politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Fiorina now leading the Donald in New Hampshire – where the first full primary takes place
While Britain has been focussed on the election of Donald Trump, and now the Ashcroft Cameron biography, the 2016 White House race has been seeing some dramatic developments
Ms Fiorina won't get the nomination, and nor will Donald Trump. But she will get her moment in the limelight and the odds might shorten a bit more on her. Meanwhile Donald Trump is a lay.
Ms Fiorina won't get the nomination, and nor will Donald Trump. But she will get her moment in the limelight and the odds might shorten a bit more on her. Meanwhile Donald Trump is a lay.
I'm rather hoping she does quite well, but only because of Trump's posturing earlier on.
Ms Fiorina won't get the nomination, and nor will Donald Trump. But she will get her moment in the limelight and the odds might shorten a bit more on her. Meanwhile Donald Trump is a lay.
She will be the Veep candidate regardless. I am not being sexist. I think in the end , it will be Jeb.
Ms Fiorina won't get the nomination, and nor will Donald Trump. But she will get her moment in the limelight and the odds might shorten a bit more on her. Meanwhile Donald Trump is a lay.
I'm rather hoping she does quite well, but only because of Trump's posturing earlier on.
She probably will do quite well, but in the end someone whose only claim to political fame is having failed miserably in the one election she did stand in, and whose business career is more of a negative than a positive, is not going to get the nomination.
Edit: As surbiton says, she might well get the VP nomination.
Not so sure it will be Bush, though. He's not showing very well at the moment and there are three or four other serious candidates.
Got to love the tribalists on here, Corbyn bangs Abbott 30 years ago and it proves he's a weirdo. Around the same time Cameron does the same with a pig's head, front page of the Mail, and its a non story.
not at all.
It's just that having an affair with Diane Abbott or putting your schlonger into the mouth of a dead pig are things that most people can't conceive as being something that anyone would actually want to do.
Oh come off it, was Abbott in her 20s really that bad, of course not. Does it matter that he put his pecker in a dead pig at uni, of course not.
Its the infantile double standards and point scoring I find amusing, both sides jumping up and down with fake outrage.
I maintain that pig-gate is more dangerous, not because of the pig but because of the story teller, despite the spin from the tories on here its bad news and Cameron will know it.
dear god man - take out the infantile double standards and point scoring on PB and what are you left with??
What’s Carson’s background? he sounds like an evangelical pastor from the south? - He’s certainly made some very odd comments regarding Nazi Germany, Gays and Muslims becoming POTUS.
Isn't it a damning indictment of Republican politicians that their top three for the presidential nomination are all from outside politics. There must be a governor or senator out there that's better than ANOTHER Bush.
What’s Carson’s background? he sounds like an evangelical pastor from the south? - He’s certainly made some very odd comments regarding Nazi Germany, Gays and Muslims becoming POTUS.
He's a surgeon.
He's said some stuff that his faith tells him evolution didn't happen and that a Muslim can't be President.
Europe's divide: Hungary posts ads in Lebanese newspapers warning migrants not to enter illegally - as Austria struggles to cope with 24,000 crossing their border
Hungary took out a full page ads saying 'the strongest possible action' will be taken against law breakers Informs would-be refugees that entering Hungary illegally is now a crime punishable by imprisonment News comes as Austrian police revealed that nearly 24,000 refugees crossed over from Hungary this weekend A further 3,200 desperate refugees arrived this morning alone, stretching local resources to the limit
If Mike follows his usual holiday pattern my next stint will be covering the London Mayoral/Scottish Parliament/Welsh Assembly and local council elections.
Nothing major will happen were Jezbollah led Labour to badly in those.
Press Gazette Former NoW political editor: Ashcroft's Cameron pig head story would not have passed 'basic standards' for tabloid http://t.co/D8pAjBFbUY
Writing in The Spectator today, Ian Kirby said: "If I had gone to Rebekah Brooks or Andy Coulson when they were editing and said that I had a story about David Cameron’s honourable member and a pig’s head, their first question would be ‘where’s the proof?’"
"If I then told them I had it on good authority from an MP who swears they’d seen a photograph but won’t go on the record, I would have been booted out of the office – only after being given a good kicking.
"As every political journalist knows there are lies, damn lies – and then the tales that MPs tell about their enemies. Lord Ashcroft’s story about Cameron and the pig would not have passed the basic standards demanded by a tabloid newspaper. Kirby also wrote that tabloids do not have the budgets they used to have and so the "easy way for a newspaper to publish a scandal nowadays is simply to serialise a book, preferably one by a ‘name’, and then print whatever they say about someone you know doesn’t have the time or the inclination to sue. It’s not the paper’s reputation on the line but the author’s."
He added: "Politicians like to attack the press for low standards, sometimes for good reason. But today we see a revolting ‘story’ that is based on nothing more substantive than the ‘word’ of a multi-millionaire."
Ms Fiorina won't get the nomination, and nor will Donald Trump. But she will get her moment in the limelight and the odds might shorten a bit more on her. Meanwhile Donald Trump is a lay.
She will be the Veep candidate regardless. I am not being sexist. I think in the end , it will be Jeb.
If Mike follows his usual holiday pattern my next stint will be covering the London Mayoral/Scottish Parliament/Welsh Assembly and local council elections.
Nothing major will happen were Jezbollah led Labour to badly in those.
when is man of the people political seer Eddie Izzard due to become London Mayor?
Press Gazette Former NoW political editor: Ashcroft's Cameron pig head story would not have passed 'basic standards' for tabloid http://t.co/D8pAjBFbUY
Writing in The Spectator today, Ian Kirby said: "If I had gone to Rebekah Brooks or Andy Coulson when they were editing and said that I had a story about David Cameron’s honourable member and a pig’s head, their first question would be ‘where’s the proof?’"
"If I then told them I had it on good authority from an MP who swears they’d seen a photograph but won’t go on the record, I would have been booted out of the office – only after being given a good kicking.
"As every political journalist knows there are lies, damn lies – and then the tales that MPs tell about their enemies. Lord Ashcroft’s story about Cameron and the pig would not have passed the basic standards demanded by a tabloid newspaper."
Poor old Dacre, miffed that he's never had, and now never will get a peerage.
Of course Mr Corbyn denies being an anti-Semite, but he has plenty of friends who don't bother to do so. He assures us that his kind remarks about the IRA were designed to advance the peace process, which is no doubt why he fawned on Gerry Adams and Martin McGuiness before the wreckage of the Grand Hotel Brighton had even been cleared, and later observed a minute's silence for eight IRA terrorists killed by the British Army.
... We, the victims of the IRA and Sinn Fein, see the advancement of men who admire those who sanction violence to get their way.
1. Loss of authority could be terminal 2. Shows power of those behind the apparent leaders, ie Ashcroft can pull the plug on Cameron if he wants, due to his powerful position and the fact that he has authority within the Press. He and the Mail don’t care for Cameron, hence this attack. Imagine if I said this about Chris Grayling (I was at Uni with him, and of course this isn't true of him) – no one would print it 3. Also initiation rites are deliberate control on future elites, to keep them in line in future 4. However it is also represents wider sexual violence, humiliation, denigration of poor people, etc, by the ruling elite
Isn't it a damning indictment of Republican politicians that their top three for the presidential nomination are all from outside politics. There must be a governor or senator out there that's better than ANOTHER Bush.
Wait and see how the outsiders do when the campaign gets serious. If there's one thing politicians are good at, it's politics.
Ms Fiorina won't get the nomination, and nor will Donald Trump. But she will get her moment in the limelight and the odds might shorten a bit more on her. Meanwhile Donald Trump is a lay.
So in your view that's Trump, Carson and Fiorina out.
1. Loss of authority could be terminal 2. Shows power of those behind the apparent leaders, ie Ashcroft can pull the plug on Cameron if he wants, due to his powerful position and the fact that he has authority within the Press. He and the Mail don’t care for Cameron, hence this attack. Imagine if I said this about Chris Grayling (I was at Uni with him, and of course this isn't true of him) – no one would print it 3. Also initiation rites are deliberate control on future elites, to keep them in line in future 4. However it is also represents wider sexual violence, humiliation, denigration of poor people, etc, by the ruling elite
hey!
Come on @TheScreamingEagles I know this is your last day (for your efforts thanks) but if you are going to set up a spoof account to continue posting to try to make us believe you are some bonkers lefty you are going to have to do better than this.
Hope you all took my Fiorina tip several months ago. At 164/1 !
I was pretty sure she would scale in simply by standing out as the only GOP woman in an over crowded stage. Her ability to lamp one on Trump has been a bonus. Go girl!
1. Loss of authority could be terminal 2. Shows power of those behind the apparent leaders, ie Ashcroft can pull the plug on Cameron if he wants, due to his powerful position and the fact that he has authority within the Press. He and the Mail don’t care for Cameron, hence this attack. Imagine if I said this about Chris Grayling (I was at Uni with him, and of course this isn't true of him) – no one would print it 3. Also initiation rites are deliberate control on future elites, to keep them in line in future 4. However it is also represents wider sexual violence, humiliation, denigration of poor people, etc, by the ruling elite
1. Loss of authority could be terminal 2. Shows power of those behind the apparent leaders, ie Ashcroft can pull the plug on Cameron if he wants, due to his powerful position and the fact that he has authority within the Press. He and the Mail don’t care for Cameron, hence this attack. Imagine if I said this about Chris Grayling (I was at Uni with him, and of course this isn't true of him) – no one would print it 3. Also initiation rites are deliberate control on future elites, to keep them in line in future 4. However it is also represents wider sexual violence, humiliation, denigration of poor people, etc, by the ruling elite
What an odd little world you live in.
His Lordship wrote a second-hand allegation from an un-quoted source, involving an initiation ceremony of a club the PM was never a member of. – No wonder some have doubts about its validity .
1. Loss of authority could be terminal 2. Shows power of those behind the apparent leaders, ie Ashcroft can pull the plug on Cameron if he wants, due to his powerful position and the fact that he has authority within the Press. He and the Mail don’t care for Cameron, hence this attack. Imagine if I said this about Chris Grayling (I was at Uni with him, and of course this isn't true of him) – no one would print it 3. Also initiation rites are deliberate control on future elites, to keep them in line in future 4. However it is also represents wider sexual violence, humiliation, denigration of poor people, etc, by the ruling elite
hey!
Come on @TheScreamingEagles I know this is your last day (for your efforts thanks) but if you are going to set up a spoof account to continue posting to try to make us believe you are some bonkers lefty you are going to have to do better than this.
Thanks, I thought I was a real person, but maybe you know better!
I'm watching the market on the SNP failing to make a clean sweep of all 73 constituency seats next year in Holyrood. 1\5 at Ladbrokes, but very little liquidity. Their candidate in Shetland, Mike Mackenzie, hasn't got a chance.
1. Loss of authority could be terminal 2. Shows power of those behind the apparent leaders, ie Ashcroft can pull the plug on Cameron if he wants, due to his powerful position and the fact that he has authority within the Press. He and the Mail don’t care for Cameron, hence this attack. Imagine if I said this about Chris Grayling (I was at Uni with him, and of course this isn't true of him) – no one would print it 3. Also initiation rites are deliberate control on future elites, to keep them in line in future 4. However it is also represents wider sexual violence, humiliation, denigration of poor people, etc, by the ruling elite
You think that's bad?
At my alma mater (the finest public school in Sheffield) we used to play chess using poor people as chess pieces.
We stood at Sheffield train station throwing soap at the poor
So in your view that's Trump, Carson and Fiorina out.
Do you think Bush will get the nod then?
Currently it looks like one of Bush, Walker, or Rubio. There are a few others whom I wouldn't rule out - Kasich, perhaps. Things can change - we're still months from the first primary votes - but it will almost certainly be someone who is or has been a governor, or (less likely) senator, not a maverick outsider who's never won anything and who has no political hinterland or organisation. As Edmund points out, this is a game for professionals, and it's also a marathon, not a novelty egg-and-gaffe race.
I left the Lib Dems looking 'insipid', admits Clegg as he takes the blame for election 'drubbing'
Former Deputy PM tells conference of his 'mistakes and miscalculations' During election he promised to 'heart' for the Tories and 'head' for Labour But in speech he admits the strategy left the Lib Dems looking 'insipid' Insists the Lib Dems can be the 'comeback kids of British politics'
Ms Fiorina won't get the nomination, and nor will Donald Trump. But she will get her moment in the limelight and the odds might shorten a bit more on her. Meanwhile Donald Trump is a lay.
Fiorina, no. Trump I wouldn't write off though as a trading bet - given the polling coming out of NH - he's probably a lay for now.
I'd be interested to see caucus-filtered polling from Iowa. The result there will have some feed through to NH and I'd have thought that Trump might be quite a good fit.
Ms Fiorina won't get the nomination, and nor will Donald Trump. But she will get her moment in the limelight and the odds might shorten a bit more on her. Meanwhile Donald Trump is a lay.
Richard, agreed. This may herald the end of the Donald's ascendancy in the polls, and the beginning of the serious campaign. If so, we can expect a whittling down of the menu and the polling to start coalescing around a number of the career politicians.
I still don't see Jeb getting it, and Walker is just about down and out. While I still like Kasich on policy, I think Rubio is the most likely to benefit at this stage.
If that sounds weak and unconvincing it's because it is. Perverse as it might sound, there really aren't any political consequences of a story that the Prime Minister did something rude to a dead pig. It won't change anyone's mind about him, though it may convince some that they were right in what they already thought. It won't change a single vote, and wouldn't have done so even if Mr Cameron was standing again.
His memory goes in and out. He certainly doesn't remember saying that he didn't remember blocking any appointments.
It's quite simple really. Clegg says he didn't block Ashcroft, that Cameron used him as an excuse. Clegg says he did block Howard.
Surely, it is quite likely that if Clegg blocked the respected former Party leader, it was almost certain he would block the, er, somewhat less respected figure of Lord Ashcroft - so Cameron didn't actually ask Clegg because the answer - No!!! over my dead body - was 100% certain?
I left the Lib Dems looking 'insipid', admits Clegg as he takes the blame for election 'drubbing'
Former Deputy PM tells conference of his 'mistakes and miscalculations' During election he promised to 'heart' for the Tories and 'head' for Labour But in speech he admits the strategy left the Lib Dems looking 'insipid' Insists the Lib Dems can be the 'comeback kids of British politics'
1) Have the LibDems go hell for leather for Labour, pointing out the LibDems were the sensible, prudent Left on the economy (rather than starting to rum that line now);
2) Resigned after the Euro results and allow the party to stand a chance of being listened to by a new voice. People just blocked out any message fed to them by Clegg.
1. Loss of authority could be terminal 2. Shows power of those behind the apparent leaders, ie Ashcroft can pull the plug on Cameron if he wants, due to his powerful position and the fact that he has authority within the Press. He and the Mail don’t care for Cameron, hence this attack. Imagine if I said this about Chris Grayling (I was at Uni with him, and of course this isn't true of him) – no one would print it 3. Also initiation rites are deliberate control on future elites, to keep them in line in future 4. However it is also represents wider sexual violence, humiliation, denigration of poor people, etc, by the ruling elite
You think that's bad?
At my alma mater (the finest public school in Sheffield) we used to play chess using poor people as chess pieces.
We stood at Sheffield train station throwing soap at the poor
Both gave us the horn.
Given that chess is a military strategy game, I assume you properly disposed of the poor once they were removed from the board.
Did you used the cleaned ones for white and the dirty ones for black?
One thing's struck me about the Labour lady's appearance on DP earlier. In her reasonable defence of railway renationalisation, she said that the railways would be more economic because of efficiency savings.
As 'efficiency savings' is another word for job cuts (or at least, that's the way Labour try to paint them when they're the government's efficiency savings), are Labour saying large numbers of railway workers will lose their jobs under renationalisation?
1. Loss of authority could be terminal 2. Shows power of those behind the apparent leaders, ie Ashcroft can pull the plug on Cameron if he wants, due to his powerful position and the fact that he has authority within the Press. He and the Mail don’t care for Cameron, hence this attack. Imagine if I said this about Chris Grayling (I was at Uni with him, and of course this isn't true of him) – no one would print it 3. Also initiation rites are deliberate control on future elites, to keep them in line in future 4. However it is also represents wider sexual violence, humiliation, denigration of poor people, etc, by the ruling elite
You think that's bad?
At my alma mater (the finest public school in Sheffield) we used to play chess using poor people as chess pieces.
We stood at Sheffield train station throwing soap at the poor
Both gave us the horn.
Given that chess is a military strategy game, I assume you properly disposed of the poor once they were removed from the board.
Did you used the cleaned ones for white and the dirty ones for black?
That's pretty much it.
With chess being a white supremacist game ( I mean black goes second after white) made it even more fun.
I have also noticed that we're coming to the put up or shut up stage of this fiasco. If the Mail and Aschcroft are unable to produce this photographic evidence they have alleged exists then I think it will need to be retracted. There are too many people rubbishing the claims who would know about it if it had happened.
I left the Lib Dems looking 'insipid', admits Clegg as he takes the blame for election 'drubbing'
Former Deputy PM tells conference of his 'mistakes and miscalculations' During election he promised to 'heart' for the Tories and 'head' for Labour But in speech he admits the strategy left the Lib Dems looking 'insipid' Insists the Lib Dems can be the 'comeback kids of British politics'
1) Have the LibDems go hell for leather for Labour, pointing out the LibDems were the sensible, prudent Left on the economy (rather than starting to rum that line now);
2) Resigned after the Euro results and allow the party to stand a chance of being listened to by a new voice. People just blocked out any message fed to them by Clegg.
One thing's struck me about the Labour lady's appearance on DP earlier. In her reasonable defence of railway renationalisation, she said that the railways would be more economic because of efficiency savings.
As 'efficiency savings' is another word for job cuts (or at least, that's the way Labour try to paint them when they're the government's efficiency savings), are Labour saying large numbers of railway workers will lose their jobs under renationalisation?
I think the perception is that because private companies are taking a cut for running the trains, if we remove them and let the state run them then we'll save money. Not necessarily the case, of course.
Having said that, I've been scratching my head about what free, non-partisan and helpful advice we can give to the dwindling band of sane Labour MPs on what to do about Corbyn, but I'm completely stumped.
I have also noticed that we're coming to the put up or shut up stage of this fiasco. If the Mail and Aschcroft are unable to produce this photographic evidence they have alleged exists then I think it will need to be retracted. There are too many people rubbishing the claims who would know about it if it had happened.
One thing's struck me about the Labour lady's appearance on DP earlier. In her reasonable defence of railway renationalisation, she said that the railways would be more economic because of efficiency savings.
As 'efficiency savings' is another word for job cuts (or at least, that's the way Labour try to paint them when they're the government's efficiency savings), are Labour saying large numbers of railway workers will lose their jobs under renationalisation?
I think the perception is that because private companies are taking a cut for running the trains, if we remove them and let the state run them then we'll save money. Not necessarily the case, of course.
She was definitely using the efficiency savings line.
I left the Lib Dems looking 'insipid', admits Clegg as he takes the blame for election 'drubbing'
Former Deputy PM tells conference of his 'mistakes and miscalculations' During election he promised to 'heart' for the Tories and 'head' for Labour But in speech he admits the strategy left the Lib Dems looking 'insipid' Insists the Lib Dems can be the 'comeback kids of British politics'
1) Have the LibDems go hell for leather for Labour, pointing out the LibDems were the sensible, prudent Left on the economy (rather than starting to rum that line now);
2) Resigned after the Euro results and allow the party to stand a chance of being listened to by a new voice. People just blocked out any message fed to them by Clegg.
Except it was of course losing tactical labour votes that lost them many of their seats.
It's a total crock. If it wasn't conference season, I'd go for a full revolt of the PLP and declare a vote of No Confidence.
Corbyn's been totally knobbled by moderates who've kettled him. But now he's got a platform and a massive base.
If I were a Labour MP, I'd be wishing for a killer story to bring him down. But those in the evil Tory Press may prefer to let this drag on and on and on...
Having said that, I've been scratching my head about what free, non-partisan and helpful advice we can give to the dwindling band of sane Labour MPs on what to do about Corbyn, but I'm completely stumped.
I had dinner with Isabel Oakeshott at last year’s Conservative Party Conference and after she’d established that I had nothing scandalous to contribute to the book she asked me how I thought people inside the Westminster bubble – journalists and broadcasters, as well as MPs – would react to ‘Call Me Dave’. I got the distinct impression she was worried about the harm it would do to her reputation, particularly if the focus was on Cameron’s student days.
Now I see why. Isabel is a first-rate reporter who deservedly won ‘Political Journalist of the Year’ for her Sunday Times scoop that led to Chris Huhne’s fall from grace. To see her reduced to helping Lord Ashcroft peddle these sub-tabloid stories is a shame. The only people whose reputations have been damaged by ‘Call Me Dave’ are Isabel and her employer.
1. Loss of authority could be terminal 2. Shows power of those behind the apparent leaders, ie Ashcroft can pull the plug on Cameron if he wants, due to his powerful position and the fact that he has authority within the Press. He and the Mail don’t care for Cameron, hence this attack. Imagine if I said this about Chris Grayling (I was at Uni with him, and of course this isn't true of him) – no one would print it 3. Also initiation rites are deliberate control on future elites, to keep them in line in future 4. However it is also represents wider sexual violence, humiliation, denigration of poor people, etc, by the ruling elite
If I were a Labour MP, I'd be wishing for a killer story to bring him down. But those in the evil Tory Press may prefer to let this drag on and on and on...
Does the Islington Allotment Keepers' Association (if there is one) have an initiation rite?
Having said that, I've been scratching my head about what free, non-partisan and helpful advice we can give to the dwindling band of sane Labour MPs on what to do about Corbyn, but I'm completely stumped.
They can try to control him through the Shadow Cabinet and get him to renounce the absurd and incoherent positions he has espoused for the last 30 years. That is the current strategy which, somewhat oddly, Tom Watson was warning against this morning. I can only infer he has not been invited into the cabal.
If that does not work they will need to humiliate him publically by having a majority of the PLP vote against him and hope he resigns in consequence.
1. Loss of authority could be terminal 2. Shows power of those behind the apparent leaders, ie Ashcroft can pull the plug on Cameron if he wants, due to his powerful position and the fact that he has authority within the Press. He and the Mail don’t care for Cameron, hence this attack. Imagine if I said this about Chris Grayling (I was at Uni with him, and of course this isn't true of him) – no one would print it 3. Also initiation rites are deliberate control on future elites, to keep them in line in future 4. However it is also represents wider sexual violence, humiliation, denigration of poor people, etc, by the ruling elite
hey!
Come on @TheScreamingEagles I know this is your last day (for your efforts thanks) but if you are going to set up a spoof account to continue posting to try to make us believe you are some bonkers lefty you are going to have to do better than this.
Thanks, I thought I was a real person, but maybe you know better!
You are a real person and apologies if you were offended by what I said.
talking about elites is always tricky. What, for example, was the percentage of the population who went to university at the time of Chris Grayling? Would that have constituted an elite?
Having said that, I've been scratching my head about what free, non-partisan and helpful advice we can give to the dwindling band of sane Labour MPs on what to do about Corbyn, but I'm completely stumped.
Loving the spin here about this now definitely not being true. I thought the line was it was no big deal, we've all been there?
Was that ever the line?
Isabell Oakeshott was on WATO whining that this story is one page out the entire book.
Translation
"I traded my journalistic repuation for a story we can't stand up. Please, please, please read the rest of the book or it was all for nought..."
Curious attitude - if it's true, then it's explosive and deserves to be told and then proven, and the rest of the book will be looked at in time. If she doesn't like it getting the attention rather than the apparently moving account of Cameron's feelings about his first born, which the Mail say is also in there, or whatever well that's tough - truth or lie, it's so far the most significant allegation one way or another, she can defend it as being true but only one part of the tale, or say it shouldn't have been in there.
They can try to control him through the Shadow Cabinet and get him to renounce the absurd and incoherent positions he has espoused for the last 30 years. That is the current strategy which, somewhat oddly, Tom Watson was warning against this morning. I can only infer he has not been invited into the cabal.
If that does not work they will need to humiliate him publically by having a majority of the PLP vote against him and hope he resigns in consequence.
The trouble with that approach is that he's going to try to get, and probably will get, support directly from party members for his policies. It's a mistake to underestimate him and his team (many of whom worked with Ken Livingstone, no slouch himself at manipulating Labour politics).
I said here after last wednesday's GOP debate that I felt Carly had won big time, and that Trump had peaked. Carly's putdown of Trump's face comment was killer, and minimalist. Her foreign policy credentials were on display as well.
If the trend continues I shall start to feel a bit smug.
Comments
Just glad it wasn't a pheasant.
I think you mean Jeremy Corbyn.
Edit: As surbiton says, she might well get the VP nomination.
Not so sure it will be Bush, though. He's not showing very well at the moment and there are three or four other serious candidates.
After all, you can't put lipstick on a pig
Hat tip to TSE for deputising.
He's said some stuff that his faith tells him evolution didn't happen and that a Muslim can't be President.
Luckily it's been a quiet period.
Remember when I tipped Lord Howard as our next man in Bruxelles at 25/1?
@TelePolitics: Nick Clegg: I blocked Lord Howard's appointment as EU commissioner http://t.co/DwK3EvZDPX
http://www.centerforpolitics.org/crystalball/2016-president/
What she did have the nerve to do was call out the ridiculous Trump when the others were running scared. Cooper and Burnham should look and weep.
Nothing major will happen were Jezbollah led Labour to badly in those.
Welcome back.
Former NoW political editor: Ashcroft's Cameron pig head story would not have passed 'basic standards' for tabloid http://t.co/D8pAjBFbUY
I'm intrigued by the possibility.
Does he have CJD?
It's tragic for one so young.
1. Loss of authority could be terminal
2. Shows power of those behind the apparent leaders, ie Ashcroft can pull the plug on Cameron if he wants, due to his powerful position and the fact that he has authority within the Press. He and the Mail don’t care for Cameron, hence this attack. Imagine if I said this about Chris Grayling (I was at Uni with him, and of course this isn't true of him) – no one would print it
3. Also initiation rites are deliberate control on future elites, to keep them in line in future
4. However it is also represents wider sexual violence, humiliation, denigration of poor people, etc, by the ruling elite
Clegg says he didn't block Ashcroft, that Cameron used him as an excuse.
Clegg says he did block Howard.
Do you think Bush will get the nod then?
Come on @TheScreamingEagles I know this is your last day (for your efforts thanks) but if you are going to set up a spoof account to continue posting to try to make us believe you are some bonkers lefty you are going to have to do better than this.
I was pretty sure she would scale in simply by standing out as the only GOP woman in an over crowded stage. Her ability to lamp one on Trump has been a bonus. Go girl!
And Ashcroft is apparently retelling a porkie pie. He didn't get a job and hasn't donated a sou or sow in years.
So what *power* does he wield beyond making himself look vengeful and petty?
He's embarrassed our PM for a day - nothing more.
His Lordship wrote a second-hand allegation from an un-quoted source, involving an initiation ceremony of a club the PM was never a member of. – No wonder some have doubts about its validity .
At my alma mater (the finest public school in Sheffield) we used to play chess using poor people as chess pieces.
We stood at Sheffield train station throwing soap at the poor
Both gave us the horn.
I'd be interested to see caucus-filtered polling from Iowa. The result there will have some feed through to NH and I'd have thought that Trump might be quite a good fit.
I still don't see Jeb getting it, and Walker is just about down and out. While I still like Kasich on policy, I think Rubio is the most likely to benefit at this stage.
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/donald-trumps-six-stages-of-doom/
Nate's analysis also works for other maverick contenders.
1) Have the LibDems go hell for leather for Labour, pointing out the LibDems were the sensible, prudent Left on the economy (rather than starting to rum that line now);
2) Resigned after the Euro results and allow the party to stand a chance of being listened to by a new voice. People just blocked out any message fed to them by Clegg.
Did you used the cleaned ones for white and the dirty ones for black?
One thing's struck me about the Labour lady's appearance on DP earlier. In her reasonable defence of railway renationalisation, she said that the railways would be more economic because of efficiency savings.
As 'efficiency savings' is another word for job cuts (or at least, that's the way Labour try to paint them when they're the government's efficiency savings), are Labour saying large numbers of railway workers will lose their jobs under renationalisation?
With chess being a white supremacist game ( I mean black goes second after white) made it even more fun.
You are scratching around for something to post now....
Meanwhile, the BBC’s coverage of the Lib Dem Autumn Conference takes on a lighter note.
https://twitter.com/SunNation/status/645960997765795840
It's actually a free public service. Clegg should have listened to the pb Tories....
1) Have the LibDems go hell for leather for Labour, pointing out the LibDems were the sensible, prudent Left on the economy (rather than starting to rum that line now);
2) Resigned after the Euro results and allow the party to stand a chance of being listened to by a new voice. People just blocked out any message fed to them by Clegg.
I wrong to make up a quote about King Edward II and his gay lover Piers Gaveston
http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2013/03/26/boris-johnson-i-was-wrong-to-make-up-a-quote-about-king-edward-ii-and-his-gay-lover-piers-gaveston/
It's inevitable and no one cares, just as they didn't all those years ago.
Except it was of course losing tactical labour votes that lost them many of their seats.
Isabell Oakeshott was on WATO whining that this story is one page out the entire book.
Translation
"I traded my journalistic repuation for a story we can't stand up. Please, please, please read the rest of the book or it was all for nought..."
It's a total crock. If it wasn't conference season, I'd go for a full revolt of the PLP and declare a vote of No Confidence.
Corbyn's been totally knobbled by moderates who've kettled him. But now he's got a platform and a massive base.
If I were a Labour MP, I'd be wishing for a killer story to bring him down. But those in the evil Tory Press may prefer to let this drag on and on and on...
Someone is about to get fired.
If that does not work they will need to humiliate him publically by having a majority of the PLP vote against him and hope he resigns in consequence.
talking about elites is always tricky. What, for example, was the percentage of the population who went to university at the time of Chris Grayling? Would that have constituted an elite?
Just invest in him to keep the job I reckon:
http://www.oddschecker.com/politics/british-politics/jeremy-corbyn-specials leader still at 1st Jan 2017 4-5.
I said here after last wednesday's GOP debate that I felt Carly had won big time, and that Trump had peaked. Carly's putdown of Trump's face comment was killer, and minimalist. Her foreign policy credentials were on display as well.
If the trend continues I shall start to feel a bit smug.