Skip to content

Anarchy in the UK – politicalbetting.com

SystemSystem Posts: 13,173
edited May 9 in General
Anarchy in the UK – politicalbetting.com

If the multi-party politics we currently have in Great Britain continues until the next general election then we’re going to see all sorts freakish/unexpected results.

Read the full story here

«13

Comments

  • LostPasswordLostPassword Posts: 24,226
    Second!
  • Second!

    No you were first!
  • LostPasswordLostPassword Posts: 24,226

    Second!

    No you were first!
    I demand a recount!
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 128,580

    Second!

    No you were first!
    I demand a recount!
    Stop obsessing about firsts, and focus on spotting the subtle music reference in the header.
  • StuartinromfordStuartinromford Posts: 22,874

    Second!

    No you were first!
    I demand a recount!
    Stop obsessing about firsts, and focus on spotting the subtle music reference in the header.
    bloc party? That really is subtle.
  • Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 59,789
    Counting staff at Tower Hamlets, Lewisham, Lambeth, Croydon = slackers!
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 128,580
    I once was chastised for calling Richard Burgon thick.

    Now here's a Labour MP publicly doing the same.



    https://x.com/DavidTaylor85/status/2052845717442449753
  • turbotubbsturbotubbs Posts: 23,200
    So Starmers thinks he hasn't convinced voters that the change will benefit them? Id argue he hasn't set out what the change is actually going to be. 14 years of planning for government and no actual plans. How does labour intend to grow the economy? How will it resolve social care? How will stop junior doctors claiming everything bigger pay rises? No actual plans seem to exist.
  • Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 59,789
    Reform won 38 seats in London OUTSIDE their bastion of Havering (39 seats won).

    9 Barking
    8 Hounslow
    7 Bexley
    6 Bromley
    4 Hillingdon
    2 Sutton
    1 Greenwich
    1 Redbridge
  • CookieCookie Posts: 17,567

    Second!

    No you were first!
    I demand a recount!
    Stop obsessing about firsts, and focus on spotting the subtle music reference in the header.
    Perhaps an "I've spotted the pun" button could be added?
    Along with an "I like the pun" and/or an " I don't understand the pun".

    (Yes, I know this isn't so much a pun as a quote)
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 59,883
    https://x.com/gbpolitcs/status/2053094812883042416

    In St. Helens alone, two Green party strongholds were won by Reform UK and the Conservatives
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 59,883
    “Where hope resides”

    https://x.com/politlcsuk/status/2053082766774776010

    WATCH: Keir Starmer says he will set out his "values and convictions" that drive him as PM on Monday

    "The hope wasn't there enough in the first two years of this Government. That's why it's important for me now to set out where hope resides"
  • noneoftheabovenoneoftheabove Posts: 27,958

    Reform won 38 seats in London OUTSIDE their bastion of Havering (39 seats won).

    9 Barking
    8 Hounslow
    7 Bexley
    6 Bromley
    4 Hillingdon
    2 Sutton
    1 Greenwich
    1 Redbridge

    What have they got against 3 and 5?
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 39,816
    edited May 9

    I once was chastised for calling Richard Burgon thick.

    Now here's a Labour MP publicly doing the same.



    https://x.com/DavidTaylor85/status/2052845717442449753

    I read that as "Socialist Champagne Group Secretary @RichardBurgon".
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 25,464

    “Where hope resides”

    https://x.com/politlcsuk/status/2053082766774776010

    WATCH: Keir Starmer says he will set out his "values and convictions" that drive him as PM on Monday

    "The hope wasn't there enough in the first two years of this Government. That's why it's important for me now to set out where hope resides"

    "hope wasn't there" = hopeless?
  • Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 72,181
    In this febrile climate goodness knows what will happen in 2029 and until yesterday I dismissed Farage as PM

    However, after yesterday it would be foolish not to think the impossible and certainly a right wing government of some form is becoming more likely, not least as Starmer puts at risk the labour party itself by his own indefenceable actions to cling on to his office

    Labour just have to bring the curtain down on this unedifying spectacle and tell Starmer his time is up
  • nico67nico67 Posts: 8,323
    Unless Starmer has a new earth shattering policy to announce then he shouldn’t bother on Monday as this will just wind people up even more .
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 91,959
    edited May 9
    nico67 said:

    Unless Starmer has a new earth shattering policy to announce then he shouldn’t bother on Monday as this will just wind people up even more .

    Wooden toys, Pet ASBOs, National Spare Room Database, Silicon Playgrounds...
  • StuartinromfordStuartinromford Posts: 22,874
    On topic:

    It's a dynamic that's been building up for a while. Different wings of the same party/tradition have always hated each other, and not often hidden it well. But whereas in the past, they were prepared to cohabit for fear of losing, now they simply don't care. I suspect it's part of the wider changes in society- we can and do seek out those very much like Us, and label everyone else as Them. And counsumer economics has taught us to demand and expect things customised exactly to what we want. Social media has just been the cat turd on the blackberry trifle.

    One of Starmer's many problems is that he's old, and what political instincts he has come from the earlier era, where people concluded that they had to to stay in the tent, even if it was suboptimal. But these days, people aren't as willing to do that. Hence Reform, and all the other Re-grouplings. Hence the Greens reinvention as lefty purists.

    I don't know who does have the skills to navigate these new choppy waters.
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 39,816

    In this febrile climate goodness knows what will happen in 2029 and until yesterday I dismissed Farage as PM

    However, after yesterday it would be foolish not to think the impossible and certainly a right wing government of some form is becoming more likely, not least as Starmer puts at risk the labour party itself by his own indefenceable actions to cling on to his office

    Labour just have to bring the curtain down on this unedifying spectacle and tell Starmer his time is up

    Just to calm you down. Does anyone remember the subsequent SDP Government?

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/09/16/the-tories-arent-finished/?fbclid=IwY2xjawRsG6VleHRuA2FlbQIxMABicmlkETEySUQ5RXJISDlQeVVzRGxtc3J0YwZhcHBfaWQQMjIyMDM5MTc4ODIwMDg5MgABHjK7wdLyZFgFdhNcLkw7c5tZbOAPeo5qHh_wIFfhqkMcailUg-QEbQQRnbgV_aem_AHzEaCW7kSh8IMxD5gtjuA
  • dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 32,596

    On topic:

    It's a dynamic that's been building up for a while. Different wings of the same party/tradition have always hated each other, and not often hidden it well. But whereas in the past, they were prepared to cohabit for fear of losing, now they simply don't care. I suspect it's part of the wider changes in society- we can and do seek out those very much like Us, and label everyone else as Them. And counsumer economics has taught us to demand and expect things customised exactly to what we want. Social media has just been the cat turd on the blackberry trifle.

    One of Starmer's many problems is that he's old, and what political instincts he has come from the earlier era, where people concluded that they had to to stay in the tent, even if it was suboptimal. But these days, people aren't as willing to do that. Hence Reform, and all the other Re-grouplings. Hence the Greens reinvention as lefty purists.

    I don't know who does have the skills to navigate these new choppy waters.

    FPTP doesn't seem a very good fit with what you describe.
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 59,883
    nico67 said:

    Unless Starmer has a new earth shattering policy to announce then he shouldn’t bother on Monday as this will just wind people up even more .

    https://x.com/Peston/status/2053105976706826380

    I asked a minister what MPs would need to hear to be clear that he does understand their concerns, that he “gets it”.

    This was the reply. “I mean god knows because I dont think he does. It’s not anything anyone else can tell him it has to come from him.”

    And that, in a nutshell, is why Starmer is in so much trouble.
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 59,883

    nico67 said:

    Unless Starmer has a new earth shattering policy to announce then he shouldn’t bother on Monday as this will just wind people up even more .

    Wooden toys, Pet ASBOs, National Spare Room Database, Silicon Playgrounds...
    A tax on second kitchens.
  • algarkirkalgarkirk Posts: 17,430
    dixiedean said:

    Reform won 38 seats in London OUTSIDE their bastion of Havering (39 seats won).

    9 Barking
    8 Hounslow
    7 Bexley
    6 Bromley
    4 Hillingdon
    2 Sutton
    1 Greenwich
    1 Redbridge

    What have they got against 3 and 5?
    They consider them odd.
    Not prime targets? A partial strike by Fibonacci numbers?

  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 72,380

    “Where hope resides”

    https://x.com/politlcsuk/status/2053082766774776010

    WATCH: Keir Starmer says he will set out his "values and convictions" that drive him as PM on Monday

    "The hope wasn't there enough in the first two years of this Government. That's why it's important for me now to set out where hope resides"

    So. Someone sat down in No 10 and said what do we do about the Greens and another aide said well their new slogan is Make Hope Normal Again so why don't we go on that?

    Not the worst idea we will hear from the bunker in next few days.
  • StuartinromfordStuartinromford Posts: 22,874
    dixiedean said:

    On topic:

    It's a dynamic that's been building up for a while. Different wings of the same party/tradition have always hated each other, and not often hidden it well. But whereas in the past, they were prepared to cohabit for fear of losing, now they simply don't care. I suspect it's part of the wider changes in society- we can and do seek out those very much like Us, and label everyone else as Them. And counsumer economics has taught us to demand and expect things customised exactly to what we want. Social media has just been the cat turd on the blackberry trifle.

    One of Starmer's many problems is that he's old, and what political instincts he has come from the earlier era, where people concluded that they had to to stay in the tent, even if it was suboptimal. But these days, people aren't as willing to do that. Hence Reform, and all the other Re-grouplings. Hence the Greens reinvention as lefty purists.

    I don't know who does have the skills to navigate these new choppy waters.

    FPTP doesn't seem a very good fit with what you describe.
    Well, yes. FPTP is fine if people are willing to sort out their coalitions in advance, then present them to the electorate on polling day. To an extent, it rewards parties that do that, which is probably a good thing from the point of view of infromed voter choice.

    If we've really got 5 (6... 7...) parties, it becomes pretty much a lottery, and nobody can want that... can they? But it's also about culture, and not just political culture. Countries with PR have seen the same fracturing of parties. And I don't think that's good for society. Somehow, we have to get along alongside each other.
  • Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 72,181

    In this febrile climate goodness knows what will happen in 2029 and until yesterday I dismissed Farage as PM

    However, after yesterday it would be foolish not to think the impossible and certainly a right wing government of some form is becoming more likely, not least as Starmer puts at risk the labour party itself by his own indefenceable actions to cling on to his office

    Labour just have to bring the curtain down on this unedifying spectacle and tell Starmer his time is up

    Just to calm you down. Does anyone remember the subsequent SDP Government?

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/09/16/the-tories-arent-finished/?fbclid=IwY2xjawRsG6VleHRuA2FlbQIxMABicmlkETEySUQ5RXJISDlQeVVzRGxtc3J0YwZhcHBfaWQQMjIyMDM5MTc4ODIwMDg5MgABHjK7wdLyZFgFdhNcLkw7c5tZbOAPeo5qHh_wIFfhqkMcailUg-QEbQQRnbgV_aem_AHzEaCW7kSh8IMxD5gtjuA

    In this febrile climate goodness knows what will happen in 2029 and until yesterday I dismissed Farage as PM

    However, after yesterday it would be foolish not to think the impossible and certainly a right wing government of some form is becoming more likely, not least as Starmer puts at risk the labour party itself by his own indefenceable actions to cling on to his office

    Labour just have to bring the curtain down on this unedifying spectacle and tell Starmer his time is up

    Just to calm you down. Does anyone remember the subsequent SDP Government?

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/09/16/the-tories-arent-finished/?fbclid=IwY2xjawRsG6VleHRuA2FlbQIxMABicmlkETEySUQ5RXJISDlQeVVzRGxtc3J0YwZhcHBfaWQQMjIyMDM5MTc4ODIwMDg5MgABHjK7wdLyZFgFdhNcLkw7c5tZbOAPeo5qHh_wIFfhqkMcailUg-QEbQQRnbgV_aem_AHzEaCW7kSh8IMxD5gtjuA
    I am not interested in whataboutery but stopping Farage and Starmer is simply making his government more likely day by day
  • FrankBoothFrankBooth Posts: 10,789
    Indeed it seems harder and harder to see how the UK can be governed effectively going forward.

    Let's try and say something nice. Gordon Brown and Harriet Harman certainly have a solid record on standing up to antisemitism.
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 59,883
    Maybe we should pay more attention to Great Yarmouth.

    https://x.com/RupertLowe10/status/2053000964580266361

    I want to be really clear about what our aim is following yesterday’s historic victory.

    Win the next general election, and I have never been more confident we are going to do exactly that.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 81,143
    He's going to dig up Atlee, Wilson and Hardie on Monday
  • TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 47,904
    Mere anarchy let loose in the Uk.
    The best lack all conviction.
    And so does Starmer.
  • isamisam Posts: 44,230
    The Kellner verdict
    Labour, 1,100, between relief and disappointment
    Con, 800, between joy and relief
    Lib Dem, 850, relief
    Reform, 1,500, near disaster
    Green, 550, disappointment


    https://x.com/johnrentoul/status/2053106162808025445?s=46&t=CW4pL-mMpTqsJXCdjW0Z6Q
  • ManchesterKurtManchesterKurt Posts: 1,003
    Isn't Gordon Brown a very strong advocate of much stronger devolution?

    I honestly think that will strongly appeal, as a start, to many centre left leaning voters.
  • DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 36,353

    Second!

    No you were first!
    I demand a recount!
    Stop obsessing about firsts, and focus on spotting the subtle music reference in the header.
    There is a reference to subtle music? Not what the BBC called it when it joined George Formby on the banned list.
  • RobDRobD Posts: 61,139

    Isn't Gordon Brown a very strong advocate of much stronger devolution?

    I honestly think that will strongly appeal, as a start, to many centre left leaning voters.

    Shall we review the current track record of devolution first?
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 59,883
    https://x.com/Keir_Starmer/status/2053109982665556046

    It’s important that we reflect and respond to these results - we haven’t done enough to offer people hope for the future.

    In the coming days I’ll be setting out the path ahead.
  • ManchesterKurtManchesterKurt Posts: 1,003
    RobD said:

    Isn't Gordon Brown a very strong advocate of much stronger devolution?

    I honestly think that will strongly appeal, as a start, to many centre left leaning voters.

    Shall we review the current track record of devolution first?
    It's working very well in Manchester, in fact, I would strongly argue it's the reason it's economic growth has been the strongest in the country for the last decade or so.
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 91,959

    https://x.com/Keir_Starmer/status/2053109982665556046

    It’s important that we reflect and respond to these results - we haven’t done enough to offer people hope for the future.

    In the coming days I’ll be setting out the path ahead.

    I AM THE CHANGE.
  • another_richardanother_richard Posts: 29,513

    So Starmers thinks he hasn't convinced voters that the change will benefit them? Id argue he hasn't set out what the change is actually going to be. 14 years of planning for government and no actual plans. How does labour intend to grow the economy? How will it resolve social care? How will stop junior doctors claiming everything bigger pay rises? No actual plans seem to exist.

    You only need plans if you are going to do something.

    Starmer prefers to make announcements.
  • TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 47,904
    RobD said:

    Isn't Gordon Brown a very strong advocate of much stronger devolution?

    I honestly think that will strongly appeal, as a start, to many centre left leaning voters.

    Shall we review the current track record of devolution first?
    You mean review why didn’t it kill nationalism stone dead?
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 91,959
    edited May 9

    So Starmers thinks he hasn't convinced voters that the change will benefit them? Id argue he hasn't set out what the change is actually going to be. 14 years of planning for government and no actual plans. How does labour intend to grow the economy? How will it resolve social care? How will stop junior doctors claiming everything bigger pay rises? No actual plans seem to exist.

    You only need plans if you are going to do something.

    Starmer prefers to make announcements.
    Now be fair, he makes announcements about an agreement to find an agreement to set up a working group / consultation to explore the possibly of progressing forward with a idea.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 55,434
    The word is it’s looking good for the Greens in Lewisham
  • DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 36,353

    RobD said:

    Isn't Gordon Brown a very strong advocate of much stronger devolution?

    I honestly think that will strongly appeal, as a start, to many centre left leaning voters.

    Shall we review the current track record of devolution first?
    It's working very well in Manchester, in fact, I would strongly argue it's the reason it's economic growth has been the strongest in the country for the last decade or so.
    That can only mean

  • solarflaresolarflare Posts: 4,848

    https://x.com/Keir_Starmer/status/2053109982665556046

    It’s important that we reflect and respond to these results - we haven’t done enough to offer people hope for the future.

    In the coming days I’ll be setting out the path ahead.

    "I'll be mailing a special parcel of hope to each household in the United Kingdom. This will come in what may look like an empty box, but rest assured, it contains all the hope you need"
  • oxfordsimonoxfordsimon Posts: 6,012

    https://x.com/Keir_Starmer/status/2053109982665556046

    It’s important that we reflect and respond to these results - we haven’t done enough to offer people hope for the future.

    In the coming days I’ll be setting out the path ahead.

    The man cannot do human.
  • mwadamsmwadams Posts: 3,878

    https://x.com/Keir_Starmer/status/2053109982665556046

    It’s important that we reflect and respond to these results - we haven’t done enough to offer people hope for the future.

    In the coming days I’ll be setting out the path ahead.

    I AM THE CHANGE.
    Funny isn't it how they somehow never come up with these brilliant plans *before* the electoral drubbing but 24h later they are poised to leap into the brave new future, fizzing with ideas.
  • another_richardanother_richard Posts: 29,513

    Reform won 38 seats in London OUTSIDE their bastion of Havering (39 seats won).

    9 Barking
    8 Hounslow
    7 Bexley
    6 Bromley
    4 Hillingdon
    2 Sutton
    1 Greenwich
    1 Redbridge

    Which will closely correlate to the remaining wwc council estates in London.
  • CookieCookie Posts: 17,567

    RobD said:

    Isn't Gordon Brown a very strong advocate of much stronger devolution?

    I honestly think that will strongly appeal, as a start, to many centre left leaning voters.

    Shall we review the current track record of devolution first?
    It's working very well in Manchester, in fact, I would strongly argue it's the reason it's economic growth has been the strongest in the country for the last decade or so.
    That can only mean

    I don't know why the MEN is so keen to shove Burnham off to London and usher in his Reform replacement.
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 91,959
    edited May 9
    mwadams said:

    https://x.com/Keir_Starmer/status/2053109982665556046

    It’s important that we reflect and respond to these results - we haven’t done enough to offer people hope for the future.

    In the coming days I’ll be setting out the path ahead.

    I AM THE CHANGE.
    Funny isn't it how they somehow never come up with these brilliant plans *before* the electoral drubbing but 24h later they are poised to leap into the brave new future, fizzing with ideas.
    Being serious for a moment, I think there is a huge vacuum of good workable ideas at the moment being proposed by any party.
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 25,464
    isam said:

    The Kellner verdict
    Labour, 1,100, between relief and disappointment
    Con, 800, between joy and relief
    Lib Dem, 850, relief
    Reform, 1,500, near disaster
    Green, 550, disappointment


    https://x.com/johnrentoul/status/2053106162808025445?s=46&t=CW4pL-mMpTqsJXCdjW0Z6Q

    With all due respect, that's a load if bollocks.
  • ManchesterKurtManchesterKurt Posts: 1,003

    RobD said:

    Isn't Gordon Brown a very strong advocate of much stronger devolution?

    I honestly think that will strongly appeal, as a start, to many centre left leaning voters.

    Shall we review the current track record of devolution first?
    It's working very well in Manchester, in fact, I would strongly argue it's the reason it's economic growth has been the strongest in the country for the last decade or so.
    That can only mean

    Manchester has had more powers devolved than any other England region outside London and has clearly benefited.

    In the event everywhere else got substantially more devolution, everywhere has the same level of local decision making as other societies, then I think longer term the massive problems faced in many of the dissolutioned parts of the country could start to be addressed.

    It won't happen overnight, but it wouldn't cost anything and would see strong support from many in the centre left.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 55,434
    isam said:

    The Kellner verdict
    Labour, 1,100, between relief and disappointment
    Con, 800, between joy and relief
    Lib Dem, 850, relief
    Reform, 1,500, near disaster
    Green, 550, disappointment


    https://x.com/johnrentoul/status/2053106162808025445?s=46&t=CW4pL-mMpTqsJXCdjW0Z6Q

    For Reform, people - even supposedly experienced analysts - overlooked the difficulty of converting protest votes into seats where those votes are relatively evenly spread - Bexley being the textbook example, but there are others. But the real disaster will arise once those thousand-plus new Reform councillors get hit with the demands of the job. Anecdotally there is already one Reform councillor who was going round her count saying that she didn’t want to do it, and another who was shocked to have his request to change the date of his council’s annual meeting, because he had something in his diary that night, was refused.
  • another_richardanother_richard Posts: 29,513

    RobD said:

    Isn't Gordon Brown a very strong advocate of much stronger devolution?

    I honestly think that will strongly appeal, as a start, to many centre left leaning voters.

    Shall we review the current track record of devolution first?
    It's working very well in Manchester, in fact, I would strongly argue it's the reason it's economic growth has been the strongest in the country for the last decade or so.
    For some reason the voters of Wigan and Tameside aren't too impressed by the foreign owned apartment blocks which have sprung up in Deansgate.
  • https://x.com/Keir_Starmer/status/2053109982665556046

    It’s important that we reflect and respond to these results - we haven’t done enough to offer people hope for the future.

    In the coming days I’ll be setting out the path ahead.

    The man cannot do human.
    Starmer is genuinely one of the worst politicians to ever gain high office in the UK. His ability to read the mood of the voters and actually communicate with them is nil.

    Even the good things Labour have achieved gain them no credit because he is completely unable to articulate those successes is a way the public pays attention to.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 55,434

    Reform won 38 seats in London OUTSIDE their bastion of Havering (39 seats won).

    9 Barking
    8 Hounslow
    7 Bexley
    6 Bromley
    4 Hillingdon
    2 Sutton
    1 Greenwich
    1 Redbridge

    Which will closely correlate to the remaining wwc council estates in London.
    Hainault elected a BNP councillor, back in the day, who was also the postman on my walk in South Woodford and always seemed a reasonably decent guy when he was delivering my post. To regress to Reform is an improvement, for that ward.
  • mwadamsmwadams Posts: 3,878
    edited May 9

    isam said:

    The Kellner verdict
    Labour, 1,100, between relief and disappointment
    Con, 800, between joy and relief
    Lib Dem, 850, relief
    Reform, 1,500, near disaster
    Green, 550, disappointment


    https://x.com/johnrentoul/status/2053106162808025445?s=46&t=CW4pL-mMpTqsJXCdjW0Z6Q

    With all due respect, that's a load if bollocks.
    It is an idiosyncratic view. Unless you reinterpret it as Kellner's feelings about YouGov's modelling of each party's result.
  • LostPasswordLostPassword Posts: 24,226

    Second!

    No you were first!
    I demand a recount!
    Stop obsessing about firsts, and focus on spotting the subtle music reference in the header.
    I refrain from pointing out the music puns so that other people can have the joy of discovering them themselves.
  • TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 47,904
    BREAKING: Betty Boothroyd's head in a jar has arrived at Number 10.

    https://x.com/j4ppleby/status/2053057597511532641?s=61&t=LYVEHh2mqFy1oUJAdCfe-Q
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 136,880
    Labour held Camden so I would expect Starmer to hold his seat if he still leads Labour into the next general election. Kemi will have a tough fight with Reform in her seat but the Tory vote held up better in Uttlesford than most of Essex yesterday. Davey will hold his Kingston upon Thames seat with few problems and Polanski is not yet an MP anyway. Based on yesterday's results Farage will win Clacton again by a landslide, Lowe's party was not even standing outside Great Yarmouth where it won some seats.

    As for the next general election we are heading for a hung parliament with Reform winning most seats based on the NEV for the local elections. Kemi would hold the balance of power but would probably just get the Tories to abstain on a confidence vote and vote bill by bill. Starmer meanwhile brought back Gordon Brown and Harriet Harman as advisers as he tries to shore up his core vote of Brownites within Labour, Corbynites now leaning towards Rayner or Burnham and Blairites for Streeting
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 25,464
    edited May 9
    Another result in Bradford and it is 3 more Reform gains.

    Reform + Tory now on 47; 46 for a majority.
  • mwadamsmwadams Posts: 3,878
    Gordon Brown seems to be a well-intentioned man, who was a bad Chancellor lucky enough to live in largely good times, tested to destruction by "the global financial crisis that started in America"(TM)

    What he has to offer the public in 2026? Who knows.
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 59,883
    FPT
    FF43 said:

    I alarmed myself when I found I was nodding along to the economic policies of Reform UK Scotland, or whatever they call themselves. ie they have economic policies.

    No way I will vote for that collection of antisemites, Islamophobes, all-sorts-of-other-phobes. Worrying nevertheless.

    Scottish Labour's line is 'time for change". A message I am very receptive to. They didn't think it necessary to explain even in the broadest terms what they would change, why and how.

    I think this is an interesting straw in the wind. Reform are serious about winning power and are attracting serious people with serious ideas.
  • mwadamsmwadams Posts: 3,878

    mwadams said:

    https://x.com/Keir_Starmer/status/2053109982665556046

    It’s important that we reflect and respond to these results - we haven’t done enough to offer people hope for the future.

    In the coming days I’ll be setting out the path ahead.

    I AM THE CHANGE.
    Funny isn't it how they somehow never come up with these brilliant plans *before* the electoral drubbing but 24h later they are poised to leap into the brave new future, fizzing with ideas.
    Being serious for a moment, I think there is a huge vacuum of good workable ideas at the moment being proposed by any party.
    And that has been an accumulating problem since 2008.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 136,880
    IanB2 said:

    isam said:

    The Kellner verdict
    Labour, 1,100, between relief and disappointment
    Con, 800, between joy and relief
    Lib Dem, 850, relief
    Reform, 1,500, near disaster
    Green, 550, disappointment


    https://x.com/johnrentoul/status/2053106162808025445?s=46&t=CW4pL-mMpTqsJXCdjW0Z6Q

    For Reform, people - even supposedly experienced analysts - overlooked the difficulty of converting protest votes into seats where those votes are relatively evenly spread - Bexley being the textbook example, but there are others. But the real disaster will arise once those thousand-plus new Reform councillors get hit with the demands of the job. Anecdotally there is already one Reform councillor who was going round her count saying that she didn’t want to do it, and another who was shocked to have his request to change the date of his council’s annual meeting, because he had something in his diary that night, was refused.
    'Joshua Kim won the sixth seat at Blaenau Gwent Caerffili Rhymni for Reform - but missed the count because he was doing a shift as a supply teacher.

    Kim told me last night he was "shellshocked" and "did not think for one minute" he would be elected.

    The supply teacher said he hadn’t told his pupils about his candidacy and wasn’t at the count because it would have meant losing a day’s pay.'

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/c1l2gp47693t
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 55,434
    Btw who was it on here who recommended the wine shop in Queens Park?
  • ManchesterKurtManchesterKurt Posts: 1,003

    RobD said:

    Isn't Gordon Brown a very strong advocate of much stronger devolution?

    I honestly think that will strongly appeal, as a start, to many centre left leaning voters.

    Shall we review the current track record of devolution first?
    It's working very well in Manchester, in fact, I would strongly argue it's the reason it's economic growth has been the strongest in the country for the last decade or so.
    For some reason the voters of Wigan and Tameside aren't too impressed by the foreign owned apartment blocks which have sprung up in Deansgate.
    Indeed, which is why much greater devolution is required, including to places like Manchester so the education, the industrial strategy etc it set locally to help Wigan, Tameside etc etc

    Having those decisions made in London is what's causing those areas of the region to be so poor and ill equipped for today.

    No other self respecting democratic country operates such a centric system leading to such an inability to shape the local population to grow a local economy.
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 25,464
    Next result in, and it is 3 seats for Labour, holding off the challenge of "Your Bradford Independent Group".
  • RogerRoger Posts: 23,140
    Anyone know if these councillors get paid and if so roughly how much?
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 91,959
    Labour has lost control of Lambeth in south London, with no party winning an outright majority.

    The Greens are the largest party, with 29 seats, and Labour are second with 26.

    Labour has controlled Lambeth since 2006. After the 2022 elections, Labour had 54 seats with the Greens and Lib Dems both on four.
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 91,959
    edited May 9
    Roger said:

    Anyone know if these councillors get paid and if so roughly how much?

    They can get about £12-15k in allowances if they turn up to the meetings. But those like council leader, cabinet member, etc get quite a bit more. Some of the roles in London like Mayor of a Borough (I don't mean Khan) pay a lot more than that. I believe there some who are on the London Assembly that combine that with other roles getting more than the PM.
  • noneoftheabovenoneoftheabove Posts: 27,958

    Next result in, and it is 3 seats for Labour, holding off the challenge of "Your Bradford Independent Group".

    Sounds like a big defence to me.
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 39,816
    edited May 9

    https://x.com/Keir_Starmer/status/2053109982665556046

    It’s important that we reflect and respond to these results - we haven’t done enough to offer people hope for the future.

    In the coming days I’ll be setting out the path ahead.

    The man cannot do human.
    Starmer is genuinely one of the worst politicians to ever gain high office in the UK. His ability to read the mood of the voters and actually communicate with them is nil.

    Even the good things Labour have achieved gain them no credit because he is completely unable to articulate those successes is a way the public pays attention to.
    Starmer is very much rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic post impact with the iceberg.

    Someone needs to sit down with him and spell it out. "You are done!"

    If he can't bring himself to organise an orderly timetable for exit by September, he needs to be challenged.
  • LostPasswordLostPassword Posts: 24,226

    dixiedean said:

    On topic:

    It's a dynamic that's been building up for a while. Different wings of the same party/tradition have always hated each other, and not often hidden it well. But whereas in the past, they were prepared to cohabit for fear of losing, now they simply don't care. I suspect it's part of the wider changes in society- we can and do seek out those very much like Us, and label everyone else as Them. And counsumer economics has taught us to demand and expect things customised exactly to what we want. Social media has just been the cat turd on the blackberry trifle.

    One of Starmer's many problems is that he's old, and what political instincts he has come from the earlier era, where people concluded that they had to to stay in the tent, even if it was suboptimal. But these days, people aren't as willing to do that. Hence Reform, and all the other Re-grouplings. Hence the Greens reinvention as lefty purists.

    I don't know who does have the skills to navigate these new choppy waters.

    FPTP doesn't seem a very good fit with what you describe.
    Well, yes. FPTP is fine if people are willing to sort out their coalitions in advance, then present them to the electorate on polling day. To an extent, it rewards parties that do that, which is probably a good thing from the point of view of infromed voter choice.

    If we've really got 5 (6... 7...) parties, it becomes pretty much a lottery, and nobody can want that... can they? But it's also about culture, and not just political culture. Countries with PR have seen the same fracturing of parties. And I don't think that's good for society. Somehow, we have to get along alongside each other.
    Politics is essentially the peaceful process of resolving disputes within a society. One of the things that you need for that process to function is to ensure that as many people as possible are represented as part of that process.

    If large numbers of people don't feel represented by the historical three parties, and it requires more parties to represent the diversity of views in society, then I think having more parties is a good thing, rather than a bad thing.

    The difficult thing is reconciling the wide variety of views, particularly given the tenuous relationship with reality that many of them possess. But it's at least easier if those views are honestly represented, rather than buried in a two-party system.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 136,880
    edited May 9
    One Nation win the Farrer by election in Australia in a rural seat vacated by departing Liberal leader Sussan Ley

    https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-05-09/farrer-sat-night-results/106656856
  • another_richardanother_richard Posts: 29,513

    RobD said:

    Isn't Gordon Brown a very strong advocate of much stronger devolution?

    I honestly think that will strongly appeal, as a start, to many centre left leaning voters.

    Shall we review the current track record of devolution first?
    It's working very well in Manchester, in fact, I would strongly argue it's the reason it's economic growth has been the strongest in the country for the last decade or so.
    For some reason the voters of Wigan and Tameside aren't too impressed by the foreign owned apartment blocks which have sprung up in Deansgate.
    Indeed, which is why much greater devolution is required, including to places like Manchester so the education, the industrial strategy etc it set locally to help Wigan, Tameside etc etc

    Having those decisions made in London is what's causing those areas of the region to be so poor and ill equipped for today.

    No other self respecting democratic country operates such a centric system leading to such an inability to shape the local population to grow a local economy.
    What happens when some of the decisions made are the wrong ones ?

    With devolution goes responsibility.

    The spending and the 'big ideas' are the easy bit.

    The higher taxes and the bailouts are when it gets hard.
  • noneoftheabovenoneoftheabove Posts: 27,958
    Cookie said:

    RobD said:

    Isn't Gordon Brown a very strong advocate of much stronger devolution?

    I honestly think that will strongly appeal, as a start, to many centre left leaning voters.

    Shall we review the current track record of devolution first?
    It's working very well in Manchester, in fact, I would strongly argue it's the reason it's economic growth has been the strongest in the country for the last decade or so.
    That can only mean

    I don't know why the MEN is so keen to shove Burnham off to London and usher in his Reform replacement.
    Because a Reform candidate will create more cheap news they can sell.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 55,434
    edited May 9

    On topic:

    It's a dynamic that's been building up for a while. Different wings of the same party/tradition have always hated each other, and not often hidden it well. But whereas in the past, they were prepared to cohabit for fear of losing, now they simply don't care. I suspect it's part of the wider changes in society- we can and do seek out those very much like Us, and label everyone else as Them. And counsumer economics has taught us to demand and expect things customised exactly to what we want. Social media has just been the cat turd on the blackberry trifle.

    One of Starmer's many problems is that he's old, and what political instincts he has come from the earlier era, where people concluded that they had to to stay in the tent, even if it was suboptimal. But these days, people aren't as willing to do that. Hence Reform, and all the other Re-grouplings. Hence the Greens reinvention as lefty purists.

    I don't know who does have the skills to navigate these new choppy waters.

    But that’s always been the interesting thing about getting involved in politics. For the young eager proto-politician, as I was so many decades back, you sign up to your local political party, and when it invites you to one of its meetings, suddenly you’re a political activist. Quite probably, you find yourself in an area where, either, things are so moribund that the handful of people who turn up to the AGM all look at the ceiling and shuffle their feet when nominations are sought for constituency secretary or treasurer, or you find you’ve intruded into a private clique where you’ll only be tolerated provided you accept that the same oldsters who have held those offices will be re-elected unopposed, without any fuss, year after year.

    Or, just possibly, you land in an area where there’s an active, thriving local party, in which case you will quickly find out the factions and divisions within your party colleagues and spend most of your time fighting internal battles with them. Once every few years, an election comes along where, for a few short weeks, you can focus your fire on the opposing political parties, but you won’t meet them except at those sessions spent telling at the polling station (nowadays a dying activity, it seems?).

    One of the striking things about being elected, for example as a councillor, is that suddenly you’re surrounded by and in regular contact with your political opponents. That suddenly makes the political contest more real but also, for any thinking councillor, makes you rethink some of the simplistic assumptions about the other parties and their motivations that you may have held prior.

    But the most notable thing about first signing up for the political front line is that you rarely tangle with your opponents and spend most of your time grappling with the enemies on your own side.
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 91,959
    edited May 9
    How the f##k are places like Croydon still bloody counting.
  • ManchesterKurtManchesterKurt Posts: 1,003

    RobD said:

    Isn't Gordon Brown a very strong advocate of much stronger devolution?

    I honestly think that will strongly appeal, as a start, to many centre left leaning voters.

    Shall we review the current track record of devolution first?
    It's working very well in Manchester, in fact, I would strongly argue it's the reason it's economic growth has been the strongest in the country for the last decade or so.
    For some reason the voters of Wigan and Tameside aren't too impressed by the foreign owned apartment blocks which have sprung up in Deansgate.
    Indeed, which is why much greater devolution is required, including to places like Manchester so the education, the industrial strategy etc it set locally to help Wigan, Tameside etc etc

    Having those decisions made in London is what's causing those areas of the region to be so poor and ill equipped for today.

    No other self respecting democratic country operates such a centric system leading to such an inability to shape the local population to grow a local economy.
    What happens when some of the decisions made are the wrong ones ?

    With devolution goes responsibility.

    The spending and the 'big ideas' are the easy bit.

    The higher taxes and the bailouts are when it gets hard.
    Amazingly other countries manage to deal with these issues.

    I've the confidence this country can do as well.
  • Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 59,789

    RobD said:

    Isn't Gordon Brown a very strong advocate of much stronger devolution?

    I honestly think that will strongly appeal, as a start, to many centre left leaning voters.

    Shall we review the current track record of devolution first?
    It's working very well in Manchester, in fact, I would strongly argue it's the reason it's economic growth has been the strongest in the country for the last decade or so.
    That can only mean

    Cometh the Mascara...
  • Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 59,789

    How the f##k are places like Croydon still bloody counting.

    Slackers, as suggested upthread,
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 25,464
    Your Bradford Independent Group get a clean sweep in the next ward to declare.

  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 91,959
    edited May 9
    Joshua Kim won the sixth seat at Blaenau Gwent Caerffili Rhymni for Reform but missed the count because he was doing a shift as a supply teacher. Kim tells the BBC he was "shellshocked" and "did not think for one minute" he would be elected, appearing "distraught, utterly shocked and confused". The supply teacher says he hadn’t told his pupils about his candidacy and wasn’t at the count because it would have meant losing a day’s pay.

    The accompanying photo on him on the bbc website, you might confuse him for a pupil rather than a teacher.
  • BattlebusBattlebus Posts: 3,257
    Starmer is a WINNER - at least for me.

    Second Most Seats (Applies Only To Contested Seats On 7th May 2026) @ 5/1

    More beer money for when I'm in France next week. Have to say Ladbrokes paid out before all the seats declared, which was nice.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 55,434
    edited May 9
    Roger said:

    Anyone know if these councillors get paid and if so roughly how much?

    It varies hugely. First tier (parish/town) councillors normally don’t get paid at all. District and county councillors normally get a basic allowance - I’m thinking £9,000 to £15,000 might reflect the current range - and then a minority of them will get special responsibility allowances on top, such that in, for example, a London Borough, if you’re a cabinet member or council leader or deputy, the council might be paying you in total £40-50,000. Which isn’t an insignificant amount, but well below the level that the skills needed to do such a job well would be remunerated in the private sector
  • LostPasswordLostPassword Posts: 24,226
    edited May 9
    mwadams said:

    Gordon Brown seems to be a well-intentioned man, who was a bad Chancellor lucky enough to live in largely good times, tested to destruction by "the global financial crisis that started in America"(TM)

    What he has to offer the public in 2026? Who knows.

    His reputation abroad is better than his reputation in Britain, so appropriately he has been appointed as Starmer's envoy to global finance.

    If I was unkind I would suggest that his job is to convince global finance to continue to lend money to Britain, that appearing to be in more doubt now than in the past.

    I can't think what else of use the job might entail. Okay, I decided to check gov.uk, and it says this.
    He will be tasked with developing new international finance partnerships that can support defence and security-related investment, including measures that underpin the UK’s relationship with Europe.

    As part of the role he will engage with international leaders and finance institutions as well as private finance partners to establish multilateral finance mechanisms.
    So it sounds like Brown's job is to create a duplicate for the EU's SAFE programme, to finance increases in Britain's defence expenditure without having to pay for it with taxes, spending cuts, or traditional government borrowing. Presumably in partnership with the EU to some extent, but with a lower upfront cost than they were asking for to include Britain in SAFE.

    I guess finding off-balance sheet ways to spend money is a Brown competency, and Britain does need greater defence expenditure and isn't willing to fund it any other way, so I could see some good coming of this, eventually. But it feels very typical of Starmer. He's ignored the problem of how to fund Defence for nearly two years. Now he's appointed Brown to work out how to fix it for him, so Starmer still doesn't know how this can be done, and so there won't be any extra funding for at least another year.

    Everything is so very slow. There's so much resistance to doing anything about anything for fear of upsetting anyone. It doesn't remotely match up to the needs of the situation.
  • algarkirkalgarkirk Posts: 17,430

    mwadams said:

    https://x.com/Keir_Starmer/status/2053109982665556046

    It’s important that we reflect and respond to these results - we haven’t done enough to offer people hope for the future.

    In the coming days I’ll be setting out the path ahead.

    I AM THE CHANGE.
    Funny isn't it how they somehow never come up with these brilliant plans *before* the electoral drubbing but 24h later they are poised to leap into the brave new future, fizzing with ideas.
    Being serious for a moment, I think there is a huge vacuum of good workable ideas at the moment being proposed by any party.
    It seems to me that the first good idea for all governments, before they start on sunlit uplands and all becoming plutocrats is just to run very well all the things the state has undertaken to be responsible for. That alone would be transformative.

    You don't really know what improvements and changes you need until you have got to first base of running the status quo you inherit very well.

  • mwadamsmwadams Posts: 3,878
    Regardless of your views of AOC's politics, this is a powerful articulation of the antithesis of Starmer's world view (and that of Labour for many years). The Ming Vase was all about power for power's sake and the administration has been all about title over purpose. They cannot rescue themselves without a fundamental change of outlook.

    https://bsky.app/profile/acyn.bsky.social/post/3mlezeoucc62h
  • another_richardanother_richard Posts: 29,513

    RobD said:

    Isn't Gordon Brown a very strong advocate of much stronger devolution?

    I honestly think that will strongly appeal, as a start, to many centre left leaning voters.

    Shall we review the current track record of devolution first?
    It's working very well in Manchester, in fact, I would strongly argue it's the reason it's economic growth has been the strongest in the country for the last decade or so.
    For some reason the voters of Wigan and Tameside aren't too impressed by the foreign owned apartment blocks which have sprung up in Deansgate.
    Indeed, which is why much greater devolution is required, including to places like Manchester so the education, the industrial strategy etc it set locally to help Wigan, Tameside etc etc

    Having those decisions made in London is what's causing those areas of the region to be so poor and ill equipped for today.

    No other self respecting democratic country operates such a centric system leading to such an inability to shape the local population to grow a local economy.
    What happens when some of the decisions made are the wrong ones ?

    With devolution goes responsibility.

    The spending and the 'big ideas' are the easy bit.

    The higher taxes and the bailouts are when it gets hard.
    Amazingly other countries manage to deal with these issues.

    I've the confidence this country can do as well.
    Well we haven't managed to deal with such issues at national level so what makes you confident that greater devolution will lead to anything other than higher spending 'funded' by higher borrowing ?

    If you can make a list of people who want devolution so that their local area can live within its means then you've made a start on how devolution can be handled competently.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 55,434

    Joshua Kim won the sixth seat at Blaenau Gwent Caerffili Rhymni for Reform but missed the count because he was doing a shift as a supply teacher. Kim tells the BBC he was "shellshocked" and "did not think for one minute" he would be elected, appearing "distraught, utterly shocked and confused". The supply teacher says he hadn’t told his pupils about his candidacy and wasn’t at the count because it would have meant losing a day’s pay.

    The accompanying photo on him on the bbc website, you might confuse him for a pupil rather than a teacher.

    We’ll probably see more than the usual rate of by elections over the summer and autumn as the many new councillors unexpectedly just elected discover that spending their evenings at the town hall in the planning sub committee isn’t the life they would have chosen.
  • carnforthcarnforth Posts: 9,242

    Joshua Kim won the sixth seat at Blaenau Gwent Caerffili Rhymni for Reform but missed the count because he was doing a shift as a supply teacher. Kim tells the BBC he was "shellshocked" and "did not think for one minute" he would be elected, appearing "distraught, utterly shocked and confused". The supply teacher says he hadn’t told his pupils about his candidacy and wasn’t at the count because it would have meant losing a day’s pay.

    The accompanying photo on him on the bbc website, you might confuse him for a pupil rather than a teacher.



    Odd headwear choices, this one.
  • DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 36,353

    Another result in Bradford and it is 3 more Reform gains.

    Reform + Tory now on 47; 46 for a majority.

    Reform + Tory is not a single party.
  • mwadamsmwadams Posts: 3,878
    IanB2 said:

    Joshua Kim won the sixth seat at Blaenau Gwent Caerffili Rhymni for Reform but missed the count because he was doing a shift as a supply teacher. Kim tells the BBC he was "shellshocked" and "did not think for one minute" he would be elected, appearing "distraught, utterly shocked and confused". The supply teacher says he hadn’t told his pupils about his candidacy and wasn’t at the count because it would have meant losing a day’s pay.

    The accompanying photo on him on the bbc website, you might confuse him for a pupil rather than a teacher.

    We’ll probably see more than the usual rate of by elections over the summer and autumn as the many new councillors unexpectedly just elected discover that spending their evenings at the town hall in the planning sub committee isn’t the life they would have chosen.
    What do you mean "there's no subsidised bar"?
  • another_richardanother_richard Posts: 29,513
    algarkirk said:

    mwadams said:

    https://x.com/Keir_Starmer/status/2053109982665556046

    It’s important that we reflect and respond to these results - we haven’t done enough to offer people hope for the future.

    In the coming days I’ll be setting out the path ahead.

    I AM THE CHANGE.
    Funny isn't it how they somehow never come up with these brilliant plans *before* the electoral drubbing but 24h later they are poised to leap into the brave new future, fizzing with ideas.
    Being serious for a moment, I think there is a huge vacuum of good workable ideas at the moment being proposed by any party.
    It seems to me that the first good idea for all governments, before they start on sunlit uplands and all becoming plutocrats is just to run very well all the things the state has undertaken to be responsible for. That alone would be transformative.

    You don't really know what improvements and changes you need until you have got to first base of running the status quo you inherit very well.

    Indeed.

    Competence is something much underrated.
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 72,380
    Rob Ford
    @robfordmancs.bsky.social‬

    Follow
    The “Blue Labour” strategy still being promoted by some on Labour right is premised on being able to win social conservatives while holding on to social liberals.

    Failure state for this strategy is failing to win social cons while alienating social liberals. Here is a map of that failure state:

    https://bsky.app/profile/robfordmancs.bsky.social/post/3mlgc3zylik2p
  • solarflaresolarflare Posts: 4,848

    Joshua Kim won the sixth seat at Blaenau Gwent Caerffili Rhymni for Reform but missed the count because he was doing a shift as a supply teacher. Kim tells the BBC he was "shellshocked" and "did not think for one minute" he would be elected, appearing "distraught, utterly shocked and confused". The supply teacher says he hadn’t told his pupils about his candidacy and wasn’t at the count because it would have meant losing a day’s pay.

    The accompanying photo on him on the bbc website, you might confuse him for a pupil rather than a teacher.

    If you're "distraught" to be elected you have to question why you'd want to ave your name put forward in the first place.

    Shocked, surprised, regretful I could understand, but distraught?
  • noneoftheabovenoneoftheabove Posts: 27,958
    In our borough council election we had 3 votes so the main parties stood 3 candidates each. There were a couple of attractive women standing one for the LDs and one for the Conservatives. The attractive women both got 41% of their total party vote rather than the neutral 33.3% - thats a 40% increase in votes for being attractive.

    Maybe our borough is quite superficial, otherwise perhaps parties could get Jimmy Carr in to rate the suitability of candidates.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 55,434
    edited May 9
    So far every seat declared on Lewisham has fallen to the Greens.

    Opps, corr’n, now Labour has held a single seat while the Greens are on eight
  • FairlieredFairliered Posts: 8,090
    HYUFD said:

    Labour held Camden so I would expect Starmer to hold his seat if he still leads Labour into the next general election. Kemi will have a tough fight with Reform in her seat but the Tory vote held up better in Uttlesford than most of Essex yesterday. Davey will hold his Kingston upon Thames seat with few problems and Polanski is not yet an MP anyway. Based on yesterday's results Farage will win Clacton again by a landslide, Lowe's party was not even standing outside Great Yarmouth where it won some seats.

    As for the next general election we are heading for a hung parliament with Reform winning most seats based on the NEV for the local elections. Kemi would hold the balance of power but would probably just get the Tories to abstain on a confidence vote and vote bill by bill. Starmer meanwhile brought back Gordon Brown and Harriet Harman as advisers as he tries to shore up his core vote of Brownites within Labour, Corbynites now leaning towards Rayner or Burnham and Blairites for Streeting

    The Tory vote held up better in Uttlesford. That is the very definition of clutching at straws.
This discussion has been closed.