“The UK Independence Party has announced that it suspended its General Secretary Roger Bird on the 7th of December following allegations of impropriety.
Shortly after a claim came to light about the conduct of Mr Bird with regard to candidate selection, the UK Independence Party took action swiftly and decisively, including steps involving external Human Resources consultants, as well as following due process and the Party’s Constitution to the letter.
Unfortunately, UKIP has had to suspend Mr Bird pending a full investigation into allegations made against him. The party has acted swiftly and decisively and will not tolerate impropriety of any kind amongst its staff.”
Anyone heard what UKIP's General Secretary Roger Bird has done to be suspended?
Impropriety covers a multitude...
I don't know but I have a feeling he is about to get promoted from "someone no one has heard of" to "Senior UKIP official"... this could be BIG! This could be THE END!
Interesting to consider that if you're able to make an average profit of £137 a day on Betfair Exchange, your winnings would equate to £50,000 a year tax-free.
“The UK Independence Party has announced that it suspended its General Secretary Roger Bird on the 7th of December following allegations of impropriety.
Shortly after a claim came to light about the conduct of Mr Bird with regard to candidate selection, the UK Independence Party took action swiftly and decisively, including steps involving external Human Resources consultants, as well as following due process and the Party’s Constitution to the letter.
Unfortunately, UKIP has had to suspend Mr Bird pending a full investigation into allegations made against him. The party has acted swiftly and decisively and will not tolerate impropriety of any kind amongst its staff.”
“The UK Independence Party has announced that it suspended its General Secretary Roger Bird on the 7th of December following allegations of impropriety.
Shortly after a claim came to light about the conduct of Mr Bird with regard to candidate selection, the UK Independence Party took action swiftly and decisively, including steps involving external Human Resources consultants, as well as following due process and the Party’s Constitution to the letter.
Unfortunately, UKIP has had to suspend Mr Bird pending a full investigation into allegations made against him. The party has acted swiftly and decisively and will not tolerate impropriety of any kind amongst its staff.”
Anyone heard what UKIP's General Secretary Roger Bird has done to be suspended?
Impropriety covers a multitude...
Perhaps he said nice things about immigrants ?
Has he bought some Euros on holiday?
Seriously, the cheerleaders won't accept this but UKIP's brand is getting damaged. It's not Ratners yet but it is the most disliked party I believe (apologies if wrong) and that ain't about to turn around, anything but.
Anyone heard what UKIP's General Secretary Roger Bird has done to be suspended?
Impropriety covers a multitude...
I don't know but I have a feeling he is about to get promoted from "someone no one has heard of" to "Senior UKIP official"...!
As of the snapshot taken by Google on 6 Dec 2014 13:48:21 he was, according to UKIP, one of UKIP's twelve 'key people', so 'Senior UKIP Official' is hardly a promotion.
What might make this particularly interesting is that it relates to candidate selection, which does seem to have been causing a lot of dissension in the party recently. For the latest example:
“The UK Independence Party has announced that it suspended its General Secretary Roger Bird on the 7th of December following allegations of impropriety.
Shortly after a claim came to light about the conduct of Mr Bird with regard to candidate selection, the UK Independence Party took action swiftly and decisively, including steps involving external Human Resources consultants, as well as following due process and the Party’s Constitution to the letter.
Unfortunately, UKIP has had to suspend Mr Bird pending a full investigation into allegations made against him. The party has acted swiftly and decisively and will not tolerate impropriety of any kind amongst its staff.”
Anyone heard what UKIP's General Secretary Roger Bird has done to be suspended?
Impropriety covers a multitude...
I don't know but I have a feeling he is about to get promoted from "someone no one has heard of" to "Senior UKIP official"... this could be BIG! This could be THE END!
More coverage = always good news for UKIP = they are invincible!
Another step towards world domination by retreating from the world.
Anyone heard what UKIP's General Secretary Roger Bird has done to be suspended?
Impropriety covers a multitude...
I don't know but I have a feeling he is about to get promoted from "someone no one has heard of" to "Senior UKIP official"... this could be BIG! This could be THE END!
More coverage = always good news for UKIP = they are invincible!
Another step towards world domination by retreating from the world.
Oh you are so incisive!
I liked your last comment.. "I don't know if this is true or not but I will say it anyway..."
Anyone heard what UKIP's General Secretary Roger Bird has done to be suspended?
Impropriety covers a multitude...
I don't know but I have a feeling he is about to get promoted from "someone no one has heard of" to "Senior UKIP official"...!
As of the snapshot taken by Google on 6 Dec 2014 13:48:21 he was, according to UKIP, one of UKIP's twelve 'key people', so 'Senior UKIP Official' is hardly a promotion.
What might make this particularly interesting is that it relates to candidate selection, which does seem to have been causing a lot of dissension in the party recently. For the latest example:
Anyone heard what UKIP's General Secretary Roger Bird has done to be suspended?
Impropriety covers a multitude...
I don't know but I have a feeling he is about to get promoted from "someone no one has heard of" to "Senior UKIP official"... this could be BIG! This could be THE END!
More coverage = always good news for UKIP = they are invincible!
Another step towards world domination by retreating from the world.
Oh you are so incisive!
I liked your last comment.. "I don't know if this is true or not but I will say it anyway..."
always pleased to entertain... was it true then? I thought it was but I'm not so obsessed with polling here as some.
Anyone heard what UKIP's General Secretary Roger Bird has done to be suspended?
Impropriety covers a multitude...
I don't know but I have a feeling he is about to get promoted from "someone no one has heard of" to "Senior UKIP official"... this could be BIG! This could be THE END!
More coverage = always good news for UKIP = they are invincible!
Another step towards world domination by retreating from the world.
Oh you are so incisive!
I liked your last comment.. "I don't know if this is true or not but I will say it anyway..."
always pleased to entertain... was it true then? I thought it was but I'm not so obsessed with polling here as some.
UKIP haters pick a poll that says it is/UKIP supporters pick a poll that says it isn't
Anyone heard what UKIP's General Secretary Roger Bird has done to be suspended?
Impropriety covers a multitude...
I don't know but I have a feeling he is about to get promoted from "someone no one has heard of" to "Senior UKIP official"... this could be BIG! This could be THE END!
More coverage = always good news for UKIP = they are invincible!
Another step towards world domination by retreating from the world.
Oh you are so incisive!
I liked your last comment.. "I don't know if this is true or not but I will say it anyway..."
always pleased to entertain... was it true then? I thought it was but I'm not so obsessed with polling here as some.
It is true. UKIP the most extreme and least fit to govern party.
Anyone heard what UKIP's General Secretary Roger Bird has done to be suspended?
Impropriety covers a multitude...
Perhaps he said nice things about immigrants ?
Perhaps he was stuck in traffic on the M4?
I'm sure it won't have anything to do with more than a dozen Ukip activists who ''quit the party over leader Nigel Farage's handling of the candidate selection process''
Anyone heard what UKIP's General Secretary Roger Bird has done to be suspended?
Impropriety covers a multitude...
I don't know but I have a feeling he is about to get promoted from "someone no one has heard of" to "Senior UKIP official"... this could be BIG! This could be THE END!
More coverage = always good news for UKIP = they are invincible!
Another step towards world domination by retreating from the world.
Oh you are so incisive!
I liked your last comment.. "I don't know if this is true or not but I will say it anyway..."
always pleased to entertain... was it true then? I thought it was but I'm not so obsessed with polling here as some.
UKIP haters pick a poll that says it is/UKIP supporters pick a poll that says it isn't
What a shock!
Who are the most unpopular party then in the 'good' UKIP polls?
By the way, do you want to pay out on our Reckless bet - £110 to me please but I'll let you off a tenner for early settlement.
Having dumped the LD’s, and therefore, presumably having mortally offended them, exactly how is Cameron supposed to “govern”. He’d be pushed to get anything in any way contentitious through Parliament.
Well they have been governing without Vince Cable for 4.5 years. I imagine the LDs must be praying for Cameron 'to walk away'. Such is the thickness of the thick tendency in the tory backbenches.
BTW -- 'one' MP said 'as many as'... yeah this is the way to conduct a poll.
Having dumped the LD’s, and therefore, presumably having mortally offended them, exactly how is Cameron supposed to “govern”. He’d be pushed to get anything in any way contentitious through Parliament.
By putting up popular policies that would damage the Lib Dems and Labour parties for voting down.
"Gogglebox's Andrew Michael chosen as Hastings and Rye Ukip candidate Ralph Atkinson claims he was kicked out in favour of the Channel 4 star He vented his anger in a leaked email that was sent to local party members Also condemned Ukip's policy of recruiting defecting Tories and celebrities"
Having dumped the LD’s, and therefore, presumably having mortally offended them, exactly how is Cameron supposed to “govern”. He’d be pushed to get anything in any way contentitious through Parliament.
I was so surprised by Osborne's attack on the The Lib Dems this weekend.
I do wonder if the Lib Dems are panicking because of their national polling and the Tories have become pissed off with that.
Seriously, the cheerleaders won't accept this but UKIP's brand is getting damaged.
Much better to attack the party's shortcomings, surely, than to insult those toying with the idea of voting for them.
How many times did we hear that during the run up to the Euro elections when there was a full on media onslaught even from certain right of centre papers that many UKIP voters read (hurrah for the attacks on UKIP...)?
Farage is making a point of winding up those who will never vote for him, goading them into loud and shrill denunciations of him (in the absurd language of those who think their view is the correct view and are aghast that people in large numbers agree with Farage). He is to my mind putting clear purple water between his party and these people, winding them up as effectively as Ali G did.
For reasons only known to themselves, Cameron & his high tories thought it was a good idea to insult and abuse the people who voted for him to please the guardianistas and others who would never ever vote for him however much he appeased them.
What will make or break the UKIP brand is how their newly elected MPs in 2015 behave and perform in parliament, including the new party leader that will inevitably follow before the 2020 election. The rest is just noise.
However for the first time in decades, certainly since the new "Gramasican" left took over Labour after Gaitskills death, the British people have on the ballot paper a broadly socially conservative small "c" conservative party of ordinary working and lower middle class people with a serious chance of electing a caucus of MPs, and certainly the first time such a party has been on offer that is not tainted either by socialism or the desires of the aristocracy. The reaction of the established parties is, I suspect, similar and similarly counter productive to their reaction when Labour first started winning seats at the turn of the 20th century.
Having dumped the LD’s, and therefore, presumably having mortally offended them, exactly how is Cameron supposed to “govern”. He’d be pushed to get anything in any way contentitious through Parliament.
By putting up popular policies that would damage the Lib Dems and Labour parties for voting down.
Anyone heard what UKIP's General Secretary Roger Bird has done to be suspended?
Impropriety covers a multitude...
I don't know but I have a feeling he is about to get promoted from "someone no one has heard of" to "Senior UKIP official"... this could be BIG! This could be THE END!
More coverage = always good news for UKIP = they are invincible!
Another step towards world domination by retreating from the world.
Oh you are so incisive!
I liked your last comment.. "I don't know if this is true or not but I will say it anyway..."
always pleased to entertain... was it true then? I thought it was but I'm not so obsessed with polling here as some.
It is true. UKIP the most extreme and least fit to govern party.
Anyone heard what UKIP's General Secretary Roger Bird has done to be suspended?
Impropriety covers a multitude...
I don't know but I have a feeling he is about to get promoted from "someone no one has heard of" to "Senior UKIP official"... this could be BIG! This could be THE END!
More coverage = always good news for UKIP = they are invincible!
Another step towards world domination by retreating from the world.
Oh you are so incisive!
I liked your last comment.. "I don't know if this is true or not but I will say it anyway..."
always pleased to entertain... was it true then? I thought it was but I'm not so obsessed with polling here as some.
UKIP haters pick a poll that says it is/UKIP supporters pick a poll that says it isn't
What a shock!
Who are the most unpopular party then in the 'good' UKIP polls?
By the way, do you want to pay out on our Reckless bet - £110 to me please but I'll let you off a tenner for early settlement.
Q1 I am not sure.. Haters post a poll, then @AnotherDave normally responds with one that disproves it.. I don't take much notice of either
Q2 Haha you must be kidding!
You can have another £100 (or more) at 2 prices better than Oddscheckers best if you like
Having dumped the LD’s, and therefore, presumably having mortally offended them, exactly how is Cameron supposed to “govern”. He’d be pushed to get anything in any way contentitious through Parliament.
By putting up popular policies that would damage the Lib Dems and Labour parties for voting down.
Something which would have been practically impossible to do without the fixed term parliament act, lol.
Is Edmund in Tokyo about? He had a great story a while back showing how one of the commissioners overseeing GCHQ didn't understand how the internet worked. I'm trying to find it...
Anyone heard what UKIP's General Secretary Roger Bird has done to be suspended?
Impropriety covers a multitude...
I don't know but I have a feeling he is about to get promoted from "someone no one has heard of" to "Senior UKIP official"... this could be BIG! This could be THE END!
More coverage = always good news for UKIP = they are invincible!
Another step towards world domination by retreating from the world.
Oh you are so incisive!
I liked your last comment.. "I don't know if this is true or not but I will say it anyway..."
always pleased to entertain... was it true then? I thought it was but I'm not so obsessed with polling here as some.
UKIP haters pick a poll that says it is/UKIP supporters pick a poll that says it isn't
What a shock!
Who are the most unpopular party then in the 'good' UKIP polls?
By the way, do you want to pay out on our Reckless bet - £110 to me please but I'll let you off a tenner for early settlement.
Q1 I am not sure.. Haters post a poll, then @AnotherDave normally responds with one that disproves it.. I don't take much notice of either
Q2 Haha you must be kidding!
You can have another £100 (or more) at 2 prices better than Oddscheckers best if you like
I'll take another £100 at the original 11-10 you offered when so confident? Or has something changed?
Having dumped the LD’s, and therefore, presumably having mortally offended them, exactly how is Cameron supposed to “govern”. He’d be pushed to get anything in any way contentitious through Parliament.
By putting up popular policies that would damage the Lib Dems and Labour parties for voting down.
Huh. That's quite a good idea.
They could start with proposals for an English parliament. Follow it up with proposals to cut non-EU immigration further (bring back primary purpose rule, ban marriage visas for arranged marriages etc)
Yes, too much of Libdem stance for retaining incumbent MPS is based around the concept that the Liberals did the right thing for the good of the country over the good of their party by going into coalition. Flouncing out would leave them with nothing.
Of coruse that dosen't stop the conservatives doing something in say late February that makes the Libdems utterly apoplectic to intentionally topple the coalition for exactly that reason though, and then saying well we did our best but the Libdems couldn't cope with government and flounced out.....
Overall though I expect the coalition to last the course. I suspect the Queen, using her all powerful soft power, was instrumental in ensuring the coalition happened and would take a very dim view of anyone who collapsed it and jeopardised the stablility of the UK.
The chancellor claims he is being straight with voters over spending cuts but he is reluctant to spell out the consequences of returning to levels of spending as a share of national income not seen for 80 years.
Anyone heard what UKIP's General Secretary Roger Bird has done to be suspended?
Impropriety covers a multitude...
I don't know but I have a feeling he is about to get promoted from "someone no one has heard of" to "Senior UKIP official"... this could be BIG! This could be THE END!
More coverage = always good news for UKIP = they are invincible!
Another step towards world domination by retreating from the world.
Oh you are so incisive!
I liked your last comment.. "I don't know if this is true or not but I will say it anyway..."
always pleased to entertain... was it true then? I thought it was but I'm not so obsessed with polling here as some.
UKIP haters pick a poll that says it is/UKIP supporters pick a poll that says it isn't
What a shock!
Who are the most unpopular party then in the 'good' UKIP polls?
By the way, do you want to pay out on our Reckless bet - £110 to me please but I'll let you off a tenner for early settlement.
Q1 I am not sure.. Haters post a poll, then @AnotherDave normally responds with one that disproves it.. I don't take much notice of either
Q2 Haha you must be kidding!
You can have another £100 (or more) at 2 prices better than Oddscheckers best if you like
I'll take another £100 at the original 11-10 you offered when so confident? Or has something changed?
Yeah the market has changed.. I could get a much better price by backing UKIP with a bookie, I am offering you the best odds for bravado...but if you don't want it fair enough
Tory Baroness Jenkin says 'the problem is poor people don't know how to cook'
I sense another UKIP defection
Why. She's telling the truth.
If you cook a meal from scratch it costs about a tenth of a ready meal. For two generations people haven't been taught basic home economics (ie how to cook nutritious food cheaply from scratch). You only have to look in a supermarket to see that it is the least educated, least well off who are piling their trolleys with expensive ready meals and think pizza or microwaved ready meals are a suitable main meal.
Another example of how socialism has destroyed the working classes.
I'm lucky, my wife was an immigrant from a country with no social security (another immigrant who will be voting UKIP BTW). Despite there being eight of us, our weekly supermarket shop rarely goes over £120 - including soap poweder etc. - because she cooks from scratch (other than Saturdays) and I grow some of it on an allotment. She once made a delicious soup out of brocolli stalks left over after the broccoli had been eaten.
"Gogglebox's Andrew Michael chosen as Hastings and Rye Ukip candidate Ralph Atkinson claims he was kicked out in favour of the Channel 4 star He vented his anger in a leaked email that was sent to local party members Also condemned Ukip's policy of recruiting defecting Tories and celebrities"
The Guardian thinks it something else (though how good are their kipper sources?)
"Gogglebox's Andrew Michael chosen as Hastings and Rye Ukip candidate Ralph Atkinson claims he was kicked out in favour of the Channel 4 star He vented his anger in a leaked email that was sent to local party members Also condemned Ukip's policy of recruiting defecting Tories and celebrities"
The Guardian thinks it something else (though how good are their kipper sources?)
Tory Baroness Jenkin says 'the problem is poor people don't know how to cook'
I sense another UKIP defection
Why. She's telling the truth.
If you cook a meal from scratch it costs about a tenth of a ready meal. For two generations people haven't been taught basic home economics (ie how to cook nutritious food cheaply from scratch). You only have to look in a supermarket to see that it is the least educated, least well off who are piling their trolleys with expensive ready meals and think pizza or microwaved ready meals are a suitable main meal.
Another example of how socialism has destroyed the working classes.
I'm lucky, my wife was an immigrant from a country with no social security (another immigrant who will be voting UKIP BTW). Despite there being eight of us, our weekly supermarket shop rarely goes over £120 - including soap poweder etc. - because she cooks from scratch (other than Saturdays) and I grow some of it on an allotment. She once made a delicious soup out of brocolli stalks left over after the broccoli had been eaten.
" She once made a delicious soup out of brocolli stalks left over after the broccoli had been eaten."
Smoking in particular is worth focussing on here, not least because the Feeding Britain report offers this thought:
“A family earning £21,000 a year, for example, where both parents smoke 20 cigarettes a day will spend a quarter of their income on tobacco. Even if people buy illicit tobacco they will still spend 15% of their total income on tobacco. Budgeting support is terribly important, but budgetary support alone is often not enough to equip families to kick their addictive habits when addiction is being fed and defended by some very powerful lobbies.”
Tory Baroness Jenkin says 'the problem is poor people don't know how to cook'
I sense another UKIP defection
Why. She's telling the truth.
If you cook a meal from scratch it costs about a tenth of a ready meal. For two generations people haven't been taught basic home economics (ie how to cook nutritious food cheaply from scratch). You only have to look in a supermarket to see that it is the least educated, least well off who are piling their trolleys with expensive ready meals and think pizza or microwaved ready meals are a suitable main meal.
Another example of how socialism has destroyed the working classes.
I'm lucky, my wife was an immigrant from a country with no social security (another immigrant who will be voting UKIP BTW). Despite there being eight of us, our weekly supermarket shop rarely goes over £120 - including soap poweder etc. - because she cooks from scratch (other than Saturdays) and I grow some of it on an allotment. She once made a delicious soup out of brocolli stalks left over after the broccoli had been eaten.
You are dreaming if you think it costs 10%, by that reckoning people equivalent to yourself would be spending over £1000 weekly at supermarket. It is also very time consuming to cook your own meals , but has benefits of you know whats in it and much better taste normally. Nothing wrong with a good pizza either if again you make it yourself. Also I fail to see the significance of being an immigrant to know how to cook. There are two of us and my wife cooks all meals but we still spend £200 a week , again down to what you purchase not the fact that you cook from scratch rather than buy ready meals.
Anyone heard what UKIP's General Secretary Roger Bird has done to be suspended?
Impropriety covers a multitude...
I don't know but I have a feeling he is about to get promoted from "someone no one has heard of" to "Senior UKIP official"... this could be BIG! This could be THE END!
More coverage = always good news for UKIP = they are invincible!
Another step towards world domination by retreating from the world.
Oh you are so incisive!
I liked your last comment.. "I don't know if this is true or not but I will say it anyway..."
always pleased to entertain... was it true then? I thought it was but I'm not so obsessed with polling here as some.
UKIP haters pick a poll that says it is/UKIP supporters pick a poll that says it isn't
What a shock!
Who are the most unpopular party then in the 'good' UKIP polls?
By the way, do you want to pay out on our Reckless bet - £110 to me please but I'll let you off a tenner for early settlement.
Q1 I am not sure.. Haters post a poll, then @AnotherDave normally responds with one that disproves it.. I don't take much notice of either
Q2 Haha you must be kidding!
You can have another £100 (or more) at 2 prices better than Oddscheckers best if you like
I'll take another £100 at the original 11-10 you offered when so confident? Or has something changed?
Yeah the market has changed.. I could get a much better price by backing UKIP with a bookie, I am offering you the best odds for bravado...but if you don't want it fair enough
Nice try!
Really - why has the market changed then? What's changed in your opinion of supporting Mr Reckless between our first bet and a second bet - I'm confused.
Anyone heard what UKIP's General Secretary Roger Bird has done to be suspended?
Impropriety covers a multitude...
I don't know but I have a feeling he is about to get promoted from "someone no one has heard of" to "Senior UKIP official"... this could be BIG! This could be THE END!
More coverage = always good news for UKIP = they are invincible!
Another step towards world domination by retreating from the world.
Oh you are so incisive!
I liked your last comment.. "I don't know if this is true or not but I will say it anyway..."
always pleased to entertain... was it true then? I thought it was but I'm not so obsessed with polling here as some.
UKIP haters pick a poll that says it is/UKIP supporters pick a poll that says it isn't
What a shock!
Who are the most unpopular party then in the 'good' UKIP polls?
By the way, do you want to pay out on our Reckless bet - £110 to me please but I'll let you off a tenner for early settlement.
Q1 I am not sure.. Haters post a poll, then @AnotherDave normally responds with one that disproves it.. I don't take much notice of either
Q2 Haha you must be kidding!
You can have another £100 (or more) at 2 prices better than Oddscheckers best if you like
I'll take another £100 at the original 11-10 you offered when so confident? Or has something changed?
Yeah the market has changed.. I could get a much better price by backing UKIP with a bookie, I am offering you the best odds for bravado...but if you don't want it fair enough
Nice try!
Really - why has the market changed then? What's changed in your opinion of supporting Mr Reckless between our first bet and a second bet - I'm confused.
Don't be a bell end
When we had the first bet, there wasn't a market.. now there is, why would I take 10/11 when I can get 13/8?
Anyone heard what UKIP's General Secretary Roger Bird has done to be suspended?
Impropriety covers a multitude...
I don't know but I have a feeling he is about to get promoted from "someone no one has heard of" to "Senior UKIP official"... this could be BIG! This could be THE END!
More coverage = always good news for UKIP = they are invincible!
Another step towards world domination by retreating from the world.
Oh you are so incisive!
I liked your last comment.. "I don't know if this is true or not but I will say it anyway..."
always pleased to entertain... was it true then? I thought it was but I'm not so obsessed with polling here as some.
UKIP haters pick a poll that says it is/UKIP supporters pick a poll that says it isn't
What a shock!
Who are the most unpopular party then in the 'good' UKIP polls?
By the way, do you want to pay out on our Reckless bet - £110 to me please but I'll let you off a tenner for early settlement.
Q1 I am not sure.. Haters post a poll, then @AnotherDave normally responds with one that disproves it.. I don't take much notice of either
Q2 Haha you must be kidding!
You can have another £100 (or more) at 2 prices better than Oddscheckers best if you like
I'll take another £100 at the original 11-10 you offered when so confident? Or has something changed?
Yeah the market has changed.. I could get a much better price by backing UKIP with a bookie, I am offering you the best odds for bravado...but if you don't want it fair enough
Nice try!
Really - why has the market changed then? What's changed in your opinion of supporting Mr Reckless between our first bet and a second bet - I'm confused.
"Gogglebox's Andrew Michael chosen as Hastings and Rye Ukip candidate Ralph Atkinson claims he was kicked out in favour of the Channel 4 star He vented his anger in a leaked email that was sent to local party members Also condemned Ukip's policy of recruiting defecting Tories and celebrities"
The Guardian thinks it something else (though how good are their kipper sources?)
Anyone heard what UKIP's General Secretary Roger Bird has done to be suspended?
Impropriety covers a multitude...
I don't know but I have a feeling he is about to get promoted from "someone no one has heard of" to "Senior UKIP official"... this could be BIG! This could be THE END!
More coverage = always good news for UKIP = they are invincible!
Another step towards world domination by retreating from the world.
Oh you are so incisive!
I liked your last comment.. "I don't know if this is true or not but I will say it anyway..."
always pleased to entertain... was it true then? I thought it was but I'm not so obsessed with polling here as some.
UKIP haters pick a poll that says it is/UKIP supporters pick a poll that says it isn't
What a shock!
Who are the most unpopular party then in the 'good' UKIP polls?
By the way, do you want to pay out on our Reckless bet - £110 to me please but I'll let you off a tenner for early settlement.
Q1 I am not sure.. Haters post a poll, then @AnotherDave normally responds with one that disproves it.. I don't take much notice of either
Q2 Haha you must be kidding!
You can have another £100 (or more) at 2 prices better than Oddscheckers best if you like
I'll take another £100 at the original 11-10 you offered when so confident? Or has something changed?
Yeah the market has changed.. I could get a much better price by backing UKIP with a bookie, I am offering you the best odds for bravado...but if you don't want it fair enough
Nice try!
Really - why has the market changed then? What's changed in your opinion of supporting Mr Reckless between our first bet and a second bet - I'm confused.
Don't be a bell end
When we had the first bet, there wasn't a market.. now there is, why would I take 10/11 when I can get 13/8?
No fair - adding an explanation after another simple name calling on it's own....
Anyone heard what UKIP's General Secretary Roger Bird has done to be suspended?
Impropriety covers a multitude...
I don't know but I have a feeling he is about to get promoted from "someone no one has heard of" to "Senior UKIP official"... this could be BIG! This could be THE END!
More coverage = always good news for UKIP = they are invincible!
Another step towards world domination by retreating from the world.
Oh you are so incisive!
I liked your last comment.. "I don't know if this is true or not but I will say it anyway..."
always pleased to entertain... was it true then? I thought it was but I'm not so obsessed with polling here as some.
UKIP haters pick a poll that says it is/UKIP supporters pick a poll that says it isn't
What a shock!
Who are the most unpopular party then in the 'good' UKIP polls?
By the way, do you want to pay out on our Reckless bet - £110 to me please but I'll let you off a tenner for early settlement.
Q1 I am not sure.. Haters post a poll, then @AnotherDave normally responds with one that disproves it.. I don't take much notice of either
Q2 Haha you must be kidding!
You can have another £100 (or more) at 2 prices better than Oddscheckers best if you like
I'll take another £100 at the original 11-10 you offered when so confident? Or has something changed?
Yeah the market has changed.. I could get a much better price by backing UKIP with a bookie, I am offering you the best odds for bravado...but if you don't want it fair enough
Nice try!
Really - why has the market changed then? What's changed in your opinion of supporting Mr Reckless between our first bet and a second bet - I'm confused.
Don't be a bell end
When we had the first bet, there wasn't a market.. now there is, why would I take 10/11 when I can get 13/8?
No fair - adding an explanation after another simple name calling on it's own....
Anyone heard what UKIP's General Secretary Roger Bird has done to be suspended?
Impropriety covers a multitude...
I don't know but I have a feeling he is about to get promoted from "someone no one has heard of" to "Senior UKIP official"... this could be BIG! This could be THE END!
More coverage = always good news for UKIP = they are invincible!
Another step towards world domination by retreating from the world.
Oh you are so incisive!
I liked your last comment.. "I don't know if this is true or not but I will say it anyway..."
always pleased to entertain... was it true then? I thought it was but I'm not so obsessed with polling here as some.
UKIP haters pick a poll that says it is/UKIP supporters pick a poll that says it isn't
What a shock!
Who are the most unpopular party then in the 'good' UKIP polls?
By the way, do you want to pay out on our Reckless bet - £110 to me please but I'll let you off a tenner for early settlement.
Q1 I am not sure.. Haters post a poll, then @AnotherDave normally responds with one that disproves it.. I don't take much notice of either
Q2 Haha you must be kidding!
You can have another £100 (or more) at 2 prices better than Oddscheckers best if you like
I'll take another £100 at the original 11-10 you offered when so confident? Or has something changed?
Yeah the market has changed.. I could get a much better price by backing UKIP with a bookie, I am offering you the best odds for bravado...but if you don't want it fair enough
Nice try!
Really - why has the market changed then? What's changed in your opinion of supporting Mr Reckless between our first bet and a second bet - I'm confused.
Don't be a bell end
When we had the first bet, there wasn't a market.. now there is, why would I take 10/11 when I can get 13/8?
No fair - adding an explanation after another simple name calling on it's own....
Oh well!
Just give me a shout then if you do just want to settle up pre-xmas. That's fine with me, saves you a tenner.
"Gogglebox's Andrew Michael chosen as Hastings and Rye Ukip candidate Ralph Atkinson claims he was kicked out in favour of the Channel 4 star He vented his anger in a leaked email that was sent to local party members Also condemned Ukip's policy of recruiting defecting Tories and celebrities"
The Guardian thinks it something else (though how good are their kipper sources?)
It seems that UKIP being bashed in the media, bashed by all the comics, boobgate, traffic gate, insert-gate, bashed generally doesn't seem to do them any harm at all.
Perhaps that's because the sort of people who support or are thinking about supporting UKIP are people who regard those stories as silly tittle-tattle detached from the issues they most care about. Each time one of then hits the front pages, UKIP support rises or remains the same, while the 75% who dislike the party continue to dislike them as before.
I said here the other day, when everyone was patting each other on the back for criticising Farage about what he didnt say about breast feeding, that it wouldn't surprise me if the LBC interviews were engineered to give him the chance to sound reasonable about a topical issue, but in a way that would attract hyperbole from UKIP haters...
They then fall over themselves to be as critical as possible, ignoring all facts in the hope that it will deflate the UKIP bubble, when in reality it just pumps it up even more.. people see through the faux outrage
Conservatives sounding like Guardianistas is the recipe for UKIP growth
'faux outrage' thats really funny coming from the kipper ilk. Faux synthetic hypoerbolic outrage at everything conceivable. Mr Grumpy incarnate. Short of a vote or two - whip up a frenzy.
At every turn we see UKIP apologists, candidates, would be candidates, officials, leaders, deputy leaders and every spokesman you care to mentions spouting endless claptrap which is aimed at so clearly whipping up anti foreigner immigrant coloured and religious prejudice all cloaked in such increasingly glaring racist cant that it is impossible to ignore.
But to be fair to Farage he is willing to leave no unimaginably small intolerant stone unturned in his gubby search for votes, 'Pardon me Mr Voter let me polish that chip on your shoulder.'
'ting tongs', voices on the tube, the overseas neighbours, breast feeding in the corner, traffic jams full of immigrants. And this is before gets all angry at stopping people profiteering from selling poppies. Lets be really really clear - I cannot believe that Farage knows his voters. There can surely be no way that British people, British people that civilised the world and saved the world and are renowned throughout the world for tolerance, can be so low crass and ignorant and downright shabby enough to vote for this man in any numbers. It would be appalling.
The chancellor claims he is being straight with voters over spending cuts but he is reluctant to spell out the consequences of returning to levels of spending as a share of national income not seen for 80 years.
The BBC are going to push this BS line all the way to the GE and conveniently forgetting that 1998 it was basically the same.
If Osborne had been a tiny bit cleverer he could have fiddled his figures to make them exactly the same as say 1998, and claim look was 98/99 so bad?
The feeling then was that public services were in crisis and needed massive investment. I'd be delighted if Osborne wanted to argue on that territory. The Tories are way out of line with public opinion on this. I did a Yougov today that suggested voters were evenly split on whether the government should prioritise deficit reduction and amongst those who thought it a priority, people were evenly split on whether tax rises or spending cuts should be the primary method of balancing the books. Of course the image the public have of politicians arguably matters far more than where their policies are on the spectrum. Labour needs to be clear that it will raise tax as well as cut spending and to hell with the tabloid/Tory reaction. The polls suggest that is where the centre is.
Anyone heard what UKIP's General Secretary Roger Bird has done to be suspended?
Impropriety covers a multitude...
I.
Oh you are so incisive!
I liked your last comment.. "I don't know if this is true or not but I will say it anyway..."
.
UKIP haters pick a poll that says it is/UKIP supporters pick a poll that says it isn't
What a shock!
Who are the most unpopular party then in the 'good' UKIP polls?
By the way, do you want to pay out on our Reckless bet - £110 to me please but I'll let you off a tenner for early settlement.
Q1 I am not sure.. Haters post a poll, then @AnotherDave normally responds with one that disproves it.. I don't take much notice of either
Q2 Haha you must be kidding!
You can have another £100 (or more) at 2 prices better than Oddscheckers best if you like
I'll take another £100 at the original 11-10 you offered when so confident? Or has something changed?
Yeah the market has changed.. I could get a much better price by backing UKIP with a bookie, I am offering you the best odds for bravado...but if you don't want it fair enough
Nice try!
Really - why has the market changed then? What's changed in your opinion of supporting Mr Reckless between our first bet and a second bet - I'm confused.
Don't be a bell end
When we had the first bet, there wasn't a market.. now there is, why would I take 10/11 when I can get 13/8?
No fair - adding an explanation after another simple name calling on it's own....
Oh well!
Just give me a shout then if you do just want to settle up pre-xmas. That's fine with me, saves you a tenner.
Don't worry that wont happen
But the offer to give you two points inside the best price stands... special deal for VIP customers, any amount you like
Smoking in particular is worth focussing on here, not least because the Feeding Britain report offers this thought:
“A family earning £21,000 a year, for example, where both parents smoke 20 cigarettes a day will spend a quarter of their income on tobacco. Even if people buy illicit tobacco they will still spend 15% of their total income on tobacco. Budgeting support is terribly important, but budgetary support alone is often not enough to equip families to kick their addictive habits when addiction is being fed and defended by some very powerful lobbies.”
But the only reason the country isn't bankrupt is because people receiving welfare benefits give a disproportionate amount of them straight back to the government in excise duties on drinking and smoking, along with the stupidity tax (the lottery).
AS far as the Tories are concerned.. having the BBC involved in political debate is equivalent to playing with a ref who is a member of the opposition club.
Humble prediction - the child abuse enquiry will keep getting derailed for a number of reasons until long after the election. No-one suggested by the establishment will be allowed to take charge of it.
The problem is the fact that Labour chose to politicise it.
In this case the victim was laying into a member of the panel's son on twitter (this is all according to media reports). The panel member spoke to the individual and then followed up with an email basically telling him not to. The victim felt "threatened" by this & therefore the panel member should resign.
Now, possibly it was foolish of the panel member to have a direct correspondence of this nature. But equally, we must be careful not to put the victims on a pedestal because of what they have suffered in the past.
At every turn we see UKIP apologists, candidates, would be candidates, officials, leaders, deputy leaders and every spokesman you care to mentions spouting endless claptrap which is aimed at so clearly whipping up anti foreigner immigrant coloured and religious prejudice all cloaked in such increasingly glaring racist cant that it is impossible to ignore...
'ting tongs', voices on the tube, the overseas neighbours, breast feeding in the corner, traffic jams full of immigrants. And this is before gets all angry at stopping people profiteering from selling poppies.
This is a perfect example of the faux outrage isam is referencing. Thanks kindly for demonstrating it for us.
... I cannot believe that Farage knows his voters. There can surely be no way that British people, British people that civilised the world and saved the world and are renowned throughout the world for tolerance, can be so low crass and ignorant and downright shabby enough to vote for this man in any numbers. It would be appalling.
Be prepared to be appalled, Mr. Path. If the polls are to be believed a significant minority of voters are prepared to vote UKIP. Maybe Farage does know his voters but you do not.
So, it looks like AV could benefit the Tories if the UKIP candidate dropped out before they did, if Green, Labour or LD preferences were all used though would benefit LDs or Labour
FrankBooth The LDs suprisingly actually have the strongest position, saying they will eliminate deficit by end of 2018, but use tax rises as well as spending cuts and then allow spending to rise but only in line with gdp
So, it looks like AV could benefit the Tories if the UKIP candidate dropped out before they did, if Green, Labour or LD preferences were all used though would benefit LDs or Labour
FrankBooth The LDs suprisingly actually have the strongest position, saying they will eliminate deficit by end of 2018, but use tax rises as well as spending cuts and then allow spending to rise but only in line with gdp
It speaks volumes about how detached the Westminster bubble is from the real world that the Lib Dems' position of "only modestly terrible spending cuts" counts as a moderate position, when in the real world anywhere between 60% and 80% of the public are against any further spending cuts at all, according to the polls.
At every turn we see UKIP apologists, candidates, would be candidates, officials, leaders, deputy leaders and every spokesman you care to mentions spouting endless claptrap which is aimed at so clearly whipping up anti foreigner immigrant coloured and religious prejudice all cloaked in such increasingly glaring racist cant that it is impossible to ignore...
'ting tongs', voices on the tube, the overseas neighbours, breast feeding in the corner, traffic jams full of immigrants. And this is before gets all angry at stopping people profiteering from selling poppies.
This is a perfect example of the faux outrage isam is referencing. Thanks kindly for demonstrating it for us.
I'm getting a bit fed up with all the anti-Ukip stuff. The left should be focusing its guns on the real enemy not an immigration protest party that most voters don't appear to like. From what I've seen anti-Ukip hostility seems to be highest amongst middle class yuppies who think Nick Clegg has been unfairly maligned, are satisfied with post-Thatcher Britain and think bashing Ukip means they have a social conscience in contrast to their general disregard for those less fortunate than themselves.
So, it looks like AV could benefit the Tories if the UKIP candidate dropped out before they did, if Green, Labour or LD preferences were all used though would benefit LDs or Labour
FrankBooth The LDs suprisingly actually have the strongest position, saying they will eliminate deficit by end of 2018, but use tax rises as well as spending cuts and then allow spending to rise but only in line with gdp
In saying that the will eliminate the deficit by tax rises as well as spending cuts the Lib Dems might have the most honest position, but in political terms I doubt it is the strongest.
Mind you no party seems to want to say who are going to be paying the extra taxes that would be required to the level to fend off serious spending cuts. Can't imagine why no one wants to be that honest.
A potential bomb on the government's feet: The Return Of The Eurocrisis.
Greece to speed up it's presidential election for Dec. 17th after they got a 2 month extension from the eurogroup on the bailout negotiations. The rules are that the greek president must be elected by at least 180 MP's after 3 rounds of voting until Dec.27th, if not then it's early elections on Jan.25th and the radical left is ahead by around 6 points in the opinion polls.
Malcolm: Yes 10% is probably an exaggeration but the point is valid. Especially as profit markups are apparently much higher for ready meals than separate ingredients.
Re Immigrants. If you come from a country with no welfare you either learn the basics or starve when things go wrong. So you see to it that your children learn the basics. Over here such basics are seen as anti feminist and frowned upon. Its one big reason why immigrants do much better than the locals. They know how to live very cheaply and have a work ethic derived from a work or starve culture. Hence they work hard, spend little, put the difference into savings and make something of their lives. Sadly the British welfare classes have never been taught the self discipline to do that because in liberal Britain self discipline is a dirty word.
You may think it odd that someone supporting UKIP says this. However the UKIP candidate for Tooting puts it much better than I can.
"So, the UKIP contender for Chuka's seat in Streatham, Bruce Machan came to Britain from Zimbabwe about the same time I came over here from Poland, and I am standing for UKIP in Tooting, which is just to the West. Directly North of Chuka's constituency, in Vauxhall, UKIP is represented by Ace Nnorom who is originally from Cameroon.
And on the East side of things Chuka is flanked by UKIP's Parliamentary Candidate for Dulwich and West Norwood Rathy Alagaratnam who is Tamil and came to Britain from Sri Lanka. And of course to the South, we have Winston McKenzie who is challenging Croydon North for UKIP -- Winston was born in Jamaica and has been suggested by Lee Jasper recently to be the most influential Black politician in Britain.
In fact, it may be inferred that UKIP is likely fielding the most ethnically diverse suite of candidates out of all the parties in South London. That is because all of us feel strongly about being British, whilst UKIP provides us with a truly meritocratic political platform, something that cannot be said of the LibLabCon establishment parties catering almost exclusively for the London upper middle classes....
Lastly, it is also worth pointing out there is only one party in the UK which has been continuously beating the drum for the Commonwealth and promoting Commonwealth free trade to ensure Britain does not miss out on unprecedented global growth. That party is UKIP.
UKIP wants a global Great Britain, not the little England on the sidelines of the European Union which we have become under the last two governments. This UKIP affinity for the Commonwealth is further reflected in our above mentioned South London UKIP candidates, four of whom were born in Commonwealth countries.http://www.thecommentator.com/article/5374/tooting_view_we_re_back_to_racism_smears_against_ukip
Humble prediction - the child abuse enquiry will keep getting derailed for a number of reasons until long after the election. No-one suggested by the establishment will be allowed to take charge of it.
The problem is the fact that Labour chose to politicise it.
In this case the victim was laying into a member of the panel's son on twitter (this is all according to media reports). The panel member spoke to the individual and then followed up with an email basically telling him not to. The victim felt "threatened" by this & therefore the panel member should resign.
Now, possibly it was foolish of the panel member to have a direct correspondence of this nature. But equally, we must be careful not to put the victims on a pedestal because of what they have suffered in the past.
One man's politicisation is another's deciding against a cosy stitch up.
And of course to the South, we have Winston McKenzie who is challenging Croydon North for UKIP -- Winston was born in Jamaica and has been suggested by Lee Jasper recently to be the most influential Black politician in Britain.
I'm not sure that those particular two names entirely inspire confidence!
Comments
Shortly after a claim came to light about the conduct of Mr Bird with regard to candidate selection, the UK Independence Party took action swiftly and decisively, including steps involving external Human Resources consultants, as well as following due process and the Party’s Constitution to the letter.
Unfortunately, UKIP has had to suspend Mr Bird pending a full investigation into allegations made against him. The party has acted swiftly and decisively and will not tolerate impropriety of any kind amongst its staff.”
Interesting to consider that if you're able to make an average profit of £137 a day on Betfair Exchange, your winnings would equate to £50,000 a year tax-free.
Seriously, the cheerleaders won't accept this but UKIP's brand is getting damaged. It's not Ratners yet but it is the most disliked party I believe (apologies if wrong) and that ain't about to turn around, anything but.
The Omnishambles budget? I seem to remember that unravelling after a few hours (even though it was quite a decent budget, unlike this one!)
Much better to attack the party's shortcomings, surely, than to insult those toying with the idea of voting for them.
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:T1DuLwTAcSAJ:www.ukip.org/people_key+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=uk
What might make this particularly interesting is that it relates to candidate selection, which does seem to have been causing a lot of dissension in the party recently. For the latest example:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2863696/Goggleboxgate-Ukip-candidate-s-fury-ousted-key-seat-star-hit-C4-show.htm
Another step towards world domination by retreating from the world.
http://www.bloomberg.com/energy/
I liked your last comment.. "I don't know if this is true or not but I will say it anyway..."
Dozens of Conservative MPs want David Cameron to walk away from the Coalition and govern alone in a minority administration.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/conservative/11280552/Abandon-the-Liberal-Democrats-and-govern-alone-Tory-MPs-tell-David-Cameron.html
Obviously if he is Gen Sec then he must be quite important, it's just that I am a Kipper anorak, and I had never heard of him
What a shock!
http://www1.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2014/09/22/the-polling-says-ukip-are-the-most-extreme-and-the-least-fit-to-govern-party/
By the way, do you want to pay out on our Reckless bet - £110 to me please but I'll let you off a tenner for early settlement.
What were those 50 MP's doing these past 4 years and 7 months?
I imagine the LDs must be praying for Cameron 'to walk away'. Such is the thickness of the thick tendency in the tory backbenches.
BTW -- 'one' MP said 'as many as'... yeah this is the way to conduct a poll.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2863696/Goggleboxgate-Ukip-candidate-s-fury-ousted-key-seat-star-hit-C4-show.html
"Gogglebox's Andrew Michael chosen as Hastings and Rye Ukip candidate
Ralph Atkinson claims he was kicked out in favour of the Channel 4 star
He vented his anger in a leaked email that was sent to local party members
Also condemned Ukip's policy of recruiting defecting Tories and celebrities"
I do wonder if the Lib Dems are panicking because of their national polling and the Tories have become pissed off with that.
Farage is making a point of winding up those who will never vote for him, goading them into loud and shrill denunciations of him (in the absurd language of those who think their view is the correct view and are aghast that people in large numbers agree with Farage). He is to my mind putting clear purple water between his party and these people, winding them up as effectively as Ali G did.
For reasons only known to themselves, Cameron & his high tories thought it was a good idea to insult and abuse the people who voted for him to please the guardianistas and others who would never ever vote for him however much he appeased them.
What will make or break the UKIP brand is how their newly elected MPs in 2015 behave and perform in parliament, including the new party leader that will inevitably follow before the 2020 election. The rest is just noise.
However for the first time in decades, certainly since the new "Gramasican" left took over Labour after Gaitskills death, the British people have on the ballot paper a broadly socially conservative small "c" conservative party of ordinary working and lower middle class people with a serious chance of electing a caucus of MPs, and certainly the first time such a party has been on offer that is not tainted either by socialism or the desires of the aristocracy. The reaction of the established parties is, I suspect, similar and similarly counter productive to their reaction when Labour first started winning seats at the turn of the 20th century.
Q2 Haha you must be kidding!
You can have another £100 (or more) at 2 prices better than Oddscheckers best if you like
Of coruse that dosen't stop the conservatives doing something in say late February that makes the Libdems utterly apoplectic to intentionally topple the coalition for exactly that reason though, and then saying well we did our best but the Libdems couldn't cope with government and flounced out.....
Overall though I expect the coalition to last the course. I suspect the Queen, using her all powerful soft power, was instrumental in ensuring the coalition happened and would take a very dim view of anyone who collapsed it and jeopardised the stablility of the UK.
Tory Baroness Jenkin says 'the problem is poor people don't know how to cook'
I sense another UKIP defection
http://order-order.com/2014/12/08/red-ukip-party-spokesman-suggests-nationalising-railways/?utm_source=Guy+Fawkes'+Blog+List&utm_campaign=eea3b9f804-happy+hour&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_547885726c-eea3b9f804-225753777
Sun Politics retweeted
steve hawkes@steve_hawkes·1 min1 minute ago
What's your favourite cheese? "Cheddar" says EdM #wallace
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-30384643
The BBC are going to push this BS line all the way to the GE and conveniently forgetting that 1998 it was basically the same.
If Osborne had been a tiny bit cleverer he could have fiddled his figures to make them exactly the same as say 1998, and claim look was 98/99 so bad?
Nice try!
There seems to be an inverse correlation between how fancy the kitchen is, and the amount of cooking which actually takes place in it.
If you cook a meal from scratch it costs about a tenth of a ready meal. For two generations people haven't been taught basic home economics (ie how to cook nutritious food cheaply from scratch). You only have to look in a supermarket to see that it is the least educated, least well off who are piling their trolleys with expensive ready meals and think pizza or microwaved ready meals are a suitable main meal.
Another example of how socialism has destroyed the working classes.
I'm lucky, my wife was an immigrant from a country with no social security (another immigrant who will be voting UKIP BTW). Despite there being eight of us, our weekly supermarket shop rarely goes over £120 - including soap poweder etc. - because she cooks from scratch (other than Saturdays) and I grow some of it on an allotment. She once made a delicious soup out of brocolli stalks left over after the broccoli had been eaten.
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/dec/08/ukip-suspends-general-secretary-candidate-selection-allegations
Impropriety is an interesting word. Sounds like some form of personal rather than institutional issue.
The new politics; not like the old politics at all!
He wasn't just a branch manager then?
Risky. Many are old enough to remember British Rail.
Frist we heard of this story was that UKIP had suspended someone. A breath of fresh air.
It is far, far simpler than that. Per Populus:
Q: Would you say the long-term economic plan is working for you and your family?
Net scores (ie Yes minus No)
Con +40
Lab -69
LD -6
UKIP -57
Just look at that UKIP score - massively negative, almost as negative as Lab.
As usual, hard core political enthusiasts on here are worried about language, what X is saying, what Y is reporting etc etc etc.
Forget it - it's all irrelevant. If those UKIP supporters start feeling better off they'll go back to Con. If they don't, they won't. Dead simple.
http://www.populus.co.uk/item/Economic-competence-may-not-translate-into-votes/
Luxury!
“A family earning £21,000 a year, for example, where both parents smoke 20 cigarettes a day will spend a quarter of their income on tobacco. Even if people buy illicit tobacco they will still spend 15% of their total income on tobacco. Budgeting support is terribly important, but budgetary support alone is often not enough to equip families to kick their addictive habits when addiction is being fed and defended by some very powerful lobbies.”
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/11280307/Some-people-using-foodbanks-buy-cigarettes-instead-of-food.html
I'm relying on Pakistan to ****-up the last four overs against New Zealand, otherwise my main bet today is down the drain.
http://www.espncricinfo.com/pakistan-v-new-zealand-2014/engine/match/742619.html
Also I fail to see the significance of being an immigrant to know how to cook. There are two of us and my wife cooks all meals but we still spend £200 a week , again down to what you purchase not the fact that you cook from scratch rather than buy ready meals.
When we had the first bet, there wasn't a market.. now there is, why would I take 10/11 when I can get 13/8?
Interesting to know who has the authority to suspend the party General Secretary. That is the person responsible for suspending others.
How robust is the decision?
Hardly.
The lack of detail smacks of cover-up rather than transparent party management.
http://blogs.spectator.co.uk/coffeehouse/2014/12/nick-clegg-and-nigel-farage-are-pursuing-the-same-electoral-strategy/
'faux outrage' thats really funny coming from the kipper ilk. Faux synthetic hypoerbolic outrage at everything conceivable. Mr Grumpy incarnate. Short of a vote or two - whip up a frenzy.
At every turn we see UKIP apologists, candidates, would be candidates, officials, leaders, deputy leaders and every spokesman you care to mentions spouting endless claptrap which is aimed at so clearly whipping up anti foreigner immigrant coloured and religious prejudice all cloaked in such increasingly glaring racist cant that it is impossible to ignore.
But to be fair to Farage he is willing to leave no unimaginably small intolerant stone unturned in his gubby search for votes, 'Pardon me Mr Voter let me polish that chip on your shoulder.'
'ting tongs', voices on the tube, the overseas neighbours, breast feeding in the corner, traffic jams full of immigrants. And this is before gets all angry at stopping people profiteering from selling poppies.
Lets be really really clear - I cannot believe that Farage knows his voters. There can surely be no way that British people, British people that civilised the world and saved the world and are renowned throughout the world for tolerance, can be so low crass and ignorant and downright shabby enough to vote for this man in any numbers. It would be appalling.
In this case the victim was laying into a member of the panel's son on twitter (this is all according to media reports). The panel member spoke to the individual and then followed up with an email basically telling him not to. The victim felt "threatened" by this & therefore the panel member should resign.
Now, possibly it was foolish of the panel member to have a direct correspondence of this nature. But equally, we must be careful not to put the victims on a pedestal because of what they have suffered in the past.
FrankBooth The LDs suprisingly actually have the strongest position, saying they will eliminate deficit by end of 2018, but use tax rises as well as spending cuts and then allow spending to rise but only in line with gdp
The subject?.....
Not another UKIPer making a tit of themselves
Mind you no party seems to want to say who are going to be paying the extra taxes that would be required to the level to fend off serious spending cuts. Can't imagine why no one wants to be that honest.
Greece to speed up it's presidential election for Dec. 17th after they got a 2 month extension from the eurogroup on the bailout negotiations.
The rules are that the greek president must be elected by at least 180 MP's after 3 rounds of voting until Dec.27th, if not then it's early elections on Jan.25th and the radical left is ahead by around 6 points in the opinion polls.
http://www.theguardian.com/business/live/2014/dec/08/japans-recession-deeper-german-industrial-output-live
Presently the government has only 156 MP's.
They say he was trying to wing it
@Smarmaron
Not according to the tweets I heard
Re Immigrants. If you come from a country with no welfare you either learn the basics or starve when things go wrong. So you see to it that your children learn the basics. Over here such basics are seen as anti feminist and frowned upon. Its one big reason why immigrants do much better than the locals. They know how to live very cheaply and have a work ethic derived from a work or starve culture. Hence they work hard, spend little, put the difference into savings and make something of their lives. Sadly the British welfare classes have never been taught the self discipline to do that because in liberal Britain self discipline is a dirty word.
You may think it odd that someone supporting UKIP says this. However the UKIP candidate for Tooting puts it much better than I can.
"So, the UKIP contender for Chuka's seat in Streatham, Bruce Machan came to Britain from Zimbabwe about the same time I came over here from Poland, and I am standing for UKIP in Tooting, which is just to the West. Directly North of Chuka's constituency, in Vauxhall, UKIP is represented by Ace Nnorom who is originally from Cameroon.
And on the East side of things Chuka is flanked by UKIP's Parliamentary Candidate for Dulwich and West Norwood Rathy Alagaratnam who is Tamil and came to Britain from Sri Lanka. And of course to the South, we have Winston McKenzie who is challenging Croydon North for UKIP -- Winston was born in Jamaica and has been suggested by Lee Jasper recently to be the most influential Black politician in Britain.
In fact, it may be inferred that UKIP is likely fielding the most ethnically diverse suite of candidates out of all the parties in South London. That is because all of us feel strongly about being British, whilst UKIP provides us with a truly meritocratic political platform, something that cannot be said of the LibLabCon establishment parties catering almost exclusively for the London upper middle classes....
Lastly, it is also worth pointing out there is only one party in the UK which has been continuously beating the drum for the Commonwealth and promoting Commonwealth free trade to ensure Britain does not miss out on unprecedented global growth. That party is UKIP.
UKIP wants a global Great Britain, not the little England on the sidelines of the European Union which we have become under the last two governments. This UKIP affinity for the Commonwealth is further reflected in our above mentioned South London UKIP candidates, four of whom were born in Commonwealth countries.http://www.thecommentator.com/article/5374/tooting_view_we_re_back_to_racism_smears_against_ukip