Stone on Dartford (Labour Defence)
Result of last election to council (2011): Conservatives 31, Labour 9, Independents 4 (Conservative majority of 18)
Result of ward at last election (2011): Emboldened denotes elected
Conservatives 713, 588, 544
Labour 642, 609, 560
English Democrats 192
Candidates duly nominated: Jim Moore (UKIP), Catherine Stafford (Lab), Stephanie Thredgle (Con)
Comments
All right, this is from my vast experience only, but almost all the UKIP supporters I know are ex-Labour. (The only ex-Tory one recently told me he's 'gone off Farage' because 'every time you see him he's drinking'.) Of course, every Kipper knows he'd sound deranged if he admitted voting for Gordon in 2010, hence this curious memory revision in the polling. Moreover, the demographics don't fit. UKIP's great appeal is to the angry and disillusioned poor - Labour territory; the truculent men of UKIP are less likely to make inroads into sedate Toryism and the comfortably off.
ConHome is number one political blog of the blogs that he owns!
PB is totally independent and will remain so until Lord Ashcroft offers me £250k
.............................................................................
Chicken feed.
Remember Mike, PB is the Fortnum & Mason of political blogs not Poundland !!
Lab 2/7
Con 5/2
Grn 50/1
UKIP 100/1
LD 100/1
Lab 1/100
Mebyon Kernow Evens
Con 100/1
Lib Dems I'll need your house keys
Lab 1/6
Con 4/1
UKIP 25/1
LD 100/1
Lab 1/16
LD 8/1
UKIP 33/1
Con 100/1
I tend to be less forward than you in questioning the political allegiances of my friends.
But it is certainly my experience that those who are now professing to be Kippers, including members of my own family, do look as though might have voted for Gordon in 2010.
The indicators are subtle but distinct. Fraying shirt cuffs and holes in leather soles are amongst the first that strike the eye.
But it is only when purses and pockets are emptied and a tube of Steradent is first to emerge that political identification can be reliably confirmed.
I think to try and argue that Labour are hurt as much as the Tories is plainly wrong.
That said to try and argue that therefore UKIP voters should all vote for the Tories is equally wrong. For people like me, even as a former Tory voter, the alternative to UKIP is not Tory. I have no idea what it might be but it would not be any of the 3 main parties.
Cheers to Mr. Hayfield for his regular column.
Lab 1/16
LD 10/1
UKIP 50/1
Con 50/1
Completely off topic but do I remember correctly that you had been contemplating the purchase of a Lincolnshire property which included a cricket pitch in its park?
Nick Clegg doesn't believe the Tories can win the next election. He thinks there are two possible outcomes at the next election. A Labour majority or a hung parliament. He doesn't believe the Tories can win. If Labour can win 35 seats off the Tories his own position as Deputy PM looks precarious. So he's doing his best to get the Tory vote share up now it's fairly clear his own Party isn't going to recover. If the government's approval ratings improve he'll probably assume that his MPs can hang on where they're fighting Tories.
So from Clegg's perspective the budget and the polling afterwards was mission accomplished. Pensions minister Steve Webb has done more to revive the Tory vote than Cameron and Osborne have managed in 4 years. I may be too cynical by half but perhaps Clegg is a smarter player than he has been given credit for.
24 or less 4/6
25 or more 11/10
(They got 13 MEPs at the last Euro election in 2009.)
http://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/why-dianne-feinstein-cant-control-the-cia/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=why-dianne-feinstein-cant-control-the-cia
A similar mindset overrides our political class. What's unexpected is that it now seems like momentum is seriously building for change in the US. I wonder how many years it will take for our political establishment to wake up to all this?
Euro election - Liberal Democrats to win 0 seats 5/1
sh!te.
Justine Greening - Conservative MP
Simon Wolfson - Conservative peer
Diane Abbott - Labour MP
Mick Hucknall - Labour supporter
Roger Helmer - Ukip MEP
The leadership and all their little stooges are SNP-haters of quite astonishing intensity. However, many of the normal activists, and vast swathes of their voters are Yes or leaning Yes.
This makes for a very unhappy family.
Ditto the Scottish Lib Dems.
Only the SNP and the Scottish Tories are united, each on their own side of the campaign.
They got their 5th highest share there in 2010.
But as bureaucracies mature they become less and less connected to their founding principles as circumstances change and they fail to adapt. They then go into a self-defense mode that makes maintaining jobs, budgets, and political turf in Washington[amend as appropriate] their top priority.
, I am beginning to see all the different seats' odds and as I wrote earlier I am really surprised. Perhaps, the polls do tell a story !
You could look at the first 70 Labour target seats and tell us the election results. It will be damn more accurate than Nationwide polls. After all, it is the marginals that decide.
Probably that
So, all these "Con Maj = XXX, Lab = 1/X odds on" seem strange. We are close in the polls some people say Lab NOM some say Cons NOM so how come there are so many supposedly bolted on deep odds-on Lab majority seats from Cons (albeit marginal) majorities?
1. I am not familiar with Islington thinking - but is it possible that a Yes vote is seen by Labour GHQ as getting rid of embarrassing leftie baggage (K. Hardie, J. Smith et aliis)?
2. The other logical possibility - however unlikely - is that Labour see their prospects after a No as just as bad (because they have been the rather public bed-partners of the Tories) - if they only get half the Scots seats at the GE they are no worse off if the nasty socialist republic of Jockistan secedes [I speak ironically, and from their perspective] and Labour can go back to being the neoliberal, M25 bubble, party ready to take power when the Kippers fall into the Tory winch drum. .
Thanks, Tony
Surely the seats with Lab 1/5 are all within the range of Lab targets 1 to 66?
(Some were Lab in 2010).
Is Lab 1/5 for any seat which is a target higher than 66?
Several interesting by-elections there. A friend in Gedling Labour says it's very hard to call that one and it's a bit special. If I understand it correctly, the former LibDem councillor is a really nice guy and has had to stand down for tragic health circumstances - she was unsure if that will produce a swing to the LibDems (in sympathy) or a swing against (because of the loss of the personal vote). Either way it's probably not going to be a guide to anything in particular. The Scottish one looks intriguing, though, and the Tories might have a shot in Stone.
The ones I think are certainly less likely that 1/5 at the moment are:
68. High Peak
66. Carmarthen East & Dinefwr (Plaid Cymru)
65. Dumfriesshire, Clydesdale & Tweeddale
64. Argyll & Bute (LD)
55. Birmingham Yardley (LD)
54. Warwick & Leamington
48. Worcester
46. Arfon (Plaid Cymru)
35. Dundee East (SNP)
Be interesting to know what the odds are for those.
Two interesting voting intention polls coming up in a few minutes; general election and Euro. Neither good for @Ed_Miliband I'm afraid.
Two interesting voting intention polls coming up in a few minutes; general election and Euro. Neither good for @Ed_Miliband I'm afraid
YouGov/Sun poll tonight: Labour lead back to 1 point, Budget bounce staying. General Election voting - LAB 36%, CON 35%, UKIP 11%, LIB 10%
Tom Newton Dunn @tnewtondunn now
YouGov/Sun poll tonight: Euro Elections voting intention - LAB 28%, UKIP 26%, CON 24%, LIB 11%. The race for May 22 is getting very tight.
The Lib Dems are a bit rubbish, though.
could you please in a line or two (max) tell me what the changes have been this season to F1 which have transformed the sport?
with thanks.
Tom Newton Dunn @tnewtondunn · 1 min
YouGov/Sun poll tonight: Euro Elections voting intention - LAB 28%, UKIP 26%, CON 24%, LIB 11%. The race for May 22 is getting very tight.
Tom Newton Dunn @tnewtondunn · 1 min
YouGov/Sun poll tonight: Labour lead back to 1 point, Budget bounce staying. General Election voting - LAB 36%, CON 35%, UKIP 11%, LIB 10%
Con no change
Lab minus 4
LD plus 1
UKIP plus 3
Euros - disastrous for the opposition to be in a three way race. They should be slaughtering all comers.
Aerodynamic grip has been reduced, particularly at the rear, and engines (now smaller but with significant turbos and kinetic/heat recovered energy worth 10x as much as KERS) vary far more than previously and are very complicated, hence less reliability.
Weekly average of YouGov will be interesting too when shown over the year to date?
And for the F1 illiterates?
Does YouGov ask the same people the GE and Euros voting intention questions?
If so, presumably GE is asked first?
Again if so, this could create a bias - ie when people are asked the Euros question some people may take it as a slight prompt to give a different answer to what they said for GE.
Squeaky bum time for those betters waiting for their polling bet - is it 1 or 2 left now - Saturday night and does Monday's count?
So just 4% separates LAB, UKIP & CON in tonight's YouGov Euros poll. My money, at 10/1 is on Tories winning most votes
Yeah, it's all over Rupert.
Labour have disaffected Lib Dem tactical voters, that is all they have. And the Tories will have a better turnout as the party of government. Night, Ed
Mr. Topping, art thou jesting? Are you jiggling my wiffle stick?
For ages engines have been basically the same. Now the Renault breaks and is a bit slow, the Ferrari uses too much fuel, and the Mercedes is fastest by some way and probably the most reliable too.
Lower downforce coupled with higher torque means there's more sliding in the corners (and overtaking/making mistakes opportunities), and reduces Red Bull's advantage (they're still very good at aerodynamics but it doesn't make up for weaknesses elsewhere).
I could bang on about this for ages, but that's the short version.
I'm afraid I'm off for the night now, but if you have any more questions I'll try and remember to check the thread and respond tomorrow.
It all depends on the end of the fieldwork date. So the poll that ends on Monday counts.
OGH may be posting about the Tory odds on winning the Euro poll shortly.....
Tonight's 11% LD share from YouGov for the May Euros is best from firm since Jan 2013. The debate affect?
I'm now backing Everton as:
1. Seeing Arsenal in the Europa League would be great. love it, love it, love it (K Keegan)
2. It would dramatically improve Spurs disastrous current aggregate results against the 'top 4' teams this season.
w/e 9 Feb - 5.0
w/e 16 Feb - 6.2
w/e 23 Feb - 6.0
w/e 2 Mar - 5.2
w/e 9 Mar - 6.4
w/e 16 Mar - 5.0
w/e 23 Mar - 4.6
w/e 30 Mar - 2.0 (first 4 polls; one poll to come)
I still want to know in one line (sorry to tighten up the params) why F1 has changed this season and what the nature of that change is which makes it so much more exciting.
I'm not being awkward - I'm one of those lost souls who finds F1 very boring so if there is now an extra element which, in knowing, will increase viewing enjoyment, I would be quite interested to know.
One line!
They need to do separate poll where they just ask the Euros question.
Around 4pm I was swearing like a squaddie with tourette's syndrome at our ineptness?
Secondly, as HYUFD points out repeatedly, every election that Labour won bar Feb 1974 and 1964 [ I think ], Labour would have won anyway even if only England had voted.
So, this idea that Labour can only win with the Scottish seats is false.
The reason is quite simple. England holds more than 80% of seats in the HoC. It is well nigh impossible to win a majority in the HoC without winning England.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-26772581#