politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Tonight’s PB quickie poll and this week’s local elections results
Risedale on Barrow in Furness (Lab defence) Result: Labour 428 (53% -24%), United Kingdom Independence Party 193 (24% +1%), Conservative 187 (23%, no candidate in 2015) Labour HOLD with a majority of 235 (29%) on a swing of 12.5% from Lab to UKIP
No is the answer to the poll. Probably because he doesn't want it and if DC goes under an EU referendum cloud then someone from the Out camp will get it. But mainly 'cos my book is laying him!
Isn't calling a charity shop for the homeless Crack + Cider quite offensive. Not entirely surprising when the liberal elite react like this when encountering the lower classes:
Wow. Not been following the footie at all! What happened
They have imploded with Mourinho in full meltdown.
As a Liverpool fan tomorrow is exciting in a different way to playing at Stamford Bridge normally is. Chelsea still have to be favourites I suspect but if we win then could that be the final straw for Mourinho?
Is there much new about the Titanic? It's well known that it's steel was inferior and its rivetting flawed. And of course it's watertight doors did not go from top to bottom. Many many more could have been saved if they'd had a proper evacuation plan and had filled all their lifeboats to capacity.
Wow. Not been following the footie at all! What happened
They have imploded with Mourinho in full meltdown.
As a Liverpool fan tomorrow is exciting in a different way to playing at Stamford Bridge normally is. Chelsea still have to be favourites I suspect but if we win then could that be the final straw for Mourinho?
I hope he goes whatever the result, I can't stand the childish egomaniac. We have superb attacking players but play the dullest football imaginable, worse still we have some superb youngsters that will never get a chance under Mourinho.
Wow. Not been following the footie at all! What happened
They have imploded with Mourinho in full meltdown.
As a Liverpool fan tomorrow is exciting in a different way to playing at Stamford Bridge normally is. Chelsea still have to be favourites I suspect but if we win then could that be the final straw for Mourinho?
Its got nil nil written all over it. Jose to limp on until December, being sacked after losing at Leicester.
Is there much new about the Titanic? It's well known that it's steel was inferior and its rivetting flawed. And of course it's watertight doors did not go from top to bottom. Many many more could have been saved if they'd had a proper evacuation plan and had filled all their lifeboats to capacity.
Wow. Not been following the footie at all! What happened
They have imploded with Mourinho in full meltdown.
As a Liverpool fan tomorrow is exciting in a different way to playing at Stamford Bridge normally is. Chelsea still have to be favourites I suspect but if we win then could that be the final straw for Mourinho?
Its got nil nil written all over it. Jose to limp on until December, being sacked after losing at Leicester.
Ha, we all want our own team to be the final straw that breaks Mourinho's back at Chelski!
Is there much new about the Titanic? It's well known that it's steel was inferior and its rivetting flawed. And of course it's watertight doors did not go from top to bottom. Many many more could have been saved if they'd had a proper evacuation plan and had filled all their lifeboats to capacity.
Mmm, the ship sank on an even keel in nearly 3 hours and early lifeboats were indeed not filled to capacity. But no evacuation plan could have got round the fact that there were lifeboat places for c.50% of the ship's company. About 35% were saved and that was a tribute to the crew who were presented with this apalling situation and most of the passengers, who behaved very well. In all classes.
Wow. Not been following the footie at all! What happened
They have imploded with Mourinho in full meltdown.
As a Liverpool fan tomorrow is exciting in a different way to playing at Stamford Bridge normally is. Chelsea still have to be favourites I suspect but if we win then could that be the final straw for Mourinho?
Its got nil nil written all over it. Jose to limp on until December, being sacked after losing at Leicester.
Is there much new about the Titanic? It's well known that it's steel was inferior and its rivetting flawed. And of course it's watertight doors did not go from top to bottom. Many many more could have been saved if they'd had a proper evacuation plan and had filled all their lifeboats to capacity.
Such as what I know I only know through the Titanic documentary industry.
Unweighted totals before the election were completely wrong and scientifically inaccurate, so what?
The point here is that the WEIGHTED ComRes totals had LAB ahead. Once the new turnout model was applied CON moved to 5% lead.
Yes so the ONLY relevant figures which have any connection to an election turnout have the Tories ahead of their May total and Labour doing worse than Kinnock in 1992. The actual turnout figures are the only realistic ones which represent those who voted in May and the proportions in which they voted for each party
The leave voters are older, wiser, and more likely to actually vote than the immature and can't-be-arsed remain crowd. A half decent campaign should see Great Britain liberated from Brussels diktat.
The leave voters are older, wiser, and more likely to actually vote than the immature and can't-be-arsed remain crowd. A half decent campaign should see Great Britain liberated from Brussels diktat.
All the remain campaign has got is scaremongering and downright lies, I think leave wins by 54-46
Is there much new about the Titanic? It's well known that it's steel was inferior and its rivetting flawed. And of course it's watertight doors did not go from top to bottom. Many many more could have been saved if they'd had a proper evacuation plan and had filled all their lifeboats to capacity.
Such as what I know I only know through the Titanic documentary industry.
Interesting all those popular beliefs about the Titanic are wrong -
1) The steel used had higher levels of various other elements in than modern steel. However, people at the time knew that the steel they used seemed to be brittle - particularly when cold. They compensated by using higher safety margins. The Titanic broke in half when the stress on it's hull exceeded 160% of the design specification (itself conservative). The wreck on the sea floor shows no signs of brittle failure - lots of steel twisted and torn, not fractured. Her sister the Olympic survived many decade of hard service and her hull was in excellent condition according to the ship breakers. 2) The riveting was standard for the day - iron rivets were always used in the hard to reach areas. The small samples of failed rivets collected were a self selecting set - the ones that failed were picked up. Again, the hull died very slowly - torn apart rather than falling apart. 3) The bulkheads went higher than most contemporary ships. In fact the compartmentation exceeds that of a number of modern cruise ships. 4) What they needed was more seamen. More boats on their own wouldn't have helped. Interestingly, a test reproduction of the loading of the boats, using the equipment made for the movie, took longer to load less. In daylight, with cooperative, fit adult volunteers, from a quay side
Is there much new about the Titanic? It's well known that it's steel was inferior and its rivetting flawed. And of course it's watertight doors did not go from top to bottom. Many many more could have been saved if they'd had a proper evacuation plan and had filled all their lifeboats to capacity.
Mmm, the ship sank on an even keel in nearly 3 hours and early lifeboats were indeed not filled to capacity. But no evacuation plan could have got round the fact that there were lifeboat places for c.50% of the ship's company. About 35% were saved and that was a tribute to the crew who were presented with this apalling situation and most of the passengers, who behaved very well. In all classes.
Yes true enough. But if all the lifeboats had been filled and indeed a bit over filled then many more could have been saved. I've often thought that with 3 hours available then why could they not build a few rafts?
Is there much new about the Titanic? It's well known that it's steel was inferior and its rivetting flawed. And of course it's watertight doors did not go from top to bottom. Many many more could have been saved if they'd had a proper evacuation plan and had filled all their lifeboats to capacity.
Such as what I know I only know through the Titanic documentary industry.
Interesting all those popular beliefs about the Titanic are wrong -
1) The steel used had higher levels of various other elements in than modern steel. However, people at the time knew that the steel they used seemed to be brittle - particularly when cold. They compensated by using higher safety margins. The Titanic broke in half when the stress on it's hull exceeded 160% of the design specification (itself conservative). The wreck on the sea floor shows no signs of brittle failure - lots of steel twisted and torn, not fractured. Her sister the Olympic survived many decade of hard service and her hull was in excellent condition according to the ship breakers. 2) The riveting was standard for the day - iron rivets were always used in the hard to reach areas. The small samples of failed rivets collected were a self selecting set - the ones that failed were picked up. Again, the hull died very slowly - torn apart rather than falling apart. 3) The bulkheads went higher than most contemporary ships. In fact the compartmentation exceeds that of a number of modern cruise ships. 4) What they needed was more seamen. More boats on their own wouldn't have helped. Interestingly, a test reproduction of the loading of the boats, using the equipment made for the movie, took longer to load less. In daylight, with cooperative, fit adult volunteers, from a quay side
Is there much new about the Titanic? It's well known that it's steel was inferior and its rivetting flawed. And of course it's watertight doors did not go from top to bottom. Many many more could have been saved if they'd had a proper evacuation plan and had filled all their lifeboats to capacity.
Mmm, the ship sank on an even keel in nearly 3 hours and early lifeboats were indeed not filled to capacity. But no evacuation plan could have got round the fact that there were lifeboat places for c.50% of the ship's company. About 35% were saved and that was a tribute to the crew who were presented with this apalling situation and most of the passengers, who behaved very well. In all classes.
Yes true enough. But if all the lifeboats had been filled and indeed a bit over filled then many more could have been saved. I've often thought that with 3 hours available then why could they not build a few rafts?
Hello Malmesbury. A lifetimes exposure to Titanic documentaries wasted. However the documentary re steel I remember was not about its back breaking but the seams splitting as its scraped along the iceberg
Is there much new about the Titanic? It's well known that it's steel was inferior and its rivetting flawed. And of course it's watertight doors did not go from top to bottom. Many many more could have been saved if they'd had a proper evacuation plan and had filled all their lifeboats to capacity.
Mmm, the ship sank on an even keel in nearly 3 hours and early lifeboats were indeed not filled to capacity. But no evacuation plan could have got round the fact that there were lifeboat places for c.50% of the ship's company. About 35% were saved and that was a tribute to the crew who were presented with this apalling situation and most of the passengers, who behaved very well. In all classes.
I thought there was a plan, albeit not a detailed, fully worked-out plan, with the expectation that the ship would remain afloat a lot longer than it did, giving enough time for other ships to come to its aid, with the lifeboats acting as ferries shuttling the passengers and crew to the rescuing ships. Andrews and the other designers never expected that such a long opening, across so many compartments, that the iceberg made, could happen.
If there really was another ship close by (the crew thought there was, and it was later identified as the SS Californian, whose master was blamed for not coming to the rescue that night) then possibly enough people could have been shuttled across for the lifeboat capacity not to have been a problem.
Wow. Not been following the footie at all! What happened
They have imploded with Mourinho in full meltdown.
As a Liverpool fan tomorrow is exciting in a different way to playing at Stamford Bridge normally is. Chelsea still have to be favourites I suspect but if we win then could that be the final straw for Mourinho?
I hope he goes whatever the result, I can't stand the childish egomaniac. We have superb attacking players but play the dullest football imaginable, worse still we have some superb youngsters that will never get a chance under Mourinho.
I can't imagine anybody having sympathy for Mourinho if he gets the sack, in fact I believe he's looking for an out. His achievements as a manager are there for all to see but he's been bad for football.
Is there much new about the Titanic? It's well known that it's steel was inferior and its rivetting flawed. And of course it's watertight doors did not go from top to bottom. Many many more could have been saved if they'd had a proper evacuation plan and had filled all their lifeboats to capacity.
Mmm, the ship sank on an even keel in nearly 3 hours and early lifeboats were indeed not filled to capacity. But no evacuation plan could have got round the fact that there were lifeboat places for c.50% of the ship's company. About 35% were saved and that was a tribute to the crew who were presented with this apalling situation and most of the passengers, who behaved very well. In all classes.
I thought there was a plan, albeit not a detailed, fully worked-out plan, with the expectation that the ship would remain afloat a lot longer than it did, giving enough time for other ships to come to its aid, with the lifeboats acting as ferries shuttling the passengers and crew to the rescuing ships. Andrews and the other designers never expected that such a long opening, across so many compartments, that the iceberg made, could happen.
If there really was another ship close by (the crew thought there was, and it was later identified as the SS Californian, whose master was blamed for not coming to the rescue that night) then possibly enough people could have been shuttled across for the lifeboat capacity not to have been a problem.
F1: A dry P2 session about to start in Mexico. Given the inclement forecast and wet P1 session this morning, expect genuine pace from most cars in this session. The long straight and medium speed turns makes this more of a power circuit, which should play to the advantage of Mercedes-powered cars at the expense of the Renault-powered ones. Unless it rains, in which case anything can happen, and usually does!
Is there much new about the Titanic? It's well known that it's steel was inferior and its rivetting flawed. And of course it's watertight doors did not go from top to bottom. Many many more could have been saved if they'd had a proper evacuation plan and had filled all their lifeboats to capacity.
Mmm, the ship sank on an even keel in nearly 3 hours and early lifeboats were indeed not filled to capacity. But no evacuation plan could have got round the fact that there were lifeboat places for c.50% of the ship's company. About 35% were saved and that was a tribute to the crew who were presented with this apalling situation and most of the passengers, who behaved very well. In all classes.
I thought there was a plan, albeit not a detailed, fully worked-out plan, with the expectation that the ship would remain afloat a lot longer than it did, giving enough time for other ships to come to its aid, with the lifeboats acting as ferries shuttling the passengers and crew to the rescuing ships. Andrews and the other designers never expected that such a long opening, across so many compartments, that the iceberg made, could happen.
If there really was another ship close by (the crew thought there was, and it was later identified as the SS Californian, whose master was blamed for not coming to the rescue that night) then possibly enough people could have been shuttled across for the lifeboat capacity not to have been a problem.
Didn't he disbelieve the distress call because the Titanic was known to be unsinkable?
Wow. Not been following the footie at all! What happened
They have imploded with Mourinho in full meltdown.
As a Liverpool fan tomorrow is exciting in a different way to playing at Stamford Bridge normally is. Chelsea still have to be favourites I suspect but if we win then could that be the final straw for Mourinho?
I hope he goes whatever the result, I can't stand the childish egomaniac. We have superb attacking players but play the dullest football imaginable, worse still we have some superb youngsters that will never get a chance under Mourinho.
I can't imagine anybody having sympathy for Mourinho if he gets the sack, in fact I believe he's looking for an out. His achievements as a manager are there for all to see but he's been bad for football.
He's an impact manager, nothing more and good for 2/3 years at most. I agree it seems he is looking to get sacked, some of you guys with much better knowledge of employment law than me can help with this:
Given the way he has behaved this season, first with the club Doctor business and with his behavior at West Ham, would the club have grounds to sack him for gross misconduct?
Wow. Not been following the footie at all! What happened
They have imploded with Mourinho in full meltdown.
As a Liverpool fan tomorrow is exciting in a different way to playing at Stamford Bridge normally is. Chelsea still have to be favourites I suspect but if we win then could that be the final straw for Mourinho?
I hope he goes whatever the result, I can't stand the childish egomaniac. We have superb attacking players but play the dullest football imaginable, worse still we have some superb youngsters that will never get a chance under Mourinho.
Should Chelsea sack Mourinho it would be reminiscent of when Apple fired Steve Jobs. You should thank your lucky stars that you have Il Maestro.
Unweighted totals before the election were completely wrong and scientifically inaccurate, so what?
The point here is that the WEIGHTED ComRes totals had LAB ahead. Once the new turnout model was applied CON moved to 5% lead.
Yes so the ONLY relevant figures which have any connection to an election turnout have the Tories ahead of their May total and Labour doing worse than Kinnock in 1992. The actual turnout figures are the only realistic ones which represent those who voted in May and the proportions in which they voted for each party
As we have reached the level of comparing Corbyn with Kinnocks best result, I'm digging in to see what caused such drastic change in the Labour/Tory figures from the ComRes highpoint.
Well from the one that had the Tories ahead by 13%, the change is that about 10% of over 55's who are ABC1 women living in the north and the midlands (basically the category that won for the Tories the last election) switched from the Tories to Labour. Everything else is about the same with the exception of scotland were ComRes has the SNP ridiculously low on 34% just 9 points ahead of the Tories.
Wow. Not been following the footie at all! What happened
They have imploded with Mourinho in full meltdown.
As a Liverpool fan tomorrow is exciting in a different way to playing at Stamford Bridge normally is. Chelsea still have to be favourites I suspect but if we win then could that be the final straw for Mourinho?
I hope he goes whatever the result, I can't stand the childish egomaniac. We have superb attacking players but play the dullest football imaginable, worse still we have some superb youngsters that will never get a chance under Mourinho.
Should Chelsea sack Mourinho it would be reminiscent of when Apple fired Steve Jobs. You should thank your lucky stars that you have Il Maestro.
Go to a few forums, they will tell you it will take a decade to repair the damage he is doing. We have the best youth academy in Europe but we may as well shut it down if he stays.
Hello rpjs Yes I believe you are broadly right. However the boat davits were sort of state of the art and in fact could have carried 2 (3?) lifeboats each, not just 1. However this took up a lot of deck space and in the end the space was used to provide some sort of snazzy walking promenade space.
Jeb Bush's campaign COO resigned today. You can put the fork in - he's done.
Could be related to all the problems of the campaign, but surely the last straw was last night's leak of Jeb's entire internal campaign report to the press.
Wow. Not been following the footie at all! What happened
They have imploded with Mourinho in full meltdown.
As a Liverpool fan tomorrow is exciting in a different way to playing at Stamford Bridge normally is. Chelsea still have to be favourites I suspect but if we win then could that be the final straw for Mourinho?
I hope he goes whatever the result, I can't stand the childish egomaniac. We have superb attacking players but play the dullest football imaginable, worse still we have some superb youngsters that will never get a chance under Mourinho.
I can't imagine anybody having sympathy for Mourinho if he gets the sack, in fact I believe he's looking for an out. His achievements as a manager are there for all to see but he's been bad for football.
He's an impact manager, nothing more and good for 2/3 years at most. I agree it seems he is looking to get sacked, some of you guys with much better knowledge of employment law than me can help with this:
Given the way he has behaved this season, first with the club Doctor business and with his behavior at West Ham, would the club have grounds to sack him for gross misconduct?
In the crazy world of football I'm not sure employment laws apply, I read that if Chelsea sack him it'll cost £30m. That can't be conducive to a happy working environment.
Is there much new about the Titanic? It's well known that it's steel was inferior and its rivetting flawed. And of course it's watertight doors did not go from top to bottom. Many many more could have been saved if they'd had a proper evacuation plan and had filled all their lifeboats to capacity.
Such as what I know I only know through the Titanic documentary industry.
Interesting all those popular beliefs about the Titanic are wrong -
1) The steel used had higher levels of various other elements in than modern steel. However, people at the time knew that the steel they used seemed to be brittle - particularly when cold. They compensated by using higher safety margins. The Titanic broke in half when the stress on it's hull exceeded 160% of the design specification (itself conservative). The wreck on the sea floor shows no signs of brittle failure - lots of steel twisted and torn, not fractured. Her sister the Olympic survived many decade of hard service and her hull was in excellent condition according to the ship breakers. 2) The riveting was standard for the day - iron rivets were always used in the hard to reach areas. The small samples of failed rivets collected were a self selecting set - the ones that failed were picked up. Again, the hull died very slowly - torn apart rather than falling apart. 3) The bulkheads went higher than most contemporary ships. In fact the compartmentation exceeds that of a number of modern cruise ships. 4) What they needed was more seamen. More boats on their own wouldn't have helped. Interestingly, a test reproduction of the loading of the boats, using the equipment made for the movie, took longer to load less. In daylight, with cooperative, fit adult volunteers, from a quay side
I've always understood that a side-on collision was the worst possible outcome.
Didn't he disbelieve the distress call because the Titanic was known to be unsinkable?
I had a friend from a Naval family who had access to the Naval archives and researched the subject exhaustively. He argued very convincingly that the The Titanic was actually The Britannic, it's sister ship, just disguised as the Titanic, which was old and ready for the scrapheap, and the plan was to sink The Titanic (Britannic), thereby getting rid of the old ship, keeping the shiny new one, and claiming the insurance. The travellers were to be rescued, as a ship was thought to be nearby, but this turned out to be a fishing boat or something?? I'm very low on detail as I've never researched it myself, just telling you what he said. Lots of evidence for it apparently - such as the name Titanic being on a steel plate as opposed to carved into the hull as was usual.
When talking about polls I think the BMG one offers a unique insight to what is going on a left/right axis and an rural/urban one, look here in the internals:
Those on the very left and those on the right are most likely to vote including those who like the government are living in rural or suburban areas and are rich, the ones least likely are centrists who have no opinion about the government are "cosmopolitans" or ethnic minorities and are poor.
Who describes himself as left wing and votes Tory? But the problem for Labour becomes obvious that they are leaking on their left.
There are many other juicy bits on the tables, table 6 in particular. Voting by urban/suburban / rural/ cosmopolitan/ethnic minorities/multicultural areas:
Unweighted totals before the election were completely wrong and scientifically inaccurate, so what?
The point here is that the WEIGHTED ComRes totals had LAB ahead. Once the new turnout model was applied CON moved to 5% lead.
Yes so the ONLY relevant figures which have any connection to an election turnout have the Tories ahead of their May total and Labour doing worse than Kinnock in 1992. The actual turnout figures are the only realistic ones which represent those who voted in May and the proportions in which they voted for each party
As we have reached the level of comparing Corbyn with Kinnocks best result, I'm digging in to see what caused such drastic change in the Labour/Tory figures from the ComRes highpoint.
Well from the one that had the Tories ahead by 13%, the change is that about 10% of over 55's who are ABC1 women living in the north and the midlands (basically the category that won for the Tories the last election) switched from the Tories to Labour. Everything else is about the same with the exception of scotland were ComRes has the SNP ridiculously low on 34% just 9 points ahead of the Tories.
Of course this is a Comres phone poll, the last Comres online poll gave the Tories a 13 point lead. Some interesting snapshots of the poll there, as you say astonishing figures in Scotland with the SNP on just 34% (down 16% since the election), the Tories on 25% (up 11%) and Labour on 24% (unchanged). That does seem like a bit of an outlier but we will see. In the North Labour lead 42% to the Tories 30%, in the South the Tories lead on 44% to Labour's 29% and in the Midlands the Tories lead 44% to 35%
Wow. Not been following the footie at all! What happened
They have imploded with Mourinho in full meltdown.
As a Liverpool fan tomorrow is exciting in a different way to playing at Stamford Bridge normally is. Chelsea still have to be favourites I suspect but if we win then could that be the final straw for Mourinho?
Its got nil nil written all over it. Jose to limp on until December, being sacked after losing at Leicester.
Unweighted totals before the election were completely wrong and scientifically inaccurate, so what?
The point here is that the WEIGHTED ComRes totals had LAB ahead. Once the new turnout model was applied CON moved to 5% lead.
Yes so the ONLY relevant figures which have any connection to an election turnout have the Tories ahead of their May total and Labour doing worse than Kinnock in 1992. The actual turnout figures are the only realistic ones which represent those who voted in May and the proportions in which they voted for each party
As we have reached the level of comparing Corbyn with Kinnocks best result, I'm digging in to see what caused such drastic change in the Labour/Tory figures from the ComRes highpoint.
Well from the one that had the Tories ahead by 13%, the change is that about 10% of over 55's who are ABC1 women living in the north and the midlands (basically the category that won for the Tories the last election) switched from the Tories to Labour. Everything else is about the same with the exception of scotland were ComRes has the SNP ridiculously low on 34% just 9 points ahead of the Tories.
Of course this is a Comres phone poll, the last Comres online poll gave the Tories a 13 point lead. Some interesting snapshots of the poll there, as you say astonishing figures in Scotland with the SNP on just 34% (down 16% since the election), the Tories on 25% (up 11%) and Labour on 24% (unchanged). That does seem like a bit of an outlier but we will see. In the North Labour lead 42% to the Tories 30%, in the South the Tories lead on 44% to Labour's 29% and in the Midlands the Tories lead 44% to 35%
Given that was a discrepancy between online and phone polls in the past where the phone polls had the best Tory/worst UKIP numbers, it will be interesting to see if that is gone.
Didn't he disbelieve the distress call because the Titanic was known to be unsinkable?
I had a friend from a Naval family who had access to the Naval archives and researched the subject exhaustively. He argued very convincingly that the The Titanic was actually The Britannic, it's sister ship, just disguised as the Titanic, which was old and ready for the scrapheap, and the plan was to sink The Titanic (Britannic), thereby getting rid of the old ship, keeping the shiny new one, and claiming the insurance. The travellers were to be rescued, as a ship was thought to be nearby, but this turned out to be a fishing boat or something?? I'm very low on detail as I've never researched it myself, just telling you what he said. Lots of evidence for it apparently - such as the name Titanic being on a steel plate as opposed to carved into the hull as was usual.
There are many flaws in that story, not the least of which is the Britannic was the third of the sister ships, and was launched *after* the Titanic.
You might mean the Olympic, the first of the three ships; but that had its maiden voyage just the year before the Titanic's, and was therefore hardly old. Besides that, there were many differences between the ships that mariners and shipworkers would have been able to tell between them.
Ditto any other ship; the Olympic class were fairly different to the other large ships, and passengers at the time (yet alone crew) would have been familiar with them, yet alone the differences between the three Olympic ships.
As it happens, the Olympic was only a few hundred miles away from the sinking Titanic and (from memory) heading in the other direction. That would have made it rather hard to do a swapsie.
Then there are the chances of finding a suitable iceberg on the route, at night, and without changing direction to hit it.
It was a hideous accident, albeit one that may well have saved tens of thousands of lives through the lessons learnt.
Aside from that, it's cr@p. Utter and total cr@p.
This conspiracy theory reminds me of the Argentinians who believe they sunk a British aircraft carrier during the Falklands conflict. They rather wrap themselves up in knots over that. Some even claim that the US built an Invincible-class carrier in secret, then sailed it to the South Atlantic to replace the sunk carrier ...
Didn't he disbelieve the distress call because the Titanic was known to be unsinkable?
I had a friend from a Naval family who had access to the Naval archives and researched the subject exhaustively. He argued very convincingly that the The Titanic was actually The Britannic, it's sister ship, just disguised as the Titanic, which was old and ready for the scrapheap, and the plan was to sink The Titanic (Britannic), thereby getting rid of the old ship, keeping the shiny new one, and claiming the insurance. The travellers were to be rescued, as a ship was thought to be nearby, but this turned out to be a fishing boat or something?? I'm very low on detail as I've never researched it myself, just telling you what he said. Lots of evidence for it apparently - such as the name Titanic being on a steel plate as opposed to carved into the hull as was usual.
Oh dear. No. The Britannic wasn't built yet, the Olympic was only a year older than the Titanic and as with all conspiracy theories, you would have to have a crew of 700 odd people to completely swallow this cunning plan, find and accurately hit an iceberg and have everyone triumphantly rescued. And then never tell anyone! Sorry but no!!
The Titanic was steaming at 21 knots, which was fast but not Blue Ribband fast, on a very calm night and saw the iceberg too late.the Officer of the Watch made a split second decision to avoid the berg and really couldn't be blamed for trying to miss.
Had any modern cruise liner, such as Costa Concordia or other large ships of a similar size sustained similar damage, they would probably have capsized very quickly without the opportunity to get all their (inadequate) lifeboats away...
When talking about polls I think the BMG one offers a unique insight to what is going on a left/right axis and an rural/urban one, look here in the internals:
Those on the very left and those on the right are most likely to vote including those who like the government are living in rural or suburban areas and are rich, the ones least likely are centrists who have no opinion about the government are "cosmopolitans" or ethnic minorities and are poor.
Who describes himself as left wing and votes Tory? But the problem for Labour becomes obvious that they are leaking on their left.
There are many other juicy bits on the tables, table 6 in particular. Voting by urban/suburban / rural/ cosmopolitan/ethnic minorities/multicultural areas:
BMG's Scottish figures give SNP 45% (down 5% on May), Labour on 23% (-1%) and the Tories on 19% (+5%). So the SNP still down but to a less extent. They have the Tories ahead in the South East, the South West, the East and West Midlands and London, Labour ahead in Wales, the East of England, the North East and North West and Yorkshire and Humber.
I like these monthly summaries, but would it be possible to have both the "before" and "after" vote aggregate percentages? I think this would put a bit of perspective on things.
Interesting too that BMG has England voting to leave the EU by 41%-39%, with the East of England, the East and West Midlands, the South East and South West and the North West voting Out, the North East tied and only London and Yorkshire and Humber voting in.
Didn't he disbelieve the distress call because the Titanic was known to be unsinkable?
I had a friend from a Naval family who had access to the Naval archives and researched the subject exhaustively. He argued very convincingly that the The Titanic was actually The Britannic, it's sister ship, just disguised as the Titanic, which was old and ready for the scrapheap, and the plan was to sink The Titanic (Britannic), thereby getting rid of the old ship, keeping the shiny new one, and claiming the insurance. The travellers were to be rescued, as a ship was thought to be nearby, but this turned out to be a fishing boat or something?? I'm very low on detail as I've never researched it myself, just telling you what he said. Lots of evidence for it apparently - such as the name Titanic being on a steel plate as opposed to carved into the hull as was usual.
Oh dear. No. The Britannic wasn't built yet, the Olympic was only a year older than the Titanic and as with all conspiracy theories, you would have to have a crew of 700 odd people to completely swallow this cunning plan, find and accurately hit an iceberg and have everyone triumphantly rescued. And then never tell anyone! Sorry but no!!
The Titanic was steaming at 21 knots, which was fast but not Blue Ribband fast, on a very calm night and saw the iceberg too late.the Officer of the Watch made a split second decision to avoid the berg and really couldn't be blamed for trying to miss.
Had any modern cruise liner, such as Costa Concordia or other large ships of a similar size sustained similar damage, they would probably have capsized very quickly without the opportunity to get all their (inadequate) lifeboats away...
Observing modern cruise liners I cannot help notice that they have very high freeboard and windage. I suspect that their point of no return following a tilt is much less than more conventional liner shapes. While rolling with wind or waves is possible to anticipate, the tilting effect of an underwater impact with berg, rock or ship is quite possible.
When talking about polls I think the BMG one offers a unique insight to what is going on a left/right axis and an rural/urban one, look here in the internals:
Those on the very left and those on the right are most likely to vote including those who like the government are living in rural or suburban areas and are rich, the ones least likely are centrists who have no opinion about the government are "cosmopolitans" or ethnic minorities and are poor.
Who describes himself as left wing and votes Tory? But the problem for Labour becomes obvious that they are leaking on their left.
There are many other juicy bits on the tables, table 6 in particular. Voting by urban/suburban / rural/ cosmopolitan/ethnic minorities/multicultural areas:
BMG's Scottish figures give SNP 45% (down 5% on May), Labour on 23% (-1%) and the Tories on 19% (+5%). So the SNP still down but to a less extent. They have the Tories ahead in the South East, the South West, the East and West Midlands and London, Labour ahead in Wales, the East of England, the North East and North West and Yorkshire and Humber.
A half decent Labour Opposition with a competent and plausible leader would, right now, be 10 points ahead in the polls. The Tories have had the week from Tartarus - they've been defeated in an attempt to impoverish the upright working classes - managing to appear weak, inept, cruel AND greedy. Yet still Labour lag.
The only way Labour can win under Corbyn is after a euroref implosion or a hideous recession. Both, however, are possible.
In either of the latter cases I think the biggest beneficiaries would be UKIP anyway, not Labour
Unweighted totals before the election were completely wrong and scientifically inaccurate, so what?
The point here is that the WEIGHTED ComRes totals had LAB ahead. Once the new turnout model was applied CON moved to 5% lead.
Yes so the ONLY relevant figures which have any connection to an election turnout have the Tories ahead of their May total and Labour doing worse than Kinnock in 1992. The actual turnout figures are the only realistic ones which represent those who voted in May and the proportions in which they voted for each party
As we have reached the level of comparing Corbyn with Kinnocks best result, I'm digging in to see what caused such drastic change in the Labour/Tory figures from the ComRes highpoint.
Well from the one that had the Tories ahead by 13%, the change is that about 10% of over 55's who are ABC1 women living in the north and the midlands (basically the category that won for the Tories the last election) switched from the Tories to Labour. Everything else is about the same with the exception of scotland were ComRes has the SNP ridiculously low on 34% just 9 points ahead of the Tories.
Of course this is a Comres phone poll, the last Comres online poll gave the Tories a 13 point lead. Some interesting snapshots of the poll there, as you say astonishing figures in Scotland with the SNP on just 34% (down 16% since the election), the Tories on 25% (up 11%) and Labour on 24% (unchanged). That does seem like a bit of an outlier but we will see. In the North Labour lead 42% to the Tories 30%, in the South the Tories lead on 44% to Labour's 29% and in the Midlands the Tories lead 44% to 35%
Given that was a discrepancy between online and phone polls in the past where the phone polls had the best Tory/worst UKIP numbers, it will be interesting to see if that is gone.
Interesting too that BMG has England voting to leave the EU by 41%-39%, with the East of England, the East and West Midlands, the South East and South West and the North West voting Out, the North East tied and only London and Yorkshire and Humber voting in.
Interesting too that BMG has England voting to leave the EU by 41%-39%, with the East of England, the East and West Midlands, the South East and South West and the North West voting Out, the North East tied and only London and Yorkshire and Humber voting in.
Didn't he disbelieve the distress call because the Titanic was known to be unsinkable?
I had a friend from a Naval family who had access to the Naval archives and researched the subject exhaustively. He argued very convincingly that the The Titanic was actually The Britannic, it's sister ship, just disguised as the Titanic, which was old and ready for the scrapheap, and the plan was to sink The Titanic (Britannic), thereby getting rid of the old ship, keeping the shiny new one, and claiming the insurance. The travellers were to be rescued, as a ship was thought to be nearby, but this turned out to be a fishing boat or something?? I'm very low on detail as I've never researched it myself, just telling you what he said. Lots of evidence for it apparently - such as the name Titanic being on a steel plate as opposed to carved into the hull as was usual.
Oh dear. No. The Britannic wasn't built yet, the Olympic was only a year older than the Titanic and as with all conspiracy theories, you would have to have a crew of 700 odd people to completely swallow this cunning plan, find and accurately hit an iceberg and have everyone triumphantly rescued. And then never tell anyone! Sorry but no!!
The Titanic was steaming at 21 knots, which was fast but not Blue Ribband fast, on a very calm night and saw the iceberg too late.the Officer of the Watch made a split second decision to avoid the berg and really couldn't be blamed for trying to miss.
Had any modern cruise liner, such as Costa Concordia or other large ships of a similar size sustained similar damage, they would probably have capsized very quickly without the opportunity to get all their (inadequate) lifeboats away...
Observing modern cruise liners I cannot help notice that they have very high freeboard and windage. I suspect that their point of no return following a tilt is much less than more conventional liner shapes. While rolling with wind or waves is possible to anticipate, the tilting effect of an underwater impact with berg, rock or ship is quite possible.
Fair point, they are built like multi story buildings. They are really floating hotels after all. However would they not have double hulls... and fancy keels giving stability?
Observing modern cruise liners I cannot help notice that they have very high freeboard and windage. I suspect that their point of no return following a tilt is much less than more conventional liner shapes. While rolling with wind or waves is possible to anticipate, the tilting effect of an underwater impact with berg, rock or ship is quite possible.
I haven't heard about any analysis of the dynamics of the Costa Concordia sinking, or how it matched expectations. Someone must have done one.
As an aside, the Americans have just built a massively expensive warship, the USS Zimwalt, which features a tumblehome hull. AIUI, tumblehome hulls were more or less abandoned for modern ships because of their instability after damage.
As a further aside, I once sailed on a tall ship out of Southampton, and we passed close to one of the modern large cruise ship (I think it was Independence of the Seas). The sailing ship was not small, but from deck the cruise ship's hull was just a sheer vertical expense of metal heading up to the sky. Very impressive. I think the cruise ship's deck was higher than the top of the masts.
When talking about polls I think the BMG one offers a unique insight to what is going on a left/right axis and an rural/urban one, look here in the internals:
Those on the very left and those on the right are most likely to vote including those who like the government are living in rural or suburban areas and are rich, the ones least likely are centrists who have no opinion about the government are "cosmopolitans" or ethnic minorities and are poor.
Who describes himself as left wing and votes Tory? But the problem for Labour becomes obvious that they are leaking on their left.
There are many other juicy bits on the tables, table 6 in particular. Voting by urban/suburban / rural/ cosmopolitan/ethnic minorities/multicultural areas:
BMG's Scottish figures give SNP 45% (down 5% on May), Labour on 23% (-1%) and the Tories on 19% (+5%). So the SNP still down but to a less extent. They have the Tories ahead in the South East, the South West, the East and West Midlands and London, Labour ahead in Wales, the East of England, the North East and North West and Yorkshire and Humber.
Didn't he disbelieve the distress call because the Titanic was known to be unsinkable?
I had a friend from a Naval family who had access to the Naval archives and researched the subject exhaustively. He argued very convincingly that the The Titanic was actually The Britannic, it's sister ship, just disguised as the Titanic, which was old and ready for the scrapheap, and the plan was to sink The Titanic (Britannic), thereby getting rid of the old ship, keeping the shiny new one, and claiming the insurance. The travellers were to be rescued, as a ship was thought to be nearby, but this turned out to be a fishing boat or something?? I'm very low on detail as I've never researched it myself, just telling you what he said. Lots of evidence for it apparently - such as the name Titanic being on a steel plate as opposed to carved into the hull as was usual.
Oh dear. No. The Britannic wasn't built yet, the Olympic was only a year older than the Titanic and as with all conspiracy theories, you would have to have a crew of 700 odd people to completely swallow this cunning plan, find and accurately hit an iceberg and have everyone triumphantly rescued. And then never tell anyone! Sorry but no!!
The Titanic was steaming at 21 knots, which was fast but not Blue Ribband fast, on a very calm night and saw the iceberg too late.the Officer of the Watch made a split second decision to avoid the berg and really couldn't be blamed for trying to miss.
Had any modern cruise liner, such as Costa Concordia or other large ships of a similar size sustained similar damage, they would probably have capsized very quickly without the opportunity to get all their (inadequate) lifeboats away...
Observing modern cruise liners I cannot help notice that they have very high freeboard and windage. I suspect that their point of no return following a tilt is much less than more conventional liner shapes. While rolling with wind or waves is possible to anticipate, the tilting effect of an underwater impact with berg, rock or ship is quite possible.
Fair point, they are built like multi story buildings. They are really floating hotels after all. However would they not have double hulls... and fancy keels giving stability?
I don't think that they have particularly deep keels, though I believe the vertical stability of a boat is proportional to the 4th power of the beam. Other factors matter too of course.
The capsize of the whale watchers in Canada apparently from crowding on the upper deck demonstrates these can still happen.
When talking about polls I think the BMG one offers a unique insight to what is going on a left/right axis and an rural/urban one, look here in the internals:
Those on the very left and those on the right are most likely to vote including those who like the government are living in rural or suburban areas and are rich, the ones least likely are centrists who have no opinion about the government are "cosmopolitans" or ethnic minorities and are poor.
Who describes himself as left wing and votes Tory? But the problem for Labour becomes obvious that they are leaking on their left.
There are many other juicy bits on the tables, table 6 in particular. Voting by urban/suburban / rural/ cosmopolitan/ethnic minorities/multicultural areas:
BMG's Scottish figures give SNP 45% (down 5% on May), Labour on 23% (-1%) and the Tories on 19% (+5%). So the SNP still down but to a less extent. They have the Tories ahead in the South East, the South West, the East and West Midlands and London, Labour ahead in Wales, the East of England, the North East and North West and Yorkshire and Humber.
Yes Mr Jessop, looking at the pictures its got a battering ram prow as well. In fact it has a look of a Roman galley. I guess its all to do with stealth. I guess tumblehome in sailing ships facilitated the heavy guns on the lower decks, as well as climbing up from boats at sea level.
I don't think that they have particularly deep keels, though I believe the vertical stability of a boat is proportional to the 4th power of the beam. Other factors matter too of course.
The capsize of the whale watchers in Canada apparently from crowding on the upper deck demonstrates these can still happen.
The report into the partial capsize and grounding of the car carrier in Southampton Water earlier in the year will be interesting, especially as it isn't the first car carrier to develop a significant and dangerous list.
What amazed me about that incident was that the ship was back in service a month or two later!
Comments
BMG: Remain 52%, Leave 48%
YouGov: Remain 50%, Leave 50%
ICM: Remain 54%, Leave 46%
http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/
@MSmithsonPB: Before ComRes applied its turnout model in latest phone poll for the Mail - LAB had small lead. See https://t.co/NePNV8QBbt
and Franklins last polar voyage http://www.channel4.com/programmes/hunt-for-the-arctic-ghost-ship
https://mobile.twitter.com/huffpostukpics/status/528294110612819972
:off-to-TD-Towers:
It's well known that it's steel was inferior and its rivetting flawed. And of course it's watertight doors did not go from top to bottom.
Many many more could have been saved if they'd had a proper evacuation plan and had filled all their lifeboats to capacity.
http://www.express.co.uk/finance/city/615920/Peter-Hargreaves-why-he-backs-Brexit-why-Mark-Carney-should-keep-out
The same day as we find out the City will not be protected from attacks by the EU.
1) The steel used had higher levels of various other elements in than modern steel. However, people at the time knew that the steel they used seemed to be brittle - particularly when cold. They compensated by using higher safety margins. The Titanic broke in half when the stress on it's hull exceeded 160% of the design specification (itself conservative). The wreck on the sea floor shows no signs of brittle failure - lots of steel twisted and torn, not fractured. Her sister the Olympic survived many decade of hard service and her hull was in excellent condition according to the ship breakers.
2) The riveting was standard for the day - iron rivets were always used in the hard to reach areas. The small samples of failed rivets collected were a self selecting set - the ones that failed were picked up. Again, the hull died very slowly - torn apart rather than falling apart.
3) The bulkheads went higher than most contemporary ships. In fact the compartmentation exceeds that of a number of modern cruise ships.
4) What they needed was more seamen. More boats on their own wouldn't have helped. Interestingly, a test reproduction of the loading of the boats, using the equipment made for the movie, took longer to load less. In daylight, with cooperative, fit adult volunteers, from a quay side
But if all the lifeboats had been filled and indeed a bit over filled then many more could have been saved.
I've often thought that with 3 hours available then why could they not build a few rafts?
A head on collision would appear to be a better outcome given the engineering.
Anyways both docus are excellent and frankly much better than the time wasting sentimental biopics/classical music foreground music offered by the BBC
A lifetimes exposure to Titanic documentaries wasted.
However the documentary re steel I remember was not about its back breaking but the seams splitting as its scraped along the iceberg
If there really was another ship close by (the crew thought there was, and it was later identified as the SS Californian, whose master was blamed for not coming to the rescue that night) then possibly enough people could have been shuttled across for the lifeboat capacity not to have been a problem.
EDIT I found the Franklin one grisly and compelling.
Given the way he has behaved this season, first with the club Doctor business and with his behavior at West Ham, would the club have grounds to sack him for gross misconduct?
Well from the one that had the Tories ahead by 13%, the change is that about 10% of over 55's who are ABC1 women living in the north and the midlands (basically the category that won for the Tories the last election) switched from the Tories to Labour.
Everything else is about the same with the exception of scotland were ComRes has the SNP ridiculously low on 34% just 9 points ahead of the Tories.
Yes I believe you are broadly right. However the boat davits were sort of state of the art and in fact could have carried 2 (3?) lifeboats each, not just 1. However this took up a lot of deck space and in the end the space was used to provide some sort of snazzy walking promenade space.
http://www.bmgresearch.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/BMG-Research-Westminster-Voting-Intentions-and-the-EU-Referendum-Tables-291015.pdf
Those on the very left and those on the right are most likely to vote including those who like the government are living in rural or suburban areas and are rich, the ones least likely are centrists who have no opinion about the government are "cosmopolitans" or ethnic minorities and are poor.
Voting on a political axis
Very left wing/ Left/ Slightly left/Centrist/Slightly Right/ Right/ Very Right
CON 3 / 16/ 14/ 33/ 70/ 74/ 63
LAB 68 / 60/ 55/ 28/ 7/ 1/ 0
UKIP 3 /2 / 9/ 19/ 18/ 24/ 37
LD 4 / 9/ 8/ 8/ 2/ 0/ 0/
GRN 14 / 4/ 6/ 6/ 4/ 2/ 1/ 0
SNP 7 /8/ 6/ 4/ 2/ 1/ 0
Who describes himself as left wing and votes Tory?
But the problem for Labour becomes obvious that they are leaking on their left.
There are many other juicy bits on the tables, table 6 in particular.
Voting by urban/suburban / rural/ cosmopolitan/ethnic minorities/multicultural areas:
CON 42/ 43/ 53/ 37/ 28/ 33
LAB 32/ 24/ 21/ 33/ 46/ 37
UKIP 10/ 21/ 15/ 5/ 12/ 16
LD 7/ 7/ 3/ 10/ 6/ 5.
http://www.comres.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Daily-Mail_October-2015_Political-poll.pdf
And he bought the lads pizza as promised:
http://mobile.lcfc.com/news/article/ranieri-keeps-pizza-promise-as-leicester-squad-enjoy-clean-sheet-reward-2772312.aspx
You might mean the Olympic, the first of the three ships; but that had its maiden voyage just the year before the Titanic's, and was therefore hardly old. Besides that, there were many differences between the ships that mariners and shipworkers would have been able to tell between them.
Ditto any other ship; the Olympic class were fairly different to the other large ships, and passengers at the time (yet alone crew) would have been familiar with them, yet alone the differences between the three Olympic ships.
As it happens, the Olympic was only a few hundred miles away from the sinking Titanic and (from memory) heading in the other direction. That would have made it rather hard to do a swapsie.
Then there are the chances of finding a suitable iceberg on the route, at night, and without changing direction to hit it.
It was a hideous accident, albeit one that may well have saved tens of thousands of lives through the lessons learnt.
Aside from that, it's cr@p. Utter and total cr@p.
This conspiracy theory reminds me of the Argentinians who believe they sunk a British aircraft carrier during the Falklands conflict. They rather wrap themselves up in knots over that. Some even claim that the US built an Invincible-class carrier in secret, then sailed it to the South Atlantic to replace the sunk carrier ...
The Titanic was steaming at 21 knots, which was fast but not Blue Ribband fast, on a very calm night and saw the iceberg too late.the Officer of the Watch made a split second decision to avoid the berg and really couldn't be blamed for trying to miss.
Had any modern cruise liner, such as Costa Concordia or other large ships of a similar size sustained similar damage, they would probably have capsized very quickly without the opportunity to get all their (inadequate) lifeboats away...
BMG's overall Tory lead of 37% to Labour's 31% is almost unchanged from May
http://www.bmgresearch.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/BMG-Research-Westminster-Voting-Intentions-and-the-EU-Referendum-Tables-291015.pdf
Great stuff as usual.
I like these monthly summaries, but would it be possible to have both the "before" and "after" vote aggregate percentages? I think this would put a bit of perspective on things.
However across the UK In wins 41%-39% thanks to a 56%-20% In margin in Scotland and a 45-36% In margin in Wales. So ironically while the SNP complain Scotland and Wales may be forced out of the EU by England, it may actually be Scotland and Wales which keep England in the EU against its wishes if a narrow English Out
http://www.bmgresearch.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/BMG-Research-Westminster-Voting-Intentions-and-the-EU-Referendum-Tables-291015.pdf
However would they not have double hulls... and fancy keels giving stability?
As an aside, the Americans have just built a massively expensive warship, the USS Zimwalt, which features a tumblehome hull. AIUI, tumblehome hulls were more or less abandoned for modern ships because of their instability after damage.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tumblehome
As a further aside, I once sailed on a tall ship out of Southampton, and we passed close to one of the modern large cruise ship (I think it was Independence of the Seas). The sailing ship was not small, but from deck the cruise ship's hull was just a sheer vertical expense of metal heading up to the sky. Very impressive. I think the cruise ship's deck was higher than the top of the masts.
The capsize of the whale watchers in Canada apparently from crowding on the upper deck demonstrates these can still happen.
I guess tumblehome in sailing ships facilitated the heavy guns on the lower decks, as well as climbing up from boats at sea level.
That graphic is like taking ICM's data using pre-92 weightings.
Trump 28 (+11)
Carson 23 (-1)
Rubio 11 (0)
Bush 6 (-2)
Cruz 6 (0)
Fiorina 3 (-6)
What amazed me about that incident was that the ship was back in service a month or two later!