Options
Just look at that Tory voters score – politicalbetting.com
Just look at that Tory voters score – politicalbetting.com
66% of Conservative voters likewise say that the government has achieved little in the 12 months since Rishi Sunak took overhttps://t.co/1Im67kfCAf pic.twitter.com/pCYhFPcTOU
0
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
Treading water is a charitable interpretation at this point.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/live/cricket/66858634
avoided a forecast recession and achieved comparable growth the G7 after out performing them the year before.
Come pretty close to achieving Sunak's inflation target, which we will by the end of the year.
Reduced boat crossings by 30%, mainly thanks to the Albania deal.
Joined the TPP
There have, of course, been a rather longer list of failures but it seems to me that these numbers reflect the fact that the vast majority of us, even natural Tory supporters, are completely fed up with this lot and reluctant to give them credit for anything.
NHS waiting lists = soaring
Boats = not under control
Borrowing = out of control
Economy = ****ed
Overall no hope no chance and I say this as a CON! 😡
Another area where government over promise and under deliver.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/10/28/xl-bully-dog-police-officer-injured-attack-ban-bite/
England, of course, are nailed on for the team that has underperformed by the greatest margin.
https://www.leicestermercury.co.uk/news/local-news/xl-bully-dog-attack-ibstock-8864011
XL Bully dog attack in Ibstock kitchen leaves police officer in hospital with serious bite injuries
OK, +0.5% on GDP is better than -0.5%, but they both feel like another year of meh. And if you still have to pay for your housing, it's doubtful that you feel any better off.
Boat crossings are down on last year, which is genuine progress (achieved by boring Centrist Dad stuff), but they're still tacking a bit above 2021. And for some, the catharsis of planes to Rwanda is what's needed.
But yes, Sunak has the same problem as Major did in 1997. People are fed up with the Conservatives, and 2019 was the win that snapped the elastic of democracy.
Turns out that Blair wasn't really necessary.
Vice versa from the UK to Germany is £ 1.85.
We are being ripped off and we are not getting a 6 day delivery either. In some places they haven't had mail for weeks.
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2023/oct/28/rishi-sunak-to-double-down-on-anti-green-policies-in-kings-speech
Last poll had 16pp lead.
Bumped into Piers Corbyn who was taking part in latest Palestine demo in central London. Happy as Larry to deny the crimes of Hamas.
https://twitter.com/lmharpin/status/1718250318775963749
Just beat the rain home having stopped off at Westfield Stratford. Pumpkins (£1 each) running out at M&S. I suggested to Mrs Stodge two limes (40p) each could do the job. Mrs Stodge far from impressed but in these financially stringent times perhaps a little imagination required.
The polls haven't moved this year - the last Techne numbers identical to the poll from 2-3 January. YouGov 48-24 but was 46-25 on January 4th. R&W was 44-26 last Monday (was 47-27 in first January poll). Opinium was 44-28 a fortnight ago, was 45-29 in 11th January.
It may be the Truss fiasco sealed the Conservative fate - perhaps all Sunak can do is run hard to stand still.
Just be happy you aren't Danish:
https://www.statista.com/chart/18283/postage-cost-of-a-standard-letter-in-european-countries/
https://www.axios.com/2023/08/03/republicans-vote-trump-prison-poll-jan-6-trial
A Biden dream scenario of course is that Trump then narrowly fails to get the GOP nomination but almost half of Republicans still back him and then Trump takes those with him with an Independent candidacy from jail.
Biden then wins with just 40-45% of the vote, 35% for the official GOP candidate and 20-25% for Trump
Had the economy been in poor shape in 2001 Hague likely would have done much better
https://www.battersea.org.uk/about-us/news/american-bully-xl-ban-what-does-mean-owners#:~:text=On 15 September the Prime,can over the coming months.
America is not going to be so perverse as to elect a guy who is spending the rest of his days in an orange jumpsuit, for crimes related to stealing an election result and trying to overthrow democracy. It just isn't.
There may still be millions of MAGA maniacs riled up, but the independents aren't going to rally to the Trump flag. And the Democrats are going to be fired up to vote like never before, even if their candidate is as underwhelming as Biden. Because Biden represents democratic ideals - and Trump represents everything that puts democracy at grave risk.
Of course the delegates formally pick the nominee at the convention I believe, but it's a fiddly process - some of them might be required to nominate Trump by law, given he won the primaries in various states. I presume they have some kind of process to theoretically get around that, but unless Trump's support craters upon conviction (neither conviction nor cratering guaranteed) would the party bother, given the risk as you point out of a solo Trump run?
They are complete cowards but they are also in a bind - the number of voters who genuinely will be for Trump even if he is convicted might be lower than polls currently claim it to be, but it won't be zero, and in an otherwise tight race they know that will screw them if they try to go another way.
In one sense Trump’s scofflaw tactics are working, as judges have tried to avoid directly confronting his behaviour. But there’s also a cumulative effect, which I think will end up doing for him.
https://twitter.com/Number10cat/status/1712161238401110334
There is of course also the chance Congress passes a law signed by Biden banning those in jail from running for President in the event of a Trump criminal conviction and jail sentence, if say 20-30 GOP representatives defected and a few GOP Senators like Romney and Collins too vote for it. While the US constitution does not prevent convicted felons in jail from running for President, it doesn't say they have a constitutional right to run either, so Congress could in theory pass a law banning them from doing so
Though it is surprising to me that given several states don't allow ex-convicts to even vote, that they do allow ex-convicts to run for office.
I think both should be possible, but it seems strange to say there should be continued punishment preventing you from voting, but want to run the state/country? No problem.
Where it might get murky is if he’s jailed in Georgia, which bans felons from voting.
So if he’s ineligible to vote in his usual state of residence(!) is he able to run?
All those Republican MAGA Congresman who have been snug in Trump's lower intestine will be desperately trying to distance themselves. But social media will be having none of it, reminding them of their every word praising Trump to the heavens.
It will be an interesting election night. Even Trump will find it impossible to claim he hasn't lost within the first hours of the results coming in.
If he’s in prison he will have to get any statement cleared by prison authorities which might take a couple of days.
My worry is that if he is convicted he will still be strong enough in his grip on the party that they feel they have to support him through at least one inevitable appeal, and as you note it quikcly becomes a problem that there may be no time to get someone else on the ballot.
For all Trump's claims the timing of the indictments after he announced he was running (way earlier than is usual) is super convenient, and why not earlier, the only chance of stopping him for that reason might have been if he had been charged much earlier. The complexities of the law, alas.
How many innocent civilians have died in Gaza? No idea is the only honest answer. I'd estimate 10% of the official report, so about 400 would be my guess, but who knows, could be more, could be fewer.
However many its both too many, and unavoidable.
Hopefully after Hamas are eliminated then new Palestinian leaders can arise who will actually put their own citizens first, rather than use them as human shields (like Hamas) or simply enrich themselves and spurn the opportunity for peace and a state of the their own (like Arafat).
I'd hope for a 14 day or 21 day jail sentence for contempt, and/or imprisonment until trial by revocation of his bail since he is in comprehensive violation.
The several Judges are being careful and using kid gloves.
Do the Tories really know what they are doing?
There is also no guarantee Trump wins the likes of Iowa either which he lost in the 2016 GOP primaries and caucuses
He was well behind in the polls, but at least appeared to have a little momentum - new PM, line drawn under the chaos, serious on the challenges facing the economy, serious on dealing with deficiencies in Johnson's Brexit, and with some new pledges about what he wanted to achieve with his Premiership. Yes, he'd probably have lost - but I suspect he'd have got some bounce just for being bold with it, and he certainly had more goodwill, so it might well have been reasonably close.
Now it's moved into classic Travolta-Micawber strategy. And maybe something will turn up, but it doesn't look terribly likely. Meanwhile, there is no momentum any more, the goodwill has dissipated, and there is a strong sense (reflected in this poll) that there is nothing in the ULEZ non-compliant tank at all.
US politics is so polarised that they will choose their side rather than the rule of law.
I don't think it's impossible that an imprisoned Trump wins election. The most likely barrier to such a scenario is that appeals against his conviction delay his imprisonment past the election date.
So I'd expect a State law to bar a convicted felon from the ballot would be Constitutional, but a Federal law I'm less sure about.
None.
I just don't see where this belief they will this time wake up if he is convicted comes from. A handful of polls vs the endless series of assertions from top politicians that they will still back him even then, or even those who have urged a different candidate (lilke Kemp in Georgia or the other candidates like Pence) still saying they will back him as nominee even if he is convicted?
That 28% is enough to ensure Trump still got the highest 3rd party vote since Perot but nowhere near enough to give him any chance of beating Biden in the general election
https://www.axios.com/2023/08/03/republicans-vote-trump-prison-poll-jan-6-trial
Such a law might therefore be held unconstitutional.
*Or people who held citizenship from ratification, but even Biden and Trump aren’t *that* old.
This discussion is just wishful thinking. I would hate Trump to win, but it would not surprise me.
Even if it was decided to be state only Trump could only be certain of being on the ballot in states where Republicans hold both the governor's mansion and state legislature, which is only a minority of states and not enough to win the EC
(If Federal law overrode state law in all things abortion would be legal, wouldn’t it?)
If the day I posted it was day 0, tracking information told me it had reached Britain on day 2. It was delivered to the watchmaker - in London mind - on day 13. It's a mind-bogglingly bad level of service.
The initial trial in that jurisdiction is no longer happening since both defendants who had requested speedy trials reached plea deals. That shortens the trial schedule by 3 months.
Of 18 Trump co-defendants in Georgia, 4 have already flipped, and offers have been made to a further six. For all I know they may all try and make deals, but I predict that Rudy Giuliani will not be accepted, as he is on record declaring that the concept of Truth means nothing.
Most of the Prosecutors and Judges (except the Trump appointed incompetent in Florida) seem to be of the view that it is far better to have cases done quickly, and therefore an accurate record of Trump's alleged criminality for the public to vote upon.
That is surely correct.
If I had to call, I would predict the first Trump criminal trial starting in January (probably Jan 4th), and probably in Georgia.
They would rather DeSantis or Pence or Haley than a jailed Trump as GOP candidate
Doesn't really matter when Trump is so far ahead anyway - that is what would need to change, whether he has 100% or 90% of delegates come Super Tuesday doesn't seem like it will matter much.
The very earliest are proportional though, with different thresholds.
Here we go again.
eg a President cannot issue a pardon for State convictions, which is why Trump is wetting his pants over the Washington and Georgia criminal cases (the Florida Judge is taking all the actions to prove herself a patsy).
There are also principled Republican Governors who have refused to swallow the Trumpist Kool Aid, or States where laws prevent them doing what Trump wants.
Georgia must terrify him, even the Governor cannot pardon him if convicted there (even though he's spent years criticising Kemp, he would probably still receive a pardon from him if possible).
We want it to be true, but this is America.