Skip to content

Restoring my faith in the betting markets – politicalbetting.com

SystemSystem Posts: 13,256
edited May 23 in General
Restoring my faith in the betting markets – politicalbetting.com

I’ve been betting on politics for over a quarter of a century and in recent months and the most astonishing odds and volumes I have ever seen is the Restore odds on the most seats at the next general election.

Read the full story here

«134567

Comments

  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 57,532
    First like Restore...🤣
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 60,933
    I guess Reform will be taking a lot of time identifying their Makerfield voters and reminding them"It's REFORM, love. Spelt R. E EFF.... No, not ESS. EFF...."

    Or they have roped in somebody from another political party to help out. "Now when I count you back from 5 to 1, you will wake from this sleep - and I want you to remember that when you see the word Reform, you only think Restore..."

    "And your tits are bigger too."
  • Dura_AceDura_Ace Posts: 15,801

    They look like a formidable election winning machine. I could foresee them seizing power in coalition with Alba, Your Party and Change UK.

    Big Roop will be satisfied as long as he cockblocks the Fukkers in Wankerfield or whatever it's called. Restore is essentially just his anti-Farage vengeance project.
  • noneoftheabovenoneoftheabove Posts: 28,318
    Cost of maintaining Reform at 20/1 in a by election = Maybe £10k (lots of trading makes it look more)
    Cost of gaining similar publicity through advertising elsewhere = Maybe £100k

    Do the maths and its articles like this one, talking about a non entity party, which are precisely why they are low odds.
  • Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 35,702
    Dura_Ace said:

    They look like a formidable election winning machine. I could foresee them seizing power in coalition with Alba, Your Party and Change UK.

    Big Roop will be satisfied as long as he cockblocks the Fukkers in Wankerfield or whatever it's called. Restore is essentially just his anti-Farage vengeance project.
    I've been trying to work out whether Burnham getting in somehow suits Restore/Lowe beyond just sticking it to Reform, but I'm a bit stumped.

    If Burnham gets in, that just warns people not to vote Restore in future, and encourages them to vote Reform to get him out. If Reform get in, and the plumber turns out to be an awful MP (there is precendent), that favours Restore. I think Reform winning with a small minority for Restore is the best possible result for them.
  • MelonBMelonB Posts: 17,570

    Dura_Ace said:

    They look like a formidable election winning machine. I could foresee them seizing power in coalition with Alba, Your Party and Change UK.

    Big Roop will be satisfied as long as he cockblocks the Fukkers in Wankerfield or whatever it's called. Restore is essentially just his anti-Farage vengeance project.
    I've been trying to work out whether Burnham getting in somehow suits Restore/Lowe beyond just sticking it to Reform, but I'm a bit stumped.

    If Burnham gets in, that just warns people not to vote Restore in future, and encourages them to vote Reform to get him out. If Reform get in, and the plumber turns out to be an awful MP (there is precendent), that favours Restore. I think Reform winning with a small minority for Restore is the best possible result for them.
    Surely the best result for them is Restore winning? 🥇
  • StuartinromfordStuartinromford Posts: 23,396
    Dura_Ace said:

    They look like a formidable election winning machine. I could foresee them seizing power in coalition with Alba, Your Party and Change UK.

    Big Roop will be satisfied as long as he cockblocks the Fukkers in Wankerfield or whatever it's called. Restore is essentially just his anti-Farage vengeance project.
    Given what Lowe believes about Farage (and belief is the right concept; it doesn't matter if it's true or not), it's not surprising that he's desperate to destroy the Clacton caudillo.

    It's probably always been the case that personal ambition drives policy choices more than we like to admit- see Andy's antics over the past week or so. I'm sure someone like Matt Ridley can explain it in evolutionary terms.
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 60,933
    Cicero said:

    Pb.com acquired a huge following because it filtered electoral prediction through cold, hard cash. Two things are threatening this preeminence: firstly, too few posters are actually looking for betting tips and won't put their money where their mouth is. (I have, to my cost as some here can testify).
    Secondly, politicians got too interested and began to try to rig and ramp the markets- as politicians will. The stuff the Tories tried to pull around the last general election is, I think, still under investigation by Plod. This latest naked ramping from Low deserves to be thumped in like manner and should be treated as what it is: a money making opportunity.for political bettors.
    So if the site needs to get it's mojo back, it is not going to happen by allowing Leon to post racist stuff about matters that are sub judice, it is to suggest politely that he backs his Reform ramping with some reasonable amount of dosh. If you can afford £20 for some slightly naff Crown Derby mug, you can certainly afford to take a few quid and back your mostly drunken and/or demented waffle supporting the treacherous Mr Farage as the likely next Prime Minister.

    So, what odds are you giving us?

    You were doing quite well until "slightly naff...mug". Play the ball...
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 60,933

    FPT....

    In the warm, still conditions, large numbers of migrants came over last night.

    To the moth trap.

    Normally lucky if I get 3 or 4 Small Mottled Willow all year. Last night - 21!

    Its an invasion, I tell yer...

    It's what happens when you Stop The Bats.
    If you pop along to this address, a nice lady will hand you the Internets...
  • AnneJGPAnneJGP Posts: 5,681
    If I may say so, being a non-bettor, I think people are too focused on the nature of the new party Restore rather than on the simple fact that it is a new party. Is a new party supposed to hold back at every point because there are bigger beasts in the game?

    Given the number of people enthusiastic about this new party, it seems to me much more likely that lots of people who never bet on politics before have placed bets with their feelings, rather than deliberately attempting to influence anything.

    Good morning, everybody.
  • TazTaz Posts: 29,644
    Dura_Ace said:

    They look like a formidable election winning machine. I could foresee them seizing power in coalition with Alba, Your Party and Change UK.

    Big Roop will be satisfied as long as he cockblocks the Fukkers in Wankerfield or whatever it's called. Restore is essentially just his anti-Farage vengeance project.
    Yeah, I think that’s exactly his M.O.
  • nico67nico67 Posts: 8,534
    You know when you see vox pops and start thinking oh dear !

    Unusually they found someone who did make a useful comment !

    The woman said she was worried about Reform Restore splitting the vote and allowing Labour to win the seat .

  • MelonBMelonB Posts: 17,570
    A good bank Saturday morning and bank holiday kick off to all. 30C today here, probably a little warmer tomorrow, then a possibility of 34C on Monday and Tuesday which is, for May, a little ludicrous. The all time May record to beat is 32.8C.

    I’ll be down the vineyard dealing with the aftermath of the opposite problem, late frosts that killed off probably well over 50% of the year’s potential yield in 3 nights earlier this month. It takes a whole winter season of mildness to bring the buds out too early, and one night of frost to wipe them out. Nature is a cruel mistress. My job this weekend is bud rubbing: taking off all the rogue shoots on the lower trunks of the vines with some rough gloves.

    In El Niño land the ocean surface continues to shift into the Nino pattern and the forecast models continue to show an extreme peak in November-December, but wind patterns aren’t joining the party at the moment so I suspect the froth will come off the outlook a bit in due course. Still, enough to guarantee 2027 is by far the world’s warmest year on record, and possibly 2026 too.

    Outlook and current Pacific wind fields here:

    https://earth.nullschool.net/#2026/05/27/2000Z/wind/surface/level/orthographic=-202.36,-0.27,346/loc=132.736,24.625

    https://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/CFSv2/imagesInd3/nino34Sea.gif
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 90,923

    Cicero said:

    Pb.com acquired a huge following because it filtered electoral prediction through cold, hard cash. Two things are threatening this preeminence: firstly, too few posters are actually looking for betting tips and won't put their money where their mouth is. (I have, to my cost as some here can testify).
    Secondly, politicians got too interested and began to try to rig and ramp the markets- as politicians will. The stuff the Tories tried to pull around the last general election is, I think, still under investigation by Plod. This latest naked ramping from Low deserves to be thumped in like manner and should be treated as what it is: a money making opportunity.for political bettors.
    So if the site needs to get it's mojo back, it is not going to happen by allowing Leon to post racist stuff about matters that are sub judice, it is to suggest politely that he backs his Reform ramping with some reasonable amount of dosh. If you can afford £20 for some slightly naff Crown Derby mug, you can certainly afford to take a few quid and back your mostly drunken and/or demented waffle supporting the treacherous Mr Farage as the likely next Prime Minister.

    So, what odds are you giving us?

    You were doing quite well until "slightly naff...mug". Play the ball...
    ... not the coffee cup ?
  • noneoftheabovenoneoftheabove Posts: 28,318
    AnneJGP said:

    If I may say so, being a non-bettor, I think people are too focused on the nature of the new party Restore rather than on the simple fact that it is a new party. Is a new party supposed to hold back at every point because there are bigger beasts in the game?

    Given the number of people enthusiastic about this new party, it seems to me much more likely that lots of people who never bet on politics before have placed bets with their feelings, rather than deliberately attempting to influence anything.

    Good morning, everybody.

    Betting on politics is a very niche thing, you don't suddenly get lots of genuine new punters wanting to bet substantial amounts on by-elections.

    Even here on politicalbetting.com it seems like actually betting on politics is still a bit niche.
  • turbotubbsturbotubbs Posts: 23,856
    Cicero said:

    Pb.com acquired a huge following because it filtered electoral prediction through cold, hard cash. Two things are threatening this preeminence: firstly, too few posters are actually looking for betting tips and won't put their money where their mouth is. (I have, to my cost as some here can testify).
    Secondly, politicians got too interested and began to try to rig and ramp the markets- as politicians will. The stuff the Tories tried to pull around the last general election is, I think, still under investigation by Plod. This latest naked ramping from Low deserves to be thumped in like manner and should be treated as what it is: a money making opportunity.for political bettors.
    So if the site needs to get it's mojo back, it is not going to happen by allowing Leon to post racist stuff about matters that are sub judice, it is to suggest politely that he backs his Reform ramping with some reasonable amount of dosh. If you can afford £20 for some slightly naff Crown Derby mug, you can certainly afford to take a few quid and back your mostly drunken and/or demented waffle supporting the treacherous Mr Farage as the likely next Prime Minister.

    So, what odds are you giving us?

    The stuff the Tories tried to pull? Which was what?
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 57,532

    FPT....

    In the warm, still conditions, large numbers of migrants came over last night.

    To the moth trap.

    Normally lucky if I get 3 or 4 Small Mottled Willow all year. Last night - 21!

    Its an invasion, I tell yer...

    It's what happens when you Stop The Bats.
    I spider little pun there...
  • AnneJGPAnneJGP Posts: 5,681

    AnneJGP said:

    If I may say so, being a non-bettor, I think people are too focused on the nature of the new party Restore rather than on the simple fact that it is a new party. Is a new party supposed to hold back at every point because there are bigger beasts in the game?

    Given the number of people enthusiastic about this new party, it seems to me much more likely that lots of people who never bet on politics before have placed bets with their feelings, rather than deliberately attempting to influence anything.

    Good morning, everybody.

    Betting on politics is a very niche thing, you don't suddenly get lots of genuine new punters wanting to bet substantial amounts on by-elections.

    Even here on politicalbetting.com it seems like actually betting on politics is still a bit niche.
    Is it substantial amounts from a few individuals? Or lots of small amounts from lots of people? I was envisaging the latter.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 90,923
    nico67 said:

    You know when you see vox pops and start thinking oh dear !

    Unusually they found someone who did make a useful comment !

    The woman said she was worried about Reform Restore splitting the vote and allowing Labour to win the seat .

    It's a common sentiment - see our own Lucky on the last thread.
  • bondegezoubondegezou Posts: 21,695
    AnneJGP said:

    AnneJGP said:

    If I may say so, being a non-bettor, I think people are too focused on the nature of the new party Restore rather than on the simple fact that it is a new party. Is a new party supposed to hold back at every point because there are bigger beasts in the game?

    Given the number of people enthusiastic about this new party, it seems to me much more likely that lots of people who never bet on politics before have placed bets with their feelings, rather than deliberately attempting to influence anything.

    Good morning, everybody.

    Betting on politics is a very niche thing, you don't suddenly get lots of genuine new punters wanting to bet substantial amounts on by-elections.

    Even here on politicalbetting.com it seems like actually betting on politics is still a bit niche.
    Is it substantial amounts from a few individuals? Or lots of small amounts from lots of people? I was envisaging the latter.
    Lowe is encouraging his supporters to bet on Restore, so it could be lots of small amounts, but there’s some probably some big amounts in there to produce such a distortion.
  • AnneJGPAnneJGP Posts: 5,681
    Nigelb said:

    nico67 said:

    You know when you see vox pops and start thinking oh dear !

    Unusually they found someone who did make a useful comment !

    The woman said she was worried about Reform Restore splitting the vote and allowing Labour to win the seat .

    It's a common sentiment - see our own Lucky on the last thread.
    It was a Labour seat until the by-election was called and Labour has a massive majority. So the real concern is that if Labour win it again Mr Burnham may well become PM. It's pretty clear that SKS will be replaced anyway so all a Labour loss would achieve is to constrain the field of candidates.
  • nico67nico67 Posts: 8,534
    Nigelb said:

    nico67 said:

    You know when you see vox pops and start thinking oh dear !

    Unusually they found someone who did make a useful comment !

    The woman said she was worried about Reform Restore splitting the vote and allowing Labour to win the seat .

    It's a common sentiment - see our own Lucky on the last thread.
    I’m still a bit bemused by polling which seems to show a lot more people know about Restore . It’s perhaps because I do very little social media apart from this site so don’t see their ads .
  • squareroot2squareroot2 Posts: 8,001
    AnneJGP said:

    Nigelb said:

    nico67 said:

    You know when you see vox pops and start thinking oh dear !

    Unusually they found someone who did make a useful comment !

    The woman said she was worried about Reform Restore splitting the vote and allowing Labour to win the seat .

    It's a common sentiment - see our own Lucky on the last thread.
    It was a Labour seat until the by-election was called and Labour has a massive majority. So the real concern is that if Labour win it again Mr Burnham may well become PM. It's pretty clear that SKS will be replaced anyway so all a Labour loss would achieve is to constrain the field of candidates.
    That's the best and most hilarious outcone for me. Burnham to fail.
    The king across the water holed below the waterline.
  • MelonBMelonB Posts: 17,570

    AnneJGP said:

    Nigelb said:

    nico67 said:

    You know when you see vox pops and start thinking oh dear !

    Unusually they found someone who did make a useful comment !

    The woman said she was worried about Reform Restore splitting the vote and allowing Labour to win the seat .

    It's a common sentiment - see our own Lucky on the last thread.
    It was a Labour seat until the by-election was called and Labour has a massive majority. So the real concern is that if Labour win it again Mr Burnham may well become PM. It's pretty clear that SKS will be replaced anyway so all a Labour loss would achieve is to constrain the field of candidates.
    That's the best and most hilarious outcone for me. Burnham to fail.
    The king across the water holed below the waterline.
    It’s perfectly possible he wins his by-election, goes on to become PM, then is the first serving PM to lose his seat in the next general election. Wouldn’t take much of a swing from 2024.
  • bondegezoubondegezou Posts: 21,695

    AnneJGP said:

    Nigelb said:

    nico67 said:

    You know when you see vox pops and start thinking oh dear !

    Unusually they found someone who did make a useful comment !

    The woman said she was worried about Reform Restore splitting the vote and allowing Labour to win the seat .

    It's a common sentiment - see our own Lucky on the last thread.
    It was a Labour seat until the by-election was called and Labour has a massive majority. So the real concern is that if Labour win it again Mr Burnham may well become PM. It's pretty clear that SKS will be replaced anyway so all a Labour loss would achieve is to constrain the field of candidates.
    That's the best and most hilarious outcone for me. Burnham to fail.
    The king across the water holed below the waterline.
    Is that worth it when it would give us an MP who is friends with neo-Nazis, who spread lies about the Southport murders, and is into vaccine denialism?
  • MelonBMelonB Posts: 17,570
    nico67 said:

    Nigelb said:

    nico67 said:

    You know when you see vox pops and start thinking oh dear !

    Unusually they found someone who did make a useful comment !

    The woman said she was worried about Reform Restore splitting the vote and allowing Labour to win the seat .

    It's a common sentiment - see our own Lucky on the last thread.
    I’m still a bit bemused by polling which seems to show a lot more people know about Restore . It’s perhaps because I do very little social media apart from this site so don’t see their ads .
    Rather like those Gaza independents. Meaningless to 98% of the population but, as you say, very prominent in certain corners of the internet.
  • MelonBMelonB Posts: 17,570

    AnneJGP said:

    Nigelb said:

    nico67 said:

    You know when you see vox pops and start thinking oh dear !

    Unusually they found someone who did make a useful comment !

    The woman said she was worried about Reform Restore splitting the vote and allowing Labour to win the seat .

    It's a common sentiment - see our own Lucky on the last thread.
    It was a Labour seat until the by-election was called and Labour has a massive majority. So the real concern is that if Labour win it again Mr Burnham may well become PM. It's pretty clear that SKS will be replaced anyway so all a Labour loss would achieve is to constrain the field of candidates.
    That's the best and most hilarious outcone for me. Burnham to fail.
    The king across the water holed below the waterline.
    Is that worth it when it would give us an MP who is friends with neo-Nazis, who spread lies about the Southport murders, and is into vaccine denialism?
    “Oh but it’ll upset all the right people”.
  • SandpitSandpit Posts: 62,557
    Every morning when Moscow is on fire, is a good morning…

    https://x.com/actfast/status/2058025526993080571
  • bondegezoubondegezou Posts: 21,695
    I hope those who celebrate are having a good Shavuot. We enjoyed some cheesecake last night.
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 57,532

    Cicero said:

    Pb.com acquired a huge following because it filtered electoral prediction through cold, hard cash. Two things are threatening this preeminence: firstly, too few posters are actually looking for betting tips and won't put their money where their mouth is. (I have, to my cost as some here can testify).
    Secondly, politicians got too interested and began to try to rig and ramp the markets- as politicians will. The stuff the Tories tried to pull around the last general election is, I think, still under investigation by Plod. This latest naked ramping from Low deserves to be thumped in like manner and should be treated as what it is: a money making opportunity.for political bettors.
    So if the site needs to get it's mojo back, it is not going to happen by allowing Leon to post racist stuff about matters that are sub judice, it is to suggest politely that he backs his Reform ramping with some reasonable amount of dosh. If you can afford £20 for some slightly naff Crown Derby mug, you can certainly afford to take a few quid and back your mostly drunken and/or demented waffle supporting the treacherous Mr Farage as the likely next Prime Minister.

    So, what odds are you giving us?

    The stuff the Tories tried to pull? Which was what?
    Betting on a July election the day before it was announced.
  • CiceroCicero Posts: 4,520
    Nigelb said:

    Cicero said:

    Pb.com acquired a huge following because it filtered electoral prediction through cold, hard cash. Two things are threatening this preeminence: firstly, too few posters are actually looking for betting tips and won't put their money where their mouth is. (I have, to my cost as some here can testify).
    Secondly, politicians got too interested and began to try to rig and ramp the markets- as politicians will. The stuff the Tories tried to pull around the last general election is, I think, still under investigation by Plod. This latest naked ramping from Low deserves to be thumped in like manner and should be treated as what it is: a money making opportunity.for political bettors.
    So if the site needs to get it's mojo back, it is not going to happen by allowing Leon to post racist stuff about matters that are sub judice, it is to suggest politely that he backs his Reform ramping with some reasonable amount of dosh. If you can afford £20 for some slightly naff Crown Derby mug, you can certainly afford to take a few quid and back your mostly drunken and/or demented waffle supporting the treacherous Mr Farage as the likely next Prime Minister.

    So, what odds are you giving us?

    You were doing quite well until "slightly naff...mug". Play the ball...
    ... not the coffee cup ?
    Meh... Its not my taste, but for those that like that sort of thing, that is... what they like.
  • malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 46,763

    AnneJGP said:

    Nigelb said:

    nico67 said:

    You know when you see vox pops and start thinking oh dear !

    Unusually they found someone who did make a useful comment !

    The woman said she was worried about Reform Restore splitting the vote and allowing Labour to win the seat .

    It's a common sentiment - see our own Lucky on the last thread.
    It was a Labour seat until the by-election was called and Labour has a massive majority. So the real concern is that if Labour win it again Mr Burnham may well become PM. It's pretty clear that SKS will be replaced anyway so all a Labour loss would achieve is to constrain the field of candidates.
    That's the best and most hilarious outcone for me. Burnham to fail.
    The king across the water holed below the waterline.
    Labour are done for , from the derision over the get £5 off your zoo visit to that Bozo Milliband wrecking the oil and gas business by importing expensive crap, You could not make up how tin eared these thick as mince muppets are. labour should never ever be allowed any control of anything again, they are just clowns.
  • CiceroCicero Posts: 4,520

    Cicero said:

    Pb.com acquired a huge following because it filtered electoral prediction through cold, hard cash. Two things are threatening this preeminence: firstly, too few posters are actually looking for betting tips and won't put their money where their mouth is. (I have, to my cost as some here can testify).
    Secondly, politicians got too interested and began to try to rig and ramp the markets- as politicians will. The stuff the Tories tried to pull around the last general election is, I think, still under investigation by Plod. This latest naked ramping from Low deserves to be thumped in like manner and should be treated as what it is: a money making opportunity.for political bettors.
    So if the site needs to get it's mojo back, it is not going to happen by allowing Leon to post racist stuff about matters that are sub judice, it is to suggest politely that he backs his Reform ramping with some reasonable amount of dosh. If you can afford £20 for some slightly naff Crown Derby mug, you can certainly afford to take a few quid and back your mostly drunken and/or demented waffle supporting the treacherous Mr Farage as the likely next Prime Minister.

    So, what odds are you giving us?

    The stuff the Tories tried to pull? Which was what?
    For example, a flurry of bets apparently made from Downing St around the timing of the last GE https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_United_Kingdom_general_election_betting_scandal

  • turbotubbsturbotubbs Posts: 23,856
    Foxy said:

    Cicero said:

    Pb.com acquired a huge following because it filtered electoral prediction through cold, hard cash. Two things are threatening this preeminence: firstly, too few posters are actually looking for betting tips and won't put their money where their mouth is. (I have, to my cost as some here can testify).
    Secondly, politicians got too interested and began to try to rig and ramp the markets- as politicians will. The stuff the Tories tried to pull around the last general election is, I think, still under investigation by Plod. This latest naked ramping from Low deserves to be thumped in like manner and should be treated as what it is: a money making opportunity.for political bettors.
    So if the site needs to get it's mojo back, it is not going to happen by allowing Leon to post racist stuff about matters that are sub judice, it is to suggest politely that he backs his Reform ramping with some reasonable amount of dosh. If you can afford £20 for some slightly naff Crown Derby mug, you can certainly afford to take a few quid and back your mostly drunken and/or demented waffle supporting the treacherous Mr Farage as the likely next Prime Minister.

    So, what odds are you giving us?

    The stuff the Tories tried to pull? Which was what?
    Betting on a July election the day before it was announced.
    Lots of people did that. And are the police really still investigating? And besides, I'm pretty sure anyone betting on the date of the election is just trying to win money, not change the outcome. I know I was.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 137,632
    It would be hilarious if Burnham won but the Reform and Restore combined votes were bigger than the Labour vote. It is possible given that Makerfield was over 60% Leave and Farage would go ballistic
  • turbotubbsturbotubbs Posts: 23,856
    Cicero said:

    Cicero said:

    Pb.com acquired a huge following because it filtered electoral prediction through cold, hard cash. Two things are threatening this preeminence: firstly, too few posters are actually looking for betting tips and won't put their money where their mouth is. (I have, to my cost as some here can testify).
    Secondly, politicians got too interested and began to try to rig and ramp the markets- as politicians will. The stuff the Tories tried to pull around the last general election is, I think, still under investigation by Plod. This latest naked ramping from Low deserves to be thumped in like manner and should be treated as what it is: a money making opportunity.for political bettors.
    So if the site needs to get it's mojo back, it is not going to happen by allowing Leon to post racist stuff about matters that are sub judice, it is to suggest politely that he backs his Reform ramping with some reasonable amount of dosh. If you can afford £20 for some slightly naff Crown Derby mug, you can certainly afford to take a few quid and back your mostly drunken and/or demented waffle supporting the treacherous Mr Farage as the likely next Prime Minister.

    So, what odds are you giving us?

    The stuff the Tories tried to pull? Which was what?
    For example, a flurry of bets apparently made from Downing St around the timing of the last GE https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_United_Kingdom_general_election_betting_scandal

    But as I posted in reply to Foxy, that's personal gain not shifting the polls. And are the plod really still investigating after two years? I mean what new evidence are they hoping to find?
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 64,114
    malcolmg said:

    AnneJGP said:

    Nigelb said:

    nico67 said:

    You know when you see vox pops and start thinking oh dear !

    Unusually they found someone who did make a useful comment !

    The woman said she was worried about Reform Restore splitting the vote and allowing Labour to win the seat .

    It's a common sentiment - see our own Lucky on the last thread.
    It was a Labour seat until the by-election was called and Labour has a massive majority. So the real concern is that if Labour win it again Mr Burnham may well become PM. It's pretty clear that SKS will be replaced anyway so all a Labour loss would achieve is to constrain the field of candidates.
    That's the best and most hilarious outcone for me. Burnham to fail.
    The king across the water holed below the waterline.
    Labour are done for , from the derision over the get £5 off your zoo visit to that Bozo Milliband wrecking the oil and gas business by importing expensive crap, You could not make up how tin eared these thick as mince muppets are. labour should never ever be allowed any control of anything again, they are just clowns.
    Cutting VAT on theme park tickets is the most contemptible bread and circuses nonsense and I think it'll be treated with the derision it deserves.
  • Leon_VotedForStarmerLeon_VotedForStarmer Posts: 69,000
    edited May 23
    Cicero said:

    Pb.com acquired a huge following because it filtered electoral prediction through cold, hard cash. Two things are threatening this preeminence: firstly, too few posters are actually looking for betting tips and won't put their money where their mouth is. (I have, to my cost as some here can testify).
    Secondly, politicians got too interested and began to try to rig and ramp the markets- as politicians will. The stuff the Tories tried to pull around the last general election is, I think, still under investigation by Plod. This latest naked ramping from Low deserves to be thumped in like manner and should be treated as what it is: a money making opportunity.for political bettors.
    So if the site needs to get it's mojo back, it is not going to happen by allowing Leon to post racist stuff about matters that are sub judice, it is to suggest politely that he backs his Reform ramping with some reasonable amount of dosh. If you can afford £20 for some slightly naff Crown Derby mug, you can certainly afford to take a few quid and back your mostly drunken and/or demented waffle supporting the treacherous Mr Farage as the likely next Prime Minister.

    So, what odds are you giving us?

    My lament about the site dying, last night, was based squarely on the fact that it is dying. In two ways

    Last night we had barely a few comments over hours. At a time of huge political interest. Similarly, we get no new posters, ever. Except the execrable @Brixian59 who is surely a previous commenter reincarnating anyway. I’ve heard of this happening

    Why? One big reason is the Blueskying of the site. It is now completely dominated by Dickless Centrist Dads like you. As relentlessly pompous as you are humourless, devoid of insight, caprice or wit. And fucking dull. And you have managed to push out anyone with a spark of wildness, plus that third of the country susceptible to Reform

    If I was a newbie passing by, looking at this parade of sad old middlebrow “opinions”, I’d keep passing by

  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 137,632
    malcolmg said:

    AnneJGP said:

    Nigelb said:

    nico67 said:

    You know when you see vox pops and start thinking oh dear !

    Unusually they found someone who did make a useful comment !

    The woman said she was worried about Reform Restore splitting the vote and allowing Labour to win the seat .

    It's a common sentiment - see our own Lucky on the last thread.
    It was a Labour seat until the by-election was called and Labour has a massive majority. So the real concern is that if Labour win it again Mr Burnham may well become PM. It's pretty clear that SKS will be replaced anyway so all a Labour loss would achieve is to constrain the field of candidates.
    That's the best and most hilarious outcone for me. Burnham to fail.
    The king across the water holed below the waterline.
    Labour are done for , from the derision over the get £5 off your zoo visit to that Bozo Milliband wrecking the oil and gas business by importing expensive crap, You could not make up how tin eared these thick as mince muppets are. labour should never ever be allowed any control of anything again, they are just clowns.
    Yet we had two polls last week with a Burnham led Labour overtaking Reform and taking the lead
  • noneoftheabovenoneoftheabove Posts: 28,318

    Cicero said:

    Pb.com acquired a huge following because it filtered electoral prediction through cold, hard cash. Two things are threatening this preeminence: firstly, too few posters are actually looking for betting tips and won't put their money where their mouth is. (I have, to my cost as some here can testify).
    Secondly, politicians got too interested and began to try to rig and ramp the markets- as politicians will. The stuff the Tories tried to pull around the last general election is, I think, still under investigation by Plod. This latest naked ramping from Low deserves to be thumped in like manner and should be treated as what it is: a money making opportunity.for political bettors.
    So if the site needs to get it's mojo back, it is not going to happen by allowing Leon to post racist stuff about matters that are sub judice, it is to suggest politely that he backs his Reform ramping with some reasonable amount of dosh. If you can afford £20 for some slightly naff Crown Derby mug, you can certainly afford to take a few quid and back your mostly drunken and/or demented waffle supporting the treacherous Mr Farage as the likely next Prime Minister.

    So, what odds are you giving us?

    My lament about the site dying, last night, was based squarely on the fact that it is dying. In two ways

    Last night we had barely a few comments over hours. At a time of huge political interest. Similarly, we get no new posters, ever. Except the execrable @Brixian59 who is surely a previous commenter reincarnating anyway. I’ve heard of this happening

    Why? One big reason is the Blueskying of the site. It is now completely dominated by Dickless Centrist Dads like you. As relentlessly pompous as you are humourless, devoid of insight, caprice or wit. And fucking dull. And you have managed push out anyone with a spark of wildness, plus that third of the country susceptible to Reform

    If I was a newbie passing by, looking at this parade of sad old middlebrow “opinions”, I’d keep passing by

    That option is still very much available to you..... just saying.....
  • SandpitSandpit Posts: 62,557

    malcolmg said:

    AnneJGP said:

    Nigelb said:

    nico67 said:

    You know when you see vox pops and start thinking oh dear !

    Unusually they found someone who did make a useful comment !

    The woman said she was worried about Reform Restore splitting the vote and allowing Labour to win the seat .

    It's a common sentiment - see our own Lucky on the last thread.
    It was a Labour seat until the by-election was called and Labour has a massive majority. So the real concern is that if Labour win it again Mr Burnham may well become PM. It's pretty clear that SKS will be replaced anyway so all a Labour loss would achieve is to constrain the field of candidates.
    That's the best and most hilarious outcone for me. Burnham to fail.
    The king across the water holed below the waterline.
    Labour are done for , from the derision over the get £5 off your zoo visit to that Bozo Milliband wrecking the oil and gas business by importing expensive crap, You could not make up how tin eared these thick as mince muppets are. labour should never ever be allowed any control of anything again, they are just clowns.
    Cutting VAT on theme park tickets is the most contemptible bread and circuses nonsense and I think it'll be treated with the derision it deserves.
    It’s probably better at this point just to abolish VAT on restaurants and entertainment venues completely.

    No companies are passing on this VAT cut in full, they’re all facing massive extra costs because of NI and min wage increases passed last year.
  • Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 60,534

    In the warm, still conditions, large numbers of migrants come over last night.

    To the moth trap.

    Normally lucky if I get 3 or 4 Small Mottled Willow all year. Last night - 21!

    Its an invasion, I tell yer...


    Saw a mayfly Ephemera danica inside the train window where we were sitting on the way back from Bath last night. Fluttered about too much to take a clear photo though!
  • SandpitSandpit Posts: 62,557
    LOL, the Russian black market in rotten old food.

    https://x.com/kshevchenkoreal/status/2057875890068127809

    In Russia, a massive black market for expired food is booming despite laws banning its sale. Wholesalers openly advertise tons of spoiled chicken, meat, cheese, sausages, canned goods, and even 68,000 cans of expired Coca-Cola from Jordan at rock-bottom prices — frozen chickens for just 75 rubles/kg. Instead of disposal, products are resold to small producers who mask the rot with spices and additives, then feed them into shops, shawarma stands, and bakeries.
  • Dura_AceDura_Ace Posts: 15,801

    Cicero said:

    Pb.com acquired a huge following because it filtered electoral prediction through cold, hard cash. Two things are threatening this preeminence: firstly, too few posters are actually looking for betting tips and won't put their money where their mouth is. (I have, to my cost as some here can testify).
    Secondly, politicians got too interested and began to try to rig and ramp the markets- as politicians will. The stuff the Tories tried to pull around the last general election is, I think, still under investigation by Plod. This latest naked ramping from Low deserves to be thumped in like manner and should be treated as what it is: a money making opportunity.for political bettors.
    So if the site needs to get it's mojo back, it is not going to happen by allowing Leon to post racist stuff about matters that are sub judice, it is to suggest politely that he backs his Reform ramping with some reasonable amount of dosh. If you can afford £20 for some slightly naff Crown Derby mug, you can certainly afford to take a few quid and back your mostly drunken and/or demented waffle supporting the treacherous Mr Farage as the likely next Prime Minister.

    So, what odds are you giving us?

    My lament about the site dying, last night, was based squarely on the fact that it is dying. In two ways

    Last night we had barely a few comments over hours. At a time of huge political interest. Similarly, we get no new posters, ever. Except the execrable @Brixian59 who is surely a previous commenter reincarnating anyway. I’ve heard of this happening

    Why? One big reason is the Blueskying of the site. It is now completely dominated by Dickless Centrist Dads like you. As relentlessly pompous as you are humourless, devoid of insight, caprice or wit. And fucking dull. And you have managed to push out anyone with a spark of wildness, plus that third of the country susceptible to Reform

    If I was a newbie passing by, looking at this parade of sad old middlebrow “opinions”, I’d keep passing by

    please don't leave
  • Oh, and Good Morning

    And my first trip abroad was quite memorable. I was 7 or 8. My mum and her lover, Vic Ellis, a Mercedes car salesman, took us down to the south of France. In his big car. My sister got car sick and Vic’s cigars made me nauseous

    We stayed in Collioure which was beautiful. Apparently I met Picasso but this memory is very hazy and might well be nonsense. I befriended a sea urchin, brought it back to the hotel and put it in the sink, hoping to make a friend. It died

    I got over the grief when Mum bought me a coffee cream eclair in the sun and when I ate it on the way down to the beach, that eclair was the nicest thing I’d ever eaten up to that moment
  • state_go_awaystate_go_away Posts: 5,963
    nico67 said:

    Nigelb said:

    nico67 said:

    You know when you see vox pops and start thinking oh dear !

    Unusually they found someone who did make a useful comment !

    The woman said she was worried about Reform Restore splitting the vote and allowing Labour to win the seat .

    It's a common sentiment - see our own Lucky on the last thread.
    I’m still a bit bemused by polling which seems to show a lot more people know about Restore . It’s perhaps because I do very little social media apart from this site so don’t see their ads .
    There are many people who think restore is reform due to name similarity . Certainly enough for the level of apparent polling . I think Lowe is making mischief now to get a deal with farage pre election
  • HYUFD said:

    Cicero said:

    Pb.com acquired a huge following because it filtered electoral prediction through cold, hard cash. Two things are threatening this preeminence: firstly, too few posters are actually looking for betting tips and won't put their money where their mouth is. (I have, to my cost as some here can testify).
    Secondly, politicians got too interested and began to try to rig and ramp the markets- as politicians will. The stuff the Tories tried to pull around the last general election is, I think, still under investigation by Plod. This latest naked ramping from Low deserves to be thumped in like manner and should be treated as what it is: a money making opportunity.for political bettors.
    So if the site needs to get it's mojo back, it is not going to happen by allowing Leon to post racist stuff about matters that are sub judice, it is to suggest politely that he backs his Reform ramping with some reasonable amount of dosh. If you can afford £20 for some slightly naff Crown Derby mug, you can certainly afford to take a few quid and back your mostly drunken and/or demented waffle supporting the treacherous Mr Farage as the likely next Prime Minister.

    So, what odds are you giving us?

    My lament about the site dying, last night, was based squarely on the fact that it is dying. In two ways

    Last night we had barely a few comments over hours. At a time of huge political interest. Similarly, we get no new posters, ever. Except the execrable @Brixian59 who is surely a previous commenter reincarnating anyway. I’ve heard of this happening

    Why? One big reason is the Blueskying of the site. It is now completely dominated by Dickless Centrist Dads like you. As relentlessly pompous as you are humourless, devoid of insight, caprice or wit. And fucking dull. And you have managed push out anyone with a spark of wildness, plus that third of the country susceptible to Reform

    If I was a newbie passing by, looking at this parade of sad old middlebrow “opinions”, I’d keep passing by

    Perhaps we need quotas for Reform PB posters. Maybe OGH and TSE could put an advert on GBNews and in the Mail?
    This is a stonking idea. A recruitment drive for crypto-fascists. I’ll get on the case
  • SandpitSandpit Posts: 62,557

    Dura_Ace said:

    They look like a formidable election winning machine. I could foresee them seizing power in coalition with Alba, Your Party and Change UK.

    Big Roop will be satisfied as long as he cockblocks the Fukkers in Wankerfield or whatever it's called. Restore is essentially just his anti-Farage vengeance project.
    I've been trying to work out whether Burnham getting in somehow suits Restore/Lowe beyond just sticking it to Reform, but I'm a bit stumped.

    If Burnham gets in, that just warns people not to vote Restore in future, and encourages them to vote Reform to get him out. If Reform get in, and the plumber turns out to be an awful MP (there is precendent), that favours Restore. I think Reform winning with a small minority for Restore is the best possible result for them.
    They’re the anti-Reform party. That’s all they care about, they’re not worried about a Labour MP, even one with visions on leadership, only in stopping Reform getting another MP.
  • Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 60,534

    HYUFD said:

    Cicero said:

    Pb.com acquired a huge following because it filtered electoral prediction through cold, hard cash. Two things are threatening this preeminence: firstly, too few posters are actually looking for betting tips and won't put their money where their mouth is. (I have, to my cost as some here can testify).
    Secondly, politicians got too interested and began to try to rig and ramp the markets- as politicians will. The stuff the Tories tried to pull around the last general election is, I think, still under investigation by Plod. This latest naked ramping from Low deserves to be thumped in like manner and should be treated as what it is: a money making opportunity.for political bettors.
    So if the site needs to get it's mojo back, it is not going to happen by allowing Leon to post racist stuff about matters that are sub judice, it is to suggest politely that he backs his Reform ramping with some reasonable amount of dosh. If you can afford £20 for some slightly naff Crown Derby mug, you can certainly afford to take a few quid and back your mostly drunken and/or demented waffle supporting the treacherous Mr Farage as the likely next Prime Minister.

    So, what odds are you giving us?

    My lament about the site dying, last night, was based squarely on the fact that it is dying. In two ways

    Last night we had barely a few comments over hours. At a time of huge political interest. Similarly, we get no new posters, ever. Except the execrable @Brixian59 who is surely a previous commenter reincarnating anyway. I’ve heard of this happening

    Why? One big reason is the Blueskying of the site. It is now completely dominated by Dickless Centrist Dads like you. As relentlessly pompous as you are humourless, devoid of insight, caprice or wit. And fucking dull. And you have managed push out anyone with a spark of wildness, plus that third of the country susceptible to Reform

    If I was a newbie passing by, looking at this parade of sad old middlebrow “opinions”, I’d keep passing by

    Perhaps we need quotas for Reform PB posters. Maybe OGH and TSE could put an advert on GBNews and in the Mail?
    This is a stonking idea. A recruitment drive for crypto-fascists. I’ll get on the case
    Does voting Leave in 2016 count?
  • SandpitSandpit Posts: 62,557
    It’s not just Moscow on fire either, Novorussiysk is also on fire.

    https://x.com/jayinkyiv/status/2058084631140774347

    As is the road to Crimea through Ukraine, Russia is totally out of air defences and every military vehicle is being taken out by the Ukranian drones.

    https://x.com/jimmysecuk/status/2057746382052597792
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 90,923
    "Biden's economy" is one thing, but Biden's FBI agents responsible for Jan 6th ?
    https://x.com/LePapillonBlu2/status/2058051138721636715

    The man has completely lost it, and no one dares invoke the 25th.
  • kinabalukinabalu Posts: 51,550
    HYUFD said:

    Cicero said:

    Pb.com acquired a huge following because it filtered electoral prediction through cold, hard cash. Two things are threatening this preeminence: firstly, too few posters are actually looking for betting tips and won't put their money where their mouth is. (I have, to my cost as some here can testify).
    Secondly, politicians got too interested and began to try to rig and ramp the markets- as politicians will. The stuff the Tories tried to pull around the last general election is, I think, still under investigation by Plod. This latest naked ramping from Low deserves to be thumped in like manner and should be treated as what it is: a money making opportunity.for political bettors.
    So if the site needs to get it's mojo back, it is not going to happen by allowing Leon to post racist stuff about matters that are sub judice, it is to suggest politely that he backs his Reform ramping with some reasonable amount of dosh. If you can afford £20 for some slightly naff Crown Derby mug, you can certainly afford to take a few quid and back your mostly drunken and/or demented waffle supporting the treacherous Mr Farage as the likely next Prime Minister.

    So, what odds are you giving us?

    My lament about the site dying, last night, was based squarely on the fact that it is dying. In two ways

    Last night we had barely a few comments over hours. At a time of huge political interest. Similarly, we get no new posters, ever. Except the execrable @Brixian59 who is surely a previous commenter reincarnating anyway. I’ve heard of this happening

    Why? One big reason is the Blueskying of the site. It is now completely dominated by Dickless Centrist Dads like you. As relentlessly pompous as you are humourless, devoid of insight, caprice or wit. And fucking dull. And you have managed push out anyone with a spark of wildness, plus that third of the country susceptible to Reform

    If I was a newbie passing by, looking at this parade of sad old middlebrow “opinions”, I’d keep passing by

    Perhaps we need quotas for Reform PB posters. Maybe OGH and TSE could put an advert on GBNews and in the Mail?
    I can morph into a Reform poster if people think it might help. I can do it no problem. I'll just hit myself on the head a few times with a frying pan and take it from there.
  • kyf_100kyf_100 Posts: 5,138

    Cicero said:

    Pb.com acquired a huge following because it filtered electoral prediction through cold, hard cash. Two things are threatening this preeminence: firstly, too few posters are actually looking for betting tips and won't put their money where their mouth is. (I have, to my cost as some here can testify).
    Secondly, politicians got too interested and began to try to rig and ramp the markets- as politicians will. The stuff the Tories tried to pull around the last general election is, I think, still under investigation by Plod. This latest naked ramping from Low deserves to be thumped in like manner and should be treated as what it is: a money making opportunity.for political bettors.
    So if the site needs to get it's mojo back, it is not going to happen by allowing Leon to post racist stuff about matters that are sub judice, it is to suggest politely that he backs his Reform ramping with some reasonable amount of dosh. If you can afford £20 for some slightly naff Crown Derby mug, you can certainly afford to take a few quid and back your mostly drunken and/or demented waffle supporting the treacherous Mr Farage as the likely next Prime Minister.

    So, what odds are you giving us?

    My lament about the site dying, last night, was based squarely on the fact that it is dying. In two ways

    Last night we had barely a few comments over hours. At a time of huge political interest. Similarly, we get no new posters, ever. Except the execrable @Brixian59 who is surely a previous commenter reincarnating anyway. I’ve heard of this happening

    Why? One big reason is the Blueskying of the site. It is now completely dominated by Dickless Centrist Dads like you. As relentlessly pompous as you are humourless, devoid of insight, caprice or wit. And fucking dull. And you have managed to push out anyone with a spark of wildness, plus that third of the country susceptible to Reform

    If I was a newbie passing by, looking at this parade of sad old middlebrow “opinions”, I’d keep passing by

    Sadly it has become the same old people rehashing the same old arguments - and PB would do well to consider why anyone who doesn't fit into one of two buckets of orthodoxy - "centrist (left leaning) dad" or "socially conservative right" tends to leave. I don't fit into either of those buckets and get piled on. I scan most days but rarely bother posting any more as a result.

    Some of the more interesting _far_ left posters like 148grss - a literal Marxist if I recall - I disagreed with on almost everything, but found to be incredibly engaging and their arguments very well considered. To the point where they actually changed my mind about some things. That is rare. As for Reform voters, I'm a self confessed liberal metropolitan elite type who sees their voter base as utterly infra dig. But I wouldn't heap scorn on them either, because I've been out to the red wall many times to do focus groups, and absolutely get where the inchoate rage at the system is coming from. We would do well to listen to Reform voters and understand where they are coming from even if we disagree with them. But they are completely under-represented on this site - and dismissed and scorned when they do pop up.

    However I don't think the problem is "middlebrow opinions" as much as it is piling on anyone who doesn't conform to the orthodoxy here. The tribalism is tiresome.
  • TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 48,229

    Cicero said:

    Pb.com acquired a huge following because it filtered electoral prediction through cold, hard cash. Two things are threatening this preeminence: firstly, too few posters are actually looking for betting tips and won't put their money where their mouth is. (I have, to my cost as some here can testify).
    Secondly, politicians got too interested and began to try to rig and ramp the markets- as politicians will. The stuff the Tories tried to pull around the last general election is, I think, still under investigation by Plod. This latest naked ramping from Low deserves to be thumped in like manner and should be treated as what it is: a money making opportunity.for political bettors.
    So if the site needs to get it's mojo back, it is not going to happen by allowing Leon to post racist stuff about matters that are sub judice, it is to suggest politely that he backs his Reform ramping with some reasonable amount of dosh. If you can afford £20 for some slightly naff Crown Derby mug, you can certainly afford to take a few quid and back your mostly drunken and/or demented waffle supporting the treacherous Mr Farage as the likely next Prime Minister.

    So, what odds are you giving us?

    My lament about the site dying, last night, was based squarely on the fact that it is dying. In two ways

    Last night we had barely a few comments over hours. At a time of huge political interest. Similarly, we get no new posters, ever. Except the execrable @Brixian59 who is surely a previous commenter reincarnating anyway. I’ve heard of this happening

    Why? One big reason is the Blueskying of the site. It is now completely dominated by Dickless Centrist Dads like you. As relentlessly pompous as you are humourless, devoid of insight, caprice or wit. And fucking dull. And you have managed to push out anyone with a spark of wildness, plus that third of the country susceptible to Reform

    If I was a newbie passing by, looking at this parade of sad old middlebrow “opinions”, I’d keep passing by

    How many years (I'd say decades but apparently you've only been around since 2020) have you been doing your 'this site is dying' schtick?
  • bondegezoubondegezou Posts: 21,695

    Foxy said:

    Cicero said:

    Pb.com acquired a huge following because it filtered electoral prediction through cold, hard cash. Two things are threatening this preeminence: firstly, too few posters are actually looking for betting tips and won't put their money where their mouth is. (I have, to my cost as some here can testify).
    Secondly, politicians got too interested and began to try to rig and ramp the markets- as politicians will. The stuff the Tories tried to pull around the last general election is, I think, still under investigation by Plod. This latest naked ramping from Low deserves to be thumped in like manner and should be treated as what it is: a money making opportunity.for political bettors.
    So if the site needs to get it's mojo back, it is not going to happen by allowing Leon to post racist stuff about matters that are sub judice, it is to suggest politely that he backs his Reform ramping with some reasonable amount of dosh. If you can afford £20 for some slightly naff Crown Derby mug, you can certainly afford to take a few quid and back your mostly drunken and/or demented waffle supporting the treacherous Mr Farage as the likely next Prime Minister.

    So, what odds are you giving us?

    The stuff the Tories tried to pull? Which was what?
    Betting on a July election the day before it was announced.
    Lots of people did that. And are the police really still investigating? And besides, I'm pretty sure anyone betting on the date of the election is just trying to win money, not change the outcome. I know I was.
    15 people charged. Trials due to start next year on ‘27.
  • turbotubbsturbotubbs Posts: 23,856

    Foxy said:

    Cicero said:

    Pb.com acquired a huge following because it filtered electoral prediction through cold, hard cash. Two things are threatening this preeminence: firstly, too few posters are actually looking for betting tips and won't put their money where their mouth is. (I have, to my cost as some here can testify).
    Secondly, politicians got too interested and began to try to rig and ramp the markets- as politicians will. The stuff the Tories tried to pull around the last general election is, I think, still under investigation by Plod. This latest naked ramping from Low deserves to be thumped in like manner and should be treated as what it is: a money making opportunity.for political bettors.
    So if the site needs to get it's mojo back, it is not going to happen by allowing Leon to post racist stuff about matters that are sub judice, it is to suggest politely that he backs his Reform ramping with some reasonable amount of dosh. If you can afford £20 for some slightly naff Crown Derby mug, you can certainly afford to take a few quid and back your mostly drunken and/or demented waffle supporting the treacherous Mr Farage as the likely next Prime Minister.

    So, what odds are you giving us?

    The stuff the Tories tried to pull? Which was what?
    Betting on a July election the day before it was announced.
    Lots of people did that. And are the police really still investigating? And besides, I'm pretty sure anyone betting on the date of the election is just trying to win money, not change the outcome. I know I was.
    15 people charged. Trials due to start next year on ‘27.
    For personal gain, presumably, not trying to change the outcome. And I find it an interesting thing. If Foxy watches Leicester City and can discern that they will be relegated, passes that info on, and I profit is that much different from a staffer in No 10 hearing a rumour that Sunsk has taken the decision to call the election?
  • FrankBoothFrankBooth Posts: 10,789
    nico67 said:

    You know when you see vox pops and start thinking oh dear !

    Unusually they found someone who did make a useful comment !

    The woman said she was worried about Reform Restore splitting the vote and allowing Labour to win the seat .

    The attempt to get Restore to back off is surely going to fall on deaf ears. It's possible that Lowe just wants to sabotage Farage anyway and would happily help Labour beat him.

    You also have to wonder who exactly is ramping Restore? Lowe and his minions? Or what about centrist dads keen to stop Farage and split the right?
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 60,933
    edited May 23
    Sandpit said:

    The Russian “governor” of occupied Kherson just closed the motorway to “non-essential traffic”.

    https://x.com/jimmysecuk/status/2057853755400355856

    Ukraine thanks them very much for this decision, as they now know that every truck on the road is a legitimate military target.

    One of the most obvious signs that Russia is now losing the war. Kerch Bridge is effectively closed to freight (the ferries have all been sunk too) and the alternative artery into Crimea is now a death trap due to the longer range drones.

    If Putin had any sense, he'd trade Crimea for the Donbas. Not expecting it however...
  • SandpitSandpit Posts: 62,557
    kyf_100 said:

    Cicero said:

    Pb.com acquired a huge following because it filtered electoral prediction through cold, hard cash. Two things are threatening this preeminence: firstly, too few posters are actually looking for betting tips and won't put their money where their mouth is. (I have, to my cost as some here can testify).
    Secondly, politicians got too interested and began to try to rig and ramp the markets- as politicians will. The stuff the Tories tried to pull around the last general election is, I think, still under investigation by Plod. This latest naked ramping from Low deserves to be thumped in like manner and should be treated as what it is: a money making opportunity.for political bettors.
    So if the site needs to get it's mojo back, it is not going to happen by allowing Leon to post racist stuff about matters that are sub judice, it is to suggest politely that he backs his Reform ramping with some reasonable amount of dosh. If you can afford £20 for some slightly naff Crown Derby mug, you can certainly afford to take a few quid and back your mostly drunken and/or demented waffle supporting the treacherous Mr Farage as the likely next Prime Minister.

    So, what odds are you giving us?

    My lament about the site dying, last night, was based squarely on the fact that it is dying. In two ways

    Last night we had barely a few comments over hours. At a time of huge political interest. Similarly, we get no new posters, ever. Except the execrable @Brixian59 who is surely a previous commenter reincarnating anyway. I’ve heard of this happening

    Why? One big reason is the Blueskying of the site. It is now completely dominated by Dickless Centrist Dads like you. As relentlessly pompous as you are humourless, devoid of insight, caprice or wit. And fucking dull. And you have managed to push out anyone with a spark of wildness, plus that third of the country susceptible to Reform

    If I was a newbie passing by, looking at this parade of sad old middlebrow “opinions”, I’d keep passing by

    Sadly it has become the same old people rehashing the same old arguments - and PB would do well to consider why anyone who doesn't fit into one of two buckets of orthodoxy - "centrist (left leaning) dad" or "socially conservative right" tends to leave. I don't fit into either of those buckets and get piled on. I scan most days but rarely bother posting any more as a result.

    Some of the more interesting _far_ left posters like 148grss - a literal Marxist if I recall - I disagreed with on almost everything, but found to be incredibly engaging and their arguments very well considered. To the point where they actually changed my mind about some things. That is rare. As for Reform voters, I'm a self confessed liberal metropolitan elite type who sees their voter base as utterly infra dig. But I wouldn't heap scorn on them either, because I've been out to the red wall many times to do focus groups, and absolutely get where the inchoate rage at the system is coming from. We would do well to listen to Reform voters and understand where they are coming from even if we disagree with them. But they are completely under-represented on this site - and dismissed and scorned when they do pop up.

    However I don't think the problem is "middlebrow opinions" as much as it is piling on anyone who doesn't conform to the orthodoxy here. The tribalism is tiresome.
    Try saying that Trump isn’t Hitler, and that he’s actually made huge achievements in immigration control, drug prices, combatting fraud, beautifying DC…
  • bondegezoubondegezou Posts: 21,695
    Sandpit said:

    The Russian “governor” of occupied Kherson just closed the motorway to “non-essential traffic”.

    https://x.com/jimmysecuk/status/2057853755400355856

    Ukraine thanks them very much for this decision, as they now know that every truck on the road is a legitimate military target.

    I don’t entirely see how that logic works. Essential does not mean the same as military.
  • theProletheProle Posts: 2,027
    Foxy said:

    Cicero said:

    Pb.com acquired a huge following because it filtered electoral prediction through cold, hard cash. Two things are threatening this preeminence: firstly, too few posters are actually looking for betting tips and won't put their money where their mouth is. (I have, to my cost as some here can testify).
    Secondly, politicians got too interested and began to try to rig and ramp the markets- as politicians will. The stuff the Tories tried to pull around the last general election is, I think, still under investigation by Plod. This latest naked ramping from Low deserves to be thumped in like manner and should be treated as what it is: a money making opportunity.for political bettors.
    So if the site needs to get it's mojo back, it is not going to happen by allowing Leon to post racist stuff about matters that are sub judice, it is to suggest politely that he backs his Reform ramping with some reasonable amount of dosh. If you can afford £20 for some slightly naff Crown Derby mug, you can certainly afford to take a few quid and back your mostly drunken and/or demented waffle supporting the treacherous Mr Farage as the likely next Prime Minister.

    So, what odds are you giving us?

    The stuff the Tories tried to pull? Which was what?
    Betting on a July election the day before it was announced.
    Which is a very different issue. They were trying to do insider trading, rather than trying to move the market to make a particular outcome look more likely.

    That said, the betting markets seem to often have quite odd sentiments even when there isn't a transparently obvious stream of cash trying to bring the odds in on an obvious outsider.

    For example: the fairly number of people who have been backing Farage for next PM over the last couple of years, when it's massively more likely that if Farage gets into No10 the sequence would be SKS -> A. N. other Labour non-entity -> Farage.
    I don't think that's market manipulation, it's just been people who think (correctly) Farage is likely to win the next election, but without realising that unlike the Gadarene Swine, the Labour Party would pause in its headlong rush to drown to elecGadarene SwineSlide clipboard items to elect a new leader for rest of the way down.
  • Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 35,702
    MelonB said:

    Dura_Ace said:

    They look like a formidable election winning machine. I could foresee them seizing power in coalition with Alba, Your Party and Change UK.

    Big Roop will be satisfied as long as he cockblocks the Fukkers in Wankerfield or whatever it's called. Restore is essentially just his anti-Farage vengeance project.
    I've been trying to work out whether Burnham getting in somehow suits Restore/Lowe beyond just sticking it to Reform, but I'm a bit stumped.

    If Burnham gets in, that just warns people not to vote Restore in future, and encourages them to vote Reform to get him out. If Reform get in, and the plumber turns out to be an awful MP (there is precendent), that favours Restore. I think Reform winning with a small minority for Restore is the best possible result for them.
    Surely the best result for them is Restore winning? 🥇
    I said the best possible result.
  • OllyTOllyT Posts: 5,255

    Cicero said:

    Pb.com acquired a huge following because it filtered electoral prediction through cold, hard cash. Two things are threatening this preeminence: firstly, too few posters are actually looking for betting tips and won't put their money where their mouth is. (I have, to my cost as some here can testify).
    Secondly, politicians got too interested and began to try to rig and ramp the markets- as politicians will. The stuff the Tories tried to pull around the last general election is, I think, still under investigation by Plod. This latest naked ramping from Low deserves to be thumped in like manner and should be treated as what it is: a money making opportunity.for political bettors.
    So if the site needs to get it's mojo back, it is not going to happen by allowing Leon to post racist stuff about matters that are sub judice, it is to suggest politely that he backs his Reform ramping with some reasonable amount of dosh. If you can afford £20 for some slightly naff Crown Derby mug, you can certainly afford to take a few quid and back your mostly drunken and/or demented waffle supporting the treacherous Mr Farage as the likely next Prime Minister.

    So, what odds are you giving us?

    My lament about the site dying, last night, was based squarely on the fact that it is dying. In two ways

    Last night we had barely a few comments over hours. At a time of huge political interest. Similarly, we get no new posters, ever. Except the execrable @Brixian59 who is surely a previous commenter reincarnating anyway. I’ve heard of this happening

    Why? One big reason is the Blueskying of the site. It is now completely dominated by Dickless Centrist Dads like you. As relentlessly pompous as you are humourless, devoid of insight, caprice or wit. And fucking dull. And you have managed push out anyone with a spark of wildness, plus that third of the country susceptible to Reform

    If I was a newbie passing by, looking at this parade of sad old middlebrow “opinions”, I’d keep passing by

    That option is still very much available to you..... just saying.....
    I doubt many tears would be shed if he goose-stepped off into the ether.
  • SandpitSandpit Posts: 62,557

    Sandpit said:

    The Russian “governor” of occupied Kherson just closed the motorway to “non-essential traffic”.

    https://x.com/jimmysecuk/status/2057853755400355856

    Ukraine thanks them very much for this decision, as they now know that every truck on the road is a legitimate military target.

    I don’t entirely see how that logic works. Essential does not mean the same as military.
    If the Russian “authority” in the occupied region says that it’s an “essential” truck, then it’s a legitimate target as far as the Ukranians are concerned.
  • bondegezoubondegezou Posts: 21,695

    Foxy said:

    Cicero said:

    Pb.com acquired a huge following because it filtered electoral prediction through cold, hard cash. Two things are threatening this preeminence: firstly, too few posters are actually looking for betting tips and won't put their money where their mouth is. (I have, to my cost as some here can testify).
    Secondly, politicians got too interested and began to try to rig and ramp the markets- as politicians will. The stuff the Tories tried to pull around the last general election is, I think, still under investigation by Plod. This latest naked ramping from Low deserves to be thumped in like manner and should be treated as what it is: a money making opportunity.for political bettors.
    So if the site needs to get it's mojo back, it is not going to happen by allowing Leon to post racist stuff about matters that are sub judice, it is to suggest politely that he backs his Reform ramping with some reasonable amount of dosh. If you can afford £20 for some slightly naff Crown Derby mug, you can certainly afford to take a few quid and back your mostly drunken and/or demented waffle supporting the treacherous Mr Farage as the likely next Prime Minister.

    So, what odds are you giving us?

    The stuff the Tories tried to pull? Which was what?
    Betting on a July election the day before it was announced.
    Lots of people did that. And are the police really still investigating? And besides, I'm pretty sure anyone betting on the date of the election is just trying to win money, not change the outcome. I know I was.
    15 people charged. Trials due to start next year on ‘27.
    For personal gain, presumably, not trying to change the outcome. And I find it an interesting thing. If Foxy watches Leicester City and can discern that they will be relegated, passes that info on, and I profit is that much different from a staffer in No 10 hearing a rumour that Sunsk has taken the decision to call the election?
    Offences under Section 42 of the Gambling Act 2005.
  • FrankBoothFrankBooth Posts: 10,789
    Sandpit said:

    kyf_100 said:

    Cicero said:

    Pb.com acquired a huge following because it filtered electoral prediction through cold, hard cash. Two things are threatening this preeminence: firstly, too few posters are actually looking for betting tips and won't put their money where their mouth is. (I have, to my cost as some here can testify).
    Secondly, politicians got too interested and began to try to rig and ramp the markets- as politicians will. The stuff the Tories tried to pull around the last general election is, I think, still under investigation by Plod. This latest naked ramping from Low deserves to be thumped in like manner and should be treated as what it is: a money making opportunity.for political bettors.
    So if the site needs to get it's mojo back, it is not going to happen by allowing Leon to post racist stuff about matters that are sub judice, it is to suggest politely that he backs his Reform ramping with some reasonable amount of dosh. If you can afford £20 for some slightly naff Crown Derby mug, you can certainly afford to take a few quid and back your mostly drunken and/or demented waffle supporting the treacherous Mr Farage as the likely next Prime Minister.

    So, what odds are you giving us?

    My lament about the site dying, last night, was based squarely on the fact that it is dying. In two ways

    Last night we had barely a few comments over hours. At a time of huge political interest. Similarly, we get no new posters, ever. Except the execrable @Brixian59 who is surely a previous commenter reincarnating anyway. I’ve heard of this happening

    Why? One big reason is the Blueskying of the site. It is now completely dominated by Dickless Centrist Dads like you. As relentlessly pompous as you are humourless, devoid of insight, caprice or wit. And fucking dull. And you have managed to push out anyone with a spark of wildness, plus that third of the country susceptible to Reform

    If I was a newbie passing by, looking at this parade of sad old middlebrow “opinions”, I’d keep passing by

    Sadly it has become the same old people rehashing the same old arguments - and PB would do well to consider why anyone who doesn't fit into one of two buckets of orthodoxy - "centrist (left leaning) dad" or "socially conservative right" tends to leave. I don't fit into either of those buckets and get piled on. I scan most days but rarely bother posting any more as a result.

    Some of the more interesting _far_ left posters like 148grss - a literal Marxist if I recall - I disagreed with on almost everything, but found to be incredibly engaging and their arguments very well considered. To the point where they actually changed my mind about some things. That is rare. As for Reform voters, I'm a self confessed liberal metropolitan elite type who sees their voter base as utterly infra dig. But I wouldn't heap scorn on them either, because I've been out to the red wall many times to do focus groups, and absolutely get where the inchoate rage at the system is coming from. We would do well to listen to Reform voters and understand where they are coming from even if we disagree with them. But they are completely under-represented on this site - and dismissed and scorned when they do pop up.

    However I don't think the problem is "middlebrow opinions" as much as it is piling on anyone who doesn't conform to the orthodoxy here. The tribalism is tiresome.
    Try saying that Trump isn’t Hitler, and that he’s actually made huge achievements in immigration control, drug prices, combatting fraud, beautifying DC…
    Would you accept he's the most corrupt President is US history?
  • kyf_100 said:

    Cicero said:

    Pb.com acquired a huge following because it filtered electoral prediction through cold, hard cash. Two things are threatening this preeminence: firstly, too few posters are actually looking for betting tips and won't put their money where their mouth is. (I have, to my cost as some here can testify).
    Secondly, politicians got too interested and began to try to rig and ramp the markets- as politicians will. The stuff the Tories tried to pull around the last general election is, I think, still under investigation by Plod. This latest naked ramping from Low deserves to be thumped in like manner and should be treated as what it is: a money making opportunity.for political bettors.
    So if the site needs to get it's mojo back, it is not going to happen by allowing Leon to post racist stuff about matters that are sub judice, it is to suggest politely that he backs his Reform ramping with some reasonable amount of dosh. If you can afford £20 for some slightly naff Crown Derby mug, you can certainly afford to take a few quid and back your mostly drunken and/or demented waffle supporting the treacherous Mr Farage as the likely next Prime Minister.

    So, what odds are you giving us?

    My lament about the site dying, last night, was based squarely on the fact that it is dying. In two ways

    Last night we had barely a few comments over hours. At a time of huge political interest. Similarly, we get no new posters, ever. Except the execrable @Brixian59 who is surely a previous commenter reincarnating anyway. I’ve heard of this happening

    Why? One big reason is the Blueskying of the site. It is now completely dominated by Dickless Centrist Dads like you. As relentlessly pompous as you are humourless, devoid of insight, caprice or wit. And fucking dull. And you have managed to push out anyone with a spark of wildness, plus that third of the country susceptible to Reform

    If I was a newbie passing by, looking at this parade of sad old middlebrow “opinions”, I’d keep passing by

    Sadly it has become the same old people rehashing the same old arguments - and PB would do well to consider why anyone who doesn't fit into one of two buckets of orthodoxy - "centrist (left leaning) dad" or "socially conservative right" tends to leave. I don't fit into either of those buckets and get piled on. I scan most days but rarely bother posting any more as a result.

    Some of the more interesting _far_ left posters like 148grss - a literal Marxist if I recall - I disagreed with on almost everything, but found to be incredibly engaging and their arguments very well considered. To the point where they actually changed my mind about some things. That is rare. As for Reform voters, I'm a self confessed liberal metropolitan elite type who sees their voter base as utterly infra dig. But I wouldn't heap scorn on them either, because I've been out to the red wall many times to do focus groups, and absolutely get where the inchoate rage at the system is coming from. We would do well to listen to Reform voters and understand where they are coming from even if we disagree with them. But they are completely under-represented on this site - and dismissed and scorned when they do pop up.

    However I don't think the problem is "middlebrow opinions" as much as it is piling on anyone who doesn't conform to the orthodoxy here. The tribalism is tiresome.
    It’s not quite tribalism. It’s an aversion to unorthodox opinions that is so self righteously pompous it is off putting to engage in the first place. Cf Bluesky

    It is also the utter tedium

    There’s a famous, historic and reliable metric for measuring this which I’ve just invented. The LEONDAMUS Index of Commenter Identifiability. LICI

    When PB is good and diverse, you can identify a load of commenters from the first couple of sentences they write. Their views are spiky, different, quirky, challenging or notably individual - exactly what you want. A good LICI reading is about 60%

    These days the PB LICI reading is down to about 10%. Thr commenters are so dull and witless yet predictably identical in their views - Trump is terrible, Reform are ghastly, etc - you don’t realise who is speaking even after they’ve spoken. I can read whole pages of the same stodgy wearying centrist opinions by @bondegezou, @kinabalu, @Cicero, @thatotherone, @whofuckingcares - that I barely register who in particular has said what and why

    They should save time and post their one single generic boring opinion under one name, once a day
  • kyf_100kyf_100 Posts: 5,138
    Sandpit said:

    kyf_100 said:

    Cicero said:

    Pb.com acquired a huge following because it filtered electoral prediction through cold, hard cash. Two things are threatening this preeminence: firstly, too few posters are actually looking for betting tips and won't put their money where their mouth is. (I have, to my cost as some here can testify).
    Secondly, politicians got too interested and began to try to rig and ramp the markets- as politicians will. The stuff the Tories tried to pull around the last general election is, I think, still under investigation by Plod. This latest naked ramping from Low deserves to be thumped in like manner and should be treated as what it is: a money making opportunity.for political bettors.
    So if the site needs to get it's mojo back, it is not going to happen by allowing Leon to post racist stuff about matters that are sub judice, it is to suggest politely that he backs his Reform ramping with some reasonable amount of dosh. If you can afford £20 for some slightly naff Crown Derby mug, you can certainly afford to take a few quid and back your mostly drunken and/or demented waffle supporting the treacherous Mr Farage as the likely next Prime Minister.

    So, what odds are you giving us?

    My lament about the site dying, last night, was based squarely on the fact that it is dying. In two ways

    Last night we had barely a few comments over hours. At a time of huge political interest. Similarly, we get no new posters, ever. Except the execrable @Brixian59 who is surely a previous commenter reincarnating anyway. I’ve heard of this happening

    Why? One big reason is the Blueskying of the site. It is now completely dominated by Dickless Centrist Dads like you. As relentlessly pompous as you are humourless, devoid of insight, caprice or wit. And fucking dull. And you have managed to push out anyone with a spark of wildness, plus that third of the country susceptible to Reform

    If I was a newbie passing by, looking at this parade of sad old middlebrow “opinions”, I’d keep passing by

    Sadly it has become the same old people rehashing the same old arguments - and PB would do well to consider why anyone who doesn't fit into one of two buckets of orthodoxy - "centrist (left leaning) dad" or "socially conservative right" tends to leave. I don't fit into either of those buckets and get piled on. I scan most days but rarely bother posting any more as a result.

    Some of the more interesting _far_ left posters like 148grss - a literal Marxist if I recall - I disagreed with on almost everything, but found to be incredibly engaging and their arguments very well considered. To the point where they actually changed my mind about some things. That is rare. As for Reform voters, I'm a self confessed liberal metropolitan elite type who sees their voter base as utterly infra dig. But I wouldn't heap scorn on them either, because I've been out to the red wall many times to do focus groups, and absolutely get where the inchoate rage at the system is coming from. We would do well to listen to Reform voters and understand where they are coming from even if we disagree with them. But they are completely under-represented on this site - and dismissed and scorned when they do pop up.

    However I don't think the problem is "middlebrow opinions" as much as it is piling on anyone who doesn't conform to the orthodoxy here. The tribalism is tiresome.
    Try saying that Trump isn’t Hitler, and that he’s actually made huge achievements in immigration control, drug prices, combatting fraud, beautifying DC…
    Well, quite. Can't say I agree with you on Trump but why bother expressing an unorthodox opinion when expressing any view outside of the norm turns into a pile on?

    Being told I was a "leftist" poster the other day when I've spent years banging on about lower taxes and less regulation just because I'm socially liberal was quite an eye opener.
  • noneoftheabovenoneoftheabove Posts: 28,318
    edited May 23

    Foxy said:

    Cicero said:

    Pb.com acquired a huge following because it filtered electoral prediction through cold, hard cash. Two things are threatening this preeminence: firstly, too few posters are actually looking for betting tips and won't put their money where their mouth is. (I have, to my cost as some here can testify).
    Secondly, politicians got too interested and began to try to rig and ramp the markets- as politicians will. The stuff the Tories tried to pull around the last general election is, I think, still under investigation by Plod. This latest naked ramping from Low deserves to be thumped in like manner and should be treated as what it is: a money making opportunity.for political bettors.
    So if the site needs to get it's mojo back, it is not going to happen by allowing Leon to post racist stuff about matters that are sub judice, it is to suggest politely that he backs his Reform ramping with some reasonable amount of dosh. If you can afford £20 for some slightly naff Crown Derby mug, you can certainly afford to take a few quid and back your mostly drunken and/or demented waffle supporting the treacherous Mr Farage as the likely next Prime Minister.

    So, what odds are you giving us?

    The stuff the Tories tried to pull? Which was what?
    Betting on a July election the day before it was announced.
    Lots of people did that. And are the police really still investigating? And besides, I'm pretty sure anyone betting on the date of the election is just trying to win money, not change the outcome. I know I was.
    15 people charged. Trials due to start next year on ‘27.
    For personal gain, presumably, not trying to change the outcome. And I find it an interesting thing. If Foxy watches Leicester City and can discern that they will be relegated, passes that info on, and I profit is that much different from a staffer in No 10 hearing a rumour that Sunsk has taken the decision to call the election?
    This is the Gambling Commission framework in place at the time of the bets. https://assets.ctfassets.net/j16ev64qyf6l/4KPgzbWpVpd5ZPsE444S9F/f4c8a91df1d3e578d698a6fbd24c5a55/Misuse-of-inside-information.pdf

    Foxy is in the first category - Art of betting - The gambling commission has no concerns about this type of information.

    The number 10 staffer depending on their precise role is in the third category - By chance informed - or fourth - Restricted Information. Typically I think either, as a one off scenario, would lead to voiding of bets and referrals to employer rather than criminal prosecution based on the framework.
  • TazTaz Posts: 29,644
    Sandpit said:

    kyf_100 said:

    Cicero said:

    Pb.com acquired a huge following because it filtered electoral prediction through cold, hard cash. Two things are threatening this preeminence: firstly, too few posters are actually looking for betting tips and won't put their money where their mouth is. (I have, to my cost as some here can testify).
    Secondly, politicians got too interested and began to try to rig and ramp the markets- as politicians will. The stuff the Tories tried to pull around the last general election is, I think, still under investigation by Plod. This latest naked ramping from Low deserves to be thumped in like manner and should be treated as what it is: a money making opportunity.for political bettors.
    So if the site needs to get it's mojo back, it is not going to happen by allowing Leon to post racist stuff about matters that are sub judice, it is to suggest politely that he backs his Reform ramping with some reasonable amount of dosh. If you can afford £20 for some slightly naff Crown Derby mug, you can certainly afford to take a few quid and back your mostly drunken and/or demented waffle supporting the treacherous Mr Farage as the likely next Prime Minister.

    So, what odds are you giving us?

    My lament about the site dying, last night, was based squarely on the fact that it is dying. In two ways

    Last night we had barely a few comments over hours. At a time of huge political interest. Similarly, we get no new posters, ever. Except the execrable @Brixian59 who is surely a previous commenter reincarnating anyway. I’ve heard of this happening

    Why? One big reason is the Blueskying of the site. It is now completely dominated by Dickless Centrist Dads like you. As relentlessly pompous as you are humourless, devoid of insight, caprice or wit. And fucking dull. And you have managed to push out anyone with a spark of wildness, plus that third of the country susceptible to Reform

    If I was a newbie passing by, looking at this parade of sad old middlebrow “opinions”, I’d keep passing by

    Sadly it has become the same old people rehashing the same old arguments - and PB would do well to consider why anyone who doesn't fit into one of two buckets of orthodoxy - "centrist (left leaning) dad" or "socially conservative right" tends to leave. I don't fit into either of those buckets and get piled on. I scan most days but rarely bother posting any more as a result.

    Some of the more interesting _far_ left posters like 148grss - a literal Marxist if I recall - I disagreed with on almost everything, but found to be incredibly engaging and their arguments very well considered. To the point where they actually changed my mind about some things. That is rare. As for Reform voters, I'm a self confessed liberal metropolitan elite type who sees their voter base as utterly infra dig. But I wouldn't heap scorn on them either, because I've been out to the red wall many times to do focus groups, and absolutely get where the inchoate rage at the system is coming from. We would do well to listen to Reform voters and understand where they are coming from even if we disagree with them. But they are completely under-represented on this site - and dismissed and scorned when they do pop up.

    However I don't think the problem is "middlebrow opinions" as much as it is piling on anyone who doesn't conform to the orthodoxy here. The tribalism is tiresome.
    Try saying that Trump isn’t Hitler, and that he’s actually made huge achievements in immigration control, drug prices, combatting fraud, beautifying DC…
    You’ll upset the PB herd if you say that !!
  • TazTaz Posts: 29,644

    Sandpit said:

    kyf_100 said:

    Cicero said:

    Pb.com acquired a huge following because it filtered electoral prediction through cold, hard cash. Two things are threatening this preeminence: firstly, too few posters are actually looking for betting tips and won't put their money where their mouth is. (I have, to my cost as some here can testify).
    Secondly, politicians got too interested and began to try to rig and ramp the markets- as politicians will. The stuff the Tories tried to pull around the last general election is, I think, still under investigation by Plod. This latest naked ramping from Low deserves to be thumped in like manner and should be treated as what it is: a money making opportunity.for political bettors.
    So if the site needs to get it's mojo back, it is not going to happen by allowing Leon to post racist stuff about matters that are sub judice, it is to suggest politely that he backs his Reform ramping with some reasonable amount of dosh. If you can afford £20 for some slightly naff Crown Derby mug, you can certainly afford to take a few quid and back your mostly drunken and/or demented waffle supporting the treacherous Mr Farage as the likely next Prime Minister.

    So, what odds are you giving us?

    My lament about the site dying, last night, was based squarely on the fact that it is dying. In two ways

    Last night we had barely a few comments over hours. At a time of huge political interest. Similarly, we get no new posters, ever. Except the execrable @Brixian59 who is surely a previous commenter reincarnating anyway. I’ve heard of this happening

    Why? One big reason is the Blueskying of the site. It is now completely dominated by Dickless Centrist Dads like you. As relentlessly pompous as you are humourless, devoid of insight, caprice or wit. And fucking dull. And you have managed to push out anyone with a spark of wildness, plus that third of the country susceptible to Reform

    If I was a newbie passing by, looking at this parade of sad old middlebrow “opinions”, I’d keep passing by

    Sadly it has become the same old people rehashing the same old arguments - and PB would do well to consider why anyone who doesn't fit into one of two buckets of orthodoxy - "centrist (left leaning) dad" or "socially conservative right" tends to leave. I don't fit into either of those buckets and get piled on. I scan most days but rarely bother posting any more as a result.

    Some of the more interesting _far_ left posters like 148grss - a literal Marxist if I recall - I disagreed with on almost everything, but found to be incredibly engaging and their arguments very well considered. To the point where they actually changed my mind about some things. That is rare. As for Reform voters, I'm a self confessed liberal metropolitan elite type who sees their voter base as utterly infra dig. But I wouldn't heap scorn on them either, because I've been out to the red wall many times to do focus groups, and absolutely get where the inchoate rage at the system is coming from. We would do well to listen to Reform voters and understand where they are coming from even if we disagree with them. But they are completely under-represented on this site - and dismissed and scorned when they do pop up.

    However I don't think the problem is "middlebrow opinions" as much as it is piling on anyone who doesn't conform to the orthodoxy here. The tribalism is tiresome.
    Try saying that Trump isn’t Hitler, and that he’s actually made huge achievements in immigration control, drug prices, combatting fraud, beautifying DC…
    Would you accept he's the most corrupt President is US history?
    Openly, for sure.
  • OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 37,670

    Foxy said:

    Cicero said:

    Pb.com acquired a huge following because it filtered electoral prediction through cold, hard cash. Two things are threatening this preeminence: firstly, too few posters are actually looking for betting tips and won't put their money where their mouth is. (I have, to my cost as some here can testify).
    Secondly, politicians got too interested and began to try to rig and ramp the markets- as politicians will. The stuff the Tories tried to pull around the last general election is, I think, still under investigation by Plod. This latest naked ramping from Low deserves to be thumped in like manner and should be treated as what it is: a money making opportunity.for political bettors.
    So if the site needs to get it's mojo back, it is not going to happen by allowing Leon to post racist stuff about matters that are sub judice, it is to suggest politely that he backs his Reform ramping with some reasonable amount of dosh. If you can afford £20 for some slightly naff Crown Derby mug, you can certainly afford to take a few quid and back your mostly drunken and/or demented waffle supporting the treacherous Mr Farage as the likely next Prime Minister.

    So, what odds are you giving us?

    The stuff the Tories tried to pull? Which was what?
    Betting on a July election the day before it was announced.
    Lots of people did that. And are the police really still investigating? And besides, I'm pretty sure anyone betting on the date of the election is just trying to win money, not change the outcome. I know I was.
    15 people charged. Trials due to start next year on ‘27.
    There's a difference, isn't there, between 'honest' gamblers, like @turbotubbs who are using their skill and knowledge to assess the situation and people who've some knowledge of the plans and use that knowledge to fleece the bookies.
  • OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 37,670

    Sandpit said:

    kyf_100 said:

    Cicero said:

    Pb.com acquired a huge following because it filtered electoral prediction through cold, hard cash. Two things are threatening this preeminence: firstly, too few posters are actually looking for betting tips and won't put their money where their mouth is. (I have, to my cost as some here can testify).
    Secondly, politicians got too interested and began to try to rig and ramp the markets- as politicians will. The stuff the Tories tried to pull around the last general election is, I think, still under investigation by Plod. This latest naked ramping from Low deserves to be thumped in like manner and should be treated as what it is: a money making opportunity.for political bettors.
    So if the site needs to get it's mojo back, it is not going to happen by allowing Leon to post racist stuff about matters that are sub judice, it is to suggest politely that he backs his Reform ramping with some reasonable amount of dosh. If you can afford £20 for some slightly naff Crown Derby mug, you can certainly afford to take a few quid and back your mostly drunken and/or demented waffle supporting the treacherous Mr Farage as the likely next Prime Minister.

    So, what odds are you giving us?

    My lament about the site dying, last night, was based squarely on the fact that it is dying. In two ways

    Last night we had barely a few comments over hours. At a time of huge political interest. Similarly, we get no new posters, ever. Except the execrable @Brixian59 who is surely a previous commenter reincarnating anyway. I’ve heard of this happening

    Why? One big reason is the Blueskying of the site. It is now completely dominated by Dickless Centrist Dads like you. As relentlessly pompous as you are humourless, devoid of insight, caprice or wit. And fucking dull. And you have managed to push out anyone with a spark of wildness, plus that third of the country susceptible to Reform

    If I was a newbie passing by, looking at this parade of sad old middlebrow “opinions”, I’d keep passing by

    Sadly it has become the same old people rehashing the same old arguments - and PB would do well to consider why anyone who doesn't fit into one of two buckets of orthodoxy - "centrist (left leaning) dad" or "socially conservative right" tends to leave. I don't fit into either of those buckets and get piled on. I scan most days but rarely bother posting any more as a result.

    Some of the more interesting _far_ left posters like 148grss - a literal Marxist if I recall - I disagreed with on almost everything, but found to be incredibly engaging and their arguments very well considered. To the point where they actually changed my mind about some things. That is rare. As for Reform voters, I'm a self confessed liberal metropolitan elite type who sees their voter base as utterly infra dig. But I wouldn't heap scorn on them either, because I've been out to the red wall many times to do focus groups, and absolutely get where the inchoate rage at the system is coming from. We would do well to listen to Reform voters and understand where they are coming from even if we disagree with them. But they are completely under-represented on this site - and dismissed and scorned when they do pop up.

    However I don't think the problem is "middlebrow opinions" as much as it is piling on anyone who doesn't conform to the orthodoxy here. The tribalism is tiresome.
    Try saying that Trump isn’t Hitler, and that he’s actually made huge achievements in immigration control, drug prices, combatting fraud, beautifying DC…
    Would you accept he's the most corrupt President is US history?
    Andrew Jackson waves.
  • FrankBoothFrankBooth Posts: 10,789

    Sandpit said:

    The Russian “governor” of occupied Kherson just closed the motorway to “non-essential traffic”.

    https://x.com/jimmysecuk/status/2057853755400355856

    Ukraine thanks them very much for this decision, as they now know that every truck on the road is a legitimate military target.

    One of the most obvious signs that Russia is now losing the war. Kerch Bridge is effectively closed to freight (the ferries have all been sunk too) and the alternative artery into Crimea is now a death trap due to the longer range drones.

    If Putin had any sense, he'd trade Crimea for the Donbas. Not expecting it however...
    People have always argued that Crimea is Putin's sine qua non with respect to Ukraine. That ignores how geographically vulnerable it is.
  • CiceroCicero Posts: 4,520

    Cicero said:

    Pb.com acquired a huge following because it filtered electoral prediction through cold, hard cash. Two things are threatening this preeminence: firstly, too few posters are actually looking for betting tips and won't put their money where their mouth is. (I have, to my cost as some here can testify).
    Secondly, politicians got too interested and began to try to rig and ramp the markets- as politicians will. The stuff the Tories tried to pull around the last general election is, I think, still under investigation by Plod. This latest naked ramping from Low deserves to be thumped in like manner and should be treated as what it is: a money making opportunity.for political bettors.
    So if the site needs to get it's mojo back, it is not going to happen by allowing Leon to post racist stuff about matters that are sub judice, it is to suggest politely that he backs his Reform ramping with some reasonable amount of dosh. If you can afford £20 for some slightly naff Crown Derby mug, you can certainly afford to take a few quid and back your mostly drunken and/or demented waffle supporting the treacherous Mr Farage as the likely next Prime Minister.

    So, what odds are you giving us?

    My lament about the site dying, last night, was based squarely on the fact that it is dying. In two ways

    Last night we had barely a few comments over hours. At a time of huge political interest. Similarly, we get no new posters, ever. Except the execrable @Brixian59 who is surely a previous commenter reincarnating anyway. I’ve heard of this happening

    Why? One big reason is the Blueskying of the site. It is now completely dominated by Dickless Centrist Dads like you. As relentlessly pompous as you are humourless, devoid of insight, caprice or wit. And fucking dull. And you have managed to push out anyone with a spark of wildness, plus that third of the country susceptible to Reform

    If I was a newbie passing by, looking at this parade of sad old middlebrow “opinions”, I’d keep passing by

    Nah...you dont have the cojones to stand behind-your-narcissistic-to-the-point-of-camp opinions.
    If no one is prepared to help TSE, Peter the Punter or OGH to become richer through backing their always wrong opinions with cash, its just another chat site.
    Doesn't matter what your opinions are, just have the courage of your demented far-right blow hard bullshit opinions and put some bawbees down.

    Lets start easy: £20 that Fartage faces censure from the House of Commons and/or criminal charges within one year from today.
    What odds will you give me he wont?
  • RandallFlaggRandallFlagg Posts: 1,499
    Sandpit said:

    kyf_100 said:

    Cicero said:

    Pb.com acquired a huge following because it filtered electoral prediction through cold, hard cash. Two things are threatening this preeminence: firstly, too few posters are actually looking for betting tips and won't put their money where their mouth is. (I have, to my cost as some here can testify).
    Secondly, politicians got too interested and began to try to rig and ramp the markets- as politicians will. The stuff the Tories tried to pull around the last general election is, I think, still under investigation by Plod. This latest naked ramping from Low deserves to be thumped in like manner and should be treated as what it is: a money making opportunity.for political bettors.
    So if the site needs to get it's mojo back, it is not going to happen by allowing Leon to post racist stuff about matters that are sub judice, it is to suggest politely that he backs his Reform ramping with some reasonable amount of dosh. If you can afford £20 for some slightly naff Crown Derby mug, you can certainly afford to take a few quid and back your mostly drunken and/or demented waffle supporting the treacherous Mr Farage as the likely next Prime Minister.

    So, what odds are you giving us?

    My lament about the site dying, last night, was based squarely on the fact that it is dying. In two ways

    Last night we had barely a few comments over hours. At a time of huge political interest. Similarly, we get no new posters, ever. Except the execrable @Brixian59 who is surely a previous commenter reincarnating anyway. I’ve heard of this happening

    Why? One big reason is the Blueskying of the site. It is now completely dominated by Dickless Centrist Dads like you. As relentlessly pompous as you are humourless, devoid of insight, caprice or wit. And fucking dull. And you have managed to push out anyone with a spark of wildness, plus that third of the country susceptible to Reform

    If I was a newbie passing by, looking at this parade of sad old middlebrow “opinions”, I’d keep passing by

    Sadly it has become the same old people rehashing the same old arguments - and PB would do well to consider why anyone who doesn't fit into one of two buckets of orthodoxy - "centrist (left leaning) dad" or "socially conservative right" tends to leave. I don't fit into either of those buckets and get piled on. I scan most days but rarely bother posting any more as a result.

    Some of the more interesting _far_ left posters like 148grss - a literal Marxist if I recall - I disagreed with on almost everything, but found to be incredibly engaging and their arguments very well considered. To the point where they actually changed my mind about some things. That is rare. As for Reform voters, I'm a self confessed liberal metropolitan elite type who sees their voter base as utterly infra dig. But I wouldn't heap scorn on them either, because I've been out to the red wall many times to do focus groups, and absolutely get where the inchoate rage at the system is coming from. We would do well to listen to Reform voters and understand where they are coming from even if we disagree with them. But they are completely under-represented on this site - and dismissed and scorned when they do pop up.

    However I don't think the problem is "middlebrow opinions" as much as it is piling on anyone who doesn't conform to the orthodoxy here. The tribalism is tiresome.
    Try saying that Trump isn’t Hitler, and that he’s actually made huge achievements in immigration control, drug prices, combatting fraud, beautifying DC…
    :D
    https://www.ms.now/news/whos-applying-for-the-1-8-billion-slush-fund
    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/vietnam-trump-trade-tariffs-golf-course-b2757581.html
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 90,923
    Sandpit said:

    kyf_100 said:

    Cicero said:

    Pb.com acquired a huge following because it filtered electoral prediction through cold, hard cash. Two things are threatening this preeminence: firstly, too few posters are actually looking for betting tips and won't put their money where their mouth is. (I have, to my cost as some here can testify).
    Secondly, politicians got too interested and began to try to rig and ramp the markets- as politicians will. The stuff the Tories tried to pull around the last general election is, I think, still under investigation by Plod. This latest naked ramping from Low deserves to be thumped in like manner and should be treated as what it is: a money making opportunity.for political bettors.
    So if the site needs to get it's mojo back, it is not going to happen by allowing Leon to post racist stuff about matters that are sub judice, it is to suggest politely that he backs his Reform ramping with some reasonable amount of dosh. If you can afford £20 for some slightly naff Crown Derby mug, you can certainly afford to take a few quid and back your mostly drunken and/or demented waffle supporting the treacherous Mr Farage as the likely next Prime Minister.

    So, what odds are you giving us?

    My lament about the site dying, last night, was based squarely on the fact that it is dying. In two ways

    Last night we had barely a few comments over hours. At a time of huge political interest. Similarly, we get no new posters, ever. Except the execrable @Brixian59 who is surely a previous commenter reincarnating anyway. I’ve heard of this happening

    Why? One big reason is the Blueskying of the site. It is now completely dominated by Dickless Centrist Dads like you. As relentlessly pompous as you are humourless, devoid of insight, caprice or wit. And fucking dull. And you have managed to push out anyone with a spark of wildness, plus that third of the country susceptible to Reform

    If I was a newbie passing by, looking at this parade of sad old middlebrow “opinions”, I’d keep passing by

    Sadly it has become the same old people rehashing the same old arguments - and PB would do well to consider why anyone who doesn't fit into one of two buckets of orthodoxy - "centrist (left leaning) dad" or "socially conservative right" tends to leave. I don't fit into either of those buckets and get piled on. I scan most days but rarely bother posting any more as a result.

    Some of the more interesting _far_ left posters like 148grss - a literal Marxist if I recall - I disagreed with on almost everything, but found to be incredibly engaging and their arguments very well considered. To the point where they actually changed my mind about some things. That is rare. As for Reform voters, I'm a self confessed liberal metropolitan elite type who sees their voter base as utterly infra dig. But I wouldn't heap scorn on them either, because I've been out to the red wall many times to do focus groups, and absolutely get where the inchoate rage at the system is coming from. We would do well to listen to Reform voters and understand where they are coming from even if we disagree with them. But they are completely under-represented on this site - and dismissed and scorned when they do pop up.

    However I don't think the problem is "middlebrow opinions" as much as it is piling on anyone who doesn't conform to the orthodoxy here. The tribalism is tiresome.
    Try saying that Trump isn’t Hitler, and that he’s actually made huge achievements in immigration control, drug prices, combatting fraud, beautifying DC…
    Good one, Sandpit. You almost had me there.
  • bondegezoubondegezou Posts: 21,695
    Taz said:

    Sandpit said:

    kyf_100 said:

    Cicero said:

    Pb.com acquired a huge following because it filtered electoral prediction through cold, hard cash. Two things are threatening this preeminence: firstly, too few posters are actually looking for betting tips and won't put their money where their mouth is. (I have, to my cost as some here can testify).
    Secondly, politicians got too interested and began to try to rig and ramp the markets- as politicians will. The stuff the Tories tried to pull around the last general election is, I think, still under investigation by Plod. This latest naked ramping from Low deserves to be thumped in like manner and should be treated as what it is: a money making opportunity.for political bettors.
    So if the site needs to get it's mojo back, it is not going to happen by allowing Leon to post racist stuff about matters that are sub judice, it is to suggest politely that he backs his Reform ramping with some reasonable amount of dosh. If you can afford £20 for some slightly naff Crown Derby mug, you can certainly afford to take a few quid and back your mostly drunken and/or demented waffle supporting the treacherous Mr Farage as the likely next Prime Minister.

    So, what odds are you giving us?

    My lament about the site dying, last night, was based squarely on the fact that it is dying. In two ways

    Last night we had barely a few comments over hours. At a time of huge political interest. Similarly, we get no new posters, ever. Except the execrable @Brixian59 who is surely a previous commenter reincarnating anyway. I’ve heard of this happening

    Why? One big reason is the Blueskying of the site. It is now completely dominated by Dickless Centrist Dads like you. As relentlessly pompous as you are humourless, devoid of insight, caprice or wit. And fucking dull. And you have managed to push out anyone with a spark of wildness, plus that third of the country susceptible to Reform

    If I was a newbie passing by, looking at this parade of sad old middlebrow “opinions”, I’d keep passing by

    Sadly it has become the same old people rehashing the same old arguments - and PB would do well to consider why anyone who doesn't fit into one of two buckets of orthodoxy - "centrist (left leaning) dad" or "socially conservative right" tends to leave. I don't fit into either of those buckets and get piled on. I scan most days but rarely bother posting any more as a result.

    Some of the more interesting _far_ left posters like 148grss - a literal Marxist if I recall - I disagreed with on almost everything, but found to be incredibly engaging and their arguments very well considered. To the point where they actually changed my mind about some things. That is rare. As for Reform voters, I'm a self confessed liberal metropolitan elite type who sees their voter base as utterly infra dig. But I wouldn't heap scorn on them either, because I've been out to the red wall many times to do focus groups, and absolutely get where the inchoate rage at the system is coming from. We would do well to listen to Reform voters and understand where they are coming from even if we disagree with them. But they are completely under-represented on this site - and dismissed and scorned when they do pop up.

    However I don't think the problem is "middlebrow opinions" as much as it is piling on anyone who doesn't conform to the orthodoxy here. The tribalism is tiresome.
    Try saying that Trump isn’t Hitler, and that he’s actually made huge achievements in immigration control, drug prices, combatting fraud, beautifying DC…
    You’ll upset the PB herd if you say that !!
    So, what are we meant to do? Not disagree with each other ever? Sounds very “woke”!
  • Cicero said:

    Cicero said:

    Pb.com acquired a huge following because it filtered electoral prediction through cold, hard cash. Two things are threatening this preeminence: firstly, too few posters are actually looking for betting tips and won't put their money where their mouth is. (I have, to my cost as some here can testify).
    Secondly, politicians got too interested and began to try to rig and ramp the markets- as politicians will. The stuff the Tories tried to pull around the last general election is, I think, still under investigation by Plod. This latest naked ramping from Low deserves to be thumped in like manner and should be treated as what it is: a money making opportunity.for political bettors.
    So if the site needs to get it's mojo back, it is not going to happen by allowing Leon to post racist stuff about matters that are sub judice, it is to suggest politely that he backs his Reform ramping with some reasonable amount of dosh. If you can afford £20 for some slightly naff Crown Derby mug, you can certainly afford to take a few quid and back your mostly drunken and/or demented waffle supporting the treacherous Mr Farage as the likely next Prime Minister.

    So, what odds are you giving us?

    My lament about the site dying, last night, was based squarely on the fact that it is dying. In two ways

    Last night we had barely a few comments over hours. At a time of huge political interest. Similarly, we get no new posters, ever. Except the execrable @Brixian59 who is surely a previous commenter reincarnating anyway. I’ve heard of this happening

    Why? One big reason is the Blueskying of the site. It is now completely dominated by Dickless Centrist Dads like you. As relentlessly pompous as you are humourless, devoid of insight, caprice or wit. And fucking dull. And you have managed to push out anyone with a spark of wildness, plus that third of the country susceptible to Reform

    If I was a newbie passing by, looking at this parade of sad old middlebrow “opinions”, I’d keep passing by

    Nah...you dont have the cojones to stand behind-your-narcissistic-to-the-point-of-camp opinions.
    If no one is prepared to help TSE, Peter the Punter or OGH to become richer through backing their always wrong opinions with cash, its just another chat site.
    Doesn't matter what your opinions are, just have the courage of your demented far-right blow hard bullshit opinions and put some bawbees down.

    Lets start easy: £20 that Fartage faces censure from the House of Commons and/or criminal charges within one year from today.
    What odds will you give me he wont?
    Just shut the fuck up
  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 64,439
    a
    theProle said:

    Foxy said:

    Cicero said:

    Pb.com acquired a huge following because it filtered electoral prediction through cold, hard cash. Two things are threatening this preeminence: firstly, too few posters are actually looking for betting tips and won't put their money where their mouth is. (I have, to my cost as some here can testify).
    Secondly, politicians got too interested and began to try to rig and ramp the markets- as politicians will. The stuff the Tories tried to pull around the last general election is, I think, still under investigation by Plod. This latest naked ramping from Low deserves to be thumped in like manner and should be treated as what it is: a money making opportunity.for political bettors.
    So if the site needs to get it's mojo back, it is not going to happen by allowing Leon to post racist stuff about matters that are sub judice, it is to suggest politely that he backs his Reform ramping with some reasonable amount of dosh. If you can afford £20 for some slightly naff Crown Derby mug, you can certainly afford to take a few quid and back your mostly drunken and/or demented waffle supporting the treacherous Mr Farage as the likely next Prime Minister.

    So, what odds are you giving us?

    The stuff the Tories tried to pull? Which was what?
    Betting on a July election the day before it was announced.
    Which is a very different issue. They were trying to do insider trading, rather than trying to move the market to make a particular outcome look more likely.

    That said, the betting markets seem to often have quite odd sentiments even when there isn't a transparently obvious stream of cash trying to bring the odds in on an obvious outsider.

    For example: the fairly number of people who have been backing Farage for next PM over the last couple of years, when it's massively more likely that if Farage gets into No10 the sequence would be SKS -> A. N. other Labour non-entity -> Farage.
    I don't think that's market manipulation, it's just been people who think (correctly) Farage is likely to win the next election, but without realising that unlike the Gadarene Swine, the Labour Party would pause in its headlong rush to drown to elecGadarene SwineSlide clipboard items to elect a new leader for rest of the way down.
    It’s the Labour Party, though.

    I find it entirely possible that Burnsiah wins his by-election. And then the contest never happens. It kind of fades away, into the next Starmer leadership crisis.

    If he loses , the chances that everyone starts looking at their shoes and mumbling is much higher, of course.

    I think there’s at least a 25% probability that Starmer leads Labour into the next election.
  • TheValiantTheValiant Posts: 2,170
    FPT:

    https://x.com/nicksortor/status/2057961275024400736

    NOW: President Trump is now BACK in Washington, DC after CANCELLING his weekend plans in New Jersey

    CBS is reporting intelligence officials have ALSO canceled Memorial Day plans, and are on standby.

    Something may be imminent 👀

    A betting opportunity is imminent. A betting opportunity.
    And pizza sales. Lots of pizza sales in the Washington DC area.

    Oh, and thousands of Cubans will be blown to smitherines, but as MarqueMark correctly said on the last thread, they're losers aren't they so who cares about them.

    /s in case anyone thought otherwise!
  • TazTaz Posts: 29,644

    Taz said:

    Sandpit said:

    kyf_100 said:

    Cicero said:

    Pb.com acquired a huge following because it filtered electoral prediction through cold, hard cash. Two things are threatening this preeminence: firstly, too few posters are actually looking for betting tips and won't put their money where their mouth is. (I have, to my cost as some here can testify).
    Secondly, politicians got too interested and began to try to rig and ramp the markets- as politicians will. The stuff the Tories tried to pull around the last general election is, I think, still under investigation by Plod. This latest naked ramping from Low deserves to be thumped in like manner and should be treated as what it is: a money making opportunity.for political bettors.
    So if the site needs to get it's mojo back, it is not going to happen by allowing Leon to post racist stuff about matters that are sub judice, it is to suggest politely that he backs his Reform ramping with some reasonable amount of dosh. If you can afford £20 for some slightly naff Crown Derby mug, you can certainly afford to take a few quid and back your mostly drunken and/or demented waffle supporting the treacherous Mr Farage as the likely next Prime Minister.

    So, what odds are you giving us?

    My lament about the site dying, last night, was based squarely on the fact that it is dying. In two ways

    Last night we had barely a few comments over hours. At a time of huge political interest. Similarly, we get no new posters, ever. Except the execrable @Brixian59 who is surely a previous commenter reincarnating anyway. I’ve heard of this happening

    Why? One big reason is the Blueskying of the site. It is now completely dominated by Dickless Centrist Dads like you. As relentlessly pompous as you are humourless, devoid of insight, caprice or wit. And fucking dull. And you have managed to push out anyone with a spark of wildness, plus that third of the country susceptible to Reform

    If I was a newbie passing by, looking at this parade of sad old middlebrow “opinions”, I’d keep passing by

    Sadly it has become the same old people rehashing the same old arguments - and PB would do well to consider why anyone who doesn't fit into one of two buckets of orthodoxy - "centrist (left leaning) dad" or "socially conservative right" tends to leave. I don't fit into either of those buckets and get piled on. I scan most days but rarely bother posting any more as a result.

    Some of the more interesting _far_ left posters like 148grss - a literal Marxist if I recall - I disagreed with on almost everything, but found to be incredibly engaging and their arguments very well considered. To the point where they actually changed my mind about some things. That is rare. As for Reform voters, I'm a self confessed liberal metropolitan elite type who sees their voter base as utterly infra dig. But I wouldn't heap scorn on them either, because I've been out to the red wall many times to do focus groups, and absolutely get where the inchoate rage at the system is coming from. We would do well to listen to Reform voters and understand where they are coming from even if we disagree with them. But they are completely under-represented on this site - and dismissed and scorned when they do pop up.

    However I don't think the problem is "middlebrow opinions" as much as it is piling on anyone who doesn't conform to the orthodoxy here. The tribalism is tiresome.
    Try saying that Trump isn’t Hitler, and that he’s actually made huge achievements in immigration control, drug prices, combatting fraud, beautifying DC…
    You’ll upset the PB herd if you say that !!
    So, what are we meant to do?”!
    Keep saying everyone the herd disagrees with is Hitler, obvs !!
  • noneoftheabovenoneoftheabove Posts: 28,318

    Foxy said:

    Cicero said:

    Pb.com acquired a huge following because it filtered electoral prediction through cold, hard cash. Two things are threatening this preeminence: firstly, too few posters are actually looking for betting tips and won't put their money where their mouth is. (I have, to my cost as some here can testify).
    Secondly, politicians got too interested and began to try to rig and ramp the markets- as politicians will. The stuff the Tories tried to pull around the last general election is, I think, still under investigation by Plod. This latest naked ramping from Low deserves to be thumped in like manner and should be treated as what it is: a money making opportunity.for political bettors.
    So if the site needs to get it's mojo back, it is not going to happen by allowing Leon to post racist stuff about matters that are sub judice, it is to suggest politely that he backs his Reform ramping with some reasonable amount of dosh. If you can afford £20 for some slightly naff Crown Derby mug, you can certainly afford to take a few quid and back your mostly drunken and/or demented waffle supporting the treacherous Mr Farage as the likely next Prime Minister.

    So, what odds are you giving us?

    The stuff the Tories tried to pull? Which was what?
    Betting on a July election the day before it was announced.
    Lots of people did that. And are the police really still investigating? And besides, I'm pretty sure anyone betting on the date of the election is just trying to win money, not change the outcome. I know I was.
    15 people charged. Trials due to start next year on ‘27.
    For personal gain, presumably, not trying to change the outcome. And I find it an interesting thing. If Foxy watches Leicester City and can discern that they will be relegated, passes that info on, and I profit is that much different from a staffer in No 10 hearing a rumour that Sunsk has taken the decision to call the election?
    This is the Gambling Commission framework in place at the time of the bets. https://assets.ctfassets.net/j16ev64qyf6l/4KPgzbWpVpd5ZPsE444S9F/f4c8a91df1d3e578d698a6fbd24c5a55/Misuse-of-inside-information.pdf

    Foxy is in the first category - Art of betting - The gambling commission has no concerns about this type of information.

    The number 10 staffer depending on their precise role is in the third category - By chance informed - or fourth - Restricted Information. Typically I think either, as a one off scenario, would lead to voiding of bets and referrals to employer rather than criminal prosecution based on the framework.
    I think such bets should be forfeited rather than voided but otherwise the framework is fine. If they use restricted information they are guilty of a criminal offence but typically won't meet the threshold for a criminal case to be in the public interest.
  • TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 48,229
    Taz said:

    Sandpit said:

    kyf_100 said:

    Cicero said:

    Pb.com acquired a huge following because it filtered electoral prediction through cold, hard cash. Two things are threatening this preeminence: firstly, too few posters are actually looking for betting tips and won't put their money where their mouth is. (I have, to my cost as some here can testify).
    Secondly, politicians got too interested and began to try to rig and ramp the markets- as politicians will. The stuff the Tories tried to pull around the last general election is, I think, still under investigation by Plod. This latest naked ramping from Low deserves to be thumped in like manner and should be treated as what it is: a money making opportunity.for political bettors.
    So if the site needs to get it's mojo back, it is not going to happen by allowing Leon to post racist stuff about matters that are sub judice, it is to suggest politely that he backs his Reform ramping with some reasonable amount of dosh. If you can afford £20 for some slightly naff Crown Derby mug, you can certainly afford to take a few quid and back your mostly drunken and/or demented waffle supporting the treacherous Mr Farage as the likely next Prime Minister.

    So, what odds are you giving us?

    My lament about the site dying, last night, was based squarely on the fact that it is dying. In two ways

    Last night we had barely a few comments over hours. At a time of huge political interest. Similarly, we get no new posters, ever. Except the execrable @Brixian59 who is surely a previous commenter reincarnating anyway. I’ve heard of this happening

    Why? One big reason is the Blueskying of the site. It is now completely dominated by Dickless Centrist Dads like you. As relentlessly pompous as you are humourless, devoid of insight, caprice or wit. And fucking dull. And you have managed to push out anyone with a spark of wildness, plus that third of the country susceptible to Reform

    If I was a newbie passing by, looking at this parade of sad old middlebrow “opinions”, I’d keep passing by

    Sadly it has become the same old people rehashing the same old arguments - and PB would do well to consider why anyone who doesn't fit into one of two buckets of orthodoxy - "centrist (left leaning) dad" or "socially conservative right" tends to leave. I don't fit into either of those buckets and get piled on. I scan most days but rarely bother posting any more as a result.

    Some of the more interesting _far_ left posters like 148grss - a literal Marxist if I recall - I disagreed with on almost everything, but found to be incredibly engaging and their arguments very well considered. To the point where they actually changed my mind about some things. That is rare. As for Reform voters, I'm a self confessed liberal metropolitan elite type who sees their voter base as utterly infra dig. But I wouldn't heap scorn on them either, because I've been out to the red wall many times to do focus groups, and absolutely get where the inchoate rage at the system is coming from. We would do well to listen to Reform voters and understand where they are coming from even if we disagree with them. But they are completely under-represented on this site - and dismissed and scorned when they do pop up.

    However I don't think the problem is "middlebrow opinions" as much as it is piling on anyone who doesn't conform to the orthodoxy here. The tribalism is tiresome.
    Try saying that Trump isn’t Hitler, and that he’s actually made huge achievements in immigration control, drug prices, combatting fraud, beautifying DC…
    You’ll upset the PB herd if you say that !!
    There's more than one PB herd - the stop being nasty to righties for example, and the right of centre dads endlessly moaning about centrist dads for another.
  • THIS is more interesting. Also, pretty incredible

    “Eli Lilly released retatrutide Phase 3 data yesterday. 28% weight loss in 80 weeks. The most powerful obesity drug that’s ever been tested.

    And today the cancer signal drops.

    12,112 patients. Seven tumor types. GLP-1 users had half the lung cancer metastasis rate (10% vs 22%). Breast cancer: 43% cut. Colon cancer five-year mortality in a separate study: 15.5% vs 37.1%.

    Cancer joins a list that already includes heart disease (SELECT, 20% MACE reduction), kidney failure (FLOW, 24% slower decline), sleep apnea (SURMOUNT-OSA, FDA-approved), addiction (BMJ, 600K veterans, 18-25% reduction across substances), and liver disease (86% fat clearance).

    Tumors express GLP-1 receptors. Activate them and NF-kB drops, apoptosis rises. The drug isn’t just shrinking fat. It’s talking directly to the cancer.

    One drug class. Designed for blood sugar. The biology keeps finding uses the designers didn’t predict.”

    It’s beginning to look like these drugs are up there with the first anti-biotics. Or way beyond. Maybe everyone should be on them

    https://x.com/agingroy/status/2057717218608099484?s=46

    TRANSPARENCY: I’m on one of them. I’m on Mounjaro. It was originally to lose weight but that’s happened. Now it’s to heal my liver and reduce the booze intake (which had to happen). It works. My drinking has probably halved
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 29,253
    Cicero said:

    Pb.com acquired a huge following because it filtered electoral prediction through cold, hard cash. Two things are threatening this preeminence: firstly, too few posters are actually looking for betting tips and won't put their money where their mouth is. (I have, to my cost as some here can testify).
    Secondly, politicians got too interested and began to try to rig and ramp the markets- as politicians will. The stuff the Tories tried to pull around the last general election is, I think, still under investigation by Plod. This latest naked ramping from Low deserves to be thumped in like manner and should be treated as what it is: a money making opportunity.for political bettors.
    So if the site needs to get it's mojo back, it is not going to happen by allowing Leon to post racist stuff about matters that are sub judice, it is to suggest politely that he backs his Reform ramping with some reasonable amount of dosh. If you can afford £20 for some slightly naff Crown Derby mug, you can certainly afford to take a few quid and back your mostly drunken and/or demented waffle supporting the treacherous Mr Farage as the likely next Prime Minister.

    So, what odds are you giving us?

    Woah there range rider. Using the betting markets to try and ramp your position is as old as the betting markets itself. Clement Freud, the former Liberal MP (and other things) used this technique very successfully in the 70s or 80s to get elected, and it's been going on ever since. The unrealistic odds on Andrea Leadsome or that mad London Mayor candidate with the suit speak to that. Mad rich people piling on to Restore is just the latest incarnation of this.
  • Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 35,702

    Cicero said:

    Cicero said:

    Pb.com acquired a huge following because it filtered electoral prediction through cold, hard cash. Two things are threatening this preeminence: firstly, too few posters are actually looking for betting tips and won't put their money where their mouth is. (I have, to my cost as some here can testify).
    Secondly, politicians got too interested and began to try to rig and ramp the markets- as politicians will. The stuff the Tories tried to pull around the last general election is, I think, still under investigation by Plod. This latest naked ramping from Low deserves to be thumped in like manner and should be treated as what it is: a money making opportunity.for political bettors.
    So if the site needs to get it's mojo back, it is not going to happen by allowing Leon to post racist stuff about matters that are sub judice, it is to suggest politely that he backs his Reform ramping with some reasonable amount of dosh. If you can afford £20 for some slightly naff Crown Derby mug, you can certainly afford to take a few quid and back your mostly drunken and/or demented waffle supporting the treacherous Mr Farage as the likely next Prime Minister.

    So, what odds are you giving us?

    My lament about the site dying, last night, was based squarely on the fact that it is dying. In two ways

    Last night we had barely a few comments over hours. At a time of huge political interest. Similarly, we get no new posters, ever. Except the execrable @Brixian59 who is surely a previous commenter reincarnating anyway. I’ve heard of this happening

    Why? One big reason is the Blueskying of the site. It is now completely dominated by Dickless Centrist Dads like you. As relentlessly pompous as you are humourless, devoid of insight, caprice or wit. And fucking dull. And you have managed to push out anyone with a spark of wildness, plus that third of the country susceptible to Reform

    If I was a newbie passing by, looking at this parade of sad old middlebrow “opinions”, I’d keep passing by

    Nah...you dont have the cojones to stand behind-your-narcissistic-to-the-point-of-camp opinions.
    If no one is prepared to help TSE, Peter the Punter or OGH to become richer through backing their always wrong opinions with cash, its just another chat site.
    Doesn't matter what your opinions are, just have the courage of your demented far-right blow hard bullshit opinions and put some bawbees down.

    Lets start easy: £20 that Fartage faces censure from the House of Commons and/or criminal charges within one year from today.
    What odds will you give me he wont?
    Just shut the fuck up
    I quite like this angry Cicero with his relatively brief slang-y posts.
  • noneoftheabovenoneoftheabove Posts: 28,318
    kyf_100 said:

    Sandpit said:

    kyf_100 said:

    Cicero said:

    Pb.com acquired a huge following because it filtered electoral prediction through cold, hard cash. Two things are threatening this preeminence: firstly, too few posters are actually looking for betting tips and won't put their money where their mouth is. (I have, to my cost as some here can testify).
    Secondly, politicians got too interested and began to try to rig and ramp the markets- as politicians will. The stuff the Tories tried to pull around the last general election is, I think, still under investigation by Plod. This latest naked ramping from Low deserves to be thumped in like manner and should be treated as what it is: a money making opportunity.for political bettors.
    So if the site needs to get it's mojo back, it is not going to happen by allowing Leon to post racist stuff about matters that are sub judice, it is to suggest politely that he backs his Reform ramping with some reasonable amount of dosh. If you can afford £20 for some slightly naff Crown Derby mug, you can certainly afford to take a few quid and back your mostly drunken and/or demented waffle supporting the treacherous Mr Farage as the likely next Prime Minister.

    So, what odds are you giving us?

    My lament about the site dying, last night, was based squarely on the fact that it is dying. In two ways

    Last night we had barely a few comments over hours. At a time of huge political interest. Similarly, we get no new posters, ever. Except the execrable @Brixian59 who is surely a previous commenter reincarnating anyway. I’ve heard of this happening

    Why? One big reason is the Blueskying of the site. It is now completely dominated by Dickless Centrist Dads like you. As relentlessly pompous as you are humourless, devoid of insight, caprice or wit. And fucking dull. And you have managed to push out anyone with a spark of wildness, plus that third of the country susceptible to Reform

    If I was a newbie passing by, looking at this parade of sad old middlebrow “opinions”, I’d keep passing by

    Sadly it has become the same old people rehashing the same old arguments - and PB would do well to consider why anyone who doesn't fit into one of two buckets of orthodoxy - "centrist (left leaning) dad" or "socially conservative right" tends to leave. I don't fit into either of those buckets and get piled on. I scan most days but rarely bother posting any more as a result.

    Some of the more interesting _far_ left posters like 148grss - a literal Marxist if I recall - I disagreed with on almost everything, but found to be incredibly engaging and their arguments very well considered. To the point where they actually changed my mind about some things. That is rare. As for Reform voters, I'm a self confessed liberal metropolitan elite type who sees their voter base as utterly infra dig. But I wouldn't heap scorn on them either, because I've been out to the red wall many times to do focus groups, and absolutely get where the inchoate rage at the system is coming from. We would do well to listen to Reform voters and understand where they are coming from even if we disagree with them. But they are completely under-represented on this site - and dismissed and scorned when they do pop up.

    However I don't think the problem is "middlebrow opinions" as much as it is piling on anyone who doesn't conform to the orthodoxy here. The tribalism is tiresome.
    Try saying that Trump isn’t Hitler, and that he’s actually made huge achievements in immigration control, drug prices, combatting fraud, beautifying DC…
    Well, quite. Can't say I agree with you on Trump but why bother expressing an unorthodox opinion when expressing any view outside of the norm turns into a pile on?

    Being told I was a "leftist" poster the other day when I've spent years banging on about lower taxes and less regulation just because I'm socially liberal was quite an eye opener.
    Is that a pile on? Or someone who also thinks Cameron and even Sunak as woke lefty liberals miscategorising you?

    The only people who get piled on, and they do exist on both left and right, are deliberately provocative themselves imo.
  • kinabalukinabalu Posts: 51,550
    Right, I've done it. Ouch!

    Anyway, those immigration numbers. Sure they're down a bit but whoppee doo. Fact is, there are millions already here with their fingers in. That's why we can't afford to fix any potholes or see a doctor. Course if you point this out you're a racist. Wtf has happened to this country. We must be soft in the head. Bunch of mugs.

    Nigel gets it. That's why Reform are leading the polls.
  • TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 48,229

    THIS is more interesting. Also, pretty incredible

    “Eli Lilly released retatrutide Phase 3 data yesterday. 28% weight loss in 80 weeks. The most powerful obesity drug that’s ever been tested.

    And today the cancer signal drops.

    12,112 patients. Seven tumor types. GLP-1 users had half the lung cancer metastasis rate (10% vs 22%). Breast cancer: 43% cut. Colon cancer five-year mortality in a separate study: 15.5% vs 37.1%.

    Cancer joins a list that already includes heart disease (SELECT, 20% MACE reduction), kidney failure (FLOW, 24% slower decline), sleep apnea (SURMOUNT-OSA, FDA-approved), addiction (BMJ, 600K veterans, 18-25% reduction across substances), and liver disease (86% fat clearance).

    Tumors express GLP-1 receptors. Activate them and NF-kB drops, apoptosis rises. The drug isn’t just shrinking fat. It’s talking directly to the cancer.

    One drug class. Designed for blood sugar. The biology keeps finding uses the designers didn’t predict.”

    It’s beginning to look like these drugs are up there with the first anti-biotics. Or way beyond. Maybe everyone should be on them

    https://x.com/agingroy/status/2057717218608099484?s=46

    TRANSPARENCY: I’m on one of them. I’m on Mounjaro. It was originally to lose weight but that’s happened. Now it’s to heal my liver and reduce the booze intake (which had to happen). It works. My drinking has probably halved

    So just the 20 units a day now.
  • kyf_100kyf_100 Posts: 5,138

    kyf_100 said:

    Sandpit said:

    kyf_100 said:

    Cicero said:

    Pb.com acquired a huge following because it filtered electoral prediction through cold, hard cash. Two things are threatening this preeminence: firstly, too few posters are actually looking for betting tips and won't put their money where their mouth is. (I have, to my cost as some here can testify).
    Secondly, politicians got too interested and began to try to rig and ramp the markets- as politicians will. The stuff the Tories tried to pull around the last general election is, I think, still under investigation by Plod. This latest naked ramping from Low deserves to be thumped in like manner and should be treated as what it is: a money making opportunity.for political bettors.
    So if the site needs to get it's mojo back, it is not going to happen by allowing Leon to post racist stuff about matters that are sub judice, it is to suggest politely that he backs his Reform ramping with some reasonable amount of dosh. If you can afford £20 for some slightly naff Crown Derby mug, you can certainly afford to take a few quid and back your mostly drunken and/or demented waffle supporting the treacherous Mr Farage as the likely next Prime Minister.

    So, what odds are you giving us?

    My lament about the site dying, last night, was based squarely on the fact that it is dying. In two ways

    Last night we had barely a few comments over hours. At a time of huge political interest. Similarly, we get no new posters, ever. Except the execrable @Brixian59 who is surely a previous commenter reincarnating anyway. I’ve heard of this happening

    Why? One big reason is the Blueskying of the site. It is now completely dominated by Dickless Centrist Dads like you. As relentlessly pompous as you are humourless, devoid of insight, caprice or wit. And fucking dull. And you have managed to push out anyone with a spark of wildness, plus that third of the country susceptible to Reform

    If I was a newbie passing by, looking at this parade of sad old middlebrow “opinions”, I’d keep passing by

    Sadly it has become the same old people rehashing the same old arguments - and PB would do well to consider why anyone who doesn't fit into one of two buckets of orthodoxy - "centrist (left leaning) dad" or "socially conservative right" tends to leave. I don't fit into either of those buckets and get piled on. I scan most days but rarely bother posting any more as a result.

    Some of the more interesting _far_ left posters like 148grss - a literal Marxist if I recall - I disagreed with on almost everything, but found to be incredibly engaging and their arguments very well considered. To the point where they actually changed my mind about some things. That is rare. As for Reform voters, I'm a self confessed liberal metropolitan elite type who sees their voter base as utterly infra dig. But I wouldn't heap scorn on them either, because I've been out to the red wall many times to do focus groups, and absolutely get where the inchoate rage at the system is coming from. We would do well to listen to Reform voters and understand where they are coming from even if we disagree with them. But they are completely under-represented on this site - and dismissed and scorned when they do pop up.

    However I don't think the problem is "middlebrow opinions" as much as it is piling on anyone who doesn't conform to the orthodoxy here. The tribalism is tiresome.
    Try saying that Trump isn’t Hitler, and that he’s actually made huge achievements in immigration control, drug prices, combatting fraud, beautifying DC…
    Well, quite. Can't say I agree with you on Trump but why bother expressing an unorthodox opinion when expressing any view outside of the norm turns into a pile on?

    Being told I was a "leftist" poster the other day when I've spent years banging on about lower taxes and less regulation just because I'm socially liberal was quite an eye opener.
    I have been meaning to apologise for that. It was a genuine moment of confusion following a helluva mental week. I am sorry.
    No worries. Apology accepted and much appreciated.

    The wider point about tribalism on this site stands though, I think people tend to consistently post "goodthink" for either the centrist dad tribe or the socially conservative tribe to gain likes, rather than say interesting stuff like "Well, I'm a low tax libertarian but actually the Greens are the only party seriously standing up for civil liberties in the UK - repeal of the online safety act, right to protest, legalisation of drugs etc so maybe I'll vote for them*"

    *I won't actually vote for a party that plans to tax the economy into the ground.
This discussion has been closed.