Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Options

Return to Sender – politicalbetting.com

SystemSystem Posts: 11,686
edited November 2023 in General
imageReturn to Sender – politicalbetting.com

There comes a point in many investigations when you know exactly what has happened, why and who is at fault. It may not mean its end. But the essential findings are clear, no matter what’s needed to colour in the whole picture.

Read the full story here

«13456

Comments

  • Options
    CatManCatMan Posts: 2,771
    First!
  • Options
    El_CapitanoEl_Capitano Posts: 3,870
    The Post Office these days is little more than a franchise organisation for WH Smith, the Co-op, and that bar in Leatherhead with a dress code. It’s a prime candidate to be burned to the ground and replaced with something suited to the 21st century.

    Unfortunately the optics of any government destroying Our Beloved Post Office are likely to rule this out - especially given that elderly Post Office customers are probably over-represented in the Conservative Party membership.
  • Options
    Sean_F said:

    Surely, people like Elaine Cottam should be prosecuted for perjury. She has lied on oath, repeatedly.

    Correct, but she is only one of the many.
  • Options
    Scott_xPScott_xP Posts: 32,959
    @IanDunt

    Can we stop with this idea that Braverman is smart enough to force her own resignation. She doesn't even know which side is which is Northern Ireland.

    @bmay

    Sky’s senior Ireland correspondent has just committed a murder live on
    @SkyPoliticsHub
    💥

    https://x.com/bmay/status/1722696060819124684?s=20
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 91,780
    edited November 2023
    I still don't really follow why this is not a major political issue - it should be an easy win for government or opposition to condemn the farcical goings on at the Post Office and promise to sort it out, even if it happened under their watch, given the egregious conduct. Instead it feels like a niche interest, something they don't want to touch as if it's too easy a target.
  • Options

    The Post Office these days is little more than a franchise organisation for WH Smith, the Co-op, and that bar in Leatherhead with a dress code. It’s a prime candidate to be burned to the ground and replaced with something suited to the 21st century.

    Unfortunately the optics of any government destroying Our Beloved Post Office are likely to rule this out - especially given that elderly Post Office customers are probably over-represented in the Conservative Party membership.

    Since learning about this scandal, El C, I am reluctant to buy so much as a stamp from the Post Office. It is a disgusting organisation.
  • Options
    El_CapitanoEl_Capitano Posts: 3,870
    By the way, do click on the link @Cyclefree has provided by the “thick as mince” comment. It’s a doozy.
  • Options
    Peter_the_PunterPeter_the_Punter Posts: 13,320
    edited November 2023
    kle4 said:

    I still don't really follow why this is not a major political issue - it should be an easy win for government or opposition to condemn the farcical goings on at the Post Office and promise to sort it out, even if it happened under their watch, given the egregious conduct. Instead it feels like a niche interest, something they don't want to touch as if it's too easy a target.

    Because any kind of reasonable financial restitution would bankrupt the Government.

    The Tories want to leave this pile of shit to Labour, and Labour knows it's going to have enough trouble managing the country's finances without promising to meet the huge burden of compensation that the Subpostmasters would be entitled to under any reasonable settlement.
  • Options
    Sean_FSean_F Posts: 35,850

    Sean_F said:

    Surely, people like Elaine Cottam should be prosecuted for perjury. She has lied on oath, repeatedly.

    Correct, but she is only one of the many.
    It’s like solicitors who steal from their clients. They get struck off, but rarely prosecuted.

    If you’re in your seventies, why wouldn’t you steal, knowing that the worst you face is forcible retirement?
  • Options
    Sean_FSean_F Posts: 35,850

    kle4 said:

    I still don't really follow why this is not a major political issue - it should be an easy win for government or opposition to condemn the farcical goings on at the Post Office and promise to sort it out, even if it happened under their watch, given the egregious conduct. Instead it feels like a niche interest, something they don't want to touch as if it's too easy a target.

    Because any kind of reasonable financial restitution would bankrupt the Government.

    The Tories want to leave this pile of shit to Labour, and Labour knows it's going to have enough trouble managing the country's finances without promising to meet the huge burden of compensation that the Subpostmasters would be entitled to under any reasonable settlement.
    The cost is trivial, in overall terms.

    And, they get the money back, by asset-stripping those responsible.
  • Options
    NigelbNigelb Posts: 62,631
    kle4 said:

    I still don't really follow why this is not a major political issue - it should be an easy win for government or opposition to condemn the farcical goings on at the Post Office and promise to sort it out, even if it happened under their watch, given the egregious conduct. Instead it feels like a niche interest, something they don't want to touch as if it's too easy a target.

    Perhaps because it’s been clear for many years what has been going on, and government has done little or nothing about it in all that time ?

    But there’s certainly political room for someone to do more than just watch from the sidelines.
  • Options
    MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 44,429

    kle4 said:

    I still don't really follow why this is not a major political issue - it should be an easy win for government or opposition to condemn the farcical goings on at the Post Office and promise to sort it out, even if it happened under their watch, given the egregious conduct. Instead it feels like a niche interest, something they don't want to touch as if it's too easy a target.

    Because any kind of reasonable financial restitution would bankrupt the Government.

    The Tories want to leave this pile of shit to Labour, and Labour knows it's going to have enough trouble managing the country's finances without promising to meet the huge burden of compensation that the Subpostmasters would be entitled to under any reasonable settlement.
    It’s more about the level of the people you are dealing with

    1) stupid
    2) incompetent
    3) spouting professionalese word salad.
    4) expecting no accountability

    These are #NU10K

    If you start holding them genuinely to account you are starting a war with the true establishment.

    Remember how no serious figure was held to account over Rotherham? Look where they are now…

    Don’t worry - in a few months time, there will be a fawning interview in the glossies with Elaine Cottam in her (presumably) large house. All about how this is a terrible imposition. She fought her way up to this tough job, and was saddled with a problem that she heroically fought. And it’s been really tough on the family…. Now all she has left is some millions and a new big job.
  • Options
    Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 25,462
    Scott_xP said:

    @IanDunt

    Can we stop with this idea that Braverman is smart enough to force her own resignation. She doesn't even know which side is which is Northern Ireland.

    @bmay

    Sky’s senior Ireland correspondent has just committed a murder live on
    @SkyPoliticsHub
    💥

    https://x.com/bmay/status/1722696060819124684?s=20

    People who judge other peoples' 'smartness' might want to learn to type sentences.
  • Options
    StuartinromfordStuartinromford Posts: 14,467
    edited November 2023
    Sean_F said:

    kle4 said:

    I still don't really follow why this is not a major political issue - it should be an easy win for government or opposition to condemn the farcical goings on at the Post Office and promise to sort it out, even if it happened under their watch, given the egregious conduct. Instead it feels like a niche interest, something they don't want to touch as if it's too easy a target.

    Because any kind of reasonable financial restitution would bankrupt the Government.

    The Tories want to leave this pile of shit to Labour, and Labour knows it's going to have enough trouble managing the country's finances without promising to meet the huge burden of compensation that the Subpostmasters would be entitled to under any reasonable settlement.
    The cost is trivial, in overall terms.

    And, they get the money back, by asset-stripping those responsible.
    Though given the hydra of culpability, which assets do you strip? The inadequates at the Post Office who appear not to have had a clue what they were doing and ruined the lives of those below them to hide that? The corporations who sold a duff system to the clueless inadequates at the Post Office? Both? Someone else?

    (And whilst the phrase "How hard can it be?" is rightly the setup to jokes with a punchline along the lines of "Much harder than you think", how hard can it be to run a network of counters providing services to the public- i.e. a set of Post Offices? Putting Horizon to one side, Post Offices are rubbish these days, and I'm not entirely sure why.)
  • Options
    Scott_xPScott_xP Posts: 32,959
    ...
  • Options
    rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 54,001
    The Post Office needs the Reverand Paul Flowers to take over.

    In that way, they can move the story on from their failings and onto his failings.
  • Options
    MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 44,429
    A

    kle4 said:

    I still don't really follow why this is not a major political issue - it should be an easy win for government or opposition to condemn the farcical goings on at the Post Office and promise to sort it out, even if it happened under their watch, given the egregious conduct. Instead it feels like a niche interest, something they don't want to touch as if it's too easy a target.

    Because any kind of reasonable financial restitution would bankrupt the Government.

    The Tories want to leave this pile of shit to Labour, and Labour knows it's going to have enough trouble managing the country's finances without promising to meet the huge burden of compensation that the Subpostmasters would be entitled to under any reasonable settlement.
    Bankrupt the government?

    How much are you thinking of?!!
  • Options
    CyclefreeCyclefree Posts: 25,210

    kle4 said:

    I still don't really follow why this is not a major political issue - it should be an easy win for government or opposition to condemn the farcical goings on at the Post Office and promise to sort it out, even if it happened under their watch, given the egregious conduct. Instead it feels like a niche interest, something they don't want to touch as if it's too easy a target.

    Because any kind of reasonable financial restitution would bankrupt the Government.

    The Tories want to leave this pile of shit to Labour, and Labour knows it's going to have enough trouble managing the country's finances without promising to meet the huge burden of compensation that the Subpostmasters would be entitled to under any reasonable settlement.
    The government has already - reportedly - put a billion aside to pay for this. So this should not be an issue.

    Relatedly and equally shamefully, the government is appealing a Freedom of Information ruling about the compensation scheme in the Blood Contamination scandal, which view with this one in the callousness with which the victims have been treated. See here - https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-coventry-warwickshire-67370940.

    It is hard to avoid the view that the state is now actively malicious towards its own citizens.
  • Options
    FoxyFoxy Posts: 44,670

    A

    kle4 said:

    I still don't really follow why this is not a major political issue - it should be an easy win for government or opposition to condemn the farcical goings on at the Post Office and promise to sort it out, even if it happened under their watch, given the egregious conduct. Instead it feels like a niche interest, something they don't want to touch as if it's too easy a target.

    Because any kind of reasonable financial restitution would bankrupt the Government.

    The Tories want to leave this pile of shit to Labour, and Labour knows it's going to have enough trouble managing the country's finances without promising to meet the huge burden of compensation that the Subpostmasters would be entitled to under any reasonable settlement.
    Bankrupt the government?

    How much are you thinking of?!!
    With current finances, some spare change would probably do it...
  • Options
    CyclefreeCyclefree Posts: 25,210

    Cottam's appearance at the Inquiry was jaw-dropping. She was either stunningly stupid, or deliberately obfuscating, but very likely both.

    Yes, I agree, Cyclefree. There is no point in this farcical Inquiry continuing. We all know what the PO did, we all know what it is doing now. It is time to call things for what they are.

    The Inquiry should be closed, and the criminal investigations should begin. If the Government gives a damn, it should assist. I am pretty sure it doesn't want to, so the judge needs to take the bull by the horns and tell it that there is no point in continuing unless it does.

    This scandal outdoes any other in this country in my life time. Mealy mouthed words and promises that 'lessons will be learned' simply won't do. The PO wrecked the lives of hundreds of people. Those responsible must now pay, and there isn't much doubt anymore who those responsible are.

    They can start by sacking the Board and a large part of its senior management.
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 91,780
    Nigelb said:

    kle4 said:

    I still don't really follow why this is not a major political issue - it should be an easy win for government or opposition to condemn the farcical goings on at the Post Office and promise to sort it out, even if it happened under their watch, given the egregious conduct. Instead it feels like a niche interest, something they don't want to touch as if it's too easy a target.

    Perhaps because it’s been clear for many years what has been going on, and government has done little or nothing about it in all that time ?

    But there’s certainly political room for someone to do more than just watch from the sidelines.
    But even that is only a partial explanation of why they're not acting now, which leaves open why not act years ago.
  • Options
    MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 44,429
    A
    Foxy said:

    A

    kle4 said:

    I still don't really follow why this is not a major political issue - it should be an easy win for government or opposition to condemn the farcical goings on at the Post Office and promise to sort it out, even if it happened under their watch, given the egregious conduct. Instead it feels like a niche interest, something they don't want to touch as if it's too easy a target.

    Because any kind of reasonable financial restitution would bankrupt the Government.

    The Tories want to leave this pile of shit to Labour, and Labour knows it's going to have enough trouble managing the country's finances without promising to meet the huge burden of compensation that the Subpostmasters would be entitled to under any reasonable settlement.
    Bankrupt the government?

    How much are you thinking of?!!
    With current finances, some spare change would probably do it...
    Divide the share holding of the Post Office among the post masters.

    Then they can hold some staff career reviews….
  • Options
    CyclefreeCyclefree Posts: 25,210
    kle4 said:

    I still don't really follow why this is not a major political issue - it should be an easy win for government or opposition to condemn the farcical goings on at the Post Office and promise to sort it out, even if it happened under their watch, given the egregious conduct. Instead it feels like a niche interest, something they don't want to touch as if it's too easy a target.

    Because much of this scandal started under a Labour government. Every major political party has dirty hands here and no politician wants to admit responsibility for the mess they made of an entity they owned on our behalf. So they've tossed the hot potato to a judge who should, if he has the balls to do it, be tossing it right back into the politicians' lap.
  • Options
    CyclefreeCyclefree Posts: 25,210

    Sean_F said:

    kle4 said:

    I still don't really follow why this is not a major political issue - it should be an easy win for government or opposition to condemn the farcical goings on at the Post Office and promise to sort it out, even if it happened under their watch, given the egregious conduct. Instead it feels like a niche interest, something they don't want to touch as if it's too easy a target.

    Because any kind of reasonable financial restitution would bankrupt the Government.

    The Tories want to leave this pile of shit to Labour, and Labour knows it's going to have enough trouble managing the country's finances without promising to meet the huge burden of compensation that the Subpostmasters would be entitled to under any reasonable settlement.
    The cost is trivial, in overall terms.

    And, they get the money back, by asset-stripping those responsible.
    Though given the hydra of culpability, which assets do you strip? The inadequates at the Post Office who appear not to have had a clue what they were doing and ruined the lives of those below them to hide that? The corporations who sold a duff system to the clueless inadequates at the Post Office? Both? Someone else?

    (And whilst the phrase "How hard can it be?" is rightly the setup to jokes with a punchline along the lines of "Much harder than you think", how hard can it be to run a network of counters providing services to the public- i.e. a set of Post Offices? Putting Horizon to one side, Post Offices are rubbish these days, and I'm not entirely sure why.)
    Fujitsu.
    Every director of the Post Office from the late 1990's onwards
    All the law firms acting for the Post Office

    Plenty of assets there.

  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 91,780
    edited November 2023
    Scott_xP said:

    @IanDunt

    Can we stop with this idea that Braverman is smart enough to force her own resignation. She doesn't even know which side is which is Northern Ireland.

    @bmay

    Sky’s senior Ireland correspondent has just committed a murder live on
    @SkyPoliticsHub
    💥

    https://x.com/bmay/status/1722696060819124684?s=20

    Have to admit to being a bit unmoved by the Braverman saga. Maybe she's trying to get sacked, maybe not and she's just taking advantage of the opportunity to speak out on matters knowing it's unlikely to harm her politically.

    Ultimately if a PM doesn't act regarding a minister either they agree with them, they don't care about the commentary being provoked, or they are too weak to do anything. I find it hard to believe any PM would not care, and if they do come out about disagreeing that leaves the obvious answer.

    And I cannot really see much advantage to him actually acting either. He's got weaknesses on that flank to protect.
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 91,780
    Cyclefree said:

    kle4 said:

    I still don't really follow why this is not a major political issue - it should be an easy win for government or opposition to condemn the farcical goings on at the Post Office and promise to sort it out, even if it happened under their watch, given the egregious conduct. Instead it feels like a niche interest, something they don't want to touch as if it's too easy a target.

    Because much of this scandal started under a Labour government. Every major political party has dirty hands here and no politician wants to admit responsibility for the mess they made of an entity they owned on our behalf. So they've tossed the hot potato to a judge who should, if he has the balls to do it, be tossing it right back into the politicians' lap.
    The last Labour government was a long time ago now. Lots of things have changed, I find it hard to believe the Opposition now could not meaningfully condemn it much harder than they have whilst distancing themselves from how it all began. Especially when there's a lot of time under a Tory government to point to.

    And likewise if it started under Labour there'd be a slim opportunity for the government to state with regret they didn't pick up on it soon enough, but it was begun when it was not their fault.

    I don't think making a bigger deal of it would take as much political courage as assumed.
  • Options
    Peter_the_PunterPeter_the_Punter Posts: 13,320
    edited November 2023
    Cyclefree said:

    kle4 said:

    I still don't really follow why this is not a major political issue - it should be an easy win for government or opposition to condemn the farcical goings on at the Post Office and promise to sort it out, even if it happened under their watch, given the egregious conduct. Instead it feels like a niche interest, something they don't want to touch as if it's too easy a target.

    Because much of this scandal started under a Labour government. Every major political party has dirty hands here and no politician wants to admit responsibility for the mess they made of an entity they owned on our behalf. So they've tossed the hot potato to a judge who should, if he has the balls to do it, be tossing it right back into the politicians' lap.
    Yes, that's the crux of the matter.

    No party is going to win points on this one. So who is going to see justice is done? Maybe Sir Wyn Williams will surprise us all and be the hero of the hour, but failing that......

    It's easy to be pessimistic. I don't want to be, because it grieves me to think of the harm that was done to so many innocent individuals, but I am afraid it is looking as though the culprits are going to get away light, because the politicians don't want to accept the responsibility they bore for allowing the PO to run so disatrously out of control for so long.
  • Options
    CatManCatMan Posts: 2,771
    edited November 2023
    kle4 said:

    Scott_xP said:

    @IanDunt

    Can we stop with this idea that Braverman is smart enough to force her own resignation. She doesn't even know which side is which is Northern Ireland.

    @bmay

    Sky’s senior Ireland correspondent has just committed a murder live on
    @SkyPoliticsHub
    💥

    https://x.com/bmay/status/1722696060819124684?s=20

    Have to admit to being a bit unmoved by the Braverman saga. Maybe she's trying to get sacked, maybe not and she's just taking advantage of the opportunity to speak out on matters knowing it's unlikely to harm her politically.

    Ultimately if a PM doesn't act regarding a minister either they agree with them, they don't care about the commentary being provoked, or they are too weak to do anything. I find it hard to believe any PM would not care, and if they do come out about disagreeing that leaves the obvious answer.

    And I cannot really see much advantage to him actually acting either. He's got weaknesses on that flank to protect.
    The problems for Starmer that the Gaza War is causing should be what we're talking about, what with the MPs and Councillors resigning, but we're not talking about that because Braverman is giving cover to him by her actions.
  • Options
    kle4 said:

    Cyclefree said:

    kle4 said:

    I still don't really follow why this is not a major political issue - it should be an easy win for government or opposition to condemn the farcical goings on at the Post Office and promise to sort it out, even if it happened under their watch, given the egregious conduct. Instead it feels like a niche interest, something they don't want to touch as if it's too easy a target.

    Because much of this scandal started under a Labour government. Every major political party has dirty hands here and no politician wants to admit responsibility for the mess they made of an entity they owned on our behalf. So they've tossed the hot potato to a judge who should, if he has the balls to do it, be tossing it right back into the politicians' lap.
    The last Labour government was a long time ago now. Lots of things have changed, I find it hard to believe the Opposition now could not meaningfully condemn it much harder than they have whilst distancing themselves from how it all began. Especially when there's a lot of time under a Tory government to point to.

    And likewise if it started under Labour there'd be a slim opportunity for the government to state with regret they didn't pick up on it soon enough, but it was begun when it was not their fault.

    I don't think making a bigger deal of it would take as much political courage as assumed.
    I believe it was Blair and Harman that got the dodgy ball rolling. Vince Cable played a significant role, especially in his appointment of the catastrophic Paula Vennels. After that it was Cameron's Government, and its successors.

    Nobody has clean hands.
  • Options
    AnabobazinaAnabobazina Posts: 20,000
    Have to admit I know sod all about the Post Office, nor the political scandal therein. What’s up?
  • Options
    CatManCatMan Posts: 2,771

    Have to admit I know sod all about the Post Office, nor the political scandal therein. What’s up?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Post_Office_scandal
  • Options
    CyclefreeCyclefree Posts: 25,210

    Cyclefree said:

    kle4 said:

    I still don't really follow why this is not a major political issue - it should be an easy win for government or opposition to condemn the farcical goings on at the Post Office and promise to sort it out, even if it happened under their watch, given the egregious conduct. Instead it feels like a niche interest, something they don't want to touch as if it's too easy a target.

    Because much of this scandal started under a Labour government. Every major political party has dirty hands here and no politician wants to admit responsibility for the mess they made of an entity they owned on our behalf. So they've tossed the hot potato to a judge who should, if he has the balls to do it, be tossing it right back into the politicians' lap.
    Yes, that's the crux of the matter.

    No party is going to win points on this one. So who is going to see justice is done? Maybe Sir Wyn Williams will surprise us all and be the hero of the hour, but failing that......

    It's easy to be pessimistic. I don't want to be, because it grieves me to think of the harm that was done to so many innocent individuals, but I am afraid it is looking as though the culprits are going to get away light, because the politicians don't want to accept the responsibility they bore for allowing the PO to run so disatrously out of control for so long.
    I am as pessimistic as you about the outcome. From what I have seen of the judge I do not think he has the toughness to punt this straight back to the government. The politicians are doing the minimum they can get away with.

    As for the Post Office and all their appalling advisors I have reached the A La Lanterne stage with them.
  • Options
    carnforthcarnforth Posts: 3,214

    Have to admit I know sod all about the Post Office, nor the political scandal therein. What’s up?

    Remember the sinking feeling in your stomach when you heard the full extent of the Windrush scandal? Like that.
  • Options
    Peter_the_PunterPeter_the_Punter Posts: 13,320
    edited November 2023
    carnforth said:

    Have to admit I know sod all about the Post Office, nor the political scandal therein. What’s up?

    Remember the sinking feeling in your stomach when you heard the full extent of the Windrush scandal? Like that.
    It's much worse than Windrush, Carn. Thousands of lives ruined, and just because the management wouldn't admit it made a mistake in buying the Horizon software from Fujitsu.
  • Options
    CyclefreeCyclefree Posts: 25,210

    Have to admit I know sod all about the Post Office, nor the political scandal therein. What’s up?

    My articles

    1. https://www.cyclefree.co.uk/the-cheque-is-in-the-post/
    2. https://www.cyclefree.co.uk/a-missed-opportunity/
    3. https://www.cyclefree.co.uk/making-an-offer-they-cannot-refuse/

    There is a very good podcast on it by Nick Wallis who has followed this from the start - https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/brand/m000jf7j. He has also written an excellent book on it.

    And you can follow the inquiry at his blog - https://www.postofficescandal.uk/.

  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 91,780
    edited November 2023

    Do have to laugh. Have successfully baited anti-EV freaks to swarm onto my YouTube channel. A lunatic surge in views, watch hours and subscribers yesterday evening, which has continued at an absurd pace for the whole of today.

    They come in, watch my videos and post negative comments about Tesla and EVs. Lots of "woke" and "WEF" warnings, even a few anti-vaxxers. Which I happily respond to. But all they are doing is driving the algorithm to push my stuff to even more people.

    Maybe they were just impressed by the broken headlight video and didn't know how to responds so lash out.
  • Options
    rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 54,001
    Cyclefree said:

    Sean_F said:

    kle4 said:

    I still don't really follow why this is not a major political issue - it should be an easy win for government or opposition to condemn the farcical goings on at the Post Office and promise to sort it out, even if it happened under their watch, given the egregious conduct. Instead it feels like a niche interest, something they don't want to touch as if it's too easy a target.

    Because any kind of reasonable financial restitution would bankrupt the Government.

    The Tories want to leave this pile of shit to Labour, and Labour knows it's going to have enough trouble managing the country's finances without promising to meet the huge burden of compensation that the Subpostmasters would be entitled to under any reasonable settlement.
    The cost is trivial, in overall terms.

    And, they get the money back, by asset-stripping those responsible.
    Though given the hydra of culpability, which assets do you strip? The inadequates at the Post Office who appear not to have had a clue what they were doing and ruined the lives of those below them to hide that? The corporations who sold a duff system to the clueless inadequates at the Post Office? Both? Someone else?

    (And whilst the phrase "How hard can it be?" is rightly the setup to jokes with a punchline along the lines of "Much harder than you think", how hard can it be to run a network of counters providing services to the public- i.e. a set of Post Offices? Putting Horizon to one side, Post Offices are rubbish these days, and I'm not entirely sure why.)
    Fujitsu.
    Every director of the Post Office from the late 1990's onwards
    All the law firms acting for the Post Office

    Plenty of assets there.

    Fujitsu-ICL, to be specific.

    It began the Horizon project as ICL and got taken over by Fujitsu half way through.
  • Options
    sladeslade Posts: 1,932
    First result of the night - a Lib Dem gain from Con in Sandhurst, a Town council ward.
  • Options
    Cyclefree said:

    Cyclefree said:

    kle4 said:

    I still don't really follow why this is not a major political issue - it should be an easy win for government or opposition to condemn the farcical goings on at the Post Office and promise to sort it out, even if it happened under their watch, given the egregious conduct. Instead it feels like a niche interest, something they don't want to touch as if it's too easy a target.

    Because much of this scandal started under a Labour government. Every major political party has dirty hands here and no politician wants to admit responsibility for the mess they made of an entity they owned on our behalf. So they've tossed the hot potato to a judge who should, if he has the balls to do it, be tossing it right back into the politicians' lap.
    Yes, that's the crux of the matter.

    No party is going to win points on this one. So who is going to see justice is done? Maybe Sir Wyn Williams will surprise us all and be the hero of the hour, but failing that......

    It's easy to be pessimistic. I don't want to be, because it grieves me to think of the harm that was done to so many innocent individuals, but I am afraid it is looking as though the culprits are going to get away light, because the politicians don't want to accept the responsibility they bore for allowing the PO to run so disatrously out of control for so long.
    I am as pessimistic as you about the outcome. From what I have seen of the judge I do not think he has the toughness to punt this straight back to the government. The politicians are doing the minimum they can get away with.

    As for the Post Office and all their appalling advisors I have reached the A La Lanterne stage with them.
    Yes, I am afraid the Cottam interview made me pessimistic as regards the judge. He would have been perfectly entitled to intervene and tell her to stop acting the goat, or risk being in contempt of Court.

    He seems to think his role is to be nice to everybody. Who will bring the PO into line if he won't.
  • Options
    CyclefreeCyclefree Posts: 25,210
    edited November 2023

    Have to admit I know sod all about the Post Office, nor the political scandal therein. What’s up?

    It is the worst miscarriage of justice in British history caused by an inept Post Office buying dodgy IT from Fujitsu, maliciously prosecuting hundreds of subpostmasters, some of whom went to prison, were bankrupted or committed suicide as a result, and throughout lied, lied and lied again and are still lying to everyone about their responsibility for what they did.

    They are obstructing the statutory inquiry set up to find out the truth and politicians are being as feeble as wet lettuce in holding them to account.
  • Options
    rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 54,001
    rcs1000 said:

    Cyclefree said:

    Sean_F said:

    kle4 said:

    I still don't really follow why this is not a major political issue - it should be an easy win for government or opposition to condemn the farcical goings on at the Post Office and promise to sort it out, even if it happened under their watch, given the egregious conduct. Instead it feels like a niche interest, something they don't want to touch as if it's too easy a target.

    Because any kind of reasonable financial restitution would bankrupt the Government.

    The Tories want to leave this pile of shit to Labour, and Labour knows it's going to have enough trouble managing the country's finances without promising to meet the huge burden of compensation that the Subpostmasters would be entitled to under any reasonable settlement.
    The cost is trivial, in overall terms.

    And, they get the money back, by asset-stripping those responsible.
    Though given the hydra of culpability, which assets do you strip? The inadequates at the Post Office who appear not to have had a clue what they were doing and ruined the lives of those below them to hide that? The corporations who sold a duff system to the clueless inadequates at the Post Office? Both? Someone else?

    (And whilst the phrase "How hard can it be?" is rightly the setup to jokes with a punchline along the lines of "Much harder than you think", how hard can it be to run a network of counters providing services to the public- i.e. a set of Post Offices? Putting Horizon to one side, Post Offices are rubbish these days, and I'm not entirely sure why.)
    Fujitsu.
    Every director of the Post Office from the late 1990's onwards
    All the law firms acting for the Post Office

    Plenty of assets there.

    Fujitsu-ICL, to be specific.

    It began the Horizon project as ICL and got taken over by Fujitsu half way through.
    And technically it dates back to John Major's time: it was awarded to ICL back in 1996.
  • Options
    FlatlanderFlatlander Posts: 3,891
    Cyclefree said:

    kle4 said:

    I still don't really follow why this is not a major political issue - it should be an easy win for government or opposition to condemn the farcical goings on at the Post Office and promise to sort it out, even if it happened under their watch, given the egregious conduct. Instead it feels like a niche interest, something they don't want to touch as if it's too easy a target.

    Because any kind of reasonable financial restitution would bankrupt the Government.

    The Tories want to leave this pile of shit to Labour, and Labour knows it's going to have enough trouble managing the country's finances without promising to meet the huge burden of compensation that the Subpostmasters would be entitled to under any reasonable settlement.
    The government has already - reportedly - put a billion aside to pay for this. So this should not be an issue.

    Relatedly and equally shamefully, the government is appealing a Freedom of Information ruling about the compensation scheme in the Blood Contamination scandal, which view with this one in the callousness with which the victims have been treated. See here - https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-coventry-warwickshire-67370940.

    It is hard to avoid the view that the state is now actively malicious towards its own citizens.
    "I'm from the government and I'm here to help"

    It is a rare thing when the state is anything other than malicious, casually indifferent, or incompetent.

    What does it actually do well?
  • Options
    CyclefreeCyclefree Posts: 25,210
    rcs1000 said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Cyclefree said:

    Sean_F said:

    kle4 said:

    I still don't really follow why this is not a major political issue - it should be an easy win for government or opposition to condemn the farcical goings on at the Post Office and promise to sort it out, even if it happened under their watch, given the egregious conduct. Instead it feels like a niche interest, something they don't want to touch as if it's too easy a target.

    Because any kind of reasonable financial restitution would bankrupt the Government.

    The Tories want to leave this pile of shit to Labour, and Labour knows it's going to have enough trouble managing the country's finances without promising to meet the huge burden of compensation that the Subpostmasters would be entitled to under any reasonable settlement.
    The cost is trivial, in overall terms.

    And, they get the money back, by asset-stripping those responsible.
    Though given the hydra of culpability, which assets do you strip? The inadequates at the Post Office who appear not to have had a clue what they were doing and ruined the lives of those below them to hide that? The corporations who sold a duff system to the clueless inadequates at the Post Office? Both? Someone else?

    (And whilst the phrase "How hard can it be?" is rightly the setup to jokes with a punchline along the lines of "Much harder than you think", how hard can it be to run a network of counters providing services to the public- i.e. a set of Post Offices? Putting Horizon to one side, Post Offices are rubbish these days, and I'm not entirely sure why.)
    Fujitsu.
    Every director of the Post Office from the late 1990's onwards
    All the law firms acting for the Post Office

    Plenty of assets there.

    Fujitsu-ICL, to be specific.

    It began the Horizon project as ICL and got taken over by Fujitsu half way through.
    And technically it dates back to John Major's time: it was awarded to ICL back in 1996.
    Because it was the cheapest bid despite coming bottom on the majority of the scoring criteria.
  • Options
    sladeslade Posts: 1,932
    Con gain from Ind in South Holland. There was a tie and the Con won the drawing of lots. There were a few problems with nominations and there could be a legal challenge.
  • Options
    NigelbNigelb Posts: 62,631
    kle4 said:

    Nigelb said:

    kle4 said:

    I still don't really follow why this is not a major political issue - it should be an easy win for government or opposition to condemn the farcical goings on at the Post Office and promise to sort it out, even if it happened under their watch, given the egregious conduct. Instead it feels like a niche interest, something they don't want to touch as if it's too easy a target.

    Perhaps because it’s been clear for many years what has been going on, and government has done little or nothing about it in all that time ?

    But there’s certainly political room for someone to do more than just watch from the sidelines.
    But even that is only a partial explanation of why they're not acting now, which leaves open why not act years ago.
    Plenty of comments above - but I think it’s largely cowardice.
    It’s a massive, messy problem, and is going to be difficult to sort; so no different from a lot of other problems facing government - but they are better known by the public.

    As Cyclefree says, easier to hand it off to a retired judge with no future career to worry about.
  • Options
    rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 54,001

    Do have to laugh. Have successfully baited anti-EV freaks to swarm onto my YouTube channel. A lunatic surge in views, watch hours and subscribers yesterday evening, which has continued at an absurd pace for the whole of today.

    They come in, watch my videos and post negative comments about Tesla and EVs. Lots of "woke" and "WEF" warnings, even a few anti-vaxxers. Which I happily respond to. But all they are doing is driving the algorithm to push my stuff to even more people.

    I'm almost disappointed by yesterday's revenue. Despite being 171% higher than my previous best revenue day I wondered if it might be higher. Expect that today will be bigger again. All hail Daily Mail / GBeebies morons! They are very profitable if you can exploit them.

    What's the channel?
  • Options
    I have to go to bed, but I hope PBers will continue to give this topic the attention it deserves.

    Nite all.
  • Options
    CyclefreeCyclefree Posts: 25,210

    Cyclefree said:

    Cyclefree said:

    kle4 said:

    I still don't really follow why this is not a major political issue - it should be an easy win for government or opposition to condemn the farcical goings on at the Post Office and promise to sort it out, even if it happened under their watch, given the egregious conduct. Instead it feels like a niche interest, something they don't want to touch as if it's too easy a target.

    Because much of this scandal started under a Labour government. Every major political party has dirty hands here and no politician wants to admit responsibility for the mess they made of an entity they owned on our behalf. So they've tossed the hot potato to a judge who should, if he has the balls to do it, be tossing it right back into the politicians' lap.
    Yes, that's the crux of the matter.

    No party is going to win points on this one. So who is going to see justice is done? Maybe Sir Wyn Williams will surprise us all and be the hero of the hour, but failing that......

    It's easy to be pessimistic. I don't want to be, because it grieves me to think of the harm that was done to so many innocent individuals, but I am afraid it is looking as though the culprits are going to get away light, because the politicians don't want to accept the responsibility they bore for allowing the PO to run so disatrously out of control for so long.
    I am as pessimistic as you about the outcome. From what I have seen of the judge I do not think he has the toughness to punt this straight back to the government. The politicians are doing the minimum they can get away with.

    As for the Post Office and all their appalling advisors I have reached the A La Lanterne stage with them.
    Yes, I am afraid the Cottam interview made me pessimistic as regards the judge. He would have been perfectly entitled to intervene and tell her to stop acting the goat, or risk being in contempt of Court.

    He seems to think his role is to be nice to everybody. Who will bring the PO into line if he won't.
    He is not a top flight judge, frankly. He practised at the Welsh Bar - mainly in Chancery work and later his practice consisted of personal injury, clinical negligence, sports and public law with a particular interest in sporting disputes relating to rugby. No experience of criminal law or investigations.

    Such an inquiry should have been given to someone as tough as old boots who wouldn't take the sort of shit that's been going on. As I say, the politicians have been doing the bare minimum they can get away with.
  • Options
    FlatlanderFlatlander Posts: 3,891
    edited November 2023
    Cyclefree said:

    rcs1000 said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Cyclefree said:

    Sean_F said:

    kle4 said:

    I still don't really follow why this is not a major political issue - it should be an easy win for government or opposition to condemn the farcical goings on at the Post Office and promise to sort it out, even if it happened under their watch, given the egregious conduct. Instead it feels like a niche interest, something they don't want to touch as if it's too easy a target.

    Because any kind of reasonable financial restitution would bankrupt the Government.

    The Tories want to leave this pile of shit to Labour, and Labour knows it's going to have enough trouble managing the country's finances without promising to meet the huge burden of compensation that the Subpostmasters would be entitled to under any reasonable settlement.
    The cost is trivial, in overall terms.

    And, they get the money back, by asset-stripping those responsible.
    Though given the hydra of culpability, which assets do you strip? The inadequates at the Post Office who appear not to have had a clue what they were doing and ruined the lives of those below them to hide that? The corporations who sold a duff system to the clueless inadequates at the Post Office? Both? Someone else?

    (And whilst the phrase "How hard can it be?" is rightly the setup to jokes with a punchline along the lines of "Much harder than you think", how hard can it be to run a network of counters providing services to the public- i.e. a set of Post Offices? Putting Horizon to one side, Post Offices are rubbish these days, and I'm not entirely sure why.)
    Fujitsu.
    Every director of the Post Office from the late 1990's onwards
    All the law firms acting for the Post Office

    Plenty of assets there.

    Fujitsu-ICL, to be specific.

    It began the Horizon project as ICL and got taken over by Fujitsu half way through.
    And technically it dates back to John Major's time: it was awarded to ICL back in 1996.
    Because it was the cheapest bid despite coming bottom on the majority of the scoring criteria.
    Maybe also historic reasons?

    ICL was of course a government (Tony Benn) creation in the first place, in a misguided attempt to rival IBM.

    As usual it took what were some interesting independent companies and eventually turned them to mush.

    [We had an Elliot 903 at school - a museum piece even then but it did teach you a lot about how these magic boxes actually worked]
  • Options
    MJWMJW Posts: 1,354
    CatMan said:

    kle4 said:

    Scott_xP said:

    @IanDunt

    Can we stop with this idea that Braverman is smart enough to force her own resignation. She doesn't even know which side is which is Northern Ireland.

    @bmay

    Sky’s senior Ireland correspondent has just committed a murder live on
    @SkyPoliticsHub
    💥

    https://x.com/bmay/status/1722696060819124684?s=20

    Have to admit to being a bit unmoved by the Braverman saga. Maybe she's trying to get sacked, maybe not and she's just taking advantage of the opportunity to speak out on matters knowing it's unlikely to harm her politically.

    Ultimately if a PM doesn't act regarding a minister either they agree with them, they don't care about the commentary being provoked, or they are too weak to do anything. I find it hard to believe any PM would not care, and if they do come out about disagreeing that leaves the obvious answer.

    And I cannot really see much advantage to him actually acting either. He's got weaknesses on that flank to protect.
    The problems for Starmer that the Gaza War is causing should be what we're talking about, what with the MPs and Councillors resigning, but we're not talking about that because Braverman is giving cover to him by her actions.
    Although Braverman's daft actions could be viewed as in part a consequence of the fact that, despite its divisions, Labour is not tearing itself apart on it. Starmer has staked out a position and stuck to it to date, and while there's obviously discontent, it's nothing like as febrile as the 2015 Syria votes under Corbyn - despite that being a far more minor issue with less reason for entrenched, strong views on either side.

    That's obviously not why Braverman has gone off the pier - but if Labour had lost the plot after October 7th, truly gone into civil war and was dipping in the polls - the Tories might have been much more confident in their response to protests, Rather than shambling about looking for a way to turn the fact there are clearly problems with them, into a popularity boost, but instead just getting into a mess whereby they look like the ones stirring tensions.
  • Options
    CyclefreeCyclefree Posts: 25,210
    Nigelb said:

    kle4 said:

    Nigelb said:

    kle4 said:

    I still don't really follow why this is not a major political issue - it should be an easy win for government or opposition to condemn the farcical goings on at the Post Office and promise to sort it out, even if it happened under their watch, given the egregious conduct. Instead it feels like a niche interest, something they don't want to touch as if it's too easy a target.

    Perhaps because it’s been clear for many years what has been going on, and government has done little or nothing about it in all that time ?

    But there’s certainly political room for someone to do more than just watch from the sidelines.
    But even that is only a partial explanation of why they're not acting now, which leaves open why not act years ago.
    Plenty of comments above - but I think it’s largely cowardice.
    It’s a massive, messy problem, and is going to be difficult to sort; so no different from a lot of other problems facing government - but they are better known by the public.

    As Cyclefree says, easier to hand it off to a retired judge with no future career to worry about.
    I have thoughts on how such a matter should be sorted. The claim that it is too messy to sort feels like an excuse to me. What you need is focus and a determination to resolve plus not lumping all sorts of different things together such as compensation and finding out what happened. The politicians have made it a large mess largely because they want to kick it into the long grass.
  • Options
    GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 20,822
    edited November 2023
    slade said:

    First result of the night - a Lib Dem gain from Con in Sandhurst, a Town council ward.

    Lib-Dems winning here (there) :D
  • Options
    sladeslade Posts: 1,932
    Worrying news from Preston. The local mosques have issued a statement that all Labour councillors should oppose Keir Starmer's position on Gaza or face sanctions.
  • Options
    sladeslade Posts: 1,932
    Stunning Lib Dem result in Powys. In a double by-election they got over 60% of the vote.
  • Options
    FlatlanderFlatlander Posts: 3,891
    edited November 2023
    Nigelb said:
    Another one.

    I wonder how long it will be before nobody from the Apollo programme is left alive?

    I think the youngest is about 88.
  • Options
    NigelbNigelb Posts: 62,631
    Cyclefree said:

    Nigelb said:

    kle4 said:

    Nigelb said:

    kle4 said:

    I still don't really follow why this is not a major political issue - it should be an easy win for government or opposition to condemn the farcical goings on at the Post Office and promise to sort it out, even if it happened under their watch, given the egregious conduct. Instead it feels like a niche interest, something they don't want to touch as if it's too easy a target.

    Perhaps because it’s been clear for many years what has been going on, and government has done little or nothing about it in all that time ?

    But there’s certainly political room for someone to do more than just watch from the sidelines.
    But even that is only a partial explanation of why they're not acting now, which leaves open why not act years ago.
    Plenty of comments above - but I think it’s largely cowardice.
    It’s a massive, messy problem, and is going to be difficult to sort; so no different from a lot of other problems facing government - but they are better known by the public.

    As Cyclefree says, easier to hand it off to a retired judge with no future career to worry about.
    I have thoughts on how such a matter should be sorted. The claim that it is too messy to sort feels like an excuse to me. What you need is focus and a determination to resolve plus not lumping all sorts of different things together such as compensation and finding out what happened. The politicians have made it a large mess largely because they want to kick it into the long grass.
    Absolutely it’s an excuse.

    Any government or aspiring government that believes it has the capacity to address hard problems should take it on, or be clear that they intend to do so.

    I understand politically why they don’t, but it’s one of the things which make me doubt whether Labour will be all that much better than the current government - which which has of course already proved that it’s worthless.
  • Options
    sladeslade Posts: 1,932
    Expected Lab hold in Lewisham.
  • Options
    Jim_MillerJim_Miller Posts: 2,507
    Related? In the US, a first class stamp (up to one ounce) currently costs 66 cents, but is soon to go up to 68 cents*. A very quick search suggests that first class stamps in the UK are more than twice as expensive.

    First class letters take between 2 and 7 days to reach their destinations. If you are mailing from a post office to a box in a near by post office, they sometimes get there in one day.

    Most likely I am missing something. I would be grateful to anyone who can explain
    what it is, why the cost seems so much higher in the UK than in the US.

    The US postal system is supposed to support itself. As I understand it, it doesn't quite do that, but comes close.

    (*Thrifty folks can beat the price increase by buying "forever" stamps, which are good indefinitely.)
  • Options
    sladeslade Posts: 1,932
    Con hold in South Kesteven. That completes the night's results.
  • Options
    Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 26,661

    Related? In the US, a first class stamp (up to one ounce) currently costs 66 cents, but is soon to go up to 68 cents*. A very quick search suggests that first class stamps in the UK are more than twice as expensive.

    First class letters take between 2 and 7 days to reach their destinations. If you are mailing from a post office to a box in a near by post office, they sometimes get there in one day.

    Most likely I am missing something. I would be grateful to anyone who can explain
    what it is, why the cost seems so much higher in the UK than in the US.

    The US postal system is supposed to support itself. As I understand it, it doesn't quite do that, but comes close.

    (*Thrifty folks can beat the price increase by buying "forever" stamps, which are good indefinitely.)

    Is the same stamp in the US valid for delivery everywhere, such as remote places in Alaska?
  • Options
    Jim_MillerJim_Miller Posts: 2,507
    Andy_JS asked: "Is the same stamp in the US valid for delivery everywhere, such as remote places in Alaska?"

    Yes, as far as I know.

    That's been true for more than a century. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rural_Free_Delivery

    That part of the Post Office is subsidized by the more profitable parts.
  • Options
    isamisam Posts: 40,930
    Cyclefree said:

    slade said:

    Worrying news from Preston. The local mosques have issued a statement that all Labour councillors should oppose Keir Starmer's position on Gaza or face sanctions.

    The local mosques need reminding that this is not a theocracy. Local councillors are responsible to voters not to religious leaders, no matter how self-important they claim to be.

    The more such religious bigots leave Labour the better it will be for Labour and the country
    I don’t know that it is for the better; the next step is an Islamic Party. There are obviously a lot of politically minded Muslims who are councillors in the areas where they dominate in terms of demographic, and they’ve started to leave a moderate party who doesn’t put Muslims
    first. They’re not going to leave politics, so where will they go? Maybe independent as a stepping stone, but in the end there will be a party acting solely for the interests of followers of their religion.
  • Options
    NigelbNigelb Posts: 62,631
    A complaint was filed at the FEC alleging former Pres. Trump violated the law. The nonpartisan staff recommended that the Commission investigate allegations of excessive contributions.
    You'll never guess what happened next . . . .

    https://twitter.com/EllenLWeintraub/status/1722741038995931214
  • Options
    williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 48,071
    Scott_xP said:

    @IanDunt

    Can we stop with this idea that Braverman is smart enough to force her own resignation. She doesn't even know which side is which is Northern Ireland.

    @bmay

    Sky’s senior Ireland correspondent has just committed a murder live on
    @SkyPoliticsHub
    💥

    https://x.com/bmay/status/1722696060819124684?s=20

    Is the latest thing to support loyalist marches to own the Tories?
  • Options
    Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 26,661

    Andy_JS asked: "Is the same stamp in the US valid for delivery everywhere, such as remote places in Alaska?"

    Yes, as far as I know.

    That's been true for more than a century. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rural_Free_Delivery

    That part of the Post Office is subsidized by the more profitable parts.

    The same as the UK in that case. So that doesn't explain the price difference.
  • Options
    Andy_JS said:

    Andy_JS asked: "Is the same stamp in the US valid for delivery everywhere, such as remote places in Alaska?"

    Yes, as far as I know.

    That's been true for more than a century. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rural_Free_Delivery

    That part of the Post Office is subsidized by the more profitable parts.

    The same as the UK in that case. So that doesn't explain the price difference.
    Prediction: this time next month there will be a major row about excess postage charges on Christmas cards, owing to confusion over the new size-based pricing for letters, and the Royal Mail imposing a £2.50 excess charge to hand over Granny's card.
  • Options

    Scott_xP said:

    @IanDunt

    Can we stop with this idea that Braverman is smart enough to force her own resignation. She doesn't even know which side is which is Northern Ireland.

    @bmay

    Sky’s senior Ireland correspondent has just committed a murder live on
    @SkyPoliticsHub
    💥

    https://x.com/bmay/status/1722696060819124684?s=20

    Is the latest thing to support loyalist marches to own the Tories?
    What a meaningless post.
  • Options
    Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 26,661

    Andy_JS said:

    Andy_JS asked: "Is the same stamp in the US valid for delivery everywhere, such as remote places in Alaska?"

    Yes, as far as I know.

    That's been true for more than a century. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rural_Free_Delivery

    That part of the Post Office is subsidized by the more profitable parts.

    The same as the UK in that case. So that doesn't explain the price difference.
    Prediction: this time next month there will be a major row about excess postage charges on Christmas cards, owing to confusion over the new size-based pricing for letters, and the Royal Mail imposing a £2.50 excess charge to hand over Granny's card.
    Also, the collectibility of stamps has been ruined by the presence of those awful QR codes.
  • Options
    JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 39,031

    Do have to laugh. Have successfully baited anti-EV freaks to swarm onto my YouTube channel. A lunatic surge in views, watch hours and subscribers yesterday evening, which has continued at an absurd pace for the whole of today.

    They come in, watch my videos and post negative comments about Tesla and EVs. Lots of "woke" and "WEF" warnings, even a few anti-vaxxers. Which I happily respond to. But all they are doing is driving the algorithm to push my stuff to even more people.

    I'm almost disappointed by yesterday's revenue. Despite being 171% higher than my previous best revenue day I wondered if it might be higher. Expect that today will be bigger again. All hail Daily Mail / GBeebies morons! They are very profitable if you can exploit them.

    "anti-EV freaks"

    Enough said... About them. And you. ;)
  • Options
    NigelbNigelb Posts: 62,631

    On the Post Office scandal:

    The whole thing seems so utterly wrong that it seems incomprehensible that it's happened in what is supposed to be a democracy with a good legal system. It's abhorrent, in terms of what happened, the effect it has had on victims, the lack of clarity, the cover-ups, and most of all, the length of time it has gone on.

    I'm also slightly saddened by the lack of anger amongst the public about it; it just does not seem to have cut-through to the public in the way other matters do. Perhaps it's because it is complex; or perhaps the 'wrong' sort of people were affected. Or perhaps it is because it was a nationalised company when the worst excesses happened.

    Computer Weekly, by the way, have been excellent on this, all the way through.

    https://www.computerweekly.com/news/366538096/Post-Office-scandal-cover-up-a-dark-chapter-in-government-corporate-and-legal-history#Timeline

    That's where I first read about it, ages ago, long before the national press cared to notice.

    Another possible reason it never took off - the victims were widely scattered across the country, rather than in a single locale - and were often shunned in their own communities at the time.
    And because of government indifference, or worse, no political advocates either.
  • Options
    NigelbNigelb Posts: 62,631
    edited November 2023
    Increasingly strange that Biden gets so little credit for the performance if the US economy

    The U.S. economy has drastically outperformed Europe's since the pandemic. The most plausible explanation is that America implemented a larger -- and in some respects, more progressive -- fiscal stimulus
    https://twitter.com/EricLevitz/status/1722419205629202589

    Though of course Ukraine affected, and affects Europe far more than it dies the US.
  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 75,929

    Related? In the US, a first class stamp (up to one ounce) currently costs 66 cents, but is soon to go up to 68 cents*. A very quick search suggests that first class stamps in the UK are more than twice as expensive.

    First class letters take between 2 and 7 days to reach their destinations. If you are mailing from a post office to a box in a near by post office, they sometimes get there in one day.

    Most likely I am missing something. I would be grateful to anyone who can explain
    what it is, why the cost seems so much higher in the UK than in the US.

    The US postal system is supposed to support itself. As I understand it, it doesn't quite do that, but comes close.

    (*Thrifty folks can beat the price increase by buying "forever" stamps, which are good indefinitely.)

    It certainly delivered for Lance Armstrong back in the day
  • Options
    FishingFishing Posts: 4,561
    edited November 2023
    Nigelb said:

    Increasingly strange that Biden gets so little credit for the performance if the US economy

    The U.S. economy has drastically outperformed Europe's since the pandemic. The most plausible explanation is that America implemented a larger -- and in some respects, more progressive -- fiscal stimulus
    https://twitter.com/EricLevitz/status/1722419205629202589

    Though of course Ukraine affected, and affects Europe far more than it dies the US.

    Or maybe people realise that it's an unsustainable and irresponsible debt-fuelled binge that is lifting interest rates, fuelling inflation and isn't even delivering that much growth for all the money they're splashing around?
  • Options
    NigelbNigelb Posts: 62,631
    Pulpstar said:

    Related? In the US, a first class stamp (up to one ounce) currently costs 66 cents, but is soon to go up to 68 cents*. A very quick search suggests that first class stamps in the UK are more than twice as expensive.

    First class letters take between 2 and 7 days to reach their destinations. If you are mailing from a post office to a box in a near by post office, they sometimes get there in one day.

    Most likely I am missing something. I would be grateful to anyone who can explain
    what it is, why the cost seems so much higher in the UK than in the US.

    The US postal system is supposed to support itself. As I understand it, it doesn't quite do that, but comes close.

    (*Thrifty folks can beat the price increase by buying "forever" stamps, which are good indefinitely.)

    It certainly delivered for Lance Armstrong back in the day
    He got his drugs by post ?
  • Options
    NigelbNigelb Posts: 62,631
    Surgeons have performed the world's first eye transplant
    https://m.koreatimes.co.kr/pages/article.asp?newsIdx=362935
  • Options
    NigelbNigelb Posts: 62,631
    Fishing said:

    Nigelb said:

    Increasingly strange that Biden gets so little credit for the performance if the US economy

    The U.S. economy has drastically outperformed Europe's since the pandemic. The most plausible explanation is that America implemented a larger -- and in some respects, more progressive -- fiscal stimulus
    https://twitter.com/EricLevitz/status/1722419205629202589

    Though of course Ukraine affected, and affects Europe far more than it dies the US.

    Or maybe people realise that it's an unsustainable and irresponsible debt-fuelled binge that is lifting interest rates, fuelling inflation and isn't even delivering that much growth for all the money they're splashing around?
    US inflation has also been lower than European.
    The irresponsible debt fuelled binge was Trump's tax cut fur the rich. I don't recall your railing about it at the time.
  • Options
    NigelbNigelb Posts: 62,631
    After decades of selfless public service, Joe Manchin has decided to sail off into the sunset in his multiple yachts.

    He will be fondly remembered for his heroic opposition to climate change, build back better, voting rights and filibuster reform…and of course, for supporting Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation.

    He was the best of the Republicans in the Democratic Party.

    They were lucky to have him.

    Fare thee well, Joe.

    https://twitter.com/7Veritas4/status/1722715353120158137
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,266
    edited November 2023
    I'm disappointed TSE(?) went with 'return to sender' instead of 'time to go postal.'

    Because let's face it, the best outcome would be for the judge to go postal on them.

    (I fear he won't, by the way. He's had ample opportunities to hold them in contempt and not done so.)
  • Options
    ChrisChris Posts: 11,134
    Judging by the latest bulletin from the Institute for the Study of War, the Ukrainians are now advancing from the left bank of the Dnipro river on quite a broad front (10-15 miles) and have penetrated as much as 2-3 miles in places:
    https://www.understandingwar.org/backgrounder/russian-offensive-campaign-assessment-november-9-2023
  • Options

    Andy_JS said:

    Andy_JS asked: "Is the same stamp in the US valid for delivery everywhere, such as remote places in Alaska?"

    Yes, as far as I know.

    That's been true for more than a century. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rural_Free_Delivery

    That part of the Post Office is subsidized by the more profitable parts.

    The same as the UK in that case. So that doesn't explain the price difference.
    Prediction: this time next month there will be a major row about excess postage charges on Christmas cards, owing to confusion over the new size-based pricing for letters, and the Royal Mail imposing a £2.50 excess charge to hand over Granny's card.
    Given that it is mostly pensioners who still send Christmas cards in the post, surely this can be dealt with by giving all pensioners a tax free Christmas Card Bonus Payment, say £125 or perhaps lets round it up to £150 to account for birthdays and Easter too.
  • Options

    On the Post Office scandal:

    The whole thing seems so utterly wrong that it seems incomprehensible that it's happened in what is supposed to be a democracy with a good legal system. It's abhorrent, in terms of what happened, the effect it has had on victims, the lack of clarity, the cover-ups, and most of all, the length of time it has gone on.

    I'm also slightly saddened by the lack of anger amongst the public about it; it just does not seem to have cut-through to the public in the way other matters do. Perhaps it's because it is complex; or perhaps the 'wrong' sort of people were affected. Or perhaps it is because it was a nationalised company when the worst excesses happened.

    Computer Weekly, by the way, have been excellent on this, all the way through.

    https://www.computerweekly.com/news/366538096/Post-Office-scandal-cover-up-a-dark-chapter-in-government-corporate-and-legal-history#Timeline

    You are so right, JJ, in every respect.

    The lack of public anger is disappointing. It is partly for the reasons you recognise. It is complex. Even anoraks like me have difficulty following it. It is also partly because because the true horror is hard to comprehend.

    You might have thought that the fact the victims were very much People Like Us would have inflamed passions and in some cases the victims were indeed strongly supported by their local communities. In others, the locals hardly knew anything about it. One of the worst cases occurred at South End Green, at the southern end of Hampstead. I know the place well and have used the PO there many times, but I didn't have a clue what had happened until I read Nick Wallis's book. I think in rural communities, awareness has been better but I think on the whole the public still retains the notion of the fluffy old Post Office that everyone likes.

    Racism is clearly an aggravating factor. A proper study will be done in due course, I expect, but there is already plenty of evidence that Asian Subpostmasters got shittier treatment than white folk.

    Computer Weekly was brilliant.
  • Options
    IanB2IanB2 Posts: 47,284
    edited November 2023

    Related? In the US, a first class stamp (up to one ounce) currently costs 66 cents, but is soon to go up to 68 cents*. A very quick search suggests that first class stamps in the UK are more than twice as expensive.

    First class letters take between 2 and 7 days to reach their destinations. If you are mailing from a post office to a box in a near by post office, they sometimes get there in one day.

    Most likely I am missing something. I would be grateful to anyone who can explain
    what it is, why the cost seems so much higher in the UK than in the US.

    The US postal system is supposed to support itself. As I understand it, it doesn't quite do that, but comes close.

    (*Thrifty folks can beat the price increase by buying "forever" stamps, which are good indefinitely.)

    The Royal Mail (separate from the Post Office, do note) has long known that the demand curve for ordinary letter post is inelastic and hence the extra revenue from higher prices exceeds the loss of volume as a result of charging more. This was particularly evident given its monopoly but remains the case even in a semi-competitive market, and is marginally more pertinent to first class than second. Hence it was always in its best financial interests to put up prices for letters - parcels and packets, which with the explosion of internet shopping now comprise the majority of business, are another matter since those are mostly business-to-consumer and the volume posters will of course shop around.

    Prior to privatisation, the company needed government approval for price rises, which were seen as a matter of some politcal consequence, and hence it was constrained by how much extra it could charge, in rather a similar way to how local authorities are constrained over their tax rises.

    Since privatation these restrictions have largely been removed, and the corporation has pushed letter prices up to their economically optimal level, at the same time expanding the variety in pricing arrangements for the volume posters (which originate and have been on the rise since the '80s), which mean that someone with a large mailing to make - who will shop around - pays a lot less per item than we do to send granny her card. This can be justified nowadays since large mailings in nicely typed identically sized C4 envelopes will whizz through the IMP whereas granny's card may end up being sorted by hand, or at least held on a loop inside the machine while the image of the postcode is transmitted to be read remotely by people employed hundreds of miles away from the actual letter to puzzle out your handwriting on the envelope.

    The letters market is anyway in decline and, as for any other delivery company, its profitability depends mostly on the income from and costs of delivering packages, not letters. So trying to compare letter prices internationally is looking at only a small, and less pertinent, part of the story.

  • Options
    Peter_the_PunterPeter_the_Punter Posts: 13,320
    edited November 2023
    ydoethur said:

    I'm disappointed TSE(?) went with 'return to sender' instead of 'time to go postal.'

    Because let's face it, the best outcome would be for the judge to go postal on them.

    (I fear he won't, by the way. He's had ample opportunities to hold them in contempt and not done so.)

    He should certainly have stepped in on Cottam, who was clearly acting dumb to thwart the Inquiry. The barrister questioning her has the patience and persistence of a saint, but his exasperation was self-evident. Yet Sir Wyn Nice-Old-Thing Williams refrained from intervening.
  • Options
    darkagedarkage Posts: 4,796
    It does appear that there are junior staff from decades ago caught like rabbits in the headlights in this post office inquiry. It was a similar thing with the Grenfell Inquiry, some of the main witnesses regarding the cladding were graduates in their first job. There is a definite tendency to attack individuals
  • Options
    rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 54,001

    ydoethur said:

    I'm disappointed TSE(?) went with 'return to sender' instead of 'time to go postal.'

    Because let's face it, the best outcome would be for the judge to go postal on them.

    (I fear he won't, by the way. He's had ample opportunities to hold them in contempt and not done so.)

    He should certainly have stepped in on Cottam, who was clearly acting dumb to thwart the Inquiry. The barrister questioning her has the patience and persistence of a saint, but his exasperation was self-evident. Yet Sir Wyn Nice-Old-Thing Williams refrained from intervening.
    No, she clearly is dumb.

    She is also a great many other things. None of them good.
  • Options
    IanB2IanB2 Posts: 47,284
    edited November 2023

    By the way, do click on the link @Cyclefree has provided by the “thick as mince” comment. It’s a doozy.

    It's quite obvious what has happened here; Post Office Legal Services drafted both her original witness statement, which she signed without paying much attention to it and never had to present in court since the case was settled prior, and may well have done the same with this latest one. It appears that the foolish manager hasn't made much effort to brief herself, or be briefed, beforehand, and the only mitigation is that she is up against a top lawyer who spends his or her life honing their skills of cross-examination and is skilled in demolishing even credible evidence. If there's an organisational failing, it is that once a matter becomes legal, the in-house lawyers tend to take over and it is very easy for the ordinary line manager, who has the day job to worry about, simply to end up following instructions, particularly as the lawyers are based at 'HQ' and the manager is out in the field, used to receiving directions from 'the centre'.
  • Options

    Do have to laugh. Have successfully baited anti-EV freaks to swarm onto my YouTube channel. A lunatic surge in views, watch hours and subscribers yesterday evening, which has continued at an absurd pace for the whole of today.

    They come in, watch my videos and post negative comments about Tesla and EVs. Lots of "woke" and "WEF" warnings, even a few anti-vaxxers. Which I happily respond to. But all they are doing is driving the algorithm to push my stuff to even more people.

    I'm almost disappointed by yesterday's revenue. Despite being 171% higher than my previous best revenue day I wondered if it might be higher. Expect that today will be bigger again. All hail Daily Mail / GBeebies morons! They are very profitable if you can exploit them.

    "anti-EV freaks"

    Enough said... About them. And you. ;)
    This lot are freaks. They have been fed a diet of nonsense by the right wing media and won't drop it. They all say the same things - which are fact free. And then wander off into WEF paranoia.
  • Options
    squareroot2squareroot2 Posts: 6,356
    Foxy said:
    These figures are always revised.i don't think you can say no growth yet.. indeed growth may be negative, but you smare being a bit presumptuous to state it as a fact.
  • Options
    IanB2IanB2 Posts: 47,284



    (*Thrifty folks can beat the price increase by buying "forever" stamps, which are good indefinitely.)

    When I left the business it was obvious the way prices would go, and I bought several hundred 'forever' stamps (which is what the standard first and second class ones with just the class and the monarch's head on them are), and am still working through them, not having had to buy a stamp for years.
This discussion has been closed.