New from @IpsosUK: Why coalition of chaos narrative unlikely to particularly help the Conservatives.Public more likely to expect chaos if Tories win with no majority than if Labour do the samehttps://t.co/zCZ4eBX4s1 pic.twitter.com/85i8XQn1ms
F1: I've still got stuff to peruse but Ocon is 2.5 for a podium yet 36 (Ladbrokes, boosted) to win each way. I've backed the latter. He starts 3rd and unless he screws up the start he's got a very high chance of being top three. Passing's impossible and drivers tend to be as slow as they can to avoid the tyres going off and forcing a pit stop which may be inopportune.
A Survation poll for the Country Land and Business Association (CLA) suggests Tories might lose 21 seats in the rural wall, including those of Jeremy Hunt, Mel Stride, Mark Harper, Lucy Frazer, Jacob Rees-Mogg and Liam Fox.
A Survation poll for the Country Land and Business Association (CLA) suggests Tories might lose 21 seats in the rural wall, including those of Jeremy Hunt, Mel Stride, Mark Harper, Lucy Frazer, Jacob Rees-Mogg and Liam Fox.
A Survation poll for the Country Land and Business Association (CLA) suggests Tories might lose 21 seats in the rural wall, including those of Jeremy Hunt, Mel Stride, Mark Harper, Lucy Frazer, Jacob Rees-Mogg and Liam Fox.
Scenes from North East Somerset on election night:
A Survation poll for the Country Land and Business Association (CLA) suggests Tories might lose 21 seats in the rural wall, including those of Jeremy Hunt, Mel Stride, Mark Harper, Lucy Frazer, Jacob Rees-Mogg and Liam Fox.
A Survation poll for the Country Land and Business Association (CLA) suggests Tories might lose 21 seats in the rural wall, including those of Jeremy Hunt, Mel Stride, Mark Harper, Lucy Frazer, Jacob Rees-Mogg and Liam Fox.
Scenes from North East Somerset on election night:
A Survation poll for the Country Land and Business Association (CLA) suggests Tories might lose 21 seats in the rural wall, including those of Jeremy Hunt, Mel Stride, Mark Harper, Lucy Frazer, Jacob Rees-Mogg and Liam Fox.
Schadenfreude is a terrible emotion - beguiling as it is - and we mustn’t forget the balls, and sacrifice, it takes to put yourself forward for public service, to raise your head above the parapet, to put yourself forward for a popularity contest every few years, submitting to the uncompromising will of the electorate. These people genuinely want to help to make this country better. I might disagree entirely with the way they think that should happen but they deserve my respect.
That said, it would be lovely to see all those Tory bastards fall. Especially Rees-Mogg.
A Survation poll for the Country Land and Business Association (CLA) suggests Tories might lose 21 seats in the rural wall, including those of Jeremy Hunt, Mel Stride, Mark Harper, Lucy Frazer, Jacob Rees-Mogg and Liam Fox.
North East Somerset/Wansdyke (Mogg) and the Forest of Dean (Harper) were both held by Labour under Blair.
Indeed, the Forest of Dean was traditionally a very safe Labour seat until 1979 when Paul Marland narrowly won it. Thus was due to its coal mining and the associated workforce. In any case, it isn't actually particularly rural. Most of its population lives in five medium-sized towns - Cinderford, Lydney, Coleford, Mitcheldean and Newent.
If that's their idea of a 'rural wall' they need to get out more.
A Survation poll for the Country Land and Business Association (CLA) suggests Tories might lose 21 seats in the rural wall, including those of Jeremy Hunt, Mel Stride, Mark Harper, Lucy Frazer, Jacob Rees-Mogg and Liam Fox.
North East Somerset/Wansdyke (Mogg) and the Forest of Dean (Harper) were both held by Labour under Blair.
Indeed, the Forest of Dean was traditionally a very safe Labour seat until 1979 when Paul Marland narrowly won it. Thus was due to its coal mining and the associated workforce. In any case, isn't actually particularly rural. Most of its population lives in five medium-sized towns - Cinderford, Lydney, Coleford, Mitcheldean and Newent.
If that's their idea of a 'rural wall' they need to get out more.
A Survation poll for the Country Land and Business Association (CLA) suggests Tories might lose 21 seats in the rural wall, including those of Jeremy Hunt, Mel Stride, Mark Harper, Lucy Frazer, Jacob Rees-Mogg and Liam Fox.
North East Somerset/Wansdyke (Mogg) and the Forest of Dean (Harper) were both held by Labour under Blair.
Indeed, the Forest of Dean was traditionally a very safe Labour seat until 1979 when Paul Marland narrowly won it. Thus was due to its coal mining and the associated workforce. In any case, isn't actually particularly rural. Most of its population lives in five medium-sized towns - Cinderford, Lydney, Coleford, Mitcheldean and Newent.
If that's their idea of a 'rural wall' they need to get out more.
SW Surrey isn’t very rural, either.
I think there's a tendency (particularly I fear among people based in London) to look at constituencies where there's a bit of countryside and lazily assume they're 'rural' as a result. It's easier than burrowing into the detail of where the population actually lives, which is a faff.
Cannock Chase would be another example. It's considered rural by many, but it isn't. Sure, it's got Cannock Chase in it but the voters don't live in Cannock Chase, they live in the Cannock Urban Area and Rugeley, the latter of which is one of the most deprived towns in England.
A Survation poll for the Country Land and Business Association (CLA) suggests Tories might lose 21 seats in the rural wall, including those of Jeremy Hunt, Mel Stride, Mark Harper, Lucy Frazer, Jacob Rees-Mogg and Liam Fox.
A Survation poll for the Country Land and Business Association (CLA) suggests Tories might lose 21 seats in the rural wall, including those of Jeremy Hunt, Mel Stride, Mark Harper, Lucy Frazer, Jacob Rees-Mogg and Liam Fox.
Schadenfreude is a terrible emotion - beguiling as it is - and we mustn’t forget the balls, and sacrifice, it takes to put yourself forward for public service, to raise your head above the parapet, to put yourself forward for a popularity contest every few years, submitting to the uncompromising will of the electorate. These people genuinely want to help to make this country better. I might disagree entirely with the way they think that should happen but they deserve my respect.
That said, it would be lovely to see all those Tory bastards fall. Especially Rees-Mogg.
PMSL, you are obviously trolling. Majority are grifters or no users looking for easy money, unlimited expenses and gold plated pensions , half the year on holiday and the other half in subsidised bars and restaurants getting sloshed whilst looking for a lumber.
F1: I slept abysmally, so we'll see if that gives me a half-asleep wisdom when trying to find value at the worst circuit of the calendar...
As someone on the spot I can report that Monaco is crowded and tickets to sit in an average seat cost 920 euros. Whatever you might think of this Grand Prix I can't imagine one more glamorous. Monaco can look spectacular when it puts its mind to it. It's wealth is there for all to see but so is it's history and this is Grand Prix number eighty.
All through the principality are archives of black and white photographs of Princess Grace and Prince Rainier set against the colourful Grand Prix stalls and screens and it works surprisingly well. It's so multinational Suella would have a seizure
The 76th film festival at Cannes by contrast though still glamorous can be pretty tacky. This year it's been taken over by 'influencers'. Girls doing ever crazier stunts to get noticed. Many finding a way onto the Red Carpet to the chagrin of the film makers. But the good news is that Jonathan Glazer won the Grand Prix (not that one) for 'The Zone of Interest'
On topic: I'd have liked to have seen the polling view of chaos if the Tories and Labour got working majorities as well!
I'm not worried about fear of a Labour minority, as I think in current circumstances it would drive some bite the bullet and vote more for Labour rather than the converse.
"thanks largely to the toxic legacy bequeathed to Sir Keir Starmer by his predecessor Jeremy Corbyn." Parties get the leaders they deserve!
Labour certainly did with Corbyn. A supreme act of self-indulgence that went badly wrong. Sadly, it cost the nation dearly as well.
I was mainly thinking of the Conservative Party!!
I feel that Corbyn was an affliction on both parties. With Labour the effects are obvious, but Corbyn's presence also gave the Tories a completely free hand to indulge their more lunatic fancies since they were effectively running a one-party state with Corbyn wrecking Labour.
The country has suffered terribly from the lack of leadership that Corbyn caused in both parties.
A Survation poll for the Country Land and Business Association (CLA) suggests Tories might lose 21 seats in the rural wall, including those of Jeremy Hunt, Mel Stride, Mark Harper, Lucy Frazer, Jacob Rees-Mogg and Liam Fox.
North East Somerset/Wansdyke (Mogg) and the Forest of Dean (Harper) were both held by Labour under Blair.
Indeed, the Forest of Dean was traditionally a very safe Labour seat until 1979 when Paul Marland narrowly won it. Thus was due to its coal mining and the associated workforce. In any case, isn't actually particularly rural. Most of its population lives in five medium-sized towns - Cinderford, Lydney, Coleford, Mitcheldean and Newent.
If that's their idea of a 'rural wall' they need to get out more.
SW Surrey isn’t very rural, either.
It is also rich in private schools. Such seats will probably rally back to the Tories in opposition, almost regardless of how badly they behave, once Labour is in office and starts jacking up their taxes.
But, that'd just get them back to par, not to winning an election.
A Survation poll for the Country Land and Business Association (CLA) suggests Tories might lose 21 seats in the rural wall, including those of Jeremy Hunt, Mel Stride, Mark Harper, Lucy Frazer, Jacob Rees-Mogg and Liam Fox.
Schadenfreude is a terrible emotion - beguiling as it is - and we mustn’t forget the balls, and sacrifice, it takes to put yourself forward for public service, to raise your head above the parapet, to put yourself forward for a popularity contest every few years, submitting to the uncompromising will of the electorate. These people genuinely want to help to make this country better. I might disagree entirely with the way they think that should happen but they deserve my respect.
That said, it would be lovely to see all those Tory bastards fall. Especially Rees-Mogg.
PMSL, you are obviously trolling. Majority are grifters or no users looking for easy money, unlimited expenses and gold plated pensions , half the year on holiday and the other half in subsidised bars and restaurants getting sloshed whilst looking for a lumber.
A Survation poll for the Country Land and Business Association (CLA) suggests Tories might lose 21 seats in the rural wall, including those of Jeremy Hunt, Mel Stride, Mark Harper, Lucy Frazer, Jacob Rees-Mogg and Liam Fox.
Schadenfreude is a terrible emotion - beguiling as it is - and we mustn’t forget the balls, and sacrifice, it takes to put yourself forward for public service, to raise your head above the parapet, to put yourself forward for a popularity contest every few years, submitting to the uncompromising will of the electorate. These people genuinely want to help to make this country better. I might disagree entirely with the way they think that should happen but they deserve my respect.
That said, it would be lovely to see all those Tory bastards fall. Especially Rees-Mogg.
PMSL, you are obviously trolling. Majority are grifters or no users looking for easy money, unlimited expenses and gold plated pensions , half the year on holiday and the other half in subsidised bars and restaurants getting sloshed whilst looking for a lumber.
Oooooooh you are cynical! Yeah no doubt there’s some like that. But not all of them, I don’t think.
I’m very, very far from being some kind of political insider, but I do happen to know, not well but cordially enough on the odd occasion I see them, a few councillors. A couple of whom have gone on to become MPs. I’d happily vote for them. Even - shudder - the Tory ones. Because they’re good, principled, decent people.
There’s a Lib Dem I know ever so slightly I wouldn’t piss on if he was on fire.
The further up they chain they go though I suspect, sadly, the less pure they become. Politics - it’s a shit business.
A Survation poll for the Country Land and Business Association (CLA) suggests Tories might lose 21 seats in the rural wall, including those of Jeremy Hunt, Mel Stride, Mark Harper, Lucy Frazer, Jacob Rees-Mogg and Liam Fox.
North East Somerset/Wansdyke (Mogg) and the Forest of Dean (Harper) were both held by Labour under Blair.
Indeed, the Forest of Dean was traditionally a very safe Labour seat until 1979 when Paul Marland narrowly won it. Thus was due to its coal mining and the associated workforce. In any case, it isn't actually particularly rural. Most of its population lives in five medium-sized towns - Cinderford, Lydney, Coleford, Mitcheldean and Newent.
If that's their idea of a 'rural wall' they need to get out more.
Don't those five towns have a combined population of around 40k ?
Which would mean that there's more people living in less populous places.
Of course this then leads to a discussion of what is urban/rural or town/village.
A Survation poll for the Country Land and Business Association (CLA) suggests Tories might lose 21 seats in the rural wall, including those of Jeremy Hunt, Mel Stride, Mark Harper, Lucy Frazer, Jacob Rees-Mogg and Liam Fox.
"thanks largely to the toxic legacy bequeathed to Sir Keir Starmer by his predecessor Jeremy Corbyn." Parties get the leaders they deserve!
Labour certainly did with Corbyn. A supreme act of self-indulgence that went badly wrong. Sadly, it cost the nation dearly as well.
I was mainly thinking of the Conservative Party!!
I feel that Corbyn was an affliction on both parties. With Labour the effects are obvious, but Corbyn's presence also gave the Tories a completely free hand to indulge their more lunatic fancies since they were effectively running a one-party state with Corbyn wrecking Labour.
The country has suffered terribly from the lack of leadership that Corbyn caused in both parties.
But not long to go. We can all look forward to a few Portillo moments though this lot have been so ghastly just watching them lose their seat doesn't seem adequate. Certainly not for Braverman. I'd like to see her frogmarched onto a plane to Rwanda while the nation cheered
"thanks largely to the toxic legacy bequeathed to Sir Keir Starmer by his predecessor Jeremy Corbyn." Parties get the leaders they deserve!
Labour certainly did with Corbyn. A supreme act of self-indulgence that went badly wrong. Sadly, it cost the nation dearly as well.
I was mainly thinking of the Conservative Party!!
I feel that Corbyn was an affliction on both parties. With Labour the effects are obvious, but Corbyn's presence also gave the Tories a completely free hand to indulge their more lunatic fancies since they were effectively running a one-party state with Corbyn wrecking Labour.
The country has suffered terribly from the lack of leadership that Corbyn caused in both parties.
But not long to go. We can all look forward to a few Portillo moments though this lot have been so ghastly just watching them lose their seat doesn't seem adequate. Certainly not for Braverman. I'd like to see her frogmarched onto a plane to Rwanda while the nation cheered
What I find bizarre is that the lesson so many in the Conservative party seem to have learned from Labour’s Jeremy Corbyn disaster is “I want a bit of that”. The retreat into the echo chamber and the growing radicalisation of the right of the party is absolutely text book Corbynism. Hating the country you want to govern - as many National Conservatives clearly do - is not a recipe for success.
If Sunak manages to defy the odds and stay in power, the Tories may manage to sort themselves out as competence and pragmatism will have delivered. But if he loses, the future looks bleak.
Labour has layers of internal power that constrain a leader’s freedom to act. These do not exist in the Conservative party. A leader with a strong mandate from members and MPs can basically do as they wish. If those members and MPs are broadly sympathetic to the NatCons, then it could be a long road back to power.
"thanks largely to the toxic legacy bequeathed to Sir Keir Starmer by his predecessor Jeremy Corbyn." Parties get the leaders they deserve!
Labour certainly did with Corbyn. A supreme act of self-indulgence that went badly wrong. Sadly, it cost the nation dearly as well.
I was mainly thinking of the Conservative Party!!
I feel that Corbyn was an affliction on both parties. With Labour the effects are obvious, but Corbyn's presence also gave the Tories a completely free hand to indulge their more lunatic fancies since they were effectively running a one-party state with Corbyn wrecking Labour.
The country has suffered terribly from the lack of leadership that Corbyn caused in both parties.
Hubris is the Tory Achilles Heal and always has been.
A Survation poll for the Country Land and Business Association (CLA) suggests Tories might lose 21 seats in the rural wall, including those of Jeremy Hunt, Mel Stride, Mark Harper, Lucy Frazer, Jacob Rees-Mogg and Liam Fox.
Schadenfreude is a terrible emotion - beguiling as it is - and we mustn’t forget the balls, and sacrifice, it takes to put yourself forward for public service, to raise your head above the parapet, to put yourself forward for a popularity contest every few years, submitting to the uncompromising will of the electorate. These people genuinely want to help to make this country better. I might disagree entirely with the way they think that should happen but they deserve my respect.
That said, it would be lovely to see all those Tory bastards fall. Especially Rees-Mogg.
PMSL, you are obviously trolling. Majority are grifters or no users looking for easy money, unlimited expenses and gold plated pensions , half the year on holiday and the other half in subsidised bars and restaurants getting sloshed whilst looking for a lumber.
Up early this morning, Malc!
Good morning to all.
Morning OKC, busy day ahead, I am off on holiday this week so lots to do. Hope you are well and things improving for you.
"Coalition of chaos" won't work as a slogan because chaos is a word associated with the Conservatives. They won't want to remind people of that.
The Sun did polling recently - that it chose not to give much prominence to - that found a Tory majority was viewed more negatively than either a Labour majority or any possible coalition combination.
As well as the price rises there has also been a noticeable drop in quality. So if supermarket fruit has gone up 20%, it is probably more like 30-40% for a similar quality piece of fruit rather than what that particular supermarket was selling in 2021 vs what it is now selling in 2023.
On topic, the coalition of chaos narrative will not wash because the Tory party is now itself a coalition of chaos. Ditched much of its core philosophy and at war with its own extremists.
The risk for the Tory vote is that it is increasingly inefficiently distributed. 30-40% in red and blue walls. If the public votes efficiently to rid themselves of the Tories, it could be a disaster for them.
"Coalition of chaos" won't work as a slogan because chaos is a word associated with the Conservatives. They won't want to remind people of that.
The Sun did polling recently - that it chose not to give much prominence to - that found a Tory majority was viewed more negatively than either a Labour majority or any possible coalition combination.
Any possible coalition? Long survey if they tested the Plaid/RefUK/Green/Yogic Flyers combo.......
The Conservatives have left no stone unturned, since 2019, in their efforts to alienate both long-standing supporters, and floating voters.
It’s surprising that their support is as high as 29%.
Also, the contempt for their own membership oozes from the letters written from CCO.
One wonder if the organisation is secretly staffed by very effective Deep Labour agents.
Worse than that, the Conservative Party made the fatal error of Starting To Believe In Something.
Once a group starts to coalesce around an organising belief, it becomes tempting to cut away any evidence that goes against that belief. Fine(ish) in a church, not fine if you're wanting to run a country. See Truss-Kwarteng for an example of this.
The Conservatives, in particular, have worn their beliefs fairly lightly most of the time. Even Maggie (real Maggie, not cartoon Maggie of campfire stories) was a lot more pragmatic than she was given credit for. Capable wets could and did advance under Thatcher; William Waldegrave joined the cabinet in early November 1990.
The party is much more monochrome than in the past- partly but not exclusively because of the Europe thing. Even if that was worth doing (and it's far too nice a morning to discuss that), it has come at a price, which is a higher propensity to groupthink and paranoia. Because it's now a Belief.
And, in the even that the Conservatives do want to try something less strident, it's going to be tricky to find a leadership team out of whatever is left after an election defeat. Much harder than Labour found it under Corbyn. He also Believed In Things to an unhealthy degree, but plenty of his party just wanted to make life nicer for the less well off.
As well as the price rises there has also been a noticeable drop in quality. So if supermarket fruit has gone up 20%, it is probably more like 30-40% for a similar quality piece of fruit rather than what that particular supermarket was selling in 2021 vs what it is now selling in 2023.
Supermarket fruit quality has imo been hit by dropping dates off the packaging. It is said to reduce waste but perhaps just at the shop end because I seem to be throwing more away than before (which was none).
As well as the price rises there has also been a noticeable drop in quality. So if supermarket fruit has gone up 20%, it is probably more like 30-40% for a similar quality piece of fruit rather than what that particular supermarket was selling in 2021 vs what it is now selling in 2023.
Supermarket fruit quality has imo been hit by dropping dates off the packaging. It is said to reduce waste but perhaps just at the shop end because I seem to be throwing more away than before (which was none).
I agree, noticed a big drop in quality of vegetables recently
A Survation poll for the Country Land and Business Association (CLA) suggests Tories might lose 21 seats in the rural wall, including those of Jeremy Hunt, Mel Stride, Mark Harper, Lucy Frazer, Jacob Rees-Mogg and Liam Fox.
Schadenfreude is a terrible emotion - beguiling as it is - and we mustn’t forget the balls, and sacrifice, it takes to put yourself forward for public service, to raise your head above the parapet, to put yourself forward for a popularity contest every few years, submitting to the uncompromising will of the electorate. These people genuinely want to help to make this country better. I might disagree entirely with the way they think that should happen but they deserve my respect.
That said, it would be lovely to see all those Tory bastards fall. Especially Rees-Mogg.
PMSL, you are obviously trolling. Majority are grifters or no users looking for easy money, unlimited expenses and gold plated pensions , half the year on holiday and the other half in subsidised bars and restaurants getting sloshed whilst looking for a lumber.
Up early this morning, Malc!
Good morning to all.
Morning OKC, busy day ahead, I am off on holiday this week so lots to do. Hope you are well and things improving for you.
Where are you off to, Malc? Somewhere, sunny and warm? Yes, I think things are improving for me. Slowly. Must say that, generally speaking, I am impressed with the NHS services.
Not sure how you link photos direct, so I’ll have to do it via a Tweet. I took a 7.5 mile stroll in the cliff country overlooking Sidmouth yesterday. To say it looked perfect is an understatement! When England gets it right, there is nowhere on earth more beautiful.
My rseaction was to wonder, how much of that will the supermarkets dump on the farmers?
All of it - and the thing is supermarkets are incredibly efficient at a price level because people will move elsewhere and then never darken the door of that chain for the next X years. I'm one example used to shop in Morrisons 2/3 times a week for 20+ years, then their recent price rises became obvious and I've been going to Aldi / Marks / Sainsburys since November and not darkened their door since. Will be there today but only because I need some garden stuff and they have always been good for that.
The irony is that if the Government really wanted to force the Supermarkets to do things will they should be insisting that petrol and diesel margins for the period of 2022-24 are kept at the average margin they used between 2015-19 and watch 5-8p immediately come off each litre.
Starmer may be uninspiring but he doesn’t go out of his way to alienate (in no particular order) civil servants, lawyers, immigrants, the children of immigrants, the young, the not quite so young, railway workers, teachers, Irish, Scots & Welsh people, Londoners, university lecturers, people who eat tofu, the poor, aspiring homeowners, liberals, Europhiles…there are no doubt others.
As soon as the Conservatives find a base they want to appeal to Starmer has a problem. Until then all he has to do is not offend the people the Tories are.
The Conservatives have left no stone unturned, since 2019, in their efforts to alienate both long-standing supporters, and floating voters.
It’s surprising that their support is as high as 29%.
Also, the contempt for their own membership oozes from the letters written from CCO.
One wonder if the organisation is secretly staffed by very effective Deep Labour agents.
Worse than that, the Conservative Party made the fatal error of Starting To Believe In Something.
Once a group starts to coalesce around an organising belief, it becomes tempting to cut away any evidence that goes against that belief. Fine(ish) in a church, not fine if you're wanting to run a country. See Truss-Kwarteng for an example of this.
The Conservatives, in particular, have worn their beliefs fairly lightly most of the time. Even Maggie (real Maggie, not cartoon Maggie of campfire stories) was a lot more pragmatic than she was given credit for. Capable wets could and did advance under Thatcher; William Waldegrave joined the cabinet in early November 1990.
The party is much more monochrome than in the past- partly but not exclusively because of the Europe thing. Even if that was worth doing (and it's far too nice a morning to discuss that), it has come at a price, which is a higher propensity to groupthink and paranoia. Because it's now a Belief.
And, in the even that the Conservatives do want to try something less strident, it's going to be tricky to find a leadership team out of whatever is left after an election defeat. Much harder than Labour found it under Corbyn. He also Believed In Things to an unhealthy degree, but plenty of his party just wanted to make life nicer for the less well off.
Yes, pragmatism, realism and stability all used to be the Conservatives secret weapons and why they kept winning elections.
I'll say it again, Brexiteer Tories are intent on delivering Michael Foot's 1983 manifesto pledges.
Brexit = Socialism.
This is what I said last night.
Sunak will end up paying private equity to subsidise food prices in supermarkets. I'm sure the likes of Clayton, Dubilier, & Rice, and the Issa Brothers will love it.
F1: I slept abysmally, so we'll see if that gives me a half-asleep wisdom when trying to find value at the worst circuit of the calendar...
As someone on the spot I can report that Monaco is crowded and tickets to sit in an average seat cost 920 euros. Whatever you might think of this Grand Prix I can't imagine one more glamorous. Monaco can look spectacular when it puts its mind to it. It's wealth is there for all to see but so is it's history and this is Grand Prix number eighty.
All through the principality are archives of black and white photographs of Princess Grace and Prince Rainier set against the colourful Grand Prix stalls and screens and it works surprisingly well. It's so multinational Suella would have a seizure
The 76th film festival at Cannes by contrast though still glamorous can be pretty tacky. This year it's been taken over by 'influencers'. Girls doing ever crazier stunts to get noticed. Many finding a way onto the Red Carpet to the chagrin of the film makers. But the good news is that Jonathan Glazer won the Grand Prix (not that one) for 'The Zone of Interest'
Have fun! I will definitely get to Monaco for the F1 one day, even Mrs Sandpit likes the look of the place.
Starmer may be uninspiring but he doesn’t go out of his way to alienate (in no particular order) civil servants, lawyers, immigrants, the children of immigrants, the young, the not quite so young, railway workers, teachers, Irish, Scots & Welsh people, Londoners, university lecturers, people who eat tofu, the poor, aspiring homeowners, liberals, Europhiles…there are no doubt others.
As soon as the Conservatives find a base they want to appeal to Starmer has a problem. Until then all he has to do is not offend the people the Tories are.
Please add "small and medium business owners" to this list.
Not sure how you link photos direct, so I’ll have to do it via a Tweet. I took a 7.5 mile stroll in the cliff country overlooking Sidmouth yesterday. To say it looked perfect is an understatement! When England gets it right, there is nowhere on earth more beautiful.
I completely agree. I did a solo 8-mile walk through the upland hills of North Hampshire yesterday, finishing up at a country pub, and I was deeply moved at how ravishing the landscape looked.
It wasn't just looking back into the valley to see all the deep greenery, although that was sublime in and of itself, it was the light breeze gently carrying all the fresh smells (honeysuckle, cut grass, wildflower meadows, the budding oaks in the copses) together with the butterflies playing around and over it on top.
You can see why Hubert Parry wrote what he did. I don't want to die and go to heaven. Heaven is here.
Not sure how you link photos direct, so I’ll have to do it via a Tweet. I took a 7.5 mile stroll in the cliff country overlooking Sidmouth yesterday. To say it looked perfect is an understatement! When England gets it right, there is nowhere on earth more beautiful.
Beautiful - knocks the pants off any scene posted recently by Leon.
We had our gardens open yesterday (and today) for charity - perfect day with lots of generous visitors. A golden days to remember.
PS You can post photos direct via vanilla PB but I sometimes find they end up on their side or upside down for some reason. I pop them on imgur and post using an image link as above.
Starmer may be uninspiring but he doesn’t go out of his way to alienate (in no particular order) civil servants, lawyers, immigrants, the children of immigrants, the young, the not quite so young, railway workers, teachers, Irish, Scots & Welsh people, Londoners, university lecturers, people who eat tofu, the poor, aspiring homeowners, liberals, Europhiles…there are no doubt others.
As soon as the Conservatives find a base they want to appeal to Starmer has a problem. Until then all he has to do is not offend the people the Tories are.
Please add "small and medium business owners" to this list.
A Survation poll for the Country Land and Business Association (CLA) suggests Tories might lose 21 seats in the rural wall, including those of Jeremy Hunt, Mel Stride, Mark Harper, Lucy Frazer, Jacob Rees-Mogg and Liam Fox.
Schadenfreude is a terrible emotion - beguiling as it is - and we mustn’t forget the balls, and sacrifice, it takes to put yourself forward for public service, to raise your head above the parapet, to put yourself forward for a popularity contest every few years, submitting to the uncompromising will of the electorate. These people genuinely want to help to make this country better. I might disagree entirely with the way they think that should happen but they deserve my respect.
That said, it would be lovely to see all those Tory bastards fall. Especially Rees-Mogg.
PMSL, you are obviously trolling. Majority are grifters or no users looking for easy money, unlimited expenses and gold plated pensions , half the year on holiday and the other half in subsidised bars and restaurants getting sloshed whilst looking for a lumber.
Oooooooh you are cynical! Yeah no doubt there’s some like that. But not all of them, I don’t think.
I’m very, very far from being some kind of political insider, but I do happen to know, not well but cordially enough on the odd occasion I see them, a few councillors. A couple of whom have gone on to become MPs. I’d happily vote for them. Even - shudder - the Tory ones. Because they’re good, principled, decent people.
There’s a Lib Dem I know ever so slightly I wouldn’t piss on if he was on fire.
The further up they chain they go though I suspect, sadly, the less pure they become. Politics - it’s a shit business.
I thought when I read TSE's header that his alliteration was a little tame.
Starmer may be uninspiring but he doesn’t go out of his way to alienate (in no particular order) civil servants, lawyers, immigrants, the children of immigrants, the young, the not quite so young, railway workers, teachers, Irish, Scots & Welsh people, Londoners, university lecturers, people who eat tofu, the poor, aspiring homeowners, liberals, Europhiles…there are no doubt others.
As soon as the Conservatives find a base they want to appeal to Starmer has a problem. Until then all he has to do is not offend the people the Tories are.
Please add "small and medium business owners" to this list.
Doctors, nurses….
Not sure how I forgot those. Hangover I guess. Finally got to go on the Japanese Whiskey tasting that my wife bought for my birthday
Starmer may be uninspiring but he doesn’t go out of his way to alienate (in no particular order) civil servants, lawyers, immigrants, the children of immigrants, the young, the not quite so young, railway workers, teachers, Irish, Scots & Welsh people, Londoners, university lecturers, people who eat tofu, the poor, aspiring homeowners, liberals, Europhiles…there are no doubt others.
As soon as the Conservatives find a base they want to appeal to Starmer has a problem. Until then all he has to do is not offend the people the Tories are.
Please add "small and medium business owners" to this list.
And the large business owners having their prices set by the "blob"!
I think England could well be a hung parliament based on the local election results but Starmer ends up with a small UK wide majority due to Labour gains from the SNP in Scotland and Labour winning an even bigger majority of seats in Wales
The Conservatives have left no stone unturned, since 2019, in their efforts to alienate both long-standing supporters, and floating voters.
It’s surprising that their support is as high as 29%.
Also, the contempt for their own membership oozes from the letters written from CCO.
One wonder if the organisation is secretly staffed by very effective Deep Labour agents.
Worse than that, the Conservative Party made the fatal error of Starting To Believe In Something.
Once a group starts to coalesce around an organising belief, it becomes tempting to cut away any evidence that goes against that belief. Fine(ish) in a church, not fine if you're wanting to run a country. See Truss-Kwarteng for an example of this.
The Conservatives, in particular, have worn their beliefs fairly lightly most of the time. Even Maggie (real Maggie, not cartoon Maggie of campfire stories) was a lot more pragmatic than she was given credit for. Capable wets could and did advance under Thatcher; William Waldegrave joined the cabinet in early November 1990.
The party is much more monochrome than in the past- partly but not exclusively because of the Europe thing. Even if that was worth doing (and it's far too nice a morning to discuss that), it has come at a price, which is a higher propensity to groupthink and paranoia. Because it's now a Belief.
And, in the even that the Conservatives do want to try something less strident, it's going to be tricky to find a leadership team out of whatever is left after an election defeat. Much harder than Labour found it under Corbyn. He also Believed In Things to an unhealthy degree, but plenty of his party just wanted to make life nicer for the less well off.
Yes, pragmatism, realism and stability all used to be the Conservatives secret weapons and why they kept winning elections.
Yet two years ago things were looking very good for the Conservatives.
So what went wrong ?
Not the policies as the country has trundled along but the revelations about the behaviour:
The hypocrisy of the Downing Street parties The greed of the PPE contracts The self indulgence of Trussomics The bullying allegations of Raab and others The tax affairs of Zahawi The uselessness of Braverman The scheming of so many
Toxic legacy my arse, you are Peter Mandleson and I claim my prize
SKS has staked all on being Toxic to Socialists and will be lucky to crawl over the line due to 2024 having a "time is up for the Tories" feel about it,
Ideally, I'd like Sunak with a majority of 100+ so he can govern sensibly.
Without it I'd probably prefer the Conservatives to go into opposition with 250 seats+ and the nutters to be purged once there.
Sunak's majority is about 70 right now? Would another 15 Conservative MPs really make a difference to anything? After all, you might just add another 15 nutters to the nutter caucus.
Ideally, I'd like Sunak with a majority of 100+ so he can govern sensibly.
Without it I'd probably prefer the Conservatives to go into opposition with 250 seats+ and the nutters to be purged once there.
Do you think adding about 10 people to the Conservative benches would enable Sunak to govern sensibly? (Serious question: we have to consider who is stepping down and what the PPCs replacing them look like.)
I'll say it again, Brexiteer Tories are intent on delivering Michael Foot's 1983 manifesto pledges.
Brexit = Socialism.
This is what I said last night.
Sunak will end up paying private equity to subsidise food prices in supermarkets. I'm sure the likes of Clayton, Dubilier, & Rice, and the Issa Brothers will love it.
Edward Heath delivered price controls in 1972. Michael Heseltine, Macmillan, Baldwin, Chamberlain, Disraeli often supported government intervention.
As a laissez faire liberal you fail to understand Toryism is a middle way between socialism and laissez faire liberalism economically (something ex LD Truss failed to grasp too), sometimes Tory governments will intervene if needed, especially due to high levels of current food prices post Ukraine war. That doesn't mean nationalising most industry however as socialists would or putting up tax levels very high.
Indeed Thatcher was arguably more a laissez faire Gladstone Liberal herself than patrician Tory
As well as the price rises there has also been a noticeable drop in quality. So if supermarket fruit has gone up 20%, it is probably more like 30-40% for a similar quality piece of fruit rather than what that particular supermarket was selling in 2021 vs what it is now selling in 2023.
Supermarket fruit quality has imo been hit by dropping dates off the packaging. It is said to reduce waste but perhaps just at the shop end because I seem to be throwing more away than before (which was none).
A thing that we take for granted in the UK that doesn't apply in France is that you can buy all types of fruits throughout the year. You can't for example buy melons in Feb/March and you cant buy clementines tangerines now. And that is anywhere and applies to the very largest of supermarkets
I'll say it again, Brexiteer Tories are intent on delivering Michael Foot's 1983 manifesto pledges.
Brexit = Socialism.
This is what I said last night.
Sunak will end up paying private equity to subsidise food prices in supermarkets. I'm sure the likes of Clayton, Dubilier, & Rice, and the Issa Brothers will love it.
French socialism? It's British Conservatism. Ted Heath had a Price Commission too. (Alongside power cuts -- have you seen the price of posh scented candles?)
This is what Joe Biden did with petrol prices. When the price of the inputs has peaked, but it hasn't really reached the consumer yet, make a big show of demanding that the retailers lower prices. Wait a couple of weeks and hey presto, your orders have been followed and the customers are saved. Thank you, Dark Brandon!
Toxic legacy my arse, you are Peter Mandleson and I claim my prize
SKS has staked all on being Toxic to Socialists and will be lucky to crawl over the line due to 2024 having a "time is up for the Tories" feel about it,
It is hard to work out whether the delusions trump the obsessions or vice versa.
Ideally, I'd like Sunak with a majority of 100+ so he can govern sensibly.
Without it I'd probably prefer the Conservatives to go into opposition with 250 seats+ and the nutters to be purged once there.
If he can’t govern sensibly with his current majority, the Tories are simply not fit to be in government. 100 plus majority “so he can govern sensibly”; FFS.
There in a nutshell if why we should have PR. We continually have parties of both left and right, commanding only a plurality of the vote, believing somehow that they have a special right to govern.
A Survation poll for the Country Land and Business Association (CLA) suggests Tories might lose 21 seats in the rural wall, including those of Jeremy Hunt, Mel Stride, Mark Harper, Lucy Frazer, Jacob Rees-Mogg and Liam Fox.
Tories still ahead in rural areas though 41% to 36% for Labour and 13% for the LDs on that poll
"thanks largely to the toxic legacy bequeathed to Sir Keir Starmer by his predecessor Jeremy Corbyn." Parties get the leaders they deserve!
Labour certainly did with Corbyn. A supreme act of self-indulgence that went badly wrong. Sadly, it cost the nation dearly as well.
I was mainly thinking of the Conservative Party!!
I feel that Corbyn was an affliction on both parties. With Labour the effects are obvious, but Corbyn's presence also gave the Tories a completely free hand to indulge their more lunatic fancies since they were effectively running a one-party state with Corbyn wrecking Labour.
The country has suffered terribly from the lack of leadership that Corbyn caused in both parties.
But not long to go. We can all look forward to a few Portillo moments though this lot have been so ghastly just watching them lose their seat doesn't seem adequate. Certainly not for Braverman. I'd like to see her frogmarched onto a plane to Rwanda while the nation cheered
I'll say it again, Brexiteer Tories are intent on delivering Michael Foot's 1983 manifesto pledges.
Brexit = Socialism.
This is what I said last night.
Sunak will end up paying private equity to subsidise food prices in supermarkets. I'm sure the likes of Clayton, Dubilier, & Rice, and the Issa Brothers will love it.
Edward Heath delivered price controls in 1972. Michael Heseltine, Macmillan, Baldwin, Chamberlain, Disraeli often supported government intervention.
As a laissez faire liberal you fail to understand Toryism is a middle way between socialism and laissez faire liberalism economically, sometimes government will intervene if needed, especially due to high level of current food prices post Ukraine war. That doesn't mean nationalising most industry however as socialists would or putting up tax levels very high.
Indeed Thatcher was arguably more a laissez faire Gladstone Liberal herself than patrician Tory
The problem isn't the level of food prices its the level of house prices.
A Survation poll for the Country Land and Business Association (CLA) suggests Tories might lose 21 seats in the rural wall, including those of Jeremy Hunt, Mel Stride, Mark Harper, Lucy Frazer, Jacob Rees-Mogg and Liam Fox.
JRM will lose if all the opposition rallies around Labour.
Labour/LD/Green combined ran him pretty close even in GE2019 - question is whether it splits evenly across Labour/LD again.
Trouble is it is easier to get angry Tories to vote LD than Lab in a place like this. I think only the LDs can win in this seat and convincing the elector you are the challenger when you are behind Lab is harder unless it is by election so he is likely to be safe because of a split vote. It would need Lab to really back off which I can't see.
Toxic legacy my arse, you are Peter Mandleson and I claim my prize
SKS has staked all on being Toxic to Socialists and will be lucky to crawl over the line due to 2024 having a "time is up for the Tories" feel about it,
There is no doubt that England has nice landscapes and these can look superficially sensational at the right time of year.
The tragedy is that beneath this superficial beauty, our landscapes are thoroughly depleted of nature. In my lifetime populations of insectivorous birds have collapsed in lowland England. Once everyday species like Grey Partridge, Swallow, Cuckoo and Willow Warbler are now noteworthy. Butterflies I used to see in huge numbers are now found in ones and twos.
It’s great to appreciate our landscapes on a nice spring day but don’t let that detract from the deep environmental problems beneath. Beneath the surface much of the landscape has as much resource availability for wildlife as an industrial estate.
Starmer may be uninspiring but he doesn’t go out of his way to alienate (in no particular order) civil servants, lawyers, immigrants, the children of immigrants, the young, the not quite so young, railway workers, teachers, Irish, Scots & Welsh people, Londoners, university lecturers, people who eat tofu, the poor, aspiring homeowners, liberals, Europhiles…there are no doubt others.
As soon as the Conservatives find a base they want to appeal to Starmer has a problem. Until then all he has to do is not offend the people the Tories are.
The Conservative government upsetting its natural supporters was an underplayed part of Labour's 1997 landslide. Ken Clarke in particular was a serial offender as he moved from department to department, and he was a key mover in the ERM debacle which cost many their homes.
Toxic legacy my arse, you are Peter Mandleson and I claim my prize
SKS has staked all on being Toxic to Socialists and will be lucky to crawl over the line due to 2024 having a "time is up for the Tories" feel about it,
Corbyn bequeathed Starmer just 202 MPs, that’s toxic.
When Corbyn became leader he had 232 MPs, he left the Labour Party in a worse state than he inherited.
I'll say it again, Brexiteer Tories are intent on delivering Michael Foot's 1983 manifesto pledges.
Brexit = Socialism.
This is what I said last night.
Sunak will end up paying private equity to subsidise food prices in supermarkets. I'm sure the likes of Clayton, Dubilier, & Rice, and the Issa Brothers will love it.
Edward Heath delivered price controls in 1972. Michael Heseltine, Macmillan, Baldwin, Chamberlain, Disraeli often supported government intervention.
As a laissez faire liberal you fail to understand Toryism is a middle way between socialism and laissez faire liberalism economically, sometimes Tory governments will intervene if needed, especially due to high levels of current food prices post Ukraine war. That doesn't mean nationalising most industry however as socialists would or putting up tax levels very high.
Indeed Thatcher was arguably more a laissez faire Gladstone Liberal herself than patrician Tory
Sunak could suggest the collectivisation of all farms and you'd find a way to support it as official party policy.
I'll say it again, Brexiteer Tories are intent on delivering Michael Foot's 1983 manifesto pledges.
Brexit = Socialism.
This is what I said last night.
Sunak will end up paying private equity to subsidise food prices in supermarkets. I'm sure the likes of Clayton, Dubilier, & Rice, and the Issa Brothers will love it.
Edward Heath delivered price controls in 1972. Michael Heseltine, Macmillan, Baldwin, Chamberlain, Disraeli often supported government intervention.
As a laissez faire liberal you fail to understand Toryism is a middle way between socialism and laissez faire liberalism economically, sometimes government will intervene if needed, especially due to high level of current food prices post Ukraine war. That doesn't mean nationalising most industry however as socialists would or putting up tax levels very high.
Indeed Thatcher was arguably more a laissez faire Gladstone Liberal herself than patrician Tory
The problem isn't the level of food prices its the level of house prices.
Not north of Watford it isn't and Local Tory councils did propose local plans with lots of new housing until on May 4th most home counties councils went NOC Independent and Green or LD in a NIMBY revolt
Comments
You also have dogs?
Daylight at 5am is a peculiar feature of this time of year.
F1: I slept abysmally, so we'll see if that gives me a half-asleep wisdom when trying to find value at the worst circuit of the calendar...
Betting Post
F1: I've still got stuff to peruse but Ocon is 2.5 for a podium yet 36 (Ladbrokes, boosted) to win each way. I've backed the latter. He starts 3rd and unless he screws up the start he's got a very high chance of being top three. Passing's impossible and drivers tend to be as slow as they can to avoid the tyres going off and forcing a pit stop which may be inopportune.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2023/05/27/tories-face-huge-losses-rural-next-election/ (£££)
A Survation poll for the Country Land and Business Association (CLA) suggests Tories might lose 21 seats in the rural wall, including those of Jeremy Hunt, Mel Stride, Mark Harper, Lucy Frazer, Jacob Rees-Mogg and Liam Fox.
'Rural Wall' collapsing as Conservative support in rural England falls by 18 points
https://www.cla.org.uk/news/rural-wall-collapsing-as-conservative-support-in-rural-england-falls-by-18-points/
via GIPHY
It’s surprising that their support is as high as 29%.
That said, it would be lovely to see all those Tory bastards fall. Especially Rees-Mogg.
Indeed, the Forest of Dean was traditionally a very safe Labour seat until 1979 when Paul Marland narrowly won it. Thus was due to its coal mining and the associated workforce. In any case, it isn't actually particularly rural. Most of its population lives in five medium-sized towns - Cinderford, Lydney, Coleford, Mitcheldean and Newent.
If that's their idea of a 'rural wall' they need to get out more.
Cannock Chase would be another example. It's considered rural by many, but it isn't. Sure, it's got Cannock Chase in it but the voters don't live in Cannock Chase, they live in the Cannock Urban Area and Rugeley, the latter of which is one of the most deprived towns in England.
Because if Putin dies Lukashenko is finished anyway, so we'd get two for the price of one.
I was amused though at the implied correlation!
but so is it's history and this is Grand Prix number eighty.
All through the principality are archives of black and white photographs of Princess Grace and Prince Rainier set against the colourful Grand Prix stalls and screens and it works surprisingly well. It's so multinational Suella would have a seizure
The 76th film festival at Cannes by contrast though still glamorous can be pretty tacky. This year it's been taken over by 'influencers'. Girls doing ever crazier stunts to get noticed. Many finding a way onto the Red Carpet to the chagrin of the film makers. But the good news is that Jonathan Glazer won the Grand Prix (not that one) for 'The Zone of Interest'
I'm not worried about fear of a Labour minority, as I think in current circumstances it would drive some bite the bullet and vote more for Labour rather than the converse.
The country has suffered terribly from the lack of leadership that Corbyn caused in both parties.
It's FPTP and it's possibly the Conservatives clock 29-30% nationally whilst not really being particularly strong in any seat, anywhere.
But, that'd just get them back to par, not to winning an election.
One wonder if the organisation is secretly staffed by very effective Deep Labour agents.
Good morning to all.
I’m very, very far from being some kind of political insider, but I do happen to know, not well but cordially enough on the odd occasion I see them, a few councillors. A couple of whom have gone on to become MPs. I’d happily vote for them. Even - shudder - the Tory ones. Because they’re good, principled, decent people.
There’s a Lib Dem I know ever so slightly I wouldn’t piss on if he was on fire.
The further up they chain they go though I suspect, sadly, the less pure they become. Politics - it’s a shit business.
Which would mean that there's more people living in less populous places.
Of course this then leads to a discussion of what is urban/rural or town/village.
Labour/LD/Green combined ran him pretty close even in GE2019 - question is whether it splits evenly across Labour/LD again.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-65736944
If Sunak manages to defy the odds and stay in power, the Tories may manage to sort themselves out as competence and pragmatism will have delivered. But if he loses, the future looks bleak.
Labour has layers of internal power that constrain a leader’s freedom to act. These do not exist in the Conservative party. A leader with a strong mandate from members and MPs can basically do as they wish. If those members and MPs are broadly sympathetic to the NatCons, then it could be a long road back to power.
However Food inflation may well have peaked.
https://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/bills/article-12119149/When-food-prices-start-fall.html
To see how price controls work have a look where they have been implemented.
Venezuela for instance.
And given that you can buy 800g bread for 39p why do they think a price cap is necessary.
The risk for the Tory vote is that it is increasingly inefficiently distributed. 30-40% in red and blue walls. If the public votes efficiently to rid themselves of the Tories, it could be a disaster for them.
Once a group starts to coalesce around an organising belief, it becomes tempting to cut away any evidence that goes against that belief. Fine(ish) in a church, not fine if you're wanting to run a country. See Truss-Kwarteng for an example of this.
The Conservatives, in particular, have worn their beliefs fairly lightly most of the time. Even Maggie (real Maggie, not cartoon Maggie of campfire stories) was a lot more pragmatic than she was given credit for. Capable wets could and did advance under Thatcher; William Waldegrave joined the cabinet in early November 1990.
The party is much more monochrome than in the past- partly but not exclusively because of the Europe thing. Even if that was worth doing (and it's far too nice a morning to discuss that), it has come at a price, which is a higher propensity to groupthink and paranoia. Because it's now a Belief.
And, in the even that the Conservatives do want to try something less strident, it's going to be tricky to find a leadership team out of whatever is left after an election defeat. Much harder than Labour found it under Corbyn. He also Believed In Things to an unhealthy degree, but plenty of his party just wanted to make life nicer for the less well off.
But likely be all some can afford.
Yes, I think things are improving for me. Slowly.
Must say that, generally speaking, I am impressed with the NHS services.
https://twitter.com/spajw/status/1662536269270773761?s=46&t=rw5lNVUgmRPVyKpxfV_pPQ
The MoS provides an update on the MP caught in a brothel; he now fears he was the victim of a foreign honeytrap.
But a senior party figure doubts this theory, saying: “I can’t think of a single useful thing he could tell the Russians or the Chinese.”
https://twitter.com/JAHeale/status/1662526583221919744
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12131511/Tory-MP-naked-brothel-4am-feared-victim-foreign-honeytrap.html
The irony is that if the Government really wanted to force the Supermarkets to do things will they should be insisting that petrol and diesel margins for the period of 2022-24 are kept at the average margin they used between 2015-19 and watch 5-8p immediately come off each litre.
As soon as the Conservatives find a base they want to appeal to Starmer has a problem. Until then all he has to do is not offend the people the Tories are.
I'll say it again, Brexiteer Tories are intent on delivering Michael Foot's 1983 manifesto pledges.
Brexit = Socialism.
This is what I said last night.
Sunak will end up paying private equity to subsidise food prices in supermarkets. I'm sure the likes of Clayton, Dubilier, & Rice, and the Issa Brothers will love it.
It wasn't just looking back into the valley to see all the deep greenery, although that was sublime in and of itself, it was the light breeze gently carrying all the fresh smells (honeysuckle, cut grass, wildflower meadows, the budding oaks in the copses) together with the butterflies playing around and over it on top.
You can see why Hubert Parry wrote what he did. I don't want to die and go to heaven. Heaven is here.
We had our gardens open yesterday (and today) for charity - perfect day with lots of generous visitors. A golden days to remember.
PS You can post photos direct via vanilla PB but I sometimes find they end up on their side or upside down for some reason. I pop them on imgur and post using an image link as above.
Without it I'd probably prefer the Conservatives to go into opposition with 250 seats+ and the nutters to be purged once there.
So what went wrong ?
Not the policies as the country has trundled along but the revelations about the behaviour:
The hypocrisy of the Downing Street parties
The greed of the PPE contracts
The self indulgence of Trussomics
The bullying allegations of Raab and others
The tax affairs of Zahawi
The uselessness of Braverman
The scheming of so many
If the country votes for this lot again after the past 13 years of mismanagement, decline and scandal it deserves to go down the pan, frankly.
SKS Fan -"Toxic legacy"
Toxic legacy my arse, you are Peter Mandleson and I claim my prize
SKS has staked all on being Toxic to Socialists and will be lucky to crawl over the line due to 2024 having a "time is up for the Tories" feel about it,
As a laissez faire liberal you fail to understand Toryism is a middle way between socialism and laissez faire liberalism economically (something ex LD Truss failed to grasp too), sometimes Tory governments will intervene if needed, especially due to high levels of current food prices post Ukraine war. That doesn't mean nationalising most industry however as socialists would or putting up tax levels very high.
Indeed Thatcher was arguably more a laissez faire Gladstone Liberal herself than patrician Tory
100 plus majority “so he can govern sensibly”; FFS.
There in a nutshell if why we should have PR. We continually have parties of both left and right, commanding only a plurality of the vote, believing somehow that they have a special right to govern.
Trouble is it is easier to get angry Tories to vote LD than Lab in a place like this. I think only the LDs can win in this seat and convincing the elector you are the challenger when you are behind Lab is harder unless it is by election so he is likely to be safe because of a split vote. It would need Lab to really back off which I can't see.
The tragedy is that beneath this superficial beauty, our landscapes are thoroughly depleted of nature. In my lifetime populations of insectivorous birds have collapsed in lowland England. Once everyday species like Grey Partridge, Swallow, Cuckoo and Willow Warbler are now noteworthy. Butterflies I used to see in huge numbers are now found in ones and twos.
It’s great to appreciate our landscapes on a nice spring day but don’t let that detract from the deep environmental problems beneath. Beneath the surface much of the landscape has as much resource availability for wildlife as an industrial estate.
When Corbyn became leader he had 232 MPs, he left the Labour Party in a worse state than he inherited.
That is toxic.
PS - I’m not a SKS fan, I’m not voting Labour.