What Brits are really looking forward to this weekend – politicalbetting.com
Which are you most looking forward to around this weekend?The bank holiday day off: 37%The coronation and celebrations surrounding it: 25%Neither: 34%https://t.co/ybC0oCcl7z pic.twitter.com/ScdsnV50H6
About 14 million saw King being Crowned, live on BBC TV. This is about half of the TV audience for the Queen's funeral last Autumn (29 million across channels and outlets). The Lionesses had an 11 million average, 17 million peak. and England v Italy 2020 had a 31m peak
With the police arresting people for exercising free speech against the monarchy, that tells us the poor place the monarchy finds itself in, a self confident monarchy wouldn’t need the state to bully their citizens like this.
The Conservative Party generally, and the Home Secretary in particular, along with the attraction that police work has to people who derive enjoyment from abusing power and abusing other people, are responsible for the wave of forcible detentions. Not the King, regardless of whether you think he merits his status or not.
Could the coronation of King Charles III be the UK’s last coronation?
Yes, that's the right take. It's not as though 1/4 of the entire nation doing something is an unusual occurrence. It's like if 100,000 people show up on a protest march, that means nothing because it's a small proportion of the overall nation.
Particularly as unlike a world cup match the coronation was not a very absorbing watch, so 1/4 of the nation doing it would be a very high number.
About 14 million saw King being Crowned, live on BBC TV. This is about half of the TV audience for the Queen's funeral last Autumn (29 million across channels and outlets). The Lionesses had an 11 million average, 17 million peak. and England v Italy 2020 had a 31m peak
Not that surprising. The respects for Elizabeth were for both the office and the holder, and Charles only has the first of those so far, which isn't worth as much as seventy years ago. At the moment, there's still a bit of a "you're not my real dad" vibe going on.
Longer term, there's a challenge for the monarchy if the monarch is always old-to-dying. That will be tricky to solve.
About 14 million saw King being Crowned, live on BBC TV. This is about half of the TV audience for the Queen's funeral last Autumn (29 million across channels and outlets). The Lionesses had an 11 million average, 17 million peak. and England v Italy 2020 had a 31m peak
And we’ve yet to get the catch up and internet figures. I suspect the Palace will be just fine with this
Indeed the Guardian is so cheesed off that it was watched by a lot of people, they are blaming the weather:
“The viewing figures for the coronation at Westminster Abbey may have been boosted by the poor weather in parts of the UK, which forced people to stay inside”
Not really surprising. The football was both more exciting and more entertaining. I'd think it odd if the coronation wasn't televised, but I'd also think it odd if the nation was glued to it. We have so much more to divert us than our counterparts for the Queen's coronation 70 years ago.
34% not looking forward to anything this weekend, though. Miserable buggers.
Personally, I rather enjoyed seeing the bunting out, and I enjoyed the little street party in the cul de sac behind our house. Small scale and drunken, it was. And I will also enjoy an extra day off work tomorrow. My glass is definitely half full.
About 14 million saw King being Crowned, live on BBC TV. This is about half of the TV audience for the Queen's funeral last Autumn (29 million across channels and outlets). The Lionesses had an 11 million average, 17 million peak. and England v Italy 2020 had a 31m peak
Not that surprising. The respects for Elizabeth were for both the office and the holder, and Charles only has the first of those so far, which isn't worth as much as seventy years ago. At the moment, there's still a bit of a "you're not my real dad" vibe going on.
Longer term, there's a challenge for the monarchy if the monarch is always old-to-dying. That will be tricky to solve.
But that’s the genius of family. There will be weddings of attractive young people
The wedding of Wills and Kate was one of the most watched royal events ever
But could this dude look more like an orc from a Lord of the Rings film if he tried? Apologies for photo of Prigozin to spoil your Sunday, I couldn't get spoiler tags to work.
About 14 million saw King being Crowned, live on BBC TV. This is about half of the TV audience for the Queen's funeral last Autumn (29 million across channels and outlets). The Lionesses had an 11 million average, 17 million peak. and England v Italy 2020 had a 31m peak
Not that surprising. The respects for Elizabeth were for both the office and the holder, and Charles only has the first of those so far, which isn't worth as much as seventy years ago. At the moment, there's still a bit of a "you're not my real dad" vibe going on.
Longer term, there's a challenge for the monarchy if the monarch is always old-to-dying. That will be tricky to solve.
Next Coronation will have a King aged in his fifties, albeit as bald as a billiard ball.
Don’t forget the weekend’s big story, the LibDems shooting off the top end of the expectations swingometer (with a dishonourable mention for our HY who predicted the LibDems would lose seats….)
Good morning all. I’m sure everyone will join me in relief that the enforced TV bible bashing is behind us and we can settle into a proper weekend day of cooking programmes and football. And the rain has gone. Hurray!
You assume far too.much.
The relief among the people is palpable, on this bright spring morn. The rainy sermon is over, and just rejoice at that news.
I am much happier rejoicing at the fact that we have reconfirmed Constitutional Monarchy as the Settlement for this country until long after all of us on PB are dead and buried. Yesterday showed that perfectly and will have done us no harm in the soft power stakes around the world.
Yes, I know the @Anabobazina’s of this world will find this bewildering and the @malcolmg’s will find it loathsome and yada yada but yesterday made me happier about things in quite an important way
My national identity is quite important to me (not quite fundamental but certainly profound). For quite a few years an air of decline and malaise - sometimes almost terminal - has surrounded Britishness and Englishness, a form of slow but debilitating sickness, a kind of scurvy of the soul
Yesterday in all its nonsensical pageantry and glorious music and matchless history and predictable drizzle and architectural spleandour and ridiculous boring horsey marching and - most of all - its mysterious, pointless, luminous ritual which goes back ONE THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED YEARS - if not longer - with an English king being anointed in the Abbey built by Anglo Saxon kings 1200 years ago - made me put all of our recent travails in perspective. The deep perspective of enormous time
We are such an ancient nation, wreathed in legend and myth, assailed and venerated, reviled and revered, broken and blighted in places, yet bright and thriving in others: the last few years are NOTHING in comparison to all of that. They are a passing fever, soon forgotten
We do not repine. We are the English, we are the British. We’re still here
Only monarchy, I suspect, can enact this peculiar and reviving magic
I’m one of the most patriotic Englishmen you’ll meet, in a sporting context. I follow the England cricket and football teams with gusto. I don’t need the monarchy to feel national pride. Indeed yesterday’s long damp sermon was rather the opposite - dull, pious and boring! Hardly the stuff to stir the senses.
As I said yesterday evening to you, if you set out to be uninspired then you will be. Only someone with an utterly closed mind could fail to be moved and inspired by the vast history and tradition on display yesterday. Not just sat in museums to be shuffled past by bored school kids but actually being used as it was intended, as part of the heritage of our country.
"Only someone with an utterly closed mind"
really? you found it moving and inspiring. others didn't.
Yes really. If you have any onterest what so ever in the history of our country as Anabob claims to have (and I do recognise that as a German that does not apply to you in the same way as it would to a Briton) then yesterday's proceedings were absolutely moving and inspiring. The use of a gospel dating from the 6th century, a ceremony that dates back to the 10th century and all performed in a building that dates back to the 11th century. All utterly authentic and unique. If someone who purports to be a 'patriotic Englishman' is not inspired by that in favour of a couple of ball games no more than 250 years old then they surely do have a closed mind.
Well, as a British person, I did not find it moving or inspiring. Maybe I didn't see the right bit, but I've seen more inspiring church fetes.
And it feels like an extremely insecure and/or arrogant statement to decree that others must find something moving and inspiring.
Apologies I thought you were German.
And no it is not insecure at all. Just basic common sense and logic. To claim one is strongly patriotic and then to be uninspired by the history and symbolism that defines the country seems utterly deluded.
Well, I can't speak for anyone else and I wouldn't claim to be strongly patriotic, but maybe that particular symbolism doesn't define the country for other people who nevertheless consider themselves strongly patriotic. Or is it delusional to disagree that the symbolism of the coronation is what defines Britain?
I think this debate hits the bullseye in terms of the peculiar challenge we face in defining “Britishness” right now.
Objectively, I agree with Richard - the depth of history on display is inspiring. Yet I can also understand a point of view that sees this as a very narrow definition of Britishness that excludes a lot of what makes me proud of our country. I can see why for some it is actively off-putting (eg the prominence of old whites men in the proceedings).
Those who scream ‘woke’ reflexively on the one hand, along with those who refuse to admit the value of this depth of national history on the other, are the truly closed-of-mind, in my view.
What value is there in defining Britishness iyo? Aren't we better off leaving it undefined?
Yeah perhaps ‘define’ is the wrong word there. I don’t mean we should try to tie it down - in fact the opposite - in my view the concept of Britishness needs to be able to accommodate those who found yesterday inspiring but also those who found the tearing down of Colston inspiring.
Which is tricky to achieve, but is what makes our country an interesting one.
Indeed, as I responded to accusations of not being proud of Britain a few days back:
One thing in particular that makes me proud is that monarchist and jingoistic self- importance is met by British mickey-taking and pricking that pomposity, rather than violent mobs. The worst that happened yesterday was a few protesters having their placards impounded, and even that fairly meekly done. Truly the mark of a civilised country.
I didn’t see the original exchange but agree wholeheartedly with your point of view @foxy.
I find the ‘gate keeping’ of patriotism by some both a visceral turn off and an expression of insecurity about a world that is (rightly) changing around us.
By contrast, I think our ability to disagree freely and in public (with or without placards) is one of the many, many things that makes me proud of our country.
I find it truly remarkable that some aren’t able to cope with the fact that other people can feel both pride and shame in the face of such a complex and multi-faceted history and culture.
About 14 million saw King being Crowned, live on BBC TV. This is about half of the TV audience for the Queen's funeral last Autumn (29 million across channels and outlets). The Lionesses had an 11 million average, 17 million peak. and England v Italy 2020 had a 31m peak
Not that surprising. The respects for Elizabeth were for both the office and the holder, and Charles only has the first of those so far, which isn't worth as much as seventy years ago. At the moment, there's still a bit of a "you're not my real dad" vibe going on.
Longer term, there's a challenge for the monarchy if the monarch is always old-to-dying. That will be tricky to solve.
Next Coronation will have a King aged in his fifties, albeit as bald as a billiard ball.
Perhaps, as is tradition, he or George will develop a fatal smoking habit in order to bring a youthful monarch to the throne. The institution demands it.
Expect to see this revelation in the upcoming Spare 2: The Sparening, by Harry Mountbatten-Windsor, former Prince.
But could this dude look more like an orc from a Lord of the Rings film if he tried? Apologies for photo of Prigozin to spoil your Sunday, I couldn't get spoiler tags to work.
They're going to rotate with some Chechen forces according to my sources
On topic - these stats are nothing to worry about for the monarchy in my view, as long as Charles doesn’t overreach and there aren’t too many Andrew-shaped skeletons in the closet.
With the police arresting people for exercising free speech against the monarchy, that tells us the poor place the monarchy finds itself in, a self confident monarchy wouldn’t need the state to bully their citizens like this.
The Conservative Party generally, and the Home Secretary in particular, along with the attraction that police work has to people who derive enjoyment from abusing power and abusing other people, are responsible for the wave of forcible detentions. Not the King, regardless of whether you think he merits his status or not.
Could the coronation of King Charles III be the UK’s last coronation?
QTWTAIN.
Caught by the New Thread, my thoughts on the protests:
Indeed, as I responded to accusations of not being proud of Britain a few days back:
One thing in particular that makes me proud is that monarchist and jingoistic self-importance is met by British mickey-taking and pricking that pomposity, rather than violent mobs. The worst that happened yesterday was a few protesters having their placards impounded, and even that fairly meekly done. Truly the mark of a civilised country.
About 14 million saw King being Crowned, live on BBC TV. This is about half of the TV audience for the Queen's funeral last Autumn (29 million across channels and outlets). The Lionesses had an 11 million average, 17 million peak. and England v Italy 2020 had a 31m peak
Not that surprising. The respects for Elizabeth were for both the office and the holder, and Charles only has the first of those so far, which isn't worth as much as seventy years ago. At the moment, there's still a bit of a "you're not my real dad" vibe going on.
Longer term, there's a challenge for the monarchy if the monarch is always old-to-dying. That will be tricky to solve.
Next Coronation will have a King aged in his fifties, albeit as bald as a billiard ball.
Really? You don't give the King any odds at all of surviving 19 years and a month? Given the very best healthcare, not smoking, and his family history of longevity, I would say there's a pretty good chance the next King will be crowned in his sixties.
About 14 million saw King being Crowned, live on BBC TV. This is about half of the TV audience for the Queen's funeral last Autumn (29 million across channels and outlets). The Lionesses had an 11 million average, 17 million peak. and England v Italy 2020 had a 31m peak
Not that surprising. The respects for Elizabeth were for both the office and the holder, and Charles only has the first of those so far, which isn't worth as much as seventy years ago. At the moment, there's still a bit of a "you're not my real dad" vibe going on.
Longer term, there's a challenge for the monarchy if the monarch is always old-to-dying. That will be tricky to solve.
Next Coronation will have a King aged in his fifties, albeit as bald as a billiard ball.
Really? You don't give the King any odds at all of surviving 19 years and a month? Given the very best healthcare, not smoking, and his family history of longevity, I would say there's a pretty good chance the next King will be crowned in his sixties.
The solution to this ageing problem is obvious - switching from primogeniture to ultimogeniture.
I suspect that the monarchy will still be in place in 1,000 years time 👍
What was that famous saying by King Ibn Saud? Something like “in 1000 years there will be just five kings left. The Kings of Spades, Hearts, Diamonds, Clubs and England”
About 14 million saw King being Crowned, live on BBC TV. This is about half of the TV audience for the Queen's funeral last Autumn (29 million across channels and outlets). The Lionesses had an 11 million average, 17 million peak. and England v Italy 2020 had a 31m peak
Not that surprising. The respects for Elizabeth were for both the office and the holder, and Charles only has the first of those so far, which isn't worth as much as seventy years ago. At the moment, there's still a bit of a "you're not my real dad" vibe going on.
Longer term, there's a challenge for the monarchy if the monarch is always old-to-dying. That will be tricky to solve.
Next Coronation will have a King aged in his fifties, albeit as bald as a billiard ball.
Really? You don't give the King any odds at all of surviving 19 years and a month? Given the very best healthcare, not smoking, and his family history of longevity, I would say there's a pretty good chance the next King will be crowned in his sixties.
I suspect that the monarchy will still be in place in 1,000 years time 👍
What was that famous saying by King Ibn Saud? Something like “in 1000 years there will be just five kings left. The Kings of Spades, Hearts, Diamonds, Clubs and England”
Google attributes it to the King of Egypt. But only ChatGPT can truly know.
I see it shows up in a lot of 'Are Monarchies days' numbered?' articles, usually coming with a clear yearning that the answer is 'Yes, hopefully'.
Could be so, but I doubt it given the stability of Scandanavian monarchies for example. The UK is more political unstable, with Sindy and all that, and so the possibility of it falling by the wayside are higher than should probably be the case given lack of consensus on what to replace it with.
But in fact we can see from various Republican dictatorships that they can be in effect monarchies, with sons inheriting presidencies from father's, so I don't think we'll ever truly be rid of monarchy, even if it is called something else. Christ, in North Korean they talk about the actual Kim bloodline being vital and still pretend not to be a monachy!
With the police arresting people for exercising free speech against the monarchy, that tells us the poor place the monarchy finds itself in, a self confident monarchy wouldn’t need the state to bully their citizens like this.
The Conservative Party generally, and the Home Secretary in particular, along with the attraction that police work has to people who derive enjoyment from abusing power and abusing other people, are responsible for the wave of forcible detentions. Not the King, regardless of whether you think he merits his status or not.
Could the coronation of King Charles III be the UK’s last coronation?
QTWTAIN.
Caught by the New Thread, my thoughts on the protests:
Indeed, as I responded to accusations of not being proud of Britain a few days back:
One thing in particular that makes me proud is that monarchist and jingoistic self-importance is met by British mickey-taking and pricking that pomposity, rather than violent mobs. The worst that happened yesterday was a few protesters having their placards impounded, and even that fairly meekly done. Truly the mark of a civilised country.
Charles has the advantage of commanding auto-loyalty from the right whilst appealing to many on the left because of his lifelong commitment to charity work promoting the environment, the young, and so on. He’s managed to appear both ahead of his time in his championing various organic/environmental causes whilst appealing to the retros with his opposition to modern architecture and the rest.
If William has anything between his ears he ought now to be thinking what he wants to be associated with when his turn to get the London procession in the rain comes around.
I remember a time when Medvedev was, whilst not considered one of the good guys, a fairly acceptable face of Russian politics.
“Former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev has threatened anyone convicted of carrying out Saturday’s attack on nationalist writer Zakhar Prilepin with death in prison.
Writing on Telegram, Medvedev, who is now deputy chairman of Russia’s security council, said that any suspects, “like other criminals, will be tried for the attack and sentenced to long prison terms”.
He continued: “But it is important that they and others like them realise a simple thing: even for those sentenced to life imprisonment (under the conditions of a moratorium on the death penalty), incidents and accidents sometimes happen.
“And then a lengthy sentence is quickly interrupted for natural reasons due to the death of the prisoner. And it also has great educational value for the new bastards who are hired to carry out assassinations.”
Prilepin, a prominent supporter of the war in Ukraine, was in the Nizhny Novgorod region of Russia on Saturday when his car exploded, injuring him and killing his driver.”
With the police arresting people for exercising free speech against the monarchy, that tells us the poor place the monarchy finds itself in, a self confident monarchy wouldn’t need the state to bully their citizens like this.
The Conservative Party generally, and the Home Secretary in particular, along with the attraction that police work has to people who derive enjoyment from abusing power and abusing other people, are responsible for the wave of forcible detentions. Not the King, regardless of whether you think he merits his status or not.
Could the coronation of King Charles III be the UK’s last coronation?
QTWTAIN.
Caught by the New Thread, my thoughts on the protests:
Indeed, as I responded to accusations of not being proud of Britain a few days back:
One thing in particular that makes me proud is that monarchist and jingoistic self-importance is met by British mickey-taking and pricking that pomposity, rather than violent mobs. The worst that happened yesterday was a few protesters having their placards impounded, and even that fairly meekly done. Truly the mark of a civilised country.
If William has anything between his ears he ought now to be thinking what he wants to be associated with when his turn to get the London procession in the rain comes around.
There are questions about that of course, though if Harry is to be believed the man is secretly a rage machine, but it's not an easy thing to put a finger on. I doubt Charles was thinking he would be praised for eco-awareness 30 years ago, so looking far ahead is hard.
About 14 million saw King being Crowned, live on BBC TV. This is about half of the TV audience for the Queen's funeral last Autumn (29 million across channels and outlets). The Lionesses had an 11 million average, 17 million peak. and England v Italy 2020 had a 31m peak
Not that surprising. The respects for Elizabeth were for both the office and the holder, and Charles only has the first of those so far, which isn't worth as much as seventy years ago. At the moment, there's still a bit of a "you're not my real dad" vibe going on.
Longer term, there's a challenge for the monarchy if the monarch is always old-to-dying. That will be tricky to solve.
Next Coronation will have a King aged in his fifties, albeit as bald as a billiard ball.
Really? You don't give the King any odds at all of surviving 19 years and a month? Given the very best healthcare, not smoking, and his family history of longevity, I would say there's a pretty good chance the next King will be crowned in his sixties.
The solution to this ageing problem is obvious - switching from primogeniture to ultimogeniture.
The old Welsh system was better still: battle-royal between anyone who fancied their chances.
With the police arresting people for exercising free speech against the monarchy, that tells us the poor place the monarchy finds itself in, a self confident monarchy wouldn’t need the state to bully their citizens like this.
The Conservative Party generally, and the Home Secretary in particular, along with the attraction that police work has to people who derive enjoyment from abusing power and abusing other people, are responsible for the wave of forcible detentions. Not the King, regardless of whether you think he merits his status or not.
Could the coronation of King Charles III be the UK’s last coronation?
QTWTAIN.
Caught by the New Thread, my thoughts on the protests:
Indeed, as I responded to accusations of not being proud of Britain a few days back:
One thing in particular that makes me proud is that monarchist and jingoistic self-importance is met by British mickey-taking and pricking that pomposity, rather than violent mobs. The worst that happened yesterday was a few protesters having their placards impounded, and even that fairly meekly done. Truly the mark of a civilised country.
Charles has the advantage of commanding auto-loyalty from the right whilst appealing to many on the left because of his lifelong commitment to charity work promoting the environment, the young, and so on. He’s managed to appear both ahead of his time in his championing various organic/environmental causes whilst appealing to the retros with his opposition to modern architecture and the rest.
If William has anything between his ears he ought now to be thinking what he wants to be associated with when his turn to get the London procession in the rain comes around.
Perhaps he will do his own flypast?
It really is quite hard to think what his interests are.
About 14 million saw King being Crowned, live on BBC TV. This is about half of the TV audience for the Queen's funeral last Autumn (29 million across channels and outlets). The Lionesses had an 11 million average, 17 million peak. and England v Italy 2020 had a 31m peak
Not that surprising. The respects for Elizabeth were for both the office and the holder, and Charles only has the first of those so far, which isn't worth as much as seventy years ago. At the moment, there's still a bit of a "you're not my real dad" vibe going on.
Longer term, there's a challenge for the monarchy if the monarch is always old-to-dying. That will be tricky to solve.
Next Coronation will have a King aged in his fifties, albeit as bald as a billiard ball.
Really? You don't give the King any odds at all of surviving 19 years and a month? Given the very best healthcare, not smoking, and his family history of longevity, I would say there's a pretty good chance the next King will be crowned in his sixties.
The solution to this ageing problem is obvious - switching from primogeniture to ultimogeniture.
The old Welsh system was better still: battle-royal between anyone who fancied their chances.
Makes you strong! But also poor.
Apparently Lukashenko in Belarus is following my proposal, as his favouite son has long been his youngest son, who is 29 years younger than the eldest.
About 14 million saw King being Crowned, live on BBC TV. This is about half of the TV audience for the Queen's funeral last Autumn (29 million across channels and outlets). The Lionesses had an 11 million average, 17 million peak. and England v Italy 2020 had a 31m peak
Not that surprising. The respects for Elizabeth were for both the office and the holder, and Charles only has the first of those so far, which isn't worth as much as seventy years ago. At the moment, there's still a bit of a "you're not my real dad" vibe going on.
Longer term, there's a challenge for the monarchy if the monarch is always old-to-dying. That will be tricky to solve.
Next Coronation will have a King aged in his fifties, albeit as bald as a billiard ball.
Really? You don't give the King any odds at all of surviving 19 years and a month? Given the very best healthcare, not smoking, and his family history of longevity, I would say there's a pretty good chance the next King will be crowned in his sixties.
The solution to this ageing problem is obvious - switching from primogeniture to ultimogeniture.
The old Welsh system was better still: battle-royal between anyone who fancied their chances.
My money would be on Harry, even after losing the battle of the dog bowl.
About 14 million saw King being Crowned, live on BBC TV. This is about half of the TV audience for the Queen's funeral last Autumn (29 million across channels and outlets). The Lionesses had an 11 million average, 17 million peak. and England v Italy 2020 had a 31m peak
Not that surprising. The respects for Elizabeth were for both the office and the holder, and Charles only has the first of those so far, which isn't worth as much as seventy years ago. At the moment, there's still a bit of a "you're not my real dad" vibe going on.
Longer term, there's a challenge for the monarchy if the monarch is always old-to-dying. That will be tricky to solve.
Next Coronation will have a King aged in his fifties, albeit as bald as a billiard ball.
Really? You don't give the King any odds at all of surviving 19 years and a month? Given the very best healthcare, not smoking, and his family history of longevity, I would say there's a pretty good chance the next King will be crowned in his sixties.
The solution to this ageing problem is obvious - switching from primogeniture to ultimogeniture.
The old Welsh system was better still: battle-royal between anyone who fancied their chances.
Because the Welsh went on to build an empire that bestrode the globe?
Not really surprising. The football was both more exciting and more entertaining. I'd think it odd if the coronation wasn't televised, but I'd also think it odd if the nation was glued to it. We have so much more to divert us than our counterparts for the Queen's coronation 70 years ago.
34% not looking forward to anything this weekend, though. Miserable buggers.
Personally, I rather enjoyed seeing the bunting out, and I enjoyed the little street party in the cul de sac behind our house. Small scale and drunken, it was. And I will also enjoy an extra day off work tomorrow. My glass is definitely half full.
I'll never understand why club football is so interesting to so many people. Don't mind watching internationals.
I suspect that the monarchy will still be in place in 1,000 years time 👍
Are you willing to take a bet on that?
Everyone be careful - assuming we have descendents and the survive the global ecological collapse, alien invasion, and the singularity, they may regard this as an enforcable contract.
I remember a time when Medvedev was, whilst not considered one of the good guys, a fairly acceptable face of Russian politics.
“Former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev has threatened anyone convicted of carrying out Saturday’s attack on nationalist writer Zakhar Prilepin with death in prison.
Writing on Telegram, Medvedev, who is now deputy chairman of Russia’s security council, said that any suspects, “like other criminals, will be tried for the attack and sentenced to long prison terms”.
He continued: “But it is important that they and others like them realise a simple thing: even for those sentenced to life imprisonment (under the conditions of a moratorium on the death penalty), incidents and accidents sometimes happen.
“And then a lengthy sentence is quickly interrupted for natural reasons due to the death of the prisoner. And it also has great educational value for the new bastards who are hired to carry out assassinations.”
Prilepin, a prominent supporter of the war in Ukraine, was in the Nizhny Novgorod region of Russia on Saturday when his car exploded, injuring him and killing his driver.”
From the Guardian.
His current role appears to be the drunken loudmouth of the Russian government - is that designed to make Putin appear the more rational statesman?
With the police arresting people for exercising free speech against the monarchy, that tells us the poor place the monarchy finds itself in, a self confident monarchy wouldn’t need the state to bully their citizens like this.
The Conservative Party generally, and the Home Secretary in particular, along with the attraction that police work has to people who derive enjoyment from abusing power and abusing other people, are responsible for the wave of forcible detentions. Not the King, regardless of whether you think he merits his status or not.
Could the coronation of King Charles III be the UK’s last coronation?
QTWTAIN.
Caught by the New Thread, my thoughts on the protests:
Indeed, as I responded to accusations of not being proud of Britain a few days back:
One thing in particular that makes me proud is that monarchist and jingoistic self-importance is met by British mickey-taking and pricking that pomposity, rather than violent mobs. The worst that happened yesterday was a few protesters having their placards impounded, and even that fairly meekly done. Truly the mark of a civilised country.
If William has anything between his ears he ought now to be thinking what he wants to be associated with when his turn to get the London procession in the rain comes around.
There are questions about that of course, though if Harry is to be believed the man is secretly a rage machine, but it's not an easy thing to put a finger on. I doubt Charles was thinking he would be praised for eco-awareness 30 years ago, so looking far ahead is hard.
That is the desolate future for William, trying to find something to be interested in to fill the gap until his dad dies.
About 14 million saw King being Crowned, live on BBC TV. This is about half of the TV audience for the Queen's funeral last Autumn (29 million across channels and outlets). The Lionesses had an 11 million average, 17 million peak. and England v Italy 2020 had a 31m peak
Not that surprising. The respects for Elizabeth were for both the office and the holder, and Charles only has the first of those so far, which isn't worth as much as seventy years ago. At the moment, there's still a bit of a "you're not my real dad" vibe going on.
Longer term, there's a challenge for the monarchy if the monarch is always old-to-dying. That will be tricky to solve.
Next Coronation will have a King aged in his fifties, albeit as bald as a billiard ball.
Really? You don't give the King any odds at all of surviving 19 years and a month? Given the very best healthcare, not smoking, and his family history of longevity, I would say there's a pretty good chance the next King will be crowned in his sixties.
The solution to this ageing problem is obvious - switching from primogeniture to ultimogeniture.
The old Welsh system was better still: battle-royal between anyone who fancied their chances.
I suspect that the monarchy will still be in place in 1,000 years time 👍
What was that famous saying by King Ibn Saud? Something like “in 1000 years there will be just five kings left. The Kings of Spades, Hearts, Diamonds, Clubs and England”
That's pretty much the quote, though I believe it was Farouk, the fat King of Egypt, who said it. In the fine tradition of monarchs being of foreign descent, the Egyptian royal family was descended from an Albanian Ottoman general. The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia is suprisingly new - founded by the father of the present king.
I stick to my earlier stated opinion on this - remove the monarchy at your peril. The French made it their national identity and every 50 years since that moment they have binned their entire constitution and started an entirely new one. They have also ended up with a far more monarchical system of government than any European monarchy outside of the Holy See.
It seems peculiar to me that, given the tremendous fuss we have just had over changing a fifty-year-old part of our constitution (a tale that still has not fully played out), we consider changing a millenium-old part of it and not imagine that there might be unintended consequences.
I suspect that the monarchy will still be in place in 1,000 years time 👍
Are you willing to take a bet on that?
Everyone be careful - assuming we have descendents and the survive the global ecological collapse, alien invasion, and the singularity, they may regard this as an enforcable contract.
Depends whether the currency in question is still in existence. Even inflation-proofing would be impossible, though. It's hard enough in my experience and reading assessing the value of money in 1823 versus today (critically dependent on social class, inter aliis).
About 14 million saw King being Crowned, live on BBC TV. This is about half of the TV audience for the Queen's funeral last Autumn (29 million across channels and outlets). The Lionesses had an 11 million average, 17 million peak. and England v Italy 2020 had a 31m peak
Not that surprising. The respects for Elizabeth were for both the office and the holder, and Charles only has the first of those so far, which isn't worth as much as seventy years ago. At the moment, there's still a bit of a "you're not my real dad" vibe going on.
Longer term, there's a challenge for the monarchy if the monarch is always old-to-dying. That will be tricky to solve.
Next Coronation will have a King aged in his fifties, albeit as bald as a billiard ball.
Really? You don't give the King any odds at all of surviving 19 years and a month? Given the very best healthcare, not smoking, and his family history of longevity, I would say there's a pretty good chance the next King will be crowned in his sixties.
The solution to this ageing problem is obvious - switching from primogeniture to ultimogeniture.
The old Welsh system was better still: battle-royal between anyone who fancied their chances.
Because the Welsh went on to build an empire that bestrode the globe?
True, but the last time English royals really started battling it out between family factions it was a mostly unknown Welshman who ended up on top, so the appeal of a system pretty much designed to lead to family conflict is apparent for them.
On British values, while yesterday may have showcased the best of them, it also showcased a very recent example of the worst of them.
It really isn't very British at all to enable the police to arrest people because they may be about to engage in a 'disruptive' protest. The legislation came into force just last Tuesday. People may be pretty relaxed about it being used in the exceptional circumstances of yesterday. But I don't think we should be at all relaxed about giving the police carte blanche in the future to make a subjective judgement, before any offence is committed, about whether one is likely to be committed.
Most unBritish. Thanks, Suella and the Tories. I hope Labour promises to repeal this bit of the legislation.
Not really surprising. The football was both more exciting and more entertaining. I'd think it odd if the coronation wasn't televised, but I'd also think it odd if the nation was glued to it. We have so much more to divert us than our counterparts for the Queen's coronation 70 years ago.
34% not looking forward to anything this weekend, though. Miserable buggers.
Personally, I rather enjoyed seeing the bunting out, and I enjoyed the little street party in the cul de sac behind our house. Small scale and drunken, it was. And I will also enjoy an extra day off work tomorrow. My glass is definitely half full.
I'll never understand why club football is so interesting to so many people. Don't mind watching internationals.
Massive matches tomorrow for Leicester, Everton, Southampton and Nottingham. All teams are desperate for points. I would be happy with a point off Fulham. Forest should get their final 3 of the season.
It's as tight as a gnats arse at the bottom of the PL.
I was going to say southern Spain, but it looks vaguely like something I've seen out of an Assassin's Creed game, so I'm going with Florence or Istanbul.
It's a slightly odd poll. "Neither" ? Who wouldn't look forward to a bank holiday weekend?
I wonder if this just measures British cynicism and non-deferential thinking; it would be somewhat uncool to look forward to the coronation this weekend, unless you were a strong monarchist, because it suggests it's the most important thing in your life and our society is quite atomised these days. And we are all centered on our own choices and priorities.
But, that doesn't mean you won't participate and enjoy it when it arrives. My whole village were out today and I met neighbours I never would have were it not for the monarchy.
On British values, while yesterday may have showcased the best of them, it also showcased a very recent example of the worst of them.
It really isn't very British at all to enable the police to arrest people because they may be about to engage in a 'disruptive' protest. The legislation came into force just last Tuesday. People may be pretty relaxed about it being used in the exceptional circumstances of yesterday. But I don't think we should be at all relaxed about giving the police carte blanche in the future to make a subjective judgement, before any offence is committed, about whether one is likely to be committed.
Most unBritish. Thanks, Suella and the Tories. I hope Labour promises to repeal this bit of the legislation.
Governments rarely give up power that has been accrued, even if the party in charge opposed it when in opposition. That's why despite some being against it Home Secretaries still have the power to withdraw someones citizenship.
I was going to say southern Spain, but it looks vaguely like something I've seen out of an Assassin's Creed game, so I'm going with Florence or Istanbul.
I was going to say southern Spain, but it looks vaguely like something I've seen out of an Assassin's Creed game, so I'm going with Florence or Istanbul.
Now you'll tell me its Grimsby.
I'm going with UK because it looks so exotic. I am thinking some sort of Mill chimney disguised as an exotic tower by prosperous Victorians.
I was going to say southern Spain, but it looks vaguely like something I've seen out of an Assassin's Creed game, so I'm going with Florence or Istanbul.
Now you'll tell me its Grimsby.
I'm going with UK because it looks so exotic. I am thinking some sort of Mill chimney disguised as an exotic tower by prosperous Victorians.
UK, yes. Not a mill, but yes, a Victorian flourish where you might not expect one.
With the police arresting people for exercising free speech against the monarchy, that tells us the poor place the monarchy finds itself in, a self confident monarchy wouldn’t need the state to bully their citizens like this.
The Conservative Party generally, and the Home Secretary in particular, along with the attraction that police work has to people who derive enjoyment from abusing power and abusing other people, are responsible for the wave of forcible detentions. Not the King, regardless of whether you think he merits his status or not.
Could the coronation of King Charles III be the UK’s last coronation?
QTWTAIN.
Caught by the New Thread, my thoughts on the protests:
Indeed, as I responded to accusations of not being proud of Britain a few days back:
One thing in particular that makes me proud is that monarchist and jingoistic self-importance is met by British mickey-taking and pricking that pomposity, rather than violent mobs. The worst that happened yesterday was a few protesters having their placards impounded, and even that fairly meekly done. Truly the mark of a civilised country.
Charles has the advantage of commanding auto-loyalty from the right whilst appealing to many on the left because of his lifelong commitment to charity work promoting the environment, the young, and so on. He’s managed to appear both ahead of his time in his championing various organic/environmental causes whilst appealing to the retros with his opposition to modern architecture and the rest.
If William has anything between his ears he ought now to be thinking what he wants to be associated with when his turn to get the London procession in the rain comes around.
Perhaps he will do his own flypast?
It really is quite hard to think what his interests are.
William is very into green stuff, it would appear. Hence the Earthshot Prize. Hence also his reported desire to destroy all the ivory artefacts in the Royal Collection. Caring about sustainability and elephants is unlikely to get him into too much trouble, save with the shrinking rump of climate change deniers, whom nobody else likes.
It's a slightly odd poll. "Neither" ? Who wouldn't look forward to a bank holiday weekend?
I wonder if this just measures British cynicism and non-deferential thinking; it would be somewhat uncool to look forward to the coronation this weekend, unless you were a strong monarchist, because it suggests it's the most important thing in your life and our society is quite atomised these days. And we are all centered on our own choices and priorities.
But, that doesn't mean you won't participate and enjoy it when it arrives. My whole village were out today and I met neighbours I never would have were it not for the monarchy.
Like much else in life: it's complicated.
Lots of people work have to work bank holiday weekends and may feel they are missing out. Others are expected to visit family they may not like. Some people may enjoy the routine of working and miss that.
I was going to say southern Spain, but it looks vaguely like something I've seen out of an Assassin's Creed game, so I'm going with Florence or Istanbul.
Now you'll tell me its Grimsby.
My first thought was Grimsby Dock Tower as well; they're reasonably similar but not the same.
edit; I'm thinking what you need tall towers for: chimneys (though the draught would be cr@p with that design; you need wind to help the smoke out); water tower; hydraulic tower; observation.
On British values, while yesterday may have showcased the best of them, it also showcased a very recent example of the worst of them.
It really isn't very British at all to enable the police to arrest people because they may be about to engage in a 'disruptive' protest. The legislation came into force just last Tuesday. People may be pretty relaxed about it being used in the exceptional circumstances of yesterday. But I don't think we should be at all relaxed about giving the police carte blanche in the future to make a subjective judgement, before any offence is committed, about whether one is likely to be committed.
Most unBritish. Thanks, Suella and the Tories. I hope Labour promises to repeal this bit of the legislation.
I’m not at all comfortable with pre-crime, however it is legislated, however enforced.
The state needs to do the hard and expensive thing. Solve actual crimes.
Not really surprising. The football was both more exciting and more entertaining. I'd think it odd if the coronation wasn't televised, but I'd also think it odd if the nation was glued to it. We have so much more to divert us than our counterparts for the Queen's coronation 70 years ago.
34% not looking forward to anything this weekend, though. Miserable buggers.
Personally, I rather enjoyed seeing the bunting out, and I enjoyed the little street party in the cul de sac behind our house. Small scale and drunken, it was. And I will also enjoy an extra day off work tomorrow. My glass is definitely half full.
I'll never understand why club football is so interesting to so many people. Don't mind watching internationals.
So many "I'll never understand why people like" x,y or z this weekend. I'll never understand how intelligent people can not understand that not everyone shares their tastes!
Well done Eagles! It's Strangeways. I think about this landmark often. It's fairly prominent on the skyline and not unpleasant looking. Most prisons are hidden away, but not this one. The surrounding area is a bit grim, but in ten years it won't be. It's close to Central Manchester and ripe for redevelopment. I imagine the prison will move, but I hope the tower stays. Maybe it could be a minor tourist attraction to see the view from the top.
It's a slightly odd poll. "Neither" ? Who wouldn't look forward to a bank holiday weekend?
I wonder if this just measures British cynicism and non-deferential thinking; it would be somewhat uncool to look forward to the coronation this weekend, unless you were a strong monarchist, because it suggests it's the most important thing in your life and our society is quite atomised these days. And we are all centered on our own choices and priorities.
But, that doesn't mean you won't participate and enjoy it when it arrives. My whole village were out today and I met neighbours I never would have were it not for the monarchy.
Like much else in life: it's complicated.
Only 9% of over 65's are looking forward to an extra Bank Holiday, presumably because they are retired.
Not really surprising. The football was both more exciting and more entertaining. I'd think it odd if the coronation wasn't televised, but I'd also think it odd if the nation was glued to it. We have so much more to divert us than our counterparts for the Queen's coronation 70 years ago.
34% not looking forward to anything this weekend, though. Miserable buggers.
Personally, I rather enjoyed seeing the bunting out, and I enjoyed the little street party in the cul de sac behind our house. Small scale and drunken, it was. And I will also enjoy an extra day off work tomorrow. My glass is definitely half full.
I'll never understand why club football is so interesting to so many people. Don't mind watching internationals.
So many "I'll never understand why people like" x,y or z this weekend. I'll never understand how intelligent people can not understand that not everyone shares their tastes!
With the police arresting people for exercising free speech against the monarchy, that tells us the poor place the monarchy finds itself in, a self confident monarchy wouldn’t need the state to bully their citizens like this.
The Conservative Party generally, and the Home Secretary in particular, along with the attraction that police work has to people who derive enjoyment from abusing power and abusing other people, are responsible for the wave of forcible detentions. Not the King, regardless of whether you think he merits his status or not.
Could the coronation of King Charles III be the UK’s last coronation?
QTWTAIN.
Caught by the New Thread, my thoughts on the protests:
Indeed, as I responded to accusations of not being proud of Britain a few days back:
One thing in particular that makes me proud is that monarchist and jingoistic self-importance is met by British mickey-taking and pricking that pomposity, rather than violent mobs. The worst that happened yesterday was a few protesters having their placards impounded, and even that fairly meekly done. Truly the mark of a civilised country.
Charles has the advantage of commanding auto-loyalty from the right whilst appealing to many on the left because of his lifelong commitment to charity work promoting the environment, the young, and so on. He’s managed to appear both ahead of his time in his championing various organic/environmental causes whilst appealing to the retros with his opposition to modern architecture and the rest.
If William has anything between his ears he ought now to be thinking what he wants to be associated with when his turn to get the London procession in the rain comes around.
Perhaps he will do his own flypast?
It really is quite hard to think what his interests are.
With the police arresting people for exercising free speech against the monarchy, that tells us the poor place the monarchy finds itself in, a self confident monarchy wouldn’t need the state to bully their citizens like this.
The Conservative Party generally, and the Home Secretary in particular, along with the attraction that police work has to people who derive enjoyment from abusing power and abusing other people, are responsible for the wave of forcible detentions. Not the King, regardless of whether you think he merits his status or not.
Could the coronation of King Charles III be the UK’s last coronation?
QTWTAIN.
Caught by the New Thread, my thoughts on the protests:
Indeed, as I responded to accusations of not being proud of Britain a few days back:
One thing in particular that makes me proud is that monarchist and jingoistic self-importance is met by British mickey-taking and pricking that pomposity, rather than violent mobs. The worst that happened yesterday was a few protesters having their placards impounded, and even that fairly meekly done. Truly the mark of a civilised country.
Charles has the advantage of commanding auto-loyalty from the right whilst appealing to many on the left because of his lifelong commitment to charity work promoting the environment, the young, and so on. He’s managed to appear both ahead of his time in his championing various organic/environmental causes whilst appealing to the retros with his opposition to modern architecture and the rest.
If William has anything between his ears he ought now to be thinking what he wants to be associated with when his turn to get the London procession in the rain comes around.
Perhaps he will do his own flypast?
It really is quite hard to think what his interests are.
Not really surprising. The football was both more exciting and more entertaining. I'd think it odd if the coronation wasn't televised, but I'd also think it odd if the nation was glued to it. We have so much more to divert us than our counterparts for the Queen's coronation 70 years ago.
34% not looking forward to anything this weekend, though. Miserable buggers.
Personally, I rather enjoyed seeing the bunting out, and I enjoyed the little street party in the cul de sac behind our house. Small scale and drunken, it was. And I will also enjoy an extra day off work tomorrow. My glass is definitely half full.
I'll never understand why club football is so interesting to so many people. Don't mind watching internationals.
So many "I'll never understand why people like" x,y or z this weekend. I'll never understand how intelligent people can not understand that not everyone shares their tastes!
With the police arresting people for exercising free speech against the monarchy, that tells us the poor place the monarchy finds itself in, a self confident monarchy wouldn’t need the state to bully their citizens like this.
The Conservative Party generally, and the Home Secretary in particular, along with the attraction that police work has to people who derive enjoyment from abusing power and abusing other people, are responsible for the wave of forcible detentions. Not the King, regardless of whether you think he merits his status or not.
Exactly. It’s utterly absurd to hold the royals responsible for yesterday’s arrests as if the Metropolitan Police are their own private militia. The Met are quite capable of fucking things up all by themselves (I’m sure we’ll get another treatise on the matter from Cyclefree in due course) without any input from Buck House. That said, if there was any external pressure put on the Met, it would have come from either Mayor Khan’t or the deranged authoritarian in the Home Office. Anyone not desperately grasping for reasons to find fault with the royals could see that.
With the police arresting people for exercising free speech against the monarchy, that tells us the poor place the monarchy finds itself in, a self confident monarchy wouldn’t need the state to bully their citizens like this.
The Conservative Party generally, and the Home Secretary in particular, along with the attraction that police work has to people who derive enjoyment from abusing power and abusing other people, are responsible for the wave of forcible detentions. Not the King, regardless of whether you think he merits his status or not.
Could the coronation of King Charles III be the UK’s last coronation?
QTWTAIN.
Caught by the New Thread, my thoughts on the protests:
Indeed, as I responded to accusations of not being proud of Britain a few days back:
One thing in particular that makes me proud is that monarchist and jingoistic self-importance is met by British mickey-taking and pricking that pomposity, rather than violent mobs. The worst that happened yesterday was a few protesters having their placards impounded, and even that fairly meekly done. Truly the mark of a civilised country.
Charles has the advantage of commanding auto-loyalty from the right whilst appealing to many on the left because of his lifelong commitment to charity work promoting the environment, the young, and so on. He’s managed to appear both ahead of his time in his championing various organic/environmental causes whilst appealing to the retros with his opposition to modern architecture and the rest.
If William has anything between his ears he ought now to be thinking what he wants to be associated with when his turn to get the London procession in the rain comes around.
Perhaps he will do his own flypast?
It really is quite hard to think what his interests are.
Some folk think they have him pegged..
Glad someone Rose to the occasion.
I believe he had a Ducati Panigale at one point which made him very mildly interesting, but I daresay he’s put aside all that nonsense nowadays. Otoh it inspired stuff as below. Who the hell would get hot and bothered by the shiny pated Hanoverian nowadays?
With the police arresting people for exercising free speech against the monarchy, that tells us the poor place the monarchy finds itself in, a self confident monarchy wouldn’t need the state to bully their citizens like this.
The Conservative Party generally, and the Home Secretary in particular, along with the attraction that police work has to people who derive enjoyment from abusing power and abusing other people, are responsible for the wave of forcible detentions. Not the King, regardless of whether you think he merits his status or not.
Could the coronation of King Charles III be the UK’s last coronation?
QTWTAIN.
Caught by the New Thread, my thoughts on the protests:
Indeed, as I responded to accusations of not being proud of Britain a few days back:
One thing in particular that makes me proud is that monarchist and jingoistic self-importance is met by British mickey-taking and pricking that pomposity, rather than violent mobs. The worst that happened yesterday was a few protesters having their placards impounded, and even that fairly meekly done. Truly the mark of a civilised country.
Charles has the advantage of commanding auto-loyalty from the right whilst appealing to many on the left because of his lifelong commitment to charity work promoting the environment, the young, and so on. He’s managed to appear both ahead of his time in his championing various organic/environmental causes whilst appealing to the retros with his opposition to modern architecture and the rest.
If William has anything between his ears he ought now to be thinking what he wants to be associated with when his turn to get the London procession in the rain comes around.
Perhaps he will do his own flypast?
It really is quite hard to think what his interests are.
William is very into green stuff, it would appear. Hence the Earthshot Prize. Hence also his reported desire to destroy all the ivory artefacts in the Royal Collection. Caring about sustainability and elephants is unlikely to get him into too much trouble, save with the shrinking rump of climate change deniers, whom nobody else likes.
Yes, but it's not going to get in front of the next big thing. That might be supporting population decrease, as some climate types are all for.
With the police arresting people for exercising free speech against the monarchy, that tells us the poor place the monarchy finds itself in, a self confident monarchy wouldn’t need the state to bully their citizens like this.
The Conservative Party generally, and the Home Secretary in particular, along with the attraction that police work has to people who derive enjoyment from abusing power and abusing other people, are responsible for the wave of forcible detentions. Not the King, regardless of whether you think he merits his status or not.
Could the coronation of King Charles III be the UK’s last coronation?
QTWTAIN.
Caught by the New Thread, my thoughts on the protests:
Indeed, as I responded to accusations of not being proud of Britain a few days back:
One thing in particular that makes me proud is that monarchist and jingoistic self-importance is met by British mickey-taking and pricking that pomposity, rather than violent mobs. The worst that happened yesterday was a few protesters having their placards impounded, and even that fairly meekly done. Truly the mark of a civilised country.
Charles has the advantage of commanding auto-loyalty from the right whilst appealing to many on the left because of his lifelong commitment to charity work promoting the environment, the young, and so on. He’s managed to appear both ahead of his time in his championing various organic/environmental causes whilst appealing to the retros with his opposition to modern architecture and the rest.
If William has anything between his ears he ought now to be thinking what he wants to be associated with when his turn to get the London procession in the rain comes around.
Perhaps he will do his own flypast?
It really is quite hard to think what his interests are.
William is very into green stuff, it would appear. Hence the Earthshot Prize. Hence also his reported desire to destroy all the ivory artefacts in the Royal Collection. Caring about sustainability and elephants is unlikely to get him into too much trouble, save with the shrinking rump of climate change deniers, whom nobody else likes.
Yes, but it's not going to get in front of the next big thing. That might be supporting population decrease, as some climate types are all for.
He might not be the sharpest tool in the box, but he’d have to be really quite stupid to make that his cause. He ain’t that dim.
The worst thing about William’s baldness is that royal decorum forbids him to just shave the whole thing off, and it’s too late now for a hair transplant too.
With the police arresting people for exercising free speech against the monarchy, that tells us the poor place the monarchy finds itself in, a self confident monarchy wouldn’t need the state to bully their citizens like this.
The Conservative Party generally, and the Home Secretary in particular, along with the attraction that police work has to people who derive enjoyment from abusing power and abusing other people, are responsible for the wave of forcible detentions. Not the King, regardless of whether you think he merits his status or not.
Could the coronation of King Charles III be the UK’s last coronation?
QTWTAIN.
Caught by the New Thread, my thoughts on the protests:
Indeed, as I responded to accusations of not being proud of Britain a few days back:
One thing in particular that makes me proud is that monarchist and jingoistic self-importance is met by British mickey-taking and pricking that pomposity, rather than violent mobs. The worst that happened yesterday was a few protesters having their placards impounded, and even that fairly meekly done. Truly the mark of a civilised country.
Charles has the advantage of commanding auto-loyalty from the right whilst appealing to many on the left because of his lifelong commitment to charity work promoting the environment, the young, and so on. He’s managed to appear both ahead of his time in his championing various organic/environmental causes whilst appealing to the retros with his opposition to modern architecture and the rest.
If William has anything between his ears he ought now to be thinking what he wants to be associated with when his turn to get the London procession in the rain comes around.
Perhaps he will do his own flypast?
It really is quite hard to think what his interests are.
Some folk think they have him pegged..
Glad someone Rose to the occasion.
I believe he had a Ducati Panigale at one point which made him very mildly interesting, but I daresay he’s put aside all that nonsense nowadays. Otoh it inspired stuff as below. Who the hell would get hot and bothered by the shiny pated Hanoverian nowadays?
Not really surprising. The football was both more exciting and more entertaining. I'd think it odd if the coronation wasn't televised, but I'd also think it odd if the nation was glued to it. We have so much more to divert us than our counterparts for the Queen's coronation 70 years ago.
34% not looking forward to anything this weekend, though. Miserable buggers.
Personally, I rather enjoyed seeing the bunting out, and I enjoyed the little street party in the cul de sac behind our house. Small scale and drunken, it was. And I will also enjoy an extra day off work tomorrow. My glass is definitely half full.
I'll never understand why club football is so interesting to so many people. Don't mind watching internationals.
So many "I'll never understand why people like" x,y or z this weekend. I'll never understand how intelligent people can not understand that not everyone shares their tastes!
Unless I’ve got a free bet to use up, which I throw on a club game, i’m just not emotionally invested. Never have been.
International football, on the other hand…
Most hardcore fans are the opposite. Eg ask a Sheffield Wednesday supporter which they'd prefer of England winning the World Cup and the Owls winning the Play Offs and getting promoted and it's a no brainer it's the latter. Why? Because when your club wins you share the buzz with fewer people. It's more exclusive.
About 14 million saw King being Crowned, live on BBC TV. This is about half of the TV audience for the Queen's funeral last Autumn (29 million across channels and outlets). The Lionesses had an 11 million average, 17 million peak. and England v Italy 2020 had a 31m peak
And we’ve yet to get the catch up and internet figures. I suspect the Palace will be just fine with this
Indeed the Guardian is so cheesed off that it was watched by a lot of people, they are blaming the weather:
“The viewing figures for the coronation at Westminster Abbey may have been boosted by the poor weather in parts of the UK, which forced people to stay inside”
With the police arresting people for exercising free speech against the monarchy, that tells us the poor place the monarchy finds itself in, a self confident monarchy wouldn’t need the state to bully their citizens like this.
The Conservative Party generally, and the Home Secretary in particular, along with the attraction that police work has to people who derive enjoyment from abusing power and abusing other people, are responsible for the wave of forcible detentions. Not the King, regardless of whether you think he merits his status or not.
Could the coronation of King Charles III be the UK’s last coronation?
QTWTAIN.
Caught by the New Thread, my thoughts on the protests:
Indeed, as I responded to accusations of not being proud of Britain a few days back:
One thing in particular that makes me proud is that monarchist and jingoistic self-importance is met by British mickey-taking and pricking that pomposity, rather than violent mobs. The worst that happened yesterday was a few protesters having their placards impounded, and even that fairly meekly done. Truly the mark of a civilised country.
Charles has the advantage of commanding auto-loyalty from the right whilst appealing to many on the left because of his lifelong commitment to charity work promoting the environment, the young, and so on. He’s managed to appear both ahead of his time in his championing various organic/environmental causes whilst appealing to the retros with his opposition to modern architecture and the rest.
If William has anything between his ears he ought now to be thinking what he wants to be associated with when his turn to get the London procession in the rain comes around.
Perhaps he will do his own flypast?
It really is quite hard to think what his interests are.
William is very into green stuff, it would appear. Hence the Earthshot Prize. Hence also his reported desire to destroy all the ivory artefacts in the Royal Collection. Caring about sustainability and elephants is unlikely to get him into too much trouble, save with the shrinking rump of climate change deniers, whom nobody else likes.
Yes, but it's not going to get in front of the next big thing. That might be supporting population decrease, as some climate types are all for.
18-20 million watching the Coronation isn't bad. That's 27% of the entire population which, in this day and age, is about as good as it gets. My estimate a week ago was about 10-11 million. And I expect the viewing figures will edge a bit higher still once catch-ups are included.
I think the highest ever was 31 million for Diana's funeral, and that was a hugely shocking event in a pre-digital/smart TV age with virtually wall-wall coverage, and whilst it's about 8-9 million less than the Queen's funeral of 28 million it's still pretty decent for a new monarch who's a bit bittersweet, has lots of baggage, and for a deeply religious service, and a long one.
I think Buckingham Palace will be satisfied with these figures.
About 14 million saw King being Crowned, live on BBC TV. This is about half of the TV audience for the Queen's funeral last Autumn (29 million across channels and outlets). The Lionesses had an 11 million average, 17 million peak. and England v Italy 2020 had a 31m peak
And we’ve yet to get the catch up and internet figures. I suspect the Palace will be just fine with this
Indeed the Guardian is so cheesed off that it was watched by a lot of people, they are blaming the weather:
“The viewing figures for the coronation at Westminster Abbey may have been boosted by the poor weather in parts of the UK, which forced people to stay inside”
I suspect that the monarchy will still be in place in 1,000 years time 👍
What was that famous saying by King Ibn Saud? Something like “in 1000 years there will be just five kings left. The Kings of Spades, Hearts, Diamonds, Clubs and England”
You have to consider procedure as much as opinion. Suppose both Lab and Con believe that about 1 million votes (a tiny % of the population but electorally critical) would swing away from a party putting a referendum on the monarchy in a manifesto, while an unknown but small number would switch the other way; that would stop such a pledge ever being made.
Which is why under current circumstances it won't be. So it won't be abolished until unforeseeable times in the future.
Comments
Those getting a paid day off work
Those not getting a paid day off work
Those who don't work
Among those getting a paid day off it will be much higher than 37%.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-65518360
Presumably we'll never know, however amusing a "jolly bad show... Constable Rowley" speech would be.
About 14 million saw King being Crowned, live on BBC TV. This is about half of the TV audience for the Queen's funeral last Autumn (29 million across channels and outlets). The Lionesses had an 11 million average, 17 million peak. and England v Italy 2020 had a 31m peak
https://twitter.com/sundersays/status/1655175061924397057
Latest German opinion poll.
Kantar:
CDU/CSU 31%
SPD 17%
Green 16%
AfD 16%
FDP 8%
Left 4%
Others 8%
https://www.wahlrecht.de/umfragen/
The Conservative Party generally, and the Home Secretary in particular, along with the attraction that police work has to people who derive enjoyment from abusing power and abusing other people, are responsible for the wave of forcible detentions. Not the King, regardless of whether you think he merits his status or not.
Could the coronation of King Charles III be the UK’s last coronation?
QTWTAIN.
Particularly as unlike a world cup match the coronation was not a very absorbing watch, so 1/4 of the nation doing it would be a very high number.
Longer term, there's a challenge for the monarchy if the monarch is always old-to-dying. That will be tricky to solve.
“King Charles’s coronation watched by peak TV audience of 20m
Event was most watched broadcast of year”
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/may/07/king-charles-coronation-watched-by-peak-tv-audience-of-20-million?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other
And we’ve yet to get the catch up and internet figures. I suspect the Palace will be just fine with this
Indeed the Guardian is so cheesed off that it was watched by a lot of people, they are blaming the weather:
“The viewing figures for the coronation at Westminster Abbey may have been boosted by the poor weather in parts of the UK, which forced people to stay inside”
34% not looking forward to anything this weekend, though. Miserable buggers.
Personally, I rather enjoyed seeing the bunting out, and I enjoyed the little street party in the cul de sac behind our house. Small scale and drunken, it was. And I will also enjoy an extra day off work tomorrow. My glass is definitely half full.
The wedding of Wills and Kate was one of the most watched royal events ever
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-65516633
But could this dude look more like an orc from a Lord of the Rings film if he tried? Apologies for photo of Prigozin to spoil your Sunday, I couldn't get spoiler tags to work.
South Park - Royal Wedding
I find the ‘gate keeping’ of patriotism by some both a visceral turn off and an expression of insecurity about a world that is (rightly) changing around us.
By contrast, I think our ability to disagree freely and in public (with or without placards) is one of the many, many things that makes me proud of our country.
I find it truly remarkable that some aren’t able to cope with the fact that other people can feel both pride and shame in the face of such a complex and multi-faceted history and culture.
Expect to see this revelation in the upcoming Spare 2: The Sparening, by Harry Mountbatten-Windsor, former Prince.
Indeed, as I responded to accusations of not being proud of Britain a few days back:
https://vf.politicalbetting.com/discussion/comment/4386927#Comment_4386927
One thing in particular that makes me proud is that monarchist and jingoistic self-importance is met by British mickey-taking and pricking that pomposity, rather than violent mobs. The worst that happened yesterday was a few protesters having their placards impounded, and even that fairly meekly done. Truly the mark of a civilised country.
You don't give the King any odds at all of surviving 19 years and a month?
Given the very best healthcare, not smoking, and his family history of longevity, I would say there's a pretty good chance the next King will be crowned in his sixties.
I see it shows up in a lot of 'Are Monarchies days' numbered?' articles, usually coming with a clear yearning that the answer is 'Yes, hopefully'.
Could be so, but I doubt it given the stability of Scandanavian monarchies for example. The UK is more political unstable, with Sindy and all that, and so the possibility of it falling by the wayside are higher than should probably be the case given lack of consensus on what to replace it with.
But in fact we can see from various Republican dictatorships that they can be in effect monarchies, with sons inheriting presidencies from father's, so I don't think we'll ever truly be rid of monarchy, even if it is called something else. Christ, in North Korean they talk about the actual Kim bloodline being vital and still pretend not to be a monachy!
If William has anything between his ears he ought now to be thinking what he wants to be associated with when his turn to get the London procession in the rain comes around.
“Former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev has threatened anyone convicted of carrying out Saturday’s attack on nationalist writer Zakhar Prilepin with death in prison.
Writing on Telegram, Medvedev, who is now deputy chairman of Russia’s security council, said that any suspects, “like other criminals, will be tried for the attack and sentenced to long prison terms”.
He continued: “But it is important that they and others like them realise a simple thing: even for those sentenced to life imprisonment (under the conditions of a moratorium on the death penalty), incidents and accidents sometimes happen.
“And then a lengthy sentence is quickly interrupted for natural reasons due to the death of the prisoner. And it also has great educational value for the new bastards who are hired to carry out assassinations.”
Prilepin, a prominent supporter of the war in Ukraine, was in the Nizhny Novgorod region of Russia on Saturday when his car exploded, injuring him and killing his driver.”
From the Guardian.
It really is quite hard to think what his interests are.
Apparently Lukashenko in Belarus is following my proposal, as his favouite son has long been his youngest son, who is 29 years younger than the eldest.
I stick to my earlier stated opinion on this - remove the monarchy at your peril. The French made it their national identity and every 50 years since that moment they have binned their entire constitution and started an entirely new one. They have also ended up with a far more monarchical system of government than any European monarchy outside of the Holy See.
It seems peculiar to me that, given the tremendous fuss we have just had over changing a fifty-year-old part of our constitution (a tale that still has not fully played out), we consider changing a millenium-old part of it and not imagine that there might be unintended consequences.
It really isn't very British at all to enable the police to arrest people because they may be about to engage in a 'disruptive' protest. The legislation came into force just last Tuesday. People may be pretty relaxed about it being used in the exceptional circumstances of yesterday. But I don't think we should be at all relaxed about giving the police carte blanche in the future to make a subjective judgement, before any offence is committed, about whether one is likely to be committed.
Most unBritish. Thanks, Suella and the Tories. I hope Labour promises to repeal this bit of the legislation.
It's as tight as a gnats arse at the bottom of the PL.
Now you'll tell me its Grimsby.
I wonder if this just measures British cynicism and non-deferential thinking; it would be somewhat uncool to look forward to the coronation this weekend, unless you were a strong monarchist, because it suggests it's the most important thing in your life and our society is quite atomised these days. And we are all centered on our own choices and priorities.
But, that doesn't mean you won't participate and enjoy it when it arrives. My whole village were out today and I met neighbours I never would have were it not for the monarchy.
Like much else in life: it's complicated.
Edit - Manchester
People are different.
The Met were probably over the top, the govt (and Labour) too willing to take extra powers but this is not Putin's Russia.
JHB silly as usual, even when on the "correct" side of the argument.
edit; I'm thinking what you need tall towers for: chimneys (though the draught would be cr@p with that design; you need wind to help the smoke out); water tower; hydraulic tower; observation.
My *guess* would be a hydraulic tower.
The state needs to do the hard and expensive thing. Solve actual crimes.
I think about this landmark often. It's fairly prominent on the skyline and not unpleasant looking. Most prisons are hidden away, but not this one.
The surrounding area is a bit grim, but in ten years it won't be. It's close to Central Manchester and ripe for redevelopment. I imagine the prison will move, but I hope the tower stays. Maybe it could be a minor tourist attraction to see the view from the top.
https://yougov.co.uk/topics/politics/survey-results/daily/2023/05/05/ba1bd/1
I’m actually with @Andy_JS on this one.
Unless I’ve got a free bet to use up, which I throw on a club game, i’m just not emotionally invested. Never have been.
International football, on the other hand…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jqQ6RWzugbc
When is the thread on Lib Dem target seats, Scottish sun-samples, or how the DUP might fare in another Northern Irish poll?
Not tall enough.
That's quite cool.
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/may/06/it-was-ludicrous-but-also-magnificent-the-coronation-stirred-every-emotion?CMP=share_btn_tw
You’re just determined to pick a fight where one doesn’t exist. A bit like @Anabobazina ‘s recent posts.
I mention this because some posters were adamant that they were never going to leave.
I think the highest ever was 31 million for Diana's funeral, and that was a hugely shocking event in a pre-digital/smart TV age with virtually wall-wall coverage, and whilst it's about 8-9 million less than the Queen's funeral of 28 million it's still pretty decent for a new monarch who's a bit bittersweet, has lots of baggage, and for a deeply religious service, and a long one.
I think Buckingham Palace will be satisfied with these figures.
The Guardian is deeply schizo on the Coronation
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/may/06/strong-bladders-required-for-interminable-faffing-of-king-charles-coronation?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other
But so, it seems, is France:
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/may/07/french-leftwing-attacks-nauseating-coronation-but-right-gives-praise?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other
Actually there’s quite a statistic in that 2nd article. 9 million French people watched it LIVE
Which is why under current circumstances it won't be. So it won't be abolished until unforeseeable times in the future.