Anyone bothering to stay up for tonight's debate ?
God no, but I’ll be getting up early. It’s 5am for me, and I’m up at 5:30 anyway.
I’m genuinely fascinated by these two characters, they’re both very different to those at the top of the tickets, and have records as state governors to defend and to shape their vision.
JD has been a Senator for 2 years. Not a governor.
If the Conservatives vote cleverly then... well, they'll vote Cleverly?
Big 'if' though.
And Cleverly is himself probably more of a steady the ship and make the Conservatives less hated candidate than an election winner, unless Labour really implode. But the choice available is the choice and they could - and quite likely will - do worse.
Anyone bothering to stay up for tonight's debate ?
God no, but I’ll be getting up early. It’s 5am for me, and I’m up at 5:30 anyway.
I’m genuinely fascinated by these two characters, they’re both very different to those at the top of the tickets, and have records as state governors to defend and to shape their vision.
JD has been a Senator for 2 years. Not a governor.
Cleverly doesn’t understand the BBC. He doesn’t understand that the BBC doesn’t generally own the rights to the content it broadcast. I wonder what else he doesn’t understand.
Cleverly doesn’t understand the BBC. He doesn’t understand that the BBC doesn’t generally own the rights to the content it broadcast. I wonder what else he doesn’t understand.
He's still the best candidate for the job in question - which is the long slog of LOTO.
Maybe somehow he'll make it to the last two and somehow Jenrick self-destructs?
Now the Olympics has finished, people realise how much they want to play chess in the park.
I know the last government got all sorts of crap for it, but little things like chess boards in the park can work really well.
Central Park in NY has dozens of them, and there’s always loads of people around wanting a game. There’s loads of videos of hustlers who could be chess masters out there, as well as actual masters turning up and playing random members of the public. It’s brilliant for interest in the game.
Anyone bothering to stay up for tonight's debate ?
God no, but I’ll be getting up early. It’s 5am for me, and I’m up at 5:30 anyway.
I’m genuinely fascinated by these two characters, they’re both very different to those at the top of the tickets, and have records as state governors to defend and to shape their vision.
JD has been a Senator for 2 years. Not a governor.
Yes of course he’s a Senator not a Governor.
Need more beer.
Also not much of a record to defend. Other than saying an awful lot of offensive and/or dumb stuff.
Cleverly doesn’t understand the BBC. He doesn’t understand that the BBC doesn’t generally own the rights to the content it broadcast. I wonder what else he doesn’t understand.
He's still the best candidate for the job in question - which is the long slog of LOTO.
Maybe somehow he'll make it to the last two and somehow Jenrick self-destructs?
He’s got more ‘normal’ in him than the other three combined, but he’s obviously a cocky so with opinions not backed up with knowledge.
Anyone bothering to stay up for tonight's debate ?
God no, but I’ll be getting up early. It’s 5am for me, and I’m up at 5:30 anyway.
I’m genuinely fascinated by these two characters, they’re both very different to those at the top of the tickets, and have records as state governors to defend and to shape their vision.
JD has been a Senator for 2 years. Not a governor.
Yes of course he’s a Senator not a Governor.
Need more beer.
Also not much of a record to defend. Other than saying an awful lot of offensive and/or dumb stuff.
Hopefully Walz will expose Vance for his vile comments on Ukraine.
Phil Stewart @phildstewart · 10m US official tells me that Iran's attack on Israel could be as big or even bigger than the one in April, if it goes ahead.
Phil Stewart @phildstewart · 10m US official tells me that Iran's attack on Israel could be as big or even bigger than the one in April, if it goes ahead.
Just had a long boozy lunch at the Groucho with a “highly placed source”
Revelations:
1. Omg the food at the Grouch is now vastly improved. Divine Sole Meunière
2. However the prices have risen accordingly. £58??? For sole meunière??? Luckily my source was paying
3. There is indeed gossip on “him”
4. Also “him”
5. And, surprisingly, “her”
Good day
This site should be above carrying slurs by people dancing round the libel laws to peddle snide inuendo, seemingly to prove both how clever they are and how well connected.
Cleverly doesn’t understand the BBC. He doesn’t understand that the BBC doesn’t generally own the rights to the content it broadcast. I wonder what else he doesn’t understand.
But that's also the BBC's own fault for not investing in their own studio productions like ITV did, instead they outsourced the majority of their drama production to the big Hollywood conglomerates who bought up the UK's indie producers from 2010-2020.
The BBC prioritised the existing on screen talent budget over investing in production, it's actually the same issue as UK companies paying dividends to shareholders rather than investing for capital growth. Good to see that it isn't just private sector management that makes the mistake.
"A luxury cruise ship, which finally set sail on Monday after spending four months in Belfast for repairs, is expected to return to the city on Tuesday due to incomplete paperwork."
Cleverly doesn’t understand the BBC. He doesn’t understand that the BBC doesn’t generally own the rights to the content it broadcast. I wonder what else he doesn’t understand.
But that's also the BBC's own fault for not investing in their own studio productions like ITV did, instead they outsourced the majority of their drama production to the big Hollywood conglomerates who bought up the UK's indie producers from 2010-2020.
The BBC prioritised the existing on screen talent budget over investing in production, it's actually the same issue as UK companies paying dividends to shareholders rather than investing for capital growth. Good to see that it isn't just private sector management that makes the mistake.
The Government of the day required that the BBC outsourced to Indies, without requiring that the Indies remained Indie. It should be no great surprise to anyone that we are where we are.
Sir Keir will simply have to console himself with a working majority of 172.
In the way that Boris consoled himself with a working majority of 80.
Until he couldn't.
Or Thatcher with a majority of 101.
It does make a difference when your government is 10 years in rather than 10 weeks. The PLP is currently far less fractured than the 1922 in 1990 or 2022.
Just had a long boozy lunch at the Groucho with a “highly placed source”
Revelations:
1. Omg the food at the Grouch is now vastly improved. Divine Sole Meunière
2. However the prices have risen accordingly. £58??? For sole meunière??? Luckily my source was paying
3. There is indeed gossip on “him”
4. Also “him”
5. And, surprisingly, “her”
Good day
This site should be above carrying slurs by people dancing round the libel laws to peddle snide inuendo, seemingly to prove both how clever they are and how well connected.
Also I had a really nice bottle of Viognier and on the lunchtable next to us was the head of BBC News. I trust he/she wasn't listening in
Just had a long boozy lunch at the Groucho with a “highly placed source”
Revelations:
1. Omg the food at the Grouch is now vastly improved. Divine Sole Meunière
2. However the prices have risen accordingly. £58??? For sole meunière??? Luckily my source was paying
3. There is indeed gossip on “him”
4. Also “him”
5. And, surprisingly, “her”
Good day
This site should be above carrying slurs by people dancing round the libel laws to peddle snide inuendo, seemingly to prove both how clever they are and how well connected.
@Leon is a fiction writer, and much of what he writes on here can be taken in the same manner.
I mean, if what he wrote on here in his various incarnations was actually factual, then he isn't a very nice bloke *at all*. Therefore I prefer to think of him as a fantasist.
Sir Keir will simply have to console himself with a working majority of 172.
In the way that Boris consoled himself with a working majority of 80.
Until he couldn't.
Or Thatcher with a majority of 101.
It does make a difference when your government is 10 years in rather than 10 weeks. The PLP is currently far less fractured than the 1922 in 1990 or 2022.
True, though in 10 weeks if the government is polling as unpopular as a knackered, incompetent 14-year-old administration it replaced, that is really not a good sign.
Cleverly doesn’t understand the BBC. He doesn’t understand that the BBC doesn’t generally own the rights to the content it broadcast. I wonder what else he doesn’t understand.
But that's also the BBC's own fault for not investing in their own studio productions like ITV did, instead they outsourced the majority of their drama production to the big Hollywood conglomerates who bought up the UK's indie producers from 2010-2020.
The BBC prioritised the existing on screen talent budget over investing in production, it's actually the same issue as UK companies paying dividends to shareholders rather than investing for capital growth. Good to see that it isn't just private sector management that makes the mistake.
The Government of the day required that the BBC outsourced to Indies, without requiring that the Indies remained Indie. It should be no great surprise to anyone that we are where we are.
Irrespective of where the blame lies (and I agree with you), it was a mistake. Similarly, the development of the BBC's online stuff was hindered by government interference.
Part of the poison is the license fee. Had the BBC been funded from general taxation, the debate over how it's run might have been far less political charged.
Sir Keir will simply have to console himself with a working majority of 172.
In the way that Boris consoled himself with a working majority of 80.
Until he couldn't.
Or Thatcher with a majority of 101.
It does make a difference when your government is 10 years in rather than 10 weeks. The PLP is currently far less fractured than the 1922 in 1990 or 2022.
True, though in 10 weeks if the government is polling as unpopular as a knackered, incompetent 14-year-old administration it replaced, that is really not a good sign.
Labour were ahead of the Tories in September 2010. The Tories finally lost power 14 years later.
Just had a long boozy lunch at the Groucho with a “highly placed source”
Revelations:
1. Omg the food at the Grouch is now vastly improved. Divine Sole Meunière
2. However the prices have risen accordingly. £58??? For sole meunière??? Luckily my source was paying
3. There is indeed gossip on “him”
4. Also “him”
5. And, surprisingly, “her”
Good day
This site should be above carrying slurs by people dancing round the libel laws to peddle snide inuendo, seemingly to prove both how clever they are and how well connected.
Also I had a really nice bottle of Viognier and on the lunchtable next to us was the head of BBC News. I trust he/she wasn't listening in
What, you couldn't tell what sex they are ? Or are you super sensitive about pronouns ?
Cleverly doesn’t understand the BBC. He doesn’t understand that the BBC doesn’t generally own the rights to the content it broadcast. I wonder what else he doesn’t understand.
But that's also the BBC's own fault for not investing in their own studio productions like ITV did, instead they outsourced the majority of their drama production to the big Hollywood conglomerates who bought up the UK's indie producers from 2010-2020.
The BBC prioritised the existing on screen talent budget over investing in production, it's actually the same issue as UK companies paying dividends to shareholders rather than investing for capital growth. Good to see that it isn't just private sector management that makes the mistake.
The Government of the day required that the BBC outsourced to Indies, without requiring that the Indies remained Indie. It should be no great surprise to anyone that we are where we are.
Irrespective of where the blame lies (and I agree with you), it was a mistake. Similarly, the development of the BBC's online stuff was hindered by government interference.
Part of the poison is the license fee. Had the BBC been funded from general taxation, the debate over how it's run might have been far less political charged.
General taxation would at least have been progressive, rather than possibly the single most regressive tax of all.
The way forward is not going to involve a licence fee, and is likely to involve government funding minor interest broadcasting directly to a number of broadcasters, with the BBC getting its arse in gear to licence the library worldwide.
There’s literally billions of people who could pay £5 a month for the BBC library. Every school in the world wants good quality English content.
Cleverly doesn’t understand the BBC. He doesn’t understand that the BBC doesn’t generally own the rights to the content it broadcast. I wonder what else he doesn’t understand.
But that's also the BBC's own fault for not investing in their own studio productions like ITV did, instead they outsourced the majority of their drama production to the big Hollywood conglomerates who bought up the UK's indie producers from 2010-2020.
The BBC prioritised the existing on screen talent budget over investing in production, it's actually the same issue as UK companies paying dividends to shareholders rather than investing for capital growth. Good to see that it isn't just private sector management that makes the mistake.
The Government of the day required that the BBC outsourced to Indies, without requiring that the Indies remained Indie. It should be no great surprise to anyone that we are where we are.
That's not true, Channel 4 had that remit but the BBC was free to spend the money however it wanted and decided to put Gary Lineker, Huw Edwards and many others on £1m+ contracts. The cost of on screen talent has progressively eaten up more of the annual budget and instead of just saying goodbye to the expensive people and trusting the formula the BBC was too timid and risk averse so they paid up and cut investment in BBC studios.
As people seem interested in my lunchtime revelations...
I can say that was the best Dover Sole Meuniere I've ever had. In fact one of the best fish dishes of any kind that I have had recnetly.
I tried to master this apparently simple dish - sole meuniere - at home, and thought I'd done it, but this.... wow. Whole new level. On the bone, of course
Nonetheless, FIFTY EIGHT QUID?
Edit to add: I take it all back. I have just checked the price, a single Dover Sole - enough for 1 - now fetches nearly £30 from a fish market. So that might explain it
Just had a long boozy lunch at the Groucho with a “highly placed source”
Revelations:
1. Omg the food at the Grouch is now vastly improved. Divine Sole Meunière
2. However the prices have risen accordingly. £58??? For sole meunière??? Luckily my source was paying
3. There is indeed gossip on “him”
4. Also “him”
5. And, surprisingly, “her”
Good day
This site should be above carrying slurs by people dancing round the libel laws to peddle snide inuendo, seemingly to prove both how clever they are and how well connected.
In a medieval court the fool was expected to entertain and amuse, and was given a greater latitude than other members of the court to transgress the normal rules to do so.
Cleverly doesn’t understand the BBC. He doesn’t understand that the BBC doesn’t generally own the rights to the content it broadcast. I wonder what else he doesn’t understand.
But that's also the BBC's own fault for not investing in their own studio productions like ITV did, instead they outsourced the majority of their drama production to the big Hollywood conglomerates who bought up the UK's indie producers from 2010-2020.
The BBC prioritised the existing on screen talent budget over investing in production, it's actually the same issue as UK companies paying dividends to shareholders rather than investing for capital growth. Good to see that it isn't just private sector management that makes the mistake.
The Government of the day required that the BBC outsourced to Indies, without requiring that the Indies remained Indie. It should be no great surprise to anyone that we are where we are.
Irrespective of where the blame lies (and I agree with you), it was a mistake. Similarly, the development of the BBC's online stuff was hindered by government interference.
Part of the poison is the license fee. Had the BBC been funded from general taxation, the debate over how it's run might have been far less political charged.
General taxation would at least have been progressive, rather than possibly the single most regressive tax of all.
The way forward is not going to involve a licence fee, and is likely to involve government funding minor interest broadcasting directly to a number of broadcasters, with the BBC getting its arse in gear to licence the library worldwide.
There’s literally billions of people who could pay £5 a month for the BBC library. Every school in the world wants good quality English content.
Once the structure of the BBC was changed in the 1990's, the movement away from in-house was an inevitability. I mention it often, but it bears repeating ; the starting mistake was letting McKinsey's run riot with the BBC in the mid-'90s.
Cleverly doesn’t understand the BBC. He doesn’t understand that the BBC doesn’t generally own the rights to the content it broadcast. I wonder what else he doesn’t understand.
But that's also the BBC's own fault for not investing in their own studio productions like ITV did, instead they outsourced the majority of their drama production to the big Hollywood conglomerates who bought up the UK's indie producers from 2010-2020.
The BBC prioritised the existing on screen talent budget over investing in production, it's actually the same issue as UK companies paying dividends to shareholders rather than investing for capital growth. Good to see that it isn't just private sector management that makes the mistake.
The Government of the day required that the BBC outsourced to Indies, without requiring that the Indies remained Indie. It should be no great surprise to anyone that we are where we are.
That's not true, Channel 4 had that remit but the BBC was free to spend the money however it wanted and decided to put Gary Lineker, Huw Edwards and many others on £1m+ contracts. The cost of on screen talent has progressively eaten up more of the annual budget and instead of just saying goodbye to the expensive people and trusting the formula the BBC was too timid and risk averse so they paid up and cut investment in BBC studios.
Absolutely!
The idea that people ever watched Match of the Day because of Lineker rather than because of the football highlights was preposterous.
Instead of paying a big sum for "The Talent" (which seems to be a proper noun the way they use it) the BBC should pay a market rate and develop talent.
Market rate doesn't mean a blank cheque whatever the most expensive person wants. Market rate means that you accept applications from everyone who meets the skill requirements of the job (or can be trained to do so) then take the cheapest applicant who has the requisite skillset.
Cleverly doesn’t understand the BBC. He doesn’t understand that the BBC doesn’t generally own the rights to the content it broadcast. I wonder what else he doesn’t understand.
But that's also the BBC's own fault for not investing in their own studio productions like ITV did, instead they outsourced the majority of their drama production to the big Hollywood conglomerates who bought up the UK's indie producers from 2010-2020.
The BBC prioritised the existing on screen talent budget over investing in production, it's actually the same issue as UK companies paying dividends to shareholders rather than investing for capital growth. Good to see that it isn't just private sector management that makes the mistake.
The thing is the BBC was encouraged to do this, to support an independent production sector, as an alternative to being a huge Goliath in the British production industry and squashing all the competition.
Just had a long boozy lunch at the Groucho with a “highly placed source”
Revelations:
1. Omg the food at the Grouch is now vastly improved. Divine Sole Meunière
2. However the prices have risen accordingly. £58??? For sole meunière??? Luckily my source was paying
3. There is indeed gossip on “him”
4. Also “him”
5. And, surprisingly, “her”
Good day
This site should be above carrying slurs by people dancing round the libel laws to peddle snide inuendo, seemingly to prove both how clever they are and how well connected.
Also I had a really nice bottle of Viognier and on the lunchtable next to us was the head of BBC News. I trust he/she wasn't listening in
What, you couldn't tell what sex they are ? Or are you super sensitive about pronouns ?
What an utter fantasist you are.
I'm just very Woke, sorry if that irks you. Pronouns matter
As people seem interested in my lunchtime revelations...
I can say that was the best Dover Sole Meuniere I've ever had. In fact one of the best fish dishes of any kind that I have had recnetly.
I tried to master this apparently simple dish - sole meuniere - at home, and thought I'd done it, but this.... wow. Whole new level. On the bone, of course
Nonetheless, FIFTY EIGHT QUID?
Edit to add: I take it all back. I have just checked the price, a single Dover Sole - enough for 1 - now fetches nearly £30 from a fish market. So that might explain it
Just had a long boozy lunch at the Groucho with a “highly placed source”
Revelations:
1. Omg the food at the Grouch is now vastly improved. Divine Sole Meunière
2. However the prices have risen accordingly. £58??? For sole meunière??? Luckily my source was paying
3. There is indeed gossip on “him”
4. Also “him”
5. And, surprisingly, “her”
Good day
This site should be above carrying slurs by people dancing round the libel laws to peddle snide inuendo, seemingly to prove both how clever they are and how well connected.
@Leon is a fiction writer, and much of what he writes on here can be taken in the same manner.
I mean, if what he wrote on here in his various incarnations was actually factual, then he isn't a very nice bloke *at all*. Therefore I prefer to think of him as a fantasist.
When I was about 19, it took me an embarrassingly long time to realise that Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas was a tad exaggerated.
Cleverly doesn’t understand the BBC. He doesn’t understand that the BBC doesn’t generally own the rights to the content it broadcast. I wonder what else he doesn’t understand.
But that's also the BBC's own fault for not investing in their own studio productions like ITV did, instead they outsourced the majority of their drama production to the big Hollywood conglomerates who bought up the UK's indie producers from 2010-2020.
The BBC prioritised the existing on screen talent budget over investing in production, it's actually the same issue as UK companies paying dividends to shareholders rather than investing for capital growth. Good to see that it isn't just private sector management that makes the mistake.
The Government of the day required that the BBC outsourced to Indies, without requiring that the Indies remained Indie. It should be no great surprise to anyone that we are where we are.
Irrespective of where the blame lies (and I agree with you), it was a mistake. Similarly, the development of the BBC's online stuff was hindered by government interference.
Part of the poison is the license fee. Had the BBC been funded from general taxation, the debate over how it's run might have been far less political charged.
General taxation would at least have been progressive, rather than possibly the single most regressive tax of all.
The way forward is not going to involve a licence fee, and is likely to involve government funding minor interest broadcasting directly to a number of broadcasters, with the BBC getting its arse in gear to licence the library worldwide.
There’s literally billions of people who could pay £5 a month for the BBC library. Every school in the world wants good quality English content.
Once the structure of the BBC was changed in the 1990's, the movement away from in-house was an inevitability. I mention it often, but it bears repeating ; the starting mistake was letting McKinsey's run riot with the BBC in the mid-'90s.
The starting mistake was keeping the licence fee model into the 21st century so that the BBC got cushy and considered itself to have a steady and guaranteed income it could spend on The Talent rather than working to develop reliable streams of income, spending where necessary not blank cheques and cutting all else, and attracting willing subscribers.
As people seem interested in my lunchtime revelations...
I can say that was the best Dover Sole Meuniere I've ever had. In fact one of the best fish dishes of any kind that I have had recnetly.
I tried to master this apparently simple dish - sole meuniere - at home, and thought I'd done it, but this.... wow. Whole new level. On the bone, of course
Nonetheless, FIFTY EIGHT QUID?
Edit to add: I take it all back. I have just checked the price, a single Dover Sole - enough for 1 - now fetches nearly £30 from a fish market. So that might explain it
Just had a long boozy lunch at the Groucho with a “highly placed source”
Revelations:
1. Omg the food at the Grouch is now vastly improved. Divine Sole Meunière
2. However the prices have risen accordingly. £58??? For sole meunière??? Luckily my source was paying
3. There is indeed gossip on “him”
4. Also “him”
5. And, surprisingly, “her”
Good day
This site should be above carrying slurs by people dancing round the libel laws to peddle snide inuendo, seemingly to prove both how clever they are and how well connected.
@Leon is a fiction writer, and much of what he writes on here can be taken in the same manner.
I mean, if what he wrote on here in his various incarnations was actually factual, then he isn't a very nice bloke *at all*. Therefore I prefer to think of him as a fantasist.
When I was about 19, it took me an embarrassingly long time to realise that Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas was a tad exaggerated.
Thing is, my life has been a bit like Hunter S Thompson's except with far fewer exaggerations. You can believe that or not
As people seem interested in my lunchtime revelations...
I can say that was the best Dover Sole Meuniere I've ever had. In fact one of the best fish dishes of any kind that I have had recnetly.
I tried to master this apparently simple dish - sole meuniere - at home, and thought I'd done it, but this.... wow. Whole new level. On the bone, of course
Nonetheless, FIFTY EIGHT QUID?
Edit to add: I take it all back. I have just checked the price, a single Dover Sole - enough for 1 - now fetches nearly £30 from a fish market. So that might explain it
Sir Keir will simply have to console himself with a working majority of 172.
In the way that Boris consoled himself with a working majority of 80.
Until he couldn't.
Or Thatcher with a majority of 101.
It does make a difference when your government is 10 years in rather than 10 weeks. The PLP is currently far less fractured than the 1922 in 1990 or 2022.
True, though in 10 weeks if the government is polling as unpopular as a knackered, incompetent 14-year-old administration it replaced, that is really not a good sign.
By the beginning of 1980, Labour had an 8% polling lead over the Conservatives.
Thatcher's signature move in her first six months was to increase defence spending - which she then reversed the following year (leading to ministerial changes, and in due course, the Falklands).
The first policy which is now positively recalled as part of her legacy (Heseltine's bill to sell council houses), didn't come until the following year. The1980 embassy siege was another boost to her popularity, which had little or nothing to do with having a coherent program for government.
And that's a new administration and PM with substantially more government experience than either Starmer or his team.
He and Labour have had a crap start, but it's perhaps a little early to be writing him off.
Sir Keir will simply have to console himself with a working majority of 172.
A working majority is only useful if he can: a) Put forward useful (to Labour...) policies/votes. b) Get his side to vote for them.
Both of these are somewhat in doubt, given the last three months.
Well it's been summer/recess/conference as you know full well.
There is a budget on 30 October.
You might have heard about it.
Some of the scandals/messes/stories that Labour and (particularly Starmer) have got themselves into are zero to do with a budget.
But if that's your copium, enjoy.
Their ratings are negative already, and we still have weeks to go until the Budget.
Hands up who thinks the Budget will result in a swing towards the government?
Anybody else remember all the SKS fans on here and elsewhere looking forward to his administration and saying how far a bit of competence and honesty would go and how many quick and easy wins there were that the EEEEVVVILLL Tories weren't going for?
By my count, we should have ended corruption, stopped the small boats, built HS2 to Inverness and started about 7 million new houses. And Labour should be on 93%.
As people seem interested in my lunchtime revelations...
I can say that was the best Dover Sole Meuniere I've ever had. In fact one of the best fish dishes of any kind that I have had recnetly.
I tried to master this apparently simple dish - sole meuniere - at home, and thought I'd done it, but this.... wow. Whole new level. On the bone, of course
Nonetheless, FIFTY EIGHT QUID?
Edit to add: I take it all back. I have just checked the price, a single Dover Sole - enough for 1 - now fetches nearly £30 from a fish market. So that might explain it
As people seem interested in my lunchtime revelations...
I can say that was the best Dover Sole Meuniere I've ever had. In fact one of the best fish dishes of any kind that I have had recnetly.
I tried to master this apparently simple dish - sole meuniere - at home, and thought I'd done it, but this.... wow. Whole new level. On the bone, of course
Nonetheless, FIFTY EIGHT QUID?
Edit to add: I take it all back. I have just checked the price, a single Dover Sole - enough for 1 - now fetches nearly £30 from a fish market. So that might explain it
The King of fish, except the legendary sea bass, ofcourse.
I'd raise this above sea bass, and I had a superb wild sea bass recently. Also fantastic carp and trout in Montenegro
I think the gold metal "greatest fish to eat" is a final bout between Dover Sole and Turbot
BUT the winner must then go to a kind of global supercup match against Patagonian Toothfish (OMG!)
I hear and read about people whose opinions I value on food and drink waxing lyrical about fish dishes and wonder why I don't enjoy them. Shellfish, prawns etc I enjoy but not fish as such. Is it because when I was a child 'fish' always seemed to have bones in it, especially snoek? Or because I spent part of my late teens dissecting dogfish? Or both?
As people seem interested in my lunchtime revelations...
I can say that was the best Dover Sole Meuniere I've ever had. In fact one of the best fish dishes of any kind that I have had recnetly.
I tried to master this apparently simple dish - sole meuniere - at home, and thought I'd done it, but this.... wow. Whole new level. On the bone, of course
Nonetheless, FIFTY EIGHT QUID?
Edit to add: I take it all back. I have just checked the price, a single Dover Sole - enough for 1 - now fetches nearly £30 from a fish market. So that might explain it
Just had a long boozy lunch at the Groucho with a “highly placed source”
Revelations:
1. Omg the food at the Grouch is now vastly improved. Divine Sole Meunière
2. However the prices have risen accordingly. £58??? For sole meunière??? Luckily my source was paying
3. There is indeed gossip on “him”
4. Also “him”
5. And, surprisingly, “her”
Good day
This site should be above carrying slurs by people dancing round the libel laws to peddle snide inuendo, seemingly to prove both how clever they are and how well connected.
Also I had a really nice bottle of Viognier and on the lunchtable next to us was the head of BBC News. I trust he/she wasn't listening in
I can't order a bottle of Viognier without thinking of this Oz and James clip about the impossibility of not ordering it in a French accent:
As people seem interested in my lunchtime revelations...
I can say that was the best Dover Sole Meuniere I've ever had. In fact one of the best fish dishes of any kind that I have had recnetly.
I tried to master this apparently simple dish - sole meuniere - at home, and thought I'd done it, but this.... wow. Whole new level. On the bone, of course
Nonetheless, FIFTY EIGHT QUID?
Edit to add: I take it all back. I have just checked the price, a single Dover Sole - enough for 1 - now fetches nearly £30 from a fish market. So that might explain it
Cleverly doesn’t understand the BBC. He doesn’t understand that the BBC doesn’t generally own the rights to the content it broadcast. I wonder what else he doesn’t understand.
But that's also the BBC's own fault for not investing in their own studio productions like ITV did, instead they outsourced the majority of their drama production to the big Hollywood conglomerates who bought up the UK's indie producers from 2010-2020.
The BBC prioritised the existing on screen talent budget over investing in production, it's actually the same issue as UK companies paying dividends to shareholders rather than investing for capital growth. Good to see that it isn't just private sector management that makes the mistake.
The Government of the day required that the BBC outsourced to Indies, without requiring that the Indies remained Indie. It should be no great surprise to anyone that we are where we are.
That's not true, Channel 4 had that remit but the BBC was free to spend the money however it wanted and decided to put Gary Lineker, Huw Edwards and many others on £1m+ contracts. The cost of on screen talent has progressively eaten up more of the annual budget and instead of just saying goodbye to the expensive people and trusting the formula the BBC was too timid and risk averse so they paid up and cut investment in BBC studios.
To be fair, they were only paying Edwards half a mil - although perhaps a few eyebrows should have been raised at his 10% pay rise being nodded through after he’d already been suspended.
"A luxury cruise ship, which finally set sail on Monday after spending four months in Belfast for repairs, is expected to return to the city on Tuesday due to incomplete paperwork."
If that wasn't a JG Ballard novel, it should have been.
One of my favourite films is a 1974 film called "Juggernaut". It's about a broken-down old liner called "Brittannic" held ransom by a bomber. The analogy to 1970s England is as subtle as a brick. I think this 2024 saga also suffices.
Just had a long boozy lunch at the Groucho with a “highly placed source”
Revelations:
1. Omg the food at the Grouch is now vastly improved. Divine Sole Meunière
2. However the prices have risen accordingly. £58??? For sole meunière??? Luckily my source was paying
3. There is indeed gossip on “him”
4. Also “him”
5. And, surprisingly, “her”
Good day
This site should be above carrying slurs by people dancing round the libel laws to peddle snide inuendo, seemingly to prove both how clever they are and how well connected.
@Leon is a fiction writer, and much of what he writes on here can be taken in the same manner.
I mean, if what he wrote on here in his various incarnations was actually factual, then he isn't a very nice bloke *at all*. Therefore I prefer to think of him as a fantasist.
When I was about 19, it took me an embarrassingly long time to realise that Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas was a tad exaggerated.
Thing is, my life has been a bit like Hunter S Thompson's except with far fewer exaggerations. You can believe that or not
You've taken so many drugs that you *think* your life has been a bit like Hunter S Thompson's except with far fewer exaggerations.
In reality, you're so doped up that, in reality, you are bashing into a wall trying to get into the toilets at King's Lynn bus station. (*)
(*) I really did see someone doing this once. The doorway was to their left, and they were constantly walking into the wall just beside the doorway.
As people seem interested in my lunchtime revelations...
I can say that was the best Dover Sole Meuniere I've ever had. In fact one of the best fish dishes of any kind that I have had recnetly.
I tried to master this apparently simple dish - sole meuniere - at home, and thought I'd done it, but this.... wow. Whole new level. On the bone, of course
Nonetheless, FIFTY EIGHT QUID?
Edit to add: I take it all back. I have just checked the price, a single Dover Sole - enough for 1 - now fetches nearly £30 from a fish market. So that might explain it
The King of fish, except the legendary sea bass, ofcourse.
I'd raise this above sea bass, and I had a superb wild sea bass recently. Also fantastic carp and trout in Montenegro
I think the gold metal "greatest fish to eat" is a final bout between Dover Sole and Turbot
BUT the winner must then go to a kind of global supercup match against Patagonian Toothfish (OMG!)
Turbot yes, Dover sole yes, sea bass (if they really exist) yes.
Carp? No, just no.
Ah, but have you had carp wild and marinated and served cold with hot boiled potatoes in spinach and herbs, at a lakeshore restaurant in Virpazar, Montenegro, by the waters of Skadar?
I have (last month actually) and it was SUBLIME. It sounded awful, but it was mega-delish
As people seem interested in my lunchtime revelations...
I can say that was the best Dover Sole Meuniere I've ever had. In fact one of the best fish dishes of any kind that I have had recnetly.
I tried to master this apparently simple dish - sole meuniere - at home, and thought I'd done it, but this.... wow. Whole new level. On the bone, of course
Nonetheless, FIFTY EIGHT QUID?
Edit to add: I take it all back. I have just checked the price, a single Dover Sole - enough for 1 - now fetches nearly £30 from a fish market. So that might explain it
The King of fish, except the legendary sea bass, ofcourse.
I'd raise this above sea bass, and I had a superb wild sea bass recently. Also fantastic carp and trout in Montenegro
I think the gold metal "greatest fish to eat" is a final bout between Dover Sole and Turbot
BUT the winner must then go to a kind of global supercup match against Patagonian Toothfish (OMG!)
I hear and read about people whose opinions I value on food and drink waxing lyrical about fish dishes and wonder why I don't enjoy them. Shellfish, prawns etc I enjoy but not fish as such. Is it because when I was a child 'fish' always seemed to have bones in it, especially snoek? Or because I spent part of my late teens dissecting dogfish? Or both?
Did you never enjoy fish & chips back in the day ?
Just had a long boozy lunch at the Groucho with a “highly placed source”
Revelations:
1. Omg the food at the Grouch is now vastly improved. Divine Sole Meunière
2. However the prices have risen accordingly. £58??? For sole meunière??? Luckily my source was paying
3. There is indeed gossip on “him”
4. Also “him”
5. And, surprisingly, “her”
Good day
This site should be above carrying slurs by people dancing round the libel laws to peddle snide inuendo, seemingly to prove both how clever they are and how well connected.
@Leon is a fiction writer, and much of what he writes on here can be taken in the same manner.
I mean, if what he wrote on here in his various incarnations was actually factual, then he isn't a very nice bloke *at all*. Therefore I prefer to think of him as a fantasist.
When I was about 19, it took me an embarrassingly long time to realise that Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas was a tad exaggerated.
Thing is, my life has been a bit like Hunter S Thompson's except with far fewer exaggerations. You can believe that or not
You've taken so many drugs that you *think* your life has been a bit like Hunter S Thompson's except with far fewer exaggerations.
In reality, you're so doped up that, in reality, you are bashing into a wall trying to get into the toilets at King's Lynn bus station. (*)
(*) I really did see someone doing this once. The doorway was to their left, and they were constantly walking into the wall just beside the doorway.
As people seem interested in my lunchtime revelations...
I can say that was the best Dover Sole Meuniere I've ever had. In fact one of the best fish dishes of any kind that I have had recnetly.
I tried to master this apparently simple dish - sole meuniere - at home, and thought I'd done it, but this.... wow. Whole new level. On the bone, of course
Nonetheless, FIFTY EIGHT QUID?
Edit to add: I take it all back. I have just checked the price, a single Dover Sole - enough for 1 - now fetches nearly £30 from a fish market. So that might explain it
The King of fish, except the legendary sea bass, ofcourse.
I'd raise this above sea bass, and I had a superb wild sea bass recently. Also fantastic carp and trout in Montenegro
I think the gold metal "greatest fish to eat" is a final bout between Dover Sole and Turbot
BUT the winner must then go to a kind of global supercup match against Patagonian Toothfish (OMG!)
I hear and read about people whose opinions I value on food and drink waxing lyrical about fish dishes and wonder why I don't enjoy them. Shellfish, prawns etc I enjoy but not fish as such. Is it because when I was a child 'fish' always seemed to have bones in it, especially snoek? Or because I spent part of my late teens dissecting dogfish? Or both?
Did you never enjoy fish & chips back in the day ?
TBH, no. Not even out of newspaper. I've eaten them of course, but I don't really enjoy them. When we go out my wife often has them, but I just can't enjoy.
"A luxury cruise ship, which finally set sail on Monday after spending four months in Belfast for repairs, is expected to return to the city on Tuesday due to incomplete paperwork."
If that wasn't a JG Ballard novel, it should have been.
One of my favourite films is a 1974 film called "Juggernaut". It's about a broken-down old liner called "Brittannic" held ransom by a bomber. The analogy to 1970s England is as subtle as a brick. I think this 2024 saga also suffices.
As people seem interested in my lunchtime revelations...
I can say that was the best Dover Sole Meuniere I've ever had. In fact one of the best fish dishes of any kind that I have had recnetly.
I tried to master this apparently simple dish - sole meuniere - at home, and thought I'd done it, but this.... wow. Whole new level. On the bone, of course
Nonetheless, FIFTY EIGHT QUID?
Edit to add: I take it all back. I have just checked the price, a single Dover Sole - enough for 1 - now fetches nearly £30 from a fish market. So that might explain it
The King of fish, except the legendary sea bass, ofcourse.
I'd raise this above sea bass, and I had a superb wild sea bass recently. Also fantastic carp and trout in Montenegro
I think the gold metal "greatest fish to eat" is a final bout between Dover Sole and Turbot
BUT the winner must then go to a kind of global supercup match against Patagonian Toothfish (OMG!)
I hear and read about people whose opinions I value on food and drink waxing lyrical about fish dishes and wonder why I don't enjoy them. Shellfish, prawns etc I enjoy but not fish as such. Is it because when I was a child 'fish' always seemed to have bones in it, especially snoek? Or because I spent part of my late teens dissecting dogfish? Or both?
Did you never enjoy fish & chips back in the day ?
TBH, no. Not even out of newspaper. I've eaten them of course, but I don't really enjoy them. When we go out my wife often has them, but I just can't enjoy.
Fish and chips, like any food, can encompass a multitude of sins. Sometimes they can awful, and sometimes they can be heavenly, depending on the shop and time you get them.
The best I ever had was in Oz. Heavenly, with a slice of lemon, salt, and vinegar.
As people seem interested in my lunchtime revelations...
I can say that was the best Dover Sole Meuniere I've ever had. In fact one of the best fish dishes of any kind that I have had recnetly.
I tried to master this apparently simple dish - sole meuniere - at home, and thought I'd done it, but this.... wow. Whole new level. On the bone, of course
Nonetheless, FIFTY EIGHT QUID?
Edit to add: I take it all back. I have just checked the price, a single Dover Sole - enough for 1 - now fetches nearly £30 from a fish market. So that might explain it
The King of fish, except the legendary sea bass, ofcourse.
I'd raise this above sea bass, and I had a superb wild sea bass recently. Also fantastic carp and trout in Montenegro
I think the gold metal "greatest fish to eat" is a final bout between Dover Sole and Turbot
BUT the winner must then go to a kind of global supercup match against Patagonian Toothfish (OMG!)
I hear and read about people whose opinions I value on food and drink waxing lyrical about fish dishes and wonder why I don't enjoy them. Shellfish, prawns etc I enjoy but not fish as such. Is it because when I was a child 'fish' always seemed to have bones in it, especially snoek? Or because I spent part of my late teens dissecting dogfish? Or both?
Did you never enjoy fish & chips back in the day ?
TBH, no. Not even out of newspaper. I've eaten them of course, but I don't really enjoy them. When we go out my wife often has them, but I just can't enjoy.
Just a personal thing, I guess. I love fish, and my wife dislikes it.
As people seem interested in my lunchtime revelations...
I can say that was the best Dover Sole Meuniere I've ever had. In fact one of the best fish dishes of any kind that I have had recnetly.
I tried to master this apparently simple dish - sole meuniere - at home, and thought I'd done it, but this.... wow. Whole new level. On the bone, of course
Nonetheless, FIFTY EIGHT QUID?
Edit to add: I take it all back. I have just checked the price, a single Dover Sole - enough for 1 - now fetches nearly £30 from a fish market. So that might explain it
The King of fish, except the legendary sea bass, ofcourse.
I'd raise this above sea bass, and I had a superb wild sea bass recently. Also fantastic carp and trout in Montenegro
I think the gold metal "greatest fish to eat" is a final bout between Dover Sole and Turbot
BUT the winner must then go to a kind of global supercup match against Patagonian Toothfish (OMG!)
I hear and read about people whose opinions I value on food and drink waxing lyrical about fish dishes and wonder why I don't enjoy them. Shellfish, prawns etc I enjoy but not fish as such. Is it because when I was a child 'fish' always seemed to have bones in it, especially snoek? Or because I spent part of my late teens dissecting dogfish? Or both?
Did you never enjoy fish & chips back in the day ?
TBH, no. Not even out of newspaper. I've eaten them of course, but I don't really enjoy them. When we go out my wife often has them, but I just can't enjoy.
Fish and chips, like any food, can encompass a multitude of sins. Sometimes they can awful, and sometimes they can be heavenly, depending on the shop and time you get them.
The best I ever had was in Oz. Heavenly, with a slice of lemon, salt, and vinegar.
Fish and chips would be nice. Feels like it's been ages.
Comments
https://www1.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2024/08/20/will-the-ayatollahs-decide-the-us-election/
1. Trash the Tory brand
2. Trash the Labour brand
3. Usher in a Reform Lib Dem government
Not a governor.
a) Put forward useful (to Labour...) policies/votes.
b) Get his side to vote for them.
Both of these are somewhat in doubt, given the last three months.
There is a budget on 30 October.
You might have heard about it.
Big 'if' though.
And Cleverly is himself probably more of a steady the ship and make the Conservatives less hated candidate than an election winner, unless Labour really implode. But the choice available is the choice and they could - and quite likely will - do worse.
Need more beer.
Revelations:
1. Omg the food at the Grouch is now vastly improved. Divine Sole Meunière
2. However the prices have risen accordingly. £58??? For sole meunière??? Luckily my source was paying
3. There is indeed gossip on “him”
4. Also “him”
5. And, surprisingly, “her”
Good day
Maybe somehow he'll make it to the last two and somehow Jenrick self-destructs?
Central Park in NY has dozens of them, and there’s always loads of people around wanting a game. There’s loads of videos of hustlers who could be chess masters out there, as well as actual masters turning up and playing random members of the public. It’s brilliant for interest in the game.
Other than saying an awful lot of offensive and/or dumb stuff.
@phildstewart
·
10m
US official tells me that Iran's attack on Israel could be as big or even bigger than the one in April, if it goes ahead.
https://x.com/phildstewart/status/1841124684932198418
The BBC prioritised the existing on screen talent budget over investing in production, it's actually the same issue as UK companies paying dividends to shareholders rather than investing for capital growth. Good to see that it isn't just private sector management that makes the mistake.
Until he couldn't.
"A luxury cruise ship, which finally set sail on Monday after spending four months in Belfast for repairs, is expected to return to the city on Tuesday due to incomplete paperwork."
https://www.itv.com/news/2024-10-01/cruise-ship-that-spent-months-in-belfast-on-its-way-back-over-paperwork
I mean, if what he wrote on here in his various incarnations was actually factual, then he isn't a very nice bloke *at all*. Therefore I prefer to think of him as a fantasist.
But if that's your copium, enjoy.
Similarly, the development of the BBC's online stuff was hindered by government interference.
Part of the poison is the license fee. Had the BBC been funded from general taxation, the debate over how it's run might have been far less political charged.
https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/jenrick-reveals-daughters-middle-name-is-thatcher
So Leon was bottom fishing ?
This has a lot to run.
https://ig.ft.com/us-election-game/
May Thatcher Jenrick.
Then she'll have the names of two Tory PM's.
Hands up who thinks the Budget will result in a swing towards the government?
Or are you super sensitive about pronouns ?
What an utter fantasist you are.
I imagine the dog is a Libertarian?
The way forward is not going to involve a licence fee, and is likely to involve government funding minor interest broadcasting directly to a number of broadcasters, with the BBC getting its arse in gear to licence the library worldwide.
There’s literally billions of people who could pay £5 a month for the BBC library. Every school in the world wants good quality English content.
I can say that was the best Dover Sole Meuniere I've ever had. In fact one of the best fish dishes of any kind that I have had recnetly.
I tried to master this apparently simple dish - sole meuniere - at home, and thought I'd done it, but this.... wow. Whole new level. On the bone, of course
Nonetheless, FIFTY EIGHT QUID?
Edit to add: I take it all back. I have just checked the price, a single Dover Sole - enough for 1 - now fetches nearly £30 from a fish market. So that might explain it
https://thecornishfishmonger.co.uk/dover-sole.html?srsltid=AfmBOopVkIKv93axTK3H5B2SOqHWuqMfSyz51pZjsjABUnq63_GVCcOJ
Think of Leon in the same way.
I mention it often, but it bears repeating ; the starting mistake was letting McKinsey's run riot with the BBC in the mid-'90s.
The idea that people ever watched Match of the Day because of Lineker rather than because of the football highlights was preposterous.
Instead of paying a big sum for "The Talent" (which seems to be a proper noun the way they use it) the BBC should pay a market rate and develop talent.
Market rate doesn't mean a blank cheque whatever the most expensive person wants. Market rate means that you accept applications from everyone who meets the skill requirements of the job (or can be trained to do so) then take the cheapest applicant who has the requisite skillset.
Brace.
I think the gold metal "greatest fish to eat" is a final bout between Dover Sole and Turbot
BUT the winner must then go to a kind of global supercup match against Patagonian Toothfish (OMG!)
Thatcher's signature move in her first six months was to increase defence spending - which she then reversed the following year (leading to ministerial changes, and in due course, the Falklands).
The first policy which is now positively recalled as part of her legacy (Heseltine's bill to sell council houses), didn't come until the following year. The1980 embassy siege was another boost to her popularity, which had little or nothing to do with having a coherent program for government.
And that's a new administration and PM with substantially more government experience than either Starmer or his team.
He and Labour have had a crap start, but it's perhaps a little early to be writing him off.
If I recall correctly the story start with a conflict in Iran.
By my count, we should have ended corruption, stopped the small boats, built HS2 to Inverness and started about 7 million new houses. And Labour should be on 93%.
Carp? No, just no.
Is it because when I was a child 'fish' always seemed to have bones in it, especially snoek? Or because I spent part of my late teens dissecting dogfish?
Or both?
https://youtu.be/b9P4oPkztLU?si=vXkfmy1okk4hx7t1
Tut.
One of my favourite films is a 1974 film called "Juggernaut". It's about a broken-down old liner called "Brittannic" held ransom by a bomber. The analogy to 1970s England is as subtle as a brick. I think this 2024 saga also suffices.
Juggernaut trailer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B4DsBoWVjvc
Juggernaut on Wiki: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Juggernaut_(1974_film)
In reality, you're so doped up that, in reality, you are bashing into a wall trying to get into the toilets at King's Lynn bus station. (*)
(*) I really did see someone doing this once. The doorway was to their left, and they were constantly walking into the wall just beside the doorway.
I have (last month actually) and it was SUBLIME. It sounded awful, but it was mega-delish
Badenoch slips to third place as Cleverly overtakes her.
The best I ever had was in Oz. Heavenly, with a slice of lemon, salt, and vinegar.
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/live/2024/oct/01/tory-leadership-rivals-turn-on-jenrick-sas-claims-tugendhat-cleverly-badenoch-tory-conference-uk-politics-live
I love fish, and my wife dislikes it.