The Tory voter suppression plan appears to be working – politicalbetting.com
The final figures are in: just 63,279 people met last night's 5pm deadline to apply for new Voter ID.That's a tiny 3% of the 2 MILLION people who lack the right ID to vote under the Govt's new rules.https://t.co/ZiuOOPVW9c
I still wonder whether this is necessarily going to be to the Tories' benefit, given that older people may tend to lack ID, coupled with the fact that normally turnout among older people is probably substantially higher than turnout among younger people lacking ID.
Has there been any proper demographic analysis to quantify the likely effect on support by party?
I still wonder whether this is necessarily going to be to the Tories' benefit, given that older people may tend to lack ID, coupled with the fact that normally turnout among older people is probably substantially higher than turnout among younger people lacking ID.
Has there been any proper demographic analysis to quantify the likely effect on support by party?
Pensioners travel passes count young peoples travel passes dont
I still wonder whether this is necessarily going to be to the Tories' benefit, given that older people may tend to lack ID, coupled with the fact that normally turnout among older people is probably substantially higher than turnout among younger people lacking ID.
Has there been any proper demographic analysis to quantify the likely effect on support by party?
There was a thread on here a while back that suggested that it might be disproportionately negative for the Tories. But that remains to be seen.
But, as these numbers clearly show, it has a disproportionate impact relative to any perceived benefit.
The best thing all round would be for the Tories to have a disaster in the locals, and for them to put about the idea that this was because they suffered disproportionately from "issues related to voter id" (which sounds like an *excellent* excuse), and for it to get thrown out before the general.
33 reports of fraud and 1 conviction at GE 2019 compared with 250,000 disenfranchised (presumably predominantly) non-Conservative voters in 2024. In theory it could turn a Labour majority into a Conservative one.
My Daughter has failed to register to the council for verification to vote, I don't know who she would have voted for, but it would not have been Tory, this will definitely suppress the vote. The Tories will do anything to cling on to power, this is just another desperate attempt by then, where i think they have missed a trick, is they should have started it just before the GE, people who miss out this time, will make sure it won't happen again, I expect a better than anticipated local election results for the Tories, because of this
Not a fan of the policy, but still of the view this is likely to be a dog that doesn't bark. Real voter surpression would be curtailing voting hours or numbers of polling stations. I'm struggling to compute whether the type of committed voters who tend to vote in local elections predominantly are the sort not to have any kind of ID. My gut says no.
As for bus passes, would OAPs in rural areas have them where there are no buses? Still think it more likely to harm older voters than young - youngsters especially the pub / club going sort will have ID including ones on the acceptable voting list. NUS cards which are part of the PASS scheme count for example. Guess we will see next week. (My postal vote has been returned).
My Daughter has failed to register to the council for verification to vote, I don't know who she would have voted for, but it would not have been Tory, this will definitely suppress the vote. The Tories will do anything to cling on to power, this is just another desperate attempt by then, where i think they have missed a trick, is they should have started it just before the GE, people who miss out this time, will make sure it won't happen again, I expect a better than anticipated local election results for the Tories, because of this
33 reports of fraud and 1 conviction at GE 2019 compared with 250,000 disenfranchised (presumably predominantly) non-Conservative voters in 2024. In theory it could turn a Labour majority into a Conservative one.
33 reports of fraud and 1 conviction at GE 2019 compared with 250,000 disenfranchised (presumably predominantly) non-Conservative voters in 2024. In theory it could turn a Labour majority into a Conservative one.
Nice work if Vladimir Putin is your role model.
The Govt has not disenfranchised anyone.
Wrong!
Check out the Tory leaflets in Norwich South telling voters they don't need ID to vote- now pulled!
33 reports of fraud and 1 conviction at GE 2019 compared with 250,000 disenfranchised (presumably predominantly) non-Conservative voters in 2024. In theory it could turn a Labour majority into a Conservative one.
Nice work if Vladimir Putin is your role model.
The Govt has not disenfranchised anyone.
People who had the right to vote but now don't have the right to vote have been disenfranchised. That is what the word means! That 3% of them have gone out of their way to regain that right does not change that this is disenfranchisement.
I still wonder whether this is necessarily going to be to the Tories' benefit, given that older people may tend to lack ID, coupled with the fact that normally turnout among older people is probably substantially higher than turnout among younger people lacking ID.
Has there been any proper demographic analysis to quantify the likely effect on support by party?
Pensioners travel passes count young peoples travel passes dont
Sorry, but I don't think that quite qualifies as "proper demographic analysis".
33 reports of fraud and 1 conviction at GE 2019 compared with 250,000 disenfranchised (presumably predominantly) non-Conservative voters in 2024. In theory it could turn a Labour majority into a Conservative one.
Nice work if Vladimir Putin is your role model.
The Govt has not disenfranchised anyone.
It's at least arguable: - People without ID were able to vote - People without ID are now not able to vote
That looks like disenfranchisement. Of course, people could take action to avoid being disenfranchised, but I'm not sure that enough was done to make the requirement obvious. They have at least introduced it for locals rather than a GE.
You don't need ID to vote by post of course and many voters, especially older voters, will already have sent their postal votes in.
Personally as said before I don't think the photo ID requirement is needed. Though most will still be able to use passport or driving licence even if they weren't able to get new voter ID
I still wonder whether this is necessarily going to be to the Tories' benefit, given that older people may tend to lack ID, coupled with the fact that normally turnout among older people is probably substantially higher than turnout among younger people lacking ID.
Has there been any proper demographic analysis to quantify the likely effect on support by party?
Good afternoon
Many if not most elderly voters use postal votes to be fair
You don't need ID to vote by post of course and many voters, especially older voters, will already have sent their postal votes in.
Personally as said before I don't think the photo ID requirement is needed. Though most will still be able to use passport or driving licence even if they weren't able to get new voter ID
My Daughter has failed to register to the council for verification to vote, I don't know who she would have voted for, but it would not have been Tory, this will definitely suppress the vote. The Tories will do anything to cling on to power, this is just another desperate attempt by then, where i think they have missed a trick, is they should have started it just before the GE, people who miss out this time, will make sure it won't happen again, I expect a better than anticipated local election results for the Tories, because of this
Did you play for Chelsea?
Unfortunately not, but he was my favourite player back in the day, an odd one I agree, but he almost single handedly kept Chelsea alive back in the dark days of 1982, with the help from a goal by Clive Walker, away to Bolton.Chelsea were on the brink of extinction for sure
My Daughter has failed to register to the council for verification to vote, I don't know who she would have voted for, but it would not have been Tory, this will definitely suppress the vote. The Tories will do anything to cling on to power, this is just another desperate attempt by then, where i think they have missed a trick, is they should have started it just before the GE, people who miss out this time, will make sure it won't happen again, I expect a better than anticipated local election results for the Tories, because of this
Still time for your daughter to get a Citizen card in time for 3 May which is acceptable voter ID: https://www.citizencard.com/ See also their Twitter feed - can get one for free for students.
33 reports of fraud and 1 conviction at GE 2019 compared with 250,000 disenfranchised (presumably predominantly) non-Conservative voters in 2024. In theory it could turn a Labour majority into a Conservative one.
Nice work if Vladimir Putin is your role model.
The Govt has not disenfranchised anyone.
It's at least arguable: - People without ID were able to vote - People without ID are now not able to vote
That looks like disenfranchisement. Of course, people could take action to avoid being disenfranchised, but I'm not sure that enough was done to make the requirement obvious. They have at least introduced it for locals rather than a GE.
Although I think the problem being addressed is miniscule but the 'solution' probably not causing major issues either (but more issues than the thing it supposedly 'fixes'). Although I might be shown to be wrong on 'not causing major issues'.
So you are asking why he is polling at a level that Blair exceeded but no other Labour leader has sustained? Not Blairite enough perhaps?
Or not Blairlike enough!
(And, in addition, Blair had the advantage of a Labour brand largely detoxified by Kinnock and Smith - Starmer started from the Corbyn era, much more of a task. Although Blair did make major changes, clause 4 etc)
My Daughter has failed to register to the council for verification to vote, I don't know who she would have voted for, but it would not have been Tory, this will definitely suppress the vote. The Tories will do anything to cling on to power, this is just another desperate attempt by then, where i think they have missed a trick, is they should have started it just before the GE, people who miss out this time, will make sure it won't happen again, I expect a better than anticipated local election results for the Tories, because of this
Did you play for Chelsea?
Unfortunately not, but he was my favourite player back in the day, an odd one I agree, but he almost single handedly kept Chelsea alive back in the dark days of 1982, with the help from a goal by Clive Walker, away to Bolton.Chelsea were on the brink of extinction for sure
So you are asking why he is polling at a level that Blair exceeded but no other Labour leader has sustained? Not Blairite enough perhaps?
Or not Blairlike enough!
(And, in addition, Blair had the advantage of a Labour brand largely detoxified by Kinnock and Smith - Starmer started from the Corbyn era, much more of a task. Although Blair did make major changes, clause 4 etc)
Tony Benn and Jeremy Corbyn were MPs under Blair as was John Reid and Blunkett
A Broad Church
Labour won as a Broad Church
Not even the biggest SKS fan could describe the SKS Party as that
So you are asking why he is polling at a level that Blair exceeded but no other Labour leader has sustained? Not Blairite enough perhaps?
Or not Blairlike enough!
(And, in addition, Blair had the advantage of a Labour brand largely detoxified by Kinnock and Smith - Starmer started from the Corbyn era, much more of a task. Although Blair did make major changes, clause 4 etc)
Tony Benn and Jeremy Corbyn were MPs under Blair as was John Reid and Blunkett
A Broad Church
Labour won as a Broad Church
Not even the biggest SKS fan could describe the SKS Party as that
John McDonnell is still an MP, a wide range of views are within the Labour party and parliamentary party. Be as socialist as you like but stop those anti semitic rants that those who have lost the whip tend to keep repeating every few months.
My Daughter has failed to register to the council for verification to vote, I don't know who she would have voted for, but it would not have been Tory, this will definitely suppress the vote. The Tories will do anything to cling on to power, this is just another desperate attempt by then, where i think they have missed a trick, is they should have started it just before the GE, people who miss out this time, will make sure it won't happen again, I expect a better than anticipated local election results for the Tories, because of this
Did you play for Chelsea?
Unfortunately not, but he was my favourite player back in the day, an odd one I agree, but he almost single handedly kept Chelsea alive back in the dark days of 1982, with the help from a goal by Clive Walker, away to Bolton.Chelsea were on the brink of extinction for sure
Saw some of it on the Big Match revisited.
They were proper shit back in the day, tbh a lot of the players didn't care, they weren't always paid on time etc, but Droy was determined not to see Chelsea fold
So you are asking why he is polling at a level that Blair exceeded but no other Labour leader has sustained? Not Blairite enough perhaps?
Or not Blairlike enough!
(And, in addition, Blair had the advantage of a Labour brand largely detoxified by Kinnock and Smith - Starmer started from the Corbyn era, much more of a task. Although Blair did make major changes, clause 4 etc)
Starmer is much closer to Smith than Blair in terms of both style and positioning. And I think that is what Labour needed at the time of his appointment.
That tweet in the header is utterly stupid. The 3% figure is just the proportion of those who didn't have ID with 1 day to go, who now do. It's relevant to precisely nothing.
That tweet in the header is utterly stupid. The 3% figure is just the proportion of those who didn't have ID with 1 day to go, who now do. It's relevant to precisely nothing.
2 million don't have suitable Id that allows them to vote. 70,000 have discovered the fact in time to get suitable ID
there are 1,930,000 people who may turn up at the polling station to discover they've been disenfranchised.
I still wonder whether this is necessarily going to be to the Tories' benefit, given that older people may tend to lack ID, coupled with the fact that normally turnout among older people is probably substantially higher than turnout among younger people lacking ID.
Has there been any proper demographic analysis to quantify the likely effect on support by party?
Good afternoon
Many if not most elderly voters use postal votes to be fair
However, I accept that Starmer won the leadership, and I wish him and his team well in securing a GE victory.
Getting rid of the Tories is my priority- what's yours?
If SKS wins we are not getting rid of the Tories we are replacing Tories with Tories
My Priority is holding the bloke who lied his way to the Leadership to Account
Holding to account the bloke who asked a lawyer to look into Racism in the Party and then ignored his findings.
Aforesaid SKS appointed Lawyer says Labour has a hierarchy of racism “Anti-black racism and Islamophobia is not taken as seriously as antisemitism within the Labour party"
My Priority is to ensure the factional tool in charge of Labour does not win a GE
My Priority is to bore PB Centrists till GE 2024 or till SKS goes whichever is the sooner
You are weirdly obsessed. Try posting about something else for a change.
You are boring.
Not only boring but stupid. SKS has been leader of the Labour party since April 2020. Does BJO offer an 'explanation' every time the Labour party has improved in the polls in the last 3 years?
When he became leader Labour were about 20 points behind in the polls. People can demand that SKS fans explain when Labour start doing worse than that.
I still wonder whether this is necessarily going to be to the Tories' benefit, given that older people may tend to lack ID, coupled with the fact that normally turnout among older people is probably substantially higher than turnout among younger people lacking ID.
Has there been any proper demographic analysis to quantify the likely effect on support by party?
Good afternoon
Many if not most elderly voters use postal votes to be fair
Don't you mean "to be unfair" ?
I don't think I count as elderly, but I use postal votes to be lazy
(although I first registered as out of the country on polling day so had good reason, then figured I might as well tick the 'permanent' box - my polling station is all of five minutes' walk away)
Sunak is having what counts as his honeymoon now, I think. It has been delayed by the whole Truss and party meltdown thing, but a little bit of personableness here, a little professionalism there, a solution here has done wonders.
But, for every success there is something like this. Much of the political and moral bankruptcy hangover from previous leaders remains and it is hitting on almost a daily basis. And, it appears, Sunak is quite content with it. So for every step forward (not with me, I'm still gone), but with blue wallers and Cameroon's, there is a step back. I'm not sure they will just drift back when GE time comes when their politics is being punched in the stomach on a routine basis. And these are not low info voters who are just going to miss it.
The fact that there was only 1 prosecution for voter impersonation does not mean that it is not a problem. The whole point is that we don't know how much it happens, or what size of problem it is, because a lot of it goes undetected. Only hysterical revolutionaries fail to understand this basic common sense fact.
This reappropriation of the Israeli flag is one of the protests’ greatest achievements, and it symbolizes much more than the flag itself. Effectively, this reappropriation of the flag foreshadows the achievement of the protests’ supreme goal – not allowing Jewish nationalists to shape the country and Israel’s fate in their own image. It symbolizes an end to our passivity, the realization that there are millions of other Israelis who feel powerless when they see everything they believed in going to hell, and the fact that we are uniting and fighting together over the character of our country.
After the holiday, the Knesset’s spring recess will end and the sword of the overhaul legislation will once again hover over us. The protests will resume as well, and they will keep expanding and intensifying until the government caves in and shelves its malicious plans. On this 75th Independence Day, the Israeli flag is in our hands.
However, I accept that Starmer won the leadership, and I wish him and his team well in securing a GE victory.
Getting rid of the Tories is my priority- what's yours?
If SKS wins we are not getting rid of the Tories we are replacing Tories with Tories
My Priority is holding the bloke who lied his way to the Leadership to Account
Holding to account the bloke who asked a lawyer to look into Racism in the Party and then ignored his findings.
Aforesaid SKS appointed Lawyer says Labour has a hierarchy of racism “Anti-black racism and Islamophobia is not taken as seriously as antisemitism within the Labour party"
My Priority is to ensure the factional tool in charge of Labour does not win a GE
My Priority is to bore PB Centrists till GE 2024 or till SKS goes whichever is the sooner
Good for you.
You are letting the good be the enemy of the perfect, the perfect being the restoration of a "hard left" RCP-type loon who would nationalise Tescos. And you are perfectly entitled to that view.
Nigel Farage campaigned for Brexit for years and years before it became a thing and now look at us so good luck with it all.
We need out there people and you appear to be one such.
I still wonder whether this is necessarily going to be to the Tories' benefit, given that older people may tend to lack ID, coupled with the fact that normally turnout among older people is probably substantially higher than turnout among younger people lacking ID.
Has there been any proper demographic analysis to quantify the likely effect on support by party?
Good afternoon
Many if not most elderly voters use postal votes to be fair
Don't you mean "to be unfair" ?
I don't think I count as elderly, but I use postal votes to be lazy
(although I first registered as out of the country on polling day so had good reason, then figured I might as well tick the 'permanent' box - my polling station is all of five minutes' walk away)
When I did my GCSE English literature in 1998 one of the texts was a short story translated from Russian. It was about a boy who is always late for school to the consternation of his teacher who later discovers it is because he spends ages walking through a forest on his way to school.
The story is a lesson on the wonders of nature and was written in the 'optimistic' years after Stalin's death. I do not remember the name but would be grateful to anyone who can tell me!
I still wonder whether this is necessarily going to be to the Tories' benefit, given that older people may tend to lack ID, coupled with the fact that normally turnout among older people is probably substantially higher than turnout among younger people lacking ID.
Has there been any proper demographic analysis to quantify the likely effect on support by party?
Oldies are big postal voters so don't need photo ID for that.
The fact that there was only 1 prosecution for voter impersonation does not mean that it is not a problem. The whole point is that we don't know how much it happens, or what size of problem it is, because a lot of it goes undetected. Only hysterical revolutionaries fail to understand this basic common sense fact.
There's some truth in that.
We also don't know 'a lot of it goes undetected'. We might detect 100%, for all we know.
We do know that there aren't many people turning up at polling stations to vote only to discover that they've already been counted as having voted. If it was really widespread, then that would happen. So it's either quite small or very well targeted towards those who will not vote. Doing that would be tricky - you might know your neighbour is housebound, but you don't know she hasn't got a postal or proxy vote.
It's hard to see how you'd do it on a useful scale without detection - you'd need a team to cast multiple votes (as the same person voting many times at one polling station would be risky) and you'd need excellent targeting of registered voters who would not vote. There aren't that many seats where it would even look feasible, I think. It looks far easier to abuse postal voting, to me.
All the above for GEs, national votes. Somewhat easier to game local votes given lower turnouts and margins, I guess (which could also be important).
Off topic: Why does Ed Sheeran go to the same barber as Boris Johnson?
I went to the same barber as my dad for several years
(most definitely not an allegation of paternity, just an observation on my experiences)
My dad and I used the same barber for years, and it was quite an unusual one as it was a combined barber shop and railway bookshop. He retired a few years back, sadly, as I really wanted my son to get a haircut there.
The fact that there was only 1 prosecution for voter impersonation does not mean that it is not a problem. The whole point is that we don't know how much it happens, or what size of problem it is, because a lot of it goes undetected. Only hysterical revolutionaries fail to understand this basic common sense fact.
It's possible. But we've discussed this at length, and if significant personation* were happening, the great majority of it would likely be postal, and not be via in person voting.
(* impersonation can be for entirely legal as well as illegal purposes.)
You don't need ID to vote by post of course and many voters, especially older voters, will already have sent their postal votes in.
Personally as said before I don't think the photo ID requirement is needed. Though most will still be able to use passport or driving licence even if they weren't able to get new voter ID
The ludicrous thing HY is postal voting was an area of fraudulent concern. And what have they done-nothing?! There is a very unpleasant smell surrounding this issue.
Not a fan of the policy, but still of the view this is likely to be a dog that doesn't bark. Real voter surpression would be curtailing voting hours or numbers of polling stations. I'm struggling to compute whether the type of committed voters who tend to vote in local elections predominantly are the sort not to have any kind of ID. My gut says no.
As for bus passes, would OAPs in rural areas have them where there are no buses? Still think it more likely to harm older voters than young - youngsters especially the pub / club going sort will have ID including ones on the acceptable voting list. NUS cards which are part of the PASS scheme count for example. Guess we will see next week. (My postal vote has been returned).
The rule will also apply at general elections.
And there could be a big additional bonus for the tories if longer queues at polling stations discourage busy people from voting.
However, I accept that Starmer won the leadership, and I wish him and his team well in securing a GE victory.
Getting rid of the Tories is my priority- what's yours?
If SKS wins we are not getting rid of the Tories we are replacing Tories with Tories
My Priority is holding the bloke who lied his way to the Leadership to Account
Holding to account the bloke who asked a lawyer to look into Racism in the Party and then ignored his findings.
Aforesaid SKS appointed Lawyer says Labour has a hierarchy of racism “Anti-black racism and Islamophobia is not taken as seriously as antisemitism within the Labour party"
My Priority is to ensure the factional tool in charge of Labour does not win a GE
My Priority is to bore PB Centrists till GE 2024 or till SKS goes whichever is the sooner
You're doing a great job on the last point. Keep it up.
However, I accept that Starmer won the leadership, and I wish him and his team well in securing a GE victory.
Getting rid of the Tories is my priority- what's yours?
So did I. Every PB Lab member voted Nandy. Not sure what this says but it says something.
PB labourites not good at backing the winner?
Or maybe non-PB labourites not good at backing a winner
ETA: As a wet lettuce centrist LD-sympathiser, I think I'd have voted for Starmer, given the vote. Not quite convinced by Nandy. But I haven't seen a great deal of her.
That tweet in the header is utterly stupid. The 3% figure is just the proportion of those who didn't have ID with 1 day to go, who now do. It's relevant to precisely nothing.
2 million don't have suitable Id that allows them to vote. 70,000 have discovered the fact in time to get suitable ID
there are 1,930,000 people who may turn up at the polling station to discover they've been disenfranchised.
The turnout at British local elections is usually pretty low, so I'm sure the polling stations won't have to turn away 1.93 million voters because they posess no ID. I would even expect people who rarely vote in local elections to be disproportionaly more likely to be the ones without any valid voter ID.
I foresee a much bigger polling day problem, that many who DO have valid ID leave it at home, and are turned away. Some of those won't bother to return later in the day.
If Voter ID is to be introduced it makes sense to do this in a non GE year.
The fact that there was only 1 prosecution for voter impersonation does not mean that it is not a problem. The whole point is that we don't know how much it happens, or what size of problem it is, because a lot of it goes undetected. Only hysterical revolutionaries fail to understand this basic common sense fact.
So you consider the disenfranchisement of potentially hundreds of thousands of voters to be a proportional response?
The fact that there was only 1 prosecution for voter impersonation does not mean that it is not a problem. The whole point is that we don't know how much it happens, or what size of problem it is, because a lot of it goes undetected. Only hysterical revolutionaries fail to understand this basic common sense fact.
So you consider the disenfranchisement of potentially hundreds of thousands of voters to be a proportional response?
This is Trumpian politics.
How is it disenfranchisement? They can very easily get ID and most have it already. Are people in Northern Ireland who already have this system disenfranchised? This is hardly gerrymandering or making people wait hours to vote.
The fact that there was only 1 prosecution for voter impersonation does not mean that it is not a problem. The whole point is that we don't know how much it happens, or what size of problem it is, because a lot of it goes undetected. Only hysterical revolutionaries fail to understand this basic common sense fact.
That tweet in the header is utterly stupid. The 3% figure is just the proportion of those who didn't have ID with 1 day to go, who now do. It's relevant to precisely nothing.
2 million don't have suitable Id that allows them to vote. 70,000 have discovered the fact in time to get suitable ID
there are 1,930,000 people who may turn up at the polling station to discover they've been disenfranchised.
The turnout at British local elections is usually pretty low, so I'm sure the polling stations won't have to turn away 1.93 million voters because they posess no ID. I would even expect people who rarely vote in local elections to be disproportionaly more likely to be the ones without any valid voter ID.
I foresee a much bigger polling day problem, that many who DO have valid ID leave it at home, and are turned away. Some of those won't bother to return later in the day.
If Voter ID is to be introduced it makes sense to do this in a non GE year.
Whats the spread on number of people who turn up without id? And how many come back having gone home to get it.
I will go with 100,000 turn up without it, of which 20,000 come back later. Will these numbers be recorded?
Despite looking so similar getting each of those passes has different procedures and levels of scrutiny to obtain it.
For the over 60s pass you have to provide a passport or driving licence, or if you don't have those you have to go to a Post Office with other ID to get a verification letter with other proofs of ID and address.
The over 18s pass doesn't need the initial scrutiny, simply sending a photo and filling in a form on a website is enough.
That's why the over 60s pass is valid and the over 18s pass is not. If the over 18s pass was properly scrutinised it would almost certainly also be acceptable.
However, I accept that Starmer won the leadership, and I wish him and his team well in securing a GE victory.
Getting rid of the Tories is my priority- what's yours?
So did I. Every PB Lab member voted Nandy. Not sure what this says but it says something.
I did too BTW
If i knew what I know now i would have voted for RLB but at the time I believed the Party need to move a bit to the right.
On that basis i should be an SKS fan but moving a bit and becoming a Socialist hating non Democratic hierarchy of racism Party is not a bit!
Thing is, yours, as per my post previously, is a wholly legitimate view. As is the view of RefUK or UKIP. But the end result is to make it harder for the lesser evil (presumably? Or is SKS = Cons Party in your mind, I know you have said this) to come to power cf RefUK/UKIP and the Cons.
I had a long and meaningful phone call with 🇨🇳 President Xi Jinping. I believe that this call, as well as the appointment of Ukraine's ambassador to China, will give a powerful impetus to the development of our bilateral relations. https://twitter.com/ZelenskyyUa/status/1651184756623802368
The fact that there was only 1 prosecution for voter impersonation does not mean that it is not a problem. The whole point is that we don't know how much it happens, or what size of problem it is, because a lot of it goes undetected. Only hysterical revolutionaries fail to understand this basic common sense fact.
So you consider the disenfranchisement of potentially hundreds of thousands of voters to be a proportional response?
This is Trumpian politics.
How is it disenfranchisement? They can very easily get ID and most have it already. Are people in Northern Ireland who already have this system disenfranchised? This is hardly gerrymandering or making people wait hours to vote.
Did you not catch my earlier post from Norwich where official Conservative Party literature tells voters in Labour wards they don't need ID?
The very fact that you are relaxed about the whole affair suggests it is to your party political advantage.
I still wonder whether this is necessarily going to be to the Tories' benefit, given that older people may tend to lack ID, coupled with the fact that normally turnout among older people is probably substantially higher than turnout among younger people lacking ID.
Has there been any proper demographic analysis to quantify the likely effect on support by party?
I could easily see a situation where the old couple stroll down to their local station to vote Conservative, as they always have done, with their polling card in hand, as they always have done.
No ID in hand, they've not even noticed the adverts. Afterall, this is the usual May late afternoon stroll, and they didn't need to take their purse or bag.
Get to the station and get into a massive fight with the returning officer. Never needed this before, it's undemocratic etc etc etc. I wonder if a few might just be allowed to vote anyway, to avoid the fight? Many will not.
Return home and straight on Facebook to moan long and loud in the 'Bickerstaff on Sea Community Group'. Either way.... they didn't get to vote Conservative after all and can't now be bothered going back to the polling station afterall.
The fact that there was only 1 prosecution for voter impersonation does not mean that it is not a problem. The whole point is that we don't know how much it happens, or what size of problem it is, because a lot of it goes undetected. Only hysterical revolutionaries fail to understand this basic common sense fact.
I see the government has reached its target for 20,000 new police officers, a pledge made in the 2019 manifesto.
That's pretty shocking. Govt makes good on manifesto pledge is not something you see every day.
If only the police's reputation wasn't in the gutter this might have positive polling implications for the Cons. It still might.
They’re measuring inputs, rather than outputs.
20,000 more officers working on trivial motoring offences and policing ‘hate crime’ on Twitter - while house burglaries, car thefts and street robberies lead to little interest - isn’t going to go down well with the general public.
I see the government has reached its target for 20,000 new police officers, a pledge made in the 2019 manifesto.
That's pretty shocking. Govt makes good on manifesto pledge is not something you see every day.
If only the police's reputation wasn't in the gutter this might have positive polling implications for the Cons. It still might.
They’re measuring inputs, rather than outputs.
20,000 more officers working on trivial motoring offences and policing ‘hate crime’ on Twitter - while house burglaries, car thefts and street robberies lead to little interest - isn’t going to go down well with the general public.
Plus there's the new Prime Minister's detachment. On the running machines and Peloton as we speak.
The fact that there was only 1 prosecution for voter impersonation does not mean that it is not a problem. The whole point is that we don't know how much it happens, or what size of problem it is, because a lot of it goes undetected. Only hysterical revolutionaries fail to understand this basic common sense fact.
So you consider the disenfranchisement of potentially hundreds of thousands of voters to be a proportional response?
This is Trumpian politics.
How is it disenfranchisement? They can very easily get ID and most have it already. Are people in Northern Ireland who already have this system disenfranchised? This is hardly gerrymandering or making people wait hours to vote.
Did you not catch my earlier post from Norwich where official Conservative Party literature tells voters in Labour wards they don't need ID?
The very fact that you are relaxed about the whole affair suggests it is to your party political advantage.
The fact that there was only 1 prosecution for voter impersonation does not mean that it is not a problem. The whole point is that we don't know how much it happens, or what size of problem it is, because a lot of it goes undetected. Only hysterical revolutionaries fail to understand this basic common sense fact.
So you consider the disenfranchisement of potentially hundreds of thousands of voters to be a proportional response?
This is Trumpian politics.
How is it disenfranchisement? They can very easily get ID and most have it already. Are people in Northern Ireland who already have this system disenfranchised? This is hardly gerrymandering or making people wait hours to vote.
Most the people who have been disenfranchised didn't have the necessary ID already by definition, none of them did. 97% of them still don't.
Great header OGH. This should be the scandal of the century. Despite protestations on here justifying that this is already the case in NI, its introduction in England (and Wales) is so transparently malign, I am shocked anyone feels they can justify its introduction.
However, I accept that Starmer won the leadership, and I wish him and his team well in securing a GE victory.
Getting rid of the Tories is my priority- what's yours?
So did I. Every PB Lab member voted Nandy. Not sure what this says but it says something.
PB labourites not good at backing the winner?
Or maybe non-PB labourites not good at backing a winner
ETA: As a wet lettuce centrist LD-sympathiser, I think I'd have voted for Starmer, given the vote. Not quite convinced by Nandy. But I haven't seen a great deal of her.
No, we don't let 'wet lettuce LD-sympathisers' stick their oar into who our leader should be, but he didn't need you as it turned out. It was never in doubt really. Starmer was one of the most solid odds-on shots in recent political betting. Hopefully you troughed some.
Comments
Has there been any proper demographic analysis to quantify the likely effect on support by party?
But, as these numbers clearly show, it has a disproportionate impact relative to any perceived benefit.
The best thing all round would be for the Tories to have a disaster in the locals, and for them to put about the idea that this was because they suffered disproportionately from "issues related to voter id" (which sounds like an *excellent* excuse), and for it to get thrown out before the general.
Indeed, none of the twelve registered voters at a one bedroom flat who have applied for postal votes need photo I.D. either.
Which problem exists, and which problem is being addressed here?
A very bold prediction if the latter!
Nice work if Vladimir Putin is your role model.
As for bus passes, would OAPs in rural areas have them where there are no buses? Still think it more likely to harm older voters than young - youngsters especially the pub / club going sort will have ID including ones on the acceptable voting list. NUS cards which are part of the PASS scheme count for example. Guess we will see next week. (My postal vote has been returned).
Check out the Tory leaflets in Norwich South telling voters they don't need ID to vote- now pulled!
In the I newspaper
Can't embed at the moment, also paywalled.
So now we have SKS Fans on board perhaps I can get an answer on my FPT question
Ten Weeks ago SKS Party had a 28 point lead according to YG
Today they have it at 15
SKS Fans please explain
https://docs.cdn.yougov.com/r2r7ejhs5x/TheTimes_VI_230215_W_.pdf
- People without ID were able to vote
- People without ID are now not able to vote
That looks like disenfranchisement. Of course, people could take action to avoid being disenfranchised, but I'm not sure that enough was done to make the requirement obvious. They have at least introduced it for locals rather than a GE.
Personally as said before I don't think the photo ID requirement is needed. Though most will still be able to use passport or driving licence even if they weren't able to get new voter ID
Many if not most elderly voters use postal votes to be fair
(And, in addition, Blair had the advantage of a Labour brand largely detoxified by Kinnock and Smith - Starmer started from the Corbyn era, much more of a task. Although Blair did make major changes, clause 4 etc)
By not Blairite enough I presume you mean offering a Broad Church and offering some radical Policies attractive to Socialists
A Broad Church
Labour won as a Broad Church
Not even the biggest SKS fan could describe the SKS Party as that
It is.... the Thread header is not Gospel.
As an aside Parties do promote policies aimed at their electoral advantage. The Lib Dems want PR, Labour votes for 16 and 17 year olds.
However, I accept that Starmer won the leadership, and I wish him and his team well in securing a GE victory.
Getting rid of the Tories is my priority- what's yours?
You are boring.
(most definitely not an allegation of paternity, just an observation on my experiences)
I mean, there must be one, surely? Somewhere?
ETA: Afterall, we even had Milifandom!
But old biddies can if they remember their bus pass.
70,000 have discovered the fact in time to get suitable ID
there are 1,930,000 people who may turn up at the polling station to discover they've been disenfranchised.
*more chance of LDs in governments, which leads to good governance
My Priority is holding the bloke who lied his way to the Leadership to Account
Holding to account the bloke who asked a lawyer to look into Racism in the Party and then ignored his findings.
Aforesaid SKS appointed Lawyer says Labour has a hierarchy of racism “Anti-black racism and Islamophobia is not taken as seriously as antisemitism within the Labour party"
My Priority is to ensure the factional tool in charge of Labour does not win a GE
My Priority is to bore PB Centrists till GE 2024 or till SKS goes whichever is the sooner
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-65397235?at_medium=social&at_campaign=Social_Flow&at_campaign_type=owned&at_bbc_team=editorial&at_link_type=web_link&at_link_id=8BD34E66-E409-11ED-B7C3-5A6A79448730&at_link_origin=BBCScotlandNews&at_ptr_name=twitter&at_format=link
When he became leader Labour were about 20 points behind in the polls. People can demand that SKS fans explain when Labour start doing worse than that.
(although I first registered as out of the country on polling day so had good reason, then figured I might as well tick the 'permanent' box - my polling station is all of five minutes' walk away)
But, for every success there is something like this. Much of the political and moral bankruptcy hangover from previous leaders remains and it is hitting on almost a daily basis. And, it appears, Sunak is quite content with it. So for every step forward (not with me, I'm still gone), but with blue wallers and Cameroon's, there is a step back. I'm not sure they will just drift back when GE time comes when their politics is being punched in the stomach on a routine basis. And these are not low info voters who are just going to miss it.
The Israeli Flag Is in Our Hands
https://www.haaretz.com/opinion/editorial/2023-04-25/ty-article-opinion/the-israeli-flag-is-in-our-hands/00000187-b4e0-d3b7-abcf-b5e454d10000
...This enormous protest movement managed to achieve something incredible. Not only has it stopped the legal overhaul for now, but it has also reappropriated the Israeli flag. This year, the flag represents a liberated Israel that seeks peace and normalcy. Masses of people who for years had reservations about it and felt growing alienation from it will now fly it with great pride.
This reappropriation of the Israeli flag is one of the protests’ greatest achievements, and it symbolizes much more than the flag itself. Effectively, this reappropriation of the flag foreshadows the achievement of the protests’ supreme goal – not allowing Jewish nationalists to shape the country and Israel’s fate in their own image. It symbolizes an end to our passivity, the realization that there are millions of other Israelis who feel powerless when they see everything they believed in going to hell, and the fact that we are uniting and fighting together over the character of our country.
After the holiday, the Knesset’s spring recess will end and the sword of the overhaul legislation will once again hover over us. The protests will resume as well, and they will keep expanding and intensifying until the government caves in and shelves its malicious plans. On this 75th Independence Day, the Israeli flag is in our hands.
You are letting the good be the enemy of the perfect, the perfect being the restoration of a "hard left" RCP-type loon who would nationalise Tescos. And you are perfectly entitled to that view.
Nigel Farage campaigned for Brexit for years and years before it became a thing and now look at us so good luck with it all.
We need out there people and you appear to be one such.
https://www.newsandstar.co.uk/news/23477035.outrage-harraby-community-centre-bans-jeremy-corbyn-film/
When I did my GCSE English literature in 1998 one of the texts was a short story translated from Russian. It was about a boy who is always late for school to the consternation of his teacher who later discovers it is because he spends ages walking through a forest on his way to school.
The story is a lesson on the wonders of nature and was written in the 'optimistic' years after Stalin's death. I do not remember the name but would be grateful to anyone who can tell me!
We also don't know 'a lot of it goes undetected'. We might detect 100%, for all we know.
We do know that there aren't many people turning up at polling stations to vote only to discover that they've already been counted as having voted. If it was really widespread, then that would happen. So it's either quite small or very well targeted towards those who will not vote. Doing that would be tricky - you might know your neighbour is housebound, but you don't know she hasn't got a postal or proxy vote.
It's hard to see how you'd do it on a useful scale without detection - you'd need a team to cast multiple votes (as the same person voting many times at one polling station would be risky) and you'd need excellent targeting of registered voters who would not vote. There aren't that many seats where it would even look feasible, I think. It looks far easier to abuse postal voting, to me.
All the above for GEs, national votes. Somewhat easier to game local votes given lower turnouts and margins, I guess (which could also be important).
He seemed to know everyone in the city.
That's pretty shocking. Govt makes good on manifesto pledge is not something you see every day.
If only the police's reputation wasn't in the gutter this might have positive polling implications for the Cons. It still might.
But we've discussed this at length, and if significant personation* were happening, the great majority of it would likely be postal, and not be via in person voting.
(* impersonation can be for entirely legal as well as illegal purposes.)
And there could be a big additional bonus for the tories if longer queues at polling stations discourage busy people from voting.
Keep it up.
Or maybe non-PB labourites not good at backing a winner
ETA: As a wet lettuce centrist LD-sympathiser, I think I'd have voted for Starmer, given the vote. Not quite convinced by Nandy. But I haven't seen a great deal of her.
I foresee a much bigger polling day problem, that many who DO have valid ID leave it at home, and are turned away. Some of those won't bother to return later in the day.
If Voter ID is to be introduced it makes sense to do this in a non GE year.
This is Trumpian politics.
If i knew what I know now i would have voted for RLB but at the time I believed the Party need to move a bit to the right.
On that basis i should be an SKS fan but moving a bit and becoming a Socialist hating non Democratic hierarchy of racism Party is not a bit!
I thought you had morphed into DecrepitJohnL.
I will go with 100,000 turn up without it, of which 20,000 come back later. Will these numbers be recorded?
For the over 60s pass you have to provide a passport or driving licence, or if you don't have those you have to go to a Post Office with other ID to get a verification letter with other proofs of ID and address.
The over 18s pass doesn't need the initial scrutiny, simply sending a photo and filling in a form on a website is enough.
That's why the over 60s pass is valid and the over 18s pass is not. If the over 18s pass was properly scrutinised it would almost certainly also be acceptable.
https://www.groupon.co.uk/deals/chaplins-hair-beauty-6?p=3&offer_type=SALE&nlp=&CID=UK&uu=ba222450-095e-11eb-b87f-0242ac120002&tx=0&utm_source=merchandising&utm_medium=email&sid=65fe2b79-0c7f-4ac0-be9c-56359fc9a13f_0_20230426&t_division=sheffield&date=20232604&sender=rm&s=body&c=image&d=deal-page
I had a long and meaningful phone call with 🇨🇳 President Xi Jinping. I believe that this call, as well as the appointment of Ukraine's ambassador to China, will give a powerful impetus to the development of our bilateral relations.
https://twitter.com/ZelenskyyUa/status/1651184756623802368
First conversation since the invasion.
The very fact that you are relaxed about the whole affair suggests it is to your party political advantage.
No ID in hand, they've not even noticed the adverts. Afterall, this is the usual May late afternoon stroll, and they didn't need to take their purse or bag.
Get to the station and get into a massive fight with the returning officer. Never needed this before, it's undemocratic etc etc etc.
I wonder if a few might just be allowed to vote anyway, to avoid the fight? Many will not.
Return home and straight on Facebook to moan long and loud in the 'Bickerstaff on Sea Community Group'. Either way.... they didn't get to vote Conservative after all and can't now be bothered going back to the polling station afterall.
I wonder how likely.......
20,000 more officers working on trivial motoring offences and policing ‘hate crime’ on Twitter - while house burglaries, car thefts and street robberies lead to little interest - isn’t going to go down well with the general public.
https://twitter.com/jk_rowling/status/1651166454375481348?s=20