At what point do the Tories think about ditching Badenoch? – politicalbetting.com
If I were Robert Jenrick I would be sharing this finding from JL Partners to my colleagues pointing out the public see Kemi Badenoch as useless as the left hand side of the Countdown clock.
Maybe the public see Badenoch as useless because she is leader of the Tory Party, and any other leader would be no better. The voters dumped the Tories wholesale only 7 months ago and I don't understand why anyone would expect them to say "oh shit, I was wrong, the Tories are really cool and I will vote for them as soon as I am able". They will probably be toxic for at least a couple of years
Badenoch is the Milwall of party leaders. No one likes her, we don't care.
The map shows how crap a lot of our voters are. Farage would be a terrible PM, not that Starmer is much of an alternative. Farage would be so bloody useless it would have us pining for the Halcyon days of the Johnson government.
Maybe the public see Badenoch as useless because she is leader of the Tory Party, and any other leader would be no better. The voters dumped the Tories wholesale only 7 months ago and I don't understand why anyone would expect them to say "oh shit, I was wrong, the Tories are really cool and I will vote for them as soon as I am able". They will probably be toxic for at least a couple of years
I agree that it’s a pretty impossible task being Tory leader right now. The problem is that Badenoch is being particularly flat footed in opposition as well.
The Tories have for some time now had a bad habit of promoting people to the leadership role who aren’t particularly good leaders. Badenoch, on paper, does have some areas that should be strengths - but these have been completely MIA since she became leader. She is too tentative, scripted and inexact.
The map in the article has a big Badenoch patch in the North West of Wales.
@Big_G_NorthWales, how many times did you take part in the survey? 😀
My favourite micro dynamic in British MRPs is that Dwyfor Meirionnydd can be one of the the most left- or right-wing constituencies on any given question depending on which ~20 Plaid voters happened to make it into the survey
It reflects well on the Conservative party membership that they are to embrace diversity, electing across a broad range... apart from competent, it's been a long time since they voted for a competent leader.
I think that the answer to the question is very shortly before they realise that the problem is not the leader but the message. What are they for? What do they want? How do they think they are going to get it?
When they have meaningful answers to these questions they can start to address whether Kemi is the right solution. But until they do its just ferrets in a sack.
Perhaps our man in North East Scotland can comment on the popularity of Farage in that part of the world. It's a very odd result unless the voters are hoping he'll visit for milkshake practice.
Maybe the public see Badenoch as useless because she is leader of the Tory Party, and any other leader would be no better. The voters dumped the Tories wholesale only 7 months ago and I don't understand why anyone would expect them to say "oh shit, I was wrong, the Tories are really cool and I will vote for them as soon as I am able". They will probably be toxic for at least a couple of years
I agree that it’s a pretty impossible task being Tory leader right now. The problem is that Badenoch is being particularly flat footed in opposition as well.
The Tories have for some time now had a bad habit of promoting people to the leadership role who aren’t particularly good leaders. Badenoch, on paper, does have some areas that should be strengths - but these have been completely MIA since she became leader. She is too tentative, scripted and inexact.
OK, it's true that she is far too scripted, especially at PMQs
But the idea that she says the things she says because after they've been through a scriptwriter... Blimey. What would happen if she improvised?
(The "rubbish scriptwriter" thing would be a problem for any Conservative leader. The party is broke, Civil Service support has been turned off, and why should any bright young thing sign up to write Conservative speeches for buttons?)
The Trump and Putin supporting doesn't seem to be doing Farage any damage. Perhaps at this point we have to accept that for the majority of the electorate it's just name recognition... "He's on TV a lot, he'll do" We need a pollster prepared to spice it up, throw in Linneker. Micah Richards, Holly Willoughby, Vernon Kay, Janet SP, Hitler and Stalin as options and expose the public.
Perhaps our man in North East Scotland can comment on the popularity of Farage in that part of the world. It's a very odd result unless the voters are hoping he'll visit for milkshake practice.
At first I thought Farage/Reform would struggle in Scotland then I remembered his raison d'être is blaming a union of nations for all the ills of that particular nation and that seceding from that union is the cure all those ills and no way would that message be popular in Scotland but then I remembered Scotland has the SNP.
The Trump and Putin supporting doesn't seem to be doing Farage any damage. Perhaps at this point we have to accept that for the majority of the electorate it's just name recognition... "He's on TV a lot, he'll do" We need a pollster prepared to spice it up, throw in Linneker. Micah Richards, Holly Willoughby, Vernon Kay, Janet SP, Hitler and Stalin as options and expose the public.
I should have added the caveat that the polling was conducted in February before that disgrace in the Oval Office.
The Trump and Putin supporting doesn't seem to be doing Farage any damage. Perhaps at this point we have to accept that for the majority of the electorate it's just name recognition... "He's on TV a lot, he'll do" We need a pollster prepared to spice it up, throw in Linneker. Micah Richards, Holly Willoughby, Vernon Kay, Janet SP, Hitler and Stalin as options and expose the public.
I should have added the caveat that the polling was conducted in February before that disgrace in the Oval Office.
I thought the disgrace had reoccupied the Oval Office in January?
The Trump and Putin supporting doesn't seem to be doing Farage any damage. Perhaps at this point we have to accept that for the majority of the electorate it's just name recognition... "He's on TV a lot, he'll do" We need a pollster prepared to spice it up, throw in Linneker. Micah Richards, Holly Willoughby, Vernon Kay, Janet SP, Hitler and Stalin as options and expose the public.
I should have added the caveat that the polling was conducted in February before that disgrace in the Oval Office.
Starmer has done well since then, at least in international affairs. In fact as long as he stays away from the ongoing economic tragedy that is his government under Reeves. He might score even higher now.
Badenoch is the Milwall of party leaders. No one likes her, we don't care.
The map shows how crap a lot of our voters are. Farage would be a terrible PM, not that Starmer is much of an alternative. Farage would be so bloody useless it would have us pining for the Halcyon days of the Johnson government.
Given the circumstances - Labour's large majority, the length of time till the GE, the need for development of ideas & policies, and a host of other factors, maybe the best way forward is for the Conservatives to identify the number of people who'd like to try being LotO and the number of weeks of the parliament left, and arrange a rota so that everybody gets a chance to try. It would give them all their chance, avoid the expense and infighting of continual elections, and crucially avoid the bad publicity, perhaps gaining some good publicity instead.
Perhaps our man in North East Scotland can comment on the popularity of Farage in that part of the world. It's a very odd result unless the voters are hoping he'll visit for milkshake practice.
At first I thought Farage/Reform would struggle in Scotland then I remembered his raison d'être is blaming a union of nations for all the ills of that particular nation and that seceding from that union is the cure all those ills and no way would that message be popular in Scotland but then I remembered Scotland has the SNP.
Nationalists may reckon that having Farage as PM would help them finish what got huge momentum under the clown?
The Trump and Putin supporting doesn't seem to be doing Farage any damage. Perhaps at this point we have to accept that for the majority of the electorate it's just name recognition... "He's on TV a lot, he'll do" We need a pollster prepared to spice it up, throw in Linneker. Micah Richards, Holly Willoughby, Vernon Kay, Janet SP, Hitler and Stalin as options and expose the public.
TSE's mention of Countdown reminds me of what a friend told me about another inane daytime show, Pointless. Apparently the recognition levels for anything to do with politics are embarrassingly low. Whilst it would appear huge numbers can name the entire cast list of Hollyoaks few can name the current PM. Ask something obscure, like who is Chancellor of the Exchequer, or President of France, and you are likely to register a flat zero.
Of course people want Farage as PM. They recognise him from the telly. They hate the existing politicians, who have dismally failed to make them personally rich, so they would quite naturally prefer someone they can actually recognise and think might at least be a bit of fun.
Perhaps we should try it. It pretty much what they have done in the USA,
Given the circumstances - Labour's large majority, the length of time till the GE, the need for development of ideas & policies, and a host of other factors, maybe the best way forward is for the Conservatives to identify the number of people who'd like to try being LotO and the number of weeks of the parliament left, and arrange a rota so that everybody gets a chance to try. It would give them all their chance, avoid the expense and infighting of continual elections, and crucially avoid the bad publicity, perhaps gaining some good publicity instead.
@BorisJohnson What a surprise - Putin rejects an unconditional ceasefire. He wants to keep bombing and killing innocent Ukrainians. He wants Ukraine disarmed. He wants Ukraine neutralised. He wants to make Ukraine a vassal state of Russia. He isn’t negotiating. He’s laughing at us.
BoZo, before the call
@BorisJohnson I trust and believe Trump will hit Putin with every shot in his locker - he can't let the world think he's lost to a cowardly mass murderer
The Tories would be in a much better place if they had elected James Cleverly .
As it is they’ve ended up with Badenoch who is likely to come under a lot of pressure after the local elections .
It’s irrelevant whether the seats being fought were from that high watermark in 2021. If you’re the official opposition you should be doing well against an unpopular government. I think the Tories are in denial over Badenoch . She’s just not up to it .
I supported Jenrick, and have been pretty disparaging on Kemi, but yesterday she gave probably her best intervention so far, and did it in an authentically 'Kemi' way - that is to say a modern 'Ted Talk' sort of feel.
The response seems to have been very good, and it opens up a fruitful avenue of opposition as Labour begins to inflict increasing hardship to meet the Net Zero target.
The map in the article has a big Badenoch patch in the North West of Wales.
@Big_G_NorthWales, how many times did you take part in the survey? 😀
Good morning
I didn't but also I do not see replacing Kemi is the answer
Starmer and Farage lead all the headlines which I expect to continue, and as has been said the conservatives were thrown out less than 9 months ago and need a few years to redefine their offer
I may be rare but I do support Kemi and certainly if Jenrick is in line to succeed her
Indeed, as I said a few days ago, apart from Reform who I totally oppose I am just watching with utter dismay at the Trump shambles which frankly terrifies me not least for our grandchildren and I am not actually listening to much anyone but the government says and does
The Trump and Putin supporting doesn't seem to be doing Farage any damage. Perhaps at this point we have to accept that for the majority of the electorate it's just name recognition... "He's on TV a lot, he'll do" We need a pollster prepared to spice it up, throw in Linneker. Micah Richards, Holly Willoughby, Vernon Kay, Janet SP, Hitler and Stalin as options and expose the public.
TSE's mention of Countdown reminds me of what a friend told me about another inane daytime show, Pointless. Apparently the recognition levels for anything to do with politics are embarrassingly low. Whilst it would appear huge numbers can name the entire cast list of Hollyoaks few can name the current PM. Ask something obscure, like who is Chancellor of the Exchequer, or President of France, and you are likely to register a flat zero.
Of course people want Farage as PM. They recognise him from the telly. They hate the existing politicians, who have dismally failed to make them personally rich, so they would quite naturally prefer someone they can actually recognise and think might at least be a bit of fun.
Perhaps we should try it. It pretty much what they have done in the USA,
Can we just shift to the end point where Ant is PM and Dec the leader of the opposition / vice versa.
Maybe the public see Badenoch as useless because she is leader of the Tory Party, and any other leader would be no better. The voters dumped the Tories wholesale only 7 months ago and I don't understand why anyone would expect them to say "oh shit, I was wrong, the Tories are really cool and I will vote for them as soon as I am able". They will probably be toxic for at least a couple of years
You don't have to be "really cool" to be better than Starmer or Farage.
And those numbers are too dismal to pass off with such an easy explanation. You'd expect them to be poor, as you say, but they're a lot worse than poor.
@BorisJohnson What a surprise - Putin rejects an unconditional ceasefire. He wants to keep bombing and killing innocent Ukrainians. He wants Ukraine disarmed. He wants Ukraine neutralised. He wants to make Ukraine a vassal state of Russia. He isn’t negotiating. He’s laughing at us.
BoZo, before the call
@BorisJohnson I trust and believe Trump will hit Putin with every shot in his locker - he can't let the world think he's lost to a cowardly mass murderer
Ummmmmmmmmm
This is two letters Boris. Two articles; two faces ...
The Trump and Putin supporting doesn't seem to be doing Farage any damage. Perhaps at this point we have to accept that for the majority of the electorate it's just name recognition... "He's on TV a lot, he'll do" We need a pollster prepared to spice it up, throw in Linneker. Micah Richards, Holly Willoughby, Vernon Kay, Janet SP, Hitler and Stalin as options and expose the public.
TSE's mention of Countdown reminds me of what a friend told me about another inane daytime show, Pointless. Apparently the recognition levels for anything to do with politics are embarrassingly low. Whilst it would appear huge numbers can name the entire cast list of Hollyoaks few can name the current PM. Ask something obscure, like who is Chancellor of the Exchequer, or President of France, and you are likely to register a flat zero.
Of course people want Farage as PM. They recognise him from the telly. They hate the existing politicians, who have dismally failed to make them personally rich, so they would quite naturally prefer someone they can actually recognise and think might at least be a bit of fun.
Perhaps we should try it. It pretty much what they have done in the USA,
Can we just shift to the end point where Ant is PM and Dec the leader of the opposition / vice versa.
Given the circumstances - Labour's large majority, the length of time till the GE, the need for development of ideas & policies, and a host of other factors, maybe the best way forward is for the Conservatives to identify the number of people who'd like to try being LotO and the number of weeks of the parliament left, and arrange a rota so that everybody gets a chance to try. It would give them all their chance, avoid the expense and infighting of continual elections, and crucially avoid the bad publicity, perhaps gaining some good publicity instead.
A great plan. Apart from the people.
There are still a few sensible ones. Alicia Kearns in Rutland is mostly sane and articulate.
The sad thing is that in the news report about him on the Today programme yesterday they felt the need to explain what the Battle of Britain was.
It felt somewhat strange that the reporters/editors of Today think that people who listen to their programme need to have the BoB explained to them.
I noted that, too. The sad thing is that we're getting old. Battle of Britain is no longer the piece of universal popular culture that it was a generation back.
The Trump and Putin supporting doesn't seem to be doing Farage any damage. Perhaps at this point we have to accept that for the majority of the electorate it's just name recognition... "He's on TV a lot, he'll do" We need a pollster prepared to spice it up, throw in Linneker. Micah Richards, Holly Willoughby, Vernon Kay, Janet SP, Hitler and Stalin as options and expose the public.
TSE's mention of Countdown reminds me of what a friend told me about another inane daytime show, Pointless. Apparently the recognition levels for anything to do with politics are embarrassingly low. Whilst it would appear huge numbers can name the entire cast list of Hollyoaks few can name the current PM. Ask something obscure, like who is Chancellor of the Exchequer, or President of France, and you are likely to register a flat zero.
Of course people want Farage as PM. They recognise him from the telly. They hate the existing politicians, who have dismally failed to make them personally rich, so they would quite naturally prefer someone they can actually recognise and think might at least be a bit of fun.
Perhaps we should try it. It pretty much what they have done in the USA,
Can we just shift to the end point where Ant is PM and Dec the leader of the opposition / vice versa.
In an idle moment I tried to discover if there were any surviving Luftwaffe pilots from the BoB since it takes two sides (or even three if you include the Regia Aeronautica) to fight a battle. There were obviously many more aircrew on the Axis side since it included bombers, but info seems almost non existent. Obviously it’s an event that varies in importance in collective memories.
It reflects well on the Conservative party membership that they are to embrace diversity, electing across a broad range... apart from competent, it's been a long time since they voted for a competent leader.
The Trump and Putin supporting doesn't seem to be doing Farage any damage. Perhaps at this point we have to accept that for the majority of the electorate it's just name recognition... "He's on TV a lot, he'll do" We need a pollster prepared to spice it up, throw in Linneker. Micah Richards, Holly Willoughby, Vernon Kay, Janet SP, Hitler and Stalin as options and expose the public.
TSE's mention of Countdown reminds me of what a friend told me about another inane daytime show, Pointless. Apparently the recognition levels for anything to do with politics are embarrassingly low. Whilst it would appear huge numbers can name the entire cast list of Hollyoaks few can name the current PM. Ask something obscure, like who is Chancellor of the Exchequer, or President of France, and you are likely to register a flat zero.
Of course people want Farage as PM. They recognise him from the telly. They hate the existing politicians, who have dismally failed to make them personally rich, so they would quite naturally prefer someone they can actually recognise and think might at least be a bit of fun.
Perhaps we should try it. It pretty much what they have done in the USA,
Surely that's the best possible argument for not trying it?
Perhaps our man in North East Scotland can comment on the popularity of Farage in that part of the world. It's a very odd result unless the voters are hoping he'll visit for milkshake practice.
Most Brexity part of Scotland. Socially conservative. Lots of farmers and fisherfolk.
In an idle moment I tried to discover if there were any surviving Luftwaffe pilots from the BoB since it takes two sides (or even three if you include the Regia Aeronautica) to fight a battle. There were obviously many more aircrew on the Axis side since it included bombers, but info seems almost non existent. Obviously it’s an event that varies in importance in collective memories.
Although the last survivor of Trafalgar was French.
The sad thing is that in the news report about him on the Today programme yesterday they felt the need to explain what the Battle of Britain was.
It felt somewhat strange that the reporters/editors of Today think that people who listen to their programme need to have the BoB explained to them.
I noted that, too. The sad thing is that we're getting old. Battle of Britain is no longer the piece of universal popular culture that it was a generation back.
The Battle of Britain was 85 years ago.
That's like me learning about the Boer Wars when I was 10. OK, the BoB is much more important an event than that, but some of my contemporaries' fathers had fought in WW2 and it had finished only 30 years previously, which is like, er, 1995 is now (can't think of anything that happened then)
So while WW2 was an epoch-making event and the ever-present background to the world many of us grew up in, it is now fairly ancient history
Perhaps our man in North East Scotland can comment on the popularity of Farage in that part of the world. It's a very odd result unless the voters are hoping he'll visit for milkshake practice.
From the south west I can opine that he is an arsehole of arseholes.
Perhaps our man in North East Scotland can comment on the popularity of Farage in that part of the world. It's a very odd result unless the voters are hoping he'll visit for milkshake practice.
Most Brexity part of Scotland. Socially conservative. Lots of farmers and fisherfolk.
Maybe the public see Badenoch as useless because she is leader of the Tory Party, and any other leader would be no better. The voters dumped the Tories wholesale only 7 months ago and I don't understand why anyone would expect them to say "oh shit, I was wrong, the Tories are really cool and I will vote for them as soon as I am able". They will probably be toxic for at least a couple of years
You don't have to be "really cool" to be better than Starmer or Farage.
And those numbers are too dismal to pass off with such an easy explanation. You'd expect them to be poor, as you say, but they're a lot worse than poor.
I don't think Starmer is doing too badly. Yesterday's benefits announcement was insufficiently radical, but the situation is one that the Tories created and did nothing about
Perhaps our man in North East Scotland can comment on the popularity of Farage in that part of the world. It's a very odd result unless the voters are hoping he'll visit for milkshake practice.
At first I thought Farage/Reform would struggle in Scotland then I remembered his raison d'être is blaming a union of nations for all the ills of that particular nation and that seceding from that union is the cure all those ills and no way would that message be popular in Scotland but then I remembered Scotland has the SNP.
Nationalists may reckon that having Farage as PM would help them finish what got huge momentum under the clown?
Perhaps our man in North East Scotland can comment on the popularity of Farage in that part of the world. It's a very odd result unless the voters are hoping he'll visit for milkshake practice.
I believe brave Sir Nigel is still avoiding visiting North Britain due to ‘security concerns’, perhaps absence makes the heart grow fonder? By that measure his ratings in his own constituency of Clacton must be colossal.
Maybe the public see Badenoch as useless because she is leader of the Tory Party, and any other leader would be no better. The voters dumped the Tories wholesale only 7 months ago and I don't understand why anyone would expect them to say "oh shit, I was wrong, the Tories are really cool and I will vote for them as soon as I am able". They will probably be toxic for at least a couple of years
You don't have to be "really cool" to be better than Starmer or Farage.
And those numbers are too dismal to pass off with such an easy explanation. You'd expect them to be poor, as you say, but they're a lot worse than poor.
I don't think Starmer is doing too badly. Yesterday's benefits announcement was insufficiently radical, but the situation is one that the Tories created and did nothing about
I wasn't really commenting on Starmer, though. It wouldn't matter who was PM; you'd still expect the leader of the opposition to poll better than 1% on that question. If no alternate leader could do better, then the Tories might as well give up.
While the perennial Tory Leader Stakes is of great interest to the overstaffed lobby correspondents guild and PB’s commentariat, it’s really not to everyone else. The Man Utd of parties need to stick with someone - for good or ill. The problems run far deeper than the manager.
I supported Jenrick, and have been pretty disparaging on Kemi, but yesterday she gave probably her best intervention so far, and did it in an authentically 'Kemi' way - that is to say a modern 'Ted Talk' sort of feel.
The response seems to have been very good, and it opens up a fruitful avenue of opposition as Labour begins to inflict increasing hardship to meet the Net Zero target.
The environmental and climate justification for moving to Net Zero isn’t going to go away and is likely going to get more immediate and obvious in the next decade and a half.
We can argue about how we get to Net Zero but not about whether we should and Badenoch’s response was more about pandering to the climate change deniers than dealing with the real world.
Conservatives have traditionally been pragmatic types and have adapted to a changing world when required - oddly enough I take the view Conservatives could probably get us to Net Zero quicker and easier than Labour but to pander to those unwilling or unable to accept the world is changing isn’t Conservative at all and is part of the reason why the likes of Badenoch and Jenrick are seen as irrelevant to the current debate.
Kremlin sources say the call with Trump went “very well.” Translation: They played him like a banjo.
Even somebody as delusional as Donald Trump will know he's looking weak. A reaction is inevitable. Something tough. Something strong. I think I can predict what it will be. He'll bomb some Houthis.
This is a fast moving story and if the courts do not start to assert themselves immediately it will simply be too late.
I think the problem is that the only court capable of asserting itself isn't interested in doing so. At least two of the Justices on that court seem to be interpreting the US Constitution as advocating an executive akin to a 17th Century Monarchy, which given the context of the time it was written, is a strange take. At least two more have odd ideas and the Chief Justice seems increasingly panicked that an executive his Court gave 'official act immunity' seems to, entirely predictably, believe it is above the law.
The lower courts might try and be assertive but the head is rotten.
Incidentally, I had a lecture on the Judicial role in the UK Constitution the other day. It was really great, the lecturer was really warmed up to his theme. He talked about the theory of the Common Law constitution and that at least some former UKSC justices may have been exploring the concept that if an act of Parliament was incompatible with fundamental common law rights, the Courts could, essentially, strike it down. He was actually very persuasive.
The problem is, that the political context in which such a decision occurred would be a full blown constitutional crisis the like we've not seen since the Civil War. What's more, looking to America, where their court actually has this power, they are groping their way into the constitutional abyss regardless.
Looking at that map gives me the appalling prospect of tactically voting Tory to keep out the Faragists, closely followed by thinking that pointless as they would then coalition with them anyway.
So sticking with the LDs, unless I am on the IoW by the next GE.
Kremlin sources say the call with Trump went “very well.” Translation: They played him like a banjo.
Even somebody as delusional as Donald Trump will know he's looking weak. A reaction is inevitable. Something tough. Something strong. I think I can predict what it will be. He'll bomb some Houthis.
For a genius peacemaker, he’s looking a bit warfighty.
Kremlin sources say the call with Trump went “very well.” Translation: They played him like a banjo.
Even somebody as delusional as Donald Trump will know he's looking weak. A reaction is inevitable. Something tough. Something strong. I think I can predict what it will be. He'll bomb some Houthis.
Trump is playing this weird line of appealing to US isolationists, whilst also appealing to the "Bomb the terrorists" people (where 'terrorist' is taken to be a rather broad grouping of anyone Trump doesn't like). The broader US public probably won't see that as much of a conflict, though.
The sad thing is that in the news report about him on the Today programme yesterday they felt the need to explain what the Battle of Britain was.
It felt somewhat strange that the reporters/editors of Today think that people who listen to their programme need to have the BoB explained to them.
I noted that, too. The sad thing is that we're getting old. Battle of Britain is no longer the piece of universal popular culture that it was a generation back.
The Battle of Britain was 85 years ago.
That's like me learning about the Boer Wars when I was 10. OK, the BoB is much more important an event than that, but some of my contemporaries' fathers had fought in WW2 and it had finished only 30 years previously, which is like, er, 1995 is now (can't think of anything that happened then)
So while WW2 was an epoch-making event and the ever-present background to the world many of us grew up in, it is now fairly ancient history
Morning, PB.
And the real worry is that the new right are now beginning to normalise Nazism. Twitter is increasingly full of very large amounts of normalised, extreme antisemitism, and earlier this week the central Maga figure Tucker Carlson implied it might have been better if Hitler had occupied Europe.
Kremlin sources say the call with Trump went “very well.” Translation: They played him like a banjo.
Even somebody as delusional as Donald Trump will know he's looking weak. A reaction is inevitable. Something tough. Something strong. I think I can predict what it will be. He'll bomb some Houthis.
I think you’re giving him too much credit for being a sentient being . In his mind he’s the “ deal maker “.
Perhaps our man in North East Scotland can comment on the popularity of Farage in that part of the world. It's a very odd result unless the voters are hoping he'll visit for milkshake practice.
Aberdeenshire North and Moray East is showing preferring Farage. As a constituency it is heavily reliant on farming, fishing and energy. The former two voted for Brexit as were being screwed by CAP/CFP and now vocally decry Brexit because they’re being screwed outside CAP/CFP.
The point is that people want change. They think Farage is change. But when they had opportunities to vote for him they didn’t do so - they finished 3rd in the Fraserburgh council by election last autumn.
Looking at that map gives me the appalling prospect of tactically voting Tory to keep out the Faragists, closely followed by thinking that pointless as they would then coalition with them anyway.
So sticking with the LDs, unless I am on the IoW by the next GE.
Less of an issue in my part of the world where the alternatives to Labour aren’t Reform, Liberal Democrats or even the Conservatives but the Greens or the Corbynite ex-Momentum pro-Palestine “Newham Independents”.
Reform are irrelevant in many areas but strong in many others.
As an aside to that, of Reform’s first 50 target seats, 27 are Labour and 23 are Conservative.
Kremlin sources say the call with Trump went “very well.” Translation: They played him like a banjo.
Even somebody as delusional as Donald Trump will know he's looking weak. A reaction is inevitable. Something tough. Something strong. I think I can predict what it will be. He'll bomb some Houthis.
I think you’re giving him too much credit for being a sentient being . In his mind he’s the “ deal maker “.
This is a fast moving story and if the courts do not start to assert themselves immediately it will simply be too late.
I think the problem is that the only court capable of asserting itself isn't interested in doing so. At least two of the Justices on that court seem to be interpreting the US Constitution as advocating an executive akin to a 17th Century Monarchy, which given the context of the time it was written, is a strange take. At least two more have odd ideas and the Chief Justice seems increasingly panicked that an executive his Court gave 'official act immunity' seems to, entirely predictably, believe it is above the law.
The lower courts might try and be assertive but the head is rotten.
Incidentally, I had a lecture on the Judicial role in the UK Constitution the other day. It was really great, the lecturer was really warmed up to his theme. He talked about the theory of the Common Law constitution and that at least some former UKSC justices may have been exploring the concept that if an act of Parliament was incompatible with fundamental common law rights, the Courts could, essentially, strike it down. He was actually very persuasive.
The problem is, that the political context in which such a decision occurred would be a full blown constitutional crisis the like we've not seen since the Civil War. What's more, looking to America, where their court actually has this power, they are groping their way into the constitutional abyss regardless.
The justification for the Second Amendment is that the ultimate defence of freedom requires the population to be armed, and willing to resist tyranny. The complete collapse of Constitutional restraints and rule of law when faced by Trumpism does validate that reasoning.
If I were American, I would be tooling up, as it looks like it may well come down to that.
Perhaps our man in North East Scotland can comment on the popularity of Farage in that part of the world. It's a very odd result unless the voters are hoping he'll visit for milkshake practice.
Aberdeenshire North and Moray East is showing preferring Farage. As a constituency it is heavily reliant on farming, fishing and energy. The former two voted for Brexit as were being screwed by CAP/CFP and now vocally decry Brexit because they’re being screwed outside CAP/CFP.
The point is that people want change. They think Farage is change. But when they had opportunities to vote for him they didn’t do so - they finished 3rd in the Fraserburgh council by election last autumn.
So they’re going to vote for Farage who helped deliver Brexit which screwed two of their main industries in the area . It’s obvious to anyone with a functioning brain that even though there were issues around CAP/CFP out of the EU those industries are in a much worse position .
Perhaps our man in North East Scotland can comment on the popularity of Farage in that part of the world. It's a very odd result unless the voters are hoping he'll visit for milkshake practice.
Aberdeenshire North and Moray East is showing preferring Farage. As a constituency it is heavily reliant on farming, fishing and energy. The former two voted for Brexit as were being screwed by CAP/CFP and now vocally decry Brexit because they’re being screwed outside CAP/CFP.
The point is that people want change. They think Farage is change. But when they had opportunities to vote for him they didn’t do so - they finished 3rd in the Fraserburgh council by election last autumn.
The problem with the desire for "Change" justified by "It couldn't be worse" is that our societies in Europe in America have become complacent. It can and would be a lot worse.
The sad thing is that in the news report about him on the Today programme yesterday they felt the need to explain what the Battle of Britain was.
It felt somewhat strange that the reporters/editors of Today think that people who listen to their programme need to have the BoB explained to them.
It's ancient history now, and people have forgotten that once we fought Fascists, rather than voted for them.
I have the awful feeling that we are going to need that lesson again.
Before we fought fascists in the 20th century, we (in the broad sense) first voted for them, of course. History does feel alarmingly like it's about to go around for another rendition of this verse and chorus...
That it feels in at least some cases as if our getting here was heavily dependent on specific leader figures rather than being a more purely systems/situation driven development (could anybody else have been as successful as Trump?) is also an echo of the last time around, I think.
Firstly, that for everything the government does, the opposition response is either that it is too much, or too little or stays the same.
Each of these, WRT long term problems - which is all of them - are different ways of saying that 2010-2024 Tory administrations were not very good.
So the Tories can only make headway by saying 'Now for something completely different' and showing it. Which is hard.
Specially hard because that is where Reform pretends to stand.
So the second dilemma as to where to pitch it: Do you vote Tory to make sure Reform don't get in (thus possibly getting the vote of trad Tories like me); or to make sure Reform and Tory together might get in (thus certainly losing it, again.)
The Trump and Putin supporting doesn't seem to be doing Farage any damage. Perhaps at this point we have to accept that for the majority of the electorate it's just name recognition... "He's on TV a lot, he'll do" We need a pollster prepared to spice it up, throw in Linneker. Micah Richards, Holly Willoughby, Vernon Kay, Janet SP, Hitler and Stalin as options and expose the public.
TSE's mention of Countdown reminds me of what a friend told me about another inane daytime show, Pointless. Apparently the recognition levels for anything to do with politics are embarrassingly low. Whilst it would appear huge numbers can name the entire cast list of Hollyoaks few can name the current PM. Ask something obscure, like who is Chancellor of the Exchequer, or President of France, and you are likely to register a flat zero.
Of course people want Farage as PM. They recognise him from the telly. They hate the existing politicians, who have dismally failed to make them personally rich, so they would quite naturally prefer someone they can actually recognise and think might at least be a bit of fun.
Perhaps we should try it. It pretty much what they have done in the USA,
We did try it when the Conservatives elected the funny chap from HIGNFY.
The sad thing is that in the news report about him on the Today programme yesterday they felt the need to explain what the Battle of Britain was.
It felt somewhat strange that the reporters/editors of Today think that people who listen to their programme need to have the BoB explained to them.
It's ancient history now, and people have forgotten that once we fought Fascists, rather than voted for them.
I have the awful feeling that we are going to need that lesson again.
Before we fought fascists in the 20th century, we (in the broad sense) first voted for them, of course. History does feel alarmingly like it's about to go around for another rendition of this verse and chorus...
I don't think Facism ever really got much support in Britain electorally, though arguably the Imperialist policies we pursued outside this Island during the Empire were experienced very much as Fascism by the peoples and lands we conquered.
The sad thing is that in the news report about him on the Today programme yesterday they felt the need to explain what the Battle of Britain was.
It felt somewhat strange that the reporters/editors of Today think that people who listen to their programme need to have the BoB explained to them.
I noted that, too. The sad thing is that we're getting old. Battle of Britain is no longer the piece of universal popular culture that it was a generation back.
The Battle of Britain was 85 years ago.
That's like me learning about the Boer Wars when I was 10. OK, the BoB is much more important an event than that, but some of my contemporaries' fathers had fought in WW2 and it had finished only 30 years previously, which is like, er, 1995 is now (can't think of anything that happened then)
So while WW2 was an epoch-making event and the ever-present background to the world many of us grew up in, it is now fairly ancient history
And yet, my nieces know the phrase "divorced, beheaded, died" (admittedly this is because my sister's friend plays the Six album in her car...), but everyone knows about The Tudors, don't they?
The sad thing is that in the news report about him on the Today programme yesterday they felt the need to explain what the Battle of Britain was.
It felt somewhat strange that the reporters/editors of Today think that people who listen to their programme need to have the BoB explained to them.
I noted that, too. The sad thing is that we're getting old. Battle of Britain is no longer the piece of universal popular culture that it was a generation back.
The Battle of Britain was 85 years ago.
That's like me learning about the Boer Wars when I was 10. OK, the BoB is much more important an event than that, but some of my contemporaries' fathers had fought in WW2 and it had finished only 30 years previously, which is like, er, 1995 is now (can't think of anything that happened then)
So while WW2 was an epoch-making event and the ever-present background to the world many of us grew up in, it is now fairly ancient history
Morning, PB.
And the real worry is that the new right are now beginning to normalise Nazism. Twitter is increasingly full of very large amounts of normalised, extreme antisemitism, and earlier this week the central Maga figure Tucker Carlson implied it might have been better if Hitler had occupied Europe.
My measure for this is what kind of accounts I have to block each week. Recently, that metric definitely confirms what you're saying.
The sad thing is that in the news report about him on the Today programme yesterday they felt the need to explain what the Battle of Britain was.
It felt somewhat strange that the reporters/editors of Today think that people who listen to their programme need to have the BoB explained to them.
I noted that, too. The sad thing is that we're getting old. Battle of Britain is no longer the piece of universal popular culture that it was a generation back.
The Battle of Britain was 85 years ago.
That's like me learning about the Boer Wars when I was 10. OK, the BoB is much more important an event than that, but some of my contemporaries' fathers had fought in WW2 and it had finished only 30 years previously, which is like, er, 1995 is now (can't think of anything that happened then)
So while WW2 was an epoch-making event and the ever-present background to the world many of us grew up in, it is now fairly ancient history
Tsk. 1995 was The Battle of Britpop, Oasis v Blur. Far more important than the Battle of Britain.
Firstly, that for everything the government does, the opposition response is either that it is too much, or too little or stays the same.
Each of these, WRT long term problems - which is all of them - are different ways of saying that 2010-2024 Tory administrations were not very good.
So the Tories can only make headway by saying 'Now for something completely different' and showing it. Which is hard.
One place to start might be to take a look at Thatcher's legacy, acknowledge the bits which were either a disaster, or deeply flawed, and develop policies to address that.
For the last generation or so they've tried (as did Blair) to cosplay Thatcherism. It's gotten very old.
I expect Kemi will survive, she may underpoll her party but the Conservatives are still expected to win most seats in May's local elections in areas having elections. The Conservatives also still lead Reform in polls for the Scottish parliament elections next year even if Reform lead the Conservatives in Wales.
I think the best PM ratings should be of even more concern for Starmer and Labour as Farage leads Starmer as best PM in a majority of seats now. Indeed it may be only the Tories outperforming Badenoch and splitting the vote on the right this time as Reform split the vote last July that prevents Reform winning a majority under FPTP
Perhaps our man in North East Scotland can comment on the popularity of Farage in that part of the world. It's a very odd result unless the voters are hoping he'll visit for milkshake practice.
Aberdeenshire North and Moray East is showing preferring Farage. As a constituency it is heavily reliant on farming, fishing and energy. The former two voted for Brexit as were being screwed by CAP/CFP and now vocally decry Brexit because they’re being screwed outside CAP/CFP.
The point is that people want change. They think Farage is change. But when they had opportunities to vote for him they didn’t do so - they finished 3rd in the Fraserburgh council by election last autumn.
I know that part of the world as I married one of the wonderful, witty and generous natives (who may read this). Agree that Brexit would colour their views but if I was to poll my sample of 1, it would be milkshake for them rather than voting. It used to be a very blue area and socially conservative. If they prefer Reform, then the Conservative brand is well Ratnered and Kemi is not the solution.
I supported Jenrick, and have been pretty disparaging on Kemi, but yesterday she gave probably her best intervention so far, and did it in an authentically 'Kemi' way - that is to say a modern 'Ted Talk' sort of feel.
The response seems to have been very good, and it opens up a fruitful avenue of opposition as Labour begins to inflict increasing hardship to meet the Net Zero target.
The environmental and climate justification for moving to Net Zero isn’t going to go away and is likely going to get more immediate and obvious in the next decade and a half.
We can argue about how we get to Net Zero but not about whether we should and Badenoch’s response was more about pandering to the climate change deniers than dealing with the real world.
Conservatives have traditionally been pragmatic types and have adapted to a changing world when required - oddly enough I take the view Conservatives could probably get us to Net Zero quicker and easier than Labour but to pander to those unwilling or unable to accept the world is changing isn’t Conservative at all and is part of the reason why the likes of Badenoch and Jenrick are seen as irrelevant to the current debate.
It feels like similar thinking to that which led to HS2 being scrapped: a sort of “it’s too hard, why should we bother, public is sick of grand projects”. Which does have its political place as a rhetorical tactic, but I think it just adds to the general air of can’t do declinism. Abandoning a target because it’s hard is not really sunlit uplands stuff.
The sad thing is that in the news report about him on the Today programme yesterday they felt the need to explain what the Battle of Britain was.
It felt somewhat strange that the reporters/editors of Today think that people who listen to their programme need to have the BoB explained to them.
It's ancient history now, and people have forgotten that once we fought Fascists, rather than voted for them.
I have the awful feeling that we are going to need that lesson again.
Before we fought fascists in the 20th century, we (in the broad sense) first voted for them, of course. History does feel alarmingly like it's about to go around for another rendition of this verse and chorus...
I don't think Facism ever really got much support in Britain electorally, though arguably the Imperialist policies we pursued outside this Island during the Empire were experienced very much as Fascism by the peoples and lands we conquered.
By "broad" I mean "us, humanity", so I'm including electoral choices made in Europe (and perhaps also Japan, though I'm not sure that counts exactly as fascism and the dynamics there were different and not entirely driven by elected politicians).
The Tories dont need to replace Badenoch, just get behind Starmer.
The new Tory Tony has arrived,
There is nothing Tory about looking at the books and concluding it's not affordable. Especially with the banks looking at your forecasts. Boris did the financial damage and Rishi didn't sort it. Kemi is just ... well Kemi ... no ideas, no personality, just a climber.
Firstly, that for everything the government does, the opposition response is either that it is too much, or too little or stays the same.
Each of these, WRT long term problems - which is all of them - are different ways of saying that 2010-2024 Tory administrations were not very good.
So the Tories can only make headway by saying 'Now for something completely different' and showing it. Which is hard.
Specially hard because that is where Reform pretends to stand.
So the second dilemma as to where to pitch it: Do you vote Tory to make sure Reform don't get in (thus possibly getting the vote of trad Tories like me); or to make sure Reform and Tory together might get in (thus certainly losing it, again.)
Time wounds all heels, as a cobbler once told me. To expect, after nine months, voters to have forgiven and forgotten the previous 14 years, is naive in extremis. Five years probably won’t be enough, ten years might.
There’s a twin track approach - the day to day opposition and the longer term strategic thinking as to what that Conservative Government elected in 2034 might look like and do and respond to what the world may look like then.
Doing too much of the former and not enough of the latter is what most opposition parties tend to do.
I supported Jenrick, and have been pretty disparaging on Kemi, but yesterday she gave probably her best intervention so far, and did it in an authentically 'Kemi' way - that is to say a modern 'Ted Talk' sort of feel.
The response seems to have been very good, and it opens up a fruitful avenue of opposition as Labour begins to inflict increasing hardship to meet the Net Zero target.
The environmental and climate justification for moving to Net Zero isn’t going to go away and is likely going to get more immediate and obvious in the next decade and a half.
We can argue about how we get to Net Zero but not about whether we should and Badenoch’s response was more about pandering to the climate change deniers than dealing with the real world.
Conservatives have traditionally been pragmatic types and have adapted to a changing world when required - oddly enough I take the view Conservatives could probably get us to Net Zero quicker and easier than Labour but to pander to those unwilling or unable to accept the world is changing isn’t Conservative at all and is part of the reason why the likes of Badenoch and Jenrick are seen as irrelevant to the current debate.
There are genuine concerns about the journey to Net Zero/renewables. What Badenoch misses is that most people still want it to happen.
I think the smart thing to do for the Conservatives is to suggest Labour are failing on Net Zero (particularly around EVs) and moan that they aren't making it easy for responsible citizens to make the transition. I would also try to own the non-environmental benefits, like increased energy security, levelling up, cheaper energy etc etc, while leaving the eco-flummery to Labour. A really easy way to do this would be to focus on our electricity imports from France. Let's wean ourselves off European energy.
At the moment, her strategy makes sense if you get all your information from facebook/twitter, which is dominated by Reform types who hyperventilate negativity about everything.
The Tories dont need to replace Badenoch, just get behind Starmer.
The new Tory Tony has arrived,
Blair never hammered farmers and business owners and pensioners in the way Starmer has, immigration wise he has done nothing Rishi didn't and benefit wise he is hitting the disabled and threatening to merge JSA with EMA which would make our welfare state even less contributory than it is now
Kremlin sources say the call with Trump went “very well.” Translation: They played him like a banjo.
Even somebody as delusional as Donald Trump will know he's looking weak. A reaction is inevitable. Something tough. Something strong. I think I can predict what it will be. He'll bomb some Houthis.
I think you’re giving him too much credit for being a sentient being . In his mind he’s the “ deal maker “.
But also a big tough guy who bombs soft targets and likes to say things like "there'll be hell to pay".
The sad thing is that in the news report about him on the Today programme yesterday they felt the need to explain what the Battle of Britain was.
It felt somewhat strange that the reporters/editors of Today think that people who listen to their programme need to have the BoB explained to them.
I noted that, too. The sad thing is that we're getting old. Battle of Britain is no longer the piece of universal popular culture that it was a generation back.
The Battle of Britain was 85 years ago.
That's like me learning about the Boer Wars when I was 10. OK, the BoB is much more important an event than that, but some of my contemporaries' fathers had fought in WW2 and it had finished only 30 years previously, which is like, er, 1995 is now (can't think of anything that happened then)
So while WW2 was an epoch-making event and the ever-present background to the world many of us grew up in, it is now fairly ancient history
Morning, PB.
And the real worry is that the new right are now beginning to normalise Nazism. Twitter is increasingly full of very large amounts of normalised, extreme antisemitism, and earlier this week the central Maga figure Tucker Carlson implied it might have been better if Hitler had occupied Europe.
Imagine if the Axis Powers had won, we'd all be driving German cars and looking and listening to Japanese consumer electronics.
I see the partial ceasefire in Ukraine is going well !
A partial ceasefire being one that only one side keeps I assume?
Are we talking about the attacks on Krasnodar or Kyiv ?
It was a snarky comment. There is no ceasefire because Russia refused to accept it. I suspect Ukraine knew that, which is why they accepted seeming unfavourable terms
I see the partial ceasefire in Ukraine is going well !
Almost as well as the ceasefire in Gaza, just with the occasional massive Israeli bombing in between and Netanyahu promising to resume full fighting against Hamas
I remember some dreadful Saturday night quiz with Dale Winton when the 20 something year old contestant was asked which of the 3 named battles was the most recent and he said laughingly that he had never heard of the Battle of Britain. Agree about the political ignorance on Pointless.
Comments
The map shows how crap a lot of our voters are. Farage would be a terrible PM, not that Starmer is much of an alternative. Farage would be so bloody useless it would have us pining for the Halcyon days of the Johnson government.
@Big_G_NorthWales, how many times did you take part in the survey? 😀
The Tories have for some time now had a bad habit of promoting people to the leadership role who aren’t particularly good leaders. Badenoch, on paper, does have some areas that should be strengths - but these have been completely MIA since she became leader. She is too tentative, scripted and inexact.
https://x.com/OwenWntr/status/1901664915292590483
When they have meaningful answers to these questions they can start to address whether Kemi is the right solution. But until they do its just ferrets in a sack.
But the idea that she says the things she says because after they've been through a scriptwriter... Blimey. What would happen if she improvised?
(The "rubbish scriptwriter" thing would be a problem for any Conservative leader. The party is broke, Civil Service support has been turned off, and why should any bright young thing sign up to write Conservative speeches for buttons?)
Perhaps at this point we have to accept that for the majority of the electorate it's just name recognition... "He's on TV a lot, he'll do"
We need a pollster prepared to spice it up, throw in Linneker. Micah Richards, Holly Willoughby, Vernon Kay, Janet SP, Hitler and Stalin as options and expose the public.
Had to move twice in the last few months, mind.
Anyhow, what's wrong with people in north Wales?
Given the circumstances - Labour's large majority, the length of time till the GE, the need for development of ideas & policies, and a host of other factors, maybe the best way forward is for the Conservatives to identify the number of people who'd like to try being LotO and the number of weeks of the parliament left, and arrange a rota so that everybody gets a chance to try. It would give them all their chance, avoid the expense and infighting of continual elections, and crucially avoid the bad publicity, perhaps gaining some good publicity instead.
Edit, apologies, I see I am a day behind.
Of course people want Farage as PM. They recognise him from the telly. They hate the existing politicians, who have dismally failed to make them personally rich, so they would quite naturally prefer someone they can actually recognise and think might at least be a bit of fun.
Perhaps we should try it. It pretty much what they have done in the USA,
Apart from the people.
@BorisJohnson
What a surprise - Putin rejects an unconditional ceasefire. He wants to keep bombing and killing innocent Ukrainians. He wants Ukraine disarmed. He wants Ukraine neutralised. He wants to make Ukraine a vassal state of Russia. He isn’t negotiating. He’s laughing at us.
BoZo, before the call
@BorisJohnson
I trust and believe Trump will hit Putin with every shot in his locker - he can't let the world think he's lost to a cowardly mass murderer
Ummmmmmmmmm
As it is they’ve ended up with Badenoch who is likely to come under a lot of pressure after the local elections .
It’s irrelevant whether the seats being fought were from that high watermark in 2021. If you’re the official opposition you should be doing well against an unpopular government. I think the Tories are in denial over Badenoch . She’s just not up to it .
The response seems to have been very good, and it opens up a fruitful avenue of opposition as Labour begins to inflict increasing hardship to meet the Net Zero target.
I didn't but also I do not see replacing Kemi is the answer
Starmer and Farage lead all the headlines which I expect to continue, and as has been said the conservatives were thrown out less than 9 months ago and need a few years to redefine their offer
I may be rare but I do support Kemi and certainly if Jenrick is in line to succeed her
Indeed, as I said a few days ago, apart from Reform who I totally oppose I am just watching with utter dismay at the Trump shambles which frankly terrifies me not least for our grandchildren and I am not actually listening to much anyone but the government says and does
It was illegal to fire all transgender military personnel
At least we would know where we stand there
And those numbers are too dismal to pass off with such an easy explanation. You'd expect them to be poor, as you say, but they're a lot worse than poor.
Just staggering levels of stupidity to be honest.
We have learnt nothing from America's fall.
This is a fast moving story and if the courts do not start to assert themselves immediately it will simply be too late.
Two articles; two faces ...
It felt somewhat strange that the reporters/editors of Today think that people who listen to their programme need to have the BoB explained to them.
Her 15 minutes of fame might be interesting.
Can you drop Marf a line please. She's has a cartoon for you and is trying to reach you but thinks the address she is using may be out of date.
Thanks
PtP
Battle of Britain is no longer the piece of universal popular culture that it was a generation back.
https://bsky.app/profile/northeastbylines.co.uk/post/3lklqeravn22g
I have the awful feeling that we are going to need that lesson again.
Massachusetts has the option to select an increased rate of tax when you submit your online tax return.
https://x.com/michaelFhurley/status/1902170263095038375
You're too hard on them.
@berlin_bridge
Kremlin sources say the call with Trump went “very well.”
Translation: They played him like a banjo.
https://www.rct.uk/collection/2907468/emmanuel-louis-cartigny-1791-1892-the-last-survivor-of-the-battle-of-trafalgar
That's like me learning about the Boer Wars when I was 10. OK, the BoB is much more important an event than that, but some of my contemporaries' fathers had fought in WW2 and it had finished only 30 years previously, which is like, er, 1995 is now (can't think of anything that happened then)
So while WW2 was an epoch-making event and the ever-present background to the world many of us grew up in, it is now fairly ancient history
If no alternate leader could do better, then the Tories might as well give up.
We can argue about how we get to Net Zero but not about whether we should and Badenoch’s response was more about pandering to the climate change deniers than dealing with the real world.
Conservatives have traditionally been pragmatic types and have adapted to a changing world when required - oddly enough I take the view Conservatives could probably get us to Net Zero quicker and easier than Labour but to pander to those unwilling or unable to accept the world is changing isn’t Conservative at all and is part of the reason why the likes of Badenoch and Jenrick are seen as irrelevant to the current debate.
The lower courts might try and be assertive but the head is rotten.
Incidentally, I had a lecture on the Judicial role in the UK Constitution the other day. It was really great, the lecturer was really warmed up to his theme. He talked about the theory of the Common Law constitution and that at least some former UKSC justices may have been exploring the concept that if an act of Parliament was incompatible with fundamental common law rights, the Courts could, essentially, strike it down. He was actually very persuasive.
The problem is, that the political context in which such a decision occurred would be a full blown constitutional crisis the like we've not seen since the Civil War. What's more, looking to America, where their court actually has this power, they are groping their way into the constitutional abyss regardless.
So sticking with the LDs, unless I am on the IoW by the next GE.
And the real worry is that the new right are now beginning to normalise Nazism. Twitter is increasingly full of very large amounts of normalised, extreme antisemitism, and earlier this week the central Maga figure Tucker Carlson implied it might have been better if Hitler had occupied Europe.
The point is that people want change. They think Farage is change. But when they had opportunities to vote for him they didn’t do so - they finished 3rd in the Fraserburgh council by election last autumn.
Reform are irrelevant in many areas but strong in many others.
As an aside to that, of Reform’s first 50 target seats, 27 are Labour and 23 are Conservative.
If I were American, I would be tooling up, as it looks like it may well come down to that.
That it feels in at least some cases as if our getting here was heavily dependent on specific leader figures rather than being a more purely systems/situation driven development (could anybody else have been as successful as Trump?) is also an echo of the last time around, I think.
The Tories dont need to replace Badenoch, just get behind Starmer.
The new Tory Tony has arrived,
Firstly, that for everything the government does, the opposition response is either that it is too much, or too little or stays the same.
Each of these, WRT long term problems - which is all of them - are different ways of saying that 2010-2024 Tory administrations were not very good.
So the Tories can only make headway by saying 'Now for something completely different' and showing it. Which is hard.
Specially hard because that is where Reform pretends to stand.
So the second dilemma as to where to pitch it: Do you vote Tory to make sure Reform don't get in (thus possibly getting the vote of trad Tories like me); or to make sure Reform and Tory together might get in (thus certainly losing it, again.)
Recently, that metric definitely confirms what you're saying.
For the last generation or so they've tried (as did Blair) to cosplay Thatcherism. It's gotten very old.
https://www.electoralcalculus.co.uk/blogs/ec_lepoll_20250314.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_polling_for_the_next_Scottish_Parliament_election
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_polling_for_the_next_Senedd_election
I think the best PM ratings should be of even more concern for Starmer and Labour as Farage leads Starmer as best PM in a majority of seats now. Indeed it may be only the Tories outperforming Badenoch and splitting the vote on the right this time as Reform split the vote last July that prevents Reform winning a majority under FPTP
View of local hill not far from start of famous - or infamous (depending on your political persuasion) - river.
There’s a twin track approach - the day to day opposition and the longer term strategic thinking as to what that Conservative Government elected in 2034 might look like and do and respond to what the world may look like then.
Doing too much of the former and not enough of the latter is what most opposition parties tend to do.
I think the smart thing to do for the Conservatives is to suggest Labour are failing on Net Zero (particularly around EVs) and moan that they aren't making it easy for responsible citizens to make the transition. I would also try to own the non-environmental benefits, like increased energy security, levelling up, cheaper energy etc etc, while leaving the eco-flummery to Labour. A really easy way to do this would be to focus on our electricity imports from France. Let's wean ourselves off European energy.
At the moment, her strategy makes sense if you get all your information from facebook/twitter, which is dominated by Reform types who hyperventilate negativity about everything.
which of the 3 named battles was the most recent and he said laughingly that he had never heard of the Battle of Britain.
Agree about the political ignorance on Pointless.