Skip to content

Starmer was a drag on the Labour vote in Wales but the King of the North might need to become the Ki

1235789

Comments

  • AnneJGPAnneJGP Posts: 5,444
    Scott_xP said:

    @chadbourn.bsky.social‬

    Looking like a bit of a shitshow in Birmingham. There’s still 22 seats to declare, but a majority is 51 and right now no one has more than 17.

    The electoral system is not fit for purpose.

    Sounds like they may be obliged to ... *gasps* .... cooperate.
  • Pro_RataPro_Rata Posts: 6,305
    edited May 8
    Pro_Rata said:

    Pro_Rata said:

    Kirklees back in the second half of counting sits at:

    Reform 21 (+21)
    Ind 9 (+4)
    Grn 6 (+3)
    LD 5 (-5)
    Con 4 (-5)
    Lab 0 (-18)

    At least 11 more non Reform needed, probably significantly more, but they are winning the 50/50 calls at the moment.

    All non Reform parties need to treat Reform and Farage with the contempt they deserve. Labour have given them a free ride and the Conservatives have as good as endorsed them.

    They are not working class heros they are friends of our enemies.
    If we discount Gaza Indies it is 21-21 at the moment.

    Squeaky bum time.
    Ref 22, Ind 12 (6 Gaza, 3 Left, 3 Local), Grn 6, Con 6, LD 5

    To declare:
    Denby Dale, Holme Valley Sth - Con/Ref battles
    Crosland Moor - likely Green
    Colne Valley West - Reform, slight Lab chance
    Ashbrow - best Lab chance, Reform poss
    Dewsbury S - probable Gaza
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 81,143
    trukat said:

    carnforth said:

    HYUFD said:

    mwadams said:

    mwadams said:

    It is interesting that people are still spinning the Greens as having a bad time of it. 2nd in NEV (and the only other party up in NEV), 2nd in number of gains, and newly 2nd place in more seats than anyone else (if I've read that right) - I'd be wary of trying to take that line. Gains of this order in the next round of locals makes them largest party (at least) in an awful lot of councils.

    A few hundred of those second places could have been firsts if Polanski hadn't pulled a Corbyn over antisemitism in the last week.

    That's why people are saying the Greens have done badly.
    I'm not sure I really buy that. But maybe.
    Looking at Peter Kellner's ready reckoner for judging the results, only the Tories have reached a number of seats that equals to relief. The other parties are down at disappointment or disaster levels, though with more councillors to be elected.

    So the Tories have done a bit better than their polling suggested, and we wait to see how the other parties have fared.
    Other parties apart from winners Reform of course
    Nope. Reform are (BBC) currently on ~1,400 councillors which was classified by Kellner as a disaster.

    So it looks like Reform have underperformed expectations based on polling by some distance.
    Pegging reality to a model instead of a model to reality is a bold approach.
    Models are useful to help us understand reality. Here the model suggests that Reform did not do as well in the local elections as suggested by the polling, which suggests that their support is lower than shown by the polls.
    Except the NEV is almost bang on Reforms polling average.
    Reform have outperformed in the north where many councils are thirds up and underperformed in London which was all out, hence their councillor number is not as high as expected for the net vote share
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 103,801
    Some Tories still recognise an enemy when they see one. Practicality in many areas suggests 'deals' even if not officially a deal though.

    The Conservatives finished with 23 seats, that’s six short of a majority, and with Labour on 19, Reform UK on 14 seats and the Liberal Democrats with one, it means [Swindon], which has for so long been a straight fight between Conservatives and Labour, is now split three ways...

    The Conservative leader, and next council leader presumptive, Councillors Gary Sumner said: “We will not do a deal with Reform which has a stated aim to destroy the Conservative party".


    https://www.swindonadvertiser.co.uk/news/26091857.conservatives-finish-largest-party-hung-council-election/
  • Wulfrun_PhilWulfrun_Phil Posts: 5,208

    RTÉ seem to believe that Starmer is safe because if he's replaced the new PM would have to hold a general election. Bizarre reporting.

    This from a nation which appoints their PM and governing coalition only after many months of negotiation in smoke filled rooms after a general election, with the electorate having no further input to say whether they approve of the eventual governing coalition or not.
  • Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 59,769
    Wanstead Village (Redbridge) - 2 Lab, 1 Green (Green GAIN from Labour)
  • ohnotnowohnotnow Posts: 6,053
    kle4 said:

    kinabalu said:

    (((Dan Hodges)))
    @DPJHodges
    ·
    11m
    It's getting ridiculous now. Those cabinet ministers trying to prop up Keir Starmer are basically the two guys from Weekend At Bernie's.

    Perhaps Desperate Dan should resign if he continually fails to deliver anything but bad predictions that Keir Starmer is about to resign.
    Pundits are not judged by the quality of their predictions or none of them would ever last in the job.

    It's their job to shift effortlessly on to the next prediction when the last one does not occur and provide colour commentary on events of the day in a way that pleases their paymasters and audiences.
    "I know what.three.words isn't now the dominant coordinate system in the world and the aliens haven't quite taken over - but!..."
  • Scott_xPScott_xP Posts: 43,513
    @generalboles.bsky.social‬

    I think if Sir Keir can hold on for another 8 days the country will be so swept up with the euphoria of our #Eurovision win that these election results will be forgotten.

    I am available to spin this out to 800 words if any commissioning eds have a hole they need filling.
  • LostPasswordLostPassword Posts: 24,196
    trukat said:

    carnforth said:

    HYUFD said:

    mwadams said:

    mwadams said:

    It is interesting that people are still spinning the Greens as having a bad time of it. 2nd in NEV (and the only other party up in NEV), 2nd in number of gains, and newly 2nd place in more seats than anyone else (if I've read that right) - I'd be wary of trying to take that line. Gains of this order in the next round of locals makes them largest party (at least) in an awful lot of councils.

    A few hundred of those second places could have been firsts if Polanski hadn't pulled a Corbyn over antisemitism in the last week.

    That's why people are saying the Greens have done badly.
    I'm not sure I really buy that. But maybe.
    Looking at Peter Kellner's ready reckoner for judging the results, only the Tories have reached a number of seats that equals to relief. The other parties are down at disappointment or disaster levels, though with more councillors to be elected.

    So the Tories have done a bit better than their polling suggested, and we wait to see how the other parties have fared.
    Other parties apart from winners Reform of course
    Nope. Reform are (BBC) currently on ~1,400 councillors which was classified by Kellner as a disaster.

    So it looks like Reform have underperformed expectations based on polling by some distance.
    Pegging reality to a model instead of a model to reality is a bold approach.
    Models are useful to help us understand reality. Here the model suggests that Reform did not do as well in the local elections as suggested by the polling, which suggests that their support is lower than shown by the polls.
    Except the NEV is almost bang on Reforms polling average.
    True. This suggests that the failure in this case was in translating the opinion polls into a seats forecast, which has implications for general election predictions.
  • TazTaz Posts: 28,123
    MelonB said:

    Leon said:

    Omnium said:

    Leon said:

    Omnium said:

    Leon said:

    Why is Greek white wine now the best in the world, when it used to be the worst?

    Leon said:

    Why is Greek white wine now the best in the world, when it used to be the worst?

    It is very good. Totally with you on that. (A local aside - I presume you know the wine shop in Queens Park that has lots of wines from lesser regarded countries?)

    No, I don't. I get all my fancy wines from Vivino, generally

    The only problem with Greek white wine is that everyone else has also discovered that it is brilliant. I am old enough to remember when I was basically the first to realise, and I was getting these dreamy dreamy assyrtikos for under a tenner a bottle. Now they are over £20
    Well go and look. I absolutely promise you it's a great place. They have a magnificent range of wines. As posted in my edit: Salusbury wines. Obviously I have no connection etc.

    Greek white wine has improved. I was in Thessaloniki last year and you can wander into food and wine that would get michelin stars here.
    Yes. Greek food is also improving fast - following the wine

    I went to Athens in the post Covid summer of 2022 and had it basically to myself. It was glorious. And I ate in loads of cool new restaurants. The food was generally excellent

    The Greeks know how to keep it simple yet delicious

    I don’t know why the wine suddenly got so good. But it did
    Same revolution that happened in most of SE Europe and West Asia in the last couple of decades: winemaking had been traditional and beset with faults like oxidation and volatile acidity, or mass produced in Soviet style factories from “international” varieties. New generation of winemakers who’d been to proper wine college and learned from working in France, Spain, Italy and the New World came along and shook things up, and rediscovered traditional varieties. As you found recently in Turkey (and very much the case in Georgia and Armenia).
    I do like the wine bar we go to in Durham. They have wines from many different nations. I had a really nice Armenian white there.

    I do like the variety they have from different nations and not expensive either.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 103,801
    AnneJGP said:

    Scott_xP said:

    @chadbourn.bsky.social‬

    Looking like a bit of a shitshow in Birmingham. There’s still 22 seats to declare, but a majority is 51 and right now no one has more than 17.

    The electoral system is not fit for purpose.

    Sounds like they may be obliged to ... *gasps* .... cooperate.
    Hopefully being unable to call fresh elections will force that, as the worry in parliament if such things happen is it's worth trying again to shake things up and NOT be forced to cooperate.

    Most council decisions are not really partisan however, even if they end up selecting sides - there's no Tory or Reform or Labour unique policy on potholes, and they all will agree they think government doesn't give enough money and makes them build too many houses.
  • TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 47,892
    CatMan said:

    CatMan said:

    SNP & Greens have enough to form a majority. Referendum now!

    Referendum now? Really? Why do you think there's a mandate for that when there's a combined 40.4% of the constituency vote for the two parties proposing secession, compared to 58.4% for those opposing it, excluding 1.4% of "others"?

    I'm just messing around. I'm not even Scottish.
    Unusual to admit that as a disqualification, well done!
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 103,801
    IanB2 said:

    First by-election spotted.

    And it is in @Leon territory.

    Richard Osley
    @RichardOsley

    We have a MESS in Camden. a Green candidate has been elected but is a teacher at one of the borough’s schools… which means you can’t be a councillor. He’s been told he can’t sign the induction papers. By-election likely in Regent’s Park.

    https://x.com/RichardOsley/status/2052798411661836502

    Remarkably, that was how Streeting got his first break in politics; having been beaten by yours truly in my own ward, it transpired that a newly elected Labour councillor in another ward was a teacher and hence disqualified, whereupon there was a by-election a few weeks later which gave a hitherto unknown Streeting an in to local politics as a councillor.
    What a story!
  • LostPasswordLostPassword Posts: 24,196

    RTÉ seem to believe that Starmer is safe because if he's replaced the new PM would have to hold a general election. Bizarre reporting.

    This from a nation which appoints their PM and governing coalition only after many months of negotiation in smoke filled rooms after a general election, with the electorate having no further input to say whether they approve of the eventual governing coalition or not.
    Last two elections have resulted in a rotisserie Taoiseach too.
  • BatteryCorrectHorseBatteryCorrectHorse Posts: 7,126
    So Reform are polling around 26% from what I can understand.

    Badenoch just needs to continue slowly grinding it down.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 55,426
    dixiedean said:

    Looks like the Greens will take Haringey as well as Hackney.

    With Lewisham counting tomorrow
  • bondegezoubondegezou Posts: 20,947

    First by-election spotted.

    And it is in @Leon territory.

    Richard Osley
    @RichardOsley

    We have a MESS in Camden. a Green candidate has been elected but is a teacher at one of the borough’s schools… which means you can’t be a councillor. He’s been told he can’t sign the induction papers. By-election likely in Regent’s Park.

    https://x.com/RichardOsley/status/2052798411661836502

    Would you not check this beforehand? The mind boggles.
    The Greens had a number of surprise wins. They may have been a paper candidate and not expecting to win.
  • dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 32,561

    So Reform are polling around 26% from what I can understand.

    Badenoch just needs to continue slowly grinding it down.

    And look at the honeymoon Labour got with 34.
  • Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 35,222

    https://x.com/PolitlcsUK/status/2052809157246402644

    🚨 NEW: Labour MPs are reportedly giving Keir Starmer until Christmas to change the party around

    Jeesh they are such a bunch of utter testicle-free shite.

    They deserve to lose their seats.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 103,801

    First by-election spotted.

    And it is in @Leon territory.

    Richard Osley
    @RichardOsley

    We have a MESS in Camden. a Green candidate has been elected but is a teacher at one of the borough’s schools… which means you can’t be a councillor. He’s been told he can’t sign the induction papers. By-election likely in Regent’s Park.

    https://x.com/RichardOsley/status/2052798411661836502

    Would you not check this beforehand? The mind boggles.
    The Greens had a number of surprise wins. They may have been a paper candidate and not expecting to win.
    Possibly, plus activists, candidates, and agents, are not universally knowledgeable about the electoral process and can have unearned confidence in how much they know about the rules.
  • Wulfrun_PhilWulfrun_Phil Posts: 5,208
    dixiedean said:

    Scott_xP said:

    @chadbourn.bsky.social‬

    Looking like a bit of a shitshow in Birmingham. There’s still 22 seats to declare, but a majority is 51 and right now no one has more than 17.

    The electoral system is not fit for purpose.

    So which alternative electoral system would deliver a majority in Birmingham based on yesterday's vote share?
    Is anywhere producing a list of vote shares by LA?
    I meant "yesterday's (fragmented) voting pattern" above.

    But to answer your question, I suspect not and haven't found one for England. Sky do have constituency vote shares for each Scottish and Welsh constituency if you drill down.
  • BatteryCorrectHorseBatteryCorrectHorse Posts: 7,126

    https://x.com/PolitlcsUK/status/2052809157246402644

    🚨 NEW: Labour MPs are reportedly giving Keir Starmer until Christmas to change the party around

    Jeesh they are such a bunch of utter testicle-free shite.

    They deserve to lose their seats.
    At this moment they’ve lost my vote on principle.
  • Leon_VotedForStarmerLeon_VotedForStarmer Posts: 69,000

    https://x.com/PolitlcsUK/status/2052809157246402644

    🚨 NEW: Labour MPs are reportedly giving Keir Starmer until Christmas to change the party around

    Jeesh they are such a bunch of utter testicle-free shite.

    They deserve to lose their seats.
    At this moment they’ve lost my vote on principle.
    BATTERY HAS DEFECTED

    REPEAT

    BATTERY HAS DEFECTED
  • dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 32,561
    IanB2 said:

    dixiedean said:

    Looks like the Greens will take Haringey as well as Hackney.

    With Lewisham counting tomorrow
    Haringey Greens are one short ATM with one three seat ward to go.
  • MikeLMikeL Posts: 7,996
    edited May 8
    Two very near misses:

    Barnet: Con +9, leaving them one short of a majority
    Enfield: Con +6, leaving them one short of a majority

    In both cases, Green hold balance of power. No LDs or Ref on either council.
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 72,354

    https://x.com/PolitlcsUK/status/2052809157246402644

    🚨 NEW: Labour MPs are reportedly giving Keir Starmer until Christmas to change the party around

    Jeesh they are such a bunch of utter testicle-free shite.

    They deserve to lose their seats.
    Xmas will become "let us wait until May and another round of local elections". If the public reject us again then...

  • solarflaresolarflare Posts: 4,847

    https://x.com/PolitlcsUK/status/2052809157246402644

    🚨 NEW: Labour MPs are reportedly giving Keir Starmer until Christmas to change the party around

    Jeesh they are such a bunch of utter testicle-free shite.

    They deserve to lose their seats.
    Maybe Starmer is really good at organising the works' Christmas do, or something.
  • sarissasarissa Posts: 2,336

    DoctorG said:

    Looking ahead, a pretty interesting by-election coming up.

    Aberdeen South will become vacant due to Stephen Flynn transferring to Holyrood.

    The 2024 result:

    SNP Stephen Flynn 15,213 32.8 −12.5
    Labour M. Tauqeer Malik 11,455 24.7 +15.9
    Conservative John Wheeler 11,300 24.4 −10.0
    Reform Michael Pearce 3,199 6.9 +6.5
    Liberal Democrats Jeff Goodhall 2,921 6.3 −4.4
    Green Guy Ingerson 1,609 3.5 +3.0
    Scottish Family Graeme Craib 423 0.9 N/A
    Independent Sophie Molly 225 0.5 N/A

    Oh please let Sophie Molly run again, there's a lack of novelty candidates in Scotland.

    Anyone see the Guga guy at Edinburgh Central count?
    I saw the pic. Angus R. giving every sign of not finding it funny.
    As outgoing Minister for Culture and Heritage , wasn’t the protest aimed squarely at him ?
  • dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 32,561

    dixiedean said:

    Scott_xP said:

    @chadbourn.bsky.social‬

    Looking like a bit of a shitshow in Birmingham. There’s still 22 seats to declare, but a majority is 51 and right now no one has more than 17.

    The electoral system is not fit for purpose.

    So which alternative electoral system would deliver a majority in Birmingham based on yesterday's vote share?
    Is anywhere producing a list of vote shares by LA?
    I meant "yesterday's (fragmented) voting pattern" above.

    But to answer your question, I suspect not and haven't found one for England. Sky do have constituency vote shares for each Scottish and Welsh constituency if you drill down.
    Wikipedia usually shows them eventually.
  • stodgestodge Posts: 16,675
    Final numbers from Newham:

    Labour 27 (including the Mayor) -38 from 2022.
    Newham Independents: 24 +24 from 2022
    Greens: 16 +14 from 2022

    Labour continue in charge with the Mayor but it will be a lot less comfortable with two strong Opposition parties in the Council chamber.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 103,801
    MikeL said:

    Two very near misses:

    Barnet: Con +9, leaving them one short of a majority
    Enfield: Con +6, leaving them one short of a majority

    In both cases, Green hold balance of power. No LDs or Ref on either council.

    They'll probably manage to tip over with by-elections or a defection in the next four years if they are that close.
  • Leon_VotedForStarmerLeon_VotedForStarmer Posts: 69,000

    https://x.com/PolitlcsUK/status/2052809157246402644

    🚨 NEW: Labour MPs are reportedly giving Keir Starmer until Christmas to change the party around

    Jeesh they are such a bunch of utter testicle-free shite.

    They deserve to lose their seats.
    Xmas will become "let us wait until May and another round of local elections". If the public reject us again then...

    O Lord give me chastity, but, not yet
  • rkrkrkrkrkrk Posts: 9,354
    kle4 said:

    kinabalu said:

    (((Dan Hodges)))
    @DPJHodges
    ·
    11m
    It's getting ridiculous now. Those cabinet ministers trying to prop up Keir Starmer are basically the two guys from Weekend At Bernie's.

    Perhaps Desperate Dan should resign if he continually fails to deliver anything but bad predictions that Keir Starmer is about to resign.
    Pundits are not judged by the quality of their predictions or none of them would ever last in the job.

    It's their job to shift effortlessly on to the next prediction when the last one does not occur and provide colour commentary on events of the day in a way that pleases their paymasters and audiences.
    In early stages (and US focused) - but this is a fun AI platform that tracks public predictions by pundits and then follows up whether they came true.
    https://www.app.vistadex.com/claim-markets
  • BatteryCorrectHorseBatteryCorrectHorse Posts: 7,126
    Leon said:

    https://x.com/PolitlcsUK/status/2052809157246402644

    🚨 NEW: Labour MPs are reportedly giving Keir Starmer until Christmas to change the party around

    Jeesh they are such a bunch of utter testicle-free shite.

    They deserve to lose their seats.
    At this moment they’ve lost my vote on principle.
    BATTERY HAS DEFECTED

    REPEAT

    BATTERY HAS DEFECTED
    Can you defect to “won’t vote”? I guess you can.

    I won’t vote Tory in a GE I expect but in the next mayoral election I probably will.
  • ohnotnowohnotnow Posts: 6,053

    Robert Peston
    @Peston
    ·
    1h
    Pretty much every member of the cabinet has tweeted some version of “it’s all very sad what’s happened but sacking the boss would be worse” - apart from Wes Streeting, Yvette Cooper, Ed Miliband and Shabana Mahmood

    https://x.com/Peston/status/2052809902297399717

    If I'm bored one weekend - I might write an LLM 'agent' who does all this pishy 'omg - but look at twitter!' punditry. Though I'm not sure I even care enough to say 'Claude - could you write me a pundit?'
  • mwadamsmwadams Posts: 3,878

    Ratters said:

    A few observations from tonight:

    1) Reform have done great, but I don't think well enough to win a majority. Not yet. Their areas of strength will see them to north of 200 seats but short of a majority as there is significant opposition, and it's becoming clear who is competitive regionally.

    2) The Tories aren't dead. They are losing seats to Reform and aren't recovering in the Southern Wall lost to the Lib Dems. But there are still certain areas that are uniquely Tory and not susceptible to either of these.

    3) The Greens haven't reached the 'tipping point'. They have done well but their vote is not as well distributed as some of the other parties. At this level they'd probably be similar to Reform last time: lots of second places but disappointingly few wins. It remains to be seen if they can continue to build on their momentum.

    4) Given the above, I expect a Reform-Tory coalition or similar is the most likely next government. But three years is a long time in politics so who knows...

    Reform's balloon has been gently deflating over the past 6-9 month.

    By the time of the election, they will look like one of those Christmas balloons you find behind the sofa in April.
    Auden's testicles syndrome
  • numbertwelvenumbertwelve Posts: 9,132

    https://x.com/PolitlcsUK/status/2052809157246402644

    🚨 NEW: Labour MPs are reportedly giving Keir Starmer until Christmas to change the party around

    Jeesh they are such a bunch of utter testicle-free shite.

    They deserve to lose their seats.
    Maybe Starmer is really good at organising the works' Christmas do, or something.
    More likely he sacks the person he put in charge of the catering while claiming the menu choices never crossed his desk.
  • BatteryCorrectHorseBatteryCorrectHorse Posts: 7,126
    I will not vote Labour again whilst Sir Keir is in charge. I am as of right now, politically homeless.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 103,801

    I will not vote Labour again whilst Sir Keir is in charge. I am as of right now, politically homeless.

    I prefer politically unencumbered.
  • Leon_VotedForStarmerLeon_VotedForStarmer Posts: 69,000
    edited May 8

    Leon said:

    https://x.com/PolitlcsUK/status/2052809157246402644

    🚨 NEW: Labour MPs are reportedly giving Keir Starmer until Christmas to change the party around

    Jeesh they are such a bunch of utter testicle-free shite.

    They deserve to lose their seats.
    At this moment they’ve lost my vote on principle.
    BATTERY HAS DEFECTED

    REPEAT

    BATTERY HAS DEFECTED
    Can you defect to “won’t vote”? I guess you can.

    I won’t vote Tory in a GE I expect but in the next mayoral election I probably will.
    Your political journey is actually quite compelling. From Corbynite to lapsed Labour supporter who might go Tory

    This site needs people like you. Thoughtful younger voters who show what's going on. In general we are a bunch of gents of a certain age. I'm glad you stayed in the PB pub

  • Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 35,222

    https://x.com/PolitlcsUK/status/2052809157246402644

    🚨 NEW: Labour MPs are reportedly giving Keir Starmer until Christmas to change the party around

    Jeesh they are such a bunch of utter testicle-free shite.

    They deserve to lose their seats.
    Maybe Starmer is really good at organising the works' Christmas do, or something.
    I don't think they have a shred of affection for him - it's basic cowardice. They are useless dependent layabouts, much like their remaining voters.
  • numbertwelvenumbertwelve Posts: 9,132

    https://x.com/PolitlcsUK/status/2052809157246402644

    🚨 NEW: Labour MPs are reportedly giving Keir Starmer until Christmas to change the party around

    Jeesh they are such a bunch of utter testicle-free shite.

    They deserve to lose their seats.
    Xmas will become "let us wait until May and another round of local elections". If the public reject us again then...

    Gordon Brown 2: Electric Boogaloo.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 55,426

    https://x.com/PolitlcsUK/status/2052809157246402644

    🚨 NEW: Labour MPs are reportedly giving Keir Starmer until Christmas to change the party around

    Jeesh they are such a bunch of utter testicle-free shite.

    They deserve to lose their seats.
    Xmas will become "let us wait until May and another round of local elections". If the public reject us again then...

    Which is sensible, keeping the hope alive, while maximising the time Starmer has to soak up all the bad news that is incoming
  • BatteryCorrectHorseBatteryCorrectHorse Posts: 7,126
    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    https://x.com/PolitlcsUK/status/2052809157246402644

    🚨 NEW: Labour MPs are reportedly giving Keir Starmer until Christmas to change the party around

    Jeesh they are such a bunch of utter testicle-free shite.

    They deserve to lose their seats.
    At this moment they’ve lost my vote on principle.
    BATTERY HAS DEFECTED

    REPEAT

    BATTERY HAS DEFECTED
    Can you defect to “won’t vote”? I guess you can.

    I won’t vote Tory in a GE I expect but in the next mayoral election I probably will.
    Your political journey is actually quite compelling. From Corbynite to lapsed Labour supporter who might go Tory

    This site needs people like you. Thoughtful younger voters who show what's going on

    Am I not just the average London centrist?

    I work in the private sector, I earn a very decent salary. I’m pretty socially liberal. I liked Johnson as London mayor, thought Cameron was fine, best PM of my life is Blair etc.
  • Peter_the_PunterPeter_the_Punter Posts: 15,648

    So Reform are polling around 26% from what I can understand.

    Badenoch just needs to continue slowly grinding it down.

    Even 26% wouldn't do them a whole lot of good at a GE, since under FPTP they be regularly thwarted by tactical voting.
  • dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 32,561
    Reform beat Labour to the second seat in Birmingham Stockland Green by ONE vote.
    1023-1022.
  • Pro_RataPro_Rata Posts: 6,305
    Pro_Rata said:

    Pro_Rata said:

    Pro_Rata said:

    Kirklees back in the second half of counting sits at:

    Reform 21 (+21)
    Ind 9 (+4)
    Grn 6 (+3)
    LD 5 (-5)
    Con 4 (-5)
    Lab 0 (-18)

    At least 11 more non Reform needed, probably significantly more, but they are winning the 50/50 calls at the moment.

    All non Reform parties need to treat Reform and Farage with the contempt they deserve. Labour have given them a free ride and the Conservatives have as good as endorsed them.

    They are not working class heros they are friends of our enemies.
    If we discount Gaza Indies it is 21-21 at the moment.

    Squeaky bum time.
    Ref 22, Ind 12 (6 Gaza, 3 Left, 3 Local), Grn 6, Con 6, LD 5

    To declare:
    Denby Dale, Holme Valley Sth - Con/Ref battles
    Crosland Moor - likely Green
    Colne Valley West - Reform, slight Lab chance
    Ashbrow - best Lab chance, Reform poss
    Dewsbury S - probable Gaza
    Crosland Moor delivers: 22 - 26(+6)
  • mwadamsmwadams Posts: 3,878

    mwadams said:

    mwadams said:

    mwadams said:

    It is interesting that people are still spinning the Greens as having a bad time of it. 2nd in NEV (and the only other party up in NEV), 2nd in number of gains, and newly 2nd place in more seats than anyone else (if I've read that right) - I'd be wary of trying to take that line. Gains of this order in the next round of locals makes them largest party (at least) in an awful lot of councils.

    A few hundred of those second places could have been firsts if Polanski hadn't pulled a Corbyn over antisemitism in the last week.

    That's why people are saying the Greens have done badly.
    I'm not sure I really buy that. But maybe.
    Looking at Peter Kellner's ready reckoner for judging the results, only the Tories have reached a number of seats that equals to relief. The other parties are down at disappointment or disaster levels, though with more councillors to be elected.

    So the Tories have done a bit better than their polling suggested, and we wait to see how the other parties have fared.
    Doesn't that mean pollsters should be disappointed?
    In part, but if parties are underperforming their polling, and you think the local elections are a more reliable guide than polling, then it implies their support is lower than we thought, which is not good for those parties.
    But it seems churlish to argue that Reform did not have an objectively good day (let alone 'a disaster'), even if they undershot polling expectations.

    Equally, the fact that Reform isn't storming ahead quite as much as we may have believed yesterday gives some hope to the other parties. They are clearly not an unstoppable force.
  • carnforthcarnforth Posts: 9,230
    Lutfur Rahman re-elected as Mayor of Tower Hamlets. Ugh.
  • Leon_VotedForStarmerLeon_VotedForStarmer Posts: 69,000

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    https://x.com/PolitlcsUK/status/2052809157246402644

    🚨 NEW: Labour MPs are reportedly giving Keir Starmer until Christmas to change the party around

    Jeesh they are such a bunch of utter testicle-free shite.

    They deserve to lose their seats.
    At this moment they’ve lost my vote on principle.
    BATTERY HAS DEFECTED

    REPEAT

    BATTERY HAS DEFECTED
    Can you defect to “won’t vote”? I guess you can.

    I won’t vote Tory in a GE I expect but in the next mayoral election I probably will.
    Your political journey is actually quite compelling. From Corbynite to lapsed Labour supporter who might go Tory

    This site needs people like you. Thoughtful younger voters who show what's going on

    Am I not just the average London centrist?

    I work in the private sector, I earn a very decent salary. I’m pretty socially liberal. I liked Johnson as London mayor, thought Cameron was fine, best PM of my life is Blair etc.
    No, you're not the average London centrist

    1. I don't believe in the "average voter" - everyone is unique

    2. This site is not blessed with smart younger people willing to explain why they are voting as they vote, you do that

    3. We still need more young women (who doesn't, etc etc) but it's something
  • TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 47,892
    Leon said:

    https://x.com/PolitlcsUK/status/2052809157246402644

    🚨 NEW: Labour MPs are reportedly giving Keir Starmer until Christmas to change the party around

    Jeesh they are such a bunch of utter testicle-free shite.

    They deserve to lose their seats.
    At this moment they’ve lost my vote on principle.
    BATTERY HAS DEFECTED

    REPEAT

    BATTERY HAS DEFECTED
    Crossover?
  • solarflaresolarflare Posts: 4,847
    edited May 8
    Special thoughts and prayers today for Anas Sarwar, who must have thought a couple of years ago he was going to be, or at least had an excellent chance to be, First Minister.
  • LostPasswordLostPassword Posts: 24,196

    https://x.com/PolitlcsUK/status/2052809157246402644

    🚨 NEW: Labour MPs are reportedly giving Keir Starmer until Christmas to change the party around

    Jeesh they are such a bunch of utter testicle-free shite.

    They deserve to lose their seats.
    Xmas will become "let us wait until May and another round of local elections". If the public reject us again then...

    Should we reconsider the odds on Farage (or Badenochn if you prefer) as next Prime Minister? Might Starmer end up leading Labour into the next election as he insists?
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 89,625
    Pro_Rata said:

    Pro_Rata said:

    Pro_Rata said:

    Kirklees back in the second half of counting sits at:

    Reform 21 (+21)
    Ind 9 (+4)
    Grn 6 (+3)
    LD 5 (-5)
    Con 4 (-5)
    Lab 0 (-18)

    At least 11 more non Reform needed, probably significantly more, but they are winning the 50/50 calls at the moment.

    All non Reform parties need to treat Reform and Farage with the contempt they deserve. Labour have given them a free ride and the Conservatives have as good as endorsed them.

    They are not working class heros they are friends of our enemies.
    If we discount Gaza Indies it is 21-21 at the moment.

    Squeaky bum time.
    Ref 22, Ind 12 (6 Gaza, 3 Left, 3 Local), Grn 6, Con 6, LD 5

    To declare:
    Denby Dale, Holme Valley Sth - Con/Ref battles
    Crosland Moor - likely Green
    Colne Valley West - Reform, slight Lab chance
    Ashbrow - best Lab chance, Reform poss
    Dewsbury S - probable Gaza
    Labour have had a bad day on W Yorks.
    Almost a clean sweep for Reform in Wakefield.
  • Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 35,222

    So Reform are polling around 26% from what I can understand.

    Badenoch just needs to continue slowly grinding it down.

    Even 26% wouldn't do them a whole lot of good at a GE, since under FPTP they be regularly thwarted by tactical voting.
    I think 26% is an excellent result for Reform given the circumstances. They've battered their way through a lot. And they've incurred a scar - backing out of that shitpost Green constituency asylum camp policy, as they will have to do, will cost them greatly in credibility.

    However, they have done it - inflicted a massive defeat on the ruling party and won more votes than anyone else. They must now build on it.
  • Leon_VotedForStarmerLeon_VotedForStarmer Posts: 69,000
    carnforth said:

    Lutfur Rahman re-elected as Mayor of Tower Hamlets. Ugh.

    Yeah. Bleak
  • TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 47,892

    https://x.com/PolitlcsUK/status/2052809157246402644

    🚨 NEW: Labour MPs are reportedly giving Keir Starmer until Christmas to change the party around

    Jeesh they are such a bunch of utter testicle-free shite.

    They deserve to lose their seats.
    Maybe Starmer is really good at organising the works' Christmas do, or something.
    I don't think they have a shred of affection for him - it's basic cowardice. They are useless dependent layabouts, much like their remaining voters.
    I thought Nigel had scooped up all the useless dependent layabout vote?
  • PJHPJH Posts: 1,139

    https://x.com/PolitlcsUK/status/2052809157246402644

    🚨 NEW: Labour MPs are reportedly giving Keir Starmer until Christmas to change the party around

    Jeesh they are such a bunch of utter testicle-free shite.

    They deserve to lose their seats.
    Xmas will become "let us wait until May and another round of local elections". If the public reject us again then...

    Another potential example of PJH's Theory of Management Decision-making: If deferring a decision is an option, that is the decision that will be taken, especially if the point at which a decision should have been taken has already passed.
  • numbertwelvenumbertwelve Posts: 9,132

    https://x.com/PolitlcsUK/status/2052809157246402644

    🚨 NEW: Labour MPs are reportedly giving Keir Starmer until Christmas to change the party around

    Jeesh they are such a bunch of utter testicle-free shite.

    They deserve to lose their seats.
    Xmas will become "let us wait until May and another round of local elections". If the public reject us again then...

    Should we reconsider the odds on Farage (or Badenochn if you prefer) as next Prime Minister? Might Starmer end up leading Labour into the next election as he insists?
    At some point it is entirely possible that the party deludes itself into believing it’s too late or disruptive to change leader and it needs to spend the remaining time preparing for the GE rather than holding a leadership contest. That was the calculation Labour made under Brown, after a couple of false starts. It’s entirely possible they’ll make the same assessment if Starmer really wants to hang on - I don’t put anything past them now.
  • Leon_VotedForStarmerLeon_VotedForStarmer Posts: 69,000

    https://x.com/PolitlcsUK/status/2052809157246402644

    🚨 NEW: Labour MPs are reportedly giving Keir Starmer until Christmas to change the party around

    Jeesh they are such a bunch of utter testicle-free shite.

    They deserve to lose their seats.
    Xmas will become "let us wait until May and another round of local elections". If the public reject us again then...

    Should we reconsider the odds on Farage (or Badenochn if you prefer) as next Prime Minister? Might Starmer end up leading Labour into the next election as he insists?
    At some point it is entirely possible that the party deludes itself into believing it’s too late or disruptive to change leader and it needs to spend the remaining time preparing for the GE rather than holding a leadership contest. That was the calculation Labour made under Brown, after a couple of false starts. It’s entirely possible they’ll make the same assessment if Starmer really wants to hang on - I don’t put anything past them now.
    Agreed. If this result doesn't nudge them, then what will?

    I guess the only wild card now is Burnham. If he can land a seat in SW1 he would surely overthrow Skyr
  • RobDRobD Posts: 61,131
    Leon said:

    https://x.com/PolitlcsUK/status/2052809157246402644

    🚨 NEW: Labour MPs are reportedly giving Keir Starmer until Christmas to change the party around

    Jeesh they are such a bunch of utter testicle-free shite.

    They deserve to lose their seats.
    Xmas will become "let us wait until May and another round of local elections". If the public reject us again then...

    Should we reconsider the odds on Farage (or Badenochn if you prefer) as next Prime Minister? Might Starmer end up leading Labour into the next election as he insists?
    At some point it is entirely possible that the party deludes itself into believing it’s too late or disruptive to change leader and it needs to spend the remaining time preparing for the GE rather than holding a leadership contest. That was the calculation Labour made under Brown, after a couple of false starts. It’s entirely possible they’ll make the same assessment if Starmer really wants to hang on - I don’t put anything past them now.
    Agreed. If this result doesn't nudge them, then what will?

    I guess the only wild card now is Burnham. If he can land a seat in SW1 he would surely overthrow Skyr
    Could Labour win any by election now? Might have to be ennobled instead.
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 25,448
    mwadams said:

    mwadams said:

    mwadams said:

    mwadams said:

    It is interesting that people are still spinning the Greens as having a bad time of it. 2nd in NEV (and the only other party up in NEV), 2nd in number of gains, and newly 2nd place in more seats than anyone else (if I've read that right) - I'd be wary of trying to take that line. Gains of this order in the next round of locals makes them largest party (at least) in an awful lot of councils.

    A few hundred of those second places could have been firsts if Polanski hadn't pulled a Corbyn over antisemitism in the last week.

    That's why people are saying the Greens have done badly.
    I'm not sure I really buy that. But maybe.
    Looking at Peter Kellner's ready reckoner for judging the results, only the Tories have reached a number of seats that equals to relief. The other parties are down at disappointment or disaster levels, though with more councillors to be elected.

    So the Tories have done a bit better than their polling suggested, and we wait to see how the other parties have fared.
    Doesn't that mean pollsters should be disappointed?
    In part, but if parties are underperforming their polling, and you think the local elections are a more reliable guide than polling, then it implies their support is lower than we thought, which is not good for those parties.
    But it seems churlish to argue that Reform did not have an objectively good day (let alone 'a disaster'), even if they undershot polling expectations.

    Equally, the fact that Reform isn't storming ahead quite as much as we may have believed yesterday gives some hope to the other parties. They are clearly not an unstoppable force.
    The pundits got it right. It was the voters who got it wrong.
  • dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 32,561
    In fact. Birmingham is so f-ed that the only three party coalitions which can reach a majority would have to include Reform.
    Some of these results will be a big test of their ability to play nicely with others.
  • Wulfrun_PhilWulfrun_Phil Posts: 5,208
    edited May 8

    I will not vote Labour again whilst Sir Keir is in charge. I am as of right now, politically homeless.

    Well when knocking up yesterday I came across someone who said they were still Labour supporters but had lent their vote to the Greens because (they thought that) if they voted Labour it would just encourage Starmer to stay on.

    The man is like a useless barnacle on a ship, dragging it back in the water while clinging on for dear life.

    1,354 English Council losses for Labour with 9 more councils to count tomorrow, going to get to well over 1,400, possibly 1,450 even. Plus complete and utter meltdown in Wales. And with a dire result in Scotland looking good by comparison, probably aided by the leader there having the guts to call for Starmer to go.

    FFS, how bad does electoral armageddon have to get in order to get rid of him?
  • RandallFlaggRandallFlagg Posts: 1,493
    edited May 8

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    https://x.com/PolitlcsUK/status/2052809157246402644

    🚨 NEW: Labour MPs are reportedly giving Keir Starmer until Christmas to change the party around

    Jeesh they are such a bunch of utter testicle-free shite.

    They deserve to lose their seats.
    At this moment they’ve lost my vote on principle.
    BATTERY HAS DEFECTED

    REPEAT

    BATTERY HAS DEFECTED
    Can you defect to “won’t vote”? I guess you can.

    I won’t vote Tory in a GE I expect but in the next mayoral election I probably will.
    Your political journey is actually quite compelling. From Corbynite to lapsed Labour supporter who might go Tory

    This site needs people like you. Thoughtful younger voters who show what's going on

    Am I not just the average London centrist?

    I work in the private sector, I earn a very decent salary. I’m pretty socially liberal. I liked Johnson as London mayor, thought Cameron was fine, best PM of my life is Blair etc.
    Kemi's Tories aren't centrist, though. Truss aside, her government would probably be the most right wing one we've had since Thatcher. She's to the right of May, Big Dog, and Sunak when it comes to immigration, the size of the state, welfare, and energy.
  • LostPasswordLostPassword Posts: 24,196

    https://x.com/PolitlcsUK/status/2052809157246402644

    🚨 NEW: Labour MPs are reportedly giving Keir Starmer until Christmas to change the party around

    Jeesh they are such a bunch of utter testicle-free shite.

    They deserve to lose their seats.
    Xmas will become "let us wait until May and another round of local elections". If the public reject us again then...

    Should we reconsider the odds on Farage (or Badenochn if you prefer) as next Prime Minister? Might Starmer end up leading Labour into the next election as he insists?
    Oddschecker suggests you can get 11/2 on Starmer being Labour leader at the next general election.

    Nigel Farage is 12/1 to be next Prime Minister, which I think is quite attractive in light of the reluctance of the plotters to act, and Burnham's absence from the Commons.

    Badenoch is 28/1 to be next Prime Minister, which is remarkable for the leader of the opposition given the PM's unpopularity. It's a bet on Labour inaction and a Farage implosion, which is surely pretty good value at 28/1 (albeit there's three years of inflation to consider).
  • BatteryCorrectHorseBatteryCorrectHorse Posts: 7,126

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    https://x.com/PolitlcsUK/status/2052809157246402644

    🚨 NEW: Labour MPs are reportedly giving Keir Starmer until Christmas to change the party around

    Jeesh they are such a bunch of utter testicle-free shite.

    They deserve to lose their seats.
    At this moment they’ve lost my vote on principle.
    BATTERY HAS DEFECTED

    REPEAT

    BATTERY HAS DEFECTED
    Can you defect to “won’t vote”? I guess you can.

    I won’t vote Tory in a GE I expect but in the next mayoral election I probably will.
    Your political journey is actually quite compelling. From Corbynite to lapsed Labour supporter who might go Tory

    This site needs people like you. Thoughtful younger voters who show what's going on

    Am I not just the average London centrist?

    I work in the private sector, I earn a very decent salary. I’m pretty socially liberal. I liked Johnson as London mayor, thought Cameron was fine, best PM of my life is Blair etc.
    Kemi's Tories aren't centrist, though. Truss aside, her government would probably be the most right wing one we've had since Thatcher.
    Yeah but Labour aren’t anything. That’s the issue.
  • Scott_xPScott_xP Posts: 43,513


    ...
  • Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 59,769
    Scott_xP said:



    ...

    Cometh the Mascara!
  • Leon_VotedForStarmerLeon_VotedForStarmer Posts: 69,000
    My sources tell me that Andy Burnham "now has moobs, lol"
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 103,801
    carnforth said:

    Lutfur Rahman re-elected as Mayor of Tower Hamlets. Ugh.

    Those expelled once for corruption should not get a second chance to get better at that corruption.
  • numbertwelvenumbertwelve Posts: 9,132
    Scott_xP said:



    ...

    Well that’s not going to do anything to burst the ego….
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 103,801
    RobD said:

    Leon said:

    https://x.com/PolitlcsUK/status/2052809157246402644

    🚨 NEW: Labour MPs are reportedly giving Keir Starmer until Christmas to change the party around

    Jeesh they are such a bunch of utter testicle-free shite.

    They deserve to lose their seats.
    Xmas will become "let us wait until May and another round of local elections". If the public reject us again then...

    Should we reconsider the odds on Farage (or Badenochn if you prefer) as next Prime Minister? Might Starmer end up leading Labour into the next election as he insists?
    At some point it is entirely possible that the party deludes itself into believing it’s too late or disruptive to change leader and it needs to spend the remaining time preparing for the GE rather than holding a leadership contest. That was the calculation Labour made under Brown, after a couple of false starts. It’s entirely possible they’ll make the same assessment if Starmer really wants to hang on - I don’t put anything past them now.
    Agreed. If this result doesn't nudge them, then what will?

    I guess the only wild card now is Burnham. If he can land a seat in SW1 he would surely overthrow Skyr
    Could Labour win any by election now? Might have to be ennobled instead.
    It would be tricky, but if he is genuinely popular and many in Labour want Starmer gone then there is at least some reason to think he could buck national trends. Indeed, that would be the point. Heck of a risk though.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 103,801
    PJH said:

    https://x.com/PolitlcsUK/status/2052809157246402644

    🚨 NEW: Labour MPs are reportedly giving Keir Starmer until Christmas to change the party around

    Jeesh they are such a bunch of utter testicle-free shite.

    They deserve to lose their seats.
    Xmas will become "let us wait until May and another round of local elections". If the public reject us again then...

    Another potential example of PJH's Theory of Management Decision-making: If deferring a decision is an option, that is the decision that will be taken, especially if the point at which a decision should have been taken has already passed.
    There's always more road to kick the can down.
  • Pro_RataPro_Rata Posts: 6,305
    Pro_Rata said:

    Pro_Rata said:

    Pro_Rata said:

    Pro_Rata said:

    Kirklees back in the second half of counting sits at:

    Reform 21 (+21)
    Ind 9 (+4)
    Grn 6 (+3)
    LD 5 (-5)
    Con 4 (-5)
    Lab 0 (-18)

    At least 11 more non Reform needed, probably significantly more, but they are winning the 50/50 calls at the moment.

    All non Reform parties need to treat Reform and Farage with the contempt they deserve. Labour have given them a free ride and the Conservatives have as good as endorsed them.

    They are not working class heros they are friends of our enemies.
    If we discount Gaza Indies it is 21-21 at the moment.

    Squeaky bum time.
    Ref 22, Ind 12 (6 Gaza, 3 Left, 3 Local), Grn 6, Con 6, LD 5

    To declare:
    Denby Dale, Holme Valley Sth - Con/Ref battles
    Crosland Moor - likely Green
    Colne Valley West - Reform, slight Lab chance
    Ashbrow - best Lab chance, Reform poss
    Dewsbury S - probable Gaza
    Crosland Moor delivers: 22 - 26(+6)
    And Reform are the filling between 2 Gazans in Dewsbury South.

    23-26(+8)
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 103,801
    Leon said:

    My sources tell me that Andy Burnham "now has moobs, lol"

    He's just like me, so relatable!
  • isamisam Posts: 44,230

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    https://x.com/PolitlcsUK/status/2052809157246402644

    🚨 NEW: Labour MPs are reportedly giving Keir Starmer until Christmas to change the party around

    Jeesh they are such a bunch of utter testicle-free shite.

    They deserve to lose their seats.
    At this moment they’ve lost my vote on principle.
    BATTERY HAS DEFECTED

    REPEAT

    BATTERY HAS DEFECTED
    Can you defect to “won’t vote”? I guess you can.

    I won’t vote Tory in a GE I expect but in the next mayoral election I probably will.
    Your political journey is actually quite compelling. From Corbynite to lapsed Labour supporter who might go Tory

    This site needs people like you. Thoughtful younger voters who show what's going on

    Am I not just the average London centrist?

    I work in the private sector, I earn a very decent salary. I’m pretty socially liberal. I liked Johnson as London mayor, thought Cameron was fine, best PM of my life is Blair etc.
    Massive Corbynite when Jezza was in charge
  • dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 32,561
    If you really really want Starmer gone then the quickest way would be to vote for Andy Burnham in any by election.
    Voting against him would be voting to keep Starmer.
  • solarflaresolarflare Posts: 4,847
    Leon said:

    My sources tell me that Andy Burnham "now has moobs, lol"

    But those are moobs of pure political ambition.
  • BatteryCorrectHorseBatteryCorrectHorse Posts: 7,126
    I find myself in total agreement with Piers Morgan.

    Shambolic government. But Reform are utterly corrupt.
  • BatteryCorrectHorseBatteryCorrectHorse Posts: 7,126
    edited May 8
    Deleted
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 25,448
    Reform gain Calderdale.

    We have to wait until tomorrow for the Bradford count to be completed. Reform currently largest party.

    Plus the election in one ward was postponed due to the death of a candidate.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 103,801

    I find myself in total agreement with Piers Morgan.

    You see what you've done, Keir Starmer!
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 72,354
    Leon said:

    https://x.com/PolitlcsUK/status/2052809157246402644

    🚨 NEW: Labour MPs are reportedly giving Keir Starmer until Christmas to change the party around

    Jeesh they are such a bunch of utter testicle-free shite.

    They deserve to lose their seats.
    Xmas will become "let us wait until May and another round of local elections". If the public reject us again then...

    Should we reconsider the odds on Farage (or Badenochn if you prefer) as next Prime Minister? Might Starmer end up leading Labour into the next election as he insists?
    At some point it is entirely possible that the party deludes itself into believing it’s too late or disruptive to change leader and it needs to spend the remaining time preparing for the GE rather than holding a leadership contest. That was the calculation Labour made under Brown, after a couple of false starts. It’s entirely possible they’ll make the same assessment if Starmer really wants to hang on - I don’t put anything past them now.
    Agreed. If this result doesn't nudge them, then what will?

    I guess the only wild card now is Burnham. If he can land a seat in SW1 he would surely overthrow Skyr
    This is far, far worse than Brown. He had at least a chance of securing a coalition with the Liberals and remaining in office.

    Starmer's Labour face a Canada style wipe out in 2029.
  • BatteryCorrectHorseBatteryCorrectHorse Posts: 7,126
    isam said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    https://x.com/PolitlcsUK/status/2052809157246402644

    🚨 NEW: Labour MPs are reportedly giving Keir Starmer until Christmas to change the party around

    Jeesh they are such a bunch of utter testicle-free shite.

    They deserve to lose their seats.
    At this moment they’ve lost my vote on principle.
    BATTERY HAS DEFECTED

    REPEAT

    BATTERY HAS DEFECTED
    Can you defect to “won’t vote”? I guess you can.

    I won’t vote Tory in a GE I expect but in the next mayoral election I probably will.
    Your political journey is actually quite compelling. From Corbynite to lapsed Labour supporter who might go Tory

    This site needs people like you. Thoughtful younger voters who show what's going on

    Am I not just the average London centrist?

    I work in the private sector, I earn a very decent salary. I’m pretty socially liberal. I liked Johnson as London mayor, thought Cameron was fine, best PM of my life is Blair etc.
    Massive Corbynite when Jezza was in charge
    But I’m talking about right now. I think I’m a very centrist voter.
  • Wulfrun_PhilWulfrun_Phil Posts: 5,208
    RobD said:

    Leon said:

    https://x.com/PolitlcsUK/status/2052809157246402644

    🚨 NEW: Labour MPs are reportedly giving Keir Starmer until Christmas to change the party around

    Jeesh they are such a bunch of utter testicle-free shite.

    They deserve to lose their seats.
    Xmas will become "let us wait until May and another round of local elections". If the public reject us again then...

    Should we reconsider the odds on Farage (or Badenochn if you prefer) as next Prime Minister? Might Starmer end up leading Labour into the next election as he insists?
    At some point it is entirely possible that the party deludes itself into believing it’s too late or disruptive to change leader and it needs to spend the remaining time preparing for the GE rather than holding a leadership contest. That was the calculation Labour made under Brown, after a couple of false starts. It’s entirely possible they’ll make the same assessment if Starmer really wants to hang on - I don’t put anything past them now.
    Agreed. If this result doesn't nudge them, then what will?

    I guess the only wild card now is Burnham. If he can land a seat in SW1 he would surely overthrow Skyr
    Could Labour win any by election now? Might have to be ennobled instead.
    If he's not willing to give up on becoming PM, Burnham's best bet now would be to very publically throw his support behind Rayner or Miliband as part of a deal in which he would be allowed to stand for any parliamentary vacancy of his chosing. There's still plenty of time to stand for leader in 2027 or 2028 should a new Labour leader fail to turn things around.

    Alternatively, just accept ennoblement and a high ranking seat in the Cabinet, while seeing out his term as GM Mayor.

    Any candidate standing against Starmer who Burnham very publically endorses will pick up support not just from the Labour selectorate but also the wider electorate.
  • Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 35,222
    kle4 said:

    PJH said:

    https://x.com/PolitlcsUK/status/2052809157246402644

    🚨 NEW: Labour MPs are reportedly giving Keir Starmer until Christmas to change the party around

    Jeesh they are such a bunch of utter testicle-free shite.

    They deserve to lose their seats.
    Xmas will become "let us wait until May and another round of local elections". If the public reject us again then...

    Another potential example of PJH's Theory of Management Decision-making: If deferring a decision is an option, that is the decision that will be taken, especially if the point at which a decision should have been taken has already passed.
    There's always more road to kick the can down.
    Anyone saying 'All the other options are worse' should consider that this option could get worse too - a lot worse. They haven't even started the Mandelson stuff. They haven't even started the public inquiry into the thing that we don't discuss.
  • dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 32,561
    Bloody hell these Reform results in Yorkshire.
    There's very much a Danelaw effect.
  • Pro_RataPro_Rata Posts: 6,305
    Pro_Rata said:

    Pro_Rata said:

    Pro_Rata said:

    Pro_Rata said:

    Pro_Rata said:

    Kirklees back in the second half of counting sits at:

    Reform 21 (+21)
    Ind 9 (+4)
    Grn 6 (+3)
    LD 5 (-5)
    Con 4 (-5)
    Lab 0 (-18)

    At least 11 more non Reform needed, probably significantly more, but they are winning the 50/50 calls at the moment.

    All non Reform parties need to treat Reform and Farage with the contempt they deserve. Labour have given them a free ride and the Conservatives have as good as endorsed them.

    They are not working class heros they are friends of our enemies.
    If we discount Gaza Indies it is 21-21 at the moment.

    Squeaky bum time.
    Ref 22, Ind 12 (6 Gaza, 3 Left, 3 Local), Grn 6, Con 6, LD 5

    To declare:
    Denby Dale, Holme Valley Sth - Con/Ref battles
    Crosland Moor - likely Green
    Colne Valley West - Reform, slight Lab chance
    Ashbrow - best Lab chance, Reform poss
    Dewsbury S - probable Gaza
    Crosland Moor delivers: 22 - 26(+6)
    And Reform are the filling between 2 Gazans in Dewsbury South.

    23-26(+8)
    Ashbrow was being targeted a bit and goes Green. Labour look at wipeout:

    23-29(+8)
  • dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 32,561
    Pro_Rata said:

    Pro_Rata said:

    Pro_Rata said:

    Pro_Rata said:

    Pro_Rata said:

    Pro_Rata said:

    Kirklees back in the second half of counting sits at:

    Reform 21 (+21)
    Ind 9 (+4)
    Grn 6 (+3)
    LD 5 (-5)
    Con 4 (-5)
    Lab 0 (-18)

    At least 11 more non Reform needed, probably significantly more, but they are winning the 50/50 calls at the moment.

    All non Reform parties need to treat Reform and Farage with the contempt they deserve. Labour have given them a free ride and the Conservatives have as good as endorsed them.

    They are not working class heros they are friends of our enemies.
    If we discount Gaza Indies it is 21-21 at the moment.

    Squeaky bum time.
    Ref 22, Ind 12 (6 Gaza, 3 Left, 3 Local), Grn 6, Con 6, LD 5

    To declare:
    Denby Dale, Holme Valley Sth - Con/Ref battles
    Crosland Moor - likely Green
    Colne Valley West - Reform, slight Lab chance
    Ashbrow - best Lab chance, Reform poss
    Dewsbury S - probable Gaza
    Crosland Moor delivers: 22 - 26(+6)
    And Reform are the filling between 2 Gazans in Dewsbury South.

    23-26(+8)
    Ashbrow was being targeted a bit and goes Green. Labour look at wipeout:

    23-29(+8)
    What does that figure you keep updating actually mean?
  • BatteryCorrectHorseBatteryCorrectHorse Posts: 7,126
    Jenrick gave an utterly shambolic performance on Question Time
  • Pro_RataPro_Rata Posts: 6,305
    edited May 8
    dixiedean said:

    Pro_Rata said:

    Pro_Rata said:

    Pro_Rata said:

    Pro_Rata said:

    Pro_Rata said:

    Pro_Rata said:

    Kirklees back in the second half of counting sits at:

    Reform 21 (+21)
    Ind 9 (+4)
    Grn 6 (+3)
    LD 5 (-5)
    Con 4 (-5)
    Lab 0 (-18)

    At least 11 more non Reform needed, probably significantly more, but they are winning the 50/50 calls at the moment.

    All non Reform parties need to treat Reform and Farage with the contempt they deserve. Labour have given them a free ride and the Conservatives have as good as endorsed them.

    They are not working class heros they are friends of our enemies.
    If we discount Gaza Indies it is 21-21 at the moment.

    Squeaky bum time.
    Ref 22, Ind 12 (6 Gaza, 3 Left, 3 Local), Grn 6, Con 6, LD 5

    To declare:
    Denby Dale, Holme Valley Sth - Con/Ref battles
    Crosland Moor - likely Green
    Colne Valley West - Reform, slight Lab chance
    Ashbrow - best Lab chance, Reform poss
    Dewsbury S - probable Gaza
    Crosland Moor delivers: 22 - 26(+6)
    And Reform are the filling between 2 Gazans in Dewsbury South.

    23-26(+8)
    Ashbrow was being targeted a bit and goes Green. Labour look at wipeout:

    23-29(+8)
    What does that figure you keep updating actually mean?
    Reform Vs others (and treat Gaza Independents separately). That last Green win means Reform cannot get a majority, so we're confirmed NOC.
  • Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 59,769
    Barkingside (Redbridge) - 3 Labour HOLDs
  • Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 35,222
    kle4 said:

    RobD said:

    Leon said:

    https://x.com/PolitlcsUK/status/2052809157246402644

    🚨 NEW: Labour MPs are reportedly giving Keir Starmer until Christmas to change the party around

    Jeesh they are such a bunch of utter testicle-free shite.

    They deserve to lose their seats.
    Xmas will become "let us wait until May and another round of local elections". If the public reject us again then...

    Should we reconsider the odds on Farage (or Badenochn if you prefer) as next Prime Minister? Might Starmer end up leading Labour into the next election as he insists?
    At some point it is entirely possible that the party deludes itself into believing it’s too late or disruptive to change leader and it needs to spend the remaining time preparing for the GE rather than holding a leadership contest. That was the calculation Labour made under Brown, after a couple of false starts. It’s entirely possible they’ll make the same assessment if Starmer really wants to hang on - I don’t put anything past them now.
    Agreed. If this result doesn't nudge them, then what will?

    I guess the only wild card now is Burnham. If he can land a seat in SW1 he would surely overthrow Skyr
    Could Labour win any by election now? Might have to be ennobled instead.
    It would be tricky, but if he is genuinely popular and many in Labour want Starmer gone then there is at least some reason to think he could buck national trends. Indeed, that would be the point. Heck of a risk though.
    I actually think Burnham would win a suitable seat. The public at large doesn't 'like' right wing politicians - yes a sizable minority now love Nige, but many are voting for him out of despair and frustration. Show them a personable left wing option that looks like he could get the car back on the road, he'll get a seat.
  • Wulfrun_PhilWulfrun_Phil Posts: 5,208
    edited May 8

    Leon said:

    https://x.com/PolitlcsUK/status/2052809157246402644

    🚨 NEW: Labour MPs are reportedly giving Keir Starmer until Christmas to change the party around

    Jeesh they are such a bunch of utter testicle-free shite.

    They deserve to lose their seats.
    Xmas will become "let us wait until May and another round of local elections". If the public reject us again then...

    Should we reconsider the odds on Farage (or Badenochn if you prefer) as next Prime Minister? Might Starmer end up leading Labour into the next election as he insists?
    At some point it is entirely possible that the party deludes itself into believing it’s too late or disruptive to change leader and it needs to spend the remaining time preparing for the GE rather than holding a leadership contest. That was the calculation Labour made under Brown, after a couple of false starts. It’s entirely possible they’ll make the same assessment if Starmer really wants to hang on - I don’t put anything past them now.
    Agreed. If this result doesn't nudge them, then what will?

    I guess the only wild card now is Burnham. If he can land a seat in SW1 he would surely overthrow Skyr
    This is far, far worse than Brown. He had at least a chance of securing a coalition with the Liberals and remaining in office.

    Starmer's Labour face a Canada style wipe out in 2029.
    Not quite, but certainly down to double digits only in parliamentary seats if things continue.

    What people forget, when judging yesterday on seat counts in England, is that although the combined Lab/LD/Green seat count is roughly equal to the combined Ref/Con seat count, the areas which DIDN'T see elections yesterday are ones where Reform and Con would pick up the vast majority of seats in a parliamentary election, and Labour very few. Basically nearly all are in the shires. So yesterday's results point to the two right wing parties between them ending up with a very large majority in a GE. The most right wing government since the universal franchise.

    And meanwhile Starmer says keep calm and carry on. No.
  • Leon_VotedForStarmerLeon_VotedForStarmer Posts: 69,000

    Leon said:

    https://x.com/PolitlcsUK/status/2052809157246402644

    🚨 NEW: Labour MPs are reportedly giving Keir Starmer until Christmas to change the party around

    Jeesh they are such a bunch of utter testicle-free shite.

    They deserve to lose their seats.
    Xmas will become "let us wait until May and another round of local elections". If the public reject us again then...

    Should we reconsider the odds on Farage (or Badenochn if you prefer) as next Prime Minister? Might Starmer end up leading Labour into the next election as he insists?
    At some point it is entirely possible that the party deludes itself into believing it’s too late or disruptive to change leader and it needs to spend the remaining time preparing for the GE rather than holding a leadership contest. That was the calculation Labour made under Brown, after a couple of false starts. It’s entirely possible they’ll make the same assessment if Starmer really wants to hang on - I don’t put anything past them now.
    Agreed. If this result doesn't nudge them, then what will?

    I guess the only wild card now is Burnham. If he can land a seat in SW1 he would surely overthrow Skyr
    This is far, far worse than Brown. He had at least a chance of securing a coalition with the Liberals and remaining in office.

    Starmer's Labour face a Canada style wipe out in 2029.
    Not quite, but certainly down to double digits in parliamentary seats if things continue.

    What people forget, when judging yesterday on seat counts in England, is that although the combined Lab/LD/Green seat count is roughly equal to the combined Ref/Con seat count, the areas which DIDN'T see elections yesterday are ones where Reform and Con would pick up the vast majority of seats in a parliamentary election, and Labour very few. Basically nearly all are in the shires. So yesterday's results point to the two right wing parties between them ending up with a very large majority in a GE. The most right wing government since the universal franchise.

    And meanwhile Starmer says keep calm and carry on. No.
    A solid insight
  • BatteryCorrectHorseBatteryCorrectHorse Posts: 7,126
    Brown at least had some sort of vision.

    Starmer has nothing. There is nothing there.

    They say go further and faster. But doing what?
  • RandallFlaggRandallFlagg Posts: 1,493
    edited May 8
    I still don't get why that absolute muppet Glasman was given the time of day. First thing Starmer's successor needs to do is expel Glasman from the party.
    Besides which, attempting to do Blue Labour with Starmer was the equivalent of Nottingham Forest appointing Big Ange. Really not the bloke you wanted as 'manager' if that was your strategy.
This discussion has been closed.