Why the best value Mayoral bets are now on the Tories – politicalbetting.com
In all the discussions over next year’s London Mayoral election hardly anybody is noting that things are very different because of changes Johnson made to the mayoral voting system when he was PM.
The new CEO of Twitter appears to be an even bigger bullshitter than Musk (and without any compensating achievements).
There’s absolutely no limit to this transformation. X will be the platform that can deliver, well….everything. @elonmusk and I are looking forward to working with our teams and every single one of our partners to bring X to the world. https://twitter.com/lindayacc/status/1683214311957594113
The new CEO of Twitter appears to be an even bigger bullshitter than Musk (and without any compensating achievements).
There’s absolutely no limit to this transformation. X will be the platform that can deliver, well….everything. @elonmusk and I are looking forward to working with our teams and every single one of our partners to bring X to the world. https://twitter.com/lindayacc/status/1683214311957594113
Presumably her golden (space) X parachute is already folded and packed . . . hopefully (for her) NOT by Musk.
An interesting argument. But I don't see the Conservatives winning unless:two things happen:
- they pick a popular celebrity candidate, of the kind that has such huge advantage in direct elections like this; and - they recover significantly in national politics.
Boris won narrowly in 2008 when he had good name recognition and Labour were hugely unpopular nationally and in 2012, he was the incumbent, which gives a big advantage in being known.
So good luck to OGH but I'm not sure I'd take 7/1 for Susan Who?
Also, looking at the figures from Boris's two victories, the second round shares of the two candidates aren't actually that different from the first round shares once the minor candidates are eliminated. In 2012, Boris' margin was 3.7% in the first round and 3.0% in the second round, for instance, so I'm not sure I'd agree that, in 2008 or 2012 at least, the Labour candidate was helped "enormously" by second preference votes.
An interesting argument. But I don't see the Conservatives winning unless:two things happen:
- they pick a popular celebrity candidate, of the kind that has such huge advantage in direct elections like this; and - they recover significantly in national politics.
Boris won narrowly in 2008 when he had good name recognition and Labour were hugely unpopular nationally and in 2012, he was the incumbent, which gives a big advantage in being known.
So good luck to OGH but I'm not sure I'd take 7/1 for Susan Who?
Indeed so. They’ve done well in the West Midlands with Andy Street, and should have found someone of similar stature to stand in London. It’s not as if the capital is short of successful and well-known people.
Instead, they tried to stitch it up for some ex-Cameron SpAd, who got a #MeToo during the campaign, and they were left with Susan Who? At least, after the events of last week, she has one good issue on which to campaign, in the outer boroughs anyway.
An interesting argument. But I don't see the Conservatives winning unless:two things happen:
- they pick a popular celebrity candidate, of the kind that has such huge advantage in direct elections like this; and - they recover significantly in national politics.
Boris won narrowly in 2008 when he had good name recognition and Labour were hugely unpopular nationally and in 2012, he was the incumbent, which gives a big advantage in being known.
So good luck to OGH but I'm not sure I'd take 7/1 for Susan Who?
Agreed. The other thing would be needing a popular celebrity candidate who isn’t labelable as a party hack.
None of the Mayors of London so far have primarily been identified by their party affiliation, in the public eye. Khan is the closest to a standard party candidate, but most people don’t regard him as Mr Labour.
Good news from Spain that Vox fell sharply backwards. They ran a campaign offering all kinds of reactionary policies, literally implored people to vote for them on their posters, and lost ground rapidly.
The new CEO of Twitter appears to be an even bigger bullshitter than Musk (and without any compensating achievements).
There’s absolutely no limit to this transformation. X will be the platform that can deliver, well….everything. @elonmusk and I are looking forward to working with our teams and every single one of our partners to bring X to the world. https://twitter.com/lindayacc/status/1683214311957594113
Presumably her golden (space) X parachute is already folded and packed . . . hopefully (for her) NOT by Musk.
Her background is entirely in advertising. While that would make sense if Musk were attempting to repair the damage he's done to Twitter (difficult, since he doesn't accept that), it's not immediately obvious to me what possible use she could be to a venture that is apparently trying to turn itself into a competitor for some of the biggest and best funded tech companies in the world - while loss making, and with a small fraction of their resources.
Following yesterday’s conversation about the debasement of language I wanted to share this gem from the daily mail
As proof of the emergency nature of the crisis they noted that “holidaymakers [at the airport] have been photographed anxiously studying the departure board”…
Following yesterday’s conversation about the debasement of language I wanted to share this gem from the daily mail
As proof of the emergency nature of the crisis they noted that “holidaymakers [at the airport] have been photographed anxiously studying the departure board”…
That's little to do with language - just debased journalism where you'd expect to find it.
An interesting argument. But I don't see the Conservatives winning unless:two things happen:
- they pick a popular celebrity candidate, of the kind that has such huge advantage in direct elections like this; and - they recover significantly in national politics.
Boris won narrowly in 2008 when he had good name recognition and Labour were hugely unpopular nationally and in 2012, he was the incumbent, which gives a big advantage in being known.
So good luck to OGH but I'm not sure I'd take 7/1 for Susan Who?
Agreed. The other thing would be needing a popular celebrity candidate who isn’t labelable as a party hack.
None of the Mayors of London so far have primarily been identified by their party affiliation, in the public eye. Khan is the closest to a standard party candidate, but most people don’t regard him as Mr Labour.
Khan is a figure of ridicule. ULEZ has given him a bloody nose because he tried to force it through. It won't be forgotten however much Labour apologise.
Following yesterday’s conversation about the debasement of language I wanted to share this gem from the daily mail
As proof of the emergency nature of the crisis they noted that “holidaymakers [at the airport] have been photographed anxiously studying the departure board”…
That's little to do with language - just debased journalism where you'd expect to find it.
Misuse of the word “crisis” isn’t limited to the Mail. Although their journalism is poor, I’ll give you that
Good news from Spain that Vox fell sharply backwards. They ran a campaign offering all kinds of reactionary policies, literally implored people to vote for them on their posters, and lost ground rapidly.
The extreme left and nationalist parties also fell back yet ironically it is the right wing JUNTS in Catalonia who now can decide who runs Spain. It's a big hot mess especially as the Senate now has a clear absolute majority for the centre right. I think that the Senate has control over constitutional matters .
An interesting argument. But I don't see the Conservatives winning unless:two things happen:
- they pick a popular celebrity candidate, of the kind that has such huge advantage in direct elections like this; and - they recover significantly in national politics.
Boris won narrowly in 2008 when he had good name recognition and Labour were hugely unpopular nationally and in 2012, he was the incumbent, which gives a big advantage in being known.
So good luck to OGH but I'm not sure I'd take 7/1 for Susan Who?
Agreed. The other thing would be needing a popular celebrity candidate who isn’t labelable as a party hack.
None of the Mayors of London so far have primarily been identified by their party affiliation, in the public eye. Khan is the closest to a standard party candidate, but most people don’t regard him as Mr Labour.
Khan is a figure of ridicule. ULEZ has given him a bloody nose because he tried to force it through. It won't be forgotten however much Labour apologise.
Khan has forced Ulez through. Despite what you might have read on a leaflet, electing a Tory in Uxbridge changes nothing.
7/1 is a good bet, although I'd prefer to bet on party rather than candidate this far out, in case some scandal or other forces a late withdrawal. In any case, it is moot as OGH has moved the market and 5/1 is the best offer I can see, which is less tempting.
It’s not difficult for voters in London to identify the anti-Conservative candidate with the best chance of winning. Labour have usually been 30%+ ahead of the LibDem or Green in third place. The smaller parties have been squeezed even though we had an ordinal voting system. They’ll stay squeezed under FPTP.
The only thing that could threaten Labour is a serious independent candidacy. Which means (J) Corbyn. Even if he does stand, I’d think Khan the favourite.
Following yesterday’s conversation about the debasement of language I wanted to share this gem from the daily mail
As proof of the emergency nature of the crisis they noted that “holidaymakers [at the airport] have been photographed anxiously studying the departure board”…
That's little to do with language - just debased journalism where you'd expect to find it.
Misuse of the word “crisis” isn’t limited to the Mail. Although their journalism is poor, I’ll give you that
At least nobody's calling it genocide.. oh
@JustStop_Oil The heatwave in Spain has already taken lives. Our government is fuelling climate-induced genocide and we must take action now.
An SNP activist is canvassing support to challenge Humza Yousaf for the leadership in the latest sign that discipline is disintegrating within the party.
Chris Hanlon has filled out the paperwork to mount a coup against the first minister and is soliciting nominations online.
On Sunday he tweeted that he would give ordinary members more power to decide policy and break from a top-down style of leadership.
If Hanlon, secretary of the West Fife and Coastal Villages branch, receives 100 nominations, he would force the second leadership contest in the SNP in six months, following the bitter race to replace Nicola Sturgeon when she resigned in February.
An SNP activist is canvassing support to challenge Humza Yousaf for the leadership in the latest sign that discipline is disintegrating within the party.
Chris Hanlon has filled out the paperwork to mount a coup against the first minister and is soliciting nominations online.
On Sunday he tweeted that he would give ordinary members more power to decide policy and break from a top-down style of leadership.
If Hanlon, secretary of the West Fife and Coastal Villages branch, receives 100 nominations, he would force the second leadership contest in the SNP in six months, following the bitter race to replace Nicola Sturgeon when she resigned in February.
An interesting argument. But I don't see the Conservatives winning unless:two things happen:
- they pick a popular celebrity candidate, of the kind that has such huge advantage in direct elections like this; and - they recover significantly in national politics.
Boris won narrowly in 2008 when he had good name recognition and Labour were hugely unpopular nationally and in 2012, he was the incumbent, which gives a big advantage in being known.
So good luck to OGH but I'm not sure I'd take 7/1 for Susan Who?
Agreed. The other thing would be needing a popular celebrity candidate who isn’t labelable as a party hack.
None of the Mayors of London so far have primarily been identified by their party affiliation, in the public eye. Khan is the closest to a standard party candidate, but most people don’t regard him as Mr Labour.
Khan is a figure of ridicule. ULEZ has given him a bloody nose because he tried to force it through. It won't be forgotten however much Labour apologise.
Well I suspect it WILL be forgotten.
It's a bit of a storm in a teacup to be absolutely frank, affecting relatively few people who probably needed to get those cars replaced anyway. My brother's car, for instance, was nearly 20 years old.
They do need to get the funding from the Central Committee. Which is split on the issue. They are worried that even if they splash out, they might come second to the Americans.
The problem for the Tories, and indeed this bet, is that the new Labour government will not have time to become seriously unpopular before the vote takes place. Indeed, it is all too likely that they won't even have taken office yet. Labour may become vulnerable again when their government has pissed everyone off, just as they were when Boris stood. Right now even losing 40% of their vote to Corbyn (and they won't) would not be enough for the Tories to get anywhere near.
An interesting argument. But I don't see the Conservatives winning unless:two things happen:
- they pick a popular celebrity candidate, of the kind that has such huge advantage in direct elections like this; and - they recover significantly in national politics.
Boris won narrowly in 2008 when he had good name recognition and Labour were hugely unpopular nationally and in 2012, he was the incumbent, which gives a big advantage in being known.
So good luck to OGH but I'm not sure I'd take 7/1 for Susan Who?
Agreed. The other thing would be needing a popular celebrity candidate who isn’t labelable as a party hack.
None of the Mayors of London so far have primarily been identified by their party affiliation, in the public eye. Khan is the closest to a standard party candidate, but most people don’t regard him as Mr Labour.
Khan is a figure of ridicule. ULEZ has given him a bloody nose because he tried to force it through. It won't be forgotten however much Labour apologise.
No. ULEZ policy is good. The implementation sucks, a bit.
Turing this into culture wars bullshit is so Donald Fucking Trump.
1) London needs cleaner air 2) Historically, the best way to achieve this is incrementally improving standards. As proven many times in many places 3) The “ULEZ policy”that was implemented was just one of a number of possible policies. 4) Not being impressed with 3) doesn’t mean opposing 1 & 2.
This is a very good tip by @MikeSmithson by the way.
Sadiq has made a huge error with ulez. However, I suspect it will blow over and that he will be re-elected.
It ought to serve as a warning to Labour. It's during their third term in office that they will combine arrogance with fatigue.
History repeats itself. Has to. No one listens.
If you apply the Uxbridge swing to the London Mayoral contest, then Khan wins by the biggest margin in any London Mayoral contest.
That’s the point. ULEZ may have allowed the Tories to hold on in Uxbridge, but there was still a substantial swing against them. The underlying unpopularity of the Conservatives is the bigger factor. Lay Hall.
An interesting argument. But I don't see the Conservatives winning unless:two things happen:
- they pick a popular celebrity candidate, of the kind that has such huge advantage in direct elections like this; and - they recover significantly in national politics.
Boris won narrowly in 2008 when he had good name recognition and Labour were hugely unpopular nationally and in 2012, he was the incumbent, which gives a big advantage in being known.
So good luck to OGH but I'm not sure I'd take 7/1 for Susan Who?
Indeed so. They’ve done well in the West Midlands with Andy Street, and should have found someone of similar stature to stand in London. It’s not as if the capital is short of successful and well-known people.
Instead, they tried to stitch it up for some ex-Cameron SpAd, who got a #MeToo during the campaign, and they were left with Susan Who? At least, after the events of last week, she has one good issue on which to campaign, in the outer boroughs anyway.
The catch is finding someone successful, well-known and attractive to Londoners who is willing to identify as a Conservative. It's not 2017 any more, and Greater Birmingham isn't Greater London.
The Conservatives took a deliberate turn to become the party of retired homeowners. In some ways that makes sense, but it has consequences.
An SNP activist is canvassing support to challenge Humza Yousaf for the leadership in the latest sign that discipline is disintegrating within the party.
Chris Hanlon has filled out the paperwork to mount a coup against the first minister and is soliciting nominations online.
On Sunday he tweeted that he would give ordinary members more power to decide policy and break from a top-down style of leadership.
If Hanlon, secretary of the West Fife and Coastal Villages branch, receives 100 nominations, he would force the second leadership contest in the SNP in six months, following the bitter race to replace Nicola Sturgeon when she resigned in February.
They do need to get the funding from the Central Committee. Which is split on the issue. They are worried that even if they splash out, they might come second to the Americans.
They’re starting from miles behind. SLS dates from as long ago as 2010 under Obama, with the moon landing missions signed off by Trump in 2017.
Yes, the Chinese will have less bureaucracy to navigate once the decision is made, not constantly going back to the politicians for more money, to be spent in 100 specific towns, with fewer suppliers and partner agencies to deal with along the way (There’s 27 countries involved in Artemis), but going to the Moon is at least an order of magnitude more complicated than going to LEO.
An SNP activist is canvassing support to challenge Humza Yousaf for the leadership in the latest sign that discipline is disintegrating within the party.
Chris Hanlon has filled out the paperwork to mount a coup against the first minister and is soliciting nominations online.
On Sunday he tweeted that he would give ordinary members more power to decide policy and break from a top-down style of leadership.
If Hanlon, secretary of the West Fife and Coastal Villages branch, receives 100 nominations, he would force the second leadership contest in the SNP in six months, following the bitter race to replace Nicola Sturgeon when she resigned in February.
They do need to get the funding from the Central Committee. Which is split on the issue. They are worried that even if they splash out, they might come second to the Americans.
They’re starting from miles behind. SLS dates from as long ago as 2010 under Obama, with the moon landing missions signed off by Trump in 2017.
Yes, the Chinese will have less bureaucracy to navigate once the decision is made, not constantly going back to the politicians for more money, to be spent in 100 specific towns, with fewer suppliers and partner agencies to deal with along the way (There’s 27 countries involved in Artemis), but going to the Moon is at least an order of magnitude more complicated than going to LEO.
An SNP activist is canvassing support to challenge Humza Yousaf for the leadership in the latest sign that discipline is disintegrating within the party.
Chris Hanlon has filled out the paperwork to mount a coup against the first minister and is soliciting nominations online.
On Sunday he tweeted that he would give ordinary members more power to decide policy and break from a top-down style of leadership.
If Hanlon, secretary of the West Fife and Coastal Villages branch, receives 100 nominations, he would force the second leadership contest in the SNP in six months, following the bitter race to replace Nicola Sturgeon when she resigned in February.
I cannot see Susan Hall winning the London mayoral contest unless something entirely unexpected happens to the labour vote
I think Scotland's SNP/Greens are heading for considerable unpopularity especially if the Greens policy of banning gas boilers comes into force in 2025
Apparently it will be a requirement to sell a home for it to comply with energy rating c but they are to change the formulae to ensure it cannot be achieved with a gas boiler.
The result will see all homes to either install a heat pump or electric heating to be saleable at a cost of 33 billion with approx 1.8 billion from the Scottish government
This, if approved, would be their poll tax and when added to their proposition to vastly increases council tax and higher rates of tax anyway compared to the rest of the UK, will the last person to leave please switch off the lights
They do need to get the funding from the Central Committee. Which is split on the issue. They are worried that even if they splash out, they might come second to the Americans.
I suspect the push to stake claims to lunar territory (though prohibited by international law*) will prove irresistible. Being first is, in that context, secondary.
An SNP activist is canvassing support to challenge Humza Yousaf for the leadership in the latest sign that discipline is disintegrating within the party.
Chris Hanlon has filled out the paperwork to mount a coup against the first minister and is soliciting nominations online.
On Sunday he tweeted that he would give ordinary members more power to decide policy and break from a top-down style of leadership.
If Hanlon, secretary of the West Fife and Coastal Villages branch, receives 100 nominations, he would force the second leadership contest in the SNP in six months, following the bitter race to replace Nicola Sturgeon when she resigned in February.
Good news from Spain that Vox fell sharply backwards. They ran a campaign offering all kinds of reactionary policies, literally implored people to vote for them on their posters, and lost ground rapidly.
The best PSOE result in terms of vote share since 2007 and a major polling failure. Only one pollster had them getting over 30% and that was the widely derided CIS, which has always been accused of being biased to the left.
A humiliation for Vox and a personal disaster for PP leader Feijóo, who is going to struggle to retain control of a party that expected the process of forming a government to have begun today but has now learned that just being anti-Sánchez was not enough.
Now, we’re almost certainly heading for new elections in November or December, with Sánchez likely to be caretaker PM in the meantime. There is a narrow path to him forming a new government, if everything falls his way - but that is highly unlikely as its Catalan separatists, who also had a terrible night, that will decide.
Notable that despite the summer polling date turnout rose from 66% to 70%. The progressive Spain turned out to keep Vox out of power. There’s a lesson there for PP. But will they learn it? They are a party much like the 2019 Tories - one with a split personality, that took votes from former C’s and Vox supporters, from the centre and the far right. How do you keep such a coalition together if being anti-Sánchez is not enough?
It’s not difficult for voters in London to identify the anti-Conservative candidate with the best chance of winning. Labour have usually been 30%+ ahead of the LibDem or Green in third place. The smaller parties have been squeezed even though we had an ordinal voting system. They’ll stay squeezed under FPTP.
The only thing that could threaten Labour is a serious independent candidacy. Which means (J) Corbyn. Even if he does stand, I’d think Khan the favourite.
I just don’t see Corbyn running. For a start, why enter a race you will lose? But, secondly, as the vote is in May, he’d have to declare his candidacy well in advance of that. This would immediately lead to his expulsion from the Labour party and it’s pretty clear now he’s keen to avoid that for as long as possible.
They do need to get the funding from the Central Committee. Which is split on the issue. They are worried that even if they splash out, they might come second to the Americans.
I suspect the push to stake claims to lunar territory (though prohibited by international law*) will prove irresistible. Being first is, in that context, secondary.
*The Outer Space Treaty
Lunar ice
{I’ll get my coat. It’s the one with the spare mechanical arm in it}
The word 'crisis ' has become a meaningless joke word.
Should only be used to mean "turning point in a disease" like in the good old days.
I don't think that's quite what the nothing to see here crew have in mind.
Well, stranded holidaymakers is the kind of story that has been sensationalised for as long as I can remember, I guess linking it to global heating is what some people don't like? There definitely seems to be an increase in wildfires in the Mediterranean (and elsewhere) in recent years, and an increased likelihood of heatwaves. But to really hit the headlines it has to affect British holidaymakers.
Good news from Spain that Vox fell sharply backwards. They ran a campaign offering all kinds of reactionary policies, literally implored people to vote for them on their posters, and lost ground rapidly.
The best PSOE result in terms of vote share since 2007 and a major polling failure. Only one pollster had them getting over 30% and that was the widely derided CIS, which has always been accused of being biased to the left.
A humiliation for Vox and a personal disaster for PP leader Feijóo, who is going to struggle to retain control of a party that expected the process of forming a government to have begun today but has now learned that just being anti-Sánchez was not enough.
Now, we’re almost certainly heading for new elections in November or December, with Sánchez likely to be caretaker PM in the meantime. There is a narrow path to him forming a new government, if everything falls his way - but that is highly unlikely as its Catalan separatists, who also had a terrible night, that will decide.
Notable that despite the summer polling date turnout rose from 66% to 70%. The progressive Spain turned out to keep Vox out of power. There’s a lesson there for PP. But will they learn it? They are a party much like the 2019 Tories - one with a split personality, that took votes from former C’s and Vox supporters, from the centre and the far right. How do you keep such a coalition together if being anti-Sánchez is not enough?
Agree mostly. I suspect Feijoo will not survive. There is talk of Juanma Moreno, the Andalucian President who did get an absolute majority here and who remains a popular centrist. The mainstream parties both improved but not quite close enough for PP. The left have their problems too, only getting the barest of majorities if the right wing JUNTS back them in return for..what? Autumn elections do seem likely.
This is a very good tip by @MikeSmithson by the way.
Sadiq has made a huge error with ulez. However, I suspect it will blow over and that he will be re-elected.
It ought to serve as a warning to Labour. It's during their third term in office that they will combine arrogance with fatigue.
History repeats itself. Has to. No one listens.
If you apply the Uxbridge swing to the London Mayoral contest, then Khan wins by the biggest margin in any London Mayoral contest.
That’s the point. ULEZ may have allowed the Tories to hold on in Uxbridge, but there was still a substantial swing against them. The underlying unpopularity of the Conservatives is the bigger factor. Lay Hall.
Or perhaps ULEZ was the reason for the massive swing 😉
I don't know much about London politics, but in a city where 46% of households don't have access to a car at all, I can't see how this can become an issue for Khan without a hysterical misinformation campaign from CCHQ. 90% of those cars are ULEZ compliant, so we are talking about less than 5% of households.
Car ownership is also strongly correlated with earnings and location. The people with cars are already likely to be voting Tory. You might find that non-ULEZ compliant cars are more likely to be owned by poorer drivers, but I'd guess this is still a very small number of possible labour voters.
There are some recent stats that suggest cycling had now overtaken driving in parts of central London, so like with all Pigou taxes, ULEZ will become a smaller issue going forward.
Good news from Spain that Vox fell sharply backwards. They ran a campaign offering all kinds of reactionary policies, literally implored people to vote for them on their posters, and lost ground rapidly.
The extreme left and nationalist parties also fell back yet ironically it is the right wing JUNTS in Catalonia who now can decide who runs Spain. It's a big hot mess especially as the Senate now has a clear absolute majority for the centre right. I think that the Senate has control over constitutional matters .
Yep, the separatist parties in Catalonia were heavily defeated - although that can be partially explained by a poll boycott organised by the major civic nationalist organisation there. However, the end result was that by voting so heavily for the socialists, Catalonia was key to preventing a PP/Vox majority. Something that totally vindicates Sánchez’s softly softly approach to Catalonia since 2018.
It was a slightly different story in the Basque Country, though. Radical separatist party Bildu beat the conservative nationalist PNV for the first time ever. That is seismic. The Basques have been much quieter than the Catalans over recent years, pretty content to enjoy the extensive autonomy they have. This is now going to change. Expect a lot more noise and close cooperation with the more radical elements of Catalan separatism.
I cannot see Susan Hall winning the London mayoral contest unless something entirely unexpected happens to the labour vote
I think Scotland's SNP/Greens are heading for considerable unpopularity especially if the Greens policy of banning gas boilers comes into force in 2025
Apparently it will be a requirement to sell a home for it to comply with energy rating c but they are to change the formulae to ensure it cannot be achieved with a gas boiler.
The result will see all homes to either install a heat pump or electric heating to be saleable at a cost of 33 billion with approx 1.8 billion from the Scottish government
This, if approved, would be their poll tax and when added to their proposition to vastly increases council tax and higher rates of tax anyway compared to the rest of the UK, will the last person to leave please switch off the lights
Apparently it will be a requirement to sell a home for it to comply with energy rating c but they are to change the formulae to ensure it cannot be achieved with a gas boiler.
Could you point out where in the article or policy it says that? Asking for a friend...
Also - they aren't banning gas boilers, just updating building regs to say that new builds can't have them. Most new builds in Edinburgh don't have boilers anyway.
The word 'crisis ' has become a meaningless joke word.
Should only be used to mean "turning point in a disease" like in the good old days.
I don't think that's quite what the nothing to see here crew have in mind.
Well, stranded holidaymakers is the kind of story that has been sensationalised for as long as I can remember, I guess linking it to global heating is what some people don't like? There definitely seems to be an increase in wildfires in the Mediterranean (and elsewhere) in recent years, and an increased likelihood of heatwaves. But to really hit the headlines it has to affect British holidaymakers.
The unprecedented (in human memory) wave of forest fires around the globe of recent years is arguably a symptom of a climate inflection point - albeit one that's measured in years and decades, rather than days and weeks.
In the particular case of Rhodes, has it ever had fires this large ?
This is a very good tip by @MikeSmithson by the way.
Sadiq has made a huge error with ulez. However, I suspect it will blow over and that he will be re-elected.
It ought to serve as a warning to Labour. It's during their third term in office that they will combine arrogance with fatigue.
History repeats itself. Has to. No one listens.
If you apply the Uxbridge swing to the London Mayoral contest, then Khan wins by the biggest margin in any London Mayoral contest.
That’s the point. ULEZ may have allowed the Tories to hold on in Uxbridge, but there was still a substantial swing against them. The underlying unpopularity of the Conservatives is the bigger factor. Lay Hall.
Or perhaps ULEZ was the reason for the massive swing 😉
I don't know much about London politics, but in a city where 46% of households don't have access to a car at all, I can't see how this can become an issue for Khan without a hysterical misinformation campaign from CCHQ. 90% of those cars are ULEZ compliant, so we are talking about less than 5% of households.
Car ownership is also strongly correlated with earnings and location. The people with cars are already likely to be voting Tory. You might find that non-ULEZ compliant cars are more likely to be owned by poorer drivers, but I'd guess this is still a very small number of possible labour voters.
There are some recent stats that suggest cycling had now overtaken driving in parts of central London, so like with all Pigou taxes, ULEZ will become a smaller issue going forward.
If you are a Labour candidate fighting a London marginal- Uxbridge, say, or Dagenham & Rainham, then you may feel that you personally can't afford to lose any votes at all. In Havering, Labour are also trying the "give me clean air, but not yet" line, which doesn't really work.
It's a similar issue to the "where to build houses?" one in a way. Something can be the right thing for the community as a whole, but some candidates are incentivised to oppose it tooth and nail.
The word 'crisis ' has become a meaningless joke word.
Should only be used to mean "turning point in a disease" like in the good old days.
I don't think that's quite what the nothing to see here crew have in mind.
Well, stranded holidaymakers is the kind of story that has been sensationalised for as long as I can remember, I guess linking it to global heating is what some people don't like? There definitely seems to be an increase in wildfires in the Mediterranean (and elsewhere) in recent years, and an increased likelihood of heatwaves. But to really hit the headlines it has to affect British holidaymakers.
The unprecedented (in human memory) wave of forest fires around the globe of recent years is arguably a symptom of a climate inflection point - albeit one that's measured in years and decades, rather than days and weeks.
In the particular case of Rhodes, has it ever had fires this large ?
It's the increase in average temperatures which is the tell. The wildfires are just "weather", but the prevalence of such weather was expected to increase as the world heats up.
This is a very good tip by @MikeSmithson by the way.
Sadiq has made a huge error with ulez. However, I suspect it will blow over and that he will be re-elected.
It ought to serve as a warning to Labour. It's during their third term in office that they will combine arrogance with fatigue.
History repeats itself. Has to. No one listens.
If you apply the Uxbridge swing to the London Mayoral contest, then Khan wins by the biggest margin in any London Mayoral contest.
That’s the point. ULEZ may have allowed the Tories to hold on in Uxbridge, but there was still a substantial swing against them. The underlying unpopularity of the Conservatives is the bigger factor. Lay Hall.
Or perhaps ULEZ was the reason for the massive swing 😉
I don't know much about London politics, but in a city where 46% of households don't have access to a car at all, I can't see how this can become an issue for Khan without a hysterical misinformation campaign from CCHQ. 90% of those cars are ULEZ compliant, so we are talking about less than 5% of households.
Car ownership is also strongly correlated with earnings and location. The people with cars are already likely to be voting Tory. You might find that non-ULEZ compliant cars are more likely to be owned by poorer drivers, but I'd guess this is still a very small number of possible labour voters.
There are some recent stats that suggest cycling had now overtaken driving in parts of central London, so like with all Pigou taxes, ULEZ will become a smaller issue going forward.
Outer London is different. In many suburbs, car usage isn’t optional. In addition, the assumption is that the next stage of ULEZ is coming. So it’s far more than the immediately effected drivers.
The overall car taxation in London, on parking, congestion charge etc. is nothing if you can afford an EV. Otherwise you pay.
The word 'crisis ' has become a meaningless joke word.
Should only be used to mean "turning point in a disease" like in the good old days.
I don't think that's quite what the nothing to see here crew have in mind.
Well, stranded holidaymakers is the kind of story that has been sensationalised for as long as I can remember, I guess linking it to global heating is what some people don't like? There definitely seems to be an increase in wildfires in the Mediterranean (and elsewhere) in recent years, and an increased likelihood of heatwaves. But to really hit the headlines it has to affect British holidaymakers.
The unprecedented (in human memory) wave of forest fires around the globe of recent years is arguably a symptom of a climate inflection point - albeit one that's measured in years and decades, rather than days and weeks.
In the particular case of Rhodes, has it ever had fires this large ?
I dunno about Rhodes, but the importance of the fires - to me - is the way so many climatic dramas are happening simultaneously, worldwide. From heat domes in the USA to 52C - an all time record - in China. Thailand broke its all time record when I was there in spring (and it was horrible)
Now Europe burns as well. It does feel like an inflection
This is a very good tip by @MikeSmithson by the way.
Sadiq has made a huge error with ulez. However, I suspect it will blow over and that he will be re-elected.
It ought to serve as a warning to Labour. It's during their third term in office that they will combine arrogance with fatigue.
History repeats itself. Has to. No one listens.
If you apply the Uxbridge swing to the London Mayoral contest, then Khan wins by the biggest margin in any London Mayoral contest.
That’s the point. ULEZ may have allowed the Tories to hold on in Uxbridge, but there was still a substantial swing against them. The underlying unpopularity of the Conservatives is the bigger factor. Lay Hall.
Or perhaps ULEZ was the reason for the massive swing 😉
I don't know much about London politics, but in a city where 46% of households don't have access to a car at all, I can't see how this can become an issue for Khan without a hysterical misinformation campaign from CCHQ. 90% of those cars are ULEZ compliant, so we are talking about less than 5% of households.
Car ownership is also strongly correlated with earnings and location. The people with cars are already likely to be voting Tory. You might find that non-ULEZ compliant cars are more likely to be owned by poorer drivers, but I'd guess this is still a very small number of possible labour voters.
There are some recent stats that suggest cycling had now overtaken driving in parts of central London, so like with all Pigou taxes, ULEZ will become a smaller issue going forward.
As sure as night follows day the pro ULEZ lobbyists are doing the rounds of the news studios expanding on the virtue of ULEZ and leading the fightback.
Apparently Angela Rayner was saying, was misquoted as saying, ULEZ is coming everywhere. An interesting point of debate for the next election looms.
I expect this to be the precursor of charging per mile as we move away from fuel duty on petrol.
The word 'crisis ' has become a meaningless joke word.
Should only be used to mean "turning point in a disease" like in the good old days.
I don't think that's quite what the nothing to see here crew have in mind.
Well, stranded holidaymakers is the kind of story that has been sensationalised for as long as I can remember, I guess linking it to global heating is what some people don't like? There definitely seems to be an increase in wildfires in the Mediterranean (and elsewhere) in recent years, and an increased likelihood of heatwaves. But to really hit the headlines it has to affect British holidaymakers.
The unprecedented (in human memory) wave of forest fires around the globe of recent years is arguably a symptom of a climate inflection point - albeit one that's measured in years and decades, rather than days and weeks.
In the particular case of Rhodes, has it ever had fires this large ?
I dunno about Rhodes, but the importance of the fires - to me - is the way so many climatic dramas are happening simultaneously, worldwide. From heat domes in the USA to 52C - an all time record - in China. Thailand broke its all time record when I was there in spring (and it was horrible)
Now Europe burns as well. It does feel like an inflection
The word 'crisis ' has become a meaningless joke word.
Should only be used to mean "turning point in a disease" like in the good old days.
I don't think that's quite what the nothing to see here crew have in mind.
Well, stranded holidaymakers is the kind of story that has been sensationalised for as long as I can remember, I guess linking it to global heating is what some people don't like? There definitely seems to be an increase in wildfires in the Mediterranean (and elsewhere) in recent years, and an increased likelihood of heatwaves. But to really hit the headlines it has to affect British holidaymakers.
The unprecedented (in human memory) wave of forest fires around the globe of recent years is arguably a symptom of a climate inflection point - albeit one that's measured in years and decades, rather than days and weeks.
In the particular case of Rhodes, has it ever had fires this large ?
I dunno about Rhodes, but the importance of the fires - to me - is the way so many climatic dramas are happening simultaneously, worldwide. From heat domes in the USA to 52C - an all time record - in China. Thailand broke its all time record when I was there in spring (and it was horrible)
Now Europe burns as well. It does feel like an inflection
The word 'crisis ' has become a meaningless joke word.
Should only be used to mean "turning point in a disease" like in the good old days.
I don't think that's quite what the nothing to see here crew have in mind.
Well, stranded holidaymakers is the kind of story that has been sensationalised for as long as I can remember, I guess linking it to global heating is what some people don't like? There definitely seems to be an increase in wildfires in the Mediterranean (and elsewhere) in recent years, and an increased likelihood of heatwaves. But to really hit the headlines it has to affect British holidaymakers.
The unprecedented (in human memory) wave of forest fires around the globe of recent years is arguably a symptom of a climate inflection point - albeit one that's measured in years and decades, rather than days and weeks.
In the particular case of Rhodes, has it ever had fires this large ?
I dunno about Rhodes, but the importance of the fires - to me - is the way so many climatic dramas are happening simultaneously, worldwide. From heat domes in the USA to 52C - an all time record - in China. Thailand broke its all time record when I was there in spring (and it was horrible)
Now Europe burns as well. It does feel like an inflection
This is a very good tip by @MikeSmithson by the way.
Sadiq has made a huge error with ulez. However, I suspect it will blow over and that he will be re-elected.
It ought to serve as a warning to Labour. It's during their third term in office that they will combine arrogance with fatigue.
History repeats itself. Has to. No one listens.
If you apply the Uxbridge swing to the London Mayoral contest, then Khan wins by the biggest margin in any London Mayoral contest.
That’s the point. ULEZ may have allowed the Tories to hold on in Uxbridge, but there was still a substantial swing against them. The underlying unpopularity of the Conservatives is the bigger factor. Lay Hall.
Or perhaps ULEZ was the reason for the massive swing 😉
I don't know much about London politics, but in a city where 46% of households don't have access to a car at all, I can't see how this can become an issue for Khan without a hysterical misinformation campaign from CCHQ. 90% of those cars are ULEZ compliant, so we are talking about less than 5% of households.
Car ownership is also strongly correlated with earnings and location. The people with cars are already likely to be voting Tory. You might find that non-ULEZ compliant cars are more likely to be owned by poorer drivers, but I'd guess this is still a very small number of possible labour voters.
There are some recent stats that suggest cycling had now overtaken driving in parts of central London, so like with all Pigou taxes, ULEZ will become a smaller issue going forward.
As sure as night follows day the pro ULEZ lobbyists are doing the rounds of the news studios expanding on the virtue of ULEZ and leading the fightback.
Apparently Angela Rayner was saying, was misquoted as saying, ULEZ is coming everywhere. An interesting point of debate for the next election looms.
I expect this to be the precursor of charging per mile as we move away from fuel duty on petrol.
One of very few things that might rescue the Tories at the GE, would be a bunch of city dwellers from Labour pledging a full-on war on cars in the rest of the country.
This is a very good tip by @MikeSmithson by the way.
Sadiq has made a huge error with ulez. However, I suspect it will blow over and that he will be re-elected.
It ought to serve as a warning to Labour. It's during their third term in office that they will combine arrogance with fatigue.
History repeats itself. Has to. No one listens.
If you apply the Uxbridge swing to the London Mayoral contest, then Khan wins by the biggest margin in any London Mayoral contest.
That’s the point. ULEZ may have allowed the Tories to hold on in Uxbridge, but there was still a substantial swing against them. The underlying unpopularity of the Conservatives is the bigger factor. Lay Hall.
Or perhaps ULEZ was the reason for the massive swing 😉
I don't know much about London politics, but in a city where 46% of households don't have access to a car at all, I can't see how this can become an issue for Khan without a hysterical misinformation campaign from CCHQ. 90% of those cars are ULEZ compliant, so we are talking about less than 5% of households.
Car ownership is also strongly correlated with earnings and location. The people with cars are already likely to be voting Tory. You might find that non-ULEZ compliant cars are more likely to be owned by poorer drivers, but I'd guess this is still a very small number of possible labour voters.
There are some recent stats that suggest cycling had now overtaken driving in parts of central London, so like with all Pigou taxes, ULEZ will become a smaller issue going forward.
As sure as night follows day the pro ULEZ lobbyists are doing the rounds of the news studios expanding on the virtue of ULEZ and leading the fightback.
Apparently Angela Rayner was saying, was misquoted as saying, ULEZ is coming everywhere. An interesting point of debate for the next election looms.
I expect this to be the precursor of charging per mile as we move away from fuel duty on petrol.
One of very few things that might rescue the Tories at the GE, would be a bunch of city dwellers from Labour pledging a full-on war on cars in the rest of the country.
That would be very silly. The natural successors to fuel duty/VED are axle-load tax and congestion charging.
This is a very good tip by @MikeSmithson by the way.
Sadiq has made a huge error with ulez. However, I suspect it will blow over and that he will be re-elected.
It ought to serve as a warning to Labour. It's during their third term in office that they will combine arrogance with fatigue.
History repeats itself. Has to. No one listens.
If you apply the Uxbridge swing to the London Mayoral contest, then Khan wins by the biggest margin in any London Mayoral contest.
That’s the point. ULEZ may have allowed the Tories to hold on in Uxbridge, but there was still a substantial swing against them. The underlying unpopularity of the Conservatives is the bigger factor. Lay Hall.
Or perhaps ULEZ was the reason for the massive swing 😉
I don't know much about London politics, but in a city where 46% of households don't have access to a car at all, I can't see how this can become an issue for Khan without a hysterical misinformation campaign from CCHQ. 90% of those cars are ULEZ compliant, so we are talking about less than 5% of households.
Car ownership is also strongly correlated with earnings and location. The people with cars are already likely to be voting Tory. You might find that non-ULEZ compliant cars are more likely to be owned by poorer drivers, but I'd guess this is still a very small number of possible labour voters.
There are some recent stats that suggest cycling had now overtaken driving in parts of central London, so like with all Pigou taxes, ULEZ will become a smaller issue going forward.
As sure as night follows day the pro ULEZ lobbyists are doing the rounds of the news studios expanding on the virtue of ULEZ and leading the fightback.
Apparently Angela Rayner was saying, was misquoted as saying, ULEZ is coming everywhere. An interesting point of debate for the next election looms.
I expect this to be the precursor of charging per mile as we move away from fuel duty on petrol.
One of very few things that might rescue the Tories at the GE, would be a bunch of city dwellers from Labour pledging a full-on war on cars in the rest of the country.
1) the aim of the policy is virtuous. 2) therefore the policy is perfect. 3) therefore anyone who opposes us is scum
The word 'crisis ' has become a meaningless joke word.
Should only be used to mean "turning point in a disease" like in the good old days.
I don't think that's quite what the nothing to see here crew have in mind.
Well, stranded holidaymakers is the kind of story that has been sensationalised for as long as I can remember, I guess linking it to global heating is what some people don't like? There definitely seems to be an increase in wildfires in the Mediterranean (and elsewhere) in recent years, and an increased likelihood of heatwaves. But to really hit the headlines it has to affect British holidaymakers.
The unprecedented (in human memory) wave of forest fires around the globe of recent years is arguably a symptom of a climate inflection point - albeit one that's measured in years and decades, rather than days and weeks.
In the particular case of Rhodes, has it ever had fires this large ?
The photos from Rhodes are extraordinary. What with small ship evacuations from beaches, repatriation flights and people walking 12 hours carrying luggage to reach them, it is The Road meets Dunkirk. Or, it's just hot weather, what do you expect in Greece in July?
The nothing to see faction really need to point to a precedent.
This is a very good tip by @MikeSmithson by the way.
Sadiq has made a huge error with ulez. However, I suspect it will blow over and that he will be re-elected.
It ought to serve as a warning to Labour. It's during their third term in office that they will combine arrogance with fatigue.
History repeats itself. Has to. No one listens.
If you apply the Uxbridge swing to the London Mayoral contest, then Khan wins by the biggest margin in any London Mayoral contest.
That’s the point. ULEZ may have allowed the Tories to hold on in Uxbridge, but there was still a substantial swing against them. The underlying unpopularity of the Conservatives is the bigger factor. Lay Hall.
Or perhaps ULEZ was the reason for the massive swing 😉
I don't know much about London politics, but in a city where 46% of households don't have access to a car at all, I can't see how this can become an issue for Khan without a hysterical misinformation campaign from CCHQ. 90% of those cars are ULEZ compliant, so we are talking about less than 5% of households.
Car ownership is also strongly correlated with earnings and location. The people with cars are already likely to be voting Tory. You might find that non-ULEZ compliant cars are more likely to be owned by poorer drivers, but I'd guess this is still a very small number of possible labour voters.
There are some recent stats that suggest cycling had now overtaken driving in parts of central London, so like with all Pigou taxes, ULEZ will become a smaller issue going forward.
Virtually none of the 46% of households without access to a car are changing their vote because of ULEZ.
A lot of the households with non compliant cars are both incentived to turn out and switch.
As with VAT on private schools it makes no difference electorally that the majority support the policy, the switchers are nearly all on one side.
The gap between Khan and Bailey last time was 120,000 votes - a lot more than that will be impacted by ULEZ. If Corbyn joins the show it feels pretty tough for Khan to me. One quirk is that if Corbyn does join, it might prompt other high profile independents as not impossible the winning number could be in the mid twenties.
This is a very good tip by @MikeSmithson by the way.
Sadiq has made a huge error with ulez. However, I suspect it will blow over and that he will be re-elected.
It ought to serve as a warning to Labour. It's during their third term in office that they will combine arrogance with fatigue.
History repeats itself. Has to. No one listens.
If you apply the Uxbridge swing to the London Mayoral contest, then Khan wins by the biggest margin in any London Mayoral contest.
That’s the point. ULEZ may have allowed the Tories to hold on in Uxbridge, but there was still a substantial swing against them. The underlying unpopularity of the Conservatives is the bigger factor. Lay Hall.
Or perhaps ULEZ was the reason for the massive swing 😉
I don't know much about London politics, but in a city where 46% of households don't have access to a car at all, I can't see how this can become an issue for Khan without a hysterical misinformation campaign from CCHQ. 90% of those cars are ULEZ compliant, so we are talking about less than 5% of households.
Car ownership is also strongly correlated with earnings and location. The people with cars are already likely to be voting Tory. You might find that non-ULEZ compliant cars are more likely to be owned by poorer drivers, but I'd guess this is still a very small number of possible labour voters.
There are some recent stats that suggest cycling had now overtaken driving in parts of central London, so like with all Pigou taxes, ULEZ will become a smaller issue going forward.
As sure as night follows day the pro ULEZ lobbyists are doing the rounds of the news studios expanding on the virtue of ULEZ and leading the fightback.
Apparently Angela Rayner was saying, was misquoted as saying, ULEZ is coming everywhere. An interesting point of debate for the next election looms.
I expect this to be the precursor of charging per mile as we move away from fuel duty on petrol.
One of very few things that might rescue the Tories at the GE, would be a bunch of city dwellers from Labour pledging a full-on war on cars in the rest of the country.
That would be very silly. The natural successors to fuel duty/VED are axle-load tax and congestion charging.
Yes - so long as one approach replaces the other, and isn’t in addition to it.
An interesting argument. But I don't see the Conservatives winning unless:two things happen:
- they pick a popular celebrity candidate, of the kind that has such huge advantage in direct elections like this; and - they recover significantly in national politics.
Boris won narrowly in 2008 when he had good name recognition and Labour were hugely unpopular nationally and in 2012, he was the incumbent, which gives a big advantage in being known.
So good luck to OGH but I'm not sure I'd take 7/1 for Susan Who?
Agreed. The other thing would be needing a popular celebrity candidate who isn’t labelable as a party hack.
None of the Mayors of London so far have primarily been identified by their party affiliation, in the public eye. Khan is the closest to a standard party candidate, but most people don’t regard him as Mr Labour.
Khan is a figure of ridicule. ULEZ has given him a bloody nose because he tried to force it through. It won't be forgotten however much Labour apologise.
No. ULEZ policy is good. The implementation sucks, a bit.
Turing this into culture wars bullshit is so Donald Fucking Trump.
1) London needs cleaner air 2) Historically, the best way to achieve this is incrementally improving standards. As proven many times in many places 3) The “ULEZ policy”that was implemented was just one of a number of possible policies. 4) Not being impressed with 3) doesn’t mean opposing 1 & 2.
What makes me laugh about the Tory attempt to create ULEZ as a culture war issue is that it's their policy. Implemented by Boris for inner London, imposed on the suburbs by Grant Shapps. Where the "it will tax motorists" attack is literally what Shapps demanded as part of the TfL bailouts.
If the Tories want to oppose their own policy that's fine. But claiming - as some have - that this is "typical socialism" is painfully deluded. Perhaps Michael Green is a socialist?
This is a very good tip by @MikeSmithson by the way.
Sadiq has made a huge error with ulez. However, I suspect it will blow over and that he will be re-elected.
It ought to serve as a warning to Labour. It's during their third term in office that they will combine arrogance with fatigue.
History repeats itself. Has to. No one listens.
If you apply the Uxbridge swing to the London Mayoral contest, then Khan wins by the biggest margin in any London Mayoral contest.
That’s the point. ULEZ may have allowed the Tories to hold on in Uxbridge, but there was still a substantial swing against them. The underlying unpopularity of the Conservatives is the bigger factor. Lay Hall.
Or perhaps ULEZ was the reason for the massive swing 😉
I don't know much about London politics, but in a city where 46% of households don't have access to a car at all, I can't see how this can become an issue for Khan without a hysterical misinformation campaign from CCHQ. 90% of those cars are ULEZ compliant, so we are talking about less than 5% of households.
Car ownership is also strongly correlated with earnings and location. The people with cars are already likely to be voting Tory. You might find that non-ULEZ compliant cars are more likely to be owned by poorer drivers, but I'd guess this is still a very small number of possible labour voters.
There are some recent stats that suggest cycling had now overtaken driving in parts of central London, so like with all Pigou taxes, ULEZ will become a smaller issue going forward.
As sure as night follows day the pro ULEZ lobbyists are doing the rounds of the news studios expanding on the virtue of ULEZ and leading the fightback.
Apparently Angela Rayner was saying, was misquoted as saying, ULEZ is coming everywhere. An interesting point of debate for the next election looms.
I expect this to be the precursor of charging per mile as we move away from fuel duty on petrol.
One of very few things that might rescue the Tories at the GE, would be a bunch of city dwellers from Labour pledging a full-on war on cars in the rest of the country.
That would be very silly. The natural successors to fuel duty/VED are axle-load tax and congestion charging.
I don't think congestion charging can raise remotely as much money as fuel duty.
Foreign Office minister Andrew Mitchell sounding shaky on the future of the 2030 petrol car ban: ‘All I can tell you is that it’s in place… I can’t prophesy the future’
The word 'crisis ' has become a meaningless joke word.
Should only be used to mean "turning point in a disease" like in the good old days.
I don't think that's quite what the nothing to see here crew have in mind.
Well, stranded holidaymakers is the kind of story that has been sensationalised for as long as I can remember, I guess linking it to global heating is what some people don't like? There definitely seems to be an increase in wildfires in the Mediterranean (and elsewhere) in recent years, and an increased likelihood of heatwaves. But to really hit the headlines it has to affect British holidaymakers.
The unprecedented (in human memory) wave of forest fires around the globe of recent years is arguably a symptom of a climate inflection point - albeit one that's measured in years and decades, rather than days and weeks.
In the particular case of Rhodes, has it ever had fires this large ?
I think there will be a series of climate tipping points that will be observable over the next 50 years. A lot of these (forest fires, melting permafrost, glacial melting) will worsen global warming given the net emissions impact or reduction in the albedo effect.
I also suspect that, absent major technological breakthroughs, the political will to push to net zero within democracies will fall short. The cost of certain aspects will just not be politically viable, particularly in the US.
Politically, mass migration from the worst affected areas is the most predictable result of all of this.
The word 'crisis ' has become a meaningless joke word.
Should only be used to mean "turning point in a disease" like in the good old days.
I don't think that's quite what the nothing to see here crew have in mind.
Well, stranded holidaymakers is the kind of story that has been sensationalised for as long as I can remember, I guess linking it to global heating is what some people don't like? There definitely seems to be an increase in wildfires in the Mediterranean (and elsewhere) in recent years, and an increased likelihood of heatwaves. But to really hit the headlines it has to affect British holidaymakers.
With a special credit to TUI. It takes epic cynicism to keep flying holidaymakers into an inferno, with the aim of avoiding liability and refund.
The word 'crisis ' has become a meaningless joke word.
Should only be used to mean "turning point in a disease" like in the good old days.
I don't think that's quite what the nothing to see here crew have in mind.
Well, stranded holidaymakers is the kind of story that has been sensationalised for as long as I can remember, I guess linking it to global heating is what some people don't like? There definitely seems to be an increase in wildfires in the Mediterranean (and elsewhere) in recent years, and an increased likelihood of heatwaves. But to really hit the headlines it has to affect British holidaymakers.
The unprecedented (in human memory) wave of forest fires around the globe of recent years is arguably a symptom of a climate inflection point - albeit one that's measured in years and decades, rather than days and weeks.
In the particular case of Rhodes, has it ever had fires this large ?
The photos from Rhodes are extraordinary. What with small ship evacuations from beaches, repatriation flights and people walking 12 hours carrying luggage to reach them, it is The Road meets Dunkirk. Or, it's just hot weather, what do you expect in Greece in July?
The nothing to see faction really need to point to a precedent.
It’s the largest wildfire evacuation in Greek history. 19,000 people. There is no precedent
Remember, just as there are people wanting to exaggerate the story for social media dopamine hits, there are people desperate to minimise it: eg anyone in the Greek tourist industry or even the airlines (and one can sympathise)
Good news from Spain that Vox fell sharply backwards. They ran a campaign offering all kinds of reactionary policies, literally implored people to vote for them on their posters, and lost ground rapidly.
The best PSOE result in terms of vote share since 2007 and a major polling failure. Only one pollster had them getting over 30% and that was the widely derided CIS, which has always been accused of being biased to the left.
A humiliation for Vox and a personal disaster for PP leader Feijóo, who is going to struggle to retain control of a party that expected the process of forming a government to have begun today but has now learned that just being anti-Sánchez was not enough.
Now, we’re almost certainly heading for new elections in November or December, with Sánchez likely to be caretaker PM in the meantime. There is a narrow path to him forming a new government, if everything falls his way - but that is highly unlikely as its Catalan separatists, who also had a terrible night, that will decide.
Notable that despite the summer polling date turnout rose from 66% to 70%. The progressive Spain turned out to keep Vox out of power. There’s a lesson there for PP. But will they learn it? They are a party much like the 2019 Tories - one with a split personality, that took votes from former C’s and Vox supporters, from the centre and the far right. How do you keep such a coalition together if being anti-Sánchez is not enough?
I hadn’t realised C’s had literally given up. No great loss (their journey from centrist to proto-Vox was deeply unedifying) but rare to see a party implode quite so rapidly.
This is a very good tip by @MikeSmithson by the way.
Sadiq has made a huge error with ulez. However, I suspect it will blow over and that he will be re-elected.
It ought to serve as a warning to Labour. It's during their third term in office that they will combine arrogance with fatigue.
History repeats itself. Has to. No one listens.
If you apply the Uxbridge swing to the London Mayoral contest, then Khan wins by the biggest margin in any London Mayoral contest.
That’s the point. ULEZ may have allowed the Tories to hold on in Uxbridge, but there was still a substantial swing against them. The underlying unpopularity of the Conservatives is the bigger factor. Lay Hall.
Or perhaps ULEZ was the reason for the massive swing 😉
I don't know much about London politics, but in a city where 46% of households don't have access to a car at all, I can't see how this can become an issue for Khan without a hysterical misinformation campaign from CCHQ. 90% of those cars are ULEZ compliant, so we are talking about less than 5% of households.
Car ownership is also strongly correlated with earnings and location. The people with cars are already likely to be voting Tory. You might find that non-ULEZ compliant cars are more likely to be owned by poorer drivers, but I'd guess this is still a very small number of possible labour voters.
There are some recent stats that suggest cycling had now overtaken driving in parts of central London, so like with all Pigou taxes, ULEZ will become a smaller issue going forward.
Outer London is different. In many suburbs, car usage isn’t optional. In addition, the assumption is that the next stage of ULEZ is coming. So it’s far more than the immediately effected drivers.
The overall car taxation in London, on parking, congestion charge etc. is nothing if you can afford an EV. Otherwise you pay.
Poorer drivers in outer London suburbs are not paying the congestion charge. I live inside the South Circular and work in central London, and I have never in my life paid the congestion charge.
This is a very good tip by @MikeSmithson by the way.
Sadiq has made a huge error with ulez. However, I suspect it will blow over and that he will be re-elected.
It ought to serve as a warning to Labour. It's during their third term in office that they will combine arrogance with fatigue.
History repeats itself. Has to. No one listens.
If you apply the Uxbridge swing to the London Mayoral contest, then Khan wins by the biggest margin in any London Mayoral contest.
That’s the point. ULEZ may have allowed the Tories to hold on in Uxbridge, but there was still a substantial swing against them. The underlying unpopularity of the Conservatives is the bigger factor. Lay Hall.
Or perhaps ULEZ was the reason for the massive swing 😉
I don't know much about London politics, but in a city where 46% of households don't have access to a car at all, I can't see how this can become an issue for Khan without a hysterical misinformation campaign from CCHQ. 90% of those cars are ULEZ compliant, so we are talking about less than 5% of households.
Car ownership is also strongly correlated with earnings and location. The people with cars are already likely to be voting Tory. You might find that non-ULEZ compliant cars are more likely to be owned by poorer drivers, but I'd guess this is still a very small number of possible labour voters.
There are some recent stats that suggest cycling had now overtaken driving in parts of central London, so like with all Pigou taxes, ULEZ will become a smaller issue going forward.
Virtually none of the 46% of households without access to a car are changing their vote because of ULEZ.
A lot of the households with non compliant cars are both incentived to turn out and switch.
As with VAT on private schools it makes no difference electorally that the majority support the policy, the switchers are nearly all on one side.
The gap between Khan and Bailey last time was 120,000 votes - a lot more than that will be impacted by ULEZ. If Corbyn joins the show it feels pretty tough for Khan to me. One quirk is that if Corbyn does join, it might prompt other high profile independents as not impossible the winning number could be in the mid twenties.
A lot of the households with non-compliant cars already vote Tory. You're right, it's the switchers who matter, but how many switchers are there? What sunk Labour in Uxbridge was not people switching to the Tories, it was too few people switching to Labour. In London as a whole, as you say, Labour start with a big lead.
The word 'crisis ' has become a meaningless joke word.
Should only be used to mean "turning point in a disease" like in the good old days.
I don't think that's quite what the nothing to see here crew have in mind.
Well, stranded holidaymakers is the kind of story that has been sensationalised for as long as I can remember, I guess linking it to global heating is what some people don't like? There definitely seems to be an increase in wildfires in the Mediterranean (and elsewhere) in recent years, and an increased likelihood of heatwaves. But to really hit the headlines it has to affect British holidaymakers.
The unprecedented (in human memory) wave of forest fires around the globe of recent years is arguably a symptom of a climate inflection point - albeit one that's measured in years and decades, rather than days and weeks.
In the particular case of Rhodes, has it ever had fires this large ?
I think there will be a series of climate tipping points that will be observable over the next 50 years. A lot of these (forest fires, melting permafrost, glacial melting) will worsen global warming given the net emissions impact or reduction in the albedo effect.
I also suspect that, absent major technological breakthroughs, the political will to push to net zero within democracies will fall short. The cost of certain aspects will just not be politically viable, particularly in the US.
Politically, mass migration from the worst affected areas is the most predictable result of all of this.
I'm not sure we need any major technological breakthroughs to reach zero fossil fuel use. We have wind turbines, solar panels and batteries, and there is immense competition to produce continuous incremental improvements in all three technologies.
Where the politics could make a difference, is in speeding up the pace of the transition to the new technology, so that the amount of global warming we end up with will be less.
The word 'crisis ' has become a meaningless joke word.
Should only be used to mean "turning point in a disease" like in the good old days.
I don't think that's quite what the nothing to see here crew have in mind.
Well, stranded holidaymakers is the kind of story that has been sensationalised for as long as I can remember, I guess linking it to global heating is what some people don't like? There definitely seems to be an increase in wildfires in the Mediterranean (and elsewhere) in recent years, and an increased likelihood of heatwaves. But to really hit the headlines it has to affect British holidaymakers.
The unprecedented (in human memory) wave of forest fires around the globe of recent years is arguably a symptom of a climate inflection point - albeit one that's measured in years and decades, rather than days and weeks.
In the particular case of Rhodes, has it ever had fires this large ?
It's the increase in average temperatures which is the tell. The wildfires are just "weather", but the prevalence of such weather was expected to increase as the world heats up.
It's to be expected from the shape of the normal curve of the probability of extreme event with intensity A which normally happens only very rarely, i.e. we live at one end of the bell curve where probability is low. You warm things up, you move along the horizontal axis a little, but the probability of event (intensity = A) goes up disproportionately, because of the shape of the bell curve whgich is, well, bell-shaped.
By which time he could very easily be the presumptive nominee, and he’d be pushing for a postponement.
He can push for a postponement all he likes and he's got his tame judge in charge, but there isn't actually any legal reason to postpone a trial because someone is busy in another aspect of their life, is there?
This is a very good tip by @MikeSmithson by the way.
Sadiq has made a huge error with ulez. However, I suspect it will blow over and that he will be re-elected.
It ought to serve as a warning to Labour. It's during their third term in office that they will combine arrogance with fatigue.
History repeats itself. Has to. No one listens.
If you apply the Uxbridge swing to the London Mayoral contest, then Khan wins by the biggest margin in any London Mayoral contest.
That’s the point. ULEZ may have allowed the Tories to hold on in Uxbridge, but there was still a substantial swing against them. The underlying unpopularity of the Conservatives is the bigger factor. Lay Hall.
Or perhaps ULEZ was the reason for the massive swing 😉
I don't know much about London politics, but in a city where 46% of households don't have access to a car at all, I can't see how this can become an issue for Khan without a hysterical misinformation campaign from CCHQ. 90% of those cars are ULEZ compliant, so we are talking about less than 5% of households.
Car ownership is also strongly correlated with earnings and location. The people with cars are already likely to be voting Tory. You might find that non-ULEZ compliant cars are more likely to be owned by poorer drivers, but I'd guess this is still a very small number of possible labour voters.
There are some recent stats that suggest cycling had now overtaken driving in parts of central London, so like with all Pigou taxes, ULEZ will become a smaller issue going forward.
Virtually none of the 46% of households without access to a car are changing their vote because of ULEZ.
A lot of the households with non compliant cars are both incentived to turn out and switch.
As with VAT on private schools it makes no difference electorally that the majority support the policy, the switchers are nearly all on one side.
The gap between Khan and Bailey last time was 120,000 votes - a lot more than that will be impacted by ULEZ. If Corbyn joins the show it feels pretty tough for Khan to me. One quirk is that if Corbyn does join, it might prompt other high profile independents as not impossible the winning number could be in the mid twenties.
A lot of the households with non-compliant cars already vote Tory. You're right, it's the switchers who matter, but how many switchers are there? What sunk Labour in Uxbridge was not people switching to the Tories, it was too few people switching to Labour. In London as a whole, as you say, Labour start with a big lead.
Turnout was 42%. Differential turnout between those who have to fork out extra few £k for a car and those who don't will be huge before you get to anyone switching.
The word 'crisis ' has become a meaningless joke word.
Should only be used to mean "turning point in a disease" like in the good old days.
I don't think that's quite what the nothing to see here crew have in mind.
Well, stranded holidaymakers is the kind of story that has been sensationalised for as long as I can remember, I guess linking it to global heating is what some people don't like? There definitely seems to be an increase in wildfires in the Mediterranean (and elsewhere) in recent years, and an increased likelihood of heatwaves. But to really hit the headlines it has to affect British holidaymakers.
The unprecedented (in human memory) wave of forest fires around the globe of recent years is arguably a symptom of a climate inflection point - albeit one that's measured in years and decades, rather than days and weeks.
In the particular case of Rhodes, has it ever had fires this large ?
I think there will be a series of climate tipping points that will be observable over the next 50 years. A lot of these (forest fires, melting permafrost, glacial melting) will worsen global warming given the net emissions impact or reduction in the albedo effect.
I also suspect that, absent major technological breakthroughs, the political will to push to net zero within democracies will fall short. The cost of certain aspects will just not be politically viable, particularly in the US.
Politically, mass migration from the worst affected areas is the most predictable result of all of this.
Humans were born into paradise. It is being transformed into hell in front of our eyes, the result of our rapacious greed and stupidity.
On the day the papers are headlining the terrible fires in Greece the UK government wants to water down its climate pledges !
They'll be lucky to have water.
I'd be very worried if I lived in some of the drier parts of south-eastern England, with population going up and **** all having been done about water conservation never mind gathering of late.
This is a very good tip by @MikeSmithson by the way.
Sadiq has made a huge error with ulez. However, I suspect it will blow over and that he will be re-elected.
It ought to serve as a warning to Labour. It's during their third term in office that they will combine arrogance with fatigue.
History repeats itself. Has to. No one listens.
If you apply the Uxbridge swing to the London Mayoral contest, then Khan wins by the biggest margin in any London Mayoral contest.
That’s the point. ULEZ may have allowed the Tories to hold on in Uxbridge, but there was still a substantial swing against them. The underlying unpopularity of the Conservatives is the bigger factor. Lay Hall.
Or perhaps ULEZ was the reason for the massive swing 😉
I don't know much about London politics, but in a city where 46% of households don't have access to a car at all, I can't see how this can become an issue for Khan without a hysterical misinformation campaign from CCHQ. 90% of those cars are ULEZ compliant, so we are talking about less than 5% of households.
Car ownership is also strongly correlated with earnings and location. The people with cars are already likely to be voting Tory. You might find that non-ULEZ compliant cars are more likely to be owned by poorer drivers, but I'd guess this is still a very small number of possible labour voters.
There are some recent stats that suggest cycling had now overtaken driving in parts of central London, so like with all Pigou taxes, ULEZ will become a smaller issue going forward.
Outer London is different. In many suburbs, car usage isn’t optional. In addition, the assumption is that the next stage of ULEZ is coming. So it’s far more than the immediately effected drivers.
The overall car taxation in London, on parking, congestion charge etc. is nothing if you can afford an EV. Otherwise you pay.
Poorer drivers in outer London suburbs are not paying the congestion charge. I live inside the South Circular and work in central London, and I have never in my life paid the congestion charge.
That’s because it has priced people out of driving into the centre. Unless you are in an EV. In which case, you roll in and park at a charging point.
Foreign Office minister Andrew Mitchell sounding shaky on the future of the 2030 petrol car ban: ‘All I can tell you is that it’s in place… I can’t prophesy the future’
Postponing the 2030 ban on new ICE cars is a bit like inflation, out of the control of government. If the manufacturers no longer make ICE cars we can no longer buy them. Unless in its lurch back to the 1950s the Government could reintroduce the half timbered Morris Minor alongside hanging.
This is a very good tip by @MikeSmithson by the way.
Sadiq has made a huge error with ulez. However, I suspect it will blow over and that he will be re-elected.
It ought to serve as a warning to Labour. It's during their third term in office that they will combine arrogance with fatigue.
History repeats itself. Has to. No one listens.
If you apply the Uxbridge swing to the London Mayoral contest, then Khan wins by the biggest margin in any London Mayoral contest.
That’s the point. ULEZ may have allowed the Tories to hold on in Uxbridge, but there was still a substantial swing against them. The underlying unpopularity of the Conservatives is the bigger factor. Lay Hall.
Or perhaps ULEZ was the reason for the massive swing 😉
I don't know much about London politics, but in a city where 46% of households don't have access to a car at all, I can't see how this can become an issue for Khan without a hysterical misinformation campaign from CCHQ. 90% of those cars are ULEZ compliant, so we are talking about less than 5% of households.
Car ownership is also strongly correlated with earnings and location. The people with cars are already likely to be voting Tory. You might find that non-ULEZ compliant cars are more likely to be owned by poorer drivers, but I'd guess this is still a very small number of possible labour voters.
There are some recent stats that suggest cycling had now overtaken driving in parts of central London, so like with all Pigou taxes, ULEZ will become a smaller issue going forward.
As sure as night follows day the pro ULEZ lobbyists are doing the rounds of the news studios expanding on the virtue of ULEZ and leading the fightback.
Apparently Angela Rayner was saying, was misquoted as saying, ULEZ is coming everywhere. An interesting point of debate for the next election looms.
I expect this to be the precursor of charging per mile as we move away from fuel duty on petrol.
One of very few things that might rescue the Tories at the GE, would be a bunch of city dwellers from Labour pledging a full-on war on cars in the rest of the country.
That would be very silly. The natural successors to fuel duty/VED are axle-load tax and congestion charging.
I don't think congestion charging can raise remotely as much money as fuel duty.
Fuel duty raises around £25bn per year, from around 40m vehicles. So an average of c.£50 per month per vehicle.
In addition, VED raises around £6bn per year for cars, and about the same again for commercial vehicles.
Foreign Office minister Andrew Mitchell sounding shaky on the future of the 2030 petrol car ban: ‘All I can tell you is that it’s in place… I can’t prophesy the future’
Postponing the 2030 ban on new ICE cars is a bit like inflation, out of the control of government. If the manufacturers no longer make ICE cars we can no longer buy them. Unless in its lurch back to the 1950s the Government could reintroduce the half timbered Morris Minor alongside hanging.
And definitely with the original wooden trim. None of the new-fangled plastic substitute.
The word 'crisis ' has become a meaningless joke word.
Should only be used to mean "turning point in a disease" like in the good old days.
I don't think that's quite what the nothing to see here crew have in mind.
Well, stranded holidaymakers is the kind of story that has been sensationalised for as long as I can remember, I guess linking it to global heating is what some people don't like? There definitely seems to be an increase in wildfires in the Mediterranean (and elsewhere) in recent years, and an increased likelihood of heatwaves. But to really hit the headlines it has to affect British holidaymakers.
With a special credit to TUI. It takes epic cynicism to keep flying holidaymakers into an inferno, with the aim of avoiding liability and refund.
And lots of photos of young ladies and yummy mummies wearing very little to add to the human interest in the DM etc.
Foreign Office minister Andrew Mitchell sounding shaky on the future of the 2030 petrol car ban: ‘All I can tell you is that it’s in place… I can’t prophesy the future’
Postponing the 2030 ban on new ICE cars is a bit like inflation, out of the control of government. If the manufacturers no longer make ICE cars we can no longer buy them. Unless in its lurch back to the 1950s the Government could reintroduce the half timbered Morris Minor alongside hanging.
The German car manufacturers are demanding a delay. They screwed up the battery supply issue.
So the EU may well delay. Which will then pose some interesting pressure on the next U.K. government. Especially if it wants to align with the EU.
Comments
There’s absolutely no limit to this transformation. X will be the platform that can deliver, well….everything. @elonmusk and I are looking forward to working with our teams and every single one of our partners to bring X to the world.
https://twitter.com/lindayacc/status/1683214311957594113
- they pick a popular celebrity candidate, of the kind that has such huge advantage in direct elections like this; and
- they recover significantly in national politics.
Boris won narrowly in 2008 when he had good name recognition and Labour were hugely unpopular nationally and in 2012, he was the incumbent, which gives a big advantage in being known.
So good luck to OGH but I'm not sure I'd take 7/1 for Susan Who?
Instead, they tried to stitch it up for some ex-Cameron SpAd, who got a #MeToo during the campaign, and they were left with Susan Who? At least, after the events of last week, she has one good issue on which to campaign, in the outer boroughs anyway.
None of the Mayors of London so far have primarily been identified by their party affiliation, in the public eye. Khan is the closest to a standard party candidate, but most people don’t regard him as Mr Labour.
While that would make sense if Musk were attempting to repair the damage he's done to Twitter (difficult, since he doesn't accept that), it's not immediately obvious to me what possible use she could be to a venture that is apparently trying to turn itself into a competitor for some of the biggest and best funded tech companies in the world - while loss making, and with a small fraction of their resources.
As proof of the emergency nature of the crisis they noted that “holidaymakers [at the airport] have been photographed anxiously studying the departure board”…
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2023/jul/24/labour-vows-to-modernise-simplify-and-reform-gender-recognition-act
With China this time, Russia's participation in anything but destruction being over.
China sets out preliminary crewed lunar landing plan
https://spacenews.com/china-sets-out-preliminary-crewed-lunar-landing-plan/
And good morning
xx
The only thing that could threaten Labour is a serious independent candidacy. Which means (J) Corbyn. Even if he does stand, I’d think Khan the favourite.
@JustStop_Oil
The heatwave in Spain has already taken lives. Our government is fuelling climate-induced genocide and we must take action now.
https://twitter.com/JustStop_Oil/status/1679823098650980353
Chris Hanlon has filled out the paperwork to mount a coup against the first minister and is soliciting nominations online.
On Sunday he tweeted that he would give ordinary members more power to decide policy and break from a top-down style of leadership.
If Hanlon, secretary of the West Fife and Coastal Villages branch, receives 100 nominations, he would force the second leadership contest in the SNP in six months, following the bitter race to replace Nicola Sturgeon when she resigned in February.
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/snp-activist-plots-leadership-bid-as-discipline-breaks-down-xhj2qglgr
Sadiq has made a huge error with ulez. However, I suspect it will blow over and that he will be re-elected.
It ought to serve as a warning to Labour. It's during their third term in office that they will combine arrogance with fatigue.
History repeats itself. Has to. No one listens.
It's a bit of a storm in a teacup to be absolutely frank, affecting relatively few people who probably needed to get those cars replaced anyway. My brother's car, for instance, was nearly 20 years old.
It will blow over.
But it's a warning to Labour for sure.
Turing this into culture wars bullshit is so Donald Fucking Trump.
1) London needs cleaner air
2) Historically, the best way to achieve this is incrementally improving standards. As proven many times in many places
3) The “ULEZ policy”that was implemented was just one of a number of possible policies.
4) Not being impressed with 3) doesn’t mean opposing 1 & 2.
That’s the point. ULEZ may have allowed the Tories to hold on in Uxbridge, but there was still a substantial swing against them. The underlying unpopularity of the Conservatives is the bigger factor. Lay Hall.
The Conservatives took a deliberate turn to become the party of retired homeowners. In some ways that makes sense, but it has consequences.
Yes, the Chinese will have less bureaucracy to navigate once the decision is made, not constantly going back to the politicians for more money, to be spent in 100 specific towns, with fewer suppliers and partner agencies to deal with along the way (There’s 27 countries involved in Artemis), but going to the Moon is at least an order of magnitude more complicated than going to LEO.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artemis_program
Oh sorry, was that a verb not your nickname for Yousaf?
And they need to get the updated version up and running. The one they launched isn’t the version they need.
And the new launch tower that costs more than a rocket development project, by itself…
https://www1.wdr.de/nachrichten/mesut-oezil-graue-woelfe-tattoo-102.html
I cannot see Susan Hall winning the London mayoral contest unless something entirely unexpected happens to the labour vote
I think Scotland's SNP/Greens are heading for considerable unpopularity especially if the Greens policy of banning gas boilers comes into force in 2025
Apparently it will be a requirement to sell a home for it to comply with energy rating c but they are to change the formulae to ensure it cannot be achieved with a gas boiler.
The result will see all homes to either install a heat pump or electric heating to be saleable at a cost of 33 billion with approx 1.8 billion from the Scottish government
This, if approved, would be their poll tax and when added to their proposition to vastly increases council tax and higher rates of tax anyway compared to the rest of the UK, will the last person to leave please switch off the lights
https://www.heraldscotland.com/news/23670366.gas-boilers-set-penalised-energy-efficiency-overhaul/
Being first is, in that context, secondary.
*The Outer Space Treaty
FWIW, I can quite see "to useless" something catching on.
A humiliation for Vox and a personal disaster for PP leader Feijóo, who is going to struggle to retain control of a party that expected the process of forming a government to have begun today but has now learned that just being anti-Sánchez was not enough.
Now, we’re almost certainly heading for new elections in November or December, with Sánchez likely to be caretaker PM in the meantime. There is a narrow path to him forming a new government, if everything falls his way - but that is highly unlikely as its Catalan separatists, who also had a terrible night, that will decide.
Notable that despite the summer polling date turnout rose from 66% to 70%. The progressive Spain turned out to keep Vox out of power. There’s a lesson there for PP. But will they learn it? They are a party much like the 2019 Tories - one with a split personality, that took votes from former C’s and Vox supporters, from the centre and the far right. How do you keep such a coalition together if being anti-Sánchez is not enough?
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=AdtLxlttrHg
https://www.ft.com/content/b027a525-05b1-45fc-a2c2-f131d341bc6b
{I’ll get my coat. It’s the one with the spare mechanical arm in it}
I don't know much about London politics, but in a city where 46% of households don't have access to a car at all, I can't see how this can become an issue for Khan without a hysterical misinformation campaign from CCHQ. 90% of those cars are ULEZ compliant, so we are talking about less than 5% of households.
Car ownership is also strongly correlated with earnings and location. The people with cars are already likely to be voting Tory. You might find that non-ULEZ compliant cars are more likely to be owned by poorer drivers, but I'd guess this is still a very small number of possible labour voters.
There are some recent stats that suggest cycling had now overtaken driving in parts of central London, so like with all Pigou taxes, ULEZ will become a smaller issue going forward.
It was a slightly different story in the Basque Country, though. Radical separatist party Bildu beat the conservative nationalist PNV for the first time ever. That is seismic. The Basques have been much quieter than the Catalans over recent years, pretty content to enjoy the extensive autonomy they have. This is now going to change. Expect a lot more noise and close cooperation with the more radical elements of Catalan separatism.
Could you point out where in the article or policy it says that? Asking for a friend...
Also - they aren't banning gas boilers, just updating building regs to say that new builds can't have them. Most new builds in Edinburgh don't have boilers anyway.
In the particular case of Rhodes, has it ever had fires this large ?
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/other/coutts-virtue-signalling-plan-had-one-flaw-the-bank-has-no-virtue-to-signal/ar-AA1eebzt?ocid=entnewsntp&cvid=cea0260624074960a1ac89dfcf010618&ei=14
It's a similar issue to the "where to build houses?" one in a way. Something can be the right thing for the community as a whole, but some candidates are incentivised to oppose it tooth and nail.
The overall car taxation in London, on parking, congestion charge etc. is nothing if you can afford an EV. Otherwise you pay.
Now Europe burns as well. It does feel like an inflection
Apparently Angela Rayner was saying, was misquoted as saying, ULEZ is coming everywhere. An interesting point of debate for the next election looms.
I expect this to be the precursor of charging per mile as we move away from fuel duty on petrol.
2) therefore the policy is perfect.
3) therefore anyone who opposes us is scum
The nothing to see faction really need to point to a precedent.
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2023/jul/24/labour-vows-to-modernise-simplify-and-reform-gender-recognition-act
A lot of the households with non compliant cars are both incentived to turn out and switch.
As with VAT on private schools it makes no difference electorally that the majority support the policy, the switchers are nearly all on one side.
The gap between Khan and Bailey last time was 120,000 votes - a lot more than that will be impacted by ULEZ. If Corbyn joins the show it feels pretty tough for Khan to me. One quirk is that if Corbyn does join, it might prompt other high profile independents as not impossible the winning number could be in the mid twenties.
If the Tories want to oppose their own policy that's fine. But claiming - as some have - that this is "typical socialism" is painfully deluded. Perhaps Michael Green is a socialist?
Foreign Office minister Andrew Mitchell sounding shaky on the future of the 2030 petrol car ban: ‘All I can tell you is that it’s in place… I can’t prophesy the future’
The Trump trial date on the 'classified documents' charges set for May 2024.
https://edition.cnn.com/2023/07/21/politics/trump-trial-date/index.html
Hmmm.
I also suspect that, absent major technological breakthroughs, the political will to push to net zero within democracies will fall short. The cost of certain aspects will just not be politically viable, particularly in the US.
Politically, mass migration from the worst affected areas is the most predictable result of all of this.
Remember, just as there are people wanting to exaggerate the story for social media dopamine hits, there are people desperate to minimise it: eg anyone in the Greek tourist industry or even the airlines (and one can sympathise)
I live inside the South Circular and work in central London, and I have never in my life paid the congestion charge.
Where the politics could make a difference, is in speeding up the pace of the transition to the new technology, so that the amount of global warming we end up with will be less.
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/met-police-blocks-report-on-its-record-with-women-bhrjq6jxs
I'd be very worried if I lived in some of the drier parts of south-eastern England, with population going up and **** all having been done about water conservation never mind gathering of late.
In addition, VED raises around £6bn per year for cars, and about the same again for commercial vehicles.
So the EU may well delay. Which will then pose some interesting pressure on the next U.K. government. Especially if it wants to align with the EU.