Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Why Ukip will stay odds-on to win most votes at EP2014 even

SystemSystem Posts: 12,213
edited May 2014 in General

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Why Ukip will stay odds-on to win most votes at EP2014 even if none the polls have them in first place

In the past fortnight the political specialist at Ladbrokes, Shadsy, has launched a blog called “The Political Bookie – NEWS FROM LADBROKES’ POLITICAL ODDS DESK”.

Read the full story here


«134

Comments

  • Tim_BTim_B Posts: 7,669
    First?
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,031
    Second! Mike, I think you need to add 'the original PB blogger' as a tagline ;-)
  • old_labourold_labour Posts: 3,238
    edited May 2014
    Daily Record Survation poll of 1003 Scottish voters for the European parliament. The article speculates that the SNP could gain one seat with a total of three and that Ukip could win a seat.
    Eurovote tables for Daily Record Survation poll

    Voting intentions for European Parliament Election (excluding Don’t Knows)

    LAB - 26% (- 3%)

    CON - 13% (NC)

    SNP - 37% (- 2%)

    LD - 6% (+ 1%)

    UKIP - 10% (+ 3%)

    Green - 6% (+ 3%)

    BNP - 1% (NC)

    Another Party - 1% (NC)



  • Stuart_DicksonStuart_Dickson Posts: 3,557
    Terrific that Shadsy has started his own blog. One of the few PBers worth reading these days.
  • Stuart_DicksonStuart_Dickson Posts: 3,557
    edited May 2014

    Daily Record Survation poll of 1003 Scottish voters for the European parliament. The article speculates that the SNP could gain one seat with a total of three and that Ukip could win a seat.
    Eurovote tables for Daily Record Survation poll

    Voting intentions for European Parliament Election (excluding Don’t Knows)

    LAB - 26% (- 3%)

    CON - 13% (NC)

    SNP - 37% (- 2%)

    LD - 6% (+ 1%)

    UKIP - 10% (+ 3%)

    Green - 6% (+ 3%)

    BNP - 1% (NC)

    Another Party - 1% (NC)



    That makes Shadsy's Scottish pricing look bang on. I still would not back UKIP even at 7/4. Their GOTV operation is pretty much non-existent in Scotland, and Euro elections are all about differential turnout. They always have been.

    Ladbrokes - 2014 UK Euro Parliamentary Elections - Scotland

    Conservatives to win a seat 1/4 (4/9 at BetVictor)
    Conservatives to win 0 seats 3/1

    UKIP to win a seat 6/4 (7/4 at Victor Chandler)
    UKIP to win 0 seats 1/2

    Lib Dems to win a seat 5/1
    Lib Dems to win 0 seats 1/10 (1/7 at BetVictor)

    SNP to win more votes than Labour 1/5 (1/4 at Hills)
    Labour to win more votes than SNP 7/2


  • anotherDaveanotherDave Posts: 6,746
    edited May 2014
    "Graham Sharpe, a spokesman for the company [William Hill], said 40% of all bets struck and 70% of stake money have been for UKIP in the run-up to Thursday's vote."

    http://www.itv.com/news/update/2014-05-18/ukip-made-favourites-to-win-euro-elections/
  • anotherDaveanotherDave Posts: 6,746
    SeanT said:

    It'll be interesting to see the reax if UKIP get a Scottish seat. All that Scotland-is-europhile-and-saintly-compared-to-nasty-England bollocks will be blown out the windae.

    However, I suspect UKIP will just fall short in Scotland, as they just fall short in the UK as a whole.

    My predix from Bangkok airport:

    Labour 27
    UKIP 25
    Tories 23
    LDs 8
    Greens 8

    In other words, something for everyone, apart from the LDs.

    Labour can say "we came first"
    UKIP can say "this is our best result ever"
    Tories can say "this isn't bad, we're only four points behind Labour"
    Greens can say "We're holding our own and equalling the Libs"
    Libs can quietly weep in the corner.

    I think UKIP are going to out perform their polling. They did in 2013, and 30-35% of the public are strongly anti-EU.

    That's also what I want to happen however, so there could be some wishful thinking going on. :-)
  • Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    He has promised price controls, rent controls, and now Ed completes the set; wage controls.

    http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/comment/ed-miliband-sells-fairer-britain-to-voters-9393071.html
  • JackWJackW Posts: 14,787
    Scott_P said:

    He has promised price controls, rent controls, and now Ed completes the set; wage controls.

    http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/comment/ed-miliband-sells-fairer-britain-to-voters-9393071.html

    Ed may promise the world and the stars .... all on tick of course, but as all PBers of standing know :

    Ed Miliband Will Never Be Prime Minister

  • Peter_the_PunterPeter_the_Punter Posts: 14,466
    Excellent blog from young Shadsy.

    Tempted by the 7/4 a Scottish UKIP seat. Any thoughts, fellow PBers? (S DIckson already duly noted.)
  • JackWJackW Posts: 14,787
    BTW .... I had a minor chortle at the Green party ad just below the thread leader, which for members of PB community missing it has a picture of Farage next to a renewables farm with the strap line :

    Both powered by wind. Which is better for Britain?
  • SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 39,668
    UKIP are favourites for a reason. Their vote is the most committed and this election is an opportunity to send a strong NOTA message without it have any specific affect on anything. The interesting thing will be the impact this has on the other parties. And how UKIP's vote reapportions itself for the GE. There will be voices inside both Labour and the Conservatives advocating a stronger anti-immigration line as a result of next week's election. But neither party can out-UKIP UKIP, and voters will know they are being sold a pup.

    It might be worth starting to take UKIP on: the fact is that there is no reason to feel afraid or worried if some Romanian men move in next door to you (the chances of them being criminals are vanishingly small); 38% of the UK's population is not made up of immigrants; and 26 million foreign people are not after your job.

    UKIP is a neo-liberal party whose leadership comprises people with very right wing economic views. There's nothing wrong with that. But they need to be confronted on it. What kind of UK does UKIP want? if it's just about pulling out of the EU it's nothing more than a pressure group and not worth voting for - especially as the Tories will give you a vote on EU membership by 2017. If it is a political party it must have policies, views and opinions on the full range of subjects. So what are they?
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 54,014
    SeanT said:

    It'll be interesting to see the reax if UKIP get a Scottish seat. All that Scotland-is-europhile-and-saintly-compared-to-nasty-England bollocks will be blown out the windae.

    However, I suspect UKIP will just fall short in Scotland, as they just fall short in the UK as a whole.

    My predix from Bangkok airport:

    Labour 27
    UKIP 25
    Tories 23
    LDs 8
    Greens 8

    In other words, something for everyone, apart from the LDs.

    Labour can say "we came first"
    UKIP can say "this is our best result ever"
    Tories can say "this isn't bad, we're only four points behind Labour"
    Greens can say "We're holding our own and equalling the Libs"
    Libs can quietly weep in the corner.

    My guess is that if you were offering the Lib Dems 8 seats right now they would bite your hand off. It is very likely to be even worse than that.
  • CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 60,216
    Scott_P said:

    He has promised price controls, rent controls, and now Ed completes the set; wage controls.

    http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/comment/ed-miliband-sells-fairer-britain-to-voters-9393071.html

    He promised a two one question referendum, automatic negotiated membership of the EU and now a member observer on the a Bank of England MPC:

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/scotland/scottish-politics/10839644/Salmond-accused-of-watering-down-shambolic-currency-policy.html
  • JackWJackW Posts: 14,787

    Excellent blog from young Shadsy.

    Tempted by the 7/4 a Scottish UKIP seat. Any thoughts, fellow PBers? (S DIckson already duly noted.)

    Was it you I spotted behind the scenes of the Conchita Wurtz concert in Vienna yesterday. Have you been appointed "Honorary Bearded Lady of the Bedchamber" ?

    Oh .... and no Ukip Scottish seat.

  • SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 39,668
    On another note - there is no reason for anyone in Scotland to vote tactically next week. So, how far will the SNP vote and the Green vote v the Labour/Tory/LD/UKIP vote be indicative of the final outcome in the independence referendum, and what are the variables? Turnout, I guess (though we are told the Yes side is more committed, so that should also be reflected in the Euro election results, shouldn't it?).
  • foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548
    Shadsy does have some interesting articles there.

    I think his point on betting on ties is a good one. 4-1 is good for two LD seats.
  • EasterrossEasterross Posts: 1,915
    Good morning all and are we less than a week away from crowning a new Gold standard pollster or will it be ICM meaning "I cant multiply" with YouJokeGuv and ComedyResolution having egg on their faces? Perhaps all 3 will be able to point to features in the results backing up their widely differing polling numbers.

    Meanwhile someone asks on twitter if Labour is actually fighting the Euro elections since they don't appear to mention them anywhere in their wonderful EPBs.

    Do we get to claim we are tired if we drop a clanger and make a racist or sexist remark?

    Ed has promised big pay rises for the low paid. Has he even considered who will pay for them? Maybe he is like the Labour voting employees in a company I have come across who when told they could either have a higher pay rise or avoid redundancies, started nominating who should be sacked. If there are any business owners who still support Labour, maybe one should offer Ed some work experience given that he has never had a real job in the real world. He might then learn where the magic money tree grows.
  • BlueberryBlueberry Posts: 408
    I enjoyed reading Shadsy's take on it too.

    Just for a bit perspective here are Hill's figures from yesterday:

    WILLIAM HILL have cut their odds for Ukip to poll more votes than any other Party at this week's Euro elections from 8/15 to 2/5 favourites. 'Despite seemingly daily attacks on Ukip by rival Parties and the media, political punters continue to make Nigel Farage's Party red hot favourites to emerge victorious' said Hill's spokesman Graham Sharpe.
    '40% of all bets struck and 70% of stake money have been for UKIP; 30% and 24% respectively for Labour; 22% and 5% for the Tories and 8% and 1% for the Lib Dems' said Sharpe.

    EURO ELECTIONS - WILLIAM HILL latest odds....2/5 UKIP; 11/4 LABOUR; 6/1 CONSERVATIVES; 250/1 LIB DEMS.
  • JackWJackW Posts: 14,787
    DavidL said:

    SeanT said:

    It'll be interesting to see the reax if UKIP get a Scottish seat. All that Scotland-is-europhile-and-saintly-compared-to-nasty-England bollocks will be blown out the windae.

    However, I suspect UKIP will just fall short in Scotland, as they just fall short in the UK as a whole.

    My predix from Bangkok airport:

    Labour 27
    UKIP 25
    Tories 23
    LDs 8
    Greens 8

    In other words, something for everyone, apart from the LDs.

    Labour can say "we came first"
    UKIP can say "this is our best result ever"
    Tories can say "this isn't bad, we're only four points behind Labour"
    Greens can say "We're holding our own and equalling the Libs"
    Libs can quietly weep in the corner.

    My guess is that if you were offering the Lib Dems 8 seats right now they would bite your hand off. It is very likely to be even worse than that.
    David, I think you'll find those numbers are for vote share and not seats won.

  • SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 39,668

    Scott_P said:

    He has promised price controls, rent controls, and now Ed completes the set; wage controls.

    http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/comment/ed-miliband-sells-fairer-britain-to-voters-9393071.html

    He promised a two one question referendum, automatic negotiated membership of the EU and now a member observer on the a Bank of England MPC:

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/scotland/scottish-politics/10839644/Salmond-accused-of-watering-down-shambolic-currency-policy.html

    Observer status as Westminster dictates an independent Scotland's monetary and fiscal policy. So where does that leave SNP promises on increased spending and lower business taxes? The only solution is much higher income tax and VAT. Or no more spending and no change in business taxes.

  • Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    @Sun_Politics: EXCL: Ed not a PM in waiting say 4/10 of HIS voters - and brother David tops successor list: http://t.co/YzqRO6Nvav
  • EasterrossEasterross Posts: 1,915

    Daily Record Survation poll of 1003 Scottish voters for the European parliament. The article speculates that the SNP could gain one seat with a total of three and that Ukip could win a seat.
    Eurovote tables for Daily Record Survation poll

    Voting intentions for European Parliament Election (excluding Don’t Knows)

    LAB - 26% (- 3%)

    CON - 13% (NC)

    SNP - 37% (- 2%)

    LD - 6% (+ 1%)

    UKIP - 10% (+ 3%)

    Green - 6% (+ 3%)

    BNP - 1% (NC)

    Another Party - 1% (NC)



    They cant both happen. Either the SNP can win a 3rd seat or UKIP can win a Scottish seat, unless of course Labour loses one of its seats or the Tories lose its only Scottish seat. Personally I am looking forward to seeing which party "wins" each Scottish constituency and comparing the results to 2009.
  • JackWJackW Posts: 14,787
    edited May 2014
    Sky News - Astrazeneca rejects Pfizer's "final bid" of £69.3bn
  • SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 39,668
    SNP/Green/Other - 44%

    Labour/Tory/LD/UKIP/BNP - 56%

    Is that the referendum outcome right there?
  • Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453


    Do we get to claim we are tired if we drop a clanger and make a racist or sexist remark?

    You don't need to be tired...

    @patrickwintour: UKIP candidate calls for pro EU political leaders to be hung for treason by neck until dead. Says sorry not media trained
  • JackWJackW Posts: 14,787

    Daily Record Survation poll of 1003 Scottish voters for the European parliament. The article speculates that the SNP could gain one seat with a total of three and that Ukip could win a seat.
    Eurovote tables for Daily Record Survation poll

    Voting intentions for European Parliament Election (excluding Don’t Knows)

    LAB - 26% (- 3%)

    CON - 13% (NC)

    SNP - 37% (- 2%)

    LD - 6% (+ 1%)

    UKIP - 10% (+ 3%)

    Green - 6% (+ 3%)

    BNP - 1% (NC)

    Another Party - 1% (NC)



    They cant both happen. Either the SNP can win a 3rd seat or UKIP can win a Scottish seat, unless of course Labour loses one of its seats or the Tories lose its only Scottish seat. Personally I am looking forward to seeing which party "wins" each Scottish constituency and comparing the results to 2009.
    Good morning to the House of Easterross.

    Indeed so.

    Effectively Ukip would need to outpoll the Conservatives in Scotland to take a seat and that's a non runner. Scotland is looking like 3:2:1 with the SNP taking up the LibDem slack with an extra seat.

  • SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 39,668
    Scott_P said:


    Do we get to claim we are tired if we drop a clanger and make a racist or sexist remark?

    You don't need to be tired...

    @patrickwintour: UKIP candidate calls for pro EU political leaders to be hung for treason by neck until dead. Says sorry not media trained

    Absolutely shocking.

    It should be hanged.

  • foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548
    I do not think the Euros matter too much. It is a stick to beat the established with as far as many voters are concerned, so not terribly predictive of next year. UKIP polled just 3.1% in 2010 a year after their 2009 performanice.

    Turnout will double next year, but the other 35% will be those less obsessed with politics and europe.

    One further thought: UKIP shows how European we are, right wing anti immigrant parties are flavor of the month across the EU. How are the True Finns, Golden Dawn and Le Pens party going to do?

    UKIP are favourites for a reason. Their vote is the most committed and this election is an opportunity to send a strong NOTA message without it have any specific affect on anything. The interesting thing will be the impact this has on the other parties. And how UKIP's vote reapportions itself for the GE. There will be voices inside both Labour and the Conservatives advocating a stronger anti-immigration line as a result of next week's election. But neither party can out-UKIP UKIP, and voters will know they are being sold a pup.

    It might be worth starting to take UKIP on: the fact is that there is no reason to feel afraid or worried if some Romanian men move in next door to you (the chances of them being criminals are vanishingly small); 38% of the UK's population is not made up of immigrants; and 26 million foreign people are not after your job.

    UKIP is a neo-liberal party whose leadership comprises people with very right wing economic views. There's nothing wrong with that. But they need to be confronted on it. What kind of UK does UKIP want? if it's just about pulling out of the EU it's nothing more than a pressure group and not worth voting for - especially as the Tories will give you a vote on EU membership by 2017. If it is a political party it must have policies, views and opinions on the full range of subjects. So what are they?

  • Peter_the_PunterPeter_the_Punter Posts: 14,466
    @JackW

    Your views on Scottish seat most welcome.

    Your other views you are perfectly entitled to, Sweetie....... [Exits with flourish.]
  • anotherDaveanotherDave Posts: 6,746

    I do not think the Euros matter too much. It is a stick to beat the established with as far as many voters are concerned, so not terribly predictive of next year. UKIP polled just 3.1% in 2010 a year after their 2009 performanice.

    Turnout will double next year, but the other 35% will be those less obsessed with politics and europe.

    One further thought: UKIP shows how European we are, right wing anti immigrant parties are flavor of the month across the EU. How are the True Finns, Golden Dawn and Le Pens party going to do?

    UKIP are favourites for a reason. Their vote is the most committed and this election is an opportunity to send a strong NOTA message without it have any specific affect on anything. The interesting thing will be the impact this has on the other parties. And how UKIP's vote reapportions itself for the GE. There will be voices inside both Labour and the Conservatives advocating a stronger anti-immigration line as a result of next week's election. But neither party can out-UKIP UKIP, and voters will know they are being sold a pup.

    It might be worth starting to take UKIP on: the fact is that there is no reason to feel afraid or worried if some Romanian men move in next door to you (the chances of them being criminals are vanishingly small); 38% of the UK's population is not made up of immigrants; and 26 million foreign people are not after your job.

    UKIP is a neo-liberal party whose leadership comprises people with very right wing economic views. There's nothing wrong with that. But they need to be confronted on it. What kind of UK does UKIP want? if it's just about pulling out of the EU it's nothing more than a pressure group and not worth voting for - especially as the Tories will give you a vote on EU membership by 2017. If it is a political party it must have policies, views and opinions on the full range of subjects. So what are they?

    UKIP is anti-uncontrolled immigration, not anti-immigrant.

  • malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 43,498

    SeanT said:

    It'll be interesting to see the reax if UKIP get a Scottish seat. All that Scotland-is-europhile-and-saintly-compared-to-nasty-England bollocks will be blown out the windae.

    However, I suspect UKIP will just fall short in Scotland, as they just fall short in the UK as a whole.

    My predix from Bangkok airport:

    Labour 27
    UKIP 25
    Tories 23
    LDs 8
    Greens 8

    In other words, something for everyone, apart from the LDs.

    Labour can say "we came first"
    UKIP can say "this is our best result ever"
    Tories can say "this isn't bad, we're only four points behind Labour"
    Greens can say "We're holding our own and equalling the Libs"
    Libs can quietly weep in the corner.

    I think UKIP are going to out perform their polling. They did in 2013, and 30-35% of the public are strongly anti-EU.

    That's also what I want to happen however, so there could be some wishful thinking going on. :-)
    It will be a miracle if they get a seat in Scotland. In real life they normally get 1-2% at best.
  • Of course UKIP will come first in the EU elections - it's a protest vote election that matters very little.

    What would be rather seismic is if Labour come 3rd - and they're only just ahead of Dave in the polls. That would leave Ed Microband with some serious splaining to do.
  • JackWJackW Posts: 14,787

    @JackW

    Your views on Scottish seat most welcome.

    Your other views you are perfectly entitled to, Sweetie....... [Exits with flourish.]

    PB has never known you exit without a flourish - All very Shirley Bassey .... or of course as you are known in the business - Burly Chassis .... which I've always thought an unfounded reference to your svelte figure. But then Sweetie, drag queens can be so cruel.

  • anotherDaveanotherDave Posts: 6,746
    malcolmg said:

    SeanT said:

    It'll be interesting to see the reax if UKIP get a Scottish seat. All that Scotland-is-europhile-and-saintly-compared-to-nasty-England bollocks will be blown out the windae.

    However, I suspect UKIP will just fall short in Scotland, as they just fall short in the UK as a whole.

    My predix from Bangkok airport:

    Labour 27
    UKIP 25
    Tories 23
    LDs 8
    Greens 8

    In other words, something for everyone, apart from the LDs.

    Labour can say "we came first"
    UKIP can say "this is our best result ever"
    Tories can say "this isn't bad, we're only four points behind Labour"
    Greens can say "We're holding our own and equalling the Libs"
    Libs can quietly weep in the corner.

    I think UKIP are going to out perform their polling. They did in 2013, and 30-35% of the public are strongly anti-EU.

    That's also what I want to happen however, so there could be some wishful thinking going on. :-)
    It will be a miracle if they get a seat in Scotland. In real life they normally get 1-2% at best.
    Don't say that Malcom, I put £50 on that with Ladbrokes.

    And they've been polling @ 10% in Scotland!

  • malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 43,498

    malcolmg said:

    SeanT said:

    It'll be interesting to see the reax if UKIP get a Scottish seat. All that Scotland-is-europhile-and-saintly-compared-to-nasty-England bollocks will be blown out the windae.

    However, I suspect UKIP will just fall short in Scotland, as they just fall short in the UK as a whole.

    My predix from Bangkok airport:

    Labour 27
    UKIP 25
    Tories 23
    LDs 8
    Greens 8

    In other words, something for everyone, apart from the LDs.

    Labour can say "we came first"
    UKIP can say "this is our best result ever"
    Tories can say "this isn't bad, we're only four points behind Labour"
    Greens can say "We're holding our own and equalling the Libs"
    Libs can quietly weep in the corner.

    I think UKIP are going to out perform their polling. They did in 2013, and 30-35% of the public are strongly anti-EU.

    That's also what I want to happen however, so there could be some wishful thinking going on. :-)
    It will be a miracle if they get a seat in Scotland. In real life they normally get 1-2% at best.
    Don't say that Malcom, I put £50 on that with Ladbrokes.

    And they've been polling @ 10% in Scotland!

    Dave, Sorry to be bearer of bad news but it is £50 down the drain. There is more chance of Scott or Carlotta posting something positive about Scotland than UKIP winning a seat.
  • CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 60,216

    SNP/Green/Other - 44%

    Labour/Tory/LD/UKIP/BNP - 56%

    Is that the referendum outcome right there?

    John Curtice makes a similar point:

    The 36 per cent for which the SNP is apparently heading in the Euro election is much the same as the 34 per cent inclined to vote Yes in the referendum.

    Yet the former figure looks good, the latter bad.


    http://www.scotsman.com/news/uk/ukip-success-would-push-1-in-5-scots-to-back-yes-1-3414996
  • Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    malcolmg said:

    posting something positive about Scotland than UKIP winning a seat.

    The SNP is not Scotland Malc.
  • anotherDaveanotherDave Posts: 6,746
    malcolmg said:

    malcolmg said:

    SeanT said:

    It'll be interesting to see the reax if UKIP get a Scottish seat. All that Scotland-is-europhile-and-saintly-compared-to-nasty-England bollocks will be blown out the windae.

    However, I suspect UKIP will just fall short in Scotland, as they just fall short in the UK as a whole.

    My predix from Bangkok airport:

    Labour 27
    UKIP 25
    Tories 23
    LDs 8
    Greens 8

    In other words, something for everyone, apart from the LDs.

    Labour can say "we came first"
    UKIP can say "this is our best result ever"
    Tories can say "this isn't bad, we're only four points behind Labour"
    Greens can say "We're holding our own and equalling the Libs"
    Libs can quietly weep in the corner.

    I think UKIP are going to out perform their polling. They did in 2013, and 30-35% of the public are strongly anti-EU.

    That's also what I want to happen however, so there could be some wishful thinking going on. :-)
    It will be a miracle if they get a seat in Scotland. In real life they normally get 1-2% at best.
    Don't say that Malcom, I put £50 on that with Ladbrokes.

    And they've been polling @ 10% in Scotland!

    Dave, Sorry to be bearer of bad news but it is £50 down the drain. There is more chance of Scott or Carlotta posting something positive about Scotland than UKIP winning a seat.
    Consider yourself in receipt of a very stern frown Jock. Tremble quietly.
  • MarkSeniorMarkSenior Posts: 4,699
    Surely the real question re Comres and their UKIP 35% figure is what they would have shown UKIP at with one of their telephone polls rather than an online poll . Given the differing consistent differences between their 2 sorts of polling a Comres telephone poll with EU VI could tell everyone including Comres themselves which set are most incorrect .
  • CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 60,216
    edited May 2014
    malcolmg said:

    malcolmg said:

    SeanT said:

    It'll be interesting to see the reax if UKIP get a Scottish seat. All that Scotland-is-europhile-and-saintly-compared-to-nasty-England bollocks will be blown out the windae.

    However, I suspect UKIP will just fall short in Scotland, as they just fall short in the UK as a whole.

    My predix from Bangkok airport:

    Labour 27
    UKIP 25
    Tories 23
    LDs 8
    Greens 8

    In other words, something for everyone, apart from the LDs.

    Labour can say "we came first"
    UKIP can say "this is our best result ever"
    Tories can say "this isn't bad, we're only four points behind Labour"
    Greens can say "We're holding our own and equalling the Libs"
    Libs can quietly weep in the corner.

    I think UKIP are going to out perform their polling. They did in 2013, and 30-35% of the public are strongly anti-EU.

    That's also what I want to happen however, so there could be some wishful thinking going on. :-)
    It will be a miracle if they get a seat in Scotland. In real life they normally get 1-2% at best.
    Don't say that Malcom, I put £50 on that with Ladbrokes.

    And they've been polling @ 10% in Scotland!

    Dave, Sorry to be bearer of bad news but it is £50 down the drain. There is more chance of Scott or Carlotta posting something positive about Scotland than UKIP winning a seat.
    Scotland will vote "no"!

    Proved you wrong!

    In the meantime our Poll of Polls has now eased down to 42% Yes, 58% No. It is nearly two months since the No side has been that far ahead.

    http://blog.whatscotlandthinks.org/2014/05/not-the-best-of-mornings-for-yes-new-icm-and-panelbase-polls/
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 119,959
    Boris has used one of Sunil's jokes in his telegraph column today

    You kip if you want to – but only one party can offer real change

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/10839796/You-kip-if-you-want-to-but-only-one-party-can-offer-real-change.html
  • RodCrosbyRodCrosby Posts: 7,737

    Scott_P said:


    Do we get to claim we are tired if we drop a clanger and make a racist or sexist remark?

    You don't need to be tired...

    @patrickwintour: UKIP candidate calls for pro EU political leaders to be hung for treason by neck until dead. Says sorry not media trained

    Absolutely shocking.

    It should be hanged.

    Meat is hung.
    Men are hanged.
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 119,959
    On topic.

    Shadsy is always worth reading.

    I hope he blogs on a regular basis.
  • malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 43,498
    Scott_P said:

    malcolmg said:

    posting something positive about Scotland than UKIP winning a seat.

    The SNP is not Scotland Malc.
    I know the difference , you obviously do not.
  • RodCrosby said:

    Scott_P said:


    Do we get to claim we are tired if we drop a clanger and make a racist or sexist remark?

    You don't need to be tired...

    @patrickwintour: UKIP candidate calls for pro EU political leaders to be hung for treason by neck until dead. Says sorry not media trained

    Absolutely shocking.

    It should be hanged.

    Meat is hung.
    Men are hanged.
    Some men are hung too! ;-)
  • JackWJackW Posts: 14,787
    Patrick said:

    RodCrosby said:

    Scott_P said:


    Do we get to claim we are tired if we drop a clanger and make a racist or sexist remark?

    You don't need to be tired...

    @patrickwintour: UKIP candidate calls for pro EU political leaders to be hung for treason by neck until dead. Says sorry not media trained

    Absolutely shocking.

    It should be hanged.

    Meat is hung.
    Men are hanged.
    Some men are hung too! ;-)
    Kindly desist from personal references about JackW !!

  • SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 39,668
    Patrick said:

    RodCrosby said:

    Scott_P said:


    Do we get to claim we are tired if we drop a clanger and make a racist or sexist remark?

    You don't need to be tired...

    @patrickwintour: UKIP candidate calls for pro EU political leaders to be hung for treason by neck until dead. Says sorry not media trained

    Absolutely shocking.

    It should be hanged.

    Meat is hung.
    Men are hanged.
    Some men are hung too! ;-)

    All men are hung; it's the quality that differentiates us. Or so I am told.

  • another_richardanother_richard Posts: 26,789

    If there are any business owners who still support Labour, maybe one should offer Ed some work experience given that he has never had a real job in the real world. He might then learn where the magic money tree grows.

    A good idea Easterross.

    Perhaps we should extend it and offer real world jobs to Cameron and Osborne.

    So far that pair have had half a trillion quid from the magic money tree.

  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,031
    Patrick said:

    RodCrosby said:

    Scott_P said:


    Do we get to claim we are tired if we drop a clanger and make a racist or sexist remark?

    You don't need to be tired...

    @patrickwintour: UKIP candidate calls for pro EU political leaders to be hung for treason by neck until dead. Says sorry not media trained

    Absolutely shocking.

    It should be hanged.

    Meat is hung.
    Men are hanged.
    Some men are hung too! ;-)
    You and your childish humour got to the comment box before me and my childish humour did!
  • SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 39,668
    There always seems to be fewer UKIP voices on here first thing in the morning. Are they all feckless idlers lying in bed while the rest of us get up for work? Or maybe immigrants have taken their jobs. Could be a retirement thing too, I guess.

    :-)
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,031

    There always seems to be fewer UKIP voices on here first thing in the morning. Are they all feckless idlers lying in bed while the rest of us get up for work? Or maybe immigrants have taken their jobs. Could be a retirement thing too, I guess.

    :-)

    Maybe they are already at work, and have to get some actual work in before sneaking on PB! :p
  • SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 39,668
    A debate on the nature of men's hungdom. This is what makes us all British. God save our United Kingdom.
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 61,950
    Good morning, everyone.

    With Mr. Antifrank and now Mr. Shadsy starting to blog, we're spoiled for choice. Of course, there's only one place to go for blind stabs in the dark cunning insight into F1 ;)

    F1: Jack Brabham has died:
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-27465380

    "He remains the only man in history to have designed, built and driven a championship-winning car."
  • foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548
    I am delighted to hear that, but still unclear as to what UKIP means by controlled immigration in terms of source and numbers.

    Obviously EU and non EU would be considered at one, and of course non racist. Would it mean keeping net immigration at the present 200 000 or so? Or would this be reduced to the tens of thousands? If so how is this to be achieved in terms of priority? Income? Asylum? Education? Family reunification? Ending of Student Visas?

    In short what is UKIPs policy for controlling immigration?

    PS Vanilla being troublesome today...

    I do not think the Euros matter too much. It is a stick to beat the established with as far as many voters are concerned, so not terribly predictive of next year. UKIP polled just 3.1% in 2010 a year after their 2009 performanice.

    Turnout will double next year, but the other 35% will be those less obsessed with politics and europe.

    One further thought: UKIP shows how European we are, right wing anti immigrant parties are flavor of the month across the EU. How are the True Finns, Golden Dawn and Le Pens party going to do?

    UKIP are favourites for a reason. Their vote is the most committed and this election is an opportunity to send a strong NOTA message without it have any specific affect on anything. The interesting thing will be the impact this has on the other parties. And how UKIP's vote reapportions itself for the GE. There will be voices inside both Labour and the Conservatives advocating a stronger anti-immigration line as a result of next week's election. But neither party can out-UKIP UKIP, and voters will know they are being sold a pup.

    It might be worth starting to take UKIP on: the fact is that there is no reason to feel afraid or worried if some Romanian men move in next door to you (the chances of them being criminals are vanishingly small); 38% of the UK's population is not made up of immigrants; and 26 million foreign people are not after your job.

    UKIP is a neo-liberal party whose leadership comprises people with very right wing economic views. There's nothing wrong with that. But they need to be confronted on it. What kind of UK does UKIP want? if it's just about pulling out of the EU it's nothing more than a pressure group and not worth voting for - especially as the Tories will give you a vote on EU membership by 2017. If it is a political party it must have policies, views and opinions on the full range of subjects. So what are they?

    UKIP is anti-uncontrolled immigration, not anti-immigrant.

  • SmarmeronSmarmeron Posts: 5,099
    @SouthamObserver

    I have heard some men in China are Hung Lo, any truth to this?
  • TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 42,146
    For the (very) few PBers who don't peruse James Kelly's blog, the ICM Scottish EU figs, probably the last before Thursday:

    SNP 36% (-1)
    Labour 27% (-1)
    Conservatives 13% (+2)
    UKIP 9% (-1)
    Liberal Democrats 7% (n/c)
    Greens 7% (+3)

  • Richard_TyndallRichard_Tyndall Posts: 32,682
    OT

    Can anyone come up with any good reasons why Natural England are pushing for the removal of protection on birds nests?

    http://tompride.wordpress.com/2014/05/18/heres-the-real-reason-the-tories-are-allowing-the-destruction-of-robin-eggs-and-nests/
  • SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 39,668
    Smarmeron said:

    @SouthamObserver

    I have heard some men in China are Hung Lo, any truth to this?

    I believe it is Lo Hung.

  • Richard_TyndallRichard_Tyndall Posts: 32,682
    RobD said:

    There always seems to be fewer UKIP voices on here first thing in the morning. Are they all feckless idlers lying in bed while the rest of us get up for work? Or maybe immigrants have taken their jobs. Could be a retirement thing too, I guess.

    :-)

    Maybe they are already at work, and have to get some actual work in before sneaking on PB! :p
    Yep. Some of us start work at 5am and have all the meetings and morning calls to get out of the way before we get our first coffee and settle down to see what has shaken PB world overnight.
  • Stuart_DicksonStuart_Dickson Posts: 3,557
    SeanT said:

    It'll be interesting to see the reax if UKIP get a Scottish seat. All that Scotland-is-europhile-and-saintly-compared-to-nasty-England bollocks will be blown out the windae.

    However, I suspect UKIP will just fall short in Scotland, as they just fall short in the UK as a whole.

    It has been fun watching all the usual dafties here at PB speculating about the SNP and the UKIP votes in Scotland.

    Here is a hint. A big hint. The elephants is the room are the SCON and the SLAB shares.

    Close observers of Alex Salmond will get another hint if they look very carefully at what he has been saying about UKIP in recent days. However, it requires intelligence and an astute political mind. So, it'll be beyond the abilities of the usual suspects.
  • another_richardanother_richard Posts: 26,789

    There always seems to be fewer UKIP voices on here first thing in the morning. Are they all feckless idlers lying in bed while the rest of us get up for work? Or maybe immigrants have taken their jobs. Could be a retirement thing too, I guess.

    :-)

    I suspect the likes of Richard Tyndall, Sean Fear and Socrates are already working.

    Though I've always been surprised at the number of working age PBers who seem to spend most of the day here.

    And on the subject I'd better do something work related now as well.

    Have a good day everyone.
  • Stuart_DicksonStuart_Dickson Posts: 3,557

    Daily Record Survation poll of 1003 Scottish voters for the European parliament. The article speculates that the SNP could gain one seat with a total of three and that Ukip could win a seat.
    Eurovote tables for Daily Record Survation poll

    Voting intentions for European Parliament Election (excluding Don’t Knows)

    LAB - 26% (- 3%)

    CON - 13% (NC)

    SNP - 37% (- 2%)

    LD - 6% (+ 1%)

    UKIP - 10% (+ 3%)

    Green - 6% (+ 3%)

    BNP - 1% (NC)

    Another Party - 1% (NC)



    That assessment concurs with John Curtice in yesterday's Sunday Herald.
    The SNP are on course to send half of Scotland's MEPs to Brussels, with the party picking up an extra seat at the expense of the Liberal Democratss, the country's leading pollster predicted yesterday.

    Professor John Curtice of Strathclyde University said recent polling evidence pointed to the SNP winning three of the country's six places at the European elections on Thursday.

    As at the last election in 2009, Labour would have two and the Conservatives one, he said. Ukip, tipped for success in England, are unlikely to secure a seat in Scotland. The clear loser would be LibDem MEP George Lyon, who is seeking re-election after a single term. "The LibDems are stuffed," Curtice said.
    http://www.heraldscotland.com/politics/wider-political-news/snp-is-on-course-to-win-third-euro-seat-polls-suggest.24250637

    Is "stuffed" an official psephologist term? :)
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 57,624
    Re LibDem seats: it's almost impossible to see how they can get more than 4.

    South East: pretty much nailed on, so long as they beat the Greens...
    London: 66% shot - likely to outpoll their national share here, but need to get 10-11% to realistically expect to get a seat.
    South West: need to be ahead of the Greens, and to have Natrass/No2EU split a little away from the UKIP share. With only 6 MEPs available here, the Libs probably need to poll 14% - which is no better than a 50/50 shot.
    North West: there are 8 MEP slots available and some areas of good LibDem strength. But LibDems are still unlikely to outpoll their national share by more than 1-2% - so, say, 10% in total, which is probably not enough unless there is a very high other share. 33% chance.

    Scotland - no chance
    East of England - no chance
    West Midlands - no chance
    East Midlands - no chance
    Yorkshire - no chance

    My guess would be 9% national share, and probably 3 of the 4 seats listed above. I think the high score for 'others' (so long as the Greens score slightly less than the LibDems) is likely to help the LibDems avoid total meltdown.
  • SmarmeronSmarmeron Posts: 5,099
    @Richard_Tyndall

    It is those damned commie birds that are holding up house building, and therefore risking the economy.
    I mean....."robin redbreast"? "redshank"?,,,says all you need to know really.
  • SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 39,668
    "Though I've always been surprised at the number of working age PBers who seem to spend most of the day here."

    PB is a great way to break the day up. My concentration levels are very low, so when I am doing work-related writing and thinking I can only do an hour or so before I need some mind balm. PB is it. Long may it continue.
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 61,950
    Nick Clegg in making stupid promises non-shock:
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/27460832

    Apparently the Lib Dems want Scotland (if No wins) to be able to set its own income tax rate.

    Right.

    "At an event hosted by the Scottish Chambers of Commerce, Mr Clegg will concede that the transfer of more powers would be subject to negotiation between the three main pro-UK parties.

    But he will say that his party has been at the forefront in arguing for greater devolution."

    Any chance people in England might get a say on this? Regional assemblies are unacceptable bullshit. An English Parliament with equal powers is the only way this sort of hokey-kokey, left foot out, right foot in approach to the UK could possibly be considered even remotely fair.
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 43,337

    OT

    Can anyone come up with any good reasons why Natural England are pushing for the removal of protection on birds nests?

    http://tompride.wordpress.com/2014/05/18/heres-the-real-reason-the-tories-are-allowing-the-destruction-of-robin-eggs-and-nests/

    Interestng. Graun has a slightly different take.
    http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2014/may/18/bird-killing-call-robin-starling-mallard-splits-conservationists

    The wording of the blog - 'birds such as robins and starlings' - would BTW imply to many birdy folk that passerines (songbirds, more or less) as a whole would be affected, but in fact the proposal document is a mixed bag of specific species each of which have some issue such as farming damage or whatever. The relevant section (p. 13) of the proposal document refers specifically to robins, starlings and pied wagtails - all apt to nest in holes/ventilation flues etc. and so a genuine H&S problem in this respect. The eggs may not be the problem but the nests can be. The statement is that the change will make it easier to deal with such instances without dealing with the bumf of a special licence

    http://www.naturalengland.org.uk/Images/cl-consultation-document_tcm6-37389.pdf


  • Richard_TyndallRichard_Tyndall Posts: 32,682
    Smarmeron said:

    @Richard_Tyndall

    It is those damned commie birds that are holding up house building, and therefore risking the economy.
    I mean....."robin redbreast"? "redshank"?,,,says all you need to know really.

    :-)
  • SmarmeronSmarmeron Posts: 5,099
    @SouthamObserver

    Several of my friends have mentioned just how balmy PB is.

    O/T Anyone know a good supplier of hearing aid batteries?
  • JackWJackW Posts: 14,787
    Latest McARSE Scottish Referendum Projection Countdown :

    24 hours
  • anotherDaveanotherDave Posts: 6,746
    rcs1000 said:

    Re LibDem seats: it's almost impossible to see how they can get more than 4.

    Paddy Power's over/under LD seat market was initially set at 4.5. They've since changed it to 3.5.

  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 43,337
    Smarmeron said:

    @Richard_Tyndall

    It is those damned commie birds that are holding up house building, and therefore risking the economy.
    I mean....."robin redbreast"? "redshank"?,,,says all you need to know really.

    And those redpolls in the back garden, a whole family of them have moved in ...

  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 43,337
    Smarmeron said:

    @SouthamObserver

    Several of my friends have mentioned just how balmy PB is.

    O/T Anyone know a good supplier of hearing aid batteries?

    Boots or other chemist is worth trying.

    If it is a NHS aid, you should be able to get the batteries free anyway from the hearing aid clinic.

  • SmarmeronSmarmeron Posts: 5,099
    @Carnyx

    Will there be a specific set of proposals for the real problem?
    Those damned migrant birds that come over here and take the homes needed for our indigenous populations?
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 43,337
    Smarmeron said:

    @Carnyx

    Will there be a specific set of proposals for the real problem?
    Those damned migrant birds that come over here and take the homes needed for our indigenous populations?

    Of course. Vide 'Sacred Ibis' and 'Indian House-crow', p. 10 below ...

    http://www.naturalengland.org.uk/Images/cl-consultation-document_tcm6-37389.pdf

  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 61,950
    Mr. Smarmeron, isn't that happening (in effect) with Canadian geese?

    Also worth mentioning the collared dove only came over in the 20th century, but now they're everywhere.
  • Richard_TyndallRichard_Tyndall Posts: 32,682
    Carnyx said:

    OT

    Can anyone come up with any good reasons why Natural England are pushing for the removal of protection on birds nests?

    http://tompride.wordpress.com/2014/05/18/heres-the-real-reason-the-tories-are-allowing-the-destruction-of-robin-eggs-and-nests/

    Interestng. Graun has a slightly different take.
    http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2014/may/18/bird-killing-call-robin-starling-mallard-splits-conservationists

    The wording of the blog - 'birds such as robins and starlings' - would BTW imply to many birdy folk that passerines (songbirds, more or less) as a whole would be affected, but in fact the proposal document is a mixed bag of specific species each of which have some issue such as farming damage or whatever. The relevant section (p. 13) of the proposal document refers specifically to robins, starlings and pied wagtails - all apt to nest in holes/ventilation flues etc. and so a genuine H&S problem in this respect. The eggs may not be the problem but the nests can be. The statement is that the change will make it easier to deal with such instances without dealing with the bumf of a special licence

    http://www.naturalengland.org.uk/Images/cl-consultation-document_tcm6-37389.pdf


    But that is the point. The numbers nesting in flues or causing potential health hazards are incredibly small and if you need a bird moved under a special licence it is a very quick process. This has nothing to do with the claimed 'health and safety' issues.

    The claims on bird numbers are also wrong. Starling numbers have dropped by 80% in 35 years and are on the red list for conservation concerns.

    I am afraid that the main reasons for this are to help builders and farmers ignore conservation issues.
  • anotherDaveanotherDave Posts: 6,746
    edited May 2014
    Wales poll to be "published at 6pm on Wales Tonight".

    twitter.com/roger_scully/status/468296429925330944

    http://blogs.cardiff.ac.uk/electionsinwales/2014/05/15/something-to-look-forward-to/
  • SmarmeronSmarmeron Posts: 5,099
    The good news just keeps coming!
    Bundled debt prices are now at pre crash levels.
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 43,046
    edited May 2014

    Good morning, everyone.

    With Mr. Antifrank and now Mr. Shadsy starting to blog, we're spoiled for choice. Of course, there's only one place to go for blind stabs in the dark cunning insight into F1 ;)

    F1: Jack Brabham has died:
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-27465380

    "He remains the only man in history to have designed, built and driven a championship-winning car."

    When presented with the Grand Military Gold Cup in 1998 for Silver Stick (M Watson up), Lord Manton noted that he was pleased to have bred the horse and the jockey.
  • JohnLilburneJohnLilburne Posts: 6,312

    I am delighted to hear that, but still unclear as to what UKIP means by controlled immigration in terms of source and numbers.

    Obviously EU and non EU would be considered at one, and of course non racist. Would it mean keeping net immigration at the present 200 000 or so? Or would this be reduced to the tens of thousands? If so how is this to be achieved in terms of priority? Income? Asylum? Education? Family reunification? Ending of Student Visas?

    In short what is UKIPs policy for controlling immigration?

    What is refreshing is the idea that nationality and residency are membership clubs. If you want to join the polis, you have to apply, and meet certain criteria. They could include such things as steady employment, capital, service in the Forces, support from other family members, facility with the English language, lack of criminal record, etc. What can also be reviewed is qualification for such things as income-replacement benefits. We need more details, yes, but no other party would give the sort of detail required to actually develop a policy.

    When it comes to quotas... I would rather 300,000 who had capital, high flying jobs, were former members of the British forces or were being financially supported by their already-settled relatives, than 200,000 people at random.
  • AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    I really enjoy shadsy's blog, and it's good to see the perspective from the other side of the fence.

    I shall be grumpy if Labour finish third, but otherwise I'll be happy enough. It would be nice if the Greens beat the Lib Dems too.
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 22,167
    Migrant birds? Where are they all flocking from?

    BNP lead candidate in the NE on the wireless this morning. Said that if the BNP form the next government, they would take us out of the EU without a referendum. Trying to out-kip the kippers!
  • AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340

    Good morning, everyone.

    With Mr. Antifrank and now Mr. Shadsy starting to blog, we're spoiled for choice. Of course, there's only one place to go for blind stabs in the dark cunning insight into F1 ;)

    I'm not really blogging, just periodically dumping my thoughts. Up to now, I've followed through three streams of thought. I'm coming to the end of the third stream (I've decided to pass on looking properly at Scotland until there are more markets on the Labour seats that the SNP will target), so my workrate is likely to slacken a lot now. From this point I intend drawing up tables with indicators of favourability/unfavourability for backing each of the parties, then revising my tables of seats ranked by swing.

    After that I expect I shall stop for the while. I only have so many thoughts, I'm afraid.
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 119,959
    This fella channels PBers of all hues

    Party election broadcasts: uniting the nation in despair and embarrassment

    Nobody wants to hear from a politician at 6.57pm, whether it is David Cameron droning on, Ed Miliband glad-handing sick pensioners or the ghost of Nick Clegg. And don't get me started on the fringe parties

    http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/may/18/party-election-broadcasts-despair-embarrassment-stuart-heritage
  • JohnLilburneJohnLilburne Posts: 6,312
    edited May 2014
    Smarmeron said:

    @SouthamObserver

    O/T Anyone know a good supplier of hearing aid batteries?

    Online? I have bought batteries from Budget Batteries, but not for hearing aids.

  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 119,959
    James O'Brien ‏@mrjamesob 22s

    Said a thing on Friday; strongly stood by it on Saturday; apologised & blamed 'tiredness' on Sunday. It's turning into a Craig David tribute
  • MarkSeniorMarkSenior Posts: 4,699
    rcs1000 said:

    Re LibDem seats: it's almost impossible to see how they can get more than 4.

    South East: pretty much nailed on, so long as they beat the Greens...
    London: 66% shot - likely to outpoll their national share here, but need to get 10-11% to realistically expect to get a seat.
    South West: need to be ahead of the Greens, and to have Natrass/No2EU split a little away from the UKIP share. With only 6 MEPs available here, the Libs probably need to poll 14% - which is no better than a 50/50 shot.
    North West: there are 8 MEP slots available and some areas of good LibDem strength. But LibDems are still unlikely to outpoll their national share by more than 1-2% - so, say, 10% in total, which is probably not enough unless there is a very high other share. 33% chance.

    Scotland - no chance
    East of England - no chance
    West Midlands - no chance
    East Midlands - no chance
    Yorkshire - no chance

    My guess would be 9% national share, and probably 3 of the 4 seats listed above. I think the high score for 'others' (so long as the Greens score slightly less than the LibDems) is likely to help the LibDems avoid total meltdown.

    A reasonable assessment of the chances . If you look at ALL the regional sub samples in the various polls you can add some clarification

    South East Probable
    London Probable
    South West 50/50
    North West reasonable chance
    Yorkshire/Humberside reasonable chance
    Others unlikely or no chance

    Obviously there are wild variations from poll to poll because of the small size of the sub samples but the pattern is clear .
  • Richard_TyndallRichard_Tyndall Posts: 32,682

    James O'Brien ‏@mrjamesob 22s

    Said a thing on Friday; strongly stood by it on Saturday; apologised & blamed 'tiredness' on Sunday. It's turning into a Craig David tribute

    I see O'Brien still hasn't admitted he lied on Friday. Makes any of his comments about honesty and integrity pretty worthless.
  • AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340

    James O'Brien ‏@mrjamesob 22s

    Said a thing on Friday; strongly stood by it on Saturday; apologised & blamed 'tiredness' on Sunday. It's turning into a Craig David tribute

    It's more like a Flanders & Swann tribute: "twas on a Monday morning that the Polish gasman came to call."
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 61,950
    Mr. Tyndall, what was the lie?

    Mr. Eagles, Craig David? That's an obscure reference, I would suggest.
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 119,959

    James O'Brien ‏@mrjamesob 22s

    Said a thing on Friday; strongly stood by it on Saturday; apologised & blamed 'tiredness' on Sunday. It's turning into a Craig David tribute

    I see O'Brien still hasn't admitted he lied on Friday. Makes any of his comments about honesty and integrity pretty worthless.
    Perhaps O'Brien was tired out, and he'll get round to apologising in a few days?
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 119,959

    Mr. Tyndall, what was the lie?

    Mr. Eagles, Craig David? That's an obscure reference, I would suggest.

    Not if you're of a certain generation.
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 52,937
    Although it may not do much for my chances as a B&B host, I am happy to report that the swarm of honey bees seems to have moved on this morning, without the need for any drastic action.
  • Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    So Ed will give us price controls, rent controls and now wage controls. Rolf Harris is in the news with a "Jake the Peg" impression. There is a Star Wars film coming out. All we need now is the Bay City Rollers to headline the Commonwealth games opening ceremony and the 70s tribute will be complete
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 43,337

    Carnyx said:

    OT

    Can anyone come up with any good reasons why Natural England are pushing for the removal of protection on birds nests?

    http://tompride.wordpress.com/2014/05/18/heres-the-real-reason-the-tories-are-allowing-the-destruction-of-robin-eggs-and-nests/

    Interestng. Graun has a slightly different take.
    http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2014/may/18/bird-killing-call-robin-starling-mallard-splits-conservationists

    The wording of the blog - 'birds such as robins and starlings' - would BTW imply to many birdy folk that passerines (songbirds, more or less) as a whole would be affected, but in fact the proposal document is a mixed bag of specific species each of which have some issue such as farming damage or whatever. The relevant section (p. 13) of the proposal document refers specifically to robins, starlings and pied wagtails - all apt to nest in holes/ventilation flues etc. and so a genuine H&S problem in this respect. The eggs may not be the problem but the nests can be. The statement is that the change will make it easier to deal with such instances without dealing with the bumf of a special licence

    http://www.naturalengland.org.uk/Images/cl-consultation-document_tcm6-37389.pdf


    But that is the point. The numbers nesting in flues or causing potential health hazards are incredibly small and if you need a bird moved under a special licence it is a very quick process. This has nothing to do with the claimed 'health and safety' issues.

    The claims on bird numbers are also wrong. Starling numbers have dropped by 80% in 35 years and are on the red list for conservation concerns.

    I am afraid that the main reasons for this are to help builders and farmers ignore conservation issues.
    I found it puzzling too - even the document said that the numbers involved were very small (and some will have been disposed of sans a licence through genuine ignorance). It is much less trouble to keep the status quo than to mess around with new legislation. And if one were really worried about H&S then mass starling roosts such as the one (that used to be?) in Victoria Park in Leicester might have been mentioned (rightly or wrongly).

    However, the range of species is so small that it cannot be read as carte blanche for clearance of housedwelling species - for instance there is nothing about sparrows, swallows, house martins ... The implications are perhaps (a) that this is a precedent for wider extension of the carte blanche range of species in future proposals, or (b) NE are trying to meet central gmt targets for doing away with red tape ...

  • SmarmeronSmarmeron Posts: 5,099
    Thanks for the recommendations on batteries all.
    But I don't actually need them, it was a comic construct based upon the supposed mishearing of "balmy"
    It;s a common form of "wit" in the knuckle dragging lowbrow pubs I frequent.
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 22,167
    So there I was all set to cast my postal vote on Saturday...except I haven't been sent a postal vote pack :-( I blame the Labour council.
    So it looks like I'll be voting on Thursday in the NE region after all. Received a Labour leaflet which had more to say about how well Durham CC is doing (despite no elections this year) than about Europe. I think the claim that we aren't really fighting the Euros rings true to an extent.
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 52,937



    A reasonable assessment of the chances . If you look at ALL the regional sub samples in the various polls you can add some clarification

    South East Probable
    London Probable
    South West 50/50
    North West reasonable chance
    Yorkshire/Humberside reasonable chance
    Others unlikely or no chance

    Obviously there are wild variations from poll to poll because of the small size of the sub samples but the pattern is clear .

    Mark, is this enough to stop any movement to hand Nick Clegg the glass of whisky and the pearl-handled revolver?
This discussion has been closed.