The Chancer of the Exchequer – politicalbetting.com
Rachel Reeves came under increasing pressure to explain her CV on Sunday after it emerged that she used a false claim to win her seat as an MP ?? https://t.co/BwpyK7cs4D
I'm more worried about her Mansion House speech and attitude towards the City. Are we going soft on levels of bank capital? Trump might well relax the rules on American banks, to which I would say good luck to them. We should not be tempted to follow.
There was a 🎄 tree visible in the Sky newsroom..surely not? 🤔🥴
I’ve noticed a tragically large number in houses as I pass. One house with three trees on show with those triangular candalabras in each visible window.
We urgently need to invent a new festival between Halloween and Christmas to hold off the nutters a bit longer.
There was a 🎄 tree visible in the Sky newsroom..surely not? 🤔🥴
I’ve noticed a tragically large number in houses as I pass. One house with three trees on show with those triangular candalabras in each visible window.
We urgently need to invent a new festival between Halloween and Christmas to hold off the nutters a bit longer.
There was a 🎄 tree visible in the Sky newsroom..surely not? 🤔🥴
I’ve noticed a tragically large number in houses as I pass. One house with three trees on show with those triangular candalabras in each visible window.
We urgently need to invent a new festival between Halloween and Christmas to hold off the nutters a bit longer.
There was a 🎄 tree visible in the Sky newsroom..surely not? 🤔🥴
I’ve noticed a tragically large number in houses as I pass. One house with three trees on show with those triangular candalabras in each visible window.
We urgently need to invent a new festival between Halloween and Christmas to hold off the nutters a bit longer.
Dewali? Hanukkah?
Needs to be end of November so weirdos hold off the Christmas decorations until December. Maybe we can import thanksgiving and people can cover their houses and shops with Turkey decorations, corn cobs and pilgrim hats.
There was a 🎄 tree visible in the Sky newsroom..surely not? 🤔🥴
I’ve noticed a tragically large number in houses as I pass. One house with three trees on show with those triangular candalabras in each visible window.
We urgently need to invent a new festival between Halloween and Christmas to hold off the nutters a bit longer.
Thanksgiving!
Look, if it the UK is going to start celebrating the massacre of Indians surely the 13th of April is more apt.
I heard a Tory MP or ex MP claiming he worked with her in the early part of her career waxing lyrical about her skills. Whether just an attempt at reflected glory or not I don't know but as this slur originates from Guido I'm surprised it's even being given an airing
There was a 🎄 tree visible in the Sky newsroom..surely not? 🤔🥴
I’ve noticed a tragically large number in houses as I pass. One house with three trees on show with those triangular candalabras in each visible window.
We urgently need to invent a new festival between Halloween and Christmas to hold off the nutters a bit longer.
Thanksgiving!
Look, if it the UK is going to start celebrating the massacre of Indians surely the 13th of April is more apt.
With General Dyer on top of the tree? Oh I do hope not.
There was a 🎄 tree visible in the Sky newsroom..surely not? 🤔🥴
I’ve noticed a tragically large number in houses as I pass. One house with three trees on show with those triangular candalabras in each visible window.
We urgently need to invent a new festival between Halloween and Christmas to hold off the nutters a bit longer.
Thanksgiving!
Look, if it the UK is going to start celebrating the massacre of Indians surely the 13th of April is more apt.
Thanksgiving has its roots in English traditions so we should reclaim it.
I heard a Tory MP or ex MP claiming he worked with her in the early part of her career and waxed lyrical about her skills. Whether just an attempt at reflected glory or not I don't know but as this slur originates from Guido I'm surprised it's even being given an airing
Given how far they screwed up in office, ad hom attacks on Starmer, Rayner and Reeves is pretty much all they’ve got left.
There was a 🎄 tree visible in the Sky newsroom..surely not? 🤔🥴
I’ve noticed a tragically large number in houses as I pass. One house with three trees on show with those triangular candalabras in each visible window.
We urgently need to invent a new festival between Halloween and Christmas to hold off the nutters a bit longer.
There was a 🎄 tree visible in the Sky newsroom..surely not? 🤔🥴
I’ve noticed a tragically large number in houses as I pass. One house with three trees on show with those triangular candalabras in each visible window.
We urgently need to invent a new festival between Halloween and Christmas to hold off the nutters a bit longer.
Thanksgiving!
Look, if it the UK is going to start celebrating the massacre of Indians surely the 13th of April is more apt.
With General Dyer on top of the tree? Oh I do hope not.
I heard a Tory MP or ex MP claiming he worked with her in the early part of her career and waxed lyrical about her skills. Whether just an attempt at reflected glory or not I don't know but as this slur originates from Guido I'm surprised it's even being given an airing
Given how far they screwed up in office, ad hom attacks on Starmer, Rayner and Reeves is pretty much all they’ve got left.
Judging by the unprecedented collapse in Starmer's approval rating since the election, might it just be working?
There was a 🎄 tree visible in the Sky newsroom..surely not? 🤔🥴
I’ve noticed a tragically large number in houses as I pass. One house with three trees on show with those triangular candalabras in each visible window.
We urgently need to invent a new festival between Halloween and Christmas to hold off the nutters a bit longer.
Thanksgiving!
Look, if it the UK is going to start celebrating the massacre of Indians surely the 13th of April is more apt.
With General Dyer on top of the tree? Oh I do hope not.
Well he should have been hanging somewhere else.
I read a book about the affair many years ago as a random find in a bookshop. What I remember most of all, apart of course from its demonstration of the benevolence of the British empire alongside railways etc., was the indignation in Cheltenham etc. that people should dare to complain.
She seems to have a bit of form, from the chess stuff to her book.
I thought the chess stuff was debunked? She claimed to make the last 16 and she did make the last 16. Others, not her, then started saying she'd won...?
Michael Crick is a serious journalistic voice in politics. If he thinks Reeves should resign, it's quite a big thing.
I don't know...he has a bit of a history of getting over excited. Remember he got the wrong end of the stick over data usage in Crewe and Nantwich by-election going offshore and also the young Tories campaigning. The second he ran what seemed like 1000s of pieces on Ch4 such he thought it was scandal of the century and one he thought that was clearly going to invalidate the GE result in many seats.
This is thin gruel, she over egged the length of time and responsibilities working these organisations. That is not something I have ever done, but I have interviewed plenty of people who have. And loads of MPs have been caught doing this.
There was a 🎄 tree visible in the Sky newsroom..surely not? 🤔🥴
I’ve noticed a tragically large number in houses as I pass. One house with three trees on show with those triangular candalabras in each visible window.
We urgently need to invent a new festival between Halloween and Christmas to hold off the nutters a bit longer.
Thanksgiving!
Look, if it the UK is going to start celebrating the massacre of Indians surely the 13th of April is more apt.
With General Dyer on top of the tree? Oh I do hope not.
Well he should have been hanging somewhere else.
I read a book about the affair many years ago as a random find in a bookshop. What I remember most of all, apart of course from its demonstration of the benevolence of the British empire alongside railways etc., was the indignation in Cheltenham etc. that people should dare to complain.
But there was outrage in the Commons led by Churchill.
There was a 🎄 tree visible in the Sky newsroom..surely not? 🤔🥴
I’ve noticed a tragically large number in houses as I pass. One house with three trees on show with those triangular candalabras in each visible window.
We urgently need to invent a new festival between Halloween and Christmas to hold off the nutters a bit longer.
There was a 🎄 tree visible in the Sky newsroom..surely not? 🤔🥴
I’ve noticed a tragically large number in houses as I pass. One house with three trees on show with those triangular candalabras in each visible window.
We urgently need to invent a new festival between Halloween and Christmas to hold off the nutters a bit longer.
Thanksgiving!
Look, if it the UK is going to start celebrating the massacre of Indians surely the 13th of April is more apt.
Or 23rd June could be Plassey Day, the celebration of the glorious defeat of the French by the East India Company under Clive of India
There was a 🎄 tree visible in the Sky newsroom..surely not? 🤔🥴
I’ve noticed a tragically large number in houses as I pass. One house with three trees on show with those triangular candalabras in each visible window.
We urgently need to invent a new festival between Halloween and Christmas to hold off the nutters a bit longer.
Thanksgiving!
Look, if it the UK is going to start celebrating the massacre of Indians surely the 13th of April is more apt.
I heard a Tory MP or ex MP claiming he worked with her in the early part of her career and waxed lyrical about her skills. Whether just an attempt at reflected glory or not I don't know but as this slur originates from Guido I'm surprised it's even being given an airing
Given how far they screwed up in office, ad hom attacks on Starmer, Rayner and Reeves is pretty much all they’ve got left.
Ironic that you wrote that in reply to an ad hom attack by Roger.
There was a 🎄 tree visible in the Sky newsroom..surely not? 🤔🥴
I’ve noticed a tragically large number in houses as I pass. One house with three trees on show with those triangular candalabras in each visible window.
We urgently need to invent a new festival between Halloween and Christmas to hold off the nutters a bit longer.
Thanksgiving!
They left here a lot earlier in the year. We should celebrate that ancestors of, for example, the Bush family left these shores.
Surely anyone from down a pit could confidently take on a sandal wearer? 😏
Ed Miliband has more in common with Greta Thunberg and Chris Packham and metropolitan Green voters than the working class trade unionists and miners who founded the Labour party 150 years ago
She seems to have a bit of form, from the chess stuff to her book.
I thought the chess stuff was debunked? She claimed to make the last 16 and she did make the last 16. Others, not her, then started saying she'd won...?
She never asked for the stories to be corrected and they were still running them even on budget day from the BBC.
She seems to have a bit of form, from the chess stuff to her book.
I thought the chess stuff was debunked? She claimed to make the last 16 and she did make the last 16. Others, not her, then started saying she'd won...?
Any excuse for her book being plagiarised from Wikipedia?
There was a 🎄 tree visible in the Sky newsroom..surely not? 🤔🥴
I’ve noticed a tragically large number in houses as I pass. One house with three trees on show with those triangular candalabras in each visible window.
We urgently need to invent a new festival between Halloween and Christmas to hold off the nutters a bit longer.
Dewali? Hanukkah?
St Andrew's Day.
It's World Television Day on 21 Nov, as proclaimed by the UN.
Or the International Day of Banks on 4 Dec for those who celebrate.
Plenty here will be partying on International Migrants Day on 18 Dec. There's quite a few expats among us, and plenty more who take a special interest in migration.
There was a 🎄 tree visible in the Sky newsroom..surely not? 🤔🥴
I’ve noticed a tragically large number in houses as I pass. One house with three trees on show with those triangular candalabras in each visible window.
We urgently need to invent a new festival between Halloween and Christmas to hold off the nutters a bit longer.
Thanksgiving!
Look, if it the UK is going to start celebrating the massacre of Indians surely the 13th of April is more apt.
Or 23rd June could be Plassey Day, the celebration of the glorious defeat of the French by the East India Company under Clive of India
I've just read a history of the battle. Aren't you sort of forgetting the local chaps? With Siraj-ud-Daulah in charge? And failing to make it clear that the French were also a bunch of capitalists and their lackeys?
Surely anyone from down a pit could confidently take on a sandal wearer? 😏
Ed Miliband has more in common with Greta Thunberg and Chris Packham and metropolitan Green voters than the working class trade unionists and miners who founded the Labour party 150 years ago
Or even the miners that were at the heart of the party only 40 years ago.
I'm more worried about her Mansion House speech and attitude towards the City. Are we going soft on levels of bank capital? Trump might well relax the rules on American banks, to which I would say good luck to them. We should not be tempted to follow.
Yes it seems Reeves, Starmer and Miliband are happy to trash family farms and close the last coal mines in the UK and freeze pensioners in winter and hammer small businesses but train drivers, bankers and GPs are to be well rewarded
She seems to have a bit of form, from the chess stuff to her book.
I thought the chess stuff was debunked? She claimed to make the last 16 and she did make the last 16. Others, not her, then started saying she'd won...?
Any excuse for her book being plagiarised from Wikipedia?
I was talking about the chess stuff, william. That's why I begun with a reference to the chess stuff.
I'm more worried about her Mansion House speech and attitude towards the City. Are we going soft on levels of bank capital? Trump might well relax the rules on American banks, to which I would say good luck to them. We should not be tempted to follow.
Yes it seems Reeves, Starmer and Miliband are happy to trash family farms and close the last coal mines in the UK and freeze pensioners in winter and hammer small businesses but train drivers, bankers and GPs are to be well rewarded
Tory fails to demand means testing for the poor ... astounding.
There was a 🎄 tree visible in the Sky newsroom..surely not? 🤔🥴
I’ve noticed a tragically large number in houses as I pass. One house with three trees on show with those triangular candalabras in each visible window.
We urgently need to invent a new festival between Halloween and Christmas to hold off the nutters a bit longer.
Thanksgiving!
Look, if it the UK is going to start celebrating the massacre of Indians surely the 13th of April is more apt.
With General Dyer on top of the tree? Oh I do hope not.
Well he should have been hanging somewhere else.
I read a book about the affair many years ago as a random find in a bookshop. What I remember most of all, apart of course from its demonstration of the benevolence of the British empire alongside railways etc., was the indignation in Cheltenham etc. that people should dare to complain.
But there was outrage in the Commons led by Churchill.
However we may dwell upon the difficulties of General Dyer…one tremendous fact stands out. I mean the slaughter of nearly 400 persons and the wounding of probably three or four times as many…. That is an episode which appears to me to be without precedent or parallel in the modern history of the British Empire. It is an event of an entirely different order from any of those tragical occurrences which take place when troops are brought into collision with the civil population. It is an extraordinary event, a monstrous event, an event which stands in singular and sinister isolation.
I'm more worried about her Mansion House speech and attitude towards the City. Are we going soft on levels of bank capital? Trump might well relax the rules on American banks, to which I would say good luck to them. We should not be tempted to follow.
Yes it seems Reeves, Starmer and Miliband are happy to trash family farms and close the last coal mines in the UK and freeze pensioners in winter and hammer small businesses but train drivers, bankers and GPs are to be well rewarded
Tory fails to demand means testing for the poor ... astounding.
Conservative cares about preserving our farms and pensioners and small businesses non shock and even now conserving our mines more than Labour has given the last Tory government wanted to open a new mine and Miliband scrapped it
There was a 🎄 tree visible in the Sky newsroom..surely not? 🤔🥴
I’ve noticed a tragically large number in houses as I pass. One house with three trees on show with those triangular candalabras in each visible window.
We urgently need to invent a new festival between Halloween and Christmas to hold off the nutters a bit longer.
Thanksgiving!
Look, if it the UK is going to start celebrating the massacre of Indians surely the 13th of April is more apt.
With General Dyer on top of the tree? Oh I do hope not.
Well he should have been hanging somewhere else.
I read a book about the affair many years ago as a random find in a bookshop. What I remember most of all, apart of course from its demonstration of the benevolence of the British empire alongside railways etc., was the indignation in Cheltenham etc. that people should dare to complain.
But there was outrage in the Commons led by Churchill.
However we may dwell upon the difficulties of General Dyer…one tremendous fact stands out. I mean the slaughter of nearly 400 persons and the wounding of probably three or four times as many…. That is an episode which appears to me to be without precedent or parallel in the modern history of the British Empire. It is an event of an entirely different order from any of those tragical occurrences which take place when troops are brought into collision with the civil population. It is an extraordinary event, a monstrous event, an event which stands in singular and sinister isolation.
When this story first broke, I didn't think it was particularly big. Big banks have a surprising number of economists, and they don't all work in the economics department. (There's a lot of microeconomics in most firms operations: we do a huge amount of work on price elasticity of demand, for example.)
However, as time as gone on, I've gotten more and more sceptical of her answers. If she was working as an economist, even in the customer complaints department, then fine. But if she was working in a different role - like supervising staff, then it's another matter altogether. One is her telling the truth ("I was an economist at Halifax"), even if she may have allowed people to come to the wrong conclusions. The other is a lie.
If she lied, then she should not be Chancellor of the Exchequer. Like with Presidents and Prime Ministers, our public servants need to consistently demonstrate the highest standards of honesty. And if she has show to have not, then SKS needs to let her go.
There was a 🎄 tree visible in the Sky newsroom..surely not? 🤔🥴
I’ve noticed a tragically large number in houses as I pass. One house with three trees on show with those triangular candalabras in each visible window.
We urgently need to invent a new festival between Halloween and Christmas to hold off the nutters a bit longer.
Thanksgiving!
Look, if it the UK is going to start celebrating the massacre of Indians surely the 13th of April is more apt.
With General Dyer on top of the tree? Oh I do hope not.
Well he should have been hanging somewhere else.
I read a book about the affair many years ago as a random find in a bookshop. What I remember most of all, apart of course from its demonstration of the benevolence of the British empire alongside railways etc., was the indignation in Cheltenham etc. that people should dare to complain.
But there was outrage in the Commons led by Churchill.
However we may dwell upon the difficulties of General Dyer…one tremendous fact stands out. I mean the slaughter of nearly 400 persons and the wounding of probably three or four times as many…. That is an episode which appears to me to be without precedent or parallel in the modern history of the British Empire. It is an event of an entirely different order from any of those tragical occurrences which take place when troops are brought into collision with the civil population. It is an extraordinary event, a monstrous event, an event which stands in singular and sinister isolation.
General Dyer was, of course, a Pakistani.
Slightly ahistorical, and as the Duke of Wellington reputably said in response to being described as Irish. "Just because a man is born in a stable doesn't make him a horse".
When this story first broke, I didn't think it was particularly big. Big banks have a surprising number of economists, and they don't all work in the economics department. (There's a lot of microeconomics in most firms operations: we do a huge amount of work on price elasticity of demand, for example.)
However, as time as gone on, I've gotten more and more sceptical of her answers. If she was working as an economist, even in the customer complaints department, then fine. But if she was working in a different role - like supervising staff, then it's another matter altogether. One is her telling the truth ("I was an economist at Halifax"), even if she may have allowed people to come to the wrong conclusions. The other is a lie.
If she lied, then she should not be Chancellor of the Exchequer. Like with Presidents and Prime Ministers, our public servants need to consistently demonstrate the highest standards of honesty. And if she has show to have not, then SKS needs to let her go.
When this story first broke, I didn't think it was particularly big. Big banks have a surprising number of economists, and they don't all work in the economics department. (There's a lot of microeconomics in most firms operations: we do a huge amount of work on price elasticity of demand, for example.)
However, as time as gone on, I've gotten more and more sceptical of her answers. If she was working as an economist, even in the customer complaints department, then fine. But if she was working in a different role - like supervising staff, then it's another matter altogether. One is her telling the truth ("I was an economist at Halifax"), even if she may have allowed people to come to the wrong conclusions. The other is a lie.
If she lied, then she should not be Chancellor of the Exchequer. Like with Presidents and Prime Ministers, our public servants need to consistently demonstrate the highest standards of honesty. And if she has show to have not, then SKS needs to let her go.
Yes, we should just leave the lying and exaggerations of the truth to the next most powerful man in the world, President elect Trump.
Certainly no problem for him being in charge of the nuclear button and maybe occasionally exaggerating the truth from time to time. Might be a problem for the UK bean counter though
When this story first broke, I didn't think it was particularly big. Big banks have a surprising number of economists, and they don't all work in the economics department. (There's a lot of microeconomics in most firms operations: we do a huge amount of work on price elasticity of demand, for example.)
However, as time as gone on, I've gotten more and more sceptical of her answers. If she was working as an economist, even in the customer complaints department, then fine. But if she was working in a different role - like supervising staff, then it's another matter altogether. One is her telling the truth ("I was an economist at Halifax"), even if she may have allowed people to come to the wrong conclusions. The other is a lie.
If she lied, then she should not be Chancellor of the Exchequer. Like with Presidents and Prime Ministers, our public servants need to consistently demonstrate the highest standards of honesty. And if she has show to have not, then SKS needs to let her go.
Political leaders having to resign for lying?
There won't be many left, and the few who do survive the cull will be insufferable prigs.
A quarter of 18 - 25 year olds have exaggerated their CV.
Bit of a crap shoot employing them isn't it?
My CV stated that I'd played for the Cambridge University First Bridge Team. Which was both (a) true, and (b) deeply misleading.
It was the very last duplicate pairs match of the Cambridgeshire League, and (perhaps unsurprisingly) the Cambridge University First Team was miles ahead of everyone else. I was good friends with Tom Townsend (then the England Under 21 Bridge team captain), and he said "we're a man short, come along and play."
So I did. I played for Cambridge University First Bridge Team, and my partner was Tom Townsend.
It was a lot of fun, and I got to put it on my CV. If anyone asked, I told them the truth about what happened. But it was also - I suppose - enormously misleading, because I am a very average bridge player.
When this story first broke, I didn't think it was particularly big. Big banks have a surprising number of economists, and they don't all work in the economics department. (There's a lot of microeconomics in most firms operations: we do a huge amount of work on price elasticity of demand, for example.)
However, as time as gone on, I've gotten more and more sceptical of her answers. If she was working as an economist, even in the customer complaints department, then fine. But if she was working in a different role - like supervising staff, then it's another matter altogether. One is her telling the truth ("I was an economist at Halifax"), even if she may have allowed people to come to the wrong conclusions. The other is a lie.
If she lied, then she should not be Chancellor of the Exchequer. Like with Presidents and Prime Ministers, our public servants need to consistently demonstrate the highest standards of honesty. And if she has show to have not, then SKS needs to let her go.
Political leaders having to resign for lying?
There won't be many left, and the few who do survive the cull will be insufferable prigs.
Isn't that the rule / law they want to introduce in Wales?
When this story first broke, I didn't think it was particularly big. Big banks have a surprising number of economists, and they don't all work in the economics department. (There's a lot of microeconomics in most firms operations: we do a huge amount of work on price elasticity of demand, for example.)
However, as time as gone on, I've gotten more and more sceptical of her answers. If she was working as an economist, even in the customer complaints department, then fine. But if she was working in a different role - like supervising staff, then it's another matter altogether. One is her telling the truth ("I was an economist at Halifax"), even if she may have allowed people to come to the wrong conclusions. The other is a lie.
If she lied, then she should not be Chancellor of the Exchequer. Like with Presidents and Prime Ministers, our public servants need to consistently demonstrate the highest standards of honesty. And if she has show to have not, then SKS needs to let her go.
Political leaders having to resign for lying?
There won't be many left, and the few who do survive the cull will be insufferable prigs.
Right, because that's exactly what you'd be saying were this a Tory.
There was a 🎄 tree visible in the Sky newsroom..surely not? 🤔🥴
I’ve noticed a tragically large number in houses as I pass. One house with three trees on show with those triangular candalabras in each visible window.
We urgently need to invent a new festival between Halloween and Christmas to hold off the nutters a bit longer.
When this story first broke, I didn't think it was particularly big. Big banks have a surprising number of economists, and they don't all work in the economics department. (There's a lot of microeconomics in most firms operations: we do a huge amount of work on price elasticity of demand, for example.)
However, as time as gone on, I've gotten more and more sceptical of her answers. If she was working as an economist, even in the customer complaints department, then fine. But if she was working in a different role - like supervising staff, then it's another matter altogether. One is her telling the truth ("I was an economist at Halifax"), even if she may have allowed people to come to the wrong conclusions. The other is a lie.
If she lied, then she should not be Chancellor of the Exchequer. Like with Presidents and Prime Ministers, our public servants need to consistently demonstrate the highest standards of honesty. And if she has show to have not, then SKS needs to let her go.
Who are the benchmarks here, Robert - Mssrs Trump and Johnson?
Dishonesty isn't great in anybody but if we are comparing her to contempraries, she's not even in the same ballpark.
Back from a few days living off-grid in rural Derbyshire.
Credibility is a word which is thrown around but, like hypocrisy, it's a word which carries greater weight in politics. IF you have or are perceived to have (just as important) credibility, that gets you a long way. Chancellors come in two flavours - technocratic or political. Technocratic chancellors like Lawson can get away with a lot as their actions aren't seen through the prism of political ambition but only as long as they retain their credibility in financial circles.
Political chancellors son't have to worry too much about financial credibility since everything they do is seen through the prism of political ambition - are they setting up policies more to ensure their advancement to No.10 than because they are fiscally the right thing to do?
There was a 🎄 tree visible in the Sky newsroom..surely not? 🤔🥴
I’ve noticed a tragically large number in houses as I pass. One house with three trees on show with those triangular candalabras in each visible window.
We urgently need to invent a new festival between Halloween and Christmas to hold off the nutters a bit longer.
Thanksgiving!
Black Friday (I really hate it).
I have a rigid principle of not buying anything on Black Friday because I hate the whole thing so much.
When this story first broke, I didn't think it was particularly big. Big banks have a surprising number of economists, and they don't all work in the economics department. (There's a lot of microeconomics in most firms operations: we do a huge amount of work on price elasticity of demand, for example.)
However, as time as gone on, I've gotten more and more sceptical of her answers. If she was working as an economist, even in the customer complaints department, then fine. But if she was working in a different role - like supervising staff, then it's another matter altogether. One is her telling the truth ("I was an economist at Halifax"), even if she may have allowed people to come to the wrong conclusions. The other is a lie.
If she lied, then she should not be Chancellor of the Exchequer. Like with Presidents and Prime Ministers, our public servants need to consistently demonstrate the highest standards of honesty. And if she has show to have not, then SKS needs to let her go.
Political leaders having to resign for lying?
There won't be many left, and the few who do survive the cull will be insufferable prigs.
Right, because that's exactly what you'd be saying were this a Tory.
Surely, he never claimed Boris was a liar when demanding his removal?
When this story first broke, I didn't think it was particularly big. Big banks have a surprising number of economists, and they don't all work in the economics department. (There's a lot of microeconomics in most firms operations: we do a huge amount of work on price elasticity of demand, for example.)
However, as time as gone on, I've gotten more and more sceptical of her answers. If she was working as an economist, even in the customer complaints department, then fine. But if she was working in a different role - like supervising staff, then it's another matter altogether. One is her telling the truth ("I was an economist at Halifax"), even if she may have allowed people to come to the wrong conclusions. The other is a lie.
If she lied, then she should not be Chancellor of the Exchequer. Like with Presidents and Prime Ministers, our public servants need to consistently demonstrate the highest standards of honesty. And if she has show to have not, then SKS needs to let her go.
Political leaders having to resign for lying?
There won't be many left, and the few who do survive the cull will be insufferable prigs.
Right, because that's exactly what you'd be saying were this a Tory.
No, as I have stated many times, I never call for people to resign or to be sacked. My only exception is Leicester City managers.
In my many post you won't see me calling for Tory resignations either.
I am very tolerant of old tweets and social media too.
Scoop from @joncraig- A politician and a close protection guard are among those the Gambling Commission is looking to prosecute over bets placed on the date of the election
A source has said at least three - and as many as five - people may be charged
Scoop from @joncraig- A politician and a close protection guard are among those the Gambling Commission is looking to prosecute over bets placed on the date of the election
A source has said at least three - and as many as five - people may be charged
Scoop from @joncraig- A politician and a close protection guard are among those the Gambling Commission is looking to prosecute over bets placed on the date of the election
A source has said at least three - and as many as five - people may be charged
Comments
https://bsky.app/profile/realedballs.bsky.social/post/3lb6bea5tvk2d
Ed Balls
@realedballs.bsky.social
Ed Balls
Very happy to see President Trump 🇺🇸 together with Saudi Arabia’s sovereign fund PIF Governor H.E. Yasir Al-Rumayyan at #ufc309 last evening.
https://x.com/HSajwanization/status/1858089941458207058?t=B3v0VBt4TQP6H9erXas-KQ&s=19
We urgently need to invent a new festival between Halloween and Christmas to hold off the nutters a bit longer.
Rick Wilson (Bulwark podcast)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-fUwEqL00BI
Surely anyone from down a pit could confidently take on a sandal wearer? 😏
This is thin gruel, she over egged the length of time and responsibilities working these organisations. That is not something I have ever done, but I have interviewed plenty of people who have. And loads of MPs have been caught doing this.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/11/18/carol-mark-thatcher-sell-auction-margaret-dormer-desk/ (£££)
Auction of Thatcher tat for any nouveau riche PBers who need to buy their own furniture.
https://www.sloanestreetauctions.com/auctions/
Or the International Day of Banks on 4 Dec for those who celebrate.
Plenty here will be partying on International Migrants Day on 18 Dec. There's quite a few expats among us, and plenty more who take a special interest in migration.
Ahem.
More pertinent is that if she was (a?) sensor economist at HBOS was she asleep when the banking crisis hit.
However, as time as gone on, I've gotten more and more sceptical of her answers. If she was working as an economist, even in the customer complaints department, then fine. But if she was working in a different role - like supervising staff, then it's another matter altogether. One is her telling the truth ("I was an economist at Halifax"), even if she may have allowed people to come to the wrong conclusions. The other is a lie.
If she lied, then she should not be Chancellor of the Exchequer. Like with Presidents and Prime Ministers, our public servants need to consistently demonstrate the highest standards of honesty. And if she has show to have not, then SKS needs to let her go.
Bit of a crap shoot employing them isn't it?
Certainly no problem for him being in charge of the nuclear button and maybe occasionally exaggerating the truth from time to time. Might be a problem for the UK bean counter though
There won't be many left, and the few who do survive the cull will be insufferable prigs.
It was the very last duplicate pairs match of the Cambridgeshire League, and (perhaps unsurprisingly) the Cambridge University First Team was miles ahead of everyone else. I was good friends with Tom Townsend (then the England Under 21 Bridge team captain), and he said "we're a man short, come along and play."
So I did. I played for Cambridge University First Bridge Team, and my partner was Tom Townsend.
It was a lot of fun, and I got to put it on my CV. If anyone asked, I told them the truth about what happened. But it was also - I suppose - enormously misleading, because I am a very average bridge player.
Then you come along and scoop up all the likes!
Dishonesty isn't great in anybody but if we are comparing her to contempraries, she's not even in the same ballpark.
• Potatoes: +73%
• Butter: +30%
• Inflation: +64%
• Mortgage rates: 28%
• Interest rates: 21%
https://x.com/FrankLuntz/status/1858544729979601069
Back from a few days living off-grid in rural Derbyshire.
Credibility is a word which is thrown around but, like hypocrisy, it's a word which carries greater weight in politics. IF you have or are perceived to have (just as important) credibility, that gets you a long way. Chancellors come in two flavours - technocratic or political. Technocratic chancellors like Lawson can get away with a lot as their actions aren't seen through the prism of political ambition but only as long as they retain their credibility in financial circles.
Political chancellors son't have to worry too much about financial credibility since everything they do is seen through the prism of political ambition - are they setting up policies more to ensure their advancement to No.10 than because they are fiscally the right thing to do?
Since almost every who went underground is over 60.
And many have emphysema and pneumonicosis.
That said, I've only really had three jobs, the last two jobs didn't involve a CV, I was hired by people I had previously worked with.
In my many post you won't see me calling for Tory resignations either.
I am very tolerant of old tweets and social media too.
A source has said at least three - and as many as five - people may be charged
https://x.com/SophyRidgeSky/status/1858578009038455296
I worked with computers being a good one.
Honestly I did, but it could mean a great deal less.