Skip to content

The Wesignation has left punters unimpressed as Burnham surges – politicalbetting.com

24

Comments

  • TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 47,892
    Lol.
    Not that anyone cares what SLab thinks, least of all the Labour Party.

    ‘The suggestion below is getting quite the reaction within Scottish Labour

    One senior party source said: "This man is an irrelevant dobber."’

    https://x.com/kieranpandrews/status/1757382016071286854?s=61&t=LYVEHh2mqFy1oUJAdCfe-Q
  • CookieCookie Posts: 17,553
    kinabalu said:

    LOL

    Labour Burnham or no Burnham have literally zero chance of winning this Makerfield by election. Keir should be very pleased if Burnham ends up as the Labour candidate

    His chances are closer to 100% than zero IMO.
    Or perhaps somewhere between the two...
  • BurgessianBurgessian Posts: 3,811
    rcs1000 said:

    mwadams said:

    IanB2 said:

    By-election in Makerfield!

    2024: Lab 45%, Reform 32%, Tory 11%, LD7%, Green 4%, Edem 1%

    Wow. That's a Reform-heavy constituency.
    In 2019, the Tory + Brexit Party vote was higher than Labour. It's very losable in a by-election.
    It is: it's a massive risk by Burnham.

    This would be very high on the Reform target list.

    On the other hand, if he does win it, he's proved himself capable of seeing off Reform (in Greater Manchester at least).
    Potentially massive for Farage too. How damaging would failing to win be for Reform? A blip, or a bubble burst?
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 64,489

    As others have said, at least Burnham has EXHIBITED THE CULLIONS

    But what a risk

    It might come down to a contest between those who want to kick Starmer - vote for Burnham - and those who want to kick the entire government - vote for Reform

    I think that's exactly right.

    It will be very interesting. And I genuinely don't know which way it will go. I can see Burnham hoovering up the Green and LibDem vote. But then again, I can see Reform getting the entire right of centre vote, and a fair number of disaffected Labour-ites.
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 22,030

    Looking at the makerfield local elections some of the wards weren't even close e.g. Hindley Ref 1832, Lab 750 Ince Ref 1809 Lab 608.

    Think the closest was Ashton S but even that was Ref 1572 Lab 1100

    It doesn’t matter. True political greats move the needle, they aren’t simply subject to it. It obviously remains to be seen whether Burnham can do so.
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 64,489

    rcs1000 said:

    mwadams said:

    IanB2 said:

    By-election in Makerfield!

    2024: Lab 45%, Reform 32%, Tory 11%, LD7%, Green 4%, Edem 1%

    Wow. That's a Reform-heavy constituency.
    In 2019, the Tory + Brexit Party vote was higher than Labour. It's very losable in a by-election.
    It is: it's a massive risk by Burnham.

    This would be very high on the Reform target list.

    On the other hand, if he does win it, he's proved himself capable of seeing off Reform (in Greater Manchester at least).
    Potentially massive for Farage too. How damaging would failing to win be for Reform? A blip, or a bubble burst?
    I don't think it would be a 'bubble burst', but it would be a bit embarassing. And it would certainly tee up 2029 as Labour v Reform.
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 40,149
    How Makerfield voted at the local elections (about 95% accurate since there are a few split wards)

    Ref 14223 (51.5%)
    Lab 6755 (24.4%)
    Grn 2960 (10.7%)
    Con 2117 (7.7%)
    LD 1029 (3.7%
    Ind 554 (2.0)

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Makerfield_(constituency)#Boundaries
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_Wigan_Metropolitan_Borough_Council_election#Candidates
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 89,615
    rcs1000 said:

    LOL

    Labour Burnham or no Burnham have literally zero chance of winning this Makerfield by election. Keir should be very pleased if Burnham ends up as the Labour candidate

    "literally zero chance"

    Presumably you'll happily offer me 20-1?
    There will be better odds elsewhere, so why should he ?
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 72,352
    edited May 14

    rcs1000 said:

    mwadams said:

    IanB2 said:

    By-election in Makerfield!

    2024: Lab 45%, Reform 32%, Tory 11%, LD7%, Green 4%, Edem 1%

    Wow. That's a Reform-heavy constituency.
    In 2019, the Tory + Brexit Party vote was higher than Labour. It's very losable in a by-election.
    It is: it's a massive risk by Burnham.

    This would be very high on the Reform target list.

    On the other hand, if he does win it, he's proved himself capable of seeing off Reform (in Greater Manchester at least).
    Potentially massive for Farage too. How damaging would failing to win be for Reform? A blip, or a bubble burst?
    Tony Diver
    @Tony_Diver
    ·
    17m
    Nigel Farage: “We look forward to the contest and we will throw absolutely everything at it.”

    https://x.com/Tony_Diver/status/2054961758331138329
  • Andy Burnham has asked the NEC for permission for him to stand

    God, what an evil, entitled little s***!
    Maybe. But the NEC cannot stand in his way again. It would plunge the entire party into bitter civil war

    He must be given his chance. He’s taken on a tough seat. Let him test his mettle

    Starmer blocking him again would make Starmer look so bad he’d probably get successfully challenged by someone else anyway, the next day
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 64,489

    Looking at the makerfield local elections some of the wards weren't even close e.g. Hindley Ref 1832, Lab 750 Ince Ref 1809 Lab 608.

    Think the closest was Ashton S but even that was Ref 1572 Lab 1100

    It doesn’t matter. True political greats move the needle, they aren’t simply subject to it. It obviously remains to be seen whether Burnham can do so.
    Exactly.

    Can Burnham move the needle. Can he persuade voters that the problem is not Labour, but Keir? And can he persuade LibDem and Green voters that seeing off Reform is for "the greater good"?

    I don't know the answer to that question, but it will be really interesting to watch and find out.
  • HeathenerHeathener Posts: 7,116

    Roger said:
    32, and a Harvard graduate. In 20 years he could be a contender. Why throw it away now for this dork?
    Erm, I see you have a visceral hatred for Mr Burnham.

    Rattled that he might actually revive this failing Labour Party? You should be.

  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 72,352
    edited May 14
    Alex Wickham
    @alexwickham
    BREAKING: ANDY BURNHAM RUNNING

    I can confirm that I will be requesting the permission of the NEC to stand in the Makerfield by-election.

    https://x.com/alexwickham/status/2054964443847536718
  • CookieCookie Posts: 17,553
    My guess is that even on a board as cultured as this, less than 10% of us have set foot in Makerfield. I reckon I've set foot in every seat in GM but this one. I can't even think of more than one person I know from Makerfield. I can generalise a bit from what I know of its neighbours and reckon I can make a better stab than most, but - we really need @dixiedean at this point.
  • bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 23,703
    Brixian59 said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Well.

    Full credit to Burnham. This is going to be an extremely interesting race:


    Surely he only has to give up Mayorality IF he becomes MP.

    So it's a shot to nothing.

    Win and he not only becomes an MP and heir apparent but he slays Reform balloon.

    However, thus has the sniff and smell of Starmer's boys club.

    Simons is up Morgans ass...

    Give Andy a hospital pass and ask him to gamble.

    He could end up politically paralysed or deemed a complete gutless coward

    10d Chess.... 10 being the emergency ward
    If he wins that he is the Messiah not just KoN

    In last week's council elections, Reform took 24 of the 25 seats up for grabs on Wigan council (where this by-election will take place).
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 81,142
    It's a good choice of seat, if Burnham can win it he more than likely wins absolutely wallops Reform at the next GE.
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 72,352
    Patrick Maguire
    @patrickkmaguire
    ·
    5m
    Counterpoint: Keir Starmer on the ballot here. Burnham wins *62 per cent* in Makerfield in 2024 mayoral.

    https://x.com/patrickkmaguire/status/2054965588401721564
  • Nigelb said:

    Worcestershire:


    “And a Tory source tells me: “As soon as she heard about this, Kemi instantly demanded this arrangement be stopped. The group leader was suspended with immediate effect. Kemi was clear she would not put up with this sort of nonsense.””

    https://x.com/jaheale/status/2054930521155650015?s=46

    Well done Kemi! I’m starting to admire her, quite a lot. She’s gaining in confidence - inside the Commons, and beyond. She’s finding herself

    Perhaps she will drag me back from Reform. I’m certainly prepared to give her a hearing

    Pretty pathetic control freakery.
    I can understand your being a fan of her backing an unsavoury set of Reform councillors, though.
    She’s done exactly what leaders are meant to do. What Starmer does not do. Shown toughness and exerted control

    And, really, the Greens are beyond the pale. They are Islamists and communists. A Tory alliance with them will repulse 96% of Tory voters, let alone anyone they hope to attract from Reform
  • mwadamsmwadams Posts: 3,878

    DavidL said:

    Can't help feeling that Sadiq Khan must be feeling pretty sore about this. Why isn't he the Prince across the water? What's Burnham got that he doesn't?

    Unlike many on PB, I quite like Khan and I despise Burnham. But even I can see that the mismatch in charisma is rather in the favour of the latter.
    Yes and no. I can imagine an equivalent of George Fouracres SKS for Burnham but not for Khan. Khan seems intrinsically quite serious (and therefore a little boring) whereas Burnham is a bit ludicrous at the best of times. When there is a generally positive sentiment for him that's fine, but it can be destroyed in an instant.
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 72,352

    Brixian59 said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Well.

    Full credit to Burnham. This is going to be an extremely interesting race:


    Surely he only has to give up Mayorality IF he becomes MP.

    So it's a shot to nothing.

    Win and he not only becomes an MP and heir apparent but he slays Reform balloon.

    However, thus has the sniff and smell of Starmer's boys club.

    Simons is up Morgans ass...

    Give Andy a hospital pass and ask him to gamble.

    He could end up politically paralysed or deemed a complete gutless coward

    10d Chess.... 10 being the emergency ward
    If he wins that he is the Messiah not just KoN

    In last week's council elections, Reform took 24 of the 25 seats up for grabs on Wigan council (where this by-election will take place).
    See Maguire tweet I posted
  • bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 23,703
    Burnham now to short on Betfair

    Gonna need a miracle to win that seat
  • BartholomewRobertsBartholomewRoberts Posts: 28,781

    Heathener said:

    Anyone else think Makerfield iis a No 10 stitch up?

    If Starmer's cronies had even a scintilla of the nous of Malcolm Tucker or Francis Underwood I'd believe it.

    A very cunning plan. Call Burnham's bluff by making him stand in a Reform target seat and in the process undermine the case for a turn to the left leaving things perfectly aligned for Streeting.
    I think Burnham will easily beat Reform under the circumstances.

    Would people in the by election want to kick out Starmer and get a local leader as PM? That is the way it will be phrased and it will be a resounding YES.
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 59,835

    Patrick Maguire
    @patrickkmaguire
    ·
    5m
    Counterpoint: Keir Starmer on the ballot here. Burnham wins *62 per cent* in Makerfield in 2024 mayoral.

    https://x.com/patrickkmaguire/status/2054965588401721564

    62% is slightly below his overall score so we shouldn't read too much into that.
  • Brixian59Brixian59 Posts: 2,187

    rcs1000 said:

    mwadams said:

    IanB2 said:

    By-election in Makerfield!

    2024: Lab 45%, Reform 32%, Tory 11%, LD7%, Green 4%, Edem 1%

    Wow. That's a Reform-heavy constituency.
    In 2019, the Tory + Brexit Party vote was higher than Labour. It's very losable in a by-election.
    It is: it's a massive risk by Burnham.

    This would be very high on the Reform target list.

    On the other hand, if he does win it, he's proved himself capable of seeing off Reform (in Greater Manchester at least).
    Potentially massive for Farage too. How damaging would failing to win be for Reform? A blip, or a bubble burst?
    Tony Diver
    @Tony_Diver
    ·
    17m
    Nigel Farage: “We look forward to the contest and we will throw absolutely everything at it.”

    https://x.com/Tony_Diver/status/2054961758331138329
    Make the little shite Yusuf the candidate

    Has he got the balls Nigel
  • Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 72,129

    Heathener said:

    Anyone else think Makerfield iis a No 10 stitch up?

    If Starmer's cronies had even a scintilla of the nous of Malcolm Tucker or Francis Underwood I'd believe it.

    A very cunning plan. Call Burnham's bluff by making him stand in a Reform target seat and in the process undermine the case for a turn to the left leaving things perfectly aligned for Streeting.
    I think Burnham will easily beat Reform under the circumstances.

    Would people in the by election want to kick out Starmer and get a local leader as PM? That is the way it will be phrased and it will be a resounding YES.
    Very probably
  • DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 36,339

    Just leaving this here:

    https://news.sky.com/story/final-tranche-of-mandelson-files-expected-to-be-released-next-week-13543738

    Given the aplomb exhibited so far on his handling of the Mandelson files, might Starmer's attempts to hang on become untenable when these get released?

    Unlikely. Starmer and Mandelson are different generations and had almost nothing to do with each other. Starmer was a barrister then head of the CPS during New Labour's pomp.
  • CookieCookie Posts: 17,553
    Cookie said:

    My guess is that even on a board as cultured as this, less than 10% of us have set foot in Makerfield. I reckon I've set foot in every seat in GM but this one. I can't even think of more than one person I know from Makerfield. I can generalise a bit from what I know of its neighbours and reckon I can make a better stab than most, but - we really need @dixiedean at this point.

    Just checked - I take it back - Orrell's in the seat. I've been to Orrell. Though Orrell us hardly typical of it.
  • HeathenerHeathener Posts: 7,116
    Anyway, it's quite pleasant to be back on here during another in a long succession of loopy moments here and abroad.

    As I mentioned earlier today, partly in total disgust at this revolting sham of a Labour Party, I took myself away from politics and literally went on a circumnavigation of the globe, which was rather fun. I've now bought a place in the Scottish Highlands.

    So a 2-year hiatus comes to an end.

    I will never ever again vote Labour.* Except that I might if Andy Burnham becomes leader because I really quite like him and he's something that none of the current Cabinet are: you know ... competent.


    * To be fair, that's not a difficult decision in Scotland.
  • numbertwelvenumbertwelve Posts: 9,132
    Pulpstar said:

    It's a good choice of seat, if Burnham can win it he more than likely wins absolutely wallops Reform at the next GE.

    High stakes for Farage, this one.

  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 72,352

    Burnham now to short on Betfair

    Gonna need a miracle to win that seat



    Ailbhe Rea

    @PronouncedAlva

    Andy Burnham wants this by-election to be a proof of concept election: he will pitch himself as the change candidate, the outsider. Once he has proven he can win in places Labour is losing, he thinks an eventual leadership election poses less jeopardy.

    https://x.com/PronouncedAlva/status/2054967350076567901
  • DougSealDougSeal Posts: 13,462

    Roger said:
    32, and a Harvard graduate. In 20 years he could be a contender. Why throw it away now for this dork?
    There's nothing precluding him having another go when he's 34/35
  • Pro_RataPro_Rata Posts: 6,305
    The locals in Makerfield delivered:

    Reform 14223 votes
    Labour 7690 votes

    It was well beyond the 50/38 percentage result that EC has for the constituency.

    So Burnham has to swing around 3300 voters if he gets the chance. It'll be a challenge for him, but he'll have to take it on.
  • RandallFlaggRandallFlagg Posts: 1,493
    Praying Reform put forward Matt Goodwin. Pretty sure Burnham would put that twerp in his place.
  • RattersRatters Posts: 2,027
    This time yesterday Miliband was favourite to be next PM.

    Now he's out at 15s.

    Just ahead of Al Carns, who could be a politician or a pizza for all I know about him.

    How quickly things turn...
  • Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 72,129
    If I had a vote I would tactically vote for Burnham to keep reform out
  • DopermeanDopermean Posts: 3,133

    Brixian59 said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Well.

    Full credit to Burnham. This is going to be an extremely interesting race:


    Surely he only has to give up Mayorality IF he becomes MP.

    So it's a shot to nothing.

    Win and he not only becomes an MP and heir apparent but he slays Reform balloon.

    However, thus has the sniff and smell of Starmer's boys club.

    Simons is up Morgans ass...

    Give Andy a hospital pass and ask him to gamble.

    He could end up politically paralysed or deemed a complete gutless coward

    10d Chess.... 10 being the emergency ward
    If he wins that he is the Messiah not just KoN

    In last week's council elections, Reform took 24 of the 25 seats up for grabs on Wigan council (where this by-election will take place).
    So if Burnham loses Makerfield will he pack up or is he going to demand someone else gives up a seat for him?
  • kinabalukinabalu Posts: 50,682

    kinabalu said:

    LOL

    Labour Burnham or no Burnham have literally zero chance of winning this Makerfield by election. Keir should be very pleased if Burnham ends up as the Labour candidate

    His chances are closer to 100% than zero IMO.
    52/48?
    Lol, yes about that.

    It resolves to a binary now doesn't it.

    1. He wins the seat, proves his chops, returns with unstoppable momentum, replaces Starmer. He is Next PM.

    2. He loses and the Burnham bubble is burst. Things proceed without him. He is not Next PM.

    I have (1) as favourite.
  • RazedabodeRazedabode Posts: 3,193
    That’s very risky re. Burnham. Can see whole thing blowing up in his face as presumably a chunk of the electorate will combine to vote against
  • DougSealDougSeal Posts: 13,462

    That’s very risky re. Burnham. Can see whole thing blowing up in his face as presumably a chunk of the electorate will combine to vote against

    As someone above noted it's a bit of a shot to nothing. If he loses he doesn't have to resign as Mayor of Greater Manchester
  • AugustusCarp2AugustusCarp2 Posts: 649

    If I had a vote I would tactically vote for Burnham to keep reform out

    But there will also be people who will vote Reform because it will help to completely destroy the Labour Party.
  • DopermeanDopermean Posts: 3,133

    kinabalu said:

    kinabalu said:

    And still far from certain as to whether the NEC will allow Burnham to run.

    Close to certain imo. I don't think it's politically possible to block him again.
    We didn’t think it was politically possible for Starmer to refuse to go, but here we are.

    I think it’s entirely possible he has another go at getting his supporters to block Burnham. What has changed in the reasons since they blocked him last time?

    I think the blocking might eventually be doomed to fail. But Starmer does seem very bullish with these things, and unwilling to bend.
    Let's see - but it would amaze me if Starmer manages to do that a 2nd time in these changed circumstances.

    We're going to have a by-election in Manchester deciding the PM, I think.

    Incredible script.
    I am going to be very interested as to how the public react to this, certainly. I could see it going either way.

    One possibility is people are so relieved Starmer is being challenged and there might be an alternative that Burnham wins handily and the country sees things more positively.

    But there is a dangerous risk here that this all looks a bit “playing politics” in that someone is being parachuted into a constituency for the pure purpose of becoming PM. It could backfire.

    I genuinely don’t know which way it will go.
    At this point I think the 2 most likely options are 1) continued in-fighting and party dysfunction with Keir or 2) Burnham doesn't surprise on the downside (and isn't any good)
  • bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 23,703
    Dopermean said:

    Brixian59 said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Well.

    Full credit to Burnham. This is going to be an extremely interesting race:


    Surely he only has to give up Mayorality IF he becomes MP.

    So it's a shot to nothing.

    Win and he not only becomes an MP and heir apparent but he slays Reform balloon.

    However, thus has the sniff and smell of Starmer's boys club.

    Simons is up Morgans ass...

    Give Andy a hospital pass and ask him to gamble.

    He could end up politically paralysed or deemed a complete gutless coward

    10d Chess.... 10 being the emergency ward
    If he wins that he is the Messiah not just KoN

    In last week's council elections, Reform took 24 of the 25 seats up for grabs on Wigan council (where this by-election will take place).
    So if Burnham loses Makerfield will he pack up or is he going to demand someone else gives up a seat for him?
    Its over his air of invincibility will have gone if he loses.

    Any other Lab Candidate gets thrashed by Reform

    I think AB loses narrowly unless Reform pick a total liability
  • CookieCookie Posts: 17,553
    Heathener said:

    Anyone else think Makerfield iis a No 10 stitch up?

    If Starmer's cronies had even a scintilla of the nous of Malcolm Tucker or Francis Underwood I'd believe it.

    I love this theory. It is Machiavellian on the scale of James Cleverly cunningly knocking himself out of the Tory leadership. But surely not, surely not.
  • rkrkrkrkrkrk Posts: 9,354
    kinabalu said:

    kinabalu said:

    LOL

    Labour Burnham or no Burnham have literally zero chance of winning this Makerfield by election. Keir should be very pleased if Burnham ends up as the Labour candidate

    His chances are closer to 100% than zero IMO.
    52/48?
    Lol, yes about that.

    It resolves to a binary now doesn't it.

    1. He wins the seat, proves his chops, returns with unstoppable momentum, replaces Starmer. He is Next PM.

    2. He loses and the Burnham bubble is burst. Things proceed without him. He is not Next PM.

    I have (1) as favourite.
    A vote for Burnham is the surest way of getting rid of Starmer. I suspect that will swing it for him.
  • kinabalukinabalu Posts: 50,682
    edited May 14

    As others have said, at least Burnham has EXHIBITED THE CULLIONS

    But what a risk

    It might come down to a contest between those who want to kick Starmer - vote for Burnham - and those who want to kick the entire government - vote for Reform

    Yes, a risk, but it's dwarfed by the prize.

    He wins and he's almost certainly the next PM in fairly short order. Number 10 Downing St. Prime Minister of the United Kingdom. It gets no bigger.

    You have to go for that when it's there in reach.

    And if he loses? Well he tried. Do something else.
  • TazTaz Posts: 28,104
    Heathener said:

    Anyway, it's quite pleasant to be back on here during another in a long succession of loopy moments here and abroad.

    As I mentioned earlier today, partly in total disgust at this revolting sham of a Labour Party, I took myself away from politics and literally went on a circumnavigation of the globe, which was rather fun. I've now bought a place in the Scottish Highlands.

    So a 2-year hiatus comes to an end.

    I will never ever again vote Labour.* Except that I might if Andy Burnham becomes leader because I really quite like him and he's something that none of the current Cabinet are: you know ... competent.


    * To be fair, that's not a difficult decision in Scotland.

    Hi Heathener. Hope you’re well 👍
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 59,835
    rkrkrk said:

    kinabalu said:

    kinabalu said:

    LOL

    Labour Burnham or no Burnham have literally zero chance of winning this Makerfield by election. Keir should be very pleased if Burnham ends up as the Labour candidate

    His chances are closer to 100% than zero IMO.
    52/48?
    Lol, yes about that.

    It resolves to a binary now doesn't it.

    1. He wins the seat, proves his chops, returns with unstoppable momentum, replaces Starmer. He is Next PM.

    2. He loses and the Burnham bubble is burst. Things proceed without him. He is not Next PM.

    I have (1) as favourite.
    A vote for Burnham is the surest way of getting rid of Starmer. I suspect that will swing it for him.
    Starmer can destroy that argument by setting out a timetable before the by election.
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 22,030
    Burnham should run the whole byelection like a GE campaign along with a manifesto of what a Burnham Labour party would look like. “True Labour” perhaps. If he doesn’t know or cannot articulate what a Burnham-led Labour party would look like, then what’s the point.

    Anecdote alert is that my girlfriend from a Reformy part of Birmingham said “oh I would like him as PM” when I told her the news.
  • TazTaz Posts: 28,104

    Dopermean said:

    Brixian59 said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Well.

    Full credit to Burnham. This is going to be an extremely interesting race:


    Surely he only has to give up Mayorality IF he becomes MP.

    So it's a shot to nothing.

    Win and he not only becomes an MP and heir apparent but he slays Reform balloon.

    However, thus has the sniff and smell of Starmer's boys club.

    Simons is up Morgans ass...

    Give Andy a hospital pass and ask him to gamble.

    He could end up politically paralysed or deemed a complete gutless coward

    10d Chess.... 10 being the emergency ward
    If he wins that he is the Messiah not just KoN

    In last week's council elections, Reform took 24 of the 25 seats up for grabs on Wigan council (where this by-election will take place).
    So if Burnham loses Makerfield will he pack up or is he going to demand someone else gives up a seat for him?
    Its over his air of invincibility will have gone if he loses.

    Any other Lab Candidate gets thrashed by Reform

    I think AB loses narrowly unless Reform pick a total liability
    Depends what the others do too. I’d suspect Greens may give it a go
  • BartholomewRobertsBartholomewRoberts Posts: 28,781

    That’s very risky re. Burnham. Can see whole thing blowing up in his face as presumably a chunk of the electorate will combine to vote against

    Against who though?

    I think the electorate will combine to vote against Starmer.
  • Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 72,129
    The point about Burnham is he has worked across politics and business to create a hugely successful Greater Manchester and he stands out when compared to Rayner and Miliband

    He is of the left but would give labour ths best chance for 2029

    It does trigger some on here when I have made no bones about my dislike for Starmer as someone not suited to the office of PM, but it is certainly being proved by events
  • kinabalu said:

    As others have said, at least Burnham has EXHIBITED THE CULLIONS

    But what a risk

    It might come down to a contest between those who want to kick Starmer - vote for Burnham - and those who want to kick the entire government - vote for Reform

    Yes, a risk, but it's dwarfed by the prize.

    He wins and he's almost certainly the next PM in fairly short order. Number 10 Downing St. Prime Minister of the United Kingdom. It gets no bigger.

    You have to go for that when it's there in reach.

    And if he loses? Well he tried. Do something else.
    Yes I agree. I’ve found Burnham’s endless careerism and entitlement off-putting. But here he is, risking total humiliation in a tough seat. Fair play to him

    If he wins, he deserves the prize
  • kinabalukinabalu Posts: 50,682
    Pulpstar said:

    It's a good choice of seat, if Burnham can win it he more than likely wins absolutely wallops Reform at the next GE.

    Exactly. It either proves he's the man or it takes him out.

    It's perfect.
  • BarnesianBarnesian Posts: 10,058
    edited May 14

    LOL

    Labour Burnham or no Burnham have literally zero chance of winning this Makerfield by election. Keir should be very pleased if Burnham ends up as the Labour candidate

    It's good that Reform was in second place last time with 32% of the vote.

    This makes it an anti-Reform by election as well as a pro Burnham election.

    There will be a lot of Conservatives voting anti-Reform as well as a big squeeze on Lib Dem and Green voters.
    Burnham will have a personal vote as a successful Manchester Mayor and he also lives in the constituency.

    I think it is odds on that Burnham will win.
  • Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 72,129
    This is a chance to tactically vote to beat Farage and Reform, which would be extremely welcome
  • tlg86tlg86 Posts: 27,853

    Praying Reform put forward Matt Goodwin. Pretty sure Burnham would put that twerp in his place.

    If they're sensible, they'll pick a local woman.
  • londonpubmanlondonpubman Posts: 3,865
    rcs1000 said:

    LOL

    Labour Burnham or no Burnham have literally zero chance of winning this Makerfield by election. Keir should be very pleased if Burnham ends up as the Labour candidate

    "literally zero chance"

    Presumably you'll happily offer me 20-1?
    Thank you for your kind offer but I shall politely decline as I don't bet on politics!

    I am offering my opinion. Other views are available 👍
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 103,794

    Andy Burnham has asked the NEC for permission for him to stand

    Waiting to move until Streeting petered out is very funny, even if I don't really like or understand why there is such a push to anoint Burnham as saviour. I get he is outside the Commons now so is, to a degree, a fresh face despite being an old hand at politics, but the level of support seems disproportionate considering he is a known quantity.
  • kinabalukinabalu Posts: 50,682
    He's close to evens Next PM now which implies clear odds on for the by-election.
  • kle4 said:

    Andy Burnham has asked the NEC for permission for him to stand

    Waiting to move until Streeting petered out is very funny, even if I don't really like or understand why there is such a push to anoint Burnham as saviour. I get he is outside the Commons now so is, to a degree, a fresh face despite being an old hand at politics, but the level of support seems disproportionate considering he is a known quantity.
    It’s pure desperation
  • tlg86tlg86 Posts: 27,853

    This is a chance to tactically vote to beat Farage and Reform, which would be extremely welcome

    Burnham is going to run the country well to the left of Starmer and Reeves. If I had a vote, I'd vote to stop him.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 103,794
    kinabalu said:

    As others have said, at least Burnham has EXHIBITED THE CULLIONS

    But what a risk

    It might come down to a contest between those who want to kick Starmer - vote for Burnham - and those who want to kick the entire government - vote for Reform

    Yes, a risk, but it's dwarfed by the prize.

    He wins and he's almost certainly the next PM in fairly short order. Number 10 Downing St. Prime Minister of the United Kingdom. It gets no bigger.

    You have to go for that when it's there in reach.

    And if he loses? Well he tried. Do something else.
    Well worth a gamble. I think he probably wins, as even those who want to in general kick the government may think forcing out the PM by Burnham getting in is worth it - on the basis they don't think Burnham will meaningfully change Labour's fortunes, which is admittedly a gamble on their part.
  • kinabalukinabalu Posts: 50,682
    tlg86 said:

    Praying Reform put forward Matt Goodwin. Pretty sure Burnham would put that twerp in his place.

    If they're sensible, they'll pick a local woman.
    Is Lucy Connolly from round there?
  • bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 23,703
    Very strange Josh Simons is one of the MPs you would think would be WS Fans
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 28,762

    Site notice.

    I am taking a three month sabbatical from PB so I can join Reform and move to Makerfield so I can campaign for Reform in this by-election.

    But only if Burnham is the Labour candidate.

    I appreciate you may be being satiric. But if you campaign for another party aren't you automatically banned from the Conservative Party?
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 55,424
    rcs1000 said:

    mwadams said:

    IanB2 said:

    By-election in Makerfield!

    2024: Lab 45%, Reform 32%, Tory 11%, LD7%, Green 4%, Edem 1%

    Wow. That's a Reform-heavy constituency.
    In 2019, the Tory + Brexit Party vote was higher than Labour. It's very losable in a by-election.
    It is: it's a massive risk by Burnham.

    This would be very high on the Reform target list.

    On the other hand, if he does win it, he's proved himself capable of seeing off Reform (in Greater Manchester at least).
    His pitch has appeal to many people who might otherwise protest by voting for Reform.

    And not voting for Burnham would be like voting to end a drama series half way through its run. I reckon there will be enough voters wanting to see how the story ends, to vote him through to the next episode.
  • RattersRatters Posts: 2,027
    Arguably, Starmer is better off letting Burnham run in the by-election:

    1) If Burnham is allowed and Reform beat him, then he's dead in the water. Starmer still needs to see off the other candidates, but they may never quite pull the trigger or even lose to him.

    2) If Burnham is not allowed to stand, I think that reflects poorly on Starmer and, on the back of a crushing by-election defeat, someone else will take the plunge. Starmer is further weakened and so is even more likely to lose.

    To be fair, these are both pretty crappy options.
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 59,835
    https://x.com/patrickkmaguire/status/2054963169487986893

    Eight Makerfield wards voted last week. Results:

    Reform: 50.4%
    Labour: 22.7%
    Green: 10.9%
    Conservative: 9.9%
    Lib Dem: 3.8%
    Other: 2.2%
  • Ratters said:

    Arguably, Starmer is better off letting Burnham run in the by-election:

    1) If Burnham is allowed and Reform beat him, then he's dead in the water. Starmer still needs to see off the other candidates, but they may never quite pull the trigger or even lose to him.

    2) If Burnham is not allowed to stand, I think that reflects poorly on Starmer and, on the back of a crushing by-election defeat, someone else will take the plunge. Starmer is further weakened and so is even more likely to lose.

    To be fair, these are both pretty crappy options.

    Part of me wants Starmer to stop Burnham standing because the ensuing blood-letting within Labour would be apocalyptic. And fabulously entertaining

    However, I fear it’s unlikely. Starmer is not strong enough. He’s no longer in control of events
  • DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 36,339
    DougSeal said:

    Roger said:
    32, and a Harvard graduate. In 20 years he could be a contender. Why throw it away now for this dork?
    There's nothing precluding him having another go when he's 34/35
    Josh Simons had to resign from government after he was found to be smearing journalists as Russian spies. He was washed up, greasy pole wise.
    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2026/feb/20/labour-minister-falsely-linked-journalists-to-pro-kremlin-network-in-emails-to-gchq
  • ThomasNasheThomasNashe Posts: 5,791
    edited May 14
    tlg86 said:

    This is a chance to tactically vote to beat Farage and Reform, which would be extremely welcome

    Burnham is going to run the country well to the left of Starmer and Reeves. If I had a vote, I'd vote to stop him.
    Sovereign debt crisis incoming.

    i.e. Labour looking at what the Tories did appointing Liz Truss, and saying we'll have some of that.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 103,794
    viewcode said:

    Site notice.

    I am taking a three month sabbatical from PB so I can join Reform and move to Makerfield so I can campaign for Reform in this by-election.

    But only if Burnham is the Labour candidate.

    I appreciate you may be being satiric. But if you campaign for another party aren't you automatically banned from the Conservative Party?
    Even if there were not there are general rules around suspending or terminating membership of those whose declared opinions or conduct are inconsistent with the wellbeing of the party or likely to bring it into disrepute, and campaigning for another is an easy way to demonstrate that.
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 28,762
    So the options are

    i) Andy wins Makerfield, Andy stands for PM, Andy wins
    ii) Andy loses Makerfield, Angie stands for PM, Angie wins

    Wes comes nowhere under either option.
  • bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 23,703
    Steve Reed is last man standing as SKS Fan
  • kinabalu said:

    He's close to evens Next PM now which implies clear odds on for the by-election.

    But imagine if he is crushed by Reform. Labour’s most popular candidate for PM. That means a Reform government is on the way
  • Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 72,129

    https://x.com/patrickkmaguire/status/2054963169487986893

    Eight Makerfield wards voted last week. Results:

    Reform: 50.4%
    Labour: 22.7%
    Green: 10.9%
    Conservative: 9.9%
    Lib Dem: 3.8%
    Other: 2.2%

    I think they are irrelevant

    This is a unique high profile high stakes by election with the opportunity to elect a defacto PM and beat Starmer
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 103,794

    Ratters said:

    Arguably, Starmer is better off letting Burnham run in the by-election:

    1) If Burnham is allowed and Reform beat him, then he's dead in the water. Starmer still needs to see off the other candidates, but they may never quite pull the trigger or even lose to him.

    2) If Burnham is not allowed to stand, I think that reflects poorly on Starmer and, on the back of a crushing by-election defeat, someone else will take the plunge. Starmer is further weakened and so is even more likely to lose.

    To be fair, these are both pretty crappy options.

    Part of me wants Starmer to stop Burnham standing because the ensuing blood-letting within Labour would be apocalyptic. And fabulously entertaining

    However, I fear it’s unlikely. Starmer is not strong enough. He’s no longer in control of events
    I would agree with that. Streeting is not up to it, and the others currently in Parliament either don't want the top job or don't think they would get it, but with so many open about wanting him gone, it is not in his hands. They want to believe Burnham can save them, and are willign to give it a try it seems.

    Worked for Mark Carney, in very different circumstances.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 55,424

    Ooh. Makerfield risky for Burnham with that Reform vote. All very interesting.

    I keep arguing that the make up of the constituency is irrelevant. If Burnham cannot win a seat like this, he cannot win an election. If Burnham can win a seat like this, then he gets the big mo. It’s a win - win really for Labour.
    If he stands, he’s also going to have the Labour by-election machine and tons of activists campaigning for him, even those who might prefer another leader. Provided he leads a competent, spirited campaign he will emerge very well placed to swing straight across into campaigning for the leadership.

    If he puts political and electoral reform front and centre of his pitch, there’s also potential to ignite a national debate stretching beyond Labour.
  • https://x.com/patrickkmaguire/status/2054963169487986893

    Eight Makerfield wards voted last week. Results:

    Reform: 50.4%
    Labour: 22.7%
    Green: 10.9%
    Conservative: 9.9%
    Lib Dem: 3.8%
    Other: 2.2%

    I think they are irrelevant

    This is a unique high profile high stakes by election with the opportunity to elect a defacto PM and beat Starmer
    That’s ridiculous. They are certainly not “irrelevant”

    This is a very Reform-y seat. These voters might well
    be furious at Labour and might relish the chance to humiliate Labour in a very public, spectacular way

    It’s a massive gamble for Burnham. What’s he going to say to these Reform voters about immigration?
  • algarkirkalgarkirk Posts: 17,429
    edited May 14

    This is a chance to tactically vote to beat Farage and Reform, which would be extremely welcome

    It's tricky one for everyone who is neither Labour nor Reform. Assuming Burnham is the candidate, he can only win with strong labour support + tactical voting from others - LD, Greens, Tories.

    However, if you are Tory/Green/LD etc, which one do you want?

    If Reform beat Burnham they look even more like the party of the next government.
    If Burnham beats Reform (and becomes PM) Labour look like the party that can stop Farage being PM well ahead of Green/Tories/LDs.
  • LostPasswordLostPassword Posts: 24,193
    I take a nap and lo! Burnham does have a seat! Or, at least, a sacrificial lamb. It begins to look as though his triumphal progression to Downing Street is on.

    Though Makerfield looks like a proper test of Burnham's ability to win over Reform voters. He could lose that by-election.
  • berberian_knowsberberian_knows Posts: 199
    So psephologists - if we look at MPs who became major officer of state between elections - how did that affect their results in the next election?Might give us an idea of the "Ooh we get the PM" factor versus the "He won't have time for us" factor. Also do we have figures on by elections where someone has voluntarily taken the Chiltern Hundreds - I hear it hits the incumbent party. Anyone got any figures?
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 55,424

    kinabalu said:

    He's close to evens Next PM now which implies clear odds on for the by-election.

    But imagine if he is crushed by Reform. Labour’s most popular candidate for PM. That means a Reform government is on the way
    A Reform government is not on the way.
  • TazTaz Posts: 28,104

    tlg86 said:

    This is a chance to tactically vote to beat Farage and Reform, which would be extremely welcome

    Burnham is going to run the country well to the left of Starmer and Reeves. If I had a vote, I'd vote to stop him.
    Sovereign debt crisis incoming.

    i.e. Labour looking at what the Tories did appointing Liz Truss, and saying we'll have some of that.
    Good. We need it to get some sense into these fuckwits
  • Another complicating factor. What if Burnham wins by a tiny margin. That’s quite a plausible outcome

    It means the PM is at terrible risk of losing his seat at the next GE
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 103,794

    https://x.com/patrickkmaguire/status/2054963169487986893

    Eight Makerfield wards voted last week. Results:

    Reform: 50.4%
    Labour: 22.7%
    Green: 10.9%
    Conservative: 9.9%
    Lib Dem: 3.8%
    Other: 2.2%

    I think they are irrelevant

    This is a unique high profile high stakes by election with the opportunity to elect a defacto PM and beat Starmer
    It's not irrelevant, in fact I'd say it is pretty relevant, it just may not be determinative, despite Burnham not being a natural Reform magnet.

    I'd agree with the conclusion though, I do think a big chunk of those Reform votes could be swayed by getting to pick the next PM.
  • bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 23,703
    Sky thinks Rayner and WS will fall in behind PM KoN

    Also think Burnham still loses in NEC 7-3 OR 6-4 Wins if it goes to full NEC rather than the Akehurst Club
  • Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 72,129
    algarkirk said:

    This is a chance to tactically vote to beat Farage and Reform, which would be extremely welcome

    It's tricky one for everyone who is neither Labour nor Reform. Assuming Burnham is the candidate, he can only win with strong labour support + tactical voting from others - LD, Greens, Tories.

    However, if you are Tory/Green/LD etc, which one do you want?

    If Reform beat Burnham they look even more like the party of the next government.
    If Burnham beats Reform (and becomes PM) Labour look like the party that can stop Farage being PM well ahead of Green/Tories/LDs.
    Not for me

    As a conservative I want Farage and Reform beaten
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 72,352
    Theo Bertram
    @theobertram

    Options for the PM:

    1. Path of maximum resistance: soldier on, block Burnham, ignore critics and the civil war that ensues

    2. Path of stubborn resistance: let him stand (he might not win) but if he wins, fight him (likely in vain)

    3. Set a timetable

    https://x.com/theobertram/status/2054966763146588180
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 55,424

    algarkirk said:

    This is a chance to tactically vote to beat Farage and Reform, which would be extremely welcome

    It's tricky one for everyone who is neither Labour nor Reform. Assuming Burnham is the candidate, he can only win with strong labour support + tactical voting from others - LD, Greens, Tories.

    However, if you are Tory/Green/LD etc, which one do you want?

    If Reform beat Burnham they look even more like the party of the next government.
    If Burnham beats Reform (and becomes PM) Labour look like the party that can stop Farage being PM well ahead of Green/Tories/LDs.
    Not for me

    As a conservative I want Farage and Reform beaten
    As will all but the most die hard LD and Green voters. Honestly, those parties might as well not bother to stand
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 72,352

    Sky thinks Rayner and WS will fall in behind PM KoN

    Also think Burnham still loses in NEC 7-3 OR 6-4 Wins if it goes to full NEC rather than the Akehurst Club

    "Akehurst Club"? :lol:
  • CookieCookie Posts: 17,553

    https://x.com/patrickkmaguire/status/2054963169487986893

    Eight Makerfield wards voted last week. Results:

    Reform: 50.4%
    Labour: 22.7%
    Green: 10.9%
    Conservative: 9.9%
    Lib Dem: 3.8%
    Other: 2.2%

    All important but not the full story. The normal behaviour of voters during a period of government unpopularity is for that party's voters to not vote. This is Burnham's biggest target - DNV Labour voters. There's probably a sprinkling of Greens and Lib Dems and maybr a few Tories he can squeeze too - though no doubt also some in three categories who will cussedly swing behind Reform.
    I still think Reform win, but not easily.
    I wonder who their candidate will be?
  • LostPasswordLostPassword Posts: 24,193

    https://x.com/patrickkmaguire/status/2054963169487986893

    Eight Makerfield wards voted last week. Results:

    Reform: 50.4%
    Labour: 22.7%
    Green: 10.9%
    Conservative: 9.9%
    Lib Dem: 3.8%
    Other: 2.2%

    I think they are irrelevant

    This is a unique high profile high stakes by election with the opportunity to elect a defacto PM and beat Starmer
    At the last GE:

    Labour 45.2%
    Reform 31.8%
    Tories 10.9%
    LibDems 6.8%
    Greens 4.4%
    EngDems 0.9%

    I think this is a tough by-election for Burnham to win. I'd think Labour could win a comfortable majority at the next GE of more than 50 and Makerfield would be the sort of seat you'd expect them to lose to Reform.

    If Burnham wins this on a by-election, with Labour polling as badly as they are, it would be genuine evidence of his appeal to the voters. It will be fascinating to see how it turns out.
  • bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 23,703
    IanB2 said:

    algarkirk said:

    This is a chance to tactically vote to beat Farage and Reform, which would be extremely welcome

    It's tricky one for everyone who is neither Labour nor Reform. Assuming Burnham is the candidate, he can only win with strong labour support + tactical voting from others - LD, Greens, Tories.

    However, if you are Tory/Green/LD etc, which one do you want?

    If Reform beat Burnham they look even more like the party of the next government.
    If Burnham beats Reform (and becomes PM) Labour look like the party that can stop Farage being PM well ahead of Green/Tories/LDs.
    Not for me

    As a conservative I want Farage and Reform beaten
    As will all but the most die hard LD and Green voters. Honestly, those parties might as well not bother to stand
    Agree with that Greens should stand down if its AB

    If its any other Lab Candidate Greens will be main challengers to Reform
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 103,794
    edited May 14

    Theo Bertram
    @theobertram

    Options for the PM:

    1. Path of maximum resistance: soldier on, block Burnham, ignore critics and the civil war that ensues

    2. Path of stubborn resistance: let him stand (he might not win) but if he wins, fight him (likely in vain)

    3. Set a timetable

    https://x.com/theobertram/status/2054966763146588180

    2.5 Let him stand, hope he loses, then set a timetable if he wins (so that hopefully someone else will win).

    Won't work - if Burnham wins it will be treated like a miracle given Labour's current situation, and other candidates won't have any momentum of their own to counter it.
  • DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 36,339

    Another complicating factor. What if Burnham wins by a tiny margin. That’s quite a plausible outcome

    It means the PM is at terrible risk of losing his seat at the next GE

    It does not matter for Burnham any more than it matters for Wes Streeting. If Labour loses the election, the Prime Minister is out on his ear anyway. If Labour recovers to win the election, then this will return to being a safe Labour seat.
  • murali_smurali_s Posts: 3,142

    https://x.com/patrickkmaguire/status/2054963169487986893

    Eight Makerfield wards voted last week. Results:

    Reform: 50.4%
    Labour: 22.7%
    Green: 10.9%
    Conservative: 9.9%
    Lib Dem: 3.8%
    Other: 2.2%

    I think they are irrelevant

    This is a unique high profile high stakes by election with the opportunity to elect a defacto PM and beat Starmer
    That’s ridiculous. They are certainly not “irrelevant”

    This is a very Reform-y seat. These voters might well
    be furious at Labour and might relish the chance to humiliate Labour in a very public, spectacular way

    It’s a massive gamble for Burnham. What’s he going to say to these Reform voters about immigration?
    Why has he chosen this seat? It looks terrible for him.
  • StillWatersStillWaters Posts: 13,446
    kinabalu said:

    Delete. Superceded by events!

    And within the 6 minutes edit limit!
This discussion has been closed.