Punters and Fox News say Harris won the debate – politicalbetting.com
Here's Trump getting fact-checked on the Springfield/immigrants eating pets hoax and just desperately responding "they said it on TV" pic.twitter.com/nHBOBJuDqP
The interesting thing about this debate is how much impact it will have.
Generally speaking I’m a bit sceptical of how important they are, but I suspect this one might have some outsized importance given the last one brought Biden down and therefore there’ll have been a heightened awareness of the debates generally.
Anyway, it shifts the momentum back in Harris’ favour after a period where it looked like she was starting to slip. As per previous thread, together with the Swift endorsement couldn’t have been a better night for the Dems really.
It looks like Harris did win this debate then based on the post debate snap polls.
However I doubt it makes much difference to the polling. Hillary Clinton won every debate with Trump in 2016 and his voteshare was little changed and it was much the same in 2020 when a pre dementia Biden won his debates with Trump too.
However if Harris can squeeze more Independents into her camp after her debate win it could help her a little in swing states
There’s a little bit of Telegraph exaggeration there. The head of the union is mooting a ballot on strike action. There’s nothing imminent.
The union remains militant, but I’m not certain the membership is that eager for more strike action. But the union is right that the sector is in trouble. Undergrad fees remain frozen despite the inflation of recent years. It’s not rocket science: costs have gone up, but a major source of income hasn’t, so universities are in deficit.
It looks like Harris did win this debate then based on the post debate snap polls.
However I doubt it makes much difference to the polling. Hillary Clinton won every debate with Trump in 2016 and his voteshare was little changed and it was much the same in 2020 when a pre dementia Biden won his debates with Trump too.
However if Harris can squeeze more Independents into her camp after her debate win it could help her a little in swing states
But the thing that was different with the Clinton debates is she made the fatal error of essentially trying to engage with him rationally. No matter what the post debate analysis said, the key moment in those debates was the “because you’d be in jail” comeback which I think was probably the only real cut-through.
Harris’s tactic of needling Trump about things like rally sizes and basically showing his thin skin is really showing the best way to fight him. Attack his ego, don’t try and play the policy ball too heavily. If you’ve annoyed him, it hands him a lot of rope to come out with something odd.
It looks like Harris did win this debate then based on the post debate snap polls.
However I doubt it makes much difference to the polling. Hillary Clinton won every debate with Trump in 2016 and his voteshare was little changed and it was much the same in 2020 when a pre dementia Biden won his debates with Trump too.
However if Harris can squeeze more Independents into her camp after her debate win it could help her a little in swing states
I think this was a somewhat bigger deal because Hillary Clinton was very well-known at that point, whereas there seem to be quite a few undecided voters who don't feel like they know much about Kamala Harris.
It looks like Harris did win this debate then based on the post debate snap polls.
However I doubt it makes much difference to the polling. Hillary Clinton won every debate with Trump in 2016 and his voteshare was little changed and it was much the same in 2020 when a pre dementia Biden won his debates with Trump too.
However if Harris can squeeze more Independents into her camp after her debate win it could help her a little in swing states
But the thing that was different with the Clinton debates is she made the fatal error of essentially trying to engage with him rationally. No matter what the post debate analysis said, the key moment in those debates was the “because you’d be in jail” comeback which I think was probably the only real cut-through.
Harris’s tactic of needling Trump about things like rally sizes and basically showing his thin skin is really showing the best way to fight him. Attack his ego, don’t try and play the policy ball too heavily. If you’ve annoyed him, it hands him a lot of rope to come out with something odd.
She was well prepared. I appreciate how she battled on his turf from the get go getting under his skin.
There’s a little bit of Telegraph exaggeration there. The head of the union is mooting a ballot on strike action. There’s nothing imminent.
The union remains militant, but I’m not certain the membership is that eager for more strike action. But the union is right that the sector is in trouble. Undergrad fees remain frozen despite the inflation of recent years. It’s not rocket science: costs have gone up, but a major source of income hasn’t, so universities are in deficit.
Worse than that, actually.
In recent years, Universities have been encouraged/expected to pay their way by taking on lots of foreign students on massive fees.
Which was sort of fine until people looked at the consequences for immigration stats.
Oh, and good-but-not-stellar universities have expanded like crazy to get more income to support their fixed costs, often more than they can really support. Which in turn has made life hell for the OK universities.
And even if you think the university system is too big, few people want their local campus to close, or their (grand)child to miss out.
The one thing you absolutely cannot say in 2024 is that debates do not make a difference.
Historically debates are often a wash, with really only marginal impact. However after the Biden implosion we will now have loads of commentary on how important an essentially marginal thing can be .. ad nausiam for the next five elections.
She has a very charming way of patronising him which she also showed at the Democratic Convention. It's a great skill. It very endearing. If she doesn't win the US are throwing away a gem.
It looks like Harris did win this debate then based on the post debate snap polls.
However I doubt it makes much difference to the polling. Hillary Clinton won every debate with Trump in 2016 and his voteshare was little changed and it was much the same in 2020 when a pre dementia Biden won his debates with Trump too.
However if Harris can squeeze more Independents into her camp after her debate win it could help her a little in swing states
But the thing that was different with the Clinton debates is she made the fatal error of essentially trying to engage with him rationally. No matter what the post debate analysis said, the key moment in those debates was the “because you’d be in jail” comeback which I think was probably the only real cut-through.
Harris’s tactic of needling Trump about things like rally sizes and basically showing his thin skin is really showing the best way to fight him. Attack his ego, don’t try and play the policy ball too heavily. If you’ve annoyed him, it hands him a lot of rope to come out with something odd.
I can't remember if it was South Park, or something else, but there was that skit about a debate between a giant douche and a turd sandwich.
They basically spend the entire debate calling each other a douche or a turd sandwich. That used to be the standard of American debates.
They are only important and decisive if they reveal the candidate to be totally incompetent and incapable. Otherwise, it's just Punch and Judy
That was a failure by the moderators. They needed to turn off his mic - and cut off his old, white-guy entitlement.
Surprised to see Wokespeak from you.
How should we describe Trump's "old white-guy entitlement"?
You shouldn't, you should just describe Trump's entitlement as an individual.
Otherwise you are casting aspersions on an entire group of people - all old white men - which is identity politics and fuels polarisation.
I've had a think about this and I think you are right.
There are 2 issues here:
Firstly, I think it would be a massive mistake for Harris supporters to complain that she got 5 minutes less because she is black, or a woman, or a black woman. Or that Trump got more minutes because he is white. It would turn off voters and help the Republican story that she is a "DEI pick"
Secondly is it acceptable or useful to ever say 'old, white-guy entitlement'? I don't like it - for the reasons you say. It's like saying 'there was this typical old white man' in a pejorative sense, when you wouldn't say 'there was this typical young black man' in a pejorative sense. Or?
There’s a little bit of Telegraph exaggeration there. The head of the union is mooting a ballot on strike action. There’s nothing imminent.
The union remains militant, but I’m not certain the membership is that eager for more strike action. But the union is right that the sector is in trouble. Undergrad fees remain frozen despite the inflation of recent years. It’s not rocket science: costs have gone up, but a major source of income hasn’t, so universities are in deficit.
Worse than that, actually.
In recent years, Universities have been encouraged/expected to pay their way by taking on lots of foreign students on massive fees.
Which was sort of fine until people looked at the consequences for immigration stats.
Oh, and good-but-not-stellar universities have expanded like crazy to get more income to support their fixed costs, often more than they can really support. Which in turn has made life hell for the OK universities.
And even if you think the university system is too big, few people want their local campus to close, or their (grand)child to miss out.
The obvious answer to that is to reverse May's idiotic decision to include students in the immigration numbers.
It looks like Harris did win this debate then based on the post debate snap polls.
However I doubt it makes much difference to the polling. Hillary Clinton won every debate with Trump in 2016 and his voteshare was little changed and it was much the same in 2020 when a pre dementia Biden won his debates with Trump too.
However if Harris can squeeze more Independents into her camp after her debate win it could help her a little in swing states
But the thing that was different with the Clinton debates is she made the fatal error of essentially trying to engage with him rationally. No matter what the post debate analysis said, the key moment in those debates was the “because you’d be in jail” comeback which I think was probably the only real cut-through.
Harris’s tactic of needling Trump about things like rally sizes and basically showing his thin skin is really showing the best way to fight him. Attack his ego, don’t try and play the policy ball too heavily. If you’ve annoyed him, it hands him a lot of rope to come out with something odd.
I can't remember if it was South Park, or something else, but there was that skit about a debate between a giant douche and a turd sandwich.
They basically spend the entire debate calling each other a douche or a turd sandwich. That used to be the standard of American debates.
They are only important and decisive if they reveal the candidate to be totally incompetent and incapable. Otherwise, it's just Punch and Judy
Generally I agree but again I would say that this one might have some more importance because a) of what happened with Biden and b) the fact that Harris needed to therefore put in a competent performance.
If there had been a Harris gaffe, then you can bet your bottom dollar the media narrative would have gone absolutely insane and it could have handed the momentum back to Trump.
Actually smart that she implies that she has had to tell people who she's voting for because of misinformation from Trump about how she is supporting him.
There’s a little bit of Telegraph exaggeration there. The head of the union is mooting a ballot on strike action. There’s nothing imminent.
The union remains militant, but I’m not certain the membership is that eager for more strike action. But the union is right that the sector is in trouble. Undergrad fees remain frozen despite the inflation of recent years. It’s not rocket science: costs have gone up, but a major source of income hasn’t, so universities are in deficit.
Worse than that, actually.
In recent years, Universities have been encouraged/expected to pay their way by taking on lots of foreign students on massive fees.
Which was sort of fine until people looked at the consequences for immigration stats.
Oh, and good-but-not-stellar universities have expanded like crazy to get more income to support their fixed costs, often more than they can really support. Which in turn has made life hell for the OK universities.
And even if you think the university system is too big, few people want their local campus to close, or their (grand)child to miss out.
The obvious answer to that is to reverse May's idiotic decision to include students in the immigration numbers.
It should balance out when they leave, if they leave. I think about 20% stay historically.
Refusing to put up fees (or finance in other ways) is impacting the quality of university courses. If people go to uni they deserve a decent course.
It looks like Harris did win this debate then based on the post debate snap polls.
However I doubt it makes much difference to the polling. Hillary Clinton won every debate with Trump in 2016 and his voteshare was little changed and it was much the same in 2020 when a pre dementia Biden won his debates with Trump too.
However if Harris can squeeze more Independents into her camp after her debate win it could help her a little in swing states
I'm betting it will make a difference to the polling. Clinton was a well known feature of US political life, who'd been around for years; there are still a fair number of voters who don't have much of a clue about Harris.
A successful convention followed by a successful debate - which the media had been bigging up as a 'test' she had to pass - is about as good an introduction as the Democrats could hope for.
And as with Reagan/Carter, this is likely to be the only debate, unless Trump gets really desperate.
Taylor Swift’s endorsement of Harris is just pitch perfect. And signing off as Childless Cat Lady the chef’s kiss.
Lady is all class.
And Musk’s subsequent offer to impregnate her just put all that into relief.
Nothing has changed my view that the 5th of November will be a blowout for Harris.
How many voters are there that care about Taylor Swift’s voting preference that would not already be voting democrat? It’s more a fleeting morale boost to the campaigners than a game changer surely. The Liz Cheney endorsement feels far more impactful to me.
There’s a little bit of Telegraph exaggeration there. The head of the union is mooting a ballot on strike action. There’s nothing imminent.
The union remains militant, but I’m not certain the membership is that eager for more strike action. But the union is right that the sector is in trouble. Undergrad fees remain frozen despite the inflation of recent years. It’s not rocket science: costs have gone up, but a major source of income hasn’t, so universities are in deficit.
Worse than that, actually.
In recent years, Universities have been encouraged/expected to pay their way by taking on lots of foreign students on massive fees.
Which was sort of fine until people looked at the consequences for immigration stats.
Oh, and good-but-not-stellar universities have expanded like crazy to get more income to support their fixed costs, often more than they can really support. Which in turn has made life hell for the OK universities.
And even if you think the university system is too big, few people want their local campus to close, or their (grand)child to miss out.
The obvious answer to that is to reverse May's idiotic decision to include students in the immigration numbers.
It should balance out when they leave, if they leave. I think about 20% stay historically.
Refusing to put up fees (or finance in other ways) is impacting the quality of university courses. If people go to uni they deserve a decent course.
Taylor Swift photographed with a cat was perfectly timed. The animal story has to have finished him. He sounded insane. Great day for cats and ladies!
I'm cynical enough* to wonder if the campaign asked her to hold back the endorsement until after the debate. As either damage control, or, as it turns out now, the cherry on the cake.
*And sufficiently impressed by how well the campaign has been managed.
Watching the whole debate - in segments as I do have to work as well.
Will the last Donald Trump supporter please set the light switch on fire as they riot in impotent rage?
This election is done.
As I have been saying for weeks, Trump has gone utterly batshit as his campaign tanks and hers takes off. He can't stand it, and he will say more and more outrageous things to get the attention back onto him.
Instructive in the debate. She quotes reality at him. He goes off down some mad alley, says the facts are lies, presents what he thinks is reality, then a few seconds later he's forgotten that number and increases it some more. Then starts on how the forrin are eating your dog.
What does Harris do? Openly laughs at him. Look at him like he's deranged. Stands there with her chin resting in her hand with a "can you believe this shit" grin on her face.
I know that the remaining Forrin Eat Your Dog fans want this not to be true. But the polls are showing the ship sinking. Whats more, we know where its sinking - moderates, undecideds, women wanting to keep the GOP out of their Vagina, young voters especially women.
Trump is the Titanic. He hit the iceberg. He's starting to list. Below the surface the ocean is steadily flooding in. But like Ismay he can only respond by rattling off stats about how the Titanic is the most Glorious, Biggest and Longest ship ever which Cannot Sink. But unlike Ismay he thinks the Titanic is a Mile long with 17 funnels. Where Guatamalans are stoking the boilers with your dog.
Taylor Swift’s endorsement of Harris is just pitch perfect. And signing off as Childless Cat Lady the chef’s kiss.
Lady is all class.
And Musk’s subsequent offer to impregnate her just put all that into relief.
Nothing has changed my view that the 5th of November will be a blowout for Harris.
How many voters are there that care about Taylor Swift’s voting preference that would not already be voting democrat? It’s more a fleeting morale boost to the campaigners than a game changer surely. The Liz Cheney endorsement feels far more impactful to me.
I believe one of the reasons Democrats were so keen for the endorsement was because it could drive turnout, particularly among the young. That’s a demographic it can be hard for politicians to reach, but whatever your views on Taylor Swift, she has proven herself to be a powerhouse when it comes to communicating with her fanbase.
Taylor Swift’s endorsement of Harris is just pitch perfect. And signing off as Childless Cat Lady the chef’s kiss.
Lady is all class.
And Musk’s subsequent offer to impregnate her just put all that into relief.
Nothing has changed my view that the 5th of November will be a blowout for Harris.
How many voters are there that care about Taylor Swift’s voting preference that would not already be voting democrat? It’s more a fleeting morale boost to the campaigners than a game changer surely. The Liz Cheney endorsement feels far more impactful to me.
It's not a surprise, but she probably reaches a demographic that might not bother to vote, so perhaps a little bit of turnout boost for Democrats that she actually publicises that she is voting for Harris? Anyway, every little helps, as they say.
Taylor Swift photographed with a cat was perfectly timed. The animal story has to have finished him. He sounded insane. Great day for cats and ladies!
I'm cynical enough* to wonder if the campaign asked her to hold back the endorsement until after the debate. As either damage control, or, as it turns out now, the cherry on the cake.
*And sufficiently impressed by how well the campaign has been managed.
Oh I don’t think that’s cynical at all, I’d have pretty much expected that with any high profile endorsements there’ll be conversations between the “teams” about the best time to release it.
There’s a little bit of Telegraph exaggeration there. The head of the union is mooting a ballot on strike action. There’s nothing imminent.
The union remains militant, but I’m not certain the membership is that eager for more strike action. But the union is right that the sector is in trouble. Undergrad fees remain frozen despite the inflation of recent years. It’s not rocket science: costs have gone up, but a major source of income hasn’t, so universities are in deficit.
If they increase tuition fees further then there'll be a further decline in student numbers, they're also being rinsed for accommodation. From ES "Figures from Ucas (Universities and Colleges Admissions Service) show by the end of June 41.9% of all 18-year-olds in the UK had applied through their system – compared to 42.1% last year and 44.1% in 2022."
Watching the whole debate - in segments as I do have to work as well.
Will the last Donald Trump supporter please set the light switch on fire as they riot in impotent rage?
This election is done.
As I have been saying for weeks, Trump has gone utterly batshit as his campaign tanks and hers takes off. He can't stand it, and he will say more and more outrageous things to get the attention back onto him.
Instructive in the debate. She quotes reality at him. He goes off down some mad alley, says the facts are lies, presents what he thinks is reality, then a few seconds later he's forgotten that number and increases it some more. Then starts on how the forrin are eating your dog.
What does Harris do? Openly laughs at him. Look at him like he's deranged. Stands there with her chin resting in her hand with a "can you believe this shit" grin on her face.
I know that the remaining Forrin Eat Your Dog fans want this not to be true. But the polls are showing the ship sinking. Whats more, we know where its sinking - moderates, undecideds, women wanting to keep the GOP out of their Vagina, young voters especially women.
Trump is the Titanic. He hit the iceberg. He's starting to list. Below the surface the ocean is steadily flooding in. But like Ismay he can only respond by rattling off stats about how the Titanic is the most Glorious, Biggest and Longest ship ever which Cannot Sink. But unlike Ismay he thinks the Titanic is a Mile long with 17 funnels. Where Guatamalans are stoking the boilers with your dog.
On one hand, 45% of the electorate will back Trump no matter what.
On the other, 55-45 is a landslide in a two horse race.
The reality of FPTP is that loyalist voters don't matter, which is why parties that play to their loyalists lose.
The debate moderator had to actually state that it is the case that "there is no state in USA where it is legal to kill a baby after it has been born".
Taylor Swift’s endorsement of Harris is just pitch perfect. And signing off as Childless Cat Lady the chef’s kiss.
Lady is all class.
And Musk’s subsequent offer to impregnate her just put all that into relief.
Nothing has changed my view that the 5th of November will be a blowout for Harris.
How many voters are there that care about Taylor Swift’s voting preference that would not already be voting democrat? It’s more a fleeting morale boost to the campaigners than a game changer surely. The Liz Cheney endorsement feels far more impactful to me.
I believe one of the reasons Democrats were so keen for the endorsement was because it could drive turnout, particularly among the young. That’s a demographic it can be hard for politicians to reach, but whatever your views on Taylor Swift, she has proven herself to be a powerhouse when it comes to communicating with her fanbase.
Seems incredible but celebrity endorsement is like gold dust. This in a way more so because everyone knows no one is paying her. In advertising terms this would be priceless
There’s a little bit of Telegraph exaggeration there. The head of the union is mooting a ballot on strike action. There’s nothing imminent.
The union remains militant, but I’m not certain the membership is that eager for more strike action. But the union is right that the sector is in trouble. Undergrad fees remain frozen despite the inflation of recent years. It’s not rocket science: costs have gone up, but a major source of income hasn’t, so universities are in deficit.
If they increase tuition fees further then there'll be a further decline in student numbers, they're also being rinsed for accommodation. From ES "Figures from Ucas (Universities and Colleges Admissions Service) show by the end of June 41.9% of all 18-year-olds in the UK had applied through their system – compared to 42.1% last year and 44.1% in 2022."
For the next few years the absolute number of 18 year olds will be fairly low as well.
Watching the whole debate - in segments as I do have to work as well.
Will the last Donald Trump supporter please set the light switch on fire as they riot in impotent rage?
This election is done.
As I have been saying for weeks, Trump has gone utterly batshit as his campaign tanks and hers takes off. He can't stand it, and he will say more and more outrageous things to get the attention back onto him.
Instructive in the debate. She quotes reality at him. He goes off down some mad alley, says the facts are lies, presents what he thinks is reality, then a few seconds later he's forgotten that number and increases it some more. Then starts on how the forrin are eating your dog.
What does Harris do? Openly laughs at him. Look at him like he's deranged. Stands there with her chin resting in her hand with a "can you believe this shit" grin on her face.
I know that the remaining Forrin Eat Your Dog fans want this not to be true. But the polls are showing the ship sinking. Whats more, we know where its sinking - moderates, undecideds, women wanting to keep the GOP out of their Vagina, young voters especially women.
Trump is the Titanic. He hit the iceberg. He's starting to list. Below the surface the ocean is steadily flooding in. But like Ismay he can only respond by rattling off stats about how the Titanic is the most Glorious, Biggest and Longest ship ever which Cannot Sink. But unlike Ismay he thinks the Titanic is a Mile long with 17 funnels. Where Guatamalans are stoking the boilers with your dog.
It's an electoral debate. Such vituperation for one participant. The voters will decide as they always do and they will be right.
There’s a little bit of Telegraph exaggeration there. The head of the union is mooting a ballot on strike action. There’s nothing imminent.
The union remains militant, but I’m not certain the membership is that eager for more strike action. But the union is right that the sector is in trouble. Undergrad fees remain frozen despite the inflation of recent years. It’s not rocket science: costs have gone up, but a major source of income hasn’t, so universities are in deficit.
If they increase tuition fees further then there'll be a further decline in student numbers, they're also being rinsed for accommodation. From ES "Figures from Ucas (Universities and Colleges Admissions Service) show by the end of June 41.9% of all 18-year-olds in the UK had applied through their system – compared to 42.1% last year and 44.1% in 2022."
Good morning
When I left school in 1960 just 4% went to university
Watching the whole debate - in segments as I do have to work as well.
Will the last Donald Trump supporter please set the light switch on fire as they riot in impotent rage?
This election is done.
As I have been saying for weeks, Trump has gone utterly batshit as his campaign tanks and hers takes off. He can't stand it, and he will say more and more outrageous things to get the attention back onto him.
Instructive in the debate. She quotes reality at him. He goes off down some mad alley, says the facts are lies, presents what he thinks is reality, then a few seconds later he's forgotten that number and increases it some more. Then starts on how the forrin are eating your dog.
What does Harris do? Openly laughs at him. Look at him like he's deranged. Stands there with her chin resting in her hand with a "can you believe this shit" grin on her face.
I know that the remaining Forrin Eat Your Dog fans want this not to be true. But the polls are showing the ship sinking. Whats more, we know where its sinking - moderates, undecideds, women wanting to keep the GOP out of their Vagina, young voters especially women.
Trump is the Titanic. He hit the iceberg. He's starting to list. Below the surface the ocean is steadily flooding in. But like Ismay he can only respond by rattling off stats about how the Titanic is the most Glorious, Biggest and Longest ship ever which Cannot Sink. But unlike Ismay he thinks the Titanic is a Mile long with 17 funnels. Where Guatamalans are stoking the boilers with your dog.
Very good and very true; except, sadly, that Trump is going to win.
Taylor Swift photographed with a cat was perfectly timed. The animal story has to have finished him. He sounded insane. Great day for cats and ladies!
I'm cynical enough* to wonder if the campaign asked her to hold back the endorsement until after the debate. As either damage control, or, as it turns out now, the cherry on the cake.
*And sufficiently impressed by how well the campaign has been managed.
Oh I don’t think that’s cynical at all, I’d have pretty much expected that with any high profile endorsements there’ll be conversations between the “teams” about the best time to release it.
I'm a bit sceptical that Swift is coordinating with the Harris campaign. She may want to Trump to lose, but I think she also cares a lot about her brand. Maybe she was waiting to see if Harris would screw up the debate badly.
Taylor Swift photographed with a cat was perfectly timed. The animal story has to have finished him. He sounded insane. Great day for cats and ladies!
Nope. Nothing finishes him. It does not matter how mad he sounds they will still vote for him.
There must be a tipping point and to see an aging looking leader say they are eating animals off the street in Ohio and being told by the modulator that it had been fact checked and its incorrect and then to see him blink and murmer 'But I've seen it on TV' must at least give his fans pause for thought.
The debate moderator had to actually state that it is the case that "there is no state in USA where it is legal to kill a baby after it has been born".
America has lost its mind.
This is the video to which Trump referred, from the previous governor of Virginia.
Taylor Swift photographed with a cat was perfectly timed. The animal story has to have finished him. He sounded insane. Great day for cats and ladies!
Nope. Nothing finishes him. It does not matter how mad he sounds they will still vote for him.
There must be a tipping point and to see an aging looking leader say they are eating animals off the street in Ohio and being told by the modulator that it had been fact checked and its incorrect and then to see him blink and murmer 'But I've seen it on TV' must at least give his fans pause for thought.
You think that Trump fans will trust the word of an NBC moderator over that of Donald Trump?
There’s a little bit of Telegraph exaggeration there. The head of the union is mooting a ballot on strike action. There’s nothing imminent.
The union remains militant, but I’m not certain the membership is that eager for more strike action. But the union is right that the sector is in trouble. Undergrad fees remain frozen despite the inflation of recent years. It’s not rocket science: costs have gone up, but a major source of income hasn’t, so universities are in deficit.
If they increase tuition fees further then there'll be a further decline in student numbers, they're also being rinsed for accommodation. From ES "Figures from Ucas (Universities and Colleges Admissions Service) show by the end of June 41.9% of all 18-year-olds in the UK had applied through their system – compared to 42.1% last year and 44.1% in 2022."
I am very pro universities, but the idea that 40%+ of our 18 year olds should be even thinking of going to one is ludicrous. The way in which the entire media prioritise them as the route for young people is absurd and damaging, and must be contributing to the jobs crisis in unfashionable fields, the marginalisation of FE, and apprentices.
There’s a little bit of Telegraph exaggeration there. The head of the union is mooting a ballot on strike action. There’s nothing imminent.
The union remains militant, but I’m not certain the membership is that eager for more strike action. But the union is right that the sector is in trouble. Undergrad fees remain frozen despite the inflation of recent years. It’s not rocket science: costs have gone up, but a major source of income hasn’t, so universities are in deficit.
Worse than that, actually.
In recent years, Universities have been encouraged/expected to pay their way by taking on lots of foreign students on massive fees.
Which was sort of fine until people looked at the consequences for immigration stats.
Oh, and good-but-not-stellar universities have expanded like crazy to get more income to support their fixed costs, often more than they can really support. Which in turn has made life hell for the OK universities.
And even if you think the university system is too big, few people want their local campus to close, or their (grand)child to miss out.
The obvious answer to that is to reverse May's idiotic decision to include students in the immigration numbers.
It should balance out when they leave, if they leave. I think about 20% stay historically.
Refusing to put up fees (or finance in other ways) is impacting the quality of university courses. If people go to uni they deserve a decent course.
“Among non-EU migrants issued an initial study visa in 2017, only 20% still had permission to stay in the UK (valid leave to remain) in 2022, around five years later. Approximately 8% (around 12,300) held work visas, another 9% (around 13,800) were still on study visas, and less than 0.1% (146) had indefinite leave to remain”
Those on study visas will mostly leave the UK on finishing their studies. A proportion of those on work visas will do too. So, yes, 20% in the short term, but it’s probably less than 10% in the long run.
However, the famously anti-immigration Conservative government did introduce a new graduate visa in 2022 that allows students to stay for 2-3 years after graduating. This has seen a large uptake.
There’s a little bit of Telegraph exaggeration there. The head of the union is mooting a ballot on strike action. There’s nothing imminent.
The union remains militant, but I’m not certain the membership is that eager for more strike action. But the union is right that the sector is in trouble. Undergrad fees remain frozen despite the inflation of recent years. It’s not rocket science: costs have gone up, but a major source of income hasn’t, so universities are in deficit.
If they increase tuition fees further then there'll be a further decline in student numbers, they're also being rinsed for accommodation. From ES "Figures from Ucas (Universities and Colleges Admissions Service) show by the end of June 41.9% of all 18-year-olds in the UK had applied through their system – compared to 42.1% last year and 44.1% in 2022."
I am very pro universities, but the idea that 40%+ of our 18 year olds should be even thinking of going to one is ludicrous. The way in which the entire media prioritise them as the route for young people is absurd and damaging, and must be contributing to the jobs crisis in unfashionable fields, the marginalisation of FE, and apprentices.
I can't think of a country other than Britain where the idea that its young people are receiving too much education has so much traction. If you suggested this in Ireland people would think you were madder than Donald Trump.
Taylor Swift’s endorsement of Harris is just pitch perfect. And signing off as Childless Cat Lady the chef’s kiss.
Lady is all class.
And Musk’s subsequent offer to impregnate her just put all that into relief.
Nothing has changed my view that the 5th of November will be a blowout for Harris.
How many voters are there that care about Taylor Swift’s voting preference that would not already be voting democrat? It’s more a fleeting morale boost to the campaigners than a game changer surely. The Liz Cheney endorsement feels far more impactful to me.
I believe one of the reasons Democrats were so keen for the endorsement was because it could drive turnout, particularly among the young. That’s a demographic it can be hard for politicians to reach, but whatever your views on Taylor Swift, she has proven herself to be a powerhouse when it comes to communicating with her fanbase.
Seems incredible but celebrity endorsement is like gold dust. This in a way more so because everyone knows no one is paying her. In advertising terms this would be priceless
Celebrity endorsements are mostly pretty meaningless imho. Swift is a big one, and may help a little with turnout. If she had unexpectedly endorsed Trump I think it would have made a bigger difference! But Swift saying she is voting Harris makes less difference I think than RFK dropping out and endorsing Trump (which also doesn't make a very big difference).
There’s a little bit of Telegraph exaggeration there. The head of the union is mooting a ballot on strike action. There’s nothing imminent.
The union remains militant, but I’m not certain the membership is that eager for more strike action. But the union is right that the sector is in trouble. Undergrad fees remain frozen despite the inflation of recent years. It’s not rocket science: costs have gone up, but a major source of income hasn’t, so universities are in deficit.
If they increase tuition fees further then there'll be a further decline in student numbers, they're also being rinsed for accommodation. From ES "Figures from Ucas (Universities and Colleges Admissions Service) show by the end of June 41.9% of all 18-year-olds in the UK had applied through their system – compared to 42.1% last year and 44.1% in 2022."
That’s on the mark - the university accommodation sector has become a rip off, in many ways.
Often backed by some… interesting financial engineering.
Hence the utter desperation by some universities, during COVID, to force students to pay for their accommodation. Even if they weren’t going to need it.
There’s a little bit of Telegraph exaggeration there. The head of the union is mooting a ballot on strike action. There’s nothing imminent.
The union remains militant, but I’m not certain the membership is that eager for more strike action. But the union is right that the sector is in trouble. Undergrad fees remain frozen despite the inflation of recent years. It’s not rocket science: costs have gone up, but a major source of income hasn’t, so universities are in deficit.
Worse than that, actually.
In recent years, Universities have been encouraged/expected to pay their way by taking on lots of foreign students on massive fees.
Which was sort of fine until people looked at the consequences for immigration stats.
Oh, and good-but-not-stellar universities have expanded like crazy to get more income to support their fixed costs, often more than they can really support. Which in turn has made life hell for the OK universities.
And even if you think the university system is too big, few people want their local campus to close, or their (grand)child to miss out.
The obvious answer to that is to reverse May's idiotic decision to include students in the immigration numbers.
It should balance out when they leave, if they leave. I think about 20% stay historically.
Refusing to put up fees (or finance in other ways) is impacting the quality of university courses. If people go to uni they deserve a decent course.
Fees have increased by over 300% since 2010.
I cannot think of anything which matches that.
The coalition government moved costs from the government to students. The amount of income to universities, however, went up much less. It was just coming from a different source.
There’s a little bit of Telegraph exaggeration there. The head of the union is mooting a ballot on strike action. There’s nothing imminent.
The union remains militant, but I’m not certain the membership is that eager for more strike action. But the union is right that the sector is in trouble. Undergrad fees remain frozen despite the inflation of recent years. It’s not rocket science: costs have gone up, but a major source of income hasn’t, so universities are in deficit.
If they increase tuition fees further then there'll be a further decline in student numbers, they're also being rinsed for accommodation. From ES "Figures from Ucas (Universities and Colleges Admissions Service) show by the end of June 41.9% of all 18-year-olds in the UK had applied through their system – compared to 42.1% last year and 44.1% in 2022."
I am very pro universities, but the idea that 40%+ of our 18 year olds should be even thinking of going to one is ludicrous. The way in which the entire media prioritise them as the route for young people is absurd and damaging, and must be contributing to the jobs crisis in unfashionable fields, the marginalisation of FE, and apprentices.
I think (and those figures are bearing that out) younger people are increasingly realising that a university education is not a magic bullet and in some cases the other routes open to them would be preferable.
There’s a little bit of Telegraph exaggeration there. The head of the union is mooting a ballot on strike action. There’s nothing imminent.
The union remains militant, but I’m not certain the membership is that eager for more strike action. But the union is right that the sector is in trouble. Undergrad fees remain frozen despite the inflation of recent years. It’s not rocket science: costs have gone up, but a major source of income hasn’t, so universities are in deficit.
Good morning everyone.
I think this is an interesting one.
Despite its squeezes, the university sector has had a long period relatively in the sun - meaning perhaps 25 years, compared to for example local authorities, public transport, the legal system, or defence.
How will this play in a competition for scarce (or "find your own" resources)?
Universities across the country have been milking the Student Accommodation cash-cow since 2000 or before, and heavily since ~2005-2010, and have also targeted intertnational student fees. What other income sources are available?
Taylor Swift photographed with a cat was perfectly timed. The animal story has to have finished him. He sounded insane. Great day for cats and ladies!
I'm cynical enough* to wonder if the campaign asked her to hold back the endorsement until after the debate. As either damage control, or, as it turns out now, the cherry on the cake.
*And sufficiently impressed by how well the campaign has been managed.
Oh I don’t think that’s cynical at all, I’d have pretty much expected that with any high profile endorsements there’ll be conversations between the “teams” about the best time to release it.
I'm a bit sceptical that Swift is coordinating with the Harris campaign. She may want to Trump to lose, but I think she also cares a lot about her brand. Maybe she was waiting to see if Harris would screw up the debate badly.
If I was writing this movie, outgoing veep Harris just endorsed Taylor for prezzo while wearing a glittery mini skirt and I HEART Taylor t shirt.
Taylor Swift’s endorsement of Harris is just pitch perfect. And signing off as Childless Cat Lady the chef’s kiss.
Lady is all class.
And Musk’s subsequent offer to impregnate her just put all that into relief.
Nothing has changed my view that the 5th of November will be a blowout for Harris.
How many voters are there that care about Taylor Swift’s voting preference that would not already be voting democrat? It’s more a fleeting morale boost to the campaigners than a game changer surely. The Liz Cheney endorsement feels far more impactful to me.
Heard it stated research showed that Oprah Winfrey's endorsement of Obama was worth 3 million votes to him.
Trump is all about celebrity. The fuel for his ego. It is why he is so thin-skinned about who has the bigger rallies. If an even bigger celebrity wades in to endorse his opponent, it will be the only thing he takes from the debate night. It will enrage him.
Hopefully, America is about to change channels and stop watching him. (I think where he really lost it and never recovered his composure was when Harris goaded him about being fired by the voters. "I'm the only one who gets to say who gets fired!! That's me! Me!!!")
Donald - you're fired from Celebrity World. Go directly to jail. Do not grab any pussy....
Watching the whole debate - in segments as I do have to work as well.
Will the last Donald Trump supporter please set the light switch on fire as they riot in impotent rage?
This election is done.
As I have been saying for weeks, Trump has gone utterly batshit as his campaign tanks and hers takes off. He can't stand it, and he will say more and more outrageous things to get the attention back onto him.
Instructive in the debate. She quotes reality at him. He goes off down some mad alley, says the facts are lies, presents what he thinks is reality, then a few seconds later he's forgotten that number and increases it some more. Then starts on how the forrin are eating your dog.
What does Harris do? Openly laughs at him. Look at him like he's deranged. Stands there with her chin resting in her hand with a "can you believe this shit" grin on her face.
I know that the remaining Forrin Eat Your Dog fans want this not to be true. But the polls are showing the ship sinking. Whats more, we know where its sinking - moderates, undecideds, women wanting to keep the GOP out of their Vagina, young voters especially women.
Trump is the Titanic. He hit the iceberg. He's starting to list. Below the surface the ocean is steadily flooding in. But like Ismay he can only respond by rattling off stats about how the Titanic is the most Glorious, Biggest and Longest ship ever which Cannot Sink. But unlike Ismay he thinks the Titanic is a Mile long with 17 funnels. Where Guatamalans are stoking the boilers with your dog.
On one hand, 45% of the electorate will back Trump no matter what.
On the other, 55-45 is a landslide in a two horse race.
The reality of FPTP is that loyalist voters don't matter, which is why parties that play to their loyalists lose.
Only loyalists, lose your loyalists and swing voters and you face extinction or near wipeout eg Clegg's LDs in 2015
Taylor Swift’s endorsement of Harris is just pitch perfect. And signing off as Childless Cat Lady the chef’s kiss.
Lady is all class.
And Musk’s subsequent offer to impregnate her just put all that into relief.
Nothing has changed my view that the 5th of November will be a blowout for Harris.
How many voters are there that care about Taylor Swift’s voting preference that would not already be voting democrat? It’s more a fleeting morale boost to the campaigners than a game changer surely. The Liz Cheney endorsement feels far more impactful to me.
I believe one of the reasons Democrats were so keen for the endorsement was because it could drive turnout, particularly among the young. That’s a demographic it can be hard for politicians to reach, but whatever your views on Taylor Swift, she has proven herself to be a powerhouse when it comes to communicating with her fanbase.
Seems incredible but celebrity endorsement is like gold dust. This in a way more so because everyone knows no one is paying her. In advertising terms this would be priceless
Celebrity endorsements are mostly pretty meaningless imho. Swift is a big one, and may help a little with turnout. If she had unexpectedly endorsed Trump I think it would have made a bigger difference! But Swift saying she is voting Harris makes less difference I think than RFK dropping out and endorsing Trump (which also doesn't make a very big difference).
I Doubt for one moment the Hulkster coming out for Trump will do anything for his campaign either.
There’s a little bit of Telegraph exaggeration there. The head of the union is mooting a ballot on strike action. There’s nothing imminent.
The union remains militant, but I’m not certain the membership is that eager for more strike action. But the union is right that the sector is in trouble. Undergrad fees remain frozen despite the inflation of recent years. It’s not rocket science: costs have gone up, but a major source of income hasn’t, so universities are in deficit.
Good morning everyone.
I think this is an interesting one.
Despite its squeezes, the university sector has had a long period relatively in the sun - meaning perhaps 25 years, compared to for example local authorities, public transport, the legal system, or defence.
How will this play in a competition for scarce (or "find your own" resources)?
Universities across the country have been milking the Student Accommodation cash-cow since 2000 or before, and heavily since ~2005-2010, and have also targeted intertnational student fees. What other income sources are available?
I would want to see evidence to back up that claim
The biggest providers in the market nowadays are private firms such as Unite, IQ or Student Roost all backed by pension funds.
Universities simply don't have the money to build them anymore - Newcastle's redevelopment of Castle Leazes is a joint venture with Unite as they cannot finance it any other way.
Taylor Swift photographed with a cat was perfectly timed. The animal story has to have finished him. He sounded insane. Great day for cats and ladies!
I'm cynical enough* to wonder if the campaign asked her to hold back the endorsement until after the debate. As either damage control, or, as it turns out now, the cherry on the cake.
*And sufficiently impressed by how well the campaign has been managed.
Oh I don’t think that’s cynical at all, I’d have pretty much expected that with any high profile endorsements there’ll be conversations between the “teams” about the best time to release it.
I'm a bit sceptical that Swift is coordinating with the Harris campaign. She may want to Trump to lose, but I think she also cares a lot about her brand. Maybe she was waiting to see if Harris would screw up the debate badly.
If I was writing this movie, outgoing veep Harris just endorsed Taylor for prezzo while wearing a glittery mini skirt and I HEART Taylor t shirt.
There’s a little bit of Telegraph exaggeration there. The head of the union is mooting a ballot on strike action. There’s nothing imminent.
The union remains militant, but I’m not certain the membership is that eager for more strike action. But the union is right that the sector is in trouble. Undergrad fees remain frozen despite the inflation of recent years. It’s not rocket science: costs have gone up, but a major source of income hasn’t, so universities are in deficit.
If they increase tuition fees further then there'll be a further decline in student numbers, they're also being rinsed for accommodation. From ES "Figures from Ucas (Universities and Colleges Admissions Service) show by the end of June 41.9% of all 18-year-olds in the UK had applied through their system – compared to 42.1% last year and 44.1% in 2022."
I am very pro universities, but the idea that 40%+ of our 18 year olds should be even thinking of going to one is ludicrous. The way in which the entire media prioritise them as the route for young people is absurd and damaging, and must be contributing to the jobs crisis in unfashionable fields, the marginalisation of FE, and apprentices.
I can't think of a country other than Britain where the idea that its young people are receiving too much education has so much traction. If you suggested this in Ireland people would think you were madder than Donald Trump.
What is wrong with Britain?
40% or more to Tertiary education is pretty much the OECD norm. Italy and Germany are less, bur even there it is 30%
This story says a lot about human nature. How blind people are to their own failings most of the time!
"The report also says that a cyclist who handed over helmet camera footage to a garda of a driver using their phone or parking illegally ended up with a Fixed Charge Penalty Notice (FCPN) after the same footage showed the cyclist breaking a red light."
Watching the whole debate - in segments as I do have to work as well.
Will the last Donald Trump supporter please set the light switch on fire as they riot in impotent rage?
This election is done.
As I have been saying for weeks, Trump has gone utterly batshit as his campaign tanks and hers takes off. He can't stand it, and he will say more and more outrageous things to get the attention back onto him.
Instructive in the debate. She quotes reality at him. He goes off down some mad alley, says the facts are lies, presents what he thinks is reality, then a few seconds later he's forgotten that number and increases it some more. Then starts on how the forrin are eating your dog.
What does Harris do? Openly laughs at him. Look at him like he's deranged. Stands there with her chin resting in her hand with a "can you believe this shit" grin on her face.
I know that the remaining Forrin Eat Your Dog fans want this not to be true. But the polls are showing the ship sinking. Whats more, we know where its sinking - moderates, undecideds, women wanting to keep the GOP out of their Vagina, young voters especially women.
Trump is the Titanic. He hit the iceberg. He's starting to list. Below the surface the ocean is steadily flooding in. But like Ismay he can only respond by rattling off stats about how the Titanic is the most Glorious, Biggest and Longest ship ever which Cannot Sink. But unlike Ismay he thinks the Titanic is a Mile long with 17 funnels. Where Guatamalans are stoking the boilers with your dog.
On one hand, 45% of the electorate will back Trump no matter what.
On the other, 55-45 is a landslide in a two horse race.
The reality of FPTP is that loyalist voters don't matter, which is why parties that play to their loyalists lose.
But you need to keep the base on side, otherwise…
FPTP is no different, in many way, to other systems. You have to build a coalition. In the case of FPTP it is a coalition inside a party, very often.
The debate moderator had to actually state that it is the case that "there is no state in USA where it is legal to kill a baby after it has been born".
America has lost its mind.
This is the video to which Trump referred, from the previous governor of Virginia.
What the governor of Virginia is saying, albeit not very well, is what happens if a baby is born who is not viable. Do you then resuscitate or not resuscitate? He then explains how that decision is taking by the parents and the physicians. It is a horrible situation and one that warrants our utmost sympathy. It is not infanticide and should not be used as a political football.
Your BBC headline shows that the right have been throwing around the term “infanticide” for many years. It doesn’t show that infanticide is legal. There is no state in USA where it is legal to kill a baby after it has been born.
By the way, do you still believe the pet-eating immigrant story too?
Watching the whole debate - in segments as I do have to work as well.
Will the last Donald Trump supporter please set the light switch on fire as they riot in impotent rage?
This election is done.
As I have been saying for weeks, Trump has gone utterly batshit as his campaign tanks and hers takes off. He can't stand it, and he will say more and more outrageous things to get the attention back onto him.
Instructive in the debate. She quotes reality at him. He goes off down some mad alley, says the facts are lies, presents what he thinks is reality, then a few seconds later he's forgotten that number and increases it some more. Then starts on how the forrin are eating your dog.
What does Harris do? Openly laughs at him. Look at him like he's deranged. Stands there with her chin resting in her hand with a "can you believe this shit" grin on her face.
I know that the remaining Forrin Eat Your Dog fans want this not to be true. But the polls are showing the ship sinking. Whats more, we know where its sinking - moderates, undecideds, women wanting to keep the GOP out of their Vagina, young voters especially women.
Trump is the Titanic. He hit the iceberg. He's starting to list. Below the surface the ocean is steadily flooding in. But like Ismay he can only respond by rattling off stats about how the Titanic is the most Glorious, Biggest and Longest ship ever which Cannot Sink. But unlike Ismay he thinks the Titanic is a Mile long with 17 funnels. Where Guatamalans are stoking the boilers with your dog.
On one hand, 45% of the electorate will back Trump no matter what.
On the other, 55-45 is a landslide in a two horse race.
The reality of FPTP is that loyalist voters don't matter, which is why parties that play to their loyalists lose.
But you need to keep the base on side, otherwise…
Hence Labour with VAT on private education - a bit of red meat that kept many left wing Labour voters onside.
Taylor Swift’s endorsement of Harris is just pitch perfect. And signing off as Childless Cat Lady the chef’s kiss.
Lady is all class.
And Musk’s subsequent offer to impregnate her just put all that into relief.
Nothing has changed my view that the 5th of November will be a blowout for Harris.
How many voters are there that care about Taylor Swift’s voting preference that would not already be voting democrat? It’s more a fleeting morale boost to the campaigners than a game changer surely. The Liz Cheney endorsement feels far more impactful to me.
Heard it stated research showed that Oprah Winfrey's endorsement of Obama was worth 3 million votes to him.
Trump is all about celebrity. The fuel for his ego. It is why he is so thin-skinned about who has the bigger rallies. If an even bigger celebrity wades in to endorse his opponent, it will be the only thing he takes from the debate night. It will enrage him.
Hopefully, America is about to change channels and stop watching him. (I think where he really lost it and never recovered his composure was when Harris goaded him about being fired by the voters. "I'm the only one who gets to say who gets fired!! That's me! Me!!!")
Donald - you're fired from Celebrity World. Go directly to jail. Do not grab any pussy....
Not only is Swift a bigger celebrity than Trump, she’s also considerably richer than he is, and she made her money rather than inheriting it.
There’s a little bit of Telegraph exaggeration there. The head of the union is mooting a ballot on strike action. There’s nothing imminent.
The union remains militant, but I’m not certain the membership is that eager for more strike action. But the union is right that the sector is in trouble. Undergrad fees remain frozen despite the inflation of recent years. It’s not rocket science: costs have gone up, but a major source of income hasn’t, so universities are in deficit.
Good morning everyone.
I think this is an interesting one.
Despite its squeezes, the university sector has had a long period relatively in the sun - meaning perhaps 25 years, compared to for example local authorities, public transport, the legal system, or defence.
How will this play in a competition for scarce (or "find your own" resources)?
Universities across the country have been milking the Student Accommodation cash-cow since 2000 or before, and heavily since ~2005-2010, and have also targeted intertnational student fees. What other income sources are available?
I would want to see evidence to back up that claim
The biggest providers in the market nowadays are private firms such as Unite, IQ or Student Roost all backed by pension funds.
Which claim?
I made several observations. I was also timed out with the following bonus bit:
Domestic student fees are down afaics by about 35% in real terms since 2010 (£9000 then to £9250 now).
There’s a little bit of Telegraph exaggeration there. The head of the union is mooting a ballot on strike action. There’s nothing imminent.
The union remains militant, but I’m not certain the membership is that eager for more strike action. But the union is right that the sector is in trouble. Undergrad fees remain frozen despite the inflation of recent years. It’s not rocket science: costs have gone up, but a major source of income hasn’t, so universities are in deficit.
If they increase tuition fees further then there'll be a further decline in student numbers, they're also being rinsed for accommodation. From ES "Figures from Ucas (Universities and Colleges Admissions Service) show by the end of June 41.9% of all 18-year-olds in the UK had applied through their system – compared to 42.1% last year and 44.1% in 2022."
I am very pro universities, but the idea that 40%+ of our 18 year olds should be even thinking of going to one is ludicrous. The way in which the entire media prioritise them as the route for young people is absurd and damaging, and must be contributing to the jobs crisis in unfashionable fields, the marginalisation of FE, and apprentices.
I can't think of a country other than Britain where the idea that its young people are receiving too much education has so much traction. If you suggested this in Ireland people would think you were madder than Donald Trump.
What is wrong with Britain?
I am sure you are right, but not quite on my point. Thankfully university is not the only form of education, and the balance needs redressing.
There’s a little bit of Telegraph exaggeration there. The head of the union is mooting a ballot on strike action. There’s nothing imminent.
The union remains militant, but I’m not certain the membership is that eager for more strike action. But the union is right that the sector is in trouble. Undergrad fees remain frozen despite the inflation of recent years. It’s not rocket science: costs have gone up, but a major source of income hasn’t, so universities are in deficit.
Good morning everyone.
I think this is an interesting one.
Despite its squeezes, the university sector has had a long period relatively in the sun - meaning perhaps 25 years, compared to for example local authorities, public transport, the legal system, or defence.
How will this play in a competition for scarce (or "find your own" resources)?
Universities across the country have been milking the Student Accommodation cash-cow since 2000 or before, and heavily since ~2005-2010, and have also targeted intertnational student fees. What other income sources are available?
I would want to see evidence to back up that claim
The biggest providers in the market nowadays are private firms such as Unite, IQ or Student Roost all backed by pension funds.
Which claim?
I made several observations. I was also timed out with the following bonus bit:
Domestic student fees are down afaics by about 35% in real terms since 2010 (£9000 then to £9250 now).
The claim that Universities are milking the accommodation cash-cow. It's not universities who are the real offenders there...
There’s a little bit of Telegraph exaggeration there. The head of the union is mooting a ballot on strike action. There’s nothing imminent.
The union remains militant, but I’m not certain the membership is that eager for more strike action. But the union is right that the sector is in trouble. Undergrad fees remain frozen despite the inflation of recent years. It’s not rocket science: costs have gone up, but a major source of income hasn’t, so universities are in deficit.
If they increase tuition fees further then there'll be a further decline in student numbers, they're also being rinsed for accommodation. From ES "Figures from Ucas (Universities and Colleges Admissions Service) show by the end of June 41.9% of all 18-year-olds in the UK had applied through their system – compared to 42.1% last year and 44.1% in 2022."
I am very pro universities, but the idea that 40%+ of our 18 year olds should be even thinking of going to one is ludicrous. The way in which the entire media prioritise them as the route for young people is absurd and damaging, and must be contributing to the jobs crisis in unfashionable fields, the marginalisation of FE, and apprentices.
I can't think of a country other than Britain where the idea that its young people are receiving too much education has so much traction. If you suggested this in Ireland people would think you were madder than Donald Trump.
What is wrong with Britain?
The problem isn’t the education, it’s the financial structures behind education which offer poor value for money and returns on the investment for too many students.
It’s a sector that should be ripe for disruption with technology.
Taylor Swift’s endorsement of Harris is just pitch perfect. And signing off as Childless Cat Lady the chef’s kiss.
Lady is all class.
And Musk’s subsequent offer to impregnate her just put all that into relief.
Nothing has changed my view that the 5th of November will be a blowout for Harris.
How many voters are there that care about Taylor Swift’s voting preference that would not already be voting democrat? It’s more a fleeting morale boost to the campaigners than a game changer surely. The Liz Cheney endorsement feels far more impactful to me.
Heard it stated research showed that Oprah Winfrey's endorsement of Obama was worth 3 million votes to him.
Trump is all about celebrity. The fuel for his ego. It is why he is so thin-skinned about who has the bigger rallies. If an even bigger celebrity wades in to endorse his opponent, it will be the only thing he takes from the debate night. It will enrage him.
Hopefully, America is about to change channels and stop watching him. (I think where he really lost it and never recovered his composure was when Harris goaded him about being fired by the voters. "I'm the only one who gets to say who gets fired!! That's me! Me!!!")
Donald - you're fired from Celebrity World. Go directly to jail. Do not grab any pussy....
Winfrey's endorsement helped Obama win the primaries. She first endorsed him when he was a very long shot to become Democratic nominee. I believe the 'worth millions of votes' research applies to the primaries.
I sometimes think that the US and the world might be currently a lot better off if Oprah hadn't endorsed Obama, and instead Hillary Clinton had won the 2008 presidential election. For one thing, she might have imposed a no-fly-zone over Syria, saving a lot of civilian lives and not emboldening Russia. We might have avoided a Russian invasion of Ukraine and also president Trump.
The debate moderator had to actually state that it is the case that "there is no state in USA where it is legal to kill a baby after it has been born".
America has lost its mind.
This is the video to which Trump referred, from the previous governor of Virginia.
What the governor of Virginia is saying, albeit not very well, is what happens if a baby is born who is not viable. Do you then resuscitate or not resuscitate? He then explains how that decision is taking by the parents and the physicians. It is a horrible situation and one that warrants our utmost sympathy. It is not infanticide and should not be used as a political football.
Your BBC headline shows that the right have been throwing around the term “infanticide” for many years. It doesn’t show that infanticide is legal. There is no state in USA where it is legal to kill a baby after it has been born.
By the way, do you still believe the pet-eating immigrant story too?
Next presidential cycle they will have the brilliant idea of merging the two stories and accusing the dems of baby eating, after some Governer of a coastal state is heard to enjoy eating jelly babies.
Comments
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/money/other/lecturers-threaten-strike-over-funding/ar-AA1qlaso?ocid=entnewsntp&pc=U531&cvid=3858d581453d49499792a12f7f9e3926&ei=10
Generally speaking I’m a bit sceptical of how important they are, but I suspect this one might have some outsized importance given the last one brought Biden down and therefore there’ll have been a heightened awareness of the debates generally.
Anyway, it shifts the momentum back in Harris’ favour after a period where it looked like she was starting to slip. As per previous thread, together with the Swift endorsement couldn’t have been a better night for the Dems really.
However I doubt it makes much difference to the polling. Hillary Clinton won every debate with Trump in 2016 and his voteshare was little changed and it was much the same in 2020 when a pre dementia Biden won his debates with Trump too.
However if Harris can squeeze more Independents into her camp after her debate win it could help her a little in swing states
Once Mad Ed kills the North sea and Wrecker Reeves butchers the economy there wont be much left.
https://www.theguardian.com/business/article/2024/sep/11/uk-economy-unexpectedly-flatlines-for-second-month-in-row
so much for growth is my priority
The union remains militant, but I’m not certain the membership is that eager for more strike action. But the union is right that the sector is in trouble. Undergrad fees remain frozen despite the inflation of recent years. It’s not rocket science: costs have gone up, but a major source of income hasn’t, so universities are in deficit.
https://x.com/brexit_sham/status/1833737950368051267
Harris’s tactic of needling Trump about things like rally sizes and basically showing his thin skin is really showing the best way to fight him. Attack his ego, don’t try and play the policy ball too heavily. If you’ve annoyed him, it hands him a lot of rope to come out with something odd.
I smell the influence of Pete Buttigieg.
In recent years, Universities have been encouraged/expected to pay their way by taking on lots of foreign students on massive fees.
Which was sort of fine until people looked at the consequences for immigration stats.
Oh, and good-but-not-stellar universities have expanded like crazy to get more income to support their fixed costs, often more than they can really support. Which in turn has made life hell for the OK universities.
And even if you think the university system is too big, few people want their local campus to close, or their (grand)child to miss out.
https://x.com/abbydphillip/status/1833703421360198026?t=zVdVrOMdbpc6yJHD5Iz5cg&s=19
/s.
Looking ahead, are riots good or bad for GDP?
https://www1.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2016/09/27/the-wh2016-betting-moves-markedly-back-to-clinton-after-convincing-first-debate-performance/
The WH2016 betting moves markedly back to Clinton after convincing first debate performance
They basically spend the entire debate calling each other a douche or a turd sandwich. That used to be the standard of American debates.
They are only important and decisive if they reveal the candidate to be totally incompetent and incapable. Otherwise, it's just Punch and Judy
"https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1833728804579111268?t=qNchxf2ASs8Vl0nS3HjGKg&s=19
"Fine Taylor … you win … I will give you a child and guard your cats with my life"
A bit creepy and non-consensual.
There are 2 issues here:
Firstly, I think it would be a massive mistake for Harris supporters to complain that she got 5 minutes less because she is black, or a woman, or a black woman. Or that Trump got more minutes because he is white. It would turn off voters and help the Republican story that she is a "DEI pick"
Secondly is it acceptable or useful to ever say 'old, white-guy entitlement'? I don't like it - for the reasons you say. It's like saying 'there was this typical old white man' in a pejorative sense, when you wouldn't say 'there was this typical young black man' in a pejorative sense. Or?
Lady is all class.
And Musk’s subsequent offer to impregnate her just put all that into relief.
Nothing has changed my view that the 5th of November will be a blowout for Harris.
If there had been a Harris gaffe, then you can bet your bottom dollar the media narrative would have gone absolutely insane and it could have handed the momentum back to Trump.
Refusing to put up fees (or finance in other ways) is impacting the quality of university courses. If people go to uni they deserve a decent course.
I'm sure it's nothing a victory in the Ludlow tractor tug-of-war won't cure but it can't come soon enough
Clinton was a well known feature of US political life, who'd been around for years; there are still a fair number of voters who don't have much of a clue about Harris.
A successful convention followed by a successful debate - which the media had been bigging up as a 'test' she had to pass - is about as good an introduction as the Democrats could hope for.
And as with Reagan/Carter, this is likely to be the only debate, unless Trump gets really desperate.
... That's not much better, is it?
Swift’s voting preference that would not already be voting democrat? It’s more a fleeting morale boost to the campaigners than a game changer surely. The Liz Cheney endorsement feels far more impactful to me.
All I can visualise is Elon chasing Taylor with a turkey baster.
I cannot think of anything which matches that.
As either damage control, or, as it turns out now, the cherry on the cake.
*And sufficiently impressed by how well the campaign has been managed.
Will the last Donald Trump supporter please set the light switch on fire as they riot in impotent rage?
This election is done.
As I have been saying for weeks, Trump has gone utterly batshit as his campaign tanks and hers takes off. He can't stand it, and he will say more and more outrageous things to get the attention back onto him.
Instructive in the debate. She quotes reality at him. He goes off down some mad alley, says the facts are lies, presents what he thinks is reality, then a few seconds later he's forgotten that number and increases it some more. Then starts on how the forrin are eating your dog.
What does Harris do? Openly laughs at him. Look at him like he's deranged. Stands there with her chin resting in her hand with a "can you believe this shit" grin on her face.
I know that the remaining Forrin Eat Your Dog fans want this not to be true. But the polls are showing the ship sinking. Whats more, we know where its sinking - moderates, undecideds, women wanting to keep the GOP out of their Vagina, young voters especially women.
Trump is the Titanic. He hit the iceberg. He's starting to list. Below the surface the ocean is steadily flooding in. But like Ismay he can only respond by rattling off stats about how the Titanic is the most Glorious, Biggest and Longest ship ever which Cannot Sink. But unlike Ismay he thinks the Titanic is a Mile long with 17 funnels. Where Guatamalans are stoking the boilers with your dog.
Trump says he has ‘concepts of a plan’ to replace Obamacare
https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4873433-vice-president-harris-trump-debate/
From ES "Figures from Ucas (Universities and Colleges Admissions Service) show by the end of June 41.9% of all 18-year-olds in the UK had applied through their system – compared to 42.1% last year and 44.1% in 2022."
On the other, 55-45 is a landslide in a two horse race.
The reality of FPTP is that loyalist voters don't matter, which is why parties that play to their loyalists lose.
America has lost its mind.
https://x.com/ons/status/1833747369793343977
Growth flat in July, 0.5% over past three months. Construction and manufacturing again showing a contraction, the positives being in services.
Pay excluding bonuses up 5.1% annually in three months to July.
But for that, Clinton would likely have won, baskets of deplorables notwithstanding.
And the Harris campaign appears far shrewder in its messaging.
When I left school in 1960 just 4% went to university
https://x.com/hodgetwins/status/1833678649632915621
It’s quite a famous video in American pro-life circles.
Here’s a BBC article about the 2019 Virginia abortion bill.
Headline “Virginia late-term abortion bill labelled 'infanticide' ”
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-47066307
LOL
“Among non-EU migrants issued an initial study visa in 2017, only 20% still had permission to stay in the UK (valid leave to remain) in 2022, around five years later. Approximately 8% (around 12,300) held work visas, another 9% (around 13,800) were still on study visas, and less than 0.1% (146) had indefinite leave to remain”
Those on study visas will mostly leave the UK on finishing their studies. A proportion of those on work visas will do too. So, yes, 20% in the short term, but it’s probably less than 10% in the long run.
However, the famously anti-immigration Conservative government did introduce a new graduate visa in 2022 that allows students to stay for 2-3 years after graduating. This has seen a large uptake.
What is wrong with Britain?
Often backed by some… interesting financial engineering.
Hence the utter desperation by some universities, during COVID, to force students to pay for their accommodation. Even if they weren’t going to need it.
I think this is an interesting one.
Despite its squeezes, the university sector has had a long period relatively in the sun - meaning perhaps 25 years, compared to for example local authorities, public transport, the legal system, or defence.
How will this play in a competition for scarce (or "find your own" resources)?
Universities across the country have been milking the Student Accommodation cash-cow since 2000 or before, and heavily since ~2005-2010, and have also targeted intertnational student fees. What other income sources are available?
Trump is all about celebrity. The fuel for his ego. It is why he is so thin-skinned about who has the bigger rallies. If an even bigger celebrity wades in to endorse his opponent, it will be the only thing he takes from the debate night. It will enrage him.
Hopefully, America is about to change channels and stop watching him. (I think where he really lost it and never recovered his composure was when Harris goaded him about being fired by the voters. "I'm the only one who gets to say who gets fired!! That's me! Me!!!")
Donald - you're fired from Celebrity World. Go directly to jail. Do not grab any pussy....
https://x.com/goodwinmj/status/1833396724137615642?s=61&t=LYVEHh2mqFy1oUJAdCfe-Q
The biggest providers in the market nowadays are private firms such as Unite, IQ or Student Roost all backed by pension funds.
Universities simply don't have the money to build them anymore - Newcastle's redevelopment of Castle Leazes is a joint venture with Unite as they cannot finance it any other way.
"The report also says that a cyclist who handed over helmet camera footage to a garda of a driver using their phone or parking illegally ended up with a Fixed Charge Penalty Notice (FCPN) after the same footage showed the cyclist breaking a red light."
FPTP is no different, in many way, to other systems. You have to build a coalition. In the case of FPTP it is a coalition inside a party, very often.
Your BBC headline shows that the right have been throwing around the term “infanticide” for many years. It doesn’t show that infanticide is legal. There is no state in USA where it is legal to kill a baby after it has been born.
By the way, do you still believe the pet-eating immigrant story too?
I made several observations. I was also timed out with the following bonus bit:
Domestic student fees are down afaics by about 35% in real terms since 2010 (£9000 then to £9250 now).
It’s a sector that should be ripe for disruption with technology.
I sometimes think that the US and the world might be currently a lot better off if Oprah hadn't endorsed Obama, and instead Hillary Clinton had won the 2008 presidential election. For one thing, she might have imposed a no-fly-zone over Syria, saving a lot of civilian lives and not emboldening Russia. We might have avoided a Russian invasion of Ukraine and also president Trump.