Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

The new normal? Reform ahead of the Tories – politicalbetting.com

SystemSystem Posts: 12,254
edited January 15 in General
imageThe new normal? Reform ahead of the Tories – politicalbetting.com

Somebody made the observation to me last night that the 75% of the polls conducted wholly in 2025 have Reform ahead of the Tories, admittedly this from admittedly small sample size. My friend observed to me that this year opinion polls will shape the narrative a lot with the likely postponement of so many local elections this year.

Read the full story here

«1345

Comments

  • AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 25,688
    Tories need to straighten themselves out
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 49,524
    The key thing to note is that both Labour and Tories could improve their polling with a change of leader, but with Reform it would have.

  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 72,114
    'That's true,' said the Polish air ace, 'but these Tories were Fukkers.'
  • AnneJGPAnneJGP Posts: 3,140
    Good morning, everybody.

    It's a time of considerable turmoil and it seems to me that, after such a long time in government, the Conservatives should be focussing on what they truly believe. Sorting themselves out, as @Alanbrooke says.
  • SandpitSandpit Posts: 55,489
    edited January 15
    Not necessarily the new normal, but likely to persist for a while as the Tories find their feet and the Labour government continues to be unpopular.

    Some internal disagreements seen in Reform in the last couple of weeks too, although if you’re voting for NOTA anyway you probably don’t care.

    On the betting topic, most likely is Badenoch, then Starmer, then Farage (who basically owns the Reform party). All very unlikely before the next election, so really not worth tying up the money for more than four years. The risk to Badenoch is in the shorter term though, if we get to 2028 with all three still in place then Starmer should be the favourite to go first.
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 62,065
    Good morning, everyone.

    F1: just put up the latest Undercutters podcast which is about the F1 betting market as it currently stands, so it might be of particular interest. No tips in there but an assessment of various things, and an amusing note on longest odds for the drivers' title. And a spot of news at the end.

    Podbean: https://undercutters.podbean.com/e/f1-2025-betting-odds/

    Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/episode/2PEmEA8CVnmRFGDjMZqS3N

    Amazon: https://music.amazon.com/podcasts/bcfe213b-55fb-408a-a823-dc6693ee9f78/episodes/9ac187d3-b23b-48cc-ab51-87fa6c11c55e/undercutters---f1-podcast-f1-2025-betting-odds

    Apple: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/f1-2025-betting-odds/id1786574257?i=1000684049358

    Transcript: https://morrisf1.blogspot.com/2025/01/f1-2025-betting-odds-undercutters-ep5.html
  • OnlyLivingBoyOnlyLivingBoy Posts: 15,976
    Reeves catches a break from slightly lower than expected inflation. Let's see if tomorrow's GDP numbers are similarly obliging.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 72,114
    edited January 15
    On a serious note, this split presents the Tories with a strategic problem. They can't out-Fuk the Fukkers, because anything they promise Farage (or whoever his nominee is) will just top. That's the way ReFuk operate. So they would be driven ever further to the right to try and top them leaving them haemorrhaging votes in the centre. This is, of course, the problem William Hague had, but many times multiplied due to ReFuk having a higher profile than the Referendum Party and later UKIP and the PCP being rather weaker and deprived of many senior and experienced figures on the centre by Massive's purge in 2019.

    But if they try to tack to the centre - which is where the votes are, and their only plausible path back to power - that leaves their right flank unguarded, not helped by the lunatic fringe represented by Braverman squealing loudly at any policies that smack of sanity rather than ideological purity. In previous times Cameron grasped that (along with huskies and hoodies) although his ultimate attempt to face down the right led to unfortunate consequences in 2016.

    It's a knotty conundrum.

    There are, however, three possible advantages:

    1) It's almost inconceivable there will be an election in the next four years, which buys them time;

    2) ReFuk being a one-man ego trip with several men with large egos in it might still disintegrate in civil war as UKIP did;

    3) Badenoch clearly isn't any good at detailed policy, or strategy, but that might actually help. If she's very flexible on every issue just keeping the party with a high profile and giving the impression she can be anything to anyone may offer a route to a better electoral performance, if not to power.
  • SandpitSandpit Posts: 55,489
    edited January 15
    Headline inflation rate 2.5%, a slight fall and good news for the government. The underlying figures not so good though, services CPI still at 5.4% with the minimum wage increases and Employer NI increases to come in April.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 72,114
    edited January 15
    Sandpit said:

    Last week Ukraine bombed Engels airbase in Russia, and it was on fire for a week with much of the fuel storage destroyed.

    After six days of trying to contain the fires by the Russians, it got bombed again last night and the fires are once again raging.

    The base is home to the long-range bomber fleet that has been devastating Ukraine, and the storage tanks are for the very rare and expensive fuel that these planes require. The base is now pretty much useless to the Russians.

    https://x.com/stratcomcentre/status/1879129497762693379

    For all intents and purposes, Russia now appears to have run out of air defences protecting military and key industrial sites. Various refineries, fuel storage, and weapons factories have been taken out in recent days, including a chemical factory that makes bombs and an electonics factory that repairs aircraft systems, both key to the war effort.

    Russia has, arguably, already lost the war, in the sense that all its key aims have been missed and the cost has been orders of magnitude higher than expected.

    But the brutal geopolitical reality is that Ukraine can't survive without help from the US.

    We can argue all day about whether Biden has done enough (he probably hasn't) but unless Trump at least maintains the current level of support outwith Russia collapsing in the next five days Ukraine is still stuffed.
  • Some positive news this Wednesday morning. Probably just an aberration, but perhaps the Government are simply slow learners. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cyv43p1z15eo
  • JohnLilburneJohnLilburne Posts: 6,346
    Sandpit said:

    Headline inflation rate 2.5%, a slight fall and good news for the government. The underlying figures not so good though, services CPI still at 5.4% with the minimum wage increases and Employer NI increases to come in April.

    Prices fell by 0.6% last January, as it will be difficult to replicate that I would expect the annualised figure to rise again next month, and then maybe fall back again as prices rose quite strongly in February and March
  • JohnLilburneJohnLilburne Posts: 6,346
    Sandpit said:

    Last week Ukraine bombed Engels airbase in Russia, and it was on fire for a week with much of the fuel storage destroyed.

    After six days of trying to contain the fires by the Russians, it got bombed again last night and the fires are once again raging.

    The base is home to the long-range bomber fleet that has been devastating Ukraine, and the storage tanks are for the very rare and expensive fuel that these planes require. The base is now pretty much useless to the Russians.

    https://x.com/stratcomcentre/status/1879129497762693379

    For all intents and purposes, Russia now appears to have run out of air defences protecting military and key industrial sites. Various refineries, fuel storage, and weapons factories have been taken out in recent days, including a chemical factory that makes bombs and an electonics factory that repairs aircraft systems, both key to the war effort.

    Nevertheless, Russia seems to have found some bombers this morning.
  • numbertwelvenumbertwelve Posts: 7,013
    edited January 15
    Sandpit said:

    Headline inflation rate 2.5%, a slight fall and good news for the government. The underlying figures not so good though, services CPI still at 5.4% with the minimum wage increases and Employer NI increases to come in April.

    I think this probably gives BOE the cover for a February rate cut. Where we go from there is anyone’s guess though.
  • Scott_xPScott_xP Posts: 36,166
    ydoethur said:

    In previous times Cameron grasped that (along with huskies and hoodies) although his ultimate attempt to face down the right led to unfortunate consequences in 2016.

    Cameron didn't try to face them down.

    He tried to appease them and got fukked.
  • numbertwelvenumbertwelve Posts: 7,013

    Some positive news this Wednesday morning. Probably just an aberration, but perhaps the Government are simply slow learners. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cyv43p1z15eo

    Yes, that is positive news. Credit to the government on that one.
  • StuartinromfordStuartinromford Posts: 17,637

    Some positive news this Wednesday morning. Probably just an aberration, but perhaps the Government are simply slow learners. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cyv43p1z15eo

    Yes, that is positive news. Credit to the government on that one.
    Also, doing the right thing the right way;

    However last July Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson paused the law, days before it was due to come into force, over fears it could protect people using hate speech on campuses and expose universities to expensive legal action.

    At the time, a government source told the BBC the legislation would have opened the way for Holocaust deniers to be allowed on campus, and was an "antisemite charter".

    Phillipson told Parliament in July that the delay would allow time to consider whether the law would be repealed.

    Having spent the last six months considering what to do, the act is now being reactivated.


    A risk was identified, some time was taken to fix the it. Doesn't fit on a tabloid front page, but kind of how things should work.

  • JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 43,888

    Sandpit said:

    Last week Ukraine bombed Engels airbase in Russia, and it was on fire for a week with much of the fuel storage destroyed.

    After six days of trying to contain the fires by the Russians, it got bombed again last night and the fires are once again raging.

    The base is home to the long-range bomber fleet that has been devastating Ukraine, and the storage tanks are for the very rare and expensive fuel that these planes require. The base is now pretty much useless to the Russians.

    https://x.com/stratcomcentre/status/1879129497762693379

    For all intents and purposes, Russia now appears to have run out of air defences protecting military and key industrial sites. Various refineries, fuel storage, and weapons factories have been taken out in recent days, including a chemical factory that makes bombs and an electonics factory that repairs aircraft systems, both key to the war effort.

    Nevertheless, Russia seems to have found some bombers this morning.
    All airplanes - especially warplanes - have a lifetime in terms of airframe hours. The older they get, the more suspectable highly-loaded items such as wings and engines get to fatigue cracking and other issues. If you fly them too much, the planes wear out.

    This is allegedly a major reason why Russian aircrews had so fer flying hours pre-war - it was not the cost of the fuel, but the cost of replacing worn-out planes. AIUI most of the flying their planes are currently doing is not exactly strenuous - take off, fly, launch missiles, fly back and land, with no combat or harsh manoeuvres. But they are using up airframe life regardless, and often on airframes that are already several decades old.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 72,906
    AnneJGP said:

    Good morning, everybody.

    It's a time of considerable turmoil and it seems to me that, after such a long time in government, the Conservatives should be focussing on what they truly believe. Sorting themselves out, as @Alanbrooke says.

    And what would that be ?
    You'd get very different answers from (say) TSE, HYUFD, Casino and PtP.

    The last decade has fragmented their coalition - and some of those fragments may permanently be lost to them.
  • TimSTimS Posts: 13,505
    Putin needn’t worry: the incoming US administration will bail him out.

    https://x.com/highbrow_nobrow/status/1878914497089597867?s=46

    I can’t decide whether Trump and his people are just scared of Russia - it’s the only country they never criticise or troll - or actively supportive. I’m starting to incline towards the latter.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 72,906
    ydoethur said:

    Sandpit said:

    Last week Ukraine bombed Engels airbase in Russia, and it was on fire for a week with much of the fuel storage destroyed.

    After six days of trying to contain the fires by the Russians, it got bombed again last night and the fires are once again raging.

    The base is home to the long-range bomber fleet that has been devastating Ukraine, and the storage tanks are for the very rare and expensive fuel that these planes require. The base is now pretty much useless to the Russians.

    https://x.com/stratcomcentre/status/1879129497762693379

    For all intents and purposes, Russia now appears to have run out of air defences protecting military and key industrial sites. Various refineries, fuel storage, and weapons factories have been taken out in recent days, including a chemical factory that makes bombs and an electonics factory that repairs aircraft systems, both key to the war effort.

    Russia has, arguably, already lost the war, in the sense that all its key aims have been missed and the cost has been orders of magnitude higher than expected.

    But the brutal geopolitical reality is that Ukraine can't survive without help from the US.

    We can argue all day about whether Biden has done enough (he probably hasn't) but unless Trump at least maintains the current level of support outwith Russia collapsing in the next five days Ukraine is still stuffed.
    That would depend on Europe.
    It's just possible we might realise that it will be cheaper preventing Ukraine's defeat that it would be dealing with its consequences.
  • AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 25,688
    Nigelb said:

    AnneJGP said:

    Good morning, everybody.

    It's a time of considerable turmoil and it seems to me that, after such a long time in government, the Conservatives should be focussing on what they truly believe. Sorting themselves out, as @Alanbrooke says.

    And what would that be ?
    You'd get very different answers from (say) TSE, HYUFD, Casino and PtP.

    The last decade has fragmented their coalition - and some of those fragments may permanently be lost to them.
    small state. sound money people responsible for their own lives.
  • Scott_xPScott_xP Posts: 36,166
    TimS said:

    Putin needn’t worry: the incoming US administration will bail him out.

    https://x.com/highbrow_nobrow/status/1878914497089597867?s=46

    I can’t decide whether Trump and his people are just scared of Russia - it’s the only country they never criticise or troll - or actively supportive. I’m starting to incline towards the latter.

    Trump is a fan of all brutal dictators. Role models...
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 72,906
    ydoethur said:

    Some positive news this Wednesday morning. Probably just an aberration, but perhaps the Government are simply slow learners. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cyv43p1z15eo

    Yes, that is positive news. Credit to the government on that one.
    Also, doing the right thing the right way;

    However last July Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson paused the law, days before it was due to come into force, over fears it could protect people using hate speech on campuses and expose universities to expensive legal action.

    At the time, a government source told the BBC the legislation would have opened the way for Holocaust deniers to be allowed on campus, and was an "antisemite charter".

    Phillipson told Parliament in July that the delay would allow time to consider whether the law would be repealed.

    Having spent the last six months considering what to do, the act is now being reactivated.


    A risk was identified, some time was taken to fix the it. Doesn't fit on a tabloid front page, but kind of how things should work.

    A Secretary of State for Education doing something vaguely intelligent is definitely front page news, if only for rarity value.
    Would it be fair to say that it's not a great piece of legislation, but the problem it's designed to address is considerably worse ?
    (Which is my view, FWIW.)
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 72,906

    Nigelb said:

    AnneJGP said:

    Good morning, everybody.

    It's a time of considerable turmoil and it seems to me that, after such a long time in government, the Conservatives should be focussing on what they truly believe. Sorting themselves out, as @Alanbrooke says.

    And what would that be ?
    You'd get very different answers from (say) TSE, HYUFD, Casino and PtP.

    The last decade has fragmented their coalition - and some of those fragments may permanently be lost to them.
    small state. sound money people responsible for their own lives.
    Reform would also claim those things, though.
  • StuartinromfordStuartinromford Posts: 17,637
    Nigelb said:

    AnneJGP said:

    Good morning, everybody.

    It's a time of considerable turmoil and it seems to me that, after such a long time in government, the Conservatives should be focussing on what they truly believe. Sorting themselves out, as @Alanbrooke says.

    And what would that be ?
    You'd get very different answers from (say) TSE, HYUFD, Casino and PtP.

    The last decade has fragmented their coalition - and some of those fragments may permanently be lost to them.
    To an extent, that's always been the case- apert from being in Thatcher's final cabinet, Chris Patten and Nick Ridley didn't have much in common.

    The glue was mostly not liking socialism. For a long time, that was enough, and 2019 saw a brief renaissance of that. But for some reason, that doesn't work now. There are similar challenges on the left.

    Maybe it's a universal move to prioritise me over us, and to want things my way or not at all. Maybe it's internet radicalisation of everyone- lefties, righties and centrists. Who knows? But it's a problem.
  • Scott_xPScott_xP Posts: 36,166

    Nigelb said:

    AnneJGP said:

    Good morning, everybody.

    It's a time of considerable turmoil and it seems to me that, after such a long time in government, the Conservatives should be focussing on what they truly believe. Sorting themselves out, as @Alanbrooke says.

    And what would that be ?
    You'd get very different answers from (say) TSE, HYUFD, Casino and PtP.

    The last decade has fragmented their coalition - and some of those fragments may permanently be lost to them.
    small state. sound money people responsible for their own lives.
    All fucked by Brexit

    Massive increase in bureaucracy

    Massive hit to the public finances

    Severely constrained personal freedoms
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 50,280
    You can’t feel sorry for someone who not only said nothing when her party was making one strategic mistake after another, but actively cheered them on.

  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 72,906
    edited January 15
    FPT
    carnforth said:

    Another job opening for Cyclefree:

    https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c20k6eqyzrwo

    "Chair of miscarriages of justice review body quits"

    Notably claiming to have been scapegoated by the review she herself set up.

    Which, either way, suggests a degree of incompetence incompatible with continued employment in post.

    Will @Cyclefree apply ?
  • Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 29,203
    Kemi gets a 3.5 out of 10 so far, mainly earning those points for having the good sense to make an intervention that we shan't discuss.

    Everything else - shadow cabinet appointments, sorting out CCHQ (she hasn't), policy (laughs bitterly), PMQs and handling the media (including social media) - has all been preeeetty bad.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 50,280
    edited January 15
    AnneJGP said:

    Good morning, everybody.

    It's a time of considerable turmoil and it seems to me that, after such a long time in government, the Conservatives should be focussing on what they truly believe. Sorting themselves out, as @Alanbrooke says.

    Which probably requires a changing of the generations. The trouble they have currently is that the people just thrown out are, understandably but probably futilely, trying to get back into office themselves. Voters won’t look until it’s a bunch of different people with some fresh talent and ideas.

    There was a story in the press at the weekend about 75% of the defeated Tories wanting to get their seats back, and allegedly Shapps is helping them organise. It’s hard to say what voters will want, come the next GE, but I very much doubt they will be clamouring for the return of the useless individuals they have just voted out.
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 29,368
    Scott_xP said:

    Nigelb said:

    AnneJGP said:

    Good morning, everybody.

    It's a time of considerable turmoil and it seems to me that, after such a long time in government, the Conservatives should be focussing on what they truly believe. Sorting themselves out, as @Alanbrooke says.

    And what would that be ?
    You'd get very different answers from (say) TSE, HYUFD, Casino and PtP.

    The last decade has fragmented their coalition - and some of those fragments may permanently be lost to them.
    small state. sound money people responsible for their own lives.
    All fucked by Brexit

    Massive increase in bureaucracy

    Massive hit to the public finances

    Severely constrained personal freedoms
    Yeah, but it got Johnson into Downing Street...
  • Scott_xPScott_xP Posts: 36,166

    Maybe it's a universal move to prioritise me over us, and to want things my way or not at all. Maybe it's internet radicalisation of everyone- lefties, righties and centrists. Who knows? But it's a problem.

    The Internet is undoubtedly a force multiplier for nutters and fruitcakes to find each other and band together

    Danny Fink's column in The Times this morning is interesting about the rise of Trump/Musk and BoZo/Cummings as a cry for help by the uneducated against their perceived failure of the traditional political class to improve their lot

    https://www.thetimes.com/comment/columnists/article/complacent-centrists-blame-elon-musk-donald-trump-nm8p53z6k
  • Nigelb said:

    AnneJGP said:

    Good morning, everybody.

    It's a time of considerable turmoil and it seems to me that, after such a long time in government, the Conservatives should be focussing on what they truly believe. Sorting themselves out, as @Alanbrooke says.

    And what would that be ?
    You'd get very different answers from (say) TSE, HYUFD, Casino and PtP.

    The last decade has fragmented their coalition - and some of those fragments may permanently be lost to them.
    small state. sound money people responsible for their own lives.
    Go further - popular Conservatism. You can’t just say “small state, sound money” - the country is broken and so many of our communities are shabby through a lack of investment.

    What we need is growth - so promote good old-fashioned capitalism again. Invest in infrastructure which will facilitate growth and thus pay for itself. Low taxes on business targeted at investment in skills and high-tech and jobs - as in you can have low Corporation Tax if you spend the saving on stuff we need.

    People are crying out for a return of the good times. Farage says he knows what is wrong and who is to blame, but offers only crayon solution. The USP for the Tories should be a return to that mid-80s buzz. And yes, that would work in the left-behind towns who had buckets of cash thrown at them through things like Development Corporations.
  • JonathanJonathan Posts: 21,759
    edited January 15
    Kemi Badenoch strength is that she is not a tribal politician. Much like Blair she can reach across traditional boundaries rather than indulge a narrow strand of conservative thought.

    That coupled with her easy charm, warmth means that the whole electorate are giving the Conservative a fresh look.

    Her deep intellectual roots and the ability to harness the great minds on the Tory front bench has created the practical Conservative vision which means that the Conservative Party renewal is not only underway, but gathering momentum.

    It’s exciting.
  • JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 43,888
    TimS said:

    Putin needn’t worry: the incoming US administration will bail him out.

    https://x.com/highbrow_nobrow/status/1878914497089597867?s=46

    I can’t decide whether Trump and his people are just scared of Russia - it’s the only country they never criticise or troll - or actively supportive. I’m starting to incline towards the latter.

    They see Russia as being filled with vast resources and oligarchs who control those resources - people like them, or people who they would like to be like. People they can do deals with for their own benefit.

    What's not to like about that, if you are an immoral narcissist who does not care for their country?
  • TazTaz Posts: 15,671

    Some positive news this Wednesday morning. Probably just an aberration, but perhaps the Government are simply slow learners. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cyv43p1z15eo

    Yes, that is positive news. Credit to the government on that one.
    Also, doing the right thing the right way;

    However last July Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson paused the law, days before it was due to come into force, over fears it could protect people using hate speech on campuses and expose universities to expensive legal action.

    At the time, a government source told the BBC the legislation would have opened the way for Holocaust deniers to be allowed on campus, and was an "antisemite charter".

    Phillipson told Parliament in July that the delay would allow time to consider whether the law would be repealed.

    Having spent the last six months considering what to do, the act is now being reactivated.


    A risk was identified, some time was taken to fix the it. Doesn't fit on a tabloid front page, but kind of how things should work.

    If only that risk had been identified earlier by the same politicians as it worked its way through the house and made its way into law through the various stages.

    It is hardly something to praise them for.

    If indeed this was a genuine reason rather than an excuse then it doesn't really reflect well on our legislators.
  • BattlebusBattlebus Posts: 101
    edited January 15
    At the beginning in 2022, there were those with an insight to the Defense industries on both sides who were indicating it would all be over by Xmas, especially Kamil Galeev. As matters progressed, he noted that Rheinmetall could have remotely switched off the equipment they supplied to Russia, but didn't. Recently there are pics of Russian LPG tankers being repaired in Danish shipyards which would allow Russia to continue to ship LPG and prop up their war economy. Then there was the trans-Ukraine Russian gas pipeline, pumping during the war.

    Perhaps Trump suspects that drill, drill, drill is now a strategic necessity viz Greenland.

    https://nitter.poast.org/kamilkazani
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 72,906
    edited January 15
    This is going to be an interesting (not in a good way) debate. The S Korean Constitution is pretty vague about the constraints on Presidential power, and it might be months before the Supreme Court confirms his impeachment (which, ceteris paribus, they're likely to do).

    Yoon is refusing to say anything to the police who have arrested him.

    Yoon claims 'martial law is not crime' in handwritten letter following detention
    https://m.koreatimes.co.kr/pages/article.asp?newsIdx=390470
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 29,368
    Nigelb said:

    AnneJGP said:

    Good morning, everybody.

    It's a time of considerable turmoil and it seems to me that, after such a long time in government, the Conservatives should be focussing on what they truly believe. Sorting themselves out, as @Alanbrooke says.

    And what would that be ?
    You'd get very different answers from (say) TSE, HYUFD, Casino and PtP.

    The last decade has fragmented their coalition - and some of those fragments may permanently be lost to them.
    Suella was on LBC yesterday doubling down on going full frontal Reform with a view to either a coalition or tacit mutual benefit arrangements. Personally, I would have thought that peels off the left flank to the LDs.
  • kamskikamski Posts: 5,253
    Scott_xP said:

    TimS said:

    Putin needn’t worry: the incoming US administration will bail him out.

    https://x.com/highbrow_nobrow/status/1878914497089597867?s=46

    I can’t decide whether Trump and his people are just scared of Russia - it’s the only country they never criticise or troll - or actively supportive. I’m starting to incline towards the latter.

    Trump is a fan of all brutal dictators. Role models...
    If Trump wanna be Putin's lover, he gotta get with his friend (Xi).

    Trump has nominated some China hawks to his administration, but has made positive remarks about Xi in recent days.
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 61,229
    Badenoch atm is only getting noticed when she gets into fights with Farage, which helps him more than her.

    She needs to get out there, tell stories, and set the agenda more. Go hard on the economy, a core Tory strength that neither Reform or Labour have.

    It shouldn't be difficult with this lot in power.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 72,906
    Jonathan said:

    Kemi Badenoch strength is that she is not a tribal politician. Much like Blair she can reach across traditional boundaries rather than indulge a narrow strand of conservative thought.

    That coupled with her easy charm, warmth means that the whole electorate are giving the Conservative a fresh look.

    Her deep intellectual roots and the ability to harness the great minds on the Tory front bench has created the practical Conservative vision which means that the Conservative Party renewal is not only underway, but gathering momentum.

    It’s exciting.

    Excellent.
  • JonathanJonathan Posts: 21,759

    Nigelb said:

    AnneJGP said:

    Good morning, everybody.

    It's a time of considerable turmoil and it seems to me that, after such a long time in government, the Conservatives should be focussing on what they truly believe. Sorting themselves out, as @Alanbrooke says.

    And what would that be ?
    You'd get very different answers from (say) TSE, HYUFD, Casino and PtP.

    The last decade has fragmented their coalition - and some of those fragments may permanently be lost to them.
    Suella was on LBC yesterday doubling down on going full frontal Reform with a view to either a coalition or tacit mutual benefit arrangements. Personally, I would have thought that peels off the left flank to the LDs.
    Where do people like Cameron, Osborne or May go on that scenario. A new “Coalition” party would become their natural home.
  • TimSTimS Posts: 13,505

    Kemi gets a 3.5 out of 10 so far, mainly earning those points for having the good sense to make an intervention that we shan't discuss.

    Everything else - shadow cabinet appointments, sorting out CCHQ (she hasn't), policy (laughs bitterly), PMQs and handling the media (including social media) - has all been preeeetty bad.

    On the other hand Reform has risen in the polls by seemingly doing almost nothing. Farage and the other MPs have had about the same amount of airtime since the election as the Lib Dems, ie hardly any. I’d put Farage’s parties’ popularity in the past down to him being an ever-present charismatic feature of the political landscape, but that doesn’t explain the post-election rise. It feels much more like an automatic NOTA vote.

    I always found the Greens’ stubbornly high support in the absence of any media coverage or visible activity at all quite remarkable, but I sense Reform is benefiting from the same phenomenon.

    These are all reasons I expect the Tories to do better vis a vis Reform in real elections for the foreseeable future. They’ve been outperforming polling in local by-elections.
  • JohnLilburneJohnLilburne Posts: 6,346

    Some positive news this Wednesday morning. Probably just an aberration, but perhaps the Government are simply slow learners. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cyv43p1z15eo

    Yes, that is positive news. Credit to the government on that one.
    Also, doing the right thing the right way;

    However last July Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson paused the law, days before it was due to come into force, over fears it could protect people using hate speech on campuses and expose universities to expensive legal action.

    At the time, a government source told the BBC the legislation would have opened the way for Holocaust deniers to be allowed on campus, and was an "antisemite charter".

    Phillipson told Parliament in July that the delay would allow time to consider whether the law would be repealed.

    Having spent the last six months considering what to do, the act is now being reactivated.


    A risk was identified, some time was taken to fix the it. Doesn't fit on a tabloid front page, but kind of how things should work.

    The other way is - pass legislation, review its effect, tweak it if necessary (eg if it isn't working as intended, or people have found a way round it). But that won't happen, as it would involve admitting it wasn't 100% successful. Instead politicians will stick their fingers in their ears and pretend everything is fine.
  • SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 39,737

    Nigelb said:

    AnneJGP said:

    Good morning, everybody.

    It's a time of considerable turmoil and it seems to me that, after such a long time in government, the Conservatives should be focussing on what they truly believe. Sorting themselves out, as @Alanbrooke says.

    And what would that be ?
    You'd get very different answers from (say) TSE, HYUFD, Casino and PtP.

    The last decade has fragmented their coalition - and some of those fragments may permanently be lost to them.
    small state. sound money people responsible for their own lives.
    Go further - popular Conservatism. You can’t just say “small state, sound money” - the country is broken and so many of our communities are shabby through a lack of investment.

    What we need is growth - so promote good old-fashioned capitalism again. Invest in infrastructure which will facilitate growth and thus pay for itself. Low taxes on business targeted at investment in skills and high-tech and jobs - as in you can have low Corporation Tax if you spend the saving on stuff we need.

    People are crying out for a return of the good times. Farage says he knows what is wrong and who is to blame, but offers only crayon solution. The USP for the Tories should be a return to that mid-80s buzz. And yes, that would work in the left-behind towns who had buckets of cash thrown at them through things like Development Corporations.

    Where's the oil and privatisation wedge coming from for a return to the 1980s?

  • TimSTimS Posts: 13,505

    Badenoch atm is only getting noticed when she gets into fights with Farage, which helps him more than her.

    She needs to get out there, tell stories, and set the agenda more. Go hard on the economy, a core Tory strength that neither Reform or Labour have.

    It shouldn't be difficult with this lot in power.

    I don’t sense the economy is a natural home for her. It’s Labour’s weakest point at the moment but seemingly not her strong point either.
  • Scott_xPScott_xP Posts: 36,166

    Go hard on the economy, a core Tory strength that neither Reform or Labour have.

    LOL

    *cough*TRUSS*cough*
  • TimSTimS Posts: 13,505

    Nigelb said:

    AnneJGP said:

    Good morning, everybody.

    It's a time of considerable turmoil and it seems to me that, after such a long time in government, the Conservatives should be focussing on what they truly believe. Sorting themselves out, as @Alanbrooke says.

    And what would that be ?
    You'd get very different answers from (say) TSE, HYUFD, Casino and PtP.

    The last decade has fragmented their coalition - and some of those fragments may permanently be lost to them.
    small state. sound money people responsible for their own lives.
    Go further - popular Conservatism. You can’t just say “small state, sound money” - the country is broken and so many of our communities are shabby through a lack of investment.

    What we need is growth - so promote good old-fashioned capitalism again. Invest in infrastructure which will facilitate growth and thus pay for itself. Low taxes on business targeted at investment in skills and high-tech and jobs - as in you can have low Corporation Tax if you spend the saving on stuff we need.

    People are crying out for a return of the good times. Farage says he knows what is wrong and who is to blame, but offers only crayon solution. The USP for the Tories should be a return to that mid-80s buzz. And yes, that would work in the left-behind towns who had buckets of cash thrown at them through things like Development Corporations.

    Where's the oil and privatisation wedge coming from for a return to the 1980s?

    Privatise the roads. That would raise vast amounts. New private operators would take control, overseen by the new regulator Ofroad, and charge tolls to users.
  • numbertwelvenumbertwelve Posts: 7,013
    I think any Tory leader would be struggling given the fundamentals are just so poor for them - the public aren’t listening to them and don’t like or trust them. So I cut Badenoch some slack. But it’s not unreasonable to criticise her either. She has not been incisive enough at PMQs, and she remains poor at message discipline. Maybe in time, if Labour’s unpopularity continues (and/or Reform implodes) she can start making a name for herself, but it hasn’t clicked yet.

    I truly believe Reform are in a good position to start leading the polls. The fundamentals favour them. Their own greatest threat comes from themselves and whether Farage and co have the discipline and staying power to keep up momentum for another four years.

    The big test is 2026. If Reform beat the Tories in Wales and Scotland and finish ahead of the Tories in vote share in the locals I think that could open the floodgates to a wider collapse in the Tory position, and Reform dominance of the opposition narrative all the way to 2028/9. At that point, the Tories are likely to be relegated to third or fourth party status.
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 61,229
    Jonathan said:

    Nigelb said:

    AnneJGP said:

    Good morning, everybody.

    It's a time of considerable turmoil and it seems to me that, after such a long time in government, the Conservatives should be focussing on what they truly believe. Sorting themselves out, as @Alanbrooke says.

    And what would that be ?
    You'd get very different answers from (say) TSE, HYUFD, Casino and PtP.

    The last decade has fragmented their coalition - and some of those fragments may permanently be lost to them.
    Suella was on LBC yesterday doubling down on going full frontal Reform with a view to either a coalition or tacit mutual benefit arrangements. Personally, I would have thought that peels off the left flank to the LDs.
    Where do people like Cameron, Osborne or May go on that scenario. A new “Coalition” party would become their natural home.
    This is classic 'centrist' establishment thinking.

    People want immigration brought under control. End of.
  • numbertwelvenumbertwelve Posts: 7,013
    edited January 15
    TimS said:

    Badenoch atm is only getting noticed when she gets into fights with Farage, which helps him more than her.

    She needs to get out there, tell stories, and set the agenda more. Go hard on the economy, a core Tory strength that neither Reform or Labour have.

    It shouldn't be difficult with this lot in power.

    I don’t sense the economy is a natural home for her. It’s Labour’s weakest point at the moment but seemingly not her strong point either.
    The economy is usually the Tory trump card in situations like this. Unfortunately for them, they’ve lost that card, and time is perhaps the only healer they have there.

    Time they may not have.
  • StuartinromfordStuartinromford Posts: 17,637

    Nigelb said:

    AnneJGP said:

    Good morning, everybody.

    It's a time of considerable turmoil and it seems to me that, after such a long time in government, the Conservatives should be focussing on what they truly believe. Sorting themselves out, as @Alanbrooke says.

    And what would that be ?
    You'd get very different answers from (say) TSE, HYUFD, Casino and PtP.

    The last decade has fragmented their coalition - and some of those fragments may permanently be lost to them.
    small state. sound money people responsible for their own lives.
    Go further - popular Conservatism. You can’t just say “small state, sound money” - the country is broken and so many of our communities are shabby through a lack of investment.

    What we need is growth - so promote good old-fashioned capitalism again. Invest in infrastructure which will facilitate growth and thus pay for itself. Low taxes on business targeted at investment in skills and high-tech and jobs - as in you can have low Corporation Tax if you spend the saving on stuff we need.

    People are crying out for a return of the good times. Farage says he knows what is wrong and who is to blame, but offers only crayon solution. The USP for the Tories should be a return to that mid-80s buzz. And yes, that would work in the left-behind towns who had buckets of cash thrown at them through things like Development Corporations.

    Where's the oil and privatisation wedge coming from for a return to the 1980s?

    Or having a small number of pensioners on stingy pensions?
  • SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 39,737
    TimS said:

    Kemi gets a 3.5 out of 10 so far, mainly earning those points for having the good sense to make an intervention that we shan't discuss.

    Everything else - shadow cabinet appointments, sorting out CCHQ (she hasn't), policy (laughs bitterly), PMQs and handling the media (including social media) - has all been preeeetty bad.

    On the other hand Reform has risen in the polls by seemingly doing almost nothing. Farage and the other MPs have had about the same amount of airtime since the election as the Lib Dems, ie hardly any. I’d put Farage’s parties’ popularity in the past down to him being an ever-present charismatic feature of the political landscape, but that doesn’t explain the post-election rise. It feels much more like an automatic NOTA vote.

    I always found the Greens’ stubbornly high support in the absence of any media coverage or visible activity at all quite remarkable, but I sense Reform is benefiting from the same phenomenon.

    These are all reasons I expect the Tories to do better vis a vis Reform in real elections for the foreseeable future. They’ve been outperforming polling in local by-elections.

    At some point, the media is going to stop giving Reform an easy time and will start asking questions about what Reform in power looks like. Who's the Chancellor, the Foreign Secretary, the Education Secretary and so on? Farage cannot do it all,. And you would not want Lee Anderson near any of it. So who gets the jobs?

  • I think any Tory leader would be struggling given the fundamentals are just so poor for them - the public aren’t listening to them and don’t like or trust them. So I cut Badenoch some slack. But it’s not unreasonable to criticise her either. She has not been incisive enough at PMQs, and she remains poor at message discipline. Maybe in time, if Labour’s unpopularity continues (and/or Reform implodes) she can start making a name for herself, but it hasn’t clicked yet.

    I truly believe Reform are in a good position to start leading the polls. The fundamentals favour them. Their own greatest threat comes from themselves and whether Farage and co have the discipline and staying power to keep up momentum for another four years.

    The big test is 2026. If Reform beat the Tories in Wales and Scotland and finish ahead of the Tories in vote share in the locals I think that could open the floodgates to a wider collapse in the Tory position, and Reform dominance of the opposition narrative all the way to 2028/9. At that point, the Tories are likely to be relegated to third or fourth party status.

    Yeah, that’s the big test, but with Reform organising hard and putting the machinery in place to run local and regional campaigning I think they stand a great chance of succeeding.

    The only way the Tories avoid this is by becoming relevant again. They will struggle if they continue along the vacuous path Badenoch has set off along. Though the only alternative the moron MPs offered was Jenrick who would have been worse.
  • Scott_xPScott_xP Posts: 36,166

    At some point, the media is going to stop giving Reform an easy time and will start asking questions about what Reform in power looks like. Who's the Chancellor, the Foreign Secretary, the Education Secretary and so on? Farage cannot do it all,. And you would not want Lee Anderson near any of it. So who gets the jobs?

    I am not sure that matters anymore

    Trump has picked some right freaks. Didn't stop him winning.
  • SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 39,737

    Jonathan said:

    Nigelb said:

    AnneJGP said:

    Good morning, everybody.

    It's a time of considerable turmoil and it seems to me that, after such a long time in government, the Conservatives should be focussing on what they truly believe. Sorting themselves out, as @Alanbrooke says.

    And what would that be ?
    You'd get very different answers from (say) TSE, HYUFD, Casino and PtP.

    The last decade has fragmented their coalition - and some of those fragments may permanently be lost to them.
    Suella was on LBC yesterday doubling down on going full frontal Reform with a view to either a coalition or tacit mutual benefit arrangements. Personally, I would have thought that peels off the left flank to the LDs.
    Where do people like Cameron, Osborne or May go on that scenario. A new “Coalition” party would become their natural home.
    This is classic 'centrist' establishment thinking.

    People want immigration brought under control. End of.

    But it's not end of, is it? They also want functioning public services, more housing, people to look after their elderly relatives and so on. So what does immigration control actually look like in those circumstances?
  • JonathanJonathan Posts: 21,759

    Jonathan said:

    Nigelb said:

    AnneJGP said:

    Good morning, everybody.

    It's a time of considerable turmoil and it seems to me that, after such a long time in government, the Conservatives should be focussing on what they truly believe. Sorting themselves out, as @Alanbrooke says.

    And what would that be ?
    You'd get very different answers from (say) TSE, HYUFD, Casino and PtP.

    The last decade has fragmented their coalition - and some of those fragments may permanently be lost to them.
    Suella was on LBC yesterday doubling down on going full frontal Reform with a view to either a coalition or tacit mutual benefit arrangements. Personally, I would have thought that peels off the left flank to the LDs.
    Where do people like Cameron, Osborne or May go on that scenario. A new “Coalition” party would become their natural home.
    This is classic 'centrist' establishment thinking.

    People want immigration brought under control. End of.
    My point was more personal, I am not sure one nation Tories could cohabit comfortably with Farageet alone the followers of folks like Tommy Robinson.

    Classic centrist establishment thinking = the platform that made the Conservatives electorally successful.

    I find it bizarre that any conservative could disparage what made the party successful. An almost Corbynite point of view.
  • SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 39,737
    Scott_xP said:

    At some point, the media is going to stop giving Reform an easy time and will start asking questions about what Reform in power looks like. Who's the Chancellor, the Foreign Secretary, the Education Secretary and so on? Farage cannot do it all,. And you would not want Lee Anderson near any of it. So who gets the jobs?

    I am not sure that matters anymore

    Trump has picked some right freaks. Didn't stop him winning.

    He picked them after he won. It doesn't really work the same way in our system. There will be a list of Reform candidates for the next GE and from those a government will have to be chosen.

  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 29,368
    ...
    Scott_xP said:

    Go hard on the economy, a core Tory strength that neither Reform or Labour have.

    LOL

    *cough*TRUSS*cough*
    "Go hard on the economy" say representatives of the party whose former Prime Minister operated a f*** business narrative and imposed economic sanctions in the form of Brexit on the economy.

    I think it's best if the Tories stick to their "Reeves is shit" lane. That way they do less damage.
  • TazTaz Posts: 15,671

    Badenoch atm is only getting noticed when she gets into fights with Farage, which helps him more than her.

    She needs to get out there, tell stories, and set the agenda more. Go hard on the economy, a core Tory strength that neither Reform or Labour have.

    It shouldn't be difficult with this lot in power.

    No it shouldn't but perhaps SKS is a lucky general here.
  • AnneJGP said:

    Good morning, everybody.

    It's a time of considerable turmoil and it seems to me that, after such a long time in government, the Conservatives should be focussing on what they truly believe. Sorting themselves out, as @Alanbrooke says.

    I think people know what the Conservatives believe. It is just they have spent 14 years not doing what they claim to believe, so why should the voters trust them?
  • TimS said:

    Kemi gets a 3.5 out of 10 so far, mainly earning those points for having the good sense to make an intervention that we shan't discuss.

    Everything else - shadow cabinet appointments, sorting out CCHQ (she hasn't), policy (laughs bitterly), PMQs and handling the media (including social media) - has all been preeeetty bad.

    On the other hand Reform has risen in the polls by seemingly doing almost nothing. Farage and the other MPs have had about the same amount of airtime since the election as the Lib Dems, ie hardly any. I’d put Farage’s parties’ popularity in the past down to him being an ever-present charismatic feature of the political landscape, but that doesn’t explain the post-election rise. It feels much more like an automatic NOTA vote.

    I always found the Greens’ stubbornly high support in the absence of any media coverage or visible activity at all quite remarkable, but I sense Reform is benefiting from the same phenomenon.

    These are all reasons I expect the Tories to do better vis a vis Reform in real elections for the foreseeable future. They’ve been outperforming polling in local by-elections.

    At some point, the media is going to stop giving Reform an easy time and will start asking questions about what Reform in power looks like. Who's the Chancellor, the Foreign Secretary, the Education Secretary and so on? Farage cannot do it all,. And you would not want Lee Anderson near any of it. So who gets the jobs?

    You might not want 30p near anything, but a lot of people would prefer him to the big party choices. He connects with people because he addresses their issues.

    You’re absolutely right that they will need to make themselves over to look like a government in waiting. Most of that GIW will be made up of people who are not MPs, so they can (and likely will) get credible people attaching themselves to the project.

    Remember this - the Whitehall machine is broken. Whatever ideas Labour had have been crushed by the Treasury. Though the “Rachael from Accounts” jibe is outrageously misogynistic, she has been captured and broken by economic orthodoxy. Reform offering up people who basically say “this is stupidity, here’s what we should do” is not the negative you may think.
  • TazTaz Posts: 15,671

    Jonathan said:

    Nigelb said:

    AnneJGP said:

    Good morning, everybody.

    It's a time of considerable turmoil and it seems to me that, after such a long time in government, the Conservatives should be focussing on what they truly believe. Sorting themselves out, as @Alanbrooke says.

    And what would that be ?
    You'd get very different answers from (say) TSE, HYUFD, Casino and PtP.

    The last decade has fragmented their coalition - and some of those fragments may permanently be lost to them.
    Suella was on LBC yesterday doubling down on going full frontal Reform with a view to either a coalition or tacit mutual benefit arrangements. Personally, I would have thought that peels off the left flank to the LDs.
    Where do people like Cameron, Osborne or May go on that scenario. A new “Coalition” party would become their natural home.
    This is classic 'centrist' establishment thinking.

    People want immigration brought under control. End of.
    Well they're not going to get it. None of the main parties want to control it irrespective of what they say. Not classing Reform as a main party yet.
  • Scott_xPScott_xP Posts: 36,166
    Jonathan said:

    I find it bizarre that any conservative could disparage what made the party successful. An almost Corbynite point of view.

    Another legacy of Brexit

    It could be argued that the Single Market was Margaret Thatcher's greatest success in office, which makes Brexit "unpicking Thatcher's greatest success in office"

    I don't know how anyone who claims to be a Conservative supported that
  • Jonathan said:

    Nigelb said:

    AnneJGP said:

    Good morning, everybody.

    It's a time of considerable turmoil and it seems to me that, after such a long time in government, the Conservatives should be focussing on what they truly believe. Sorting themselves out, as @Alanbrooke says.

    And what would that be ?
    You'd get very different answers from (say) TSE, HYUFD, Casino and PtP.

    The last decade has fragmented their coalition - and some of those fragments may permanently be lost to them.
    Suella was on LBC yesterday doubling down on going full frontal Reform with a view to either a coalition or tacit mutual benefit arrangements. Personally, I would have thought that peels off the left flank to the LDs.
    Where do people like Cameron, Osborne or May go on that scenario. A new “Coalition” party would become their natural home.
    This is classic 'centrist' establishment thinking.

    People want immigration brought under control. End of.

    But it's not end of, is it? They also want functioning public services, more housing, people to look after their elderly relatives and so on. So what does immigration control actually look like in those circumstances?
    “I’d rather eat grass than stay in the EU”

    The pitch will be that we train our own people. May take time, will be some disruption, but think about the brilliant place we would get to in a few years.
  • SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 39,737

    TimS said:

    Kemi gets a 3.5 out of 10 so far, mainly earning those points for having the good sense to make an intervention that we shan't discuss.

    Everything else - shadow cabinet appointments, sorting out CCHQ (she hasn't), policy (laughs bitterly), PMQs and handling the media (including social media) - has all been preeeetty bad.

    On the other hand Reform has risen in the polls by seemingly doing almost nothing. Farage and the other MPs have had about the same amount of airtime since the election as the Lib Dems, ie hardly any. I’d put Farage’s parties’ popularity in the past down to him being an ever-present charismatic feature of the political landscape, but that doesn’t explain the post-election rise. It feels much more like an automatic NOTA vote.

    I always found the Greens’ stubbornly high support in the absence of any media coverage or visible activity at all quite remarkable, but I sense Reform is benefiting from the same phenomenon.

    These are all reasons I expect the Tories to do better vis a vis Reform in real elections for the foreseeable future. They’ve been outperforming polling in local by-elections.

    At some point, the media is going to stop giving Reform an easy time and will start asking questions about what Reform in power looks like. Who's the Chancellor, the Foreign Secretary, the Education Secretary and so on? Farage cannot do it all,. And you would not want Lee Anderson near any of it. So who gets the jobs?

    You might not want 30p near anything, but a lot of people would prefer him to the big party choices. He connects with people because he addresses their issues.

    You’re absolutely right that they will need to make themselves over to look like a government in waiting. Most of that GIW will be made up of people who are not MPs, so they can (and likely will) get credible people attaching themselves to the project.

    Remember this - the Whitehall machine is broken. Whatever ideas Labour had have been crushed by the Treasury. Though the “Rachael from Accounts” jibe is outrageously misogynistic, she has been captured and broken by economic orthodoxy. Reform offering up people who basically say “this is stupidity, here’s what we should do” is not the negative you may think.

    It may not be a negative. Let's see. That's kind of the point.

  • numbertwelvenumbertwelve Posts: 7,013

    TimS said:

    Kemi gets a 3.5 out of 10 so far, mainly earning those points for having the good sense to make an intervention that we shan't discuss.

    Everything else - shadow cabinet appointments, sorting out CCHQ (she hasn't), policy (laughs bitterly), PMQs and handling the media (including social media) - has all been preeeetty bad.

    On the other hand Reform has risen in the polls by seemingly doing almost nothing. Farage and the other MPs have had about the same amount of airtime since the election as the Lib Dems, ie hardly any. I’d put Farage’s parties’ popularity in the past down to him being an ever-present charismatic feature of the political landscape, but that doesn’t explain the post-election rise. It feels much more like an automatic NOTA vote.

    I always found the Greens’ stubbornly high support in the absence of any media coverage or visible activity at all quite remarkable, but I sense Reform is benefiting from the same phenomenon.

    These are all reasons I expect the Tories to do better vis a vis Reform in real elections for the foreseeable future. They’ve been outperforming polling in local by-elections.

    At some point, the media is going to stop giving Reform an easy time and will start asking questions about what Reform in power looks like. Who's the Chancellor, the Foreign Secretary, the Education Secretary and so on? Farage cannot do it all,. And you would not want Lee Anderson near any of it. So who gets the jobs?

    This is true, but I think that media scrutiny is not as powerful an influencer as it once was. How many of us thought Trump’s first run would fall apart under the sustained glare of the media? I will hold my hand up there. Who thought eventually that would also put paid to his 2024 chances? Again, I thought it would go some way to denting his appeal.

    We’re not the US. But faith in the media is running very low indeed. And when people want a “change” - a real change, as they see it, not what Starmer is selling - it is hard to dissuade them.
  • SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 39,737

    I think any Tory leader would be struggling given the fundamentals are just so poor for them - the public aren’t listening to them and don’t like or trust them. So I cut Badenoch some slack. But it’s not unreasonable to criticise her either. She has not been incisive enough at PMQs, and she remains poor at message discipline. Maybe in time, if Labour’s unpopularity continues (and/or Reform implodes) she can start making a name for herself, but it hasn’t clicked yet.

    I truly believe Reform are in a good position to start leading the polls. The fundamentals favour them. Their own greatest threat comes from themselves and whether Farage and co have the discipline and staying power to keep up momentum for another four years.

    The big test is 2026. If Reform beat the Tories in Wales and Scotland and finish ahead of the Tories in vote share in the locals I think that could open the floodgates to a wider collapse in the Tory position, and Reform dominance of the opposition narrative all the way to 2028/9. At that point, the Tories are likely to be relegated to third or fourth party status.

    Yeah, that’s the big test, but with Reform organising hard and putting the machinery in place to run local and regional campaigning I think they stand a great chance of succeeding.

    The only way the Tories avoid this is by becoming relevant again. They will struggle if they continue along the vacuous path Badenoch has set off along. Though the only alternative the moron MPs offered was Jenrick who would have been worse.

    It would be helpful to know about what Badenoch disagrees with Farage on.

  • TazTaz Posts: 15,671

    TimS said:

    Kemi gets a 3.5 out of 10 so far, mainly earning those points for having the good sense to make an intervention that we shan't discuss.

    Everything else - shadow cabinet appointments, sorting out CCHQ (she hasn't), policy (laughs bitterly), PMQs and handling the media (including social media) - has all been preeeetty bad.

    On the other hand Reform has risen in the polls by seemingly doing almost nothing. Farage and the other MPs have had about the same amount of airtime since the election as the Lib Dems, ie hardly any. I’d put Farage’s parties’ popularity in the past down to him being an ever-present charismatic feature of the political landscape, but that doesn’t explain the post-election rise. It feels much more like an automatic NOTA vote.

    I always found the Greens’ stubbornly high support in the absence of any media coverage or visible activity at all quite remarkable, but I sense Reform is benefiting from the same phenomenon.

    These are all reasons I expect the Tories to do better vis a vis Reform in real elections for the foreseeable future. They’ve been outperforming polling in local by-elections.

    At some point, the media is going to stop giving Reform an easy time and will start asking questions about what Reform in power looks like. Who's the Chancellor, the Foreign Secretary, the Education Secretary and so on? Farage cannot do it all,. And you would not want Lee Anderson near any of it. So who gets the jobs?

    You might not want 30p near anything, but a lot of people would prefer him to the big party choices. He connects with people because he addresses their issues.

    You're right and this is something most of the people, especially the posh boy fraternity, here won't get or ever get.

    Because they don't like someone or their politics they automatically assume no one should.

    Be better to understand the appeal of the likes of Lee Anderson than just scoff but PB is what it is.

  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 53,241
    Sandpit said:

    Last week Ukraine bombed Engels airbase in Russia, and it was on fire for a week with much of the fuel storage destroyed.

    After six days of trying to contain the fires by the Russians, it got bombed again last night and the fires are once again raging.

    The base is home to the long-range bomber fleet that has been devastating Ukraine, and the storage tanks are for the very rare and expensive fuel that these planes require. The base is now pretty much useless to the Russians.

    https://x.com/stratcomcentre/status/1879129497762693379

    For all intents and purposes, Russia now appears to have run out of air defences protecting military and key industrial sites. Various refineries, fuel storage, and weapons factories have been taken out in recent days, including a chemical factory that makes bombs and an electonics factory that repairs aircraft systems, both key to the war effort.

    Still plenty of air defence around Putin's villas though, by all accounts...
  • Scott_xPScott_xP Posts: 36,166

    Remember this - the Whitehall machine is broken. Whatever ideas Labour had have been crushed by the Treasury. Though the “Rachael from Accounts” jibe is outrageously misogynistic, she has been captured and broken by economic orthodoxy. Reform offering up people who basically say “this is stupidity, here’s what we should do” is not the negative you may think.

    Which brings us back to Danny Fink's column

    Voters think the Government is not working for them

    They will vote for people promising to smash it

    Unfortunately that's mob mentality. The same people who vote for trashing the system are the ones who try and burn down a hotel housing migrants

    Of course in the aftermath they also want the fire brigade, ambulances and hospitals...
  • SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 39,737

    Jonathan said:

    Nigelb said:

    AnneJGP said:

    Good morning, everybody.

    It's a time of considerable turmoil and it seems to me that, after such a long time in government, the Conservatives should be focussing on what they truly believe. Sorting themselves out, as @Alanbrooke says.

    And what would that be ?
    You'd get very different answers from (say) TSE, HYUFD, Casino and PtP.

    The last decade has fragmented their coalition - and some of those fragments may permanently be lost to them.
    Suella was on LBC yesterday doubling down on going full frontal Reform with a view to either a coalition or tacit mutual benefit arrangements. Personally, I would have thought that peels off the left flank to the LDs.
    Where do people like Cameron, Osborne or May go on that scenario. A new “Coalition” party would become their natural home.
    This is classic 'centrist' establishment thinking.

    People want immigration brought under control. End of.

    But it's not end of, is it? They also want functioning public services, more housing, people to look after their elderly relatives and so on. So what does immigration control actually look like in those circumstances?
    “I’d rather eat grass than stay in the EU”

    The pitch will be that we train our own people. May take time, will be some disruption, but think about the brilliant place we would get to in a few years.

    Yep, that will be the pitch, for sure. It may work politically. It won't work economically. That said, both the Tories and Reform are now so tied to the incoming Trump administration that a lot of what happens here in 2029 is going to depend on what happens in the US over the next four years.

  • SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 39,737
    Taz said:

    TimS said:

    Kemi gets a 3.5 out of 10 so far, mainly earning those points for having the good sense to make an intervention that we shan't discuss.

    Everything else - shadow cabinet appointments, sorting out CCHQ (she hasn't), policy (laughs bitterly), PMQs and handling the media (including social media) - has all been preeeetty bad.

    On the other hand Reform has risen in the polls by seemingly doing almost nothing. Farage and the other MPs have had about the same amount of airtime since the election as the Lib Dems, ie hardly any. I’d put Farage’s parties’ popularity in the past down to him being an ever-present charismatic feature of the political landscape, but that doesn’t explain the post-election rise. It feels much more like an automatic NOTA vote.

    I always found the Greens’ stubbornly high support in the absence of any media coverage or visible activity at all quite remarkable, but I sense Reform is benefiting from the same phenomenon.

    These are all reasons I expect the Tories to do better vis a vis Reform in real elections for the foreseeable future. They’ve been outperforming polling in local by-elections.

    At some point, the media is going to stop giving Reform an easy time and will start asking questions about what Reform in power looks like. Who's the Chancellor, the Foreign Secretary, the Education Secretary and so on? Farage cannot do it all,. And you would not want Lee Anderson near any of it. So who gets the jobs?

    You might not want 30p near anything, but a lot of people would prefer him to the big party choices. He connects with people because he addresses their issues.

    You're right and this is something most of the people, especially the posh boy fraternity, here won't get or ever get.

    Because they don't like someone or their politics they automatically assume no one should.

    Be better to understand the appeal of the likes of Lee Anderson than just scoff but PB is what it is.

    Lee Anderson is the middle class, right wing metropolitan's view of the working class everyman.
  • SandpitSandpit Posts: 55,489

    Sandpit said:

    Last week Ukraine bombed Engels airbase in Russia, and it was on fire for a week with much of the fuel storage destroyed.

    After six days of trying to contain the fires by the Russians, it got bombed again last night and the fires are once again raging.

    The base is home to the long-range bomber fleet that has been devastating Ukraine, and the storage tanks are for the very rare and expensive fuel that these planes require. The base is now pretty much useless to the Russians.

    https://x.com/stratcomcentre/status/1879129497762693379

    For all intents and purposes, Russia now appears to have run out of air defences protecting military and key industrial sites. Various refineries, fuel storage, and weapons factories have been taken out in recent days, including a chemical factory that makes bombs and an electonics factory that repairs aircraft systems, both key to the war effort.

    Nevertheless, Russia seems to have found some bombers this morning.
    Unfortunately so, they’re not totally out of bombers and bombs yet, still have the ability to target mostly civilian infrastructure in Ukraine.
  • TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 42,330
    Looks like Anas will not be FM *sad face*
    Though I'd absolutely love it if a motley crew of Unionist parties conspired to put him in place.

    https://x.com/HolyroodSources/status/1879127360387313799

  • JonathanJonathan Posts: 21,759

    Taz said:

    TimS said:

    Kemi gets a 3.5 out of 10 so far, mainly earning those points for having the good sense to make an intervention that we shan't discuss.

    Everything else - shadow cabinet appointments, sorting out CCHQ (she hasn't), policy (laughs bitterly), PMQs and handling the media (including social media) - has all been preeeetty bad.

    On the other hand Reform has risen in the polls by seemingly doing almost nothing. Farage and the other MPs have had about the same amount of airtime since the election as the Lib Dems, ie hardly any. I’d put Farage’s parties’ popularity in the past down to him being an ever-present charismatic feature of the political landscape, but that doesn’t explain the post-election rise. It feels much more like an automatic NOTA vote.

    I always found the Greens’ stubbornly high support in the absence of any media coverage or visible activity at all quite remarkable, but I sense Reform is benefiting from the same phenomenon.

    These are all reasons I expect the Tories to do better vis a vis Reform in real elections for the foreseeable future. They’ve been outperforming polling in local by-elections.

    At some point, the media is going to stop giving Reform an easy time and will start asking questions about what Reform in power looks like. Who's the Chancellor, the Foreign Secretary, the Education Secretary and so on? Farage cannot do it all,. And you would not want Lee Anderson near any of it. So who gets the jobs?

    You might not want 30p near anything, but a lot of people would prefer him to the big party choices. He connects with people because he addresses their issues.

    You're right and this is something most of the people, especially the posh boy fraternity, here won't get or ever get.

    Because they don't like someone or their politics they automatically assume no one should.

    Be better to understand the appeal of the likes of Lee Anderson than just scoff but PB is what it is.

    Lee Anderson is the middle class, right wing metropolitan's view of the working class everyman.
    His political journey is interesting. You can’t pull that off without some talent. It’s going to be interesting to see where he goes next.
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 53,241
    edited January 15

    AnneJGP said:

    Good morning, everybody.

    It's a time of considerable turmoil and it seems to me that, after such a long time in government, the Conservatives should be focussing on what they truly believe. Sorting themselves out, as @Alanbrooke says.

    I think people know what the Conservatives believe. It is just they have spent 14 years not doing what they claim to believe, so why should the voters trust them?
    2010 - 2015 were spent in coalition with the LibDems. Should they have spent those years doing Conservatve stuff?

    Once you get to 2016, you have the political turmoil that dispatched Cameron and Osborne. Then May lingered in an ever weakened state because Parliament was deadlocked.

    A deadlock broken by Boris winning in December 2019. But then you get to the start of 2020, and Covid - when the decision was taken by the government to max out the credit card protecting the private sector from destruction (and the massive overtime bill for the NHS).

    Then funding lecky bills to mitigate the Cost of Living Crisis.

    About the only time in those 14 years there was scope for a proper Conservative agenda was what Sunak and Hunt were trying to implement from 2022 onwards. Albeit, hideously boxed in by what had gone before.
  • CookieCookie Posts: 14,271

    Jonathan said:

    Nigelb said:

    AnneJGP said:

    Good morning, everybody.

    It's a time of considerable turmoil and it seems to me that, after such a long time in government, the Conservatives should be focussing on what they truly believe. Sorting themselves out, as @Alanbrooke says.

    And what would that be ?
    You'd get very different answers from (say) TSE, HYUFD, Casino and PtP.

    The last decade has fragmented their coalition - and some of those fragments may permanently be lost to them.
    Suella was on LBC yesterday doubling down on going full frontal Reform with a view to either a coalition or tacit mutual benefit arrangements. Personally, I would have thought that peels off the left flank to the LDs.
    Where do people like Cameron, Osborne or May go on that scenario. A new “Coalition” party would become their natural home.
    This is classic 'centrist' establishment thinking.

    People want immigration brought under control. End of.

    But it's not end of, is it? They also want functioning public services, more housing, people to look after their elderly relatives and so on. So what does immigration control actually look like in those circumstances?
    None of that is incompatible with much lower immigration. It does however imply some redistribution in how various groups in society do. Particularly at the expense of comfortably off over 50s. But in favour of the lowest paid.
  • JonathanJonathan Posts: 21,759

    AnneJGP said:

    Good morning, everybody.

    It's a time of considerable turmoil and it seems to me that, after such a long time in government, the Conservatives should be focussing on what they truly believe. Sorting themselves out, as @Alanbrooke says.

    I think people know what the Conservatives believe. It is just they have spent 14 years not doing what they claim to believe, so why should the voters trust them?
    2010 - 2015 were spent in coalition with the LibDems. Should they have spent those years doing Conservatve stuff?

    Once you get to 2016, you have the political turmoil that dispatched Cameron and Osborne. Then May lingered in an ever weakened state because Parliament was deadlocked.

    A deadlock broken by Boris winning in December 2019. But then you get to the start of 2020, and Covid - when the decision was taken by the government to max out the credit card protecting the private sector from destruction (and the massive overtime bill for the NHS).

    Then funding lecky bills to mitigate the Cost of Living Crisis.

    About the only time in those 14 years there was scope for a proper Conservative agenda was what Sunak and Hunt were trying to implement from 2022 onwards. Albeit, hideously boxed in by what had gone before.
    That’s such a load of old cobblers. Cameron won the 2015 election. He was king of all he surveyed, he had it all in front of him and then proceeded to screw it up. An unforced error.

    No one forced May to call a GE in 2017 and Boris brought himself down by being Boris. Truss had the opportunity to reset again, but blew it.


  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 22,707
    Jonathan said:

    Kemi Badenoch strength is that she is not a tribal politician. Much like Blair she can reach across traditional boundaries rather than indulge a narrow strand of conservative thought.

    That coupled with her easy charm, warmth means that the whole electorate are giving the Conservative a fresh look.

    Her deep intellectual roots and the ability to harness the great minds on the Tory front bench has created the practical Conservative vision which means that the Conservative Party renewal is not only underway, but gathering momentum.

    It’s exciting.

    YouGov, Con, 22%.
  • algarkirkalgarkirk Posts: 13,038
    AnneJGP said:

    Good morning, everybody.

    It's a time of considerable turmoil and it seems to me that, after such a long time in government, the Conservatives should be focussing on what they truly believe. Sorting themselves out, as @Alanbrooke says.

    Yes. The current big picture is this: Con/Lab/LD/Reform all agree on the essentials of the post WWII social democratic deal, which is: Cradle to grave welfare state, pensions, health care free at point of delivery, free education to 18, regulated private enterprise, international trade as a good thing, NATO. The differences are minor, but very noisy, bits of tinkering.

    The public all agree that none of the above have the proven competence to deliver any or all of this very well.

    The Tories have two issues: Are they prepared to rethink the post WWII deal (I doubt it). Can they present as serious and competent? (They have not yet started).
  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 51,966
    Sandpit said:

    Sandpit said:

    Last week Ukraine bombed Engels airbase in Russia, and it was on fire for a week with much of the fuel storage destroyed.

    After six days of trying to contain the fires by the Russians, it got bombed again last night and the fires are once again raging.

    The base is home to the long-range bomber fleet that has been devastating Ukraine, and the storage tanks are for the very rare and expensive fuel that these planes require. The base is now pretty much useless to the Russians.

    https://x.com/stratcomcentre/status/1879129497762693379

    For all intents and purposes, Russia now appears to have run out of air defences protecting military and key industrial sites. Various refineries, fuel storage, and weapons factories have been taken out in recent days, including a chemical factory that makes bombs and an electonics factory that repairs aircraft systems, both key to the war effort.

    Nevertheless, Russia seems to have found some bombers this morning.
    Unfortunately so, they’re not totally out of bombers and bombs yet, still have the ability to target mostly civilian infrastructure in Ukraine.
    “Broken back war” - see Herman Kahn.

    The retreat from technology to human wave tactics and trench warfare.

    History repeating - that’s what happened to the German army in Russia from 1943 onwards.
  • SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 39,737
    Jonathan said:

    Taz said:

    TimS said:

    Kemi gets a 3.5 out of 10 so far, mainly earning those points for having the good sense to make an intervention that we shan't discuss.

    Everything else - shadow cabinet appointments, sorting out CCHQ (she hasn't), policy (laughs bitterly), PMQs and handling the media (including social media) - has all been preeeetty bad.

    On the other hand Reform has risen in the polls by seemingly doing almost nothing. Farage and the other MPs have had about the same amount of airtime since the election as the Lib Dems, ie hardly any. I’d put Farage’s parties’ popularity in the past down to him being an ever-present charismatic feature of the political landscape, but that doesn’t explain the post-election rise. It feels much more like an automatic NOTA vote.

    I always found the Greens’ stubbornly high support in the absence of any media coverage or visible activity at all quite remarkable, but I sense Reform is benefiting from the same phenomenon.

    These are all reasons I expect the Tories to do better vis a vis Reform in real elections for the foreseeable future. They’ve been outperforming polling in local by-elections.

    At some point, the media is going to stop giving Reform an easy time and will start asking questions about what Reform in power looks like. Who's the Chancellor, the Foreign Secretary, the Education Secretary and so on? Farage cannot do it all,. And you would not want Lee Anderson near any of it. So who gets the jobs?

    You might not want 30p near anything, but a lot of people would prefer him to the big party choices. He connects with people because he addresses their issues.

    You're right and this is something most of the people, especially the posh boy fraternity, here won't get or ever get.

    Because they don't like someone or their politics they automatically assume no one should.

    Be better to understand the appeal of the likes of Lee Anderson than just scoff but PB is what it is.

    Lee Anderson is the middle class, right wing metropolitan's view of the working class everyman.
    His political journey is interesting. You can’t pull that off without some talent. It’s going to be interesting to see where he goes next.

    He definitely speaks for a constituency of late Boomers/early Gen Xers who grew up when the welfare state was at its most generous, when the Black and White Minstrel Show was the most watched programme on TV, who benefited from rising house prices and who have watched their small town communities fall into disrepair. There is no disputing that.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 124,580
    I would point though that even on this new Yougov poll it would still be the Tories second on seats and slightly up on the general election. As the over 100 Reform MPs would almost entirely be from gains in Labour held seats.

    Kemi will therefore survive until the general election. She won both the Tory MPs and Tory members vote.

    On immigration let us also not forget Boris ended EU free movement and Rishi cut net non EU immigration too by tightening visa requirements and the ability to bring dependents over
  • EabhalEabhal Posts: 9,143

    Looks like Anas will not be FM *sad face*
    Though I'd absolutely love it if a motley crew of Unionist parties conspired to put him in place.

    https://x.com/HolyroodSources/status/1879127360387313799

    The Edinburgh protocol.

    (Think you linked the wrong tweet - Holyrood is this one: https://x.com/HolyroodSources/status/1879438373871575490?t=nADY_RveF9GKuqu6ck0ThA&s=19)
  • SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 39,737
    Cookie said:

    Jonathan said:

    Nigelb said:

    AnneJGP said:

    Good morning, everybody.

    It's a time of considerable turmoil and it seems to me that, after such a long time in government, the Conservatives should be focussing on what they truly believe. Sorting themselves out, as @Alanbrooke says.

    And what would that be ?
    You'd get very different answers from (say) TSE, HYUFD, Casino and PtP.

    The last decade has fragmented their coalition - and some of those fragments may permanently be lost to them.
    Suella was on LBC yesterday doubling down on going full frontal Reform with a view to either a coalition or tacit mutual benefit arrangements. Personally, I would have thought that peels off the left flank to the LDs.
    Where do people like Cameron, Osborne or May go on that scenario. A new “Coalition” party would become their natural home.
    This is classic 'centrist' establishment thinking.

    People want immigration brought under control. End of.

    But it's not end of, is it? They also want functioning public services, more housing, people to look after their elderly relatives and so on. So what does immigration control actually look like in those circumstances?
    None of that is incompatible with much lower immigration. It does however imply some redistribution in how various groups in society do. Particularly at the expense of comfortably off over 50s. But in favour of the lowest paid.

    And who do comfortably off over-50s tend to vote for?

  • squareroot2squareroot2 Posts: 6,894
    edited January 15
    Jonathan said:

    Kemi Badenoch strength is that she is not a tribal politician. Much like Blair she can reach across traditional boundaries rather than indulge a narrow strand of conservative thought.

    That coupled with her easy charm, warmth means that the whole electorate are giving the Conservative a fresh look.

    Her deep intellectual roots and the ability to harness the great minds on the Tory front bench has created the practical Conservative vision which means that the Conservative Party renewal is not only underway, but gathering momentum.

    It’s exciting.

    At first I thought you were talking about Starmer.....
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 53,241
    Jonathan said:

    AnneJGP said:

    Good morning, everybody.

    It's a time of considerable turmoil and it seems to me that, after such a long time in government, the Conservatives should be focussing on what they truly believe. Sorting themselves out, as @Alanbrooke says.

    I think people know what the Conservatives believe. It is just they have spent 14 years not doing what they claim to believe, so why should the voters trust them?
    2010 - 2015 were spent in coalition with the LibDems. Should they have spent those years doing Conservatve stuff?

    Once you get to 2016, you have the political turmoil that dispatched Cameron and Osborne. Then May lingered in an ever weakened state because Parliament was deadlocked.

    A deadlock broken by Boris winning in December 2019. But then you get to the start of 2020, and Covid - when the decision was taken by the government to max out the credit card protecting the private sector from destruction (and the massive overtime bill for the NHS).

    Then funding lecky bills to mitigate the Cost of Living Crisis.

    About the only time in those 14 years there was scope for a proper Conservative agenda was what Sunak and Hunt were trying to implement from 2022 onwards. Albeit, hideously boxed in by what had gone before.
    That’s such a load of old cobblers. Cameron won the 2015 election. He was king of all he surveyed, he had it all in front of him and then proceeded to screw it up. An unforced error.

    No one forced May to call a GE in 2017 and Boris brought himself down by being Boris. Truss had the opportunity to reset again, but blew it.


    Cameron won in 2015 because the Conservative manifesto committed to "a straight in-out referendum on our membership of the European Union by the end of 2017". (Labour, in an echo of its Ming vase strategy of 2024, did not support this, but did commit to an EU membership referendum if any further powers were transferred to the European Union.)

    How long would the King of All He Surveys have lasted if he had not delivered the Referendum?

    Having a Referendum was voted for by the population in the 2015 General Election.

    Leaving the EU was voted for by the population in 2016.

    So a load of old cobblers backatcher....
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 124,580
    Eabhal said:

    Looks like Anas will not be FM *sad face*
    Though I'd absolutely love it if a motley crew of Unionist parties conspired to put him in place.

    https://x.com/HolyroodSources/status/1879127360387313799

    The Edinburgh protocol.

    (Think you linked the wrong tweet - Holyrood is this one: https://x.com/HolyroodSources/status/1879438373871575490?t=nADY_RveF9GKuqu6ck0ThA&s=19)
    So more than enough Unionist MSPs for a majority, blocking indyref2. So Swinney and SNP would be in office but Nats would not be in power
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 53,241
    Jonathan said:

    Taz said:

    TimS said:

    Kemi gets a 3.5 out of 10 so far, mainly earning those points for having the good sense to make an intervention that we shan't discuss.

    Everything else - shadow cabinet appointments, sorting out CCHQ (she hasn't), policy (laughs bitterly), PMQs and handling the media (including social media) - has all been preeeetty bad.

    On the other hand Reform has risen in the polls by seemingly doing almost nothing. Farage and the other MPs have had about the same amount of airtime since the election as the Lib Dems, ie hardly any. I’d put Farage’s parties’ popularity in the past down to him being an ever-present charismatic feature of the political landscape, but that doesn’t explain the post-election rise. It feels much more like an automatic NOTA vote.

    I always found the Greens’ stubbornly high support in the absence of any media coverage or visible activity at all quite remarkable, but I sense Reform is benefiting from the same phenomenon.

    These are all reasons I expect the Tories to do better vis a vis Reform in real elections for the foreseeable future. They’ve been outperforming polling in local by-elections.

    At some point, the media is going to stop giving Reform an easy time and will start asking questions about what Reform in power looks like. Who's the Chancellor, the Foreign Secretary, the Education Secretary and so on? Farage cannot do it all,. And you would not want Lee Anderson near any of it. So who gets the jobs?

    You might not want 30p near anything, but a lot of people would prefer him to the big party choices. He connects with people because he addresses their issues.

    You're right and this is something most of the people, especially the posh boy fraternity, here won't get or ever get.

    Because they don't like someone or their politics they automatically assume no one should.

    Be better to understand the appeal of the likes of Lee Anderson than just scoff but PB is what it is.

    Lee Anderson is the middle class, right wing metropolitan's view of the working class everyman.
    His political journey is interesting. You can’t pull that off without some talent. It’s going to be interesting to see where he goes next.
    If I had to put money on it, retirement.

    Failing that, back to the Conservatives.
  • Scott_xPScott_xP Posts: 36,166

    There are two choice here.

    1) a Social Liberal Democratic *reform* of the system.
    2 Reform - or worse.

    That's exactly the point the column makes. Not sure how you read it backwards
  • Scott_xPScott_xP Posts: 36,166

    How long would the King of All He Surveys have lasted if he had not delivered the Referendum?

    Longer than he actually did
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 124,580
    viewcode said:

    Jonathan said:

    Kemi Badenoch strength is that she is not a tribal politician. Much like Blair she can reach across traditional boundaries rather than indulge a narrow strand of conservative thought.

    That coupled with her easy charm, warmth means that the whole electorate are giving the Conservative a fresh look.

    Her deep intellectual roots and the ability to harness the great minds on the Tory front bench has created the practical Conservative vision which means that the Conservative Party renewal is not only underway, but gathering momentum.

    It’s exciting.

    YouGov, Con, 22%.
    Which on the Yougov poll would still see Kemi be the first Opposition Leader of a party which has just lost power to deprive the newly elected government of its majority at the next GE since Wilson in 1974
  • algarkirkalgarkirk Posts: 13,038
    Scott_xP said:

    Remember this - the Whitehall machine is broken. Whatever ideas Labour had have been crushed by the Treasury. Though the “Rachael from Accounts” jibe is outrageously misogynistic, she has been captured and broken by economic orthodoxy. Reform offering up people who basically say “this is stupidity, here’s what we should do” is not the negative you may think.

    Which brings us back to Danny Fink's column

    Voters think the Government is not working for them

    They will vote for people promising to smash it

    Unfortunately that's mob mentality. The same people who vote for trashing the system are the ones who try and burn down a hotel housing migrants

    Of course in the aftermath they also want the fire brigade, ambulances and hospitals...
    This is not quite right. People are not moving to Reform in order to smash stuff (though of course it might). The mass of voters have no interest in revolution. People like a quiet life. They neither know nor care how Whitehall works. Nor should they, it isn't their job. They want social democracy delivered with boring competence, and for many years now that has not been achieved. Reform's promise in fact is to do just that.

    Note with care Farage distancing himself from trouble makers. Though he needs to go further.
Sign In or Register to comment.