politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » The pollsters need to wake up to the fact that Cameron has said that he won’t serve a third term
Last night we saw the release of the monthly ComRes phone poll for the Daily Mail showing the CON lead down 5 to 9%. There was much focus on best PM figures showing Cameron 24% ahead of the new LAB leader.
Whcameron does not seem to be suffering any lame duck effect. When Blair made much the same announcement it was described as a huge blunder. That does not seem to have happened.
People have either forgotten about Cameron'ss departure or maybe yhey do not believe it.
It is a valid point Mike but the pollsters don't know who the Tory alternative PM will be yet. Cameron has extended the reach of the Tory party to voters others may find hard to reach. If they focus more on getting some of the UKIP 4m back then they will lose those voters.
I think Cameron is a remarkable and exceptionally able politician. The fact that he, against pretty crap opposition, got his party a majority of 12 suggests to me that there is absolutely no room for Tory complacency, despite Labour's best efforts to stimulate it.
Whcameron does not seem to be suffering any lame duck effect. When Blair made much the same announcement it was described as a huge blunder. That does not seem to have happened.
People have either forgotten about Cameron'ss departure or maybe yhey do not believe it.
It is a valid point Mike but the pollsters don't know who the Tory alternative PM will be yet. Cameron has extended the reach of the Tory party to voters others may find hard to reach. If they focus more on getting some of the UKIP 4m back then they will lose those voters.
I think Cameron is a remarkable and exceptionally able politician. The fact that he, against pretty crap opposition, got his party a majority of 12 suggests to me that there is absolutely no room for Tory complacency, despite Labour's best efforts to stimulate it.
I thought it was Crosby who won it for the Tories.
However, all polling on Jeremy Corbyn for now is of limited value. He's got off to a shaky start but the public probably haven't finally settled their view of him in the same way that they have of longer established politicians.
Whcameron does not seem to be suffering any lame duck effect. When Blair made much the same announcement it was described as a huge blunder. That does not seem to have happened.
People have either forgotten about Cameron'ss departure or maybe yhey do not believe it.
I suggest the latter.
It does seem strange that there are no preparations for his departure. I could believe that he intends to hang on to the EU referendum and then go taking any blame from his successor but they need to start organising something soon
It is a valid point Mike but the pollsters don't know who the Tory alternative PM will be yet. Cameron has extended the reach of the Tory party to voters others may find hard to reach. If they focus more on getting some of the UKIP 4m back then they will lose those voters.
I think Cameron is a remarkable and exceptionally able politician. The fact that he, against pretty crap opposition, got his party a majority of 12 suggests to me that there is absolutely no room for Tory complacency, despite Labour's best efforts to stimulate it.
I thought it was Crosby who won it for the Tories.
Crosby certainly helped but he is a salesman dependent on the quality of his product. I think it is doubtful that whoever is doing the selling the next time around will have a product as sellable as Cameron.
Firstly if Corbyn is still Labour leader in 2020 I think Cameron will probably fight a third election anyway to ensure he is beaten. Even if Corbyn is replaced, perhaps by Hilary Benn, Cameron may stay on if EU ref was a narrow In to ensure stability. Third Comres have already given net favourabilty scores comparing Corbyn to the likes of Boris and May and Osborne and Corbyn trails all of them, Boris by even more than Cameron. Finally we are in the equivalent of 2001 to 2005 not 2005 to 2010
Morning all! Been away for a few days so catching up. Reading yesterday's threads, oh to be a fly on the wall of Neil Kinnock's office today, realising that the people he spend the best part of a decade throwing out of the party are not just back, but back with a vengeance and being welcomed to Conference by th new leader. Including the speech writers!!
Are any bookies offering odds that the Conservatives decide to start each day of their conference with everyone standing for the National Anthem..?
With five years less 4 months to go, it is hard to get excited on Westminster polling. Imagine a Jezza 5 years older and looking more haggard, vs the master strategist.
Scots, Welsh polling and a couple of tasty byelections in Scotland could be interesting though
Dr. Foxinsox, but Corbyn saying he'll form a coalition with the SNP (if needs be) means the 2015 campaign can be dusted off, and this time they can add lots of quotes about Hamas, the Falklands and so on.
On topic, assuming the referendum is won for the PM, he would surely either resign immediately having cemented his legacy, or will wait until the election. Maybe he might hand over to a new Conservative leader a year before the election while remaining as PM, allowing his successor to concentrate on policy to win another majority. DC can then implement what's left of the manifesto and get some contentious stuff like Trident, Fracking and HS2 through, without having to fight the election himself.
F1: had to laugh at this, from the BBC gossip page: "Ecclestone has warned that Red Bull could walk out of Formula 1 if European Union investigators demand that they hand back £46m in special payments."
And if they don't get the engine they want. And if they don't start winning. And if every race doesn't start with the drivers enjoying the great benefits of a certain energy drink.
With five years less 4 months to go, it is hard to get excited on Westminster polling. Imagine a Jezza 5 years older and looking more haggard, vs the master strategist.
Scots, Welsh polling and a couple of tasty byelections in Scotland could be interesting though
That is the other fallacy. Does anyone really believe that Corbyn is actually going to lead Labour into the next election? At 69 or whatever? Surely he will have run out of old speeches long before then.
So the next PM is really an unknown against an unknown. Perhaps the pollsters shouldn't bother.
Scrapheap as was...A brilliant move on the part of those particular Tory voters...and Corbyn and co don't really understand it yet... Cameron has got the perfect opposition eader..
F1: had to laugh at this, from the BBC gossip page: "Ecclestone has warned that Red Bull could walk out of Formula 1 if European Union investigators demand that they hand back £46m in special payments."
And if they don't get the engine they want. And if they don't start winning. And if every race doesn't start with the drivers enjoying the great benefits of a certain energy drink.
Mr Dancer, F1 is looking more and more a complete shambles every day at the moment. The idea that the teams help write the rules, and that the contracts are shrouded in secrecy is just not acceptable for what is supposed to be the pinnacle of the sport. Any sport. The best thing that could happen to it right now is either a breakaway series or for a certain octogenarian dwarf to shuffle off the scene permanently.
Dr. Foxinsox, but Corbyn saying he'll form a coalition with the SNP (if needs be) means the 2015 campaign can be dusted off, and this time they can add lots of quotes about Hamas, the Falklands and so on.
The Scottish question could be much less pertinent in 2020, depending on how events work out, but the prospect of Ms Sturgeon pulling Corbyn's strings or even as PM is not going to have the same effect. Indeed Ms Sturgeon being in the driving seat may up the Labour vote!
Mr. Sandpit, the issue that only some teams get to write the rules. And some teams get more money (typically, those who already have larger budgets). And the engines. And the tyres.
I thought it was Crosby who won it for the Tories.
Crosby certainly helped but he is a salesman dependent on the quality of his product. I think it is doubtful that whoever is doing the selling the next time around will have a product as sellable as Cameron.
And he certainly won´t have the Lib Dems in government with him, helping to de-toxify the Tory brand.
With five years less 4 months to go, it is hard to get excited on Westminster polling. Imagine a Jezza 5 years older and looking more haggard, vs the master strategist.
Scots, Welsh polling and a couple of tasty byelections in Scotland could be interesting though
That is the other fallacy. Does anyone really believe that Corbyn is actually going to lead Labour into the next election? At 69 or whatever? Surely he will have run out of old speeches long before then.
So the next PM is really an unknown against an unknown. Perhaps the pollsters shouldn't bother.
The Soviets managed with old speeches for 70 yrs or more
I thought it was Crosby who won it for the Tories.
Crosby certainly helped but he is a salesman dependent on the quality of his product. I think it is doubtful that whoever is doing the selling the next time around will have a product as sellable as Cameron.
And he certainly won´t have the Lib Dems in government with him, helping to de-toxify the Tory brand.
The Lib Dems? Who are they?
As an aside the Lib Dems are utterly toxic.
Every Lib Dem who served in cabinet in the last parliament apart from Clegg either lost their seat or ended up in court.
F1: had to laugh at this, from the BBC gossip page: "Ecclestone has warned that Red Bull could walk out of Formula 1 if European Union investigators demand that they hand back £46m in special payments."
And if they don't get the engine they want. And if they don't start winning. And if every race doesn't start with the drivers enjoying the great benefits of a certain energy drink.
Dont' forget: and if they don't get a guaranteed top step of the podium for whoever is their favoured driver.
I thought it was Crosby who won it for the Tories.
Crosby certainly helped but he is a salesman dependent on the quality of his product. I think it is doubtful that whoever is doing the selling the next time around will have a product as sellable as Cameron.
And he certainly won´t have the Lib Dems in government with him, helping to de-toxify the Tory brand.
Or such easy pickings either. A Corbyn led Labour party would offer another slew of seats but I still can't see Labour being that stupid. If Labour get their act together and there is a slow down before the next election (which I think is likely) it will be tough.
Mr. Sandpit, the issue that only some teams get to write the rules. And some teams get more money (typically, those who already have larger budgets). And the engines. And the tyres.
...and the pay TV deals that enrich FOM while reducing exposure for teams and their sponsors. And the obsession with government-backed races in backwards countries at the expense of the classic circuits. And the massively complicated front wings making it difficult to follow the car in front. And the lack of allowed engine development or car testing entrenching the performance differentials across several seasons.... I would carry on but this isn't f1betting.com Grr.
Indeed, Mr. Jessop. Losing 4 cars (potentially 6, with Lotus, that's still not secure) would be a bad state of affairs, especially as Ricciardo, Kvyat, Sainz and Verstappen are all good drivers.
And yet some respite from the never-ending bleating would be very welcome.
Edited extra bit: Mr. Sandpit, they're trying to improve the aerodynamic situation by having wider front wings and smaller rear wings which should make it easier to follow a car through the corners.
With five years less 4 months to go, it is hard to get excited on Westminster polling. Imagine a Jezza 5 years older and looking more haggard, vs the master strategist.
Scots, Welsh polling and a couple of tasty byelections in Scotland could be interesting though
That is the other fallacy. Does anyone really believe that Corbyn is actually going to lead Labour into the next election? At 69 or whatever? Surely he will have run out of old speeches long before then.
So the next PM is really an unknown against an unknown. Perhaps the pollsters shouldn't bother.
The Soviets managed with old speeches for 70 yrs or more
Yeah, but they also skipped the getting elected thing.
F1: had to laugh at this, from the BBC gossip page: "Ecclestone has warned that Red Bull could walk out of Formula 1 if European Union investigators demand that they hand back £46m in special payments."
And if they don't get the engine they want. And if they don't start winning. And if every race doesn't start with the drivers enjoying the great benefits of a certain energy drink.
One other point: if I was Bernie, I would be more pi***ed off at Red Bull annoying Renault, who have a much longer and prestigious position in the sport than the drinks company.
How can F1 attract more chassis / engine manufacturers in if they get treated as Red Bull have treated Renault?
I thought it was Crosby who won it for the Tories.
Crosby certainly helped but he is a salesman dependent on the quality of his product. I think it is doubtful that whoever is doing the selling the next time around will have a product as sellable as Cameron.
And he certainly won´t have the Lib Dems in government with him, helping to de-toxify the Tory brand.
That job is already done, as much as is possible at any rate, so it depends if the Tories actually go hard right crazy or are just accused of doing so. If they are cautious and sensible then accusations won't have as much impact.
Dave will be gone by 2019 to give the next Tory leader an incumbency boost as PM.
I think Dave likes the position of being one of the few PMs who went at the time of their own choosing nor as he gone 'mad' in power as some PMs have.
I think Cameron will fight one more election if Corbyn is leader and could also stay for stability post EU ref
You mean you think Cameron lied to the electorate. Good job he doesn't represent a Scottish seat.
Given he would surely only stay on if what counts as evidence suggested he would win, I think people would forgive him on that. Not to mention it is possible to change your mind on things, unlike stating you had not done something which you definitely did, so it is not quite the same.
F1: had to laugh at this, from the BBC gossip page: "Ecclestone has warned that Red Bull could walk out of Formula 1 if European Union investigators demand that they hand back £46m in special payments."
And if they don't get the engine they want. And if they don't start winning. And if every race doesn't start with the drivers enjoying the great benefits of a certain energy drink.
Mr Dancer, F1 is looking more and more a complete shambles every day at the moment. The idea that the teams help write the rules, and that the contracts are shrouded in secrecy is just not acceptable for what is supposed to be the pinnacle of the sport. Any sport. The best thing that could happen to it right now is either a breakaway series or for a certain octogenarian dwarf to shuffle off the scene permanently.
Am I the only PBer to have met Bernie?
(In my usual style, it was a purely accidental meeting and I did not realise who he was for a few minutes).
I must admit that I have a lot of time for Bernie. He made F1 into the worldwide success it has become, and has been involved on-and-off from the very first championship race in 1950. Having said that, it's becoming clear that the F1 he created of backroom deals and handshake agreements is not particularly fit for the modern world.
Dave will be gone by 2019 to give the next Tory leader an incumbency boost as PM.
I think Dave likes the position of being one of the few PMs who went at the time of their own choosing nor as he gone 'mad' in power as some PMs have.
I think Cameron will fight one more election if Corbyn is leader and could also stay for stability post EU ref
You mean you think Cameron lied to the electorate. Good job he doesn't represent a Scottish seat.
Having thought about it more last night the one limitation on the broader interpretation given by the Court of Session is that there has to be an election in which the liar is a candidate. Carmichael's mistake was to lie about the leak in the election period. Lies at any other time, for example about having independent legal advice about EU membership, still won't count.
I wanted to smack the TV. The best bit is we're building a prison there for 300 prisoners - they cost us £10m pa here and we're finally getting rid of them.
They can sod off. Be interesting to hear the Chairman's view on it, though.
Ugh, and an apology. Look, you cannot make up for a thing like slavery, the best you can do is stop doing it and trying to stop others doing it. Isn't that a type of apology?
Mr. kle4, intriguing how nobody asks for reparations from the 'other side' (the sellers of slaves, who were black Africans...), or other forms of slavery (those who continued it after we abolished it, or those who had white slaves).
Still, I look forward to our reparations from the Germans, Scandinavians, Normans, Romans, Irish (Scots invading the Picts) and the Spanish [for the Armada].
On a more serious note, in early America it's my understanding that Irish and Chinese immigrants had terrible conditions. But that rarely gets mentioned.
They can sod off. Be interesting to hear the Chairman's view on it, though.
Ugh, and an apology. Look, you cannot make up for a thing like slavery, the best you can do is stop doing it and trying to stop others doing it. Isn't that a type of apology?
Good day to all.
Are they going to seek reparations from all the African and Arab traders who were involved in the trade as well?
And what about the steps which Britain took to stop the slave trade? Do we get credit for that?
The past has happened. Those who suffered cannot be apologised to because they are dead and those living now are not responsible for what their ancestors did. The sins of the father are not borne by the sons etc.
The best we can do is to stop it happening again and deal with its modern day equivalent. May deserves some credit for what she is trying to do in this area. More power to her elbow, frankly.
@RupertMyers: People pretending Corbyn only ruled out killing millions: he didn't, he just rendered the UK's nuclear deterrent pointless if Labour wins
They can sod off. Be interesting to hear the Chairman's view on it, though.
Ugh, and an apology. Look, you cannot make up for a thing like slavery, the best you can do is stop doing it and trying to stop others doing it. Isn't that a type of apology?
Good day to all.
Are they going to seek reparations from all the African and Arab traders who were involved in the trade as well?
And what about the steps which Britain took to stop the slave trade? Do we get credit for that?
The past has happened. Those who suffered cannot be apologised to because they are dead and those living now are not responsible for what their ancestors did. The sins of the father are not borne by the sons etc.
The best we can do is to stop it happening again and deal with its modern day equivalent. May deserves some credit for what she is trying to do in this area. More power to her elbow, frankly.
Not that there are natives left, but if we're diggi g up the past, perhaps the Jamaicans should vacate the island? Their presence perpetuates the ongoing legacy of slavery on other regions. Granted, that's a stupid, offensive idea, but stupid ideas seem usual in these manufactured outrage diplomatic issues.
Morning all! Been away for a few days so catching up. Reading yesterday's threads, oh to be a fly on the wall of Neil Kinnock's office today, realising that the people he spend the best part of a decade throwing out of the party are not just back, but back with a vengeance and being welcomed to Conference by th new leader. Including the speech writers!!
Are any bookies offering odds that the Conservatives decide to start each day of their conference with everyone standing for the National Anthem..?
Here is something to get the swivel-eyed in our midst foaming at the mouth:
"Almost £6bn of the UK’s foreign aid budget will be spent on tackling climate change in poor countries over the next five years, David Cameron has said, as Britain steps up its contributions by 50 per cent to help meet international targets."
F1: had to laugh at this, from the BBC gossip page: "Ecclestone has warned that Red Bull could walk out of Formula 1 if European Union investigators demand that they hand back £46m in special payments."
And if they don't get the engine they want. And if they don't start winning. And if every race doesn't start with the drivers enjoying the great benefits of a certain energy drink.
Mr Dancer, F1 is looking more and more a complete shambles every day at the moment. The idea that the teams help write the rules, and that the contracts are shrouded in secrecy is just not acceptable for what is supposed to be the pinnacle of the sport. Any sport. The best thing that could happen to it right now is either a breakaway series or for a certain octogenarian dwarf to shuffle off the scene permanently.
Am I the only PBer to have met Bernie?
(In my usual style, it was a purely accidental meeting and I did not realise who he was for a few minutes).
I must admit that I have a lot of time for Bernie. He made F1 into the worldwide success it has become, and has been involved on-and-off from the very first championship race in 1950. Having said that, it's becoming clear that the F1 he created of backroom deals and handshake agreements is not particularly fit for the modern world.
And he's not the man to change that.
F1 is a "sport" for lawyers, and a sport that someone owns. I cannot take it seriously.
Mr. kle4, intriguing how nobody asks for reparations from the 'other side' (the sellers of slaves, who were black Africans...), or other forms of slavery (those who continued it after we abolished it, or those who had white slaves).
Still, I look forward to our reparations from the Germans, Scandinavians, Normans, Romans, Irish (Scots invading the Picts) and the Spanish [for the Armada].
On a more serious note, in early America it's my understanding that Irish and Chinese immigrants had terrible conditions. But that rarely gets mentioned.
Further, what reparations should be asked/demanded by the likes of Tanzania for the slaves obtained from there and sent to Arabia? And from whom. Turkey, as the then occupying poers? Or Saudi Arabia and Yemen?
F1: had to laugh at this, from the BBC gossip page: "Ecclestone has warned that Red Bull could walk out of Formula 1 if European Union investigators demand that they hand back £46m in special payments."
And if they don't get the engine they want. And if they don't start winning. And if every race doesn't start with the drivers enjoying the great benefits of a certain energy drink.
Mr Dancer, F1 is looking more and more a complete shambles every day at the moment. The idea that the teams help write the rules, and that the contracts are shrouded in secrecy is just not acceptable for what is supposed to be the pinnacle of the sport. Any sport. The best thing that could happen to it right now is either a breakaway series or for a certain octogenarian dwarf to shuffle off the scene permanently.
Am I the only PBer to have met Bernie?
(In my usual style, it was a purely accidental meeting and I did not realise who he was for a few minutes).
I must admit that I have a lot of time for Bernie. He made F1 into the worldwide success it has become, and has been involved on-and-off from the very first championship race in 1950. Having said that, it's becoming clear that the F1 he created of backroom deals and handshake agreements is not particularly fit for the modern world.
How much use are polls five years out from an election anyway? They weren't much use five days out from the last one, let alone....
I also query the value, other than as gossip fodder here of a hypothetical match up between Sajid Javid, say, an Jeremy Corbyn. Nobody knows who the hell the former is, let alone how he'd perform leading his party. It all just seems ludicrously early... I appreciate DC won't be the candidate, but the voting public know so little about who may be and what their pitch would be that the exercise seems worthless other than as a way for experienced gamblers to steal a few quid off those who overreact.
With five years less 4 months to go, it is hard to get excited on Westminster polling.
Lucy Powell was saying yesterday that "it is at least five years until the next general election", I know what she meant but it made me grin to hear the new shadow education secretary put it like that.
F1: had to laugh at this, from the BBC gossip page: "Ecclestone has warned that Red Bull could walk out of Formula 1 if European Union investigators demand that they hand back £46m in special payments."
And if they don't get the engine they want. And if they don't start winning. And if every race doesn't start with the drivers enjoying the great benefits of a certain energy drink.
Mr Dancer, F1 is looking more and more a complete shambles every day at the moment. The idea that the teams help write the rules, and that the contracts are shrouded in secrecy is just not acceptable for what is supposed to be the pinnacle of the sport. Any sport. The best thing that could happen to it right now is either a breakaway series or for a certain octogenarian dwarf to shuffle off the scene permanently.
Am I the only PBer to have met Bernie?
(In my usual style, it was a purely accidental meeting and I did not realise who he was for a few minutes).
I must admit that I have a lot of time for Bernie. He made F1 into the worldwide success it has become, and has been involved on-and-off from the very first championship race in 1950. Having said that, it's becoming clear that the F1 he created of backroom deals and handshake agreements is not particularly fit for the modern world.
And he's not the man to change that.
F1 is a "sport" for lawyers, and a sport that someone owns. I cannot take it seriously.
As I've said many times passim, F1 is not a sport. It is a business masquerading as a sport. Once you realise that, it's much easier to watch.
It's also much more honest about it than football.
@politicshome: Farage: "I don't want to become like the @theSNP," by calling for another EU referendum if Britain votes to stay. #playbookbreakfast
They should open a spread market on how many hours Nigel will stick to that line after the result is announced and before adoring and tearful fans on the UKIP exec successfully prevail upon him to reverse his position.
How much use are polls five years out from an election anyway? They weren't much use five days out from the last one, let alone....
I also query the value, other than as gossip fodder here of a hypothetical match up between Sajid Javid, say, an Jeremy Corbyn. Nobody knows who the hell the former is, let alone how he'd perform leading his party. It all just seems ludicrously early... I appreciate DC won't be the candidate, but the voting public know so little about who may be and what their pitch would be that the exercise seems worthless other than as a way for experienced gamblers to steal a few quid off those who overreact.
I agree with this, the future leader of the tories is unknown, so it would be silly dealing with the future unknown unknowns, and of very little value.
The positioning and stall which Osborne, Boris, Javid etc would make their play on would by its very nature effect how the public see them.
Here is something to get the swivel-eyed in our midst foaming at the mouth:
"Almost £6bn of the UK’s foreign aid budget will be spent on tackling climate change in poor countries over the next five years, David Cameron has said, as Britain steps up its contributions by 50 per cent to help meet international targets."
They can sod off. Be interesting to hear the Chairman's view on it, though.
Ugh, and an apology. Look, you cannot make up for a thing like slavery, the best you can do is stop doing it and trying to stop others doing it. Isn't that a type of apology?
Good day to all.
Are they going to seek reparations from all the African and Arab traders who were involved in the trade as well?
And what about the steps which Britain took to stop the slave trade? Do we get credit for that?
The past has happened. Those who suffered cannot be apologised to because they are dead and those living now are not responsible for what their ancestors did. The sins of the father are not borne by the sons etc.
The best we can do is to stop it happening again and deal with its modern day equivalent. May deserves some credit for what she is trying to do in this area. More power to her elbow, frankly.
Perhaps we can pay Jamaica out of the money we get from the Romans and Vikings
Here is something to get the swivel-eyed in our midst foaming at the mouth:
"Almost £6bn of the UK’s foreign aid budget will be spent on tackling climate change in poor countries over the next five years, David Cameron has said, as Britain steps up its contributions by 50 per cent to help meet international targets."
Foaming completely justified. Serious doubts about the efficacy of such expenditure.
Cameron's great legacy to the Tories will be Labour's post-GE implosion and the election of Jeremy Corbyn. After the EU election is out of the way, what more can he reasonably hope to achieve in politics? He will also not want to deal with the end of the Union, which will become a very live issue again after the Tory victory in 2020. Better to leave that to his successor.
As for Corbyn, the day after and his speech is even worse than it was yesterday. As he sees it, the UK is divided into the Tories and the desperately poor who are being shafted by them. What he genuinely does not seem to understand is that most people do not live in poverty and that the only way to do anything about the ones who do is to form a prospectus that has some relevance to the majority.
Dave will be gone by 2019 to give the next Tory leader an incumbency boost as PM.
I think Dave likes the position of being one of the few PMs who went at the time of their own choosing nor as he gone 'mad' in power as some PMs have.
I think Cameron will fight one more election if Corbyn is leader and could also stay for stability post EU ref
You mean you think Cameron lied to the electorate. Good job he doesn't represent a Scottish seat.
Having thought about it more last night the one limitation on the broader interpretation given by the Court of Session is that there has to be an election in which the liar is a candidate. Carmichael's mistake was to lie about the leak in the election period. Lies at any other time, for example about having independent legal advice about EU membership, still won't count.
Morning, DavidL. Interesting comment. Yet I can't quite get my head around it, as the ROPA does say in section 106 "A person who [...] before or during an election [...] ".
Note that 'before', or am I missing something? Interesting implications if so, especially as we all know when the next election is (or it will be even sooner), so it would be hard to deny prior knowledge.
Most voters will not have heard of Javed, as an example of how still pointless such polls will be. Most will not have heard of 'former soldier' Dan Jarvis as a labour alternative to Corbyn.
@politicshome: Farage: "I don't want to become like the @theSNP," by calling for another EU referendum if Britain votes to stay. #playbookbreakfast
They should open a spread market on how many hours Nigel will stick to that line after the result is announced and before adoring and tearful fans on the UKIP exec successfully prevail upon him to reverse his position.
He is in danger of turning this into a referendum on Nigel Farage.
Comments
Whcameron does not seem to be suffering any lame duck effect. When Blair made much the same announcement it was described as a huge blunder. That does not seem to have happened.
People have either forgotten about Cameron'ss departure or maybe yhey do not believe it.
Conservative conference next week?
I think Cameron is a remarkable and exceptionally able politician. The fact that he, against pretty crap opposition, got his party a majority of 12 suggests to me that there is absolutely no room for Tory complacency, despite Labour's best efforts to stimulate it.
It deserved an award.
There is no damage to Nicola.
https://twitter.com/scotsw12/status/648959988103258112
(drag to 6 mins 45 secs)
http://tinyurl.com/NPconference
However, all polling on Jeremy Corbyn for now is of limited value. He's got off to a shaky start but the public probably haven't finally settled their view of him in the same way that they have of longer established politicians.
"Did anyone just see Eamonn intv Jezza? It was hilarious. Eamonn's face was a mix of incredulity, boredom and laughing to himself.
It deserved an award."
Have you ever thought about writing something interesting? Surely you can post something that isn't drivel and gossip
You are morphing into tim in terms of personal abuse.
Dave will be gone by 2019 to give the next Tory leader an incumbency boost as PM.
I think Dave likes the position of being one of the few PMs who went at the time of their own choosing nor as he gone 'mad' in power as some PMs have.
Are any bookies offering odds that the Conservatives decide to start each day of their conference with everyone standing for the National Anthem..?
Scots, Welsh polling and a couple of tasty byelections in Scotland could be interesting though
"Ecclestone has warned that Red Bull could walk out of Formula 1 if European Union investigators demand that they hand back £46m in special payments."
And if they don't get the engine they want. And if they don't start winning. And if every race doesn't start with the drivers enjoying the great benefits of a certain energy drink.
norman smith @BBCNormanS 53 secs54 seconds ago
I'm delighted to say some Tory voters helped me in my leadership campaign - @jeremycorbyn @BBCr4today
So the next PM is really an unknown against an unknown. Perhaps the pollsters shouldn't bother.
The best thing that could happen to it right now is either a breakaway series or for a certain octogenarian dwarf to shuffle off the scene permanently.
He was CCHQ's first choice until Corbyn got involved.
The Tories have and would wrapped Stafford round his neck. It would have been utterly brutal.
Andy Burnham the Westminster village idiot.
As an aside the Lib Dems are utterly toxic.
Every Lib Dem who served in cabinet in the last parliament apart from Clegg either lost their seat or ended up in court.
And yet some respite from the never-ending bleating would be very welcome.
Edited extra bit: Mr. Sandpit, they're trying to improve the aerodynamic situation by having wider front wings and smaller rear wings which should make it easier to follow a car through the corners.
How can F1 attract more chassis / engine manufacturers in if they get treated as Red Bull have treated Renault?
I was tempted to go to Labour's, but then I decided that the torture wouldn't be worth the amusement value. Tory one is too far for me - have fun
http://youtu.be/pSWN6Qj98Iw
How bad must the losers' brands be?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-34398014
They can sod off. Be interesting to hear the Chairman's view on it, though.
(In my usual style, it was a purely accidental meeting and I did not realise who he was for a few minutes).
I must admit that I have a lot of time for Bernie. He made F1 into the worldwide success it has become, and has been involved on-and-off from the very first championship race in 1950. Having said that, it's becoming clear that the F1 he created of backroom deals and handshake agreements is not particularly fit for the modern world.
And he's not the man to change that.
Good day to all.
Still, I look forward to our reparations from the Germans, Scandinavians, Normans, Romans, Irish (Scots invading the Picts) and the Spanish [for the Armada].
On a more serious note, in early America it's my understanding that Irish and Chinese immigrants had terrible conditions. But that rarely gets mentioned.
And what about the steps which Britain took to stop the slave trade? Do we get credit for that?
The past has happened. Those who suffered cannot be apologised to because they are dead and those living now are not responsible for what their ancestors did. The sins of the father are not borne by the sons etc.
The best we can do is to stop it happening again and deal with its modern day equivalent. May deserves some credit for what she is trying to do in this area. More power to her elbow, frankly.
@politicshome: Farage: "I don't want to become like the @theSNP," by calling for another EU referendum if Britain votes to stay. #playbookbreakfast
What odds/size?
"Almost £6bn of the UK’s foreign aid budget will be spent on tackling climate change in poor countries over the next five years, David Cameron has said, as Britain steps up its contributions by 50 per cent to help meet international targets."
I also query the value, other than as gossip fodder here of a hypothetical match up between Sajid Javid, say, an Jeremy Corbyn. Nobody knows who the hell the former is, let alone how he'd perform leading his party. It all just seems ludicrously early... I appreciate DC won't be the candidate, but the voting public know so little about who may be and what their pitch would be that the exercise seems worthless other than as a way for experienced gamblers to steal a few quid off those who overreact.
It's also much more honest about it than football.
Three Libyan soldiers jailed for raping women in Cambridge have applied for Asylum.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-cambridgeshire-34392667
Can we as a country apply for asylum from them?
The positioning and stall which Osborne, Boris, Javid etc would make their play on would by its very nature effect how the public see them.
As for Corbyn, the day after and his speech is even worse than it was yesterday. As he sees it, the UK is divided into the Tories and the desperately poor who are being shafted by them. What he genuinely does not seem to understand is that most people do not live in poverty and that the only way to do anything about the ones who do is to form a prospectus that has some relevance to the majority.
Note that 'before', or am I missing something? Interesting implications if so, especially as we all know when the next election is (or it will be even sooner), so it would be hard to deny prior knowledge.
The BBC is planning an X Factor-style UK national final for the 2016 Eurovision entries
http://bit.ly/1JBR2vK