Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Ayrshire hotelier Donald Trump becomes American president again – politicalbetting.com

1356710

Comments

  • bondegezoubondegezou Posts: 11,043
    Nigelb said:

    Everyone, and I mean everyone, needs a massive dose of humble pie and to revist all their assumptions.

    All of them.

    Trump won a majority of the vote. He got massive swings amongst constituencies that are meant to hate him and it was nearly a landslide in the EC.

    There's some serious introspection needed and difficult questions to be asked.

    Why is a dose of humble pie needed? I thought the result would be close, the result looks to be close. Most people here thought the result would be close. We were all right.
    No, Casino is at least partially right.
    While I'll come out slightly ahead overall, thanks to hedging, it would have been a very profitable night indeed had Harris won.

    I'm happy to acknowledge I called that wrong.
    We talked at length about the polls being wrong in either direction, and I put money on the wrong way (the hedges, thankfully, acknowledged the possibility of the other eventuality).

    The implications of the Trump win are going to take a lot more time to disentangle, though.

    If he goes ahead with his pledges on tariffs and deportation, there are going to be a lot of very angry and disappointed Trump voters in four years time, for example.
    Some people here predicted Harris would win comfortably. Sadly, they were wrong. But most people thought it could go either way.
  • MaxPBMaxPB Posts: 38,771

    Everyone, and I mean everyone, needs a massive dose of humble pie and to revist all their assumptions.

    All of them.

    Trump won a majority of the vote. He got massive swings amongst constituencies that are meant to hate him and it was nearly a landslide in the EC.

    There's some serious introspection needed and difficult questions to be asked.

    Why is a dose of humble pie needed? I thought the result would be close, the result looks to be close. Most people here thought the result would be close. We were all right.
    It's not close, he's heading for a similarly sized victory as Biden on 2020.
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 62,686
    NY Times has changed its headline in last few minutes to:

    Trump on Verge of Victory With Swing State Wins
  • londonpubmanlondonpubman Posts: 3,639
    OK I called it wrong

    Not for the first time!
  • SelebianSelebian Posts: 8,714
    Fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuck!
  • malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 43,309
    DavidL said:

    One thing I got wrong is that I thought it would be seriously close. Its not. Trump has Michigan, Nevada, Wisconsin. Like the incumbent government here the blue wall has collapsed entirely. I was always unsure whether picking Walz over Shapiro was a good idea but against that background it almost certainly does not matter.

    I thought Harris fought an exceptional campaign. That didn't matter either. Bidenomics has delivered for the US better than the economic policies of any western government. Not enough. Media, and in particular Fox and X, have persuaded the majority that they were in dire straits when they were not. That they were in a crime wave when they were not.

    Trump will now double down on the right wing majority in the SC for a generation. The Federal cases against him for keeping secrets in his bathroom and causing a riot on Jan 6th will vanish. Women's freedom will continue to be severely curtailed. Gilead approaches. Grim. Really grim. Mainly for the people of America but we will have the backwash.

    It was the "Eating your Pets" what won it
  • LeonLeon Posts: 55,227

    That anecdote “he didn’t start any wars” is one of these interesting things that I thought meant nothing at the time but I wonder if it reflects more what people were voting for as opposed to against.

    Morning all.

    Yes, I noticed this online a lot. There was a large online constituency who thought Trump represented an antu-war vote.
    And not without reason

    Would Putin have invaded Ukraine with Trump as POTUS? It is at least arguable he would not have risked it

    I can also see Trump putting the screws on Netanyahu to end his wars, just because that will make Trump look good (in a way Biden/Harris would never do)
  • SelebianSelebian Posts: 8,714
    Cookie said:

    GIN1138 said:

    I don’t want to sound bitter but I just cannot understand how after four years of utter chaos you’d decide to vote for this chap again.

    It seems to me to escape all logic and understanding.

    I will hold my hands up and say I got this completely wrong but I just cannot understand what’s happened. I clearly don’t understand the US at all. I don’t think I even understand young people in the US either.

    And Trump winning the popular vote! Never thought I would see that.

    I guess Kamala must have been a really, really crap candidate.

    And that's before we get on to what the Dems have been up to, covering up for Bidens senility for years...
    Yes, that's it exactly. Fear of a Harris presidency outweighed fear of a Trump presidency. We were shielded in the UK from just how negatively she was seen and how extremist she was perceived to be.
    Johnson versus Corbyn redux.

    People thought, "yes, this guy's a lying clown, but the alternative is going to wreck the country".

    That's harsh on both Johnson and Harris, of course!
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 48,615
    edited November 6

    Barnesian said:

    This reminds me of Brexit. The shock.
    The motivation for it, the subsequent regret.

    It's less shocking than 2016, because it has happened before. I suppose the hope is he was all mouth and trousers then and he might be again.

    There are however more sinister people waiting in the wings and eating three BigMacs a day is a distinct health negative.
    Its MORE shocking. In 2016 people didn't know what he represented.

    In 2024 they know exactly what he represents. And voted for it.
    Not really, in 2020 he was up against a WASP male. I was offended earlier when Adam Boulton said Harris would struggle to overcome the handicaps of not being male and white. Seems he was at least in part correct.
    Biden isn't a WASP, he is a WIC.
  • LostPasswordLostPassword Posts: 18,339

    Look on the bright side.

    Now that colonials have gotten their election out of the way the next big election for PB to focus on is the 2026 Holyrood election.

    So PB will be wall to wall coverage about North Britain between now and then.

    23 days until the likely election just across the Irish Sea. It may see that rare thing these days - an incumbent winning reelection.

    Though, with the news yesterday that public spending is up 13% this year it perhaps isn't that surprising. If a government has the cash (temporarily) it can buy votes.
  • If I was Kemi, I would use PMQs to go after Lab for sending volunteers for the Democrats. Also question whether Lammy's position is tenable (he previously called Trump a Neo-Nazi)

    When tariffs hit and Ukraine suffers setbacks because of Trump’s policies, I’m not convinced Badenoch cosying up to Trump will be good for her own electoral performance.
    She must and will stay aloof. The problem for her is that Trump's victory gives Farage more credibility with Right of Centre voters in the UK. Until the dispute on the right of British politics has been settled there is no way we can tackle government as a whole. There is a way that Reform and the Conservatives can co-exist but there are too many on both sides, encouraged by our common enemies who want to nuke each other.

    I might have to listen to Rory Stewart's podcast. Sounds like fun for those whose lives he made hell up here.
  • StereodogStereodog Posts: 692
    IanB2 said:

    Everyone, and I mean everyone, needs a massive dose of humble pie and to revist all their assumptions.

    All of them.

    Trump won a majority of the vote. He got massive swings amongst constituencies that are meant to hate him and it was nearly a landslide in the EC.

    There's some serious introspection needed and difficult questions to be asked.

    Why is a dose of humble pie needed? I thought the result would be close, the result looks to be close. Most people here thought the result would be close. We were all right.
    And it was mostly a failure of hope, not a failure of analysis.
    It was a close election in a foreign (for most of us) country. If we called it right every time then we'd all be getting our butlers to type these posts. Casino just wants us all to feel bad about him losing money.
  • MaxPBMaxPB Posts: 38,771
    It's shocking to me that JD Vance is one heart attack away from being POTUS in s few months. At least last time Pence was actually an experienced politician despite not agreeing with much of his policy he wouldn't have been completely terrible.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,859
    Andy_JS said:

    I'm slightly in shock that opponents of Trump have conducted themselves so poorly as to allow him to win again. A really extraordinary failure.

    It’s the ‘again’ that’s the really remarkable thing.

    If I was Kemi, I would use PMQs to go after Lab for sending volunteers for the Democrats. Also question whether Lammy's position is tenable (he previously called Trump a Neo-Nazi)

    I don't think that will work.

    Even most Tory voters would have preferred Harris to have won, to most Brits Donald Trump is about as appealing as a prostate exam from Edward Scissorhands.
    It's possible that this makes things more difficult for KB, not less.

    She can't get closer to Trump than Farage, because that's anatomically impossible. But if she says anything positive about the new Chief at all, she cuts herself off from a lot of British voters.

    Besides. There's the whole question of whether the next President actually succeeds or not. The Trump agenda isn't anything new. Has it ever ended well?
    Reform is the most likely beneficiary of any ‘Trump effect’, and that just makes the Tories’ road back to credibility all the more difficult.
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 62,686
    John Rentoul reposted
    J.L. Partners 🇺🇸
    @J_L_Partners
    ·
    36m
    Politico Playbook: J.L. Partners /
    @DailyMail
    model and election forecast was the most accurate in the country.

    https://x.com/JohnRentoul?ref_src=twsrc^google|twcamp^serp|twgr^author
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 28,368
    edited November 6

    Andy_JS said:

    I'm slightly in shock that opponents of Trump have conducted themselves so poorly as to allow him to win again. A really extraordinary failure.

    It’s doubly odd that they found a way to win in 2020 and didn’t manage to do it again.

    But as I said above, I do wonder if this election was genuinely unwinnable for them whatever happened.
    They didn't really, they got lucky that the election happened to coincide with a pandemic that Trump handled disastrously. Even then he barely lost.
    But that’s the point isn’t it? Covid was handled here disastrously if you take Partygate. But fundamentally the Tories got thrown out because of the economy.

    Starmer needs to do something on the economy or he’s out.
    Not easily achievable in the midst of a Trump engineered World depression. I don't think the Conservatives will necessarily be the net beneficiaries. Let's hear it for Britain Trump (Farage).
  • LeonLeon Posts: 55,227
    MaxPB said:

    It's shocking to me that JD Vance is one heart attack away from being POTUS in s few months. At least last time Pence was actually an experienced politician despite not agreeing with much of his policy he wouldn't have been completely terrible.

    Vance is smart. I reckon he’d be a good president
  • RattersRatters Posts: 1,075
    The Trump supporters seem to have missed that his election will kick-start a trade war, and we will not be on the side of the US. Europe will be in his crossfires as much as China, and the UK will be treated no different.

    So for all the talk of Musk winning - yes he will in the US, as Trump will see a symbiotic relationship there. But not in Europe. Teslas will face steep tariffs in the EU as retaliation inevitably happens.

    The question for the UK more widely is: are we going to continue to try to suck up to the US under Trump; or side with our allies in Europe? Or try to stay neutral?

    And if Starmer wants reproachment short of rejoining, the EU's door just flung wide open to him.
  • SelebianSelebian Posts: 8,714
    I totally get why they voted for Trump first time round. Many, many people failed/ignored by the state and wanting to roll the dice. Like us with Brexit. What I can't understand is, having seen Trump in action as president, how the US could vote for him again.
  • John Rentoul reposted
    J.L. Partners 🇺🇸
    @J_L_Partners
    ·
    36m
    Politico Playbook: J.L. Partners /
    @DailyMail
    model and election forecast was the most accurate in the country.

    https://x.com/JohnRentoul?ref_src=twsrc^google|twcamp^serp|twgr^author

    They did well here in GE24 too. But James Johnson never comes across like he isn’t really smug.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,859
    Leon said:

    MaxPB said:

    It's shocking to me that JD Vance is one heart attack away from being POTUS in s few months. At least last time Pence was actually an experienced politician despite not agreeing with much of his policy he wouldn't have been completely terrible.

    Vance is smart. I reckon he’d be a good president
    If he is smart, he will keep his head down and keep feeding Trump the burgers….
  • TimSTimS Posts: 12,983

    That anecdote “he didn’t start any wars” is one of these interesting things that I thought meant nothing at the time but I wonder if it reflects more what people were voting for as opposed to against.

    A lot of what Trump represents is indeed consistent with the long-term traditions of US geopolitics before the Cold War. That is, military isolationism and a focus on its own hemisphere, coupled with trade protectionism.

    The US economy grew rapidly in the late 19th and early 20th century but it was always behind a significant tariff barrier. Customs duties into the US were consistently much higher than the European powers, and way behind the global leader in free trade, the UK.

    Its avoidance of the costly wars on the European continent and Asian margins from the Franco-Prussian war through the Russo-Japanese war until the final throes of WW1 gave it a huge economic advantage. It then returned to the old policies of tariff barriers and military neutrality in the 1930s until Pearl Harbor. It was only in the post-WW2 period that it entered what might now seem like an aberration - a period of interventionism and trade liberalisation.

    It can do this because it has a perfectly protected strategic position - it dominates its own continent - and a rich agricultural and industrial heartland with its own domestic energy sources, that benefits from economies of scale. It could survive perfectly well, albeit probably losing relative economic and geopolitical clout, even if it embraced full-on autarky and neutrality.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 71,013

    Leon said:

    Credit to Elon Musk. He went All In on Trump. And will now make a gazillion dollars.

    Yes. He made a huge call. And yet again it’s paid off

    Elon has tremendous power now. Maybe he will use it to save us from Starmer. We can only hope
    How does he do that in the short term i.e. within almost five years? Get Trump to point the nukes at Blighty and demand Nigel is installed as Governor General or he will shoot.

    You've come back more bonkers than when you left.
    Yes, that bit's ridiculous. But probably just Leon doing his piss taking bit.

    The point that right wing billionaires - not just Musk, but some of Vance's backers - are going to have remarkable influence on the administration is absolutely correct.
  • numbertwelvenumbertwelve Posts: 6,807

    That anecdote “he didn’t start any wars” is one of these interesting things that I thought meant nothing at the time but I wonder if it reflects more what people were voting for as opposed to against.

    I think we do have to look at his claims he would stop WWIII as a factor. There are a lot of us who believe he’ll make the world a more dangerous place in the medium term, but for a lot of Americans they will look at Ukraine and the ME and be genuinely concerned. Then you’ve got a guy selling fairy dust who is going to disentangle you from it all and keep you safe.
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 48,615
    edited November 6

    That anecdote “he didn’t start any wars” is one of these interesting things that I thought meant nothing at the time but I wonder if it reflects more what people were voting for as opposed to against.

    Morning all.

    Yes, I noticed this online a lot. There was a large online constituency who thought Trump represented an antu-war vote.
    I think Trump is supremely uninterested in foreign policy. He doesn't care much about any foreign country, including the UK.

    He will not get America involved in wars, he will let Putin, Bibi and Xi do what they like. It's not America so who cares?
  • MaxPBMaxPB Posts: 38,771
    Leon said:

    MaxPB said:

    It's shocking to me that JD Vance is one heart attack away from being POTUS in s few months. At least last time Pence was actually an experienced politician despite not agreeing with much of his policy he wouldn't have been completely terrible.

    Vance is smart. I reckon he’d be a good president
    I don't see a lot of evidence for that.
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 28,368
    Foxy said:

    Barnesian said:

    This reminds me of Brexit. The shock.
    The motivation for it, the subsequent regret.

    It's less shocking than 2016, because it has happened before. I suppose the hope is he was all mouth and trousers then and he might be again.

    There are however more sinister people waiting in the wings and eating three BigMacs a day is a distinct health negative.
    Its MORE shocking. In 2016 people didn't know what he represented.

    In 2024 they know exactly what he represents. And voted for it.
    Not really, in 2020 he was up against a WASP male. I was offended earlier when Adam Boulton said Harris would struggle to overcome the handicaps of not being male and white. Seems he was at least in part correct.
    Biden isn't a WASP, he is a WIC.
    My bad. True enough, and a proud Catholic, but he looks like a WASP male and Kamala doesn't.
  • eekeek Posts: 28,362
    edited November 6
    Selebian said:

    I totally get why they voted for Trump first time round. Many, many people failed/ignored by the state and wanting to roll the dice. Like us with Brexit. What I can't understand is, having seen Trump in action as president, how the US could vote for him again.

    Because they were better off in 2020 than they are now.

    Now they were better off in 2016 than they were in 2020 but that requires an even longer term lens which most people won't have.
  • TimSTimS Posts: 12,983

    Barnesian said:

    This reminds me of Brexit. The shock.
    The motivation for it, the subsequent regret.

    It's less shocking than 2016, because it has happened before. I suppose the hope is he was all mouth and trousers then and he might be again.

    There are however more sinister people waiting in the wings and eating three BigMacs a day is a distinct health negative.
    Its MORE shocking. In 2016 people didn't know what he represented.

    In 2024 they know exactly what he represents. And voted for it.
    Not really, in 2020 he was up against a WASP male. I was offended earlier when Adam Boulton said Harris would struggle to overcome the handicaps of not being male and white. Seems he was at least in part correct.
    Biden was in fact a WASC, not a WASP. And might contest the Anglo Saxon bit if he were in one of his Irish moods.
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 62,686
    Selebian said:

    I totally get why they voted for Trump first time round. Many, many people failed/ignored by the state and wanting to roll the dice. Like us with Brexit. What I can't understand is, having seen Trump in action as president, how the US could vote for him again.

    Enough of them have forgotten presumably.

    iirc he had pretty poor ratings throughout the entire presidency.
  • numbertwelvenumbertwelve Posts: 6,807
    GIN1138 said:

    Kamala going into hiding for hours on end is a sign she would have been a terrible POTUS to be fair...

    Hillary did the same. Not a great look really.
  • eekeek Posts: 28,362
    Ratters said:

    The Trump supporters seem to have missed that his election will kick-start a trade war, and we will not be on the side of the US. Europe will be in his crossfires as much as China, and the UK will be treated no different.

    So for all the talk of Musk winning - yes he will in the US, as Trump will see a symbiotic relationship there. But not in Europe. Teslas will face steep tariffs in the EU as retaliation inevitably happens.

    The question for the UK more widely is: are we going to continue to try to suck up to the US under Trump; or side with our allies in Europe? Or try to stay neutral?

    And if Starmer wants reproachment short of rejoining, the EU's door just flung wide open to him.

    The other issue we have is that our entire military strategy is based and built upon close co-operation with the US and that may no longer be possible or practical.
  • bondegezoubondegezou Posts: 11,043
    .
    TimS said:

    IanB2 said:

    Leon said:

    Vance will win in 2028

    That depends on whether the playing field remains reasonably level. We’ve just seen how difficult it is to defend as an incumbent, and VP to P through the electoral route is an exceptionally rare journey to make.

    The scenario where that becomes more credible is if he’s already President by the time 2028 comes around. Which is certainly quite possible.
    Very possible. If there’s a next President market, Vance has to be the favourite: he’ll either succeed Trump or he’s the most likely Republican candidate in 2028.
    Don't you think Donald will have fallen out with him by then? My money would be on one of the Trump offspring.
    I did wonder about that as I was typing…
  • TazTaz Posts: 14,351

    Andy_JS said:

    I'm slightly in shock that opponents of Trump have conducted themselves so poorly as to allow him to win again. A really extraordinary failure.

    It’s doubly odd that they found a way to win in 2020 and didn’t manage to do it again.

    But as I said above, I do wonder if this election was genuinely unwinnable for them whatever happened.
    They didn't really, they got lucky that the election happened to coincide with a pandemic that Trump handled disastrously. Even then he barely lost.
    But that’s the point isn’t it? Covid was handled here disastrously if you take Partygate. But fundamentally the Tories got thrown out because of the economy.

    Starmer needs to do something on the economy or he’s out.
    Not really the same comparison as there was no GE here in the immediate post-COVID aftermath. And Partygate was a very different "failure" than what happened in the US where Trump promoted quack treatments and denied the seriousness of the disease
    But the Tories lost? The main reason they lost here IMHO is that after many years people felt the country had not improved for them, I.e. the economy was not working.

    To me that’s why people have rolled the dice with Trump again?
    I suspect you are right in that respect. The most powerful Trump ad I saw was one that listed some basic food staples and how much they cost under Trump and the cost under Biden.

    Very effective I thought.
  • StereodogStereodog Posts: 692
    MaxPB said:

    It's shocking to me that JD Vance is one heart attack away from being POTUS in s few months. At least last time Pence was actually an experienced politician despite not agreeing with much of his policy he wouldn't have been completely terrible.

    I found Pence's bloodless ironclad religious conservatism absolutely terrifying at the time. I remember thinking that liberals who would have liked him to take over from Trump who as an ex Democrat can be surprisingly socially liberal (on stuff like homosexuality) were crazy.
  • LeonLeon Posts: 55,227
    Selebian said:

    I totally get why they voted for Trump first time round. Many, many people failed/ignored by the state and wanting to roll the dice. Like us with Brexit. What I can't understand is, having seen Trump in action as president, how the US could vote for him again.

    Do I really have to say this YET AGAIN??

    IT’S BECAUSE MANY AMERICANS KNOW THAT TRUMP IS A CRIMINAL LOON, BUT THEY FIRMLY BELIEVE THE DEMOCRATS ARE MUCH MUCH WORSE
  • TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 41,947
    boulay said:

    I don’t want to sound bitter but I just cannot understand how after four years of utter chaos you’d decide to vote for this chap again.

    It seems to me to escape all logic and understanding.

    I will hold my hands up and say I got this completely wrong but I just cannot understand what’s happened. I clearly don’t understand the US at all. I don’t think I even understand young people in the US either.

    And Trump winning the popular vote! Never thought I would see that.

    Do you think you don’t understand it is because you think erroneously that Americans are just like us? Maybe because our news and media blurs the lines between the two countries and culture we see the liberal cultural side of the US but not the huge equivalent of normal “red wall” (in British terms) people.

    It would probably help people who think we are the same if the US spoke a different language as it would stop this misconception of sameness.

    The same people who don’t understand Trump didn’t understand Brexit, Boris, the Red Wall.
    Wait a gosh darn minute, aren’t you contradicting yourself by equating Trump, Brexit, Boris and the Red Wall? We’ve just been told that people are fucking bored of mass immigration and woke and being told if they are white they are evil and women are men and America (and britain) are uniquely evil and all that endless endless lefty bollocks which suggests a certain universality.
  • MaxPB said:

    It's shocking to me that JD Vance is one heart attack away from being POTUS in s few months. At least last time Pence was actually an experienced politician despite not agreeing with much of his policy he wouldn't have been completely terrible.

    When I spoke to OGH last month it was the prospect of Vance becoming POTUS that scared OGH the most about a Trump victory.

    I tried to reassure OGH that Vance has impeccable judgment because he previously called Trump America's Hitler.
  • EabhalEabhal Posts: 8,630
    Ratters said:

    The Trump supporters seem to have missed that his election will kick-start a trade war, and we will not be on the side of the US. Europe will be in his crossfires as much as China, and the UK will be treated no different.

    So for all the talk of Musk winning - yes he will in the US, as Trump will see a symbiotic relationship there. But not in Europe. Teslas will face steep tariffs in the EU as retaliation inevitably happens.

    The question for the UK more widely is: are we going to continue to try to suck up to the US under Trump; or side with our allies in Europe? Or try to stay neutral?

    And if Starmer wants reproachment short of rejoining, the EU's door just flung wide open to him.

    I think the Trump fanbois are going to be rather frustrated by Starmer's response to Trump. It won't be their simpering servitude.

    If it really does kick off I can see us sheltering with Europe.
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 62,686
    Nigelb said:

    Leon said:

    Credit to Elon Musk. He went All In on Trump. And will now make a gazillion dollars.

    Yes. He made a huge call. And yet again it’s paid off

    Elon has tremendous power now. Maybe he will use it to save us from Starmer. We can only hope
    How does he do that in the short term i.e. within almost five years? Get Trump to point the nukes at Blighty and demand Nigel is installed as Governor General or he will shoot.

    You've come back more bonkers than when you left.
    Yes, that bit's ridiculous. But probably just Leon doing his piss taking bit.

    The point that right wing billionaires - not just Musk, but some of Vance's backers - are going to have remarkable influence on the administration is absolutely correct.
    I read @Leon 's comment to mean Starmer will only be one term. That seems likely now as he will get the blame in 2028 for the coming economic storm from US.
  • GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 22,261

    GIN1138 said:

    Kamala going into hiding for hours on end is a sign she would have been a terrible POTUS to be fair...

    Hillary did the same. Not a great look really.
    We have a better system on election night where every candidate from the PM down is subjected to public scrutiny and shame, lol...
  • LeonLeon Posts: 55,227

    GIN1138 said:

    Kamala going into hiding for hours on end is a sign she would have been a terrible POTUS to be fair...

    Hillary did the same. Not a great look really.
    Yes, it’s pathetic

    Your supporters are hurting, your side of the nation is quailing, show some fucking backbone and get out there and make a good speech to steady their nerves and console their sadness. Hiding away is contemptible
  • DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 27,830

    Credit to Elon Musk. He went All In on Trump. And will now make a gazillion dollars.

    You're thinking of Jeff Bezos who stopped the papers endorsing Kamala and presumably has rescued his Blue Origin contracts and protected Amazon from monopoly charges.

    The danger for Elon Musk is that Trump's tariffs screw up Tesla's supply chains and possibly his foreign markets too if there is retaliation.
  • TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 41,947
    Leon said:

    MaxPB said:

    It's shocking to me that JD Vance is one heart attack away from being POTUS in s few months. At least last time Pence was actually an experienced politician despite not agreeing with much of his policy he wouldn't have been completely terrible.

    Vance is smart. I reckon he’d be a good president
    Surprise on the upside perhaps?
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 28,368
    Eabhal said:

    Ratters said:

    The Trump supporters seem to have missed that his election will kick-start a trade war, and we will not be on the side of the US. Europe will be in his crossfires as much as China, and the UK will be treated no different.

    So for all the talk of Musk winning - yes he will in the US, as Trump will see a symbiotic relationship there. But not in Europe. Teslas will face steep tariffs in the EU as retaliation inevitably happens.

    The question for the UK more widely is: are we going to continue to try to suck up to the US under Trump; or side with our allies in Europe? Or try to stay neutral?

    And if Starmer wants reproachment short of rejoining, the EU's door just flung wide open to him.

    I think the Trump fanbois are going to be rather frustrated by Starmer's response to Trump. It won't be their simpering servitude.

    If it really does kick off I can see us sheltering with Europe.
    Looking forward to Nigel HawHaw's letters from America.
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 32,538
    edited November 6
    Cicero said:

    Since 1941 the interests and the values of the US and the UK have been aligned based on the agreed principles of the Atlantic Charter. Those values included, but were not limited to, the value of a peaceful democratic order and a just, rules-based system of security and trade.

    Trump, like his backers seems to believe that these principles are not universal and have outlived their usefulness. Instead of multilateral agreements, they argue for a more direct, unilateral approach with the immediate interests of the United States a priority at all times. It is no good arguing that the altruism of post war America allowed the recovery of (western) Europe and the emergence of a mutually enriching trade. This point of view believes that the goodwill of the US has been exploited by enemies (China) and allies (the EU) alike.

    The mealy-mouthed compromises which have been the foundation of globalisation are themselves seen as morally weak and in any event led to the wholesale off-shoring of jobs and large parts of the Western economy to Asia. Again, there is no point in arguing for Ricardo´s comparative advantage when you see once prosperous factories closed and the urban blight of drugs and vice replacing it.

    As for the special pleading for minorities, racial and sexual, this infuriates large numbers of straight white voters who feel that affirmative action has replaced one injustice with another, and who remain, at best, uncomfortable with the reality of gay rights activists who seem to be pushing for acceptance of ever less acceptable, even "degenerate" groups at a time when birthrates have collapsed and the demographic survival of some places seems doubtful. Abortion rights are also involved in this world view too and are not positive.

    Trump and the radical right offers clear and simple solutions. That these solutions in many cases seem at best questionable, at worse dangerous and potentially authoritarian does not bother the MAGA world view at all.

    The rise of general authoritarianism is a clear global trend. Today Trump, in two years time, perhaps, Le Pen. As for the UK, it doesn´t matter, our withdrawal from the EU commits us to the United States, no matter that the values of the US and the UK have always differed and may now be misaligned. The decisive power of the United States is now over, it is one amongst many. If you no longer trust the fairness of the US, China doesn´t look so bad an alternative. Europe can only be a force if Russia is defeated and then brought into the EU state system, which is now very much not the wish of the USA.

    Farage offers us the Trumpian future. Those of us who still believe in a fundamental justice will need to answer this defeat. Can Britain overcome our own crisis? Can we realign? This is now a fundamental state challenge for the UK, and not just from the centre and left of our political system.

    Project 2025 is coming. What is our response? What choices, if any, do we have?

    "If you no longer trust the fairness of the US, China doesn´t look so bad an alternative."

    You can't really believe this.


    "Those of us who still believe in a fundamental justice will need to answer this defeat."

    What do you mean by "a fundamental justice" as opposed to just "fundamental justice"?
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 62,686
    Presumably Harris can just refuse to certify the result as Trump wanted Pence to do four years ago?
  • TimSTimS Posts: 12,983
    Leon said:

    That anecdote “he didn’t start any wars” is one of these interesting things that I thought meant nothing at the time but I wonder if it reflects more what people were voting for as opposed to against.

    Morning all.

    Yes, I noticed this online a lot. There was a large online constituency who thought Trump represented an antu-war vote.
    And not without reason

    Would Putin have invaded Ukraine with Trump as POTUS? It is at least arguable he would not have risked it

    I can also see Trump putting the screws on Netanyahu to end his wars, just because that will make Trump look good (in a way Biden/Harris would never do)
    He happily sent chemical assassins to Salisbury during Trump's term. Neither Trump nor Biden really acted as much of a deterrent to someone who'd got away with invasions under both Bush and Obama.
  • FishingFishing Posts: 5,032
    At least Trump's victory seems clear and afaik undisputed.

    So he doesn't need to undermine democracy this time - my guess is he'll probably leave it alone and focus on other things as he won't be facing the voters in 2028.

    So that's a silver lining in a rather dark cloud anyway.
  • I remember in 2016 people said that Clinton not campaigning in certain states swung it. I now wonder if it would have made any difference at all.
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 61,774
    Hearing unconfirmed and fictional rumours Starmer's plan to get on-side with Trump is to offer him reparations of £18tn.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 71,013
    Stocky said:

    I did wonder whether the puzzling, extraordinary initial enthusiasm for Harris was mostly Dem Party construction.

    Was it ? - look at her approval figures vs Biden's, all the way up to the election.

    It's at least arguable that there wasn't a good way for this to go, once Biden decided to go for renomination, in any event.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,859
    edited November 6
    Taz said:

    Andy_JS said:

    I'm slightly in shock that opponents of Trump have conducted themselves so poorly as to allow him to win again. A really extraordinary failure.

    It’s doubly odd that they found a way to win in 2020 and didn’t manage to do it again.

    But as I said above, I do wonder if this election was genuinely unwinnable for them whatever happened.
    They didn't really, they got lucky that the election happened to coincide with a pandemic that Trump handled disastrously. Even then he barely lost.
    But that’s the point isn’t it? Covid was handled here disastrously if you take Partygate. But fundamentally the Tories got thrown out because of the economy.

    Starmer needs to do something on the economy or he’s out.
    Not really the same comparison as there was no GE here in the immediate post-COVID aftermath. And Partygate was a very different "failure" than what happened in the US where Trump promoted quack treatments and denied the seriousness of the disease
    But the Tories lost? The main reason they lost here IMHO is that after many years people felt the country had not improved for them, I.e. the economy was not working.

    To me that’s why people have rolled the dice with Trump again?
    I suspect you are right in that respect. The most powerful Trump ad I saw was one that listed some basic food staples and how much they cost under Trump and the cost under Biden.

    Very effective I thought.
    Having done long trips three times now, it certainly is very noticeable how much more expensive everything is there now. The economy seemed to be buzzing, but it’s mostly the already rich who are benefitting. The mystery is why ordinary workers think Trump is going to help them, rather than his superrich buddies, any more than he did last time.
  • malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 43,309
    Andy_JS said:

    Good luck to David Lammy on his future dealings with the Trump administration.

    He will be lucky to get in the back door, lame duck.
  • LeonLeon Posts: 55,227

    Nigelb said:

    Leon said:

    Credit to Elon Musk. He went All In on Trump. And will now make a gazillion dollars.

    Yes. He made a huge call. And yet again it’s paid off

    Elon has tremendous power now. Maybe he will use it to save us from Starmer. We can only hope
    How does he do that in the short term i.e. within almost five years? Get Trump to point the nukes at Blighty and demand Nigel is installed as Governor General or he will shoot.

    You've come back more bonkers than when you left.
    Yes, that bit's ridiculous. But probably just Leon doing his piss taking bit.

    The point that right wing billionaires - not just Musk, but some of Vance's backers - are going to have remarkable influence on the administration is absolutely correct.
    I read @Leon 's comment to mean Starmer will only be one term. That seems likely now as he will get the blame in 2028 for the coming economic storm from US.

    I was clearly joking as @Nigelb noted. I don’t believe Musk will “overthrow” the British PM

    However I do believe Musk has now has unexampled power, the most important non politician in America and the world, and now untouchable (probably forever)

    I also believe this Trump victory is terrible for Labour, for so many reasons, and makes their defeat in 2028-29 near certain
  • CJohnCJohn Posts: 14
    From a betting point of view, I unnecessarily hedged my Trump bet last night, when it still looked like a Harris victory was possible.

    Will Trump be good for the US? Not if he fulfills on tariffs. Mass deportations: my feeling is these will be underwhelming given logistical and legal obstacles.

    Rewarding Putin for his aggression will have little immediate negative impact for US.

  • TazTaz Posts: 14,351
    @
    GIN1138 said:

    Kamala going into hiding for hours on end is a sign she would have been a terrible POTUS to be fair...

    Utterly spineless.

    She was a terrible candidate. The Democrats should have chosen from a field rather than deciding it was her turn so she got the gig.
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 62,686
    Fishing said:

    At least Trump's victory seems clear and afaik undisputed.

    So he doesn't need to undermine democracy this time - my guess is he'll probably leave it alone and focus on other things as he won't be facing the voters in 2028.

    So that's a silver lining in a rather dark cloud anyway.

    There's no way they will get in out of the Oval Office now except when he passes away. That's my prediction FWIW.

    If there is an election in 2028 it will be rigged beyond words.
  • Is there any mileage in Biden stepping down and putting Harris in the White House?
  • CleitophonCleitophon Posts: 480
    Fishing said:

    At least Trump's victory seems clear and afaik undisputed.

    So he doesn't need to undermine democracy this time - my guess is he'll probably leave it alone and focus on other things as he won't be facing the voters in 2028.

    So that's a silver lining in a rather dark cloud anyway.

    That is wishful thinking .... the US will never get rid of him. Hence the worry... "You won't have to vote again" as he said.
  • eekeek Posts: 28,362

    Credit to Elon Musk. He went All In on Trump. And will now make a gazillion dollars.

    You're thinking of Jeff Bezos who stopped the papers endorsing Kamala and presumably has rescued his Blue Origin contracts and protected Amazon from monopoly charges.

    The danger for Elon Musk is that Trump's tariffs screw up Tesla's supply chains and possibly his foreign markets too if there is retaliation.
    Tesla has factories in China and the EU, he won't have a problem really.
  • JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 42,542
    This victory will mean an unprecedented redistribution of wealth from the poor in America to the rich.

    They have made this clear, and the poor have voted for it.
  • bondegezoubondegezou Posts: 11,043
    MaxPB said:

    Everyone, and I mean everyone, needs a massive dose of humble pie and to revist all their assumptions.

    All of them.

    Trump won a majority of the vote. He got massive swings amongst constituencies that are meant to hate him and it was nearly a landslide in the EC.

    There's some serious introspection needed and difficult questions to be asked.

    Why is a dose of humble pie needed? I thought the result would be close, the result looks to be close. Most people here thought the result would be close. We were all right.
    It's not close, he's heading for a similarly sized victory as Biden on 2020.
    … which was fairly close.

    In 1992, Clinton won 370 to 168 in the EC. In 1996, he did even better. Obama won 365 to 173, and then 332 to 206. Those victories were not close.
  • MaxPBMaxPB Posts: 38,771
    Andy_JS said:

    Cicero said:

    Since 1941 the interests and the values of the US and the UK have been aligned based on the agreed principles of the Atlantic Charter. Those values included, but were not limited to, the value of a peaceful democratic order and a just, rules-based system of security and trade.

    Trump, like his backers seems to believe that these principles are not universal and have outlived their usefulness. Instead of multilateral agreements, they argue for a more direct, unilateral approach with the immediate interests of the United States a priority at all times. It is no good arguing that the altruism of post war America allowed the recovery of (western) Europe and the emergence of a mutually enriching trade. This point of view believes that the goodwill of the US has been exploited by enemies (China) and allies (the EU) alike.

    The mealy-mouthed compromises which have been the foundation of globalisation are themselves seen as morally weak and in any event led to the wholesale off-shoring of jobs and large parts of the Western economy to Asia. Again, there is no point in arguing for Ricardo´s comparative advantage when you see once prosperous factories closed and the urban blight of drugs and vice replacing it.

    As for the special pleading for minorities, racial and sexual, this infuriates large numbers of straight white voters who feel that affirmative action has replaced one injustice with another, and who remain, at best, uncomfortable with the reality of gay rights activists who seem to be pushing for acceptance of ever less acceptable, even "degenerate" groups at a time when birthrates have collapsed and the demographic survival of some places seems doubtful. Abortion rights are also involved in this world view too and are not positive.

    Trump and the radical right offers clear and simple solutions. That these solutions in many cases seem at best questionable, at worse dangerous and potentially authoritarian does not bother the MAGA world view at all.

    The rise of general authoritarianism is a clear global trend. Today Trump, in two years time, perhaps, Le Pen. As for the UK, it doesn´t matter, our withdrawal from the EU commits us to the United States, no matter that the values of the US and the UK have always differed and may now be misaligned. The decisive power of the United States is now over, it is one amongst many. If you no longer trust the fairness of the US, China doesn´t look so bad an alternative. Europe can only be a force if Russia is defeated and then brought into the EU state system, which is now very much not the wish of the USA.

    Farage offers us the Trumpian future. Those of us who still believe in a fundamental justice will need to answer this defeat. Can Britain overcome our own crisis? Can we realign? This is now a fundamental state challenge for the UK, and not just from the centre and left of our political system.

    Project 2025 is coming. What is our response? What choices, if any, do we have?

    "If you no longer trust the fairness of the US, China doesn´t look so bad an alternative."

    You can't really believe this.


    "Those of us who still believe in a fundamental justice will need to answer this defeat."

    What do you mean by "a fundamental justice" as opposed to just "fundamental justice"?
    It's a very long example of Trump derangement syndrome.
  • ToryJimToryJim Posts: 4,189

    That anecdote “he didn’t start any wars” is one of these interesting things that I thought meant nothing at the time but I wonder if it reflects more what people were voting for as opposed to against.

    I think we do have to look at his claims he would stop WWIII as a factor. There are a lot of us who believe he’ll make the world a more dangerous place in the medium term, but for a lot of Americans they will look at Ukraine and the ME and be genuinely concerned. Then you’ve got a guy selling fairy dust who is going to disentangle you from it all and keep you safe.
    Of course there has been a major strand of isolationism in the US and that might be a factor. If anyone thinks that disengaging from world affairs means you aren’t going to be impacted by them is an idiot. Sure you can ignore reality if you wish but it’s still going to mug you.
  • DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 27,830
    Leon said:

    MaxPB said:

    It's shocking to me that JD Vance is one heart attack away from being POTUS in s few months. At least last time Pence was actually an experienced politician despite not agreeing with much of his policy he wouldn't have been completely terrible.

    Vance is smart. I reckon he’d be a good president
    Vance's immediate problem is not falling out with Trump as so many did 2016-20.
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 28,368

    Presumably Harris can just refuse to certify the result as Trump wanted Pence to do four years ago?

    The SCOTUS have exempted Biden from prosecution in the event.
  • TimSTimS Posts: 12,983
    Selebian said:

    I totally get why they voted for Trump first time round. Many, many people failed/ignored by the state and wanting to roll the dice. Like us with Brexit. What I can't understand is, having seen Trump in action as president, how the US could vote for him again.

    If we're torturing the Brexit analogy, then this is perhaps December 2019. The populist right had two big successes here after all, 2016 and 2019, the second happening after the government's poor preparation for Brexit had become abundantly clear.
  • TazTaz Posts: 14,351
    IanB2 said:

    Taz said:

    Andy_JS said:

    I'm slightly in shock that opponents of Trump have conducted themselves so poorly as to allow him to win again. A really extraordinary failure.

    It’s doubly odd that they found a way to win in 2020 and didn’t manage to do it again.

    But as I said above, I do wonder if this election was genuinely unwinnable for them whatever happened.
    They didn't really, they got lucky that the election happened to coincide with a pandemic that Trump handled disastrously. Even then he barely lost.
    But that’s the point isn’t it? Covid was handled here disastrously if you take Partygate. But fundamentally the Tories got thrown out because of the economy.

    Starmer needs to do something on the economy or he’s out.
    Not really the same comparison as there was no GE here in the immediate post-COVID aftermath. And Partygate was a very different "failure" than what happened in the US where Trump promoted quack treatments and denied the seriousness of the disease
    But the Tories lost? The main reason they lost here IMHO is that after many years people felt the country had not improved for them, I.e. the economy was not working.

    To me that’s why people have rolled the dice with Trump again?
    I suspect you are right in that respect. The most powerful Trump ad I saw was one that listed some basic food staples and how much they cost under Trump and the cost under Biden.

    Very effective I thought.
    Having done long trips three times now, it certainly is very noticeable how much more expensive everything is there now. The economy seemed to be buzzing, but it’s mostly the already rich who are benefitting. The mystery is why ordinary workers think Trump is going to help them, rather than his superrich buddies, any more than he did last time.
    Alot of the inflation they had was due to policies put in place at the time of Covid, similar to ours, however people will turn to Trump if they don't think the incumbents will help them.

    I don't think Harris had any counter to the messages about inflation aside from flirting with price controls which was always a stupid idea.
  • LostPasswordLostPassword Posts: 18,339
    Latest counts have Democrats falling short in the House too. Currently leading in only 216 districts of the 218 needed.
  • StuartinromfordStuartinromford Posts: 17,207

    MaxPB said:

    It's shocking to me that JD Vance is one heart attack away from being POTUS in s few months. At least last time Pence was actually an experienced politician despite not agreeing with much of his policy he wouldn't have been completely terrible.

    When I spoke to OGH last month it was the prospect of Vance becoming POTUS that scared OGH the most about a Trump victory.

    I tried to reassure OGH that Vance has impeccable judgment because he previously called Trump America's Hitler.
    That was then.

    One of the things that bothers me is that plenty of people associated with Trump or the Republican party have pointed out the whole "danger to democracy" thing, but hardly anybody currently active or with ambitions for the future.

    What was that David Low cartoon? They salute with both hands now?
  • RattersRatters Posts: 1,075
    Incidentally, Starmer should certainly not change his foreign secretary at the whims of a not-entirely-friendly foreign power.
  • malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 43,309
    Leon said:

    MaxPB said:

    It's shocking to me that JD Vance is one heart attack away from being POTUS in s few months. At least last time Pence was actually an experienced politician despite not agreeing with much of his policy he wouldn't have been completely terrible.

    Vance is smart. I reckon he’d be a good president
    that is almost as deranged as Vance.
  • LeonLeon Posts: 55,227
    MaxPB said:

    Leon said:

    MaxPB said:

    It's shocking to me that JD Vance is one heart attack away from being POTUS in s few months. At least last time Pence was actually an experienced politician despite not agreeing with much of his policy he wouldn't have been completely terrible.

    Vance is smart. I reckon he’d be a good president
    I don't see a lot of evidence for that.
    Hillbilly Elegy is a fine book
  • CiceroCicero Posts: 3,077
    Andy_JS said:

    Cicero said:

    Since 1941 the interests and the values of the US and the UK have been aligned based on the agreed principles of the Atlantic Charter. Those values included, but were not limited to, the value of a peaceful democratic order and a just, rules-based system of security and trade.

    Trump, like his backers seems to believe that these principles are not universal and have outlived their usefulness. Instead of multilateral agreements, they argue for a more direct, unilateral approach with the immediate interests of the United States a priority at all times. It is no good arguing that the altruism of post war America allowed the recovery of (western) Europe and the emergence of a mutually enriching trade. This point of view believes that the goodwill of the US has been exploited by enemies (China) and allies (the EU) alike.

    The mealy-mouthed compromises which have been the foundation of globalisation are themselves seen as morally weak and in any event led to the wholesale off-shoring of jobs and large parts of the Western economy to Asia. Again, there is no point in arguing for Ricardo´s comparative advantage when you see once prosperous factories closed and the urban blight of drugs and vice replacing it.

    As for the special pleading for minorities, racial and sexual, this infuriates large numbers of straight white voters who feel that affirmative action has replaced one injustice with another, and who remain, at best, uncomfortable with the reality of gay rights activists who seem to be pushing for acceptance of ever less acceptable, even "degenerate" groups at a time when birthrates have collapsed and the demographic survival of some places seems doubtful. Abortion rights are also involved in this world view too and are not positive.

    Trump and the radical right offers clear and simple solutions. That these solutions in many cases seem at best questionable, at worse dangerous and potentially authoritarian does not bother the MAGA world view at all.

    The rise of general authoritarianism is a clear global trend. Today Trump, in two years time, perhaps, Le Pen. As for the UK, it doesn´t matter, our withdrawal from the EU commits us to the United States, no matter that the values of the US and the UK have always differed and may now be misaligned. The decisive power of the United States is now over, it is one amongst many. If you no longer trust the fairness of the US, China doesn´t look so bad an alternative. Europe can only be a force if Russia is defeated and then brought into the EU state system, which is now very much not the wish of the USA.

    Farage offers us the Trumpian future. Those of us who still believe in a fundamental justice will need to answer this defeat. Can Britain overcome our own crisis? Can we realign? This is now a fundamental state challenge for the UK, and not just from the centre and left of our political system.

    Project 2025 is coming. What is our response? What choices, if any, do we have?

    "If you no longer trust the fairness of the US, China doesn´t look so bad an alternative."

    You can't really believe this.


    "Those of us who still believe in a fundamental justice will need to answer this defeat."

    What do you mean by "a fundamental justice" as opposed to just "fundamental justice"?
    1. I'm thinking more of the global south and 2, obeying the rules
  • GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 22,261

    Latest counts have Democrats falling short in the House too. Currently leading in only 216 districts of the 218 needed.

    Dems have been routed,
  • RattersRatters Posts: 1,075

    Is there any mileage in Biden stepping down and putting Harris in the White House?

    10 months' ago? It would have been worth a shot.
  • MaxPB said:

    It's shocking to me that JD Vance is one heart attack away from being POTUS in s few months. At least last time Pence was actually an experienced politician despite not agreeing with much of his policy he wouldn't have been completely terrible.

    When I spoke to OGH last month it was the prospect of Vance becoming POTUS that scared OGH the most about a Trump victory.

    I tried to reassure OGH that Vance has impeccable judgment because he previously called Trump America's Hitler.
    Vance = Von Papen. Thinks the guy is a fascist, but decided he can work with him because the other lot are worse and he'll be able to pull the strings behind the throne.
  • RobDRobD Posts: 59,925
    .

    Latest counts have Democrats falling short in the House too. Currently leading in only 216 districts of the 218 needed.

    Who had GOP winning the trifecta in their book?
  • bondegezoubondegezou Posts: 11,043
    TimS said:

    That anecdote “he didn’t start any wars” is one of these interesting things that I thought meant nothing at the time but I wonder if it reflects more what people were voting for as opposed to against.

    A lot of what Trump represents is indeed consistent with the long-term traditions of US geopolitics before the Cold War. That is, military isolationism and a focus on its own hemisphere, coupled with trade protectionism.

    The US economy grew rapidly in the late 19th and early 20th century but it was always behind a significant tariff barrier. Customs duties into the US were consistently much higher than the European powers, and way behind the global leader in free trade, the UK.

    Its avoidance of the costly wars on the European continent and Asian margins from the Franco-Prussian war through the Russo-Japanese war until the final throes of WW1 gave it a huge economic advantage. It then returned to the old policies of tariff barriers and military neutrality in the 1930s until Pearl Harbor. It was only in the post-WW2 period that it entered what might now seem like an aberration - a period of interventionism and trade liberalisation.

    It can do this because it has a perfectly protected strategic position - it dominates its own continent - and a rich agricultural and industrial heartland with its own domestic energy sources, that benefits from economies of scale. It could survive perfectly well, albeit probably losing relative economic and geopolitical clout, even if it embraced full-on autarky and neutrality.
    A lot of what Trump represents is consistent with long-term traditions of US domestic politics too, like being racist and blaming immigrants.
  • TazTaz Posts: 14,351
    Leon said:

    Nigelb said:

    Leon said:

    Credit to Elon Musk. He went All In on Trump. And will now make a gazillion dollars.

    Yes. He made a huge call. And yet again it’s paid off

    Elon has tremendous power now. Maybe he will use it to save us from Starmer. We can only hope
    How does he do that in the short term i.e. within almost five years? Get Trump to point the nukes at Blighty and demand Nigel is installed as Governor General or he will shoot.

    You've come back more bonkers than when you left.
    Yes, that bit's ridiculous. But probably just Leon doing his piss taking bit.

    The point that right wing billionaires - not just Musk, but some of Vance's backers - are going to have remarkable influence on the administration is absolutely correct.
    I read @Leon 's comment to mean Starmer will only be one term. That seems likely now as he will get the blame in 2028 for the coming economic storm from US.

    I was clearly joking as @Nigelb noted. I don’t believe Musk will “overthrow” the British PM

    However I do believe Musk has now has unexampled power, the most important non politician in America and the world, and now untouchable (probably forever)

    I also believe this Trump victory is terrible for Labour, for so many reasons, and makes their defeat in 2028-29 near certain
    I don't know about that but certainly organising to send people over there to campaign for Harris, as opposed to people just going over as individuals to help as many did, will not go down well and was somewhat foolish.
  • DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 27,830

    Is there any mileage in Biden stepping down and putting Harris in the White House?

    It would screw anyone selling Trump 45-47 tat.
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 60,393
    Leon said:

    TimS said:

    Andy_JS said:

    ToryJim said:

    So America has decided to give power to a guy who fomented a coup. I wonder how that worked out in 1930s Germany.

    We need to understand the root causes of why people are supporting him. The Democrats have spent 10 years refusing to do that.
    It's that old chestnut, the "she was asking for it wearing that short skirt" line of political analysis.
    Or people are fucking bored of mass immigration and woke and being told if they are white they are evil and women are men and America (and britain) are uniquely evil and all that endless endless lefty bollocks?
    It's beyond them to realise this.

    This is their religion. This is their creed.
  • Richard_TyndallRichard_Tyndall Posts: 32,503

    For all of you bewildered as to why Trump won again and so comprehensively, perhaps I can crave your indulgence and repost the link to the article I wrote for PB on the Trump phenomena back in early 2021.

    https://www1.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2021/01/09/this-is-not-about-trump-except-of-course-it-is/

    Nothing really has changed since Trump's first win in 2016. Indeed in no small part because of Trump and of course because of Biden as his successor, for millions of Amernican who see themselves as MIddle Class, things have only got worse.

    And the sad fact is that, just as in 2016 and 2020, there is no real prospect of a Trump presidency making it any better.

    As an aside, interstimg to see what has changed since then - Trump's relationship with Twitter being the most obvious.

    As I say they have abandoned democracy because of the price of eggs.
    That will always be the case. At the most extreme, starving, penniless people have little interest in democracy and this is just a milder version of that. It has ever been such since the birth iof the idea of democracy.

    Pythagoras may have been willing to die for his rather strange philosophical ideas but most people are not.
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 28,368
    edited November 6

    This victory will mean an unprecedented redistribution of wealth from the poor in America to the rich.

    They have made this clear, and the poor have voted for it.

    More remarkably, a not insignificant number of poor blacks too.
  • Credit to Elon Musk. He went All In on Trump. And will now make a gazillion dollars.

    You're thinking of Jeff Bezos who stopped the papers endorsing Kamala and presumably has rescued his Blue Origin contracts and protected Amazon from monopoly charges.

    The danger for Elon Musk is that Trump's tariffs screw up Tesla's supply chains and possibly his foreign markets too if there is retaliation.
    Trump is heavily focused on automation and the US version of what automation is required. He's now making his own batteries in the US as well which is important. I can imagine that Tesla Shanghai would be in trouble, but then again as the Lord Elon is now going to be in charge of Government Efficiency perhaps he will persuade Trump that tariffs are a Bad Idea.
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 51,573
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 62,686
    Sherrod Brown has lost Ohio senate seat.

    That's a real shame. A Dem holding out in an increasingly red state who seemed to understand why things were slipping away.

    Will he run for POTUS in 2028, if there is a contest?



  • RattersRatters Posts: 1,075
    Reads a bit like a hostage negotiation letter...

    But flattery is probably the right tactic with Trump. After all, he is an incredible narcissist.
  • GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 22,261
    Networks should just call the election for Trump.

    He's over 300,000 votes ahead in Michigan. Kamala can't possibly make that up.

    It's over.
  • JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 42,542

    Leon said:

    TimS said:

    Andy_JS said:

    ToryJim said:

    So America has decided to give power to a guy who fomented a coup. I wonder how that worked out in 1930s Germany.

    We need to understand the root causes of why people are supporting him. The Democrats have spent 10 years refusing to do that.
    It's that old chestnut, the "she was asking for it wearing that short skirt" line of political analysis.
    Or people are fucking bored of mass immigration and woke and being told if they are white they are evil and women are men and America (and britain) are uniquely evil and all that endless endless lefty bollocks?
    It's beyond them to realise this.

    This is their religion. This is their creed.
    And what is your religion, your creed?
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 51,573
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 122,874
    It is cost of living in the US which has elected Trump again and looks to have given the GOP control of Congress.

    However the massive tariffs Trump and the GOP will impose from January will start the biggest global trade war in 100 years so not sure if that cost of living is going to get much better for the average American as a result
  • malcolmg said:

    Andy_JS said:

    Good luck to David Lammy on his future dealings with the Trump administration.

    He will be lucky to get in the back door, lame duck.
    Sky just repeating Lammy's derogatory words
  • DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 27,830
    Post-mortem aftertiming – about £100 up on Betfair. Would have been more if Kamala had won.
  • RobD said:

    .

    Latest counts have Democrats falling short in the House too. Currently leading in only 216 districts of the 218 needed.

    Who had GOP winning the trifecta in their book?
    The House will be completely ungovernable again though with Johnson having to try and keep both the ultra right faction and the swing district centrists happy
This discussion has been closed.