I see the Tories are continuing to flog a dead horse . It’s irrelevant now what Reeves said yesterday . The estate agent apologized and has taken responsibility.
Yes but the slightest inconsistency is enough to try to keep the story going.
A private individual would, I assume, do the necessary research before embarking on becoming a landlord and would discover if a licence were needed in the area where their property was located.
Rachel Reeves, as an MP and Chancellor, has other things on her plate (understandably) and in the blizzard of everything going on around her (and I can only guess what kind of working day she has), a tweet from three years ago would mean nothing. She probably wanted the lettings agent to deal with all the paperwork (that's what you pay them for I imagine) and assumed that had happened but it didn't and she has caught out.
The Lettings Agent has admitted the mistake but if there is a fine levied by Leeds Council, Reeves, as the landlord, would have to pay it. Is any of this a hanging offence? Hardly - the only bone those hostile to her still seem to be chewing is the inconsistency angle and while that looks bad, again, hardly worth a resignation.
Rentoul, wisely, asks why on this basis Rayner had to go. The problem is always when the story gets to such a point it becomes an unnecessary and damaging distraction at which point it no longer matters who did or said what and when.
In the same way, the only hope those hoping to undermine Reeves and force her out is to keep the story going somehow but absent any new evidence it's going to fade away.
Rayner was tax evasion based on her failure to take advice and misreporting to the revenue
Reeves was an administrative oversight in failing to follow up with her agent to ensure they had done what they promised
Does not bode well for a budget that she cannot even handle her own finances
Rachel Reeves probably does not spend a lot of time reading the LandlordTODAY website. But if she did, she might have seen this article, written earlier this year, highlighting complaints about licensing schemes like the one that has got the chancellor into difficulties. It says:
Phil Turtle, a compliance consultant at Landlord Licensing & Defence, says it is increasingly the case that a missed renewal notice, a buried letter, or a forgotten deadline can cost landlords their financial stability – and even their properties.
And he believes that selective licensing schemes, enforced with increasing rigour by local councils, are catching landlords off guard with fines that can spiral into the hundreds of thousands.
“I’ve seen landlords lose everything because they didn’t have a system in place to track compliance. One missed deadline can cost you £105,000, and if you’re operating through a limited company, that fine could double to £210,000.”
He points to a recent case in the London Borough of Waltham Forest, where a landlord faced a staggering £66,000 in fines for failing to license a single house converted into two flats. “The council hit the landlord’s limited company with £16,500 per flat and then fined him personally as the sole director another £16,500 per flat. That’s £66,000 for a simple oversight – and now he’s forced to sell the property to cover the cost.”
Reeves was aware she needed a licence, but never paid for one
Whatever the estate agent has said, it remains the landlord's responsibility
A diligent person would have double-checked
The Chancellor ought to be the epitome of diligence
I never called for her to lose her job, and never really expected her to
I strongly contested, and continue to contest, the ludicrous notion the she could somehow be unaware of a policy that she had been campaigning in favour of for over eighteen months, before it affected her personally
It is a white wash for sure
Nonsense. I'd have said almost certainly not. Too messy.
But if you think so I'll bet one of my lovely shining English pounds against your equivalent 4.56million Scottish groats that you can't prove your assertion.
BREAKING - The King has taken further action on Prince Andrew and moved to formally strip all his titles. The former Duke of York will now be known as Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and will leave Royal Lodge. “These censures are deemed necessary.”
BREAKING - The King has taken further action on Prince Andrew and moved to formally strip all his titles. The former Duke of York will now be known as Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and will leave Royal Lodge. “These censures are deemed necessary.”
From the information now released, it seems quite plausible that Reeves was unaware of the licence requirements. Being rather busy, it looks like she'd left this particular bit of business up to her husband.
So, the real moral of the story is: check your other half's homework.
BREAKING - The King has taken further action on Prince Andrew and moved to formally strip all his titles. The former Duke of York will now be known as Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and will leave Royal Lodge. “These censures are deemed necessary.”
The use of notwithstanding tells us everything we need to know - the King and William know he's a lying twat who is guilty but you have to let him pretend otherwise..
BREAKING - The King has taken further action on Prince Andrew and moved to formally strip all his titles. The former Duke of York will now be known as Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and will leave Royal Lodge. “These censures are deemed necessary.”
BREAKING - The King has taken further action on Prince Andrew and moved to formally strip all his titles. The former Duke of York will now be known as Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and will leave Royal Lodge. “These censures are deemed necessary.”
The use of notwithstanding tells us everything we need to know - the King and William know he's a lying twat who is guilty but you have to let him pretend otherwise..
Beautifully done. Thrown in as an aside to make it clear they think it is a lie, followed up with a devastating riposte.
From the information now released, it seems quite plausible that Reeves was unaware of the licence requirements. Being rather busy, it looks like she'd left this particular bit of business up to her husband.
So, the real moral of the story is: check your other half's homework.
Stoney cold silence over the Findus pancakes and peas at the Reeves' household dinner table tonight?
62% for the monarchy is still a landslide and I expect Buckingham Palace will be relieved with those Yougov numbers after the furore in the media over Andrew. Clear majorities for keeping the monarchy in all the main UK parties, only Green voters mainly republicans. 4% still with a favourable view of Andrew too
Rachel Reeves is still chancellor after making an “inadvertent mistake” in failing to apply for a licence to let her family home in south London.
A brief excitement swept through Westminster this afternoon when No 10 said emails between the chancellor’s husband and the letting agent had “come to light”. They had not been published when this newsletter went out, but the lettings agency said it had apologised to Reeves for an “oversight” in not applying for a licence.
But Angela Rayner is no longer deputy prime minister after making a “mistake” in which she “acted with integrity”, according to the adviser on ministerial interests, in failing to pay the required amount of stamp duty on a property purchase.
The amounts of money involved may be similar, in that Reeves’s error may cost her not just the £945 for a licence but a year’s rent of £38,000 as well. Rayner is repaying an estimated £40,000 in additional stamp duty.
I have commented that it is hard to see the difference in principle between the two cases – and I speculate that the real difference is that Keir Starmer was content to see Rayner go but desperate to keep Reeves, an ally who is not a threat to his position, in place.
Licenses for single family residence rentals are basically automatically granted, so -in terms of scale- it's not really comparable.
What a poll for the Greens, quite historic it seems to be. I didn't expect the Greens to be showing up ahead of Labour, the Tories, and the Lib Dems on any poll this soon, regardless of the methodology.
“These decisions have been the King’s, given the serious lapses of judgment which his brother has shown.” Andrew will move to a private property at Sandringham, funded by Charles. Sarah Ferguson will make her own arrangements. Princesses Beatrice and Eugenie retain their titles.
Rachel Reeves is still chancellor after making an “inadvertent mistake” in failing to apply for a licence to let her family home in south London.
A brief excitement swept through Westminster this afternoon when No 10 said emails between the chancellor’s husband and the letting agent had “come to light”. They had not been published when this newsletter went out, but the lettings agency said it had apologised to Reeves for an “oversight” in not applying for a licence.
But Angela Rayner is no longer deputy prime minister after making a “mistake” in which she “acted with integrity”, according to the adviser on ministerial interests, in failing to pay the required amount of stamp duty on a property purchase.
The amounts of money involved may be similar, in that Reeves’s error may cost her not just the £945 for a licence but a year’s rent of £38,000 as well. Rayner is repaying an estimated £40,000 in additional stamp duty.
I have commented that it is hard to see the difference in principle between the two cases – and I speculate that the real difference is that Keir Starmer was content to see Rayner go but desperate to keep Reeves, an ally who is not a threat to his position, in place.
Licenses for single family residence rentals are basically automatically granted, so -in terms of scale- it's not really comparable.
The massive difference is Ange needs a few month is the sin bin to clear her copy book for a run at leadership.
BREAKING - The King has taken further action on Prince Andrew and moved to formally strip all his titles. The former Duke of York will now be known as Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and will leave Royal Lodge. “These censures are deemed necessary.”
“These decisions have been the King’s, given the serious lapses of judgment which his brother has shown.” Andrew will move to a private property at Sandringham, funded by Charles. Sarah Ferguson will make her own arrangements. Princesses Beatrice and Eugenie retain their titles.
So Andrew is being housed at His Majesty's Pleasure.
OT. Paul Allen's house on Cap Ferrat was recently sold to an American hedge fund manager Izzy Englander following his death. It's rumoured to have cost its new owner 105 million Euros. That's exactly the same price paid by Liverpool for Alexander Izak
BREAKING - The King has taken further action on Prince Andrew and moved to formally strip all his titles. The former Duke of York will now be known as Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and will leave Royal Lodge. “These censures are deemed necessary.”
BREAKING - The King has taken further action on Prince Andrew and moved to formally strip all his titles. The former Duke of York will now be known as Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and will leave Royal Lodge. “These censures are deemed necessary.”
Rachel Reeves is still chancellor after making an “inadvertent mistake” in failing to apply for a licence to let her family home in south London.
A brief excitement swept through Westminster this afternoon when No 10 said emails between the chancellor’s husband and the letting agent had “come to light”. They had not been published when this newsletter went out, but the lettings agency said it had apologised to Reeves for an “oversight” in not applying for a licence.
But Angela Rayner is no longer deputy prime minister after making a “mistake” in which she “acted with integrity”, according to the adviser on ministerial interests, in failing to pay the required amount of stamp duty on a property purchase.
The amounts of money involved may be similar, in that Reeves’s error may cost her not just the £945 for a licence but a year’s rent of £38,000 as well. Rayner is repaying an estimated £40,000 in additional stamp duty.
I have commented that it is hard to see the difference in principle between the two cases – and I speculate that the real difference is that Keir Starmer was content to see Rayner go but desperate to keep Reeves, an ally who is not a threat to his position, in place.
Licenses for single family residence rentals are basically automatically granted, so -in terms of scale- it's not really comparable.
Do you still think that it was reasonable for her to not know she needed a licence, because you didn't know whether you needed one?
You weren't campaigning for selective landlord licensing in Jan 2023 were you?
Reeves was aware she needed a licence, but never paid for one
Whatever the estate agent has said, it remains the landlord's responsibility
A diligent person would have double-checked
The Chancellor ought to be the epitome of diligence
I never called for her to lose her job, and never really expected her to
I strongly contested, and continue to contest, the ludicrous notion the she could somehow be unaware of a policy that she had been campaigning in favour of for over eighteen months, before it affected her personally
It is a white wash for sure
Nonsense. I'd have said almost certainly not. Too messy.
But if you think so I'll bet one of my lovely shining English pounds against your equivalent 4.56million Scottish groats that you can't prove your assertion.
What a poll for the Greens, quite historic it seems to be. I didn't expect the Greens to be showing up ahead of Labour, the Tories, and the Lib Dems on any poll this soon, regardless of the methodology.
Is this the first time they've ever been in second place in a UK VI? Must be surely
Reeves was aware she needed a licence, but never paid for one
Whatever the estate agent has said, it remains the landlord's responsibility
A diligent person would have double-checked
The Chancellor ought to be the epitome of diligence
I never called for her to lose her job, and never really expected her to
I strongly contested, and continue to contest, the ludicrous notion the she could somehow be unaware of a policy that she had been campaigning in favour of for over eighteen months, before it affected her personally
It is a white wash for sure
Nonsense. I'd have said almost certainly not. Too messy.
But if you think so I'll bet one of my lovely shining English pounds against your equivalent 4.56million Scottish groats that you can't prove your assertion.
Rachel Reeves is still chancellor after making an “inadvertent mistake” in failing to apply for a licence to let her family home in south London.
A brief excitement swept through Westminster this afternoon when No 10 said emails between the chancellor’s husband and the letting agent had “come to light”. They had not been published when this newsletter went out, but the lettings agency said it had apologised to Reeves for an “oversight” in not applying for a licence.
But Angela Rayner is no longer deputy prime minister after making a “mistake” in which she “acted with integrity”, according to the adviser on ministerial interests, in failing to pay the required amount of stamp duty on a property purchase.
The amounts of money involved may be similar, in that Reeves’s error may cost her not just the £945 for a licence but a year’s rent of £38,000 as well. Rayner is repaying an estimated £40,000 in additional stamp duty.
I have commented that it is hard to see the difference in principle between the two cases – and I speculate that the real difference is that Keir Starmer was content to see Rayner go but desperate to keep Reeves, an ally who is not a threat to his position, in place.
Licenses for single family residence rentals are basically automatically granted, so -in terms of scale- it's not really comparable.
From the information now released, it seems quite plausible that Reeves was unaware of the licence requirements. Being rather busy, it looks like she'd left this particular bit of business up to her husband.
So, the real moral of the story is: check your other half's homework.
Stoney cold silence over the Findus pancakes and peas at the Reeves' household dinner table tonight?
He will be a certainty for taking the rap of thick husband for her.
What a poll for the Greens, quite historic it seems to be. I didn't expect the Greens to be showing up ahead of Labour, the Tories, and the Lib Dems on any poll this soon, regardless of the methodology.
Is this the first time they've ever been in second place in a UK VI? Must be surely
1989 - 14% in Euro elections and third is closest I think?
Reeves was aware she needed a licence, but never paid for one
Whatever the estate agent has said, it remains the landlord's responsibility
A diligent person would have double-checked
The Chancellor ought to be the epitome of diligence
I never called for her to lose her job, and never really expected her to
I strongly contested, and continue to contest, the ludicrous notion the she could somehow be unaware of a policy that she had been campaigning in favour of for over eighteen months, before it affected her personally
It is a white wash for sure
Nonsense. I'd have said almost certainly not. Too messy.
But if you think so I'll bet one of my lovely shining English pounds against your equivalent 4.56million Scottish groats that you can't prove your assertion.
Rachel Reeves is still chancellor after making an “inadvertent mistake” in failing to apply for a licence to let her family home in south London.
A brief excitement swept through Westminster this afternoon when No 10 said emails between the chancellor’s husband and the letting agent had “come to light”. They had not been published when this newsletter went out, but the lettings agency said it had apologised to Reeves for an “oversight” in not applying for a licence.
But Angela Rayner is no longer deputy prime minister after making a “mistake” in which she “acted with integrity”, according to the adviser on ministerial interests, in failing to pay the required amount of stamp duty on a property purchase.
The amounts of money involved may be similar, in that Reeves’s error may cost her not just the £945 for a licence but a year’s rent of £38,000 as well. Rayner is repaying an estimated £40,000 in additional stamp duty.
I have commented that it is hard to see the difference in principle between the two cases – and I speculate that the real difference is that Keir Starmer was content to see Rayner go but desperate to keep Reeves, an ally who is not a threat to his position, in place.
Licenses for single family residence rentals are basically automatically granted, so -in terms of scale- it's not really comparable.
He knifed Rayner yet blesses the sainted Reeves
Rayner was avoiding paying tax Reeves - her husband / letting agent screwed up a small piece of paperwork
Pretty decisive action by the King, albeit following the polling.
The core motive is to protect the Monarchy, even if that means sending his own brother to Coventry.
Who do we get as the BBC commentator for major royal events now?
Once the statement was finished, these men then “spurned the said hatchments with their feet out of the quire.” They proceeded to kick Buckingham’s arms and achievements down the full length of the nave, out of the west door and into the ditch beyond. As they were thus expelled, Buckingham was considered fully degraded from the Order of the Garter.
Rachel Reeves is still chancellor after making an “inadvertent mistake” in failing to apply for a licence to let her family home in south London.
A brief excitement swept through Westminster this afternoon when No 10 said emails between the chancellor’s husband and the letting agent had “come to light”. They had not been published when this newsletter went out, but the lettings agency said it had apologised to Reeves for an “oversight” in not applying for a licence.
But Angela Rayner is no longer deputy prime minister after making a “mistake” in which she “acted with integrity”, according to the adviser on ministerial interests, in failing to pay the required amount of stamp duty on a property purchase.
The amounts of money involved may be similar, in that Reeves’s error may cost her not just the £945 for a licence but a year’s rent of £38,000 as well. Rayner is repaying an estimated £40,000 in additional stamp duty.
I have commented that it is hard to see the difference in principle between the two cases – and I speculate that the real difference is that Keir Starmer was content to see Rayner go but desperate to keep Reeves, an ally who is not a threat to his position, in place.
Licenses for single family residence rentals are basically automatically granted, so -in terms of scale- it's not really comparable.
He knifed Rayner yet blesses the sainted Reeves
She's been left in place so she can get you paying your fair share of tax on your Malc.
Pretty decisive action by the King, albeit following the polling.
The core motive is to protect the Monarchy, even if that means sending his own brother to Coventry.
Who do we get as the BBC commentator for major royal events now?
Once the statement was finished, these men then “spurned the said hatchments with their feet out of the quire.” They proceeded to kick Buckingham’s arms and achievements down the full length of the nave, out of the west door and into the ditch beyond. As they were thus expelled, Buckingham was considered fully degraded from the Order of the Garter.
Reeves was aware she needed a licence, but never paid for one
Whatever the estate agent has said, it remains the landlord's responsibility
A diligent person would have double-checked
The Chancellor ought to be the epitome of diligence
I never called for her to lose her job, and never really expected her to
I strongly contested, and continue to contest, the ludicrous notion the she could somehow be unaware of a policy that she had been campaigning in favour of for over eighteen months, before it affected her personally
It is a white wash for sure
Nonsense. I'd have said almost certainly not. Too messy.
But if you think so I'll bet one of my lovely shining English pounds against your equivalent 4.56million Scottish groats that you can't prove your assertion.
I do think the first bit's right though.
You are a naughty boy
And I am the official recipient of the most minor retribution ever conveyed by the poster @malcolmg in the history of PB!
'The Trump administration will limit the number of refugees admitted to the US to 7,500 over the next year, and give priority to white South Africans.
The move, announced in a notice published on Thursday, marks a dramatic cut from the previous limit of 125,000 set by former President Joe Biden and will bring the cap to a record low.' https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cy40jj71243o
I have to ask - given that he was supposedly off to Frogmore Cottage last week, what new evidence has turned up that has resulted in Randy being sent to Norfolk never to be seen again and Randy accepting the fact...
FON of course but Reeves needs to do some tax and spend in the budget to reduce the Green total and the Tories need to win back some Reform voters for the normal order to be restored
What a poll for the Greens, quite historic it seems to be. I didn't expect the Greens to be showing up ahead of Labour, the Tories, and the Lib Dems on any poll this soon, regardless of the methodology.
Is this the first time they've ever been in second place in a UK VI? Must be surely
1989 - 14% in Euro elections and third is closest I think?
What a poll for the Greens, quite historic it seems to be. I didn't expect the Greens to be showing up ahead of Labour, the Tories, and the Lib Dems on any poll this soon, regardless of the methodology.
Is this the first time they've ever been in second place in a UK VI? Must be surely
Yes, it must be.
What a month for their organisation and social media ; showing the older parties how it's done there , too.
I have to ask - given that he was supposedly off to Frogmore Cottage last week, what new evidence has turned up that has resulted in Randy being sent to Norfolk never to be seen again and Randy accepting the fact...
It is not a Crown Estate property, so much less of a media hoo hah over him being sent there.
I am sure Fergie can be found a flat in King's Lynn not too far away above a Lidl
I have to ask - given that he was supposedly off to Frogmore Cottage last week, what new evidence has turned up that has resulted in Randy being sent to Norfolk never to be seen again and Randy accepting the fact...
I have to ask - given that he was supposedly off to Frogmore Cottage last week, what new evidence has turned up that has resulted in Randy being sent to Norfolk never to be seen again and Randy accepting the fact...
Mad hypothesis: the US congressional shutdown and labeling "antifa" as terrorists—a witch hunt pretext, because it's not a group with a membership list—is happening because Trump's a paedophile, the files contain hard evidence, and shit's going down in January. ex-Prince Andrew is the UK corollary.
FON of course but Reeves needs to do some tax and spend in the budget to reduce the Green total and the Tories need to win back some Reform voters for the normal order to be restored
Its a fact that Labour have been shedding far more voters to Greens/PC/ LDs/YP than they have to Ref/Con.
Voters have somewhere else to go. Why didn't anyone tell them?
Oh, wait. Some of us did.
There have been some defections at Council level. I wonder when the MPs start to do so.
For me, the most interesting feature of the monarchy polls isn't the party split, it's the ethnic split. In the last one I saw, White British supported retaining the monarchy by 5:1 while Others were evenly split. As the country's ethnic mix changes, we are likely to see support for the monarchy falling gently over the decades.
I suppose it shows that heritage really matters in shaping attitudes and that, while individuals may escape their past, people en masse often don't.
Though once the King dies, mixed race Prince Archie will be 5th in line to the throne and mixed race Princess Lilibet 6th in line. We forget both are already higher in line now than Andrew
Rachel Reeves is still chancellor after making an “inadvertent mistake” in failing to apply for a licence to let her family home in south London.
A brief excitement swept through Westminster this afternoon when No 10 said emails between the chancellor’s husband and the letting agent had “come to light”. They had not been published when this newsletter went out, but the lettings agency said it had apologised to Reeves for an “oversight” in not applying for a licence.
But Angela Rayner is no longer deputy prime minister after making a “mistake” in which she “acted with integrity”, according to the adviser on ministerial interests, in failing to pay the required amount of stamp duty on a property purchase.
The amounts of money involved may be similar, in that Reeves’s error may cost her not just the £945 for a licence but a year’s rent of £38,000 as well. Rayner is repaying an estimated £40,000 in additional stamp duty.
I have commented that it is hard to see the difference in principle between the two cases – and I speculate that the real difference is that Keir Starmer was content to see Rayner go but desperate to keep Reeves, an ally who is not a threat to his position, in place.
Licenses for single family residence rentals are basically automatically granted, so -in terms of scale- it's not really comparable.
He knifed Rayner yet blesses the sainted Reeves
She's been left in place so she can get you paying your fair share of tax on your Malc.
Makes sense.
You should hear the rumours about excise tax on cask strength turnip juice.
Reeves was aware she needed a licence, but never paid for one
Whatever the estate agent has said, it remains the landlord's responsibility
A diligent person would have double-checked
The Chancellor ought to be the epitome of diligence
I never called for her to lose her job, and never really expected her to
I strongly contested, and continue to contest, the ludicrous notion the she could somehow be unaware of a policy that she had been campaigning in favour of for over eighteen months, before it affected her personally
It is a white wash for sure
Nonsense. I'd have said almost certainly not. Too messy.
But if you think so I'll bet one of my lovely shining English pounds against your equivalent 4.56million Scottish groats that you can't prove your assertion.
I do think the first bit's right though.
You are a naughty boy
And I am the official recipient of the most minor retribution ever conveyed by the poster @malcolmg in the history of PB!
FON of course but Reeves needs to do some tax and spend in the budget to reduce the Green total and the Tories need to win back some Reform voters for the normal order to be restored
Its a fact that Labour have been shedding far more voters to Greens/PC/ LDs/YP than they have to Ref/Con.
Voters have somewhere else to go. Why didn't anyone tell them?
Oh, wait. Some of us did.
There have been some defections at Council level. I wonder when the MPs start to do so.
There's no imminent election. I'd be surprised if the greens prevented a squeeze as one became closer. Labour can hammer home the 'vote green get reform ' message.
BREAKING: King strips his brother Andrew of Prince title.
Wasn't it always 'Randy'
The Randy, Old Duke of York
"The esrtwhile Duke of York..." surely?
He will be feeling very hard done by. It'd be a risk but I think he should consider a prime time tv interview to put his side of things. Perhaps with Victoria Derbyshire.
Can anyone confirm if parliament need to pass an act to revoke Andrew M-W's titles of Duke of York, Earl of Inverness etc? Assuming this would sail through on the King's advice
Comments
But if you think so I'll bet one of my lovely shining English pounds against your equivalent 4.56million Scottish groats that you can't prove your assertion.
Just 11 per cent of the French public approve of the embattled 47-year-old centrist, according to the Verian poll for Le Figaro Magazine.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2025/10/30/emmanuel-macron-most-unpopular-french-president-in-70-years/
I expect this has already been posted:
Westminster Voting Intention:
RFM: 32% (=)
GRN: 17% (+2)
CON: 16% (-1)
LAB: 16% (=)
LDM: 12% (=)
SNP: 2% (=)
Via @findoutnow.bsky.social, 29 Oct.
Changes w/ 22 Oct.
https://bsky.app/profile/electionmaps.uk/post/3m4ge5jfgkc2x
😂😂😂🍿🍿🍿🥂🥂🥂
So, the real moral of the story is: check your other half's homework.
What is it that Churchill said about fanatics?
What a poll for the Greens, quite historic it seems to be. I didn't expect the Greens to be showing up ahead of Labour, the Tories, and the Lib Dems on any poll this soon, regardless of the methodology.
Imagine what they might have to do if those allegations were proven true and/or he accepted them.
That's not a problem Reeves has.
If only.
You weren't campaigning for selective landlord licensing in Jan 2023 were you?
https://www.pressreader.com/uk/the-national-scotland/20251030/281595246773348?srsltid=AfmBOorXxW7EIrRCFssb-_0GJN6zb9qQT7N18d6C2z5nwiUC7Wui01kS
Hopefully the King took my advice and threatened to pass a Bill of Attainder against Andrew Saxe-Coburg and Gotha.
The core motive is to protect the Monarchy, even if that means sending his own brother to Coventry.
JD Vance: "The suffering is going to get a lot worse."
https://bsky.app/profile/atrupar.com/post/3m4gorvwuyy2d
Andrew only fucked ladies under dubious circumstances.
Labour has fucked everybody.
Eddy Shah anyone???
Reeves - her husband / letting agent screwed up a small piece of paperwork
It’s not quite the same
Once the statement was finished, these men then “spurned the said hatchments with their feet out of the quire.” They proceeded to kick Buckingham’s arms and achievements down the full length of the nave, out of the west door and into the ditch beyond. As they were thus expelled, Buckingham was considered fully degraded from the Order of the Garter.
https://www.stgeorges-windsor.org/degradation-of-a-garter-knight/
Trump probably thinking about how he can pardon Prince Andrew as we speak.
Makes sense.
Damn, that's going to take some beating!
The move, announced in a notice published on Thursday, marks a dramatic cut from the previous limit of 125,000 set by former President Joe Biden and will bring the cap to a record low.'
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cy40jj71243o
It will be privately funded by the King.' So yes
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/cnveqgj957dt
What a month for their organisation and social media ; showing the older parties how it's done there , too.
I am sure Fergie can be found a flat in King's Lynn not too far away above a Lidl
Mad hypothesis: the US congressional shutdown and labeling "antifa" as terrorists—a witch hunt pretext, because it's not a group with a membership list—is happening because Trump's a paedophile, the files contain hard evidence, and shit's going down in January. ex-Prince Andrew is the UK corollary.
Voters have somewhere else to go. Why didn't anyone tell them?
Oh, wait. Some of us did.
There have been some defections at Council level. I wonder when the MPs start to do so.
The health benefits of the GLP1 drugs extend well beyond obesity.
And we're genetically programmed to overeat; some more so that others.
Obesity isn't really a moral failing.
"Intercourse with Saint Helena Act 1816".
They could also try being less shite
If the former then due to the recent Trump induced price rise.
In due course it might well be the latter.
It was a joke on @Foxy saying Andrew was being sent to Coventry. Which, for the avoidance of doubt, is not in Norfolk