Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Betting on when The Queen will invite someone to form a gov

SystemSystem Posts: 12,217
edited May 2015 in General

imagepoliticalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Betting on when The Queen will invite someone to form a government

Please note the terms of the bet, Applies to the date of the Queen’s first invitation to form a government. Person first invited may or may not go on to form a government. Invitation counts even if an exploratory commission is accepted. PP decision final.

Read the full story here


«13456

Comments

  • ChameleonChameleon Posts: 4,264
    First?
  • edmundintokyoedmundintokyo Posts: 17,708
    What happens if Cameron stays on as PM? He's already in charge of the government, he doesn't need to be invited to form one, does he?
  • PlatoPlato Posts: 15,724
    edited May 2015
    Second Coming! EDIT Bah!
  • MattWMattW Posts: 23,937
    Second.

    I shall build a monument to my achievement.
  • ArtistArtist Posts: 1,893
    I'd go for the 11th of May. The dust will settle on the Friday, there'll be negotiations during the weekend and the Prime Minister elect will be invited on the Monday.
  • IOSIOS Posts: 1,450
    Artist

    Depends on what government we get. I can't see a Lab / Lib coalition so getting a lab minority together shouldn't be to hard.
  • MarkHopkinsMarkHopkins Posts: 5,584
    SeanT said:

    fpt for YBarddCwsc

    Re my OFFICIAL indyref forecast: if you like you can check the Official PB Indyref prediction game, where my prediction is recorded. I called it narrow NO (I was within about 2.5 points of the final score), I also got the turnout within about 2% - see here

    SeanT Posts: 7,602
    September 2014
    I'm in.

    I've gone for 47.12% YES

    And 82.something (forgot)% TURNOUT

    Not bad. Not bad at all.

    FPT Yes.

    47.12% and 82.83%

    http://www.nojam.com/demo/pbindycomp/results.php?s_Name=sean+thomas
  • CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 60,216
    Artist said:

    I'd go for the 11th of May. The dust will settle on the Friday, there'll be negotiations during the weekend and the Prime Minister elect will be invited on the Monday.

    There isn't a 'Prime Minister elect'

    There is a 'Prime Minister' - who is David Cameron, until he decides otherwise, or loses a vote in the HoC that 'This House has no confidence in Her Majesty's Government' (or words to the effect under the FPTA).....
  • Ishmael_XIshmael_X Posts: 3,664
    MattW said:

    Second.

    I shall build a monument to my achievement.

    I would start an argument with you about that, but I suspect your decision is set in stone.

    Some VERY rattled lefties about today.
  • CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 60,216
    FPT:
    SeanT said:

    murali_s said:

    surbiton said:

    SeanT said:

    kle4 said:

    Daniel said:

    Labour HQ praying for the new Princess to named today...

    Is there a feminine form of Moses?

    Thank you so much for this Labour, I've not had enough chance to laugh at something in this campaign without needing to worry about the politics of it all (a lot of the humour will be partisan of course, but it's silly no matter the side).
    Likewise. It's the first time in quite a depressing campaign, where I have genuinely laughed out loud - and laughed a lot. Not just sneered and grinned, or chortled contemptuously, or done a partisan chuckle - but laughed.

    The trouble is, I really am laughing AT Ed and the Labour buffoons who devised this. I suspect many others will, too, not just nasty rightwingers.

    Labour have spent weeks deconstructing the perceived image of Ed as a gigantic, flailing dork, and with some success. Now this. Will it impact? Probably not, but it ain't good to go into the final week of a tight election with EVERYONE sniggering at you. Even the Guardian.
    120 hours and someone else will be laughing at you !
    To be fair, SeanT has called the GE for Ed Milliband.
    To be fair, SeanT called the Indy Ref for Yes, then No, then Yes, then No, then Yes, then No, then (at the very end, in a public meltdown on pb) Yes.

    When it came in No, Sean could say honestly that he had predicted it.
    I also predicted, unlike ANYONE, that the SNP would get a huge sympathy vote
    Actually...no

    Some Scots Tories (I think DavidL was among them) predicted very much this.

    And some of us (moi) were rubbished by OGH for pointing out consistently good SNP subsamples in YouGov, post SindyRef....
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,591
    edited May 2015
    IOS said:

    Chelsea winning the league

    Royal Baby

    The boxing


    All these are going to be more on peoples minds. The idea that this is a sheffield moment shows how utterly desperate the Tories are.

    Very few people have said that (most have simply mocked it), so while the Tories are desperate, this doesn't show that desperation, only that you have imagined what you think they are saying I fear.

    I'm thinking it will take Ed a few days at least to get things in order for his government, and Cameron won't wait for a vote but until he sees Ed has not messed up his negotiations with the SNP. Call it 4-5 working days.
  • CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 60,216
    Ishmael_X said:

    MattW said:

    Second.

    I shall build a monument to my achievement.

    Some VERY rattled lefties about today.
    They're between a rock and a hard place...

    ....I'll get my coat....
  • SandpitSandpit Posts: 55,031
    Does the Queen have to invite someone to form the government, even if it a continuation of the old one?

    For all the discussion on the constitutional processes over the past few days on here, the consensus was that Dave remains PM and the government in place until he goes to the Queen to resign. If he doesn't resign then his government will deliver the Queen's Speech, I don't see where in that process the Queen asks him to form a government? Too ambiguous, no bet.
  • MarkHopkinsMarkHopkins Posts: 5,584
    edited May 2015

    Travelled a couple of miles through suburban town today; passing detached houses, semis, and flats.

    One Conservative poster.

    Two Labour posters.

    Don't they know there's an election on?

  • PlatoPlato Posts: 15,724
    Whilst I find the EdStone surreal and very funny, if Cameron did this - I'd be WTF? Hubris much? Who thought this was a vote winner?? It's made my Party Leader into a laughing stock 3 Days out.

    I'd be laughing it off, but very let down inside...
    Ishmael_X said:

    MattW said:

    Second.

    I shall build a monument to my achievement.

    I would start an argument with you about that, but I suspect your decision is set in stone.

    Some VERY rattled lefties about today.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,591

    SeanT said:

    fpt for YBarddCwsc

    Re my OFFICIAL indyref forecast: if you like you can check the Official PB Indyref prediction game, where my prediction is recorded. I called it narrow NO (I was within about 2.5 points of the final score), I also got the turnout within about 2% - see here

    SeanT Posts: 7,602
    September 2014
    I'm in.

    I've gone for 47.12% YES

    And 82.something (forgot)% TURNOUT

    Not bad. Not bad at all.

    FPT Yes.

    47.12% and 82.83%

    http://www.nojam.com/demo/pbindycomp/results.php?s_Name=sean+thomas
    Hmm, I had 53.23%. Should I be worried about my Lab plurality prediction?

    Anyway, must be off.
  • SandpitSandpit Posts: 55,031
    Plato said:

    Whilst I find the EdStone surreal and very funny, if Cameron did this - I'd be WTF? Hubris much? Who thought this was a vote winner?? It's made my Party Leader into a laughing stock 3 Days out.

    I'd be laughing it off, but very let down inside...

    Ishmael_X said:

    MattW said:

    Second.

    I shall build a monument to my achievement.

    I would start an argument with you about that, but I suspect your decision is set in stone.

    Some VERY rattled lefties about today.
    Plato, you said you did PR - how does the discussion start, that ends with "I know, let's get a bloody big stone pledge card and have the leader stand in front of it on Sunday morning"?
  • edmundintokyoedmundintokyo Posts: 17,708
    I agree with Sandpit, this needs clarity on what happens if Cameron stays on.

    On the politics, I don't think Cameron's going to want to hang around like a bad smell, whatever the Tories might currently be spinning to try to keep their options open. If Lab+SNP have the numbers I think he'd sod promptly off. Whether that's Friday or Saturday depends on the counting - do we think there will be a fair few contentious counts still going through Friday?
  • RodCrosbyRodCrosby Posts: 7,737

    What happens if Cameron stays on as PM? He's already in charge of the government, he doesn't need to be invited to form one, does he?

    Correct. One possibility for the bet is "Never", since we have Fixed term parliaments, and the Queen is getting on...
  • IOSIOS Posts: 1,450
    Kle

    Yeah people mocking it if of course fair play. Its the few - and it is a few - that think its some massive moment.

    I mean guys we have been here before several times in the last week. See question time!
  • surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549
    edited May 2015

    What happens if Cameron stays on as PM? He's already in charge of the government, he doesn't need to be invited to form one, does he?

    Logic says that Cameron will stay put and try to cobble together a "coalition" - I use the word because it doesn't have to be one .

    If the arithmetic is clear cut, he will go to the Palace and resign. The Queen will ask Miliband to form a government.

    As we know from this morning's thread, in Harold Wilson's book, he made it clear that the outgoing PM does NOT advise the Queen about his replacement - and the Queen does not have to heed it anyway.

    Ed becomes PM on 8th evening.
  • foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548
    edited May 2015

    SeanT said:

    fpt for YBarddCwsc

    Re my OFFICIAL indyref forecast: if you like you can check the Official PB Indyref prediction game, where my prediction is recorded. I called it narrow NO (I was within about 2.5 points of the final score), I also got the turnout within about 2% - see here

    SeanT Posts: 7,602
    September 2014
    I'm in.

    I've gone for 47.12% YES

    And 82.something (forgot)% TURNOUT

    Not bad. Not bad at all.

    FPT Yes.

    47.12% and 82.83%

    http://www.nojam.com/demo/pbindycomp/results.php?s_Name=sean+thomas
    Thanks for the link. Those wishing to weigh up predictions for this election may want to check their tipster on this list (of frequent posters Richard Nabavi did notably well):

    http://www.nojam.com/demo/pbindycomp/results.php?b=0&i=0&s_Name=&o_lcl=C_1

    I got the result to 0.37, but was a bit out on turnout, may need to adjust my position for this election accordingly.

    Edit : Those betting on Scotterdammerung may want to note that antifrank had Yes on 57.3. 12 points out...
  • DairDair Posts: 6,108
    Sandpit said:

    Plato said:

    Whilst I find the EdStone surreal and very funny, if Cameron did this - I'd be WTF? Hubris much? Who thought this was a vote winner?? It's made my Party Leader into a laughing stock 3 Days out.

    I'd be laughing it off, but very let down inside...

    Ishmael_X said:

    MattW said:

    Second.

    I shall build a monument to my achievement.

    I would start an argument with you about that, but I suspect your decision is set in stone.

    Some VERY rattled lefties about today.
    Plato, you said you did PR - how does the discussion start, that ends with "I know, let's get a bloody big stone pledge card and have the leader stand in front of it on Sunday morning"?
    It's not the idea process that Labour seem to have a problem with. It's the back end.

    One thing any marketing campaign needs to do, once it has completed a pitch or a campaign, is to hand it off to people with absolutely no involvement in the creative process and let them pick holes in it.

    I suspect Labour just do not do this and have not done this during their campaign.
  • PlatoPlato Posts: 15,724
    IME, you start off with all sorts of ideas - some of them dull and safe, others off the wall - the off the wall ones are either epic successes or EdStone.

    Once a few ideas are picked out, we'd go through the messaging/audience/influencers/potential prat-falls/piss-taking/easily offended = then make a calculated decision that would generate enough noise, without becoming overwhelmed by controversy.

    IMO, Labour have fallen into the hubris trap that can happen when the Brand Faithful totally miss the point of what they're doing. If the decision to go ahead was made after a day in a bar - I'd believe it.

    The only other explanation is that Someone Important Really Liked It and everyone else just went along with it. Usually it's the person whose signature or photo is on the creation/advert that's responsible - or an acolyte of theirs. Being flattered into it really isn't an excuse.
    Sandpit said:

    Plato said:

    Whilst I find the EdStone surreal and very funny, if Cameron did this - I'd be WTF? Hubris much? Who thought this was a vote winner?? It's made my Party Leader into a laughing stock 3 Days out.

    I'd be laughing it off, but very let down inside...

    Ishmael_X said:

    MattW said:

    Second.

    I shall build a monument to my achievement.

    I would start an argument with you about that, but I suspect your decision is set in stone.

    Some VERY rattled lefties about today.
    Plato, you said you did PR - how does the discussion start, that ends with "I know, let's get a bloody big stone pledge card and have the leader stand in front of it on Sunday morning"?
  • BannedInParisBannedInParis Posts: 2,191


    Travelled a couple of miles through suburban town today; passing detached houses, semis, and flats.

    One Conservative poster.

    Two Labour posters.

    Don't they know there's an election on?

    Any of them have massive stone pledge obelisks?
  • surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549


    Travelled a couple of miles through suburban town today; passing detached houses, semis, and flats.

    One Conservative poster.

    Two Labour posters.

    Don't they know there's an election on?

    There is a reason behind this. Most people have decided months ago. This is not a campaign - if it ever does - to switch opinions.
  • frpenkridgefrpenkridge Posts: 670
    I'm surprised nobody here has remembered that Moses was not allowed to enter the Promised Land.
  • surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549
    edited May 2015
    Sunil, Let's take your phone polls only.

    What does it show ? 2.5% - 3% Con lead. *

    More than 4% swing to Labour , slightly more in England.

    I will take that.

    * Even though this is for GB, the vast majority of votes are in England.
  • PlatoPlato Posts: 15,724
    40yrs in the Wilderness suits me fine.

    I'm surprised nobody here has remembered that Moses was not allowed to enter the Promised Land.

  • saddosaddo Posts: 534
    Plato said:

    IME, you start off with all sorts of ideas - some of them dull and safe, others off the wall - the off the wall ones are either epic successes or EdStone.

    Once a few ideas are picked out, we'd go through the messaging/audience/influencers/potential prat-falls/piss-taking/easily offended = then make a calculated decision that would generate enough noise, without becoming overwhelmed by controversy.

    IMO, Labour have fallen into the hubris trap that can happen when the Brand Faithful totally miss the point of what they're doing. If the decision to go ahead was made after a day in a bar - I'd believe it.

    The only other explanation is that Someone Important Really Liked It and everyone else just went along with it. Usually it's the person whose signature or photo is on the creation/advert that's responsible - or an acolyte of theirs. Being flattered into it really isn't an excuse.

    Sandpit said:

    Plato said:

    Whilst I find the EdStone surreal and very funny, if Cameron did this - I'd be WTF? Hubris much? Who thought this was a vote winner?? It's made my Party Leader into a laughing stock 3 Days out.

    I'd be laughing it off, but very let down inside...

    Ishmael_X said:

    MattW said:

    Second.

    I shall build a monument to my achievement.

    I would start an argument with you about that, but I suspect your decision is set in stone.

    Some VERY rattled lefties about today.
    Plato, you said you did PR - how does the discussion start, that ends with "I know, let's get a bloody big stone pledge card and have the leader stand in front of it on Sunday morning"?
    Is it a dose of "Bay of Pigs" syndrome?

    Miliband's not allowed near any voters, except on QT on Thursday, where labour react by saying its a biased crowd

    He's surrounded by idiots like Spencer Livermore & Lucy Powell who just let him what he wants to hear

    He believes he's on some divine mission to rebuild the UK as some socialist utopia

    Net result is the Labour election lot actually believe all the crap they spout and no doubt will see the coverage of the stone as coverage of their policies, not everyone crying with laughter.

    And some people still want him as PM?
  • IOSIOS Posts: 1,450
    SeanT

    The polls have drifted back to Lab a bit. Yesterday we had survation and a lead in the other you gov.
  • Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826
    surbiton said:

    Sunil, Let's take your phone polls only.

    What does it show ? 2.5% - 3% Con lead. *

    More than 4% swing to Labour , slightly more in England.

    I will take that.

    * Even though this is for GB, the vast majority of votes are in England.
    With a trendline that indicates that's probably not the final result.
  • IOSIOS Posts: 1,450
    Also

    Just because Clegg says that the Lib Dems want to back the Tories doesn't mean every Lib Dem will... or indeed that the Tories can rely on the DUP.
  • Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 52,149

    I'm surprised nobody here has remembered that Moses was not allowed to enter the Promised Land.

    I'm surprised nobody here has remembered that Moses was not allowed to enter the Promised Land.

    Balls = Joshua?
  • SandpitSandpit Posts: 55,031

    I agree with Sandpit, this needs clarity on what happens if Cameron stays on.

    On the politics, I don't think Cameron's going to want to hang around like a bad smell, whatever the Tories might currently be spinning to try to keep their options open. If Lab+SNP have the numbers I think he'd sod promptly off. Whether that's Friday or Saturday depends on the counting - do we think there will be a fair few contentious counts still going through Friday?

    The ambiguity and the massive over-round says a definite no to this one.

    I reckon DC will resign as early as Friday if the results go against him, even if he retains the plurality of seats.

    Best case scenario he needs Con+LD+UKIP+DUP>321, and some of those may be willing only to abstain. If he's on 280 and LDs only 20 or so he'll know he has no chance and head to see the Queen.

    Dave's pragmatic view would be that he's done his time, clearly lost and wouldn't want to deal with the mess, better to let Ed have a go while his team choose a new leader in preparation for the almost inevitable second election. His advisers and strategists would also love to see Ed and the Nats not-doing-a-deal, it'll buy the Tories more English seats for every day it continues.
  • PlatoPlato Posts: 15,724
    IME - only meeting with yourselves is the most dangerous thing any organisation can do - it's an opinion echo chamber where everyone pontificates about what customers think and want, sometimes based on market research - often not. And when The Wrong Answer is delivered - it's ignored.

    Meeting face to face with hostile/lost customers is the best reality check you can ever get. And to keep doing it. I don't mean appeasing Haters - but those who once liked your message/product and you've lost along the way.
    saddo said:

    Plato said:

    IME, you start off with all sorts of ideas - some of them dull and safe, others off the wall - the off the wall ones are either epic successes or EdStone.

    Once a few ideas are picked out, we'd go through the messaging/audience/influencers/potential prat-falls/piss-taking/easily offended = then make a calculated decision that would generate enough noise, without becoming overwhelmed by controversy.

    IMO, Labour have fallen into the hubris trap that can happen when the Brand Faithful totally miss the point of what they're doing. If the decision to go ahead was made after a day in a bar - I'd believe it.

    The only other explanation is that Someone Important Really Liked It and everyone else just went along with it. Usually it's the person whose signature or photo is on the creation/advert that's responsible - or an acolyte of theirs. Being flattered into it really isn't an excuse.

    Sandpit said:

    Plato said:

    Whilst I find the EdStone surreal and very funny, if Cameron did this - I'd be WTF? Hubris much? Who thought this was a vote winner?? It's made my Party Leader into a laughing stock 3 Days out.

    I'd be laughing it off, but very let down inside...

    Ishmael_X said:

    MattW said:

    Second.

    I shall build a monument to my achievement.

    I would start an argument with you about that, but I suspect your decision is set in stone.

    Some VERY rattled lefties about today.
    Plato, you said you did PR - how does the discussion start, that ends with "I know, let's get a bloody big stone pledge card and have the leader stand in front of it on Sunday morning"?
    Is it a dose of "Bay of Pigs" syndrome?

    Miliband's not allowed near any voters, except on QT on Thursday, where labour react by saying its a biased crowd

    He's surrounded by idiots like Spencer Livermore & Lucy Powell who just let him what he wants to hear

    He believes he's on some divine mission to rebuild the UK as some socialist utopia

    Net result is the Labour election lot actually believe all the crap they spout and no doubt will see the coverage of the stone as coverage of their policies, not everyone crying with laughter.

    And some people still want him as PM?
  • IOSIOS Posts: 1,450
    Plato

    In 4 days time we are going to be back in power...
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 82,533
    edited May 2015
    http://order-order.com/2015/05/03/biased-bbc-website-forgets-biggest-story-of-the-day

    Just wondering when does the legal requirement to be OTT in pursuit of balance going to start? 8th May?

    BBC normally super quick to report on what is hot on twitter...
  • ChameleonChameleon Posts: 4,264
    FPT.
    AndyJS said:

    Big news in the last 24 hours: Professor John Curtis predicting Con, LD, DUP and UKIP to win 327 seats.

    Looks like we may get a super-hung parliament then where Lab + SNP & Con + LD are sub 325. That'll be fun.
  • surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549
    IOS said:

    Also

    Just because Clegg says that the Lib Dems want to back the Tories doesn't mean every Lib Dem will... or indeed that the Tories can rely on the DUP.

    DUP = No Bedroom Tax.

    The DUP has to show some paper to get into Ministerial cars.
  • DairDair Posts: 6,108
    AndyJS said:

    Big news in the last 24 hours: Professor John Curtis predicting Con, LD, DUP and UKIP to win 327 seats.

    DUP are far more likely to back Labour than the Tories.

    It shows a distinct and fundamental mis-understanding of NI politics and a complete ignorance to believe the DUP are naturally aligned to the Conservatives. It is their differences to the Conservatives that allowed them to completely take over NI politics from the UUP.

    Good Friday and Religion helped them. But it was their left-wing Socialism politics which made this stick.
  • foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548
    IOS said:

    Plato

    In 4 days time we are going to be back in power...

    Don't we get a plague of frogs first? Or Locusts? Or has that been updated to Owls?
  • SandpitSandpit Posts: 55,031
    Dair said:

    Sandpit said:

    Plato said:

    Whilst I find the EdStone surreal and very funny, if Cameron did this - I'd be WTF? Hubris much? Who thought this was a vote winner?? It's made my Party Leader into a laughing stock 3 Days out.

    I'd be laughing it off, but very let down inside...

    Ishmael_X said:

    MattW said:

    Second.

    I shall build a monument to my achievement.

    I would start an argument with you about that, but I suspect your decision is set in stone.

    Some VERY rattled lefties about today.
    Plato, you said you did PR - how does the discussion start, that ends with "I know, let's get a bloody big stone pledge card and have the leader stand in front of it on Sunday morning"?
    It's not the idea process that Labour seem to have a problem with. It's the back end.

    One thing any marketing campaign needs to do, once it has completed a pitch or a campaign, is to hand it off to people with absolutely no involvement in the creative process and let them pick holes in it.

    I suspect Labour just do not do this and have not done this during their campaign.
    Interesting point, hadn't thought of that.

    As an IT guy I would call that Quality Assurance, whereby a bunch of people who didn't develop the software test it before it gets released to make sure there's no fewer bugs in it before it gets to the public!
  • surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549
    Dair said:

    AndyJS said:

    Big news in the last 24 hours: Professor John Curtis predicting Con, LD, DUP and UKIP to win 327 seats.

    DUP are far more likely to back Labour than the Tories.

    It shows a distinct and fundamental mis-understanding of NI politics and a complete ignorance to believe the DUP are naturally aligned to the Conservatives. It is their differences to the Conservatives that allowed them to completely take over NI politics from the UUP.

    Good Friday and Religion helped them. But it was their left-wing Socialism politics which made this stick.
    DUP's origin before it overran the UUP was in Protestant working class estates and towns. Why would the Bedroom Tax be a Red Line ?
  • SandpitSandpit Posts: 55,031
    Plato said:

    IME, you start off with all sorts of ideas - some of them dull and safe, others off the wall - the off the wall ones are either epic successes or EdStone.

    Once a few ideas are picked out, we'd go through the messaging/audience/influencers/potential prat-falls/piss-taking/easily offended = then make a calculated decision that would generate enough noise, without becoming overwhelmed by controversy.

    IMO, Labour have fallen into the hubris trap that can happen when the Brand Faithful totally miss the point of what they're doing. If the decision to go ahead was made after a day in a bar - I'd believe it.

    The only other explanation is that Someone Important Really Liked It and everyone else just went along with it. Usually it's the person whose signature or photo is on the creation/advert that's responsible - or an acolyte of theirs. Being flattered into it really isn't an excuse.

    Sandpit said:

    Plato said:

    Whilst I find the EdStone surreal and very funny, if Cameron did this - I'd be WTF? Hubris much? Who thought this was a vote winner?? It's made my Party Leader into a laughing stock 3 Days out.

    I'd be laughing it off, but very let down inside...

    Ishmael_X said:

    MattW said:

    Second.

    I shall build a monument to my achievement.

    I would start an argument with you about that, but I suspect your decision is set in stone.

    Some VERY rattled lefties about today.
    Plato, you said you did PR - how does the discussion start, that ends with "I know, let's get a bloody big stone pledge card and have the leader stand in front of it on Sunday morning"?
    Thanks for the insight. I could well see that Someone Really Important liked this, I've seen that before in business where no-one dares tell the Emperor that he has no clothes on!
  • Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826
    IOS said:

    Also

    Just because Clegg says that the Lib Dems want to back the Tories doesn't mean every Lib Dem will... or indeed that the Tories can rely on the DUP.

    Does anyone know where the LD's who are likely to survive (as opposed to those who lose their seats) sit on the parties left/right spectrum.

    Is it going to be more Labour-leaning or Tory-leaning party after the cull?
  • ChameleonChameleon Posts: 4,264
    IOS said:

    Plato

    In 4 days time we are going to be back in power...

    I'd give it 10 & replace 'power' with 'residence of No.10' ;)
  • richardDoddrichardDodd Posts: 5,472
    Is there a venue planned for a second look at THE STONE tomorrow..
  • edmundintokyoedmundintokyo Posts: 17,708
    SeanT said:


    Yes some shockingly bad predix from other regular pb-ers (excluding antifrank, who claims he did it deliberately, and the Nats, who can be forgiven bias?), Easterross, Rod Crosby and Morris Dancer were all wildly out.

    If you're playing a prediction competition to win then you also have to consider the number of other predictions close to yours, so it can be worth going a long way out from the most likely result if that results in you winning on a wider band of outcomes.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,591

    http://order-order.com/2015/05/03/biased-bbc-website-forgets-biggest-story-of-the-day

    Just wondering when does the legal requirement to be OTT in pursuit of balance going to start? 8th May?

    BBC normally super quick to report on what is hot on twitter...

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-2015-32573812
  • So Ed Miliband hopes to put the Labour Election Pledge plinth in the gardens of 10 Downing Street...wherever it ends up, the birds will have 5 years to shit on it...at least the rest of us only have to wait 4 days to do the same.
  • IOSIOS Posts: 1,450
    Fox

    Mock away. But with PM Ed against Boris the Tories will be in a world of pain.
  • CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758


    Travelled a couple of miles through suburban town today; passing detached houses, semis, and flats.

    One Conservative poster.

    Two Labour posters.

    Don't they know there's an election on?

    Yesterday: Cambridge (Girton): 9 Huppert, 8 Labour, 1 Tory garden pole.

    Huntington: complaints from a Scot that no one had been to talk to her (she had no idea she was in a safe seat). Not a Nicola fan though...
  • Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826
    surbiton said:

    IOS said:

    Also

    Just because Clegg says that the Lib Dems want to back the Tories doesn't mean every Lib Dem will... or indeed that the Tories can rely on the DUP.

    DUP = No Bedroom Tax.

    The DUP has to show some paper to get into Ministerial cars.
    DUP can't and won't work with the SNP.

    If the DUP had the balance of power between the Tories and Labour you may have the point. With Labour's fortunes being tied to the SNP's, you don't. The DUP can only work with Labour if Labour don't need the SNP ... in which case Labour have won anyway.
  • saddosaddo Posts: 534
    8 foot 6 inch stones don't just happen overnight. Its been on the Labour election grid for a good few weeks so lots of Labour insiders should have had the chance to say "WTF". What happened to them?
  • NeilNeil Posts: 7,983
    Dair said:

    AndyJS said:

    Big news in the last 24 hours: Professor John Curtis predicting Con, LD, DUP and UKIP to win 327 seats.

    DUP are far more likely to back Labour than the Tories.

    It shows a distinct and fundamental mis-understanding of NI politics and a complete ignorance to believe the DUP are naturally aligned to the Conservatives. It is their differences to the Conservatives that allowed them to completely take over NI politics from the UUP.

    Good Friday and Religion helped them. But it was their left-wing Socialism politics which made this stick.
    God, you're hilarious. The DUP will back the highest bidder if they are lucky enough to find themselves in a bidding war.

  • surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549
    edited May 2015

    IOS said:

    Also

    Just because Clegg says that the Lib Dems want to back the Tories doesn't mean every Lib Dem will... or indeed that the Tories can rely on the DUP.

    Does anyone know where the LD's who are likely to survive (as opposed to those who lose their seats) sit on the parties left/right spectrum.

    Is it going to be more Labour-leaning or Tory-leaning party after the cull?
    I think the answer is once bitten - twice shy. Clegg faced a lot of internal criticism when he was dog whistling Tories to help him.

    Does it help Farron ? After all it is a Tory seat. Does it help the LDs save their skins in the SW trying to squeeze Labour voters ?

    I don't think the party will join any coalition.
  • richardDoddrichardDodd Posts: 5,472
    Its The Stone wot wunnit
  • PlatoPlato Posts: 15,724
    edited May 2015
    Any monumental masons read PB? I'd imagine a run-up time of at least 2 months to select idea/sign-off copy/commission the supplier, and deliver this.
    saddo said:

    8 foot 6 inch stones don't just happen overnight. Its been on the Labour election grid for a good few weeks so lots of Labour insiders should have had the chance to say "WTF". What happened to them?

  • NeilNeil Posts: 7,983

    SeanT said:


    Yes some shockingly bad predix from other regular pb-ers (excluding antifrank, who claims he did it deliberately, and the Nats, who can be forgiven bias?), Easterross, Rod Crosby and Morris Dancer were all wildly out.

    If you're playing a prediction competition to win then you also have to consider the number of other predictions close to yours, so it can be worth going a long way out from the most likely result if that results in you winning on a wider band of outcomes.
    That's fairly obvious. SeanT is only pretending he doesnt grasp this.

  • DairDair Posts: 6,108
    surbiton said:

    Dair said:

    AndyJS said:

    Big news in the last 24 hours: Professor John Curtis predicting Con, LD, DUP and UKIP to win 327 seats.

    DUP are far more likely to back Labour than the Tories.

    It shows a distinct and fundamental mis-understanding of NI politics and a complete ignorance to believe the DUP are naturally aligned to the Conservatives. It is their differences to the Conservatives that allowed them to completely take over NI politics from the UUP.

    Good Friday and Religion helped them. But it was their left-wing Socialism politics which made this stick.
    DUP's origin before it overran the UUP was in Protestant working class estates and towns. Why would the Bedroom Tax be a Red Line ?
    Because of still massive levels of benefit dependency in NI. You said it yourself The DUP are a working class party, not a (small c) conservative party.
  • dr_spyndr_spyn Posts: 11,300
    BBC wake up and realise that the prophet Edward has lost the plot.

    https://twitter.com/BBCPolitics/status/594852264692555777

    Another tablet...
  • Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826
    edited May 2015
    surbiton said:

    IOS said:

    Also

    Just because Clegg says that the Lib Dems want to back the Tories doesn't mean every Lib Dem will... or indeed that the Tories can rely on the DUP.

    Does anyone know where the LD's who are likely to survive (as opposed to those who lose their seats) sit on the parties left/right spectrum.

    Is it going to be more Labour-leaning or Tory-leaning party after the cull?
    I think the answer is once bitten - twice shy. Clegg faced a lot of internal criticism when he was dog whistling Tories to help him.

    Does it help Farron ? After all it is a Tory seat. Does it help the LDs save their skins in the SW trying to squeeze Labour voters ?
    I think it's far easier for the LD's to continue with the coalition they've already got. They've paid the electoral price for joining the Tories ... if they join with Labour I don't think that gets them the lost red Liberal votes back, and they'll lose blue Liberal votes too. They'll go even further down in the public's esteem than they currently are hopping from one to the other like a cheap date.

    Incidentally if they'd joined Labour last time, I'd think they'd have to continue with Labour rather than join the Tories. After 5 years of opposition to create some breathing space they could maybe join a Labour coalition in 2020
  • isamisam Posts: 41,118
    edited May 2015
    FPT

    surbiton said:
    I think the hilarity of the PB Tories only says one thing. They are resigned to a bad defeat. Their entire assumption was based on the likelihood that Ed would collapse during the campaign because, guess what, he is crap !

    For six weeks now, Ed has surprised them. Ed didn't need to support a football team - he probably does even support one. But Cameron does , because he is one of us. Only he forgets which one he supports.

    All these tweets referencing an expression containing the word "stone" is the last gasp of a dying corpse.

    Guess what ? They is a more than subtle hint in it.

    Miliband - Stone - Moses.

    Geddit !


    The Stone Moses?

    I am the risible erection?
  • SandpitSandpit Posts: 55,031

    http://order-order.com/2015/05/03/biased-bbc-website-forgets-biggest-story-of-the-day

    Just wondering when does the legal requirement to be OTT in pursuit of balance going to start? 8th May?

    BBC normally super quick to report on what is hot on twitter...

    Guido has been pointing out for the whole campaign that the BBC website looks like its editors only ever read the Guardian. One could almost imagine that he was preparing a complaint to the BBC Trust after the election, troublemaker that he is.

    The question remains, given that the website is in a state of constant change by nature, is it actually biased as he suggests, or does Guido deliberately not mention when stories favourable to Con and UKIP make the front page?
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 57,655
    @Sunil

    In France, internet pollsters are more favourable to the FN
    In the Netherlands, the same is true of the PVV
    in Spain, it is true of Podemos
    In Finland, it was true of The Finns
    In the UK, for the Euros, it was true for UKIP

    this leads to me concluding it is likely that the lowest internet pollster (YouGov) will be the one that gets UKIP right
  • surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549

    surbiton said:

    IOS said:

    Also

    Just because Clegg says that the Lib Dems want to back the Tories doesn't mean every Lib Dem will... or indeed that the Tories can rely on the DUP.

    DUP = No Bedroom Tax.

    The DUP has to show some paper to get into Ministerial cars.
    DUP can't and won't work with the SNP.

    If the DUP had the balance of power between the Tories and Labour you may have the point. With Labour's fortunes being tied to the SNP's, you don't. The DUP can only work with Labour if Labour don't need the SNP ... in which case Labour have won anyway.
    Where did I say DUP will be in Labour's camp - Dair said that.

    I am saying the DUP will extract a lot of things from the Tory / LD coalition in return of support particularly more financial support for NI.

    However, for their voters, the abolition of the Bedroom Tax will be the visible success.
  • MarkHopkinsMarkHopkins Posts: 5,584

    SeanT said:


    Yes some shockingly bad predix from other regular pb-ers (excluding antifrank, who claims he did it deliberately, and the Nats, who can be forgiven bias?), Easterross, Rod Crosby and Morris Dancer were all wildly out.

    If you're playing a prediction competition to win then you also have to consider the number of other predictions close to yours, so it can be worth going a long way out from the most likely result if that results in you winning on a wider band of outcomes.
    It doesn't work like that though. If you move further away from where the bulk of entries are, you are (probably) further away from the likely correct result.

    What you gain from the lower number of entries in an area, you lose from the lower chance of being right.

  • foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548
    IOS said:

    Fox

    Mock away. But with PM Ed against Boris the Tories will be in a world of pain.

    I think that would be the ideal situation for my party (LD) to stage a rapid recovery.

    I would marginally prefer a Lab govt to a Con one, but neither appeals much.
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 57,655
    rcs1000 said:

    @Sunil

    In France, internet pollsters are more favourable to the FN
    In the Netherlands, the same is true of the PVV
    in Spain, it is true of Podemos
    In Finland, it was true of The Finns
    In the UK, for the Euros, it was true for UKIP

    this leads to me concluding it is likely that the lowest internet pollster (YouGov) will be the one that gets UKIP right

    I haven't checked Italy, but I would bet you that they were more favourable to the Five Star movement too.
  • Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 28,869
    Personally I think though the thing is presentationally dreadful, the main disaster is the dire lack of ambition and equivocation of all the 'pledges'. Like they actually aimed to have nothing on the stone that they could be measured on, which defeats the entire purpose.
  • surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549
    Just note.

    There will be no referendum in 2017. We are Europeans.

  • The_ApocalypseThe_Apocalypse Posts: 7,830
    edited May 2015
    Trouble is, even if Con, UKIP, DUP, and LD are 327 altogether, the LDs have said they won't enter coalition with either the DUP or UKIP, and apparently according to Sam Coates, Clegg doesn't want confidence and supply, either as the LDs would still be in opposition.

    So......
  • isamisam Posts: 41,118
    Got a lift to pick up my car from last nights shindig .. A massive billboard of Farage 'let's get our country back' outside Upminster Bridge station

    And we were behind a van with a Ukip poster in the back window

    No other posters or billboards from any other party spotted so far here in Hx and Up FWIW

    I think it will be close between Tories and Ukip with Labour a very distant third
  • ChameleonChameleon Posts: 4,264
    Charles said:


    Travelled a couple of miles through suburban town today; passing detached houses, semis, and flats.

    One Conservative poster.

    Two Labour posters.

    Don't they know there's an election on?

    Yesterday: Cambridge (Girton): 9 Huppert, 8 Labour, 1 Tory garden pole.

    Huntington: complaints from a Scot that no one had been to talk to her (she had no idea she was in a safe seat). Not a Nicola fan though...
    On this topic I was in Reading East today - there's almost nothing in the inner town but I saw 7 Rob Wilson (Con) against one generic Lab poster on the outskirts.
  • foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548

    SeanT said:


    Yes some shockingly bad predix from other regular pb-ers (excluding antifrank, who claims he did it deliberately, and the Nats, who can be forgiven bias?), Easterross, Rod Crosby and Morris Dancer were all wildly out.

    If you're playing a prediction competition to win then you also have to consider the number of other predictions close to yours, so it can be worth going a long way out from the most likely result if that results in you winning on a wider band of outcomes.
    It doesn't work like that though. If you move further away from where the bulk of entries are, you are (probably) further away from the likely correct result.

    What you gain from the lower number of entries in an area, you lose from the lower chance of being right.

    Does anyone have a link to the current NoJam predictions? I am struggling to find it.
  • PlatoPlato Posts: 15,724
    Just like the Dome - all Grand Design and actual content was a complete after thought.

    Personally I think though the thing is presentationally dreadful, the main disaster is the dire lack of ambition and equivocation of all the 'pledges'. Like they actually aimed to have nothing on the stone that they could be measured on, which defeats the entire purpose.

  • Andy_CookeAndy_Cooke Posts: 5,037
    surbiton said:

    Sunil, Let's take your phone polls only.

    What does it show ? 2.5% - 3% Con lead. *

    More than 4% swing to Labour , slightly more in England.

    I will take that.

    * Even though this is for GB, the vast majority of votes are in England.
    Um.
    That's a 2% swing. Not 4.
  • edmundintokyoedmundintokyo Posts: 17,708

    SeanT said:


    Yes some shockingly bad predix from other regular pb-ers (excluding antifrank, who claims he did it deliberately, and the Nats, who can be forgiven bias?), Easterross, Rod Crosby and Morris Dancer were all wildly out.

    If you're playing a prediction competition to win then you also have to consider the number of other predictions close to yours, so it can be worth going a long way out from the most likely result if that results in you winning on a wider band of outcomes.
    It doesn't work like that though. If you move further away from where the bulk of entries are, you are (probably) further away from the likely correct result.

    What you gain from the lower number of entries in an area, you lose from the lower chance of being right.

    Sure, it's a trade-off, but the best-value band won't necessarily be the narrowest/likeliest one. It depends where the other entries go.
  • It is my understanding that at dawn on the morning of the Vernal Equinox the plinth will align perfectly with the sun shining out of Nicola Sturgeon's backside.
  • CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758
    surbiton said:

    surbiton said:

    IOS said:

    Also

    Just because Clegg says that the Lib Dems want to back the Tories doesn't mean every Lib Dem will... or indeed that the Tories can rely on the DUP.

    DUP = No Bedroom Tax.

    The DUP has to show some paper to get into Ministerial cars.
    DUP can't and won't work with the SNP.

    If the DUP had the balance of power between the Tories and Labour you may have the point. With Labour's fortunes being tied to the SNP's, you don't. The DUP can only work with Labour if Labour don't need the SNP ... in which case Labour have won anyway.
    Where did I say DUP will be in Labour's camp - Dair said that.

    I am saying the DUP will extract a lot of things from the Tory / LD coalition in return of support particularly more financial support for NI.

    However, for their voters, the abolition of the Bedroom Tax will be the visible success.
    I'd imagine it would be devolution of bedroom tax, not abolition...
  • ChameleonChameleon Posts: 4,264
    edited May 2015
    surbiton said:

    Just note.

    There will be no referendum in 2017. We are Europeans.

    You're really panicking today aren't you.
  • DairDair Posts: 6,108
    Neil said:

    Dair said:

    AndyJS said:

    Big news in the last 24 hours: Professor John Curtis predicting Con, LD, DUP and UKIP to win 327 seats.

    DUP are far more likely to back Labour than the Tories.

    It shows a distinct and fundamental mis-understanding of NI politics and a complete ignorance to believe the DUP are naturally aligned to the Conservatives. It is their differences to the Conservatives that allowed them to completely take over NI politics from the UUP.

    Good Friday and Religion helped them. But it was their left-wing Socialism politics which made this stick.
    God, you're hilarious. The DUP will back the highest bidder if they are lucky enough to find themselves in a bidding war.
    EVEL is a red line for DUP.
    Welfare cuts are a red line for DUP.

    The DUP will not back to Tories on May 8th despite what #BBCbias tells you.
  • surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549

    Trouble is, even if Con, UKIP, DUP, and LD are 327 altogether, the LDs have said they won't enter coalition with either the DUP or UKIP, and apparently according to Sam Coates, Clegg doesn't want confidence and supply, either as the LDs would still be in opposition.

    So......

    Clegg wants to be DPM. He doesn't care about anything else. If the LDP is as democratic as they claim, then the party will veto any coalition.
  • MarkHopkinsMarkHopkins Posts: 5,584

    SeanT said:


    Yes some shockingly bad predix from other regular pb-ers (excluding antifrank, who claims he did it deliberately, and the Nats, who can be forgiven bias?), Easterross, Rod Crosby and Morris Dancer were all wildly out.

    If you're playing a prediction competition to win then you also have to consider the number of other predictions close to yours, so it can be worth going a long way out from the most likely result if that results in you winning on a wider band of outcomes.
    It doesn't work like that though. If you move further away from where the bulk of entries are, you are (probably) further away from the likely correct result.

    What you gain from the lower number of entries in an area, you lose from the lower chance of being right.

    Does anyone have a link to the current NoJam predictions? I am struggling to find it.

    Do you mean the GE15 predictions from April?

    http://show.nojam.com/a2sq/search.php?b=0
  • surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549
    Chameleon said:

    surbiton said:

    Just note.

    There will be no referendum in 2017. We are Europeans.

    You're really panicking today aren't you.
    I agree Labour will not get absolute majority - but I am not ruling it out.
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 57,655
    surbiton said:

    Trouble is, even if Con, UKIP, DUP, and LD are 327 altogether, the LDs have said they won't enter coalition with either the DUP or UKIP, and apparently according to Sam Coates, Clegg doesn't want confidence and supply, either as the LDs would still be in opposition.

    So......

    Clegg wants to be DPM. He doesn't care about anything else. If the LDP is as democratic as they claim, then the party will veto any coalition.
    If the liberal Democrats are the junior branch of the labour party, as I Surbiton believe they should be, then they would veto any coalition with the Tories as a matter of principle!
  • LadyBucketLadyBucket Posts: 590
    My 'late' observations from the QT Leaders debate.
    David Cameron looked far more comfortable than the other two and actually seemed to enjoy it.
    EdM looked like a fish out of water, he was clearly uncomfortable. As a northern MP, I'm surprised, as he should have known we northerners call a spade a spade.
    NIck Clegg always reverts to peevishness when under pressure.
    The real losers of the night, were the main stream 'metropolitan' media. The good folk of Yorkshire really showed them up and they got more answers from the politicians than any other programme I have seen. The Media are overrated and overpaid In my view. Their coverage of this campaign, has been absolutely dire.
  • The_ApocalypseThe_Apocalypse Posts: 7,830
    surbiton said:

    Trouble is, even if Con, UKIP, DUP, and LD are 327 altogether, the LDs have said they won't enter coalition with either the DUP or UKIP, and apparently according to Sam Coates, Clegg doesn't want confidence and supply, either as the LDs would still be in opposition.

    So......

    Clegg wants to be DPM. He doesn't care about anything else. If the LDP is as democratic as they claim, then the party will veto any coalition.
    Clegg may well want to be DPM, but he has to get his party to endorse it. Given what Sam Coates wrote in The Times this week about the prospect of an LD/Con coalition, and LDs feelings towards it, along with Clegg's and Alexanders' responses it, I'd say is quite unlikely you're going to see a Con-Lib coalition, and I have no idea why so many Conservatives are heavily investing in having LD support, as if it's guaranteed.
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 57,655
    Dair said:

    Neil said:

    Dair said:

    AndyJS said:

    Big news in the last 24 hours: Professor John Curtis predicting Con, LD, DUP and UKIP to win 327 seats.

    DUP are far more likely to back Labour than the Tories.

    It shows a distinct and fundamental mis-understanding of NI politics and a complete ignorance to believe the DUP are naturally aligned to the Conservatives. It is their differences to the Conservatives that allowed them to completely take over NI politics from the UUP.

    Good Friday and Religion helped them. But it was their left-wing Socialism politics which made this stick.
    God, you're hilarious. The DUP will back the highest bidder if they are lucky enough to find themselves in a bidding war.
    EVEL is a red line for DUP.
    Welfare cuts are a red line for DUP.

    The DUP will not back to Tories on May 8th despite what #BBCbias tells you.
    As an aside, I suspect if the LibDems lose all their Scottish seats, then they will also lose their opposition to EV4EL.
  • Maybe the plinth is just the first of ten...like the Ten Commandments. Ed's just waiting for the SNP to complete the other nine!
  • dr_spyndr_spyn Posts: 11,300
    3D printing will allow you to recreate faithful copies of Ed's pledge stone.
  • Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 28,869
    Plato said:

    Just like the Dome - all Grand Design and actual content was a complete after thought.

    Personally I think though the thing is presentationally dreadful, the main disaster is the dire lack of ambition and equivocation of all the 'pledges'. Like they actually aimed to have nothing on the stone that they could be measured on, which defeats the entire purpose.

    Precisely. They haven't learned. Can you imagine the meeting? 'What about "an NHS with time to care"?' 'Yeah, great!'. Absolutely moronic. The controls on immigration one is the biggest insult.

  • PlatoPlato Posts: 15,724
    LOL
    dr_spyn said:

    3D printing will allow you to recreate faithful copies of Ed's pledge stone.

  • RodCrosbyRodCrosby Posts: 7,737
    Sandpit said:

    Does the Queen have to invite someone to form the government, even if it a continuation of the old one?

    For all the discussion on the constitutional processes over the past few days on here, the consensus was that Dave remains PM and the government in place until he goes to the Queen to resign. If he doesn't resign then his government will deliver the Queen's Speech, I don't see where in that process the Queen asks him to form a government? Too ambiguous, no bet.

    Correct. It is not usual for a PM who continues merrily in office to seek an audience merely because he has been re-elected at the polls.

    If the nature of the government were to change significantly, however, with or without an election, it would be proper to resign and be re-appointed, as MacDonald was in August 1931.
  • NeilNeil Posts: 7,983
    Dair said:

    Neil said:

    Dair said:

    AndyJS said:

    Big news in the last 24 hours: Professor John Curtis predicting Con, LD, DUP and UKIP to win 327 seats.

    DUP are far more likely to back Labour than the Tories.

    It shows a distinct and fundamental mis-understanding of NI politics and a complete ignorance to believe the DUP are naturally aligned to the Conservatives. It is their differences to the Conservatives that allowed them to completely take over NI politics from the UUP.

    Good Friday and Religion helped them. But it was their left-wing Socialism politics which made this stick.
    God, you're hilarious. The DUP will back the highest bidder if they are lucky enough to find themselves in a bidding war.
    EVEL is a red line for DUP.
    Welfare cuts are a red line for DUP.

    The DUP will not back to Tories on May 8th despite what #BBCbias tells you.
    Stick to your side of the North Channel. Neither EVEL nor welfare get a mention in the main bullet points the DUP themselves chose to highlight from their manifesto. The DUP are actively campaigning for votes on the back of getting the best possible deal for Northern Ireland. Refusing to deal with the party most likely to give them it would clearly be bonkers. But then you do hold quite a few bonkers opinions on NI politics.


  • Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826

    Trouble is, even if Con, UKIP, DUP, and LD are 327 altogether, the LDs have said they won't enter coalition with either the DUP or UKIP, and apparently according to Sam Coates, Clegg doesn't want confidence and supply, either as the LDs would still be in opposition.

    So......

    The thing is neither the DUP or UKIP would have enough MPs to provide ministers or be a part of the coalition. In that scenario it'd be a formal Con+LD coalition with DUP and UKIP confidence and supply. Probably would get through to 2017 and then a new election.
  • surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549

    My 'late' observations from the QT Leaders debate.
    David Cameron looked far more comfortable than the other two and actually seemed to enjoy it.
    EdM looked like a fish out of water, he was clearly uncomfortable. As a northern MP, I'm surprised, as he should have known we northerners call a spade a spade.
    NIck Clegg always reverts to peevishness when under pressure.
    The real losers of the night, were the main stream 'metropolitan' media. The good folk of Yorkshire really showed them up and they got more answers from the politicians than any other programme I have seen. The Media are overrated and overpaid In my view. Their coverage of this campaign, has been absolutely dire.

    Are we talking about the QT where the composition of the audience was stitched up betwwen the tories and the BBC.

    Conservative Party members went in as undecided.
This discussion has been closed.