Somerton looks like a nailed on LD gain to me - as Stephen Bush from FT put it. They will absolutely smash it and it won’t be close. a) it’s a by-election b) it’s a seat with a Lib Dem history c) uh, have you seen the i) the circumstances Warburton is standing down in and ii) the state of the country lately? https://twitter.com/stephenkb/status/1670178119360081922?cxt=HHwWhMCzwdGJ1a0uAAAA
Uxbridge looks a classic loss to opposition by-election, so that level of betting would make sense.
Rishi would take winning 1 of 4, but will hope for 2 I guess.
@christopherhope NEW Government whips are expecting a vote in the House of Commons on the Privileges report into whether Boris Johnson lied to MPs at 9.30pm, MPs tell me.
@christopherhope NEW Government whips are expecting a vote in the House of Commons on the Privileges report into whether Boris Johnson lied to MPs at 9.30pm, MPs tell me.
Do they still have to go through both lobbies in order to register an absention?
Asking for around 150 Tory MPs looking to take the second most cowardly way out.
Is a heart-stopping England win written in the stars?
Well I've been thinking that. It's been very close throughout. Hasn't really swung wildly from one team to another the way close test matches can - all the way through both teams have been about par. Looking like a victory between a handful of runs or a couple of wickets. That said, it could be entirely washed out looking at the forecast.
Uxbridge and South Ruislip - LAB but may be surprisingly close
Somerton - probably comfortably LD by 10% +
Selby - likely CON again might be comfortable
Mid Beds - probably not happening, if it does then possibly small CON maj
My inexpert guess would be had Boris stood Con might have had a decent showing in Uxbridge, one last rally behind their man. With him out the way and everyone predicting a Lab gain, the stay at home factor might be enormous.
6K in tonight in the relative heat, shins behaving
It'd be a lot more comfortable if you went out at five o'clock in the morning. It's the right time of year and the right conditions for it
Yeah, I did my short runs early in the morning last week. I haven't done any long runs as the heat is just too oppressive - and I've missed my objective for the year anyway.
Spare a thought for the chronically crocked: I've only just progressed from the misery of run/walking and back onto continuous running - and I'm still only allowed to do that for a limited distance, three times a week. The loss of fitness hasn't been catastrophic, but that's noticeable as well. Think it'll be at least August before I can race again, and I dread to think what my times are going to be like even then.
I do spare a thought for them: I was chronically crocked (could not walk at times) between the ages of 13 and 25. It's why I'm keen not to stress times - in that "I ran a 10K in 45 minutes!" (*), but just that I did the distance.
The external competitive aspect of leisure running is utterly counter-productive IMO. If you are an amateur you are not competing against others; you are competing against yourself.
My son is now at just under 70 junior parkruns. He's not won a single one, and has been at the back on two occasions when the field has been sparse. But he turns up week after week and plods away. I'm prouder of him than if he had turned up for 5 and won 2.
We all do what we can. we cannot all be record breaker, but they key thing is to stretch yourself in whatever ways you can; physically or mentally.
(*) Which I never have.
I get that up to a point. I would like to be able to earn points for my club in the leagues in which we compete, but I'm just too heavy to be sufficiently competitive even at a fairly low level (there are good reasons why 14st blokes don't do well in distance racing...) So, in my case it really is pretty much me versus myself when I'm trying for some sort of time - which makes setbacks ever so frustrating.
And my 10K PB is also over 45 minutes - though not by that much... I still harbour fantasies of breaking that particular barrier, but it is somewhat contingent on my body not starting to disintegrate again before I can manage it.
@PaulBrandITV NEW: As MPs debate his behaviour, Boris Johnson is attending the International Democratic Union reception tonight.
Sources say while there he criticised the privileges committee as “biased and wilfully ignorant” and added that “there is always another innings”.
Translation - they disagreed with me.
Amazing how the classics always work though - those who find against me are biased, therefore to be ignored. And to think they end up supproted by talentless yes men.
Question for Labourite PB-ers. You guys are gonna win in 2024 (I think win pretty big, as the Scots punish the Nats). And good luck o you, the Tories had 13 years and blew it, on the whole
So: what could a Starmer government do, what WILL a Starmer government do, that will make you profoundly grateful for a Labour government at last?
I don't mean "just not being Tories" or "kissing goodbye to Jacob Rees Mogg", I mean positive things that you expect Labour to do, which will benefit the country
eg Boris Johnsin can say, of his 2019 election, he Got Brexit Done. You may loathe and despise Brexit, but with his big majority Boris finally got the will of people enacted, thereby saving our reputation for democracy - or, indeed, democracy - and a lot of people voted for him to do exactly that. And he did it
What will be the Starmerite equivalent? I am intrigued
6K in tonight in the relative heat, shins behaving
It'd be a lot more comfortable if you went out at five o'clock in the morning. It's the right time of year and the right conditions for it
Yeah, I did my short runs early in the morning last week. I haven't done any long runs as the heat is just too oppressive - and I've missed my objective for the year anyway.
Spare a thought for the chronically crocked: I've only just progressed from the misery of run/walking and back onto continuous running - and I'm still only allowed to do that for a limited distance, three times a week. The loss of fitness hasn't been catastrophic, but that's noticeable as well. Think it'll be at least August before I can race again, and I dread to think what my times are going to be like even then.
I do spare a thought for them: I was chronically crocked (could not walk at times) between the ages of 13 and 25. It's why I'm keen not to stress times - in that "I ran a 10K in 45 minutes!" (*), but just that I did the distance.
The external competitive aspect of leisure running is utterly counter-productive IMO. If you are an amateur you are not competing against others; you are competing against yourself.
My son is now at just under 70 junior parkruns. He's not won a single one, and has been at the back on two occasions when the field has been sparse. But he turns up week after week and plods away. I'm prouder of him than if he had turned up for 5 and won 2.
We all do what we can. we cannot all be record breaker, but they key thing is to stretch yourself in whatever ways you can; physically or mentally.
(*) Which I never have.
I get that up to a point. I would like to be able to earn points for my club in the leagues in which we compete, but I'm just too heavy to be sufficiently competitive even at a fairly low level (there are good reasons why 14st blokes don't do well in distance racing...) So, in my case it really is pretty much me versus myself when I'm trying for some sort of time - which makes setbacks ever so frustrating.
And my 10K PB is also over 45 minutes - though not by that much... I still harbour fantasies of breaking that particular barrier, but it is somewhat contingent on my body not starting to disintegrate again before I can manage it.
IMV the problem with external competition is that it is a *massive* barrier to the majority. If he only thing that counts is beating everyone else, then only a few people will ever try. If what matters is beating yourself (calm down, Leon...) then that is a challenge many of us can take on.
I'll never be the 'best' long-distance walker. I'll never be the fastest runner. But I'm proud of what I've achieved in both those areas, even if those achievements mean sod-all to anyone else, and on their own may seem slightly pathetic. I've challenged myself and done well - and mostly enjoyed it.
Uxbridge is a fantastic bet. Tories just 10% chance but their candidate is a local South Ruislip councillor while the Labour candidate is a Camden councillor. It also has a big Hindu vote and the council stayed Tory last year.
Somerton and Frome almost certain to go LD, Selby correctly forecast to be neck and neck between Tories and Labour (I expect the Tories to scrape home). Mid Beds if Dorries steps down likely goes LD like Somerton, forecast correct there too
I'm still trying to understand how Jack Dorsey can have decided to endorse Robert Kennedy for president, given their respective views on the pandemic, vaccines, etc.
eg Boris Johnsin can say, of his 2019 election, he Got Brexit Done.
I thought it was blocked by the blob...
No, we have definitely Brexited, as 7,398 articles in the Guardian about New Brexit Tariffs on Semi Processed Cashew Crisps, or the 19 day long queues for Brits at Malaga airport, constantly tell us
So, what is Starmer's equivalent? What is his USP? What will he get done? Drastically repair or reform? I cannot see it as of now. but I am - genuinely - happy to be schooled. This guy, after all, is likely to be our PM for four-five years, minimum
Rishi should be more like Stokes and declare/call a GE - even if he loses it would be entertaining.
Otherwise it'll be Borisians resigning from now until Autumn 2024, lost by election after lost by election.
Are there enough left? Seriously.
For a handful of further by-elections? Possibly, from those who can claim they are just bowing out and not 'intending' to damage the PM.
Of course, if someone thinks there is no chance of reelection, then jacking it in [edit] earlym, before the GE, would lose the redundo. Quite a sacrifice, unless one is very well off. Or there is a Good Fairy in the background, of course.
"Under reforms introduced in 2013[1], MPs will be eligible to receive a Loss of Office payment if they lose their seat at a general election. The amount of the Loss of Office payment will be equal to double the statutory redundancy entitlement.
MPs are only eligible for such payments if they have held office for a continuous period of at least two years, stand for re-election but are not re-elected. MPs who choose to stand down prior to an election are not entitled to any payment."
I'm still trying to understand how Jack Dorsey can have decided to endorse Robert Kennedy for president, given their respective views on the pandemic, vaccines, etc.
Robert Kennedy is also 'anti big oil and big Pharma' and supports AOC's Green New Deal, backs Senator Warren's wealth tax proposals and opposed the Iraq War and NATO involvement in Ukraine.
On some policies Kennedy is not far off Jeremy Corbyn and his anti vax policies are certainly something Piers Corbyn would approve of
Question for Labourite PB-ers. You guys are gonna win in 2024 (I think win pretty big, as the Scots punish the Nats). And good luck o you, the Tories had 13 years and blew it, on the whole
So: what could a Starmer government do, what WILL a Starmer government do, that will make you profoundly grateful for a Labour government at last?
I don't mean "just not being Tories" or "kissing goodbye to Jacob Rees Mogg", I mean positive things that you expect Labour to do, which will benefit the country
eg Boris Johnsin can say, of his 2019 election, he Got Brexit Done. You may loathe and despise Brexit, but with his big majority Boris finally got the will of people enacted, thereby saving our reputation for democracy - or, indeed, democracy - and a lot of people voted for him to do exactly that. And he did it
What will be the Starmerite equivalent? I am intrigued
It's a good question. I'd like to imagine there will be some grand achievement, but to be honest if they just fund the schools properly and fund the Bakerloo Line extension I'll be grateful. I would guess though that there will be a significant improvement in the quality of governance if we no longer have people in charge pandering to the worst instincts of the country's most ignorant and wrong-headed people. Imagine if the government's first thought was no longer "will this be popular with a Daily Mail reading pensioner who collects golliwogs in their spare time and thinks that global warming is a woke conspiracy" every time they came to make a policy decision. Oh, and hopefully a referendum on EEA membership in the second term, but let's not get ahead of ourselves.
I'm still trying to understand how Jack Dorsey can have decided to endorse Robert Kennedy for president, given their respective views on the pandemic, vaccines, etc.
England are embarrassingly overblessed with footballing talent
I would have them as favourites for the euros 24
Let's not get carried away. Remember that this is a team that managed to get through an entire tournament without conceding a goal - and still contrived to lose the final in yet another penalty shootout. They've an immense talent for finding inventive ways not to win stuff.
I'm still trying to understand how Jack Dorsey can have decided to endorse Robert Kennedy for president, given their respective views on the pandemic, vaccines, etc.
I'm struggling to understand how anyone but a mentally challenged wombat could endorse him.
Kennedy is already picking up much of the support for Bernie Sanders in the 2020 and 2016 Democratic primaries as the candidate of the US populist left
Question for Labourite PB-ers. You guys are gonna win in 2024 (I think win pretty big, as the Scots punish the Nats). And good luck o you, the Tories had 13 years and blew it, on the whole
So: what could a Starmer government do, what WILL a Starmer government do, that will make you profoundly grateful for a Labour government at last?
I don't mean "just not being Tories" or "kissing goodbye to Jacob Rees Mogg", I mean positive things that you expect Labour to do, which will benefit the country
eg Boris Johnsin can say, of his 2019 election, he Got Brexit Done. You may loathe and despise Brexit, but with his big majority Boris finally got the will of people enacted, thereby saving our reputation for democracy - or, indeed, democracy - and a lot of people voted for him to do exactly that. And he did it
What will be the Starmerite equivalent? I am intrigued
It's a good question. I'd like to imagine there will be some grand achievement, but to be honest if they just fund the schools properly and fund the Bakerloo Line extension I'll be grateful. I would guess though that there will be a significant improvement in the quality of governance if we no longer have people in charge pandering to the worst instincts of the country's most ignorant and wrong-headed people. Imagine if the government's first thought was no longer "will this be popular with a Daily Mail reading pensioner who collects golliwogs in their spare time and thinks that global warming is a woke conspiracy" every time they came to make a policy decision. Oh, and hopefully a referendum on EEA membership in the second term, but let's not get ahead of ourselves.
My concern is that Labour administration will just result in the same rotten old system managed less incompetently, with the ongoing rot artfully disguised with a smattering of additional wind turbines. I wait to be proven wrong, but not with much hope.
'The mayor of Keighley has resigned after being criticised for describing his attendance at a Pride event as a "lapse in judgement".
In a Facebook post, Mohammed Nazam said his participation had contradicted his "personal religious beliefs".
He was suspended by the Conservative group on Bradford Council once his comments came to light and later announced he would quit as mayor.
In a statement he said he "did not mean any harm to the LGBTQ community".
He said he intended to carry on as an Independent councillor, according to the Local Democracy Reporting Service.
In his post, on a page called Keighley Pakistanis, Mr Nazam said: "I wholeheartedly apologise for my participation in the flag-raising ceremony, as it contradicts my personal religious beliefs, as many of you are aware."
He said he had since "personally repented for this error," adding: "Looking back, I realise that I should have respectfully declined the request at the time."
I'm still trying to understand how Jack Dorsey can have decided to endorse Robert Kennedy for president, given their respective views on the pandemic, vaccines, etc.
Question for Labourite PB-ers. You guys are gonna win in 2024 (I think win pretty big, as the Scots punish the Nats). And good luck o you, the Tories had 13 years and blew it, on the whole
So: what could a Starmer government do, what WILL a Starmer government do, that will make you profoundly grateful for a Labour government at last?
I don't mean "just not being Tories" or "kissing goodbye to Jacob Rees Mogg", I mean positive things that you expect Labour to do, which will benefit the country
eg Boris Johnsin can say, of his 2019 election, he Got Brexit Done. You may loathe and despise Brexit, but with his big majority Boris finally got the will of people enacted, thereby saving our reputation for democracy - or, indeed, democracy - and a lot of people voted for him to do exactly that. And he did it
What will be the Starmerite equivalent? I am intrigued
I'm not Labour, so eff knows. But if they go large on their council planning powers policy, and get hundreds of thousands of homes built by local authorities, then I will be pleasantly surprised.
It's one thing which financial constraints wouldn't prevent or downsize, unlike much of their wish list, and it would be a big deal. Just needs political will.
England are embarrassingly overblessed with footballing talent
I would have them as favourites for the euros 24
Not fatally stifled by Woke?
Weaker, Wokier opposition
In all seriousness, if they can't win it with this squad, then we might as well Cancel English Football. From Saka, to Bellingham, to Kane, to Rashford, to Alexander-Arnold, to Boden, to Grealish - they really should win, or come extremely close
France are fading, a little. Spain Germany and Italy are all middling-good, Dutch could be a threat mebbes
England are embarrassingly overblessed with footballing talent
I would have them as favourites for the euros 24
Let's not get carried away. Remember that this is a team that managed to get through an entire tournament without conceding a goal - and still contrived to lose the final in yet another penalty shootout. They've an immense talent for finding inventive ways not to win stuff.
Question for Labourite PB-ers. You guys are gonna win in 2024 (I think win pretty big, as the Scots punish the Nats). And good luck o you, the Tories had 13 years and blew it, on the whole
So: what could a Starmer government do, what WILL a Starmer government do, that will make you profoundly grateful for a Labour government at last?
I don't mean "just not being Tories" or "kissing goodbye to Jacob Rees Mogg", I mean positive things that you expect Labour to do, which will benefit the country
eg Boris Johnsin can say, of his 2019 election, he Got Brexit Done. You may loathe and despise Brexit, but with his big majority Boris finally got the will of people enacted, thereby saving our reputation for democracy - or, indeed, democracy - and a lot of people voted for him to do exactly that. And he did it
What will be the Starmerite equivalent? I am intrigued
Dilute Brexit, expand the public sector and tax the rich and corporations a bit more, stand up for Wokeism and migrants.
Ed Miliband as Shadow Climate Secretary will also push Net Zero hard if he becomes Environment Secretary and Labour has already said it will ban further exploration for gas and oil and ban new coal mines
Question for Labourite PB-ers. You guys are gonna win in 2024 (I think win pretty big, as the Scots punish the Nats). And good luck o you, the Tories had 13 years and blew it, on the whole
So: what could a Starmer government do, what WILL a Starmer government do, that will make you profoundly grateful for a Labour government at last?
I don't mean "just not being Tories" or "kissing goodbye to Jacob Rees Mogg", I mean positive things that you expect Labour to do, which will benefit the country
eg Boris Johnsin can say, of his 2019 election, he Got Brexit Done. You may loathe and despise Brexit, but with his big majority Boris finally got the will of people enacted, thereby saving our reputation for democracy - or, indeed, democracy - and a lot of people voted for him to do exactly that. And he did it
What will be the Starmerite equivalent? I am intrigued
Dilute Brexit, expand the public sector and tax the rich a bit more, stand up for Wokeism and migrants.
Ed Miliband as Shadow Climate Secretary will also push Net Zero hard if he becomes Environment Secretary and Labour has already said it will ban further exploration for gas and oil and ban new coal mines
Well, where are the differences with current Conservative policy, a bit of woke-bashing more or less?
Question for Labourite PB-ers. You guys are gonna win in 2024 (I think win pretty big, as the Scots punish the Nats). And good luck o you, the Tories had 13 years and blew it, on the whole
So: what could a Starmer government do, what WILL a Starmer government do, that will make you profoundly grateful for a Labour government at last?
I don't mean "just not being Tories" or "kissing goodbye to Jacob Rees Mogg", I mean positive things that you expect Labour to do, which will benefit the country
eg Boris Johnsin can say, of his 2019 election, he Got Brexit Done. You may loathe and despise Brexit, but with his big majority Boris finally got the will of people enacted, thereby saving our reputation for democracy - or, indeed, democracy - and a lot of people voted for him to do exactly that. And he did it
What will be the Starmerite equivalent? I am intrigued
A fascinating question. It is hard to imagine trickier circumstances for a new administration. Sir K is rightly not promising the earth. I am not a Labourite but will vote for them this time for the simple reason that only Tory or Labour can lead a government, and the Tories need time to rethink what it might mean to be a servant government with integrity and honour. So Labour it must be.
I expect by 2028/9 there to be almost no (average) greater prosperity under Labour. Tax and spend will remain at Tory levels at least, mostly out of necessity.
Six areas I hope will make some limited progress:
1) The level of integrity in government 2) Administrative competence 3) Moving towards either a Swiss style or EFTA relationship with the EU 4) A rational policy on migration and housing, where we stop the policies of wanting both fewer and more houses built, and fewer and more migrants. 5) Moves away from the plethora of policies which assist the super rich 6) Policies towards making the NHS non reliant on stealing staff from very poor countries, thus making a bad situation for them worse, and doing the opposite.
Question for Labourite PB-ers. You guys are gonna win in 2024 (I think win pretty big, as the Scots punish the Nats). And good luck o you, the Tories had 13 years and blew it, on the whole
So: what could a Starmer government do, what WILL a Starmer government do, that will make you profoundly grateful for a Labour government at last?
I don't mean "just not being Tories" or "kissing goodbye to Jacob Rees Mogg", I mean positive things that you expect Labour to do, which will benefit the country
eg Boris Johnsin can say, of his 2019 election, he Got Brexit Done. You may loathe and despise Brexit, but with his big majority Boris finally got the will of people enacted, thereby saving our reputation for democracy - or, indeed, democracy - and a lot of people voted for him to do exactly that. And he did it
What will be the Starmerite equivalent? I am intrigued
I expect the Starmer government to be deliberately technocratic. Lots of house building. Quite strong on crime and justice. Not so strong on health and education. Some more help for families, but not enough. Will have an industrial policy.Continuity on fiscal, foreign and defence policy.
England are embarrassingly overblessed with footballing talent
I would have them as favourites for the euros 24
Not fatally stifled by Woke?
Weaker, Wokier opposition
In all seriousness, if they can't win it with this squad, then we might as well Cancel English Football. From Saka, to Bellingham, to Kane, to Rashford, to Alexander-Arnold, to Boden, to Grealish - they really should win, or come extremely close
France are fading, a little. Spain Germany and Italy are all middling-good, Dutch could be a threat mebbes
Question for Labourite PB-ers. You guys are gonna win in 2024 (I think win pretty big, as the Scots punish the Nats). And good luck o you, the Tories had 13 years and blew it, on the whole
So: what could a Starmer government do, what WILL a Starmer government do, that will make you profoundly grateful for a Labour government at last?
I don't mean "just not being Tories" or "kissing goodbye to Jacob Rees Mogg", I mean positive things that you expect Labour to do, which will benefit the country
eg Boris Johnsin can say, of his 2019 election, he Got Brexit Done. You may loathe and despise Brexit, but with his big majority Boris finally got the will of people enacted, thereby saving our reputation for democracy - or, indeed, democracy - and a lot of people voted for him to do exactly that. And he did it
What will be the Starmerite equivalent? I am intrigued
A fascinating question. It is hard to imagine trickier circumstances for a new administration. Sir K is rightly not promising the earth. I am not a Labourite but will vote for them this time for the simple reason that only Tory or Labour can lead a government, and the Tories need time to rethink what it might mean to be a servant government with integrity and honour. So Labour it must be.
I expect by 2028/9 there to be almost no (average) greater prosperity under Labour. Tax and spend will remain at Tory levels at least, mostly out of necessity.
Six areas I hope will make some limited progress:
1) The level of integrity in government 2) Administrative competence 3) Moving towards either a Swiss style or EFTA relationship with the EU 4) A rational policy on migration and housing, where we stop the policies of wanting both fewer and more houses built, and fewer and more migrants. 5) Moves away from the plethora of policies which assist the super rich 6) Policies towards making the NHS non reliant on stealing staff from very poor countries, thus making a bad situation for them worse, and doing the opposite.
Question for Labourite PB-ers. You guys are gonna win in 2024 (I think win pretty big, as the Scots punish the Nats). And good luck o you, the Tories had 13 years and blew it, on the whole
So: what could a Starmer government do, what WILL a Starmer government do, that will make you profoundly grateful for a Labour government at last?
I don't mean "just not being Tories" or "kissing goodbye to Jacob Rees Mogg", I mean positive things that you expect Labour to do, which will benefit the country
eg Boris Johnsin can say, of his 2019 election, he Got Brexit Done. You may loathe and despise Brexit, but with his big majority Boris finally got the will of people enacted, thereby saving our reputation for democracy - or, indeed, democracy - and a lot of people voted for him to do exactly that. And he did it
What will be the Starmerite equivalent? I am intrigued
Dilute Brexit, expand the public sector and tax the rich a bit more, stand up for Wokeism and migrants.
Ed Miliband as Shadow Climate Secretary will also push Net Zero hard if he becomes Environment Secretary and Labour has already said it will ban further exploration for gas and oil and ban new coal mines
Well, where are the differences with current Conservative policy, a bit of woke-bashing more or less?
Sunak and Hunt are capping public spending even if they reversed Truss and Kwarteng's tax cuts for the rich and corporations, Starmer and Miliband will also oppose new coal mines and new oil unlike this government but like the SNP. Starmer will also allow more building on the greenbelt than Sunak would and he could face a rare Tory-LD alliance again in opposition to a Labour government on that.
They will also align more to EU regulations and take us at least closer to the May Deal rather than the Boris Deal and then if they win a second term likely push to join the EEA and if they win a third term maybe even to rejoin the full EU again too
Question for Labourite PB-ers. You guys are gonna win in 2024 (I think win pretty big, as the Scots punish the Nats). And good luck o you, the Tories had 13 years and blew it, on the whole
So: what could a Starmer government do, what WILL a Starmer government do, that will make you profoundly grateful for a Labour government at last?
I don't mean "just not being Tories" or "kissing goodbye to Jacob Rees Mogg", I mean positive things that you expect Labour to do, which will benefit the country
eg Boris Johnsin can say, of his 2019 election, he Got Brexit Done. You may loathe and despise Brexit, but with his big majority Boris finally got the will of people enacted, thereby saving our reputation for democracy - or, indeed, democracy - and a lot of people voted for him to do exactly that. And he did it
What will be the Starmerite equivalent? I am intrigued
I expect the Starmer government to be deliberately technocratic. Lots of house building. Quite strong on crime and justice. Not so strong on health and education. Some more help for families, but not enough. Will have an industrial policy.Continuity on fiscal, foreign and defence policy.
Sounds about right, though not sure what “not so strong on health” means.
I think the idea is to invest in health tech in a more concerted fashion to drive up NHS productivity which as even Jeremy Hunt has noticed, is in steep decline. I expect a return to Blairite targets too, which,..actually worked.
I'm still trying to understand how Jack Dorsey can have decided to endorse Robert Kennedy for president, given their respective views on the pandemic, vaccines, etc.
@gavinesler This could have been @RishiSunak ‘s big moment - standing up for decency and personal responsibility. If he can’t do that he should make way for someone who can.
I was at Edgbaston on Friday and have been glued to this Test since.
The forecast is interesting. We might only get three hours play tomorrow, with the Aussies maybe in and out between showers.
That would appear to favour us in what would otherwise be a 50/50 shout IMO.
Yes England slight favourites at this stage. Even without weather considerations it is difficult to get another 170 when 3 wickets down in a 4th innings on Day 5.
'The mayor of Keighley has resigned after being criticised for describing his attendance at a Pride event as a "lapse in judgement".
In a Facebook post, Mohammed Nazam said his participation had contradicted his "personal religious beliefs".
He was suspended by the Conservative group on Bradford Council once his comments came to light and later announced he would quit as mayor.
In a statement he said he "did not mean any harm to the LGBTQ community".
He said he intended to carry on as an Independent councillor, according to the Local Democracy Reporting Service.
In his post, on a page called Keighley Pakistanis, Mr Nazam said: "I wholeheartedly apologise for my participation in the flag-raising ceremony, as it contradicts my personal religious beliefs, as many of you are aware."
He said he had since "personally repented for this error," adding: "Looking back, I realise that I should have respectfully declined the request at the time."
i dont see the problem - attendance at Pride events is not compulsory even for mayors . Therefore by definition everyone uses their judgement about whether to go . Cancel culture is ridiculous
Question for Labourite PB-ers. You guys are gonna win in 2024 (I think win pretty big, as the Scots punish the Nats). And good luck o you, the Tories had 13 years and blew it, on the whole
So: what could a Starmer government do, what WILL a Starmer government do, that will make you profoundly grateful for a Labour government at last?
I don't mean "just not being Tories" or "kissing goodbye to Jacob Rees Mogg", I mean positive things that you expect Labour to do, which will benefit the country
eg Boris Johnsin can say, of his 2019 election, he Got Brexit Done. You may loathe and despise Brexit, but with his big majority Boris finally got the will of people enacted, thereby saving our reputation for democracy - or, indeed, democracy - and a lot of people voted for him to do exactly that. And he did it
What will be the Starmerite equivalent? I am intrigued
A fascinating question. It is hard to imagine trickier circumstances for a new administration. Sir K is rightly not promising the earth. I am not a Labourite but will vote for them this time for the simple reason that only Tory or Labour can lead a government, and the Tories need time to rethink what it might mean to be a servant government with integrity and honour. So Labour it must be.
I expect by 2028/9 there to be almost no (average) greater prosperity under Labour. Tax and spend will remain at Tory levels at least, mostly out of necessity.
Six areas I hope will make some limited progress:
1) The level of integrity in government 2) Administrative competence 3) Moving towards either a Swiss style or EFTA relationship with the EU 4) A rational policy on migration and housing, where we stop the policies of wanting both fewer and more houses built, and fewer and more migrants. 5) Moves away from the plethora of policies which assist the super rich 6) Policies towards making the NHS non reliant on stealing staff from very poor countries, thus making a bad situation for them worse, and doing the opposite.
Yes, I miss all the integrity and honour that Labour showed in office last time.
'The mayor of Keighley has resigned after being criticised for describing his attendance at a Pride event as a "lapse in judgement".
In a Facebook post, Mohammed Nazam said his participation had contradicted his "personal religious beliefs".
He was suspended by the Conservative group on Bradford Council once his comments came to light and later announced he would quit as mayor.
In a statement he said he "did not mean any harm to the LGBTQ community".
He said he intended to carry on as an Independent councillor, according to the Local Democracy Reporting Service.
In his post, on a page called Keighley Pakistanis, Mr Nazam said: "I wholeheartedly apologise for my participation in the flag-raising ceremony, as it contradicts my personal religious beliefs, as many of you are aware."
He said he had since "personally repented for this error," adding: "Looking back, I realise that I should have respectfully declined the request at the time."
i dont see the problem - attendance at Pride events is not compulsory even for mayors . Therefore by definition everyone uses their judgement about whether to go . Cancel culture is ridiculous
True but I think his phrase 'lapse in judgement' caused the problem.
Does show like Kate Forbes however strict Muslims have the same potential clash of culture with LGBT activists as evangelical Christians like Forbes or strict Roman Catholics
Question for Labourite PB-ers. You guys are gonna win in 2024 (I think win pretty big, as the Scots punish the Nats). And good luck o you, the Tories had 13 years and blew it, on the whole
So: what could a Starmer government do, what WILL a Starmer government do, that will make you profoundly grateful for a Labour government at last?
I don't mean "just not being Tories" or "kissing goodbye to Jacob Rees Mogg", I mean positive things that you expect Labour to do, which will benefit the country
eg Boris Johnsin can say, of his 2019 election, he Got Brexit Done. You may loathe and despise Brexit, but with his big majority Boris finally got the will of people enacted, thereby saving our reputation for democracy - or, indeed, democracy - and a lot of people voted for him to do exactly that. And he did it
What will be the Starmerite equivalent? I am intrigued
I expect the Starmer government to be deliberately technocratic. Lots of house building. Quite strong on crime and justice. Not so strong on health and education. Some more help for families, but not enough. Will have an industrial policy.Continuity on fiscal, foreign and defence policy.
Sounds about right, though not sure what “not so strong on health” means.
I think the idea is to invest in health tech in a more concerted fashion to drive up NHS productivity which as even Jeremy Hunt has noticed, is in steep decline. I expect a return to Blairite targets too, which,..actually worked.
It's big, difficult, and most importantly, expensive. Fiscal constraints are likely to make big policy achievements hard. I'm willing to be surprised (and hope I am), but I suspect improvements might not be massive.
Technology is great - but do they have the ability to make it transformative ?
Apparently in addition to his more eye catching conspiracies RFK is a believer in the 'Boris Johnson forced Ukraine to extend the war' conspiracy.
It's a joke, but why isn't this guy running as a Trumpist Republican? He genuinely seems like he would do well there.
As he is anti big oil, pro a wealth tax and opposed the Iraq War.
As I said earlier Robert Kennedy Jnr is not a million miles from Corbyn on some policies, indeed on foreign policy (pro Putin, anti Iraq War and anti NATO) and lockdowns and vax Corbynites and Trumpites are closer to each other than the UK and US political establishment
England are embarrassingly overblessed with footballing talent
I would have them as favourites for the euros 24
Not fatally stifled by Woke?
To be fair, Wokery has finally gone off the boil this year - crippled by ludicrous ultra-liberal overreach and a half-decent opposition put up (finally) by many, including the Tories, capitalising on public scepticism more widely.
That hasn't happened "naturally" but because a resistance was put up to what was argued to be progressive inevitability- a salutary lesson to those that think the tide of history only marches one way: it doesn't.
'The mayor of Keighley has resigned after being criticised for describing his attendance at a Pride event as a "lapse in judgement".
In a Facebook post, Mohammed Nazam said his participation had contradicted his "personal religious beliefs".
He was suspended by the Conservative group on Bradford Council once his comments came to light and later announced he would quit as mayor.
In a statement he said he "did not mean any harm to the LGBTQ community".
He said he intended to carry on as an Independent councillor, according to the Local Democracy Reporting Service.
In his post, on a page called Keighley Pakistanis, Mr Nazam said: "I wholeheartedly apologise for my participation in the flag-raising ceremony, as it contradicts my personal religious beliefs, as many of you are aware."
He said he had since "personally repented for this error," adding: "Looking back, I realise that I should have respectfully declined the request at the time."
i dont see the problem - attendance at Pride events is not compulsory even for mayors . Therefore by definition everyone uses their judgement about whether to go . Cancel culture is ridiculous
True but I think his phrase 'lapse in judgement' caused the problem.
Does show like Kate Forbes however strict Muslims have the same potential clash of culture with LGBT activists as evangelical Christians like Forbes or strict Roman Catholics
not sure why "lapse in judgment " means anything damming either tbh. If he means it conflicts with his religious views then he is being honest , not hateful to anyone. I dont go to Pride events as well because I dont think they are necessary and are generally too hyped up- - are we not allowed to say we dont want to go to Pride events or regret going to them ? This country get more daft every day
England are embarrassingly overblessed with footballing talent
I would have them as favourites for the euros 24
Not fatally stifled by Woke?
Weaker, Wokier opposition
In all seriousness, if they can't win it with this squad, then we might as well Cancel English Football. From Saka, to Bellingham, to Kane, to Rashford, to Alexander-Arnold, to Boden, to Grealish - they really should win, or come extremely close
France are fading, a little. Spain Germany and Italy are all middling-good, Dutch could be a threat mebbes
This Scot is quite pleased that they are keeping up with Scotland on the qualification front.
Question for Labourite PB-ers. You guys are gonna win in 2024 (I think win pretty big, as the Scots punish the Nats). And good luck o you, the Tories had 13 years and blew it, on the whole
So: what could a Starmer government do, what WILL a Starmer government do, that will make you profoundly grateful for a Labour government at last?
I don't mean "just not being Tories" or "kissing goodbye to Jacob Rees Mogg", I mean positive things that you expect Labour to do, which will benefit the country
eg Boris Johnsin can say, of his 2019 election, he Got Brexit Done. You may loathe and despise Brexit, but with his big majority Boris finally got the will of people enacted, thereby saving our reputation for democracy - or, indeed, democracy - and a lot of people voted for him to do exactly that. And he did it
What will be the Starmerite equivalent? I am intrigued
I expect the Starmer government to be deliberately technocratic. Lots of house building. Quite strong on crime and justice. Not so strong on health and education. Some more help for families, but not enough. Will have an industrial policy.Continuity on fiscal, foreign and defence policy.
Sounds about right, though not sure what “not so strong on health” means.
I think the idea is to invest in health tech in a more concerted fashion to drive up NHS productivity which as even Jeremy Hunt has noticed, is in steep decline. I expect a return to Blairite targets too, which,..actually worked.
What I mean is that Labour policies in areas they are most interested in are extensive, comprehensive and specific. On that basis Labour are most interested in house building, industrial policy, crime and justice, data regulation.and to some extent family policy, procurement and asylum policy.
Policies are skimpy and formulaic in areas they are not interested in such as foreign policy and constitutional affairs. They don't say too much about health. Train 10 000 nurses (everyone says that), move to more technology and focus on primary care. But they don't flesh these last two out, so suspect they may not get a lot of priority. Maybe I'm wrong on that and they will be quite radical. Also on transport.
With the talent surging through the England squad I suggest this is VALUE (and I nearly always advise against betting ON England: the patriotic punter warps the market)
But this is real. England possess an excess of exuberant talent; can Gareth finally unlock it?
@KevinASchofield now BREAKING: MPs vote by 354 to 7 to back the privileges committee's report which found Boris Johnson guilty of repeatedly misleading MPs over partygate.
It means he will be stripped of his ex-MP's parliamentary pass.
354 MPs for the Boris report, so a narrow majority in favour but most Tory MPs abstained and did not vote for it and 7 Conservative MPs even voted against the report
354 MPs for the Boris report, so a narrow majority in favour but most Tory MPs abstained and did not vote for it and 7 Conservative MPs even voted against the report
354 MPs for the Boris report, so a narrow majority in favour but most Tory MPs abstained and did not vote for it and 7 Conservative MPs even voted against the report
354 MPs for the Boris report, so a narrow majority in favour but most Tory MPs abstained and did not vote for it and 7 Conservative MPs even voted against the report
354 MPs for the Boris report, so a narrow majority in favour but most Tory MPs abstained and did not vote for it and 7 Conservative MPs even voted against the report
Which Tories voted for, and which against?
Rees Mogg and Cash definitely voted against, Nicci, Fletcher and Jake Berry too. May, Mordaunt, Lewis and Seely definitely for
354 MPs for the Boris report, so a narrow majority in favour but most Tory MPs abstained and did not vote for it and 7 Conservative MPs even voted against the report
Cowardly, but not unexpected - it means Boris and his cohorts can pretend to have significant parliament support they just saw no point in going along with the process, and the rest of the party get a quiet life (from their fellow Tory MPs at least) by not 'humiliating' Boris, and even the anti-Boris ones can claim later it was all a Labour plot if they want.
That is so many that it was definitely an unofficial whip situation though, so a bit too obvious - there are sufficient numbers of open Boris critics, and defenders, to have had way more back or reject the report, so an order was given here since no way they all independently decided that was the best move.
'The mayor of Keighley has resigned after being criticised for describing his attendance at a Pride event as a "lapse in judgement".
In a Facebook post, Mohammed Nazam said his participation had contradicted his "personal religious beliefs".
He was suspended by the Conservative group on Bradford Council once his comments came to light and later announced he would quit as mayor.
In a statement he said he "did not mean any harm to the LGBTQ community".
He said he intended to carry on as an Independent councillor, according to the Local Democracy Reporting Service.
In his post, on a page called Keighley Pakistanis, Mr Nazam said: "I wholeheartedly apologise for my participation in the flag-raising ceremony, as it contradicts my personal religious beliefs, as many of you are aware."
He said he had since "personally repented for this error," adding: "Looking back, I realise that I should have respectfully declined the request at the time."
i dont see the problem - attendance at Pride events is not compulsory even for mayors . Therefore by definition everyone uses their judgement about whether to go . Cancel culture is ridiculous
True but I think his phrase 'lapse in judgement' caused the problem.
Does show like Kate Forbes however strict Muslims have the same potential clash of culture with LGBT activists as evangelical Christians like Forbes or strict Roman Catholics
not sure why "lapse in judgment " means anything damming either tbh. If he means it conflicts with his religious views then he is being honest , not hateful to anyone. I dont go to Pride events as well because I dont think they are necessary and are generally too hyped up- - are we not allowed to say we dont want to go to Pride events or regret going to them ? This country get more daft every day
I think what's really undone this gentleman is the flip-flopping. If he'd decided either to stay away or to defend his presence he'd probably have been fine, but the U-turn has behind it the implication that he was embarrassed into this grovel by co-members of his own sect, and that's fatal in a secular society.
Personally I find it hard to have much sympathy for believers in the various omnipotent sky beings in any situation such is that, but then I'm one of the gays and they've been shitting on us for thousands of years - and continue to do so everywhere on Earth where they still enjoy real power.
At the end of the day, if people feel that they have to surrender public office because the alternative is to compromise on their religious convictions, then so be it. That's infinitely preferable to holders of public office having the ability to inflict those beliefs on everyone else.
354 MPs for the Boris report, so a narrow majority in favour but most Tory MPs abstained and did not vote for it and 7 Conservative MPs even voted against the report
354 to 7 a narrow majority only in your mind
Abstentions are exactly that and the 7 against are dinosaurs
354 MPs for the Boris report, so a narrow majority in favour but most Tory MPs abstained and did not vote for it and 7 Conservative MPs even voted against the report
Which Tories voted for, and which against?
Rees Mogg and Cash definitely voted against, Nicci, Fletcher and Jake Berry too. May, Mordaunt, Lewis and Seely definitely for
At least some with courage of their convictions then. Abstention is always an option, to be sure, but I do think it generally needs to be justified, and the milquetoast objections to the report being harsh, or the criticism of Boris as having done wrong, have been too prominent for that many of the rest to not be able to come down on one side or another.
354 MPs for the Boris report, so a narrow majority in favour but most Tory MPs abstained and did not vote for it and 7 Conservative MPs even voted against the report
354 to 7 a narrow majority only in your mind
Abstentions are exactly that and the 7 against are dinosaurs
It doesn't reflect particularly well on the abstainers either.
354 MPs for the Boris report, so a narrow majority in favour but most Tory MPs abstained and did not vote for it and 7 Conservative MPs even voted against the report
354 to 7 a narrow majority only in your mind
Abstentions are exactly that and the 7 against are dinosaurs
Presumably they think lying to the Commons is acceptable behaviour. Note and move on.
354 MPs for the Boris report, so a narrow majority in favour but most Tory MPs abstained and did not vote for it and 7 Conservative MPs even voted against the report
Lib Dem focus leaflets highlighting the abstention of the local MP being mass-printed across the shires as we speak.
354 MPs for the Boris report, so a narrow majority in favour but most Tory MPs abstained and did not vote for it and 7 Conservative MPs even voted against the report
354 to 7 a narrow majority only in your mind
Abstentions are exactly that and the 7 against are dinosaurs
Seven dwarfs? (Actually, doesn't really mean 9, as No side would have 2 tellers?)
354 MPs for the Boris report, so a narrow majority in favour but most Tory MPs abstained and did not vote for it and 7 Conservative MPs even voted against the report
354 to 7 a narrow majority only in your mind
Abstentions are exactly that and the 7 against are dinosaurs
It doesn't reflect particularly well on the abstainers either.
Sunak should have voted but I understand Starmer abstained as well which is strange
Comments
Runs scored on Day One at Edgbaston in...
2005: 407
2023: 407
Fourth-innings target at Edgbaston in...
2005: 282
2023: 281
Is a heart-stopping England win written in the stars?
Somerton looks like a nailed on LD gain to me - as Stephen Bush from FT put it.
They will absolutely smash it and it won’t be close. a) it’s a by-election b) it’s a seat with a Lib Dem history c) uh, have you seen the i) the circumstances Warburton is standing down in and ii) the state of the country lately?
https://twitter.com/stephenkb/status/1670178119360081922?cxt=HHwWhMCzwdGJ1a0uAAAA
Uxbridge looks a classic loss to opposition by-election, so that level of betting would make sense.
Rishi would take winning 1 of 4, but will hope for 2 I guess.
NEW Government whips are expecting a vote in the House of Commons on the Privileges report into whether Boris Johnson lied to MPs at 9.30pm, MPs tell me.
Somerton - probably comfortably LD by 10% +
Selby - likely CON again might be comfortable
Mid Beds - probably not happening, if it does then possibly small CON maj
Asking for around 150 Tory MPs looking to take the second most cowardly way out.
It's been very close throughout. Hasn't really swung wildly from one team to another the way close test matches can - all the way through both teams have been about par. Looking like a victory between a handful of runs or a couple of wickets.
That said, it could be entirely washed out looking at the forecast.
And my 10K PB is also over 45 minutes - though not by that much... I still harbour fantasies of breaking that particular barrier, but it is somewhat contingent on my body not starting to disintegrate again before I can manage it.
Otherwise it'll be Borisians resigning from now until Autumn 2024, lost by election after lost by election.
NEW: As MPs debate his behaviour, Boris Johnson is attending the International Democratic Union reception tonight.
Sources say while there he criticised the privileges committee as “biased and wilfully ignorant” and added that “there is always another innings”.
Amazing how the classics always work though - those who find against me are biased, therefore to be ignored. And to think they end up supproted by talentless yes men.
You guys are gonna win in 2024 (I think win pretty big, as the Scots punish the Nats). And good luck o you, the Tories had 13 years and blew it, on the whole
So: what could a Starmer government do, what WILL a Starmer government do, that will make you profoundly grateful for a Labour government at last?
I don't mean "just not being Tories" or "kissing goodbye to Jacob Rees Mogg", I mean positive things that you expect Labour to do, which will benefit the country
eg Boris Johnsin can say, of his 2019 election, he Got Brexit Done. You may loathe and despise Brexit, but with his big majority Boris finally got the will of people enacted, thereby saving our reputation for democracy - or, indeed, democracy - and a lot of people voted for him to do exactly that. And he did it
What will be the Starmerite equivalent? I am intrigued
I'll never be the 'best' long-distance walker. I'll never be the fastest runner. But I'm proud of what I've achieved in both those areas, even if those achievements mean sod-all to anyone else, and on their own may seem slightly pathetic. I've challenged myself and done well - and mostly enjoyed it.
Somerton and Frome almost certain to go LD, Selby correctly forecast to be neck and neck between Tories and Labour (I expect the Tories to scrape home). Mid Beds if Dorries steps down likely goes LD like Somerton, forecast correct there too
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries#Declared_major_candidates
So, what is Starmer's equivalent? What is his USP? What will he get done? Drastically repair or reform? I cannot see it as of now. but I am - genuinely - happy to be schooled. This guy, after all, is likely to be our PM for four-five years, minimum
https://twitter.com/mori_tories/status/1670872910662184964
https://www.theipsa.org.uk/freedom-of-information/2017-18/cas-80614
"Under reforms introduced in 2013[1], MPs will be eligible to receive a Loss of Office payment if they lose their seat at a general election. The amount of the Loss of Office payment will be equal to double the statutory redundancy entitlement.
MPs are only eligible for such payments if they have held office for a continuous period of at least two years, stand for re-election but are not re-elected. MPs who choose to stand down prior to an election are not entitled to any payment."
11s
Timid Rish! goes missing in action in face of Boris Johnson’s lies
https://twitter.com/GdnPolitics/status/1670883162183049217
I would have them as favourites for the euros 24
But I am thinking that wiggy doesn't perhaps yet understand why?
On some policies Kennedy is not far off Jeremy Corbyn and his anti vax policies are certainly something Piers Corbyn would approve of
If he's so bloody great he can come back from that.
But if he is that bloody great, then he's not stupid enough to have inadvertently misled parliament, so it must have been intentional.
Oh, and hopefully a referendum on EEA membership in the second term, but let's not get ahead of ourselves.
The forecast is interesting. We might only get three hours play tomorrow, with the Aussies maybe in and out between showers.
That would appear to favour us in what would otherwise be a 50/50 shout IMO.
In a Facebook post, Mohammed Nazam said his participation had contradicted his "personal religious beliefs".
He was suspended by the Conservative group on Bradford Council once his comments came to light and later announced he would quit as mayor.
In a statement he said he "did not mean any harm to the LGBTQ community".
He said he intended to carry on as an Independent councillor, according to the Local Democracy Reporting Service.
In his post, on a page called Keighley Pakistanis, Mr Nazam said: "I wholeheartedly apologise for my participation in the flag-raising ceremony, as it contradicts my personal religious beliefs, as many of you are aware."
He said he had since "personally repented for this error," adding: "Looking back, I realise that I should have respectfully declined the request at the time."
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-leeds-65954361
But if they go large on their council planning
powers policy, and get hundreds of thousands of homes built by local authorities, then I will be pleasantly surprised.
It's one thing which financial constraints wouldn't prevent or downsize, unlike much of their wish list, and it would be a big deal.
Just needs political will.
In all seriousness, if they can't win it with this squad, then we might as well Cancel English Football. From Saka, to Bellingham, to Kane, to Rashford, to Alexander-Arnold, to Boden, to Grealish - they really should win, or come extremely close
France are fading, a little. Spain Germany and Italy are all middling-good, Dutch could be a threat mebbes
Second string gigs from now on, mate.
Ed Miliband as Shadow Climate Secretary will also push Net Zero hard if he becomes Environment Secretary and Labour has already said it will ban further exploration for gas and oil and ban new coal mines
I expect by 2028/9 there to be almost no (average) greater prosperity under Labour. Tax and spend will remain at Tory levels at least, mostly out of necessity.
Six areas I hope will make some limited progress:
1) The level of integrity in government
2) Administrative competence
3) Moving towards either a Swiss style or EFTA relationship with the EU
4) A rational policy on migration and housing, where we stop the policies of wanting both fewer and more houses built, and fewer and more migrants.
5) Moves away from the plethora of policies which assist the super rich
6) Policies towards making the NHS non reliant on stealing staff from very poor countries, thus making a bad situation for them worse, and doing the opposite.
They will also align more to EU regulations and take us at least closer to the May Deal rather than the Boris Deal and then if they win a second term likely push to join the EEA and if they win a third term maybe even to rejoin the full EU again too
New Deal with Europe closer to EEA
Standards in public life
I think the idea is to invest in health tech in a more concerted fashion to drive up NHS productivity which as even Jeremy Hunt has noticed, is in steep decline. I expect a return to Blairite targets too, which,..actually worked.
This could have been @RishiSunak ‘s big moment - standing up for decency and personal responsibility. If he can’t do that he should make way for someone who can.
The Scottish Conservatives have called a Vote of No Confidence in Green Minister Lorna Slater.
This will be a test of MSP honesty. Because no one with eyes to see or ears to hear could believe Lorna Slater is fit for the role she holds.
Let's see who supports it.
Does show like Kate Forbes however strict Muslims have the same potential clash of culture with LGBT activists as evangelical Christians like Forbes or strict Roman Catholics
Fiscal constraints are likely to make big policy achievements hard. I'm willing to be surprised (and hope I am), but I suspect improvements might not be massive.
Technology is great - but do they have the ability to make it transformative ?
Inspiring stuff.
It's a joke, but why isn't this guy running as a Trumpist Republican? He genuinely seems like he would do well there.
As I said earlier Robert Kennedy Jnr is not a million miles from Corbyn on some policies, indeed on foreign policy (pro Putin, anti Iraq War and anti NATO) and lockdowns and vax Corbynites and Trumpites are closer to each other than the UK and US political establishment
That hasn't happened "naturally" but because a resistance was put up to what was argued to be progressive inevitability- a salutary lesson to those that think the tide of history only marches one way: it doesn't.
Policies are skimpy and formulaic in areas they are not interested in such as foreign policy and constitutional affairs. They don't say too much about health. Train 10 000 nurses (everyone says that), move to more technology and focus on primary care. But they don't flesh these last two out, so suspect they may not get a lot of priority. Maybe I'm wrong on that and they will be quite radical. Also on transport.
https://labourlist.org/2023/05/labour-manifesto-2024-election-what-policies-npf-party/
https://www.oddschecker.com/football/euro-2024/euro/winner
With the talent surging through the England squad I suggest this is VALUE (and I nearly always advise against betting ON England: the patriotic punter warps the market)
But this is real. England possess an excess of exuberant talent; can Gareth finally unlock it?
now
BREAKING: MPs vote by 354 to 7 to back the privileges committee's report which found Boris Johnson guilty of repeatedly misleading MPs over partygate.
It means he will be stripped of his ex-MP's parliamentary pass.
seven? dopey, sleazy, shifty, creepy, thicko, crooked, and duck.
That is so many that it was definitely an unofficial whip situation though, so a bit too obvious - there are sufficient numbers of open Boris critics, and defenders, to have had way more back or reject the report, so an order was given here since no way they all independently decided that was the best move.
Personally I find it hard to have much sympathy for believers in the various omnipotent sky beings in any situation such is that, but then I'm one of the gays and they've been shitting on us for thousands of years - and continue to do so everywhere on Earth where they still enjoy real power.
At the end of the day, if people feel that they have to surrender public office because the alternative is to compromise on their religious convictions, then so be it. That's infinitely preferable to holders of public office having the ability to inflict those beliefs on everyone else.
Abstentions are exactly that and the 7 against are dinosaurs