politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » As the immigration debate moves centre stage the minister in charge resigns for employing an illegal as his cleaner
Immigration Minister Mark Harper resigns after it emerged his cleaner did not have permission to work in the UK. pic.twitter.com/CD3uOfzKRe
Read the full story here
Comments
I know, I know, but I've said before, in the world of politics, the perceptions sometimes matter more than the facts.
Mark Harper knew how damaging it would be for the government if he didn't resign.
Baroness Scotland has sacked her housekeeper from Tonga, because she was allegedly working in the UK illegally.
The attorney general employed Loloahi Tapui, 27, for six months, the Daily Mail reported.
She was a Home Office minister when laws were passed to fine bosses who employ illegal workers up to £10,000.
Downing St said Gordon Brown had "full confidence" in Baroness Scotland who says she hired Ms Tapui in "good faith" and thought she was entitled to work.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8260088.stm
Gordon Brown today decided to allow the attorney general, Lady Scotland, to remain in government after she was fined £5,000 for employing an illegal immigrant.
The prime minister said he had decided to take no further action because Scotland had employed Loloahi Tapui, a housekeeper from Tonga, "in good faith" and had apologised "unreservedly".
But the Tories demanded Scotland's immediate resignation, pointing out that she was being punished for breaking a law that she had helped steer through parliament.
Chris Huhne, the Liberal Democrat home affairs spokesman, said: "Lawmakers should not be law-breakers, and this applies even more to Baroness Scotland due to her special position as chief law officer. Her position now looks untenable."
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2009/sep/22/lady-scotland-illegal-immigrant-brown
Woman who lit the Olympic flame sent a racist tweet about Barack Obama last year
http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/olympics/sochi/2014/02/07/winter-games-obama-flame-irina-rodnina-racist/5289869/
Ian Liddell-Grainger, Tory MP for flood-hit Bridgwater in Somerset
Neil Parish, Tory MP for Tiverton and Honiton
Jacob Rees-Mogg, Tory MP for North East Somerset
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2554324/Spend-foreign-aid-British-victims-flooding-MPs-impassioned-call-crisis-deepens.html
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2552969/Ukips-Nigel-Farage-calls-foreign-aid-budget-used-help-flood-hit-communities.html
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/details-of-ministerial-appointments-announced
Very surprised by the dominance of Ireland's victory. They must be confident of a tilt at the tournament now.
http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/458527/FARAGE-ON-FRIDAY-Let-s-demand-EU-cashback-and-divert-foreign-aid-for-flood-victims
pic.twitter.com/kgpj75T0LY
Phillips is an annoying so-and-so.
Those are tremendous odds.
I did post the winning betting slip afterwards though
http://www.oddschecker.com/rugby-union/six-nations/scotland-v-england/winner
And England to win by 21-30 points at 9/2
http://www.oddschecker.com/rugby-union/six-nations/scotland-v-england/winning-margin
And I'm not sure I buy Harper's 'Although I complied with the law at all times' as one of the requirements of the law is that you keep records - his 'I lost them' cost Baroness Scotland £5,000......
http://www.eveningnews24.co.uk/news/labour_election_mastermind_arnie_graf_in_norfolk_visit_1_2361767
Unfortunately it's not as simple as that. You have quoted the 'cost' of being in the 'club' without mentioning the benefits, tangible and otherwise.
Not saying that the EU is perfect, but to leave it is sheer lunacy. The UK would become an isolated and poor backwater of north-west Europe as multi-nationals leave the UK in their droves.
John Major hit the nail on the head...
http://www.scotsman.com/news/uk/john-major-warns-of-cost-of-britain-leaving-eu-1-3213922
Er, why should the cost of being in any 'club' be a net 10 billion quid?
Er, cost of not being in the 'club' - poverty, isolation and irrelevance...
I'm afraid other matters kept me from commenting on David H's piece this morning. I understand the point, I think, but I'm not wholly convinced.
There are, to my mind, three distinct voting blocks at the moment - the "Blue" side which is the Conservative vote plus maybe 40% of the UKIP numbers, the "Red" side which is the Labour vote plus perhaps 10% of the UKIP vote and the "Rest" which is what it says on the tin.
When I look at poll numbers I add 40% of the UKIP score to the Conservatives and 10% to Labour and that tells me what a GE would look like at the moment. Hugely imprecise but we have to start somewhere.
I do agree with the premise that the movement is between "Blue" and "Rest" or "Red" and "Rest" and this might explain the fairly static poll numbers since the spring of 2012.
As for Mark Harper, well, yes, he had to go and it's an embarrassment that the Conservatives could probably do without but it's not much more than that. Whether or not UKIP gain any temporary traction is debatable and within a fortnight this will be ancient history (or it may not).
Show how Norway or Switzerland are isolated, poor and irrelevant.
http://survation.com/2013/05/ukip-won-in-8-westminster-constituencies-last-thursday/
http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/2015guide/forestofdean/
It's hardly a major crime, and he has reacted speedily. Unless more comes out (and who knows?) then it should hardly be the end of his political career.
But:
Hahahahaha hum.
Also: I wonder which other politicians are calling in their staff to re-check their status?
Of course, I doubt Harper was her only employer - I wonder who else is feeling nervous tonight.....
Muddy field more like !
'Scottish rugby will be sh*te until independence' or 'Scottish rugby is so sh*te you don't deserve independence.'
If we want to play those games lets then talk about the real costs and not just the membership fee.
EU 'costs Britain £118bn a year'
The European Union's vast cost is one of the biggest reasons to be concerned about Britain's relationship with it, says Matthew Elliott.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/6198708/EU-costs-Britain-118bn-a-year.html
Ironic that's about the same as the current annual government overspend.
"Did she clean behind the fridge?"
I'm puzzled as to why the "cost" of being in something should be the rationale for whether we join it or not. I suspect being in the UN "costs" and I also suspect being in NATO "costs" as well.
If you start from a hostile position then an analysis based simply on accounting can usually support your position but if our future international relations are going to be based on knowing the cost of everything and the value of nothing - well, that will be a strange way of doing things.
The question is less how much does it cost to be in the EU, UN or NATO but rather what value do we get from being a member of these organisations (and others ?).
The same argument can be used when discussing international aid as well.
Naturally this includes more than just financial costs, but I would assume there are formulae that are accepted to calculate the value of these intangibles (e.g. I believe the value of a human life in traffic safety measures is set at £1 million)