Can we have the Georgian team please? Same flags and symbols so maybe no one would notice. At least until they started playing and people realised they were way too good to be England
Didn't something like this happen with the ITV debate as well? Sunak did way better on the headline "winning the debate" question than any of the supplementaries? When all the dust settles, there feels like a project for someone to work out why.
Those numbers far closer than they were as is the headline debate figure apart from 'in touch' which given Sunak's wealth unsurprising.'
2019 Tories who had been undecided now saying Rishi won tonight by a landslide.
Given today's polls showing 41% Labour 20% Tory 15% Reform if by polling day we got to something like an exit poll of 36% Labour 29% Tory 11% Reform after this debate that would be like 2017 was for Labour for Tories. That now at the absolute top end of hopes though
Didn't something like this happen with the ITV debate as well? Sunak did way better on the headline "winning the debate" question than any of the supplementaries? When all the dust settles, there feels like a project for someone to work out why.
“I suspect this debate will not change the fundamentals, Sunak is the worst rated PM at the eve of an election and the same applies to his government. In around nine days Sir Keir Starmer will become Prime Minister.” It won’t, but it might reduce the margin of defeat slightly.
FPT: I think someone should have the guts to organise a Lincoln-Douglas style debate. Six minutes from speaker A, nine minutes from speaker B and a three minute rejoinder from speaker A on each topic. You could cover six topics in two hours and it would be a damned sight more instructive than this rubbish because they'd have to develop their arguments.
Ballot Box Scotland @BallotBoxScot BBS + @heraldscotland EXCLUSIVE: New Scotland Only Westminster poll, Survation 21-25 Jun (changes vs 23-27 May):
Lab ~ 37% (+1) SNP ~ 31% (-1) Con ~ 14% (-3) RUK ~ 8% (new) LD ~ 7% (-2) Grn ~ 3% (new) Alba ~ 1% (+1)
If the Tories really narrow the gap post this debate, on that poll it would be Scottish gains from the SNP which gives Starmer a clear UK wide majority.
In my view Starmer's performance and comments will have appealed more to 2019 SNP voters, LDs and Remainers than Leavers in the redwall and English marginals
Watched Georgia’s stalwart performance against Portugal instead of this rancid debate format (which, surely, has to be completely rethought next time round?).
Fabulous result for the Georgians, and it’s always good to see Portugal get slapped.
Absolutely sensational from Georgia, brilliant win.
They played with such passion and amazing individual skills. They managed to make Portugal look really pedestrian at times. Best game of the tournament so far.
Ballot Box Scotland @BallotBoxScot BBS + @heraldscotland EXCLUSIVE: New Scotland Only Westminster poll, Survation 21-25 Jun (changes vs 23-27 May):
Lab ~ 37% (+1) SNP ~ 31% (-1) Con ~ 14% (-3) RUK ~ 8% (new) LD ~ 7% (-2) Grn ~ 3% (new) Alba ~ 1% (+1)
If the Tories really narrow the gap post this debate, on that poll it would be Scottish gains from the SNP which gives Starmer a clear UK wide majority
I missed the opportunity to comment on the coding debate on the last thread. I’m going to throw in Whitespace as a language and Galactic Trader for anyone who used Vax / vms
Ballot Box Scotland @BallotBoxScot BBS + @heraldscotland EXCLUSIVE: New Scotland Only Westminster poll, Survation 21-25 Jun (changes vs 23-27 May):
Lab ~ 37% (+1) SNP ~ 31% (-1) Con ~ 14% (-3) RUK ~ 8% (new) LD ~ 7% (-2) Grn ~ 3% (new) Alba ~ 1% (+1)
If the Tories really narrow the gap post this debate, on that poll it would be Scottish gains from the SNP which gives Starmer a clear UK wide majority
Fwiw I doubt this debate will have shifted much opinion at all. No big talking points; wagergate and D-Day (and poor no-Sky Rishi) have been the real campaign moments, all of which demonstrate a party not fit to govern and a PM unfit to lead. Policies at this point are moot.
Didn't something like this happen with the ITV debate as well? Sunak did way better on the headline "winning the debate" question than any of the supplementaries? When all the dust settles, there feels like a project for someone to work out why.
I think it shows the public are quite savvy in separating out their current voting intention and watching the debate from a neutral standpoint .
I scored Sunak as the winner but find him really annoying and unlikeable. And I think you can hold both positions at the same time.
Cracking in the way a bitter journalist who really nobody will remember wants to find a way to make himself feel better.
What an absolute c. A journalist putting someone’s achievements on paper as a means of diminishing them when their own achievements are the tiniest woodlouse shit in the consciousness of the world.
It’s amazing how many journalists are so much more intelligent than those they write about but then, just stay average journalists.
I'm never going to look at a wasp in the same way ever again.
Ah, but which sort of wasp?
This being pedantic betting, I have to point out that there are thousands of wasp species in the UK and many are fascinating and also slightly disturbing.
I'm assuming your wasp was the classic Vespula vulgaris, ruiner of picnics?
Didn't something like this happen with the ITV debate as well? Sunak did way better on the headline "winning the debate" question than any of the supplementaries? When all the dust settles, there feels like a project for someone to work out why.
I think it shows the public are quite savvy in separating out their current voting intention and watching the debate from a neutral standpoint .
I scored Sunak as the winner but find him really annoying an unlikeable. And I think you can hold both positions at the same time.
This is spot on, and I wouldn’t draw any conclusions from it.
Honestly I think these debates just make politicians in general look worse. The Sky format was probably the best.
I didn’t watch the debate, just seeing the highlights, and Sunak’s repeated use of “surrender” comes across to me as very artificial and performative. He’s just saying anything, and it shows.
Cracking in the way a bitter journalist who really nobody will remember wants to find a way to make himself feel better.
What an absolute c. A journalist putting someone’s achievements on paper as a means of diminishing them when their own achievements are the tiniest woodlouse shit in the conscientious of the world.
It’s amazing how many journalists are so much more intelligent than those they write about but then, just stay average journalists.
I'm sure senpai will notice you eventually if you keep defending his honour on here.
Ballot Box Scotland @BallotBoxScot BBS + @heraldscotland EXCLUSIVE: New Scotland Only Westminster poll, Survation 21-25 Jun (changes vs 23-27 May):
Lab ~ 37% (+1) SNP ~ 31% (-1) Con ~ 14% (-3) RUK ~ 8% (new) LD ~ 7% (-2) Grn ~ 3% (new) Alba ~ 1% (+1)
If the Tories really narrow the gap post this debate, on that poll it would be Scottish gains from the SNP which gives Starmer a clear UK wide majority
Cracking in the way a bitter journalist who really nobody will remember wants to find a way to make himself feel better.
What an absolute c. A journalist putting someone’s achievements on paper as a means of diminishing them when their own achievements are the tiniest woodlouse shit in the consciousness of the world.
It’s amazing how many journalists are so much more intelligent than those they write about but then, just stay average journalists.
Right, forget that old PB header I linked to earlier. Nothing to see here...
Didn't something like this happen with the ITV debate as well? Sunak did way better on the headline "winning the debate" question than any of the supplementaries? When all the dust settles, there feels like a project for someone to work out why.
I think it shows the public are quite savvy in separating out their current voting intention and watching the debate from a neutral standpoint .
I scored Sunak as the winner but find him really annoying an unlikeable. And I think you can hold both positions at the same time.
This is spot on, and I wouldn’t draw any conclusions from it.
Honestly I think these debates just make politicians in general look worse. The Sky format was probably the best.
Agreed. I really hope we drop the head to head format for future elections. It does absolutely nothing good for politics or democracy.
I'm never going to look at a wasp in the same way ever again.
Ah, but which sort of wasp?
This being pedantic betting, I have to point out that there are thousands of wasp species in the UK and many are fascinating and also slightly disturbing.
I'm assuming your wasp was the classic Vespula vulgaris, ruiner of picnics?
Cracking in the way a bitter journalist who really nobody will remember wants to find a way to make himself feel better.
What an absolute c. A journalist putting someone’s achievements on paper as a means of diminishing them when their own achievements are the tiniest woodlouse shit in the conscience of the world.
It’s amazing how many journalists are so much more intelligent than those they write about but then, just stay average journalists.
Journalists perform a vital function. I'm even prepared to say political commentators (who I would not class as journalists personally) perform a useful function.
But at times it can feel a bit like those who are too afraid to try something moaning about those who were not too afraid to try.
That's not to go soft on politicians, they ask to be given power and so must accept getting a harsh deal to a degree, but occasionally I feel like a well crafted line of criticism, though often merited, is a very easy thing to do versus attempting to implement things.
I'm never going to look at a wasp in the same way ever again.
Ah, but which sort of wasp?
This being pedantic betting, I have to point out that there are thousands of wasp species in the UK and many are fascinating and also slightly disturbing.
I'm assuming your wasp was the classic Vespula vulgaris, ruiner of picnics?
Can't believe TSE would associate with anything vulgaris tbh.
I'm never going to look at a wasp in the same way ever again.
Ah, but which sort of wasp?
This being pedantic betting, I have to point out that there are thousands of wasp species in the UK and many are fascinating and also slightly disturbing.
I'm assuming your wasp was the classic Vespula vulgaris, ruiner of picnics?
Yah, the ruiner of picnics.
Swat away...
I once found out why most mountain bike helmets have a mesh on the front vent these days.
Cracking in the way a bitter journalist who really nobody will remember wants to find a way to make himself feel better.
What an absolute c. A journalist putting someone’s achievements on paper as a means of diminishing them when their own achievements are the tiniest woodlouse shit in the conscientious of the world.
It’s amazing how many journalists are so much more intelligent than those they write about but then, just stay average journalists.
I'm sure senpai will notice you eventually if you keep defending his honour on here.
Yes, I want to be beholden to him. I live somewhere else outside his government and influence, don’t need his politics, his money, his contacts, but other than that you are correct.
I'm never going to look at a wasp in the same way ever again.
Ah, but which sort of wasp?
This being pedantic betting, I have to point out that there are thousands of wasp species in the UK and many are fascinating and also slightly disturbing.
I'm assuming your wasp was the classic Vespula vulgaris, ruiner of picnics?
Any wasp with the temerity to find itself inside @TSE’s foreskin would be extremely vulgaris.
People on here grossly overestimate how many people will have watched that, and how many of them were genuinely undecided.
All of this is of marginal importance.
82% of 2019 Tories thought Sunak won.
82%!
And the impact on their plan not to vote for Sunak? 0.82%
Dunno. When you’re as far in the poo as Tory poll figures and his ratings are, this sort of thing can help reversion to the mean. I still think they could push 30% by polling day.
Still, Sunak performed well. The years of drilling by Dowden et al really show in that format.
Labour's final pitch - rolled out at the end - was simple and effective. Sunak's "Surrender" thing was embarrassing.
Overall, Sunak and CCHQ will be happy. Labour will be nervously poll-watching over the next few days.
Hmm. Thinking more about the "surrender" stuff. I'm not so sure it is so bad. It's presumably designed to rile up @Casino_Royale and the like, and I think it's likely to work as intended. It's not designed to win the centre. It's heavily defensive. Will it lose more votes than it helps retain?
It's obvious that it's obvious to CCHQ that the party is facing potential extinction.
The "surrender" shite is probably the best they've got, pathetic as it may seem to the rest of us.
Didn't something like this happen with the ITV debate as well? Sunak did way better on the headline "winning the debate" question than any of the supplementaries? When all the dust settles, there feels like a project for someone to work out why.
I think it shows the public are quite savvy in separating out their current voting intention and watching the debate from a neutral standpoint .
I scored Sunak as the winner but find him really annoying an unlikeable. And I think you can hold both positions at the same time.
This is spot on, and I wouldn’t draw any conclusions from it.
Honestly I think these debates just make politicians in general look worse. The Sky format was probably the best.
Agreed. I really hope we drop the head to head format for future elections. It does absolutely nothing good for politics or democracy.
It generates media attention, and vast column inches and blog posts. So if they have anything to do with it it won't be going anywhere.
One party, I think the LDs, want to mandate tv debates.
Didn't something like this happen with the ITV debate as well? Sunak did way better on the headline "winning the debate" question than any of the supplementaries? When all the dust settles, there feels like a project for someone to work out why.
I think it shows the public are quite savvy in separating out their current voting intention and watching the debate from a neutral standpoint .
I scored Sunak as the winner but find him really annoying an unlikeable. And I think you can hold both positions at the same time.
This is spot on, and I wouldn’t draw any conclusions from it.
Honestly I think these debates just make politicians in general look worse. The Sky format was probably the best.
Agreed. I really hope we drop the head to head format for future elections. It does absolutely nothing good for politics or democracy.
Watched Georgia’s stalwart performance against Portugal instead of this rancid debate format (which, surely, has to be completely rethought next time round?).
Fabulous result for the Georgians, and it’s always good to see Portugal get slapped.
So if England can bore past Slovakia, its the Suiss or the Italians in the QFs. Be home time if England don't suddenly play well.
The thing is England's side of the draw is the much easier one. I don't think they had a better route to a final in modern times. Now they don't face any of the real big boys until the final.
My first ever date was a picnic and the chat up line I used was picnic related.
I like the look of your lunchbox?
No, that's far too subtle for me.
The line was
Me: Do you know the difference between a prawn cocktail sandwich and a [certain sex act]?
Her: No
Me: Cool, do you fancy going on a picnic with me?
Her: Oh you absolute fucking dickhead.
I think we need clarification. Your original post implied you had actually been on the picnic date whereas later information seems to indicate you asked the potential date and they said "dickhead".
My first ever date was a picnic and the chat up line I used was picnic related.
I like the look of your lunchbox?
No, that's far too subtle for me.
The line was
Me: Do you know the difference between a prawn cocktail sandwich and a [certain sex act]?
Her: No
Me: Cool, do you fancy going on a picnic with me?
Her: Oh you absolute fucking dickhead.
I think we need clarification. Your original post implied you had actually been on the picnic date whereas later information seems to indicate you asked the potential date and they said "dickhead".
Newsnight are using the Game of Thrones theme tune.
And a set of none entities being interviewed...
Newsnight needs taking out the back and putting down. No big beasts feel the need to go on Newsnight these days, its years since it was THE show that government and opposition felt they had to be interviewed on about the topics of the day.
Comments
Me
Who do BBC debate viewers think came across as more...
Trustworthy: Sunak 39% / Starmer 50%
Likeable: Sunak 33% / Starmer 52%
In touch: Sunak 18% / Starmer 63%
Prime Ministerial: Sunak 41% / Starmer 42%
The question selection, the BBC write-up.
Still, Sunak performed well. The years of drilling by Dowden et al really show in that format.
Labour's final pitch - rolled out at the end - was simple and effective. Sunak's "Surrender" thing was embarrassing.
Overall, Sunak and CCHQ will be happy. Labour will be nervously poll-watching over the next few days.
2019 Tories who had been undecided now saying Rishi won tonight by a landslide.
Given today's polls showing 41% Labour 20% Tory 15% Reform if by polling day we got to something like an exit poll of 36% Labour 29% Tory 11% Reform after this debate that would be like 2017 was for Labour for Tories. That now at the absolute top end of hopes though
https://thecritic.co.uk/the-rise-and-fall-of-rishi/
@BallotBoxScot
BBS +
@heraldscotland
EXCLUSIVE: New Scotland Only Westminster poll, Survation 21-25 Jun (changes vs 23-27 May):
Lab ~ 37% (+1)
SNP ~ 31% (-1)
Con ~ 14% (-3)
RUK ~ 8% (new)
LD ~ 7% (-2)
Grn ~ 3% (new)
Alba ~ 1% (+1)
Shurely shome mishtake. Should be about 2%?u
It won’t, but it might reduce the margin of defeat slightly.
In my view Starmer's performance and comments will have appealed more to 2019 SNP voters, LDs and Remainers than Leavers in the redwall and English marginals
Fabulous result for the Georgians, and it’s always good to see Portugal get slapped.
https://www.newstatesman.com/world/europe/2024/06/brexit-keir-starmer-eu-uk-haunt-labour-government
All of this is of marginal importance.
I am less confident of a CON majority
https://www1.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2023/12/12/that-he-should-be-so-lucky/
I scored Sunak as the winner but find him really annoying and unlikeable. And I think you can hold both positions at the same time.
I'm joking!
What an absolute c. A journalist putting someone’s achievements on paper as a means of diminishing them when their own achievements are the tiniest woodlouse shit in the consciousness of the world.
It’s amazing how many journalists are so much more intelligent than those they write about but then, just stay average journalists.
My main takeaway - the chairs were very uncomfortable.
There, I hope that helps inform any constituency betting in this seat.
This being pedantic betting, I have to point out that there are thousands of wasp species in the UK and many are fascinating and also slightly disturbing.
I'm assuming your wasp was the classic Vespula vulgaris, ruiner of picnics?
Honestly I think these debates just make politicians in general look worse. The Sky format was probably the best.
#lowbar
But at times it can feel a bit like those who are too afraid to try something moaning about those who were not too afraid to try.
That's not to go soft on politicians, they ask to be given power and so must accept getting a harsh deal to a degree, but occasionally I feel like a well crafted line of criticism, though often merited, is a very easy thing to do versus attempting to implement things.
Do you know the truly scary moment when I was in hospital and the doctor told me I needed emergency surgery?
The doctor who told me was wearing crocs.
I once found out why most mountain bike helmets have a mesh on the front vent these days.
Not good.
82%!
And the impact on their plan not to vote for Sunak? 0.82%
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/28286594/general-election-2024-nigel-farage-rishi-sunak-keir-starmer/
My first ever date was a picnic and the chat up line I used was picnic related.
Well done to Alba for getting on the board.
It's obvious that it's obvious to CCHQ that the party is facing potential extinction.
The "surrender" shite is probably the best they've got, pathetic as it may seem to the rest of us.
One party, I think the LDs, want to mandate tv debates.
Or have I imagined this for some weird reason?
Comfortable, easily washable - I can fully get why hospital staff wear them...
Or Cristiano Ronaldo?
The line was
Me: Do you know the difference between a prawn cocktail sandwich and a [certain sex act]?
Her: No
Me: Cool, do you fancy going on a picnic with me?
Her: Oh you absolute fucking dickhead.
NEW: Met police confirms that it's taking over a small number of investigations into election-related bets from the Gambling Commission
Move could pave the way for political figures, as well as police officers, to face charges of misconduct in public office
Something to do with the holes and infection risk or so I am told.
Police officer overhearing decisions and making bets? Possible misconduct in public office. I can see that.
An MP who is not a minister? Much harder.
The thing is England's side of the draw is the much easier one. I don't think they had a better route to a final in modern times. Now they don't face any of the real big boys until the final.
And a set of none entities being interviewed...