Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

DefSec Wallace now firm favourite for next PM – politicalbetting.com

1235711

Comments

  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 42,839
    ydoethur said:

    algarkirk said:

    geoffw said:

    If the Tories want a principled leader who understands politics and is not tarnished by association with the Borisian shambles they need look no further than Steve Baker. There, I've said it.

    Why do I keep feeling I shall have to emigrate to North Korea to be sure of having someone sensible in charge?

    The mind boggles at the thought of having this fundamentalist pre Victorian intensely neurotic unstable idealist anywhere near the levers of power.
    I suggest going easier on the booze if you do feel that way. Whatever their faults, the Conservatives are not the Communist Party of North Korea.
    No. The NKs don't look like an escapee from a Whitby cosplay weekend.
  • Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 51,821
    ydoethur said:

    algarkirk said:

    geoffw said:

    If the Tories want a principled leader who understands politics and is not tarnished by association with the Borisian shambles they need look no further than Steve Baker. There, I've said it.

    Why do I keep feeling I shall have to emigrate to North Korea to be sure of having someone sensible in charge?

    The mind boggles at the thought of having this fundamentalist pre Victorian intensely neurotic unstable idealist anywhere near the levers of power.
    I suggest going easier on the booze if you do feel that way. Whatever their faults, the Conservatives are not the Communist Party of North Korea.
    They both believe in hereditary monarchy?
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 51,636
    Foxy said:

    It's not quite Montenegro, but after a long walk and having chased a few hares*, there is a field of bullocks between the stile and the pub...

    Lovely weather for a staycation though.

    *The dog, not me.

    Is your dog a fox?
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,390

    ydoethur said:

    algarkirk said:

    geoffw said:

    If the Tories want a principled leader who understands politics and is not tarnished by association with the Borisian shambles they need look no further than Steve Baker. There, I've said it.

    Why do I keep feeling I shall have to emigrate to North Korea to be sure of having someone sensible in charge?

    The mind boggles at the thought of having this fundamentalist pre Victorian intensely neurotic unstable idealist anywhere near the levers of power.
    I suggest going easier on the booze if you do feel that way. Whatever their faults, the Conservatives are not the Communist Party of North Korea.
    They both believe in hereditary monarchy?
    Give @TSE time to rejoin...
  • BartholomewRobertsBartholomewRoberts Posts: 21,971
    edited July 2022
    Carnyx said:

    Carnyx said:

    Carnyx said:

    Carnyx said:

    Andy_JS said:

    "@MetroUK

    The Benny Hill theme tune has been blasted outside Parliament live on TV ahead of Boris Johnson's resignation – and it turns out Hugh Grant was behind it"

    What price Hugh Grant playing Boris in a biopic (and in a wig)?
    Isn't he, er, a little petit?

    Round the waist, I mean.
    Yes, he would need to put on a good deal of muscle to be realistic in the role.
    Yep, really get with the Charles Atlas springy thing. Or just get him to do a remake of the Frank Launder film Wee Geordie. All the muscle needed to do a Boris!
    Charles Atlas?

    Would need less korma and more Tim Curry.
    CA is this chap here. Obvs the guru for your hero Boris. Solid muscle, all the way round the 44" waist.

    https://reprobatepress.com/2018/06/18/dynamic-tension-the-charles-atlas-story/
    I know that but dynamic tension must be hard work. Such strenuous living I just don't understand.
    BTW the Tim Curry ref escapes me?
    He was Frank-N-Furter. He sang the Charles Atlas Song.

    Boris would have more chance of a "Charles Atlas" body by "making a man" Frank-N-Furter style than by exercise.
  • Pro_RataPro_Rata Posts: 5,288
    algarkirk said:

    Pro_Rata said:

    Do we think Barclay will run? Done lots of mid ranking jobs without making a particular meds or indeed doing anything in particular, seems affable, well.presentef, very loyal to various PMs. Brexity. Like a male Mordaumt, a lot of projection could be done onto him.

    If he went for it, could be the closest facsimile to a Major type candidate?

    I don't think Barclay would make a John Major tribute band in an Accrington pub on a wet Thursday.

    If he ran, how would you tell? Can you be sure he actually exists. Could he be a Tibetan tulpa or thought form?

    Pithy, but sort of echoes my point.

    More loyal than Nick Palmer on Mogadon, about third most popular on the ConHome survey, a majority of 56% (merits a Ceefax style: FIFTY-SIX), chief sec to the Treasury, the minister in place when Brexit got done..

    Who is he? Exactly.
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 42,839

    Foxy said:

    It's not quite Montenegro, but after a long walk and having chased a few hares*, there is a field of bullocks between the stile and the pub...

    Lovely weather for a staycation though.

    *The dog, not me.

    Is your dog a fox?
    No, that's Foxy. Obviously.
  • FairlieredFairliered Posts: 4,931
    JRM for PM for the shits and giggles.

    On second thoughts, that would be all shits and no giggles.
  • Pro_RataPro_Rata Posts: 5,288
    algarkirk said:

    Pro_Rata said:

    Do we think Barclay will run? Done lots of mid ranking jobs without making a particular meds or indeed doing anything in particular, seems affable, well.presentef, very loyal to various PMs. Brexity. Like a male Mordaumt, a lot of projection could be done onto him.

    If he went for it, could be the closest facsimile to a Major type candidate?

    I don't think Barclay would make a John Major tribute band in an Accrington pub on a wet Thursday.

    If he ran, how would you tell? Can you be sure he actually exists. Could he be a Tibetan tulpa or thought form?

    Pithy, but sort of echoes my point.

    More loyal than Nick Palmer on Mogadon, about third most popular on the ConHome survey, a majority of 56% (merits a Ceefax style: FIFTY-SIX), chief sec to the Treasury, the minister in place when Brexit got done..

    Who is he? Exactly.
  • Beibheirli_CBeibheirli_C Posts: 8,163
    edited July 2022
    Carnyx said:

    Carnyx said:

    Carnyx said:

    Carnyx said:

    Andy_JS said:

    "@MetroUK

    The Benny Hill theme tune has been blasted outside Parliament live on TV ahead of Boris Johnson's resignation – and it turns out Hugh Grant was behind it"

    What price Hugh Grant playing Boris in a biopic (and in a wig)?
    Isn't he, er, a little petit?

    Round the waist, I mean.
    Yes, he would need to put on a good deal of muscle to be realistic in the role.
    Yep, really get with the Charles Atlas springy thing. Or just get him to do a remake of the Frank Launder film Wee Geordie. All the muscle needed to do a Boris!
    Charles Atlas?

    Would need less korma and more Tim Curry.
    CA is this chap here. Obvs the guru for your hero Boris. Solid muscle, all the way round the 44" waist.

    https://reprobatepress.com/2018/06/18/dynamic-tension-the-charles-atlas-story/
    I know that but dynamic tension must be hard work. Such strenuous living I just don't understand.
    BTW the Tim Curry ref escapes me?
    Rocky Horror Picture Show

    https://youtu.be/h3kkbZU-JtY
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 48,653
    Carnyx said:

    Carnyx said:

    Carnyx said:

    Carnyx said:

    Andy_JS said:

    "@MetroUK

    The Benny Hill theme tune has been blasted outside Parliament live on TV ahead of Boris Johnson's resignation – and it turns out Hugh Grant was behind it"

    What price Hugh Grant playing Boris in a biopic (and in a wig)?
    Isn't he, er, a little petit?

    Round the waist, I mean.
    Yes, he would need to put on a good deal of muscle to be realistic in the role.
    Yep, really get with the Charles Atlas springy thing. Or just get him to do a remake of the Frank Launder film Wee Geordie. All the muscle needed to do a Boris!
    Charles Atlas?

    Would need less korma and more Tim Curry.
    CA is this chap here. Obvs the guru for your hero Boris. Solid muscle, all the way round the 44" waist.

    https://reprobatepress.com/2018/06/18/dynamic-tension-the-charles-atlas-story/
    I know that but dynamic tension must be hard work. Such strenuous living I just don't understand.
    BTW the Tim Curry ref escapes me?
    An early aficionado of Trans propaganda.
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 42,839

    Carnyx said:

    Carnyx said:

    Carnyx said:

    Carnyx said:

    Andy_JS said:

    "@MetroUK

    The Benny Hill theme tune has been blasted outside Parliament live on TV ahead of Boris Johnson's resignation – and it turns out Hugh Grant was behind it"

    What price Hugh Grant playing Boris in a biopic (and in a wig)?
    Isn't he, er, a little petit?

    Round the waist, I mean.
    Yes, he would need to put on a good deal of muscle to be realistic in the role.
    Yep, really get with the Charles Atlas springy thing. Or just get him to do a remake of the Frank Launder film Wee Geordie. All the muscle needed to do a Boris!
    Charles Atlas?

    Would need less korma and more Tim Curry.
    CA is this chap here. Obvs the guru for your hero Boris. Solid muscle, all the way round the 44" waist.

    https://reprobatepress.com/2018/06/18/dynamic-tension-the-charles-atlas-story/
    I know that but dynamic tension must be hard work. Such strenuous living I just don't understand.
    BTW the Tim Curry ref escapes me?
    He was Frank-N-Furter. He sang the Charles Atlas Song.
    Ah! Thank you.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 122,926
    Hard to see Wallace not moving to No 10 now, if he wins the MPs vote he may even be elected Tory leader and become PM before the membership vote. For as Yougov shows he is comfortably ahead with the membership anyway.

    The 1922 cttee will announce the leadership timetable next week
  • XtrainXtrain Posts: 341
    It's Penny for me.
  • FairlieredFairliered Posts: 4,931
    ydoethur said:

    geoffw said:

    ydoethur said:

    geoffw said:

    If the Tories want a principled leader who understands politics and is not tarnished by association with the Borisian shambles they need look no further than Steve Baker. There, I've said it.

    He's even more nailed on to lose his seat than Boris Johnson.
    But at least Baker would know whether something was oven ready.
    Keep 'em coming, thirteen to the dozen.

    I won't rise to that.
    That’s the yeast funny pun I’ve heard today.
  • Alphabet_SoupAlphabet_Soup Posts: 3,250
    There have been 3024 comments since 04:30 today.

    If only there was a way for OGH to charge 10p a shot.
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 48,653

    Foxy said:

    It's not quite Montenegro, but after a long walk and having chased a few hares*, there is a field of bullocks between the stile and the pub...

    Lovely weather for a staycation though.

    *The dog, not me.

    Is your dog a fox?
    What else?

    No he is a Portuguese Podengo, but he really does look like a fox.
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 42,839

    ydoethur said:

    geoffw said:

    ydoethur said:

    geoffw said:

    If the Tories want a principled leader who understands politics and is not tarnished by association with the Borisian shambles they need look no further than Steve Baker. There, I've said it.

    He's even more nailed on to lose his seat than Boris Johnson.
    But at least Baker would know whether something was oven ready.
    Keep 'em coming, thirteen to the dozen.

    I won't rise to that.
    That’s the yeast funny pun I’ve heard today.
    It has been a rather barmy day, though.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 122,926
    geoffw said:

    If the Tories want a principled leader who understands politics and is not tarnished by association with the Borisian shambles they need look no further than Steve Baker. There, I've said it.

    Steve Baker would also be the second evangelical Christian party leader after Tim Farron and our first openly Christian evangelical PM
  • Scott_xPScott_xP Posts: 35,990
  • MISTYMISTY Posts: 1,594
    MaxPB said:

    Two days now of EUR/GBP weakening quite badly. The news that the UK will have a new government plus noises from big players in the BoE around higher rates seems to have helped sterling decouple from the Euro as it approaches parity with USD.

    There's still a near terms future where sterling recovers to something like $1.25-1.27 which takes the edge off commodity price inflation leaving us with some domestic inflation to handle.

    Have to say this Eurozone crisis may end up being worse than the last one, simply because the monetary road has run out. We may need for real German and Dutch taxpayer money to be spent buying Italian and Greek debt. I have no idea how realistic that is, I'd guess at low.

    'Brexit pound powers ahead against beleaguered euro....?' my dear fellow, that will never happen.
  • MrEdMrEd Posts: 5,578
    Scott_xP said:
    Not getting a positive response on Twitter....too Remain for the party
  • MaxPB said:

    First day without caffeine almost over, definitely got a headache but as @TOPPING predicted, I feel really good otherwise. No heartburn or indigestion at all which I'd normally be having to deal with around this time of the evening.

    Spent the day off work obviously and I've also got tomorrow and Monday off sick just to recover properly.

    My wife broke into tears a couple of times today because my mortality seems to have suddenly become very visible but she seems fine after reading about the condition and my drive to eliminate caffeine and reduce my sugar intake.

    Overall still a very sobering experience and I feel very fragile. My cousin (a doctor) pointed out that if I had known about this condition beforehand I'd have probably not been offered the Moderna vaccine and got AZ or Pfizer instead just as there's a known risk factor around heart tissue weakening with Moderna to a degree that isn't the case with AZ and Pfizer. He's recommended me a specialist to essentially see if there's any damage and how to remedy it.

    Have to say that having a daughter has made my response to this completely different to what I'd imagine would be the case if I didn't have one. I never thought that would be the case.

    Glad you're feeling OK. Look after yourself. 👍
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 42,839
    HYUFD said:

    geoffw said:

    If the Tories want a principled leader who understands politics and is not tarnished by association with the Borisian shambles they need look no further than Steve Baker. There, I've said it.

    Steve Baker would also be the second evangelical Christian party leader after Tim Farron and our first openly Christian evangelical PM
    W, E. Gladstone says 'Hallelujah!'.
  • geoffwgeoffw Posts: 8,717
     
    HYUFD said:

    geoffw said:

    If the Tories want a principled leader who understands politics and is not tarnished by association with the Borisian shambles they need look no further than Steve Baker. There, I've said it.

    Steve Baker would also be the second evangelical Christian party leader after Tim Farron and our first openly Christian evangelical PM
    It doesn't sound as if he'd duck the looming culture wars.

  • 10 By-elections today.

    Andrew Teale's usual review https://medium.com/britainelects/previewing-the-ten-council-by-elections-of-7th-july-2022-e0d6574eac4

    Hollingwood and Inkersall, Chesterfield Council - Independent defence; G, I, L
    Woughton and Fishermead, Milton Keynes Council - Labour defence; C, LD, L
    Hatfield Central, Welwyn Hatfield Council - Labour defence; C, LD, L, Abolish the BBE Television Licence
    Worthing West, West Sussex County Council - Labour defence; C, G, LD, L
    Charlwood, Mole Valley Council - Conservative defence; C, G, LD, L
    West Ewell, Epsom and Ewell Council - Residents defence; C, LD, L, Residents
    De Beauvoir, Hackney Council - Labour defence; C, G, I, LD, L, Women's Equality
    Hampstead Town, Camden Council - Labour defence; C, G, I, LD, L, National Housing Party
    Bridge and Bridge Without, City of London - Independent defence; I, I
    Walbrook, City of London - Independent defence; I, I, I, I, I


  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,863

    Andy_JS said:

    Mordaunt might win but she's pretty green.

    I think 3 months as defence secretary was as high as she went.

    Of all the candidates, the one where you can see them winning and then something going badly wrong within 12 months because of inexperience would be Penny Mordaunt.
    If I were the Conservatives I'd forget hair and gender and new and exciting and and and..

    Just focus on doing a bloody good job, and pick an experienced candidate.

    Wallace. Javid. Saj. Hunt. Maybe Tugendhat if they want to roll the dice on someone sensible.
    Javid and Saj?
  • algarkirkalgarkirk Posts: 12,497
    Heathener said:

    I'm not going to engage much in debating this leadership pageant on here. It interests me very little. The Conservatives have dug themselves into this hole and they have to sort it out.

    As a left-of-centre voter I'm glad to have seen Johnson felled and I don't fear any of the other candidates (apart from Penny). I suspect that after a honeymoon they will do far worse in the polls than Boris Johnson.

    For all his many, many, faults Boris did appeal to red wall voters. They will now be lost again to the party.

    I have generally voted Tory in GEs (not local elections) for several decades. At this moment nothing on earth would get me to do so (apart from Laura Pidcock), so I am interested in which of the possibles would possibly persuade me back. From current polling I presume there could be a few million voters who are similar in this respect. The next election will turn on their outlook.

    Of some of the possibles I currently think this about supporting the party if they were PM:

    Hunt and Tugendhat: Yes
    Mordaunt: Would incline to yes

    Wallace: Curiously vague. No idea where he stands except on Ukraine, which doesn't help or hinder. Would look carefully. less tainted by government as Ukraine gives him an excuse.

    The other front runners: Between impossible (most) and unlikely. Either useless or too tainted by being in government.


  • geoffwgeoffw Posts: 8,717
    IanB2 said:

    Andy_JS said:

    Mordaunt might win but she's pretty green.

    I think 3 months as defence secretary was as high as she went.

    Of all the candidates, the one where you can see them winning and then something going badly wrong within 12 months because of inexperience would be Penny Mordaunt.
    If I were the Conservatives I'd forget hair and gender and new and exciting and and and..

    Just focus on doing a bloody good job, and pick an experienced candidate.

    Wallace. Javid. Saj. Hunt. Maybe Tugendhat if they want to roll the dice on someone sensible.
    Javid and Saj?
    Two for the price of one.

  • boulayboulay Posts: 5,486
    Carnyx said:

    HYUFD said:

    geoffw said:

    If the Tories want a principled leader who understands politics and is not tarnished by association with the Borisian shambles they need look no further than Steve Baker. There, I've said it.

    Steve Baker would also be the second evangelical Christian party leader after Tim Farron and our first openly Christian evangelical PM
    W, E. Gladstone says 'Hallelujah!'.
    Gladstone wasn’t a proper Tory so doesn’t exist. He was Peelite and Liberal as well. Almost as unforgivable as voting for Plaid once.
  • CookieCookie Posts: 13,799
    Foxy said:

    It's not quite Montenegro, but after a long walk and having chased a few hares*, there is a field of bullocks between the stile and the pub...

    Lovely weather for a staycation though.



    *The dog, not me.

    Montenegro looks lovely. But that photo is lovelier, and makes my soul sing. A neutral observer may prefer Montenegro, but I am not a neutral observer, I am a human with a home, and that photo sings of home. Where is it?
  • GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 22,286
    HYUFD said:

    Hard to see Wallace not moving to No 10 now, if he wins the MPs vote he may even be elected Tory leader and become PM before the membership vote. For as Yougov shows he is comfortably ahead with the membership anyway.

    The 1922 cttee will announce the leadership timetable next week

    Do you think he actually wants to do it though?

    He strikes me as a man that would much prefer a quiet life?
  • Beibheirli_CBeibheirli_C Posts: 8,163

    HYUFD said:

    geoffw said:

    If the Tories want a principled leader who understands politics and is not tarnished by association with the Borisian shambles they need look no further than Steve Baker. There, I've said it.

    Steve Baker would also be the second evangelical Christian party leader after Tim Farron and our first openly Christian evangelical PM
    The last thing we need is religious BS being imported from the US to our politics.

    I couldn't care less if Baker is an evangelical, a Methodist, an atheist, a Mormon, a Jew or a Scientologist so long as he keeps his religion to himself and doesn't try and shove it upon everyone else via Parliament.
    But they do not. Just look at the US and imagine that sort of cr*p trying to happen over here.
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 42,839
    Cookie said:

    Foxy said:

    It's not quite Montenegro, but after a long walk and having chased a few hares*, there is a field of bullocks between the stile and the pub...

    Lovely weather for a staycation though.



    *The dog, not me.

    Montenegro looks lovely. But that photo is lovelier, and makes my soul sing. A neutral observer may prefer Montenegro, but I am not a neutral observer, I am a human with a home, and that photo sings of home. Where is it?
    Chalkland?
  • algarkirkalgarkirk Posts: 12,497
    Carnyx said:

    HYUFD said:

    geoffw said:

    If the Tories want a principled leader who understands politics and is not tarnished by association with the Borisian shambles they need look no further than Steve Baker. There, I've said it.

    Steve Baker would also be the second evangelical Christian party leader after Tim Farron and our first openly Christian evangelical PM
    W, E. Gladstone says 'Hallelujah!'.
    Anglo-Catholic. he says 'Alleluia'.

  • SeaShantyIrish2SeaShantyIrish2 Posts: 17,559
    Carnyx said:

    HYUFD said:

    geoffw said:

    If the Tories want a principled leader who understands politics and is not tarnished by association with the Borisian shambles they need look no further than Steve Baker. There, I've said it.

    Steve Baker would also be the second evangelical Christian party leader after Tim Farron and our first openly Christian evangelical PM
    W, E. Gladstone says 'Hallelujah!'.
    Also Spencer Percival. Study of history is fascinating. Esp. IF you bother to actually study it.
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 42,839
    boulay said:

    Carnyx said:

    HYUFD said:

    geoffw said:

    If the Tories want a principled leader who understands politics and is not tarnished by association with the Borisian shambles they need look no further than Steve Baker. There, I've said it.

    Steve Baker would also be the second evangelical Christian party leader after Tim Farron and our first openly Christian evangelical PM
    W, E. Gladstone says 'Hallelujah!'.
    Gladstone wasn’t a proper Tory so doesn’t exist. He was Peelite and Liberal as well. Almost as unforgivable as voting for Plaid once.
    Yebbut HYUFD is talking about Farron. Maybe Farron is one of those Tibetan Buddhist thought form thingies that one of us was mentioning just now.
  • Beibheirli_CBeibheirli_C Posts: 8,163
    Xtrain said:

    It's Penny for me.

    Down the corridor, 3rd on the right....
  • darkagedarkage Posts: 5,398
    Even though it was clear that Johnson had to go, there is no obvious replacement leader. They need someone to reinvent the party, not just hold it together until the next general election.

    Johnson achieved a unique feat in 2019. Maybe the peverse legacy of Johnson will be that he detoxified the Conservative party in large parts of the north of England.
  • GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 22,286
    edited July 2022
    MaxPB said:

    First day without caffeine almost over, definitely got a headache but as @TOPPING predicted, I feel really good otherwise. No heartburn or indigestion at all which I'd normally be having to deal with around this time of the evening.

    Spent the day off work obviously and I've also got tomorrow and Monday off sick just to recover properly.

    My wife broke into tears a couple of times today because my mortality seems to have suddenly become very visible but she seems fine after reading about the condition and my drive to eliminate caffeine and reduce my sugar intake.

    Overall still a very sobering experience and I feel very fragile. My cousin (a doctor) pointed out that if I had known about this condition beforehand I'd have probably not been offered the Moderna vaccine and got AZ or Pfizer instead just as there's a known risk factor around heart tissue weakening with Moderna to a degree that isn't the case with AZ and Pfizer. He's recommended me a specialist to essentially see if there's any damage and how to remedy it.

    Have to say that having a daughter has made my response to this completely different to what I'd imagine would be the case if I didn't have one. I never thought that would be the case.

    Oh have you been unwell? I'd missed that. Pleased to hear you're feeling better now anyway.
  • CookieCookie Posts: 13,799

    HYUFD said:

    geoffw said:

    If the Tories want a principled leader who understands politics and is not tarnished by association with the Borisian shambles they need look no further than Steve Baker. There, I've said it.

    Steve Baker would also be the second evangelical Christian party leader after Tim Farron and our first openly Christian evangelical PM
    If he wants to do religion he can take it to church, but evangelical types seem to have a need to force the rest of us to live by their beliefs. To govern, we need people who can cope with the modern world and not someone who thinks the Universe and the planet run on the basis of a 2,000 year old set of multiply translated fictions.
    I don't think Tim Farron did, to be fair to him. The media found his religion so peculiar it focused on it relentlessly, but he didn't really want to talk about it - seemed very keen to separate the sacred and the profane.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 122,926
    edited July 2022
    Carnyx said:

    HYUFD said:

    geoffw said:

    If the Tories want a principled leader who understands politics and is not tarnished by association with the Borisian shambles they need look no further than Steve Baker. There, I've said it.

    Steve Baker would also be the second evangelical Christian party leader after Tim Farron and our first openly Christian evangelical PM
    W, E. Gladstone says 'Hallelujah!'.
    Gladstone was brought up evangelical by his mother but had become high church Anglican by the time he was PM.

    Steve Baker is a member of an evangelical, Bible based Baptist Church having formerly been a member of an evangelical Pentecostal church
  • HYUFD said:

    geoffw said:

    If the Tories want a principled leader who understands politics and is not tarnished by association with the Borisian shambles they need look no further than Steve Baker. There, I've said it.

    Steve Baker would also be the second evangelical Christian party leader after Tim Farron and our first openly Christian evangelical PM
    The last thing we need is religious BS being imported from the US to our politics.

    I couldn't care less if Baker is an evangelical, a Methodist, an atheist, a Mormon, a Jew or a Scientologist so long as he keeps his religion to himself and doesn't try and shove it upon everyone else via Parliament.
    But they do not. Just look at the US and imagine that sort of cr*p trying to happen over here.
    Precisely my point!

    That is one US import we do not need.
  • Beibheirli_CBeibheirli_C Posts: 8,163

    HYUFD said:

    geoffw said:

    If the Tories want a principled leader who understands politics and is not tarnished by association with the Borisian shambles they need look no further than Steve Baker. There, I've said it.

    Steve Baker would also be the second evangelical Christian party leader after Tim Farron and our first openly Christian evangelical PM
    The last thing we need is religious BS being imported from the US to our politics.

    I couldn't care less if Baker is an evangelical, a Methodist, an atheist, a Mormon, a Jew or a Scientologist so long as he keeps his religion to himself and doesn't try and shove it upon everyone else via Parliament.
    But they do not. Just look at the US and imagine that sort of cr*p trying to happen over here.
    Precisely my point!

    That is one US import we do not need.
    For once we agree!
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,863

    HYUFD said:

    geoffw said:

    If the Tories want a principled leader who understands politics and is not tarnished by association with the Borisian shambles they need look no further than Steve Baker. There, I've said it.

    Steve Baker would also be the second evangelical Christian party leader after Tim Farron and our first openly Christian evangelical PM
    The last thing we need is religious BS being imported from the US to our politics.

    I couldn't care less if Baker is an evangelical, a Methodist, an atheist, a Mormon, a Jew or a Scientologist so long as he keeps his religion to himself and doesn't try and shove it upon everyone else via Parliament.
    But they do not. Just look at the US and imagine that sort of cr*p trying to happen over here.
    And he would be discredited as quickly as Farron was, with a few pointed questions about the modern world
  • geoffwgeoffw Posts: 8,717
    Cookie said:

    Foxy said:

    It's not quite Montenegro, but after a long walk and having chased a few hares*, there is a field of bullocks between the stile and the pub...

    Lovely weather for a staycation though.



    *The dog, not me.

    Montenegro looks lovely. But that photo is lovelier, and makes my soul sing. A neutral observer may prefer Montenegro, but I am not a neutral observer, I am a human with a home, and that photo sings of home. Where is it?
    It captures an archetypal atmosphere of summer late afternoon and a suggestion of developing narrative with the fox-dog and the cattle.

  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 42,839
    edited July 2022

    Carnyx said:

    HYUFD said:

    geoffw said:

    If the Tories want a principled leader who understands politics and is not tarnished by association with the Borisian shambles they need look no further than Steve Baker. There, I've said it.

    Steve Baker would also be the second evangelical Christian party leader after Tim Farron and our first openly Christian evangelical PM
    W, E. Gladstone says 'Hallelujah!'.
    Also Spencer Percival. Study of history is fascinating. Esp. IF you bother to actually study it.
    Oh, indeed. Ramsay Mac was a Presbyterian, C of S originally, so potentially very Evangelical, but it depends which C of S he was in, plus the timijng of the various mergers and splits is critical, also because he turned to Unitarianism. I was not sure how the timing fitted in with being PM. So I didn't adduce him.
  • londonpubmanlondonpubman Posts: 3,639
    #Penny22

    #NewLeadershipNewDirection
  • SeaShantyIrish2SeaShantyIrish2 Posts: 17,559

    Ben Wallace would appear to be perhaps the best choice (out of a poor selection) for caretaker Prime Minister.

    Especially IF he were to disavow any intention to run for the leadership (this time) AND remain serving as Minister of Defense, as Big Dog's (alleged) role model, Winston Churchill.

    Given numbers posted at top of this thread, reckon that he could be put in and Boris tipped out, with amazing speed . . . even for Tory MP slugs . . .

    Question NOW is NOT the ideology or personality or electablity of next PM. It is getting BJ-Exit DONE. ASAP.

    That may be your priority, but it certainly isn't the priority of anyone living in the UK - surprisingly we actually give a shit who we get as next PM.
    Purpose of caretaker - who will serve until Tory leadership is decided - is to hold down the fort and mind the store.

    Right now, focus is removing Boris from the seat of power - pronto.

    Unless you wish the perfect to be the enemy of the good . . . and risk Boris turning something up . . .
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 48,653
    Cookie said:

    Foxy said:

    It's not quite Montenegro, but after a long walk and having chased a few hares*, there is a field of bullocks between the stile and the pub...

    Lovely weather for a staycation though.



    *The dog, not me.

    Montenegro looks lovely. But that photo is lovelier, and makes my soul sing. A neutral observer may prefer Montenegro, but I am not a neutral observer, I am a human with a home, and that photo sings of home. Where is it?
    7 miles from Leicester City centre, but not seen anyone else in an hour. I often walk my dog here on a summer evening. Leicester is big enough to have lots going on, but small enough to get out of.
  • MISTYMISTY Posts: 1,594
    MrEd said:

    Scott_xP said:
    Not getting a positive response on Twitter....too Remain for the party
    The tories are insane if they choose this guy.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 122,926
    edited July 2022
    GIN1138 said:

    HYUFD said:

    Hard to see Wallace not moving to No 10 now, if he wins the MPs vote he may even be elected Tory leader and become PM before the membership vote. For as Yougov shows he is comfortably ahead with the membership anyway.

    The 1922 cttee will announce the leadership timetable next week

    Do you think he actually wants to do it though?

    He strikes me as a man that would much prefer a quiet life?
    I think most probably he would be the Douglas Home of our times, do a short stint as PM out of duty, get closer than expected in the subsequent general election even if still losing it
  • SeaShantyIrish2SeaShantyIrish2 Posts: 17,559
    Foxy said:

    It's not quite Montenegro, but after a long walk and having chased a few hares*, there is a field of bullocks between the stile and the pub...

    Lovely weather for a staycation though.



    *The dog, not me.

    Red Fang!
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,103
    It's a dark time. No, not with politics, but a new Windows era - the 'do you want Windows 11' prompts have been getting increasingly pushy and annoying, as with Windows 10.
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 42,839
    Foxy said:

    Cookie said:

    Foxy said:

    It's not quite Montenegro, but after a long walk and having chased a few hares*, there is a field of bullocks between the stile and the pub...

    Lovely weather for a staycation though.



    *The dog, not me.

    Montenegro looks lovely. But that photo is lovelier, and makes my soul sing. A neutral observer may prefer Montenegro, but I am not a neutral observer, I am a human with a home, and that photo sings of home. Where is it?
    7 miles from Leicester City centre, but not seen anyone else in an hour. I often walk my dog here on a summer evening. Leicester is big enough to have lots going on, but small enough to get out of.
    The high wolds? Rather a nice area.
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 48,653
    Cookie said:

    HYUFD said:

    geoffw said:

    If the Tories want a principled leader who understands politics and is not tarnished by association with the Borisian shambles they need look no further than Steve Baker. There, I've said it.

    Steve Baker would also be the second evangelical Christian party leader after Tim Farron and our first openly Christian evangelical PM
    If he wants to do religion he can take it to church, but evangelical types seem to have a need to force the rest of us to live by their beliefs. To govern, we need people who can cope with the modern world and not someone who thinks the Universe and the planet run on the basis of a 2,000 year old set of multiply translated fictions.
    I don't think Tim Farron did, to be fair to him. The media found his religion so peculiar it focused on it relentlessly, but he didn't really want to talk about it - seemed very keen to separate the sacred and the profane.
    Yes, I think Farron was hard done by by the media. The essence of Liberalism is not forcing your views on others, so he was very different to the American religious right.
  • HYUFD said:

    geoffw said:

    If the Tories want a principled leader who understands politics and is not tarnished by association with the Borisian shambles they need look no further than Steve Baker. There, I've said it.

    Steve Baker would also be the second evangelical Christian party leader after Tim Farron and our first openly Christian evangelical PM
    If he wants to do religion he can take it to church, but evangelical types seem to have a need to force the rest of us to live by their beliefs. To govern, we need people who can cope with the modern world and not someone who thinks the Universe and the planet run on the basis of a 2,000 year old set of multiply translated fictions.
    I'm afraid this is broadly right. Tim Farron was and is tremendously likeable - witty, empathetic, charming.

    But he arrived kicking and screaming at gay marriage after extensive prayer and doubtless long nights of the soul over biblical compatibility. It's tragic, because he's instinctively warm and inclusive. But it's allowing superstition to cause a real problem politically, just as much as Nancy Reagan dicking about with horoscopes.

    It's distinctively evangelical (not just in the Christian sense). They have huge problems compartmentalising it in a way that works.
  • algarkirkalgarkirk Posts: 12,497
    Cookie said:

    HYUFD said:

    geoffw said:

    If the Tories want a principled leader who understands politics and is not tarnished by association with the Borisian shambles they need look no further than Steve Baker. There, I've said it.

    Steve Baker would also be the second evangelical Christian party leader after Tim Farron and our first openly Christian evangelical PM
    If he wants to do religion he can take it to church, but evangelical types seem to have a need to force the rest of us to live by their beliefs. To govern, we need people who can cope with the modern world and not someone who thinks the Universe and the planet run on the basis of a 2,000 year old set of multiply translated fictions.
    I don't think Tim Farron did, to be fair to him. The media found his religion so peculiar it focused on it relentlessly, but he didn't really want to talk about it - seemed very keen to separate the sacred and the profane.
    To be fair to evangelicals - who are mostly really nice and decent people - those in politics tend to get hammered, like Farron, for having views which are unfashionable but fairly widely shared, while Roman Catholics and the Islamic community also have all sorts of minority views but tend to be miraculously protected from scrutiny.

  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,103
    geoffw said:

    If the Tories want a principled leader who understands politics and is not tarnished by association with the Borisian shambles they need look no further than Steve Baker. There, I've said it.

    Baker has some opinions which might surprise people who only think about him as 'Brexit hard man Steve Baker'. I cannot say I am a particular fan, but I do believe he is a principled Brexiteer - he has not stopped being a memebr of the awkward squad even with Brexit Boris winning, which shows that principle.

    It might make him find leadership difficult though.
  • bigglesbiggles Posts: 6,052

    Ben Wallace would appear to be perhaps the best choice (out of a poor selection) for caretaker Prime Minister.

    Especially IF he were to disavow any intention to run for the leadership (this time) AND remain serving as Minister of Defense, as Big Dog's (alleged) role model, Winston Churchill.

    Given numbers posted at top of this thread, reckon that he could be put in and Boris tipped out, with amazing speed . . . even for Tory MP slugs . . .

    Question NOW is NOT the ideology or personality or electablity of next PM. It is getting BJ-Exit DONE. ASAP.

    That may be your priority, but it certainly isn't the priority of anyone living in the UK - surprisingly we actually give a shit who we get as next PM.
    Purpose of caretaker - who will serve until Tory leadership is decided - is to hold down the fort and mind the store.

    Right now, focus is removing Boris from the seat of power - pronto.

    Unless you wish the perfect to be the enemy of the good . . . and risk Boris turning something up . . .
    Nobody really believes this “Boris can’t be trusted to leave after the vote” nonsense. A few were worked up about it earlier but the idea will be dead by tomorrow night. The system has worked and is working. Again.

  • MISTY said:

    MrEd said:

    Scott_xP said:
    Not getting a positive response on Twitter....too Remain for the party
    The tories are insane if they choose this guy.
    I might have missed it but did you answer yet why you want us to use more expensive gas instead of cheaper renewable energy?

    I assume you saw my, RCS and others replies to you that the "surcharge" on energy bills is more due to legacy contracts that have to be honoured and can't be avoided than due to tariffs being agreed today - new investments don't get the old feed in tariffs as they're more than competitive at market rate.

    Even if Net Zero were abolished overnight, we'd still need to honour feed in tariff etc contracts made in the past that haven't been any more made of in many years now - unless you advocate breaking contracts?
  • OnlyLivingBoyOnlyLivingBoy Posts: 15,784
    kle4 said:

    It's a dark time. No, not with politics, but a new Windows era - the 'do you want Windows 11' prompts have been getting increasingly pushy and annoying, as with Windows 10.

    I clicked yes, and my printer hasn't worked properly since. Resist!
  • ApplicantApplicant Posts: 3,379

    Ben Wallace would appear to be perhaps the best choice (out of a poor selection) for caretaker Prime Minister.

    Especially IF he were to disavow any intention to run for the leadership (this time) AND remain serving as Minister of Defense, as Big Dog's (alleged) role model, Winston Churchill.

    Given numbers posted at top of this thread, reckon that he could be put in and Boris tipped out, with amazing speed . . . even for Tory MP slugs . . .

    Question NOW is NOT the ideology or personality or electablity of next PM. It is getting BJ-Exit DONE. ASAP.

    That may be your priority, but it certainly isn't the priority of anyone living in the UK - surprisingly we actually give a shit who we get as next PM.
    Purpose of caretaker - who will serve until Tory leadership is decided - is to hold down the fort and mind the store.

    Right now, focus is removing Boris from the seat of power - pronto.

    Unless you wish the perfect to be the enemy of the good . . . and risk Boris turning something up . . .
    Boris is done, stick a fork in him, he has no power. If anything, he is the caretaker.
  • BartholomewRobertsBartholomewRoberts Posts: 21,971
    edited July 2022

    Ben Wallace would appear to be perhaps the best choice (out of a poor selection) for caretaker Prime Minister.

    Especially IF he were to disavow any intention to run for the leadership (this time) AND remain serving as Minister of Defense, as Big Dog's (alleged) role model, Winston Churchill.

    Given numbers posted at top of this thread, reckon that he could be put in and Boris tipped out, with amazing speed . . . even for Tory MP slugs . . .

    Question NOW is NOT the ideology or personality or electablity of next PM. It is getting BJ-Exit DONE. ASAP.

    That may be your priority, but it certainly isn't the priority of anyone living in the UK - surprisingly we actually give a shit who we get as next PM.
    Purpose of caretaker - who will serve until Tory leadership is decided - is to hold down the fort and mind the store.

    Right now, focus is removing Boris from the seat of power - pronto.

    Unless you wish the perfect to be the enemy of the good . . . and risk Boris turning something up . . .
    Boris is gone.

    You've been batshit crazy in saying that Boris is Trump/Putin all along when he's nothing of the sort, and the UK isn't Russia/USA either.

    The system worked, the unwritten constitution did its job, and he's gone and he's accepted he's gone - something Trump never did and still hasn't done.

    Boris is officially a caretaker PM now.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,103
    Cookie said:

    HYUFD said:

    geoffw said:

    If the Tories want a principled leader who understands politics and is not tarnished by association with the Borisian shambles they need look no further than Steve Baker. There, I've said it.

    Steve Baker would also be the second evangelical Christian party leader after Tim Farron and our first openly Christian evangelical PM
    If he wants to do religion he can take it to church, but evangelical types seem to have a need to force the rest of us to live by their beliefs. To govern, we need people who can cope with the modern world and not someone who thinks the Universe and the planet run on the basis of a 2,000 year old set of multiply translated fictions.
    I don't think Tim Farron did, to be fair to him. The media found his religion so peculiar it focused on it relentlessly, but he didn't really want to talk about it - seemed very keen to separate the sacred and the profane.
    Perhaps, though he did not handle it well, and gave answers he later admitted were not really true to his beliefs. I remember being yelled at for being a horrible Tory by I believe the late Mark Senior about it.
  • Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 51,821

    Ben Wallace would appear to be perhaps the best choice (out of a poor selection) for caretaker Prime Minister.

    Especially IF he were to disavow any intention to run for the leadership (this time) AND remain serving as Minister of Defense, as Big Dog's (alleged) role model, Winston Churchill.

    Given numbers posted at top of this thread, reckon that he could be put in and Boris tipped out, with amazing speed . . . even for Tory MP slugs . . .

    Question NOW is NOT the ideology or personality or electablity of next PM. It is getting BJ-Exit DONE. ASAP.

    That may be your priority, but it certainly isn't the priority of anyone living in the UK - surprisingly we actually give a shit who we get as next PM.
    Purpose of caretaker - who will serve until Tory leadership is decided - is to hold down the fort and mind the store.

    Right now, focus is removing Boris from the seat of power - pronto.

    Unless you wish the perfect to be the enemy of the good . . . and risk Boris turning something up . . .
    Boris is gone.

    You've been batshit crazy in saying that Boris is Trump/Putin all along when he's nothing of the sort, and the UK isn't Russia/USA either.

    The system worked, the unwritten constitution did its job, and he's gone and he's accepted he's gone - something Trump never did and still hasn't done.

    Boris is officially a caretaker PM now.
    He's not gone gone! He's still PM - for now!
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 71,070

    HYUFD said:

    geoffw said:

    If the Tories want a principled leader who understands politics and is not tarnished by association with the Borisian shambles they need look no further than Steve Baker. There, I've said it.

    Steve Baker would also be the second evangelical Christian party leader after Tim Farron and our first openly Christian evangelical PM
    The last thing we need is religious BS being imported from the US to our politics.

    I couldn't care less if Baker is an evangelical, a Methodist, an atheist, a Mormon, a Jew or a Scientologist so long as he keeps his religion to himself and doesn't try and shove it upon everyone else via Parliament.
    But they do not. Just look at the US and imagine that sort of cr*p trying to happen over here.
    Not really possible.

    This is Reagan’s education secretary on Fox recently…

    Bill Bennett just said we should consider using exorcists to stop mass shootings???????
    https://twitter.com/abughazalehkat/status/1544818389289508867
  • SeaShantyIrish2SeaShantyIrish2 Posts: 17,559
    biggles said:

    Ben Wallace would appear to be perhaps the best choice (out of a poor selection) for caretaker Prime Minister.

    Especially IF he were to disavow any intention to run for the leadership (this time) AND remain serving as Minister of Defense, as Big Dog's (alleged) role model, Winston Churchill.

    Given numbers posted at top of this thread, reckon that he could be put in and Boris tipped out, with amazing speed . . . even for Tory MP slugs . . .

    Question NOW is NOT the ideology or personality or electablity of next PM. It is getting BJ-Exit DONE. ASAP.

    That may be your priority, but it certainly isn't the priority of anyone living in the UK - surprisingly we actually give a shit who we get as next PM.
    Purpose of caretaker - who will serve until Tory leadership is decided - is to hold down the fort and mind the store.

    Right now, focus is removing Boris from the seat of power - pronto.

    Unless you wish the perfect to be the enemy of the good . . . and risk Boris turning something up . . .
    Nobody really believes this “Boris can’t be trusted to leave after the vote” nonsense. A few were worked up about it earlier but the idea will be dead by tomorrow night. The system has worked and is working. Again.

    IIRC, heard similar just after the votes were counted in November 2020.

    And thanks for calling me a "nobody"! One of the nicest things said about me on PB recently.
  • Beibheirli_CBeibheirli_C Posts: 8,163
    Cookie said:

    HYUFD said:

    geoffw said:

    If the Tories want a principled leader who understands politics and is not tarnished by association with the Borisian shambles they need look no further than Steve Baker. There, I've said it.

    Steve Baker would also be the second evangelical Christian party leader after Tim Farron and our first openly Christian evangelical PM
    If he wants to do religion he can take it to church, but evangelical types seem to have a need to force the rest of us to live by their beliefs. To govern, we need people who can cope with the modern world and not someone who thinks the Universe and the planet run on the basis of a 2,000 year old set of multiply translated fictions.
    I don't think Tim Farron did, to be fair to him. The media found his religion so peculiar it focused on it relentlessly, but he didn't really want to talk about it - seemed very keen to separate the sacred and the profane.
    No, Tim Farron found himself on the wrong end of the "belief spectrum" and voted against the Equality Act, tried to timetable the Same Sex Marriage Act so that it would fail and alienated a lot of the LDs. Years later, in a Guardian interview, he claimed that he only went along with the LDs position on LGBT issues but wished he had not done so
  • dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 29,402
    kle4 said:

    geoffw said:

    If the Tories want a principled leader who understands politics and is not tarnished by association with the Borisian shambles they need look no further than Steve Baker. There, I've said it.

    Baker has some opinions which might surprise people who only think about him as 'Brexit hard man Steve Baker'. I cannot say I am a particular fan, but I do believe he is a principled Brexiteer - he has not stopped being a memebr of the awkward squad even with Brexit Boris winning, which shows that principle.

    It might make him find leadership difficult though.
    Fan of taking the knee ISTR.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 122,926

    Carnyx said:

    HYUFD said:

    geoffw said:

    If the Tories want a principled leader who understands politics and is not tarnished by association with the Borisian shambles they need look no further than Steve Baker. There, I've said it.

    Steve Baker would also be the second evangelical Christian party leader after Tim Farron and our first openly Christian evangelical PM
    W, E. Gladstone says 'Hallelujah!'.
    Also Spencer Percival. Study of history is fascinating. Esp. IF you bother to actually study it.
    Even Spencer Percival is debatable, he was firmly Church of England and did not believe any bible based gathering of believers constituted a church as evangelicals outside the Church of England would
  • MoonRabbitMoonRabbit Posts: 13,507
    HYUFD said:

    Hard to see Wallace not moving to No 10 now, if he wins the MPs vote he may even be elected Tory leader and become PM before the membership vote. For as Yougov shows he is comfortably ahead with the membership anyway.

    The 1922 cttee will announce the leadership timetable next week

    Surely you can’t be a loyalist to absolutely anybody. Is there anyones ring you would struggle to kiss?
  • TazTaz Posts: 14,385
    Foxy said:

    Carnyx said:

    Carnyx said:

    Carnyx said:

    Carnyx said:

    Andy_JS said:

    "@MetroUK

    The Benny Hill theme tune has been blasted outside Parliament live on TV ahead of Boris Johnson's resignation – and it turns out Hugh Grant was behind it"

    What price Hugh Grant playing Boris in a biopic (and in a wig)?
    Isn't he, er, a little petit?

    Round the waist, I mean.
    Yes, he would need to put on a good deal of muscle to be realistic in the role.
    Yep, really get with the Charles Atlas springy thing. Or just get him to do a remake of the Frank Launder film Wee Geordie. All the muscle needed to do a Boris!
    Charles Atlas?

    Would need less korma and more Tim Curry.
    CA is this chap here. Obvs the guru for your hero Boris. Solid muscle, all the way round the 44" waist.

    https://reprobatepress.com/2018/06/18/dynamic-tension-the-charles-atlas-story/
    I know that but dynamic tension must be hard work. Such strenuous living I just don't understand.
    BTW the Tim Curry ref escapes me?
    An early aficionado of Trans propaganda.
    Given that he doesn’t claim by putting on women’s clothes he is now a woman that is clearly not the case.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,390
    edited July 2022
    Carnyx said:

    Carnyx said:

    HYUFD said:

    geoffw said:

    If the Tories want a principled leader who understands politics and is not tarnished by association with the Borisian shambles they need look no further than Steve Baker. There, I've said it.

    Steve Baker would also be the second evangelical Christian party leader after Tim Farron and our first openly Christian evangelical PM
    W, E. Gladstone says 'Hallelujah!'.
    Also Spencer Percival. Study of history is fascinating. Esp. IF you bother to actually study it.
    Oh, indeed. Ramsay Mac was a Presbyterian, C of S originally, so potentially very Evangelical, but it depends which C of S he was in, plus the timijng of the various mergers and splits is critical, also because he turned to Unitarianism. I was not sure how the timing fitted in with being PM. So I didn't adduce him.
    Lloyd George was a Baptist.

    Well, insofar as he worshipped anything other than Lloyd George.
  • MoonRabbitMoonRabbit Posts: 13,507
    Et tu Gullis?

    "My personal preference would have been... that Boris would have gone entirely and we installed Dominic Raab as an interim prime minister, with the interim cabinet, until we had a new leader," Mr Gullis explained. 

    From head banging loyalist to head banging enemy? I don’t understand how 🤷‍♀️
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 42,839

    Cookie said:

    HYUFD said:

    geoffw said:

    If the Tories want a principled leader who understands politics and is not tarnished by association with the Borisian shambles they need look no further than Steve Baker. There, I've said it.

    Steve Baker would also be the second evangelical Christian party leader after Tim Farron and our first openly Christian evangelical PM
    If he wants to do religion he can take it to church, but evangelical types seem to have a need to force the rest of us to live by their beliefs. To govern, we need people who can cope with the modern world and not someone who thinks the Universe and the planet run on the basis of a 2,000 year old set of multiply translated fictions.
    I don't think Tim Farron did, to be fair to him. The media found his religion so peculiar it focused on it relentlessly, but he didn't really want to talk about it - seemed very keen to separate the sacred and the profane.
    No, Tim Farron found himself on the wrong end of the "belief spectrum" and voted against the Equality Act, tried to timetable the Same Sex Marriage Act so that it would fail and alienated a lot of the LDs. Years later, in a Guardian interview, he claimed that he only went along with the LDs position on LGBT issues but wished he had not done so
    Oh dear. Not very liberal, was it, trying to fiddle things so that others' beliefs were banned/suppressed?
  • OnlyLivingBoyOnlyLivingBoy Posts: 15,784
    MaxPB said:

    First day without caffeine almost over, definitely got a headache but as @TOPPING predicted, I feel really good otherwise. No heartburn or indigestion at all which I'd normally be having to deal with around this time of the evening.

    Spent the day off work obviously and I've also got tomorrow and Monday off sick just to recover properly.

    My wife broke into tears a couple of times today because my mortality seems to have suddenly become very visible but she seems fine after reading about the condition and my drive to eliminate caffeine and reduce my sugar intake.

    Overall still a very sobering experience and I feel very fragile. My cousin (a doctor) pointed out that if I had known about this condition beforehand I'd have probably not been offered the Moderna vaccine and got AZ or Pfizer instead just as there's a known risk factor around heart tissue weakening with Moderna to a degree that isn't the case with AZ and Pfizer. He's recommended me a specialist to essentially see if there's any damage and how to remedy it.

    Have to say that having a daughter has made my response to this completely different to what I'd imagine would be the case if I didn't have one. I never thought that would be the case.

    You're better off without coffee. I stopped drinking it a decade ago and life is much better without it. Can you still drink tea? The methodone of the caffeine world. Hope you continue to feel well.
  • kle4 said:

    It's a dark time. No, not with politics, but a new Windows era - the 'do you want Windows 11' prompts have been getting increasingly pushy and annoying, as with Windows 10.

    I clicked yes, and my printer hasn't worked properly since. Resist!
    I clicked yes and I hated it. Mainly because it would take 6 steps to sort out my WiFi if the connection dropped out instead of right clicking on the WiFi symbol and selecting "Troubleshoot problems" when it happens which fixes it every time on Windows 10. It seems that half the options on things have been hidden away, presumably to be more "user friendly" not to offer so many options, but I know what I'm doing and I want those options conveniently available to me. 👎

    Back on 10 now, and I have no intention of "upgrading" until I hear decent things about it. Which I expect to be about when hell freezes over, or when Windows 12 is released.
  • dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 29,402
    Applicant said:

    Ben Wallace would appear to be perhaps the best choice (out of a poor selection) for caretaker Prime Minister.

    Especially IF he were to disavow any intention to run for the leadership (this time) AND remain serving as Minister of Defense, as Big Dog's (alleged) role model, Winston Churchill.

    Given numbers posted at top of this thread, reckon that he could be put in and Boris tipped out, with amazing speed . . . even for Tory MP slugs . . .

    Question NOW is NOT the ideology or personality or electablity of next PM. It is getting BJ-Exit DONE. ASAP.

    That may be your priority, but it certainly isn't the priority of anyone living in the UK - surprisingly we actually give a shit who we get as next PM.
    Purpose of caretaker - who will serve until Tory leadership is decided - is to hold down the fort and mind the store.

    Right now, focus is removing Boris from the seat of power - pronto.

    Unless you wish the perfect to be the enemy of the good . . . and risk Boris turning something up . . .
    Boris is done, stick a fork in him, he has no power. If anything, he is the caretaker.
    Caretakers clear up other people's mess.
    Fitting.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,390

    Ben Wallace would appear to be perhaps the best choice (out of a poor selection) for caretaker Prime Minister.

    Especially IF he were to disavow any intention to run for the leadership (this time) AND remain serving as Minister of Defense, as Big Dog's (alleged) role model, Winston Churchill.

    Given numbers posted at top of this thread, reckon that he could be put in and Boris tipped out, with amazing speed . . . even for Tory MP slugs . . .

    Question NOW is NOT the ideology or personality or electablity of next PM. It is getting BJ-Exit DONE. ASAP.

    That may be your priority, but it certainly isn't the priority of anyone living in the UK - surprisingly we actually give a shit who we get as next PM.
    Purpose of caretaker - who will serve until Tory leadership is decided - is to hold down the fort and mind the store.

    Right now, focus is removing Boris from the seat of power - pronto.

    Unless you wish the perfect to be the enemy of the good . . . and risk Boris turning something up . . .
    Boris is gone.

    You've been batshit crazy in saying that Boris is Trump/Putin all along when he's nothing of the sort, and the UK isn't Russia/USA either.

    The system worked, the unwritten constitution did its job, and he's gone and he's accepted he's gone - something Trump never did and still hasn't done.

    Boris is officially a caretaker PM now.
    The only official caretaker PMs in the last 200 years were Wellington in 1834 and Churchill in 1945.

    Johnson is caretaker leader of the party. He is still the PM.

    But I agree. He won't try to hang on once a new leader is around.

    The wound to his ego is too deep.
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 42,839

    HYUFD said:

    Hard to see Wallace not moving to No 10 now, if he wins the MPs vote he may even be elected Tory leader and become PM before the membership vote. For as Yougov shows he is comfortably ahead with the membership anyway.

    The 1922 cttee will announce the leadership timetable next week

    Surely you can’t be a loyalist to absolutely anybody. Is there anyones ring you would struggle to kiss?
    R. B. Cunninghame-Graham for dead sure.
  • JACK_WJACK_W Posts: 682
    Mordaunt Election Slogan :

    Spend A Penny - Together We'll Piss All Over The Labour Party
  • NickPalmerNickPalmer Posts: 21,526
    algarkirk said:

    Cookie said:

    HYUFD said:

    geoffw said:

    If the Tories want a principled leader who understands politics and is not tarnished by association with the Borisian shambles they need look no further than Steve Baker. There, I've said it.

    Steve Baker would also be the second evangelical Christian party leader after Tim Farron and our first openly Christian evangelical PM
    If he wants to do religion he can take it to church, but evangelical types seem to have a need to force the rest of us to live by their beliefs. To govern, we need people who can cope with the modern world and not someone who thinks the Universe and the planet run on the basis of a 2,000 year old set of multiply translated fictions.
    I don't think Tim Farron did, to be fair to him. The media found his religion so peculiar it focused on it relentlessly, but he didn't really want to talk about it - seemed very keen to separate the sacred and the profane.
    To be fair to evangelicals - who are mostly really nice and decent people - those in politics tend to get hammered, like Farron, for having views which are unfashionable but fairly widely shared, while Roman Catholics and the Islamic community also have all sorts of minority views but tend to be miraculously protected from scrutiny.

    What? Not my impression that the Islamic community are protected from scrutiny - their beliefs are widely and IMo unfairly regarded with suspicion, and attacked every few days in mainstream media, because some lunatics claim to share them. Evangelicals are seen as a bit cranky, but few would go further than that. I don't really care what Baker's beliefs are, unless they affect his policies.
  • Ben Wallace would appear to be perhaps the best choice (out of a poor selection) for caretaker Prime Minister.

    Especially IF he were to disavow any intention to run for the leadership (this time) AND remain serving as Minister of Defense, as Big Dog's (alleged) role model, Winston Churchill.

    Given numbers posted at top of this thread, reckon that he could be put in and Boris tipped out, with amazing speed . . . even for Tory MP slugs . . .

    Question NOW is NOT the ideology or personality or electablity of next PM. It is getting BJ-Exit DONE. ASAP.

    That may be your priority, but it certainly isn't the priority of anyone living in the UK - surprisingly we actually give a shit who we get as next PM.
    Purpose of caretaker - who will serve until Tory leadership is decided - is to hold down the fort and mind the store.

    Right now, focus is removing Boris from the seat of power - pronto.

    Unless you wish the perfect to be the enemy of the good . . . and risk Boris turning something up . . .
    Boris is gone.

    You've been batshit crazy in saying that Boris is Trump/Putin all along when he's nothing of the sort, and the UK isn't Russia/USA either.

    The system worked, the unwritten constitution did its job, and he's gone and he's accepted he's gone - something Trump never did and still hasn't done.

    Boris is officially a caretaker PM now.
    He's not gone gone! He's still PM - for now!
    His credibility and power has gone and he's a caretaker PM not a proper PM now.

    He's accepted its over. Something Trump has never done. Its over, now we need his successor.

    As days pass people will stop talking about Boris and just be debating more and more about who's coming next.
  • algarkirkalgarkirk Posts: 12,497
    kle4 said:

    geoffw said:

    If the Tories want a principled leader who understands politics and is not tarnished by association with the Borisian shambles they need look no further than Steve Baker. There, I've said it.

    Baker has some opinions which might surprise people who only think about him as 'Brexit hard man Steve Baker'. I cannot say I am a particular fan, but I do believe he is a principled Brexiteer - he has not stopped being a memebr of the awkward squad even with Brexit Boris winning, which shows that principle.

    It might make him find leadership difficult though.
    Yes. He is of the sort who need always to be in opposition to something. Like David Davis. And like all the Labour left who prefer losing elections to having to take responsibility for hard decisions.

  • Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 28,434

    Ben Wallace would appear to be perhaps the best choice (out of a poor selection) for caretaker Prime Minister.

    Especially IF he were to disavow any intention to run for the leadership (this time) AND remain serving as Minister of Defense, as Big Dog's (alleged) role model, Winston Churchill.

    Given numbers posted at top of this thread, reckon that he could be put in and Boris tipped out, with amazing speed . . . even for Tory MP slugs . . .

    Question NOW is NOT the ideology or personality or electablity of next PM. It is getting BJ-Exit DONE. ASAP.

    That may be your priority, but it certainly isn't the priority of anyone living in the UK - surprisingly we actually give a shit who we get as next PM.
    Purpose of caretaker - who will serve until Tory leadership is decided - is to hold down the fort and mind the store.

    Right now, focus is removing Boris from the seat of power - pronto.

    Unless you wish the perfect to be the enemy of the good . . . and risk Boris turning something up . . .
    @SeaShantyIrish2 - I apologise; I misunderstood your post.
  • Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 51,821
    Applicant said:

    Ben Wallace would appear to be perhaps the best choice (out of a poor selection) for caretaker Prime Minister.

    Especially IF he were to disavow any intention to run for the leadership (this time) AND remain serving as Minister of Defense, as Big Dog's (alleged) role model, Winston Churchill.

    Given numbers posted at top of this thread, reckon that he could be put in and Boris tipped out, with amazing speed . . . even for Tory MP slugs . . .

    Question NOW is NOT the ideology or personality or electablity of next PM. It is getting BJ-Exit DONE. ASAP.

    That may be your priority, but it certainly isn't the priority of anyone living in the UK - surprisingly we actually give a shit who we get as next PM.
    Purpose of caretaker - who will serve until Tory leadership is decided - is to hold down the fort and mind the store.

    Right now, focus is removing Boris from the seat of power - pronto.

    Unless you wish the perfect to be the enemy of the good . . . and risk Boris turning something up . . .
    Boris is done, stick a fork in him, he has no power. If anything, he is the caretaker.
    Jani-Tory?
  • ApplicantApplicant Posts: 3,379

    biggles said:

    Ben Wallace would appear to be perhaps the best choice (out of a poor selection) for caretaker Prime Minister.

    Especially IF he were to disavow any intention to run for the leadership (this time) AND remain serving as Minister of Defense, as Big Dog's (alleged) role model, Winston Churchill.

    Given numbers posted at top of this thread, reckon that he could be put in and Boris tipped out, with amazing speed . . . even for Tory MP slugs . . .

    Question NOW is NOT the ideology or personality or electablity of next PM. It is getting BJ-Exit DONE. ASAP.

    That may be your priority, but it certainly isn't the priority of anyone living in the UK - surprisingly we actually give a shit who we get as next PM.
    Purpose of caretaker - who will serve until Tory leadership is decided - is to hold down the fort and mind the store.

    Right now, focus is removing Boris from the seat of power - pronto.

    Unless you wish the perfect to be the enemy of the good . . . and risk Boris turning something up . . .
    Nobody really believes this “Boris can’t be trusted to leave after the vote” nonsense. A few were worked up about it earlier but the idea will be dead by tomorrow night. The system has worked and is working. Again.

    IIRC, heard similar just after the votes were counted in November 2020.

    And thanks for calling me a "nobody"! One of the nicest things said about me on PB recently.
    Totally different system. You're letting your visceral hatred of Trump (a man whose name you can't even bring yourself to use) cloud your understanding.
  • bigglesbiggles Posts: 6,052

    biggles said:

    Ben Wallace would appear to be perhaps the best choice (out of a poor selection) for caretaker Prime Minister.

    Especially IF he were to disavow any intention to run for the leadership (this time) AND remain serving as Minister of Defense, as Big Dog's (alleged) role model, Winston Churchill.

    Given numbers posted at top of this thread, reckon that he could be put in and Boris tipped out, with amazing speed . . . even for Tory MP slugs . . .

    Question NOW is NOT the ideology or personality or electablity of next PM. It is getting BJ-Exit DONE. ASAP.

    That may be your priority, but it certainly isn't the priority of anyone living in the UK - surprisingly we actually give a shit who we get as next PM.
    Purpose of caretaker - who will serve until Tory leadership is decided - is to hold down the fort and mind the store.

    Right now, focus is removing Boris from the seat of power - pronto.

    Unless you wish the perfect to be the enemy of the good . . . and risk Boris turning something up . . .
    Nobody really believes this “Boris can’t be trusted to leave after the vote” nonsense. A few were worked up about it earlier but the idea will be dead by tomorrow night. The system has worked and is working. Again.

    IIRC, heard similar just after the votes were counted in November 2020.

    And thanks for calling me a "nobody"! One of the nicest things said about me on PB recently
    Oh don’t take pretend offence. It’s boring. Ok - nobody in the U.K. who can see how this is actually developing.

  • algarkirk said:

    Cookie said:

    HYUFD said:

    geoffw said:

    If the Tories want a principled leader who understands politics and is not tarnished by association with the Borisian shambles they need look no further than Steve Baker. There, I've said it.

    Steve Baker would also be the second evangelical Christian party leader after Tim Farron and our first openly Christian evangelical PM
    If he wants to do religion he can take it to church, but evangelical types seem to have a need to force the rest of us to live by their beliefs. To govern, we need people who can cope with the modern world and not someone who thinks the Universe and the planet run on the basis of a 2,000 year old set of multiply translated fictions.
    I don't think Tim Farron did, to be fair to him. The media found his religion so peculiar it focused on it relentlessly, but he didn't really want to talk about it - seemed very keen to separate the sacred and the profane.
    To be fair to evangelicals - who are mostly really nice and decent people - those in politics tend to get hammered, like Farron, for having views which are unfashionable but fairly widely shared, while Roman Catholics and the Islamic community also have all sorts of minority views but tend to be miraculously protected from scrutiny.

    No, it's not that they have unfashionable views. It's that they allow religion to dictate things that are utterly at odds with their instinct. That makes them look weird beyond belief.

    Had Tim Farron been a staunch, right wing Tory, actually his position would have landed okay. But he genuinely is a liberal, and the tortured, prayerful approach to the matter just came over as deranged as it was so utterly at odds with everything else about him.
  • Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 51,821

    Ben Wallace would appear to be perhaps the best choice (out of a poor selection) for caretaker Prime Minister.

    Especially IF he were to disavow any intention to run for the leadership (this time) AND remain serving as Minister of Defense, as Big Dog's (alleged) role model, Winston Churchill.

    Given numbers posted at top of this thread, reckon that he could be put in and Boris tipped out, with amazing speed . . . even for Tory MP slugs . . .

    Question NOW is NOT the ideology or personality or electablity of next PM. It is getting BJ-Exit DONE. ASAP.

    That may be your priority, but it certainly isn't the priority of anyone living in the UK - surprisingly we actually give a shit who we get as next PM.
    Purpose of caretaker - who will serve until Tory leadership is decided - is to hold down the fort and mind the store.

    Right now, focus is removing Boris from the seat of power - pronto.

    Unless you wish the perfect to be the enemy of the good . . . and risk Boris turning something up . . .
    Boris is gone.

    You've been batshit crazy in saying that Boris is Trump/Putin all along when he's nothing of the sort, and the UK isn't Russia/USA either.

    The system worked, the unwritten constitution did its job, and he's gone and he's accepted he's gone - something Trump never did and still hasn't done.

    Boris is officially a caretaker PM now.
    He's not gone gone! He's still PM - for now!
    His credibility and power has gone and he's a caretaker PM not a proper PM now.

    He's accepted its over. Something Trump has never done. Its over, now we need his successor.

    As days pass people will stop talking about Boris and just be debating more and more about who's coming next.
    Ancient history was never my strong point, but how long did Maggie serve as Jani-Tory?
  • SeaShantyIrish2SeaShantyIrish2 Posts: 17,559
    Nigelb said:

    HYUFD said:

    geoffw said:

    If the Tories want a principled leader who understands politics and is not tarnished by association with the Borisian shambles they need look no further than Steve Baker. There, I've said it.

    Steve Baker would also be the second evangelical Christian party leader after Tim Farron and our first openly Christian evangelical PM
    The last thing we need is religious BS being imported from the US to our politics.

    I couldn't care less if Baker is an evangelical, a Methodist, an atheist, a Mormon, a Jew or a Scientologist so long as he keeps his religion to himself and doesn't try and shove it upon everyone else via Parliament.
    But they do not. Just look at the US and imagine that sort of cr*p trying to happen over here.
    Not really possible.

    This is Reagan’s education secretary on Fox recently…

    Bill Bennett just said we should consider using exorcists to stop mass shootings???????
    https://twitter.com/abughazalehkat/status/1544818389289508867
    Mr. Moral Compass = Cheapjack Hypocrite. Hasn't been taken seriously for nearly 20 years since he made himself national laughingstock.
  • dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 29,402
    Nice to see @MoonRabbit back.
    And @CorrectHorseBattery too.
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 22,015

    #Penny22

    #NewLeadershipNewDirection

    #ToryMembershipGetsErection
  • Beibheirli_CBeibheirli_C Posts: 8,163
    edited July 2022
    Nigelb said:

    HYUFD said:

    geoffw said:

    If the Tories want a principled leader who understands politics and is not tarnished by association with the Borisian shambles they need look no further than Steve Baker. There, I've said it.

    Steve Baker would also be the second evangelical Christian party leader after Tim Farron and our first openly Christian evangelical PM
    The last thing we need is religious BS being imported from the US to our politics.

    I couldn't care less if Baker is an evangelical, a Methodist, an atheist, a Mormon, a Jew or a Scientologist so long as he keeps his religion to himself and doesn't try and shove it upon everyone else via Parliament.
    But they do not. Just look at the US and imagine that sort of cr*p trying to happen over here.
    Not really possible.

    This is Reagan’s education secretary on Fox recently…

    Bill Bennett just said we should consider using exorcists to stop mass shootings???????
    https://twitter.com/abughazalehkat/status/1544818389289508867
    We often say stuff like "It would never happen here", but we said that about Brexit and we never imagined a PM would behave like Boris. We laughed and scorned Trump for refusing to go, but look at the last few days in Westminster.

    The time to call out this stuff is not after it happens, but before it has time to get started. Our freedoms have been hard won and the last thing we need is some folk trying to drag us back a few hundred years because of their own insecurities.

    It can happen here. And it will happen here if we let it.
This discussion has been closed.