Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Enter PB Indyref prediction competition as Panelbase become

SystemSystem Posts: 12,213
edited September 2014 in General

imagepoliticalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Enter PB Indyref prediction competition as Panelbase becomes the fourth pollster to have it No 52, Yes 48

Welcome to PB’s Indyref prediction competition, you need to enter the % Yes will achieve, and the % turnout.

Read the full story here


«13

Comments

  • eekeek Posts: 28,585
    first
  • TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633
    What splendid fun - I am in.
  • AllyMAllyM Posts: 260
    It is technically speaking, 53/47 if rounded properly. Or, 52.6/47.4 ;)

    Though doesn't make as interesting a headline as 'at least 4 pollsters the same'.

    :)
  • SocratesSocrates Posts: 10,322
    Hmmm. I don't think line charts are the best ones to use.

  • If you are using a computer with a mouse, you can hover over the graph line to see who made the entries (as the axis at the bottom will become too crowded to see).

  • AllyMAllyM Posts: 260
    As for a prediction. Hm, I will muse this.

    I've a deep emotional attachment to this referendum. Will think this through.
  • I have voted in the prediction game:

    Yes 103%
    Turnout 104%

    ...not sure you can trust these Nats to run it evenly! :-)
  • AndyJS said:

    SeanT said:

    Scott_P said:

    @BethRigby: Paddy Power says 3 out of 4 cities look set to vote No.
    Glasgow, Edinburgh, Aberdeen odds moving to No. Dundee likely to go Yes
    #scotref

    How the F do they know about regional changes?

    I'd like to believe it's true as if Glasgae, Edinboro and Aberdeen all go NO then NO must very likely win.

    But I am deeply suspicious of their info. Who or what is their source?
    My take is Yes can't win unless Glasgow goes Yes. If Glasgow is 50/50 No wins by 2 to 5 points.
    In that case the current Ladbrokes prices for Glasgow point to an overall Yes victory:

    Ladbrokes - Glasgow result

    Yes 8/11
    No EVS
  • RodCrosbyRodCrosby Posts: 7,737
    Betfair will hit £10m matched in the next few minutes...
  • RaRaRasputinRaRaRasputin Posts: 48
    edited September 2014
    Hello all,

    I've been lurking here for the best part of three years - I even used to sporadically post on an old, sadly forgotten, account. Anyway, I thought I'd return to posting in time for arguably the most momentous political event of my lifetime.

    Cheers!

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VmkySNDX4dU
  • Chris_AChris_A Posts: 1,237
    Bugger I've given us 55.4 rather than 45.6. Can I change it?
  • felixfelix Posts: 15,173
    Lol - Patrick distorting the summary table average somewhat.
  • 'Yes or No, the little white rose of Scotland will bloom again'

    We are a house divided this week but still a house.

    Isn't the 'white rose’ of Scotland, emblematic of Jacobitism support? -
    Yes. Please note that the writer, Alex Massie, is a Tory.

    The Tories were the party of the Jacobites whereas the Whigs were the party of the Hanoverians.
  • NickPalmerNickPalmer Posts: 21,564
    What did the Panelbase undecideds say when asked to imagine themselves in the polling booth? ("Wtf am I doing in here, where's the pub?")

    By the way, SeanT and I have virtually identical predictions. Hmm. Has anyone seen us together in the same room?
  • not sure i can separate my emotional response to this to give a balanced prediction... will give it a go though ;-)
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,406

    AndyJS said:

    SeanT said:

    Scott_P said:

    @BethRigby: Paddy Power says 3 out of 4 cities look set to vote No.
    Glasgow, Edinburgh, Aberdeen odds moving to No. Dundee likely to go Yes
    #scotref

    How the F do they know about regional changes?

    I'd like to believe it's true as if Glasgae, Edinboro and Aberdeen all go NO then NO must very likely win.

    But I am deeply suspicious of their info. Who or what is their source?
    My take is Yes can't win unless Glasgow goes Yes. If Glasgow is 50/50 No wins by 2 to 5 points.
    In that case the current Ladbrokes prices for Glasgow point to an overall Yes victory:

    Ladbrokes - Glasgow result

    Yes 8/11
    No EVS
    You've made an error in logic,

    Andy's statement can be boiled down to

    Glagow(No) => Scot(No)

    That implies

    Scot(Yes) => Glasgow(Yes)

    But certainly not

    Glasgow(Yes) => Scot(Yes)


    Glasgow going Yes is necessary but not sufficient for a Yes vote.
  • Chris_A said:

    Bugger I've given us 55.4 rather than 45.6. Can I change it?

    I've changed this for you, mouse-hover over the chart and you will be able to the new value.
  • DanSmithDanSmith Posts: 1,215
    I've gone for YES 50.4%
  • SeanT said:

    I agree the charts are a bit confusing.

    Can we not have an aggregate so we can see the collective wisdom of the pb crowd (and ignore Patrick)?

    Aggregate in on Summary link



  • As a small Royal Mail shareholder, I'm interested to know if anything has been said about its delivery obligations in an independent Scotland.
    In theory, if it no longer had to deliver to all points tartan on pain of death, it could save a few groats.
    Also, would an independent Scotland want to rely for its post on a foreign-owned and domiciled business?
  • YES 44.7%

    T/O 88.3%
  • SeanT said:

    I agree the charts are a bit confusing.

    Can we not have an aggregate so we can see the collective wisdom of the pb crowd (and ignore Patrick)?

    Hey - sorry all if I have not taken this as seriously as some and thereby screwed an average. I'll try to redo my prediction which is really Yes/No 51/49 (so Independence!). Failing that Mike please do exclude my first effort.
  • welshowlwelshowl Posts: 4,464
    I'm in. 48.51%
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,406
    Yes 47.50%
    Turnout 79.90%
  • TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633
    Jack's ARSE would appear to be at the end of the bell curve.
  • SocratesSocrates Posts: 10,322
    The sensible way to plot this data would be a bar charts tallying how many people fall within different segments. Or maybe a cumulative distribution chart if you want to be fancy.
  • It let me vote again - sensibly this time. But it said 'added your prediction'. Hmm...appears here on PB as well as in Tower Hamlets you can vote early and vote often....
  • Stuart_DicksonStuart_Dickson Posts: 3,557
    edited September 2014

    Afternoon all and I don't know about the rest of you (other than English PBers who want rid of Scotland) but I am very anxious about tomorrow's result. The feeling is that some in the NO camp, both media chatterati and politicians are becoming complacent that Don't Knows mean NO. The more I am hearing, the more I am leaning to thinking they are all in for a horrible surprise. The concerted effort by the Establishment to brow beat the Scots into voting NO smacks of desperation and what they forget is that with so many of the 1st time registered voters and previous non-voters being C2DE folks, they don't read London newspapers or watch TV news programmes and they certainly don't give a flying fart what some general in London says!!

    Looking at the expected declaration times, we might get an indication fairly early on. North Lanarkshire is listed as the 2nd earliest expected declaration at around 2am. If it is any closer than 60 NO 40 YES then I suspect it is going to be a bad night for NO.

    North Lanarkshire is pretty much the most rotten of all Scottish Labour's rotten burghs. It was along with Glasgow the safest Labour council in 2012 with 41 seats of out 70 returning Labour councillors. This is Dr John Reid territory. So if it votes anything like YES, it would be as important as Tower Hamlets in London electing a Tory council.

    - "The concerted effort by the Establishment to brow beat the Scots into voting NO smacks of desperation and what they forget is that with so many of the 1st time registered voters and previous non-voters being C2DE folks, they don't read London newspapers or watch TV news programmes and they certainly don't give a flying fart what some general in London says!!"

    The dunderheids around here haven't got the faintest clue about Scottish demography. They neither know nor care. Which is absolutely fine by me. The current Betfair Yes price is 5.3, which is simply crazy.

    - "If it is any closer than 60 NO 40 YES then I suspect it is going to be a bad night for NO."

    Incidentally Easterross, the current Ladbrokes prices for North Lanarkshire are:

    Yes 5/6
    No 5/6

    So, if it is a dead heat tomorrow night, just watch as the Betfair exchange goes absolutely bananas.
  • ItajaiItajai Posts: 721
    Wasn't Inverclyde once upon a time an area of LD strength?
  • MarkHopkinsMarkHopkins Posts: 5,584
    edited September 2014
    ALL - I have removed Patrick's "prediction" from the public results to avoid spoiling them.

    The details will still be available to determine if he is a winner at 103% Yes.

    EDIT: noted new entry, so will ignore the 103.
  • Yes: 44.95%
    Turnout: 81.75%

    I have a few quid (from mid-June) on turnout above 75% at 5/6, so I'm feeling pretty confident.
  • Itajai said:

    Wasn't Inverclyde once upon a time an area of LD strength?

    Yes. (See my post at the end of the previous thread.)
  • AllyMAllyM Posts: 260
    edited September 2014
    My Predicition.

    Yes: 47.48%
    Turnout: 86%
  • Any entries that aren't between 0% and 100% will be deleted
  • Pulpstar said:

    AndyJS said:

    SeanT said:

    Scott_P said:

    @BethRigby: Paddy Power says 3 out of 4 cities look set to vote No.
    Glasgow, Edinburgh, Aberdeen odds moving to No. Dundee likely to go Yes
    #scotref

    How the F do they know about regional changes?

    I'd like to believe it's true as if Glasgae, Edinboro and Aberdeen all go NO then NO must very likely win.

    But I am deeply suspicious of their info. Who or what is their source?
    My take is Yes can't win unless Glasgow goes Yes. If Glasgow is 50/50 No wins by 2 to 5 points.
    In that case the current Ladbrokes prices for Glasgow point to an overall Yes victory:

    Ladbrokes - Glasgow result

    Yes 8/11
    No EVS
    You've made an error in logic,

    Andy's statement can be boiled down to

    Glagow(No) => Scot(No)

    That implies

    Scot(Yes) => Glasgow(Yes)

    But certainly not

    Glasgow(Yes) => Scot(Yes)


    Glasgow going Yes is necessary but not sufficient for a Yes vote.
    I have not many any error, logical or otherwise. Please look at Andy's original statement:

    - "My take is Yes can't win unless Glasgow goes Yes. If Glasgow is 50/50 No wins by 2 to 5 points."

    Then look at the Shadsy price:

    Ladbrokes - Glasgow result

    Yes 8/11
    No EVS
  • The Ipsos-Mori is out at 6pm and YouGov at 10pm
  • My prediction:

    Yes 46.1%

    Turnover 87.2%
  • Yes 50.8%
    Turnout 88.6%
  • HughHugh Posts: 955
    Yes 52.21
    Turnout 76.44
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 61,950
    edited September 2014
    Good afternoon, fellow British patriots.

    I went for round numbers, because I'm a bit tired and forgot you were meant to use decimals.

    Yes 53%, turnout 89%. Surprised the average turnout guess is a bit below this, but not surprised the general view is of a narrow No victory.

    Edited extra bit: thanks to Mr. Shadsy for this.
  • On topic, I went for Yes to get 42%, and turnout at 82%
  • Conservative MP Sir Christopher Chope just told the BBC News channel that he will attempt to block any proposed extra powers for Scotland. There's now only one realistic way to get extra powers for Scotland.
  • dr_spyndr_spyn Posts: 11,300
    Yes 46.8.
    Turnout 77.8%
  • HughHugh Posts: 955

    My prediction:

    Yes 46.1%

    Turnover 87.2%

    What's "turnover"?
  • The BBC did a dry run today for their Referendum Results Show tomorrow. But just look at the graphic they were testing their systems with!

    https://www.facebook.com/ChristiansForIndependence/photos/pcb.731347250236394/731346486903137/?type=1

    :)
  • 'Yes or No, the little white rose of Scotland will bloom again'

    We are a house divided this week but still a house.

    Isn't the 'white rose’ of Scotland, emblematic of Jacobitism support? -
    Yes. Please note that the writer, Alex Massie, is a Tory.

    The Tories were the party of the Jacobites whereas the Whigs were the party of the Hanoverians.
    Cheers Stuart for getting back to me - I just thought it was an odd artcle headline for a country not normally associated with the rose - thought there may be some other connotation, but obviously not.
  • Average Yes at moment = 48.01%

    It's not just the pollsters....
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 43,336
    Hugh said:

    My prediction:

    Yes 46.1%

    Turnover 87.2%

    What's "turnover"?
    The appley things you get in Greggs.
  • Yes vote: 49.76%
    Turnout: 87.49%
  • FF42FF42 Posts: 114
    Yes: 47.19%
    Turnout: 78.54%

    I trust ICM a bit more than the others because of the higher Don't Know figures, although I realise different polling companies treat Don't Knows in different ways.
  • RodCrosbyRodCrosby Posts: 7,737
    £10 million matched....
  • felixfelix Posts: 15,173

    Conservative MP Sir Christopher Chope just told the BBC News channel that he will attempt to block any proposed extra powers for Scotland. There's now only one realistic way to get extra powers for Scotland.

    Gosh you are so bitter - maybe cut down on the soused herrings?
  • LennonLennon Posts: 1,782
    Yes 50.05% for me. But maybe I am biased towards wanting an exciting Friday AM...
  • DanSmithDanSmith Posts: 1,215
    Do we know how close it has to be for an automatic recount to be triggered?
  • Forecast:

    Yes: 51.3%
    Turnout: 83.2%
  • welshowlwelshowl Posts: 4,464
    welshowl said:

    I'm in. 48.51%

    oh and 86.02% turnout.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,406

    Pulpstar said:

    AndyJS said:

    SeanT said:

    Scott_P said:

    @BethRigby: Paddy Power says 3 out of 4 cities look set to vote No.
    Glasgow, Edinburgh, Aberdeen odds moving to No. Dundee likely to go Yes
    #scotref

    How the F do they know about regional changes?

    I'd like to believe it's true as if Glasgae, Edinboro and Aberdeen all go NO then NO must very likely win.

    But I am deeply suspicious of their info. Who or what is their source?
    My take is Yes can't win unless Glasgow goes Yes. If Glasgow is 50/50 No wins by 2 to 5 points.
    In that case the current Ladbrokes prices for Glasgow point to an overall Yes victory:

    Ladbrokes - Glasgow result

    Yes 8/11
    No EVS
    You've made an error in logic,

    Andy's statement can be boiled down to

    Glagow(No) => Scot(No)

    That implies

    Scot(Yes) => Glasgow(Yes)

    But certainly not

    Glasgow(Yes) => Scot(Yes)


    Glasgow going Yes is necessary but not sufficient for a Yes vote.
    I have not many any error, logical or otherwise. Please look at Andy's original statement:

    - "My take is Yes can't win unless Glasgow goes Yes. If Glasgow is 50/50 No wins by 2 to 5 points."

    Then look at the Shadsy price:

    Ladbrokes - Glasgow result

    Yes 8/11
    No EVS
    The implied probability of Glasgow going Yes from that market is 53.6%. That's entirely consistent with a (slim) victory for No.
  • I wonder what hellish CGI bullshit the BBC will subject viewers to at 2am. Caber tossing politicians seem possible.
  • SeanT said:

    Patrick said:

    It let me vote again - sensibly this time. But it said 'added your prediction'. Hmm...appears here on PB as well as in Tower Hamlets you can vote early and vote often....

    Apparently you now think turnout will be 49%. Are you expecting a tsunami to hit Clydebank at about 11am?
    Whoops! Now at 85%. But can see I appear twice in the updated charts. I may now make an additional 100 predictions and thereby improve my chances of winning! (And making myself really popular ;-) )
  • 'Yes or No, the little white rose of Scotland will bloom again'

    We are a house divided this week but still a house.

    Isn't the 'white rose’ of Scotland, emblematic of Jacobitism support? -
    Yes. Please note that the writer, Alex Massie, is a Tory.

    The Tories were the party of the Jacobites whereas the Whigs were the party of the Hanoverians.
    Cheers Stuart for getting back to me - I just thought it was an odd artcle headline for a country not normally associated with the rose - thought there may be some other connotation, but obviously not.
    There is another, more modern connotation, which is probably the one Alex Massie was actually referring to as it is a well-known piece of political verse in Scotland:

    The rose of all the world is not for me.
    I want for my part
    Only the little white rose of Scotland
    That smells sharp and sweet - and breaks the heart.


    Hugh MacDiarmid
  • weejonnieweejonnie Posts: 3,820

    As a small Royal Mail shareholder, I'm interested to know if anything has been said about its delivery obligations in an independent Scotland.
    In theory, if it no longer had to deliver to all points tartan on pain of death, it could save a few groats.
    Also, would an independent Scotland want to rely for its post on a foreign-owned and domiciled business?

    I can't guarantee this but I understand that IF Scotland becomes part of the EU then it MUST have a national post system in place. This will be horrendously expensive to a) set up and b) run. Since cash will be tight post independence I am pretty sure that Scotland will have no alternative to purchase a system 'off the peg' from a foreign owned and domiciled business (if any want to set it up risking being nationalised if they fall out with the Government)

    Currently the Royal Mail is bound by an agreement to deliver any letter in the UK anywhere for a fixed price dependent on weight and speed of delivery, but not destination. As Scotland has 8% of the population but 40% of the land area, it is pretty obvious that the average distance a letter has to be delivered will increase (but will substantially decrease in England as the Royal Mail only has to deliver letters to Berwick Upon Tweed rather than Lerwick at the same price) and can/ will charge more for delivering letters to the Scottish Postal Service for onward delivery.

    This will also reduce the loss-making areas of Royal Mail - so if the price hasn't shifted recently a small investment might be on the cards. (I am not an IFA).
  • Conservative MP Sir Christopher Chope just told the BBC News channel that he will attempt to block any proposed extra powers for Scotland. There's now only one realistic way to get extra powers for Scotland.

    Chope clearly has not been told they have television in Scotland.
  • Bob__SykesBob__Sykes Posts: 1,179
    Without looking at any of the other prediction postings or the averages, I went:

    Yes 47.5%
    Turnout 82.8%

    The average currently stands at 47.99% and 82.74%, so I feel comforted!
  • TheWatcherTheWatcher Posts: 5,262
    edited September 2014

    The BBC did a dry run today for their Referendum Results Show tomorrow. But just look at the graphic they were testing their systems with!

    https://www.facebook.com/ChristiansForIndependence/photos/pcb.731347250236394/731346486903137/?type=1

    :)

    Is that same BBC who in the eyes of Yessers, are biased and not to be trusted?
  • AlistairAlistair Posts: 23,670
    Interesting line in the panelbase Poll

    Despite the poll being 52/48 for no there is the following line

    "37% (+9%) say that they expect most of their friends and family to vote Yes against 35% (-6%) who say they are mostly voting No."

    Evidence of Shy No's?
  • Carnyx said:

    Hugh said:

    My prediction:

    Yes 46.1%

    Turnover 87.2%

    What's "turnover"?
    The appley things you get in Greggs.
    LOL
  • FlightpathFlightpath Posts: 4,012

    Conservative MP Sir Christopher Chope just told the BBC News channel that he will attempt to block any proposed extra powers for Scotland. There's now only one realistic way to get extra powers for Scotland.

    Chope does seem to be being very silly since the then only realistic way to get extra powers would be to vote Labour. What you are suggesting is in fact to get extra taxes for Scotland, paid for in who knows what currency - but ultimately the Euro and all the political control that goes with it.
  • RodCrosbyRodCrosby Posts: 7,737
    DanSmith said:

    Do we know how close it has to be for an automatic recount to be triggered?

    there will be no national recount.
  • JonnyJimmyJonnyJimmy Posts: 2,548
    Yes 49.99%
    Turnout 82.34%
  • taffystaffys Posts: 9,753
    Conservative MP Sir Christopher Chope just told the BBC News channel that he will attempt to block any proposed extra powers for Scotland. There's now only one realistic way to get extra powers for Scotland.

    I wonder what labour MPs will do...
  • HughHugh Posts: 955
    Carnyx said:

    Hugh said:

    My prediction:

    Yes 46.1%

    Turnover 87.2%

    What's "turnover"?
    The appley things you get in Greggs.
    Ooh no. Greggs have perfected the Sausage Roll, let's be clear about that right now.

    But their sweet stuff is not great.
  • OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 33,701

    I wonder what hellish CGI bullshit the BBC will subject viewers to at 2am. Caber tossing politicians seem possible.

    Can a caber toss policians? Might be amusing!

    50.93% NO and 81.75% turnout

    Result declared 10.15am. Cameron announces he’s saved the union 10.16am.
  • EasterrossEasterross Posts: 1,915

    Easterross • Posts: 1,274
    4:09PM

    hamiltonace said:
    » show previous quotes
    Note sure you can take Inverclyde as representative of Glasgow. Inverclyde is truly depressing place, no students and no middle class. The only similarity is that both vote Labour.


    Have to disagree. There are 3 adjacent towns. Port Glasgow was the most industrial as its name suggests. Greenock is the mixed one, mainly working class. Gourock on the other hand is mostly middle class, private housing and much smaller than Greenock. You also have the Tory hinterland like Kilmacolm which is a small but very affluent village.
  • Patrick said:

    SeanT said:

    Patrick said:

    It let me vote again - sensibly this time. But it said 'added your prediction'. Hmm...appears here on PB as well as in Tower Hamlets you can vote early and vote often....

    Apparently you now think turnout will be 49%. Are you expecting a tsunami to hit Clydebank at about 11am?
    Whoops! Now at 85%. But can see I appear twice in the updated charts. I may now make an additional 100 predictions and thereby improve my chances of winning! (And making myself really popular ;-) )
    Removed your previous for you - strangely enough we do know when you've entered more than once!

    Presumably only the last entry will be counted - but that will be Mike's decision.

  • Bob__SykesBob__Sykes Posts: 1,179
    DanSmith said:

    Do we know how close it has to be for an automatic recount to be triggered?

    I read that there is no recount once the result overall is totted up. Each campaign can request an individual recount in each counting area before an individual declaration. So we could have the perverse situation where there are no particularly close contests in any of the 32 areas but the overall result comes down to a hundred votes either way - and there will be no basis for anyone to seek a recount.

    Absolutely crazy, but then everything else about this current vote and the fact it's taking place at all is crazy...
  • Beverley_CBeverley_C Posts: 6,256
    edited September 2014
    My sense of gloom expects YES to win. My heart tells me that most Scots do not swallow Salmond's pipedream so I have split the DKs and subtracted it off the common poll figure for YES. That puts me at 40%

    It will be a disaster if I win £50 of bets. I have never been in a bookies in my life.
  • AlistairAlistair Posts: 23,670
    Yeah, James Kelly raises a valid question, "Why aren't ICM weighting by country of birth?"
  • Ishmael_XIshmael_X Posts: 3,664
    DanSmith said:

    Do we know how close it has to be for an automatic recount to be triggered?

    No recounts: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-29176884
    Except locally, and on grounds of process not numerical closeness.

    Makes sense if you think about it. Local numerical closeness is neither here nor there (you aren't electing a local representative), national would require a recount of all 32 areas.
  • weejonnie said:

    As a small Royal Mail shareholder, I'm interested to know if anything has been said about its delivery obligations in an independent Scotland.
    In theory, if it no longer had to deliver to all points tartan on pain of death, it could save a few groats.
    Also, would an independent Scotland want to rely for its post on a foreign-owned and domiciled business?

    I can't guarantee this but I understand that IF Scotland becomes part of the EU then it MUST have a national post system in place. This will be horrendously expensive to a) set up and b) run. Since cash will be tight post independence I am pretty sure that Scotland will have no alternative to purchase a system 'off the peg' from a foreign owned and domiciled business (if any want to set it up risking being nationalised if they fall out with the Government)

    Currently the Royal Mail is bound by an agreement to deliver any letter in the UK anywhere for a fixed price dependent on weight and speed of delivery, but not destination. As Scotland has 8% of the population but 40% of the land area, it is pretty obvious that the average distance a letter has to be delivered will increase (but will substantially decrease in England as the Royal Mail only has to deliver letters to Berwick Upon Tweed rather than Lerwick at the same price) and can/ will charge more for delivering letters to the Scottish Postal Service for onward delivery.

    This will also reduce the loss-making areas of Royal Mail - so if the price hasn't shifted recently a small investment might be on the cards. (I am not an IFA).
    Indeed. The Royal Mail price has risen c. 3.5% today. Make of this what you will!

  • Without looking at any of the other prediction postings or the averages, I went:

    Yes 47.5%
    Turnout 82.8%

    The average currently stands at 47.99% and 82.74%, so I feel comforted!

    The averages are buggered by me and Buxton confusing Turnout for No.
  • King Cole, if you want a quality tossing then you really need a trebuchet to fling one of the bounders into the North Sea.

    For more serious offenders, the solar death ray or space cannon offer more permanent punishments.
  • Conservative MP Sir Christopher Chope just told the BBC News channel that he will attempt to block any proposed extra powers for Scotland. There's now only one realistic way to get extra powers for Scotland.

    Chope clearly has not been told they have television in Scotland.
    :)

    Fortunately, Chope is not the only chump. Several Tory loons have been busy destroying "The Vow".

    We just look on in wonder. They are doing our job for us! ;)
  • SocratesSocrates Posts: 10,322

    Yes 50.8%
    Turnout 88.6%

    We have remarkably similar estimates.
  • SocratesSocrates Posts: 10,322
    I want to see what Tapestry's estimate is.
  • Miss C, me neither, I just bet a little online.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,578
    Hmm - I meant to put 52.23 for Yes, but I seem to have put 53.23. Eh,close enough.

    Turnout 86 (.13)
  • Conservative MP Sir Christopher Chope just told the BBC News channel that he will attempt to block any proposed extra powers for Scotland. There's now only one realistic way to get extra powers for Scotland.

    If legislation that Mr Chope intended to block never passed, no Act of Parliament would have received the Royal Assent in the last four years.
  • AlistairAlistair Posts: 23,670
    The prediction page is asking for a username and password, I signed up using my Google account OpenID - what should I put in? do I need ot create a non-Google based account and use that info?
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 43,336

    'Yes or No, the little white rose of Scotland will bloom again'

    We are a house divided this week but still a house.

    Isn't the 'white rose’ of Scotland, emblematic of Jacobitism support? -
    Yes. Please note that the writer, Alex Massie, is a Tory.

    The Tories were the party of the Jacobites whereas the Whigs were the party of the Hanoverians.
    Cheers Stuart for getting back to me - I just thought it was an odd artcle headline for a country not normally associated with the rose - thought there may be some other connotation, but obviously not.
    There is another, more modern connotation, which is probably the one Alex Massie was actually referring to as it is a well-known piece of political verse in Scotland:

    The rose of all the world is not for me.
    I want for my part
    Only the little white rose of Scotland
    That smells sharp and sweet - and breaks the heart.


    Hugh MacDiarmid
    IIRC it's carved in stone either at the Scottish Pmt - or up the Royal Mile in Lady Stair's Close above the High Kirk - or is it both?

  • taffystaffys Posts: 9,753
    edited September 2014
    My sense of gloom expects YES to win.

    Would that be so gloomy? I'm starting to think a narrow no would be much worse. There is no way English conservatives will grant Scotland extra powers and extra money. There is a huge silence on the tory back benches, being broken only by a few off messagers until Friday/.

    When the promises founder, Scotland will be up in arms, rightly.

    Dan Hodges is correct. The union is over. What's the point of pretending it isn't.
  • Mr. T, not sure if I'm still classed as an ardent unionist after the panic-stricken idiocy of recent days, but I backed Yes at 53%.
  • I fear the stress is getting to James, late of this Parish:

    Poll 1:
    Yes: 48 (+1)
    No: 52 (-1)
    Yes soars to all time high

    Poll 2:
    Yes: 48 (-1)
    No: 52(+1)
    Margin of Error Noise
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,578

    Conservative MP Sir Christopher Chope just told the BBC News channel that he will attempt to block any proposed extra powers for Scotland. There's now only one realistic way to get extra powers for Scotland.

    Tory backbenchers can be outvoted, as they have been before, particularly if Labour and Cameroons reach agreement on something. I'm not saying that should be an inducement to vote No, but angry Tory backbenchers need not scupper the plans of the leaders.
  • Beverley_CBeverley_C Posts: 6,256


    By the way, SeanT and I have virtually identical predictions. Hmm. Has anyone seen us together in the same room?

    You ARE SeanT and I claim my £50

  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 0
    edited September 2014
    SeanT said:

    Question for all pb-ers, are there any ardent unionists who have predicted a YES? Or, more interestingly, are there any Nats who have predicted a NO?

    I can't find any of the latter on the graph.

    I'm an ardent Unionist (with the caveat that this means a FUK with England being recognised - but given that caveat would hugely prefer the Jocks to stay) and have predicted 51% YES. (or 103% YES depending on which of my many votes you choose to look at).
  • saddenedsaddened Posts: 2,245
    Alistair said:

    Yeah, James Kelly raises a valid question, "Why aren't ICM weighting by country of birth?"

    Because MI5 won't let them. It's all part of the massive conspiracy.
  • EasterrossEasterross Posts: 1,915
    Have predicted 52.83% for YES and 81.65% turnout. Looked at the SKY page http://news.sky.com/story/1336051/scotland-referendum-explore-the-voting-areas and noted all the registration totals.
  • HughHugh Posts: 955
    weejonnie said:

    As a small Royal Mail shareholder, I'm interested to know if anything has been said about its delivery obligations in an independent Scotland.
    In theory, if it no longer had to deliver to all points tartan on pain of death, it could save a few groats.
    Also, would an independent Scotland want to rely for its post on a foreign-owned and domiciled business?

    I can't guarantee this but I understand that IF Scotland becomes part of the EU then it MUST have a national post system in place. This will be horrendously expensive to a) set up and b) run. Since cash will be tight post independence I am pretty sure that Scotland will have no alternative to purchase a system 'off the peg' from a foreign owned and domiciled business (if any want to set it up risking being nationalised if they fall out with the Government)

    Currently the Royal Mail is bound by an agreement to deliver any letter in the UK anywhere for a fixed price dependent on weight and speed of delivery, but not destination. As Scotland has 8% of the population but 40% of the land area, it is pretty obvious that the average distance a letter has to be delivered will increase (but will substantially decrease in England as the Royal Mail only has to deliver letters to Berwick Upon Tweed rather than Lerwick at the same price) and can/ will charge more for delivering letters to the Scottish Postal Service for onward delivery.

    This will also reduce the loss-making areas of Royal Mail - so if the price hasn't shifted recently a small investment might be on the cards. (I am not an IFA).
    Yeah Royal Mail will still be the postal service, but the Universal Service Obligation will probably go.

    Making a load of posties unemployed in the process, of course.
  • ItajaiItajai Posts: 721
    Just seen Kay Burley on Sky. Whatever does she look like with that cap on her head?
  • Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    Business leaders and campaigners are being intimidated because of their pro-Union views, the Telegraph can disclose.

    Dozens of Scottish businesses have been subjected to bullying, threats and abuse after publicly questioning independence.

    Several company directors said that they had received messages threatening to attack their families or boycott their business.
    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/scottish-independence/11102194/Threats-intimidation-and-abuse-the-dark-side-of-the-Yes-campaign-exposed.html
This discussion has been closed.