Probably not, even if we leave there will be a minority wanting back in again. I wonder if they will also think that it is worth handing over power to a bunch of incompetents to make a point?
If by some miracle the Tories are in power and a referendum occurs, then yes. If Cameron and co do not U-turn and campaign for out, and In is successful, then the BOOers who are left will leave, leaving the openly pro-EU, all one of them, and the discontented but willing to accept it crowd.
If Lab win, then the Tories will continue to flit back and forth, attempting to out UKIP UKIP or just asking UKIP for an alliance, while the leadership remains unwilling to contemplate it in a genuine fashion.
Pretty sure that the Tories have been massively split over seemingly intractable disagreements in the past. Something to do with the Corn Laws, perhaps?
I don't know what resolved this sort of split in the past. Maybe a big enough war. The losers of the debate might have noticed that the world was moving on and leaving them behind.
All going really well for the PB Hodges on News at Ten. Didn't realise Cammo was dragged out of his shin dig due to the farce.
Does anyone seriously believe this issue will move any voters in any direction?
Entrenching people in their positions in opposition to the government because it is clearly incompetent can be just as damaging as causing actual movement, given the Tories need to win back support, not just maintain their current polling.
In all seriousness is it just possible that there may come a point when the consensus in the Tory party settles on the proposition that the EU is just not worth it?
If the EU continues its attacks on the City, if it continues to integrate the EZ and they start to vote as a QMV bloc, if the bill rises to unacceptable levels and if a credible alternative can be found for British business just maybe.
I think we are slowly heading towards the exit. The leadership of the main parties doesn't really want this but we are on a different path to most of the EU and the paths are gradually drifting apart. My guess is that this consensus will not be reached by 2017 though. If the tories win they run a serious risk of self destructing on this.
Sadly not - Europe has been the party's fault line for now going on 30 years.
I cannot fathom why the whips/May contrived not to have a vote on the EAW - sure there would have been a Tory rebellion but one (as the eventual vote proved) that was eminently containable. While the public won't give a jot about the Parliamentary manouverings, it was a wholly gratituous provocation to many backbenchers beyond the usual suspects and hence woefully counter-productive.
Can someone in the Labour party please walk in front of Ed Bland when he takes to the streets of London to ensure he is not knocked down by the proverbial Clapham Omnibus between now and 7th May 2015?
Sadly not - Europe has been the party's fault line for now going on 30 years.
I cannot fathom why the whips/May contrived not to have a vote on the EAW - sure there would have been a Tory rebellion but one (as the eventual vote proved) that was eminently containable. While the public won't give a jot about the Parliamentary manouverings, it was a wholly gratituous provocation to many backbenchers beyond the usual suspects and hence woefully counter-productive.
I can only assume if was designed to take the heat of Ed Miliband.
If by some miracle the Tories are in power and a referendum occurs,
What's the miracle? The Tories being in power (Cameron 11/10 with ladbrokes to be PM at Queen's speech), or the referendum?
If they are in power and they don't hold the referendum as promised I will join UKIP, I'm sure I won't be alone.
The Tories being in power would be the miracle. Although in fairness perhaps I should downgrade it to just being very unlikely, if Labour's internal problems become more pronounced and the threat in Scotland materializes.
I do think there will be a referendum if they do get in, in a coalition that would be a red line issue, as as little credibility as the leadership has with much of its own base - and those left for UKIP - on the issue, I can see people spontaneously combusting if Cameron sought to delay or prevent it, even if there was theoretically a good reason. Hell, he'll have enough trouble defending why it will be in 2017 and not sooner.
The Tories will only be a settled party on Europe when it is fully a hard eurosceptic party committed to withdrawal.
Never happen. The parliamentary Conservative Party is openly pro-EU. UKIP are the only anti-EU option.
Actually after the Tory defeat next May most of the centrist Tory MP's will be gone. The Tory parliamentary party was europhile until 1997 but only the eurosceptic right wing core remained after 1997 till 2010.
Twitter steve hawkes @steve_hawkes · 1 hr 1 hour ago Tories furious with Bercow, Labour furious with Theresa, Eurosceptics furious. Another day in Westminster
Sadly not - Europe has been the party's fault line for now going on 30 years.
I cannot fathom why the whips/May contrived not to have a vote on the EAW - sure there would have been a Tory rebellion but one (as the eventual vote proved) that was eminently containable. While the public won't give a jot about the Parliamentary manouverings, it was a wholly gratituous provocation to many backbenchers beyond the usual suspects and hence woefully counter-productive.
One thing that I have been confused about for a while is how the HoC managed to vote for 35 pieces of EU legislation that we had previously opted out of which have created or, in most cases recreated, new EU competencies without triggering a referendum.
The European Union Act 2011 is a remarkably complicated piece of legislation but this still strikes me as odd.
If by some miracle the Tories are in power and a referendum occurs,
What's the miracle? The Tories being in power (Cameron 11/10 with ladbrokes to be PM at Queen's speech), or the referendum?
If they are in power and they don't hold the referendum as promised I will join UKIP, I'm sure I won't be alone.
The Tories being in power would be the miracle. Although in fairness perhaps I should downgrade it to just being very unlikely, if Labour's internal problems become more pronounced and the threat in Scotland materializes.
I do think there will be a referendum if they do get in, in a coalition that would be a red line issue, as as little credibility as the leadership has with much of its own base - and those left for UKIP - on the issue, I can see people spontaneously combusting if Cameron sought to delay or prevent it, even if there was theoretically a good reason. Hell, he'll have enough trouble defending why it will be in 2017 and not sooner.
If you can call an 11/10 shot very unlikely, you should be laying it for every penny you can afford to gamble. Are you?
Most Tories have always believed that Europe starts on the French side of the English Channel. However most of us view the EU as a necessary evil. Personally if I was Dave I would be pushing for an EU which is virtually a United States of Europe which we would not join and a beefed up version of the EEA/EFTA which we would be part of. We wouldn't need to pay £billions to subsidise EU corruption and waste but would pay an appropriate amount to share the burden of running a small, free trade body administration.
One thing that I have been confused about for a while is how the HoC managed to vote for 35 pieces of EU legislation that we had previously opted out of which have created or, in most cases recreated, new EU competencies without triggering a referendum.
The European Union Act 2011 is a remarkably complicated piece of legislation but this still strikes me as odd.
It's simple, as Theresa May tried to prove today it's only when a government says something it's a law then it's a law, parliament doesn't matter.
It was priceless hearing Chuka proclaim David Miliband a great leader and future PM this morning.
I repeat, what do you think about the EAW mess?
Frankly I don't give a toss about the EAW. I am interested in tax cuts and Labour getting hammered at the GE with UKIP marginalised.
LoL, You could show a bit more respect after Labour killed themselves in Scotland winning the referendum for you whilst Cameron hid in the bushes somewhere.
Can't see UKIP being marginalised, I'm afraid; I've spoken to too many people who are through with the Tories just as much as Labour. GE2015 is going to be one to sit and laugh at, win lose or draw. There will be some crazily random results and Tory majority is one outcome we won't be getting.
Sadly not - Europe has been the party's fault line for now going on 30 years.
I cannot fathom why the whips/May contrived not to have a vote on the EAW - sure there would have been a Tory rebellion but one (as the eventual vote proved) that was eminently containable. While the public won't give a jot about the Parliamentary manouverings, it was a wholly gratituous provocation to many backbenchers beyond the usual suspects and hence woefully counter-productive.
Well said.
Agreed. Looks shifty and pathetic, and as it was the catalyst for what followed, will result in the principal amount of derision fall on them, to the extent people notice. Labour won't escape derision for the mess, so it could wind up as a no score draw, but the Tories have an aura of intra-party incompetence already, unlike, somehow, Labour, where the effect is less pronounced.
I've not been really following it, but judging what I've read of it, and JohnO's criticism, I can only say it is a clusterfuck wrapped in an omnishambles
Even if Europe wasn't divisive for the Conservatives they'd still find a way to keep it destructive for them. They're pretty much just BlueKip now anyway and they're still fighting themselves.
If by some miracle the Tories are in power and a referendum occurs,
What's the miracle? The Tories being in power (Cameron 11/10 with ladbrokes to be PM at Queen's speech), or the referendum?
If they are in power and they don't hold the referendum as promised I will join UKIP, I'm sure I won't be alone.
The Tories being in power would be the miracle. Although in fairness perhaps I should downgrade it to just being very unlikely, if Labour's internal problems become more pronounced and the threat in Scotland materializes.
I do think there will be a referendum if they do get in, in a coalition that would be a red line issue, as as little credibility as the leadership has with much of its own base - and those left for UKIP - on the issue, I can see people spontaneously combusting if Cameron sought to delay or prevent it, even if there was theoretically a good reason. Hell, he'll have enough trouble defending why it will be in 2017 and not sooner.
If you can call an 11/10 shot very unlikely, you should be laying it for every penny you can afford to gamble. Are you?
Not every penny, but a little. Actually, I'm less certain of a Tory loss than I have been at any time this parliament, with Labour declining, showing some more divisions and under pressure in Scotland, but I still think with the Tories as incompetent at managing their own party as ever, with the electoral disadvantages they face, having been in power during a period of unpopular 'cuts' and not receiving any uptick now the economy is improving, and still suffering at the hand of UKIP more than Labour, that it is too much for them to overcome.
Should have got on Labour right after the 2010 election really, I thought they would win abck then, and as the Tory polling held up until the omnishambles budget, I'd probably have gotten a good price.
I cannot fathom why the whips/May contrived not to have a vote on the EAW
The EAW was incorporates into UK legislation when Gordo signed the Lisbon Treaty (via the back door)
What exactly would you have had them vote on? "This House agrees that no changes to UK law are required, so, err..."
Other parts of the indivisible package require changes in UK law. Should the HoC not have debated those? (Yvette tried to stop them)
There could have easily been a separate motion/resolution on the EAW in addition to those parts that did require formal Parliamentary approval. An explicit promise was made by both PM and May that such a vote would take place: it should have been honoured. The result would have been the same - 30-40 Tory rebels - but would not have added an unnecessary injection of rancour. I've no time whatever for self-indulgent Tory splitters on the backbenches but the leadership has to play its part in not going out of its way to offend. Ken Clarke recognized that, why couldn't Theresa May done the same?
The Tories will only be a settled party on Europe when it is fully a hard eurosceptic party committed to withdrawal.
Never happen. The parliamentary Conservative Party is openly pro-EU. UKIP are the only anti-EU option.
Actually after the Tory defeat next May most of the centrist Tory MP's will be gone. The Tory parliamentary party was europhile until 1997 but only the eurosceptic right wing core remained after 1997 till 2010.
By all accounts, most of the 2010 intake were eurosceptic.
It's just most of them are careerists and will follow the line of the leadership/big business over voting on their principles.
The fault line in the Tory party over the EU could easily be remedied. All it would need is a Tory leader to come out and say "We want to restrict EU migration to 150k a year, opt out the CAP and be able to negotiate our own trade deals. If we don't get two out of the three, I'll campaign for replacing our membership with a free trade deal."
The whole Tory party, except Ken Clarke, would back that position. UKIP would be neutralised. The public would support it. The Tories would romp home with a good sized majority.
And yet they refuse to do it. For what purpose? A handful of votes in the European parliament and avoiding country of origin labelling. It's ridiculous.
Very poor judgement from Reckless and his team tonight.
Twitter Dan Hodges @DPJHodges now60 seconds ago London, England Medway hospital ask Mark Reckless and Ukip not to use them for political purposes. So, true to form, Ukip and Reckless attack the hospital.
I see that UKIP have lengthened slightly in Rochester & Strood. I do hope that Tracey Crouch hasn't been ramping.
Maybe ..@DPJHodges: Medway hospital ask Mark Reckless and Ukip not to use them for political purposes. So, true to form, Ukip and Reckless attack the hospital.
The rebels on the substantive vote (Graham Stringer is Labour and Sammy Wilson DUP). At first glance I'd say about half are from the 2010 intake
Afriyie, Adam Baker, Steve Barclay, Stephen Baron, Mr John Brady, Mr Graham Bridgen, Andrew Cash, Sir William Davis, rh Mr David de Bois, Nick Drax, Richard Goldsmith, Zac Gray, Mr James Heaton-Harris, Chris Henderson, Gordon Jenkin, Mr Bernard Kelly, Chris Leigh, Sir Edward Lewis, Dr Julian Lilley, rh Mr Peter Main, Mrs Anne McCartney, Jason McCartney, Karl Mills, Nigel Morris, Anne Marie Nuttall, Mr David Percy, Andrew Raab, Mr Dominic Redwood, rh Mr John Rees-Mogg, Jacob Reevell, Simon Robertson, Mr Laurence Shepherd, Sir Richard Stringer, Graham Syms, Mr Robert Turner, Mr Andrew Whittingdale, Mr John Wiggin, Bill Wilson, Sammy
They help keep the riff raff out of my local Waitrose
I like riff raff.
Love my once a month visit to Aldi
That's very interesting, but how am I to interpret a Yougov poll which no one has run through a ludicrously outdated UNS calculator which I could never, ever find for myself on the internet?
Comments
Edit my first first for ages. Woopee!
If Lab win, then the Tories will continue to flit back and forth, attempting to out UKIP UKIP or just asking UKIP for an alliance, while the leadership remains unwilling to contemplate it in a genuine fashion.
I don't know what resolved this sort of split in the past. Maybe a big enough war. The losers of the debate might have noticed that the world was moving on and leaving them behind.
"QTWTAIN?"
Only when the Tory party officially splits and all it's euro-skeptics are in a single party of their own.
If they are in power and they don't hold the referendum as promised I will join UKIP, I'm sure I won't be alone.
If the EU continues its attacks on the City, if it continues to integrate the EZ and they start to vote as a QMV bloc, if the bill rises to unacceptable levels and if a credible alternative can be found for British business just maybe.
I think we are slowly heading towards the exit. The leadership of the main parties doesn't really want this but we are on a different path to most of the EU and the paths are gradually drifting apart. My guess is that this consensus will not be reached by 2017 though. If the tories win they run a serious risk of self destructing on this.
I cannot fathom why the whips/May contrived not to have a vote on the EAW - sure there would have been a Tory rebellion but one (as the eventual vote proved) that was eminently containable. While the public won't give a jot about the Parliamentary manouverings, it was a wholly gratituous provocation to many backbenchers beyond the usual suspects and hence woefully counter-productive.
I nearly tacked on the end of the previous post that the PBT's would no doubt see today's debacle as all about Chuka...
Europe .... yawn
Road improvements ...now thats something useful
Ed PM ....you must be joking!
Dave will start to take comfort in losing the GE.
Come to think of it, that might explain current strategy.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/8388475.stm
Yvette Cooper was good today.
I do think there will be a referendum if they do get in, in a coalition that would be a red line issue, as as little credibility as the leadership has with much of its own base - and those left for UKIP - on the issue, I can see people spontaneously combusting if Cameron sought to delay or prevent it, even if there was theoretically a good reason. Hell, he'll have enough trouble defending why it will be in 2017 and not sooner.
The Tory parliamentary party was europhile until 1997 but only the eurosceptic right wing core remained after 1997 till 2010.
steve hawkes @steve_hawkes · 1 hr 1 hour ago
Tories furious with Bercow, Labour furious with Theresa, Eurosceptics furious. Another day in Westminster
What exactly would you have had them vote on? "This House agrees that no changes to UK law are required, so, err..."
Other parts of the indivisible package require changes in UK law. Should the HoC not have debated those? (Yvette tried to stop them)
The European Union Act 2011 is a remarkably complicated piece of legislation but this still strikes me as odd.
Only 38 headbangers left as well post tonight... clever tactics to reveal themselves albeit one was the UKIP man needing a clean pair of pants.
I'm knucking fackered tonight
Scrapheap and I's Dry but NOT obsessed with Europe and the Gays new Tory Party probably picked up a few new members this evening.
Can't see UKIP being marginalised, I'm afraid; I've spoken to too many people who are through with the Tories just as much as Labour. GE2015 is going to be one to sit and laugh at, win lose or draw. There will be some crazily random results and Tory majority is one outcome we won't be getting.
Try your ludicrous spinning somewhere else , it won't do you or May/Cameron any good on here .
In my admittedly limited experience dinner parties don't really get off the ground before 8.30 these days. You must eat jolly fast.
Should have got on Labour right after the 2010 election really, I thought they would win abck then, and as the Tory polling held up until the omnishambles budget, I'd probably have gotten a good price.
Everbody avoiding TSE in the easy to cook aisle
They help keep the riff raff out of my local Waitrose
The way to regain votes from UKIP is to raise the profile of the domestic agenda.
"This is already legislated for thanks to Gordo so we ..."
Judas had the decency to commit suicide after his betrayal
It's just most of them are careerists and will follow the line of the leadership/big business over voting on their principles.
YouGov/Sun poll tonight - Labour lead by one, Lib Dems and Greens tied in fourth place on 6%: CON 32%, LAB 33%, LD 6%, UKIP 17%, GRN 6%
One particularly stupid poster concluded that I was a racist, and was the sort who put burning crosses in the gardens of Muslim families.
Rochester special on telly or radio on bbc somewhere...
You can't help but pity people with such a mindset.
Love my once a month visit to Aldi
The whole Tory party, except Ken Clarke, would back that position. UKIP would be neutralised. The public would support it. The Tories would romp home with a good sized majority.
And yet they refuse to do it. For what purpose? A handful of votes in the European parliament and avoiding country of origin labelling. It's ridiculous.
Lab 32.50%
Con 31.75%
UKIP 15.00%
LD 8.75%
Greens 5.75%
Lab lead: 0.75%
Baxtered:
Lab 326, Con 273, LD 22, Nat 9, UKIP 0
Twitter
Dan Hodges @DPJHodges now60 seconds ago London, England
Medway hospital ask Mark Reckless and Ukip not to use them for political purposes. So, true to form, Ukip and Reckless attack the hospital.
Mark Reckless @MarkReckless 4 mins4 minutes ago
Questions for Medway Hospital Board http://wp.me/p43U2c-2oe
Afriyie, Adam
Baker, Steve
Barclay, Stephen
Baron, Mr John
Brady, Mr Graham
Bridgen, Andrew
Cash, Sir William
Davis, rh Mr David
de Bois, Nick
Drax, Richard
Goldsmith, Zac
Gray, Mr James
Heaton-Harris, Chris
Henderson, Gordon
Jenkin, Mr Bernard
Kelly, Chris
Leigh, Sir Edward
Lewis, Dr Julian
Lilley, rh Mr Peter
Main, Mrs Anne
McCartney, Jason
McCartney, Karl
Mills, Nigel
Morris, Anne Marie
Nuttall, Mr David
Percy, Andrew
Raab, Mr Dominic
Redwood, rh Mr John
Rees-Mogg, Jacob
Reevell, Simon
Robertson, Mr Laurence
Shepherd, Sir Richard
Stringer, Graham
Syms, Mr Robert
Turner, Mr Andrew
Whittingdale, Mr John
Wiggin, Bill
Wilson, Sammy
Tellers for the Noes:
Douglas Carswell
and
Mr Philip Hollobone