France: How the next President market is moving – politicalbetting.com
For all the poll movements and questions over Macron he is still leading in all the surveys and UK punters still rate him very highly. But the 93%+ betting chances of a month ago have passed and he is now an 81% punt.
Rishi's star falls further as he donates £100, 000 to Winchester School
He has astonished me and Boris needs to move him on
So out of touch
"The donations fund bursaries for children whose parents would not otherwise be able to send them there."
I would have thought as a Conservative leaning voter you would be board with rich people donating so those fortunate can have access to top level education?
Rishi's star falls further as he donates £100, 000 to Winchester School
He has astonished me and Boris needs to move him on
So out of touch
"The donations fund bursaries for children whose parents would not otherwise be able to send them there."
I would have thought as a Conservative leaning voter you would be board with rich people donating so those fortunate can have access to top level education?
Objectively, it's commendable. Yet it is focussed very much on buttressing the private education system.
Subjectively, it's a disaster, as it reminds the rest of the UK just how much money the Chancellor has to spare. (And how much tax relief was involved, too?)
Edit: that last point concerns the amount of tax moneys effectively taken out of the Exchequer and diverted to the private purposes of this, or indeed, any donor.
Russia is incredibly good at winding up and infuriating people like me who watch them aghast as they spout the usual complete lies, with a half smirk. But ultimately we all know know they will lose in just about every way. Even if they somehow manage to occupy Ukraine and then march on Moldova and the Baltics, they will end up losing in the ways that matter.
The trouble is we know they will aim to drag as many people down with them as possible. In that way they remind me of my sister in law's controlling ex-husband who she ended up leaving after a domestic violence episode. The similarities are there both before the incident and afterwards. For years below we could see the warning signs, the erratic and controlling behaviour, though when it happened there was still a feeling of shock. But afterwards he didn't let up - he made false accusations to the police, tried every trick in the book through the courts, vexatious anonymous referrals to social services.
Each time things got harder for him, but he kept going. He lost any share of child custody, then was eventually denied contact, then had a restraining order slapped on him, and finally lost the vast majority of the joint assets after trying to hide sources of income from the court. He lost completely and comprehensively. And again a few years later after abusing his next unfortunate wife. Yet he still managed to drag his ex through about 6 or 7 years of hell on earth on the way down, which she is only just recovering from.
Putin is an abusive ex who's essentially said to Ukraine, if I can't have you then I'm going to make sure nobody else will want you.
'aint gonna be any kind of peace deal any time soon...
Deborah Haynes @haynesdeborah · 1h Asked by @SkyNews how Ukraine could negotiate with Russia's Vladimir Putin given the atrocities allegedly committed by his forces, the Ukrainian interior minister said, speaking in English: “Go to hell.”
Objectively, it's commendable. Yet it is focussed very much on buttressing the private education system.
Subjectively, it's a disaster, as it reminds the rest of the UK just how much money the Chancellor has to spare. (And how much tax relief was involved, too?)
Edit: that last point concerns the amount of tax moneys effectively taken out of the Exchequer and diverted to the private purposes of this, or indeed, any donor.
Better he spends it on this than 5 star Holidays to the Caribbean and Maldives, Michelin starred meals etc which he easily could.
Voters who are ideologically opposed to private education generally don't vote Tory anyway
Objectively, it's commendable. Yet it is focussed very much on buttressing the private education system.
Subjectively, it's a disaster, as it reminds the rest of the UK just how much money the Chancellor has to spare. (And how much tax relief was involved, too?)
Edit: that last point concerns the amount of tax moneys effectively taken out of the Exchequer and diverted to the private purposes of this, or indeed, any donor.
Worth noting he's worth c £500 m. So. The equivalent of someone worth £50 k bunging a tenner to his old school.
Objectively, it's commendable. Yet it is focussed very much on buttressing the private education system.
Subjectively, it's a disaster, as it reminds the rest of the UK just how much money the Chancellor has to spare. (And how much tax relief was involved, too?)
Edit: that last point concerns the amount of tax moneys effectively taken out of the Exchequer and diverted to the private purposes of this, or indeed, any donor.
Worth noting he's worth c £500 m. So. The equivalent of someone worth £50 k bunging a tenner to his old school.
Indeed, which reminds those struggling this year even more how wealthy he is.
Being a cynical guy I am maybe sunak wants to put about a bit how loaded he is. Lost a few allies with his rubbish budgets but as we all now wealth brings friends
Russia is incredibly good at winding up and infuriating people like me who watch them aghast as they spout the usual complete lies, with a half smirk. But ultimately we all know know they will lose in just about every way. Even if they somehow manage to occupy Ukraine and then march on Moldova and the Baltics, they will end up losing in the ways that matter.
The trouble is we know they will aim to drag as many people down with them as possible. In that way they remind me of my sister in law's controlling ex-husband who she ended up leaving after a domestic violence episode. The similarities are there both before the incident and afterwards. For years below we could see the warning signs, the erratic and controlling behaviour, though when it happened there was still a feeling of shock. But afterwards he didn't let up - he made false accusations to the police, tried every trick in the book through the courts, vexatious anonymous referrals to social services.
Each time things got harder for him, but he kept going. He lost any share of child custody, then was eventually denied contact, then had a restraining order slapped on him, and finally lost the vast majority of the joint assets after trying to hide sources of income from the court. He lost completely and comprehensively. And again a few years later after abusing his next unfortunate wife. Yet he still managed to drag his ex through about 6 or 7 years of hell on earth on the way down, which she is only just recovering from.
Putin is an abusive ex who's essentially said to Ukraine, if I can't have you then I'm going to make sure nobody else will want you.
Rishi's star falls further as he donates £100, 000 to Winchester School
He has astonished me and Boris needs to move him on
So out of touch
"The donations fund bursaries for children whose parents would not otherwise be able to send them there."
I would have thought as a Conservative leaning voter you would be board with rich people donating so those fortunate can have access to top level education?
The problem is that it adds to the narrative that he ignored those in need in his widely criticised budget then gives £100,000 to a private school
But a number of other international players have not been signed. David Warner, Aaron Finch, Chris Gayle and Babar Azam are among those to have missed out.
Funnily enough though I have not been a fan of Sunak's period as Chancellor I thought his funding of bursaries to Whinchester was a commendable thing to do.
Objectively, it's commendable. Yet it is focussed very much on buttressing the private education system.
Subjectively, it's a disaster, as it reminds the rest of the UK just how much money the Chancellor has to spare. (And how much tax relief was involved, too?)
Edit: that last point concerns the amount of tax moneys effectively taken out of the Exchequer and diverted to the private purposes of this, or indeed, any donor.
Better he spends it on this than 5 star Holidays to the Caribbean and Maldives, Michelin starred meals etc which he easily could.
Voters who are ideologically opposed to private education generally don't vote Tory anyway
I'm not so sure. Simply buying luxury items, as opposed to deeply wounding the social cohesion of the country ... and as for your ignoring non-Tory voters as usual, their taxes are being used to buttress such donations in general.
Visegrád 24 @visegrad24 · 33m Many Ukrainians say that even worse crimes against humanity were committed by Russian troops in Borodyanka than in Bucha.
Funnily enough though I have not been a fan of Sunak's period as Chancellor I thought his funding of bursaries to Whinchester was a commendable thing to do.
Just think its for a bit of show. We all know his boss cannot find 10 quid so it's to say to potential allies plenty more where that came
Objectively, it's commendable. Yet it is focussed very much on buttressing the private education system.
Subjectively, it's a disaster, as it reminds the rest of the UK just how much money the Chancellor has to spare. (And how much tax relief was involved, too?)
Objectively.. is it? Donating money to a cause depends on the worthiness of that cause. Private schools are engines for concentrating the quality of services and delivering them mostly to those who can pay.
Yes, I know that bursaries exist and the poor but brilliant gold ticket winner can get in, but it's still a system of intentional and intense stratification that benefits the extremely wealthy. It obviously right up HYUFD's street but if you asked me (I know, I know) I could find much better things to do with a spare £100k.
Funnily enough though I have not been a fan of Sunak's period as Chancellor I thought his funding of bursaries to Whinchester was a commendable thing to do.
Just think its for a bit of show. We all know his boss cannot find 10 quid so it's to say to potential allies plenty more where that came
Ms Sunak making the point he can afford to replace the wallpaper?
Funnily enough though I have not been a fan of Sunak's period as Chancellor I thought his funding of bursaries to Whinchester was a commendable thing to do.
We have zero idea how much Sunak and his wife donate to charities every year. I am going to guess the £100k to his former school is a tiny fraction of that.
Rishi's star falls further as he donates £100, 000 to Winchester School
He has astonished me and Boris needs to move him on
So out of touch
"The donations fund bursaries for children whose parents would not otherwise be able to send them there."
I would have thought as a Conservative leaning voter you would be board with rich people donating so those fortunate can have access to top level education?
The problem is that it adds to the narrative that he ignored those in need in his widely criticised budget then gives £100,000 to a private school
It isn't a thing which has just happened, it happened and then got published in an annual round up in the school magazine and then Sky News got hold of a copy. So "then gives" is wrong.
Objectively, it's commendable. Yet it is focussed very much on buttressing the private education system.
Subjectively, it's a disaster, as it reminds the rest of the UK just how much money the Chancellor has to spare. (And how much tax relief was involved, too?)
Edit: that last point concerns the amount of tax moneys effectively taken out of the Exchequer and diverted to the private purposes of this, or indeed, any donor.
Better he spends it on this than 5 star Holidays to the Caribbean and Maldives, Michelin starred meals etc which he easily could.
Voters who are ideologically opposed to private education generally don't vote Tory anyway
I'm not so sure. Simply buying luxury items, as opposed to deeply wounding the social cohesion of the country ... and as for your ignoring non-Tory voters as usual, their taxes are being used to buttress such donations in general.
Case made, you are an ideological anti Tory voter who thinks private education is 'deeply wounding to the social cohesion of the country'.
Rishi's star falls further as he donates £100, 000 to Winchester School
He has astonished me and Boris needs to move him on
So out of touch
"The donations fund bursaries for children whose parents would not otherwise be able to send them there."
I would have thought as a Conservative leaning voter you would be board with rich people donating so those fortunate can have access to top level education?
The problem is that it adds to the narrative that he ignored those in need in his widely criticised budget then gives £100,000 to a private school
It isn't a thing which has just happened, it happened and then got published in an annual round up in the school magazine and then Sky News got hold of a copy. So "then gives" is wrong.
Yes, but since when did the narrative have to be accurate?
Objectively, it's commendable. Yet it is focussed very much on buttressing the private education system.
Subjectively, it's a disaster, as it reminds the rest of the UK just how much money the Chancellor has to spare. (And how much tax relief was involved, too?)
Edit: that last point concerns the amount of tax moneys effectively taken out of the Exchequer and diverted to the private purposes of this, or indeed, any donor.
Better he spends it on this than 5 star Holidays to the Caribbean and Maldives, Michelin starred meals etc which he easily could.
Voters who are ideologically opposed to private education generally don't vote Tory anyway
I'm not so sure. Simply buying luxury items, as opposed to deeply wounding the social cohesion of the country ... and as for your ignoring non-Tory voters as usual, their taxes are being used to buttress such donations in general.
Case made, you are an ideological anti Tory voter who thinks private education is 'deeply wounding to the social cohesion of the country'.
Whereas Tories believe in parental choice
Only for the wealthy naturally. Eton for everyone!
Rishi's star falls further as he donates £100, 000 to Winchester School
He has astonished me and Boris needs to move him on
So out of touch
"The donations fund bursaries for children whose parents would not otherwise be able to send them there."
I would have thought as a Conservative leaning voter you would be board with rich people donating so those fortunate can have access to top level education?
Sunak has spectacularly self-destructed
The most tin-eared donation EVER? What a moron. This on top of his Will Smith wife analogy, because people should not pick on a billionairess, and also filling up a Kia and being unable to use contactless because he is SO RICH
No chance he ever becomes leader. Not a boerwurst sausage’s chance on a braai
Russia is incredibly good at winding up and infuriating people like me who watch them aghast as they spout the usual complete lies, with a half smirk. But ultimately we all know know they will lose in just about every way. Even if they somehow manage to occupy Ukraine and then march on Moldova and the Baltics, they will end up losing in the ways that matter.
The trouble is we know they will aim to drag as many people down with them as possible. In that way they remind me of my sister in law's controlling ex-husband who she ended up leaving after a domestic violence episode. The similarities are there both before the incident and afterwards. For years below we could see the warning signs, the erratic and controlling behaviour, though when it happened there was still a feeling of shock. But afterwards he didn't let up - he made false accusations to the police, tried every trick in the book through the courts, vexatious anonymous referrals to social services.
Each time things got harder for him, but he kept going. He lost any share of child custody, then was eventually denied contact, then had a restraining order slapped on him, and finally lost the vast majority of the joint assets after trying to hide sources of income from the court. He lost completely and comprehensively. And again a few years later after abusing his next unfortunate wife. Yet he still managed to drag his ex through about 6 or 7 years of hell on earth on the way down, which she is only just recovering from.
Putin is an abusive ex who's essentially said to Ukraine, if I can't have you then I'm going to make sure nobody else will want you.
The good thing is that Europe no longer believes a word of his bullshit.
Rishi's star falls further as he donates £100, 000 to Winchester School
He has astonished me and Boris needs to move him on
So out of touch
"The donations fund bursaries for children whose parents would not otherwise be able to send them there."
I would have thought as a Conservative leaning voter you would be board with rich people donating so those fortunate can have access to top level education?
The problem is that it adds to the narrative that he ignored those in need in his widely criticised budget then gives £100,000 to a private school
To be spent on scholarships and bursaries to include some clever pupils in need whose parents could not otherwise afford the fees for Winchester
'aint gonna be any kind of peace deal any time soon...
Deborah Haynes @haynesdeborah · 1h Asked by @SkyNews how Ukraine could negotiate with Russia's Vladimir Putin given the atrocities allegedly committed by his forces, the Ukrainian interior minister said, speaking in English: “Go to hell.”
At some point there will have to be a peace deal with the difference between now and that some point being measured in deaths. I would not like to be the politician that has to determine when that time has arrived.
For those interested, the experimental details of the fusion announcement.
Enough lay-chat. What have we really done? Everything here comes from our white paper detailing the experimental results. If you want them, every single raw data trace is there. 🧵(1/n).. https://twitter.com/FLF_Nick/status/1511374600575365122
New XE variant found in UK and early data suggests it's 9.8% more transmissible
Just out of interest how did you discover that. What path of investigation or browsing were you on which threw that up. A covid-specific group on social media, for example?
Russia is incredibly good at winding up and infuriating people like me who watch them aghast as they spout the usual complete lies, with a half smirk. But ultimately we all know know they will lose in just about every way. Even if they somehow manage to occupy Ukraine and then march on Moldova and the Baltics, they will end up losing in the ways that matter.
The trouble is we know they will aim to drag as many people down with them as possible. In that way they remind me of my sister in law's controlling ex-husband who she ended up leaving after a domestic violence episode. The similarities are there both before the incident and afterwards. For years below we could see the warning signs, the erratic and controlling behaviour, though when it happened there was still a feeling of shock. But afterwards he didn't let up - he made false accusations to the police, tried every trick in the book through the courts, vexatious anonymous referrals to social services.
Each time things got harder for him, but he kept going. He lost any share of child custody, then was eventually denied contact, then had a restraining order slapped on him, and finally lost the vast majority of the joint assets after trying to hide sources of income from the court. He lost completely and comprehensively. And again a few years later after abusing his next unfortunate wife. Yet he still managed to drag his ex through about 6 or 7 years of hell on earth on the way down, which she is only just recovering from.
Putin is an abusive ex who's essentially said to Ukraine, if I can't have you then I'm going to make sure nobody else will want you.
But a number of other international players have not been signed. David Warner, Aaron Finch, Chris Gayle and Babar Azam are among those to have missed out.
Harumph. Or, if you wanted a cheaper and less ugly short form of cricket, the T20 blast is starting in May. I'm looking forward to going to see Lancashire play. It may have fewer big international names, but it does have people associated with Lancashire.
Choosing one team over another is always a slightly arbitrary choice. But a process whereby a load of random professionals arrive arbitrarily in your city feels to me a bit like they're taking the piss.
Rishi's star falls further as he donates £100, 000 to Winchester School
He has astonished me and Boris needs to move him on
So out of touch
"The donations fund bursaries for children whose parents would not otherwise be able to send them there."
I would have thought as a Conservative leaning voter you would be board with rich people donating so those fortunate can have access to top level education?
Sunak has spectacularly self-destructed
The most tin-eared donation EVER? What a moron. This on top of his Will Smith wife analogy, because people should not pick on a billionairess, and also filling up a Kia and being unable to use contactless because he is SO RICH
No chance he ever becomes leader. Not a sausage
What does surprise me is he could just have done it anonymously if he wanted to do it out of the goodness of his heart. Edit: works both ways, of course, but still, he had that option.
If Sunak was going to give money to a private school, he'd have been better off giving it to Ampleforth College, which is in his neighbouring constituency. It was inspected recently by Ofsted and found to be a) a den of iniquity, and b) inadequate. That's private schools for you - a heady mix of drugs, alcohol, sex and "monks of concern".
You don't get that sort of stuff in the state sector.
I'm not convinced that Sunak has really got the hang of this levelling-up malarkey.
View 1: he is contributing to the opportunities of under-privileged children so that they can benefit from a private school education View 2: of all the institutions that don't need money from the CotE either in a personal or professional capacity, one of the country's leading public schools must be in the top five.
'aint gonna be any kind of peace deal any time soon...
Deborah Haynes @haynesdeborah · 1h Asked by @SkyNews how Ukraine could negotiate with Russia's Vladimir Putin given the atrocities allegedly committed by his forces, the Ukrainian interior minister said, speaking in English: “Go to hell.”
At some point there will have to be a peace deal with the difference between now and that some point being measured in deaths. I would not like to be the politician that has to determine when that time has arrived.
You're framing it as a decision for one side only which wrongly implies that the victim of aggression is morally responsible for the consequences of fighting back.
Objectively, it's commendable. Yet it is focussed very much on buttressing the private education system.
Subjectively, it's a disaster, as it reminds the rest of the UK just how much money the Chancellor has to spare. (And how much tax relief was involved, too?)
Objectively.. is it? Donating money to a cause depends on the worthiness of that cause. Private schools are engines for concentrating the quality of services and delivering them mostly to those who can pay.
Yes, I know that bursaries exist and the poor but brilliant gold ticket winner can get in, but it's still a system of intentional and intense stratification that benefits the extremely wealthy. It obviously right up HYUFD's street but if you asked me (I know, I know) I could find much better things to do with a spare £100k.
"...the poor but brilliant gold ticket winner can get in..."
This is a modern version of the Distressed Gentlefolk* charity. Sure, in theory it's open to anybody but in reality only a very small subset of society, usually with the right connections, would ever have the wherewithal to apply, let alone be successful. It's a sham.
(*I am probably being unfair to that charity, now sensibly renamed 'Elizabeth Finn Care'.)
Rishi's star falls further as he donates £100, 000 to Winchester School
He has astonished me and Boris needs to move him on
So out of touch
"The donations fund bursaries for children whose parents would not otherwise be able to send them there."
I would have thought as a Conservative leaning voter you would be board with rich people donating so those fortunate can have access to top level education?
Sunak has spectacularly self-destructed
The most tin-eared donation EVER? What a moron. This on top of his Will Smith wife analogy, because people should not pick on a billionairess, and also filling up a Kia and being unable to use contactless because he is SO RICH
No chance he ever becomes leader. Not a sausage
It's amazing how a politician's reputation can suddenly go into free-fall when he, as leader anointed, fails to make a move against the wounded incumbent. Happened to Michael Portillo and David Miliband.
'aint gonna be any kind of peace deal any time soon...
Deborah Haynes @haynesdeborah · 1h Asked by @SkyNews how Ukraine could negotiate with Russia's Vladimir Putin given the atrocities allegedly committed by his forces, the Ukrainian interior minister said, speaking in English: “Go to hell.”
At some point there will have to be a peace deal with the difference between now and that some point being measured in deaths. I would not like to be the politician that has to determine when that time has arrived.
Yeah it's all jolly sending weapons but they essentially kill people and prolong things
'aint gonna be any kind of peace deal any time soon...
Deborah Haynes @haynesdeborah · 1h Asked by @SkyNews how Ukraine could negotiate with Russia's Vladimir Putin given the atrocities allegedly committed by his forces, the Ukrainian interior minister said, speaking in English: “Go to hell.”
At some point there will have to be a peace deal with the difference between now and that some point being measured in deaths. I would not like to be the politician that has to determine when that time has arrived.
OK I have radically changed my stance. Shit just got real: we are obliged by treaty to prevent as well as to punish genocide, and there is no "unless the perpetrator has nuclear weapons and shit" getout clause in the treaty. This is now genocide. We need to prevent it, even if that requires sending in a huge and armed to the teeth UN peacekeeping force. Fiat justitia, ruat caelum.
Objectively, it's commendable. Yet it is focussed very much on buttressing the private education system.
Subjectively, it's a disaster, as it reminds the rest of the UK just how much money the Chancellor has to spare. (And how much tax relief was involved, too?)
Objectively.. is it? Donating money to a cause depends on the worthiness of that cause. Private schools are engines for concentrating the quality of services and delivering them mostly to those who can pay.
Yes, I know that bursaries exist and the poor but brilliant gold ticket winner can get in, but it's still a system of intentional and intense stratification that benefits the extremely wealthy. It obviously right up HYUFD's street but if you asked me (I know, I know) I could find much better things to do with a spare £100k.
One of its benefits, however, is that it will confound Left Wing class warriors. Because once an underprivileged child goes to Winchester and, perish the thought, succeeds in life, then he will automatically become a class traitor and Tory Scum.
As has been the case with every other working class lad and lass made good over the years according to the left.
Rishi's star falls further as he donates £100, 000 to Winchester School
He has astonished me and Boris needs to move him on
So out of touch
"The donations fund bursaries for children whose parents would not otherwise be able to send them there."
I would have thought as a Conservative leaning voter you would be board with rich people donating so those fortunate can have access to top level education?
Sunak has spectacularly self-destructed
The most tin-eared donation EVER? What a moron. This on top of his Will Smith wife analogy, because people should not pick on a billionairess, and also filling up a Kia and being unable to use contactless because he is SO RICH
No chance he ever becomes leader. Not a sausage
It's amazing how a politician's reputation can suddenly go into free-fall when he, as leader anointed, fails to make a move against the wounded incumbent. Happened to Michael Portillo and David Miliband.
Boris is ruthless. For anyone taking him on, it was always case of kill or be killed. Rishi chose the latter.
New XE variant found in UK and early data suggests it's 9.8% more transmissible
Just out of interest how did you discover that. What path of investigation or browsing were you on which threw that up. A covid-specific group on social media, for example?
Its all over the media. The data comes from the UK's Health Security Agency.
Rishi's star falls further as he donates £100, 000 to Winchester School
He has astonished me and Boris needs to move him on
So out of touch
"The donations fund bursaries for children whose parents would not otherwise be able to send them there."
I would have thought as a Conservative leaning voter you would be board with rich people donating so those fortunate can have access to top level education?
The problem is that it adds to the narrative that he ignored those in need in his widely criticised budget then gives £100,000 to a private school
To be spent on scholarships and bursaries to include some clever pupils in need whose parents could not otherwise afford the fees for Winchester
Not relevant. He could give the money to a charity to preserve the moths of Epping Forest or to the Dog Aid Society and the point would be the same.
Objectively, it's commendable. Yet it is focussed very much on buttressing the private education system.
Subjectively, it's a disaster, as it reminds the rest of the UK just how much money the Chancellor has to spare. (And how much tax relief was involved, too?)
Edit: that last point concerns the amount of tax moneys effectively taken out of the Exchequer and diverted to the private purposes of this, or indeed, any donor.
Better he spends it on this than 5 star Holidays to the Caribbean and Maldives, Michelin starred meals etc which he easily could.
Voters who are ideologically opposed to private education generally don't vote Tory anyway
I'm not so sure. Simply buying luxury items, as opposed to deeply wounding the social cohesion of the country ... and as for your ignoring non-Tory voters as usual, their taxes are being used to buttress such donations in general.
Case made, you are an ideological anti Tory voter who thinks private education is 'deeply wounding to the social cohesion of the country'.
Whereas Tories believe in parental choice
@HYUFD I am often more sympathetic to you than most, but this is idiotic from Sunak. Winchester College is already insanely wealthy. He should have just given the money straight to Prince Andrew, who does so much good work with impoverished young women
That’s about the level of crassness. A man so lacking in basic political judgement should never be allowed to lead
If Sunak was going to give money to a private school, he'd have been better off giving it to Ampleforth College, which is in his neighbouring constituency. It was inspected recently by Ofsted and found to be a) a den of iniquity, and b) inadequate. That's private schools for you - a heady mix of drugs, alcohol, sex and "monks of concern".
You don't get that sort of stuff in the state sector.
The Ofsted report was of course a load of rubbish. Academically Ampleforth still gets top grade average GCSEs and A levels and provides plenty of extra curricular activities.
The main concern from Ofsted is the monks live on site with the pupils, as they have done for centuries. Yet supposedly this is a major safeguarding issue.
The rest is par for the course for most schools with teenagers
Rishi's star falls further as he donates £100, 000 to Winchester School
He has astonished me and Boris needs to move him on
So out of touch
"The donations fund bursaries for children whose parents would not otherwise be able to send them there."
I would have thought as a Conservative leaning voter you would be board with rich people donating so those fortunate can have access to top level education?
Sunak has spectacularly self-destructed
The most tin-eared donation EVER? What a moron. This on top of his Will Smith wife analogy, because people should not pick on a billionairess, and also filling up a Kia and being unable to use contactless because he is SO RICH
No chance he ever becomes leader. Not a boerwurst sausage’s chance on a braai
like I say it's a sleeper. Sky News have probably known about it for years and thought it was too boring to publish, until it wasn't. But yes he is toasted by it. PORWAS.
FYI the £100k donation Sunak has made. He hasn't just written a big fat cheque last week. It is he has now given that of his lifetime, and in doing so has been listed by the school as a "Wykeham benefactors".
So the claims of making a tin eared donation in current climate is nonsense. I am guessing it is more ever since he has become wealthy he probably makes a donation every year, which has now in totality exceeded £100k.
If Sunak was going to give money to a private school, he'd have been better off giving it to Ampleforth College, which is in his neighbouring constituency. It was inspected recently by Ofsted and found to be a) a den of iniquity, and b) inadequate. That's private schools for you - a heady mix of drugs, alcohol, sex and "monks of concern".
You don't get that sort of stuff in the state sector.
The Ofsted report was of course a load of rubbish. Academically Ampleforth still gets top grade average GCSEs and A levels and provides plenty of extra curricular activities.
The main concern from Ofsted is the monks live on site with the boys, as they have done for centuries. Yet supposedly this is a major safeguarding issue
'aint gonna be any kind of peace deal any time soon...
Deborah Haynes @haynesdeborah · 1h Asked by @SkyNews how Ukraine could negotiate with Russia's Vladimir Putin given the atrocities allegedly committed by his forces, the Ukrainian interior minister said, speaking in English: “Go to hell.”
At some point there will have to be a peace deal with the difference between now and that some point being measured in deaths. I would not like to be the politician that has to determine when that time has arrived.
OK I have radically changed my stance. Shit just got real: we are obliged by treaty to prevent as well as to punish genocide, and there is no "unless the perpetrator has nuclear weapons and shit" getout clause in the treaty. This is now genocide. We need to prevent it, even if that requires sending in a huge and armed to the teeth UN peacekeeping force. Fiat justitia, ruat caelum.
'aint gonna be any kind of peace deal any time soon...
Deborah Haynes @haynesdeborah · 1h Asked by @SkyNews how Ukraine could negotiate with Russia's Vladimir Putin given the atrocities allegedly committed by his forces, the Ukrainian interior minister said, speaking in English: “Go to hell.”
At some point there will have to be a peace deal with the difference between now and that some point being measured in deaths. I would not like to be the politician that has to determine when that time has arrived.
You're framing it as a decision for one side only which wrongly implies that the victim of aggression is morally responsible for the consequences of fighting back.
You are misreading the comment.
The reality is that people are dying every day in Ukraine and at some point it will stop. It is up to several parties to determine when that is, one of them being Zelensky.
If Sunak was going to give money to a private school, he'd have been better off giving it to Ampleforth College, which is in his neighbouring constituency. It was inspected recently by Ofsted and found to be a) a den of iniquity, and b) inadequate. That's private schools for you - a heady mix of drugs, alcohol, sex and "monks of concern".
You don't get that sort of stuff in the state sector.
The Ofsted report was of course a load of rubbish. Academically Ampleforth still gets top grade average GCSEs and A levels and provides plenty of extra curricular activities.
The main concern from Ofsted is the monks live on site with the boys, as they have done for centuries. Yet supposedly this is a major safeguarding issue
I see no inconsistency between drugs, alcohol and sex and 'plenty of extra curricular activities'.
Russia is incredibly good at winding up and infuriating people like me who watch them aghast as they spout the usual complete lies, with a half smirk. But ultimately we all know know they will lose in just about every way. Even if they somehow manage to occupy Ukraine and then march on Moldova and the Baltics, they will end up losing in the ways that matter.
The trouble is we know they will aim to drag as many people down with them as possible. In that way they remind me of my sister in law's controlling ex-husband who she ended up leaving after a domestic violence episode. The similarities are there both before the incident and afterwards. For years below we could see the warning signs, the erratic and controlling behaviour, though when it happened there was still a feeling of shock. But afterwards he didn't let up - he made false accusations to the police, tried every trick in the book through the courts, vexatious anonymous referrals to social services.
Each time things got harder for him, but he kept going. He lost any share of child custody, then was eventually denied contact, then had a restraining order slapped on him, and finally lost the vast majority of the joint assets after trying to hide sources of income from the court. He lost completely and comprehensively. And again a few years later after abusing his next unfortunate wife. Yet he still managed to drag his ex through about 6 or 7 years of hell on earth on the way down, which she is only just recovering from.
Putin is an abusive ex who's essentially said to Ukraine, if I can't have you then I'm going to make sure nobody else will want you.
The good thing is that Europe no longer believes a word of his bullshit.
Previously we had plausible deniability. Now it is just lying, and insulting an entire continent at the same time. They've gone down several rungs in the criminal scales - from being sophisticated mafia types, to mad drug addicts.
I'm not convinced that Sunak has really got the hang of this levelling-up malarkey.
View 1: he is contributing to the opportunities of under-privileged children so that they can benefit from a private school education View 2: of all the institutions that don't need money from the CotE either in a personal or professional capacity, one of the country's leading public schools must be in the top five.
View 2 holds.
There's lots of better ways of spending your money to contribute to the well-being of under-privileged children. (Not that any are likely to get a place at Winchester even under a bursary/scholarship anyway).
If Sunak was going to give money to a private school, he'd have been better off giving it to Ampleforth College, which is in his neighbouring constituency. It was inspected recently by Ofsted and found to be a) a den of iniquity, and b) inadequate. That's private schools for you - a heady mix of drugs, alcohol, sex and "monks of concern".
You don't get that sort of stuff in the state sector.
The Ofsted report was of course a load of rubbish. Academically Ampleforth still gets top grade average GCSEs and A levels and provides plenty of extra curricular activities.
The main concern from Ofsted is the monks live on site with the boys, as they have done for centuries. Yet supposedly this is a major safeguarding issue
I see no inconsistency between drugs, alcohol and sex and 'plenty of extra curricular activities'.
Objectively, it's commendable. Yet it is focussed very much on buttressing the private education system.
Subjectively, it's a disaster, as it reminds the rest of the UK just how much money the Chancellor has to spare. (And how much tax relief was involved, too?)
Objectively.. is it? Donating money to a cause depends on the worthiness of that cause. Private schools are engines for concentrating the quality of services and delivering them mostly to those who can pay.
Yes, I know that bursaries exist and the poor but brilliant gold ticket winner can get in, but it's still a system of intentional and intense stratification that benefits the extremely wealthy. It obviously right up HYUFD's street but if you asked me (I know, I know) I could find much better things to do with a spare £100k.
"...the poor but brilliant gold ticket winner can get in..."
This is a modern version of the Distressed Gentlefolk* charity. Sure, in theory it's open to anybody but in reality only a very small subset of society, usually with the right connections, would ever have the wherewithal to apply, let alone be successful. It's a sham.
(*I am probably being unfair to that charity, now sensibly renamed 'Elizabeth Finn Care'.)
'aint gonna be any kind of peace deal any time soon...
Deborah Haynes @haynesdeborah · 1h Asked by @SkyNews how Ukraine could negotiate with Russia's Vladimir Putin given the atrocities allegedly committed by his forces, the Ukrainian interior minister said, speaking in English: “Go to hell.”
At some point there will have to be a peace deal with the difference between now and that some point being measured in deaths. I would not like to be the politician that has to determine when that time has arrived.
OK I have radically changed my stance. Shit just got real: we are obliged by treaty to prevent as well as to punish genocide, and there is no "unless the perpetrator has nuclear weapons and shit" getout clause in the treaty. This is now genocide. We need to prevent it, even if that requires sending in a huge and armed to the teeth UN peacekeeping force. Fiat justitia, ruat caelum.
Yeah it's much easier to make such pronouncements on an internet chat room because no one will say - OK, let's mobilise, send your soldiers over there. So keep at it.
Objectively, it's commendable. Yet it is focussed very much on buttressing the private education system.
Subjectively, it's a disaster, as it reminds the rest of the UK just how much money the Chancellor has to spare. (And how much tax relief was involved, too?)
Edit: that last point concerns the amount of tax moneys effectively taken out of the Exchequer and diverted to the private purposes of this, or indeed, any donor.
Better he spends it on this than 5 star Holidays to the Caribbean and Maldives, Michelin starred meals etc which he easily could.
Voters who are ideologically opposed to private education generally don't vote Tory anyway
I'm not so sure. Simply buying luxury items, as opposed to deeply wounding the social cohesion of the country ... and as for your ignoring non-Tory voters as usual, their taxes are being used to buttress such donations in general.
Case made, you are an ideological anti Tory voter who thinks private education is 'deeply wounding to the social cohesion of the country'.
Whereas Tories believe in parental choice
@HYUFD I am often more sympathetic to you than most, but this is idiotic from Sunak. Winchester College is already insanely wealthy. He should have just given the money straight to Prince Andrew, who does so much good work with impoverished young women
That’s about the level of crassness. A man so lacking in basic political judgement should never be allowed to lead
Go long on Truss or Mordaunt
Yes but this is going solely to fund bursaries for bright but relatively poor pupils to the school. Not Winchester college's new cocktail bar, polo enclosure and 5000 seat theatre.
'aint gonna be any kind of peace deal any time soon...
Deborah Haynes @haynesdeborah · 1h Asked by @SkyNews how Ukraine could negotiate with Russia's Vladimir Putin given the atrocities allegedly committed by his forces, the Ukrainian interior minister said, speaking in English: “Go to hell.”
At some point there will have to be a peace deal with the difference between now and that some point being measured in deaths. I would not like to be the politician that has to determine when that time has arrived.
Yeah it's all jolly sending weapons but they essentially kill people and prolong things
It has been the paradigm of eg civil wars throughout history. At some point someone will win. Until that time then the deaths will mount up. As I said not a decision I would like to be in a position to make. And yes also historically arming the protagonists has extended the war.
FYI the £100k donation Sunak has made. He hasn't just written a big fat cheque last week. It is he has now given that of his lifetime, and in doing so has been listed now listed by the school as a "Wykeham benefactors".
So the claims of making a tin eared donation in current climate is nonsense.
Then he is still guilty of foolishness, and semi-tone-deafness, and he has been successfully despatched as a candidate for leader by some ruthless opponent. Hmmmm
If Sunak was going to give money to a private school, he'd have been better off giving it to Ampleforth College, which is in his neighbouring constituency. It was inspected recently by Ofsted and found to be a) a den of iniquity, and b) inadequate. That's private schools for you - a heady mix of drugs, alcohol, sex and "monks of concern".
You don't get that sort of stuff in the state sector.
The Ofsted report was of course a load of rubbish. Academically Ampleforth still gets top grade average GCSEs and A levels and provides plenty of extra curricular activities.
The main concern from Ofsted is the monks live on site with the pupils, as they have done for centuries. Yet supposedly this is a major safeguarding issue.
The rest is par for the course for most schools with teenagers
That's never been a safeguarding issue in any other religious establishment of course.
150 dogs in a Ukrainian shelter in Borodyanka, in which the Russian occupation starved them to death. Even killing UAnimals volunteers attempting to feed the dogs during the occupation. I can't bear to repost the vid. I hope Putin dies a slow painful death. https://twitter.com/DoctorJones7961/status/1511378519342821379
Funnily enough though I have not been a fan of Sunak's period as Chancellor I thought his funding of bursaries to Whinchester was a commendable thing to do.
Just think its for a bit of show. We all know his boss cannot find 10 quid so it's to say to potential allies plenty more where that came
Perhaps it is the other way round, reminding Boris that he needs to get out of Downing Street and onto the gravy train if he wants to be able to write 6-figure cheques.
If Sunak was going to give money to a private school, he'd have been better off giving it to Ampleforth College, which is in his neighbouring constituency. It was inspected recently by Ofsted and found to be a) a den of iniquity, and b) inadequate. That's private schools for you - a heady mix of drugs, alcohol, sex and "monks of concern".
You don't get that sort of stuff in the state sector.
The Ofsted report was of course a load of rubbish. Academically Ampleforth still gets top grade average GCSEs and A levels and provides plenty of extra curricular activities.
The main concern from Ofsted is the monks live on site with the pupils, as they have done for centuries. Yet supposedly this is a major safeguarding issue.
The rest is par for the course for most schools with teenagers
Funny that. You swear by Ofsted reports when they tell us how good grammar and private schools are.
And you're too dismissive. The 'monks of concern' are, as the report says, monks who have been accused of, or found guilty of, sexual abuse. It's not unusual for the Catholic Church to cover such things up, is it?
New XE variant found in UK and early data suggests it's 9.8% more transmissible
Just out of interest how did you discover that. What path of investigation or browsing were you on which threw that up. A covid-specific group on social media, for example?
Its all over the media. The data comes from the UK's Health Security Agency.
'aint gonna be any kind of peace deal any time soon...
Deborah Haynes @haynesdeborah · 1h Asked by @SkyNews how Ukraine could negotiate with Russia's Vladimir Putin given the atrocities allegedly committed by his forces, the Ukrainian interior minister said, speaking in English: “Go to hell.”
At some point there will have to be a peace deal with the difference between now and that some point being measured in deaths. I would not like to be the politician that has to determine when that time has arrived.
Yeah it's all jolly sending weapons but they essentially kill people and prolong things
It has been the paradigm of eg civil wars throughout history. At some point someone will win. Until that time then the deaths will mount up. As I said not a decision I would like to be in a position to make.
The only person currently in a position to make that decision is Putin, not Zelensky. If Zelensky said, "Ok, enough dying, enough suffering," it wouldn't be the end of Russian aggression against Ukraine.
Rishi's star falls further as he donates £100, 000 to Winchester School
He has astonished me and Boris needs to move him on
So out of touch
"The donations fund bursaries for children whose parents would not otherwise be able to send them there."
I would have thought as a Conservative leaning voter you would be board with rich people donating so those fortunate can have access to top level education?
Sunak has spectacularly self-destructed
The most tin-eared donation EVER? What a moron. This on top of his Will Smith wife analogy, because people should not pick on a billionairess, and also filling up a Kia and being unable to use contactless because he is SO RICH
No chance he ever becomes leader. Not a boerwurst sausage’s chance on a braai
Not really tin eared at all. This was part of an appeal for a new fund for bursaries and scholarships a while ago.
There’s a very interesting Tatler (yes I know….) dive into him which goes into him failing to get a scholarship which resulted in his parents “having to make sacrifices”. It also talks about him working as a waiter during school holidays in a friend of the family’s Indian restaurant. So he’s not the typical loaded public schoolboy of myth.
Added to this was his fixation in his interview after the budget with wanting to give everyone the ability to work.
Whether he’s so far done anything to help more people to “work” I think it shows where his ideology is - work your ass off and you might succeed….
If you are a Tory I would imagine that a chancellor with this ideology and background is actually a wet dream - he might have been holed below the waterline by Covid and Ukraine but Once we are out the other side I think he’s actually probably the “perfect” Tory chancellor. Prob not PM but this donation issue is easy to frame as “billionaire Rishi gives money to toffs” but really exposes that he wants to give people the leg up he felt he had. Which is admirable whatever you think of his Spring statement…..
FYI the £100k donation Sunak has made. He hasn't just written a big fat cheque last week. It is he has now given that of his lifetime, and in doing so has been listed now listed by the school as a "Wykeham benefactors".
So the claims of making a tin eared donation in current climate is nonsense.
Then he is still guilty of foolishness, and semi-tone-deafness, and he has been successfully despatched as a candidate for leader by some ruthless opponent. Hmmmm
How so? I wouldn't be surprised if it is a direct debit donation and probably had no clue it was going to go over £100k. Should he had just stopped it as soon as he became chancellor or that the economy was looking iffy?
Also, this listing of a benefactor is in the latest issue of their alumni magazine, I wouldn't be surprised if the donation that triggered this might well have been historic and only now the school have done some sums and said he has reached this status.
Objectively, it's commendable. Yet it is focussed very much on buttressing the private education system.
Subjectively, it's a disaster, as it reminds the rest of the UK just how much money the Chancellor has to spare. (And how much tax relief was involved, too?)
Edit: that last point concerns the amount of tax moneys effectively taken out of the Exchequer and diverted to the private purposes of this, or indeed, any donor.
Better he spends it on this than 5 star Holidays to the Caribbean and Maldives, Michelin starred meals etc which he easily could.
Voters who are ideologically opposed to private education generally don't vote Tory anyway
I'm not so sure. Simply buying luxury items, as opposed to deeply wounding the social cohesion of the country ... and as for your ignoring non-Tory voters as usual, their taxes are being used to buttress such donations in general.
If its a scholarship awarded to someone not able to afford an elite education, I feel that's a benefit to social mobility.
FYI the £100k donation Sunak has made. He hasn't just written a big fat cheque last week. It is he has now given that of his lifetime, and in doing so has been listed now listed by the school as a "Wykeham benefactors".
So the claims of making a tin eared donation in current climate is nonsense.
Then he is still guilty of foolishness, and semi-tone-deafness, and he has been successfully despatched as a candidate for leader by some ruthless opponent. Hmmmm
How so? I wouldn't be surprised if it is a direct debit donation and probably had no clue it was going to go over £100k. ?
"There is almost nothing left of the town," – Oleksiy Kuleba of the Kyiv Regional Military Administration on the liberated Borodianka. According to Prosecutor General Iryna Venediktova, the situation with civilian casualties there is the worst in the Kyiv region. https://twitter.com/StratcomCentre/status/1511372231452069895
For those interested, the experimental details of the fusion announcement.
Enough lay-chat. What have we really done? Everything here comes from our white paper detailing the experimental results. If you want them, every single raw data trace is there. 🧵(1/n).. https://twitter.com/FLF_Nick/status/1511374600575365122
The last tweet in that thread is worth framing for them. They must be very happy with the results and tbh, the doubters have been silenced.
Ideally the government will come in with lots of money for them in the next few months and help from the defence industry for making their projectiles even faster.
FYI the £100k donation Sunak has made. He hasn't just written a big fat cheque last week. It is he has now given that of his lifetime, and in doing so has been listed now listed by the school as a "Wykeham benefactors".
So the claims of making a tin eared donation in current climate is nonsense.
Then he is still guilty of foolishness, and semi-tone-deafness, and he has been successfully despatched as a candidate for leader by some ruthless opponent. Hmmmm
How so? I wouldn't be surprised if it is a direct debit donation and probably had no clue it was going to go over £100k. Should he had just stopped it as soon as he became chancellor or that the economy was looking iffy?
Also, this listing of a benefactor is in the latest issue of their alumni magazine, I wouldn't be surprised if the donation that triggered this might well have been historic and only now the school have done some sums and said he has reached this status.
'aint gonna be any kind of peace deal any time soon...
Deborah Haynes @haynesdeborah · 1h Asked by @SkyNews how Ukraine could negotiate with Russia's Vladimir Putin given the atrocities allegedly committed by his forces, the Ukrainian interior minister said, speaking in English: “Go to hell.”
At some point there will have to be a peace deal with the difference between now and that some point being measured in deaths. I would not like to be the politician that has to determine when that time has arrived.
OK I have radically changed my stance. Shit just got real: we are obliged by treaty to prevent as well as to punish genocide, and there is no "unless the perpetrator has nuclear weapons and shit" getout clause in the treaty. This is now genocide. We need to prevent it, even if that requires sending in a huge and armed to the teeth UN peacekeeping force. Fiat justitia, ruat caelum.
The sky might literally fall in. But yes. RU's wmd arsenal would have to be taken out by first strike, without warning. The retaliatory model is inadequate for this sitaution.
YouGov polling carried out on behalf of These Islands highlights a series of problems facing the SNP in their push for a second independence referendum:
- Voters don’t want a second independence referendum on their proposed timescale: only 36% support an independence referendum being held in 2023 - The majority don’t support independence: when asked as a Yes/No question the split is 47/53 in favour of No - There is evidence of acquiescence bias favouring the Yes side and the SNP may not benefit from their preferred question in a future referendum: when asked as a Remain/Leave question, the split is 59/41 in favour of Remain
'aint gonna be any kind of peace deal any time soon...
Deborah Haynes @haynesdeborah · 1h Asked by @SkyNews how Ukraine could negotiate with Russia's Vladimir Putin given the atrocities allegedly committed by his forces, the Ukrainian interior minister said, speaking in English: “Go to hell.”
At some point there will have to be a peace deal with the difference between now and that some point being measured in deaths. I would not like to be the politician that has to determine when that time has arrived.
OK I have radically changed my stance. Shit just got real: we are obliged by treaty to prevent as well as to punish genocide, and there is no "unless the perpetrator has nuclear weapons and shit" getout clause in the treaty. This is now genocide. We need to prevent it, even if that requires sending in a huge and armed to the teeth UN peacekeeping force. Fiat justitia, ruat caelum.
Yeah it's much easier to make such pronouncements on an internet chat room because no one will say - OK, let's mobilise, send your soldiers over there. So keep at it.
But that's always a playable card, and if it is valid that entails us never going to war, unless I suppose the active armed forces vote by a majority to do so. We are party to a treaty which says if X, then Y. Now X, so Y. We shouldn't have signed up if we can't take a joke.
'aint gonna be any kind of peace deal any time soon...
Deborah Haynes @haynesdeborah · 1h Asked by @SkyNews how Ukraine could negotiate with Russia's Vladimir Putin given the atrocities allegedly committed by his forces, the Ukrainian interior minister said, speaking in English: “Go to hell.”
At some point there will have to be a peace deal with the difference between now and that some point being measured in deaths. I would not like to be the politician that has to determine when that time has arrived.
You say that, and I was about to "like" your comment to indicate agreement, but there are lots of conflicts which don't yet have a peace deal - Israel/Palestine, North/South Korea are obvious examples.
Even for a ceasefire, both sides would have to accept the futility of continuing to fight at the same time. I fear that there is a lot of fighting, and a lot of dying, before that point will be reached between Russia and Ukraine.
'aint gonna be any kind of peace deal any time soon...
Deborah Haynes @haynesdeborah · 1h Asked by @SkyNews how Ukraine could negotiate with Russia's Vladimir Putin given the atrocities allegedly committed by his forces, the Ukrainian interior minister said, speaking in English: “Go to hell.”
At some point there will have to be a peace deal with the difference between now and that some point being measured in deaths. I would not like to be the politician that has to determine when that time has arrived.
OK I have radically changed my stance. Shit just got real: we are obliged by treaty to prevent as well as to punish genocide, and there is no "unless the perpetrator has nuclear weapons and shit" getout clause in the treaty. This is now genocide. We need to prevent it, even if that requires sending in a huge and armed to the teeth UN peacekeeping force. Fiat justitia, ruat caelum.
Article II
In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:
Killing members of the group; Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.
IANAL but that seems to turn on "with intent to destroy". Genocide remains arguable. War crimes not so.
Rishi's star falls further as he donates £100, 000 to Winchester School
He has astonished me and Boris needs to move him on
So out of touch
"The donations fund bursaries for children whose parents would not otherwise be able to send them there."
I would have thought as a Conservative leaning voter you would be board with rich people donating so those fortunate can have access to top level education?
Sunak has spectacularly self-destructed
The most tin-eared donation EVER? What a moron. This on top of his Will Smith wife analogy, because people should not pick on a billionairess, and also filling up a Kia and being unable to use contactless because he is SO RICH
No chance he ever becomes leader. Not a boerwurst sausage’s chance on a braai
Not really tin eared at all. This was part of an appeal for a new fund for bursaries and scholarships a while ago.
There’s a very interesting Tatler (yes I know….) dive into him which goes into him failing to get a scholarship which resulted in his parents “having to make sacrifices”. It also talks about him working as a waiter during school holidays in a friend of the family’s Indian restaurant. So he’s not the typical loaded public schoolboy of myth.
Added to this was his fixation in his interview after the budget with wanting to give everyone the ability to work.
Whether he’s so far done anything to help more people to “work” I think it shows where his ideology is - work your ass off and you might succeed….
If you are a Tory I would imagine that a chancellor with this ideology and background is actually a wet dream - he might have been holed below the waterline by Covid and Ukraine but Once we are out the other side I think he’s actually probably the “perfect” Tory chancellor. Prob not PM but this donation issue is easy to frame as “billionaire Rishi gives money to toffs” but really exposes that he wants to give people the leg up he felt he had. Which is admirable whatever you think of his Spring statement…..
So do it anonymously?
No, he wanted to be SEEN doing this
Everything else apart, that shows total lack of basic political common sense
'aint gonna be any kind of peace deal any time soon...
Deborah Haynes @haynesdeborah · 1h Asked by @SkyNews how Ukraine could negotiate with Russia's Vladimir Putin given the atrocities allegedly committed by his forces, the Ukrainian interior minister said, speaking in English: “Go to hell.”
At some point there will have to be a peace deal with the difference between now and that some point being measured in deaths. I would not like to be the politician that has to determine when that time has arrived.
Yeah it's all jolly sending weapons but they essentially kill people and prolong things
It has been the paradigm of eg civil wars throughout history. At some point someone will win. Until that time then the deaths will mount up. As I said not a decision I would like to be in a position to make.
The only person currently in a position to make that decision is Putin, not Zelensky. If Zelensky said, "Ok, enough dying, enough suffering," it wouldn't be the end of Russian aggression against Ukraine.
I was taking my lead from the tweet posted above about the Ukraine interior minister saying they would not be negotiating with Russia.
'aint gonna be any kind of peace deal any time soon...
Deborah Haynes @haynesdeborah · 1h Asked by @SkyNews how Ukraine could negotiate with Russia's Vladimir Putin given the atrocities allegedly committed by his forces, the Ukrainian interior minister said, speaking in English: “Go to hell.”
At some point there will have to be a peace deal with the difference between now and that some point being measured in deaths. I would not like to be the politician that has to determine when that time has arrived.
OK I have radically changed my stance. Shit just got real: we are obliged by treaty to prevent as well as to punish genocide, and there is no "unless the perpetrator has nuclear weapons and shit" getout clause in the treaty. This is now genocide. We need to prevent it, even if that requires sending in a huge and armed to the teeth UN peacekeeping force. Fiat justitia, ruat caelum.
Yeah it's much easier to make such pronouncements on an internet chat room because no one will say - OK, let's mobilise, send your soldiers over there. So keep at it.
But that's always a playable card, and if it is valid that entails us never going to war, unless I suppose the active armed forces vote by a majority to do so. We are party to a treaty which says if X, then Y. Now X, so Y. We shouldn't have signed up if we can't take a joke.
Yes. You are absolutely right. But it was a bluff. We knew it was a bluff, they knew it was a bluff. We have seen that consistently for the past six weeks.
'aint gonna be any kind of peace deal any time soon...
Deborah Haynes @haynesdeborah · 1h Asked by @SkyNews how Ukraine could negotiate with Russia's Vladimir Putin given the atrocities allegedly committed by his forces, the Ukrainian interior minister said, speaking in English: “Go to hell.”
At some point there will have to be a peace deal with the difference between now and that some point being measured in deaths. I would not like to be the politician that has to determine when that time has arrived.
OK I have radically changed my stance. Shit just got real: we are obliged by treaty to prevent as well as to punish genocide, and there is no "unless the perpetrator has nuclear weapons and shit" getout clause in the treaty. This is now genocide. We need to prevent it, even if that requires sending in a huge and armed to the teeth UN peacekeeping force. Fiat justitia, ruat caelum.
While I agree, getting agreement on any such effort will take some time. Sending Ukraine sufficient kit to defeat the invaders could be done much more quickly.
Objectively, it's commendable. Yet it is focussed very much on buttressing the private education system.
Subjectively, it's a disaster, as it reminds the rest of the UK just how much money the Chancellor has to spare. (And how much tax relief was involved, too?)
Objectively.. is it? Donating money to a cause depends on the worthiness of that cause. Private schools are engines for concentrating the quality of services and delivering them mostly to those who can pay.
Yes, I know that bursaries exist and the poor but brilliant gold ticket winner can get in, but it's still a system of intentional and intense stratification that benefits the extremely wealthy. It obviously right up HYUFD's street but if you asked me (I know, I know) I could find much better things to do with a spare £100k.
"...the poor but brilliant gold ticket winner can get in..."
This is a modern version of the Distressed Gentlefolk* charity. Sure, in theory it's open to anybody but in reality only a very small subset of society, usually with the right connections, would ever have the wherewithal to apply, let alone be successful. It's a sham.
(*I am probably being unfair to that charity, now sensibly renamed 'Elizabeth Finn Care'.)
Not so. The recipients of these bursaries are not secret poshos down on their luck, they are the real deal. And quite often getting a shit time from everybody else for their failure to be posh, secretly or otherwise, but that's another story.
Memo to massively wealthy Tory politicians, don’t give MORE money to already wildly wealthy and super elitist public schools
I’d give similar advice to Labour politicians of questionable patriotism: don’t support the IRA and hang out with Hamas
Nah, it's very easy to defend - "I had a brillliant education at Winchester and I've been donating to a scholarship fund to enable kids who weren't as fortunate as I was when growing up to enable them to get the same benefits I had and with our education plan we will ensure that all kids get the same kind of excellent education I was able to receive"
'aint gonna be any kind of peace deal any time soon...
Deborah Haynes @haynesdeborah · 1h Asked by @SkyNews how Ukraine could negotiate with Russia's Vladimir Putin given the atrocities allegedly committed by his forces, the Ukrainian interior minister said, speaking in English: “Go to hell.”
At some point there will have to be a peace deal with the difference between now and that some point being measured in deaths. I would not like to be the politician that has to determine when that time has arrived.
OK I have radically changed my stance. Shit just got real: we are obliged by treaty to prevent as well as to punish genocide, and there is no "unless the perpetrator has nuclear weapons and shit" getout clause in the treaty. This is now genocide. We need to prevent it, even if that requires sending in a huge and armed to the teeth UN peacekeeping force. Fiat justitia, ruat caelum.
The sky might literally fall in. But yes. RU's wmd arsenal would have to be taken out by first strike, without warning. The retaliatory model is inadequate for this sitaution.
Comments
I would have thought as a Conservative leaning voter you would be board with rich people donating so those fortunate can have access to top level education?
New XE variant found in UK and early data suggests it's 9.8% more transmissible
Subjectively, it's a disaster, as it reminds the rest of the UK just how much money the Chancellor has to spare. (And how much tax relief was involved, too?)
Edit: that last point concerns the amount of tax moneys effectively taken out of the Exchequer and diverted to the private purposes of this, or indeed, any donor.
A replay.
Russia is incredibly good at winding up and infuriating people like me who watch them aghast as they spout the usual complete lies, with a half smirk. But ultimately we all know know they will lose in just about every way. Even if they somehow manage to occupy Ukraine and then march on Moldova and the Baltics, they will end up losing in the ways that matter.
The trouble is we know they will aim to drag as many people down with them as possible. In that way they remind me of my sister in law's controlling ex-husband who she ended up leaving after a domestic violence episode. The similarities are there both before the incident and afterwards. For years below we could see the warning signs, the erratic and controlling behaviour, though when it happened there was still a feeling of shock. But afterwards he didn't let up - he made false accusations to the police, tried every trick in the book through the courts, vexatious anonymous referrals to social services.
Each time things got harder for him, but he kept going. He lost any share of child custody, then was eventually denied contact, then had a restraining order slapped on him, and finally lost the vast majority of the joint assets after trying to hide sources of income from the court. He lost completely and comprehensively. And again a few years later after abusing his next unfortunate wife. Yet he still managed to drag his ex through about 6 or 7 years of hell on earth on the way down, which she is only just recovering from.
Putin is an abusive ex who's essentially said to Ukraine, if I can't have you then I'm going to make sure nobody else will want you.
Deborah Haynes
@haynesdeborah
·
1h
Asked by
@SkyNews
how Ukraine could negotiate with Russia's Vladimir Putin given the atrocities allegedly committed by his forces, the Ukrainian interior minister said, speaking in English: “Go to hell.”
https://twitter.com/haynesdeborah
Voters who are ideologically opposed to private education generally don't vote Tory anyway
So. The equivalent of someone worth £50 k bunging a tenner to his old school.
But a number of other international players have not been signed. David Warner, Aaron Finch, Chris Gayle and Babar Azam are among those to have missed out.
https://www.bbc.com/sport/live/cricket/60982426
How does nobody sign Babar Azam....
@visegrad24
·
33m
Many Ukrainians say that even worse crimes against humanity were committed by Russian troops in Borodyanka than in Bucha.
This video shows that the city is in ruins.
https://twitter.com/visegrad24/status/1511368084942200838
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DNbad82plR0
LAB: 40% (+1)
CON: 33% (-2)
LDEM: 11% (-)
GRN: 4% (+1)
Via @SavantaComRes, 01 - 03 Apr
Whereas Tories believe in parental choice
The most tin-eared donation EVER? What a moron. This on top of his Will Smith wife analogy, because people should not pick on a billionairess, and also filling up a Kia and being unable to use contactless because he is SO RICH
No chance he ever becomes leader. Not a boerwurst sausage’s chance on a braai
https://twitter.com/olliecarroll/status/1511350713435230217
Enough lay-chat. What have we really done? Everything here comes from our white paper detailing the experimental results. If you want them, every single raw data trace is there. 🧵(1/n)..
https://twitter.com/FLF_Nick/status/1511374600575365122
Choosing one team over another is always a slightly arbitrary choice. But a process whereby a load of random professionals arrive arbitrarily in your city feels to me a bit like they're taking the piss.
Absolute LOLs.
You don't get that sort of stuff in the state sector.
If anybody's interested: https://reports.ofsted.gov.uk/provider/27/121735
View 2: of all the institutions that don't need money from the CotE either in a personal or professional capacity, one of the country's leading public schools must be in the top five.
This is a modern version of the Distressed Gentlefolk* charity. Sure, in theory it's open to anybody but in reality only a very small subset of society, usually with the right connections, would ever have the wherewithal to apply, let alone be successful. It's a sham.
(*I am probably being unfair to that charity, now sensibly renamed 'Elizabeth Finn Care'.)
As has been the case with every other working class lad and lass made good over the years according to the left.
That’s about the level of crassness. A man so lacking in basic political judgement should never be allowed to lead
Go long on Truss or Mordaunt
The main concern from Ofsted is the monks live on site with the pupils, as they have done for centuries. Yet supposedly this is a major safeguarding issue.
The rest is par for the course for most schools with teenagers
So the claims of making a tin eared donation in current climate is nonsense. I am guessing it is more ever since he has become wealthy he probably makes a donation every year, which has now in totality exceeded £100k.
How do you know it's rubbish?
The reality is that people are dying every day in Ukraine and at some point it will stop. It is up to several parties to determine when that is, one of them being Zelensky.
There's lots of better ways of spending your money to contribute to the well-being of under-privileged children. (Not that any are likely to get a place at Winchester even under a bursary/scholarship anyway).
Wallace also in the frame for next leader
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/may/21/lord-moore-of-lower-marsh-obituary
https://twitter.com/DoctorJones7961/status/1511378519342821379
And you're too dismissive. The 'monks of concern' are, as the report says, monks who have been accused of, or found guilty of, sexual abuse. It's not unusual for the Catholic Church to cover such things up, is it?
There’s a very interesting Tatler (yes I know….) dive into him which goes into him failing to get a scholarship which resulted in his parents “having to make sacrifices”. It also talks about him working as a waiter during school holidays in a friend of the family’s Indian restaurant. So he’s not the typical loaded public schoolboy of myth.
Added to this was his fixation in his interview after the budget with wanting to give everyone the ability to work.
Whether he’s so far done anything to help more people to “work” I think it shows where his ideology is - work your ass off and you might succeed….
If you are a Tory I would imagine that a chancellor with this ideology and background is actually a wet dream - he might have been holed below the waterline by Covid and Ukraine but Once we are out the other side I think he’s actually probably the “perfect” Tory chancellor. Prob not PM but this donation issue is easy to frame as “billionaire Rishi gives money to toffs” but really exposes that he wants to give people the leg up he felt he had. Which is admirable whatever you think of his Spring statement…..
Also, this listing of a benefactor is in the latest issue of their alumni magazine, I wouldn't be surprised if the donation that triggered this might well have been historic and only now the school have done some sums and said he has reached this status.
Good grief. It gets worse.
https://twitter.com/StratcomCentre/status/1511372231452069895
Ideally the government will come in with lots of money for them in the next few months and help from the defence industry for making their projectiles even faster.
I’d give similar advice to Labour politicians of questionable patriotism: don’t support the IRA and hang out with Hamas
- Voters don’t want a second independence referendum on their proposed timescale: only 36% support an independence referendum being held in 2023
- The majority don’t support independence: when asked as a Yes/No question the split is 47/53 in favour of No
- There is evidence of acquiescence bias favouring the Yes side and the SNP may not benefit from their preferred question in a future referendum: when asked as a Remain/Leave question, the split is 59/41 in favour of Remain
https://www.these-islands.co.uk/publications/i379/keeping_the_dream_alive.aspx
Even for a ceasefire, both sides would have to accept the futility of continuing to fight at the same time. I fear that there is a lot of fighting, and a lot of dying, before that point will be reached between Russia and Ukraine.
In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:
Killing members of the group;
Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.
IANAL but that seems to turn on "with intent to destroy".
Genocide remains arguable. War crimes not so.
Wordle 290 6/6
⬜🟩🟩⬜⬜
⬜🟩🟩⬜⬜
⬜🟩🟩⬜⬜
⬜🟩🟩⬜⬜
⬜🟩🟩⬜⬜
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
No, he wanted to be SEEN doing this
Everything else apart, that shows total lack of basic political common sense
It's an ain't gonna happen event.
Sending Ukraine sufficient kit to defeat the invaders could be done much more quickly.
It doesn't need more than one line.