There comes a point in many investigations when you know exactly what has happened, why and who is at fault. It may not mean its end. But the essential findings are clear, no matter what’s needed to colour in the whole picture.
Cottam's appearance at the Inquiry was jaw-dropping. She was either stunningly stupid, or deliberately obfuscating, but very likely both.
Yes, I agree, Cyclefree. There is no point in this farcical Inquiry continuing. We all know what the PO did, we all know what it is doing now. It is time to call things for what they are.
The Inquiry should be closed, and the criminal investigations should begin. If the Government gives a damn, it should assist. I am pretty sure it doesn't want to, so the judge needs to take the bull by the horns and tell it that there is no point in continuing unless it does.
This scandal outdoes any other in this country in my life time. Mealy mouthed words and promises that 'lessons will be learned' simply won't do. The PO wrecked the lives of hundreds of people. Those responsible must now pay, and there isn't much doubt anymore who those responsible are.
The Post Office these days is little more than a franchise organisation for WH Smith, the Co-op, and that bar in Leatherhead with a dress code. It’s a prime candidate to be burned to the ground and replaced with something suited to the 21st century.
Unfortunately the optics of any government destroying Our Beloved Post Office are likely to rule this out - especially given that elderly Post Office customers are probably over-represented in the Conservative Party membership.
I still don't really follow why this is not a major political issue - it should be an easy win for government or opposition to condemn the farcical goings on at the Post Office and promise to sort it out, even if it happened under their watch, given the egregious conduct. Instead it feels like a niche interest, something they don't want to touch as if it's too easy a target.
The Post Office these days is little more than a franchise organisation for WH Smith, the Co-op, and that bar in Leatherhead with a dress code. It’s a prime candidate to be burned to the ground and replaced with something suited to the 21st century.
Unfortunately the optics of any government destroying Our Beloved Post Office are likely to rule this out - especially given that elderly Post Office customers are probably over-represented in the Conservative Party membership.
Since learning about this scandal, El C, I am reluctant to buy so much as a stamp from the Post Office. It is a disgusting organisation.
I still don't really follow why this is not a major political issue - it should be an easy win for government or opposition to condemn the farcical goings on at the Post Office and promise to sort it out, even if it happened under their watch, given the egregious conduct. Instead it feels like a niche interest, something they don't want to touch as if it's too easy a target.
Because any kind of reasonable financial restitution would bankrupt the Government.
The Tories want to leave this pile of shit to Labour, and Labour knows it's going to have enough trouble managing the country's finances without promising to meet the huge burden of compensation that the Subpostmasters would be entitled to under any reasonable settlement.
I still don't really follow why this is not a major political issue - it should be an easy win for government or opposition to condemn the farcical goings on at the Post Office and promise to sort it out, even if it happened under their watch, given the egregious conduct. Instead it feels like a niche interest, something they don't want to touch as if it's too easy a target.
Because any kind of reasonable financial restitution would bankrupt the Government.
The Tories want to leave this pile of shit to Labour, and Labour knows it's going to have enough trouble managing the country's finances without promising to meet the huge burden of compensation that the Subpostmasters would be entitled to under any reasonable settlement.
The cost is trivial, in overall terms.
And, they get the money back, by asset-stripping those responsible.
I still don't really follow why this is not a major political issue - it should be an easy win for government or opposition to condemn the farcical goings on at the Post Office and promise to sort it out, even if it happened under their watch, given the egregious conduct. Instead it feels like a niche interest, something they don't want to touch as if it's too easy a target.
Perhaps because it’s been clear for many years what has been going on, and government has done little or nothing about it in all that time ?
But there’s certainly political room for someone to do more than just watch from the sidelines.
I still don't really follow why this is not a major political issue - it should be an easy win for government or opposition to condemn the farcical goings on at the Post Office and promise to sort it out, even if it happened under their watch, given the egregious conduct. Instead it feels like a niche interest, something they don't want to touch as if it's too easy a target.
Because any kind of reasonable financial restitution would bankrupt the Government.
The Tories want to leave this pile of shit to Labour, and Labour knows it's going to have enough trouble managing the country's finances without promising to meet the huge burden of compensation that the Subpostmasters would be entitled to under any reasonable settlement.
It’s more about the level of the people you are dealing with
1) stupid 2) incompetent 3) spouting professionalese word salad. 4) expecting no accountability
These are #NU10K
If you start holding them genuinely to account you are starting a war with the true establishment.
Remember how no serious figure was held to account over Rotherham? Look where they are now…
Don’t worry - in a few months time, there will be a fawning interview in the glossies with Elaine Cottam in her (presumably) large house. All about how this is a terrible imposition. She fought her way up to this tough job, and was saddled with a problem that she heroically fought. And it’s been really tough on the family…. Now all she has left is some millions and a new big job.
I still don't really follow why this is not a major political issue - it should be an easy win for government or opposition to condemn the farcical goings on at the Post Office and promise to sort it out, even if it happened under their watch, given the egregious conduct. Instead it feels like a niche interest, something they don't want to touch as if it's too easy a target.
Because any kind of reasonable financial restitution would bankrupt the Government.
The Tories want to leave this pile of shit to Labour, and Labour knows it's going to have enough trouble managing the country's finances without promising to meet the huge burden of compensation that the Subpostmasters would be entitled to under any reasonable settlement.
The cost is trivial, in overall terms.
And, they get the money back, by asset-stripping those responsible.
Though given the hydra of culpability, which assets do you strip? The inadequates at the Post Office who appear not to have had a clue what they were doing and ruined the lives of those below them to hide that? The corporations who sold a duff system to the clueless inadequates at the Post Office? Both? Someone else?
(And whilst the phrase "How hard can it be?" is rightly the setup to jokes with a punchline along the lines of "Much harder than you think", how hard can it be to run a network of counters providing services to the public- i.e. a set of Post Offices? Putting Horizon to one side, Post Offices are rubbish these days, and I'm not entirely sure why.)
I still don't really follow why this is not a major political issue - it should be an easy win for government or opposition to condemn the farcical goings on at the Post Office and promise to sort it out, even if it happened under their watch, given the egregious conduct. Instead it feels like a niche interest, something they don't want to touch as if it's too easy a target.
Because any kind of reasonable financial restitution would bankrupt the Government.
The Tories want to leave this pile of shit to Labour, and Labour knows it's going to have enough trouble managing the country's finances without promising to meet the huge burden of compensation that the Subpostmasters would be entitled to under any reasonable settlement.
I do appreciate the focus here. Nowhere else seems much bothered about the petty bureaucratic tyranny done by the PO to vulnerable community stalwarts.
I still don't really follow why this is not a major political issue - it should be an easy win for government or opposition to condemn the farcical goings on at the Post Office and promise to sort it out, even if it happened under their watch, given the egregious conduct. Instead it feels like a niche interest, something they don't want to touch as if it's too easy a target.
Because any kind of reasonable financial restitution would bankrupt the Government.
The Tories want to leave this pile of shit to Labour, and Labour knows it's going to have enough trouble managing the country's finances without promising to meet the huge burden of compensation that the Subpostmasters would be entitled to under any reasonable settlement.
The government has already - reportedly - put a billion aside to pay for this. So this should not be an issue.
Relatedly and equally shamefully, the government is appealing a Freedom of Information ruling about the compensation scheme in the Blood Contamination scandal, which view with this one in the callousness with which the victims have been treated. See here - https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-coventry-warwickshire-67370940.
It is hard to avoid the view that the state is now actively malicious towards its own citizens.
I still don't really follow why this is not a major political issue - it should be an easy win for government or opposition to condemn the farcical goings on at the Post Office and promise to sort it out, even if it happened under their watch, given the egregious conduct. Instead it feels like a niche interest, something they don't want to touch as if it's too easy a target.
Because any kind of reasonable financial restitution would bankrupt the Government.
The Tories want to leave this pile of shit to Labour, and Labour knows it's going to have enough trouble managing the country's finances without promising to meet the huge burden of compensation that the Subpostmasters would be entitled to under any reasonable settlement.
Bankrupt the government?
How much are you thinking of?!!
With current finances, some spare change would probably do it...
Cottam's appearance at the Inquiry was jaw-dropping. She was either stunningly stupid, or deliberately obfuscating, but very likely both.
Yes, I agree, Cyclefree. There is no point in this farcical Inquiry continuing. We all know what the PO did, we all know what it is doing now. It is time to call things for what they are.
The Inquiry should be closed, and the criminal investigations should begin. If the Government gives a damn, it should assist. I am pretty sure it doesn't want to, so the judge needs to take the bull by the horns and tell it that there is no point in continuing unless it does.
This scandal outdoes any other in this country in my life time. Mealy mouthed words and promises that 'lessons will be learned' simply won't do. The PO wrecked the lives of hundreds of people. Those responsible must now pay, and there isn't much doubt anymore who those responsible are.
They can start by sacking the Board and a large part of its senior management.
I still don't really follow why this is not a major political issue - it should be an easy win for government or opposition to condemn the farcical goings on at the Post Office and promise to sort it out, even if it happened under their watch, given the egregious conduct. Instead it feels like a niche interest, something they don't want to touch as if it's too easy a target.
Perhaps because it’s been clear for many years what has been going on, and government has done little or nothing about it in all that time ?
But there’s certainly political room for someone to do more than just watch from the sidelines.
But even that is only a partial explanation of why they're not acting now, which leaves open why not act years ago.
I still don't really follow why this is not a major political issue - it should be an easy win for government or opposition to condemn the farcical goings on at the Post Office and promise to sort it out, even if it happened under their watch, given the egregious conduct. Instead it feels like a niche interest, something they don't want to touch as if it's too easy a target.
Because any kind of reasonable financial restitution would bankrupt the Government.
The Tories want to leave this pile of shit to Labour, and Labour knows it's going to have enough trouble managing the country's finances without promising to meet the huge burden of compensation that the Subpostmasters would be entitled to under any reasonable settlement.
Bankrupt the government?
How much are you thinking of?!!
With current finances, some spare change would probably do it...
Divide the share holding of the Post Office among the post masters.
I still don't really follow why this is not a major political issue - it should be an easy win for government or opposition to condemn the farcical goings on at the Post Office and promise to sort it out, even if it happened under their watch, given the egregious conduct. Instead it feels like a niche interest, something they don't want to touch as if it's too easy a target.
Because much of this scandal started under a Labour government. Every major political party has dirty hands here and no politician wants to admit responsibility for the mess they made of an entity they owned on our behalf. So they've tossed the hot potato to a judge who should, if he has the balls to do it, be tossing it right back into the politicians' lap.
I still don't really follow why this is not a major political issue - it should be an easy win for government or opposition to condemn the farcical goings on at the Post Office and promise to sort it out, even if it happened under their watch, given the egregious conduct. Instead it feels like a niche interest, something they don't want to touch as if it's too easy a target.
Because any kind of reasonable financial restitution would bankrupt the Government.
The Tories want to leave this pile of shit to Labour, and Labour knows it's going to have enough trouble managing the country's finances without promising to meet the huge burden of compensation that the Subpostmasters would be entitled to under any reasonable settlement.
The cost is trivial, in overall terms.
And, they get the money back, by asset-stripping those responsible.
Though given the hydra of culpability, which assets do you strip? The inadequates at the Post Office who appear not to have had a clue what they were doing and ruined the lives of those below them to hide that? The corporations who sold a duff system to the clueless inadequates at the Post Office? Both? Someone else?
(And whilst the phrase "How hard can it be?" is rightly the setup to jokes with a punchline along the lines of "Much harder than you think", how hard can it be to run a network of counters providing services to the public- i.e. a set of Post Offices? Putting Horizon to one side, Post Offices are rubbish these days, and I'm not entirely sure why.)
Fujitsu. Every director of the Post Office from the late 1990's onwards All the law firms acting for the Post Office
Have to admit to being a bit unmoved by the Braverman saga. Maybe she's trying to get sacked, maybe not and she's just taking advantage of the opportunity to speak out on matters knowing it's unlikely to harm her politically.
Ultimately if a PM doesn't act regarding a minister either they agree with them, they don't care about the commentary being provoked, or they are too weak to do anything. I find it hard to believe any PM would not care, and if they do come out about disagreeing that leaves the obvious answer.
And I cannot really see much advantage to him actually acting either. He's got weaknesses on that flank to protect.
I still don't really follow why this is not a major political issue - it should be an easy win for government or opposition to condemn the farcical goings on at the Post Office and promise to sort it out, even if it happened under their watch, given the egregious conduct. Instead it feels like a niche interest, something they don't want to touch as if it's too easy a target.
Because much of this scandal started under a Labour government. Every major political party has dirty hands here and no politician wants to admit responsibility for the mess they made of an entity they owned on our behalf. So they've tossed the hot potato to a judge who should, if he has the balls to do it, be tossing it right back into the politicians' lap.
The last Labour government was a long time ago now. Lots of things have changed, I find it hard to believe the Opposition now could not meaningfully condemn it much harder than they have whilst distancing themselves from how it all began. Especially when there's a lot of time under a Tory government to point to.
And likewise if it started under Labour there'd be a slim opportunity for the government to state with regret they didn't pick up on it soon enough, but it was begun when it was not their fault.
I don't think making a bigger deal of it would take as much political courage as assumed.
I still don't really follow why this is not a major political issue - it should be an easy win for government or opposition to condemn the farcical goings on at the Post Office and promise to sort it out, even if it happened under their watch, given the egregious conduct. Instead it feels like a niche interest, something they don't want to touch as if it's too easy a target.
Because much of this scandal started under a Labour government. Every major political party has dirty hands here and no politician wants to admit responsibility for the mess they made of an entity they owned on our behalf. So they've tossed the hot potato to a judge who should, if he has the balls to do it, be tossing it right back into the politicians' lap.
Yes, that's the crux of the matter.
No party is going to win points on this one. So who is going to see justice is done? Maybe Sir Wyn Williams will surprise us all and be the hero of the hour, but failing that......
It's easy to be pessimistic. I don't want to be, because it grieves me to think of the harm that was done to so many innocent individuals, but I am afraid it is looking as though the culprits are going to get away light, because the politicians don't want to accept the responsibility they bore for allowing the PO to run so disatrously out of control for so long.
Have to admit to being a bit unmoved by the Braverman saga. Maybe she's trying to get sacked, maybe not and she's just taking advantage of the opportunity to speak out on matters knowing it's unlikely to harm her politically.
Ultimately if a PM doesn't act regarding a minister either they agree with them, they don't care about the commentary being provoked, or they are too weak to do anything. I find it hard to believe any PM would not care, and if they do come out about disagreeing that leaves the obvious answer.
And I cannot really see much advantage to him actually acting either. He's got weaknesses on that flank to protect.
The problems for Starmer that the Gaza War is causing should be what we're talking about, what with the MPs and Councillors resigning, but we're not talking about that because Braverman is giving cover to him by her actions.
I still don't really follow why this is not a major political issue - it should be an easy win for government or opposition to condemn the farcical goings on at the Post Office and promise to sort it out, even if it happened under their watch, given the egregious conduct. Instead it feels like a niche interest, something they don't want to touch as if it's too easy a target.
Because much of this scandal started under a Labour government. Every major political party has dirty hands here and no politician wants to admit responsibility for the mess they made of an entity they owned on our behalf. So they've tossed the hot potato to a judge who should, if he has the balls to do it, be tossing it right back into the politicians' lap.
The last Labour government was a long time ago now. Lots of things have changed, I find it hard to believe the Opposition now could not meaningfully condemn it much harder than they have whilst distancing themselves from how it all began. Especially when there's a lot of time under a Tory government to point to.
And likewise if it started under Labour there'd be a slim opportunity for the government to state with regret they didn't pick up on it soon enough, but it was begun when it was not their fault.
I don't think making a bigger deal of it would take as much political courage as assumed.
I believe it was Blair and Harman that got the dodgy ball rolling. Vince Cable played a significant role, especially in his appointment of the catastrophic Paula Vennels. After that it was Cameron's Government, and its successors.
Do have to laugh. Have successfully baited anti-EV freaks to swarm onto my YouTube channel. A lunatic surge in views, watch hours and subscribers yesterday evening, which has continued at an absurd pace for the whole of today.
They come in, watch my videos and post negative comments about Tesla and EVs. Lots of "woke" and "WEF" warnings, even a few anti-vaxxers. Which I happily respond to. But all they are doing is driving the algorithm to push my stuff to even more people.
I'm almost disappointed by yesterday's revenue. Despite being 171% higher than my previous best revenue day I wondered if it might be higher. Expect that today will be bigger again. All hail Daily Mail / GBeebies morons! They are very profitable if you can exploit them.
I still don't really follow why this is not a major political issue - it should be an easy win for government or opposition to condemn the farcical goings on at the Post Office and promise to sort it out, even if it happened under their watch, given the egregious conduct. Instead it feels like a niche interest, something they don't want to touch as if it's too easy a target.
Because much of this scandal started under a Labour government. Every major political party has dirty hands here and no politician wants to admit responsibility for the mess they made of an entity they owned on our behalf. So they've tossed the hot potato to a judge who should, if he has the balls to do it, be tossing it right back into the politicians' lap.
Yes, that's the crux of the matter.
No party is going to win points on this one. So who is going to see justice is done? Maybe Sir Wyn Williams will surprise us all and be the hero of the hour, but failing that......
It's easy to be pessimistic. I don't want to be, because it grieves me to think of the harm that was done to so many innocent individuals, but I am afraid it is looking as though the culprits are going to get away light, because the politicians don't want to accept the responsibility they bore for allowing the PO to run so disatrously out of control for so long.
I am as pessimistic as you about the outcome. From what I have seen of the judge I do not think he has the toughness to punt this straight back to the government. The politicians are doing the minimum they can get away with.
As for the Post Office and all their appalling advisors I have reached the A La Lanterne stage with them.
Have to admit I know sod all about the Post Office, nor the political scandal therein. What’s up?
Remember the sinking feeling in your stomach when you heard the full extent of the Windrush scandal? Like that.
It's much worse than Windrush, Carn. Thousands of lives ruined, and just because the management wouldn't admit it made a mistake in buying the Horizon software from Fujitsu.
There is a very good podcast on it by Nick Wallis who has followed this from the start - https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/brand/m000jf7j. He has also written an excellent book on it.
Do have to laugh. Have successfully baited anti-EV freaks to swarm onto my YouTube channel. A lunatic surge in views, watch hours and subscribers yesterday evening, which has continued at an absurd pace for the whole of today.
They come in, watch my videos and post negative comments about Tesla and EVs. Lots of "woke" and "WEF" warnings, even a few anti-vaxxers. Which I happily respond to. But all they are doing is driving the algorithm to push my stuff to even more people.
Maybe they were just impressed by the broken headlight video and didn't know how to responds so lash out.
I still don't really follow why this is not a major political issue - it should be an easy win for government or opposition to condemn the farcical goings on at the Post Office and promise to sort it out, even if it happened under their watch, given the egregious conduct. Instead it feels like a niche interest, something they don't want to touch as if it's too easy a target.
Because any kind of reasonable financial restitution would bankrupt the Government.
The Tories want to leave this pile of shit to Labour, and Labour knows it's going to have enough trouble managing the country's finances without promising to meet the huge burden of compensation that the Subpostmasters would be entitled to under any reasonable settlement.
The cost is trivial, in overall terms.
And, they get the money back, by asset-stripping those responsible.
Though given the hydra of culpability, which assets do you strip? The inadequates at the Post Office who appear not to have had a clue what they were doing and ruined the lives of those below them to hide that? The corporations who sold a duff system to the clueless inadequates at the Post Office? Both? Someone else?
(And whilst the phrase "How hard can it be?" is rightly the setup to jokes with a punchline along the lines of "Much harder than you think", how hard can it be to run a network of counters providing services to the public- i.e. a set of Post Offices? Putting Horizon to one side, Post Offices are rubbish these days, and I'm not entirely sure why.)
Fujitsu. Every director of the Post Office from the late 1990's onwards All the law firms acting for the Post Office
Plenty of assets there.
Fujitsu-ICL, to be specific.
It began the Horizon project as ICL and got taken over by Fujitsu half way through.
I still don't really follow why this is not a major political issue - it should be an easy win for government or opposition to condemn the farcical goings on at the Post Office and promise to sort it out, even if it happened under their watch, given the egregious conduct. Instead it feels like a niche interest, something they don't want to touch as if it's too easy a target.
Because much of this scandal started under a Labour government. Every major political party has dirty hands here and no politician wants to admit responsibility for the mess they made of an entity they owned on our behalf. So they've tossed the hot potato to a judge who should, if he has the balls to do it, be tossing it right back into the politicians' lap.
Yes, that's the crux of the matter.
No party is going to win points on this one. So who is going to see justice is done? Maybe Sir Wyn Williams will surprise us all and be the hero of the hour, but failing that......
It's easy to be pessimistic. I don't want to be, because it grieves me to think of the harm that was done to so many innocent individuals, but I am afraid it is looking as though the culprits are going to get away light, because the politicians don't want to accept the responsibility they bore for allowing the PO to run so disatrously out of control for so long.
I am as pessimistic as you about the outcome. From what I have seen of the judge I do not think he has the toughness to punt this straight back to the government. The politicians are doing the minimum they can get away with.
As for the Post Office and all their appalling advisors I have reached the A La Lanterne stage with them.
Yes, I am afraid the Cottam interview made me pessimistic as regards the judge. He would have been perfectly entitled to intervene and tell her to stop acting the goat, or risk being in contempt of Court.
He seems to think his role is to be nice to everybody. Who will bring the PO into line if he won't.
Have to admit I know sod all about the Post Office, nor the political scandal therein. What’s up?
It is the worst miscarriage of justice in British history caused by an inept Post Office buying dodgy IT from Fujitsu, maliciously prosecuting hundreds of subpostmasters, some of whom went to prison, were bankrupted or committed suicide as a result, and throughout lied, lied and lied again and are still lying to everyone about their responsibility for what they did.
They are obstructing the statutory inquiry set up to find out the truth and politicians are being as feeble as wet lettuce in holding them to account.
I still don't really follow why this is not a major political issue - it should be an easy win for government or opposition to condemn the farcical goings on at the Post Office and promise to sort it out, even if it happened under their watch, given the egregious conduct. Instead it feels like a niche interest, something they don't want to touch as if it's too easy a target.
Because any kind of reasonable financial restitution would bankrupt the Government.
The Tories want to leave this pile of shit to Labour, and Labour knows it's going to have enough trouble managing the country's finances without promising to meet the huge burden of compensation that the Subpostmasters would be entitled to under any reasonable settlement.
The cost is trivial, in overall terms.
And, they get the money back, by asset-stripping those responsible.
Though given the hydra of culpability, which assets do you strip? The inadequates at the Post Office who appear not to have had a clue what they were doing and ruined the lives of those below them to hide that? The corporations who sold a duff system to the clueless inadequates at the Post Office? Both? Someone else?
(And whilst the phrase "How hard can it be?" is rightly the setup to jokes with a punchline along the lines of "Much harder than you think", how hard can it be to run a network of counters providing services to the public- i.e. a set of Post Offices? Putting Horizon to one side, Post Offices are rubbish these days, and I'm not entirely sure why.)
Fujitsu. Every director of the Post Office from the late 1990's onwards All the law firms acting for the Post Office
Plenty of assets there.
Fujitsu-ICL, to be specific.
It began the Horizon project as ICL and got taken over by Fujitsu half way through.
And technically it dates back to John Major's time: it was awarded to ICL back in 1996.
I still don't really follow why this is not a major political issue - it should be an easy win for government or opposition to condemn the farcical goings on at the Post Office and promise to sort it out, even if it happened under their watch, given the egregious conduct. Instead it feels like a niche interest, something they don't want to touch as if it's too easy a target.
Because any kind of reasonable financial restitution would bankrupt the Government.
The Tories want to leave this pile of shit to Labour, and Labour knows it's going to have enough trouble managing the country's finances without promising to meet the huge burden of compensation that the Subpostmasters would be entitled to under any reasonable settlement.
The government has already - reportedly - put a billion aside to pay for this. So this should not be an issue.
Relatedly and equally shamefully, the government is appealing a Freedom of Information ruling about the compensation scheme in the Blood Contamination scandal, which view with this one in the callousness with which the victims have been treated. See here - https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-coventry-warwickshire-67370940.
It is hard to avoid the view that the state is now actively malicious towards its own citizens.
"I'm from the government and I'm here to help"
It is a rare thing when the state is anything other than malicious, casually indifferent, or incompetent.
I still don't really follow why this is not a major political issue - it should be an easy win for government or opposition to condemn the farcical goings on at the Post Office and promise to sort it out, even if it happened under their watch, given the egregious conduct. Instead it feels like a niche interest, something they don't want to touch as if it's too easy a target.
Because any kind of reasonable financial restitution would bankrupt the Government.
The Tories want to leave this pile of shit to Labour, and Labour knows it's going to have enough trouble managing the country's finances without promising to meet the huge burden of compensation that the Subpostmasters would be entitled to under any reasonable settlement.
The cost is trivial, in overall terms.
And, they get the money back, by asset-stripping those responsible.
Though given the hydra of culpability, which assets do you strip? The inadequates at the Post Office who appear not to have had a clue what they were doing and ruined the lives of those below them to hide that? The corporations who sold a duff system to the clueless inadequates at the Post Office? Both? Someone else?
(And whilst the phrase "How hard can it be?" is rightly the setup to jokes with a punchline along the lines of "Much harder than you think", how hard can it be to run a network of counters providing services to the public- i.e. a set of Post Offices? Putting Horizon to one side, Post Offices are rubbish these days, and I'm not entirely sure why.)
Fujitsu. Every director of the Post Office from the late 1990's onwards All the law firms acting for the Post Office
Plenty of assets there.
Fujitsu-ICL, to be specific.
It began the Horizon project as ICL and got taken over by Fujitsu half way through.
And technically it dates back to John Major's time: it was awarded to ICL back in 1996.
Because it was the cheapest bid despite coming bottom on the majority of the scoring criteria.
Con gain from Ind in South Holland. There was a tie and the Con won the drawing of lots. There were a few problems with nominations and there could be a legal challenge.
I still don't really follow why this is not a major political issue - it should be an easy win for government or opposition to condemn the farcical goings on at the Post Office and promise to sort it out, even if it happened under their watch, given the egregious conduct. Instead it feels like a niche interest, something they don't want to touch as if it's too easy a target.
Perhaps because it’s been clear for many years what has been going on, and government has done little or nothing about it in all that time ?
But there’s certainly political room for someone to do more than just watch from the sidelines.
But even that is only a partial explanation of why they're not acting now, which leaves open why not act years ago.
Plenty of comments above - but I think it’s largely cowardice. It’s a massive, messy problem, and is going to be difficult to sort; so no different from a lot of other problems facing government - but they are better known by the public.
As Cyclefree says, easier to hand it off to a retired judge with no future career to worry about.
Do have to laugh. Have successfully baited anti-EV freaks to swarm onto my YouTube channel. A lunatic surge in views, watch hours and subscribers yesterday evening, which has continued at an absurd pace for the whole of today.
They come in, watch my videos and post negative comments about Tesla and EVs. Lots of "woke" and "WEF" warnings, even a few anti-vaxxers. Which I happily respond to. But all they are doing is driving the algorithm to push my stuff to even more people.
I'm almost disappointed by yesterday's revenue. Despite being 171% higher than my previous best revenue day I wondered if it might be higher. Expect that today will be bigger again. All hail Daily Mail / GBeebies morons! They are very profitable if you can exploit them.
I still don't really follow why this is not a major political issue - it should be an easy win for government or opposition to condemn the farcical goings on at the Post Office and promise to sort it out, even if it happened under their watch, given the egregious conduct. Instead it feels like a niche interest, something they don't want to touch as if it's too easy a target.
Because much of this scandal started under a Labour government. Every major political party has dirty hands here and no politician wants to admit responsibility for the mess they made of an entity they owned on our behalf. So they've tossed the hot potato to a judge who should, if he has the balls to do it, be tossing it right back into the politicians' lap.
Yes, that's the crux of the matter.
No party is going to win points on this one. So who is going to see justice is done? Maybe Sir Wyn Williams will surprise us all and be the hero of the hour, but failing that......
It's easy to be pessimistic. I don't want to be, because it grieves me to think of the harm that was done to so many innocent individuals, but I am afraid it is looking as though the culprits are going to get away light, because the politicians don't want to accept the responsibility they bore for allowing the PO to run so disatrously out of control for so long.
I am as pessimistic as you about the outcome. From what I have seen of the judge I do not think he has the toughness to punt this straight back to the government. The politicians are doing the minimum they can get away with.
As for the Post Office and all their appalling advisors I have reached the A La Lanterne stage with them.
Yes, I am afraid the Cottam interview made me pessimistic as regards the judge. He would have been perfectly entitled to intervene and tell her to stop acting the goat, or risk being in contempt of Court.
He seems to think his role is to be nice to everybody. Who will bring the PO into line if he won't.
He is not a top flight judge, frankly. He practised at the Welsh Bar - mainly in Chancery work and later his practice consisted of personal injury, clinical negligence, sports and public law with a particular interest in sporting disputes relating to rugby. No experience of criminal law or investigations.
Such an inquiry should have been given to someone as tough as old boots who wouldn't take the sort of shit that's been going on. As I say, the politicians have been doing the bare minimum they can get away with.
I still don't really follow why this is not a major political issue - it should be an easy win for government or opposition to condemn the farcical goings on at the Post Office and promise to sort it out, even if it happened under their watch, given the egregious conduct. Instead it feels like a niche interest, something they don't want to touch as if it's too easy a target.
Because any kind of reasonable financial restitution would bankrupt the Government.
The Tories want to leave this pile of shit to Labour, and Labour knows it's going to have enough trouble managing the country's finances without promising to meet the huge burden of compensation that the Subpostmasters would be entitled to under any reasonable settlement.
The cost is trivial, in overall terms.
And, they get the money back, by asset-stripping those responsible.
Though given the hydra of culpability, which assets do you strip? The inadequates at the Post Office who appear not to have had a clue what they were doing and ruined the lives of those below them to hide that? The corporations who sold a duff system to the clueless inadequates at the Post Office? Both? Someone else?
(And whilst the phrase "How hard can it be?" is rightly the setup to jokes with a punchline along the lines of "Much harder than you think", how hard can it be to run a network of counters providing services to the public- i.e. a set of Post Offices? Putting Horizon to one side, Post Offices are rubbish these days, and I'm not entirely sure why.)
Fujitsu. Every director of the Post Office from the late 1990's onwards All the law firms acting for the Post Office
Plenty of assets there.
Fujitsu-ICL, to be specific.
It began the Horizon project as ICL and got taken over by Fujitsu half way through.
And technically it dates back to John Major's time: it was awarded to ICL back in 1996.
Because it was the cheapest bid despite coming bottom on the majority of the scoring criteria.
Maybe also historic reasons?
ICL was of course a government (Tony Benn) creation in the first place, in a misguided attempt to rival IBM.
As usual it took what were some interesting independent companies and eventually turned them to mush.
[We had an Elliot 903 at school - a museum piece even then but it did teach you a lot about how these magic boxes actually worked]
Have to admit to being a bit unmoved by the Braverman saga. Maybe she's trying to get sacked, maybe not and she's just taking advantage of the opportunity to speak out on matters knowing it's unlikely to harm her politically.
Ultimately if a PM doesn't act regarding a minister either they agree with them, they don't care about the commentary being provoked, or they are too weak to do anything. I find it hard to believe any PM would not care, and if they do come out about disagreeing that leaves the obvious answer.
And I cannot really see much advantage to him actually acting either. He's got weaknesses on that flank to protect.
The problems for Starmer that the Gaza War is causing should be what we're talking about, what with the MPs and Councillors resigning, but we're not talking about that because Braverman is giving cover to him by her actions.
Although Braverman's daft actions could be viewed as in part a consequence of the fact that, despite its divisions, Labour is not tearing itself apart on it. Starmer has staked out a position and stuck to it to date, and while there's obviously discontent, it's nothing like as febrile as the 2015 Syria votes under Corbyn - despite that being a far more minor issue with less reason for entrenched, strong views on either side.
That's obviously not why Braverman has gone off the pier - but if Labour had lost the plot after October 7th, truly gone into civil war and was dipping in the polls - the Tories might have been much more confident in their response to protests, Rather than shambling about looking for a way to turn the fact there are clearly problems with them, into a popularity boost, but instead just getting into a mess whereby they look like the ones stirring tensions.
I still don't really follow why this is not a major political issue - it should be an easy win for government or opposition to condemn the farcical goings on at the Post Office and promise to sort it out, even if it happened under their watch, given the egregious conduct. Instead it feels like a niche interest, something they don't want to touch as if it's too easy a target.
Perhaps because it’s been clear for many years what has been going on, and government has done little or nothing about it in all that time ?
But there’s certainly political room for someone to do more than just watch from the sidelines.
But even that is only a partial explanation of why they're not acting now, which leaves open why not act years ago.
Plenty of comments above - but I think it’s largely cowardice. It’s a massive, messy problem, and is going to be difficult to sort; so no different from a lot of other problems facing government - but they are better known by the public.
As Cyclefree says, easier to hand it off to a retired judge with no future career to worry about.
I have thoughts on how such a matter should be sorted. The claim that it is too messy to sort feels like an excuse to me. What you need is focus and a determination to resolve plus not lumping all sorts of different things together such as compensation and finding out what happened. The politicians have made it a large mess largely because they want to kick it into the long grass.
Worrying news from Preston. The local mosques have issued a statement that all Labour councillors should oppose Keir Starmer's position on Gaza or face sanctions.
I still don't really follow why this is not a major political issue - it should be an easy win for government or opposition to condemn the farcical goings on at the Post Office and promise to sort it out, even if it happened under their watch, given the egregious conduct. Instead it feels like a niche interest, something they don't want to touch as if it's too easy a target.
Perhaps because it’s been clear for many years what has been going on, and government has done little or nothing about it in all that time ?
But there’s certainly political room for someone to do more than just watch from the sidelines.
But even that is only a partial explanation of why they're not acting now, which leaves open why not act years ago.
Plenty of comments above - but I think it’s largely cowardice. It’s a massive, messy problem, and is going to be difficult to sort; so no different from a lot of other problems facing government - but they are better known by the public.
As Cyclefree says, easier to hand it off to a retired judge with no future career to worry about.
I have thoughts on how such a matter should be sorted. The claim that it is too messy to sort feels like an excuse to me. What you need is focus and a determination to resolve plus not lumping all sorts of different things together such as compensation and finding out what happened. The politicians have made it a large mess largely because they want to kick it into the long grass.
Absolutely it’s an excuse.
Any government or aspiring government that believes it has the capacity to address hard problems should take it on, or be clear that they intend to do so.
I understand politically why they don’t, but it’s one of the things which make me doubt whether Labour will be all that much better than the current government - which which has of course already proved that it’s worthless.
Worrying news from Preston. The local mosques have issued a statement that all Labour councillors should oppose Keir Starmer's position on Gaza or face sanctions.
The local mosques need reminding that this is not a theocracy. Local councillors are responsible to voters not to religious leaders, no matter how self-important they claim to be.
The more such religious bigots leave Labour the better it will be for Labour and the country
Related? In the US, a first class stamp (up to one ounce) currently costs 66 cents, but is soon to go up to 68 cents*. A very quick search suggests that first class stamps in the UK are more than twice as expensive.
First class letters take between 2 and 7 days to reach their destinations. If you are mailing from a post office to a box in a near by post office, they sometimes get there in one day.
Most likely I am missing something. I would be grateful to anyone who can explain what it is, why the cost seems so much higher in the UK than in the US.
The US postal system is supposed to support itself. As I understand it, it doesn't quite do that, but comes close.
(*Thrifty folks can beat the price increase by buying "forever" stamps, which are good indefinitely.)
Related? In the US, a first class stamp (up to one ounce) currently costs 66 cents, but is soon to go up to 68 cents*. A very quick search suggests that first class stamps in the UK are more than twice as expensive.
First class letters take between 2 and 7 days to reach their destinations. If you are mailing from a post office to a box in a near by post office, they sometimes get there in one day.
Most likely I am missing something. I would be grateful to anyone who can explain what it is, why the cost seems so much higher in the UK than in the US.
The US postal system is supposed to support itself. As I understand it, it doesn't quite do that, but comes close.
(*Thrifty folks can beat the price increase by buying "forever" stamps, which are good indefinitely.)
Is the same stamp in the US valid for delivery everywhere, such as remote places in Alaska?
Worrying news from Preston. The local mosques have issued a statement that all Labour councillors should oppose Keir Starmer's position on Gaza or face sanctions.
The local mosques need reminding that this is not a theocracy. Local councillors are responsible to voters not to religious leaders, no matter how self-important they claim to be.
The more such religious bigots leave Labour the better it will be for Labour and the country
I don’t know that it is for the better; the next step is an Islamic Party. There are obviously a lot of politically minded Muslims who are councillors in the areas where they dominate in terms of demographic, and they’ve started to leave a moderate party who doesn’t put Muslims first. They’re not going to leave politics, so where will they go? Maybe independent as a stepping stone, but in the end there will be a party acting solely for the interests of followers of their religion.
A complaint was filed at the FEC alleging former Pres. Trump violated the law. The nonpartisan staff recommended that the Commission investigate allegations of excessive contributions. You'll never guess what happened next . . . . https://twitter.com/EllenLWeintraub/status/1722741038995931214
As this is a statutory inquiry the minister who created it can suspend it. I think we are now at the point where the Chair should ask him to do so so that prosecutions are not further delayed. We simply cannot wait any longer for the miscreants to be held to account.
That part of the Post Office is subsidized by the more profitable parts.
The same as the UK in that case. So that doesn't explain the price difference.
Prediction: this time next month there will be a major row about excess postage charges on Christmas cards, owing to confusion over the new size-based pricing for letters, and the Royal Mail imposing a £2.50 excess charge to hand over Granny's card.
That part of the Post Office is subsidized by the more profitable parts.
The same as the UK in that case. So that doesn't explain the price difference.
Prediction: this time next month there will be a major row about excess postage charges on Christmas cards, owing to confusion over the new size-based pricing for letters, and the Royal Mail imposing a £2.50 excess charge to hand over Granny's card.
Also, the collectibility of stamps has been ruined by the presence of those awful QR codes.
Do have to laugh. Have successfully baited anti-EV freaks to swarm onto my YouTube channel. A lunatic surge in views, watch hours and subscribers yesterday evening, which has continued at an absurd pace for the whole of today.
They come in, watch my videos and post negative comments about Tesla and EVs. Lots of "woke" and "WEF" warnings, even a few anti-vaxxers. Which I happily respond to. But all they are doing is driving the algorithm to push my stuff to even more people.
I'm almost disappointed by yesterday's revenue. Despite being 171% higher than my previous best revenue day I wondered if it might be higher. Expect that today will be bigger again. All hail Daily Mail / GBeebies morons! They are very profitable if you can exploit them.
The whole thing seems so utterly wrong that it seems incomprehensible that it's happened in what is supposed to be a democracy with a good legal system. It's abhorrent, in terms of what happened, the effect it has had on victims, the lack of clarity, the cover-ups, and most of all, the length of time it has gone on.
I'm also slightly saddened by the lack of anger amongst the public about it; it just does not seem to have cut-through to the public in the way other matters do. Perhaps it's because it is complex; or perhaps the 'wrong' sort of people were affected. Or perhaps it is because it was a nationalised company when the worst excesses happened.
Computer Weekly, by the way, have been excellent on this, all the way through.
The whole thing seems so utterly wrong that it seems incomprehensible that it's happened in what is supposed to be a democracy with a good legal system. It's abhorrent, in terms of what happened, the effect it has had on victims, the lack of clarity, the cover-ups, and most of all, the length of time it has gone on.
I'm also slightly saddened by the lack of anger amongst the public about it; it just does not seem to have cut-through to the public in the way other matters do. Perhaps it's because it is complex; or perhaps the 'wrong' sort of people were affected. Or perhaps it is because it was a nationalised company when the worst excesses happened.
Computer Weekly, by the way, have been excellent on this, all the way through.
That's where I first read about it, ages ago, long before the national press cared to notice.
Another possible reason it never took off - the victims were widely scattered across the country, rather than in a single locale - and were often shunned in their own communities at the time. And because of government indifference, or worse, no political advocates either.
Increasingly strange that Biden gets so little credit for the performance if the US economy
The U.S. economy has drastically outperformed Europe's since the pandemic. The most plausible explanation is that America implemented a larger -- and in some respects, more progressive -- fiscal stimulus https://twitter.com/EricLevitz/status/1722419205629202589
Though of course Ukraine affected, and affects Europe far more than it dies the US.
Related? In the US, a first class stamp (up to one ounce) currently costs 66 cents, but is soon to go up to 68 cents*. A very quick search suggests that first class stamps in the UK are more than twice as expensive.
First class letters take between 2 and 7 days to reach their destinations. If you are mailing from a post office to a box in a near by post office, they sometimes get there in one day.
Most likely I am missing something. I would be grateful to anyone who can explain what it is, why the cost seems so much higher in the UK than in the US.
The US postal system is supposed to support itself. As I understand it, it doesn't quite do that, but comes close.
(*Thrifty folks can beat the price increase by buying "forever" stamps, which are good indefinitely.)
It certainly delivered for Lance Armstrong back in the day
Increasingly strange that Biden gets so little credit for the performance if the US economy
The U.S. economy has drastically outperformed Europe's since the pandemic. The most plausible explanation is that America implemented a larger -- and in some respects, more progressive -- fiscal stimulus https://twitter.com/EricLevitz/status/1722419205629202589
Though of course Ukraine affected, and affects Europe far more than it dies the US.
Or maybe people realise that it's an unsustainable and irresponsible debt-fuelled binge that is lifting interest rates, fuelling inflation and isn't even delivering that much growth for all the money they're splashing around?
Related? In the US, a first class stamp (up to one ounce) currently costs 66 cents, but is soon to go up to 68 cents*. A very quick search suggests that first class stamps in the UK are more than twice as expensive.
First class letters take between 2 and 7 days to reach their destinations. If you are mailing from a post office to a box in a near by post office, they sometimes get there in one day.
Most likely I am missing something. I would be grateful to anyone who can explain what it is, why the cost seems so much higher in the UK than in the US.
The US postal system is supposed to support itself. As I understand it, it doesn't quite do that, but comes close.
(*Thrifty folks can beat the price increase by buying "forever" stamps, which are good indefinitely.)
It certainly delivered for Lance Armstrong back in the day
Increasingly strange that Biden gets so little credit for the performance if the US economy
The U.S. economy has drastically outperformed Europe's since the pandemic. The most plausible explanation is that America implemented a larger -- and in some respects, more progressive -- fiscal stimulus https://twitter.com/EricLevitz/status/1722419205629202589
Though of course Ukraine affected, and affects Europe far more than it dies the US.
Or maybe people realise that it's an unsustainable and irresponsible debt-fuelled binge that is lifting interest rates, fuelling inflation and isn't even delivering that much growth for all the money they're splashing around?
US inflation has also been lower than European. The irresponsible debt fuelled binge was Trump's tax cut fur the rich. I don't recall your railing about it at the time.
I still don't really follow why this is not a major political issue - it should be an easy win for government or opposition to condemn the farcical goings on at the Post Office and promise to sort it out, even if it happened under their watch, given the egregious conduct. Instead it feels like a niche interest, something they don't want to touch as if it's too easy a target.
Because much of this scandal started under a Labour government. Every major political party has dirty hands here and no politician wants to admit responsibility for the mess they made of an entity they owned on our behalf. So they've tossed the hot potato to a judge who should, if he has the balls to do it, be tossing it right back into the politicians' lap.
The chairman really needs to stand up and say that he’s resigning from the inquiry because of the contempt of the Post Office towards it, that he believes that charges of perjury should now be investigated, and that he’s passing his files to government and police.
After decades of selfless public service, Joe Manchin has decided to sail off into the sunset in his multiple yachts.
He will be fondly remembered for his heroic opposition to climate change, build back better, voting rights and filibuster reform…and of course, for supporting Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation.
He was the best of the Republicans in the Democratic Party.
@Cyclefree another excellent article. Your focus on this scandal has been consistently enlightening.
The PO scandal simply highlights what many of us suspect. There is little accountability in in our institutions and few leaders have the decency to resign. We are stuck with this revolving door mateocracy and the country suffers as a result.
That part of the Post Office is subsidized by the more profitable parts.
The same as the UK in that case. So that doesn't explain the price difference.
Prediction: this time next month there will be a major row about excess postage charges on Christmas cards, owing to confusion over the new size-based pricing for letters, and the Royal Mail imposing a £2.50 excess charge to hand over Granny's card.
Given that it is mostly pensioners who still send Christmas cards in the post, surely this can be dealt with by giving all pensioners a tax free Christmas Card Bonus Payment, say £125 or perhaps lets round it up to £150 to account for birthdays and Easter too.
The whole thing seems so utterly wrong that it seems incomprehensible that it's happened in what is supposed to be a democracy with a good legal system. It's abhorrent, in terms of what happened, the effect it has had on victims, the lack of clarity, the cover-ups, and most of all, the length of time it has gone on.
I'm also slightly saddened by the lack of anger amongst the public about it; it just does not seem to have cut-through to the public in the way other matters do. Perhaps it's because it is complex; or perhaps the 'wrong' sort of people were affected. Or perhaps it is because it was a nationalised company when the worst excesses happened.
Computer Weekly, by the way, have been excellent on this, all the way through.
The lack of public anger is disappointing. It is partly for the reasons you recognise. It is complex. Even anoraks like me have difficulty following it. It is also partly because because the true horror is hard to comprehend.
You might have thought that the fact the victims were very much People Like Us would have inflamed passions and in some cases the victims were indeed strongly supported by their local communities. In others, the locals hardly knew anything about it. One of the worst cases occurred at South End Green, at the southern end of Hampstead. I know the place well and have used the PO there many times, but I didn't have a clue what had happened until I read Nick Wallis's book. I think in rural communities, awareness has been better but I think on the whole the public still retains the notion of the fluffy old Post Office that everyone likes.
Racism is clearly an aggravating factor. A proper study will be done in due course, I expect, but there is already plenty of evidence that Asian Subpostmasters got shittier treatment than white folk.
Related? In the US, a first class stamp (up to one ounce) currently costs 66 cents, but is soon to go up to 68 cents*. A very quick search suggests that first class stamps in the UK are more than twice as expensive.
First class letters take between 2 and 7 days to reach their destinations. If you are mailing from a post office to a box in a near by post office, they sometimes get there in one day.
Most likely I am missing something. I would be grateful to anyone who can explain what it is, why the cost seems so much higher in the UK than in the US.
The US postal system is supposed to support itself. As I understand it, it doesn't quite do that, but comes close.
(*Thrifty folks can beat the price increase by buying "forever" stamps, which are good indefinitely.)
The Royal Mail (separate from the Post Office, do note) has long known that the demand curve for ordinary letter post is inelastic and hence the extra revenue from higher prices exceeds the loss of volume as a result of charging more. This was particularly evident given its monopoly but remains the case even in a semi-competitive market, and is marginally more pertinent to first class than second. Hence it was always in its best financial interests to put up prices for letters - parcels and packets, which with the explosion of internet shopping now comprise the majority of business, are another matter since those are mostly business-to-consumer and the volume posters will of course shop around.
Prior to privatisation, the company needed government approval for price rises, which were seen as a matter of some politcal consequence, and hence it was constrained by how much extra it could charge, in rather a similar way to how local authorities are constrained over their tax rises.
Since privatation these restrictions have largely been removed, and the corporation has pushed letter prices up to their economically optimal level, at the same time expanding the variety in pricing arrangements for the volume posters (which originate and have been on the rise since the '80s), which mean that someone with a large mailing to make - who will shop around - pays a lot less per item than we do to send granny her card. This can be justified nowadays since large mailings in nicely typed identically sized C4 envelopes will whizz through the IMP whereas granny's card may end up being sorted by hand, or at least held on a loop inside the machine while the image of the postcode is transmitted to be read remotely by people employed hundreds of miles away from the actual letter to puzzle out your handwriting on the envelope.
The letters market is anyway in decline and, as for any other delivery company, its profitability depends mostly on the income from and costs of delivering packages, not letters. So trying to compare letter prices internationally is looking at only a small, and less pertinent, part of the story.
I'm disappointed TSE(?) went with 'return to sender' instead of 'time to go postal.'
Because let's face it, the best outcome would be for the judge to go postal on them.
(I fear he won't, by the way. He's had ample opportunities to hold them in contempt and not done so.)
He should certainly have stepped in on Cottam, who was clearly acting dumb to thwart the Inquiry. The barrister questioning her has the patience and persistence of a saint, but his exasperation was self-evident. Yet Sir Wyn Nice-Old-Thing Williams refrained from intervening.
It does appear that there are junior staff from decades ago caught like rabbits in the headlights in this post office inquiry. It was a similar thing with the Grenfell Inquiry, some of the main witnesses regarding the cladding were graduates in their first job. There is a definite tendency to attack individuals
I'm disappointed TSE(?) went with 'return to sender' instead of 'time to go postal.'
Because let's face it, the best outcome would be for the judge to go postal on them.
(I fear he won't, by the way. He's had ample opportunities to hold them in contempt and not done so.)
He should certainly have stepped in on Cottam, who was clearly acting dumb to thwart the Inquiry. The barrister questioning her has the patience and persistence of a saint, but his exasperation was self-evident. Yet Sir Wyn Nice-Old-Thing Williams refrained from intervening.
No, she clearly is dumb.
She is also a great many other things. None of them good.
By the way, do click on the link @Cyclefree has provided by the “thick as mince” comment. It’s a doozy.
It's quite obvious what has happened here; Post Office Legal Services drafted both her original witness statement, which she signed without paying much attention to it and never had to present in court since the case was settled prior, and may well have done the same with this latest one. It appears that the foolish manager hasn't made much effort to brief herself, or be briefed, beforehand, and the only mitigation is that she is up against a top lawyer who spends his or her life honing their skills of cross-examination and is skilled in demolishing even credible evidence. If there's an organisational failing, it is that once a matter becomes legal, the in-house lawyers tend to take over and it is very easy for the ordinary line manager, who has the day job to worry about, simply to end up following instructions, particularly as the lawyers are based at 'HQ' and the manager is out in the field, used to receiving directions from 'the centre'.
Do have to laugh. Have successfully baited anti-EV freaks to swarm onto my YouTube channel. A lunatic surge in views, watch hours and subscribers yesterday evening, which has continued at an absurd pace for the whole of today.
They come in, watch my videos and post negative comments about Tesla and EVs. Lots of "woke" and "WEF" warnings, even a few anti-vaxxers. Which I happily respond to. But all they are doing is driving the algorithm to push my stuff to even more people.
I'm almost disappointed by yesterday's revenue. Despite being 171% higher than my previous best revenue day I wondered if it might be higher. Expect that today will be bigger again. All hail Daily Mail / GBeebies morons! They are very profitable if you can exploit them.
"anti-EV freaks"
Enough said... About them. And you.
This lot are freaks. They have been fed a diet of nonsense by the right wing media and won't drop it. They all say the same things - which are fact free. And then wander off into WEF paranoia.
These figures are always revised.i don't think you can say no growth yet.. indeed growth may be negative, but you smare being a bit presumptuous to state it as a fact.
(*Thrifty folks can beat the price increase by buying "forever" stamps, which are good indefinitely.)
When I left the business it was obvious the way prices would go, and I bought several hundred 'forever' stamps (which is what the standard first and second class ones with just the class and the monarch's head on them are), and am still working through them, not having had to buy a stamp for years.
Comments
Yes, I agree, Cyclefree. There is no point in this farcical Inquiry continuing. We all know what the PO did, we all know what it is doing now. It is time to call things for what they are.
The Inquiry should be closed, and the criminal investigations should begin. If the Government gives a damn, it should assist. I am pretty sure it doesn't want to, so the judge needs to take the bull by the horns and tell it that there is no point in continuing unless it does.
This scandal outdoes any other in this country in my life time. Mealy mouthed words and promises that 'lessons will be learned' simply won't do. The PO wrecked the lives of hundreds of people. Those responsible must now pay, and there isn't much doubt anymore who those responsible are.
Unfortunately the optics of any government destroying Our Beloved Post Office are likely to rule this out - especially given that elderly Post Office customers are probably over-represented in the Conservative Party membership.
Can we stop with this idea that Braverman is smart enough to force her own resignation. She doesn't even know which side is which is Northern Ireland.
@bmay
Sky’s senior Ireland correspondent has just committed a murder live on
@SkyPoliticsHub
💥
https://x.com/bmay/status/1722696060819124684?s=20
The Tories want to leave this pile of shit to Labour, and Labour knows it's going to have enough trouble managing the country's finances without promising to meet the huge burden of compensation that the Subpostmasters would be entitled to under any reasonable settlement.
If you’re in your seventies, why wouldn’t you steal, knowing that the worst you face is forcible retirement?
And, they get the money back, by asset-stripping those responsible.
But there’s certainly political room for someone to do more than just watch from the sidelines.
1) stupid
2) incompetent
3) spouting professionalese word salad.
4) expecting no accountability
These are #NU10K
If you start holding them genuinely to account you are starting a war with the true establishment.
Remember how no serious figure was held to account over Rotherham? Look where they are now…
Don’t worry - in a few months time, there will be a fawning interview in the glossies with Elaine Cottam in her (presumably) large house. All about how this is a terrible imposition. She fought her way up to this tough job, and was saddled with a problem that she heroically fought. And it’s been really tough on the family…. Now all she has left is some millions and a new big job.
(And whilst the phrase "How hard can it be?" is rightly the setup to jokes with a punchline along the lines of "Much harder than you think", how hard can it be to run a network of counters providing services to the public- i.e. a set of Post Offices? Putting Horizon to one side, Post Offices are rubbish these days, and I'm not entirely sure why.)
In that way, they can move the story on from their failings and onto his failings.
How much are you thinking of?!!
I think about what happened and feel nauseous.
Relatedly and equally shamefully, the government is appealing a Freedom of Information ruling about the compensation scheme in the Blood Contamination scandal, which view with this one in the callousness with which the victims have been treated. See here - https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-coventry-warwickshire-67370940.
It is hard to avoid the view that the state is now actively malicious towards its own citizens.
Then they can hold some staff career reviews….
Every director of the Post Office from the late 1990's onwards
All the law firms acting for the Post Office
Plenty of assets there.
Ultimately if a PM doesn't act regarding a minister either they agree with them, they don't care about the commentary being provoked, or they are too weak to do anything. I find it hard to believe any PM would not care, and if they do come out about disagreeing that leaves the obvious answer.
And I cannot really see much advantage to him actually acting either. He's got weaknesses on that flank to protect.
And likewise if it started under Labour there'd be a slim opportunity for the government to state with regret they didn't pick up on it soon enough, but it was begun when it was not their fault.
I don't think making a bigger deal of it would take as much political courage as assumed.
No party is going to win points on this one. So who is going to see justice is done? Maybe Sir Wyn Williams will surprise us all and be the hero of the hour, but failing that......
It's easy to be pessimistic. I don't want to be, because it grieves me to think of the harm that was done to so many innocent individuals, but I am afraid it is looking as though the culprits are going to get away light, because the politicians don't want to accept the responsibility they bore for allowing the PO to run so disatrously out of control for so long.
Nobody has clean hands.
They come in, watch my videos and post negative comments about Tesla and EVs. Lots of "woke" and "WEF" warnings, even a few anti-vaxxers. Which I happily respond to. But all they are doing is driving the algorithm to push my stuff to even more people.
I'm almost disappointed by yesterday's revenue. Despite being 171% higher than my previous best revenue day I wondered if it might be higher. Expect that today will be bigger again. All hail Daily Mail / GBeebies morons! They are very profitable if you can exploit them.
As for the Post Office and all their appalling advisors I have reached the A La Lanterne stage with them.
1. https://www.cyclefree.co.uk/the-cheque-is-in-the-post/
2. https://www.cyclefree.co.uk/a-missed-opportunity/
3. https://www.cyclefree.co.uk/making-an-offer-they-cannot-refuse/
There is a very good podcast on it by Nick Wallis who has followed this from the start - https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/brand/m000jf7j. He has also written an excellent book on it.
And you can follow the inquiry at his blog - https://www.postofficescandal.uk/.
It began the Horizon project as ICL and got taken over by Fujitsu half way through.
He seems to think his role is to be nice to everybody. Who will bring the PO into line if he won't.
They are obstructing the statutory inquiry set up to find out the truth and politicians are being as feeble as wet lettuce in holding them to account.
It is a rare thing when the state is anything other than malicious, casually indifferent, or incompetent.
What does it actually do well?
It’s a massive, messy problem, and is going to be difficult to sort; so no different from a lot of other problems facing government - but they are better known by the public.
As Cyclefree says, easier to hand it off to a retired judge with no future career to worry about.
Nite all.
Such an inquiry should have been given to someone as tough as old boots who wouldn't take the sort of shit that's been going on. As I say, the politicians have been doing the bare minimum they can get away with.
ICL was of course a government (Tony Benn) creation in the first place, in a misguided attempt to rival IBM.
As usual it took what were some interesting independent companies and eventually turned them to mush.
[We had an Elliot 903 at school - a museum piece even then but it did teach you a lot about how these magic boxes actually worked]
That's obviously not why Braverman has gone off the pier - but if Labour had lost the plot after October 7th, truly gone into civil war and was dipping in the polls - the Tories might have been much more confident in their response to protests, Rather than shambling about looking for a way to turn the fact there are clearly problems with them, into a popularity boost, but instead just getting into a mess whereby they look like the ones stirring tensions.
https://twitter.com/ArmstrongSpace/status/1722745369019273407
I wonder how long it will be before nobody from the Apollo programme is left alive?
I think the youngest is about 88.
Any government or aspiring government that believes it has the capacity to address hard problems should take it on, or be clear that they intend to do so.
I understand politically why they don’t, but it’s one of the things which make me doubt whether Labour will be all that much better than the current government - which which has of course already proved that it’s worthless.
The more such religious bigots leave Labour the better it will be for Labour and the country
First class letters take between 2 and 7 days to reach their destinations. If you are mailing from a post office to a box in a near by post office, they sometimes get there in one day.
Most likely I am missing something. I would be grateful to anyone who can explain
what it is, why the cost seems so much higher in the UK than in the US.
The US postal system is supposed to support itself. As I understand it, it doesn't quite do that, but comes close.
(*Thrifty folks can beat the price increase by buying "forever" stamps, which are good indefinitely.)
Yes, as far as I know.
That's been true for more than a century. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rural_Free_Delivery
That part of the Post Office is subsidized by the more profitable parts.
first. They’re not going to leave politics, so where will they go? Maybe independent as a stepping stone, but in the end there will be a party acting solely for the interests of followers of their religion.
You'll never guess what happened next . . . .
https://twitter.com/EllenLWeintraub/status/1722741038995931214
Enough said... About them. And you.
The whole thing seems so utterly wrong that it seems incomprehensible that it's happened in what is supposed to be a democracy with a good legal system. It's abhorrent, in terms of what happened, the effect it has had on victims, the lack of clarity, the cover-ups, and most of all, the length of time it has gone on.
I'm also slightly saddened by the lack of anger amongst the public about it; it just does not seem to have cut-through to the public in the way other matters do. Perhaps it's because it is complex; or perhaps the 'wrong' sort of people were affected. Or perhaps it is because it was a nationalised company when the worst excesses happened.
Computer Weekly, by the way, have been excellent on this, all the way through.
https://www.computerweekly.com/news/366538096/Post-Office-scandal-cover-up-a-dark-chapter-in-government-corporate-and-legal-history#Timeline
Another possible reason it never took off - the victims were widely scattered across the country, rather than in a single locale - and were often shunned in their own communities at the time.
And because of government indifference, or worse, no political advocates either.
The U.S. economy has drastically outperformed Europe's since the pandemic. The most plausible explanation is that America implemented a larger -- and in some respects, more progressive -- fiscal stimulus
https://twitter.com/EricLevitz/status/1722419205629202589
Though of course Ukraine affected, and affects Europe far more than it dies the US.
https://m.koreatimes.co.kr/pages/article.asp?newsIdx=362935
The irresponsible debt fuelled binge was Trump's tax cut fur the rich. I don't recall your railing about it at the time.
Great piece by the way.
He will be fondly remembered for his heroic opposition to climate change, build back better, voting rights and filibuster reform…and of course, for supporting Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation.
He was the best of the Republicans in the Democratic Party.
They were lucky to have him.
Fare thee well, Joe.
https://twitter.com/7Veritas4/status/1722715353120158137
Because let's face it, the best outcome would be for the judge to go postal on them.
(I fear he won't, by the way. He's had ample opportunities to hold them in contempt and not done so.)
https://www.understandingwar.org/backgrounder/russian-offensive-campaign-assessment-november-9-2023
The PO scandal simply highlights what many of us suspect. There is little accountability in
in our institutions and few leaders have the decency to resign. We are stuck with this revolving door mateocracy and the country suffers as a result.
The lack of public anger is disappointing. It is partly for the reasons you recognise. It is complex. Even anoraks like me have difficulty following it. It is also partly because because the true horror is hard to comprehend.
You might have thought that the fact the victims were very much People Like Us would have inflamed passions and in some cases the victims were indeed strongly supported by their local communities. In others, the locals hardly knew anything about it. One of the worst cases occurred at South End Green, at the southern end of Hampstead. I know the place well and have used the PO there many times, but I didn't have a clue what had happened until I read Nick Wallis's book. I think in rural communities, awareness has been better but I think on the whole the public still retains the notion of the fluffy old Post Office that everyone likes.
Racism is clearly an aggravating factor. A proper study will be done in due course, I expect, but there is already plenty of evidence that Asian Subpostmasters got shittier treatment than white folk.
Computer Weekly was brilliant.
Prior to privatisation, the company needed government approval for price rises, which were seen as a matter of some politcal consequence, and hence it was constrained by how much extra it could charge, in rather a similar way to how local authorities are constrained over their tax rises.
Since privatation these restrictions have largely been removed, and the corporation has pushed letter prices up to their economically optimal level, at the same time expanding the variety in pricing arrangements for the volume posters (which originate and have been on the rise since the '80s), which mean that someone with a large mailing to make - who will shop around - pays a lot less per item than we do to send granny her card. This can be justified nowadays since large mailings in nicely typed identically sized C4 envelopes will whizz through the IMP whereas granny's card may end up being sorted by hand, or at least held on a loop inside the machine while the image of the postcode is transmitted to be read remotely by people employed hundreds of miles away from the actual letter to puzzle out your handwriting on the envelope.
The letters market is anyway in decline and, as for any other delivery company, its profitability depends mostly on the income from and costs of delivering packages, not letters. So trying to compare letter prices internationally is looking at only a small, and less pertinent, part of the story.
https://www.ons.gov.uk/economy/grossdomesticproductgdp/bulletins/gdpfirstquarterlyestimateuk/julytoseptember2023
She is also a great many other things. None of them good.