Pulpstar Posts: 8,403 1:06PM SeanT said: Salmond will surely resign now, or soon after the next GE? He looked a broken man in that car.
Sturgeon is ready and able to replace.
If he quite shortly he can retire with honour, having nearly done the inconceivable, and while he is still revered by his disciples; or he can trundle on, gradually earning more resentment.
If he's got any political sense (which he has, in spades) he will go, and go soon.
To take the 9-4 on him going before the 22nd though, that's the betting question.
I think Miliband will be sending some SPADs out to hide all the scythes, remove all the blades from lawnmowers and put all the sheep into upper pastures.
The grass needs to be long to hide the EVEL ball he's kicked.
I do think Nicola Sturgeon leading would give them a better chance in the next independence referendum (inevitably within the next 10 years surely?). Salmond might be better at firing up the diehard nationalists, but I feel Sturgeon would've appealed more to the more moderate people who liked the idea of a more "left-wing" state but were turned off by Salmond's tub-thumping "us vs them" approach.
The only man in the room laughing at his "jokes" - refusing to face the defeat.
Suddenly the air smells fresher.
Indeed. He won't be missed by many in the media.
Gordon Brown odds to replace him?
Typical oily, slimey, wringling, obsequious, dishonest response from Miliband to the planned change of constitutional powers. The man is a thoroughly nasty piece of work. Actually, why waste the vocabulary? He's a shit.
I think this was unnecessary if correct. He raised the SNP from a rag bag team to a party on the cusp of independence [ his goal always ] through dempcratic means.
Easily the most formidable politician amongst the current lot.
Why is he going ? He is not interested in being just a FM. He wanted to be PM of an independent Scotland. His bar was set quite high !
I hope this rumour is not ciorrect, if it is a rumour.
Well, it is not really a surprise. He had left politics before and then came back when the SNP started to do very poorly, so it is not surprising that he is going again.
Hopefully, the SNP will revert to their previous state as a fringe party.
Well, it is not really a surprise. He had left politics before and then came back when the SNP started to do very poorly, so it is not surprising that he is going again.
Hopefully, the SNP will revert to their previous state as a fringe party.
What are the odds on Labour winning both Wesminster and Holyrood ?
Salmond lied and lied and lied again. His promises of freedom and jam were deeply mendacious. It would have been freedom and vinegar - by the bucketful. He deserves this.
I do think Nicola Sturgeon leading would give them a better chance in the next independence referendum (inevitably within the next 10 years surely?). Salmond might be better at firing up the diehard nationalists, but I feel Sturgeon would've appealed more to the more moderate people who liked the idea of a more "left-wing" state but were turned off by Salmond's tub-thumping "us vs them" approach.
No, Sturgeon is cold and lacks emotion, she will repel people easily. As for the next referendum, if it ever happens it will be after the oil has run out. Since scottish nationalisism is economically based on north sea oil, it will run out with it.
I do think Nicola Sturgeon leading would give them a better chance in the next independence referendum (inevitably within the next 10 years surely?). Salmond might be better at firing up the diehard nationalists, but I feel Sturgeon would've appealed more to the more moderate people who liked the idea of a more "left-wing" state but were turned off by Salmond's tub-thumping "us vs them" approach.
No, Sturgeon is cold and lacks emotion, she will repel people easily. As for the next referendum, if it ever happens it will be after the oil has run out. Since scottish nationalisism is economically based on north sea oil, it will run out with it.
I couldn't agree more. I had quite a lot of respect for Salmond as an operator at the beginning, then the lies of an expert confidence trickster just piled up and up.
He needed to be taken out. That the electorate did it in spades just makes it all the more poignant. Eventually, enough saw through it. Salmond = the Bernie Madoff of politics.
Salmond lied and lied and lied again. His promises of freedom and jam were deeply mendacious. It would have been freedom and vinegar - by the bucketful. He deserves this.
All politicians end in failure = Salmond, the man who nearly broke the Bank at Monte Carlo.
If I had managed to achieve 1. a huge defeat for SLAB and establishing SNP as the natural government of Scotland in one minority and one majority election in a parliament gerrymandered to make [edit] the latter impossible 2. an actual democratic referendum 3.(probably) another massive chunk of damage on SLAB 4.frightening the Unionist party leaders out of their lives (or pushing them to give a very good impersonation) and making them make promises which they have to keep or else and 5. making independence more popular than Tory or even Labour rule from Westminsiter (even though not more popular than staying in the UK)
from when the SNP was a fringe party and when he has never had the patronage options of the other parties (Commons and Lords) and all on incessant attack from the media the like of which I can't recall since the days of Neil Kinnock
Whoever takes over has a huge task to keep the SNP together now that independence is off the table for a while. The party basically has to start again, so a new leader makes sense; but how many have the experience and guile to do that?
I do think Nicola Sturgeon leading would give them a better chance in the next independence referendum (inevitably within the next 10 years surely?). Salmond might be better at firing up the diehard nationalists, but I feel Sturgeon would've appealed more to the more moderate people who liked the idea of a more "left-wing" state but were turned off by Salmond's tub-thumping "us vs them" approach.
Sometimes the "velvet" approach does not work ! The SNP started winning Parliamentary seats since 1967. You have to ask who took them from a rag bag team , first to government and then to the cusp of independence. Only one man !
The government, by all accounts, is also reasonably popular !
I heard his Perth speech on Wednesday night. I am a socialist. I could hardly disagree with anything he said. No wonder they carried Glasgow. It is the middle class Labour vote who stuck to NO.
"Social research and polling expert Rachel Ormiston at ScotCen has contacted my colleague Severin Carrell to point out that only 14 people aged 16 and 17 were polled by Lord Ashcroft, a very small sample that makes the 71% yes vote figure quite unreliable, in her view. It’s certainly worth bearing in mind when looking at the figures – and before making judgments about younger v older voters."
Tom McNulty tweets: What a nice man - Salmond barred Mail, Telegraph and Express journos from his resignation press conference. Guardian refuse to go as result
How about a poll on PoliticalBetting as to what the solution of West Lothian question will be / ought to be.
Why does everyone keep saying whatever the result yesterday the world or at least the relationship between Scotland and the UK has changed for good. In other words where is the support for maintaining the status quo or even devo-reversed? How do we know the majority of people in the UK as a whole do not want to preserve the current level of devolution?
Well, it is not really a surprise. He had left politics before and then came back when the SNP started to do very poorly, so it is not surprising that he is going again.
Hopefully, the SNP will revert to their previous state as a fringe party.
What are the odds on Labour winning both Wesminster and Holyrood ?
Quite high now. If Brown wants to become First Minister, in order to bury the SNP for good, he will.
It was claimed last night that every constituency in Glasgow voted Yes. Since the margin was 25,000 and there are 7 constituencies, that would mean each one voted Yes by around 3,500 votes which on the face of it seems a bit unlikely.
All politicians end in failure = Salmond, the man who nearly broke the Bank at Monte Carlo.
If I had managed to achieve 1. a huge defeat for SLAB and establishing SNP as the natural government of Scotland in one minority and one majority election in a parliament gerrymandered to make [edit] the latter impossible 2. an actual democratic referendum 3.(probably) another massive chunk of damage on SLAB 4.frightening the Unionist party leaders out of their lives (or pushing them to give a very good impersonation) and making them make promises which they have to keep or else and 5. making independence more popular than Tory or even Labour rule from Westminsiter (even though not more popular than staying in the UK)
from when the SNP was a fringe party and when he has never had the patronage options of the other parties (Commons and Lords) and all on incessant attack from the media the like of which I can't recall since the days of Neil Kinnock
I wouldn't think I had done too badly.
Exactly and fpt at some point also, I can't imagine anyone else leading the line in the forthcoming negotiations with Westminster. OK he misspoke a couple of times but he is the consumate politician and I will miss his presence.
Plus also I really really don't think he needed to resign as you say, that's quite some achievement(s).
I'm sure he'll play some part in future efforts. Too valuable an asset to abandon as a political force.
He's more or less said that to Jon Snow.....
He's a far superior politician to Cameron and Miliband.
He was just defeated by reality.
What a non sequitur.
That's exactly why he isn't a far superior politician to Cameron. (I'll leave shit-face Miliband out of it.)
Having a grasp of reality is essential if you are to be a great politician. Cameron has that by the bucket load. Blair and Clinton even more.
Real guile is knowing how to gain, and retain, power. Salmond was stuck so far up his own posterior that he failed to judge the mood. Close, but no cigar. And in politics the winner takes all.
That failure to grasp reality is also, incidentally, why Boris will never make PM or if he does God help us all.
Whoever takes over has a huge task to keep the SNP together now that independence is off the table for a while. The party basically has to start again, so a new leader makes sense; but how many have the experience and guile to do that?
it will split. Salmond's the glue.
A party that has Jim Sillars and Brian Souter under one roof isn't stable now that Indy is off the table.
I do think Nicola Sturgeon leading would give them a better chance in the next independence referendum (inevitably within the next 10 years surely?). Salmond might be better at firing up the diehard nationalists, but I feel Sturgeon would've appealed more to the more moderate people who liked the idea of a more "left-wing" state but were turned off by Salmond's tub-thumping "us vs them" approach.
Sorry, there'll be no referendum in 10 years. It has gone for a generation as Cameron has said, indeed a lifetime. In order for there to be sufficient pressure to change this result within our lifetimes there would have to be the clear, settled will of the Scots to vote again and vote 'Yes'. This would mean, to my mind, polls consistently showing 70 or 80% in favour of separation and a clear mandate from across all of the political parties. It aint gonna happen.
"Social research and polling expert Rachel Ormiston at ScotCen has contacted my colleague Severin Carrell to point out that only 14 people aged 16 and 17 were polled by Lord Ashcroft, a very small sample that makes the 71% yes vote figure quite unreliable, in her view. It’s certainly worth bearing in mind when looking at the figures – and before making judgments about younger v older voters."
What a bitter rant he is giving here - to hand picked journos.
Soft balled to the end .
Plenty of bitter rants on this thread! "All political careers end in failure", but his was as close as you usually get to qualified success. No reason not to wish him a happy retirement.
His hectoring, paranoia, dismissal of rancour, and hubristic triumphalism - probably driven by his narcissism - cost YES a lot of swing voters in the last week, I think. If he'd played his cards right, he could have run NO much closer.
He forgot he needed to address the moderate undecideds, not his pumped up core vote.
Well, it is not really a surprise. He had left politics before and then came back when the SNP started to do very poorly, so it is not surprising that he is going again.
Hopefully, the SNP will revert to their previous state as a fringe party.
What are the odds on Labour winning both Wesminster and Holyrood ?
Quite high now. If Brown wants to become First Minister, in order to bury the SNP for good, he will.
Don't forget Nicola Sturgeon is the most popular major pol in Scotland by a long chalk. The various poll tables differ, but she's almost or always at the top.
I do think Nicola Sturgeon leading would give them a better chance in the next independence referendum (inevitably within the next 10 years surely?). Salmond might be better at firing up the diehard nationalists, but I feel Sturgeon would've appealed more to the more moderate people who liked the idea of a more "left-wing" state but were turned off by Salmond's tub-thumping "us vs them" approach.
No, Sturgeon is cold and lacks emotion, she will repel people easily. As for the next referendum, if it ever happens it will be after the oil has run out. Since scottish nationalisism is economically based on north sea oil, it will run out with it.
Whoever takes over has a huge task to keep the SNP together now that independence is off the table for a while. The party basically has to start again, so a new leader makes sense; but how many have the experience and guile to do that?
I've seen quite a few posts on Scottish nationalist forums seriously discussing emigration. They are completely emotionally broken.
Some fellow has tweeted a formula that apparently gives value of pi to the first 42 billion digits. Very neat an elegant it is too. Unfortunately it is the form of a ".png" image and I have no idea how to get one of those on here.
Belike, else (I forgot it was talk like a pirate day)
Salmond lied and lied and lied again. His promises of freedom and jam were deeply mendacious. It would have been freedom and vinegar - by the bucketful. He deserves this.
The most remarkable thing about the nonsense he spouted was that much of it was unnecessary and counter-productive.
Instead of the ludicrous claim that Scotland would be able to borrow at the same rate as the UK, why not say: "Of course as a new country we'll have to show the markets that we are fiscally responsible, but I'm confident that in a very short time we'll have an excellent credit rating and low borrowing costs".
Instead of the ludicrous claim that Scotland would somehow magically automatically become a full member of the EU, why not say "After a Yes vote we'll immediately start talking with the EU about formal accession, and in the meantime I'm confident that we can agree an interim agreement which will allow trade and investment to continue without disruption, which is in everyone's interest"?
Admittedly on the currency issue he had a harder problem, but making the ludicrous claim that a currency union could be conjured out of thin air without the consent of the other side was just bizarre.
Perhaps with sane answers to questions like this it might have gone the other way. We'll never know.
I do think Nicola Sturgeon leading would give them a better chance in the next independence referendum (inevitably within the next 10 years surely?). Salmond might be better at firing up the diehard nationalists, but I feel Sturgeon would've appealed more to the more moderate people who liked the idea of a more "left-wing" state but were turned off by Salmond's tub-thumping "us vs them" approach.
Sorry, there'll be no referendum in 10 years. It has gone for a generation as Cameron has said, indeed a lifetime. In order for there to be sufficient pressure to change this result within our lifetimes there would have to be the clear, settled will of the Scots to vote again and vote 'Yes'. This would mean, to my mind, polls consistently showing 70 or 80% in favour of separation and a clear mandate from across all of the political parties. It aint gonna happen.
There only has to be a majority in the Scottish Parliament of SNP + Greens -- not really that much of a longshot.
I do think Nicola Sturgeon leading would give them a better chance in the next independence referendum (inevitably within the next 10 years surely?). Salmond might be better at firing up the diehard nationalists, but I feel Sturgeon would've appealed more to the more moderate people who liked the idea of a more "left-wing" state but were turned off by Salmond's tub-thumping "us vs them" approach.
Sorry, there'll be no referendum in 10 years. It has gone for a generation as Cameron has said, indeed a lifetime. In order for there to be sufficient pressure to change this result within our lifetimes there would have to be the clear, settled will of the Scots to vote again and vote 'Yes'. This would mean, to my mind, polls consistently showing 70 or 80% in favour of separation and a clear mandate from across all of the political parties. It aint gonna happen.
I can't imagine the powers that be ever being stupid enough to exclude Scots living in rUK from the electorate again.
OK this is my last smug self regarding comment, at least for the next 20 minutes, but when the eurozone first went into crisis, I noted on here that it killed off Salmond's chances of winning any indyref, because he would have no answer to the currency question.
And so it proved, about four years later. The currency was the killer.
If the euro had been functioning smoothly, I reckon he would have won this referendum.
Salmond failed to have a good answer to the currency question - all the snake oil in Stonehaven couldn't grease that past the Scottish voters.
Real guile is knowing how to gain, and retain, power. Salmond was stuck so far up his own posterior that he failed to judge the mood. Close, but no cigar. And in politics the winner takes all.
Sometimes I can understand what drove Pork to his demented rantings.
I do think Nicola Sturgeon leading would give them a better chance in the next independence referendum (inevitably within the next 10 years surely?). Salmond might be better at firing up the diehard nationalists, but I feel Sturgeon would've appealed more to the more moderate people who liked the idea of a more "left-wing" state but were turned off by Salmond's tub-thumping "us vs them" approach.
Sorry, there'll be no referendum in 10 years. It has gone for a generation as Cameron has said, indeed a lifetime. In order for there to be sufficient pressure to change this result within our lifetimes there would have to be the clear, settled will of the Scots to vote again and vote 'Yes'. This would mean, to my mind, polls consistently showing 70 or 80% in favour of separation and a clear mandate from across all of the political parties. It aint gonna happen.
There only has to be a majority in the Scottish Parliament of SNP + Greens -- not really that much of a longshot.
And the independents (of whom Margo McDonald is much missed).
And any new "real socialist" party arising from the Glasgow area after the indyref.
Whoever takes over has a huge task to keep the SNP together now that independence is off the table for a while. The party basically has to start again, so a new leader makes sense; but how many have the experience and guile to do that?
We always accused the Liberal Democrats of being a different party in different places. What is the SNP really ? How can Tartan Tories be in the same party as some of their very laudable social democratic policies. One of the few political parties in Britain which could publicly support more immigration !
The inevitable tension will cause a fracture sooner or later. The SNP might implode now or after the devo max negotiations, which, as usual, will become for the Scots the Great Betrayal !
I do think Nicola Sturgeon leading would give them a better chance in the next independence referendum (inevitably within the next 10 years surely?). Salmond might be better at firing up the diehard nationalists, but I feel Sturgeon would've appealed more to the more moderate people who liked the idea of a more "left-wing" state but were turned off by Salmond's tub-thumping "us vs them" approach.
Sorry, there'll be no referendum in 10 years. It has gone for a generation as Cameron has said, indeed a lifetime. In order for there to be sufficient pressure to change this result within our lifetimes there would have to be the clear, settled will of the Scots to vote again and vote 'Yes'. This would mean, to my mind, polls consistently showing 70 or 80% in favour of separation and a clear mandate from across all of the political parties. It aint gonna happen.
I can't imagine the powers that be ever being stupid enough to exclude Scots living in rUK from the electorate again.
Good point. Although the practicalities are a major hurdle.
Salmond lied and lied and lied again. His promises of freedom and jam were deeply mendacious. It would have been freedom and vinegar - by the bucketful. He deserves this.
The most remarkable thing about the nonsense he spouted was that much of it was unnecessary and counter-prductive.
Instead of the ludicrous claim that Scotland would be able to borrow at the same rate as the UK, why not say: "Of course as a new country we'll have to show the markets that we are fiscally responsible, but I'm confident that in a very short time we'll have an excellent credit rating and low borrowing costs".
Instead of the ludicrous claim that Scotland would somehow magically automatically become a full member of the EU, why not say "After a Yes vote we'll immediately start talking with the EU about formal accession, and in the meantime I'm confident that we can agree an interim agreement which will allow trade and investment to continue without disruption, which is in everyone's interest"?
Admittedly on the currency issue he had a harder problem, but making the ludicrous claim that a currency union could be conjured out of thin air without the consent of the other side was just bizarre.
Perhaps with sane answers to questions like this it might have gone the other way. We'll never know.
Even on the currency, if he had just said "The preferred option is a currency union, but if Westminster proves to be vindictive about this, then a Scottish pound would be a perfectly adequate alternative." It would have been very hard for the No campaign to have a clear message against that.
Salmond lied and lied and lied again. His promises of freedom and jam were deeply mendacious. It would have been freedom and vinegar - by the bucketful. He deserves this.
Yeah, it's important to remember he is a total liar. Worse than that, a dangerous liar. A classic example of that deeply pernicious thing: the charismatic but amoral politician
The second Darling vs Salmond debate was just gruelling to watch, with the combination of Salmond's bare-faced deceptions and Darling's complete inability to handle them.
Watching him stand there and pretend that the fact that Scotland could use the pound without a currency union was some new revelation he'd just forced Darling to admit for the first time, and get a huge round of applause for it, and knowing that the media was never going to call him out on it, was absolutely sickening.
It was the same low, obvious tricks over and over, throughout the campaign. Pretending that not liking No's "negativity" was a good reason to vote Yes, as if the referendum was some kind of reality TV show competition where viewers phoned in to vote on which campaign had more flair and panache. Somehow managing to turn their inability to answer the most basic questions into a positive point by claiming that No was harping on the same points. The ridiculous Hope vs Fear dichotomy (when you stand on the edge of a cliff, do you choose Fear of splattering on the rocks below, or Hope that you'll somehow learn to fly on the way down?)
And I guess mentioning how stupid you have to be to fall for all that would have been patronising or something, so of course nobody ever did. No let Yes set the agenda again and again. I'm sure it was a joint success for Yes, but Salmond really was the face of those awful tactics, and he absolutely exemplified them. So no matter what his achievements or history, it's very hard for me to be anything other than glad to see the back of him.
I do think Nicola Sturgeon leading would give them a better chance in the next independence referendum (inevitably within the next 10 years surely?). Salmond might be better at firing up the diehard nationalists, but I feel Sturgeon would've appealed more to the more moderate people who liked the idea of a more "left-wing" state but were turned off by Salmond's tub-thumping "us vs them" approach.
Sorry, there'll be no referendum in 10 years. It has gone for a generation as Cameron has said, indeed a lifetime. In order for there to be sufficient pressure to change this result within our lifetimes there would have to be the clear, settled will of the Scots to vote again and vote 'Yes'. This would mean, to my mind, polls consistently showing 70 or 80% in favour of separation and a clear mandate from across all of the political parties. It aint gonna happen.
There only has to be a majority in the Scottish Parliament of SNP + Greens -- not really that much of a longshot.
And the independents (of whom Margo McDonald is much missed).
And any new "real socialist" party arising from the Glasgow area after the indyref.
That much more doable.
SNP to lurch to the left after this - try and outflank Labour from the unlimited welfare "social justice" angle ?
I do think Nicola Sturgeon leading would give them a better chance in the next independence referendum (inevitably within the next 10 years surely?). Salmond might be better at firing up the diehard nationalists, but I feel Sturgeon would've appealed more to the more moderate people who liked the idea of a more "left-wing" state but were turned off by Salmond's tub-thumping "us vs them" approach.
Sometimes the "velvet" approach does not work ! The SNP started winning Parliamentary seats since 1967. You have to ask who took them from a rag bag team , first to government and then to the cusp of independence. Only one man !
The government, by all accounts, is also reasonably popular !
I heard his Perth speech on Wednesday night. I am a socialist. I could hardly disagree with anything he said. No wonder they carried Glasgow. It is the middle class Labour vote who stuck to NO.
That is also the problem. Salmond promised the moon and stars, he promised to turn scotland into a gay religious socialist state with low taxes and deregulation for businesses, all funded by oil and green power. So he lied heavily to either the poor or the rich, to the gays or the priests, to the oilmen or the greens, or simply to everyone including you.
He only cared to have scotland under his boot, he didn't care how.
Comments
1:06PM
SeanT said:
Salmond will surely resign now, or soon after the next GE? He looked a broken man in that car.
Sturgeon is ready and able to replace.
If he quite shortly he can retire with honour, having nearly done the inconceivable, and while he is still revered by his disciples; or he can trundle on, gradually earning more resentment.
If he's got any political sense (which he has, in spades) he will go, and go soon.
To take the 9-4 on him going before the 22nd though, that's the betting question.
Noone answered !
That said Salmond was defeated by Cameron, the incompetent, out of touch English Tory toff.
Well, almost! And just for the one day obviously.
Soft balled to the end .
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y-rFT-uHm4w
The grass needs to be long to hide the EVEL ball he's kicked.
Suddenly the air smells fresher.
Trying the, as SeanT said, Bonnie Prince Charlie routine.
Instead, he looks like an old, dirty, nasty, smelly sock with about as much grace as one.
Though it would be fun to have him him back for a little while.
I do think Nicola Sturgeon leading would give them a better chance in the next independence referendum (inevitably within the next 10 years surely?). Salmond might be better at firing up the diehard nationalists, but I feel Sturgeon would've appealed more to the more moderate people who liked the idea of a more "left-wing" state but were turned off by Salmond's tub-thumping "us vs them" approach.
https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=930120922627919768&postID=8288999413723991579&isPopup=true
I particularly liked "PB Stormfront Lite "
If it's a Yes, then Cameron may resign, or he may not for the reasons that have been discussed.
If it's a No, then Salmond is finished as a politician; the generational opportunity will be over.
Gordon Brown odds to replace him?
Typical oily, slimey, wringling, obsequious, dishonest response from Miliband to the planned change of constitutional powers. The man is a thoroughly nasty piece of work. Actually, why waste the vocabulary? He's a shit.
http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/4706/gazan-hamas-war-crimes
Gazans Speak Out: Hamas War Crimes
Easily the most formidable politician amongst the current lot.
Why is he going ? He is not interested in being just a FM. He wanted to be PM of an independent Scotland. His bar was set quite high !
I hope this rumour is not ciorrect, if it is a rumour.
Hopefully, the SNP will revert to their previous state as a fringe party.
Huh, strange that he didn't mention this before the vote. He sounds like a solid No
As for the next referendum, if it ever happens it will be after the oil has run out.
Since scottish nationalisism is economically based on north sea oil, it will run out with it.
But at the last he came up against the only political force in the UK capable of beating him - Gordon Brown.
He needed to be taken out. That the electorate did it in spades just makes it all the more poignant. Eventually, enough saw through it. Salmond = the Bernie Madoff of politics.
1. a huge defeat for SLAB and establishing SNP as the natural government of Scotland in one minority and one majority election in a parliament gerrymandered to make [edit] the latter impossible
2. an actual democratic referendum
3.(probably) another massive chunk of damage on SLAB
4.frightening the Unionist party leaders out of their lives (or pushing them to give a very good impersonation) and making them make promises which they have to keep or else
and 5. making independence more popular than Tory or even Labour rule from Westminsiter (even though not more popular than staying in the UK)
from when the SNP was a fringe party and when he has never had the patronage options of the other parties (Commons and Lords) and all on incessant attack from the media the like of which I can't recall since the days of Neil Kinnock
I wouldn't think I had done too badly.
The government, by all accounts, is also reasonably popular !
I heard his Perth speech on Wednesday night. I am a socialist. I could hardly disagree with anything he said. No wonder they carried Glasgow. It is the middle class Labour vote who stuck to NO.
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/scottish-independence-blog/live/2014/sep/19/scotland-votes-no-in-independence-referendum-live-coverage
Camp Miliband are really up shit creek if there's a 'Biggin up Broon' campaign rolling.
Isn't he the man who took Labour to their second worst election defeat?
Why does everyone keep saying whatever the result yesterday the world or at least the relationship between Scotland and the UK has changed for good. In other words where is the support for maintaining the status quo or even devo-reversed? How do we know the majority of people in the UK as a whole do not want to preserve the current level of devolution?
How bonkers was Scandal S2??!!
Can't wait for S3
If Brown wants to become First Minister, in order to bury the SNP for good, he will.
Haha this trolling is great you are desperate for a bite aren't you?
Throw in a few Gideon's, that might help
Plus also I really really don't think he needed to resign as you say, that's quite some achievement(s).
That's exactly why he isn't a far superior politician to Cameron. (I'll leave shit-face Miliband out of it.)
Having a grasp of reality is essential if you are to be a great politician. Cameron has that by the bucket load. Blair and Clinton even more.
Real guile is knowing how to gain, and retain, power. Salmond was stuck so far up his own posterior that he failed to judge the mood. Close, but no cigar. And in politics the winner takes all.
That failure to grasp reality is also, incidentally, why Boris will never make PM or if he does God help us all.
A party that has Jim Sillars and Brian Souter under one roof isn't stable now that Indy is off the table.
He forgot he needed to address the moderate undecideds, not his pumped up core vote.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zNay_f2zaJ0
EtA:
Unkie' Clown English? Pfft:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TnkjOHVK-H4
Don't forget Nicola Sturgeon is the most popular major pol in Scotland by a long chalk. The various poll tables differ, but she's almost or always at the top.
Some fellow has tweeted a formula that apparently gives value of pi to the first 42 billion digits. Very neat an elegant it is too. Unfortunately it is the form of a ".png" image and I have no idea how to get one of those on here.
Belike, else (I forgot it was talk like a pirate day)
Instead of the ludicrous claim that Scotland would be able to borrow at the same rate as the UK, why not say: "Of course as a new country we'll have to show the markets that we are fiscally responsible, but I'm confident that in a very short time we'll have an excellent credit rating and low borrowing costs".
Instead of the ludicrous claim that Scotland would somehow magically automatically become a full member of the EU, why not say "After a Yes vote we'll immediately start talking with the EU about formal accession, and in the meantime I'm confident that we can agree an interim agreement which will allow trade and investment to continue without disruption, which is in everyone's interest"?
Admittedly on the currency issue he had a harder problem, but making the ludicrous claim that a currency union could be conjured out of thin air without the consent of the other side was just bizarre.
Perhaps with sane answers to questions like this it might have gone the other way. We'll never know.
If you start at S1 bear with it because it's very weak for the first few episodes.
( @Plato is a US mini-series authority, I believe)
Most important vote in generation saw 1000s of 16 & 17 year olds vote in indyref. How can we deny them vote in General Election?
Stayed up till 5.15 last night, when the Beeb suggested a NO vote was a cert.
So looks like:
Vote NO, get Ed!
but also, vote NO, get rid of Alex!
Surprised by the margin of victory (10%), looks like the final week of polls were out by some distance.
And any new "real socialist" party arising from the Glasgow area after the indyref.
That much more doable.
The inevitable tension will cause a fracture sooner or later. The SNP might implode now or after the devo max negotiations, which, as usual, will become for the Scots the Great Betrayal !
Watching him stand there and pretend that the fact that Scotland could use the pound without a currency union was some new revelation he'd just forced Darling to admit for the first time, and get a huge round of applause for it, and knowing that the media was never going to call him out on it, was absolutely sickening.
It was the same low, obvious tricks over and over, throughout the campaign. Pretending that not liking No's "negativity" was a good reason to vote Yes, as if the referendum was some kind of reality TV show competition where viewers phoned in to vote on which campaign had more flair and panache. Somehow managing to turn their inability to answer the most basic questions into a positive point by claiming that No was harping on the same points. The ridiculous Hope vs Fear dichotomy (when you stand on the edge of a cliff, do you choose Fear of splattering on the rocks below, or Hope that you'll somehow learn to fly on the way down?)
And I guess mentioning how stupid you have to be to fall for all that would have been patronising or something, so of course nobody ever did. No let Yes set the agenda again and again. I'm sure it was a joint success for Yes, but Salmond really was the face of those awful tactics, and he absolutely exemplified them. So no matter what his achievements or history, it's very hard for me to be anything other than glad to see the back of him.
It wouldn't be too far fetched. Mending fences etc.
Last night at one time he wrote: YES 50.6 NO 49.4.
Salmond promised the moon and stars, he promised to turn scotland into a gay religious socialist state with low taxes and deregulation for businesses, all funded by oil and green power.
So he lied heavily to either the poor or the rich, to the gays or the priests, to the oilmen or the greens, or simply to everyone including you.
He only cared to have scotland under his boot, he didn't care how.