-Schengen-is-on-brink-of-collapse-latest-news.html

    Sweden has reinstated border controls in a bid to gain control over the massive influx of migrants arriving in the country. Prime Minister Stefan Lofven insisted: "This is not a fence. We need to make sure that we have control ... We have to make sure we know who is coming to Sweden"...

    Police began carrying out identification checks on passengers travelling on trains crossing the bridge over the Oresund strait from Denmark, an AFP correspondent reported.
  • ReggieCideReggieCide Posts: 4,312
    Dair said:

    Danny565 said:

    Also, that's a surprisingly weak personal rating for Ruth Davidson given we're always told how great she is.

    She's great in the eyes of the media bubbles in Holyrood and Westminster. Even if you do have a passing interest in Scottish politics, even if you're one of the 20,000 people who watch Scotland 2015, you could watch an entire month of the programme and the Sunday Politics Scotland and never see Ruth Davidson once.

    She is the leader of a minor party which gets coverage in newspapers no-one reads (the Scotsman sells about 15,000 copies a week) and gets very limited TV coverage. I think people outside Scotland don't really get it, To the public, Sturgeon *IS* Scottish politics right now, she's utterly dominant and dominating.
    A couple of genuine questions from an Englishman with Scottish ancestry (1) does NS's dominance make her more or less vulnerable to any "bad news"? (2) it is blindingly obvious that NS is extremely popular with the considerable majority of Scots (not my friends & family I have to say) but to what extent is SNP popularity dependent upon hers?
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 54,040

    I'm impressed that 21% of Scots, according to this poll, don't know who Jeremy Corbyn is.

    Bearded fellow? Badly dressed? Not too bright?

    That's the one.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,421
    Anorak said:

    Is it just me, or are posts discussing other posters being 'disappeared'? No names mentioned as the ban hammer seems to be hovering over our collective heads at the mo.

    Don't mention Reggie Perrin !
  • Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 28,917
    isam said:

    If you're not a Europhile when you're a teenager you've no heart,
    If you're still one when you're 40 you've no brains

    Well I never had any heart then - or perhaps I just had extra brains.
  • NickPalmerNickPalmer Posts: 21,572
    Cyclefree said:



    I'm not a Farage supporter but he is not a Fascist. Fini leads a party which is the explicit descendant of Mussolini's party. I think there is a significant difference - and I'm surprised (and a little disappointed, TBH) - that you should not.

    It's that kind of lazy thinking which infuriates me. Fascism is a specific political creed, a nasty one. Being against the EU or unlimited immigration does not make one a fascist.

    As ever Orwell had it right: "The word Fascism has now no meaning except in so far as it signifies "something not desirable"."

    FPTP may have something to do with it but is not the main reason. We are a largely pragmatic bottom up sort of a county where practicality matters more than theory. Partly as a result of that (and many other factors) we have not been prey to or have resisted the furiously murderous passions which have enveloped other European countries despite being, often, subject to the same political and economic whirlwinds. That is to Britain's credit and something to be proud of. It does sometimes feel that those who are in favour of the EU think that Britain's pride in itself is somehow a bad thing.

    Aren't you making my point? I'm not that expert on Italian politics, but Mussolini is a long time ago, and parties evolve. I'd be surprised if most of the supporters of Fini's party could define, let alone support, the specific creed of fascism. As you say, they might be inhospitable to immigrants or Eurosceptics (both of which seem fair descriptions of typical UKIP voters), but that doesn't make them fascists.

    I agree that Britain is more pragmatic than most European countries, and it insulates us against violence extremism, and as you say that's something to be proud of. Unfortunately that also makes us pragmatic about a level of xenophobia which would suprise most people (though not the minority of Front National voters, of course) in many Western European countries. The Sun is quite mainstream in Britain; its counterpart in Germany, Bild-Zeitung, is a rare exception, and it doesn't really have a counterpart at all in France or Denmark.

    I'm not saying that the balance is bad - the benefits of pragmatism are strong. But overall the same currents of opinion that we have here are recognisable in every Western European country, and it's a mistake if we think we're either far superior or far worse - we're a bit different, but probably not as different as we think.
  • AlistairAlistair Posts: 23,670
    Ken said:

    To the fellow who thinks that Labour will hold Edinburgh Northern & Leith, which happens to be my constituency:

    There is even less chance of Labour holding EN&L at Holyrood than there was in the General Election. The boundaries of EN&L are different for Holyrood than they are for Westminster

    Westminster Edinburgh North & Leith takes in the New town city centre, Stock Bridge, Trinity, Fettess and all those million pound town houses. Holyrood Edinburgh North and Leith ditches the city centre, Stock Bridge, Fettes, Craigleith and all those pricey Inverleith town houses and instead takes in more Blackhall and err Leith into the constituency.

    If your working theory is that C2DEs vote SNP then the Holyrood version of EN&L massively reduces the number of ABC1s and boosts the number of C2DEs
  • Danny565Danny565 Posts: 8,091
    Pulpstar said:

    isam said:

    LucyJones said:

    Pulpstar said:

    isam said:

    Pulpstar said:

    isam said:

    If you're not a Europhile when you're a teenager you've no heart,
    If you're still one when you're 40 you've no brains

    What happens if you're 28 :) ?
    You are allowed to be undecided!

    Is your monicker because you like the group Pulp?
    The misses told me she wasn't happy that I was veering towards 'leave'. I asked her why, she replied that the EU protects workers rights. I said that we could protect those outside the EU anyway. "What under the Tories ?!" was her comeback ! I then replied that Gov'ts would come and go of all colours for the ~ 40 years the vote will/should be valid for - the current Gov't shouldn't be the basis of the decision tbh ^_~
    Pretty undemocratic to support the EU on the basis that it imposes legislation that the electorate wouldn't actually choose via the ballot box.

    That's the entire reason that Labour started to support them if Peter Hitchens documentary "This Sceptic Isle" is to be believed

    Worth a look
    She couldn't believe it when she was agreeing with him on the last QT !
    I was nodding my head vigorously to Hitchens far too much for my comfort when he was on QT.
  • AlistairAlistair Posts: 23,670
    It's pretty vital for anyone looking to bet on Holyrood constituency results to understand the difference between the Westminster and Holyrood boundaries.

    http://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/election-maps/gb/
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,421
    I think Nicola Sturgeon is to the SNP now, as Margaret Thatcher was to the Conservatives in the 80s.
  • AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    edited November 2015
    Oil price in freefall. Now down to $44.82.

    http://www.bloomberg.com/energy

    Something to do with Chinese steel?...
  • CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758
    Pulpstar said:

    Dair said:

    Should be noted that Willie Rennie and Tim Farron don't even rate a question about their popularity. Suspect both would be over 80% No Idea Who They Are.

    Who ?
    I think he means Tim Fallon?
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 54,040
    isam said:

    If you're not a Europhile when you're a teenager you've no heart,
    If you're still one when you're 40 you've no brains

    And if you really don't care at any age you are in the vast majority.
  • So Leave need to target the ABC classes in the 35-54 bracket, IMHO.

    The younger (than that) won't vote.
  • I'm shocked at few Scots actively like the eminently likeable Ruth Davidson.

    She's far nicer than Sturgeon.
  • Plato_SaysPlato_Says Posts: 11,822
    :lol:
    Pulpstar said:

    I think Nicola Sturgeon is to the SNP now, as Margaret Thatcher was to the Conservatives in the 80s.

  • LucyJonesLucyJones Posts: 651
    edited November 2015

    LucyJones said:

    Anyone know what has happened to JEO? Casino Royale mentioned something about a possible banning yesterday. Has he actually been banned for some reason? A shame, if so.

    We're not supposed to discuss banning, but his account suddenly appeared as banned, and I've no idea why: his posts that morning seemed innocuous enough, unless one was deleted. He then came back as JEO2, and I haven't seen anything from him since.

    Either he or CR asked if it was a geographic issue due to where he was posting from.

    If he has been banned, then it's a shame. Let's hope it's not a long one.

    (And on that basis, have totally broken the rule not discuss bans ... )
    Not for me to say whether bans are right or wrong. I just think it must be frustrating to be banned without any warning or explanation when you can't see what you did that was wrong. Sometimes, when people have been banned, I could see it coming a mile off. Other occasions have left me perplexed.

    (And if I say much more, I'll probably be banned myself. That is, if I haven't already overstepped the mark. Hope not. Still, at least I would get a bit more work done. )

  • Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 28,917

    LucyJones said:

    Anyone know what has happened to JEO? Casino Royale mentioned something about a possible banning yesterday. Has he actually been banned for some reason? A shame, if so.

    We're not supposed to discuss banning, but his account suddenly appeared as banned, and I've no idea why: his posts that morning seemed innocuous enough, unless one was deleted. He then came back as JEO2, and I haven't seen anything from him since.

    Either he or CR asked if it was a geographic issue due to where he was posting from.

    If he has been banned, then it's a shame. Let's hope it's not a long one.

    (And on that basis, have totally broken the rule not discuss bans ... )
    Aropos of this, I have always had a feeling that JEO was a reincarnated Socrates. One is a Tory turned Kipper, the other is a Tory with Kipper sympathies. Both just seem to have extremely similar posting styles and concerns.

    I've mentioned it once before and been contradicted, not sure on what basis. I am not insisting I am right on this, I could well be totally wrong.
  • Via John Rentoul, an excerpt from Gary Gibbons' blog:

    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CTj3Xg1WwAEDYoN.png

    It seems very dangerous to me to underestimate your opponent.
  • AlistairAlistair Posts: 23,670
    edited November 2015

    Dair said:

    Danny565 said:

    Also, that's a surprisingly weak personal rating for Ruth Davidson given we're always told how great she is.

    She's great in the eyes of the media bubbles in Holyrood and Westminster. Even if you do have a passing interest in Scottish politics, even if you're one of the 20,000 people who watch Scotland 2015, you could watch an entire month of the programme and the Sunday Politics Scotland and never see Ruth Davidson once.

    She is the leader of a minor party which gets coverage in newspapers no-one reads (the Scotsman sells about 15,000 copies a week) and gets very limited TV coverage. I think people outside Scotland don't really get it, To the public, Sturgeon *IS* Scottish politics right now, she's utterly dominant and dominating.
    A couple of genuine questions from an Englishman with Scottish ancestry (1) does NS's dominance make her more or less vulnerable to any "bad news"? (2) it is blindingly obvious that NS is extremely popular with the considerable majority of Scots (not my friends & family I have to say) but to what extent is SNP popularity dependent upon hers?
    1) I think she is less vulnerable to bad news. Obviously it would depend on how bad but the run of the will stuff that has been chucked at her has slid off with barely a mark.

    2) Prior to NS it was assumed that the SNPs popularity was entirely down to Alex Salmond (which explained by SLab spent the entirety of the last decade attacking Alex Salmond rather than the SNP). So I don't think it is a given that the SNP's popularity is dependent on her.

    Bascially, people who hate the SNP (and who really, really hate(d) Salmond) are bemused about why everyone doesn't hate the SNP so construct their attacks in incoherent ways that must look self-evident to them but causes other people to just shrug their shoulders.
  • CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758

    So Leave need to target the ABC classes in the 35-54 bracket, IMHO.

    The younger (than that) won't vote.

    i.e. you... ;)
  • LucyJones said:

    Anyone know what has happened to JEO? Casino Royale mentioned something about a possible banning yesterday. Has he actually been banned for some reason? A shame, if so.

    We're not supposed to discuss banning, but his account suddenly appeared as banned, and I've no idea why: his posts that morning seemed innocuous enough, unless one was deleted. He then came back as JEO2, and I haven't seen anything from him since.

    Either he or CR asked if it was a geographic issue due to where he was posting from.

    If he has been banned, then it's a shame. Let's hope it's not a long one.

    (And on that basis, have totally broken the rule not discuss bans ... )
    I have chased this a couple of times. Sadly I've heard nothing back yet.

    I assume if he's not posting on here he hasn't heard yet.
  • AlistairAlistair Posts: 23,670
    antifrank said:

    Via John Rentoul, an excerpt from Gary Gibbons' blog:

    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CTj3Xg1WwAEDYoN.png

    It seems very dangerous to me to underestimate your opponent.

    That's right up there with not focus grouping "The Big Society" in 2010. I don't believe it.
  • AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    "The European Union could break up within months as the migration crisis pushes member states to take unilateral measures to protect their borders, the bloc’s longest-serving foreign minister said yesterday.
    The warning from Jean Asselborn of Luxembourg came as 30,000 refugees and migrants prepared to pour into the Balkans. The latest wave is made up mainly of people who were stranded on the Greek islands last week by a four-day ferry strike."


    http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/news/world/europe/article4610721.ece
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 54,040
    Alistair said:

    Dair said:

    Danny565 said:

    Also, that's a surprisingly weak personal rating for Ruth Davidson given we're always told how great she is.

    She's great in the eyes of the media bubbles in Holyrood and Westminster. Even if you do have a passing interest in Scottish politics, even if you're one of the 20,000 people who watch Scotland 2015, you could watch an entire month of the programme and the Sunday Politics Scotland and never see Ruth Davidson once.

    She is the leader of a minor party which gets coverage in newspapers no-one reads (the Scotsman sells about 15,000 copies a week) and gets very limited TV coverage. I think people outside Scotland don't really get it, To the public, Sturgeon *IS* Scottish politics right now, she's utterly dominant and dominating.
    A couple of genuine questions from an Englishman with Scottish ancestry (1) does NS's dominance make her more or less vulnerable to any "bad news"? (2) it is blindingly obvious that NS is extremely popular with the considerable majority of Scots (not my friends & family I have to say) but to what extent is SNP popularity dependent upon hers?
    1) I think she is less vulnerable to bad news. Obviously it would depend on how bad but the run of the will stuff that has been chucked at her has slid off with barely a mark.

    2) Prior to NS it was assumed that the SNPs popularity was entirely down to Alex Salmond (which explained by SLab spent the entirety of the last decade attacking Alex Salmond rather than the SNP). So I don't think it is a given that the SNP's popularity is dependent on her.

    Bascially, people who hate the SNP (and who really, really hate(d) Salmond) are bemused about why everyone doesn't hate the SNP so construct their attacks in incoherent ways that must look self-evident to them but causes other people to just shrug their shoulders.
    Personally I like Nicola Sturgeon a lot more than Salmond who had a smug gitness that frankly needed a punch. Her first step as First Minister was to get rid of the two most useless ministers in Salmond's administration and that impressed me too.

    I am resigned to another SNP majority government but I think that the tories will do better and Labour worse than the TNS poll indicates.
  • antifrank said:

    Via John Rentoul, an excerpt from Gary Gibbons' blog:

    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CTj3Xg1WwAEDYoN.png

    It seems very dangerous to me to underestimate your opponent.

    That doesn't sound like the Tories' regular MO. Perhaps they're just being prudent, and not wanting to waste money in case it turns out to be AN Other...
  • Charles said:

    So Leave need to target the ABC classes in the 35-54 bracket, IMHO.

    The younger (than that) won't vote.

    i.e. you... ;)
    I will vote!
  • Plato_SaysPlato_Says Posts: 11,822
    There's also been a bit of polling about Corbyn's various gaffes like the National Anthem, I don't see much point focus grouping Corbyn for a while yet, the newspaper polling is quite clear for now.

    antifrank said:

    Via John Rentoul, an excerpt from Gary Gibbons' blog:

    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CTj3Xg1WwAEDYoN.png

    It seems very dangerous to me to underestimate your opponent.

    That doesn't sound like the Tories' regular MO. Perhaps they're just being prudent, and not wanting to waste money in case it turns out to be AN Other...
  • With the Lib Dems below 5% is it not becoming time to drop them into the category of "others"?
  • So Leave need to target the ABC classes in the 35-54 bracket, IMHO.

    The younger (than that) won't vote.

    Is there evidence that the younger ABC 18-34 don't vote? I'm 33 and have voted in every election since turning 18, I strongly suspect it is the C2DE who are much less likely to vote.
  • ReggieCideReggieCide Posts: 4,312

    When border controls aren't border controls http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/eu/11991098/Migrant-crisis-Donald-Tusk-warns-that-Schengen-is-on-brink-of-collapse-latest-news.html

    Sweden has reinstated border controls in a bid to gain control over the massive influx of migrants arriving in the country. Prime Minister Stefan Lofven insisted: "This is not a fence. We need to make sure that we have control ... We have to make sure we know who is coming to Sweden"...

    Police began carrying out identification checks on passengers travelling on trains crossing the bridge over the Oresund strait from Denmark, an AFP correspondent reported.
    I saw it reported this morning that the rationale for this move was that " we were bussing them in from the border but many of them disappeared before registering". That makes it sound like they weren't playing fair. Surely not.
  • LucyJones said:

    LucyJones said:

    Anyone know what has happened to JEO? Casino Royale mentioned something about a possible banning yesterday. Has he actually been banned for some reason? A shame, if so.

    We're not supposed to discuss banning, but his account suddenly appeared as banned, and I've no idea why: his posts that morning seemed innocuous enough, unless one was deleted. He then came back as JEO2, and I haven't seen anything from him since.

    Either he or CR asked if it was a geographic issue due to where he was posting from.

    If he has been banned, then it's a shame. Let's hope it's not a long one.

    (And on that basis, have totally broken the rule not discuss bans ... )
    Not for me to say whether bans are right or wrong. I just think it must be frustrating to be banned without any warning or explanation when you can't see what you did that was wrong. Sometimes, when people have been banned, I could see it coming a mile off. Other occasions have left me perplexed.

    (And if I say much more, I'll probably be banned myself. That is, if I haven't already overstepped the mark. Hope not. Still, at least I would get a bit more work done. )

    The general rule is: don't piss off OGH.

    Which I'm sure I've done in the past. The difference is he knows who I am and I've been around a very long time, so seems to put up with me - so far!

    None of us must ever forget it's his blog.
  • AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    It looks like the only reason Remain is ahead is because of heavy support with young, educated/well-off voters:

    Men 18-54 ABC1: Remain 53%, Leave 31%
    Women 18-54 ABC1: Remain 52%, Leave 27%

    Men 55+ ABC1: Remain 46%, Leave 46%
    Women 55+ ABC1: Remain 39%, Leave 45%

    Men 18-54 C2DE: Remain 38%, Leave 42%
    Women 18-54 C2DE: Remain 34%, Leave 34%

    Men 55+ C2DE: Remain 30%, Leave 59%
    Women 55+ C2DE: Remain 22%, Leave 57%

    https://gqrr.app.box.com/s/lpha0zg5y4k1t4sa2czfuczv7dw0h3wb
  • AndyJS said:

    Oil price in freefall. Now down to $44.82.

    http://www.bloomberg.com/energy

    Something to do with Chinese steel?...

    On balance this should help us with inflation, but be bad news as far as government revenues are concerned. Not terribly good news for an independent Scotland. Correct my maths but 44 is a lot less than 150.
  • CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758

    Charles said:

    So Leave need to target the ABC classes in the 35-54 bracket, IMHO.

    The younger (than that) won't vote.

    i.e. you... ;)
    I will vote!
    I was putting you in the ABC1 35-54 bracket...
  • DairDair Posts: 6,108
    LucyJones said:

    Pulpstar said:

    isam said:

    Pulpstar said:

    isam said:

    If you're not a Europhile when you're a teenager you've no heart,
    If you're still one when you're 40 you've no brains

    What happens if you're 28 :) ?
    You are allowed to be undecided!

    Is your monicker because you like the group Pulp?
    The misses told me she wasn't happy that I was veering towards 'leave'. I asked her why, she replied that the EU protects workers rights. I said that we could protect those outside the EU anyway. "What under the Tories ?!" was her comeback ! I then replied that Gov'ts would come and go of all colours for the ~ 40 years the vote will/should be valid for - the current Gov't shouldn't be the basis of the decision tbh ^_~
    Pretty undemocratic to support the EU on the basis that it imposes legislation that the electorate wouldn't actually choose via the ballot box.

    37% does not represent the choice of the electorate.

    And on this issue, UKIP counts with the rest so you can't even use that cheat.
  • Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826
    edited November 2015

    AndyJS said:

    Oil price in freefall. Now down to $44.82.

    http://www.bloomberg.com/energy

    Something to do with Chinese steel?...

    On balance this should help us with inflation, but be bad news as far as government revenues are concerned. Not terribly good news for an independent Scotland. Correct my maths but 44 is a lot less than 150.
    Good news overall for the UK, terrible news for Canada and some other places. Would have been an unmitigated disaster for an independent Scotland.
  • Sean_FSean_F Posts: 37,558
    Yougov have just published a poll for Prospect, conducted on 19th October, showing Remain 42% to Leave 40%, with the usual differences by age, class, and political outlook.
  • Sean_FSean_F Posts: 37,558

    So Leave need to target the ABC classes in the 35-54 bracket, IMHO.

    The younger (than that) won't vote.

    Is there evidence that the younger ABC 18-34 don't vote? I'm 33 and have voted in every election since turning 18, I strongly suspect it is the C2DE who are much less likely to vote.
    I think students generally have a poor voting record.
  • Sean_FSean_F Posts: 37,558
    AndyJS said:

    It looks like the only reason Remain is ahead is because of heavy support with young, educated/well-off voters:

    Men 18-54 ABC1: Remain 53%, Leave 31%
    Women 18-54 ABC1: Remain 52%, Leave 27%

    Men 55+ ABC1: Remain 46%, Leave 46%
    Women 55+ ABC1: Remain 39%, Leave 45%

    Men 18-54 C2DE: Remain 38%, Leave 42%
    Women 18-54 C2DE: Remain 34%, Leave 34%

    Men 55+ C2DE: Remain 30%, Leave 59%
    Women 55+ C2DE: Remain 22%, Leave 57%

    https://gqrr.app.box.com/s/lpha0zg5y4k1t4sa2czfuczv7dw0h3wb

    Although differences by gender aren't huge, older women tend to be more Eurosceptic than older men, whereas the reverse is true among younger men and women.
  • When border controls aren't border controls http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/eu/11991098/Migrant-crisis-Donald-Tusk-warns-that-Schengen-is-on-brink-of-collapse-latest-news.html

    Sweden has reinstated border controls in a bid to gain control over the massive influx of migrants arriving in the country. Prime Minister Stefan Lofven insisted: "This is not a fence. We need to make sure that we have control ... We have to make sure we know who is coming to Sweden"...

    Police began carrying out identification checks on passengers travelling on trains crossing the bridge over the Oresund strait from Denmark, an AFP correspondent reported.
    The end of Schengen would be a good thing as far as the UK is concerned. However it's 'end' is likely to be just a 'suspension' not a total repeal.
  • Sean_F said:

    Yougov have just published a poll for Prospect, conducted on 19th October, showing Remain 42% to Leave 40%, with the usual differences by age, class, and political outlook.

    Yougov are usually more favourable to Leave than other pollsters as shown in a thread recently.
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 43,049
    DavidL said:

    I'm impressed that 21% of Scots, according to this poll, don't know who Jeremy Corbyn is.

    Bearded fellow? Badly dressed? Not too bright?

    That's the one.
    with more charisma than Dave according to a legit poll, wasn't NPXMPX2 saying this morning?
  • ReggieCideReggieCide Posts: 4,312

    Danny565 said:

    Also, that's a surprisingly weak personal rating for Ruth Davidson given we're always told how great she is.

    I think it sums up the hopelessness of the Tory situation in Scotland. They've had one good female leader after another and it's done them no good whatsoever.

    'One nation' Dave's approval ratings north of the border look truly abysmal.
    Being English in Scotland makes you unelectable to public office in Scotland; this does not apply to Scots in England. A Scot even gets elected mayor of Newham and subsidises the local football club's cost of playing at the Olympic Stadium. There are of course many examples. I'd be interested if anyone knows of an Englishman being elected to public office in Scotland.
  • LucyJones said:

    Anyone know what has happened to JEO? Casino Royale mentioned something about a possible banning yesterday. Has he actually been banned for some reason? A shame, if so.

    We're not supposed to discuss banning, but his account suddenly appeared as banned, and I've no idea why: his posts that morning seemed innocuous enough, unless one was deleted. He then came back as JEO2, and I haven't seen anything from him since.

    Either he or CR asked if it was a geographic issue due to where he was posting from.

    If he has been banned, then it's a shame. Let's hope it's not a long one.

    (And on that basis, have totally broken the rule not discuss bans ... )
    Aropos of this, I have always had a feeling that JEO was a reincarnated Socrates. One is a Tory turned Kipper, the other is a Tory with Kipper sympathies. Both just seem to have extremely similar posting styles and concerns.

    I've mentioned it once before and been contradicted, not sure on what basis. I am not insisting I am right on this, I could well be totally wrong.
    I am pretty sure but not 100% that JEO was not Socrates. Socrates and I were extremely close in most of our opinions and I did not get the same vibe from JEO although I did agree with much of what he said.

    I hope both come back eventually.
  • DairDair Posts: 6,108

    Dair said:

    Danny565 said:

    Also, that's a surprisingly weak personal rating for Ruth Davidson given we're always told how great she is.

    She's great in the eyes of the media bubbles in Holyrood and Westminster. Even if you do have a passing interest in Scottish politics, even if you're one of the 20,000 people who watch Scotland 2015, you could watch an entire month of the programme and the Sunday Politics Scotland and never see Ruth Davidson once.

    She is the leader of a minor party which gets coverage in newspapers no-one reads (the Scotsman sells about 15,000 copies a week) and gets very limited TV coverage. I think people outside Scotland don't really get it, To the public, Sturgeon *IS* Scottish politics right now, she's utterly dominant and dominating.
    A couple of genuine questions from an Englishman with Scottish ancestry (1) does NS's dominance make her more or less vulnerable to any "bad news"? (2) it is blindingly obvious that NS is extremely popular with the considerable majority of Scots (not my friends & family I have to say) but to what extent is SNP popularity dependent upon hers?
    Both the party and the leader are popular, jointly and separately.

    The SNP as a party have done a magnificent job. The overall position of the NHS, Police, Education (what the newspapers try and find specific metrics to bash the SNP over) are all substantially better in totalis than the same service in England.

    Nicola (who I met a few times about 15 years ago and had quite a few mutual acquaintances) has gone from being a bit of a prickly pear with limited social skills to being a warm, friendly and engaging individual and in the public mind can do little wrong.

    There probably isn't a conceivable shock that could occur to derail this at the moment. The Tories will never be an option, Labour and the Liberals have not just bad but utterly abysmal records in government. This makes the leader almost irrelevant. Until people don't just want change but have actually FORGOTTEN the record of Labour and the Liberals then this cannot change.
  • DairDair Posts: 6,108

    I'm shocked at few Scots actively like the eminently likeable Ruth Davidson.

    She's far nicer than Sturgeon.

    Most of them don't have an opinion because they never see or hear from her.
  • ReggieCideReggieCide Posts: 4,312

    Cyclefree said:



    I'm not a Farage supporter but he is not a Fascist. Fini leads a party which is the explicit descendant of Mussolini's party. I think there is a significant difference - and I'm surprised (and a little disappointed, TBH) - that you should not.

    It's that kind of lazy thinking which infuriates me. Fascism is a specific political creed, a nasty one. Being against the EU or unlimited immigration does not make one a fascist.

    As ever Orwell had it right: "The word Fascism has now no meaning except in so far as it signifies "something not desirable"."

    FPTP may have something to do with it but is not the main reason. We are a largely pragmatic bottom up sort of a county where practicality matters more than theory. Partly as a result of that (and many other factors) we have not been prey to or have resisted the furiously murderous passions which have enveloped other European countries despite being, often, subject to the same political and economic whirlwinds. That is to Britain's credit and something to be proud of. It does sometimes feel that those who are in favour of the EU think that Britain's pride in itself is somehow a bad thing.

    Aren't you making my point? I'm not that expert on Italian politics, but Mussolini is a long time ago, and parties evolve. I'd be surprised if most of the supporters of Fini's party could define, let alone support, the specific creed of fascism. As you say, they might be inhospitable to immigrants or Eurosceptics (both of which seem fair descriptions of typical UKIP voters), but that doesn't make them fascists.

    I agree that Britain is more pragmatic than most European countries, and it insulates us against violence extremism, and as you say that's something to be proud of. Unfortunately that also makes us pragmatic about a level of xenophobia which would suprise most people (though not the minority of Front National voters, of course) in many Western European countries. The Sun is quite mainstream in Britain; its counterpart in Germany, Bild-Zeitung, is a rare exception, and it doesn't really have a counterpart at all in France or Denmark.

    I'm not saying that the balance is bad - the benefits of pragmatism are strong. But overall the same currents of opinion that we have here are recognisable in every Western European country, and it's a mistake if we think we're either far superior or far worse - we're a bit different, but probably not as different as we think.
    I think you define your lack of expertise too narrowly.
  • Sean_F said:

    So Leave need to target the ABC classes in the 35-54 bracket, IMHO.

    The younger (than that) won't vote.

    Is there evidence that the younger ABC 18-34 don't vote? I'm 33 and have voted in every election since turning 18, I strongly suspect it is the C2DE who are much less likely to vote.
    I think students generally have a poor voting record.
    34 year olds are not students. I suspect graduates have a better voting record than non-grads of the same age.
  • DairDair Posts: 6,108
    Pulpstar said:

    I think Nicola Sturgeon is to the SNP now, as Margaret Thatcher was to the Conservatives in the 80s.

    To a certain extent. Sturgeon (as, by definition the entire SNP) are conviction politicians which have not existed at the national level since Thatcher. The idea of persuading people to accept your argument instead of just changing your tune based on the latest opinion polling is anathema to the current generation of politicians.

    However, the Sturgeon isn't a 100% conviction politician like Thatcher was. She will compromise on non core issues and bend with the wind. But compared to a Cameron or Miliband it is like night and day.
This discussion has been closed.