Skip to content

Graveyard or launchpad? – politicalbetting.com

SystemSystem Posts: 12,669
edited September 7 in General
Graveyard or launchpad? – politicalbetting.com

The Rt Hon Shabana Mahmood MP @ShabanaMahmood has been appointed as Secretary of State for the Home Department @UKHomeOffice. pic.twitter.com/HUKQh8wnDT

Read the full story here

«13456710

Comments

  • StillWatersStillWaters Posts: 10,812
    First
  • tlg86tlg86 Posts: 27,185
    An excellent header which asks all the right questions.
  • wooliedyedwooliedyed Posts: 13,897
    edited September 7
    If Akhmed Yakoob doesnt stand then YP would have a good shot in Ladywood. If he stands again and splits the Corbyn/Green/Gaza vote shes safe.
    With Galloway hinting WPB might now fold into the Corbyn umbrella one of his acolytes under a YP banner would be best placed to try and oust her
  • Another good thread from @Cyclefree and Mahmood looks to be the rising star

    Though the Home Office is a very difficult department of government
  • SandpitSandpit Posts: 56,822
    Ukranian bloggers reporting that Russia hit the offices of the Ukranian Prime Minister in Kyiv last night.

    https://x.com/jayinkyiv/status/1964560453247594975
  • tlg86tlg86 Posts: 27,185
    Actually, I think the BBC is helping Reform. Brian Cox will do wonders for Reform.
  • SandpitSandpit Posts: 56,822
    Pulpstar said:

    She's there because she's ostensibly better than Cooper, who has been useless in the home office, but instead of a straight demotion to justice has failed upwards to the easier and glitzier foreign office role; replacing Lammy - who, despite seriously low expectations has managed to build a good relationship particularly with the US VP but has now been given the sop of Deputy PM; a good personal relationship wiped out with the US administration because Starmer didn't dare demote Cooper.

    A lot of comment from the US right about Shabhana Mahmood in the Home Office, and some of the causes and protests to which she’s aligned herself in the past.
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 123,630
    edited September 7
    More proof that Trump is a Russian asset, this is a death sentence for these people.

    ICE is sending Russian dissidents back to Russia. According to the ⁦@thetimes

    ⁩ When the dissidents arrived in Russia, the Russian authorities were given documents relating to their asylum applications in the US.


    https://x.com/Billbrowder/status/1964297062960279595
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 123,630
    edited September 7
    Ah Sajid Javid becoming Home Secretary brings back happy memories, it led to two 33/1 winners in the space of 12 hours.

    #LegendaryModestyKlaxon
  • Pulpstar said:

    She's there because she's ostensibly better than Cooper, who has been useless in the home office, but instead of a straight demotion to justice has failed upwards to the easier and glitzier foreign office role; replacing Lammy - who, despite seriously low expectations has managed to build a good relationship particularly with the US VP but has now been given the sop of Deputy PM; a good personal relationship wiped out with the US administration because Starmer didn't dare demote Cooper.

    Has Yvette Cooper achieved anything at any time ?

    She seems very much the pound shop version of Ursula von der Leyen, continually failing upwards.
  • Northern_AlNorthern_Al Posts: 9,054
    Shabana has shown she can get things done, quickly. Despite opposition to an extension of the early release scheme, she succeeded in easing the crisis of overcrowded prisons pretty effectively through decisive action.

    Against that, of course, apparently over a thousand people arrived in small boats yesterday, so she's already failed as HS and should be sacked.
  • I have decided Louise Haigh is a Reform/Tory/Lib Dem plant because I am not sure the optics of this will be good for Labour.

    Louise Haigh shrugs off fraud controversy with run for deputy leader

    The former transport secretary, who resigned after a past fraud conviction emerged, has told friends that she plans to run in the party election


    https://www.thetimes.com/article/7fe538f3-19d0-45b7-98e2-369e074436bc
  • Emily Thornberry thinking about deputy leader
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 34,049
    edited September 7

    More proof that Trump is a Russian asset, this is a death sentence for these people.

    ICE is sending Russian dissidents back to Russia. According to the ⁦@thetimes

    ⁩ When the dissidents arrived in Russia, the Russian authorities were given documents relating to their asylum applications in the US.


    https://x.com/Billbrowder/status/1964297062960279595

    Does that mean Nigey might be a Taliban asset sending Afghan ladies back to Kabul?
  • SandpitSandpit Posts: 56,822

    Emily Thornberry thinking about deputy leader

    We can all raise a flag (or five) to that prospect!
  • stodgestodge Posts: 15,251
    Morning all :)

    We've had some on here wailing it's like the 1930s while others have compared the current state to the 1970s.

    Needless to say, both are wrong - it's 1981 - who are the Soft Cell and the Adam & The Ants de nos jours?

    We have an insurgent party riding high in the polls whose leader basically tells their Party Conference to go back to your constituencies and prepare for a little disappointment (I may have misremembered that).

    We have a Government and Prime Minister slightly less popular than bubonic plague but determined to stay on couse and even making a virtue of its unwillingness to countenance any change in policy or direction after having performed any number of changes earlier in its time.

    We have a useless ineffective Opposition whose leader is under pressure from more radical colleagues.

    Yep, it's 1981 - all we need is a Royal Wedding and we can all do the Prince Charming - remember, ridicule is nothing to be scared of (the motto of the Liberal Democrats I believe).
  • Northern_AlNorthern_Al Posts: 9,054
    edited September 7
    Sandpit said:

    Pulpstar said:

    She's there because she's ostensibly better than Cooper, who has been useless in the home office, but instead of a straight demotion to justice has failed upwards to the easier and glitzier foreign office role; replacing Lammy - who, despite seriously low expectations has managed to build a good relationship particularly with the US VP but has now been given the sop of Deputy PM; a good personal relationship wiped out with the US administration because Starmer didn't dare demote Cooper.

    A lot of comment from the US right about Shabhana Mahmood in the Home Office, and some of the causes and protests to which she’s aligned herself in the past.
    I'm absolutely astonished that some on the US right would not be happy about somebody called Shabana Mahmood being HS in the UK. Baffling.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 80,916
    A very interesting header from Cyclefree, and I agree that she's the cabinet minister most worth watching in the near future.

    One point that's not quite correct is that Mahmood* has already faced some of the sort of attacks that Farron attracted. But in this case from the US right on social media - I've even seen calls for the UK's access to Five Eyes data be suspended owing to her appointment.

    *my autocorrect has yet to learn the correct spelling of her name
  • CookieCookie Posts: 15,981
    Was 'unfit for purpose' John Reid? It was a phrase I hadn't heard before he used it. After that it was suddenly everywhere.
  • Is it because everyone relentlessly treated Rayner herself like some special-needs child, a young, underprivileged woman who they secretly suspected couldn’t read or write? If you look at the way Starmer spoke about her, it was constantly in these terms: she was a woman, and working class.

    Of her actual record, of course: no hint. She was the perfect deputy prime minister for him: a politician allowed to rise to the top on personality alone. And that personality was: middle-class person’s idea of what a working-class person should be. Slobby, ribald, partying in ’Beefa — isn’t vaping on inflatables what working-class people all do? Spoiler alert: it isn’t. Most working-class people are insulted to be compared to her.


    https://www.thetimes.com/comment/columnists/article/angela-rayner-no-working-class-hero-ptr88wp8b

    Rayner was someone from the bottom 10% who moved into the top 10% through the Labour party.

    Its no wonder that Labour politicians, people who are obsessed about the top 10% and bottom 10% and very little in between, turned Rayner into their living icon.
  • Sandpit said:

    Pulpstar said:

    She's there because she's ostensibly better than Cooper, who has been useless in the home office, but instead of a straight demotion to justice has failed upwards to the easier and glitzier foreign office role; replacing Lammy - who, despite seriously low expectations has managed to build a good relationship particularly with the US VP but has now been given the sop of Deputy PM; a good personal relationship wiped out with the US administration because Starmer didn't dare demote Cooper.

    A lot of comment from the US right about Shabhana Mahmood in the Home Office, and some of the causes and protests to which she’s aligned herself in the past.
    I'm absolutely astonished that some on the US right would not be happy about somebody called Shabana Mahmood being HS in the UK. Baffling.
    Good thing that we've all realised that Americans sticking their oars into British politics is wrong and counterproductive.

    Or was then just when Obama did it?
  • More proof that Trump is a Russian asset, this is a death sentence for these people.

    ICE is sending Russian dissidents back to Russia. According to the ⁦@thetimes

    ⁩ When the dissidents arrived in Russia, the Russian authorities were given documents relating to their asylum applications in the US.


    https://x.com/Billbrowder/status/1964297062960279595

    Does that mean Nigey might be a Taliban asset sending Afghan ladies back to Kabul?
    I will be covering that in an upcoming thread, which will be adorned with my new favourite Farage picture.


    That's a very good picture
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 34,049
    edited September 7

    Is it because everyone relentlessly treated Rayner herself like some special-needs child, a young, underprivileged woman who they secretly suspected couldn’t read or write? If you look at the way Starmer spoke about her, it was constantly in these terms: she was a woman, and working class.

    Of her actual record, of course: no hint. She was the perfect deputy prime minister for him: a politician allowed to rise to the top on personality alone. And that personality was: middle-class person’s idea of what a working-class person should be. Slobby, ribald, partying in ’Beefa — isn’t vaping on inflatables what working-class people all do? Spoiler alert: it isn’t. Most working-class people are insulted to be compared to her.


    https://www.thetimes.com/comment/columnists/article/angela-rayner-no-working-class-hero-ptr88wp8b

    Rayner was someone from the bottom 10% who moved into the top 10% through the Labour party.

    Its no wonder that Labour politicians, people who are obsessed about the top 10% and bottom 10% and very little in between, turned Rayner into their living icon.

    Put the "scum" back in her box where she belongs? We need proper working class heroes like Boris Johnson, Nigel Farage and Lucy Connolly.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 80,916

    More proof that Trump is a Russian asset, this is a death sentence for these people.

    ICE is sending Russian dissidents back to Russia. According to the ⁦@thetimes

    ⁩ When the dissidents arrived in Russia, the Russian authorities were given documents relating to their asylum applications in the US.


    https://x.com/Billbrowder/status/1964297062960279595

    What does the UK do if the US fully restores relations with Russia while they're still at war in Ukraine ?

    For now that's still a bit unlikely, but what if Trump dies and Vance takes office ?
    I don't think this is about Trump alone.
  • isamisam Posts: 42,531

    Sandpit said:

    Pulpstar said:

    She's there because she's ostensibly better than Cooper, who has been useless in the home office, but instead of a straight demotion to justice has failed upwards to the easier and glitzier foreign office role; replacing Lammy - who, despite seriously low expectations has managed to build a good relationship particularly with the US VP but has now been given the sop of Deputy PM; a good personal relationship wiped out with the US administration because Starmer didn't dare demote Cooper.

    A lot of comment from the US right about Shabhana Mahmood in the Home Office, and some of the causes and protests to which she’s aligned herself in the past.
    I'm absolutely astonished that some on the US right would not be happy about somebody called Shabana Mahmood being HS in the UK. Baffling.
    Good thing that we've all realised that Americans sticking their oars into British politics is wrong and counterproductive.

    Or was then just when Obama did it?
    Probably a bit more meaningful when the POTUS pokes his nose into a referendum campaign than when someone on twitter mentions a cabinet reshuffle
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 52,999
    Thanks for the header, though I have no opinion on Mahmood. Let's see how she grasps the nettle.

    Good to see you writing headers again @Cyclefree and hope you are keeping well.

    Indeed it may inspire me to submit a few more headers that have been knocking around in my head.
  • stodgestodge Posts: 15,251

    Is it because everyone relentlessly treated Rayner herself like some special-needs child, a young, underprivileged woman who they secretly suspected couldn’t read or write? If you look at the way Starmer spoke about her, it was constantly in these terms: she was a woman, and working class.

    Of her actual record, of course: no hint. She was the perfect deputy prime minister for him: a politician allowed to rise to the top on personality alone. And that personality was: middle-class person’s idea of what a working-class person should be. Slobby, ribald, partying in ’Beefa — isn’t vaping on inflatables what working-class people all do? Spoiler alert: it isn’t. Most working-class people are insulted to be compared to her.


    https://www.thetimes.com/comment/columnists/article/angela-rayner-no-working-class-hero-ptr88wp8b

    Rayner was someone from the bottom 10% who moved into the top 10% through the Labour party.

    Its no wonder that Labour politicians, people who are obsessed about the top 10% and bottom 10% and very little in between, turned Rayner into their living icon.

    Put the "scum" back in her box where she belongs? We need proper working class heroes like Boris Johnson, Nigel Farage and Lucy Connolly.
    I have to say, reading that absurd drivel in what was once a genuinely significant newspaper, my "right to be offended" has been sorely tested.
  • I notice that the new Business Secretary Peter Kyle doesn't seem to have ever had a business or indeed worked in the private sector.

    Which is very similar to the previous Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds.

    Its a pity for Labour that there isn't a cabinet post for owning multiple homes and having dubious housing transactions.

    They would have no shortage of MPs with personal experience of those.
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 34,049

    More proof that Trump is a Russian asset, this is a death sentence for these people.

    ICE is sending Russian dissidents back to Russia. According to the ⁦@thetimes

    ⁩ When the dissidents arrived in Russia, the Russian authorities were given documents relating to their asylum applications in the US.


    https://x.com/Billbrowder/status/1964297062960279595

    Does that mean Nigey might be a Taliban asset sending Afghan ladies back to Kabul?
    I will be covering that in an upcoming thread, which will be adorned with my new favourite Farage picture.


    Does this mean you have dispensed with your previous favourite Farage picture, which I assume now adorns the BBC news noticeboard?
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 80,916
    stodge said:

    Morning all :)

    We've had some on here wailing it's like the 1930s while others have compared the current state to the 1970s.

    Needless to say, both are wrong - it's 1981 - who are the Soft Cell and the Adam & The Ants de nos jours?

    We have an insurgent party riding high in the polls whose leader basically tells their Party Conference to go back to your constituencies and prepare for a little disappointment (I may have misremembered that).

    We have a Government and Prime Minister slightly less popular than bubonic plague but determined to stay on couse and even making a virtue of its unwillingness to countenance any change in policy or direction after having performed any number of changes earlier in its time.

    We have a useless ineffective Opposition whose leader is under pressure from more radical colleagues.

    Yep, it's 1981 - all we need is a Royal Wedding and we can all do the Prince Charming - remember, ridicule is nothing to be scared of (the motto of the Liberal Democrats I believe).

    Where's the equivalent of Reagan's staunch support for NATO ?
  • The defence secretary says the reshuffle represents Keir Starmer "going up a gear" after a year of "sorting out the mess" he says was left behind by the previous Tory government.

    I don't think anybody is buying that BS.
  • isamisam Posts: 42,531
    edited September 7
    Foxy said:

    Thanks for the header, though I have no opinion on Mahmood. Let's see how she grasps the nettle.

    Good to see you writing headers again @Cyclefree and hope you are keeping well.

    Indeed it may inspire me to submit a few more headers that have been knocking around in my head.

    Yes, interesting header @Cyclefree. Hope you are keeping your spirits up

    Mahmood isn’t even listed on Betfair’s next PM market, but you can lay Holly Valance at 870 for £7
  • squareroot2squareroot2 Posts: 7,141

    Is it because everyone relentlessly treated Rayner herself like some special-needs child, a young, underprivileged woman who they secretly suspected couldn’t read or write? If you look at the way Starmer spoke about her, it was constantly in these terms: she was a woman, and working class.

    Of her actual record, of course: no hint. She was the perfect deputy prime minister for him: a politician allowed to rise to the top on personality alone. And that personality was: middle-class person’s idea of what a working-class person should be. Slobby, ribald, partying in ’Beefa — isn’t vaping on inflatables what working-class people all do? Spoiler alert: it isn’t. Most working-class people are insulted to be compared to her.


    https://www.thetimes.com/comment/columnists/article/angela-rayner-no-working-class-hero-ptr88wp8b

    Rayner was someone from the bottom 10% who moved into the top 10% through the Labour party.

    Its no wonder that Labour politicians, people who are obsessed about the top 10% and bottom 10% and very little in between, turned Rayner into their living icon.

    Her personality.. jeeez
  • JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 46,891
    FPT, as I think it's important:

    Taz said:

    Taz said:


    William Dalrymple
    @DalrympleWill
    ·
    3h
    BBC News is now running a full-blown recruitment campaign for Reform. This report, by the BBC political editor, doesn't even make a stab at neutrality in its breathless enthusiasm for Farage

    Reform conference shows party's growing ambition

    https://x.com/DalrympleWill/status/1964408520989708621

    Well it did. And I loathe Reform.
    Hitler was one popular.
    Godwins. And so early in the day.

    Springtime for Farage. He was just a paper hanger.
    May I ask; do you see any negatives, or have genuine criticisms, about Farage and his party?
    I have posted several here.

    Not being rabidly anti reform and seeing them as the new Nazis does not make one a supporter. I just find the hysteria around them odd
    I have a foreign-born wife. In fact, one who was born in a Muslim country. I don't think it's 'hysterical' to see what many Reform-aligned people say as a threat to her. And indeed, our son.
    Without being personal your wife presumably is culturally aligned to the UK? No veil, no prayers 5 times a day to a sky fairy, no calling for jihad? Most people upset about immigration from Muslim countries are partly upset by culture, not ethnicity. If they were all doctors, engineers, etc sharing a beer after work etc there would be a lot fewer issues.

    Those who have pushed multiculturalism have much to answer for. They might think it just means a great range of restaurants to eat in but forget it also sometimes means views that are counter to the British way of life.

    I saw a woman in a full on burwua/niquab or whatever the one is where you cannot even see the face, in Warminstwr. Walking behind a chap dressed in shorts and a T shirt. Maybe that's her choice. But how is she going to integrate like that?
    Mrs J is indeed culturally aligned to the UK. very much so in fact.

    But here's the point.

    To the racists, it won't matter. Wherever you look through history, people who have set one group up for a fall have rarely cared about the individual, only about their belonging to a group. Hence why Jews who fought for Germany in WW1 were still sent to the camps. If you were a good person, it did not matter. If you were a boon to the country, it did not matter. If you were brilliant in your field, it did not matter.

    All that mattered was that you were part of a certain group.

    And this is seen time and time again. The Rwandan genocide; Apartheid; racism in America's deep south.
  • More proof that Trump is a Russian asset, this is a death sentence for these people.

    ICE is sending Russian dissidents back to Russia. According to the ⁦@thetimes

    ⁩ When the dissidents arrived in Russia, the Russian authorities were given documents relating to their asylum applications in the US.


    https://x.com/Billbrowder/status/1964297062960279595

    Does that mean Nigey might be a Taliban asset sending Afghan ladies back to Kabul?
    I will be covering that in an upcoming thread, which will be adorned with my new favourite Farage picture.


    Does this mean you have dispensed with your previous favourite Farage picture, which I assume now adorns the BBC news noticeboard?
    I will use that picture when PBers annoy me, things like saying Die Hard is a Christmas movie, criticising Dave (pbuh) etc.
  • isamisam Posts: 42,531
    edited September 7
    isam said:

    Foxy said:

    Thanks for the header, though I have no opinion on Mahmood. Let's see how she grasps the nettle.

    Good to see you writing headers again @Cyclefree and hope you are keeping well.

    Indeed it may inspire me to submit a few more headers that have been knocking around in my head.

    Yes, interesting header @Cyclefree. Hope you are keeping your spirits up

    Mahmood isn’t even listed on Betfair’s next PM market, but you can lay Holly Valance at 870 for £7
    Mahmood is nominally 12/1 to be next Labour leader, although there’s no money there



  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 52,999
    stodge said:

    Is it because everyone relentlessly treated Rayner herself like some special-needs child, a young, underprivileged woman who they secretly suspected couldn’t read or write? If you look at the way Starmer spoke about her, it was constantly in these terms: she was a woman, and working class.

    Of her actual record, of course: no hint. She was the perfect deputy prime minister for him: a politician allowed to rise to the top on personality alone. And that personality was: middle-class person’s idea of what a working-class person should be. Slobby, ribald, partying in ’Beefa — isn’t vaping on inflatables what working-class people all do? Spoiler alert: it isn’t. Most working-class people are insulted to be compared to her.


    https://www.thetimes.com/comment/columnists/article/angela-rayner-no-working-class-hero-ptr88wp8b

    Rayner was someone from the bottom 10% who moved into the top 10% through the Labour party.

    Its no wonder that Labour politicians, people who are obsessed about the top 10% and bottom 10% and very little in between, turned Rayner into their living icon.

    Put the "scum" back in her box where she belongs? We need proper working class heroes like Boris Johnson, Nigel Farage and Lucy Connolly.
    I have to say, reading that absurd drivel in what was once a genuinely significant newspaper, my "right to be offended" has been sorely tested.
    I can't read through the paywall, but do wonder in what way Camilla Long is qualified to adjudicate on whether someone is working class.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camilla_Long
  • rkrkrkrkrkrk Posts: 8,788
    Interesting header - thank you.

    My suspicion is that the most realistic threat to Starmer in this parliament comes from the (relatively speaking) left of his party.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 80,916

    The defence secretary says the reshuffle represents Keir Starmer "going up a gear" after a year of "sorting out the mess" he says was left behind by the previous Tory government.

    I don't think anybody is buying that BS.

    That's up there with Starmer's "we did the hard yards in our first year".
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 87,380
    edited September 7

    I notice that the new Business Secretary Peter Kyle doesn't seem to have ever had a business or indeed worked in the private sector.

    Which is very similar to the previous Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds.

    Its a pity for Labour that there isn't a cabinet post for owning multiple homes and having dubious housing transactions.

    They would have no shortage of MPs with personal experience of those.

    I mentioned the other day that some tech people I know had dealings with him and they weren't impressed at all. Answer to everything AI, except you can't use that BS on people who do AI for a living. Greasy and clueless about tech / business was the summary.
  • Foxy said:

    stodge said:

    Is it because everyone relentlessly treated Rayner herself like some special-needs child, a young, underprivileged woman who they secretly suspected couldn’t read or write? If you look at the way Starmer spoke about her, it was constantly in these terms: she was a woman, and working class.

    Of her actual record, of course: no hint. She was the perfect deputy prime minister for him: a politician allowed to rise to the top on personality alone. And that personality was: middle-class person’s idea of what a working-class person should be. Slobby, ribald, partying in ’Beefa — isn’t vaping on inflatables what working-class people all do? Spoiler alert: it isn’t. Most working-class people are insulted to be compared to her.


    https://www.thetimes.com/comment/columnists/article/angela-rayner-no-working-class-hero-ptr88wp8b

    Rayner was someone from the bottom 10% who moved into the top 10% through the Labour party.

    Its no wonder that Labour politicians, people who are obsessed about the top 10% and bottom 10% and very little in between, turned Rayner into their living icon.

    Put the "scum" back in her box where she belongs? We need proper working class heroes like Boris Johnson, Nigel Farage and Lucy Connolly.
    I have to say, reading that absurd drivel in what was once a genuinely significant newspaper, my "right to be offended" has been sorely tested.
    I can't read through the paywall, but do wonder in what way Camilla Long is qualified to adjudicate on whether someone is working class.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camilla_Long
    Well Ms Long went to an absolute dump of a university, which is a bit like Angela Rayner attending the university of life.
  • numbertwelvenumbertwelve Posts: 7,985

    The defence secretary says the reshuffle represents Keir Starmer "going up a gear" after a year of "sorting out the mess" he says was left behind by the previous Tory government.

    I don't think anybody is buying that BS.

    Well it immediately invites the question why he wasn’t in top gear to start with!
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 80,916
    isam said:

    Sandpit said:

    Pulpstar said:

    She's there because she's ostensibly better than Cooper, who has been useless in the home office, but instead of a straight demotion to justice has failed upwards to the easier and glitzier foreign office role; replacing Lammy - who, despite seriously low expectations has managed to build a good relationship particularly with the US VP but has now been given the sop of Deputy PM; a good personal relationship wiped out with the US administration because Starmer didn't dare demote Cooper.

    A lot of comment from the US right about Shabhana Mahmood in the Home Office, and some of the causes and protests to which she’s aligned herself in the past.
    I'm absolutely astonished that some on the US right would not be happy about somebody called Shabana Mahmood being HS in the UK. Baffling.
    Good thing that we've all realised that Americans sticking their oars into British politics is wrong and counterproductive.

    Or was then just when Obama did it?
    Probably a bit more meaningful when the POTUS pokes his nose into a referendum campaign than when someone on twitter mentions a cabinet reshuffle
    In the age of the social media administration, is it ?
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 37,385
    "The Black Farmer: If you think rural Britain is racist, you’re wrong
    My experiences in Devon show the countryside is far more welcoming than the latest report on ‘normalised’ abuse would have you believe

    Wilfred Emmanuel-Jones"

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/09/02/black-farmer-branding-countryside-as-racist-is-a-mistake/?recomm_id=9d459d0e-d0b5-4de6-907e-d97cbe2896f6
  • isamisam Posts: 42,531
    Foxy said:

    stodge said:

    Is it because everyone relentlessly treated Rayner herself like some special-needs child, a young, underprivileged woman who they secretly suspected couldn’t read or write? If you look at the way Starmer spoke about her, it was constantly in these terms: she was a woman, and working class.

    Of her actual record, of course: no hint. She was the perfect deputy prime minister for him: a politician allowed to rise to the top on personality alone. And that personality was: middle-class person’s idea of what a working-class person should be. Slobby, ribald, partying in ’Beefa — isn’t vaping on inflatables what working-class people all do? Spoiler alert: it isn’t. Most working-class people are insulted to be compared to her.


    https://www.thetimes.com/comment/columnists/article/angela-rayner-no-working-class-hero-ptr88wp8b

    Rayner was someone from the bottom 10% who moved into the top 10% through the Labour party.

    Its no wonder that Labour politicians, people who are obsessed about the top 10% and bottom 10% and very little in between, turned Rayner into their living icon.

    Put the "scum" back in her box where she belongs? We need proper working class heroes like Boris Johnson, Nigel Farage and Lucy Connolly.
    I have to say, reading that absurd drivel in what was once a genuinely significant newspaper, my "right to be offended" has been sorely tested.
    I can't read through the paywall, but do wonder in what way Camilla Long is qualified to adjudicate on whether someone is working class.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camilla_Long
    Fuck me, don’t start that one
  • I see Mike Johnson is repeating the QAnon line that Donald Trump was in fact an informant for the FBI on Epstein.

    So like Kemi Badenoch, Trump is a snitch.
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 52,999

    I notice that the new Business Secretary Peter Kyle doesn't seem to have ever had a business or indeed worked in the private sector.

    Which is very similar to the previous Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds.

    Its a pity for Labour that there isn't a cabinet post for owning multiple homes and having dubious housing transactions.

    They would have no shortage of MPs with personal experience of those.

    Isn't that usual though?

    Health secretaries rarely have a background working in the sector, Transport secretaries rarely used to work on the railways or roads etc etc.

  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 34,049
    edited September 7

    The defence secretary says the reshuffle represents Keir Starmer "going up a gear" after a year of "sorting out the mess" he says was left behind by the previous Tory government.

    I don't think anybody is buying that BS.

    Indeed, this is PB. We all know the previous Government got all the big calls right and left a golden legacy.
  • CookieCookie Posts: 15,981
    stodge said:

    Is it because everyone relentlessly treated Rayner herself like some special-needs child, a young, underprivileged woman who they secretly suspected couldn’t read or write? If you look at the way Starmer spoke about her, it was constantly in these terms: she was a woman, and working class.

    Of her actual record, of course: no hint. She was the perfect deputy prime minister for him: a politician allowed to rise to the top on personality alone. And that personality was: middle-class person’s idea of what a working-class person should be. Slobby, ribald, partying in ’Beefa — isn’t vaping on inflatables what working-class people all do? Spoiler alert: it isn’t. Most working-class people are insulted to be compared to her.


    https://www.thetimes.com/comment/columnists/article/angela-rayner-no-working-class-hero-ptr88wp8b

    Rayner was someone from the bottom 10% who moved into the top 10% through the Labour party.

    Its no wonder that Labour politicians, people who are obsessed about the top 10% and bottom 10% and very little in between, turned Rayner into their living icon.

    Put the "scum" back in her box where she belongs? We need proper working class heroes like Boris Johnson, Nigel Farage and Lucy Connolly.
    I have to say, reading that absurd drivel in what was once a genuinely significant newspaper, my "right to be offended" has been sorely tested.
    Apart from calling her 'slobby' I ho estlybdon't see the problem. She has got where she is purely on identity, because Labour is obsessed with identity. As a minister she's been a failure.
  • isamisam Posts: 42,531
    Nigelb said:

    isam said:

    Sandpit said:

    Pulpstar said:

    She's there because she's ostensibly better than Cooper, who has been useless in the home office, but instead of a straight demotion to justice has failed upwards to the easier and glitzier foreign office role; replacing Lammy - who, despite seriously low expectations has managed to build a good relationship particularly with the US VP but has now been given the sop of Deputy PM; a good personal relationship wiped out with the US administration because Starmer didn't dare demote Cooper.

    A lot of comment from the US right about Shabhana Mahmood in the Home Office, and some of the causes and protests to which she’s aligned herself in the past.
    I'm absolutely astonished that some on the US right would not be happy about somebody called Shabana Mahmood being HS in the UK. Baffling.
    Good thing that we've all realised that Americans sticking their oars into British politics is wrong and counterproductive.

    Or was then just when Obama did it?
    Probably a bit more meaningful when the POTUS pokes his nose into a referendum campaign than when someone on twitter mentions a cabinet reshuffle
    In the age of the social media administration, is it ?
    I obviously think so. Even if you think the President is no longer more influential than Twitter randoms, interference in an election campaign vs the appointment of a cabinet member is more significant
  • SandpitSandpit Posts: 56,822
    On the previous thread’s subject of national anthems, anyone watching the F2 race at Monza just heard God Save the King.

    With any luck, we’ll be hearing it again after the F1 race later.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 80,916
    Nigelb said:

    isam said:

    Sandpit said:

    Pulpstar said:

    She's there because she's ostensibly better than Cooper, who has been useless in the home office, but instead of a straight demotion to justice has failed upwards to the easier and glitzier foreign office role; replacing Lammy - who, despite seriously low expectations has managed to build a good relationship particularly with the US VP but has now been given the sop of Deputy PM; a good personal relationship wiped out with the US administration because Starmer didn't dare demote Cooper.

    A lot of comment from the US right about Shabhana Mahmood in the Home Office, and some of the causes and protests to which she’s aligned herself in the past.
    I'm absolutely astonished that some on the US right would not be happy about somebody called Shabana Mahmood being HS in the UK. Baffling.
    Good thing that we've all realised that Americans sticking their oars into British politics is wrong and counterproductive.

    Or was then just when Obama did it?
    Probably a bit more meaningful when the POTUS pokes his nose into a referendum campaign than when someone on twitter mentions a cabinet reshuffle
    In the age of the social media administration, is it ?
    The VP and one of his party's senators conduct their policy discussions there.

    Killing cartel members who poison our fellow citizens is the highest and best use of our military.
    https://x.com/JDVance/status/1964341094226743787

    JD “I don’t give a shit” Vance says killing people he accuses of a crime is the “highest and best use of the military.”

    Did he ever read To Kill a Mockingbird?

    Did he ever wonder what might happen if the accused were immediately executed without trial or representation??

    What a despicable and thoughtless sentiment it is to glorify killing someone without a trial.

    https://x.com/RandPaul/status/1964494191783714933
  • Badenoch: 'We have to show the electorate we're ready'

    Not doing a very good job so far.
  • JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 46,891
    Phil said:

    Andy_JS said:

    "The Black Farmer: If you think rural Britain is racist, you’re wrong
    My experiences in Devon show the countryside is far more welcoming than the latest report on ‘normalised’ abuse would have you believe

    Wilfred Emmanuel-Jones"

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/09/02/black-farmer-branding-countryside-as-racist-is-a-mistake/?recomm_id=9d459d0e-d0b5-4de6-907e-d97cbe2896f6

    IIRC if you look at the comparative surveys that ask questions like: “would you be happy with a family with a different skin colour moving in next door?” or “Would you react negatively to your daughter marrying someone of a different race?” the UK is one of the least racist countries in Europe, possibly on the planet.

    Which doesn’t make us a pure, prefect land of colour blind plenty, but it is food for thought.
    As I've said many times passim, Mrs J has never suffered any overt racist abuse in the UK. On the first evening on a trip through Germany, she did.

    So yes, for someone who tries hard to 'fit in' to her new home and culture, and who lives in, and works in, an area that is fairly multicultural, it is not bad at all. But that is far from being the experience of all.
  • Northern_AlNorthern_Al Posts: 9,054
    edited September 7
    I occasionally look at the Mail to keep my finger on the pulse. One of today's headlines is:

    Forensic handwriting experts say Sir Keir's letter to Angela Rayner reveals a man who is 'untrustworthy', 'two-faced' and 'likes to control'.

    Devastating for SKS. I'll bet he wished he'd typed it.
    Alternatively, political discourse in the Mail is the pits.
  • isamisam Posts: 42,531
    edited September 7

    I see Mike Johnson is repeating the QAnon line that Donald Trump was in fact an informant for the FBI on Epstein.

    So like Kemi Badenoch, Trump is a snitch.

    I was reading ‘Long Walk to Freedom’ yesterday and, when a prefect, Mandela had a decision to make on whether to dob in a fellow prefect for urinating out of a window. He’d already caught 15 non prefects, and decided against reporting anyone at all so as not to have ‘two tier justice’ one might say. As I was getting to the end of that story I though he was going to grass them all up, and wonders if it had been the inspiration for Badenoch’s snitching, but no
  • I occasionally look at the Mail to keep my finger on the pulse. One of today's headlines is:

    Forensic handwriting experts say Sir Keir's letter to Angela Rayner reveals a man who is 'untrustworthy', 'two-faced' and 'likes to control'.

    Devastating for SKS. I'll be he wished he'd typed it.
    Alternatively, political discourse in the Mail is the pits.

    Let me introduce you to the idea of click bait.....
  • boulayboulay Posts: 7,217

    I see Mike Johnson is repeating the QAnon line that Donald Trump was in fact an informant for the FBI on Epstein.

    So like Kemi Badenoch, Trump is a snitch.

    I’m guessing the FBI in question is this lot though.



    How they laughed.
  • wooliedyedwooliedyed Posts: 13,897

    Badenoch: 'We have to show the electorate we're ready'

    Not doing a very good job so far.

    That's why you keep showing it until it is a good job.
    They wont be ready to come back until they are ready to come back. Which is not achieved by inertia.
    Theres some fucked up feathers between duckling and Swan
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 34,049

    I see Mike Johnson is repeating the QAnon line that Donald Trump was in fact an informant for the FBI on Epstein.

    So like Kemi Badenoch, Trump is a snitch.

    I suspect that is largely true. Although it wasn't out of altruism so much as protecting oneself from a former friend he just f***** over.
  • PhilPhil Posts: 2,922

    Is it because everyone relentlessly treated Rayner herself like some special-needs child, a young, underprivileged woman who they secretly suspected couldn’t read or write? If you look at the way Starmer spoke about her, it was constantly in these terms: she was a woman, and working class.

    Of her actual record, of course: no hint. She was the perfect deputy prime minister for him: a politician allowed to rise to the top on personality alone. And that personality was: middle-class person’s idea of what a working-class person should be. Slobby, ribald, partying in ’Beefa — isn’t vaping on inflatables what working-class people all do? Spoiler alert: it isn’t. Most working-class people are insulted to be compared to her.


    https://www.thetimes.com/comment/columnists/article/angela-rayner-no-working-class-hero-ptr88wp8b

    Rayner was someone from the bottom 10% who moved into the top 10% through the Labour party.

    Its no wonder that Labour politicians, people who are obsessed about the top 10% and bottom 10% and very little in between, turned Rayner into their living icon.

    The Independent is gunning for Farage over taxes today, perhaps hoping that the Rayner zeitgeist will enable another scalp.

    Question for the lawyers: if Farage had provided the £800k for his girlfriend to buy the flat in Clacton which he later claimed to own, does this actually open him up to any legal liability? It appears on the face of it that he has structured this transaction to avoid paying the higher rate of stamp duty.

    If the £800k was a gift & the girlfriend gets to keep the property free & clear if they break up, then obviously he’s fine. But HMRC might well look at this transaction as one being structured to avoid tax & the property being “really” owned by Farage acting in a similar fashion to a shadow director of a limited company. Is that actually prosecutable though? My instincts say no, but that doesn’t mean much in this area!
  • JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 46,891

    The defence secretary says the reshuffle represents Keir Starmer "going up a gear" after a year of "sorting out the mess" he says was left behind by the previous Tory government.

    I don't think anybody is buying that BS.

    Indeed, this is PB. We all know the previous Government got all the big calls right and left a golden legacy.
    Several things to say to that:

    *) Arguments can be made that the previous goverment got the big calls right - especially vaccines and Ukraine. Notable about Covid was Starmer calling for another lockdown very late during the crisis, which was not needed. That does not mean they didn't get many other things wrong, or were good.

    *) Labour are now in power. The longer they are in power, the more responsibility they have for the mess. Harking back to the previous lot will sound increasingly shrill as this government drifts on.

    *) Many of the things causing them problems - from the incredible grifting that was going on, to Rayner's stupidity (at best) over her housing are totally their own doing. Utterly unforced errors.
  • numbertwelvenumbertwelve Posts: 7,985
    edited September 7

    Badenoch: 'We have to show the electorate we're ready'

    Not doing a very good job so far.

    There is precisely nothing that Badenoch has done in her first 9 months that convinces me she has any idea the radical steps needed to get the Tories back to power. In that time, the only thing she’s really done is try to defend the previous government (badly) in a series of generally sub-par PMQs performances against a PM who leaves open goals all over the place.

    I think it’s too late for Badenoch now. She will be the fall girl for the 2026 elections and it’ll be someone else who needs to try and save the Party.
  • OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 35,654

    Phil said:

    Andy_JS said:

    "The Black Farmer: If you think rural Britain is racist, you’re wrong
    My experiences in Devon show the countryside is far more welcoming than the latest report on ‘normalised’ abuse would have you believe

    Wilfred Emmanuel-Jones"

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/09/02/black-farmer-branding-countryside-as-racist-is-a-mistake/?recomm_id=9d459d0e-d0b5-4de6-907e-d97cbe2896f6

    IIRC if you look at the comparative surveys that ask questions like: “would you be happy with a family with a different skin colour moving in next door?” or “Would you react negatively to your daughter marrying someone of a different race?” the UK is one of the least racist countries in Europe, possibly on the planet.

    Which doesn’t make us a pure, prefect land of colour blind plenty, but it is food for thought.
    As I've said many times passim, Mrs J has never suffered any overt racist abuse in the UK. On the first evening on a trip through Germany, she did.

    So yes, for someone who tries hard to 'fit in' to her new home and culture, and who lives in, and works in, an area that is fairly multicultural, it is not bad at all. But that is far from being the experience of all.
    Morning all. Lovely day again!

    One of my daughters-in-law is Thai. AFAIK she's also never experienced racist abuse here. Nor, AFAIK has her husband in Thailand.
    One of my granddaughters spent a few months waitressing here while she and one of her UK cousins put together enough money for a trip round Europe. The only 'racialism' she experienced was being asked, while waitressing, where she came from. When she told them, all she had was friendly interest.
  • ohnotnowohnotnow Posts: 5,328

    I notice that the new Business Secretary Peter Kyle doesn't seem to have ever had a business or indeed worked in the private sector.

    Which is very similar to the previous Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds.

    Its a pity for Labour that there isn't a cabinet post for owning multiple homes and having dubious housing transactions.

    They would have no shortage of MPs with personal experience of those.

    I mentioned the other day that some tech people I know had dealings with him and they weren't impressed at all. Answer to everything AI, except you can't use that BS on people who do AI for a living. Greasy and clueless about tech / business was the summary.
    I was asked to get 'the AI' to copy some files between network shares recently. Sad and confused times all round.
  • CookieCookie Posts: 15,981
    Foxy said:

    stodge said:

    Is it because everyone relentlessly treated Rayner herself like some special-needs child, a young, underprivileged woman who they secretly suspected couldn’t read or write? If you look at the way Starmer spoke about her, it was constantly in these terms: she was a woman, and working class.

    Of her actual record, of course: no hint. She was the perfect deputy prime minister for him: a politician allowed to rise to the top on personality alone. And that personality was: middle-class person’s idea of what a working-class person should be. Slobby, ribald, partying in ’Beefa — isn’t vaping on inflatables what working-class people all do? Spoiler alert: it isn’t. Most working-class people are insulted to be compared to her.


    https://www.thetimes.com/comment/columnists/article/angela-rayner-no-working-class-hero-ptr88wp8b

    Rayner was someone from the bottom 10% who moved into the top 10% through the Labour party.

    Its no wonder that Labour politicians, people who are obsessed about the top 10% and bottom 10% and very little in between, turned Rayner into their living icon.

    Put the "scum" back in her box where she belongs? We need proper working class heroes like Boris Johnson, Nigel Farage and Lucy Connolly.
    I have to say, reading that absurd drivel in what was once a genuinely significant newspaper, my "right to be offended" has been sorely tested.
    I can't read through the paywall, but do wonder in what way Camilla Long is qualified to adjudicate on whether someone is working class.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camilla_Long
    Eh? Camilla Long is not suggesting Angela isn't working class. Are you suggesting she's wrong?
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 34,049
    edited September 7

    The defence secretary says the reshuffle represents Keir Starmer "going up a gear" after a year of "sorting out the mess" he says was left behind by the previous Tory government.

    I don't think anybody is buying that BS.

    Indeed, this is PB. We all know the previous Government got all the big calls right and left a golden legacy.
    Several things to say to that:

    *) Arguments can be made that the previous goverment got the big calls right - especially vaccines and Ukraine. Notable about Covid was Starmer calling for another lockdown very late during the crisis, which was not needed. That does not mean they didn't get many other things wrong, or were good.

    *) Labour are now in power. The longer they are in power, the more responsibility they have for the mess. Harking back to the previous lot will sound increasingly shrill as this government drifts on.

    *) Many of the things causing them problems - from the incredible grifting that was going on, to Rayner's stupidity (at best) over her housing are totally their own doing. Utterly unforced errors.
    I was being mischievous.

    Although as Chris Philp has hinted. There wasn't a small boat problem before July last year.
  • OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 35,654

    Badenoch: 'We have to show the electorate we're ready'

    Not doing a very good job so far.

    There is precisely nothing that Badenoch has done in her first 9 months that convinces me she has any idea the radical steps needed to get the Tories back to power. In that time, the only thing she’s really done is try to defend the previous government (badly) in a series of generally sub-par PMQs performances against a PM who leaves open goals all over the place.

    I think it’s too late for Badenoch now. She will be the fall girl for the 2026 elections and it’ll be someone else who needs to try and save the Party.
    She came over as very aggressive this morning.
  • ohnotnowohnotnow Posts: 5,328

    FPT, as I think it's important:

    Taz said:

    Taz said:


    William Dalrymple
    @DalrympleWill
    ·
    3h
    BBC News is now running a full-blown recruitment campaign for Reform. This report, by the BBC political editor, doesn't even make a stab at neutrality in its breathless enthusiasm for Farage

    Reform conference shows party's growing ambition

    https://x.com/DalrympleWill/status/1964408520989708621

    Well it did. And I loathe Reform.
    Hitler was one popular.
    Godwins. And so early in the day.

    Springtime for Farage. He was just a paper hanger.
    May I ask; do you see any negatives, or have genuine criticisms, about Farage and his party?
    I have posted several here.

    Not being rabidly anti reform and seeing them as the new Nazis does not make one a supporter. I just find the hysteria around them odd
    I have a foreign-born wife. In fact, one who was born in a Muslim country. I don't think it's 'hysterical' to see what many Reform-aligned people say as a threat to her. And indeed, our son.
    Without being personal your wife presumably is culturally aligned to the UK? No veil, no prayers 5 times a day to a sky fairy, no calling for jihad? Most people upset about immigration from Muslim countries are partly upset by culture, not ethnicity. If they were all doctors, engineers, etc sharing a beer after work etc there would be a lot fewer issues.

    Those who have pushed multiculturalism have much to answer for. They might think it just means a great range of restaurants to eat in but forget it also sometimes means views that are counter to the British way of life.

    I saw a woman in a full on burwua/niquab or whatever the one is where you cannot even see the face, in Warminstwr. Walking behind a chap dressed in shorts and a T shirt. Maybe that's her choice. But how is she going to integrate like that?
    Mrs J is indeed culturally aligned to the UK. very much so in fact.

    But here's the point.

    To the racists, it won't matter. Wherever you look through history, people who have set one group up for a fall have rarely cared about the individual, only about their belonging to a group. Hence why Jews who fought for Germany in WW1 were still sent to the camps. If you were a good person, it did not matter. If you were a boon to the country, it did not matter. If you were brilliant in your field, it did not matter.

    All that mattered was that you were part of a certain group.

    And this is seen time and time again. The Rwandan genocide; Apartheid; racism in America's deep south.
    I misread that as 'culinarily aligned to the UK' and thought 'the poor woman'....
  • CookieCookie Posts: 15,981
    TimS said:

    Phil said:

    Andy_JS said:

    "The Black Farmer: If you think rural Britain is racist, you’re wrong
    My experiences in Devon show the countryside is far more welcoming than the latest report on ‘normalised’ abuse would have you believe

    Wilfred Emmanuel-Jones"

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/09/02/black-farmer-branding-countryside-as-racist-is-a-mistake/?recomm_id=9d459d0e-d0b5-4de6-907e-d97cbe2896f6

    IIRC if you look at the comparative surveys that ask questions like: “would you be happy with a family with a different skin colour moving in next door?” or “Would you react negatively to your daughter marrying someone of a different race?” the UK is one of the least racist countries in Europe, possibly on the planet.

    Which doesn’t make us a pure, prefect land of colour blind plenty, but it is food for thought.
    It’s consistently been a bright spot in Britain’s comparative rankings. Race has been far less of a salient issue than elsewhere.

    Now the Americans and their British enablers are trying to take even that away from us.
    Yes. Though I'd also argue the identarian left who aee racism in everything and who demand special pivileges for different races are also trying to take that away from us.
  • Northern_AlNorthern_Al Posts: 9,054
    Phil said:

    Andy_JS said:

    "The Black Farmer: If you think rural Britain is racist, you’re wrong
    My experiences in Devon show the countryside is far more welcoming than the latest report on ‘normalised’ abuse would have you believe

    Wilfred Emmanuel-Jones"

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/09/02/black-farmer-branding-countryside-as-racist-is-a-mistake/?recomm_id=9d459d0e-d0b5-4de6-907e-d97cbe2896f6

    IIRC if you look at the comparative surveys that ask questions like: “would you be happy with a family with a different skin colour moving in next door?” or “Would you react negatively to your daughter marrying someone of a different race?” the UK is one of the least racist countries in Europe, possibly on the planet.

    Which doesn’t make us a pure, prefect land of colour blind plenty, but it is food for thought.
    While that is true, it's not inevitable that the data moves one way, towards us being even less racist.

    There are worrying signs that racism towards certain groups is becoming more 'respectable' again, fuelled by the current dehumanising attitudes towards asylum seekers and the call in some quarters for 'mass deportations'.
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 67,803
    Shabana is now basically the minister for small boats.

    We have to hope she can crack this or otherwise the voters will invite Farage to have a go.

  • wooliedyedwooliedyed Posts: 13,897
    edited September 7

    Badenoch: 'We have to show the electorate we're ready'

    Not doing a very good job so far.

    There is precisely nothing that Badenoch has done in her first 9 months that convinces me she has any idea the radical steps needed to get the Tories back to power. In that time, the only thing she’s really done is try to defend the previous government (badly) in a sense of generally sub-par PMQs performances against a PM who leaves open goals all over the place.

    I think it’s too late for Badenoch now. She will be the fall girl for the 2026 elections and it’ll be someone else who needs to try and save the Party.
    Badenoch is an interesting one. I agree shes likely to go in May after they take a (slightly less horrific than 2025) drubbing but the Tories being in third has hidden her underwhelmingness a bit. Her personal ratings are poor but not catastrophic bolstered by lower negatives (the invisibility factor). She has far fewer negatives than Starmer and similar numbers of negs to Farage but far fewer positives.
    If she were able to find some way of boosting her positives from 19 to mid 20s the 'recovery' to 2024 static would be on and 120 to 150 seats is orobably the upper limit of Tory potential unless Reform implode.
    Edit to add - her personal ratings have recovered slightly from their floor in May
  • RogerRoger Posts: 21,005
    Who is 'The Jewish Community' of which you speak? Those who march behind the Israeli flag like today claiming to be against anti semitism? Or the Board of deputies who supported until his death their late President Greville Janner* You would think those who will today march behind the Netanyahu flag might have the humility to ask themselves what in Hell's name are they supporting.

    *https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/oct/12/culture-of-deference-may-have-protected-lord-jenner-abuse-inquiry-hears
  • SandpitSandpit Posts: 56,822
    TimS said:

    Sandpit said:

    Pulpstar said:

    She's there because she's ostensibly better than Cooper, who has been useless in the home office, but instead of a straight demotion to justice has failed upwards to the easier and glitzier foreign office role; replacing Lammy - who, despite seriously low expectations has managed to build a good relationship particularly with the US VP but has now been given the sop of Deputy PM; a good personal relationship wiped out with the US administration because Starmer didn't dare demote Cooper.

    A lot of comment from the US right about Shabhana Mahmood in the Home Office, and some of the causes and protests to which she’s aligned herself in the past.
    I remember the good old days when it was none of their fucking business.
    Great in theory, but when the comments look like this it’s potentially concerning for the UK government.

    https://x.com/bgatesisapyscho/status/1964554012352500054
    “Calls for America to restrict its ‘Intelligence Sharing’ with the UK following the appointment of Shabana Mahmood to UK Home Secretary.
    “Mahmood swore her oath to UK Office on the Quran & has attended Pro Hamas Rallies that have called for the ‘Globalisation of the Intifada’.”

    https://x.com/kevin_rainville/status/1964360369155043682
    @DNIGabbard @SecRubio Five Eyes Intelligence Services MUST exclude the UK from receiving any further data. Mahmood has publicly stated multiple times that Islam governs EVERY facet of her life. Such as spying for the IRGC and practicing Taqiyah during international relations.”

    https://x.com/steve_zivin/status/1964295446358090075
    “I am not sure Americans realize how outrageous this is. We need to immediately reevaluate intelligence sharing. Mahmood has refused to condemn Palestinian activists sabotaging British military hardware as well as championing boycotts of Jews.“
  • Is it because everyone relentlessly treated Rayner herself like some special-needs child, a young, underprivileged woman who they secretly suspected couldn’t read or write? If you look at the way Starmer spoke about her, it was constantly in these terms: she was a woman, and working class.

    Of her actual record, of course: no hint. She was the perfect deputy prime minister for him: a politician allowed to rise to the top on personality alone. And that personality was: middle-class person’s idea of what a working-class person should be. Slobby, ribald, partying in ’Beefa — isn’t vaping on inflatables what working-class people all do? Spoiler alert: it isn’t. Most working-class people are insulted to be compared to her.


    https://www.thetimes.com/comment/columnists/article/angela-rayner-no-working-class-hero-ptr88wp8b

    Rayner was someone from the bottom 10% who moved into the top 10% through the Labour party.

    Its no wonder that Labour politicians, people who are obsessed about the top 10% and bottom 10% and very little in between, turned Rayner into their living icon.

    Put the "scum" back in her box where she belongs? We need proper working class heroes like Boris Johnson, Nigel Farage and Lucy Connolly.
    Poshos at the top is the standard order of things, which is why nobody was bothered about the likes of Blair and Darling.

    Whereas Rayner is disconcerting, having gone from bottom 10% to top 10%, entirely through the medium of the Labour party.

    That appears great to Labour politicians who are obsessed about those at the top and those at the bottom.

    But less so to the 80% who get the impression that Labour isn't interested in them.

    There are, of course, other people who have gone from bottom 10% to top 10% - in sport, in entertainment, even in business. But these people leave a trail of visible achievement whereas Rayner was a pretty rubbish housing minister for a year.
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 34,049

    Badenoch: 'We have to show the electorate we're ready'

    Not doing a very good job so far.

    There is precisely nothing that Badenoch has done in her first 9 months that convinces me she has any idea the radical steps needed to get the Tories back to power. In that time, the only thing she’s really done is try to defend the previous government (badly) in a series of generally sub-par PMQs performances against a PM who leaves open goals all over the place.

    I think it’s too late for Badenoch now. She will be the fall girl for the 2026 elections and it’ll be someone else who needs to try and save the Party.
    She came over as very aggressive this morning.
    I do hope Rayner's lawyers are checking over what she said in Essex on Friday.
  • SandpitSandpit Posts: 56,822

    Phil said:

    Andy_JS said:

    "The Black Farmer: If you think rural Britain is racist, you’re wrong
    My experiences in Devon show the countryside is far more welcoming than the latest report on ‘normalised’ abuse would have you believe

    Wilfred Emmanuel-Jones"

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/09/02/black-farmer-branding-countryside-as-racist-is-a-mistake/?recomm_id=9d459d0e-d0b5-4de6-907e-d97cbe2896f6

    IIRC if you look at the comparative surveys that ask questions like: “would you be happy with a family with a different skin colour moving in next door?” or “Would you react negatively to your daughter marrying someone of a different race?” the UK is one of the least racist countries in Europe, possibly on the planet.

    Which doesn’t make us a pure, prefect land of colour blind plenty, but it is food for thought.
    While that is true, it's not inevitable that the data moves one way, towards us being even less racist.

    There are worrying signs that racism towards certain groups is becoming more 'respectable' again, fuelled by the current dehumanising attitudes towards asylum seekers and the call in some quarters for 'mass deportations'.
    Yes, it’s quite possible that two decades of identity politics and multiculturalism, seeing race and gender in everything, has the potential to reverse the trend towards a less-racist country.
  • TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 45,053

    I see Mike Johnson is repeating the QAnon line that Donald Trump was in fact an informant for the FBI on Epstein.

    So like Kemi Badenoch, Trump is a snitch.

    If there's anything that confirms that Trump appears frequently in the Epstein files, it's these gimps trying to portray the 'activities' of Agent Orange as on behalf of the Feds.
  • StillWatersStillWaters Posts: 10,812

    I have decided Louise Haigh is a Reform/Tory/Lib Dem plant because I am not sure the optics of this will be good for Labour.

    Louise Haigh shrugs off fraud controversy with run for deputy leader

    The former transport secretary, who resigned after a past fraud conviction emerged, has told friends that she plans to run in the party election


    https://www.thetimes.com/article/7fe538f3-19d0-45b7-98e2-369e074436bc

    The LibDems seem to have plants everywhere. Are we sure they’re not vegetables?
  • JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 46,891
    ohnotnow said:

    FPT, as I think it's important:

    Taz said:

    Taz said:


    William Dalrymple
    @DalrympleWill
    ·
    3h
    BBC News is now running a full-blown recruitment campaign for Reform. This report, by the BBC political editor, doesn't even make a stab at neutrality in its breathless enthusiasm for Farage

    Reform conference shows party's growing ambition

    https://x.com/DalrympleWill/status/1964408520989708621

    Well it did. And I loathe Reform.
    Hitler was one popular.
    Godwins. And so early in the day.

    Springtime for Farage. He was just a paper hanger.
    May I ask; do you see any negatives, or have genuine criticisms, about Farage and his party?
    I have posted several here.

    Not being rabidly anti reform and seeing them as the new Nazis does not make one a supporter. I just find the hysteria around them odd
    I have a foreign-born wife. In fact, one who was born in a Muslim country. I don't think it's 'hysterical' to see what many Reform-aligned people say as a threat to her. And indeed, our son.
    Without being personal your wife presumably is culturally aligned to the UK? No veil, no prayers 5 times a day to a sky fairy, no calling for jihad? Most people upset about immigration from Muslim countries are partly upset by culture, not ethnicity. If they were all doctors, engineers, etc sharing a beer after work etc there would be a lot fewer issues.

    Those who have pushed multiculturalism have much to answer for. They might think it just means a great range of restaurants to eat in but forget it also sometimes means views that are counter to the British way of life.

    I saw a woman in a full on burwua/niquab or whatever the one is where you cannot even see the face, in Warminstwr. Walking behind a chap dressed in shorts and a T shirt. Maybe that's her choice. But how is she going to integrate like that?
    Mrs J is indeed culturally aligned to the UK. very much so in fact.

    But here's the point.

    To the racists, it won't matter. Wherever you look through history, people who have set one group up for a fall have rarely cared about the individual, only about their belonging to a group. Hence why Jews who fought for Germany in WW1 were still sent to the camps. If you were a good person, it did not matter. If you were a boon to the country, it did not matter. If you were brilliant in your field, it did not matter.

    All that mattered was that you were part of a certain group.

    And this is seen time and time again. The Rwandan genocide; Apartheid; racism in America's deep south.
    I misread that as 'culinarily aligned to the UK' and thought 'the poor woman'....
    Well, I do do a lot of cooking... ;)
  • Phil said:

    Is it because everyone relentlessly treated Rayner herself like some special-needs child, a young, underprivileged woman who they secretly suspected couldn’t read or write? If you look at the way Starmer spoke about her, it was constantly in these terms: she was a woman, and working class.

    Of her actual record, of course: no hint. She was the perfect deputy prime minister for him: a politician allowed to rise to the top on personality alone. And that personality was: middle-class person’s idea of what a working-class person should be. Slobby, ribald, partying in ’Beefa — isn’t vaping on inflatables what working-class people all do? Spoiler alert: it isn’t. Most working-class people are insulted to be compared to her.


    https://www.thetimes.com/comment/columnists/article/angela-rayner-no-working-class-hero-ptr88wp8b

    Rayner was someone from the bottom 10% who moved into the top 10% through the Labour party.

    Its no wonder that Labour politicians, people who are obsessed about the top 10% and bottom 10% and very little in between, turned Rayner into their living icon.

    The Independent is gunning for Farage over taxes today, perhaps hoping that the Rayner zeitgeist will enable another scalp.

    Question for the lawyers: if Farage had provided the £800k for his girlfriend to buy the flat in Clacton which he later claimed to own, does this actually open him up to any legal liability? It appears on the face of it that he has structured this transaction to avoid paying the higher rate of stamp duty.

    If the £800k was a gift & the girlfriend gets to keep the property free & clear if they break up, then obviously he’s fine. But HMRC might well look at this transaction as one being structured to avoid tax & the property being “really” owned by Farage acting in a similar fashion to a shadow director of a limited company. Is that actually prosecutable though? My instincts say no, but that doesn’t mean much in this area!
    Farage said this morning that his girlfiend is very wealthy and bought the house which he lives in with her

    I do not like Farage at all but this is a non story

    Lots of more important ones, like sending women back to Afghanistan and Iran and is thinking about what to do with children

    Or having an anti vaxer on his stage spouting dangerous nonsense

    Or his delusion on reducing taxes and tens of billions of pounds gap in his solution

    And many more now, and to come
  • StillWatersStillWaters Posts: 10,812
    Cookie said:

    Was 'unfit for purpose' John Reid? It was a phrase I hadn't heard before he used it. After that it was suddenly everywhere.

    Yes, although it was “not fit for purpose”
  • CookieCookie Posts: 15,981
    Sandpit said:

    Phil said:

    Andy_JS said:

    "The Black Farmer: If you think rural Britain is racist, you’re wrong
    My experiences in Devon show the countryside is far more welcoming than the latest report on ‘normalised’ abuse would have you believe

    Wilfred Emmanuel-Jones"

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/09/02/black-farmer-branding-countryside-as-racist-is-a-mistake/?recomm_id=9d459d0e-d0b5-4de6-907e-d97cbe2896f6

    IIRC if you look at the comparative surveys that ask questions like: “would you be happy with a family with a different skin colour moving in next door?” or “Would you react negatively to your daughter marrying someone of a different race?” the UK is one of the least racist countries in Europe, possibly on the planet.

    Which doesn’t make us a pure, prefect land of colour blind plenty, but it is food for thought.
    While that is true, it's not inevitable that the data moves one way, towards us being even less racist.

    There are worrying signs that racism towards certain groups is becoming more 'respectable' again, fuelled by the current dehumanising attitudes towards asylum seekers and the call in some quarters for 'mass deportations'.
    Yes, it’s quite possible that two decades of identity politics and multiculturalism, seeing race and gender in everything, has the potential to reverse the trend towards a less-racist country.
    Yes, I agree - I'd argue the UK of 2005 or thereabouts was as unracist as its possible for a society to be. The identity politics we've had since then has got us to the rather less harmonioua state we are in now.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 52,785
    edited September 7
    Although being one of the three most senior posts, history suggests that progressing from there to PM is extremely uncommon. When the PM role becomes vacant, it's the Chancellor and FS who are best placed to pitch for the top job.

    Which is why I think Cooper comes out well from the recent shuffle in terms of her prospects. Although she may have under-performed particularly from a media/comms perspective, she has avoided any of the major scandals, disasters or blunders that killed the careers of so many previous Home Secs, and now she's FS she could pitch for a future leadership having done two out of the three most senior roles.

    Given that Reeves is already tarnished and Mahmood is brand new (and inherits the poisoned chalice), Cooper is effectively heir apparent. Yes, there's Streeting hanging about in the wings, but people underestimate how unpopular he is with many party members, making the young Blair look like a hero of socialism by comparison.
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 34,049
    edited September 7

    Is it because everyone relentlessly treated Rayner herself like some special-needs child, a young, underprivileged woman who they secretly suspected couldn’t read or write? If you look at the way Starmer spoke about her, it was constantly in these terms: she was a woman, and working class.

    Of her actual record, of course: no hint. She was the perfect deputy prime minister for him: a politician allowed to rise to the top on personality alone. And that personality was: middle-class person’s idea of what a working-class person should be. Slobby, ribald, partying in ’Beefa — isn’t vaping on inflatables what working-class people all do? Spoiler alert: it isn’t. Most working-class people are insulted to be compared to her.


    https://www.thetimes.com/comment/columnists/article/angela-rayner-no-working-class-hero-ptr88wp8b

    Rayner was someone from the bottom 10% who moved into the top 10% through the Labour party.

    Its no wonder that Labour politicians, people who are obsessed about the top 10% and bottom 10% and very little in between, turned Rayner into their living icon.

    Put the "scum" back in her box where she belongs? We need proper working class heroes like Boris Johnson, Nigel Farage and Lucy Connolly.
    Poshos at the top is the standard order of things, which is why nobody was bothered about the likes of Blair and Darling.

    Whereas Rayner is disconcerting, having gone from bottom 10% to top 10%, entirely through the medium of the Labour party.

    That appears great to Labour politicians who are obsessed about those at the top and those at the bottom.

    But less so to the 80% who get the impression that Labour isn't interested in them.

    There are, of course, other people who have gone from bottom 10% to top 10% - in sport, in entertainment, even in business. But these people leave a trail of visible achievement whereas Rayner was a pretty rubbish housing minister for a year.
    Like I said.

    She called you "scum" so you don't like her. Nonetheless I don't believe you can dismiss her achievement in becoming Deputy Prime Minister.

    And don't forget, Boris got all the big calls right.
  • StillWatersStillWaters Posts: 10,812

    More proof that Trump is a Russian asset, this is a death sentence for these people.

    ICE is sending Russian dissidents back to Russia. According to the ⁦@thetimes

    ⁩ When the dissidents arrived in Russia, the Russian authorities were given documents relating to their asylum applications in the US.


    https://x.com/Billbrowder/status/1964297062960279595

    Does that mean Nigey might be a Taliban asset sending Afghan ladies back to Kabul?
    I will be covering that in an upcoming thread, which will be adorned with my new favourite Farage picture.


    Does this mean you have dispensed with your previous favourite Farage picture, which I assume now adorns the BBC news noticeboard?
    I will use that picture when PBers annoy me, things like saying Die Hard is a Christmas movie, criticising Dave (pbuh) etc.
    Can we have Corbyn an the fur coat for old times sakes?
  • nico67nico67 Posts: 6,171
    Sandpit said:

    TimS said:

    Sandpit said:

    Pulpstar said:

    She's there because she's ostensibly better than Cooper, who has been useless in the home office, but instead of a straight demotion to justice has failed upwards to the easier and glitzier foreign office role; replacing Lammy - who, despite seriously low expectations has managed to build a good relationship particularly with the US VP but has now been given the sop of Deputy PM; a good personal relationship wiped out with the US administration because Starmer didn't dare demote Cooper.

    A lot of comment from the US right about Shabhana Mahmood in the Home Office, and some of the causes and protests to which she’s aligned herself in the past.
    I remember the good old days when it was none of their fucking business.
    Great in theory, but when the comments look like this it’s potentially concerning for the UK government.

    https://x.com/bgatesisapyscho/status/1964554012352500054
    “Calls for America to restrict its ‘Intelligence Sharing’ with the UK following the appointment of Shabana Mahmood to UK Home Secretary.
    “Mahmood swore her oath to UK Office on the Quran & has attended Pro Hamas Rallies that have called for the ‘Globalisation of the Intifada’.”

    https://x.com/kevin_rainville/status/1964360369155043682
    @DNIGabbard @SecRubio Five Eyes Intelligence Services MUST exclude the UK from receiving any further data. Mahmood has publicly stated multiple times that Islam governs EVERY facet of her life. Such as spying for the IRGC and practicing Taqiyah during international relations.”

    https://x.com/steve_zivin/status/1964295446358090075
    “I am not sure Americans realize how outrageous this is. We need to immediately reevaluate intelligence sharing. Mahmood has refused to condemn Palestinian activists sabotaging British military hardware as well as championing boycotts of Jews.“
    Given the Putin stooges in the WH shouldn’t the UK be concerned about our own intelligence? The USA lost its moral authority to criticise any other country after the re-election of Trump . In his first term there were at least some saner people surrounding him . That’s no longer the case .
  • FishingFishing Posts: 5,827
    edited September 7

    The defence secretary says the reshuffle represents Keir Starmer "going up a gear" after a year of "sorting out the mess" he says was left behind by the previous Tory government.

    I don't think anybody is buying that BS.

    Indeed, this is PB. We all know the previous Government got all the big calls right and left a golden legacy.
    Several things to say to that:

    *) Arguments can be made that the previous goverment got the big calls right - especially vaccines and Ukraine. Notable about Covid was Starmer calling for another lockdown very late during the crisis, which was not needed. That does not mean they didn't get many other things wrong, or were good.

    *) Labour are now in power. The longer they are in power, the more responsibility they have for the mess. Harking back to the previous lot will sound increasingly shrill as this government drifts on.

    *) Many of the things causing them problems - from the incredible grifting that was going on, to Rayner's stupidity (at best) over her housing are totally their own doing. Utterly unforced errors.
    I think another of their achievements you don't mention for some reason, that they implemented the biggest popular vote for anything in British history, could well be more important anything else. People forget how badly damaged and paralysed this country's political system was in 2019, after three and a half years of Remainer obfuscation, denial, lawfare and political warfare against the repeatedly expressed will of the people. I well remember the bizarre arguments about how best to ignore or frustrate 17.4 million votes, or whether to ask people to vote again and again until they came up with the right answer. I'm not sure it would have survived had it gone unresolved with the added trauma of the pandemic.

    But within a few months, Boris lanced that boil very effectively and saved it.
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 34,049
    Fishing said:

    The defence secretary says the reshuffle represents Keir Starmer "going up a gear" after a year of "sorting out the mess" he says was left behind by the previous Tory government.

    I don't think anybody is buying that BS.

    Indeed, this is PB. We all know the previous Government got all the big calls right and left a golden legacy.
    Several things to say to that:

    *) Arguments can be made that the previous goverment got the big calls right - especially vaccines and Ukraine. Notable about Covid was Starmer calling for another lockdown very late during the crisis, which was not needed. That does not mean they didn't get many other things wrong, or were good.

    *) Labour are now in power. The longer they are in power, the more responsibility they have for the mess. Harking back to the previous lot will sound increasingly shrill as this government drifts on.

    *) Many of the things causing them problems - from the incredible grifting that was going on, to Rayner's stupidity (at best) over her housing are totally their own doing. Utterly unforced errors.
    I think another of their achievements you don't mention for some reason, that they implemented the biggest popular vote for anything in British history, could well be more important anything else. People forget how badly damaged and paralysed this country's political system was in 2019, after three and a half years of Remainer obfuscation, denial, lawfare and political warfare against the repeatedly expressed will of the people. I'm not sure it would have survived had it gone unresolved with the added trauma of the pandemic.

    But within a few months, Boris lanced that boil very effectively and saved it.
    Blimey!
  • StillWatersStillWaters Posts: 10,812
    Foxy said:

    stodge said:

    Is it because everyone relentlessly treated Rayner herself like some special-needs child, a young, underprivileged woman who they secretly suspected couldn’t read or write? If you look at the way Starmer spoke about her, it was constantly in these terms: she was a woman, and working class.

    Of her actual record, of course: no hint. She was the perfect deputy prime minister for him: a politician allowed to rise to the top on personality alone. And that personality was: middle-class person’s idea of what a working-class person should be. Slobby, ribald, partying in ’Beefa — isn’t vaping on inflatables what working-class people all do? Spoiler alert: it isn’t. Most working-class people are insulted to be compared to her.


    https://www.thetimes.com/comment/columnists/article/angela-rayner-no-working-class-hero-ptr88wp8b

    Rayner was someone from the bottom 10% who moved into the top 10% through the Labour party.

    Its no wonder that Labour politicians, people who are obsessed about the top 10% and bottom 10% and very little in between, turned Rayner into their living icon.

    Put the "scum" back in her box where she belongs? We need proper working class heroes like Boris Johnson, Nigel Farage and Lucy Connolly.
    I have to say, reading that absurd drivel in what was once a genuinely significant newspaper, my "right to be offended" has been sorely tested.
    I can't read through the paywall, but do wonder in what way Camilla Long is qualified to adjudicate on whether someone is working class.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camilla_Long
    That seems solidly middle class.

    Are you sure you are not muddling her up with Marina Catherine Elizabeth Dudley-Williams?

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marina_Hyde
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 67,803
    nico67 said:

    Sandpit said:

    TimS said:

    Sandpit said:

    Pulpstar said:

    She's there because she's ostensibly better than Cooper, who has been useless in the home office, but instead of a straight demotion to justice has failed upwards to the easier and glitzier foreign office role; replacing Lammy - who, despite seriously low expectations has managed to build a good relationship particularly with the US VP but has now been given the sop of Deputy PM; a good personal relationship wiped out with the US administration because Starmer didn't dare demote Cooper.

    A lot of comment from the US right about Shabhana Mahmood in the Home Office, and some of the causes and protests to which she’s aligned herself in the past.
    I remember the good old days when it was none of their fucking business.
    Great in theory, but when the comments look like this it’s potentially concerning for the UK government.

    https://x.com/bgatesisapyscho/status/1964554012352500054
    “Calls for America to restrict its ‘Intelligence Sharing’ with the UK following the appointment of Shabana Mahmood to UK Home Secretary.
    “Mahmood swore her oath to UK Office on the Quran & has attended Pro Hamas Rallies that have called for the ‘Globalisation of the Intifada’.”

    https://x.com/kevin_rainville/status/1964360369155043682
    @DNIGabbard @SecRubio Five Eyes Intelligence Services MUST exclude the UK from receiving any further data. Mahmood has publicly stated multiple times that Islam governs EVERY facet of her life. Such as spying for the IRGC and practicing Taqiyah during international relations.”

    https://x.com/steve_zivin/status/1964295446358090075
    “I am not sure Americans realize how outrageous this is. We need to immediately reevaluate intelligence sharing. Mahmood has refused to condemn Palestinian activists sabotaging British military hardware as well as championing boycotts of Jews.“
    Given the Putin stooges in the WH shouldn’t the UK be concerned about our own intelligence? The USA lost its moral authority to criticise any other country after the re-election of Trump . In his first term there were at least some saner people surrounding him . That’s no longer the case .
    Yep. Totally.
  • IanB2 said:

    Although being one of the three most senior posts, history suggests that progressing from there to PM is extremely uncommon. When the PM role becomes vacant, it's the Chancellor and FS who are best placed to pitch for the top job.

    Which is why I think Cooper comes out well from the recent shuffle in terms of her prospects. Although she may have under-performed particularly from a media/comms perspective, she has avoided any of the major scandals, disasters or blunders that killed the careers of so many previous Home Secs, and now she's FS she could pitch for a future leadership having done two out of the three most senior roles.

    Given that Reeves is already tarnished and Mahmood is brand new (and inherits the poisoned chalice), Cooper is effectively heir apparent. Yes, there's Streeting hanging about in the wings, but people underestimate how unpopular he is with many party members, making the young Blair look like a hero of socialism by comparison.

    At present the question is will she retain her seat as is the same with Streeting ?
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 52,785

    Badenoch: 'We have to show the electorate we're ready'

    Not doing a very good job so far.

    There is precisely nothing that Badenoch has done in her first 9 months that convinces me she has any idea the radical steps needed to get the Tories back to power. In that time, the only thing she’s really done is try to defend the previous government (badly) in a series of generally sub-par PMQs performances against a PM who leaves open goals all over the place.

    I think it’s too late for Badenoch now. She will be the fall girl for the 2026 elections and it’ll be someone else who needs to try and save the Party.
    She came over as very aggressive this morning.
    She's on the defensive as far as her credibility with her own side is concerned, which is never a good position for a leader. She looks irritated that her natural brilliance isn't being properly appreciated by her colleagues.
Sign In or Register to comment.