Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

How does Sunak cope with both Truss and Johnson? – politicalbetting.com

SystemSystem Posts: 12,150
edited February 2023 in General
imageHow does Sunak cope with both Truss and Johnson? – politicalbetting.com

A huge problem for Sunak as he contemplates the way forward is that the previous two Tory leaders are still very active in the party and want to have an impact on the future

Read the full story here

«134

Comments

  • Agree it's a moment of risk, Mike, but would the Tories really oust a sitting Prime Minister for the third time in less than a year?

    If Tory MPs are resigned to losing in 2024 it becomes an exercise in damage limitation so they've got a better chance in 2029. Reinstalling Boris will mean they may well have to fight 2029 with him as leader -- better to rebuild with a new face post-GE defeat, surely?
  • The funny thing is that Truss and Boris are pulling in opposite directions. Crudely put, Liz Truss wants a smaller state and Boris wants more government investment. For that reason, I'd be wary of assuming that Sunak out means Johnson in.
  • HeathenerHeathener Posts: 7,084
    edited February 2023
    Good morning all.

    That's a truly terrible by-election result for the tories. Labour just got a higher share than in the 1997 landslide General Election. This defending their own safe seat in a by-election!

    As Sky News put it:

    "This result wasn't just bad for the Tories, it was terrible. While they won't admit it, they know it was
    Labour commanded a bigger vote share in this constituency than in Tony Blair's landslide general election victory in 1997 - and a trouncing in May's local elections would send many Tory MPs into a blind panic."

    https://news.sky.com/story/west-lancashire-by-election-labour-hold-onto-its-seat-12807130

    https://news.sky.com/story/senior-tories-were-prepared-for-the-worst-at-the-by-election-and-they-werent-far-wrong-12807217


    As I keep suggesting, an outright Labour majority is extremely likely. The Conservatives are going to get trounced.
  • HeathenerHeathener Posts: 7,084

    Agree it's a moment of risk, Mike, but would the Tories really oust a sitting Prime Minister for the third time in less than a year?

    If Tory MPs are resigned to losing in 2024 it becomes an exercise in damage limitation so they've got a better chance in 2029. Reinstalling Boris will mean they may well have to fight 2029 with him as leader -- better to rebuild with a new face post-GE defeat, surely?

    I think they know they will be out for at least 2 terms.
  • Agree it's a moment of risk, Mike, but would the Tories really oust a sitting Prime Minister for the third time in less than a year?

    If Tory MPs are resigned to losing in 2024 it becomes an exercise in damage limitation so they've got a better chance in 2029. Reinstalling Boris will mean they may well have to fight 2029 with him as leader -- better to rebuild with a new face post-GE defeat, surely?

    Sunak will say: challenge me and I call a GE. Unanswerable.
  • HeathenerHeathener Posts: 7,084

    Agree it's a moment of risk, Mike, but would the Tories really oust a sitting Prime Minister for the third time in less than a year?

    If Tory MPs are resigned to losing in 2024 it becomes an exercise in damage limitation so they've got a better chance in 2029. Reinstalling Boris will mean they may well have to fight 2029 with him as leader -- better to rebuild with a new face post-GE defeat, surely?

    Sunak will say: challenge me and I call a GE. Unanswerable.
    We had all of that idea with Liz Truss ... and she didn't. So I don't believe he would either.
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 48,552
    Lancashire, election forecast:

    Britain Elects forecast was quite accurate in Chester I recall. This is their prediction for tonight in West Lancs. Sounds about right to me.

    LAB: 63% (+11)
    CON: 26% (-10)
    REF: 5% (+5)
    GRN: 4% (+2)
    LDEM: 3% (-2)

    via Britain Predicts
    sotn.newstatesman.com/2023/02/conser…

    Turns out to have been a very accurate prediction:

    Result

    LAB: 62.3% (+10.2)
    CON: 25.4% (-10.9)
    REF: 4.4% (+0.1)
    LDEM: 4.1% (-0.8)
    GRN: 2.9% (+0.5)
    MRLP: 0.9% (+0.9)

    Labour HOLD.

    This is based on the same MRP that has 138 Tory MPs after the next GE and 424 Labour.

    https://sotn.newstatesman.com/2022/11/britain-predicts-who-would-win-election-held-today


  • Both Johnson and Truss have an eye to the battle for the soul of the Conservative Party that will surely follow an election loss.

    Sunak is oddly disconnected from it in a way. He will trudge on to defeat with the only realistic strategy in the circumstances of "don't scare the horses" economic credibility to avoid making the situation worse, coupled with some tired old sh1te about small boats and Brexit dividends to shore up the core. But it is hard to believe that's a strategy for turning round the supertanker, just running it aground at slightly lower speed to limit the damage.

    I think Johnson and Truss are aware of that and are happy enough for Sunak to take on what is a fool's errand. They may talk the talk, but I doubt they seriously believe the next election can be salvaged - a longer game is at play.
  • felixfelix Posts: 15,163
    edited February 2023
    Fairly sure that the next election is lost for the Conservatives. The only uncertainty is how quickly the disillusionment will come - a week or a month?😭🤣😂
  • HeathenerHeathener Posts: 7,084
    edited February 2023
    Foxy said:


    [...]

    This is based on the same MRP that has 138 Tory MPs after the next GE and 424 Labour.



    MRP is really good.

    That tallies with my current forecast of tory seats in the 100-150 range.

    I've never known such anger out there. They are in for an evisceration.
  • HeathenerHeathener Posts: 7,084
    Foxy said:

    Lancashire, election forecast:

    Britain Elects forecast was quite accurate in Chester I recall. This is their prediction for tonight in West Lancs. Sounds about right to me.

    LAB: 63% (+11)
    CON: 26% (-10)
    REF: 5% (+5)
    GRN: 4% (+2)
    LDEM: 3% (-2)

    via Britain Predicts
    sotn.newstatesman.com/2023/02/conser…

    Turns out to have been a very accurate prediction:

    Result

    LAB: 62.3% (+10.2)
    CON: 25.4% (-10.9)
    REF: 4.4% (+0.1)
    LDEM: 4.1% (-0.8)
    GRN: 2.9% (+0.5)
    MRLP: 0.9% (+0.9)

    Labour HOLD.

    This is based on the same MRP that has 138 Tory MPs after the next GE and 424 Labour.

    https://sotn.newstatesman.com/2022/11/britain-predicts-who-would-win-election-held-today




    You know, it really IS an appalling result for the tories. A rock solid safe Labour seat with a massive 'meh' factor and Labour still increased their share to higher than they got in the 1997 Tony Blair-inspired landslide.

  • Dura_AceDura_Ace Posts: 13,677

    Agree it's a moment of risk, Mike, but would the Tories really oust a sitting Prime Minister for the third time in less than a year?

    If Tory MPs are resigned to losing in 2024 it becomes an exercise in damage limitation so they've got a better chance in 2029. Reinstalling Boris will mean they may well have to fight 2029 with him as leader -- better to rebuild with a new face post-GE defeat, surely?

    Sunak will say: challenge me and I call a GE. Unanswerable.
    Johnson or Truss would think: Great, I get to be LotO even sooner.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,845

    The funny thing is that Truss and Boris are pulling in opposite directions. Crudely put, Liz Truss wants a smaller state and Boris wants more government investment. For that reason, I'd be wary of assuming that Sunak out means Johnson in.

    Indeed - Tories do appear to have rather short memories!

    Leaving aside (the very significant issues of) Johnson's behaviour, honesty and morality, remember back then that the most common moan heard from Conservatives about Johnson concerned the big-spending, north-investing nature of his administration coupled with concerns about specifics like HS2 and Net zero. And, in many quarters, about his lazy, incompetent, capricious approach to leadership and delivery.

    To go back to all that would be bizarre, whether or not it comes with another helping of scandal-ridden leadership.

    Besides, the sight of Johnson simply says "Covid parties" to many voters, and most of us want to put all that behind us now.
  • darkagedarkage Posts: 5,386

    Both Johnson and Truss have an eye to the battle for the soul of the Conservative Party that will surely follow an election loss.

    Sunak is oddly disconnected from it in a way. He will trudge on to defeat with the only realistic strategy in the circumstances of "don't scare the horses" economic credibility to avoid making the situation worse, coupled with some tired old sh1te about small boats and Brexit dividends to shore up the core. But it is hard to believe that's a strategy for turning round the supertanker, just running it aground at slightly lower speed to limit the damage.

    I think Johnson and Truss are aware of that and are happy enough for Sunak to take on what is a fool's errand. They may talk the talk, but I doubt they seriously believe the next election can be salvaged - a longer game is at play.

    What is most absurd about the Conservative party is that Truss has standing in it at all. She is hated and ridiculed by voters. So why does she have this platform?
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 57,037
    Foxy said:

    Lancashire, election forecast:

    Britain Elects forecast was quite accurate in Chester I recall. This is their prediction for tonight in West Lancs. Sounds about right to me.

    LAB: 63% (+11)
    CON: 26% (-10)
    REF: 5% (+5)
    GRN: 4% (+2)
    LDEM: 3% (-2)

    via Britain Predicts
    sotn.newstatesman.com/2023/02/conser…

    Turns out to have been a very accurate prediction:

    Result

    LAB: 62.3% (+10.2)
    CON: 25.4% (-10.9)
    REF: 4.4% (+0.1)
    LDEM: 4.1% (-0.8)
    GRN: 2.9% (+0.5)
    MRLP: 0.9% (+0.9)

    Labour HOLD.

    This is based on the same MRP that has 138 Tory MPs after the next GE and 424 Labour.

    https://sotn.newstatesman.com/2022/11/britain-predicts-who-would-win-election-held-today




    How can we take any forecast seriously that gets the libdem - green order wrong?
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,845
    darkage said:

    Both Johnson and Truss have an eye to the battle for the soul of the Conservative Party that will surely follow an election loss.

    Sunak is oddly disconnected from it in a way. He will trudge on to defeat with the only realistic strategy in the circumstances of "don't scare the horses" economic credibility to avoid making the situation worse, coupled with some tired old sh1te about small boats and Brexit dividends to shore up the core. But it is hard to believe that's a strategy for turning round the supertanker, just running it aground at slightly lower speed to limit the damage.

    I think Johnson and Truss are aware of that and are happy enough for Sunak to take on what is a fool's errand. They may talk the talk, but I doubt they seriously believe the next election can be salvaged - a longer game is at play.

    What is most absurd about the Conservative party is that Truss has standing in it at all. She is hated and ridiculed by voters. So why does she have this platform?
    Because not being hated or ridiculed has never been one of the criteria that Conservatives use to choose their leaders?
  • ThomasNasheThomasNashe Posts: 5,331
    rcs1000 said:

    Foxy said:

    Lancashire, election forecast:

    Britain Elects forecast was quite accurate in Chester I recall. This is their prediction for tonight in West Lancs. Sounds about right to me.

    LAB: 63% (+11)
    CON: 26% (-10)
    REF: 5% (+5)
    GRN: 4% (+2)
    LDEM: 3% (-2)

    via Britain Predicts
    sotn.newstatesman.com/2023/02/conser…

    Turns out to have been a very accurate prediction:

    Result

    LAB: 62.3% (+10.2)
    CON: 25.4% (-10.9)
    REF: 4.4% (+0.1)
    LDEM: 4.1% (-0.8)
    GRN: 2.9% (+0.5)
    MRLP: 0.9% (+0.9)

    Labour HOLD.

    This is based on the same MRP that has 138 Tory MPs after the next GE and 424 Labour.

    https://sotn.newstatesman.com/2022/11/britain-predicts-who-would-win-election-held-today


    How can we take any forecast seriously that gets the libdem - green order wrong?

    It’s an under the radar yellow surge.
  • NeilVWNeilVW Posts: 732
    Surely comparisons with 1997 are not valid. It’s a BE. A 10% swing, albeit in a safe Lab seat, is hardly earth-shattering.
  • dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 29,384
    Recession avoided.
    No growth in final quarter.
  • darkage said:

    Both Johnson and Truss have an eye to the battle for the soul of the Conservative Party that will surely follow an election loss.

    Sunak is oddly disconnected from it in a way. He will trudge on to defeat with the only realistic strategy in the circumstances of "don't scare the horses" economic credibility to avoid making the situation worse, coupled with some tired old sh1te about small boats and Brexit dividends to shore up the core. But it is hard to believe that's a strategy for turning round the supertanker, just running it aground at slightly lower speed to limit the damage.

    I think Johnson and Truss are aware of that and are happy enough for Sunak to take on what is a fool's errand. They may talk the talk, but I doubt they seriously believe the next election can be salvaged - a longer game is at play.

    What is most absurd about the Conservative party is that Truss has standing in it at all. She is hated and ridiculed by voters. So why does she have this platform?
    Does Truss have much standing outside her own imagination? The Telegraph printed her essay, but The Telegraph is pretty out there as well.

    And Johnson ought to be pretty easy to neutralise by the Privileges Committee. Even if he does harbour dreams of hopping into Nadine's (Mid) Beds.

    The noises won't help Rishi steer the ship, but neither of his undead predecessors can really take over.

    Can they?
  • Dura_Ace said:

    Agree it's a moment of risk, Mike, but would the Tories really oust a sitting Prime Minister for the third time in less than a year?

    If Tory MPs are resigned to losing in 2024 it becomes an exercise in damage limitation so they've got a better chance in 2029. Reinstalling Boris will mean they may well have to fight 2029 with him as leader -- better to rebuild with a new face post-GE defeat, surely?

    Sunak will say: challenge me and I call a GE. Unanswerable.
    Johnson or Truss would think: Great, I get to be LotO even sooner.
    Johnson would lose his seat.

    You think thatwill try Truss again? Really?
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 57,037
    I'm beginning to wonder if George Santos is actually a Democrat plant:

    https://www.politico.com/news/2023/02/09/santos-charged-theft-2017-dog-breeders-00082091
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 53,755
    dixiedean said:

    Recession avoided.
    No growth in final quarter.

    But no shrinkage either. As I said a week or so ago the long recession forecast was too pessimistic. We are going to be broadly flat with some small pick up at the end as inflation falls boost spending power again.
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 48,552
    NeilVW said:

    Surely comparisons with 1997 are not valid. It’s a BE. A 10% swing, albeit in a safe Lab seat, is hardly earth-shattering.

    Completely in line with the polls and Britain Elects MRP. It does look valid to me.

    Of course things can change with "events" but there is no guarantee that those "events" favour the government. It is very possible that they favour Starmer.

  • Peter_the_PunterPeter_the_Punter Posts: 14,309
    edited February 2023
    Heathener said:

    Foxy said:


    [...]

    This is based on the same MRP that has 138 Tory MPs after the next GE and 424 Labour.

    MRP is really good.

    That tallies with my current forecast of tory seats in the 100-150 range.

    I've never known such anger out there. They are in for an evisceration.

    That would be my prediction right now but the scary thing is that at these levels of support it wouldn't take much movement in the polls for it to change by a 100 seats. It could be in the right direction of course and they might make it 250 but equally it could go the other other way and they'd be close to zero.

    FPTP puts them on a cliff edge. Move in the wrong direction and it's over.

    PS Btw, I'd like to meet some of the 25% who voted Conservative. What on earth would motivate you to go the ballot box and support this lot? Is there a zombie cult faction in the area?
  • SandpitSandpit Posts: 54,509
    rcs1000 said:

    I'm beginning to wonder if George Santos is actually a Democrat plant:

    https://www.politico.com/news/2023/02/09/santos-charged-theft-2017-dog-breeders-00082091

    Well they sure as hell didn’t do much research on him before the election.
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 52,482

    rcs1000 said:

    Foxy said:

    Lancashire, election forecast:

    Britain Elects forecast was quite accurate in Chester I recall. This is their prediction for tonight in West Lancs. Sounds about right to me.

    LAB: 63% (+11)
    CON: 26% (-10)
    REF: 5% (+5)
    GRN: 4% (+2)
    LDEM: 3% (-2)

    via Britain Predicts
    sotn.newstatesman.com/2023/02/conser…

    Turns out to have been a very accurate prediction:

    Result

    LAB: 62.3% (+10.2)
    CON: 25.4% (-10.9)
    REF: 4.4% (+0.1)
    LDEM: 4.1% (-0.8)
    GRN: 2.9% (+0.5)
    MRLP: 0.9% (+0.9)

    Labour HOLD.

    This is based on the same MRP that has 138 Tory MPs after the next GE and 424 Labour.

    https://sotn.newstatesman.com/2022/11/britain-predicts-who-would-win-election-held-today
    How can we take any forecast seriously that gets the libdem - green order wrong?

    It’s an under the radar yellow surge.

    Refuk beating LibDems is worthy of note.
  • darkage said:

    Both Johnson and Truss have an eye to the battle for the soul of the Conservative Party that will surely follow an election loss.

    Sunak is oddly disconnected from it in a way. He will trudge on to defeat with the only realistic strategy in the circumstances of "don't scare the horses" economic credibility to avoid making the situation worse, coupled with some tired old sh1te about small boats and Brexit dividends to shore up the core. But it is hard to believe that's a strategy for turning round the supertanker, just running it aground at slightly lower speed to limit the damage.

    I think Johnson and Truss are aware of that and are happy enough for Sunak to take on what is a fool's errand. They may talk the talk, but I doubt they seriously believe the next election can be salvaged - a longer game is at play.

    What is most absurd about the Conservative party is that Truss has standing in it at all. She is hated and ridiculed by voters. So why does she have this platform?
    She is hated and ridiculed by members.

    She is also hated and ridiculed by MPs.

    The only reason not to stand down at the next election is the brass neck that led her to think she would be a great Prime Minister first time around. She gets to perform that trick exactly once.

    The reason Boris has not yet stood down is that as an MP he can better play the Ukraine card. Which he sees as a route to making squillions.

    Sunak doesn't need to remotely worry about either of them.
    Sadly, Mark, you are right. Why is there a part of me that wishes you were not?
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 48,552
    edited February 2023
    DavidL said:

    dixiedean said:

    Recession avoided.
    No growth in final quarter.

    But no shrinkage either. As I said a week or so ago the long recession forecast was too pessimistic. We are going to be broadly flat with some small pick up at the end as inflation falls boost spending power again.
    Inflation falling only boosts spending power if people get real terms payrises. If not, then reduced Inflation just means they get poorer more slowly.
  • Sandpit said:

    rcs1000 said:

    I'm beginning to wonder if George Santos is actually a Democrat plant:

    https://www.politico.com/news/2023/02/09/santos-charged-theft-2017-dog-breeders-00082091

    Well they sure as hell didn’t do much research on him before the election.
    Do you think he was nominated by the same guy who did Jared O'Mara?
  • DavidL said:

    dixiedean said:

    Recession avoided.
    No growth in final quarter.

    But no shrinkage either. As I said a week or so ago the long recession forecast was too pessimistic. We are going to be broadly flat with some small pick up at the end as inflation falls boost spending power again.
    Trouble is that it's going to feel like a recession. Even now, tend growth is 1.5% or so (isn't it?), so the vibe is closer to "bad" rather than "normal", let alone "good".

    As with Norma Lamont's Green Shoots, Conservatives saying "we're not actually in recession" may well just annoy the public even more.
  • darkagedarkage Posts: 5,386
    Foxy said:


    While the Tories do deserve a thrashing, I don't think such huge majorities make for good government. Too many bored and ambitious new government MPs, little chance of promotion and an ineffective rump opposition. That is before we get to the blank canvas of Starmerism too.

    In the end the 'blank canvas' of Starmerism may well be why it isn't a rout, there isn't something positive to vote for in the way that there was with Blair. My sense is that ultimately Labour will win (either biggest party or a small majority) but not very convincingly.
    It feels more like 1992 or 2010 than 1997.
    At least with Sunak there is a sense of things calming down, a sort of 'incompetence as usual'.
  • darkagedarkage Posts: 5,386

    darkage said:

    Both Johnson and Truss have an eye to the battle for the soul of the Conservative Party that will surely follow an election loss.

    Sunak is oddly disconnected from it in a way. He will trudge on to defeat with the only realistic strategy in the circumstances of "don't scare the horses" economic credibility to avoid making the situation worse, coupled with some tired old sh1te about small boats and Brexit dividends to shore up the core. But it is hard to believe that's a strategy for turning round the supertanker, just running it aground at slightly lower speed to limit the damage.

    I think Johnson and Truss are aware of that and are happy enough for Sunak to take on what is a fool's errand. They may talk the talk, but I doubt they seriously believe the next election can be salvaged - a longer game is at play.

    What is most absurd about the Conservative party is that Truss has standing in it at all. She is hated and ridiculed by voters. So why does she have this platform?
    She is hated and ridiculed by members.

    She is also hated and ridiculed by MPs.

    The only reason not to stand down at the next election is the brass neck that led her to think she would be a great Prime Minister first time around. She gets to perform that trick exactly once.

    The reason Boris has not yet stood down is that as an MP he can better play the Ukraine card. Which he sees as a route to making squillions.

    Sunak doesn't need to remotely worry about either of them.
    I hope you are right, the last thing we need is a comeback from either of them.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,308
    Interesting that the threader only mentions two former PMs. There is a third still around.
  • RattersRatters Posts: 1,074
    edited February 2023

    DavidL said:

    dixiedean said:

    Recession avoided.
    No growth in final quarter.

    But no shrinkage either. As I said a week or so ago the long recession forecast was too pessimistic. We are going to be broadly flat with some small pick up at the end as inflation falls boost spending power again.
    Trouble is that it's going to feel like a recession. Even now, tend growth is 1.5% or so (isn't it?), so the vibe is closer to "bad" rather than "normal", let alone "good".

    As with Norma Lamont's Green Shoots, Conservatives saying "we're not actually in recession" may well just annoy the public even more.
    Particularly as we're still below pre-Covid GDP. Hard to make a big thing of arguing we're not in recession when we haven't recovered from the last one and the BoE is predicting we're about to enter another.

    Close to zero GDP growth over 5 years' of this government won't exactly sound like a roaring success just because we are growing a bit in 2024 and inflation is back down.
  • TimSTimS Posts: 12,928
    Foxy said:

    Lancashire, election forecast:

    Britain Elects forecast was quite accurate in Chester I recall. This is their prediction for tonight in West Lancs. Sounds about right to me.

    LAB: 63% (+11)
    CON: 26% (-10)
    REF: 5% (+5)
    GRN: 4% (+2)
    LDEM: 3% (-2)

    via Britain Predicts
    sotn.newstatesman.com/2023/02/conser…

    Turns out to have been a very accurate prediction:

    Result

    LAB: 62.3% (+10.2)
    CON: 25.4% (-10.9)
    REF: 4.4% (+0.1)
    LDEM: 4.1% (-0.8)
    GRN: 2.9% (+0.5)
    MRLP: 0.9% (+0.9)

    Labour HOLD.

    This is based on the same MRP that has 138 Tory MPs after the next GE and 424 Labour.

    https://sotn.newstatesman.com/2022/11/britain-predicts-who-would-win-election-held-today




    Notable overnight, again, was the Lib Dems outperforming the polls in all the by-elections they stood in. Couple of gains with huge swings in Cheltenham and Masham and Fountains, and the only party the Britain Predicts algorithm didn’t quite get right for West Lancs.

    Encouraging for the May elections
  • LostPasswordLostPassword Posts: 18,273
    NeilVW said:

    Surely comparisons with 1997 are not valid. It’s a BE. A 10% swing, albeit in a safe Lab seat, is hardly earth-shattering.

    The Hemsworth by-election of February 1996 might be the closest comparison, though that was a somewhat safer Labour seat. Tory vote down by ~10pp in both cases. Turnout down heavily to only just over 20k votes in both cases. Labour vote up more strongly in West Lancs than in Hemsworth.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hemsworth_(UK_Parliament_constituency)

    The most negative interpretation I can put on it for Labour is that the result looks very similar to Hemsworth, so you can make a case for them achieving a 1997-style swing as a result at the next election, but they start so much further back than in 1997 that such a swing might only just be enough to take them to a wafer-thin majority, rather than to a huge landslide.

    We could do with Matt Hancock receiving an offer he can't refuse out of politics and a by-election in West Suffolk. At the 1997 GE Labour were 1,867 votes behind. If they could win it at a by-election then a landslide looks on - particularly given the older demographic profile of the seat.
  • When voting forecast models currently predicting an overall Labour majority of around 150 at the next general election consistently provide highly accurate predictions of by-election results, it’s time to start taking them very seriously.

    I still struggle to see an actual general election result that gets Labour beyond a very narrow majority, and think Labour winning most seats is still the most likely outcome, but that is not where we are currently. So, the question is: how do the Tories start clawing it back and when will the process begin?
  • JonathanJonathan Posts: 21,605

    darkage said:

    Both Johnson and Truss have an eye to the battle for the soul of the Conservative Party that will surely follow an election loss.

    Sunak is oddly disconnected from it in a way. He will trudge on to defeat with the only realistic strategy in the circumstances of "don't scare the horses" economic credibility to avoid making the situation worse, coupled with some tired old sh1te about small boats and Brexit dividends to shore up the core. But it is hard to believe that's a strategy for turning round the supertanker, just running it aground at slightly lower speed to limit the damage.

    I think Johnson and Truss are aware of that and are happy enough for Sunak to take on what is a fool's errand. They may talk the talk, but I doubt they seriously believe the next election can be salvaged - a longer game is at play.

    What is most absurd about the Conservative party is that Truss has standing in it at all. She is hated and ridiculed by voters. So why does she have this platform?
    She is hated and ridiculed by members.

    She is also hated and ridiculed by MPs.

    The only reason not to stand down at the next election is the brass neck that led her to think she would be a great Prime Minister first time around. She gets to perform that trick exactly once.

    The reason Boris has not yet stood down is that as an MP he can better play the Ukraine card. Which he sees as a route to making squillions.

    Sunak doesn't need to remotely worry about either of them.
    Alas, I suspect you remain detached from a large part of your party. I remember how certain you were that Penny Mordaunt would be leader, right up until the point she was destroyed by her own side.
  • JonathanJonathan Posts: 21,605

    When voting forecast models currently predicting an overall Labour majority of around 150 at the next general election consistently provide highly accurate predictions of by-election results, it’s time to start taking them very seriously.

    I still struggle to see an actual general election result that gets Labour beyond a very narrow majority, and think Labour winning most seats is still the most likely outcome, but that is not where we are currently. So, the question is: how do the Tories start clawing it back and when will the process begin?

    It should worry the Tories that they are still so far behind whilst the economy is doing better than expected. Very 1990s.
  • ydoethur said:

    Interesting that the threader only mentions two former PMs. There is a third still around.

    Major? No he's retired.
    Thatcher? No, she's six feet under.

    Oh, you're thinking of big necklace lady, aren't you? Whilst she is clearly the best of the bunch, chances of her coming back are approximately zero.

    That would be to admit that the sugar frenzy of the last few years was a mistake, and the current Conservative generation can never do that.
  • LostPasswordLostPassword Posts: 18,273

    DavidL said:

    dixiedean said:

    Recession avoided.
    No growth in final quarter.

    But no shrinkage either. As I said a week or so ago the long recession forecast was too pessimistic. We are going to be broadly flat with some small pick up at the end as inflation falls boost spending power again.
    Trouble is that it's going to feel like a recession. Even now, tend growth is 1.5% or so (isn't it?), so the vibe is closer to "bad" rather than "normal", let alone "good".

    As with Norma Lamont's Green Shoots, Conservatives saying "we're not actually in recession" may well just annoy the public even more.
    Also, if the economy is still growing (remember in real, inflation-adjusted, terms), people may also wonder why their pay is being cut relative to inflation. Where else is the money going?
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 53,755
    Foxy said:

    DavidL said:

    dixiedean said:

    Recession avoided.
    No growth in final quarter.

    But no shrinkage either. As I said a week or so ago the long recession forecast was too pessimistic. We are going to be broadly flat with some small pick up at the end as inflation falls boost spending power again.
    Inflation falling only boosts spending power if people get real terms payrises. If not, then reduced Inflation just means they get poorer more slowly.
    Yes but just as pay increases fail to keep up with inflation when it is rising quickly, as we have seen in the last 6 months, so pay increases tend to run ahead of inflation when it is falling swiftly and I think that we will see that in the second half of the year.
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 28,319

    darkage said:

    Both Johnson and Truss have an eye to the battle for the soul of the Conservative Party that will surely follow an election loss.

    Sunak is oddly disconnected from it in a way. He will trudge on to defeat with the only realistic strategy in the circumstances of "don't scare the horses" economic credibility to avoid making the situation worse, coupled with some tired old sh1te about small boats and Brexit dividends to shore up the core. But it is hard to believe that's a strategy for turning round the supertanker, just running it aground at slightly lower speed to limit the damage.

    I think Johnson and Truss are aware of that and are happy enough for Sunak to take on what is a fool's errand. They may talk the talk, but I doubt they seriously believe the next election can be salvaged - a longer game is at play.

    What is most absurd about the Conservative party is that Truss has standing in it at all. She is hated and ridiculed by voters. So why does she have this platform?
    She is hated and ridiculed by members.

    She is also hated and ridiculed by MPs.

    The only reason not to stand down at the next election is the brass neck that led her to think she would be a great Prime Minister first time around. She gets to perform that trick exactly once.

    The reason Boris has not yet stood down is that as an MP he can better play the Ukraine card. Which he sees as a route to making squillions.

    Sunak doesn't need to remotely worry about either of them.
    The trouble is, out of the three of them Mrs May is the one viewed by the public as a safe pair of hands. If she could return and remould the current party into the one nation feudal Tories that voters appreciate and would comfortably vote for, the next election is not lost.

    In order to win the next GE with Truss or Johnson the Conservatives need to dig deep to find the vein of 40% populism. Perhaps Lee Anderson has some ideas.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,845

    Heathener said:

    Foxy said:


    [...]

    This is based on the same MRP that has 138 Tory MPs after the next GE and 424 Labour.

    MRP is really good.

    That tallies with my current forecast of tory seats in the 100-150 range.

    I've never known such anger out there. They are in for an evisceration.
    That would be my prediction right now but the scary thing is that at these levels of support it wouldn't take much movement in the polls for it to change by a 100 seats. It could be in the right direction of course and they might make it 250 but equally it could go the other other way and they'd be close to zero.

    FPTP puts them on a cliff edge. Move in the wrong direction and it's over.

    PS Btw, I'd like to meet some of the 25% who voted Conservative. What on earth would motivate you to go the ballot box and support this lot? Is there a zombie cult faction in the area?

    MRP is good - better than a randomly sampled national poll - but it still reflects opinion now, not how people will feel when the GE arrives.
  • tlg86tlg86 Posts: 26,152

    NeilVW said:

    Surely comparisons with 1997 are not valid. It’s a BE. A 10% swing, albeit in a safe Lab seat, is hardly earth-shattering.

    The Hemsworth by-election of February 1996 might be the closest comparison, though that was a somewhat safer Labour seat. Tory vote down by ~10pp in both cases. Turnout down heavily to only just over 20k votes in both cases. Labour vote up more strongly in West Lancs than in Hemsworth.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hemsworth_(UK_Parliament_constituency)

    The most negative interpretation I can put on it for Labour is that the result looks very similar to Hemsworth, so you can make a case for them achieving a 1997-style swing as a result at the next election, but they start so much further back than in 1997 that such a swing might only just be enough to take them to a wafer-thin majority, rather than to a huge landslide.

    We could do with Matt Hancock receiving an offer he can't refuse out of politics and a by-election in West Suffolk. At the 1997 GE Labour were 1,867 votes behind. If they could win it at a by-election then a landslide looks on - particularly given the older demographic profile of the seat.
    In Hemsworth, the Tory share of the vote fell by 53%. In West Lancashire, it fell by 30%. That the Labour vote didn’t go up in Hemsworth is perhaps not surprising as they did well in 1992. On the other hand, Labour had a terrible 2019, so it would be disappointing for Labour if they weren’t showing signs of recovery.

    Now, that’s not to say Labour aren’t on course to form the next government, but I don’t think the by election results are nearly as good as what Blair was achieving in opposition.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,308

    ydoethur said:

    Interesting that the threader only mentions two former PMs. There is a third still around.

    Major? No he's retired.
    Thatcher? No, she's six feet under.

    Oh, you're thinking of big necklace lady, aren't you? Whilst she is clearly the best of the bunch, chances of her coming back are approximately zero.

    That would be to admit that the sugar frenzy of the last few years was a mistake, and the current Conservative generation can never do that.
    Thatcher six feet under would still be a better PM than Truss.

    I wonder though if May might return to the cabinet at some point. She's a senior figure and unquestionably able. There might be an opening as say, leader of the House if Wallace moves on and Mordaunt returned to Defence.

    Equally, she may not want to. She's on a nice earner outside Parliament making speeches, and that would have to go if she became a Minister again. And unlike Johnson she surely knows she has no chance of the leadership again unless she is a Grimond in a real, real crisis.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,845
    edited February 2023
    ydoethur said:

    ydoethur said:

    Interesting that the threader only mentions two former PMs. There is a third still around.

    Major? No he's retired.
    Thatcher? No, she's six feet under.

    Oh, you're thinking of big necklace lady, aren't you? Whilst she is clearly the best of the bunch, chances of her coming back are approximately zero.

    That would be to admit that the sugar frenzy of the last few years was a mistake, and the current Conservative generation can never do that.
    Thatcher six feet under would still be a better PM than Truss.

    I wonder though if May might return to the cabinet at some point. She's a senior figure and unquestionably able. There might be an opening as say, leader of the House if Wallace moves on and Mordaunt returned to Defence.

    Equally, she may not want to. She's on a nice earner outside Parliament making speeches, and that would have to go if she became a Minister again. And unlike Johnson she surely knows she has no chance of the leadership again unless she is a Grimond in a real, real crisis.
    I think we can safely say she's not a Grimond!

    But she would probably be willing to serve responsibly under someone else and isn't, as you say, after the top job, her leadership skills having been already found rather wanting.

    Even though she would undoubtedly have been better than Johnson during the pandemic - she has a sense of duty so would have observed her own rules, would have been all over the detail and been better at those press conferences with the scientists, and wouldn't have had Johnson's reluctance to go down the route of restrictions that proved so fatal - literally - to many people back at the beginning of the crisis. And the vans driving around all over the country with posters telling us to stay indoors would have given us something to look at during the lockdown!
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,308
    IanB2 said:

    ydoethur said:

    ydoethur said:

    Interesting that the threader only mentions two former PMs. There is a third still around.

    Major? No he's retired.
    Thatcher? No, she's six feet under.

    Oh, you're thinking of big necklace lady, aren't you? Whilst she is clearly the best of the bunch, chances of her coming back are approximately zero.

    That would be to admit that the sugar frenzy of the last few years was a mistake, and the current Conservative generation can never do that.
    Thatcher six feet under would still be a better PM than Truss.

    I wonder though if May might return to the cabinet at some point. She's a senior figure and unquestionably able. There might be an opening as say, leader of the House if Wallace moves on and Mordaunt returned to Defence.

    Equally, she may not want to. She's on a nice earner outside Parliament making speeches, and that would have to go if she became a Minister again. And unlike Johnson she surely knows she has no chance of the leadership again unless she is a Grimond in a real, real crisis.
    I think we can safely say she's not a Grimond!

    But she would probably be willing to serve responsibly under someone else and isn't, as you say, after the top job, her leadership skills having been already found rather wanting.
    I meant, Jo Grimond who returned as acting leader of the Liberals during the Thorpe affair.
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 53,755

    DavidL said:

    dixiedean said:

    Recession avoided.
    No growth in final quarter.

    But no shrinkage either. As I said a week or so ago the long recession forecast was too pessimistic. We are going to be broadly flat with some small pick up at the end as inflation falls boost spending power again.
    Trouble is that it's going to feel like a recession. Even now, tend growth is 1.5% or so (isn't it?), so the vibe is closer to "bad" rather than "normal", let alone "good".

    As with Norma Lamont's Green Shoots, Conservatives saying "we're not actually in recession" may well just annoy the public even more.
    Oh I agree. I don’t think that the over performance will be on a sufficient scale to do the government any favours. People will still feel (and will actually be) worse off.
  • FishingFishing Posts: 5,010
    ydoethur said:

    ydoethur said:

    Interesting that the threader only mentions two former PMs. There is a third still around.

    Major? No he's retired.
    Thatcher? No, she's six feet under.

    Oh, you're thinking of big necklace lady, aren't you? Whilst she is clearly the best of the bunch, chances of her coming back are approximately zero.

    That would be to admit that the sugar frenzy of the last few years was a mistake, and the current Conservative generation can never do that.
    Thatcher six feet under would still be a better PM than Truss.

    As the years go by and we get one failed premiership after another it makes Mrs Thatcher's achievements seem more and more impressive.

    She was undoubtedly one of the greatest figures the democratic world has ever produced.
  • JonathanJonathan Posts: 21,605
    Fishing said:

    ydoethur said:

    ydoethur said:

    Interesting that the threader only mentions two former PMs. There is a third still around.

    Major? No he's retired.
    Thatcher? No, she's six feet under.

    Oh, you're thinking of big necklace lady, aren't you? Whilst she is clearly the best of the bunch, chances of her coming back are approximately zero.

    That would be to admit that the sugar frenzy of the last few years was a mistake, and the current Conservative generation can never do that.
    Thatcher six feet under would still be a better PM than Truss.

    As the years go by and we get one failed premiership after another it makes Mrs Thatcher's achievements seem more and more impressive.

    She was undoubtedly one of the greatest figures the democratic world has ever produced.
    Just for you.

  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,845
    ydoethur said:

    IanB2 said:

    ydoethur said:

    ydoethur said:

    Interesting that the threader only mentions two former PMs. There is a third still around.

    Major? No he's retired.
    Thatcher? No, she's six feet under.

    Oh, you're thinking of big necklace lady, aren't you? Whilst she is clearly the best of the bunch, chances of her coming back are approximately zero.

    That would be to admit that the sugar frenzy of the last few years was a mistake, and the current Conservative generation can never do that.
    Thatcher six feet under would still be a better PM than Truss.

    I wonder though if May might return to the cabinet at some point. She's a senior figure and unquestionably able. There might be an opening as say, leader of the House if Wallace moves on and Mordaunt returned to Defence.

    Equally, she may not want to. She's on a nice earner outside Parliament making speeches, and that would have to go if she became a Minister again. And unlike Johnson she surely knows she has no chance of the leadership again unless she is a Grimond in a real, real crisis.
    I think we can safely say she's not a Grimond!

    But she would probably be willing to serve responsibly under someone else and isn't, as you say, after the top job, her leadership skills having been already found rather wanting.
    I meant, Jo Grimond who returned as acting leader of the Liberals during the Thorpe affair.
    Grimond was an inspirational figure who set the Liberals on the long path to recovery, and is still revered among many older members. His leadership was before my time - believe it or not, I was inspired to join by Thorpe - but I met many people during my time in the party who had joined because of Grimond, and later gone on to become leading councillors or MPs. Without someone like Grimond it's quite possible the party would still be stuck on 5% (and, yes, I anticipate that is setting you up for a witty reply).
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 28,319
    edited February 2023
    Heathener said:

    Foxy said:

    Lancashire, election forecast:

    Britain Elects forecast was quite accurate in Chester I recall. This is their prediction for tonight in West Lancs. Sounds about right to me.

    LAB: 63% (+11)
    CON: 26% (-10)
    REF: 5% (+5)
    GRN: 4% (+2)
    LDEM: 3% (-2)

    via Britain Predicts
    sotn.newstatesman.com/2023/02/conser…

    Turns out to have been a very accurate prediction:

    Result

    LAB: 62.3% (+10.2)
    CON: 25.4% (-10.9)
    REF: 4.4% (+0.1)
    LDEM: 4.1% (-0.8)
    GRN: 2.9% (+0.5)
    MRLP: 0.9% (+0.9)

    Labour HOLD.

    This is based on the same MRP that has 138 Tory MPs after the next GE and 424 Labour.

    https://sotn.newstatesman.com/2022/11/britain-predicts-who-would-win-election-held-today


    "You know, it really IS an appalling result for the tories. A rock solid safe Labour seat with a massive 'meh' factor and Labour still increased their share to higher than they got in the 1997 Tony Blair-inspired landslide."



    Calm down, you sound like the 1992 Sheffield Rally. Caution should be applied.
  • MortimerMortimer Posts: 14,115
    The Lancashire result is appalling for the Tory leadership.

    Hunt and Sunak to go after May looking increasingly likely to me. I suspect Johnson will be back.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,308
    IanB2 said:

    ydoethur said:

    IanB2 said:

    ydoethur said:

    ydoethur said:

    Interesting that the threader only mentions two former PMs. There is a third still around.

    Major? No he's retired.
    Thatcher? No, she's six feet under.

    Oh, you're thinking of big necklace lady, aren't you? Whilst she is clearly the best of the bunch, chances of her coming back are approximately zero.

    That would be to admit that the sugar frenzy of the last few years was a mistake, and the current Conservative generation can never do that.
    Thatcher six feet under would still be a better PM than Truss.

    I wonder though if May might return to the cabinet at some point. She's a senior figure and unquestionably able. There might be an opening as say, leader of the House if Wallace moves on and Mordaunt returned to Defence.

    Equally, she may not want to. She's on a nice earner outside Parliament making speeches, and that would have to go if she became a Minister again. And unlike Johnson she surely knows she has no chance of the leadership again unless she is a Grimond in a real, real crisis.
    I think we can safely say she's not a Grimond!

    But she would probably be willing to serve responsibly under someone else and isn't, as you say, after the top job, her leadership skills having been already found rather wanting.
    I meant, Jo Grimond who returned as acting leader of the Liberals during the Thorpe affair.
    Grimond was an inspirational figure who set the Liberals on the long path to recovery, and is still revered among many older members. His leadership was before my time - believe it or not, I was inspired to join by Thorpe - but I met many people during my time in the party who had joined because of Grimond, and later gone on to become leading councillors or MPs. Without someone like Grimond it's quite possible the party would still be stuck on 5% (and, yes, I anticipate that is setting you up for a witty reply).
    I wouldn't lower myself to a 5% gag! :smile:

    Again, I wasn't comparing her leadership, which clearly was not in the class of Grimond's(!) but possible circumstances where she might become PM again. There are not many, but Rishi Sunak having a dog shot might cover it...
  • bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 22,649
    West Lancashire Highest ever percentage for Labour

    "Best result ever" say SKS fans.

    At the same time Labour received the f"ewest votes ever" in the Comstituency.

    Of course mostly down to the lowest turnout ever as often happens in a by election.

    My view is those who are shouting BEST EVER like my own MP are still missing the lack of enthusiasm for SKS but undoubted visceral hatred of the Tories may outweigh that.

    GE 2024 lowest ever turnout??
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,308
    Mortimer said:

    The Lancashire result is appalling for the Tory leadership.

    Hunt and Sunak to go after May looking increasingly likely to me. I suspect Johnson will be back.

    They can't go after May. She has to make the comeback first so they would be going before her.
  • tlg86tlg86 Posts: 26,152
    Mortimer said:

    The Lancashire result is appalling for the Tory leadership.

    Hunt and Sunak to go after May looking increasingly likely to me. I suspect Johnson will be back.

    Nah, that result isn’t terrible. Probably going to lose the next election, but that result is no worse than what Boris was achieving.
  • I guess the really big unknown is how successful the government’s voter suppression measures will be. If the Tories have got it right it could save them a lot of seats.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,308
    Jonathan said:

    Fishing said:

    ydoethur said:

    ydoethur said:

    Interesting that the threader only mentions two former PMs. There is a third still around.

    Major? No he's retired.
    Thatcher? No, she's six feet under.

    Oh, you're thinking of big necklace lady, aren't you? Whilst she is clearly the best of the bunch, chances of her coming back are approximately zero.

    That would be to admit that the sugar frenzy of the last few years was a mistake, and the current Conservative generation can never do that.
    Thatcher six feet under would still be a better PM than Truss.

    As the years go by and we get one failed premiership after another it makes Mrs Thatcher's achievements seem more and more impressive.

    She was undoubtedly one of the greatest figures the democratic world has ever produced.
    Just for you.

    Just for you all

    https://vimeo.com/642311804
  • bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 22,649
    ydoethur said:

    West Lancashire Highest ever percentage for Labour

    "Best result ever" say SKS fans.

    At the same time Labour received the f"ewest votes ever" in the Comstituency.

    Of course mostly down to the lowest turnout ever as often happens in a by election.

    My view is those who are shouting BEST EVER like my own MP are still missing the lack of enthusiasm for SKS but undoubted visceral hatred of the Tories may outweigh that.

    GE 2024 lowest ever turnout??

    Has anyone ever considered trying to tap the burning and increasingly irrational hatred of Corbynistas for SKS as a renewable heat source?
    Why not burn the 32k labour voters of West Lancashire in 2017 but not the 14k Tories who voted for SKS
  • SandpitSandpit Posts: 54,509
    edited February 2023

    Sandpit said:

    rcs1000 said:

    I'm beginning to wonder if George Santos is actually a Democrat plant:

    https://www.politico.com/news/2023/02/09/santos-charged-theft-2017-dog-breeders-00082091

    Well they sure as hell didn’t do much research on him before the election.
    Do you think he was nominated by the same guy who did Jared O'Mara?
    I always try and avoid the more hyperbolic descriptions given to politicians - although I did have quite a bit to say about Corbyn being the leader of the Labour Party - I genuinely think that most of them have good, if misplaced, intentions, and like the concept of Parliamentary language that refers to elected Members as honourable people.

    But then occasionally, someone like Santos or O’Mara makes it through, and I have to reconsider…
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,308

    ydoethur said:

    West Lancashire Highest ever percentage for Labour

    "Best result ever" say SKS fans.

    At the same time Labour received the f"ewest votes ever" in the Comstituency.

    Of course mostly down to the lowest turnout ever as often happens in a by election.

    My view is those who are shouting BEST EVER like my own MP are still missing the lack of enthusiasm for SKS but undoubted visceral hatred of the Tories may outweigh that.

    GE 2024 lowest ever turnout??

    Has anyone ever considered trying to tap the burning and increasingly irrational hatred of Corbynistas for SKS as a renewable heat source?
    Why not burn the 32k labour voters of West Lancashire in 2017 but not the 14k Tories who voted for SKS
    Okaaaaay...that's actually slightly beyond irrational.
  • SandpitSandpit Posts: 54,509
    Mortimer said:

    The Lancashire result is appalling for the Tory leadership.

    Hunt and Sunak to go after May looking increasingly likely to me. I suspect Johnson will be back.

    Not sure that May will be too interested any more. She’s happy on the back benches.
  • bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 22,649

    Heathener said:

    Foxy said:

    Lancashire, election forecast:

    Britain Elects forecast was quite accurate in Chester I recall. This is their prediction for tonight in West Lancs. Sounds about right to me.

    LAB: 63% (+11)
    CON: 26% (-10)
    REF: 5% (+5)
    GRN: 4% (+2)
    LDEM: 3% (-2)

    via Britain Predicts
    sotn.newstatesman.com/2023/02/conser…

    Turns out to have been a very accurate prediction:

    Result

    LAB: 62.3% (+10.2)
    CON: 25.4% (-10.9)
    REF: 4.4% (+0.1)
    LDEM: 4.1% (-0.8)
    GRN: 2.9% (+0.5)
    MRLP: 0.9% (+0.9)

    Labour HOLD.

    This is based on the same MRP that has 138 Tory MPs after the next GE and 424 Labour.

    https://sotn.newstatesman.com/2022/11/britain-predicts-who-would-win-election-held-today
    "You know, it really IS an appalling result for the tories. A rock solid safe Labour seat with a massive 'meh' factor and Labour still increased their share to higher than they got in the 1997 Tony Blair-inspired landslide."



    Calm down, you sound like the 1992 Sheffield Rally. Caution should be applied.

    Labour vote up from 59% in 2017 to 62% last night.
  • OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 33,401
    Good morning all!

    Johnson has still to get past the committee of privileges. I suspect that will be the end of his political career.
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 52,482
    Jonathan said:

    darkage said:

    Both Johnson and Truss have an eye to the battle for the soul of the Conservative Party that will surely follow an election loss.

    Sunak is oddly disconnected from it in a way. He will trudge on to defeat with the only realistic strategy in the circumstances of "don't scare the horses" economic credibility to avoid making the situation worse, coupled with some tired old sh1te about small boats and Brexit dividends to shore up the core. But it is hard to believe that's a strategy for turning round the supertanker, just running it aground at slightly lower speed to limit the damage.

    I think Johnson and Truss are aware of that and are happy enough for Sunak to take on what is a fool's errand. They may talk the talk, but I doubt they seriously believe the next election can be salvaged - a longer game is at play.

    What is most absurd about the Conservative party is that Truss has standing in it at all. She is hated and ridiculed by voters. So why does she have this platform?
    She is hated and ridiculed by members.

    She is also hated and ridiculed by MPs.

    The only reason not to stand down at the next election is the brass neck that led her to think she would be a great Prime Minister first time around. She gets to perform that trick exactly once.

    The reason Boris has not yet stood down is that as an MP he can better play the Ukraine card. Which he sees as a route to making squillions.

    Sunak doesn't need to remotely worry about either of them.
    Alas, I suspect you remain detached from a large part of your party. I remember how certain you were that Penny Mordaunt would be leader, right up until the point she was destroyed by her own side.
    I was - and remain of the view - that Penny Mordaunt was the best Conservative leader to have fought the next election.

    That the Daily Mail went in with both feet - presumably because of some bat-shit notion that Boris could yet come back as leader - has much to answer for.

  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 28,319
    ydoethur said:

    West Lancashire Highest ever percentage for Labour

    "Best result ever" say SKS fans.

    At the same time Labour received the f"ewest votes ever" in the Comstituency.

    Of course mostly down to the lowest turnout ever as often happens in a by election.

    My view is those who are shouting BEST EVER like my own MP are still missing the lack of enthusiasm for SKS but undoubted visceral hatred of the Tories may outweigh that.

    GE 2024 lowest ever turnout??

    Has anyone ever considered trying to tap the burning and increasingly irrational hatred of Corbynistas for SKS as a renewable heat source?
    Johnsonian Corbynistas please.
  • SandpitSandpit Posts: 54,509

    DavidL said:

    dixiedean said:

    Recession avoided.
    No growth in final quarter.

    But no shrinkage either. As I said a week or so ago the long recession forecast was too pessimistic. We are going to be broadly flat with some small pick up at the end as inflation falls boost spending power again.
    Trouble is that it's going to feel like a recession. Even now, tend growth is 1.5% or so (isn't it?), so the vibe is closer to "bad" rather than "normal", let alone "good".

    As with Norma Lamont's Green Shoots, Conservatives saying "we're not actually in recession" may well just annoy the public even more.
    There’s a good chance of inflation actually going negative later in the year, as last year’s price rises work their way out of the numbers. Energy bills in particular might fall substantially for many people, which will feel like a pay rise after a difficult winter.
  • Sandpit said:

    Sandpit said:

    rcs1000 said:

    I'm beginning to wonder if George Santos is actually a Democrat plant:

    https://www.politico.com/news/2023/02/09/santos-charged-theft-2017-dog-breeders-00082091

    Well they sure as hell didn’t do much research on him before the election.
    Do you think he was nominated by the same guy who did Jared O'Mara?
    I always try and avoid the more hyperbolic descriptions given to politicians - although I did have quite a bit to say about Corbyn being the leader of the Labour Party - I genuinely think that most of them have good, if misplaced, intentions, and like the concept of Parliamentary language that refers to elected Members as honourable people.

    But then occasionally, someone like Santos or O’Mara makes it through, and I have to reconsider…
    I'd like to meet the guy who put O'Mara's name forward and hear what he has to say for himself. In my book, he's more culpable than O'Mara himself who is plainly a deeply troubled individual.
  • Any thoughts on why the UK and Russia are doing so badly?

    UK and Russia are currently the only two G20 economies below their pre-pandemic output level.



    https://twitter.com/shjfrench/status/1623949191759233028/photo/1
  • BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 34,637
    Fishing said:

    ydoethur said:

    ydoethur said:

    Interesting that the threader only mentions two former PMs. There is a third still around.

    Major? No he's retired.
    Thatcher? No, she's six feet under.

    Oh, you're thinking of big necklace lady, aren't you? Whilst she is clearly the best of the bunch, chances of her coming back are approximately zero.

    That would be to admit that the sugar frenzy of the last few years was a mistake, and the current Conservative generation can never do that.
    Thatcher six feet under would still be a better PM than Truss.

    As the years go by and we get one failed premiership after another it makes Mrs Thatcher's achievements seem more and more impressive.

    She was undoubtedly one of the greatest figures the democratic world has ever produced.
    Brilliant irony there, Fishing. Made me chortle ;-)
  • I see Suella Braverman has been captured by liberalist civil servants at the Home Office.

    Suella Braverman has watered down Rishi Sunak’s pledge to “stop the boats” after committing only to a “dramatic reduction” in the number of migrants crossing the Channel.

    The home secretary refused to give a timeframe for achieving the target, one of the government’s five priorities.


    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/suella-braverman-rows-back-on-boat-pledge-zjmgs9fk7
  • bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 22,649
    ydoethur said:

    ydoethur said:

    West Lancashire Highest ever percentage for Labour

    "Best result ever" say SKS fans.

    At the same time Labour received the f"ewest votes ever" in the Comstituency.

    Of course mostly down to the lowest turnout ever as often happens in a by election.

    My view is those who are shouting BEST EVER like my own MP are still missing the lack of enthusiasm for SKS but undoubted visceral hatred of the Tories may outweigh that.

    GE 2024 lowest ever turnout??

    Has anyone ever considered trying to tap the burning and increasingly irrational hatred of Corbynistas for SKS as a renewable heat source?
    Why not burn the 32k labour voters of West Lancashire in 2017 but not the 14k Tories who voted for SKS
    Okaaaaay...that's actually slightly beyond irrational.
    Why did 18k Labour voters who turned out for the "worst ever" leader stay at home?

    It was a by election and people can't be arsed I presume.
  • A nice headline for Liz Truss and her supporters.

    Liz Truss budget blamed as repossessions double

    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/liz-truss-budget-blamed-as-repossessions-double-zjnmqr0jn
  • bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 22,649

    Good morning all!

    Johnson has still to get past the committee of privileges. I suspect that will be the end of his political career.

    When is it?
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 122,664
    edited February 2023
    It is a myth to say the Tories were doing much better before the May 2019 local elections than now. Indeed the final Yougov before the May 2019 local elections had the Tories on just 29% and the Tories got just 28%.

    Given the latest Yougov puts the Tories on 24%, although the Tories may see losses, especially to Labour, the swing and number of seats and councils lost is likely to be much lower than in 2019 when the Tories lost 7% voteshare compared to the local elections in 2015 where they got 35%, over 1000 councillors and 44 councils
    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_polling_for_the_2019_United_Kingdom_general_election

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_polling_for_the_next_United_Kingdom_general_election#Graphical_summary
  • OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 33,401

    Good morning all!

    Johnson has still to get past the committee of privileges. I suspect that will be the end of his political career.

    When is it?
    Good question; why is it being delayed?
  • Good morning all!

    Johnson has still to get past the committee of privileges. I suspect that will be the end of his political career.

    When is it?
    Good question; why is it being delayed?
    Because


  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 48,552

    Jonathan said:

    darkage said:

    Both Johnson and Truss have an eye to the battle for the soul of the Conservative Party that will surely follow an election loss.

    Sunak is oddly disconnected from it in a way. He will trudge on to defeat with the only realistic strategy in the circumstances of "don't scare the horses" economic credibility to avoid making the situation worse, coupled with some tired old sh1te about small boats and Brexit dividends to shore up the core. But it is hard to believe that's a strategy for turning round the supertanker, just running it aground at slightly lower speed to limit the damage.

    I think Johnson and Truss are aware of that and are happy enough for Sunak to take on what is a fool's errand. They may talk the talk, but I doubt they seriously believe the next election can be salvaged - a longer game is at play.

    What is most absurd about the Conservative party is that Truss has standing in it at all. She is hated and ridiculed by voters. So why does she have this platform?
    She is hated and ridiculed by members.

    She is also hated and ridiculed by MPs.

    The only reason not to stand down at the next election is the brass neck that led her to think she would be a great Prime Minister first time around. She gets to perform that trick exactly once.

    The reason Boris has not yet stood down is that as an MP he can better play the Ukraine card. Which he sees as a route to making squillions.

    Sunak doesn't need to remotely worry about either of them.
    Alas, I suspect you remain detached from a large part of your party. I remember how certain you were that Penny Mordaunt would be leader, right up until the point she was destroyed by her own side.
    I was - and remain of the view - that Penny Mordaunt was the best Conservative leader to have fought the next election.

    That the Daily Mail went in with both feet - presumably because of some bat-shit notion that Boris could yet come back as leader - has much to answer for.

    I rather liked Penny, but she was dreadful in the contest.

    Useless as he is, Sunak was actually the best of a very poor field in last summers contest. One reason that the nation is such a mess is that Brexit has hollowed out what little talent there was in the party.
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 28,319

    ydoethur said:

    ydoethur said:

    West Lancashire Highest ever percentage for Labour

    "Best result ever" say SKS fans.

    At the same time Labour received the f"ewest votes ever" in the Comstituency.

    Of course mostly down to the lowest turnout ever as often happens in a by election.

    My view is those who are shouting BEST EVER like my own MP are still missing the lack of enthusiasm for SKS but undoubted visceral hatred of the Tories may outweigh that.

    GE 2024 lowest ever turnout??

    Has anyone ever considered trying to tap the burning and increasingly irrational hatred of Corbynistas for SKS as a renewable heat source?
    Why not burn the 32k labour voters of West Lancashire in 2017 but not the 14k Tories who voted for SKS
    Okaaaaay...that's actually slightly beyond irrational.
    Why did 18k Labour voters who turned out for the "worst ever" leader stay at home?

    It was a by election and people can't be arsed I presume.
    You are being more than disingenuous to the hapless Starmer. You keep quoting peak Corbyn by ignoring 2019, and by your own admission, last night the hopeless Starmer was 3% ahead of 2017 Corbyn, which bearing in mind Starmer's abject uselessness must suggest Corbyn is even more abjectly useless.

    On a positive note, the economy is not in recession. Yay!
  • JonathanJonathan Posts: 21,605

    ydoethur said:

    ydoethur said:

    West Lancashire Highest ever percentage for Labour

    "Best result ever" say SKS fans.

    At the same time Labour received the f"ewest votes ever" in the Comstituency.

    Of course mostly down to the lowest turnout ever as often happens in a by election.

    My view is those who are shouting BEST EVER like my own MP are still missing the lack of enthusiasm for SKS but undoubted visceral hatred of the Tories may outweigh that.

    GE 2024 lowest ever turnout??

    Has anyone ever considered trying to tap the burning and increasingly irrational hatred of Corbynistas for SKS as a renewable heat source?
    Why not burn the 32k labour voters of West Lancashire in 2017 but not the 14k Tories who voted for SKS
    Okaaaaay...that's actually slightly beyond irrational.
    Why did 18k Labour voters who turned out for the "worst ever" leader stay at home?

    It was a by election and people can't be arsed I presume.
    You are being more than disingenuous to the hapless Starmer. You keep quoting peak Corbyn by ignoring 2019, and by your own admission, last night the hopeless Starmer was 3% ahead of 2017 Corbyn, which bearing in mind Starmer's abject uselessness must suggest Corbyn is even more abjectly useless.

    On a positive note, the economy is not in recession. Yay!
    It's what's currently keeping the Tory vote share up.
  • boulayboulay Posts: 5,450

    I see Suella Braverman has been captured by liberalist civil servants at the Home Office.

    Suella Braverman has watered down Rishi Sunak’s pledge to “stop the boats” after committing only to a “dramatic reduction” in the number of migrants crossing the Channel.

    The home secretary refused to give a timeframe for achieving the target, one of the government’s five priorities.


    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/suella-braverman-rows-back-on-boat-pledge-zjmgs9fk7

    If someone was cynical then they might think that this could be the reason Sunak kept her as Home Secretary. He probably realised (or someone close to him did) that “stopping the boats” isn’t that easy but better to pay lip service to it.

    If he had put in place someone from the non headbanger wing then the headbangers would be going nuts and claiming that if someone “tough” like Suella had been HS then this would be solved.

    By ensuring that someone who lives without a heart or soul has made the decision/come to that conclusion he has political cover on his right wing.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 122,664
    edited February 2023

    Heathener said:

    Foxy said:

    Lancashire, election forecast:

    Britain Elects forecast was quite accurate in Chester I recall. This is their prediction for tonight in West Lancs. Sounds about right to me.

    LAB: 63% (+11)
    CON: 26% (-10)
    REF: 5% (+5)
    GRN: 4% (+2)
    LDEM: 3% (-2)

    via Britain Predicts
    sotn.newstatesman.com/2023/02/conser…

    Turns out to have been a very accurate prediction:

    Result

    LAB: 62.3% (+10.2)
    CON: 25.4% (-10.9)
    REF: 4.4% (+0.1)
    LDEM: 4.1% (-0.8)
    GRN: 2.9% (+0.5)
    MRLP: 0.9% (+0.9)

    Labour HOLD.

    This is based on the same MRP that has 138 Tory MPs after the next GE and 424 Labour.

    https://sotn.newstatesman.com/2022/11/britain-predicts-who-would-win-election-held-today
    "You know, it really IS an appalling result for the tories. A rock solid safe Labour seat with a massive 'meh' factor and Labour still increased their share to higher than they got in the 1997 Tony Blair-inspired landslide."

    'Calm down, you sound like the 1992 Sheffield Rally. Caution should be applied.

    Labour vote up from 59% in 2017 to 62% last night.'

    The 10.5% swing in West Lancashire last night if repeated nationally would give a hung parliament, not a Labour majority, with the Tories still on 243 seats

    https://www.electoralcalculus.co.uk/fcgi-bin/usercode.py?scotcontrol=Y&CON=34.2&LAB=43.5&LIB=11&Reform=2&Green=2&UKIP=&TVCON=&TVLAB=&TVLIB=&TVReform=&TVGreen=&TVUKIP=&SCOTCON=18.5&SCOTLAB=29.5&SCOTLIB=6.5&SCOTReform=0&SCOTGreen=0&SCOTUKIP=&SCOTNAT=43&display=AllChanged&regorseat=(none)&boundary=2019nbbase
  • OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 33,401
    Foxy said:

    Jonathan said:

    darkage said:

    Both Johnson and Truss have an eye to the battle for the soul of the Conservative Party that will surely follow an election loss.

    Sunak is oddly disconnected from it in a way. He will trudge on to defeat with the only realistic strategy in the circumstances of "don't scare the horses" economic credibility to avoid making the situation worse, coupled with some tired old sh1te about small boats and Brexit dividends to shore up the core. But it is hard to believe that's a strategy for turning round the supertanker, just running it aground at slightly lower speed to limit the damage.

    I think Johnson and Truss are aware of that and are happy enough for Sunak to take on what is a fool's errand. They may talk the talk, but I doubt they seriously believe the next election can be salvaged - a longer game is at play.

    What is most absurd about the Conservative party is that Truss has standing in it at all. She is hated and ridiculed by voters. So why does she have this platform?
    She is hated and ridiculed by members.

    She is also hated and ridiculed by MPs.

    The only reason not to stand down at the next election is the brass neck that led her to think she would be a great Prime Minister first time around. She gets to perform that trick exactly once.

    The reason Boris has not yet stood down is that as an MP he can better play the Ukraine card. Which he sees as a route to making squillions.

    Sunak doesn't need to remotely worry about either of them.
    Alas, I suspect you remain detached from a large part of your party. I remember how certain you were that Penny Mordaunt would be leader, right up until the point she was destroyed by her own side.
    I was - and remain of the view - that Penny Mordaunt was the best Conservative leader to have fought the next election.

    That the Daily Mail went in with both feet - presumably because of some bat-shit notion that Boris could yet come back as leader - has much to answer for.

    I rather liked Penny, but she was dreadful in the contest.

    Useless as he is, Sunak was actually the best of a very poor field in last summers contest. One reason that the nation is such a mess is that Brexit has hollowed out what little talent there was in the party.
    Johnson’s election as party leader and subsequent purge is at least partly responsible for the loss of talent.
  • bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 22,649

    ydoethur said:

    ydoethur said:

    West Lancashire Highest ever percentage for Labour

    "Best result ever" say SKS fans.

    At the same time Labour received the f"ewest votes ever" in the Comstituency.

    Of course mostly down to the lowest turnout ever as often happens in a by election.

    My view is those who are shouting BEST EVER like my own MP are still missing the lack of enthusiasm for SKS but undoubted visceral hatred of the Tories may outweigh that.

    GE 2024 lowest ever turnout??

    Has anyone ever considered trying to tap the burning and increasingly irrational hatred of Corbynistas for SKS as a renewable heat source?
    Why not burn the 32k labour voters of West Lancashire in 2017 but not the 14k Tories who voted for SKS
    Okaaaaay...that's actually slightly beyond irrational.
    Why did 18k Labour voters who turned out for the "worst ever" leader stay at home?

    It was a by election and people can't be arsed I presume.
    You are being more than disingenuous to the hapless Starmer. You keep quoting peak Corbyn by ignoring 2019, and by your own admission, last night the hopeless Starmer was 3% ahead of 2017 Corbyn, which bearing in mind Starmer's abject uselessness must suggest Corbyn is even more abjectly useless.

    On a positive note, the economy is not in recession. Yay!
    It is fact, though, that a lot more people voted Labour under their worst ever leader (even in 2019) than could be arsed to vote for SKS yesterday!!
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 122,664
    Mortimer said:

    The Lancashire result is appalling for the Tory leadership.

    Hunt and Sunak to go after May looking increasingly likely to me. I suspect Johnson will be back.

    It wasn't appalling at all, the swing Labour got last night wouldn't even give Starmer a majority.

    It was a bad result yes but certainly wasn't an appalling one and indeed an improvement on the swings to LAB Truss was getting in polls and even better for Rishi than some of the swings against Boris in by elections
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 28,319
    Foxy said:

    Jonathan said:

    darkage said:

    Both Johnson and Truss have an eye to the battle for the soul of the Conservative Party that will surely follow an election loss.

    Sunak is oddly disconnected from it in a way. He will trudge on to defeat with the only realistic strategy in the circumstances of "don't scare the horses" economic credibility to avoid making the situation worse, coupled with some tired old sh1te about small boats and Brexit dividends to shore up the core. But it is hard to believe that's a strategy for turning round the supertanker, just running it aground at slightly lower speed to limit the damage.

    I think Johnson and Truss are aware of that and are happy enough for Sunak to take on what is a fool's errand. They may talk the talk, but I doubt they seriously believe the next election can be salvaged - a longer game is at play.

    What is most absurd about the Conservative party is that Truss has standing in it at all. She is hated and ridiculed by voters. So why does she have this platform?
    She is hated and ridiculed by members.

    She is also hated and ridiculed by MPs.

    The only reason not to stand down at the next election is the brass neck that led her to think she would be a great Prime Minister first time around. She gets to perform that trick exactly once.

    The reason Boris has not yet stood down is that as an MP he can better play the Ukraine card. Which he sees as a route to making squillions.

    Sunak doesn't need to remotely worry about either of them.
    Alas, I suspect you remain detached from a large part of your party. I remember how certain you were that Penny Mordaunt would be leader, right up until the point she was destroyed by her own side.
    I was - and remain of the view - that Penny Mordaunt was the best Conservative leader to have fought the next election.

    That the Daily Mail went in with both feet - presumably because of some bat-shit notion that Boris could yet come back as leader - has much to answer for.

    I rather liked Penny, but she was dreadful in the contest.

    Useless as he is, Sunak was actually the best of a very poor field in last summers contest. One reason that the nation is such a mess is that Brexit has hollowed out what little talent there was in the party.
    I am not sure she is the red hot political genius that she and @MarqueeMark give her credit for.

    The "Goodness me, I'm a great one- nation Tory, I've organised and opened two new food banks in Cosham" is not necessarily the political win it might first appear, but certainly she is less dreadful than most of the alternative runners and riders.
  • Pro_RataPro_Rata Posts: 5,280
    West Lancashire: Slightly underbaked for Labour to my eyes, probably a little less good than either Stretford or Chester, but still not bad.

    Main difference in the slightly lower swing is that the Con vote share fall this time is only marginally bigger than the Labour vote share gain (<10%) where as in Chester Con lost 40% vote share more than Labour gained.

    If not exactly a recovery, signs of Conservatives at least stemming the blood loss?
  • Sandpit said:

    Sandpit said:

    rcs1000 said:

    I'm beginning to wonder if George Santos is actually a Democrat plant:

    https://www.politico.com/news/2023/02/09/santos-charged-theft-2017-dog-breeders-00082091

    Well they sure as hell didn’t do much research on him before the election.
    Do you think he was nominated by the same guy who did Jared O'Mara?
    I always try and avoid the more hyperbolic descriptions given to politicians - although I did have quite a bit to say about Corbyn being the leader of the Labour Party - I genuinely think that most of them have good, if misplaced, intentions, and like the concept of Parliamentary language that refers to elected Members as honourable people.

    But then occasionally, someone like Santos or O’Mara makes it through, and I have to reconsider…
    I'd like to meet the guy who put O'Mara's name forward and hear what he has to say for himself. In my book, he's more culpable than O'Mara himself who is plainly a deeply troubled individual.
    It's all Theresa May's fault.

    The rumour I have heard is that Hallam Labour Party believed Mrs May when she said she wouldn't hold a snap election.

    In early 2017 I speculated on here that it was more likely the Tories take Hallam than Labour did.
  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 50,048
    Sandpit said:

    DavidL said:

    dixiedean said:

    Recession avoided.
    No growth in final quarter.

    But no shrinkage either. As I said a week or so ago the long recession forecast was too pessimistic. We are going to be broadly flat with some small pick up at the end as inflation falls boost spending power again.
    Trouble is that it's going to feel like a recession. Even now, tend growth is 1.5% or so (isn't it?), so the vibe is closer to "bad" rather than "normal", let alone "good".

    As with Norma Lamont's Green Shoots, Conservatives saying "we're not actually in recession" may well just annoy the public even more.
    There’s a good chance of inflation actually going negative later in the year, as last year’s price rises work their way out of the numbers. Energy bills in particular might fall substantially for many people, which will feel like a pay rise after a difficult winter.
    Inflation is rarely so easily defeated. Yes, the primary cause is (largely) gone. But then you have the secondary and tertiary and so effects - wage rises have a momentum. And the price rises they cause.

    Think of it as a complex series of waves interacting.
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 28,319
    HYUFD said:

    Mortimer said:

    The Lancashire result is appalling for the Tory leadership.

    Hunt and Sunak to go after May looking increasingly likely to me. I suspect Johnson will be back.

    It wasn't appalling at all, the swing Labour got last night wouldn't even give Starmer a majority.

    It was a bad result yes but certainly wasn't an appalling one and indeed an improvement on the swings to LAB Truss was getting in polls and even better for Rishi than some of the swings against Boris in by elections
    UNS, especially in a by election is not necessarily your friend.
  • OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 33,401
    Deleted
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 122,664

    Sandpit said:

    Sandpit said:

    rcs1000 said:

    I'm beginning to wonder if George Santos is actually a Democrat plant:

    https://www.politico.com/news/2023/02/09/santos-charged-theft-2017-dog-breeders-00082091

    Well they sure as hell didn’t do much research on him before the election.
    Do you think he was nominated by the same guy who did Jared O'Mara?
    I always try and avoid the more hyperbolic descriptions given to politicians - although I did have quite a bit to say about Corbyn being the leader of the Labour Party - I genuinely think that most of them have good, if misplaced, intentions, and like the concept of Parliamentary language that refers to elected Members as honourable people.

    But then occasionally, someone like Santos or O’Mara makes it through, and I have to reconsider…
    I'd like to meet the guy who put O'Mara's name forward and hear what he has to say for himself. In my book, he's more culpable than O'Mara himself who is plainly a deeply troubled individual.
    It's all Theresa May's fault.

    The rumour I have heard is that Hallam Labour Party believed Mrs May when she said she wouldn't hold a snap election.

    In early 2017 I speculated on here that it was more likely the Tories take Hallam than Labour did.
    Hallam is a Remain voting seat full of academics. The Tories never had a chance their even in early 2017, it was always going to be a LD v Labour battle now
  • LostPasswordLostPassword Posts: 18,273
    edited February 2023
    HYUFD said:
    That's actually a tiny wafer-thin Labour majority given Sinn Fein abstentionism. But in general you'd expect the opposition to underperform by-election swings.
  • OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 33,401
    Another deleted
This discussion has been closed.