Skip to content

A nice and humorous response from Andy Burnham – politicalbetting.com

1235»

Comments

  • RogerRoger Posts: 23,179

    Finally confirmed the genocide was real. Several apologies owed starting with Starmer to several of his backbenchers. The list is huge but I hope action is taken.......

    https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/israel-genocide-children-palestine-un-report-b3001474.html
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 60,672
    Roger said:

    dixiedean said:

    Two by elections so far called.

    Camp Hill (Nuneaton & Bedworth) Council By-Election Result:

    ➡️ RFM: 48.7% (+2.6)
    🌹 LAB: 42.4% (+19.3)
    🌳 CON: 8.9% (-2.6)

    No GRN (-17.8) as previous.

    Reform GAIN from Labour.
    Changes w/ 2026.


    Farnworth (Halton) Council By-Election Result:

    🌹 LAB: 51.0% (+14.6)
    ➡️ RFM: 36.4% (-0.0)
    🌳 CON: 7.7% (-5.7)
    🌍 GRN: 4.7% (-9.0)
    🦅 LBT: 0.2% (New)

    Labour HOLD.
    Changes w/ 2026.

    Are Labour suddenly improving?
    Post Starmer, Labour are now an acceptable vehicle for anti-Reform tactical voting from all parties.
  • PeterCairnsPeterCairns Posts: 240
    carnforth said:
    Les Dawson;

    “I am not saying my wife is rough but on our wedding day she walked down the Aisle to March of the Gladiators!”

    Peter.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 104,137

    Taz said:

    My MP on a big win today !!

    There was a GOTV campaign too from Labour. I know Sacriston quite well. Cycle through it quite regularly.


    ‘ Great result in our local byelection for Sacriston Parish Council today:
    Labour 268 (68.2%)
    Lib Dem 125 (31.8%)’


    https://x.com/lukeakehurst/status/2070257035849908615?s=61

    We should ban party affiliations on parish councils. It is completely unnecessary and is only a fairly recent development. In 1991 only 10% of Parish and Town councillors had a declared party affiliation and only 4% of councils were run on political lines.
    I've only ever seen less than a handful of party candidates on parish councils, even when the person is a party candidate elsewhere.

    Where they are called a parish council at any rate. Parties do often now dominate on town councils I find, even if legally there's no difference.

    I don't think it needs banning, but it's very unecessary.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 104,137

    kle4 said:

    Taz said:

    I feel a bubble is about to burst.

    “ BREAKING: OpenAI is now "leaning toward" pushing its IPO until 2027, per NYT.

    Details include:

    1. "Choppy" markets in recent weeks have led OpenAI to reconsider the timeline of the IPO

    2. The company is worried it may not find much enthusiasm from retail investors

    3. Advisors are recommending OpenAI either wait until 2027 to IPO at $1 trillion or lower the valuation for a quicker IPO

    Recent volatility in tech stocks has raised concerns around OpenAI's IPO.”

    https://x.com/kobeissiletter/status/2070248030234706379?s=61

    Their finances got leaked, which deprived OpenAI of the opportunity to put a positive spin on them before the IPO. The numbers are so horrible the market is starting to realise there is no path to profitability.

    And if OpenAI can't IPO it dies, because there is no other way to raise enough money to pay for all the commitments they've made for purchasing hardware and renting compute capacity.
    Why would bad numbers surprise anyone?
    Because they're really quite horrible, a $33bn yearly loss with $20bn of that coming from operations.

    It's costing OpenAI $20bn to run a service that brings in $13bn from customers. They are also spending north of $5bn on marketing to get those customers. This does not include the very significant costs of developing the models, or the enormous spending commitments.

    If my back of an envelope maths are correct, OpenAI needs to either IPO or roughly triple their customer base in a year or they will run out of money around Q3 or Q4 next year.
    The initial funders were hoping being the first major player would lead to a winner takes all scenario, but the big tech companies today weren't the first to get big in their respective specialties, it might be the same with AI.

    It's quite funny to watch. Sam Altman seems to have the weirdness of Musk without prior achievements to back up any belief in him.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 104,137

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cvgjm61lkl4o

    Now it makes sense why Whitehall has seized control over planning at Cherwell District Council. They can force through the Bicester plans irrespective of local views.

    They could anyway, but it's easier if taking over at the first stage.

    Of course, many more councils will face the scenario as they'd probably prefer it to approving things they don't like. Always has been a careful dance of course, but a lot of councils are feeling more bullish that there's no benefit to trying to mitigate national policy.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 104,137

    Roger said:

    dixiedean said:

    Two by elections so far called.

    Camp Hill (Nuneaton & Bedworth) Council By-Election Result:

    ➡️ RFM: 48.7% (+2.6)
    🌹 LAB: 42.4% (+19.3)
    🌳 CON: 8.9% (-2.6)

    No GRN (-17.8) as previous.

    Reform GAIN from Labour.
    Changes w/ 2026.


    Farnworth (Halton) Council By-Election Result:

    🌹 LAB: 51.0% (+14.6)
    ➡️ RFM: 36.4% (-0.0)
    🌳 CON: 7.7% (-5.7)
    🌍 GRN: 4.7% (-9.0)
    🦅 LBT: 0.2% (New)

    Labour HOLD.
    Changes w/ 2026.

    Are Labour suddenly improving?
    Notwithstanding that its another data point of the Tories being nowhere in England despite the Aberdeen result
    The Lib Demification continues.
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 22,140
    edited 12:27AM
    Roger said:


    Finally confirmed the genocide was real. Several apologies owed starting with Starmer to several of his backbenchers. The list is huge but I hope action is taken.......

    https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/israel-genocide-children-palestine-un-report-b3001474.html

    A report with no evidence in it does not confirm “the genocide” is real Roger. It might be real, but that report certainly doesn’t prove anything.
Sign In or Register to comment.